Reimagining Learning: Creativity, Attunement, and Slow Pedagogy with Debi Keyte-Hartland

Are our schools preparing children for the world they actually live in, or one that no longer exists? Today's young people need more than knowledge. They need what technology can't replace, curiosity, creativity, emotional intelligence and care. In my free webinar from stress to strength, why outdoor learning is the future of education? I'll share fresh insights into why stress and behaviour challenges are symptoms, not failures. And how outdoor learning offers a practical evidence-based way to respond. You'll discover how time outdoors supports the nervous system, restores focus and balance, and helps both teachers and pupils feel more connected and resilient. It's an inspiring, high impact session, completely free to attend, and you'll receive a certificate of attendance to. Join me, the first weekend in February, register now at theoutdoorteacher.com/webinar. Part of the problem is that it's not about needing to know, it's about needing time to think through for ourselves and valuing thinking, and creativity is a process of thinking. And that's why it's really valuable, because creativity enables us to see what's possible, to explore possibilities, to experiment, to stop keep doing something, because it's the way that we've always done it. It's the thing that helps us grow and expand. It enables us to imagine other ways of being in the world. What if you could cultivate fulfilling lives and contribute to a healthy natural world? The Wild Minds podcast is brought to you by me, Marina Robb, an author, social entrepreneur, Forest School, a nature-based trainer, and consultant, and pioneer in developing green programs for the health service in the UK. Join me as I discover new perspectives on what it is to be a human in a more than human world, challenging dominant paradigms, finding ways to be kinder on ourselves and harder on the system. I'm also the founder of the Outdoor Teacher and Creative Practical Online Forest School Outdoor Learning and Nature-Based trainings for people in health, education, and business. Tune in for interviews, insights, cutting edge and actionable approaches to help you to improve your relationship with yourself, others, and the natural world. Welcome to episode 55, re-imagining learning, creativity, achievement, and slow pedagogy. This podcast episode is just full of insight and thinking about what matters to children. Today, I'm speaking with Debbie Keith Hartland, a passionate early childhood consultant, trainer, author, and speaker, who's so experienced in developing creative environments that invite rich learning and complex thinking. I so enjoyed the depth of thinking and a permission to re-evaluate the image of the child, and develop pedagogues of observation, listening, and reflection. In this episode, Debbie pulls together so much of her own creative thinking to enable me and you, as you'll see, to really bring new possibilities to our teaching practice, as well as enabling us to value children's capacity to learn and think for themselves, given the attunement and listening of a supportive adult. Debbie works with educators, managers, and leadership teams across the UK and international schools co-creating the playful, intentional, and relational pedagogies that put children's 100 languages of learning, meaning-making, and communicating at the centre. This conversation has ramifications for the way we teach children, the way we co-create spaces and groups in the indoors or outdoors, and the way, I think, we grow together as a society. As you'll see, she effortlessly introduces me to so many wonderful thinkers of the past and present so that we can reimagine learning and the value of our relationship with nature and materials as another critically important teacher. Like me, she believes that well-being and learning are deeply interconnected and that we need to move away from approaches that don't serve the needs of children today. In this episode, we'll dive into some big questions. What does it really mean to create an education system that nurtures creativity, slow pedagogy, and why is it so, so valuable? How can we measure the warm data, not just measure the ability of children to memorise all, reproduce facts that we give them? How can we co-create the curriculum and develop our own thinking? So whether you're an educator, a health practitioner, a parent, a leader, or someone simply interested in shaping a better future, you are in for an inspiring conversation. Let's get started. Welcome, Debbie, to The Wild Minds podcast. I'm really excited to be speaking to you. Thank you for coming. Oh, it's an absolute pleasure to be here. Pleasure and a privilege. So thank you. Thank you so much. So I really want to kick off as I do with a bit of gratitude and then I've got just, you know, I just have reels of paper, of possibilities and questions, but just to stay with the gratitude as a practice, I, when thinking about this and about this conversation we're going to have, I really am immensely grateful to children and their vitality and enthusiasm and also to the opportunity to be really working with children and hopefully together as a community supporting them for their future. So I think that's a privilege and I'm, I'm incredibly grateful for that and yeah, I just wonder if you would join me in some gratitude, whatever, whatever occurs to you. Oh, absolutely. Do you know what, I'm looking at my window at the moment and we've got blue skies here at the moment and it's January. And, and I think I'm just really in gratitude to the blueness of that sky. I think it's a really crisp and it's a cold and it's a bit of a windy day, but I just adore and grateful for that color really and that sense of joy and hope that a blue sky brings and that's something, I think there's something there about a metaphor of a blue sky and blue sky thinking and how it opens us up to, to, to, to new ways of being in the world. So yeah, that's what I mean, gratitude of today, the blueness of a beautiful sky on this cold and crisp and windy day. Thank you so much. It makes me think about people who often say even when it's grey and cloudy, you can imagine that beyond that, it's blue and that comforts me sometimes. Yeah, no. Blue is always there. It's