'Oppenheimer' With Sean Fennessey | Nolan Revisited
1h 52m 16s
The podcast offers a thoughtful, in-depth exploration of Christopher Nolan’s *Oppenheimer*, focusing on its layered themes of regret, ambition, and moral consequence. Hosts Sean Fennessey and Joanna Robinson revisit the film multiple times, praising its first two hours as a cinematic masterwork and acknowledging the third act’s structural imbalance despite its thematic weight. Central to the analysis is the idea of regret within achievement—the emotional toll of creating something world-altering, as seen in the pivotal Trinity test scene where Oppenheimer is hoisted on men’s shoulders, radiating quiet sorrow. The film critiques the "great man" narrative, portraying Oppenheimer as a complex, flawed individual whose actions ripple through science, politics, and personal relationships. The inclusion of sexual content—especially in scenes between Gene Oppenheimer and Kitty—is framed not as gratuitous, but as a humanizing touch that reflects the film’s themes of desire, guilt, and interconnectedness. The discussion also draws parallels between *Oppenheimer* and Nolan’s earlier films, highlighting a shift toward emotional depth and moral ambiguity. Ultimately, the conversation reveals Nolan’s enduring interest in the tension between theory and reality, and the personal cost of wielding immense power—making *Oppenheimer* both a critical and emotionally resonant culmination of his filmography. The hosts also reflect on how the film’s themes of accountability, guilt, and human fallibility resonate beyond the screen, offering a profound meditation on power, responsibility, and the human condition.
hello welcome back to house of r i'm joida robinson that's the beautiful luminous malia
rubin joining us today it is the man the icon himself the atomic bomb of cinematic discourse
sean fantasy thank you thank you for having me oh my gosh thank you for being here for our
long-awaited out of order oppenheimer podcast meta non-linear storytelling here on house of r
yes this has been much like the launch of the bomb rescheduled at least three times but we're
going to make it happen today yeah due to rain and another a number of other things okay so we
are going to get to a lengthy healthy discussion and close our nolan rewatch right observe the
north american dad 50s great polo collection he enters his vehicle information on carvana
an offer appears in minutes remarkable he squints reads it again smiles and says dang
dang
that's a good offer the highest form of approval no haggling no hassle no one called him boss
he's still on the couch astonishing sell your car today on carvana.com pickup fees may apply
this episode is brought to you by the home depot black friday is happening now at the home depot
and they've got just a tree for your style space and budget make the holidays merry and bright with
artificial trees starting at 49 then make it your own with ornaments and trimmings for every holiday
style find your
perfect tree at the number one christmas tree retailer and get low prices guaranteed on all
your festive favorites at the home depot exclusions apply visit home depot.com slash price match for
details after this
all right program reminders what do we want to tell folks uh about what's coming up well we're
continuing to cover lanterns the show that we're quite enjoying so those pods will be dropping on
mondays those deep dives you picked lanterns in the house of our hype draft good for you yeah
watch the premiere enjoyed it didn't see episode two okay into it i will continue to watch it have
you ever seen a more handsome person than hal jordan in specifically hbo's lanterns i mean i
know he's a long time paramour of yours um yeah i like the man i think he's handsome yeah you know
i aspire to such rugged but but but unfussy masculinity i'll never quite get there but
it'd be nice if i could just put on like a suede jacket i kind of like your fussy masculinity thank
you thank you many people are calling it that put in the market on it it's pretty good uh in addition
to lanterns next week i believe the second podcast is buffy season five wow part one at long last we
will be resuming our buffy rewatch so that's a thrill that's exciting it's true for that i've
seen full for love so my life is forever altered we did do our look ahead for the rest of the year
uh at the live show in baltimore and there's a lot of great stuff coming wildwood made it very
high on my hype list uh for this fall i was invited to a screening and i dropped your name
and i said joanna robinson will need to see this film with me they said great i'll let you know
about that after the recording okay i like uh um sean yes wait hold on we're not gonna blow past
our trip to baltimore so i you know i've not spoken to either of you since you you traversed
the baseball stadium and one of you i sent you through a first pitch you i yes you did and i
left you an instagram comment but we're gonna talk about it in person we've known each other
for 13 years god damn it i left you an instagram comment i knew we would be face to face and that's
how i want to have this conversation okay so okay i've still only seen the first pitch yeah from
the angle that the orioles shared on instagram
which is to say i did not see home plate yeah so what how did it go what happened you know what
they told us is they don't usually shoot how it connects just to you know keep people guessing
that's the standard though i think that was that was edited by by our beloved jomie i think oh okay
you know with with taste and care um unlike danny heifetz who just posted the whole thing on his
instagram is that true yes you can see the hype is cut heifetz was an angel throughout the whole
night and then i was like damn man you really put me on blast here um you know the experience of
was wonderful the pitch itself it was it will be better next time when i'm invited back to do it
again i when would that be next year we're we're camping house of our night at oriole park at camden
yards an annual tradition we'll see if anybody on the receiving end of that uh they nodded
enthusiastically when we mentioned it maybe that was them like being like yeah there was passion in
the room in real time yeah um i i spent you know we like to prep here at the podcast so i i would
not say that i prepped the way i wanted to which would have been every day for six months i feel if
i had done that i would have been really dialed in exactly where i needed to be because as you know
it's not just about building up arm strength it's about mechanics consistency release point yeah
it started to started to practice just like a couple like a week and a half couple weeks before
and it was just enough to enough time to tell me i had left enough time for it yeah and when i would
adam went to the park with me it was lovely it was actually really fun like should we keep playing
reveal the park nearest to my home on a public podcast sorry you know i've got to realize you're
such a star i know you're throwing out first pitches behind the scenes photos on instagram
and then people can very easily identify it if they care right next to your comments we should
we should create a ringer-esque gawker stalker but just for parks it's a good idea it's a good
idea because we're all famously out and about yeah well those of us with children have to go
