A series of investigative reports expose systemic corruption and political overreach under the Trump administration. ProPublica reveals that Senator Susan Collins accepted illegal donations from a defense contractor, prompting a federal investigation that was halted by Trump, who removed key investigators. This reflects a broader return to the old “spoils system,” where political loyalty trumps accountability. The administration is funneling taxpayer money to authoritarian nations to expel immigrants, a practice condemned as unlawful and human rights violating. Multiple officials—including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—have accepted significant donations from political allies, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. ICE agents, including those with violent histories, were hired without proper vetting, culminating in a fatal shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant. The administration also dismantled federal science agencies like the NSF, redirecting funds to politically aligned projects, such as artificial intelligence. Additionally, the White House bypassed safety regulations to build a ballroom without fire code compliance, exemplifying disregard for public safety. These actions collectively demonstrate a pattern of prioritizing political power and personal interests over transparency, accountability, and constitutional protections, echoing 19th-century political corruption while modernizing its reach.
Hello, this is Michael Moss.
Heather Cox Richardson is unable to read the letter today, so I will be reading it in her
place.
September 23, 2026.
Yesterday, William Turton, Avi Asher Shapiro, Molly Redden, and Kristen Berg of ProPublica
published a blockbuster story reporting that the anti-corruption group of the Federal Bureau
of Investigation was investigating Senator Susan Collins, a Republican of Maine, for
engaging in a pay-to-play scheme in which defense contractor Navitek made illegal donations
to her 2020 campaign and later got multi-million dollar contracts from the government.
Collins is the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
And yet, the story continues, when he returned to the White House in 2025, Trump fired the
investigators building the case and largely stopped investigating public corruption.
While the primary witness in the case was Martin Cow, the man who allegedly engaged
in the bribery, the ProPublica journalist corroborated much of Cow's account through
public records, FBI evidence, and interviews with people who worked for him.
Collins' deputy chief of staff, Annie Clark, said Collins' office vigorously denies allegations
of bribery and pay-to-play, but she did admit that the Collins campaign disgorged the illegal
contributions that Martin Cow had made without our knowledge.
Emails suggest that, in fact, her office did know about the deal.
After a $150,000 donation, a staff member from her office emailed a lobbyist for Navitek
to ask for Cow's phone number, writing,
Although the story's authors report that Navitek never produced a product the military needed,
it did, in fact, receive millions in defense contracts.
The bribery angle of this story is huge.
So, too, is that the story suggests that Trump, at least, might perceive that he has
something to hold over Collins' head to keep her behind his actions, even when they
have dramatically weakened her power at the head of appropriations.
The 1873 novel The Gilded Age, a tale of today, by Charles Dudley Warner and Mark Twain that
gave the late 19th century its nickname, was not about the rich and the poor.
It was not about the riches of the industrialists who came to be known as robber barons.
It was about the political corruption of the era.
In the book, unscrupulous speculators bribe congressmen.
A congressional appropriation costs money, a railroad man tells a naive youth who wonders
where a $200,000 appropriation has gone.
He listed the bribes his project required and noted that the high moral lawmakers cost more
than the usual ones.
It was an era in which lawmakers lived by the spoils system, as in, to the victors go
the spoils.
Lawmakers at the time rewarded their business followers with government contracts and put
supporters into political office.
The businessmen and officials, in turn, would hire workers on the condition they voted for
the party the boss supported.
Every good man looks after his friends.
The U.S. outlawed the spoils system in 1883 after a disappointed office seeker assassinated
President James Garfield, replacing it with the Merit-Based Civil Service Reform Act, or
Pendleton Act.
Trump has ripped up those civil service protections, making much of the government staff again
political appointees.
Curiously, at the United Nations, the U.S. Department of Justice has been the first to
in the United Nations to have a civil service reform act.
The U.S. Department of Justice has been the first to have a civil service reform act.
At the United Nations yesterday, Trump used the phrase,
To the victor belong the spoils.
The relationship between the MAGA Republican agenda and the misuse of tax dollars is becoming
more and more obvious since ProPublica ran the story last November of how contracts from
the Department of Homeland Security appeared to be going to those personally tied to then
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her allies.
The U.S. Corey Lewandowski.
In July 2026, Tarini Pardee, Josh Dawsey, Michelle Hackman, and Summer Said of the Wall Street Journal
confirmed that Lewandowski effectively controlled billions in spending at Homeland Security.
Lewandowski responded, somewhat half-heartedly, that the story was
just another example of the kind of anonymous source, politically driven reporting that
Americans are not allowed to have a civil service reform act.
Americans have seen time and again, and emphasized that he was
a volunteer in advancing this administration's agenda.
Stories of the Trump administration's misuse of taxpayer money are starting to drop fast and furious.
