Russell Brand's Friend on the TRUTH, Meghan Markle's Father Back in Jail, and Diversity Over Excellence in Culture, with Heather Mac Donald | Ep. 1439
1h 43m 22s
The Megyn Kelly Show explores the Russell Brand case, where he was sentenced to 10.5 years in prison for rape and sexual assault, with growing skepticism from those who argue the allegations are based on a single accuser, Complainant 5, and potentially influenced by mental health issues and a lack of transparency. Samantha Presti, a long-time friend of Brand, challenges the narrative of widespread knowledge of misconduct, asserting that no warnings were given and that the media and comedy industry are now enforcing a political ideology that silences dissent. She claims the case is a product of cancel culture, citing silenced critics like Ian McNabb and Graham Linehan. The show also critiques the UK prison system, noting its squalid conditions and potential harm to Brand’s health during a seven-year sentence. A parallel story examines the media’s disproportionate reaction to a racist incident at the University of Mississippi, where two white women made monkey gestures toward black students, contrasting sharply with the media's silence on white youth killed by black perpetrators. The host highlights a systemic racial double standard, where stories of black-on-white violence are ignored or downplayed, while minor racial slights receive massive coverage. The narrative underscores concerns about media manipulation, political bias, and the erosion of free expression under the guise of "woke" justice.
Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show, live on Sirius XM Channel 111, every weekday at noon east.
Hey everyone, I'm Megyn Kelly. Welcome to The Megyn Kelly Show.
We have multiple stories with major updates today, including Thomas Markle Sr.
allegedly trying to cut off his ankle monitor.
This is unbelievable. He's only got the one leg.
Somehow he managed to get down and cut off the ankle monitor
after he was given the enormous gift of being released pending trial.
He was charged with the possession of child sexual abuse material, as you know,
and somehow misunderstood what an enormous gift that was and abused it.
And now he's back in custody and will not be released again, I think it's fair to say.
Unbelievable.
But we begin today with an update in the Russell Brand case.
As we reported Monday, a judge sentenced the British comedian to ten and a half years in prison
with a minimum of seven years behind bars
after a London jury convicted him of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault.
Brand is currently incarcerated in a reportedly decrepit facility
where inmates are kept in, quote,
unsafe, overcrowded, unsanitary,
and squalid conditions, according to a Watchdog report.
The Daily Mail also reporting police say several more women have come forward
with information about more accusations of rape
and related charges potentially against Brand.
This is all pointing in a very dark direction.
And where were these people when they did the Channel 4 documentary, in air quotes?
Where were they when the police were putting together,
the criminal charge, now that he's been convicted,
these women are coming out of the woodwork to say, me too?
Please.
All right, just like, they will not be satisfied
until this guy is behind bars for the rest of his life.
And the narrative now in the media, it's amazing how they're just piling on.
I mean, every publication is rapist Russell Brand, rapist Russell Brand.
I realize there's been a verdict, but please do a little research
on the alleged rapist Russell Brand.
Please do a little research on the alleged rapist Russell Brand.
before you run with this.
These people know, they know how thin this is.
There's a hatred for Russell and you can see it behind the glee with which they're
calling him a rapist.
It's a joke.
The rape charge was a joke.
These people obviously know nothing about Complainant 5.
Well, we wanted to speak with someone who actually knows Russell and who could shed
some light on whether these claims are believable at all.
This alleged open secret, now that they're all saying, oh, it was an open secret, Russell
was a rapist.
Really?
Where were you all?
Why weren't you all jumping up and down, setting yourselves on fire to say, oh my God, don't
be alone with that guy.
He's a known rapist.
Is that true?
Or is this just his political haters trying to pile on as they enjoy his downfall?
Samantha Presti is a British stand-up comedian who has known Russell Brand for over a decade.
She joins us now.
We have all heard those radio ads about owing money to the IRS.
They try to scare you and push you into calling out of fear.
But Tax Relief Advocates takes a different approach.
If you owe the IRS $5,000, $50,000, or even $500,000, TRA has real solutions to fix your
tax problem. Don't lose hope. TRA can often reduce or completely eliminate what you owe.
Their focus is taxes and helping people and businesses resolve IRS problems. They have
more than 1,000 five-star Google reviews and an A-plus rating from the Better Business Bureau.
You no longer have to fear the IRS. Generous relief programs exist right now that can give
you a clean slate. So act today. Go the TRA.com route. That's TRA.com. Or call 800-575-6845.
Again, 800-575-6845. Tax Relief Advocates. Real solutions for real people.
Samantha, welcome to the show. Great to have you.
Hello, Megan. Thank you so much for having me.
of course so tell us how you know russell how did you and he get to know each other we met in a bar
in 2006 um his writing partner matt morgan was djing at the bar and russell made an appearance
um there weren't many people at the bar there were about 50 uh they were all following him
around like he was the pied piper and i was just being cool um and then uh he came up to me and
said you're coming with me and I'm like where and he's like to my home and I was like no and he's
like come on it'll be an adventure so I went to his home uh we had a little bit of a romantic
tumble um I think um the most important part of my story is that I said no to him at the most
frustrating possible moment the last possible moment I could say no I said no and he was a
perfect gentleman about it and um to this uh to this day I still care about him dearly I've been
around him a lot uh reconnected with him maybe around 2013 when he started getting political
we were both on the activist scene and I was around him sometimes on a weekly basis and and
all the comedy industry knew I was a comedian um all the comedy industry knew that I was connected
to him. And not one single person ever warned me to be careful around Russell Brand. So I don't
buy the open secret. I would have been warned. It's a false narrative.
Why are they all coming out now claiming, we knew, everyone knew?
I think journalists planted the narrative because the first I heard of it was from
the comedian Alfie Brown he said it on stage in 2023 and uh this guy Alfie Brown around 2016
had ridden with me in my campaign van that Russell's team had decorated it got the trues
on the side it got Russell's website on it hop on the brand wagon so he knew that I was connected
to Russell and he didn't say anything around 2016 when he knew that I was around Russell everyone
knew i was talking about him on stage um i had publicity pictures that indicated a connection
i think there was a mention in my press release because we were working on a campaign together
which was a long political campaign called sweet's way resist so he said nothing to me
back then uh his cousin also went to russell's home around that time for for romance um and he
never even warned his cousin so this is a lie um that there was an open secret maybe people knew
that he was uh promiscuous but he told people that himself nobody needed warning about that we all
we all knew that he was that kind of guy and that kind of behavior in the uk is is very normal and
socially acceptable even to this day i know you've said you think what's underway here is a feminist
hit job against russell why do you think that um because um it's the same narrative the believable
women narrative it's the same narrative as trans women are women and any comedian me being one of
them that's spoken against that narrative in recent years has been cancelled it happened to
graham linehan he's a bafta winner he's the writer of father ted he's a bafta winning comedian and
He came on the show. Sorry. Yeah, we've we had Graham. Yeah. Yeah. And all the police were waiting for him when he was flying across. He was arrested. It treated him like he was a gang rapist. Yeah. It's the same movement because the human right is to be innocent until proven guilty. That has not happened here. Russell has not had a fair trial instead of being thought of as innocent until proven guilty.
No guilt has really been proven.
Questionable women, anonymous women, have just been believed.
The ridiculous rush to just universally call Russell Brand a rapist now on the word of
Complainant 5, of all the accusers, Complainant 5, which is, to me, a joke and suggests no
one has bothered to actually look into the claims or just no one cares. They had it against Russell
to begin with, and they're just enjoying his downfall, which to me smacks of politics,
given that the UK is very left and very woke and Russell isn't. What do you make of it?
I think it is that. And I also think that with his defense, anyone in the comedy industry that
may have had information that could have come to his defense, they would have been immediately
ruined uh there's a there's a musician that's just um spoken out about it ian mcnabb from
icicle works he spoke saying that he thought it was a stitch-up he's been immediately cancelled
all his tour has been cancelled so there's also this underlying cancel culture which has basically
led the campaign against russell brand and it's undermined the justice system yes that right that
comedian, Ian, he said, basically, he just had a social media post suggesting he didn't believe
these claims against him. And now, so his whole tour has been canceled because he's thrown his
support behind Russell. That's it. So you're not allowed to disbelieve the jury's claim.