all the time unfortunately please put your children on a gawker stalker sean and bill and i learned on
the about last night rewatchables just mere
days ago that there is a apparently a robust thriving booming ringer intramural sports
experience that none of us have been invited to participate in they've got we've had a basketball
team oh yeah i know about this have you been invited to play no why would anybody invite me
i'm not fun why would anybody invite me to do anything i thought you were gonna say you're not
yeah but i don't know what the fussy masculine and easy energy you want to bring to intramurals
i think you'd be well i for years i did play on the intramural basketball team here and then i
retired i remember the back pain the lower back it was very hard on my body that was a tough playing
with 25 year olds and i was like oh my god i'm gonna play on the intramural basketball team
my back also hurts uh but that's just also because i'm getting old so the quick answer
to the how did the actual pitch go i was very worried as joe and all of the bad babies who
joined us at this wonderful event at oriole park at camden yards because we did the pre-game live
pod at the warehouse yes incredible experience we went down on the field we got to take pictures
incredible experience did the pitch incredible experience you know steve beslow my dear friend
yes i i could hear the bad babies cheering i knew adam had sort of vowed to take my parents
into a place where they would be able to see both the field and the jumbotron but i will
and joe was right there on the field but i wasn't expecting i turned around and my beloved steve one
of my best friends in the world was just had made his way down behind home plate and was right there
and i got all weepy and it was just very like wonderful and emotional and surreal and great
got out there i'd been really nervous in the run-up because every time adam and i went to
practice the first throw no matter how many times we did it not enough times but no matter how many
times always a spike 10 feet in front of me to the left every time because i was trying for
extra distance and would you know so i'm like all right don't spike the ball i told the room
at the live pot and you get a couple warm-up throws in you're fine but the first throw always
a mess i overcompensated released early and so because i was so anxious about holding late
but i cleared that i got had the distance to reach the place and that was that to me was
the most important thing didn't spike it didn't come up short but wide right yeah wide right okay
yeah so if it were right-handed hitter it would have been behind him and they would have thought
that i like tried to hit him in the spine but but missed okay um yeah
she did connect on all of her warm like i did i requested to warm up on the sideline before i saw
that yeah i don't want to say this then but i had a sinking feeling because you know the like the
rule of show business is like if your dress rehearsal is great sure the like oh no yeah
and i was like oh no she's hitting all of these enough to it you gotta try to get the arm a little
limber it was a very humid day there were storms there was a tornado warning nervous for her
beforehand no i was just excited she was incredibly supportive mallory had laid enough track that she
was so beautiful
so beautiful
very deep and meaningful she was like i'm just gonna spike it like she was really prepared to
spike it into the dirt spike felt to me so she wasn't like nervous about whether or not she was
gonna make it she had like come up with a whole routine of what she was gonna do yeah shook off
the catcher twice yeah then you know did her little challenge i saw you immediately called
for abs yeah she plotted that i saw did your hop over the foul line a cr approved bit which is how
i knew it was worth trying i knew she had a whole routine plan and i was just i just got emotional
she was like walked out there like yeah and then i walked into your arms and they like said her name
over the announcer and you could see her on the jumbotron it was just my high school it was really
fun oh wow it was great it was really sweet it was an honor and jimmy and i were just sitting there
and i just started crying it was really really sweet it was really wonderful it was a very cool
day for my family they were super hyped my dad was just like over the moon also joe got to meet my
family she got to meet some of my best friends it was amazing and then because people who had
bought this was a really cool event people who had bought tickets to the jumbotron and they were like
to the live show we all had like a dedicated section in center field so we spent the whole
game meeting the the meeting the listeners meeting the viewers and hanging out with them
um you know i didn't see a pitch of the game the orioles got their asses kicked uh lamentably by
the yankees however they bounced back and then took the next couple from the race so why did they
yeah they did why didn't you see a pitch of the game because we were just hanging with the bad
babies the whole time we were just we were in a throng of the bad baby community out in the wild
it's a wonderful thing to get to experience and then people are making line friends they're
to watch them meet each other you know i mean it's just a delight it's great it was a wonderful
experience uh and we're looking forward to house of our night at camden yards in 2027
and you were interviewed by kevin brown yeah so
And he hopped on the podcast, too.
No kidding.
He hopped on at the very end.
It sounded like he maybe he fangirled out a little bit.
Well, Kevin is a big fan of The Ringer.
He's a fan of House of R.
He's a Sean Fennessey and Big Pig super fan.
Nice.
And so while I would consider Kevin.
He's great.
He's super talented.
He's amazing.
While I would consider Kevin an actual genuine friend, like one of my dear friends, someone I adore.
You know, I know that our friendship is just a it's just a plot to get to you eventually.
And I'm OK with it.
I'm available.
His dream in life is to participate in a big picture movie draft.
Wow.
His dream in life.
Baltimore movies.
Are there enough?
You know, I've been plotting a baseball movie draft.
Let's do it.
I'm inviting myself as well.
Well, you were you were on the list.
You were on the invitation list.
Well, I'm number one.
Me, too.
Like number one.
Spoilers.
Well, now that you're all in.
I do love baseball movies.
Are you adopting the Orioles?
Have you considered that?
She has a custom jersey now.
I do.
Oh, I think I saw that.
Here's my hope is that if we make this an annual tradition, we get to start collecting.
Because they put 26 on the back for the year.
Then we get 27, 28.
Actually, they just back collect one every year.
Wow.
We need to be invited on a City Connect night so that we can get the custom City Connect.
So, oh, City Connect this year.
It's just fucking amazing.
I'm not familiar with them, but I reject City Connect on the premise.
I don't.
I'm just not a fan.
Well, I mean, I've seen the Met City Connect, so I bet.
They're pretty rough.
Yeah.
Let me ask you this.
Why didn't you respond to my text where I sent you Pete Alonso's Player Weekend bat,
which had a Maryland crab, blue crab.
And it was all about the Eastern Shore and being just being in love with Maryland and
Baltimore and this new community.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And you did not reply.
