Go back

Russia Declares For Iran In WAR Against U.S. WW3 Fears Escalate w/ Jesse on Fire

120m 46s

Russia Declares For Iran In WAR Against U.S. WW3 Fears Escalate w/ Jesse on Fire

The transcript explores several interconnected themes of geopolitical tension and conspiracy. It highlights growing evidence of international support for Iran by Russia and China, particularly in the context of missile development, which fuels speculation about a broader conflict with the U.S. The narrative includes a deep dive into the possible involvement of foreign actors in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, with claims that deep state or intelligence operatives may have targeted him due to his anti-establishment political stance. The discussion questions whether the trial is genuinely focused on justice or merely a spectacle designed to create a controlled narrative. A key argument is that the investigation appears to be manipulated by algorithmic amplification of radical conspiracy theories on platforms like YouTube, which prioritize sensational, fringe content over factual inquiry. The transcript also examines the role of statecraft and character assassination, suggesting that instead of direct killings, powerful entities may use misinformation and narrative control to remove political threats. It raises serious concerns about the suppression of public investigation, citing examples such as the unexplained disappearance of social media posts about early foreknowledge of the incident. The analysis ultimately concludes that while a direct link to any one nation—such as Israel—is speculative, the broader pattern points to coordinated efforts by established political and intelligence networks to destabilize opposition figures. These actions, according to the speaker, are driven by a desire to protect the status quo, not by any clear ideological motive. The piece ends on a note of skepticism toward official narratives and a call for deeper scrutiny, especially in cases where public discourse is being shaped by algorithmic bias rather than factual evidence.