conclusion you suddenly now you must go along with whatever the jury says if the jury had said
not guilty I guess everyone would have been required to go along with that and by this same
logic any woman out there posting I believed the women and I think Russell did do it I guess those
female comedians who posted that would have had their lives canceled too it's only if you're on
this um if you're challenging the the narratives that you get canceled it's a it's a the comedy
industry has been completely captured for years by this leftist fake feminist ideology um I was
about to quit in 2023 I wrote an article slamming the industry saying that it was pushing an ideology
that was curtailing freedom of expression and undermining women's sex-based rights against the
transgender narrative and um my show was canceled and I I got terrible um it blew up on Twitter
apparently people were telling me I was getting death threats um so it just basically proved my
point what happened after the article was published and and then I got canceled um it
proved my point that you can't tell the truth the comedian is supposed to be the one that can tell
the truth but we've now kind of metaphorically killed the court jester in the UK and we're we're
living in tyranny we we're not really a democratic country if we don't have free speech so this is
against the values not that not just the UK but the rest of the world so I think it's a it's a
but the whole west has been built on and this was um this was Graham Linehan's uh sin too that
he spoke out on the transgender ideology and that's why he got canceled and arrested and on
and on it went like the harassment of him his whole career had to go away because he would not
accept that a man can become a woman this um comedian you mentioned Ian McNabb this is what
he's a musician he's a musician musician sorry musician he posted Russell Brand is being
stitched up for his outspoken views he got close to the target and he has a big audience I know
people who were in his orbit and girls were throwing themselves at him every night if that
happened to me I know what I'd do your pays your money your takes your chance if you want to hang
out with the artist don't cry when you're in the picture all the chicks who turn up at these
situations know exactly what's going on the ones who decided they were done badly to 10 years after
the event are the worst he speaks for many people who are too
cowardly to say that and then he posted the following after being canceled his concerts
I it's with a heavy heart and deep sadness and regret I make this post I've been canceled and
therefore all of my shows for the foreseeable future have also this is as a result of a post
I made regarding the plight of British comedian entertainer Russell Brand um he says I don't
support the actions of the man both you and I know he behaved wrongly in many situations but
I feel the story goes deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper and
deeper in no way did I mean to cause offense I've committed no crime um but then continues to say
when he turned on the Epstein class his fate was sealed I fail to understand how many who have
committed worse offenses continue to roam free without consequence and he's exactly right the
the double standard on rape claims in the UK is as plain as the nose on your face there are how
many of these Muslim immigrants who were never even charged for rape in the United States and
are now being charged with the rapes of young white girls because of skin color that's been documented
yeah and uh people were people that were speaking out against that they were being labeled racists
which is wrong um again it's it's almost like another manifestation of cancel culture to
to label someone as a as a racist or a rape apologist or a trans exclusionary radical feminist
um it's it's crazy it's it's insane
yes and the woke mob will not be satisfied until Russell is in jail for the rest of his life what
do you make of these reports that now all these other women are coming forward calling the police
trying to add on to the charges that he may face in a potential second trial they could be gold
diggers um I think that if a woman has believed that someone's hurt them they should go straight
to the police that's the correct thing to do you may stop that person from then hurting other women
just that person being arrested might stop them hurting other women even if it doesn't go to a
trial but at this point after a documentary and the police coming out of the court and appealing
for more people to come forward I think opportunists are likely to jump on this um on this
bandwagon the notion that complainant five had her life ruined by Russell her victim testimonial
which was read by the prosecutor spoke to how she now no longer trusts the police and she's now
her judgment and we're supposed to attribute all of this to her alleged anal rape by Russell brand
I know you've been paying attention to the case your thoughts on complainant five of all the women
now her allegations being used to label him universally as this terror terrorizing rapist
she couldn't trust her judgment of the day that she met him when she went into his dressing room
and licked his back door right who
in their right mind would do that so it's clear that this is probably most likely a woman that's
got severe mental health issues the judge said as much but I don't think they came after I think
she already had them she was cheating on her boyfriend she would have been upset about that
she may wanted to place the guilt on someone else um there was talk of her being an active addiction
the way that she behaved not even I used to hang out with all the groupies in the noughties I I
don't even know any groupie that would do that I don't even know any groupie that would do that
like that um to immediately go and do a thing like that like no um it's it's insane that this
this woman who has cheated on her boyfriend um done a really gross sex act within minutes of
meeting her hero she was an obsessed fan she probably had some parasocial relationship with
him and was disappointed when he discarded her she she couldn't have been in her right mind
anyone in their right mind knew that if she had been in her right mind she would have been in her
if if you were going to go into Russell's dressing room you you were you were going to be well she
knew that she did that she went to his house she knew what was going to happen but they should also
know that he's going to quickly move on to the next woman and I think that's probably what upset
her that she cheated on her boyfriend maybe she had this fantasy that Russell would be her new
boyfriend she'd be on the red carpet with him and then he just discarded her after the after the um
the events exactly that that this person had to do something about it and that's what I think
had consented to oral sex with him to vaginal sex with him to she performed anal sex on him
within seconds of meeting him and yet we're supposed to believe that him doing it to her
which was a bridge too far that she said no to Russell's testimony was that she did consent
she asked him to quote be gentle and he denied the claims that he treated her badly after the
fact saying clean up the mess you've made that he actually sat there and watched tv with her
her testimony was they ended she had said no
and he scolded her and you know she was effectively shamed and bitter about it as she had been
cheating on her boyfriend and had committed or agreed to everything but she claims the back door
the jury apparently bought it but now there is a question about how this whole thing got started
because there is this activist journalist Roz Irwin who was behind the whole thing
this is the person who basically put together
the
the collection of women who came forward and participated in that so-called documentary
which kicked things off which we've been discussing with our audience the notion of having
actresses play the alleged victims in a so-called documentary is farcical they are professional
actresses who will portray the part of a victim obviously potentially much better than an actual
faker might who is telling lies about
the perpetrator i mean this is just the whole thing is dishonest on its face
they play the scary music under the women's testimonial and now you have this woman who
was with russell her name is georgina bally i know you know about her she's now criticizing
russell but she gave an interview in october of 2023 uh suggesting she too was contacted by so-called
journalists not necessarily from this so-called dispatches documentary but she
the journalists out there trying to get dirt on russell had been calling her too
and this is what she said on the podcast anything goes back then so i've been receiving calls from
channel four since 2020 about this and they've wanted me to contribute to it and i just said
well i don't really have anything to say other than everything was consensual because that's
the truth and i had a few of these randoms um sending me messages on on social media and stuff
and so it's been sort of in in my hemisphere for a long time um but i just
i just offered you money yeah yeah much oh i can't remember but like it was they wanted me to
basically anybody who's spoken to me from the mainstream media is trying to get me to bend to
their narrative and i simply will not do it because it's not the truth so they try to get you to bring
the Dispatch documentary?
No, so not people from Dispatch,
But there were a few people that were saying, like, you know, how did you feel used or anything like that?
And really, I was using him just as much as he was using me.
If somebody's going, look, there's 10 grand.
Say this about Russell.
100% of the time, you're going to take the money.
Well, then, when I was younger, absolutely.
That's what I did.
So these journalists, so-called journalists, real journalists don't offer money for stories,
have been sniffing around Russell's ex-girlfriends for quite some time now, Samantha.
Yeah.
Yeah, I believe that they've also planted the narrative in the comedy industry,
because I'd never heard it before 2023, right before the documentary was going to come out.
So maybe some comedians really believe that there was an open secret.
They may have heard a rumor that had been planted by a journalist.
But if there really was, it would have been around in 2014, 2015, 2016,
2017.
2017, 2018, all these years I was around Russell when he was an activist and I was
working with him and they knew that.
And you, is it true you offered to give character evidence on Russell's behalf,
but the defense did not follow up with you?
I did.
I sent an email to his lawyers before Christmas.
I told him about something that I thought was contempt of court.
The other comedian pushing the false narrative on stage when the attorney general had warned
about contempt of court and reporting was restricted.
So I wrote about that.
Um, I also wrote about that to the police and I said, look, I can be a character witness
if you need me.
I knew that he would have a difficulty getting anyone for his defense because of the cancel
culture that we have and people have mortgages and kids to feed.
I'm already canceled.
I've got nothing to lose.
Um, so yeah, I didn't hear back.
I did follow up, still didn't hear back.
Not sure what happened there.
I just assumed maybe he's already got a strong defense.
I wish I'd, I wish I'd tried harder now.
Well, I mean, it was their obligation to follow up with you.
Uh, yeah.
I did more than most people would do, which is volunteer to come forward and, and help
a man who's become a pariah.
You know, Samantha, all I can think of as I cover this case is my friend, Charlie Kirk,
who did interview Russell.
And as with virtually everything, Charlie saw the story correctly from the beginning
and had the following exchange with Russell, some of which we pulled.
Watch this.
The entire government is going after Russell.
I hope you guys know.
That you're under attack from the UK government on, I think, completely fake stuff.
And you better believe the enemy's not happy that now you're proclaiming Jesus in front
of millions of people.
And, you know, we as believers believe Satan is real.
Satan is active.
Yes.
Satan attacks.
Satan targets.
Satan is literally in Hebrew.
Satan means the prosecutor, the deceiver.
So all of what you are going through in the United Kingdom is a satanic attack to try
to say, oh, Russell, remember that thing that happened 10 years ago?
Try to have you feel guilty and ashamed.
Remember Satan.
Figure out the scriptures would constantly always whisper, whether it be in the garden
or elsewhere, about, oh, you need to be held back by what you once did.
But Christ sets you free.
Wow.
It's chilling to watch.
Charlie would be dead within weeks of that conversation.
But he saw exactly what was happening to Russell.
And there are demons out there.
And the entire UK wants us to believe that Russell is one of them, as opposed to Russell
was a big star.
He was a big star with a lot of groupies who threw themselves at him.
He did not have to perform non-consensual sex acts on women.
He had hundreds, if not thousands of options for consensual sex, but found God, reformed
himself, changed his political outlook, found someone he truly loved, had three children
with her.
They are completely resistant to that narrative because the new version of Russell is what
they find truly deplorable, Samantha.
The old version of Russell is what they find truly deplorable, Samantha.
The old version of Russell, they completely supported, allowed, promoted.
It was the new version that they objected to.
