Prosecutors' love triangle theory. Youth pastor accused of wife's murder. Plus, June Diane Raphael.
32m 7s
Dateline True Crime Weekly covers several high-profile cases, beginning with the reopened murder of Bernadette Vandermeer, a former youth pastor’s wife, accused of a fatal fall in Utah. New evidence, including testimony from a former youth group member who alleges David groomed her and claimed she would never be with him unless Bernadette died, and timeline inconsistencies in the hiking incident, has shifted the case from accident to murder, leading to David’s arrest. A major challenge remains the lack of physical evidence and the presumption of Maya’s survival in the separate case of Navy optician Larry Miliette, where prosecutors rely on marital strife and a love triangle involving Jamie Laird. Patricia Laird’s testimony, as the wife of Jamie, reveals Larry’s persistent calls and Maya’s dismissal of danger, fueling both defense and prosecution arguments. The defense uses these details to question the credibility of the affair narrative and suggest alternative suspects. Meanwhile, updates on the trials of Alec Murdoch and Luigi Mangione show Murdoch’s conviction overturned with a retrial scheduled for 2027, and Mangione’s federal trial postponed due to overlap with his state proceedings. The case of Nicholas Eleverdian, a fugitive who faked his death and was later extradited to face rape charges, ends with his death from medical complications at age 38. The episode also features June Diane Rayfield, a true crime enthusiast and actress, discussing her fascination with the Mangione case and the cultural impact of the "Legally Blonde" prequel series, which highlights women’s empowerment and resilience in the face of tragedy. These stories underscore the complexity of modern criminal investigations, the role of personal relationships in motive, and the enduring public interest in justice and accountability.
It's the start of another work day for the Dateline team. She's saying, no, I didn't do it, dad did it, it was a murder suicide. Our producers are catching up on breaking crime news. Monday, there's motions and stuff. When she saw herself on video, she realized, wow, this is exactly as I remember it. We're going to cover all the ins and outs of this. Welcome to Dateline True Crime Weekly. I'm Andrea Canning, it's July 2nd, and here's what's on our docket. In Las Vegas, a former youth pastor is accused of murdering his wife on a hiking trail, disturbing allegations emerge about what went on in his church youth group. She actually said that David told her that the only way that the two of them could ever be together was if, quote, "Bernadette" was not alive. In Dateline Roundup, we've got the latest from the courtroom in the blockbuster cases of Luigi Mangioni, an Alec Murdoch. There were dozens of media outlets, international agencies, local TV stations, and of course, true crime broadcasters were there. Plus, we're joined by June Diane Rayfield, star of the new legally blonde prequel series, who's also an avid Dateline viewer. She talks about the case she can't get enough of. I'm surprised at the recent development, which I learned about on your podcast. Before all that, we are heading back to a San Diego County courthouse and the murder trial of Navy optician Larry Miliette, before resting, the prosecution called another bombshell witness. For the past six weeks, prosecutors have tried to convince jurors that Larry Miliette murdered his 39-year-old wife Maya back in 2021. They haven't presented any physical evidence that a murder even took place, and Maya's body has never been found. Instead, their case is largely focused on Larry and Maya's failing marriage. Prosecutors say Larry became increasingly unhinged as he realized Maya planned to leave him. At the crux of their case is a love triangle involving Larry, Maya, and Maya's lover, Jamie Laird. Last week, jurors heard from Jamie about the affair. Then prosecutors called a witness no one had heard from before. Someone else deeply affected by the affair. His wife at the time, Patricia, joining us again is NBC7 investigative reporter Alexis Revis. Hey, Alexis. Welcome back. Hi, Andrea. Thanks for having me. Sure. Uh, this affair between Maya and Jamie is really central to the story the prosecution is telling. Remind us who Jamie is and when he got together with Maya. So Jamie started working in the same office as Maya in the summer of 2019, but it was about six months later, while he was on a work trip to New York that he said Maya started texting him. And that texting very quickly turned into a physical relationship. He said within a month, they started meeting at hotels, meeting in their cars. They were also using secret Instagram accounts to send hundreds of messages actually over the course of a year. They sent a detective said that they sent 760 messages, most of which were sexually explicit. In the early summer, late spring of 2020, and this is the year before my vanished, Jamie said Larry actually caught the two of them inside of a truck just outside of their office. And the week Maya vanished, Jamie said that Larry had called his then wife, Patricia and Nicole Laird to essentially expose the affair. What do we know about Patricia Laird? So Patricia Laird has been a San Diego County sheriff's deputy since 2016. We have known, just during the course of this trial that Patricia was pregnant, she actually wound up going into labor the same night Maya was lasting alive January 7th, 2021. And something we didn't know until she took the stand is that Larry didn't just call her the week Maya vanished. They actually were talking the whole year leading up to that point that Maya disappeared. What was her demeanor