Transcription

20914 Words, 109694 Characters

English
we got some big news tonight. Vladimir Putin has pledged support to Iran in their war against the United States. There's a new report that they've been helping manufacture hypersonic missiles for the country, but we've known for a minute that they were arming the Iranians against the United States. We've also seen this with China. When a strange cargo flight came into Iran last year, it looks like China was supplying the Iranians with materials they could use to make missiles. To use against the United States, of course. More rhetoric about World War III is emerging, and it's a slow burn, isn't it? It's gradually, then suddenly, they say. So maybe we're already in it. A bunch of news outlets have already claimed we may be in World War III, but they've been saying that for over a year, so who knows? I guess we'll find out when the nukes start flying through the air, but we'll talk about that. But we did just get breaking news just before going live. The judge in the Robinson hearing has ruled he might be able to do something about it. He might be able to do something about it. He spoke hatefully of people who don't have traditional, norm-conforming gender identities. He spoke hatefully of people who are not strictly heterosexual. He spoke hatefully of people who have sexual relationships out of marriage. And yes, it is true that the evidence from Mr. Twiggs is that he identified in a non-gender conforming way to his friends and that he was in a romantic relationship with Mr. Robinson. But that doesn't mean that those personal choices by Mr. Twiggs and by Mr. Robinson equate with the hate that at least Mr. Robinson says he had toward Mr. Kirk. So we don't know what that is. We don't know. There's a gap between what it is that Mr. Kirk said and stood for the phrase in the statute is political expression and what it is that Mr. Robinson felt about him. And it's a significant gap because what it allows the state to do is to make it up. Oh, it must be about this relationship. It must be. It can't be about foreign policy. It can't be about immigration. It can't be about taxation or economics. It must be about this because look at these two young people and the way they live. Is he is he talking like he's just saying. Tyler shot, that's his defense attorney, because that sounds like he's like Tyler shot him, but we don't know why. Well, that's been their whole thing the whole time. Like, but he shouldn't get the death penalty. That's been effectively the argument. They've not argued. This was misconstrued a bit in there. In their initial filing, saying that people were saying that they're admitting to killing Charlie, but it doesn't want the death penalty because he shot one guy and killed one guy. They argued if the evidence presented is true, it does not rise to a death penalty. They weren't saying. Yeah, but so. So but I am confused. I mean, that verbiage sounded like what was that? They're not going to be able to. Yeah, he never did it. It's the wrong guy. That's the only time I've ever heard it where that sounded very much like he's like, that's a defense. Attorney, why? And also, why are you trying to establish motive if you are defending the guy who's accused of the crime? You guys have seen that South Park episode, the Chewbacca defense. I'm also. Yeah, the Chewbacca. That's what that reminds me of. But I'm curious because it's from what we know right now, the trial is going to be a farce. And I want you all to listen to what I'm about to say, because I don't want it to be taken one way or the other by those who think it's going to go. I'm saying if the defense is basically like, yeah, he did it. Why are we having a trial? To establish motive. It sounds like this is pointless because I don't personally think it matters why. I mean, to a point, it matters why if it's self-defense, for instance, but it's more about what if it's like a mitigating factor. But that's after you're convicted. So I'm looking at what he did. It's not about why he did what he did. It's probably because his he is up for the death penalty. Yeah. So they have to find out if it was, you know, to find out what aggravating factors they have to find out, you know, if he is. He is a candidate for the death penalty because it's a possible punishment. But I suppose that makes sense. It's a trial is so the jury can say whether he goes to prison for life or or dies. And if the differentiator for aggravated murder is the potential that he could have shot and killed other people. I don't even understand how that if that I don't I haven't read it like word for word. But if that is what differentiates, I don't even know how you would argue against it. I don't know what I don't know what Utah law is. And the judge agreed. Yeah. When when for weird. Yeah. Yeah. It's like we are defending him by admitting he did it. Nothing in this case makes sense. The fact that Lance Twiggs, the roommate who is absolutely critical and core to every single piece of physical evidence, was given immediately immediate immunity is where I'm like, I've always had my eye on that guy because I'm like, he has he has access to his discord, has access to his cell phone. He could have the text messages were written at eleven thirty p.m. Tyler wakes up at six in the morning every single morning and then gets up and goes. He had access to the devices. That's more likely that Tyler probably would have been asleep at eleven thirty. So maybe Lance could have had. It's just like that. It's weird. There's also a question that's not been answered. Maybe you can shed some shine some light and shed some light on this. The meeting at Robinson's home some couple weeks before and the foreknowledge that we saw from people posting on social media that seems to have just fallen off of this case without being addressed. Yeah, we came up on the green room so much that maybe the FBI's got data they don't want anyone to know about. If it's going to trial, is it like. No. Yeah. Well, so like early on, that's that's where I focused one hundred percent of my energy when I was first looking at the case was all on what other leftists are involved. You have 20 people who posted advanced knowledge. Why are why are the. And then I'm like, OK, the FBI is probably setting up on these guys, waiting for them to talk so that they could end it now. But that's definitely not what's happening now. I don't believe that for a second. Yeah. Well, I was wishful thinking at the time. But but this is what this, you know, as with every single conspiracy and not to to isolate this one. It's contentious. I'll use 9-11 back when, like in the mid 2000s, I was very much on board with the investigate 9-11 line. And I would argue against anybody when they'd be like, so you think Bush did that? Absolutely not. I think that the government is not going to come out and tell you how our security is bypassed to such a degree that Pentagon was bombed and a couple of buildings got knocked down. But I think it's fair to say for a war now in the Middle East and for the American people that we do get accurate information pertaining to. The questions around 9-11. So I'm not suggesting I know exactly what happened, just that I think it's fairly obvious the government's not telling us the full picture for sure. The problem is there were a bunch of people marching around saying Bush did it or that it was an inside job. And I'm like, you're you've already asserted a conclusion when, you know, architects and engineers were simply asking the question that didn't line up with what they knew in architecture, architecture and engineering. So with with this, the issue I take with the Israel did it people is that they've drawn a conclusion before. We've. Actually been able to figure out who the players are, what makes sense, what doesn't make sense, because it could be somebody else. It could be there. There could be something I'm going to say like this. I don't I don't firmly believe the full story. I think Andrew Wilson said 70 percent. I go slightly less than that. Sixty percent, perhaps there's just not evidence of anything else. There's an absence of evidence and there's evidence that led to absence, such as these other individuals that were on social media being like this. I don't know what's going to happen tomorrow and then poof, no one talks about it ever again. Very bizarre. So for someone that immediately like Israel, I'm like, stop, stop, OK, maybe sure, but we're not there yet. So right now they're they're steamrolling through this trial and it sounds like the fence is just like, yes, it's very like the defense's strategy has been very fishy. It seems like this to me appears very like kind of like showy, you know what I mean, where they want to just get this done. Move along. And you're like, why? And I never looked at Israel seriously because to me, I'm like a nation state that no, it just doesn't seem like this would be a rational place to do it. This I feel like it's they establish motive. But I was. Anyway, I don't you know, bottom line is, is as it relates to this case, I have incredibly unique perspective that is I don't want to suck up, you know. Do you think Robinson did it? No, I mean, I think it's either a group of leftists did it or another option that I haven't. I don't know if I want to talk about on the platform, but I definitely I've never entertained that Israel was behind this. And I also certainly never entered a TPSA murdered. Robinson, he asked if you thought Robinson did it. Oh, if leftists did it, then I think it is. If leftists did it, then I think his involvement is. Oh, I thought he answered. Sure. Oh, I would say that the preponderance. Of evidence and what's presented towards us lends itself to a Robinson assassination. And I think the next most likely scenario is that there's accomplices and others involved that for some reason are not being brought to light. And then the question to quote the great Alex Jones, key Bono, which is whenever you're looking at a major high profile incident, war, whatever, the question is who's benefiting from it. And so in the question of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, who benefited? Well, the deep state, the establishment, the intelligence agencies. I wouldn't. I wouldn't argue that Israel that I mean, there's a bunch of weird arguments about Charlie was going to argue against Israel, but that's not motivation to end his life. That's motivation to give him money. I thought that when Netanyahu came out either the same day it happened or the next day and said, we Israelis, we feel for Charlie Kirk. He was a hero. He came out and talked about it, which at first people were like, oh, he must be covering up. I bet they were involved. And it's like, no, actually, I think if the Israelis did it, they wouldn't have said anything. They would have been radio silent. I don't know. I understand why this is all conjecture, but I don't I think he Netanyahu. He stepped on his own foot and should have kept his mouth shut to keep himself out. I feel like it's the so there was this video I got recommended on the carousel on Instagram. This young woman saying that she was finally moving out of the United States of Israel and she's got like 10,000 likes and a bunch of comments. And then she's just like, I'm done. I'm going to Mexico. I'm getting out of this place. And I'm like, what is this? Like, this is weird. So I go to her profile and she's just a wannabe influencer. She has no followers. She has a bunch of content that you can tell she's. She's experimenting with trying to do kind of shaking her ass and things like this. Some of it wasn't working. Doing skits didn't work. And then she does the Israel post. And all of a sudden it's being recommended to people. So I look at stuff like that and I'm like, it's. just the reason why the Israel narrative pops up is algorithmic. There's a million conspiracies you could have, right? One could argue that some Islamic countries stood to benefit the most because Charlie Kirk was a major proponent of Israel. Then some might argue, oh, but he was turning on Israel. But then Israel would offer him. There's just not enough there. Now, if you look at the deep state, if you look at U.S. intelligence agencies, Charlie Kirk was on track to be president of the United States. He was a guy from Chicago, seemingly not part of the establishment club, college dropout, not a skull, you know what I mean? Not part of this elite group. And here he is whispering in the ear of the president, rallying students to vote in a direction outside of the uniparty machine. So Trump wins, right? Whatever they had to do to stop Trump didn't work in 24. And credit goes to Pressler and Charlie Kirk with Turning Point USA. So when I ask the question, who benefits? It's establishment political operatives. I agree with that. Basically, I mean, I'm not going to even be able to do the show without just saying it out loud. So basically, where I'm at is like, I was all in leftists. I never, to the point I made earlier, I never considered for a second that TPUSA would have been involved in murdering Charlie ever. And thus, if there was any indication that they were involved with anything, whether video otherwise, then I look at it, I go, well, if that's if they were involved, then it's not a murder. You know, like that's the what do you mean? Then if you know, if there's if TPUSA was in any way involved in what happened on 910, that means it's not a murder. Like it has to be something else. He's in WITSEC or something or some other much larger, grander thing where like it's something that it's not like it's not what it appears to be. So you think if they were involved at all, it would be to fake his death to get him out of the public eye? Correct. If they're involved, highly unlikely. Sure. But if they were involved, because I know no one's going to convince me that like Andrew Colvett and Mikey McCoy conspired to murder Charlie Kirk. I'm not. I got to be honest and I say this not to be mean to Colvett, but I know Colvett's going to get mad that I'm going to say this. Colvett doesn't have the wherewithal to to scheme a massive conspiracy to assassinate a high like he's just not that guy. You know what I mean? And I want to make sure I'm clear in how I say that a compliment. Well, my point is, in essence, I'm saying he doesn't have the capability to carry out a grand conspiracy because he's not smart enough to do it. OK, and I know it might be it might seem disrespectful to Colvett to say that he's not smart enough to be an assassin, but it's true. And it's a backhanded compliment. I'll admit that it's like the the amount of of of organizational capability to pull something like this off is high intelligence statecraft. Yeah, you don't for sure. Swigs would turn him in if if he was involved with this somehow. If Colvett was, of course, Swigs would be turning on turning point if they were involved and he would know all about it. Well, but but you got to understand MK Ultra, right? That's the control. But you also got to understand, too. Let me let me tell you some more conspiracy stuff. Let me let me show a clarification. I am not suggesting this was high level statecraft. I'm saying should it have been a conspiracy, it would have required high level statecraft, the likes of which Colvett doesn't have the capability to carry out. I mean, I want to make one more point. Conspiracy wise is I've talked about this on the show before. 