Yeah, and he was a sick man back then.
He was an addict, and they used him.
The media used him.
They enabled him in his promiscuity, and now that he's cleaned up his life, and his conversion
is genuine.
I've been to countless very small work-in-progress shows, Q&As that he did.
And he would often recite the St. Francis prayer before he was officially a Christian.
So I know that his walk with Christ is 100% genuine.
I've given him books about Christianity.
He was very grateful to receive them.
But they're trying to make out that he's made it all up to try and avoid getting caught
for the alleged things that he did.
I mean, he was promiscuous, but I don't believe that he was a criminal.
Mm, it's very chilling.
I just feel like I don't understand how a close relative to the United States, somebody
as close as the UK, you know, a country as close in so many ways and from which we hail
originally, could be this far gone when it comes to due process and a man's rights.
The media, even though they weren't allowed to report on the case with analysis while
it was ongoing, boy, as soon as it was unleashed, there's, I mean, literally every single person
over there other than Dan Wooten, I think, in the media is going with this.
He has almost no defenders.
It's very unfair.
Yeah, and like I say, if he did have defenders, they would be cancelled.
That's what it's like here now.
People are getting arrested, ordinary people, for social media posts.
We have hate crime laws.
We basically have a blasphemy law coming through so that you can't criticize Islam.
Just Islam, not Christianity, only Islam.
So it's really weird.
It's really weird.
It's really creepy.
It is sinister.
It is demonic.
Yeah, it's hard to stay hopeful, but I'm just doing my bit.
I'm telling the truth about Russell, what I know of him.
And I do feel that I know his heart.
I think he's a good man.
Like everyone, he's made his mistakes, but he's been in repentance from his former lifestyle
for over a decade.
And it was a lifestyle that all these same media critics had.
No problem with.
While it was ongoing and he was still pledged to the left, it was only when he changed his
politics, got outspoken on things like COVID lockdowns and vaccines, big government overreach
that they started to turn on him and got very, very interested in paying women for stories.
It's deeply concerning.
Listen, thank you.
Thank you for speaking out.
You've been very fearless over there.
I hope you're enjoying your cancellation.
I mean, many have found liberty in it.
I'm one of them.
Yes, that's true.
It's very liberating.
You can just speak your mind and they can't get you twice.
So I'll continue to tell the truth.
God bless you.
Thanks for coming on.
Thank you.
Wow.
And the reports of that prison are very dark that Russell's in, which we told you about
at the beginning.
It's it's it's said to be a 360 prisoner.
No, sorry.
Over the past year, there were 360 prisoner on prisoner assaults.
Reportedly, drugs and other banned items are regularly ferried in via drone or thrown over the walls.
There are some sort of record number of staff absences because the staff reportedly doesn't want to be there.
And they can mean that inmates can be locked in their cells for up to 22 hours a day.
Alex Wood, 44, a Londoner who served a sentence in Wadsworth for fraud from 2015 to 2017,
described the prison as a horrible and dangerous place.
Saying, quote, I don't think the staff feel safe there either.
This is quoting here from The New York Times.
Just today, it broke that there is a prisoner inside the prison who somehow is posting to his social media.
I don't totally understand how he's managing this.
He's gotten in trouble for doing it before.
But he he's a rapper named Turngu Aguera, 35, known as Mover, who posted a veiled threat.
To Russell on Snapchat using his rap name.
And it reads, Russell Brand, you naughty boy, we'll be seeing you.
We'll be seeing you, son.
I don't know if he meant soon, but that's disturbing.
His words were pasted over a blurry photo that appears to have been taken through a window frame of his jail cell on an illicit phone.
He was jailed for life with a minimum of 30 years after knifing.
I think Russell's a dirtbag because he admits he was a dirtbag for most of his adult life.
And I get all that.
I don't defend Russell's conduct.
as that of a gentleman at all. And as you guys know, when this story first broke, the story about
him being with a 16-year-old when he was 31 was genuinely horrifying to me. And I didn't want to
talk to Russell. I didn't understand conservatives defending Russell. And then I learned more about
his story, about what he had done from that point to this one. And eventually, I did have him on the
show and heard him out and saw him very differently. Not everybody is capable of
reevaluating an earlier opinion or has any desire to. And look, there are a lot of people who
genuinely believe he's a cad and potentially a criminal and have come to that in good faith.
And I don't, I don't, that's fine. Everyone's entitled to their opinion on this, including me.
It's crazy to think, like, I don't care, whatever. It's like the latest controversy. But
if you follow. If you follow this case, as I know all of you have with me, you know exactly why I have serious
doubts about this verdict. And I think it is disgustingly unjust that he's been found guilty
of these absurd allegations and is going to prison for nearly 10 years for them. The sentence is 10
and a half. He'll serve seven. His 10-year-old will be going off to college when he's done. He's
going to miss the whole thing. His three-year-old, he'll miss all of the single digits. That child
will be 10.
His little boy. And a little boy needs his dad when Russell gets out. It's just,
this is very severe. I'm, I'm very worried that he might not make it. I don't know
Russell well enough to say if he has the strength to handle these prison conditions where he's being
held in solitary for his own protection. And, and while this isn't the prison that he's going to
serve the entire term in, the UK jails are apparently known for their squalid conditions.
Do wonder, will he make it? Can he do seven years? Is he going to be held in solitary for his own
protection for seven years? Because we told you the other day, they're treating him, the other
prisoners, like he's a child molester. They were chanting this word nonce, which apparently means
child molester, um, when he arrived. And that, that's not the case. Russell was not convicted
of any, or even accused in this case of molesting anyone other than mature adult women.
Um, and I just don't, what kind of a normal human being can go seven years in solitary
and be fine? You know, which he tried to say to his wife when they sentenced him on Monday,
it'll be okay. It'll be okay. I don't know how, but it will be okay.
Um, when he sat here and I played you that sort of funny clip between us where I said,
Russell, I'm worried you're going to go to jail. And he said, I don't want to.
It was kind of funny. And it's still,
makes me laugh. So he was able to be funny even in thinking of that. But I actually saw the longer
clip. Somebody else posted it online and I was watching it and I was like, Oh wow, I forgot
that's where it went. And what I said to him was maybe it's part of your journey. Maybe if you do
get sentenced to prison, maybe this is part of your redemption arc. You know, maybe God intends
this for you as well, because you're going to go to jail. And I said, I don't want to. And he said,
there's someone in prison who needs your help, or there's someone you need to save with your own
life experience and conveying it, or you need to go through this and emerge out the other side with
some level of wisdom that could be used by others or by you to save others. I don't know. We as mere
mortals can never know, but I have to believe it's part of his redemption arc or God wouldn't
have allowed it. How often do you give out your personal phone number? It's tied to your bank,
doctor, and personal life. Yet we hand it to websites,
every day, leading to constant spam calls. That's why I want to tell you about Glacier,
a mobile security app co-founded by my friend, Sean Ryan, alongside former U.S. intelligence
professionals. Let me tell you about this amazing feature of Glacier, your own burner phone number.
Generate a separate U.S. number for voice calls with businesses. When spam starts, just burn that
number and get a new one without changing your real number. Love this. Glacier also protects your
privacy, blocking background connections to trackers, ad networks, and malicious sites.
Glacier never reads, stores, sells, or shares your personal data. Open the app,
tap connect, and you're done. It makes keeping your digital life private and effortless.
Take your privacy back today and download Glacier on the App Store or Google Play or get 20% off
your first three months at my link, theglacierapp.com. And use code Megan at checkout. Again, that's
theglacierapp.com. And use code Megan at checkout for 20% off your first three months. Remember,
privacy is not paranoia, it's protection. Let's talk about something that is not always
the most comfortable subject, but it is incredibly important. And that's making
sure the people you love have financial security. God forbid something happens to you. I mean,
I know that's not going to happen to you. It's not going to happen to me either. We're all good.
We're going to be here forever. But like, just in case, just in case, we should talk for a bit about
life insurance. It's very easy to put off. You don't want to think about it, but you know,
you need it. You have loved ones who rely on you and getting the coverage doesn't actually even
have to be complicated or unpleasant, which is why I want to tell you about Ethos. They make
getting life insurance fast and easy. And the entire process is 100% online. You can get a
quote in seconds, apply in minutes and get same day coverage. There is no medical exam. You just
answer a few simple health questions online and you can get up to $3 million online.
And some policies are as low as $30 a month. So if you've been putting off getting life insurance,
take 10 minutes and look into coverage through Ethos today. It could be an important step toward
helping protect your loved ones and providing financial security for your family. Take 10
minutes to get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your free quote at ethos.com
slash MK. That's ethos.com slash MK. Application times may vary. Rates may vary too.
I want to get to more of today's news headlines, including a story out of the University of
Mississippi that is making national news. Now, I mean, there's a real question about
why this story would be making national news. Why does the media think this is so important
that they need to bring this to you on ABC nightly news? And then again, on their morning
program, they need to bring this to you on ABC nightly news. And then again, on their morning
program, one one does wonder. They are so desperate for stories of white on black racism
that they're going to feature it all over ABC news when they think they found one alleged
instance of it. They're so excited. I mean, the number of crimes committed by black defendants
on white victims, where in particular white women, but also white men and white boys are being
murdered by black defendants is deeply disturbing. The numbers are they will they will rattle you
to the bone. And most of us out of like a sense of decorum and politeness don't go there.