always there. We're just going to put our head above the clouds. Well, it's probably good that we're thinking about that right now because I'm sure we're going to dive into education and dive into perhaps what isn't always blue. And, you know, what, what, what we might need to consider to support a bit of color in the curriculum. So, so with that, with that in mind, I wanted to start actually with thinking about what I read, I read research, let's say the economic forum that will often say we want adults to be creative thinkers, we want adults to be emotionally literate, we want adults to be problem solvers and things like that. And I've read some of your your thoughts through your writing and you often say about children's learning and development that yeah, that that you you are also really, you know, what's the word? It's so important to you to think about creativity and critical thinking and playful inquiry. And I'd love you to just share with me the link between the early years and perhaps that happening and how that could support that later on. Absolutely. I think I'm, I'm, yeah, I'm so passionate about creativity and I truly believe that we are all born with creative capacity. That doesn't mean to say that through education, we can't learn to become more retuned to that creative thinking and process, that we can't as educators help children to really grow and develop those skills of creativity. But I fundamentally believe like Lois Maligots did in the schools of Reggio Amelia that that we are born, we are all born with a rich capacity to think for ourselves. So I think that as a fundamental value and belief sort of runs traversally through all that I'm doing. And that means that as adults as educators, we are still with that capacity to be creative. Yet one of the things I often hear when I'm working with educators are educators saying, especially if I'm coming in to their setting, and they know my background as a creative and sort of arts based practitioner, they will always say, oh, you know, my goodness, you know, our Debbie is coming in. Debbie, so I'm so over there, she's the creative one. I'm not, and people say I'm not creative and will literally point to the ones who they think are creative. And I think that's really, really interesting in how we, as adults, perceive our self-efficacy and perceive our creative identities as something because that we do have and that we don't have. And I think that affects then how we work, we work with children. And I think part of the things that I'm doing in the work that I'm doing is sort of alerting us all at whatever age that we are, that we all have creative capacity. And it's about on picking what do we mean by creativity? What do we mean by creative thinking? And how do we develop the rich and fertile environments for children in which to amplify and generate and activate the creativity that they have that is already inside them? Because I do also fundamentally believe that our attitudes to our own creativity affects children and that that can dampen the experiences for children. It can cloud it and it can prevent children's creativity from growing. So I'm really passionate about how we view sort of the, I don't often call it a mutuality between how we perceive children as learners and children as creative beings and ourselves as adults working with children as well. There's a mutuality between the two or it's isomorphic. These things go together when we think about it. Are you ready to elevate your forest school skills and breathe new life into your sessions? Don't allow doubt to hinder your exploration of outdoor learning's potential. Without proper direction, young people may miss out on nature's profound impact. Imagine confidently guiding your groups through parks or green spaces equipped with essential skills. Explore theoutdoorteacher.com/forestschool for my premiere online training in forest school activities and begin your path towards becoming a skilled outdoor educated today. And don't forget, if you're in the UK, you have the opportunity to experience the wonders of nature firsthand at one of our direct trainings in Sussex. Dive into the details of our in-person courses at circleofliferediscovery.com. Yeah, that's already food for thought because I'm wondering how that gets taken out of our learning experience then. Before we perhaps say what is creativity and how can we, how and why should we bring it in or learn the skills? How is it that I can get to an adult? Because I also feel often that I'm surrounded by creative people and I make certain assumptions around that and that I exclude myself from that. So I'm doing exactly what you're saying or how am I playful? Well, but so and so, so playful and I'm not so playful. So it feels like I'm boxing myself already into something that I'm not and I wonder where that started. And how that is happening all the time through our education system. So I wonder whether you'd speak a little bit about that. Why, why so many adults end up like that? Or what are the seeds that that perhaps help us not to be like that? So it's the kind of same question, but from a different perspective. Yeah, and that is a fascinating question actually. I think, you know, so often as adults, we can be almost tricked into thinking about polar opposites and dichotomies that it's either this or it's that and never exploring the the mess and the complexity actually. And I think how we all learn is a very complex and interdependent and interrelated way. Look, going back to Laura Smolagussi, he always used the metaphor of a of a bowl of spaghetti as being what learning looks like and that when you dive into a bowl of spaghetti, you're not choosing one strand to follow from beginning to end. You're just diving into the middle of it. You're taking a bit of the source with you, and there's no beginning and there's no end. It's it's it's it's riseomatic. And so learning is completely, you know, we can look at learning has been really complicated as multi-directional and relational, where there are no linear or set ways in which to learn, make progress or develop, yet our language, a language of education forces us almost to think in a very linear way. So when we think about progress in learning, we think of a ladder and we think, well, this is what children need