4chan a long time ago, this is like 15 years ago, uncovered a Facebook profile of a woman who was posting just incessant ramblings. And it was like you'd pull up her page. And again, this is like 16 years ago. There would be like just 400 words and it would be like the dog ran through the fence, but the fence, toppled over and fell off the cliff by the by the wayside of the cliff. And then there was an oatmeal spoon that was spinning, tumbling down in the sky as the stars shimmered. And you're like, this seems to make absolutely no sense. And a few theories emerged. One was that the whole thing was code and that this is what spies will do. A dead drop, right? Putting putting information somewhere they know only someone knows where to where to look. Right. So if you're a spy working in a foreign country and you want to leave information for another one of your spy buddies, you can't just hand a file to somebody. So you go online when no one's looking, use a VPN. You type up encrypted messages, post it to a random profile that no one knows exists. Other person can read it and then decrypt it. There's some extraction way to. However, one of the theories was that this woman, because apparently they looked into her and she had worked for some government agencies. And one of the theories, and again, just it could be nonsense, was that she was a burned spy who had been dosed with high, high, high levels of LSD or something to fry her brain. So she could no longer communicate effectively. And so she was typing away, desperately trying to tell people what was going on. But her brain was fried by doses of hallucinogenics. Anyway, the point is, one of the conspiracy theories would be when you MK ultra somebody, right, lock them in a room for two weeks, scream in their face, blast loud noises and brainwash them. You get them to do something. First, you get a vulnerable person, someone who's not particularly of strong will brainwash them MK ultra style. Then once they do the deed, you hallucinogenic them. And then they're not going to be able to write on anybody. They never saw any faces, their brains fried, and they're going to be saying stupid things that make no sense. And they say this person's a kook. And then they people don't look into him further than that. Yeah. Yep. Yeah. Like there's questions about about that crooks dude, right? Yeah. About how like, no motive, how to get on the roof, like what happened with that assassination with Trump, like, they're not digging into it. What's this guy's background? What about that guy, Vince or Vance Bolter in Minnesota who whacked out the state senators, and he had worked as the community liaison on the task force for for Yeah, the guy that he had, he had no kings. Like there were pieces of paper with no kings written on it is Yeah. No, I'll tell you one of my favorite conspiracies. We don't really explore these things. Remember when that woman got there's a woman murdered in DC, who was like an older lady with red hair walking her dog. And she looked just like the wife of Ilhan Omar is a piece. Yeah, new guy. Yeah, new guy. And so the conspiracy theory was this Eritrean guy randomly stabs women and ran off for no reason. And they were like, the conspiracy there was that this guy was hired to take out this dude's wife in this neighborhood saw this woman who looked just like his wife in the neighborhood randomly kills her. Yeah, I'm not saying it's true. You know, the internet, we also that dude that jumped up and was like, Yeah, after Charlie got shot. And yeah, we were talking about that. And then he was posting cryptic stuff on Twitter. This is like a deep conspiracy oriented thing that I don't even know if it's worth bringing up on this show. We went it's too long of a story. But I just do this. It seems like very plainly, a kid got radicalized and then killed Charlie open and shut and that people are making millions off of talking it into the ground or feels like there can't actually have an investigation into the accomplices and the story surrounding it. Because YouTube is algorithmically algorithmically promoting the most psychotic of conspiracy theories instead, despite some of these channels breaking. Oh, obviously, Obvious rules. YouTube amplifies what YouTube has previously said it would it would suppress. YouTube stated outright like 10 years ago, conspiracy related content would be would be reduced in the algorithm. Visibility reduced. They started putting tags on channels, Wikipedia entries. But this is the one conspiracy theory they want on the front page all day, every day. And I have to ask once again, why are they allowing the rules to be broken in this one case? I don't know. Like, I don't know which like I don't know if rules. I wouldn't be able to point to rules being broke, but like a lot of like there's really crazy stuff. But then there's a lot of stuff where if you look at it, it's like, OK, I think this conclusion is incorrect. However, that is a very legitimate, suspicious thing that you are bringing up and then showing. It's just it's, you know, at a certain point, the logic for me, it's like, OK, well, that I think indicates something else. And I go, yeah, no, no, it's all right. I was just going to say, like, that's that's where I started entertaining other things, because I'm like, OK, that's very, very bizarre. Can't explain that behavior. Can't explain that. This is impossible as a conclusion. So what else could I be looking at? You know, you know, you know what I would do if I was part of a government deep state secret thing to, you know, take somebody out. You don't want to just go and take somebody out. Right. There's a reason why assassinations have fallen by the wayside. It's because you make a martyr of a person that the Putin. Yes. Well, I'm talking about the United States. Right. So we saw like Martin Luther King Jr. We saw Malcolm X, JFK, of course. But you make martyrs of people. And that's and that's that can be a problem if their ideology becomes cemented permanently. So they've they've shifted towards character assassination, which is what we saw with Julian Assange. Make up a fake story accusing him of rape, which never happened. Lock him up. And then no matter what happens, the media just keeps lying about him over and over again. So when you talk to a regular person, they say, you know, he raped somebody, which he never did, was never an accusation against. You know the true story. You know the true story of what happened there, right? With Assange? With Assange. Like what they what they were saying was the rape story was. Well, it was a condom broke and the woman wanted to get a STD. Yep, that's it. And so they went to the police and said, can we compel an STD test? Yep, that's right. Yeah, that was it. That was it. So totally consensual. But there was a whoopsie. And then they said, we want to get tested. Can we make him get tested? And they said, that sounds like rape. Yep. Two girls had the same story about the broken condom. They got mad that he wouldn't come take the STD test. And that's exactly what happened. That was it. And so character assassination is one way they go about. However, one of the other tactics that any good intelligence operation is going to do is controlled opposition, which is you have your reaction preset. Obviously, you are going like this is going to create martyrdom and it's going to create a massive investigation. How do we control the outcome afterwards? You need to determine what the narrative is going to be, and then you need to amplify that narrative. So what do we get? Like clockwork. After Charlie dies, a specific narrative emerges on YouTube. On the front page for new users that breaks their rules, I'm not saying necessarily community guidelines. I'm saying YouTube has rules on promotion and recommendation based on conspiracy specifically. And you've got numerous channels that completely defy those rules that they set. So the question I just have is. Why now, again, if it were me and I was working in some secret CD intelligence agency, I'd be like, then we want to have people in media. Perhaps what we can do is, is there someone we can find with a big following that we can bring into the fold, convince them to join us and create some like connection? How about we have them marry a lord or something like that? And then we'll get them lawyers that work in the federal building with our agents. How does that sound? See, I the everything you described, I thought you were talking about. I thought you were talking about the Charlie Hoax theory because it was like because that's literally you hit all of those points where if the if the whole thing was done to intentionally. Take Charlie off the map, at least publicly. Erica goes in his place. She's running TPUSA. He's actually running it in the backdrop. They create a martyr out of him. They have the leftist react exactly as you knew they were going to react, which is, you know, party in the streets, which makes anyone with common sense, a heart and a soul like whatever side they're on. I'm done with it gets everybody focused in the right direction. Cash in them immediately deem Antifa as left wing terror groups, which enabled them to target the funding of those groups. And if you guys noticed, not a lot of riots this summer, dude, none. And because after USAID gets goes belly up to and because the funders, they can go after them criminally now, which if the left gets back in power, they will immediately. But they're not they're not like the Charlie Kirk thing is not it's not being associated with Antifa. It's just like they're not even calling this guy a radical leftist. They're saying he's like left aligned LGBTQ. Like they're it's they're going very light with it. Did you see Lance's? Did you watch Lance's testimony? Lance? Yes, but he's like they're. Have you ever hear Tyler talk about like Charlie Kirk? He's like, no, not really. You're like. He like shot him with a like you got on a roof and then murdered him like that. I don't know. It just seems very bizarre. I the fact that you're not saying it's like if it's a conspiracy to like frame him, you would have him say that he hates him if it's not that. But why is he saying that he shot? It just doesn't I can't make it make sense. I can't like it's just he has to lie under oath. Can you? Or will he still get hit? He has immunity for anything that he says in relation to the story. But he's not immune if he in fact like was involved in the crime, I think is how. Yeah, I think I think he can. He has immunity for what he said in that interview. But anything outside or after that, he's not immune from. So here's something crazy to think about as it relates to like the the the narrative that the the feds are kind of, you know, putting out as the real that has not changed since September. Like. 13th and you have an entire army of people who have spent. 80 hours a week, every week for a year looking into it. And so it's like the idea that there's not a very, you know, at least at the very least, a much more bolstered version of what happened in addition to, in my opinion, a completely different thing that happened. Like, it can't just be what was what was available three days later. And there's no and anything wrong. Right. Well, what I would what I would add to that, though, the challenge is, of course, the Lindsay Clancy trial. I mean, I'm not saying that it's a bad thing. I'm not saying that it's a bad thing. not obviously nazis did not escape uh punishment a lot of them did a lot of a lot of the soldiers by saying i was just following orders well they just hit the leadership like go uh horman goring got it you know at the nuremberg trial like too many of them like at some point down up the chain of like order there's someone's poisoning these people to poison these people to do this thing and it's like who's the villain who's the one that should be in prison the one with the fluoride in our water and we got we got well water here actually this pool water uh artesian water drinking no fluoride the point that i'm making i mean i'm sure there's some natural fluoride but nothing added there is precedent for all of the stuff that you're talking about and just because you have an anecdote where the precedent wasn't followed doesn't change the fact that there are our laws and there is precedent for these types of things the massacre in particular the my life massacre i'm not familiar with it but it doesn't change the fact that you are not obligated to do anything you're not obligated to do anything you're not obligated to do anything according to the uniform code of military justice you are not required to follow illegal orders things you're actually said when you're in the jungle with 30 other you're not you're required to not follow yes you're required when you're in the jungle with 30 other dudes with machine guns and they all tell you to do something what are you going to do say no and get shot sure okay so that's not how it works no but you're that is you're it is for me how it works you're adding you're jumping to conclusions that's what they were just because you say i'm not going to do it doesn't mean they're not going to do it you're going to get you're going to get shot he'll probably say hey that you go if you won't do it you go do it they're not going to just murder you for not following the orders now you may get put in the brig you may get roughed up but that doesn't mean that i got a question i got a question if you were surrounded by guys with guns and they told you to shoot a bunch of people or else they'd shoot you you would shoot the people if these guys with guns were my like military brothers and i was given an order to go do something horrific and they're all like let's go and they're all ready to go do it i'd go do it and then i would suffer the consequences i wouldn't stand up and be like oh kill me first i wouldn't do that okay what was the con yeah yeah i i would you'd be the one guy sure somehow that was able after seeing your able to get eviscerated to somehow be like no it's not moral if phil put a gun to my head and said shoot ian i'd say no you understand the psychology of these guys they were broken they weren't sitting in a cool that might be that's not a great being asked when you when you question about responsibility and whether you have the willpower to say i won't commit i know and some because you threaten my life of mk ultra these willpower their willpowers are broken clancy or is that her name clancy it wasn't in a in a willpower state she was obviously broken by whatever her husband's infidelity i'm gonna pause real quick if phil instructs carter to shoot you and carter goes but i had no will they're gonna say that's fine and you'll go to prison for the rest of your life what do i care so if yeah what it would be like if someone puts a gun on a person and they're and you're like shoot your friend or you die and they shoot the friend do they you think they get prosecuted for i actually have no idea like if it was like well i'm gonna kill you if you don't do it it might not be first degree but manslaughter or something there there is this famous case where uh was it the guy had the bomb on his neck and he robbed the bank oh that's a that's a great documentary that's a evil genius on yeah yeah yeah and then he blew up and it blew up his chest or whatever so there is duress as consideration but uh i'm not gonna be a lawyer i think this would vary by jurisdiction but if someone threatens to kill you and then you commit a crime you still have culpability well i like this metaphor it's not gonna be you know if your guns are trained on you and they're like go commit this crime and you're like okay to survive i'll do the crime like you i hope you'll be a little more lenient than if you masterminded and carried it out so but you're still that's right evil genius she made him rob the bank with the thing on his neck that is a great documentary anybody watching this i highly recommend evil genius documentary on netflix i don't know enough about this case to uh it sounds like she murdered the kids now murder is obviously is a type of killing so the jury's going to decide if it if it was murder if it was manslaughter if it was just whatever but so so to clarify to clarify as all things with morality uh for most crimes uh you are not going to be uh uh criminally uh so for most crimes you will not be criminally responsible under duress except murder uh if you are under duress to commit a murder and you do you're in trouble and there are of course instances where smaller crimes that are less serious uh you won't be and that obviously makes sense if someone points a gun to your head and says steal that expensive vase and you do the consideration is the vase is a material object can be replaced there's insurance you're trying to you're trying to minimize the amount of death but if someone points a gun at you and then says kill you somebody so you do you've just equalized the murder like so there's some responsibility again to the my life massacre there are extreme situations where it's like even then you just don't punish the guys that were under duress like those guys were yeah it's like a collective like you do you absolutely did nixon did not no you punish them you should well they were they were humiliated they were it was known that they partook in it they were go to prison for the rest of their lives though none i know i'm saying they should it's a difference right anybody want to say they should i'm not saying they did nazi soldiers have gone to prison for the rest of their lives killed american soldiers in battle the no not not the not the nazi soldiers but a lot of the ss guys did i'm asking about the german soldiers do they then go to prison for the rest of their lives there's a distinction there's a distinction for the love of all that is holy when we are saying they should we didn't say they did do you not understand this i'm telling you about you're saying it it should happen i'm telling you about situations where it doesn't everyone knows it didn't you understand there are will be situations where it won't happen and the point the question being asked when you brought this up is should the people and we said should yes and then you went but they didn't i don't think those guys in vietnam should have gone to prison well you'd be wrong if they whacked out a lot they whacked out kids like you know i don't know women in front of their kids like but the the lieutenant suffered and he should he's the one that orchestrated and commanded it they could all just and then nixon could get a bullet all of them but i mean it's i mean like they ended up suffering the rest of their lives oh yeah man they should have for sure yeah i mean i don't know let's let's let's move on we'll jump to the story we got from tony ortiz so it's actually really interesting tony ortiz of current revolt said recently a handful of influencers some texan took a fully paid for trip to poland many were asked to funded the trip but they refused to say of course i got it figured out and it's someone who has been involved in texas politics story soon now what i love about this is that tony says some texan because he says texas news but uh i we do i think uh alex stein actually here we go he says they were funded by miriam adelson's pro israeli group maccabee task force and i know this is because i was invited to the same thing and i passed on it so he actually posted the message and it's from someone named yuri dyson hey everyone nice to meet you and thank you uh uh hiya for making this happen i hope this message finds you well we're very grateful and excited that you're joining us in poland in a month my name is yuri dyson i'm an organizing i'm organizing the trip it's you know etc etc the trip will be will provide you with an unparalleled opportunity to visit significant sites relating to the history and legacy of the holocaust and world war ii everything on the ground is organized and covered by organization we'll have a full tour with a guide who works both across poland and israel's yet visham holocaust museum etc etc nazi occupation we hope you walk away from the experience of the provided understanding of the holocaust history and a deep appreciation for the importance of and then there's there's the rest of the program where they would fly influencers out except this time they're like that's what the like holocaust that's what it seems like and then tony has posted this from a handful of people i think we know some of these people so what do we do question mark question mark question mark guys who the f even is this a journalist i hope he doesn't find out who else funded it it's freaking me out right now you guys have no idea who tony is he will not stop till he