We're not looking to ratchet up a sense of racial grievance or target any particular group by
reporting its crime stats on a day to day basis. But the mainstream
media doesn't feel that way when they find what they think might be a white racist.
They don't give a shit about the whites being murdered by blacks. Just to be clear, they don't.
What they care about is black victims of white racism, especially if the white perpetrator
happens to be an attractive young woman. Then it may lead world news tonight.
It may lead. Good morning, America. They they found a live one. Or did they? It's
just it's genuinely upsetting because we do have stories of kids being killed, kids being killed
white kids by black defendants. And they don't feel the need to go all in on those stories
at all. But they do like this one a lot. Happened to the University of Mississippi,
University of Mississippi, where they are currently investigating a video that shows
three white women. Only the first two you're going to see on this video,
are at issue. The third to travel along in the video is not accused of doing anything racist,
as far as we know. Three white women outside a black student's apartment. And just as I read
this from the ABC write up, of course, because they changed the style guide the AP did back in
2020. And now all the media goes along with it. Black is capitalized. White is not capitalized,
but black is capitalized. You have to cap. I don't do it. I'm not fucking capitalizing black
or brown.
Or anything like it. It's it's a color. Stop. And by the way, if you say something like black
culture, they'll accuse you of being a racist. Well, what which is it? Is it like a special
group that gets a capital letter? Because I just see them as my fellow Americans.
I don't see them as particularly more dangerous, less dangerous, dumber, smarter, more prone to
receive racism or to give it than anybody else. It's just this is weird, woke language manipulation.
That requires the capital. Okay. A video showing three white.
women outside a black student's apartment Friday evening, this just happened, with two of them
allegedly making racist noises and gestures captured on ring camera footage. Quote, the
incident is being actively investigated by the appropriate university offices, says the vice
chancellor of the university. Our staff have reached out to the students directly impacted
to offer support, listen to their concerns, and connect them with available resources.
We'll continue to support them as we work through this process. The two women in the video, which
was posted to TikTok, are seen briefly stepping toward the door camera, beating their chests
while grunting and cooing like monkeys, reading here from ABC. The third woman glanced toward the
camera, but she did not appear to make any gestures or monkey noises. The school said in its statement
that it was investigating the incident. Here is the video, which has now been viewed over 12 million
times. Watch.
Okay, that's it. That's all we have from the alleged incident. The school confirmed that
the students, sorry, that the women in the video are students at Ole Miss. It did not respond to
ABC News's question about whether disciplinary action was necessary.
The school confirmed that the students, sorry, that the women in the video were students at Ole Miss. Who was first to discover this video on the Ring camera?
Me.
And what did you do?
We actually went outside and tried to, like, approach them and, like, get them to, like, explain why they did that.
One girl was apologizing. She was like, I'm sorry. We did that to, like, four doors.
And mind you, we didn't see anyone else. It was just ours that was targeted.
And she was like, we didn't mean any harm.
Okay, so that was the girls who live in the apartment and their moms.
You could hear them say that they they there tried to approach the students who made the noises and they went on.
Let's play the next one. They say the first person seen in the November 6th video, Elena Kunis, apologized.
But the second person who they say lives in their complex doubled down off camera.
She continued to make the gestures after the girl was apologizing. It's like a slapping face.
What did you guys say back when she continued?
Because now I would imagine it's really hard for you to keep your cool.
Yeah, I have said that I don't think they should go around.
Even if they did go to other people's door and do that, I don't think they should do that because it's very disrespectful.
Do you forgive her?
I feel like no matter who we are or if she knew our race or not, but the gestures and the noises, I feel like it still was very disrespectful.
for. I just have mixed feelings about it. I appreciate the apology, but I feel like it
still doesn't change what happened on that Friday because it's still hurtful and it's
still devastating. Next one will come to our camera and do that. Okay. So the girls and their
mom speaking out saying that they had a confrontation with these girls after the
alleged doorbell incident or door camera, whatever. And that the second girl shown in the video
made the gestures again. Let's watch the videotape one more time.
Okay. So they're claiming that the second girl doubled down and did it again, which is relevant
because I believe it's the first girl who is denying that she knew that these were black
girls in this apartment. She says to the women, she's issued a statement. Her name is Elena
Kuniz. She's a freshman in 18. She writes, and this is the first woman you see in the videotape
making the sounds and beating her chest, quote, to the women I offended and to the Ole Miss
community, I sincerely apologize. Before the incident on November 6th, I never met the women
involved and was unaware of their race. However, I recognize my actions were insensitive,
inappropriate, and deeply harmful. I would have never intentionally made those noises or gestures
toward a person of color. I've apologized to the women, and I pray they will forgive me.
I can never truly understand the pain I've caused them, and it was never my intention.
These girls deserve to feel seen and understood and what I did is not a reflection of who I am
trying to become. Over the past several days, my family and I have received death threats and
harassment. I'm grateful for the authorities working to ensure our safety. As I intend to
cooperate fully with the university's investigation, I ask for privacy from my family. I understand the
seriousness of this situation and remain committed to taking responsibility and learning from this
embarrassing ordeal. The student, that first girl, has also withdrawn from the university,
according to a source. So she's out. But again, the suggestion is that one apologized. One of
these girls apologized. I don't know which one. That's what the girls who live in the apartment
said. One was apologizing. And they say, yeah, they say it was her, the first girl. They said
the first person seen in the video apologized, but the second person who lives in their complex
doubled down off camera. Just want to be sure, because they're using different names here.
The statement is from Elena Cunez, who's a freshman who says, I had no idea that they were
black women who lived in there. CBS is reporting that the first person seen in the video is Elena
Kuniz, who apologized. So it could be that the second girl, forgive me, I just don't know,
was the girl who issued the statement and has withdrawn from the university. Look, here's
the bottom line, as far as I see it. I do find it a stretch to believe these girls were randomly
making monkey noises and gestures outside of any old apartment door. That seems like a stretch.
I mean, why? Why? I need more, if you want me to believe that. Like, what made you do monkey noises?
And if the one girl actually lived in this apartment complex, I also find it a stretch
to believe she had no idea that there were black girls living downstairs. I mean, I don't know how
big it is. That's also a fact that we need to find out. But if it's relatively small and, you know,
they're freshmen, so it's still relatively early in the year, I think you'd know. But we need to
know more. If it is true that the one girl continued, who doubled down after the black
girls came out of the apartment to say, what are you doing? And she then made those noises or
gestures, that's ballgame. There's no question that's racist. And we have a racist incident on
our hand and it's unambiguous. So we need to know. But I do think the bottom line about this story
to me is, why is it getting so much attention? The media is delighted with this story. They
can't give us enough of it. And yet, as I pointed out, we just had an incident just recently.
Do we have it here? Of a young white boy being murdered by a group of black assailants.
His name was Austin Payne. And it got no attention whatsoever. Todd Starnes, my old colleague from
Fox News, was posting this. It happened on Halloween. Austin Payne called his mother
on Halloween night, he was only 15 years old, to tell her that he'd been shot. By the next morning,
he was found dead inside an abandoned apartment in Georgia. He's white. His assailants were black,
four of them. Now all four have been charged with murder. Albany, Georgia police announced
the arrest three days after Payne's body was found on Cameo Lane in Albany. The charges are
against Jens Quincy Donaldson, 15, Omari Marion, 15, Adarius Wallace, 16, and Deltra Vion Parker,
22. Witnesses told officers that armed individuals allegedly approached a group walking with Austin
Payne, ordered them to hand over their belongings, and fired shots the night of October 31st,
according to an initial incident report. Didn't hear about that one, did you?
You have no idea who Austin Payne is, do you? Do you know it's spelled P-A-Y-N-E? Do you know
what he looks like. Looks actually very sweet. Do you have any idea what the story is around
these defendants? No, no one does. Because the media won't tell you about stories like that.
Now, you tell me which one is more offensive,
the murder of a 15-year-old on Halloween by a gang of others, or two girls'
behaving completely inappropriately if this is actually the motivation to black girls whose
feelings would obviously be deeply hurt and they would be rattled by it, but they were alive.
I mean, just in the relative scale of sins, which if you were a news organization would be a bigger
story. And let me tell you why there's no big story on the four black kids killing the white
kid, because the media understands, unfortunately, giving the crime statistics that that is a dog
bites man story. And they know whether they'll admit it or not, that the actual racism, if that's
what this is, again, we need some more facts just to make sure, is more of a man bites dog story.
It's very hard to find. You've got to really look for it. And when you find it, it's like the pot
of gold at the end of the rainbow.
If you're ABC or CBS, they're thrilled. It confirms the narrative they've been spinning
all along. Aha, latent racists everywhere in America. And we are three to one from them
trying to get to these girls' social media posts and look for anything that bears a MAGA hat or
suggests conservatism is in their family, right? We've all been through the drill.
We know exactly how this goes. So I object. I object to the whole thing. I object
to the fact that I know these girls' names, that I didn't know the name Austin Payne or the names of
any of the white kids who were killed by black gangs or others day to day in this country.
Matt Walsh is pointing out, Carmelo Anthony, he writes, stabbed a white kid to death and was still
able to stay in school and graduate with no issues while his family raised half a million dollars and
bought a new house.