Well, my enthusiasm for your experience only extends so far.
I'm happy you had this wonderful day that you got to experience it with Joanna.
Same.
And your family got to be there.
Yeah.
Pete Alonso was a member of my family for many years.
That's right.
There were a couple people in Mets gear.
And I was like, why are you wearing Mets gear?
And then I heard about the whole Pete thing.
They said Pete.
Yeah.
I mean, it's not Pete's fault.
No.
You know.
He's wonderful.
He should have been retained.
No, I just heard that it might be a note of sensitivity among Mets fans.
I do feel bad for Mets fans.
I feel happy to have Pete in my life.
He's wonderful.
And he has 30 home runs.
It's great.
I mean, the main point is that.
That's what he does every year.
The main point is that I understood your Instagram comment when you left it.
There you go.
Yeah.
I know.
Now you're in the loop on baseball lore.
He did not embrace me to answer your Instagram question, but he's embraced the city of Baltimore
and the state of Maryland.
And then his wife threw out the pitch a couple days later.
No kidding.
He caught that pitch.
She seems like a nice gal, too.
What's her name?
Wonderful family.
Kelsey?
I think that's something like that.
Remember your family, but you don't know the wife?
All right.
Oh, man.
Great stuff.
Speaking of great men and their wives that are also here, let's talk about Oppenheimer.
Spoiler for history, I suppose.
Indeed.
This is the last of our Nolan movies.
So all Nolan movies are on the table, including The Odyssey, which we have all seen.
I would say if we want to make reference to The Odyssey and you haven't seen The Odyssey
yet, you should know the story of The Odyssey, but we might talk about it.
This film was directed and written by Christopher Nolan, came out July 21st, 2023.
Budget $100 million worldwide.
Box office, $976.7 million, nearly a billion dollars, an incredible, outrageous achievement,
a pile of Oscars, just the film of that year, undoubtedly.
She said with some resignation.
No, you know what?
And I told you this already.
Every time I rewatch this movie, I like it more.
It's nice to hear.
You say it like I'm doing it for you.
That's what you said last time.
I'm on this movie's corner.
I'm a fan.
I'm a big fan.
When will you show the same grace to Inception, you know?
I've certainly given it a lot of looks.
I've tried to evolve my thoughts.
Because we were supposed to do this a while ago, I did all my prep then, and then I rewatched
it a couple times the last two days also to remind myself because my memory is bad.
And again, every single time I rewatch it, I admire it more.
I think there is a lot.
There's obviously so much going on here, but it's an interesting movie.
It's an undeniable achievement, and it is so rich with ideas and intellectually dense
that every time I watch it, I discover something else, and every time I read an in-depth essay
about it, I enjoy that experience.
But I think I do still admire it more than I love it because I don't feel sort of emotionally
moved by it.
I feel intellectually stimulated by it, and there's nothing wrong with that, but that's
just sort of where I land with it.
Yeah.
Sean Fennessey, tell me about your love of Oppenheimer.
I think that's a completely reasonable opinion, and I wouldn't want to take it away from anybody.
I don't. Well, you can't.
I'm not. Well, I mean, don't dare me.
I think. Don't listen to a prophet.
It's interesting that you frame it that way because I don't know that I really have thought
about the film in that dynamic, though that's a very common dynamic that people have with
movies, which is sort of like, did this movie work for me personally on an emotional level?
And also, is it successful?
And what is it attempting to try to do?
I don't find Chris Nolan to be a terribly emotional filmmaker.
I would say The Odyssey is a pretty big breakthrough in that respect for me with his movies.
I find him to be extremely structurally interesting.
I think he's capable of great depth and imagination, but I find a lot of the emotional mechanics
of his movies to be like a little tight and British.
And so this movie to me is a kind of a fascinating breakthrough in that I feel like he's
really trying to reckon with something that has recurred in all of his movies, and he
kind of breaks through on that thing, which is this idea of sort of like, you know, we
spend so much time figuring out if we could, we didn't think to ask if we should.
And that's a hard line through all the movies.
You know, it's, you know. My number one, The Prestige, that's what it's about.
The Prestige is about that, and Following is about that.
You know, this guy who sort of stumbles into a world of intrigue and doesn't really think
about the consequences of that.
Memento is about the. The inability to see what the consequences of your actions are because of something that
is sort of blocking your ability to see it.
Insomnia is, should we get room darkening shades?
Exactly.
All of these. But specifically, like, I can't sleep.
You know, I'm not able to sleep, and it is causing my mind to worry.
Like digging, you know, you quoted Jurassic Park, love to see it.
Digging too greedily and too deep.
That's like what a lot of his stuff is about.
Mallory, what was your journey through these rewatches of Oppenheimer, and anything you
want to weigh in on?
On that sort of, like, emotional versus. We've talked about this, but, like, the chilliness of Nolan, for some people.
Where do you land on that after this Oppenheimer revisitation?
Yeah, I mean, you know, I love the filmography.
I love Nolan's movies, as we've talked about now, over the course of a year plus, which
has been such a joy, you know, to go through slowly and non-sequentially out of order.
All of his movies.
And it's fun because it started very authentically with, like, the Batman Begins and Inception
anniversaries last year.
And there's the idea of, like, you know, then we'll do the Prestige.
Because we want to.
And should we keep going?
And it has felt weirdly meta and apt, albeit genuinely unintentional, to take them in this
order and in this way.
And I think, you know, Joe, this was maybe how we justified it to ourselves in real time.
But it actually does feel kind of nice to look back at Oppenheimer after The Odyssey,
given what a massive achievement and culmination, you know, of so many of those core areas of
emphasis, the focus and through lines across the entire filmography that Odyssey felt like.
And to then study Oppenheimer.
You could have done this in an anticipatory fashion.
But given the ending of The Odyssey in particular and how much of it is about legacy and guilt
and shame and interrogating the great man idea that is so central to so much of Nolan's,
you know, preoccupation in his work, this actually feels like a nice way to do it and
to look back.