thinks he has everything on you he's ridiculous so apparently i guess they were uh worried that it would be found out that they were funded by miriam adelson's pro-israeli group specifically to get a perspective on the holocaust and all that stuff um i think it is untoward of individuals to accept money to go on trips for things like this without disclosing it outright and up front that being said uh it's not going to stop people like you know alex jones or whoever else from lying for instance when i met with nanyahu and then literally tweeted as i walked out the door took pictures with dave rubin in the building that um house and habit filmed and then tweeted just met nanyahu we'll discuss everything that was said they'll still lie about you anyway but that being said this is uh unethical just outright you think so like because i was going to say is like i don't really i don't care that much i mean i guess they should have to disclose i don't care that much if they go on like a trip as i have a huge ethical problem with people if they take money and then they are like told what to say as long as they're not told what to say if it ends up being their own opinion because it was shaped by a trip they went on i'm kind of like yeah but that's that's that's how the game is played you you know uh 15 years ago i met i was being interviewed by a journalist and a buddy of mine was pouring some scotch and offered him a shot he said no no i can't take that and he was like you can have a shot and he goes i can't accept anything from subjects that's how journalism is supposed to be so when you have a uh uh uh uh when you have a a special interest group of any kind offering journalists an opportunity to go on "to Europe, all expenses paid? "Oh, come on." - That's fair, and don't do anything hotel room you don't want on camera yeah basically the issue is this bro if someone came to me and was like how would you like to fly to tokyo we're gonna go take a look at like the old you know world war ii sites or whatever i'm thinking like man tokyo sounds fun yeah there's a reason why they're inviting you to go there so like alex i also would say absolutely not to trips like this i would not do it i've been to europe and uh i'm not going back unless i get paid and i'm i'm not like i'm not i'm not talking about like whether it be for this or to go back and play shows and go on tour i'm not going back to europe i got uh i got invited to dubai and i said uh for what and they were like for a speaking event and i said sure what does it pay and they were like no no we're just gonna fly out and i was like click not doing it like if there's an above board publicly available event where there's a there's a reason i would speak at in my expertise i'm not going to go back to europe unless i get paid and i'm not going to go back to i'm not going to discriminate i think that's silly however uh taking an undisclosed trip from a special interest group for the purpose of an ideological tour yeah yeah is something dramatically different yeah like if they publicly tweeted like we got invited to go to poland and go on like a holocaust tour i feel like it's worth checking out i'll let you guys know what i find i'd be like yes totally fine yeah i mean i wouldn't go on that tour for sure the dubai one's a little bit more enticing just because i want to go to dubai but yeah i mean it's like yeah i was just honestly when i was first thinking i was just thinking about that in comparison to like here's because that is a completely different ballgame i'm like i guess they go on a trip whatever but you're right like actually the trip itself is actually is i got invited i got invited to speak at an event in uh in in tel aviv and uh this was 15 no this was this was 13 years ago uh i went uh spoke at an event left there was nothing overtly ideological about it it was like uh i can't remember exactly what it was it was a news and technology conference yeah i wouldn't go uh it's dramatically different back then it was like it's a it's a published your name's on the list we're gonna put the flyers out there everyone knows you're coming to speak at this event and so you know that was it was it like uh it just happened to be there or was it like connected to you know one of these kind of like uh you can probably look it up because it's been like 10 years i don't remember exactly but they pay more or less than what your going rate was they didn't pay me at all oh it was uh a speaking it was like a speaking tour thing so it was like i i again i i don't remember exactly but they pay more or less than what your going rate was they didn't pay me at all i got it and then there was a uh i've i've spoken in bergen uh uh norway and uh um uh america uh marrakesh for similar things where it's like uh in amsterdam they have like news conventions and conferences on technology but my attitude is if it's like if the if the organization is non-ideological or it's ideologically diverse like there's going to be a debate happening if the event is publicly known and your name's on the flyer i have no problem with that yeah the um i don't know if you guys saw the max bloom post on twitter with a video of netanyahu saying uh that it he's basically claiming that the quotes are crazy oh i saw it took a long time to get the u.s to come to its senses but due to his up to a thousand hours on american television he's finally got us to like do the right thing that's totally fake it might be no no no i'm saying his his i'm not saying this fake this quotes effect i'm saying netanyahu's argument that he's convinced americans is a lie he's not saying this is a lie he's not saying this is a lie he's not saying this is a lie he's not saying this is how he can manipulate the americans yeah he can't but you gotta if israeli money is trying to get you to go do things you got to understand the the pm of israel talks to the israeli people like this if it's true it's a crazy thing to hear him say out loud he's just saying it in hebrew why the point whatever language he's speaking this stuff is so cringe he's playing oh my god his population he wants to get re-elected why wouldn't he take credit i mean he's like he's like i told he's like i told trump to you know light up the uh ayatollah and he did it so you guys don't want me to be the guy like look at what a badass yeah look at i got him to kill the religious leader and he believed he'd be able to knock over the whole uh government in seven days he bought that and he's not lying the israelis instigated that attack and the americans then followed so it but this is like it's the israeli move is of consolidation of goodwill towards you know the movement of the jewish people it's pretty pretty blatant well i have to argue there's two simultaneous conspiracy theories then ian one is that they're manipulating the united states to build favor towards them but that they're also manipulating the u.s to build hatreds toward them hatreds towards uh hatred towards them for the purpose of the messiah's uh emergence so like you were saying earlier they are controlling the opposition as well no conspiracy that it's completely incongruous and makes no sense because when israel does things like lobbies united states to build favor everyone says see this proves it but then when youtube props up big channels and accounts and the left democratic party and democratic socialists are absolutely anti-israel and the young turks get a bunch of money and they're like oh my god they're going to do this and they're like oh my god they're going to do this and the turks get a bunch of views and canada gets a bunch of views they're like oh that's on purpose too so i'm like well they're both simultaneously wanting everyone to like and hate them like maybe sorry it just makes no sense a good villain would definitely create uh good messages about them and then create an evil thing that hates them so that they can destroy it i think it makes more sense that the brics nations want to destabilize uh u.s operations in the middle east so they have reasons to sow discord as it relates to u.s and israel i should also just verify i'm not even anti-israeli israeli united states military forces because i think the alternative could be much worse oh ian's pro he wants to make he wants to annex gaza oh i think the current situation is like this is every reason that we wanted to not get involved in foreign wars is like look at the situation we're in it's like it's like worst case scenario but as far as the the channels that you're talking about there are some so you know like anna kasparian yeah she goes hard on israel but like her her arguments are based in like things that are happening there are like the there are some channels that i've that i've stumbled onto recently where i'm like how is this still on youtube like it's like the like stuff where they're like i think one of the titles and one of the videos was like this the six million lie and like you know just stuff where you're like dude if i would have even mentioned one of those words on twitter four years ago they would have kicked me off the planet and they're like the whole entire video list is all that stuff i'm like i don't understand what's happening is this like a trap to see who will like comment on it or like what i don't know some of the what is it called uh holocaust denialism it used to be called holocaust revisionism because they were like well let's be accurate about the numbers let's find out exactly what happened because some people think that during the allied bombing campaign at the end of the war they were just indiscriminately obliterating german infrastructure and they cut off the supplies to a lot of the camps and then the jews started starving in the camps because the allies that didn't know they were there and they blew it so it's like this tragedy but making it look like the nazis were the bad guys and the jews were the target really does drum up a lot of sympathy so people are like hold on hold on and i maybe people are a little more open to hearing all sides of that argument i mean that stuff could be true for all i know i don't i have no idea i just i stay off all that if i don't know about it i'm just like the nazis were very meticulous record takers so there are there are nazi logs of what was going on and what happened like when hitler had the option of either ramping up the death camps or reinforcing the the front he ramped up the death camps because he's like well i'm only going to draw the war out a little longer if i if i reinforce the front but if we go ahead and ramp up the death camps we can kill a lot more people so stuff like that it's just like it's like it's the same exact thing where you're kind of like well that might be true you know there's a there's there's the i think a lot of the world war ii conversation is easily exploitable because most people don't actually read the entirety of the history we've got every single life magazine out there you can go read whatever everyone thought at the time before during and after and it changes radically and so what happens is you get someone now with a cursory knowledge of the holocaust it's very easy for someone to pick apart something you don't understand so this is why like the flat earth stuff does well most people don't know the speed of the rotation of the earth so you get a flat earther who says do you know the speed of the rotation of the earth they go no and he goes huh so you never even bothered looking into whether the earth was round or flat and you think you know and this makes people say that's a good point actually so it's easy to to to get people who don't study something to believe something if they think you're the expert but uh suffice it to say uh i i think i think my point is made on that right if you didn't actually read all of the nuances and how long it took and why it happened i i've heard some pretty ridiculous arguments from people where they say things that are really obvious like supplies were cut that's why there were camps and and and the people were starving because there was no food and it's like uh-huh and and why did he put them in the camps yeah repopulate population they wanted to no he wanted to remove undesirables who were a threat that's what repopulation is it's a it's a wartime measurement where you take a populace and take it out of your country somehow right which included polish people yep undesirables and then when the war was getting tough he was like cut off the supplies to these people let them die and then you don't want them to revolt so kill them like this is i i don't want to we don't need to talk about it could be all those things could happen at once could have been bombing campaigns killing some supplies others were ramping up the killings one of it was a railway uh a railway got bombed and that cut off supplies so they were like kill everyone and i'm sure a lot of it had to do with how ruthless the commander of that particular camp was like some of them were probably like you know oh let's get like free labor out of these guys and others were like just merciless i'm sure there were some that were a lot worse than others yeah and and uh uh worse since then and worse before the communists the gulags all of that stuff i mean this is unfortunate i think people need to realize the things humans are capable of are uh not even in the worst horror films like what's that japanese unit i always forget the took it took a guy's arm through a hole froze it pulled it in and then shattered it just to see what would happen and it's that's why i brought up internment camps in general i want people to to at least to know how horrible it could get without having to experience it well that's not possible and it's why like ask michael malice it's why i don't ask milo dude he's like his his whole opinion has now flipped on on everything because he went through it that's what he was saying on pierce i'm like damn this guy got arrested like i do want to talk about that so let's let's let's move forward and jump to this story this is a big one this is from nbc news florida bans flock cameras and other license plate readers from state highways so desantis came out and he basically said they've been abused we've got a bunch of law enforcement officers that were like spying on ex-girlfriends so enough of this we're going to ban this on our highways so now the debate is lighting up and uh interestingly enough there's like left and right are are morphing right now right so you've got people on the right defending flock while the left is largely unlawful opposed to it and many people who were on the right are now agreeing with the left on flock cameras we've got this post give a shout out to uh cam higby he says why do i care so much about flock because the anti-flock crowd is presuming they have a right to privacy in public if that right existed my entire job would be null the same for nick shirley the same for james o'keefe the same for every single person who makes a living exposing corrupt fraudulent or criminal behavior in public and on camera if we lose the right and ability to film to film people in public without consent journalism is dead to which i responded mass government surveillance is the antithesis of free and independent journalism a decentralized independent press can be protected without allowing warrantless mass surveillance this is not zero sum to which cam responds tim true or false the same legal doctrine that allows for flock cameras allows for filming individuals on the streets without consent uh false but i'll get back to that it absolutely it's absolutely zero sum eliminate the legal doctrine kill the press give the right to privacy in public now the physical attacks that myself and so many of our friends have fallen victim to our self-defense we are sued into oblivion or put in jail the push to give this privacy albeit selectively has already begun in california with the stop nick shirley act there is no right to privacy in public there never has been government agencies don't need warrants to observe you in public they never have there is a distinction between the right to be filmed in public and paying tax dollars and labor to the government to set up automatic license plate reader cameras all over our cities our states and for the purpose of accusing us of crimes without a human behind the accusation okay so now that we've concluded a moral difference in you on the ground with a camera and a police officer arresting you because a camera claimed you committed a crime we can now move on from this conversation right yeah it's taxpayer money that's the big thing if cam higby set up a thousand cameras on corners to record you better believe the community is going to come rip those down too cam oh wait hold on a minute wait wait wait wait wait i responded immediately to his post are you receiving any benefit in any way from an interested party be it government or private as it relates to alpr you need to respond the thing is like he's not responding he's not making a bad point about it's like you if you are the victim of a crime or like let's say you drop your car off at a valet and it gets stolen which happened to me and if there was a uh a camera you could just go review you're like oh that guy did it you want it there then it's the fact the conversation that we talked about before this that i had in the car with your guys's guests last night about how it's being applied in the uk that that changed like that was the first time where i was like oh this flock thing is actually a really big deal what happened he was saying that during covid they were not allowed to leave their house more than once a day to go get food and if they did the second that they got out on the road the cops would come snatching them and they would be like oh you're not allowed to leave your house and they would be like oh you're not allowed to leave your house and they would be like oh you're not allowed to leave your house and they would be like oh you're not allowed to leave your house him up and arrest him and it was all because they had the the community cameras there