A new house. This white girl made a gesture and has had to withdraw from the University of
Mississippi. There's a double standard that makes it very hard to take this bullshit seriously.
Our sponsor, the Electronic Payments Coalition, says Washington politicians are always getting
in your wallet and that now they're messing with your credit card. They say your credit card and
the security it offers are under attack and that Senators Dick Durbin and Roger Marshall want to
benefit corporate megastores like Walmart and Target at the expense of everyday Americans.
Credit cards can keep your payments secure and provide rewards to families that they use to help
make everyday purchases more affordable. The Electronic Payments Coalition says the Durbin
Marshall mandates would let corporate megastores cut corners on credit card processing,
routing transactions over cheaper, untested networks with weaker security and fewer
protections. Find out more at GuardYourCard.com and consider telling Congress to
guard your card.
Okay, two clarifications on our last report. It was Elena Kunis who is the first person
in the video who both apologized and is seen first. It is the second person whose name we do
not know who has not issued a public apology as far as we know who is accused of doubling down
when the girls came out of the apartment. So just to be clear,
on that. And it is also Elena Kunis whose family is now being harassed. She's 18 years old and
she apparently has a granddad in Wisconsin-based Kunis Auto Group. It's on the border of Wisconsin
and Illinois. And her father was the former COO before he left the company back in February,
but her grandfather owns this car dealership.
And CBS 58 in Milwaukee issued the following report, we've got part of it, about that. Watch this.
A southeastern Wisconsin woman caught on camera making monkey gestures and noises
into a black woman's doorbell camera no longer goes to the University of Mississippi.
She was one of three women in the video and has connections to a well-known local car dealership.
Jenna Wells live in our newsroom with the new information tonight.
Jenna.
That's right. Jessa, Ben, Natalie, a source,
close to the family, confirms Elena Kunis has withdrawn from the University of Mississippi
due to safety and harassment concerns. A representative for Kunis tells us Elena
is the granddaughter of Greg Kunis, the owner of Kunis Auto Group.
What does the grandpa have to do with this? Honestly, and now they're digging deep into
his car dealership and reporting that-
We're digging deep into his car dealership and reporting that there was an incident back in
January 2025 when an Oak Creek woman said a racial slur was written on an oil change sticker
placed on her vehicle following a service appointment. The Kunis Auto Group fired the
employee when that happened. So, and then issued a statement after CBS 58 did this report on
granddad's car dealership in the wake of his granddaughter and the Ole Miss controversy,
saying the individual in the video,
has no employment, ownership, or professional affiliation with Kunis Auto Group. We do not
comment on private citizens unaffiliated with the company. So this is just ridiculous. Okay,
so there was an alleged racial incident there in January 2025. And so this is offered up,
of course, so you can say the grandfather is a racist and that is why his granddaughter is a
racist. None of which we actually know. We have no idea what actually happened with this alleged
incident on the receipt.
And we have zero idea whether this girl, Kunis, Elena Kunis, actually did know that there was a
black person living inside that apartment. We don't know. What we do know is that as soon as
she saw black women emerge from the apartment to say, what the hell, she apologized. And she has
maintained from the beginning, she actually didn't know that there were black women inside of there.
It is the second girl who is alleged to have doubled down. I don't know what the truth is,
but dragging grandpa into the story seems like a below the belt
hit, even for our disgusting media. Leave grandpa alone. If you've got evidence that grandpa
himself, as opposed to some employee he fired, has done something racist, then we can talk about
grandpa, but you don't have it. So in the news biz, we would move right past that. Do we know
whether the parents of the kids who killed Austin Payne are racists? Do we know whether the
grandparents of the kids who killed Austin Payne have ever uttered a racial slur or had an employee
who did something racist? Do we? Should we start taking these deep dives into black on white
violence about the entire family, how they live, what comments they've made, whether they have any
racism in their hearts? Okay. Okay. I don't think you're going to like the way that's going to land.
Not sure the woke brigade of 2020, which appears to be back,
is going to like the way that goes. Instead, they would call all of us who did that
a bunch of raging racists just for reporting an actual black on white crime that's truly violent
and devastating and robs somebody not of their dignity, but of their life.
So it's just, it's just, it's just so galling. So now, I mean, again, what, what is with like
the platforming again, all the national news networks are doing it. CBS gets not only the
girls who live in the apartment, but their, their, their moms have to participate too. Their
moms are on camera. I mean, these girls are 18 years old, but their moms have to be there.
I will say their moms were reasonable. One of the woman's mother said the following and sought six.
As a human being, I hate to hear that because, you know, the church is not a future,
but I feel like everybody needs to be accountable.
What's your message to people as they listen to your story, your perspective of what happened?
I want people to be mindful of their actions. So I also want people who would,
potentially experience the same situations to speak out and don't let things be swept under the
rug because this is a reality for us. And I feel like voices need to be heard.
So you heard the mom there reacting to news that the girl had withdrawn from the university saying
she hated to hear that, which is nice, but saying accountability is important. Yes. Okay.
But that's not where the media is going to go with this. I mean, they, they,
they won't stop until these girls' lives are absolutely ruined. I mean, truly absolutely
And the Carmelo Anthony example is a good one. That case got so turned around by his very weird
dishonest band of supporters down there who turned it, the fact that this black kid had killed a white
kid into a racist criminal prosecution because he was black. They acted like he was the one who died.
So like we are used to the media manipulating the situations and it's going to be really hard now
because, you know, there's alternative media now who are going to point out the
facts like the disparity in attention on world news tonight, GMA and CBS to these other crimes.
I'm great. I'm actually thrilled that you're so interested in the racial component of crimes.
Okay. I look forward to your consistency on that front. Uh, let's, let's keep going.
There's news on Alina Haba.
I mean, look, this woman defended Trump in Tish James civil case against him,
where she tried to bankrupt him for allegedly making
false or fraudulent statements to banks about the size of his New York apartment so he could get
certain loans at a more favorable rate. I mean, the sophisticated investors and so on,
all of them said, we're not mad. The Trump organization was always good to deal with.
Like, we have no beef here. But Tish James was like, well, somehow the consumers of New York
were hurt by this transaction. How? She was never really able to prove it.
Alina Haba tried that case for Trump. She was not impressive. I said this during the trial.
I said, I was not impressed with Alina Haba. I never have been. To me, I'm just going to be
honest. She's seemed like a grifter from day one. I've seen her at a couple of events. I'm just,
look, it's been my impression. She glommed on to Trump and tried to make herself a star.
And she lost to that case, which was then reversed on appeal by an appellate lawyer.
So she decided to glomm on to Trump and try to make herself into something.
And she.
She is accused by Trump of doing something despicable, which is cozying up to some
Venezuelan billionaire and effectively selling a pardon, bribing, taking a bribe for a pardon.
That's something she denies. She absolutely denies. But you tell me how a not impressive
lawyer from that nobody's ever heard of other than this particular lane.
Where it was a loss, winds up getting hired as general counsel for a company recently started
by a Venezuelan billionaire accused of a crime, convicted of a crime. It was a felony,
which he got knocked down to a misdemeanor, but it was reportedly very upset about having
any crime on his record whatsoever. And suddenly his daughter formed this company and hired who?
Alina Haba as her general counsel. Why? Some Venezuelan billionaire needs,
a New York lawyer as her general counsel for her Venezuelan, uh, adventure. I I've got questions.
And not only that struck a deal reportedly to pay Alina Haba $10 million a year as general
counsel of that company. I mean, that is such an outrageous sum. Let me tell you who gets $10
million a year as a lawyer. It would be the biggest rainmakers at the biggest firms in the country.
The people who land the RJ Reynolds accounts, which fund an entire firm for years on end
could potentially get up around that number. But $10 million a year is astronomical for a lawyer
practicing law, including as general counsel. Generally, you need to be C O O C F O C E O C T O
to try to break in numbers like that at the most successful companies in America.
So a lot of people had eyebrows raised when,
when this news broke and it, while it was $10 million a year, reportedly over four years,
that would have been 40, but they said the deal she signed was worth 50, $50 million. And Oh,
shocked. The guy got his pardon within weeks. He was pardoned. Alina Haba claimed she had
nothing to do with the pardon. Okay. We'll see when she gets dragged before Congress
and others do as well. But, uh, this happened. Trump found out about it and was very angry
because it was,
it was pretty clear as it is to all of us what she had done. And he said they should fire her
and she should make a donation because now we find out she got a, um, I think it was an $8
million signing bonus and $6 million already paid. It was basically the equivalent of $14
million that had already been paid out. And he said she should be fired from this post.
And also she should make a donation of this potentially ill gotten gain to the Trump
library or some other charity. I don't think she's done the latter. So she's $14 million richer,
but she just got fired. The company did fire her, uh, suggesting that she had not lived up to
her end of the deal. She hadn't fulfilled her legal obligations to the company, something she
is denying. Um, and she's reportedly now threatening to sue. So that'll be fun to watch.
Um, it's called Concord,
partners. And in a letter dated November 4th, they fired her citing a failure to perform duties
according to a person close to the family and documents obtained by the New York times.