like? It must have been so uncomfortable talking about her ex-husband's infidelity, right? We weren't really sure what to expect, but she did smile a few times while she was on the stand. She didn't appear shy. She did not get emotional, but things she kept saying over and over again is that she remembers that year, essentially reaching a point with Larry that she didn't want any more drama. She didn't want to be a part of the drama. She just kept saying she wanted to move on with her relationship. She wanted to believe that Jamie was being loyal to her and she said who wouldn't want to believe that your husband is actually being faithful, especially if you're pregnant. Larry was calling Patricia a lot, right? So yeah, he would call her from different phone numbers like his work number or some of the kids numbers or some unknown numbers and it got to a point where she was just really sick of it. So she started blocking Larry. She didn't really want to deal with him calling her anymore. And then even more surprises came from her testimony. What were those surprises? So she called Maya. I don't think anyone knew that Patricia Larry had ever talked to Maya directly. She said she wanted to call Maya woman to woman and see what was happening. She says Maya told her the affair was a story she made up to make Larry quote, "feel stupid" and that Larry was quote, "crazy." And that's when something interesting happened because Patricia says being a law enforcement officer, hearing the word crazy, this didn't seem really normal to her. So she wanted to ask Maya if she was okay and needed any help, like the police resources. The restraining order, for example. But apparently Maya turned her down, said she didn't need any of that and she wasn't scared of Larry. That's phone calls from Larry to Patricia. It sounds like the prosecutors were trying to portray Larry as maybe somewhat obsessive. The defense handled the calls between Patricia and Larry very differently. Yes. And cross the defense really wanted to drill down the point that Larry was always polite, that Larry wasn't aggressive, didn't seem violent, didn't seem unhinged, and they also wanted to counter her, you know, did Maya really have the ability to say that he was crazy, you know, in what way? So I think that was a big area of some damage control. Yeah. And also what you said earlier about Maya telling Patricia that she was not scared and didn't need her help. Yeah. She shut down the opportunity to take any kind of resources. Alexis, how did Patricia's testimony impact the defense's strategy that, you know, Jamie could be an alternate suspect in all of this? There's definitely a couple things that worked in favor for the defense after Patricia took the stand. I mean, Jamie, you didn't really have to impeach him. He admitted on the stand that he lied, but she insinuated that Jamie could still be lying, that he might still be holding some things back. So that helped their case. I think it seemed like something that worked against the defense was Patricia backing up Jamie's timeline of events where he was, what he was doing at the time when Maya disappeared. That's really what the prosecution, I think, needed Patricia layered for is that they needed someone to say, this is where Jamie was. She went to labor the night Maya disappeared, and they were at the hospital for five days because of complications. And she said Jamie was with her. That's really what the prosecution needed, I think, to help the jury eliminate him as a suspect. One thing, you know, obviously that the defense has to work with is that Maya's body has never been found. And in fact, a date line was mentioned during the trial this week in our, for a missing in America series where we profiled Maya. That's right, because that's a huge part of this case that I think sometimes we forget about because there's this presumption that she's not alive. But the jury has to not only, if they want to reach a conviction against Larry, they have to reach a conclusion that she is in fact dead, and that she's not alive somewhere out there. So this prosecution has to prove that there was all of this attention on her case. And in this day and age, the likelihood that she is alive is pretty much not existed. We should say Larry has maintained his innocence from the beginning. At the time we're taping this, the defense has not started presenting its case to the jury yet. But according to the court, they've only asked for one day to call witnesses. The jury should get the case next week, and we will be watching closely, Alexis. Thank you so much for your analysis. Of course, thanks so much again. Coming up, a Las Vegas youth pastor is accused of murdering his first wife 20 years ago. One of the key witnesses against him, his second wife. Just before sunrise on August 22nd, 2006, David and Bernadette Vandermeer set off to hike the Angels Landing Trail in Utah Zion National Park. Hundreds of thousands of people make that same trek each year, drawn to the trail's breathtaking views and treacherous terrain. But Bernadette never came back down. David, a youth pastor, told investigators his wife had accidentally fallen off a cliff to her death. They had some suspicions about David's story, but the case was ruled in accident and it stayed that way for nearly 20 years. Then last week, news broke on NBC affiliate KSNV. Thorne's in Utah reopened a murder case surrounding a suspicious fall at the Angels Landing Trail in Zion National Park. U.S. Marshals arrested David Vandermeer in Las Vegas to face charges back in Utah for the murder of his wife and insurance fraud. At least Idaho News reporter Nate Eaton has been following this case closely and recently spoke with Bernadette's family.
