Palantir contro la democrazia

In the beginning, we were at odds because we were pro-American, pro-wrest, and pro-making the government functional, and that was very controversial in Silicon Valley because it equated to not making any money and being a loser. We won that battle, and I think Silicon Valley actually has become very least officially and even beyond closed doors patriotic. The world changes every day. This is Stefano Feltre, a podcast and a program of Raera Dutre. This generation of technological entrepreneurs and philosophical athletes who were missing the previous one, those of the Steve Jobs, the Bill Gates, once in Silicon Valley, the challenge to invent new technology seems that the mission is to build new society through existing technology. The Palantir society, founded by Peter Till, published on account social, a 22-point manifesto, which is the synthesis of a few of the times, released on February 25, from the head of the Palantir Alix Carp and the Cap of Gaffari Legal, as the same company, Nicola Stamisca. At the time of publication, almost two years ago, many noticed that the book seemed to be written by another American without any other "carp", in fact, it has always been the progressive philosophy used by Peter Till for the more-definite environments, versus his technologies, his ideas. If Till is never noticed as a theological aspirant who talks about the apocalypse, Antichrist, Alex Carp, he is always presented as a leader of the great philosophical of the little "Jurkenápermas" but also as a son of a working class, mother from American, artist, father, pediatre and brother, who is better than him to represent America, of the opportunities. Then, from the other hand, Palantir has been exposed where it was necessary to obtain government for hundreds of millions of dollars, that is, the defense of the West that has a vision of Carp's history as a champion in the Trumpian America and Israel of Benjamin Netanyahu, which has been used as a Palantir in the War of the Garts. Palantir has not been given enough data but has been able to identify and collect enormous information about the already available government, and the use of using the most effective and political policies to act. Whether you are able to kill terrorist presence and return home from the families, or whether you are able to suggest the militias of the "Lies" in which they seek to emigrate with the documents that are scheduled to be carried out, Palantir can help you. And with Palantir's manifesto in 22 points, it is not only the synthesis of the book of Carp, it is about a theological manifesto of the Silicon Valley at the time of Trump. Some points may be explicitly explained exclusively to compel the legal of the house of Bianca. For example, the 11th of the manifesto, it is read that we should show much more indulgence towards the color that is exposed to the public life, the elimination of any space for forgiveness, the abandonment of every tolerance for the compressive contradictions of the human psyche, could leave us with a class of leaders that we will end up losing ourselves. The reference of Donald Trump is completely out of the full confinetic of the investments in conflict of interest on the cryptocurrency regulated by the government, the frequentations of the pedophilogen and the Freehapsing. Carp is saying, "Wait for it to be too urgent, we will lose this kind of character and we will be able to pay for it." In another passage of Palantir's manifesto, it is read that the exposition is hidden from private lives, the public figures are far too talented in the government service. But the most interesting parts are dedicated to the type of private and public-owned relationship that Palantir imagines, according to Alex Carp's vision of the Silicon Valley, is to participate in the defense of the nation, an ambiguous expression, but because a country can defend a community of many ways, but Carp is an only one, that is to give more power to the government to do what is necessary, without realizing anyone of the chosen facts. In the vision of Carp, the democratic society is not a prospect for the strength of the ideas that are regulated, but because they have the most powerful and powerful weapons. So, the quote of the new manifesto, "If a sea of an intense, who is a better person, we should build it." And the same goes for the software. However, if this is obvious that Palantir's manifesto is all about regulation or the limitation of the race on the intelligence of the artificial intelligence group, because the question is written by Alex Carp, "It is not the weapons based on artificial intelligence that will be built, and who will build it for the first and for the next generation." Our opponents will not be stopped by indulging and debating on the merits of the development of technology with military applications and national security. They will go forward. During World War II, there was no time to reflect on the moral implications of the atomic bomb that was simply necessary to build the first of the Nazis. And so, today, the artificial intelligence needs to arrive before the Chinese, this is the only thing that counts, this is the vision of Alex Carp. And then, certain public functions have not destroyed the organization to compete with the great technological Zen, therefore they had to renounce each attempt to inter-altern their race with rules and values that they do not know how to respect. All this could seem like a delirious, little elaborate delirium that came from all the cultural limits of who wrote it, even if it is a deep philosophical formation. But there are many important things to consider. The most obvious is the re-indication