The person said her priorities appeared to shift away from Concord after she'd started dating
Turhan Mildon, a 25 year old Turkish investor earlier this year. So she's 40 something and
he's 25 and he's reportedly a billionaire. This, this is a separate story, but he's a
Turkish billionaire who said he was 29, but in fact is 25. And, um, he's, he, they, they spent
$10 million on their wedding. So look, my opinion is this woman cashed in. She's a grifter. She
obviously saw her association with Trump as a piggy bank, parlayed it into, in my opinion,
marrying some Turkish billionaire who was what, 15 years younger than she is. And then wasn't
satisfied with his billions and her $10 million wedding, but decided to enter into this very
sketchy deal with a Venezuelan billionaire. That's how it looks to me. And on top of that,
she's accusing Rick Grinnell of grifting off of the Trump administration where her Turkish billionaire
husband came forward in some explosive oval office meeting reportedly and told Trump he had cut Rick
Grinnell some sort of a check and said 6 million of it was going to be designated for the Kennedy
center. And then she claimed Rick Grinnell never made that donation to the Kennedy center,
something he has denied vehemently and is accusing her of being a liar.
I have no idea what actually happened there, but I would submit she doesn't have a very good track
record of, um, honesty and upending up, up, upstanding behavior, in my opinion.
Uh, so we'll see what happens, but I do believe as she really wants us to call her Mrs. Meldon now,
Mrs. Meldon, that's the last name of the Turkish billionaire. Uh, I, I think she's in some trouble
and she will be one of the first people to get subpoenaed by the new Democrat Congress.
And as the kids say, I'm here for it. Not all of the investigations they're going to be pursuing
will be political witch hunts. That's a good one. Let's find out what exactly happened there.
What exactly Kimberly Guilfoyle did with the billionaires flying her to Paris on their jets
and putting her up at George the sank and all of that. I mean, yeah, we should know all of that
is worthy of investigation. What was Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski doing? What were they doing
at DHS? I don't trust that pair as far as I can throw them, especially him. Um, and there have
been a lot of allegations swirling around them. We'll see. I think all of those are fair game
Trump family and around it are fair game. They work for us. So we'll see Alina what exactly went
on. Speaking of Trump, we've been talking this week about the president's comments on 60 minutes
that he thought he could strike a deal with the Democrats on immigration for the landscapers and
the hotel workers who are here illegally, but haven't committed a second crime after the first
one of coming in the country unlawfully said it explicitly. He's looking to strike a
deal. You can strike a deal on them. Yes. He said then backlash from the base. Then Trump tried to
clarify it at a presser saying no amnesty, no amnesty, but then said, but there may be a deal
for some set of illegals who are here. Okay. Well that, that is amnesty. Okay. So then Mark
Wayne Mullen, who, as you know, is our DHS secretary went on with Laura Ingram and she's
on whether we're getting amnesty in some way, shape, or form. Here's that. It's not eight.
Can you promise our viewers and the 77 million people who voted for president Trump
that there is no change in his immigration policy? Zero change. The president made that
very clear. We're still going after the worst, the worst, and amnesty will never be on the table.
But why does it flow DACA, Mr. Secretary? Why is that the message for you guys of this election?
Has DACA applies to children that were brought in this country at no fault of their own. They were,
yes, but they were brought here at no fault of their own. And some of them may not even speak
English or never even lived in their country. I think there's, there's a part that we could look
to say, listen, you're not going to become citizens because you wasn't born here, but is there a path
for you to be legal? I know that's, it's a very far fetched because the president tried to do this
in 2016 and the Democrats weren't interested in doing it. So, but before we would even consider
doing any of this, we're not going to do it. We're not going to do it. We're
going to make sure that one, our base is with us on it. And so, and if they're not, and I'm going
to tell you, the president will not sign anything that isn't in the, it isn't in the, the right
movement for this country and the Republican party. Okay. This is not an impressive figure.
And, um, he basically gave up the farm. Like they keep, they just keep saying no amnesty, but,
but maybe for this group, that's amnesty. That's amnesty. And by the way,
they're not going to sign anything that isn't in the right movement for this country and the Republican
Okay. Like they keep,
president wasn't even discussing children when he was on 60 Minutes.
He was discussing landscapers and hotel maids who have been here for a long, not not children brought here by their parents illegally.
The president was explicit about that.
So I don't know what they're getting ready to do.
But I think all of us who don't want amnesty because it leads to more illegal immigration have more than fair reason to be concerned here.
That that interview did not help at all.
OK, finally, Thomas Markle, senior.
He got arrested by the FBI, as we told you a few days ago.
He they searched his L.A. storage facility and they say they found.
Additional child sexual abuse material there, including pictures of Thomas Markle with young girls like in compromising positions like underage prepubescent girls.
Which is the definition of pedophile prepubescent children, an attraction to them.
And amazingly, even though he was brought up on charges here, one charge, there'll be more, but one charge of child sexual abuse material and having it.
They released him.
They released him on his own recognizance, but with an ankle monitor.
And he reportedly chopped it off.
Like I it's it's unbelievable.
And yet it's totally believable.
Here's what Bill Assay Lee, who's the U.S. attorney for this district out in California, posted four days ago.
A federal judge allowed Mr. Markle to remain out of custody pending trial.
He was ordered to wear a location monitoring device.
He allegedly cut the bracelet off at one forty five a.m. last night.
Release conditions are court orders, not suggestions.
We are asking the court to revoke his release and detain him pending trial.
And we will continue to prosecute this case to the fullest extent of the law.
That request was granted by.
The judge a short time later, Judge Lindsey Griffin.
Griffin said Markle had tampered with his ankle monitor and said he needed to be rearrested because his living arrangements had become untenable.
He's now jailed without bond.
He was also interestingly rejected from his senior living facility.
A spokesperson for the U.S.
Marshal Service, the branch of federal law enforcement responsible for monitoring his whereabouts via his GPS ankle monitor, said it was working to establish exactly what had happened.
The spokesman.
The person said that he had been rejected from his senior living facility when he was bailed and he was released to the custody of his other daughter, Samantha.
On Saturday, the Daily Mail saw Mark Phillips, the partner of Samantha Markle, arriving to pick up Markle seniors items from the home.
Phillips emerged moments later with several bags full of clothes, crutches and a stroller.
When the Daily Mail asked him exactly where Markle was, he snarled.
That's the reporting quote.
You will never find him.
OK.
Well, we did find him because he took off his monitor and now he's back in jail.
Phillips, 68, then visited another care home in the Lakeland area and walked inside to collect a brochure before returning to the trailer.
He shares with Samantha, who is wheelchair bound.
The couple had attached a rope across the entrance and erected a no trespassing sign at Markle's court hearing on Friday.
The judge also ordered him to undergo a mental competency exam at his first court hearing, which is scheduled for November 20th.
By the way, I have something to tell you about Thomas Markle.
Junior Deb, can you read forward that to me so I have it in front of me?
But before I get to that, for what it's worth, Representative Paulina Luna, Anna Paulina Luna, who is in Florida, and that is the state where Markle was living.
He was in Florida.
The cache of child sexual abuse material was in Los Angeles, where Markle spent his career and was living prior to moving to Mexico, then the Philippines, then a stint in Philadelphia, reportedly, then down to Florida.
Now he's in jail, we believe, in California.
But in any event, she's from Florida, where he has been for some time.
And she posted the following.
Thomas Markle was found with photos of himself posing with a naked underage girl and an undressed child.
He's a sicko.
The guy was mentally fit enough to keep naked photos of children.
He was mentally fit enough to hide the photos.
Mentally fit enough to travel outside the country to do it.
He was mentally fit enough to exploit a child.
Florida classifies sexual battery on a child.
Under 12, by a person 18 or older, as a capital felony under the following statute.
It is punishable by death or life imprisonment without parole.
They should be seeking the death penalty.
I am calling for Thomas Markle to receive the death penalty.
So, and there she goes again, talking about how he was found.
She said, I'm calling for him to receive the death penalty.
Agent seized items from his L.A. storage units, including film negatives, showing him, ID'd by a longtime witness,
with a nude, prepubescent girl, one involving apparent genital contact,
plus other images of him with children in various stages of undress.
He's a sick human.
I did not know that.
That's the first I'd heard of that genital contact shown in the photos between Markle and a prepubescent girl,
which is obviously deeply concerning.
He is 82 years old.
One final note.
We reported to you a week or so ago that Philippine,
authorities were now expanding their investigation into Markle senior to include a look at Markle junior,
the one who raised the red flag about the cash of child sexual abuse material.
He says he found in Markle's home in the Philippines that came directly from a Philippine authority.
We read you the name.
We read you the statement.
Well, they are now apologizing to Thomas Markle junior via,
the UK son reporting here after wrongly naming him a person of interest in their probe into Thomas Markle.
Filipino police have cleared Thomas Markle junior 60 of any wrongdoing in the ongoing child sexual abuse investigation against his father.
He was said to be a person of interest in a bizarre statement by interior minister Juanito Victor Remula last week.
The outspoken politician writes the UK son reported that witnesses claimed they saw underage girls entering,
Markle junior's property and ring lights through the windows.
But police in Cordova Philippines where Markle junior lives have interviewed his fiance Rose and Gabu ya and his wider circle who have resolved the matter on Friday senior officials at the Philippines national police apologized to Markle junior for their mix up over the phone and confirmed the outlandish claims came from a nosy neighbor, a source close to the case said, quote, the matter has been cleared up.