Yesterday, Liz Esley White of the Wall Street Journal reported that Health and Human Services
Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. funded enhanced security for himself
by taking a loan from the U.S. Department of Justice.
The U.S. By taking funds from the Department's Office of Minority Health.
White notes that the Reagan administration created the Office of Minority Health
after a landmark report showed that black life expectancy in the U.S.
was shorter than white Americans, and that black babies were more likely than white babies to die.
Christina Jewett and Cheryl Gay Stolberg of the New York Times reported today that
over the past year, Kennedy has also accepted $4 million in book advances
and more than $270,000 in gifts from allies connected to the
Make America Healthy, or MAHA, movement interested in changes to government policies.
Kennedy's wife, Cheryl Hines, accepted $210,000 in consulting fees from a MAHA advocacy group.
On a far larger scale is the use of tax dollars to pay authoritarian governments
to imprison immigrants from the United States who are not their own citizens.
On Monday, David Nakamura and Adam Taylor of the Washington Post
reported that the State Department's Office of Remigration
has pledged at least $400 million to facilitate third-country renditions
to expel migrants from the United States.
The U.S. Department of Justice has also accepted $400 million to facilitate third-country renditions to expel migrants from the United States.
that U.S. courts say cannot be returned to their home countries for fear they will be harmed or
killed. So the U.S. has sent more than 25,000 people to at least 28 third countries, including
Eswatini, Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, and Sierra Leone for a fee.
That money includes $81 million in direct payments to 13 foreign governments,
as well as funding for agencies that will then contribute to those countries.
Those countries either imprison the migrants or send them back to their home countries,
a loophole that enables the administration to get around the prohibition on the U.S. sending them
there. Last Friday, a federal appeals court found that this policy was not a good idea,
is unlawful. The administration will appeal to the Supreme Court. White House Deputy Chief of
Staff Stephen Miller has ordered the deals, and Christian Earhart, a State Department official,
has secured them. Nakamura and Taylor explain that the Office of Remigration,
the word remigration is popular with white nationalists who seek to expel racial minorities
and immigrants through ethnic cleansing.
Reverses the previous U.S. emphasis on resettling refugees and instead focuses on expelling them,
including into places where there is strong evidence they will be tortured.
The administration is locking in those deals as quickly as possible, the journalists report,
exercising minimal oversight over how the money is spent and how the migrants are treated,
even though some of the third countries are ruled by authoritarian regimes.
A former State Department official who left the department over the policy told Nakamura and
Taylor that the administration wanted fast money with no strings attached. The whole point was
to circumvent congressional notification that money was being sent to a government known to
be corrupt. The plan appears to be to create such terror in migrant communities that people hear
self-deport and others are afraid to come.
Aaron Reikland Melnick of the American Immigration Council notes that
Congress should demand answers from those responsible for diverting tax
payer funding intended to protect people from persecution to some of the world's worst
authoritarians for purposes which clearly violate human rights. On Sunday, an agent from Immigration
and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, shot Wilbur Rafael Garces Perez, a Venezuelan food delivery
driver, in the back in Austin, Texas. With a bullet still lodged in his body, he was discharged from a
hospital to ICE custody, where he spent the night in pain on a cold floor. Nick Miroff of The Atlantic
reported yesterday that the officer was a recent hire who was not wearing a body camera, despite
the promise of Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen that all ICE agents would wear cameras.
News outlets reported that the officer had been issued one. The Department of Homeland Security
set out to add 10,000 new agents last year after Congress provided billions of dollars to double
the ICE workforce. ICE ramped up its hiring by offering $50,000 signing bonuses and cutting
normal vetting procedures, sometimes not even checking fingerprints or identities or conducting
a job interview.
David Brouillette, the ICE officer with a volatile history, who killed Johann Sebastian Duran Guerrero
in Biddeford, Maine in July, was also a recent hire. On September 15th, Alex Horton, Joy Sohyun Lee,
Maria Sicetti, and Ted Hessen of The Washington Post reported that ICE has been quietly firing
some of those hastily hired. ICE told The Washington Post,
ICE is hiring the best of the best to go after the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens,
including drug traffickers, murderers, and pedophiles. When individuals fall short of
that standard, personnel decisions are made. This is standard practice in almost every American
workplace. Officials told Miroff that the agents who stopped Garcés Pérez used a commercial
database to track down the murderers, including drug traffickers, murderers, and pedophiles.