for his podcast courtroom insider Nate. Welcome back to the podcast. Thanks for having me, Andrea. Good to see you. You too. All right. So Nate, take us back to the beginning. Tell us about David and Bernadette. What was their story? They actually met as teenagers. They performed together in a church play. They fell in love and they got married. Bernadette was fairly young only 18 years old. Her family says that faith was so important to them. At one point she actually worked in a casino as a cocktail waitress and her mother said that she would often share the gospel with people who she met while they were gambling. She was bread the word about Jesus Christ. So people should be delivering drinks to and by 2006 they were living in Vegas and attending a church where David was the youth pastor. So that brings us to August of 2006. Walk us through what David said happened that day in the national park that terrible day. Well, they went a few weeks before their wedding anniversary to to celebrate that. And according to the probable cause, affidavit, David and Bernadette drove design national park. It was August 21st. They spent the night there early the next morning very early. They began hiking angels landing before the sun came up. David said they reached the summit while it was still dark that he stepped away to set up a sunrise photograph. Then he heard his wife scream. He turned around and she had fallen off the cliff. Now investigators thought that part of his story were suspicious parts of him. But according to the affidavit, they didn't believe they had enough evidence to actually prove that this was a crime. So that's what her death was rule accidental and the case was closed. Nate, for years, that's where the case stayed a lot of years. What happened to David after Bernadette's death? He moved on with life and so did her family, Andrea. David returned to the church where he was at a pastor, the youth pastor, after she died. But then around 2008, the affidavit says that he was fired after leaders learned at the church that he was throwing parties for teenagers and giving them alcohol and encouraging gambling. Eventually, he built this entirely new life in Las Vegas, working as a school counselor and actually becoming a yoga instructor. So while David was building this new life, investigators say another story was unfolding behind the scenes. According to the affidavit, former members of the youth group began coming forward with allegations that David had groomed them. Investigators looked into it, but no charges were brought at the time. So what led to the investigation into his wife's death? A few years later, a senior pastor at the church contacted authorities in Utah and said that they no longer believe that Bernadette's death had been an accident. Okay, so there's an important witness in all of this who really seemed to help crack the case wide open and investigators identify this witness in the affidavit only by her initials SH. Yeah, she said that David began grooming her when she was 14 years old. She said that the relationship became sexual when she was 16. And at this time, David was still married to Bernadette. So according to the affidavit, SH told investigators she tried to break things off with David the night before David and Bernadette left for Zion National Park. Right. And she actually said that David told her that the only way that the two of them could ever be together was if quote, Bernadette was not alive. And get this after Bernadette died, she ended up marrying David. Oh my wait, so is this now marriage number? That was number two because then he got married again. Okay. Investigators believe this relationship then motivated David to kill Bernadette. But there was more to it than just the relationship as we know Nate in a lot of our cases, life insurance comes into play as a possible motive. Yep, the money. And according to the affidavit, David collected around $567,000 in life insurance proceeds after Bernadette's death. Now I spoke with her mother who told me that the very morning they left for Zion, Bernadette had told her that they had recently increased their life insurance coverage. And she said, come here. I'll show you and she took me to the computer and put a code in and it didn't work. She put another code in and still it worked. The password had been changed and she said, David, change the password. I'll figure it out. We can log in later and I'll show you. So many suspicious things happening in all of this. Nate, you know these these cases can be tricky for investigators, these where people get pushed off cliffs. In this case, you know, David's the only person with Bernadette on top of the cliff that morning. What else did they uncover to propel this investigation? They went through the timeline that he gave them minute by minute. He had always maintained that he was setting up the camera to take the sunrise photo with his wife when she fell. But according to the affidavit, when investigators compared his timeline to the NASA sunrise data, they didn't match up. If David