The outlandish claims came from a nosy neighbor, a source close to the case said, quote, the matter has been cleared up. The officers were very apologetic. Rose told cops her younger siblings aged 11, 14, 16 and 17 are regular visitors to her and Markle junior at the property, as well as a young three year old niece. Rose also told officers she often uses a ring light inside the house to film her own social media content and handed them at least 10 videos of her siblings dancing at the house. Good grief. What a mess. The Filipino authorities like this is why it's good that the FBI is handling the charges.
And taking the lead in the case against Thomas senior. I don't think we want this in the hands of the Philippines. I have no faith in them. I said it the other day. And this is just further evidence that there's no reason to have faith in them. So Thomas Markle junior not accused of any wrongdoing with respect to children. That's cleared up. Okay, we're going to take a break and then we're going to come back with the one and only Heather McDonald. Heather, she's brilliant and you should read her on anything and everything.
But Heather, among her many other gifts, keeps a close eye on the art world on in particular the music world of which she's a massive fan classical symphony symphonies and classical music. And since most of us have no idea what's going on in that world, I'm way too pedestrian for that. I love to read her updates on exactly what's going on. Well, let's just say they like the poetry world are among the wokest of the arts.
Heather's got her finger on the pulse and a deeply disturbing story about what just happened in Boston. Okay, that's next.
Heather, you're up next.
Filtered with no agenda and no apologies.
Along with the Megyn Kelly Show.
you're going to hear from people like Mark Halperin, Link Loren, Maureen Callahan, Emily
Jashinsky, Jesse Kelly, Real Clear Politics, and many more. It's bold, no BS news, only on the
Megyn Kelly channel, Sirius XM 111, and on the Sirius XM app. Well, I read a new piece in City
Journal, which you guys should all be reading, headlined, Classical Music's Misguided Quest
for Relevance. And it was written by Heather MacDonald, which anything she writes, I will read
and I will learn and I'll be a better person for it. It examines the firing of Boston Symphony
Orchestra conductor, Andres Nelsons, just five months after he pushed to restore, quote,
artistic excellence to the orchestra's strategic plan. He wanted artistic excellence, you see,
and that's what he did. And that was the problem. Now, was Andres a bad conductor? Did he get up there and mislead
the orchestra into playing badly and in a way that horrified the fans? Not at all. Here's a
little sample of Andres conducting Tchaikovsky's Symphony No. 5 in October of 2025. Stop 40.
Absolutely beautiful. But the problem, you see, as Heather's documented in prior pieces with a lot
of these orchestras, is a lot of the people you were seeing in that orchestra have committed the
sin of being white, which is bad in the world of classical music. And a lot of the people sitting
in the audience have been white, which is also very, very bad. And most unforgivable of all,
they are playing music written by the worst thing you can be,
which is a white man. And Andres apparently had no problem with that. So of course, he had to go.
Heather documents all of this as only she can in great detail, and she's going to walk us through
it. Heather, so great to have you back. Thank you for writing this piece and for shining a light on
the arts, because as they erode and are decimated from within, we're really losing something
special. So tell us about Andres and how
this whole thing got kicked off. Well, Megan, you're absolutely right. We are losing our
civilization. We are losing the highest aspirations and expression of humanity by a leadership class
that is betraying every single day its primary duty, which is to curate this civilization,
pass it on, teach the young why they should be down on their knees in gratitude before the genius
is that that gave us both science, rationality and beauty. And this leadership class, as we saw
in the Boston Symphony Orchestra's CEO and board of of trustees, whether it's them or people that
are overseeing medical schools, would rather get approval from their peers for fighting
phantom at this point in justice than fulfill their paramount duty.
Andres Nilsson, the conductor of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, was hired in 2014 by the BSO.
He is universally respected. He's got a joint appointment with a world leading orchestra in Leipzig that has loves him so much they've they've hired him through 2036 and the BSO itself has been a very, very important part of his life.
from somebody you'd hear at the Harvard DEI office
or the Cornell anti-female victimization office
talking about we need to foreground lost voices,
silenced and marginalized voices.
We have to allow the audience to see themselves in classical music, which is a complete misreading of what artistic experience should be about.
It is not about narcissism.
You should not tell audiences that they go to hear the Bach St. Matthew Passion
or a Beethoven late piano sonata works of terrifying sublimity
because they want to see themselves reflected.
They should be hearing music to lose themselves in the composer's soul.
But we live in a world of narcissism.
It's all about whether it's the leadership class feeling proud of itself for fighting injustice or teaching audiences to not be interested in real difference, which is the difference of the past.
You know, you want to you want to experience real difference. Listen to the French Baroque like that is a different sensibility that is not ours.
but we can learn from it. This leadership class has no interest in actual difference,
but only wants to be identical to everybody else. So the BSO went through a two-year strategic
planning process that is the height of corporate vapidity. It's all about priorities and planning,
And as Chad Smith, we need to do the work of diversity. He uses every cliche in the book. And in the process of that, they largely cut out Andres Nilsson's. But in the process, as you said, Megan, he wanted to restore a key phrase that had been deleted from the strategic plan, which was to make artistic excellence at the core of what the BSO does.
He graciously asked that this phrase be restored. And that was like the final straw he had to go because that's too much of a diversion from the diversity imperative.
And Andres had played the game somewhat other than this request that they focus on artistic excellence. He had done a bunch of diversity type offerings in the selections made and the themes of some of the performances, none of which was enough because he landed on saying, OK, and I'm not rejecting any of that.
But I do think the main focus of the orchestra should be artistic excellence. And that is what did him in.
This is also a power struggle.
Well, what you have, you've got several things happening in the orchestral world that is
no different than universities.
It's no different than medical schools, which is the growth of the bureaucracy.
30, 40 years ago, the Boston Symphony Orchestra, like most orchestras, had about 100 musicians
and six administrators.
That was enough to keep this enterprise at the absolute top of the game.
The BSO has been regarded for a century as one of America's great orchestras and still largely is.
We'll see what happens after Nelson's leaves.
Currently, the ratio of administrators to musicians is about one to one.
There's about 100 administrators now to 100 musicians.
And that, of course, is vastly expensive.
Feeding and keeping occupied all of these human resources consultants and whatnot costs a fortune, which results in ticket prices going up.
You know, if you want a diverse audience, how about you lower your ticket prices?
How about even making it free to schoolchildren?
And so this has been going on, and they need something to do, and so they get involved in programming decisions and decide that music is not enough, that we need to wrap music around ideas.
And these are, of course, transgressive ideas a lot of the time. Tanglewood, which is the summer home of the Boston Symphony Orchestra up in Litchfield, Massachusetts. It's, again, been a pilgrimage for music devotees and novices to classical music for decades.
That's where I graduated from law school. We had our ceremony there.
Oh, you look. Well, it's a gorgeous spot and a gorgeous place to hear music. I actually heard Tchaikovsky's Fourth Symphony there, which has one of the most erotic middle movements.
erotic middle movements
uh in classical music Tchaikovsky was an absolute master at using the winds and as you heard in that
excerpt from the fifth symphony his melodies are very sinuous and the fourth symphony I remember
sitting out in the lawn outside the Tanglewood shed it was hot and humid and I had a crush on
the guy that I was with and here comes this second movement with this melody being passed from
you know a clarinet to an oboe to a flute and it was absolutely uh devastating in its
seductiveness um so it's a great place to hear music and and feel its power anyway so but what
did they do this summer at Tanglewood uh one of their concluding humanities programs was all about
mass incarceration and systemic racism they brought in Bryan Stevenson who's
absolutely
you know
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely
absolutely and so that's the way that was made by the mass incarceration and systemic racism they brought in Brian Stevenson who's absolutely
incredibly beloved on the academic circuit as a commencement speaker or as a uh you know will bring him in to tutor a class on systemic racism the criminal justice system what does this have to do with classical music not clear except actually it has everything to do with classical music let me amend that uh today megan because you know classical music is seen simply as a jumping off point to get to what really matters which is is fighting racism so
so this was in one sense a battle of who gets to decide what an orchestra is about the conductor somebody like nelson's who says besides the the um is wanting the restoration of the phrase artistic excellence he also said i want this strategic plan to say that cultivating the core repertoire not diversity picks and the sound of the orchestra
which is how it communicates is our core mission versus the management and this this absolutely nauseating narcissist uh ceo chad smith who want music simply to serve a political agenda and and the then the conductor kind of has to go along and put up with it this is reminding me i'm sure you and i have discussed this story but a friend of mine has a sister who is teaching at yale and also not
at yale at smith at smith and um she she was visiting from yale to at smith and she had reported back to this family member who i know that she got some sort of a protest as soon as she got there she was an english literature professor and he said let me guess because um there were too many white men on the syllabus and she said no that there were any white men on the syllabus
was a problem that there was even a single which smith did not want the students at smith did not want to see one single white man and his work listed on a syllabus for english lit at smith and the same thing is happening in the music world when it comes to i mean some of our most beautiful offerings with these symphonies they don't want to hear music authored by people like shakofsky it's offensive to them you've documented on this show before how
they back after the 2020 george floyd a palooza nonsense we're trying to get rid of blind auditions which is how they generally select their orchestras because they thought they were discriminatory how can they be discriminatory on the basis of race if no one knows what the race of the auditioner is um but they thought they didn't have enough people of color in and now of course it's morphed over into what is the music saying does it talk about mass incarceration or doesn't it
it's all narcissism it's narcissism on the part of students and i will be generous for a very fleeting moment and then take it all back uh one could argue that well we can't really blame the students uh it's for the adults to take them out of their adolescent self-involvement and solipsism and if they feel like they're entitled to go on a rampage a you know french revolution guillotining
of of the greats before them it's because the adults have allowed them to give in to their
innate ignorance uh know nothing uh qualities and desire to have the world revolve around them
but the adults are just as narcissistic because they're seeking the approval of the students uh
there's a codependent relationship between ignorant student adolescents and and now pre
teens uh and the adults who were supposed to be the authorities in the room uh we give them this
power in universities because we used to they used to be scholars they used to have spent decades of
their lives trying to understand the mysteries of the past trying to understand the greatest of all
human dramas which is the evolution of style you know it is it is an amazing thing to trace the
evolution of style and the evolution of style and the evolution of style and the evolution of
say a romance a medieval romantic epic uh threw into the 19th century realistic novel how did
that happen it's absolutely compelling knowledge to understand how human beings have changed in
their relationship in the world that's what they should be studying and instead they're they're
regurgitating the same just shallow academic rhetoric from one environment to another whether
it's music whether it's literature
whether it's philosophy or whether it's medicine to be perfectly honest because we see the same
yeah the same betrayal i've heard this from a lot of my doctors who complain about this it's a faux
sophistication it's it's faux it's like what they think they need to say in order to sound like
they're well educated from these universities but on the on the subject of the bso you write in your
piece that they had been doing the dance andres had been doing the dance you know to the extent he
had to in march of 2020 he was the first to do the dance and he was the first to do the dance
and he was the first to do the dance and he was the first to do the dance and he was the first to do the dance
that blacks in the U.S. and Europe learn to accept the near certainty of being accosted by public
authority in one form or another. The spurious motivation for many of these encounters is
impossible to deny, despite the strenuous efforts made in some circles to do so and so on. So he
goes along with all of this, but then wants pure excellence to be the standard. And he winds up
getting fired. And here is the president and CEO of the Boston Symphony Orchestra, Chad Smith,
talking about the future of the group on a radio show in June 2026. It's not 41.