at the beginning. And then if only we follow those those steps, you know, we will achieve what we need to do, but it's not, it's it's it's messiness. And so I think how we think in these sort of dichotomies, which are not in the way that nature thinks at all either, and is part of the problem that we are looking for simple solutions to things. And this is what causes some of the problem. And I think, you know, Gregory Bateson famously said it's the the major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and the way people think. And I think if we take any kind of living system, and we can say a school is a living system, it's full of liveliness and vitality, it's like an it's an ecosystem of its own. But if we treat that like a machine with mechanisms, then we take that vitality and life away. And the messiness of what learning looks like, the natural world is learning from each other all the time, it's making mistakes, it's figuring things out, it's forming relationships, it's it's constantly interrelating. Yet when we come to viewer school and how learning happens, we use the language of linearity of machine learning. And that takes away that that essentialness of who we are as human beings and how we learn. And I think that's one of the biggest problems in in how we in how we view education and is one of the biggest stumbling blocks. We've got to embrace the messiness, embrace that complexity and challenge those fixed notions of education in which children's learning is simply mapped out as a stage or as something that they advance through carefully. And we even use the language and education of having a carefully sequenced high level plan, you know, but actually what does that mean? And how does even that language frame then, how we think? Because the curriculum is something that children as Tedioki talked about is something that yes, there is a mandated curriculum and and things that we are, you know, asked to look at nationally and and really important things there. But Tedioki talked about the lived curriculum, how children experience that on a day to day. And you said right at the beginning, you know, where is the colour in the curriculum? And I think it's that's where the children bring that colour, they bring that sense of vitality and liveliness. And one of the simplest things we can do is to think about how do we make curriculum with children rather than thinking of curriculum as being something that sits on a shelf that tells us and instructs us what to do in any given bit of time that we have with children. So when I talk to head teachers, they're they're talking about medium and long-term planning. So they've already fixed their curriculum in a certain way and they are measuring certain data I assume from what what they think they the children should be achieving at a certain point. And that's what I've understood a lot of sort of mainstream, a lot to do with I understand primary perhaps a little bit more than early years. But there's something you've talked about linear thinking and I understand the current pedagogy being much more about didactic teaching and this kind of linear thinking. And yet you've started already talking about that that isn't how learning happens. It isn't one thing after the next in the consecutive direction, but it's it's much more complex. So part of me wants to understand well how is it that all these theorists these people you've just touched on a few have explained and described learning is something far more colorful and far more complex, far more active, far more mutual and yet here we are across the board seemingly teaching in a very linear way and I kind of want to understand that because it doesn't make sense to me when teachers and let's say pedagogs are the experts. I am confused why why we have to have this conversation Debbie when it seems to me that all the writing I mean not in the way that you write because you do have a particularly wonderful in my view view on these things but but nevertheless it's like why is it that we are so stuck on this linear way when we've talked about a little bit about creativity already and the value of that. So what's going on and and then let's speak to some different pedagogy then. Absolutely I think there's so much I wonder whether in what we are doing that we are often measuring the wrong things and in measuring the wrong things and observing and attuning to the wrong things like what do children know and remember is a huge focus at the moment. You know what do they hold on to and it feels like if we're measuring that and attuning and responding to that then we are of course going to see education in a very narrow way and I think curriculum and how we're working with children curriculum for me is about the relationship that we have with children it's about building that sustainable and relational educational paradigm where we're thinking about the well-being of all children but where we're not seeing them as like little units and Ken Robinson speaks so powerfully about how the education system is sort of set up for sort of you know sort of an industrial unit of a child that falls off the end of a production line that they're all neatly boxed up as as as something that's been sort of manufactured that doesn't see them as connected as part of a whole web of ways of thinking together that includes thinking with with the world and so we need to think about what matters to this group of children who are in front of me now what matters to them as opposed to well what does I work in the early years for example you know what does in general a four a group of four and five year olds need to think about we need to think about what matters to the children in front of us see their liveliness see their vitality we need to be able to activate those children who are before us not a generalized picture we need to activate their curiosity that they bring with them and we need to see those children as as Laura Smaligatzi said having a hundred languages or hundred different ways of relating to and developing understanding of the world around them and their relationships with them rather than as he says in that wonderful poem stealing the 99 languages of children and just concentrating on academic subjects that we as adults consider to be important so we've been