had really been getting Bernadette into a position for a sunrise photo, the sun should have actually been coming up. But the first 911 call came in long before the sun was visible from the location. So it was still dark when that 911 call came in. And so once they were able to piece all this together, plus the previous woman coming forward, they say that the evidence pointed to murder and that it was not an accident. And this all led to David's arrest. He was taken into custody pending extradition back to Utah. But then another shocking twist in this. Right. We learned he was supposed to appear in court on Thursday. The judge showed up and said that actually he wasn't going to be there because he had died. And then the jail released a statement saying that they had an inmate who had died from self-inflicted injuries who was David. I can't even imagine what this is like for the family. All these years go by someone's finally arrested for their daughter's death. And then now he's dead so quickly afterwards. How did they react to this? Yeah, it's been a roller coaster. You know, when Bernadette died, they had their suspicions. But then they say that they were able to put them aside and move on with life because he was never charged. So when investigators called to tell them the news that he had been arrested, they felt like they were finally going to get those answers that they had longed for. But but the day that he died, I actually spoke with them a few hours after that. And they said that they felt like justice had been served, but his death won't erase the loss of Bernadette. She was a wonderful, special woman of God. She had a great, bright future ahead of her and it was cut short. Such a heartbreaking story, Nate. Thank you for bringing it to us. Up next, it's time for Dateline Roundup. Luigi Mangione and Alec Murdoch are back in court gearing up for their trials. Plus, she's a beloved actress and podcaster and a devoted Dateline viewer. We'll be catching up with June Diane Rafeel. Welcome back. Joining me for this week's Roundup is Dateline producer Sue Simpson. Sue, thanks for being here. So Sue, we are back in South Carolina where Alec Murdoch was back in court this week. He is of course the disgraced former attorney whose double murder conviction was overturned by the state Supreme Court in May. Remind us why these convictions were overturned. So Andrew, as you know, in 2023 Murdoch was found guilty and sentenced to two consecutive life sentences in prison for the murders of his wife Maggie and his son Paul. Shortly after he was sentenced, Murdoch's defense team filed an appeal arguing that he didn't get a fair trial. The appeal eventually made its way to the state Supreme Court and five judges unanimously ruled to overturn Murdoch's conviction and ordered a new trial. So this is the first hearing that he's had leading up to his retrial. Murdoch was wearing an orange jumpsuit, prison jumpsuit, and was shackled. And remember, he is behind bars not for the murders, but for financial crimes that he pleaded guilty to. He has always maintained his innocence, though, for the murders. And Sue, the courthouse was packed and this can fit what? 200 people? 200 approximately. And Andrea, no surprise, it was packed, right? There were dozens of media outlets, international agencies, local TV stations. And of course, true crime broadcasters were there. The judge, Deborah McCaslin acknowledged the crowd when she sat down at the bench. So Andrea, this is a new judge. She took over from Judge Clifton Newman, who recently retired. And while many of the people at the hearing were probably very familiar with the Murdoch murders, the judge was not. And she acknowledged that. Let me tell y'all, I don't know anything about the first trial. So when you tell me something, please be complete, Can you tell me because don't assume
that I know 'cause I don't. - Murdoch's defense team has already filed several pretrial motions, which were brought up at this hearing. What are they asking for? - So the defense has requested a change of venue. They also ask that Murdoch be allowed to wear civilian clothes and to be unshackled when he appears in front of the jury. - We learned that the defense is planning on calling eight new expert witnesses and ask the judge for access to some of the evidence from the investigation. They did. They want access to DNA evidence recovered from under maggies and fingernails. Back in the day, investigators determined that this DNA belonged to an unknown, unrelated man. So they want to find out everything they can about that DNA. - It may turn out to be innocuous. We don't know, but it's worth looking into. - The defense told the judge they'd cover the cost to this independent DNA testing. - And the judge had something to say about that. - I'm gonna let you back forward. - Yeah. - Yeah, a lighter moment. The judge did not rule on any of these motions at this hearing, but she did put a tentative date on the calendar for the retrial, which is a big deal. That's right. April 5th, 2027. - Okay, speaking of trial