And also because it was the big awards, you know, breakthrough and darling and The Odyssey
until Dune 3 comes in.
And just that's the only thing we're all talking about, you know.
It feels like it has a chance to. Really dominate the discussion as well.
You're not an Elsinore truther?
There's still time.
Okay.
Give it time.
Who knows?
I think I'll be seeing it pretty soon.
I'll let you know.
When we did our. So I didn't. I've said this before, but I didn't participate in real time at the theater in Barbenheimer
and the Barbenheimer extravaganza.
Halo had a surgery that weekend.
We were watching him for like multiple weeks after that.
By that time, I was like, I'll just watch this movie at home.
So I actually never saw Oppenheimer in movie theaters, which is like not ideal.
Not ideal, obviously.
I think I saw it like four times.
Yeah, yeah.
But, you know, now certainly I think in the last year, I've shifted a little bit out of my. We have a big TV and nice speakers and room darkening shades.
Like I can watch movies comfortably at home.
And boy, it's really great to be back at the movie theater with my friends.
You know, I think after the like 2020, 2021, 2022 anxiety has like abated a little bit.
So I have not seen this movie in that setting.
When I watched it for the first time, it was months into. Not only. Not only the Barbenheimer like cultural zeitgeist animating moment of this real unique shared experience,
but people talking about Oppenheimer like it was this incredible achievement.
And I don't think that was the ideal way to go into seeing it.
I quite. I admired it and respected it.
And I think when I saw it the first time, I really appreciated and liked the first two hours,
but was like pretty baffled by the third act relying and resting so heavily on the straws trial.
Nothing about that opinion.
Has changed no matter how many times I've revisited it.
I still find the balance of the film and how much of the focus I understand the logic and rationale behind the choice.
And I think that in terms of the portrait of inadequacy and the strivers compared to the people who actually achieve
and like which of those things is frankly more dangerous in terms of the impact it has on the world.
I understand all of the reasons to structure the film that way.
way and balance the story that way. It's just not as interesting when you shift into that stretch.
at the end because the first two hours are so riveting and gobsmacking re-watching it multiple
times this last year i have found myself so swept up in the first two hours of it like i think the
first two hours of this movie are among the great achievements in the nolan filmography i when we
did our when joe and i did our rankings um a few weeks ago i had it at six and like the thing about
the nolan ranking you're going through 13 movies they're all good like they're all good to some
extent and through for me 10 i think through 10 i was like i actually really like all of these
movies you know there's a degree of generally agree with that i mean you know dark knight rises
has some some flaws yeah but it also has bane and he fucking rules i love i love bane he fucking
rules it's funny like the the this criticism that you just shared which i think you share
um and i know amanda shares because she brings it up every time we talk about
on the third act is one of those things where i'm like for the big spectacle movies we tend
to hand it over to the other people and we're like oh my god i'm gonna have to do this again
and i'm like oh my god i'm gonna have to do this again and i'm like oh my god i'm gonna have to do this
and we've like a lot of the flaws where we're like oh yeah but this movie has bane it's a fun
batman movie but for whatever reason like the hang-up i think with oppenheimer among some of
its if not detractors people who have notes for it it's a very similar kind of note that i think
you could have for almost all of his movies which is perceptionally there is some kind of like
structural flaw where he's like reached too far like he has done this incredible thing yeah and
well yeah you know there's something to that i think you know that he's really interested in
these really ambitious people that really reach for something beyond themselves and
much like batman um and so this is the rare case i think where maybe that hang-up doesn't bother me
because i'm very very interested in the core idea that creates the friction between the three acts
and the two story structures between the straw structure and between the oppenheimer structure
and that idea is very simple which is you mentioned the idea of this driver and this
idea of ambition and there's two strains of ambition one is for power and one is for ideas
and sometimes ideas start reaching towards power and whenever power starts reaching towards ideas
we get a mess of a world and he seemed to be genuinely interested in the mess of the world
like kind of what happened that seemed to animate his interest in telling the story i just love that
idea i think that's pretty sophisticated and it maybe doesn't make the movie as fun in the in the
final hour but it's a it's i thought it was pretty deep no absolutely i think it's incredibly deep
you know his you know most repeated inspiration that i saw uh was amadeus obviously one of my
prestige also has a lot of amadeus dna in it but there but it is like a more evenly balanced and
amadeus it is in many ways a salieri movie actually and this in sort of chasing that amadeus
energy i think the straw stuff is so much weaker in a way that makes it feel unbalanced i also
this is just like not my favorite downy performance and also unfortunately for my guy alden aaron reich
he is just saddled with a lot of just saying the thing one of your biggest critiques of inception
which is just sort of like uh you know when we try to compliment tenant we like to say
uh you know he said just like you know just feel it don't try to understand it right and so when he
is making his sort of like uh and you this is one of the first things you said when you came out of
the odyssey where you're talking about the rapid edits and cuts in odyssey which is of course here
as well this sort of like montage approach impressionistic eisenstein-esque like approach
to storytelling and it works so well
and then you just sort of sort of like grinds to a halt for me a bit when alden aaron reich has to say
like well so it was you well you know like no doubt in the drawing room trying to tell you who
did the crime and that's that's like that's like the ideas that you outline i think are incredible
but the execution and yeah i can i can forgive a flaw in a diamond for sure i think you're
absolutely right and i i can't really quibble with it i think the other major influence which
you guys have cited here too is jfk and that's really more the jfk stream where jfk is like
jfk is this kind of wild frenzy of ideas but whenever the film flashes to black and white
it's attempting to create this kind of heightened docudrama experience and that's it's a it's a
borrowed style and so he's attempting to fuse this wild editing impressionistic style that
you described which i love and i think this to me is the pinnacle of that the first 40 minutes of
this movie is so breathtaking yeah i and i i could tell within the first five minutes that i was going
to fall in love with it and and seeing it you know it's so obnoxious but seeing it on imax on the big
screen and hearing uh goranson score immediately and the raindrops falling and i'm thinking about
that and that moment when he's sort of thinking about um the mechanics of bomb building and