responsive to those children attune into children listening and observing closely to how those particular children play and inquire into the world and reflect on what he's seen and done and that's how you construct curriculum with children it's about engaging with what's important to them now as well as what's going to be important to them in the future as well I can't help but think that we started the conversation as an adult you know me as an adult saying well you know maybe I don't always feel creative or or I decide that I'm not something and how that links to perhaps my own experience of going through the school system and I'm just wondering whether so many of us as adults just didn't have that attention didn't have that experience didn't have that experimentation that inquiry because it seems to me that I mean I understand that's why you need consultants you need people to come in and to kind of give people different opportunities give teachers different opportunities because I was a primary school teacher and I trained as a primary school teacher and I don't ever remember there being a sense of experimentation or play or I mean I wasn't early as I was primary but nevertheless the sort of experience that you're giving me the kind of imagination into I just don't think many teachers are having and and as you said at the beginning well if we don't have those experiences it's very very hard for us to value them and I'm also wondering around about like you know my my sense of how I learn my own individual experience of how I learn through relationships from what other another person might say or do or what I might observe or or and it not just being about humans it also being about something that might occur because of the smell or something that I've just smell so I'm kind of trying to to make these links because it don't I don't think that's happening very easily in our schools schools and and yet the theory says let's do that and yet and yet we're not so I am I think there's something about the head needing to know the educators needing to know the value of this needing you know like if we can tick the box in our head saying why is play good I hear it so much I can't believe that I mean I'm involved in you know playing for a school but I'm still hearing that school struggle to educate parents to educate themselves to say well play matters or I'm going to add into that creativity matters time space to explore matters why does it matter Debbie can you help us understand for those that are going oh it sounds wonderful but they're not learning anything oh there's two things there's for me I'm going to come back to the why it matters yeah but I think you know in schools there are so many there is so much to read so much to do so many consultants coming in telling people what they should be doing and yet everything as Nancy Klein says everything that we do depends on the quality of the thinking that we do first and I think part of the problem is that it's not about needing to know it's about needing time to think through for ourselves and valuing thinking and creativity is a process of thinking and that's why it's really valuable because creativity enables us to see what's possible to explore possibilities to experiment to stop keep doing something because you know it's the way that we've always done it it's the thing that helps us grow and expand it enables us to imagine other ways of being in the world and we need that more than ever we are facing you know meta and multiple and meta crises in the world and our thinking needs to grow in order to think wisely about our future as as human beings and our relationship with the world that's why creativity is really fundamentally important because it helps us to think it helps us to think about our relationships with the world our relationships with each other and and how we work and collaborate together and I think when I'm talking about creativity I'm not just talking about the kind of creativity that is about the idea of a genius you know you're your Einstein's of the world I have these like amazing world shattering ideas I'm talking about the kind of relational creativity that exists within groups of people I often when I'm talking with students get them to think about a band not a band who's been constructed and put together but a band who have been messing around with sound and and music and rhythm and harmonies and balance that you know they've got relationships with one another and they're they're putting together a song about something you know it's like where does where does that creativity lie in that band is it in the lead singer who might be the one who's coming up with the lyrics is it is it with the drummer who's really thinking about the rhythm you know who who's creativity is it and actually it's coming out of their collective experiences of being together and that creativity is coming from the spaces in between of each of those people and that for me is really a powerful thing to hold on to because we in being creative we create things that weren't possible before and we are creating things when we are working together that we couldn't do when we're on our own and that for me why creativity creative thinking and teaching for creativity is just so it's so valuable so that could lead me on to talking about participatory pedagogy and pedagogy of listening which I do hope we get a chance to talk about but if not I will signpost people to some of your writing but when you said about the collective organism if you like and the potential of creativity I I couldn't help but think about the natural world because both of us care deeply about our relationship to the natural world in the future of outcomes for ourselves and the well-being of the planet as well so I know that you've spent a lot of time thinking and considering the agency of materials of water or clay and and I'd love to hear more about that because when you said about togetherness of course it isn't just togetherness of humans is it? Absolutely it's about the more than human it's about relationships with everything here it's you know when when I'm watching a group of young children exploring clay for example that clay has as much agency as those children have on how it changes and transforms the children we could observe