dates in New York, we have an update in Luigi Mangione's federal case. He is accused of gunning down United Health Care CEO, Brian Thompson back in 2024 and faces several charges, including a state murder charge and federal stalking charges. He has pleaded not guilty to all of them. So this week Mangione made a brief court appearance for his federal proceedings. What happened there? - Well, Andrew, according to a court official on Monday, Mangione appeared 30 minutes late. He apparently got stuck in a courthouse elevator. - Okay. - Yeah, and he remained shackled. Those building engineers freed him from the elevator. And when he finally walked into court, he walked in through the entrance that's reserved for the judge. When the hearing finally got underway, Andrea, the judge made a big announcement that she'd be pushing back his federal trial date from this November to January 25th, 2027. - Do we know why, Sue? - Well, she said a November date would be impossible. Her word, because of Mangione's state trial, which is scheduled to start in September. She said the defense can't go through with jury selection for the federal trial while the state trial is in process. Sue, last week we found out that Mangione might be in talks about taking a plea deal in his federal case. That's according to what sources familiar with the matter told our New York affiliate WNBC. What happened with that? Apparently those talks fell apart. That doesn't mean that a plea deal is off the table entirely. A plea deal could still be considered right up until Mangione's trial date. - Okay, this next update I have to say completely caught me off guard. I bet news about Nicholas Eleverdian from Utah. Nicholas was the international con man who faked his own death in 2020 before fleeing to Scotland to evade rape charges. Overseas, he took up a new identity as a British orphan named Arthur Knight. I confronted him about his identity in one of my most memorable date line interviews. - What do you say to someone who believes that you are Nicholas Eleverdian? - I am the Andrea, I am not Nicholas Eleverdian. And I do not know how to make this clear. - Nicholas was extradited from Scotland, brought back to Utah last year to stand trial for the rape charges against him. Sue, there were two separate trials remind us about those. In August 2025, Andrea, a jury found Nicholas guilty of raping his former fiancee. He was sentenced to five years to life. And then in September 2025, a separate jury found Nicholas guilty of raping his former ex girlfriend. And he was sentenced to five years to life as well for that. - So this is where my jaw drops Sue. Last week, news broke that Nicholas died. - What happened? - Yeah. According to a press release from the Utah Department of Corrections, they said that Nicholas died from complications of an existing medical condition after choosing to discontinue medical treatment. We don't know Andrea what that medical condition was. He was only 38 years old. - So, that is it for Nicholas Eleverdian. Wow, that was a long saga, that story. Sue, thank you so much for these updates. - Thanks for having me. - For our final story this week, we are joined by a very special guest. Someone you might recognize from your favorite TV shows like Netflix's Grace and Frankie. - That was a joke. - Ha, he's funny. - Or maybe from her podcasts, how did this get made and the deep dive? - This movie I truly believe was like the cultural reset that this podcast needed. - June Diane Rayfield is not only a successful actress and podcaster, she is also a keen date line watcher. She's here today to talk about her favorite cases plus her role in the new Legally Blonde prequel series called Elle, available on Amazon Prime Video. June, thanks for coming on the podcast. - I'm thrilled to be here and talk to you. - Likewise, and we have to say for our listeners, you are addressed in true Legally Blonde fashion with a lovely pink St. John suit. - It's so, you know what, even though you're mom. - It is very Elle Woods coated, but Elle got her fashion sense from somewhere. That's what you're gonna find out about in the prequel series. A lot of it, if I may, came from Eva Woods. - Awesome. - All right, so as we said, you're a big date line fan. How did you become interested in true crime? - You know, I think I just started just watching the show and I loved it. And I think so many women are drawn to the show to be quite honest. - True. - There is something about listening to these stories that are told with such humanity and such empathy for the victims and their families, where I think we're kind of getting back some agency and learning and understanding what red flags were and how we could prevent it. But it is actually, I think, no surprise that women have really latched onto this genre. - Yeah, they have. And also I think because so many of the cases involve men taking the lives of women. It is nice at the end of our date lines, most date lines to see them. - Yes. - You know, have there come up and it's that they're going to prison justice. - That's