throwing the glass and looking at the cubist paintings and his mind kind of turning around
art and science together i felt like that was a huge step forward or he had like kind of like i
said kind of cracked something but he also wanted to have this idea about america and so he's
thinking about presidential assassinations and so in this attempt to kind of create a stew
like he has a better handle on some styles than others and i think this idea of like
creating a story about america is so successful when you get things like
the gary oldman scene or what matt damon is doing this whole movie like to all of that
yeah all of that stuff really really works for me i do like the alden aaron x characters uh just
called senate aid which so for him to get the following the blonde treatment that's pretty great
says a lot yeah what do you think
it is uh we've been sort of talking around this for a little bit but like i've been really bumping
on his sort of like what i'm calling his ingenue problem as we have discussed sort of the weaker
elements of even the films we love like say the ariadne character in inception uh etc etc there
is this sort of like type of character i would say i think tom holland is one of the weaker parts of
the odyssey uh it is it does not have to be gender but alden aaron reich i think again i love alden
for him is really tough in this movie and so do you have any thoughts about what it is about this
archetype that is that is not very successful in nolan films well i mean i think you could make
the case that penelope carries some of that load in the odyssey as well where where there are long
stretches of the movie where they use these characters to allow other characters to explain
to them what's really going on in the story and so they they're meant to seem one they're not what
nolan is really best at which is sort of men and or women but mostly men of action you know people
who drive the action of the story that's something that he really leans into he's like a real student
of david lean in that respect where his kind of his protagonists are these sort of like um
swashbuckling uh adventurous types and the counterpoint to that always has to be somebody
but like who's like oh tell me more how does this work sir and that's a little bit different from
the dead wife problem but there's a sort of a correlation there where they're sort of like
but it's like let me create these kind of motivating factors and let's also build characters who can
help our hero explain what's really happening here again one of the reasons why i like tenant
which sort of like is dispensing with that and calling the primary character the protagonist
instead of a side character senate aide or you know a single named woman who doesn't really have
any depth yeah i think you know one of the things i i so love about nolan's movies this has been one
of the really fun things to talk about in a track because the films are very distinct from each
other and he plays across different genres but there are these uh this is an aspect of a threat
across the tapestry and his movies his style it's like so utterly specific right and there are
details and aspects not only of his craft and the way he makes films but of each story that you're
like this is only inception it can only be inception right i'm an interstellar definitively
but then they're also in tandem with that functioning as fables right he is interested
to your point from earlier and like uh through a specific lens of his style a broad
assessment of human nature and human capacity and so i think the tendency to put characters
like that in the movie is like there's a function to it you know the kind of like gentle useful
innocence of meeting and wanting to understand is that always effectively rendered in the films like
no but i understand what leads him to put characters like that in the movie i get a
laugh and it is interesting to you know we talked about this a little bit on the odyssey pod tell me
about my dad yeah it was we talked about this a bit on on the on the odyssey pod but like if you
just compare a couple of the most recent odyssey adaptations you know with christopher nolan's
odyssey and then the return like the telemachus characters among the most differently and
distinctly rendered right there's like a violence and a rage to the telemachus in the return that is
just like not present in nolan's version of it so yeah i i wonder if that's like a mileage may
vary viewer to viewer person but i think that's a good point i think that's a good point i think
the fact that it's very consistent in the movies feels purposeful i want to go back to sort of how
we got here uh in the first place with oppenheimer which is you know the story has been told a
million times with the fact that robert pattinson gave christopher nolan a book of oppenheimer
speeches uh after they made tenant together of course uh oppenheimer is mentioned in tenant um
the fact that it started with the speeches so uh one of our listeners um sam who sends like the
really really really really incredible long uh email about the speech scene in oppenheimer which
has like you know incredible uh analysis of it but i it helped me really appreciate in my last
rewatch the way in which you know the thumping of the feet on the floor is executed auditorially
at these key moments leading up to so the way in which that sort of impressionistic montage
storytelling leads you to this is this is the beating heart core of the story it could be the
test if you decide but i think most people believe it is this speech scene that he gives
after the bombs have been dropped.
And I was thinking about it as sort of like,
this is the snow fortress.
This is what's inside the safe of the snow fortress
of Oppenheimer's mine.
And it keeps sort of like calling to him throughout
as he's sort of explaining things.
And then we finally get there and it is so horrific
and incredibly technically executed.
But I love the idea that like the germ for this movie was
because that speech as it exists in the film
is lifted directly from, you know,
the language is what Oppenheimer said.
So for Nolan to have read that speech
and then sort of been caught on this idea of like,
what could he have been thinking when he said this?
And of course, like American Prometheus is,
you know, the blueprint for this movie.
But just like that, that scene coming from that book
given to him by Robert Pattinson
and sort of like building,
sort of how we were talking about with Lantern
early this week, like starting with one image
and sort of like building out this entire labyrinth
from there to get to this thing at the center of the maze.
So just to be clear, the one image
that the film built from was not the poisoned green apple.
Big Apple War movie for us
because the red apple consumed in full in real time,
the green apple with the cyanide injected
sits there untouched for long enough
that Oppie can pull it away, not commit a murder.
Notable.
I really didn't think you could surprise me anymore.
And the fact that you said that
instead of Cillian Murphy sitting naked in the chair,
and you've restrained yourself from mentioning it
thus far into the podcast is really impressive.
You know, I just feel fairly sure
we'll be making that a meme, you know,
photoshopping Sean's head onto that image
and putting it on our Instagram.
Do we have your permission?
If only I could be that svelte, that lean.
Do we have your permission to do that?
Whatever you want.
At this point, I'm out of control of the memes.
Did Bill love to put your face on movie posters
for rewatchables?
He did. He was sort of a meme innovator.
I mean, he literally had a poster of you in his office.
The silent judge.