children and think that they are just you know that they are exploring that clay that they're developing understanding about what that clay can do and then using that understanding they are then transforming it they're doing something with it and and that is one way of looking at creativity and and a crafts work talks about positive you know moving from that you know not knowing what something is material is like clay to that shift in understanding it and then being able to think about what I can possibly do with that now but there's also for me that agency and we can call that a liveliness too that exists within that clay because that clay isn't neutral that clay has come as come from a place it's well you can have different sorts of clay you can have the kind of clay that's got plastic threaded through it for starters which is awful which is absolutely awful and isn't a natural material but we've also got you know clay is a material that has such history and it's a material that comes from the earth and that has a responsibility to think about as well I remember one of my students decided with her young children to dig up some clay that was in that it's an outdoors setting millies garden in Bristol and she dug up some clay for the children to explore the children were digging it up in the garden there's a lot of clay within with in Bristol and the children asked if the garden thought it was okay to dig up that clay and what could they give back to that garden if they were going to take that clay away and do something with it so I think we can look at any material and I can give you a link to read more about those stories of of of wild clay and but I think there is just so much in thinking about the possibilities of how we learn with and how we think in the world together that it's not just something that happens in our heads we creativity and thinking happens outside of the brain too so it's happening I've said you know with other people in our relationships with other people but it's also happening with our surroundings to our environment where we are and those materials that are within that too as well as that with our relationships too and anima if you pull often talks about this in terms of the extended mind the power of thinking outside of the brain that it's about how we think through our bodies our environments and surroundings and our relationships and for me that really pulls into what we might call you know a new materialist or or post-humanist way of sort of viewing viewing learning and the world is that we are not just interacting with one thing but we are interacting and this really challenges how we do education when we think that we are not the only teachers of children when we think that that clay will teach the children something too when we think about how we curate that clay how we put it out where that clay has come from when we start thinking in a much more complex way about the materials and those interactions the histories that the messiness and the complexity of all of all that is going on at play then then we begin to see then we start getting out of these boxes of ways of thinking which I think are really detrimental to how we learn and develop. There's something about the world view that everything's alive and that you can learn from multiple interactions, multiple beings and that has a really valid place and it's not just about you know the human interaction because I'll often read about indigenous thinking and they often talk about animism that you know they actually believe that the plants and the land is imbued with a spirit and that's quite hard for the modern mind to understand and also it veers into something that might be a bit more uncomfortable and are now taking on a kind of religious idea but I really appreciate that regardless of that and that might just be a cultural perspective of where you've grown up rather than actually saying well hang on a second we can learn from the more than human you know whether they're like is it right to say inert like a kind of clay or whether it's a woodlouse crawling around you know what we could learn from that and you said intra-active I think that's another pedagogy isn't it intra-active pedagogy different ways of learning and it seems to me that then we move away from being the centre of the universe because when I think about the future and how we may hopefully move to be a culture of people that is more understanding about our relationship to the natural world and I think that we have to stop being the centre of everything somehow and you know and and it sounds to me that the yeah new materialism the pedagogy that you're you're immersed in and teach or if it is teach is it teaching you know brings a different set of values and fosters a different world view I think so I think it is about a world view in where we're seeing ourselves as part of something bigger than ourselves a world view that is seeing us as not separate from nature but one and with it and not just connected to it that that we are and that to separate things out are are just mechanisms that that that that don't allow us to think in the way that we are naturally born to do I think we are teaching but there are so many different ways of looking at what that what that word means and and who teaches and last malrogacy said the environment is the third teacher and it the question there is well who's the first and the second teacher and what does and how does an environment actually teach so for me you know I think going back into his writings he's he's he's words on that word that the first teachers of children are of course the their families who the where they are born into those those first really really important attachments that they are making in the world that the second teacher are the people that they encounter in the world are the children being teachers and ourselves as educators we are the second teachers but that the environment is also a teacher of children and it's everything within that environment it's the climate the emotional climate of that environment as well as the physicality and all of those materials within it but it's how then we view that environment and whether we see that or something that is really affecting children and I love how in the schools in in in Reggio Amelia in