fair. - So you previously moderated a panel at South by Southwest with my fabulous colleagues Keith and Josh. - And it was an incredible experience. It felt, it was like the Beatles were there. People were going crazy for them. - Yeah, people love Josh and Keith. - Yes, they do. I mean, they are, I have to say that one of the things I walked away with was both of them, but I specifically remember Josh talking about just how much of his time was spent just on a day-to-day following up with these stories. Just staying in touch with these families and victims and I thought that was so beautiful. - Yeah, we really do stay in touch with people, the people we interview and we'll do updates on shows and we'll also do, we have a podcast called After the Vertict where we check in with people and I'm generally a ball of tears at the end. - I love hearing those stories because it does make you reflect on all you have. And how, you know, how people can overcome such tragedy and to actually give back and prevent it. It's always so special to hear about. - Are there any true crime cases you're following right now we're interested in? - Oh gosh. Well, I'm absolutely following Luigi Mangione case. - We just did that on a date line. - I'm just fascinated by that case and who he is. I'm surprised at the recent development which I learned about on your podcast about his plea and how he's going about it and the defense rather. - Right. - Yeah, he flip-flopped his defense team on this psychiatric defense announced. - Yeah, so I'm following that one very closely. - Okay, so let's talk about your newest project. I know a lot of people were really sad when Grace and Frankie ended back in 2022. But I am a massive legally blonde fan. My daughter's embarrassed by this. I named her my daughter L after L was. - I love that. - So there you go. - And Reese talks about that a lot where she meets women and they've-- - There's a lot of L's. - There's a lot of L's, but that's so beautiful because and there's also real data on how many women went to law school after-- - Oh, I love that. - After seeing this move. - I wish I did. - Really, kind of blown away by the cultural impact this character has had. And you get to certainly find out in the series how she became who she is. And it's really cool to see because I think most women feel like we didn't just arrive confident, successful, whatever. - No, no. - Heck no. - There are other women who helped us along the way, who challenged us maybe, who didn't believe in us, maybe in their experiences and circumstances that got us there. So it's really, it's a very special series. And I noticed in the trailer that L does a little bit of sleuth thing. - Yes, she's got a case. She's, you know, there are some similar storylines. I think if you're a fan of the movie, there's so much connectivity.
to shoot from the movie to the TV show and it also becomes its own thing too. So which is really nice. - I'm so excited and you're the perfect person to play her mom. - Thank you. - And if anyone wants to watch my version of the "Bend and Snap" I did it with the original "Delivery Man" you can go to my Instagram with I did it with Bruce Thomas who played Jennifer Coolidge's "Love Interest". You can go to my Instagram and watch my "Bend and Snap" "Bend and Snap". - June, thank you for being here and we're so excited for your new project. - I really love the work you all do. So it's a total honor to be here. - That's it for this episode of "Dateline True Crime Weekly". But if you wanna check out after the verdict, subscribe to "Dateline Premium". In our latest episode, Keith Morrison catches up with Aya Altentawi who we interviewed for the shadow in the window. His story about the murder of Aya's mother at the hands of her older brother. They talk about what family means now to Aya and how she's one step closer to pursuing her dream of becoming a lawyer. Coming up this Friday on "Dateline", we've got a classic Josh episode for you. It starts with one of the most intense 9-1-1 calls we've ever heard on "Dateline". - This is Dr. Aya, the transfer. She's extremely at the best. She's so much easier running and she's crying so she needs a place to meet the police. - Make sure to watch "Out of the Darkness". Friday at 10/9 central on NBC. Thanks for listening. "Dateline" "True Crime Weekly" is produced by Carson Cummins, Caroline Casey, and Keonnie Reed. Our associate producers are Ellery Gladstone-Grath and Aria Young. Our senior producer is Liz Brown-Curloff, production and fact-checking helped by Yana Johnson. Veronica Mosaic is our digital producer. Rick Kwan is our sound designer, original music by Jesse McGinty. Paul Ryan is executive producer and Liz Cole is senior executive producer of "Dateline". - Thanks everybody. See you later.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
A former youth pastor in Las Vegas, David Vandermeer, is accused of murdering his wife Bernadette on the Angels Landing Trail in 2006, with new evidence suggesting a motive tied to a prior sexual relationship and life insurance fraud.