of the Alliance for a Big Tech and the Trump administration, in the name of the defense of the West, of the competition with China. The second aspect of the manifesto is the type of relationship that Palantir thinks of having with political decision. The Zen founded the Peter Till is not a simple service, but a piece of state, externalized, to those who have the technology and skills to do it. The values of the West, the argument of the manifesto of Palantir, are votes without the necessary force to impose them. That force was a time when the apparatus of the State, in its bureaucracy, in the army, in the weapons, in the dogs, now that force and in the algorithms, the 3D, the Agents, as Palantir, who indicate where to choose or who choose in the automatic way to account the human beings, without any involvement. In short, the real power is not a government, but a technological one that works for the government. This was also the intuition that was pushed by the mask to be taught in the DOGE, if you remember the department for the government efficiency, created and then abandoned in a few months of the Trump administration. If you need a computer to follow the vertical and political indications, you need to take the software control, the software inside the computer, not the bureaucracy that escapes the tasks, this intuition of the mask of the article. In this vision of the world, in the world of Palantir there is a problem, Europe. In other words, the European Union chose an approach that Palantir had to interfere with the fight, the fight to ask for the sense of rule, and to ask for the power to control the political system, the European Union still tries to put the city in control with its rights, not the technological company with its own essence. And this often translates into a bureaucratic barrier that frees innovation, but also prevents the abuse, and almost more so, there are now a narrative of GDPR for personal data management and the Artificial Intelligence Act. When the approach of the European Union works better, it ensures transparency and visibility on the decisions of the company, and in the limit the accumulation of power with wins, like those of the anti-trust, which block the fusion and acquisitions to limit the competition. There are two laws on this important, digital services Act and digital markets Act, which obviously are very much of the Silicon Valley. But the same European Union that, predicts and practices, values or posts that of Palantir does not buy the services. Many European governments already use Palantir, Germany, for political purposes, France, the US, the Olympics, in 2024, for the end of the Luxembourg, use the oil of Peter Till, and the international aspect of the interaction between Palantir and the governments that the states that want to use Palantir, then, end up changing the laws to consent to the agenda of Peter Till and Alex Carp, to access data reserved and to be able to combine to collect and build new information and give new input to the politicians. I can't seem to be a bit theoretical, but imagine that if a single subject can be recruited by data and three surveillance cameras, telephonic traffic, from the files of the police on the previous panels, then maybe the denials, the testimonies, and at the center of all this there is a private agenda that then sells the finished product to the government. The total surveillance specie that can't be done, because it builds its own data analysis that we already have product and dispersion in the digital universe. It limits to add and provide the right to the political decision, but above all, it creates a new ability to protect the executive power, administrative, security. It takes more power, more invasive, but also privacy-free. It's a private agenda that has the responsibility to the last of the actions of the Foreigners, that is, Palantir or the client, or the government. We are building a network of connections that will guarantee services and to provide the power of the state, which, however, at the center has a private subject that, once again, says to be a morsel, not financial motivation, which will be all-out-suffered, not only to make money, but it says to be a morsel of ideological motivation. It's a very important thing, because who has given Palantir a mandate to establish what are the values of the accident, and how much violence can be used to protect it, where the technology can be pushed to the offensive scope to defend the accident of which the car is considered. nessuno questo mandato non ha preso i voti, non è un tipo di potere democratico. L'Italia, ufficialmente, non compre servizi di Palantir, ma sia Peter Till, che Alex Carp ha in una certa frequentazione del nostro Paese, e non è schluso che stiano cercando delle opportunità. La traduzione italiana del libro "D Alex Carp", che non la ripubblica tecnologica, è uscita per l'assilio Berlusconi Editore, il progetto personale di Marina Berlusconi che, come di trice media set, si è sempre detto molto preoccupata dell'invadenza delle Big Tech. Marina Berlusconi però deve sentire anche una certa fascinazione o sintonia per il modello Palantir, in fondo il successo di Silvio Berlusconi, suo padre, si è fondato suo tempo, proprio, sull'utilizzo di un'azienda leader nella tecnologia dell'epoca, cioè la televisione, per conquistare la politica, e poi fondere le due entità in una cosa sola, dove i confini, fra interesse, aziendale e nazionale sono diventati sempre più indistinguibili. Fateci sapere cosa ne pensate, scrivevi che ti ci ho revolution, ci ho ciò da RAI.IT. Revolution è un podcast e un programma di RAI RAI 3. Seguiteci su RAI Play Sound e sulle altre piattaforme. [Musica]