Italy and that's a place that has been sort of a real sort of way of it's enabled me to to think so differently about about the possibilities of of of education because Laura Smondagutzi he was the sort of the the the the founding sort of teacher and sort of philosopher of the approach there really makes us think about how we are creating the fertile conditions for children to grow and develop and how that environment can make a difference to that how it amplifies how it general and these words amplify how it amplifies how it generates how it creates possibility for children to learn and to think and make discoveries and that's very different from an environment that is about instruction that is about telling you what you need to know and I think that's a fundamental attitude to sort of to sort of grasp and to identify where your professional identity as a as an educator is and I think for many people who I encounter is that they haven't had the time or the opportunity to even think about that they've just been told this is how it happens this is how you teach this is what you need to know this is what you need to do there is no time to develop your own thinking around that but I want to say jump in there because again we're we seem to be mirroring our own experience that because me or the the adult teacher hasn't had time well then we create systems where the child doesn't have time and and I feel really strongly that it's it's in the spaces in between as you've said and it's in the timelessness moments where we start to have this sense of connection is very very hard to feel connected to yourself or to another or even to the natural world if you have to keep moving on in a hurry and it feels very very important that that all the kind of well-being and nourishment on both sides on multiple sides comes from this slowing down I mean people talk about slow pedagogy as well don't they but that's where this this kind of let's say magic of connection happens and it can be an intellectual connection can be an emotional connection it can be a physical connection it can be a mysterious connection but we need space and time I need it as an adult I find myself being you know so much information to take on and I'm beginning to realize that I just can't you know there's just no way I'm going to be able to to to know to have knowledge of all this stuff it's just impossible so what I need is time to digest time to let the I like the cooking pot you know that I can stir the pot and just to let whatever percolate is what wants to arise arise so that I can notice it and think about it like you say creatively think about it and I I do spend quite a lot of time trying to not separate my child self from my adult self because like we like you said and have said in many times at what point do we suddenly stop from being the three-year-old and suddenly become the seven-year-old you know like suddenly suddenly we have to suddenly sit and desk and perform in a different way and I'm I I'm not sure we do maybe we just become disconnected well I think that's exactly what happens and I think there is so much about slowing down that is that is so fundamental to think about and of course Alison Clark's work has has really helped us to think about the power of of of slowing down in order to do more ironically in order to learn more ironically and I think this is you know when I think about well what does this actually look like you know I can imagine somebody saying yes this is all very well and good but what does this actually look like in a in a in a busy setting in a busy school I think for me you know in an example that has come to mind is how and it's an example about the natural world that we can you know we can think that we're doing a topic where we're going to teach children about mini beasts whatever a mini beast is you know they've got proper names so let's let's first of all think about what those are and they're not beasts and we can that's a conversation for another day maybe but you know we could we could sit down with a limited amount of time and say right you know we've got half a term we're going to we need to cram as much information into the children's heads that they can remember about about different insects molests different things right and we just want them to know what the names are and what they look like and what they identify with and we can do that but that for me you know and and there will be worksheets there will be plastic animal you know things to look at and it will be done very efficiently and bitch bash bash at the end and children can regurgitate inside this is what I would like to see this is what spider is this is what a worm is wonderful or or we can slow down and think about what what matters to the children you know going back to this idea of what matters to the children who are in front of us today and I've I've worked with educators at Mailey nursery in Telford-Dedrykin for many years and I'd like to share an example that they did there and Mailey nursery is situated right you know not far from the river seven it often floods there are in the in the in the town along the river that you know there will be times when the the flood deventities are put up to you know and all of that and it was a time where the children had been hearing on the local news and from families and from within the local community they could see these flood defences going up so it was in their mind that something could happen and you know I don't know maybe they're thinking of floods like you know really you know that taking their homes and that they're going to lose everything you know that that people might be hurt no the children were thinking about the woodlice that they that they had in their garden in their garden space the children were worried and concerned that these woodlice that that they would dig and find and and and look at and pick up and notice they worried about what would happen to these little woodlice in the garden and slowing down for maize is about responding and attuning to what's important to the children and that's what the educators did they said well what do you what do you think and given them the children's space to think what do you think these woodlice need is there anything that we can do to help this community of woodlice