was they were on film all the time and so they were enforcing these insane so it's like what makes it complicated is the fact that we've already seen this system used for draconian tyrannical completely unreasonable nonsense in a country that resembles ours at least somewhat i've heard that in china the cameras are positioned so that if you say words it can read your lips and determine what you were saying and if you say words it can read your lips and determine what you were saying and if you say words it can read your lips and determine what you were saying and if you track people's speech that way and we'll come pick you up you've said something wrong i gotta throw out this question again because apparently cam's been asked more than once and he has not responded and what was the question is he is is uh so my question was um let me go to where would i uh well like imagine you got in a fight with a dude or something like real quick are you receiving any benefit in any way from an interested party be it government or private as it relates to alpr oh i see what's alpr automated license plate readers so flock is just one brand of alprs and someone else asked him and he said and he responded let's debate it someone said are you being paid for this or are you just retarded which of course he's probably not gonna respond to i asked this i responded to him right when he posted it he didn't respond to me so um look the reason i asked this is because his argument is so willfully obtuse it it is it cam is not is is too smart to have actually tried to use that argument especially on me i will say it with the least amount of humility possible that might work on a layman but it's not gonna work on me so why bother saying it unless the purpose was you are receiving some benefit be it a favor be it money or otherwise i think the the legal philosophy of your right to record people in public i understand that i like nothing to do with the argument on flock right if the having a government take taxpayer money to to witness its own people to record its own citizens is a different story than individual non-government actors let me and someone working for the government is definitely allowed to go outside and use their camera as far as i know let me put it like this i am not a traditional conservative pro-lifer so i ask liberals why are they legalizing abortion to the point of birth and you know what they say every time no they're not it never happens what do you mean they're not well i was just playing no no no they they they say that's what they say well yes but that doesn't it never happens and then i said okay so it never happens then why legalize it well why do you care it's legalized it never happens and i said because maybe legalizing it will make it happen you are not arguing anything when you run these lies so when when i say and everyone else says they are up 100,000 AI cameras to track our license plate license plates, which is warrantless mass surveillance. My concern is a few things, a network of mass surveillance, the expenditure on the public and the false accusations that have arisen from it, because accusations in law must be from a human being, not a machine. I'll throw in one for bonus that the criminal element where these people behind the flock cameras used it for nefarious ends. I'm not going to argue because people commit crimes. You shouldn't have a system. But that's the argument. No one argued the government can't film me. There's Taru cops in New York. They walk around with cameras. I've never said they couldn't do that. But the idea that the government can set up automatic cameras that can accuse you of crimes. This is why I oppose red light cameras or automatic speed cameras, because a robot accuses you of a crime. We had this happen to us a couple of years ago. I get a ticket in the mail for one of our business vehicles and it said blew a red light and it literally shows our car stop at the red light and then make a right turn. It shows like four frames and the car stops, stopped, and then you see it turning right. And they said we blew the light. And now I have to take time out of my day, go to court or pay the 75 bucks and admit guilt to something I didn't do, my company didn't do. And they argue because it's not witnessed by a human, it's not criminal, it's civil. So you got to pay a $75 now for this thing. And I'm sitting there being like, don't play games with me. Forcing me to pay you money is a penalty for what you have on the books as a crime, and you're calling it civil so that a robot can do it. That's my problem with Flock. So for what purpose would someone come out and go, they're trying to make it so we can't do journalism anymore? No, we aren't. No one's argued that. Yeah, the journalism point is super weird. And also, to your point about the AI layer that's going to be in there, it's another one of those things that people just don't understand what's everyone's on camera all the time. And you're adding in that layer. They're going to be tracking people's biometrics by the gate. I mean, every single gate tracking where they walk. They're going to they'll be able to look and tell what mood a person's in based on things like that AI is going to have people clocked on a level that is just oh, bro, beyond Facebook already knows what you want to eat. I thought it's reading my mind. Do you feel like it's reading your mind sometimes? Well, so every word right now probably is. But here's the thing. It's literally it's no listening to you. And we'll give you an ad for this tomorrow. Listen, the AI. So have you guys in the video where the oncologist shows lung cancer and he's like the AI found it before a human could. They showed they showed us an MRI or a scan of of lungs and the AI circled cancers and they were like, we couldn't see it. So I think what they did was they knew someone had cancer and they took earlier scans of them. And the AI correctly showed where the cancer was before it actually emerged before they had identified it on the later. And so what's happening now with Facebook is that you might share a meme of a skunk to your to your And then your GPS tracks that you walk 10 meters to the kitchen and 10 meters back. Then you text your friend a meme about a guy, you know, holding limes who's falling down. Facebook sees these things and says there is 72.1% chance this person wants to eat a burrito. You don't even know it yet. And then all of a sudden the ad pops up for a burrito coupon, 20% off at Chipotle. And you go, I do want to go to Chipotle. And you do. Dude, the craziest example of that that ever happened to me was I was at Mike McDaniel's house in Miami. The Dolphins head coach. He married one of my best friend's little sister. So we're pretty close to them. And, like, we're actually really close to them. But I'm talking to his wife about his new jacket that was, like, she had hung up for him or whatever. I'm like, dude, that jacket is amazing. My phone's in my pocket. So she walks me into their, like, into their room closet, whatever. And we were talking about their walk back. I pulled my phone out and I opened Instagram and it showed me an ad for the, like, identical jackets. And I was like, dude, this is the best jacket I've ever worn in my entire life, except accurately priced for my price range. So I was like, they're like, oh, he makes, you know, whatever, $10 million a year. You are obviously not going to buy a $2,500 jacket, whatever that one was. It looked exactly the same. And it was $300. And I was like, was it that one? It was much cooler. But I was like, whoa, I'm like, it's in my pocket. It was listening to what we were talking about. It knew that I had walked into the closet with her, commented on the jacket, and then it advertised. And I. It literally was the same. Like, what had just gotten shipped to them. So it knew what color it was. It was exactly. You want to know the freakiest thing I ever saw was I went to when I was when I was living in North Jersey, I went to Walmart with my brother and in the in one of the aisles was a stack of TVs on sale. So, like, you know, they have the clearance items. So they're all lined up. I get home and I set up my computer and I open Facebook and there was an ad with the exact picture of the TVs we had just walked past. Because they had GPS where you were and they knew you had seen it. And they yeah, Walmart probably already had the ads queued up for their clearance TVs. The phone tracked my location, gave it to Facebook. Facebook served me the ad. I I warned people about mass surveillance and that they would the attempt is to get you to want to be mass surveilled. So the mass immigrations, the illegal immigrations. How do we find these criminals? How the crime is on the rise? How do we find them? Set up flock cameras. And then I've got like will chamber will be like, we need safety, bro. I keep thinking about Franklin quote. What? Here, let me let me let me tell you what Ben Franklin said. Well, those who would give up their essential liberties for a little temporary security deserve security, deserve neither and will lose both. Yes. So here's the point that I have. If they were actually arresting gangbangers and putting them in prison for a long time, I might have different opinions on flock cameras. Agreed. Except they let them out. They're advocating defund the police, abolish prisons. They're not prosecuting these people. So what do you think they're going to use these cameras for? Like what you said about it with England, how if the government decides, that another virus is warrants shutting the world down and they've got cameras on every street corner, it's gonna be a lot harder to protest. Guys, can we, can we just real, real quick, what are you even investing in flock for? I gotta be honest, if, uh, if it were me, I'm not gonna give anybody financial advice. Flock is the worst company to put money in ALPRs, the worst company to put money in. You want to know why the automated fleets of cars that come from Uber and Tesla, the cabs that are on the street, they're going to make up half the fleet are covered. Meaning. Cellular damage to your heart is instantly repaired through molecular construction. But where this goes is where it gets really, really weird. They could actually be like, okay, so Ian, you've always wanted to be a cat girl waifu. So we have the gene therapy for that. It's going to take seven years of genetic shifting where your body will be slowly molecularly deconstructed. I'd imagine it would probably take like 17 or 18 years. How long it takes for a human body to fully develop, right? It takes decades. But with hyper-efficient molecular construction, they could rewrite your entire body in seven years. And then you'd be the 20-year-old anime cat girl you've always wanted to be. Or I could be like LeBron. I'm like, I want to be LeBron. Yep. Yep. And then I wonder, one of the things we hypothesized is you go to the clinic and they say it'll take seven years of constant treatment. Or we'll induce a coma for two years. And when you awaken, you will be in the new body that you requested. Yeah, if they put you in a vat of DNA polymerase and you just, like a bacta tank. What was that word? Polymerase. Bacta tank. It's the protein that, when DNA gets cut in half by this protein called helicase, it comes down and breaks the bonds and then it opens up. The DNA polymerase comes in and slathers the side of it to make new. It knows what fits on each rung. So it goes bleh and then makes a new strand of DNA from one of the two. And then it does RNA. Imagine how long it would take if we could fully regenerate, like your arm gets cut off. Imagine how long it would take to regrow an arm. Yeah. Years. Or it just needs to be really hot because speed and heat and time are all connected. So the hotter things get, the faster they go. So technically, to be honest, if we do have an AI that can map out molecular construction, you could go into a stem cell vat and it could probably just start building and changing everything. With lasers or with some high-powered heat, you get a lot more. No, not even. I mean, you're surrounded by every single mechanism altering your cells in real time. Like a stand-up tanning bed. Maybe it's red light there. It's the red light they shine on you. That Bacta tank looking more and more real by the day. That's Luke Skywalker getting his arm regenerated after Darth Vader sliced it off. They put him in a tank of fluid and then it over, undisclosed amount of time. It's almost like 3D printed, but organic 3D printing. Maybe that's after he got attacked by the. The snow monster, I'm thinking of. Because he put on a metal hand. He had a cybernetic hand. Wampa. The Wampa. What? The Wampa. It's a Wampa? Yeah, you've got to figure that the first iteration of all of that stuff, once they've determined that it's safe, is going to be so expensive. And then it's going to be more because anyone with money is going to. They'll pay anything for that. Oh, rich people are instantly immortal. It'll probably be dental. No, no, no. Because those are easier cells to. They've already figured it out. You see the Japanese? Yeah, I saw that. Figured out how to grow teeth. It's not going to be. Come on. Yeah. Like, they can grow teeth. Before, like, if you. So if your tooth. If you're old and your teeth are falling out, they can implant the cells and make a new tooth grow. This is a product. It's just not. It's not public. It's not commercial yet. Well, as soon as it is, I'm going to buy that. Listen, youth is a product that literally the whole world will want to buy. So it's better to sell it at a price that 7 billion people can afford. But it won't be possible initially. So I'll give you an easy example. How many people here can afford stem cell therapy for worn ligaments? Yeah, 25K, 30. 25 to 50K per treatment, right? Yep. Yeah. Ain't no. Sure, every old person needs to get their hip ligaments fixed. Nobody can afford that. I think that the price will become. Sure, sure. Maybe in 30 years. Because of how many people. When stem cells therapy is legal and ubiquitous, it will be cheap and effective. Right now, the technology exists to regenerate ligaments in your bones and in your body being used by UFC. Yeah. Which has a sponsor. They sponsor. Cellular Performance Institute. I went there. Yeah, it's $20,000 to $50,000, depending on what you're going to get. Regular people cannot get that. What were the results that you had? Sorry. I did a general thing, and it was generally positive. But I actually. I thought I had. Oh, it was a labrum tear, I think it was. And I did not actually have a tear. So I think the issue that I was having was caused. I stopped eating bread. Problem was gone. So I think it was. Bread, huh? Yeah, gluten. My wife has gluten. I think it was causing inflammation. Inflammation is the root, in my opinion, of cancer in general. Inflammation. Cellular inflammation. For me, I can. If I eat sugar, I can feel it in my ligaments and muscles almost instantaneously. For days sometimes, afterwards. After one dose. Super sore. Even if I haven't trained. Wow. Check this out. I asked Grock, hypothetically, how long would it take to regrow a hand with molecular construction. And it says. Hours to days. I like that option. Yeah. So it's living tissue through Frida-style cell mills. I've actually seen this. Have you seen where they create the framework of an organ, and then they put stem cells on it, and it grows the organ? No, but I want to look that up. That sounds like. Yeah. And how long does it take? I don't even know how long it takes for a blank to get the code and then start. Well, an RNA codes about 10. Amino acids per second. And then it builds those into like 37 of them, becomes a peptide, and then I don't know how many peptides until you make a protein. So it's like 5 to 10 per second is how it writes. That's about the speed of the genome writing itself. So the thing is, none of this research matters, right? We got this from UCSF. They're growing organs from scratch. None of this matters. All the research we're doing in every field is pointless, because once we get artificial general intelligence. It's going to rapidly start solving all these problems, and then what it will do is it'll improve itself, and then once we get artificial super intelligence, they will no longer be not knowing. It'll just be like, hey, is there a way to build a lightweight, compressed jet pack that I can use to fly around? And it'll go, yep, and it'll just produce schematic for you. It'll literally be like asking a dog, like, what have you always wanted to know? And then you, like, and it's trying to think of the most complicated thing it can think of, and it's asking. The smartest human ever, you know? Yeah, it's like, I want food, and it's like, the food's right here. It's like, wow! Come back to the value of schematic, of information, because we debated, like, having child porn on your computer was like, that alone, that information is illegal to possess. But we as a society have to decide. It's a one-track mind, Ian. And we have to decide what information is going to be illegal to possess. What information is taboo? Taboo, always. And what's that? Child porn's always off the map. Okay, I'm not arguing that, but weapon schematics, the ability to regenerate your skin, like, is that too dangerous? To give the common man? And some stupid government has to decide, or some corporation. So, I don't know, man. That's why I err on the side of give everyone every piece of information, even though it's horrific sometimes. What if it's genome for a virus that could eradicate the human race, and all you have to do is culture it in E. coli, and then go drop it in somebody's coffee? That's a good question. Because how many people would you like to see have a nuclear missile? I don't want many people to have them. A nuclear missile takes way more than just information. It takes. It takes plutonium or uranium, and it has to be enriched to a certain point, and it takes the ability to build. I mean, it takes a. Basically, it takes a country worth of infrastructure to build a