The silent judge.
In the old pre-COVID days.
An Imagine TNT series
in which I was some sort of lawyer, I guess,
who was solving cases silently.
Sitting there in meetings, silently judging.
This is a reference to the fact that
frequently things were uttered in ringer meetings.
And I was like,
I'm not sure if that's such a good idea,
but I never said that out loud.
But you could tell.
But you could tell.
It was very disapproving.
What do you think,
in terms of like there was an idea,
what do you think is at the core of,
this movie?
Regret within accomplishment.
You know, it seems to be the big concept.
And the scene that you were just describing
is really about that.
It's about trying to find a way to communicate that
without having Oppenheimer say,
what have I done?
Without having to, you know, straws.
I have such doubt.
And Ehrenreich, you know,
they get to sort of over-communicate
some of the consequences and circumstances.
But Oppenheimer,
even in a sort of quasi-courtroom function
in the film opposite Jason Clarke,
like,
isn't actually able to honestly communicate
through most of that discussion
because he's protecting himself
and he's trying to navigate
his own safety long-term.
And so there's something really interesting
about the kind of,
the restrained pain that he feels
in the almost immediate aftermath.
I mean, this is kind of skipping ahead
to one of the categories,
but my favorite shot in the movie
is not of the Trinity test.
It's not of, you know,
the raindrops falling.
It's specifically Oppenheimer
being hoisted on men's shoulders
after the success of the Trinity test
with the American people.
The American flag waving behind him
because there's just like
a scintilla of regret
on Murphy's face.
And, you know,
it's such a special performance in this movie.
But that's,
the movie kind of turns on that specific moment
where it feels like they've accomplished something
and then this is where everything
is about to go downhill.
Yeah.
And it's just,
it's a brilliant piece of filmmaking
and it's nice that, you know,
Nolan can't help but kind of announce
his themes and intentions
throughout his movies,
which I usually bump on.
This is a case where, like,
that's not an understated sequence
that you just described,
but it's not overstated either.
It just is appropriate
given the magnitude of the story.
And it does make the moments,
I mean, especially with
Oppenheimer's character himself,
in part because, you know,
as the movie says out loud many times,
you know,
the most important man who ever lived,
like, this is such a consequential thing
and you understand that as a viewer,
but also just the Killian Murphy performance
is exquisite.
Like, it's gorgeous.
The expression on his face,
that shot that you're identifying
the hoisted on the shoulders,
you know, the fact that we,
especially with this American movie,
but sports fans the world over,
you associate that with, like,
celebrating the win
and that is the headspace
that some people in that moment
are occupying.
But, like, it almost feels like
over the IMAX lens,
there's an x-ray machine
and you can see the twisting of the gut
just because of what he's conveying
on his face.
So then when you have a moment,
like, I really like
the Jason Clarke performance
in this movie.
I do too.
I love him.
And when Roger Robb is, like,
berating him, you know,
220,000 dead at least,
yes, any moral scruples about that,
he does say terrible ones,
but it's two words.
It's not a grand speech
in that moment.
There is a gentle, quiet delivery
and we have seen the moments
that you're both identifying
that make the truth of that
even inside of the machinations
of what will you do or not do
to kind of preserve
or protect your reputation.
You shook his hand,
you know, the way Kitty is talking
about the teller handshake,
et cetera, and then the payoff,
obviously, at the salmon dinner
of not shaking it.
We understand that.
We don't need him to say it.
Mm-hmm.
But then the moment
when he does say it
doesn't feel like
did you need to say it
like some other moments can
because we understand it in full
and the fact that
he is acknowledging it
is the point.
Something that really
unlocked for me
in my latest rewatch,
which was this morning,
was. This is a three-hour movie.
Time to wake up this morning.
We started this about at 9.30.
We did not sleep last night.
We did.
We had a late friend of the fest
10 o'clock screening.
No kidding.
Yeah.
So we both. How'd it go?
I would say got to bed
at 2 o'clock
but didn't go to sleep
and. Was it Labyrinth?
It was Labyrinth.
It was Labyrinth.
I've never seen the movie.
It was great.
My first time ever seeing that film.
Oh, I love Labyrinth.
Yeah.
So good.
Wonderful stuff.
Yeah.
It was really fun to show.
I love Ludo.
Big Ludo fan instantly.
Was Bowie playing in here earlier?
Synced to the. No.
Labyrinth film?
No.
But it's nice that you thought
that was the case.
You just feel like Bowie is. Maybe you just had that energy.
Oh, yeah.
Was he the Goblin King?
Don't people usually say
I have Bowie energy?
You do have Bowie energy.
Absolutely.
I wish.
You 100% do.
Tesla?
Something that. A layer that really. Bring it back.
Nice job.
That's true.
Nice.
A layer that really struck me
this morning was like
among the sort of like genuine
what have I wrought
sort of regret
which, you know,
we can chase through
all of Nolan's movies.
There's also this other
fascinating layer
inside of this story
which is, you know,
in terms of the like
calling it the Trinity Test
or I've become death
destroyer of worlds
the clear God complex
that exists for Oppenheimer
and then the moment
that the creation
and the decision around
the creation
is taken out of his hands
Yes.
and the bomb is shipped off
to Washington
and he's like
should I come
and Damon's like
whatever for essentially.
But, you know,
and he, you know,
he's repeating to other
other scientists
it's not up to us
what should be done
but you can tell
that there's like
I feel like
the film is trying to say
and this is not
a great revelation
necessarily
but like I feel like
the film is,
like, yeah,
does he have profound regrets?
Yeah, that exists for him
but also like
maybe
how much of this
is his ego
and the fact that he got to
like sort of like
play God
justify
the increasingly
dangerous steps
he was taking
towards his end goal
and then he
was not
at the end of the day
the ultimate decider
on what was done
with his creation
and so there is this
and then
and so then he becomes
then there is this hypocrisy
inside of his advocacy
against
the thing he created
because
because he's no longer
the one who gets to decide
what we do with it.