We landed at a place where we felt that the organization, that the orchestra must serve
Boston, must serve our communities more expansively and inclusively,
that we were seeing significant declines across a number of areas at the BSO. And the only way
for us to move forward was to think differently about what it is
that we put on our stages, whose voices get to be heard, whose stories get to be told. How do we do
that in a way which continues to center and anchor the great canon of classical music? But the
decision came down to a need for alignment.
Oh, alignment and inclusivity.
Oh, it just makes, you can tell the voice is just so oleaginous. And frankly, the guy is
lying through his teeth because audience membership, you know, buying tickets increased
under Nelson's. This was never about finances. They were very clear. It wasn't about the finance.
The BSO is rich. It is loaded with its endowment. And it was never about artistic excellence. There
was, you know, there was never a hint in the voluminous email correspondence between Nelson's,
his agents, and various members of the massive management class.
The BSO, that he was anything other than a great leader. It never came up. So it's all about this.
In fact, there were protests when he left, Heather.
Oh, huge. The orchestra members are furious. It is unprecedented, unprecedented to have
a conductor who is beloved of his orchestra, against whom there are no charges of misconduct,
of sexual improprieties, to be fired. It hasn't happened. And so the orchestra,
they hadn't been consulted on this, and they started a protest of wearing red flowers in
their lapels in honor of the Latvian flag, which was Nelson's home country. And this continued
into Tanglewood this year. And the musicians would hand these boutonnieres out. And management
finally said, this is getting like a public relations, too much of a disaster. And it
cracked down and said, you may not distribute anything on the site of Tanglewood. And so the
businesses who have their windows are plastered with signs in support of Nelson's, they started
handing out the boutonnieres.
the Red Flowers. So yes, this produced a revolt. The orchestra members have been telling members
of other orchestras for years that the BSO had been forced under Smith to hire not the best
soloists, not the best conductors as guest conductors in the service of diversity.
But that Chad Smith quote, you got the absolute heart of that NPR interview, was an absolute gem
of academic fatuousness. Because again, music is not about you. It's about the conductor.
Try listening to a Mozart piano concerto, maybe number 25, number 17. You lose yourself
in Mozart.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's not about trying to hear your own little pathetic self. And this idea of who's, we need
to think about, as he said, whose voices get to be heard, whose stories get to be told.
We are hearing the voices of Brahms and Chopin. You don't go to a classical concert to hear
your own voice. And here's what else you don't go to, Megan, to hear more about George Floyd.
Or any other current martyr to phantom racism. There are many, many opportunities. There is no
shortage of opportunities to hear oppression stories in our culture. It's basically four
years of academic indoctrination in that, if you're going to college. What there is a shortage
of, given the long-term tragic recession of classical music from popular consciousness,
is an opportunity to,
to experience an art form that tragically has become alien. It is a, it is a complex musical
language. The symphonic score is much more complicated than anything in pop music today.
And it takes getting used to. Your ear has to be acclimated to it. There are people that
have the wonderful experience of hearing a symphony orchestra for the first time, and
it's magic. And I, I actually do think, how can you have that sound, that volume go through
your sternum and not be shaken up and think, whoa, you know, what, what is going on here?
But if it's, if it's difficult, try it again. But that's what there's a shortage of, not of
the, the, again, the, the, the voices being heard and stories getting to be told. The stories are
the movement of the composer's soul. That's what you should be there to hear, not your own ridiculous
limited autobiography.
Heather McDonald says it like only she can. God bless you for writing this piece. Thank
you for calling our attention to it. Much love to be continued. And we will be back
with all of you tomorrow with Sean and SoRev. We'll see you then.
Thanks for listening to The Megyn Kelly Show. No BS, no agenda, and no fear.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Russell Brand was convicted of rape and sexual assault in the UK, facing a 10.5-year sentence with a minimum of seven years, amid allegations of misconduct and widespread media coverage.
Samantha Presti, a former friend of Russell Brand, challenges the narrative of an "open secret" rape case, asserting that no warnings were given to her or other comedians about his behavior.
Presti claims the media and comedy industry are using cancel culture to suppress dissent, with figures like Graham Linehan and Ian McNabb being silenced for speaking out against prevailing political ideologies.
Critics argue the case relies heavily on a single accuser, Complainant 5, who allegedly had mental health issues and a history of infidelity, with no evidence of non-consensual acts.
The UK prison where Brand is being held is described as unsafe, overcrowded, and unsanitary, raising concerns about his ability to endure a seven-year sentence in solitary confinement.
A video from the University of Mississippi showing two white women making racist gestures toward black students has drawn intense media attention, despite a lack of evidence or context about the individuals’ knowledge.
A stark racial double standard is highlighted when a white teen is murdered by black assailants receives no media coverage, while racists’ actions are sensationalized and exploited.
Critics accuse the media of weaponizing racial narratives and engaging in political bias, particularly in downplaying black-on-white violence while amplifying isolated incidents of alleged racism.
Summary:
5 years in prison for rape and sexual assault, with growing skepticism from those who argue the allegations are based on a single accuser, Complainant 5, and potentially influenced by mental health issues and a lack of transparency. Samantha Presti, a long-time friend of Brand, challenges the narrative of widespread knowledge of misconduct, asserting that no warnings were given and that the media and comedy industry are now enforcing a political ideology that silences dissent. She claims the case is a product of cancel culture, citing silenced critics like Ian McNabb and Graham Linehan.
The show also critiques the UK prison system, noting its squalid conditions and potential harm to Brand’s health during a seven-year sentence. A parallel story examines the media’s disproportionate reaction to a racist incident at the University of Mississippi, where two white women made monkey gestures toward black students, contrasting sharply with the media's silence on white youth killed by black perpetrators. The host highlights a systemic racial double standard, where stories of black-on-white violence are ignored or downplayed, while minor racial slights receive massive coverage.
The narrative underscores concerns about media manipulation, political bias, and the erosion of free expression under the guise of "woke" justice.
FAQs
Russell Brand has been sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison with a minimum of seven years. He was convicted of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault following a London jury verdict.
Reports describe the prison as squalid, overcrowded, and unsafe, with staff absences and inmates often locked in cells for up to 22 hours a day. There are also reports of drug smuggling and inmate violence.
Several sources, including Samantha Presti, a former companion of Russell Brand, claim that the narrative of an 'open secret' is false, citing that no warnings were given to her or others about his behavior, and that some accusers may have been influenced by journalists or had mental health issues.
Critics argue that the media campaign against Russell Brand is politically motivated, especially given his shift in political views and criticism of left-wing ideologies, and that it reflects broader patterns of cancel culture and suppression of free speech.
The allegations were notably amplified by a Channel 4 documentary, and some claim that journalists have been actively seeking stories from former partners, offering money in exchange for testimony, which raises concerns about authenticity and manipulation.
She believes the media and justice system have treated Russell unfairly, pointing to a double standard where individuals with darker histories are not held accountable, and suggesting that the narrative is driven by bias and cancel culture rather than evidence.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.