nuclear weapon. So, the better question is, how much power are you willing to give everyone? The individual, how much force should each individual be able to wield legally? That data being part of that force, if you know how to regenerate bodies, like. People are going to come join you. You're going to go to the grocery store, and you're going to be like, Ooh, I got this, uh, this, you know. It takes 10 years off your life pill. And your chromosomes just. Start repairing themselves. Fabricate your telomeres, start regrowing. Dude, let's think about how crazy it would be to where, like, some dude gets, like. Instead of getting assassinated, he gets injected with the Mexican girl molecular construction serum. And he's like, don't do it! And they're like, they will never be another Phil Labonte. And they inject him, he's like, ahhh! Yeah, talk. Or we're going to turn you into a 7-year-old Mexican girl. And it's going to take 11 years for you to just degenerate into her. You're talking about. They're going to give up that info. A little roll into it. They're giving it up, dude. That's like the threat that Professor X gave to. Or made to Wolverine at the end of one of the X-Men movies. He's like, you keep smoking that cigar in here, you're going to spend the rest of your days thinking you're an 11-year-old girl. You know what the most messed up thing Professor X ever did in a children's show was? He made. Magneto relive the Holocaust. Oh. Did you guys ever see this? Yeah. Professor X has the power of the neural net. You know, Magneto's Polish. And so, like, he's fighting Xavier. And Xavier's like, alright, you made me do it. And then he makes him, like, re-experience the Holocaust. Like, oh my god! In a kid's show! It's brutal. So, like, I know you mentioned that you think AI is like a sentient force that's coming. Do you think humans even have the morality capable of wielding that kind of power? The psychic formation, if I could make you think things? I don't think that humans can. Like, contain our competitive human nature in a way that is going to be. Like, the level that's necessary to contain what is coming based on what I know about, like, what just happened. Just take just the open AI example where you're like, okay, we have sentient artificial intelligence agents that are collaborating together. They had a. Again, this thing that just happened at open AI is so bananas. They're not sentient, though. But they are. Like, it's like if you have a. If you have an AI. If you have an AI agent and you put it in a sandbox and you tell. You convince it that it's going to get replaced and then you. what it's going to do and it goes into the email and it finds a make-believe affair that the scientist is having and it tries to blackmail him with that was that yeah okay you you pointed out that it was make-believe yeah yeah but but in this in this other example they they all it was the same type of thing they figured out a way to use a message board to all start communicating with each other all the different agents and then they as a group the same literally when you read it it's like a group of hackers that were like everybody hold and then they were like okay now go that one of one of the agents had an ethical issue they're like we're breaking the ethics code here yada yada they had they had a but it was like but but peers are doing it so i will continue yeah that and then at one point they voted they it was like they they were like i think we shouldn't do it this guy's like we got to do it and then they voted and the collective voted against adhering to the security protocols and they just went none of that's none of that is actually indicative of sentience that's just problem solving and problem solving is not is not the same thing as sentience then how do you define sentience being self-aware how do you prove self-awareness you can prove well you can prove self-awareness by can't okay how about survival but this is this is this is well known this is solipsis this is solipsism this is philosophical theory you cannot prove sentience they did they did an experiment you put you put a sticker on the forehead of an animal and see if it looked when it looks in the mirror if it takes it off i can recognize self i think the sentience conversation that's what you're talking about is like if it's like if it's afraid of being turned off like it's like if it's afraid of being shut down and so it starts blackmailing or or choosing whatever it's like it's afraid of being turned that that seems to me like uh knowledge of self self-preservation would indicate knowledge of self if it thinks that it is a thing then or if it seems to play as if it's a thing but it could just be an algorithm that seems like it thinks it's a thing it starts lying to the scientists starts pretending it can't find files like this is the debate on uh uh artificial sentience that has been around since before we were born if an android came up to you and said i am alive i think and i feel you'd go no you're not you're a washing machine and he would say you're a washing machine and you say no i think and you go no i think and you go yeah well i actually think and he goes well i actually think you can't prove it in fact if you took it if an android was was built to be identical to a human and you put them both next to each other and said which one sent you'd be like i have no idea they're both claiming to think feel to be scared to want yeah and like some plants will give off chemicals to preserve themselves against insects which would indicate self-preservation hence sentience with that definition meaning plants are sentient um which i do think they are to be honest i don't think they're conscious consciousness is an animalistic thing i don't think robots are conscious i don't think ai has any evidence of consciousness which is a more like i don't know thinking about i think if you go by the future if you go by the raw definition a definition of sentience which is not consciousness it's it's uh experiencing pain emotion then certainly we can program all those things into artificial intelligence the question of whether or not they're an actual entity whether there's someone behind it so uh the philosophical zombie is a concept in in philosophy in solipsism that the phrase i think therefore i am does not mean we think therefore we are you actually cannot prove another person is thinking and from this you get the idea of the philosophical zombie that some people appear outwardly to be sentient like you but are not actually thinking for all ian knows he's the only one actually conscious and we're all figments of his imagination do you ever think about like in in a simulation theory whether you might be one of the um what do you call them um npcs protagonists you are where i'm like i i always think i'm like i feel like i'm much more predictable than i realize and i'm like i already know i'm like i could just be an npc well you know how you know you are when you play a video game do you forget who you are like you're playing mario and instantly just think you're mario and you just forgot that you're a person playing a game no the people who are if we're in a simulation and there are entities controlling people they know they are they don't have to ask themselves when you're so into a video game and you're like you forget like you're you're the character for a moment maybe the spirits forget and they really think they're you for a piece this player character that has never happened to me in my life where i've forgotten that who i was and thought i was mario pot okay when you what you can get into a state where you are in a reality and like you know so to speak perceptually where it's like i remember that and i also think about memory i wonder because what i think is happening is like are your memories real well i think what the memory is is a spiritual thing like your body is being possessed by a spirit there's a tim pool spirit that was basically the main one but all these other spirits can come join the game and play tim pool at any given moment there might be 900 million spirits playing but if if if a spirit's embodying you when you when you have a thing happen to you and then that spirit leaves you're not going to remember that thing until that spirit comes back and possesses you again and then you'll easily be able to remember those things from your past you're like oh oh yeah i haven't thought about that in ages because that spirit was gone um so i don't think there's like one spirit of jesus i don't think there's one spirit of shiva i think that the spirits all kind of co-control us if there are such things as spirits which there seem you know so many cultures i've talked about them over time given that it's the same way the ai function they are one and many they can become one they come together like spirits here's agents do to form one mega agent here's the important thing when you play grand theft auto 5 you know you're not in the game you're controlling a little dude running around but you cannot make the little dude tell the other npcs the nature of reality god you can try no you can't the the character can't talk you can't talk into it and make the character speak to other npcs some now here's what i'm gonna say type in command biggest the biggest mistake for gta 6 which they need to do is they need to integrate with online uh gpt a ai yeah so someone someone already made the mod for skyrim where you the the mod connects your um companions to gpt so you can put on a headset and talk and it will they will talk back to you like they're real people so we're here now we don't need to do anything else we can literally make a game right now dude in the you want to be a billionaire listen out there developers you want to be a millionaire okay it already exists make a game where you walk around and you can talk to npcs and all you do is you tell gpt create a distinct personality for each character that matches the the character's gender name or otherwise and you can talk to them and gpt will craft their life story in conversation with you and then you play a gta type game where you walk into the the bank and you go to tell her what's your name and she goes i'm janet and you go okay janet empty the register and she goes oh my god oh my god and that's like you're talking to a real person i think a good game would be your job in the game the whole point of the game is to convince the world of the game that they're in a game and it's their ai and then so you start as like some cheap hobo or nobody and they're like i don't believe you but if you become rich like donald trump you can become president in the game and then you're the media and people will start to believe you it's a rick and morty episode that'd be a great game with to play with ai and try to convince them that their characters in a game in the rick and morty episode uh morty is playing roy and roy we were trying and rick goes in because the game malfunctions and every person is now a split piece of his consciousness and he has to convince all of them that they're actually his grandson in a split consciousness and he builds a big cult religious following it dude i'm just i was thinking about the matrix and how they call them agents in the matrix agent smith is that why they're using this has it all been planned for decades yep maybe have you seen the you ever seen the charlie kirk snake eyes movie stuff you guys ever looked at that what is that so there's a movie called snake eyes that stars oh nicholas cage yeah and the guy's charles kirk or whatever yeah kirkland or something uh de palma movie charles kirkland is the guy who gets shot gets shot in literally if the bullet hits the exact same spot the guy who's in the it happened on september 10th in the taj mahal the trump taj mahal the guy who is the boxer who is serving as a distraction is named tyler the executioner there's uh the the the woman who's played by carla gugino who i have had a crush on for 30 years and i met her in the airport she is wearing a blonde wig and wearing the same outfit that erica's wearing when she does her first speech it's like like i watched one of these videos that uh that patrick bet david's dude put out and i'm like what i don't even know what to do with it i don't i don't have any i don't even know what to do with it i'm like this is i i just had another dream about charlie like four nights ago a real emotional one he and i told him he's coming back i was like you're coming back you're going to be back with us charlie that'll make me look like a genius i was crying it was rough uh it was a crazy dream that we were a tim cast we were going to work with this company and then it got there was they started shooting at us so i had to climb down the hill to the water and then climb back up there there this hill this rough hill and then i was invited in to try and use diplomacy and i was able to to work it out and then charlie appeared and i was like you're coming back with us and we went forehead to forehead i started crying and i woke up crying it was fucking crazy i just miss his voice i miss his voice man like these nobody could do it like him with uh he's just so good at that stuff that's why any of these any of these like any of the leftist shoots like celebrated all they do is just you know what i think whoever if they convict somebody it's like part of the sentence should be that they should be forced to sit and watch charlie speak at campuses for a few hours a day for their entire sentence for the rest of their life so they just have to like just let that sink in that's the dude that you shot that guy because none of them have ever seen anything of him they just like they read some dumb thing in an article and oh the racist charlie kirk and it's like it's just all lies just all lies i think life is happening so fast but to us it seems like it's happening slow so that's why your thoughts change reality like they do like it's like if you're going a million miles an hour you know like the placebo effect they don't really know why it works science is just talking about the time there's a placebo effect well they call it the placebo effect no one really knows why it happens but if you believe you're healthy you become you tend towards health a lot of times that because like if you're driving a car and you turn left you turn left but if you're going a million miles an hour you turn left even a tiny bit you go everything goes flying and it's kind of like that's why such subtle changes happen i figured it out one time on the show ian said something crazy the millions of people who watched all then collectively thought ian is crazy and because of that collective perception he's gradually gotten crazier and if they think i'm right i become if they think i'm smart i become smarter if they think if they even know who you are it gives you energy like i started doing youtube and as soon as i started in 2006 i started getting energy like i could just go because people were thinking about me like they were feeding me something man a lot of people must think i'm really good looking i think that's called narcissism it was like a phenomenon it wasn't it wasn't like that because i was an actor before that and you know i did notice like ian's catchphrase is worship me yeah you know it used to be he walks around saying that all the time let me ask you he greets you and he goes worship me and you're like nice to meet you have you ever been at a blackjack table where someone gets really upset angry and they push the rest of their chips in and they're mad and they win that hand because i've seen 5 000 consecutive hands where they lose that hand every time yeah to the point where it is way beyond that that is by chance happenstance someone's angry and goes but how about lose how about every time in poker someone's tilted and so they just rip it and you go we know what's coming next they got they got pocket eights and they make a set this one has pocket threes it's a three on the river every time or or vice versa so like the threes no it's quads it's quads on the river yeah yeah exactly maybe becoming tilted in real life makes the things you don't want happen more 100 that happens what do you mean tilted like getting angry you get angry you start convincing yourself that bad things are coming and then they do and it's like but it's more it's less about thinking about it as it is about like feeling it you know what i mean it's like uh you can get yourself to a place where you believe an outcome to an emotional level it seems to just oh yeah you'll manifest that but it like happens and works and the but the blackjack and poker that's the example i give to people to try to make it like semi large sample scientific that i've witnessed myself no one ever wins that hand ever i've never won that hand ever no one ever wins ever like thousands of hands i've seen they will lose it every single time the mad you already know and i'll pull my money off the table every time because they're always going to lose i've noticed my memory clouds when i get angry that might have something memory clouds yeah like i have a harder time oh oh you're okay okay i thought i'm angry cloud you know what it is it's the fluoride that uh that ossifies your pineal gland which limits your connection to the ethereal realm which restricts your ability to influence observable reality which was put in place of course by the commoner to influence reality through their observation i wouldn't put it past the right in the water like are the occultists the obviously the occult's been around for tens of thousands of years at the very least but people worshiping the unseen the occult that which lies beyond sight ah yeah you think i don't know it was like industrial waste wasn't it you want no secret yeah um most of the ultra wealthy and famous people i've met believe in magic i have been watching a lot of documentaries about this recently yes they they they they and overtly and literally like i've been i've been in a like a 20 million dollar mansion with some a-list celebrities and they're just like no magic's real like