you're concerned about them being hurt in the flood so so what do we do and the children were creative that opened up discussion amongst this group of three and four year old children and they started thinking about they needed to get these woodlice up and out of the way that they needed ladders and so that started this whole six month project about building ladders for woodlice oh love it which you know which which tapped into so many different areas of the curriculum because children were collectively sharing their ideas with each other they were having to exchange their points of view if that's not communication and language and development than than what is it they were they were drawing their designs and thinking about what kind of ladder and what if you were a woodlice that couldn't see in the dark if you were an elderly woodlice if you were a disabled woodlice what kind of ladder would you need and would a ladder be good enough so there's your creativity being activated there and that's also your expressive arts and design because they are building models and and refining these models in terms of what makes a good ladder the mathematics that was involved in thinking about that too was there so we can see how something as and that grew you know it wasn't just a woodlice but it was like well actually who lives with the woodlice in this ecosystem of the garden and what else do we need to do so you know this and all of this you know that by the end of this time that they spent together thinking about what mattered to children and thinking about those woodlice and the very precarious situation that the children thought that they had faced they had developed so much more understanding about what a woodlice was and what was phenomenal for me was their drawings because these are three and four year old children who are who are just trying to you know figure out how to hold a pencil or a piece of charcoal and make marks and then knowledge and their deep thinking came through their drawings and you could see this evolution from just drawing a round shape with some legs sticking out of it to children then thinking about how those legs are articulated you know how those legs came from underneath the shell and how do you draw that when a piece of paper is flat and too dimensional and these are the conversations that each children where have it and that for me that is phenomenal and these weren't super special super articulate super intelligent children these were children who were being who had educators who were responsive and attuned and thinking about how though what mattered to those children and constructing curriculum with them and it was really really quite simple I absolutely love so many things of what you've just said from the back linking kind of expert to look look there it is all the curriculum is just there in front of you two two important things that I want to draw out and I just can't believe we we're coming almost to the end of this podcast because I could just carry on you know learning with you and from you um but the two things that come out for me are the vision of children and warm data again I want to come back to warm data and the vision of children because there's something here about how we view children and and actually I would link how we view the natural world as well because there's something about the people that can't speak you know the things that don't speak articulately we we seem to esteem language so much you know especially academic language most of which I find really hard to understand most of the time right um so I'm thinking about that and I'm thinking well what is this warm what is this warm data and in a way when we're thinking together about building a sustainable ecological educational paradigm perhaps it starts with something around vision and different measurement and and I wonder whether you could speak to that and that's a huge subject we could we could talk about even just that for another hour but but would you speak to that because it does seem you've said so many times what matters to children and you've given examples of their complex creativity and thinking and understanding of the world so yeah those two things vision of children and and measuring something different than what we're always measuring that would be wonderful and then with that maybe we'll be almost there you know I go back to Laura Smelligutzi here and he said our image of the child is where teaching begins and if our image of the child is one of an empty vessel then our teaching becomes one in which we are filling up that empty vessel if our image of the child is one that doesn't need any adults within the life just just let them be then we will be a very less affair hands off kind of educator not wanting to interact or interact and not seeing those possibilities and if we see that child as being born as as rich and competent in their own way with ideas of their own with thoughts and capabilities that will come out their capabilities are within them but they will only come out if the environment is supportive and activating for that then our teaching will respond to that image and we will see that environment as something so powerful we will see our relationship with children as being something that has to be responsive to their to their liveliness and I think that for me is what connects these ideas about warm data and and nor debates and is the one to look to there in terms of warm data and I think you know in in conversations with her and things that I've I've read she's always talked about you know the way in which we measure the world the way in which we measure the value of education or the value of learning or you know what progress looks like can be very clinical and we do so with these with these very specific lenses so we are measuring children now in terms of what they remember and that's an extremely extremely narrow lens which doesn't leave room for creativity and creative thinking because why would you need to look at that if all you need to do is remember stuff so for me that's very much that image of the child who is that empty vessel and and and warm data for me and from what I've read and how I perceive that and how I use that is about the relationships and the multiple perspectives that we can have so we can