A former church youth group member, identified by initials SH, testified that David groomed her and told her the only way they could be together was if Bernadette was not alive, implicating a motive for the murder.
Investigators found inconsistencies in David’s timeline, including a 911 call made before sunrise, which contradicted his claim of taking a sunrise photo, undermining the accidental death narrative.
In the trial of Navy optician Larry Miliette, prosecutors introduced Patricia Laird, Maya’s lover’s wife, who testified about the affair and revealed Larry’s repeated calls, suggesting obsession, while Maya claimed to be unafraid of him.
Patricia’s testimony raised doubts about Jamie Laird’s alibi and supported the defense’s claim that he may have been lying, though the prosecution used it to show he was present during Maya’s disappearance.
The prosecution faces a key challenge
In the retrials of Alec Murdoch and Luigi Mangione, both cases saw significant developments—Murdoch’s conviction overturned and a new trial set for 2027, while Mangione’s federal trial date was pushed to January 2027 due to overlap with his state trial.
Nicholas Eleverdian, a fugitive who faked his death and was later extradited, died at 38 from complications after discontinuing medical treatment, ending a high-profile case involving deception and international evasion.
Summary:
Dateline True Crime Weekly covers several high-profile cases, beginning with the reopened murder of Bernadette Vandermeer, a former youth pastor’s wife, accused of a fatal fall in Utah. New evidence, including testimony from a former youth group member who alleges David groomed her and claimed she would never be with him unless Bernadette died, and timeline inconsistencies in the hiking incident, has shifted the case from accident to murder, leading to David’s arrest. A major challenge remains the lack of physical evidence and the presumption of Maya’s survival in the separate case of Navy optician Larry Miliette, where prosecutors rely on marital strife and a love triangle involving Jamie Laird.
Patricia Laird’s testimony, as the wife of Jamie, reveals Larry’s persistent calls and Maya’s dismissal of danger, fueling both defense and prosecution arguments. The defense uses these details to question the credibility of the affair narrative and suggest alternative suspects. Meanwhile, updates on the trials of Alec Murdoch and Luigi Mangione show Murdoch’s conviction overturned with a retrial scheduled for 2027, and Mangione’s federal trial postponed due to overlap with his state proceedings.
The case of Nicholas Eleverdian, a fugitive who faked his death and was later extradited to face rape charges, ends with his death from medical complications at age 38. The episode also features June Diane Rayfield, a true crime enthusiast and actress, discussing her fascination with the Mangione case and the cultural impact of the "Legally Blonde" prequel series, which highlights women’s empowerment and resilience in the face of tragedy. These stories underscore the complexity of modern criminal investigations, the role of personal relationships in motive, and the enduring public interest in justice and accountability.
FAQs
Investigators believe David was motivated by a long-term relationship with a former youth group member, SH, who claimed David groomed her and told her the only way they could be together was if Bernadette was not alive. Additionally, David collected around $567,000 in life insurance proceeds after her death, suggesting financial motive.
The case was reopened after a former youth group member, identified by initials SH, came forward with allegations that David groomed her and that he told her Bernadette had to be dead for them to be together. This testimony, combined with inconsistencies in David’s timeline and the first 911 call coming in before sunrise, led investigators to conclude the fall was not accidental.
David claimed he set up a sunrise photo while it was still dark, but investigators found that the first 911 call came in before the sun was visible. NASA sunrise data showed the sun had not yet risen, meaning the timeline did not align with his story, casting doubt on the accident claim.
Patricia Laird, the wife of Jamie Laird, testified that Larry called her repeatedly about the affair between Maya and Jamie, and that Maya told her the affair was a fabrication to make Larry feel stupid. She also said Maya claimed she wasn’t scared of Larry and didn’t need help, which the prosecution used to portray Larry as obsessive.
The jury must conclude that Maya is dead to convict Larry, as her body has never been found. The prosecution argues that the extensive media attention and public interest make it highly unlikely she is still alive, which helps establish the case for murder rather than disappearance.
Mangione appeared 30 minutes late in court due to an elevator issue, and his federal trial date was pushed from November 2024 to January 25, 2027. The judge cited scheduling conflicts with his state trial. Additionally, reports suggest his defense was considering a plea deal, though it reportedly fell through.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.