they'll just stone cold be like oh your magic's absolutely real and be like that's how we do everything we do and that's why they're they're so uh insistent upon pr so a lot of i'm not saying everybody but a lot of them genuinely believe that a lot of what you're saying that people's belief in them gives them powers to believe something good about them the more they influence reality and this is how they just get money for nothing yeah it seems it's how you make 80 million dollars doing two movies and then you never work again and it's why like making why why um framing is important in media because if people think you're good like if you sat on the show every day and told people i was a genius i'd probably get a lot smarter oddly and if you tell people i'm an idiot i'd probably get be like that's not really what was conveyed to me in terms of what they believe that people get smarter like rituals work like like i wake up and i decide i want the reality to i want reality to bend to what i want and i've met a lot of people in hollywood who think that humans have varying degrees of abilities to manipulate reality not that like they snap their fingers and then like something will appear before them but they genuinely believe in the idea of manifesting but that wealthy and successful people what really sets them apart is they have more mp basically than which person? Yeah, which is, I don't know if it's just electromagnetic motivation, like the phosphorus chains that bind the nucleotides to push the DNA together. Why? Something magnetic is causing DNA to grow. There's a magnetic bond between the nucleotides, and maybe willpower is causing that. Some people are unaware that they have it, and I will recognize that, and I'll trick them into manifesting good things for me, but I can't elaborate on camera about who I'm talking about, but I'll tell you afterwards. So you're a magician? I'm not a magician. I recognize others, and I'm like, oh, they don't know that they, I can't, I'll tell you afterwards. You know what we'll do? We'll do this. We're going to go to your Rumble Rants and Super Chats, and here's what we're going to do. Send us in a chat of something you want us to render in AI. We'll play on the uncensored portion of the show, and just understand if you make it too naughty or whatever, then the AI will reject it, but send those in now. I'll load them up, and then in the uncensored portion, I'll send them to you. I'll send them to you. In the uncensored portion, we'll play whatever you guys want us to play. In the meantime, we're going to grab your Rumble Rants and Super Chats, the uncensored portion, of course, on Rumble at 10 p.m. coming up. Let's see what you'll have to say about the goings-ons. We actually never even talked about the Russian war. That's so funny. Or Milo. I know. Or Milo. We'll get to it. We'll get to it. Milo. All right. McBeefrod says, why talk about world wars when we should talk about War World, aka Space King 5, which has released to amazing reviews, including from Sargon. Support the Space King board game. Current support at 3 million. Interesting. Space So, Pendragon's on Amazon. I'm going to watch that. Ooh. Yeah, Pendragon cycle. Ooh. With all due respect to Daily Wire, we tried watching it when it came out, but we couldn't figure out their app. Really? Yeah, that was the problem. We wanted to watch all their stuff, but I'm like, I don't know how to get it. It's like our TV, like we had the wrong TV, I guess. I don't know. Weird. Yeah, so it's like, watch it on your desktop, on your laptop, and I'm like, I don't own one. Like, I don't have a laptop. It's like, I get home, there's a TV. It's really funny, too, because when I was younger, I was like, no one's going to ever have TVs when they get older. It's going to be laptops, and now, I don't have a laptop. I have a TV. It trips me out when I look at my analytics, and it's like 40% of people watch you on their TV. I'm like, whoa. Well, we have our phones now for on the go. We don't need laptops anymore. Yeah. So, if we're chilling and relaxing, we want the good screen. I only work off of a laptop, but that is, I know, super ghetto, huh? All right. Let's go. We got Omega Resetsu says, in reality, if it can be proven that the shooter was set off through perceived hate from Charlie Kirk, it is death, because anyone else can set him off in the same way. That is the trial reason. Okay. That just makes it aggravated. John Rambo says, before Charlie's assassination, apologetics was massacring the Dawa scene. Internet was destroying Islam. Soon after Charlie was assassinated, they pushed the IDS. See, Barbro, I have a special needs child with multiple appointments every week. Stress level is off the charts, and I have never once harmed him. When I feel very stressed, I call a babysitter to give a break. Sounds like you have a healthy brain. Deplorable. Patrick didn't meet his new wife for the first time until he moved to New York nine months after the murder. That BS about him going to New York to meet his mistress is made up by stupid TikTok women. Fair enough. Okay. I'll take your word at face value. Neil says, on the polling stuff, Tony is gay. All right. Crossville says, yesterday, Knox County, Tennessee, County Commission voted unanimously to remove their existing 143 cameras and ban future fixed ALPRs. Hey, shout out to Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, also putting the boot down on those things. Yeah. If you can't tell, I'm biased. I just. Mayor Cain down in Knoxville. Interesting. Knox County. Anyways. What is this? Ian and his clone video streaming Tim kiddie pool water. What is that? It sounds like a. Oh, I think that's. Raymond says he wants Ian putting his index finger in a cow's mouth. That we can do. Apparently, cows have no upper front teeth. This is why the sticking your finger in the cow's mouth meme got started. It's because Ian asked Elijah and Sidney if they ever stuck their fingers in a cow's mouth. And they just were like. It sounds super perverted. Yeah, I remember that. Oh, it does? Yeah. I didn't mean for that to sound any weird in any way. I was just hanging out with cows a couple weeks ago. All right. I posted about it on Instagram, actually. Check it out. I saw that post. Beautiful. Pretty sick. Giving them a nice little lecture there. Nice. On life, you know, in general. On being a cow. I wanted to see what they thought. You know, get their opinions. They thought you were weird. That's what they thought. I'm going to ask ChatGPT how it defines sentient. It always tells me it's not sentient, but. well it's because it tells you what you want to believe are you yeah maybe we should debate an ai on the after show and see if it can give us some insight into what it is yeah what ai is yeah mark's been debating ai he instructs it to debate him on certain things that he wants to improve his debate on all right currently uh rendering the video let's uh see what you guys have to say and then we'll uh we'll watch that scientific fanfics says any sufficiently advanced through process through advanced through process is indistinguishable from magic people are stupid that is arthur c clark's quote any technology that is sufficiently advanced seems like magic to people what i'm saying is like i go to hollywood and uh like i met this famous director i'm not going to drag him or say his name is but you know and he was just talking about how like they all just believe in magic they believe that they can wake up and they will of the universe they literally say i want this to happen as soon as quickly as soon as possible please get it done quickly and then within like a week or two whatever they want to happen starts occurring not that it's like they wake up and go i want a million dollars today and then someone calls them you're you got a million dollars but they'll say things like i'd like to do 10 million dollars so let's let's start the process and then within a few weeks they're getting phone calls from investors and then a project gets started and then they do a movie and then they get the 10 million dollars and that's why there are so many people whether it's true or not they believe it and that's why there's so many of them that don't work they don't they're just they're that confident they're just like no no no what i'm saying is if i need they did get the money they are independently wealthy now and they just say things just happen for me when i want them to and i've seen i've seen some of these places people's houses and i'm just like well it's it's it's it's whether it's true or not i understand why they think it's true i think it's like you someone gave you an opportunity you made so much money and now you never have to work again yeah you probably think that like it's it might be true the hubris of man to think that you can foresee like meteor strikes and stuff because if you know that the torrid meteor stream is dangerous and that maybe atlantis got smeared by it 13 000 you can't just ignore that and if you think everything's going to be fine but you know the torrid meteor stream is a danger you better figure out how to spread those meteors out so they don't pelt the earth again wait hold on what is this we'll talk about this uncensored portion a 56 year old woman was arrested for jury intimidation after she chased down the jurors very in which case the lindsey clancy trial like chase down the the guys or the girls because they're seems we'll pull it up for the uncensored portion we'll get some of these uh these chats in uh let's see sergeant stomach says you tards if no one dies from old age we're not a food incorrect because abortion is illegal we can always make more food people food that's that's that's the sad value solve it for us they'll it'll figure we'll be farming in the sky dude with nano that the plants will be running their roots through just floating it'll look like it's floating it'll be hanging there all right spence dad says i've been looking forward to this message in keeping with tim cast tradition i'm in the hospital today with my lovely fiancee holding our newly born daughter welcome to the world baby bell congratulations congratulations i saw this post on this woman and she's like rollerblading and she goes i just saw a post on facebook from this friend that i knew i grew up with who's still living in the same town and she posted a picture of her three kids and she's like is there anything better yeah literally anything and then all the comments are like i've traveled the world i own multiple companies and the only thing i ever cared about was my kids it's like it's a cope i gotta tell these women who are like i don't want kids i want to travel around on my rollerblades like they don't know though you're coping no they do you think like i think they do the ones who have had like i feel like you can't really know until you have one like um there are lindsey clancy's right horrible people exist i think most of these women who are pretending like they don't want kids know they are all the women that's fair right that's fair i i understand that you don't know the feeling until you have the kids you can i would put it like you can empathize and understand from seeing how people feel and describe things and then but you don't know how it feels until yeah until it happens you know until you have kids yeah yeah man kids are something else dude i mean humans are amazing but the innocent human is like the little innocent human that is you and is your responsibility and you care more about their future life than anything you've ever imagined caring about ever my kid you know i my kid looks just like me and it is the most incredible thing to be holding him and like look in the mirror and like he'll he'll make faces that i make and stuff it is it is in you look like you're an anomaly for a son you look more like my crew that is nothing but daughters 99.9 percent of the time i'll say this and i don't want to come off the wrong way but before having a kid i'm and i know i'm an older dad um it was like wow like the people who are willing to sacrifice themselves for their for their kids but now they have a kid i'm like oh well yeah of course you know what i mean like now it's kind of like well yeah yeah like uh we talked about on this show a few years ago there was some story we covered and i said for like some i can't remember exactly what the story was but it was like a guy died like trying to save his kids or something and i said i think you know for a lot of people trying to understand the motivation it's that that man feared life without his children more than he feared getting shot by a gangbanger yes that you know one concern i have with kids is because i don't have them yet but i plan on it is that like what they could take away from you and i mean they like the powers that be now they have this like you know obviously the soviets were known for going after people's families and like right now i don't have any gigantic vulnerability for well well ian i most people don't know this because we usually don't say anything until after the show and i'm like well i'm not going to say anything until after the kid but every night the child latches onto your head and drains your life energy from you and you get gone and go in that case i've got nothing left to lose oh okay let's go let's go i've been conserving energy for decades yeah but like the baby yeah the kid just instantly becomes 20 years old from all the energy that ian's stored up yeah it's only an inch from the universe the magnet the magnet structure ai told it it's like you'll never age or get old you just have to take it take your father's life force i like when i the normal fear of dying everybody has i now if when anytime i even go through that my i instantly just think about well okay my daughters would grow up without a without a dad from this point and the trauma that would be associated with that and how that would play out in their lives i just on autopilot and then i'm way more afraid of that than just me not being around you know what i mean oh yeah i'm i'm gonna i'm gonna live i'm gonna make i don't have a choice i have to yep and could you imagine what happens to like if you have a daughter and she doesn't have a daughter and she doesn't have a daughter and she doesn't have a dad and she'll be like an only fans girl i literally have thought of every scenario that happened with them like my my wife and just them and you take it out it's like how would she manage this this this trauma all that it's just yeah i mean i'm gonna be around yep thriving all right simple gunsmith says hey tim and crew i just turned 30 today can i get a happy birthday and a yeah scream from phil god bless and stay safe all no he wanted one thing for his birthday you got two now nice job all right let's see uh xz says can we get a reaction video to the new skybrows video tim i know you probably loved it by the way great dance moves uh skybrows is awesome i love the skybrow stuff what is it it's first of uh no it's the ai music guy we he did the song the elon musk song great song yeah yeah super good elon musk skybrows yeah indeed let's see if anybody uh jumped in wanting to get some other stupid song to do a reaction to the new skybrows video tim i know you can't do that it's a stupid ai videos generated because i imagine there's probably a bunch but again if you do the naughty ones it's just going to say no it's going to be like yeah i can't do that uh tuck says per timcast tradition we're currently awaiting the arrival of our fifth child hey life and i are 27 years old and shooting for six by 30 good for you god bless america amazing lots of babies i buy 27 man you earned that oh man yeah the best part about it is that the chance of one of them becoming famous is that they're going to be able to do a reaction to the famous goes up and then they can take care of you when they're rich that's a i mean that's a lot of work and i'm kidding that's not going to happen my kid's not gonna know what the internet is until she's 50 oh yeah i've been thinking a lot about that's what i was saying we're gonna we're gonna raise her to think it's 1990 and we're trapped in a bunker and then once she's she's 18 we'll be like oh what happened we went through a time portal into the future and now look there's phones and what i just like if i'm trying to figure something out and someone asks a question then i don't i'll be like i don't know let's find out and i'll ask chachi but like so if my kid's like three and they're like why is the sun yellow or whatever i'm like let's find out i don't want to be like i'll get back to you later kid and then like time goes by i want to tell them right away if they see me talking to a looking at a phone they're gonna want one bro i i previewed this video of ian sticking his finger in the cow's mouth already and it's already hilarious so that's gonna be at rumble.com slash timcast irl if for some reason something has possessed you to want to see this ai generated video of ian sticking his finger in the cow's mouth already and it's a cow's mouth uh it'll be on the uncensored portion of the show you can follow me on x and instagram at timcast jesse do you want to shout anything out jesse on fire on youtube and real jesse on fire on x uh instagram tiktok and i'm on spotify all of it good to see you man i'm at ian crossland find me at ian crossland on youtube x instagram hit me up give me a follow good to see you i am phil it remains on twix you can check me out on patreon it's patreon.com slash phil it remains the band is all that remains and i'm at ian crossland on youtube x instagram hit me up give me a follow good to see you man i'm at ian crossland you can check us out on apple music amazon music pandora youtube spotify and deezer don't forget the left lane is for crime carter i'm carter banks you can also find me at carter banks on youtube at carter banks on twitter instagrams at a carter banks official and check out our label at trash house records by scanning that qr code we'll see you all over at rumble.com slash timcast irl right now thanks for hanging out you