Officials also told Miroff that the agents who stopped Garcés Pérez used a commercial database
and federal immigration file that identified the man's plates as belonging to someone
with an outstanding deportation order. His lawyer said he had a valid work permit and is an asylum
seeker, and that the deportation order came because notice of his immigration court hearing
was sent to the wrong address. After a public outcry, officials took Garcés Pérez back to the
court. Ryan Quinn of Inside Higher Ed reported Monday that the National Science Foundation,
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality are running far behind where they should be in terms of funding for
the fiscal year, which ends on September 30th. Trump fired the board of the National Science
Foundation, or NSF, in April, and the foundation is now in session with the National Science
Foundation. The foundation is now effectively being run by the White House Office of Management
and Budget, or OMB, a former NSF board member told Quinn. The director of OMB is Russell Vogt,
a key author of Project 2025. And OMB is directing the agency to direct its grant-making dollars
in ways that are very different from federal law, as passed by Congress in its budget,
the former board member said.
Quinn noted that nature attributed the funding shortfall mainly to the agency keeping more than
$1 billion in an account, much of which is for the White House's Grand Research Challenges project,
which is meant to support specific fields, including artificial intelligence.
The Trump family and the president's allies are heavily invested in the AI sector.
And then there are Trump's vanity issues.
Even before Trump announced that the American taxpayer wouldn't pay a dime for the White House
ballroom project, the administration had already signed contracts that put the American taxpayer
on the hook for more than $300 million for it. Today, Sarah Blaski and Jonathan O'Connell of
the Washington Post reported that James McCrary II, the first architect on Trump's ballroom,
resigned when Trump insisted that the White House would not pay a dime for the White House ballroom
because it consisted on a design that did not meet fire codes.
Normally, White House construction would be managed by federal agencies
required by law to comply with building safety codes. But White House officials have routed the
ballroom through the tiny executive residence office that is exempt from rules because it is
not a federal agency. McCrary warned that Trump's design did not have enough emergency exits or
measures to contain a fire.
The president said the design was not up to code. Trump waved off his concerns.
I am the code, he said.
Letters from an American was written by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions,
Ed in Massachusetts. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.
you
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
ProPublica revealed that Senator Susan Collins received illegal donations from defense contractor Navitek, leading to a pay-to-play investigation, which was later halted by Trump’s administration.
Trump fired federal corruption investigators and undermined public integrity by obstructing investigations into political misconduct, echoing the “spoils system” of the 19th century.
The Department of Justice and State Department are funding third-country renditions to expel migrants, with $400 million allocated to authoritarian regimes where detainees face torture or imprisonment.
Multiple officials, including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., accepted large campaign donations and book advances from political allies, raising concerns over conflicts of interest.
ICE agents, including those with violent histories, were hired without proper vetting, and one officer shot a Venezuelan immigrant, sparking outrage over lack of oversight and accountability.
The Trump administration disrupted key federal agencies like the NSF, shifting funding priorities to align with political goals, such as AI development favored by Trump allies.
The White House used executive exemptions to bypass safety and oversight rules, allowing unauthorized construction of the ballroom without compliance with fire codes.
The use of taxpayer funds to support authoritarian regimes and political allies reflects a broader pattern of political corruption and disregard for civil service integrity and human rights.
Summary:
A series of investigative reports expose systemic corruption and political overreach under the Trump administration. ProPublica reveals that Senator Susan Collins accepted illegal donations from a defense contractor, prompting a federal investigation that was halted by Trump, who removed key investigators. This reflects a broader return to the old “spoils system,” where political loyalty trumps accountability.
The administration is funneling taxpayer money to authoritarian nations to expel immigrants, a practice condemned as unlawful and human rights violating. Multiple officials—including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. —have accepted significant donations from political allies, raising concerns about conflicts of interest.
ICE agents, including those with violent histories, were hired without proper vetting, culminating in a fatal shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant. The administration also dismantled federal science agencies like the NSF, redirecting funds to politically aligned projects, such as artificial intelligence. Additionally, the White House bypassed safety regulations to build a ballroom without fire code compliance, exemplifying disregard for public safety.
These actions collectively demonstrate a pattern of prioritizing political power and personal interests over transparency, accountability, and constitutional protections, echoing 19th-century political corruption while modernizing its reach.
FAQs
ProPublica reported that Senator Susan Collins received illegal donations from Navitek during her 2020 campaign and later received multi-million dollar defense contracts, raising allegations of a pay-to-play scheme.
Yes, when Trump returned to the White House in 2025, he fired the FBI investigators building the case and largely halted the investigation into public corruption.
Martin Cow was the alleged briber who made illegal payments to Senator Collins' campaign. ProPublica corroborated his account using public records, FBI evidence, and interviews with colleagues.
The campaign denied allegations of bribery and pay-to-play, but admitted it had disbursed the illegal donations made by Martin Cow without full knowledge.
It reflects a return to the spoils system, where political allies receive government contracts and appointments, undermining merit-based civil service reforms established in 1883.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Lewandowski effectively controlled billions in Homeland Security spending and that the administration's spending patterns raised concerns about political favoritism.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.