Yeah,
and I think it's
quite subtle
because some of it
is that general feeling
of loss of control
where anytime
you've worked hard on something
and it's no longer in your hands
I think that's very relatable.
Oh, of course.
And then there's also
something that is
of much greater consequence
which is
moving from the theoretical
to the actual
makes things real.
Yes.
You know,
and men of science,
women of science
are the ones
who often
live in the theoretical,
you know,
like I'm married
to a mathematician,
my father-in-law
is a math professor,
like these are,
I know a lot of people
whose minds
are occupied
by concepts
but not necessarily
like practical executions
and so
I mean,
I love,
I'm interested in people like that,
I love people like that
but they don't
often think
specifically
about the pragmatic
next step
and this is a move
And then Michael Angarano's like
here's a slideshow
that shows you exactly
the consequences
of your accuracy.
Exactly.
Well, and like,
you know,
I think we've all been talking,
many of our colleagues
and fellow podcasters
have been talking about like,
well, what's next for Nolan?
You know, he's done Oppenheimer,
he's done The Odyssey,
like what movies,
who's going to interest him
and draw his attention next?
And like that specific thing
and the way the movie
constantly returns
our attention
to that idea of like
theory can only take you so far
and literalizes it,
the relationship
between like Oppie and Lawrence
from the word go, right?
Nolan is somebody
who is interested
in big ideas
and we hear across
the movie studies,
I have been thinking about this
for 20 years.
Oh, this was the first story
I ever wrote.
Oh, I just had to wait
until I could return.
But you also,
so you understand
why the theory would interest him,
but you also understand
why that part of like
what happens when
you go beyond theory
for a tactile technician
like he is,
like somebody who is so
not only focused on his craft
and expert at it,
but like serious
about pushing it forward,
right?
And about,
about thinking about
what's,
what,
what,
what,
like how do you build a team?
You know?
What happens when
Warner Brothers,
Who's your editor?
Who's your cinematographer?
What happens when
Warner Brothers gets to decide
who's your distributor?
Who's your distributor?
That's how your movie is displayed, you know, at home.
You understand why he's interested in all of that.
Talk about I finished my work of art and now it's out of my hands.
Exactly, yeah.
This is fascinating.
On this sort of, to tie a bow in this idea of the architect of your own misfortune, the what have I wrought concept,
you and I were talking about this a little bit off pod where this theory coming out of Oppenheimer that people really cherished was this idea that like the central metaphor,
the big regret of Christopher Nolan's life that he is reflecting back in Oppenheimer's story is I made Batman Begins and I brought, you know,
the age of the superhero cinema and that ruined Hollywood and that's my big regret.
And you and I were both talking about, like we were talking about this, I think right before Spider-Man and we were like, A, it's a little interesting and it's kind of funny,
but we both don't think that is like has to be the, that can't be the only answer, especially when he reiterates it again in the,
I'm like, he's not so torn up about having made Batman that he had to make two massive movies about it.
So do you have any theories?
It's also just not true.
Like they were making Superman movies, superhero movies before the Dark Knight.
Yeah, and Ulti.
They were, but I don't think you can, I don't ascribe to this theory.
I do not think it is why he has been telling this story.
I do think there is a difference of pre-Nolan Batman, post-Nolan Batman.
Yeah, of course.
Definitely changed.
I think there was.
It was a cultural shift.
I think it's amusing conversation fodder.
Yeah, yeah.
If the idea crossed his mind, I wouldn't be shocked.
Yeah.
It being the primary motivating factor for making a movie about J. Robert Oppenheimer.
That's like, it's a bit of a stretch.
I don't know.
I think it's, I think that intellectual dynamic that we're describing here is the thing that is most interesting to him,
which is sort of like, well, to quote another superhero, with great power comes great responsibility.
You know, like there is something in that conceit that keeps drawing him back.
And like that's in the prestige, that's in Inception, right, that's in Cobb, that's in Interstellar with the idea of sort of like taking a great leap towards something and then we're having that deep regret about having missed your children's lives, you know.
So, you know, what the, I don't know if there's a single answer for why people do things and I sometimes get caught in the rabbit holes of psychologizing why filmmakers make certain decisions because I'm so interested in the choices that they make.
Yeah.
I don't know.
I don't know Christopher Nolan.
I've never met him.
I don't talk, I've never talked to him before.
Seems to come from an interesting family.
I don't know what could possibly be motivating the desire to discover this, but I do think that there's something really interesting in the kind of dyad of Dunkirk in this movie, which is, you know, he's a British-American man.
And he's told one World War II story through the prism of a sort of British dignity, which has these kind of flashes of vulnerability.
You know, speaking of Cillian Murphy, his character in that film or some of the like emotional outbursts when they're trapped in the ship.
But for the most part…
That's sort of a stiff upper lip tribute.
And I find Oppenheimer to be this like emotional break, like American breakdown.
You know, it's sort of like once America comes into that war and the literal megaton power that they bring to world conflict and that they bring to the way that they've kind of shaped the world stage over the last 80, 85 years.
I say they as if I'm not a member of this country.
And I'm sure that maybe some personal push and pull that he feels between those two ideas and that he is very much an American and very much a Brit and that this world changing conflict is something that fascinated most people who were born in the 20th century.
How could you not be interested in World War II?
So, you know, that's one thing that I think about with him and the fact that he came back to a World War II story so quickly after making Dunkirk is of note to me.
Yeah, I think it's interesting, too, to think of Dunkirk and Oppenheimer as on opposite sides.
Of the coin in terms of the individual and the collective and which one is more central in the focus.
Like, certainly aspects of Oppenheimer are about the collective, both in terms of like nationhood, but also in terms of like the scientific community or the political community, any number of things of that nature.
You know, the family unit, right?
The idea of giving all of the wives the jobs and bringing the families to Los Alamos, etc.
But it is so much about J. Robert.
It's called Oppenheimer.