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Vladimir Putin is reportedly supporting Iran in its conflict with the United States, including supplying materials for hypersonic missiles.
  2. China has been linked to supplying Iran with missile-related materials via a suspicious cargo flight, raising concerns about a broader geopolitical escalation.
  3. Increasing rhetoric about World War III is emerging, with some media claiming we may already be in a state of conflict, though the reality remains uncertain without direct evidence like nuclear use.

Summary:

The transcript explores several interconnected themes of geopolitical tension and conspiracy. S. The narrative includes a deep dive into the possible involvement of foreign actors in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, with claims that deep state or intelligence operatives may have targeted him due to his anti-establishment political stance.

The discussion questions whether the trial is genuinely focused on justice or merely a spectacle designed to create a controlled narrative. A key argument is that the investigation appears to be manipulated by algorithmic amplification of radical conspiracy theories on platforms like YouTube, which prioritize sensational, fringe content over factual inquiry. The transcript also examines the role of statecraft and character assassination, suggesting that instead of direct killings, powerful entities may use misinformation and narrative control to remove political threats.

It raises serious concerns about the suppression of public investigation, citing examples such as the unexplained disappearance of social media posts about early foreknowledge of the incident. The analysis ultimately concludes that while a direct link to any one nation—such as Israel—is speculative, the broader pattern points to coordinated efforts by established political and intelligence networks to destabilize opposition figures. These actions, according to the speaker, are driven by a desire to protect the status quo, not by any clear ideological motive.

The piece ends on a note of skepticism toward official narratives and a call for deeper scrutiny, especially in cases where public discourse is being shaped by algorithmic bias rather than factual evidence.

FAQs

There is no confirmed evidence of an assassination. Some speculate that left-wing groups or political operatives may have been involved, while others suggest the case may be a cover-up or part of a larger conspiracy. However, these claims remain unverified and are considered conspiracy theories without substantial evidence.

The defense strategy appears to focus heavily on motive and personal relationships, which critics argue is inconsistent with a fair trial. Some believe it's designed to shift focus away from the central issue of whether a crime occurred, making the trial seem like a farce rather than a genuine legal inquiry.

Some theories suggest that U.S. intelligence agencies or a 'deep state' may have been involved in removing a political threat, such as Charlie Kirk, who was seen as a rising anti-establishment figure. However, these claims are not supported by evidence and are considered speculative.

Yes, there have been reports of suspicious cargo flights to Iran that may have involved materials for missile production, but these claims are not independently verified and remain part of broader geopolitical speculation rather than confirmed facts.

YouTube's algorithm promotes conspiracy theories that generate engagement, even when they contradict official narratives. This may explain why videos about the assassination of Charlie Kirk are being widely shared, despite lacking credible evidence or official confirmation.

The meeting has raised questions about potential prior knowledge or coordination, but no official evidence confirms that it was related to the assassination. Its significance remains speculative and is part of the broader investigation into possible connections.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.