take anything we can take those and I think it's what warm data is what the children were doing to those woodlies it's like seeing them as as holistic and connected beings that's you know that's that's that's part of a much bigger picture and I think you know we need to stop measuring children with these very narrow lenses we need to build multiple perspectives we need to think about you know we it's about talking with families and carers about the children and so what do you know about them and this is what we know about them it's it's about seeing how those children are with other children and how they interact with the environment and it's about seeing difference as and not conforming it's about seeing those differences something that we can learn from where there's a real possibility to learn something and to think in a different way than what we did before and that for me is what is what growth is that for me is what evolution is and I can't believe sometimes why why going back to that that quote of of Gregory Bateson is why we would think different to that yeah I I really agree and I am wondering about this idea of being a participant in our lives and in our schooling and in our world and our culture and how these ideas that you've been speaking about often happen in certain pockets or within my work you know we'll often talk about it within for a school and yet I I feel like all of these threads and all of these the whole of these conversation really it feels important for life you know for the education that we have from early years through to primary through to secondary through to our life that that we can actually be who we are and be valued for who we are as being different with different ideas and that we have the tolerance and the capacity to listen to each other and to not assume as you said at the beginning this kind of binary thinking that we seem so locked into except instead of this kind of more experimental research open-ended exploratory wonder of this life that we have you know and I speak and you know we often think about when you see an older person maybe somebody that's coming to the end of their life and they've got that sparkle and I don't know about you Debbie but I really hope to have that sparkle you know and continue to have that and to be and that the people have that because I don't know if you can measure that I don't but you know what you can feel it you can feel it and I think for me this is about the wholeness and so often what we try to do is to fix a problem we say you know we could say oh you know um children aren't connected to the natural world so so let's do so let's take let's do let's let's do forest school even and that's just part you know that's like so we do forest school on a Monday afternoon whatever that means so we do that but then something else is altered and dropped off so we have to think about the whole the whole system and I think I I remember listening to um I don't know who it was it was one of the astronauts and they said how for so many who get that opportunity to go into space and to see the wholeness of the planet earth and to see it in the context of the vastness of space is something that is you know only a few of us can have and they come back so many of them come back so changed and this conversation that I read was how when looking back at the earth you don't see you don't see the separation between countries you don't see barriers you don't see walls you don't see you know the human buildings and impact you just see the wholeness and I think you know you said about tolerance about learning from differences and I think you know any of us can think about our current um you know what's going on in the world um how we resort to wars and killing each other um over land grabs um how we see borders as being well you keep to your side and we'll keep to our sides there is no tolerance and these are really important things for us to to grapple with and to and to trouble and I think that you know that the sparkle that people have at the end of life I think they've learnt something they've learnt something about the world and interestingly I started working with people time and I'm you know in working with early years now but I started working with with elderly people at the end of life often with dementia of different kinds and I'd learnt so much from their sparkle from their their way of being in the world in terms of what they had had learnt and understood and I think it's that which we have to hold onto the wholeness we are we are part of something and we have to stop these individualistic ways of seeing not just education but how we how we live together on this wonderful planet Debbie my heart is full my heart is full so thank you so much we will absolutely be linking to your website to things that you've written to to so many things on the show notes so please know that and thank you again for this wonderful wonderful exploration oh it's been a privilege and an absolute pleasure well I don't know about you but I am left with such a sense of possibility and really excited about developing all these ideas and putting them into practice this conversation has been such a rich exploration of how we can rethink learning nurture creativity value creativity and truly listen to children in meaningful ways next week is the final episode of the season so join me for more reflection deeper thinking and responses to the insights we've gathered over the last eight weeks I'd love to hear your thoughts what's resonated with you what questions you're still holding and how these ideas are shaping your own practice so if you haven't already be sure to subscribe share the episode with others who might find it inspiring and let's keep the conversation going see you next week thank you for listening to this episode of the wild minds podcast if you enjoyed it and what to help support this podcast please subscribe share and leave a rating and review wherever you get your podcasts your review will help others find the show to stay updated with the wild minds podcast and get all the behind the scenes content you can visit the outdoorteacher.com or follow me on Facebook at the outdoorteacher UK and LinkedIn Marina Rob the music was written and performed by Jeff Rob see you next week same time same place