Oppenheimer.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And it is about this person and his impact on history and his.
What's more American than that?
The rugged individualist nation.
Even, you know, Groves, Damon's character showing up and being like, the reason I'm here to talk to you is because everybody just had bad things to say about you.
And I needed to understand that.
It's so much about the you.
They have Dunkirk is such a, you know, we think, I think, lovely.
Yeah, exactly.
And again, there are aspects of that and Oppenheimer is like all of the physicists.
Pulling together to try to solve this problem.
Can the American physicists who have made their way here beat the Germans, beat Heisenberg and his crew?
But, you know, then you have moments like not the famous Einstein Oppenheimer scene that ends the film, but the one shortly before that by the car.
You know, and Einstein saying to him, like, you don't think I understand this?
Like, I left my country.
Never returned.
You serve your country well.
If this is the reward she offers you, then perhaps you should turn.
You're back on her.
That is like quite different from the Dunkirk perspective.
It is.
Anything you want to say, Molly Rubin, about the sexual content of this film?
Oh, yeah, I'd be delighted.
Okay, great.
I just think Horny Nolan is really welcome and I'm glad we got it.
You know, I mean, it's this and Carrie Ann Moss spitting in the beer in terms of like.
I know you find that very, very horny.
Freakiness.
The cut from the.
Gene Oppenheimer wiggle room flirtation into them fucking tits out.
If you've been watching Nolan fans for two decades is a real show.
It's like.
Wow.
And then the fact that we get the now I am become death destroyer of worlds quote for the first time.
While they're fucking is just really something memorable.
Great stuff.
I think that when Robert meets Kitty, you're married to Dr. Harrison.
Not very.
It's pretty horny inside of an old movie.
That's great.
That's great.
The dual nude armchair.
Them sitting, you know, naked, cross-legged.
Gene and Oppenheimer in the in the armchairs.
Important to you emotionally.
It became iconic for a reason.
I think it was funny because, you know, we talked about this a lot when we talked about the Odyssey.
The fact that despite the source material involving, you know, Odysseus like fucking his way home.
It's a very like sexless.
Version of the Odyssey.
And so that was fun to think about in terms of coming back to Oppenheimer because I was like, oh, maybe an Oppenheimer.
He turned a corner.
Yeah.
And he was like, I would like to put more sexual content in my stories for some reason, even though I have not been really doing it before.
But that's not the case.
And so then then you're sort of like, OK, so then why this story?
And I think it goes back to what you were outlining, this idea of like American power and this idea of, you know, American.
Greed or warmongering and how that is tied up in sort of like rapacious appetite.
And so the fact that like sexual content is part of that and the way in which like the death of Gene and the dropping of the bomb are like the blood on his hands and, you know, and connected in the edit.
Yeah.
Very distinctly.
And so the way in which like sex and violence are connected makes sense to me why this is the one story that is thus far in his.
Career that he has decided to put like explicit ish sexual content.
I think appetite, the word you just used is is perfect.
Like there is a hunger.
I think there's also just something humanizing about it.
Genuinely, like, is it titillating and salacious when we're in the interrogation room scene and suddenly Florence Pugh is there?
You fucking Gene and Oppenheimer are fucking and Kitty is watching.
It's like I have not seen something quite like this in a Nolan movie.
Yeah, of course.
But the idea that a character, this this actual person in history who is doing this.
This unbelievably consequential thing.
And you have other moments in the movie that achieve this.
Like, as they say, you couldn't run a hamburger stand like I couldn't.
Right.
But the idea that there's something like messy about his sex life and his yearning and his need.
And also just there's something human about.
Impulse, lack of impulse control, being led by your desire, but also, of course, then the self-obsession, not only the melding of the of the violence in the edit, which is very striking and I think notable on the.
You know, the great man front, but like the fact that and there's the you know, we feel empathy, I think, on the like you carry guilt based on how you've treated other people front when we watch Robert sobbing beneath the tree in New Mexico and Kitty finds him, but also the fact that he's like, I did this my fault, my fault.
What happened to Gene is my fault.
Me, me, because everything I do has an impact, the ripple on everybody else in the world, individual people in my life and also the world at large, like the movie ending on a shot of.
Atmospheric ignition, this threat that looms over the entire film, every individual relationship that he has, there's a version of that atmospheric ignition from his perspective to you.
And so the sex is kind of a way of unlocking that.
Yeah, there's something I have a lot to say about you guys are saying so smart.
Love the show.
You're welcome.
Anytime.
So we'd love to have you.
I think there's an interesting intellectual conflict with how people receive this movie because, you know, you've already said the phrase a great man a couple of times and it is obviously a man about.
A man who did something quote unquote great and it is a very narcissistic.
portrait of a person oh yeah and everything that he does has this very upsetting ripple effect
whether it be on a single woman or on a community of people or on friends of his who are part of a
socialist communist community or his colleagues in science or his family and his wife and his
children or the american president and the american idea like he has this kind of corrupting quality
yeah so like on the one hand you would say well that's not a very noble portrait of a person like
this is a person who created kind of great shame and great violence in the world yeah and but then
there's also something so empathetic about killian murphy as a performer and so clearly like an
admiration that nolan brings to the achievements of this great mind and not just the mind who is
able to sort of formulaically solve something but build a team and execute something collectively
yeah so one of the reasons why like
i think i reject the general like well this is a great man movie like as though it were a movie
about like a john ford movie um that has an uncritical look at someone who raped and pillaged
across the american frontier is because it's all you know it feels like on any given day while they
were making the film nolan had a different perspective on who what oppenheimer represented
and who he was yeah and to me that friction is really exciting and really interesting to think
about and it speaks to i just think most people that i know which is like even the
closest people in the world to you make terrible mistakes or do things that they deeply regret
and wish they hadn't done and so i'm not sure if i'd necessarily like to me this isn't gandhi
right gandhi is a portrait of a movie of like a man who did effectively no wrong i i both agree
with you but then i kind of then my thinking comes back around to the other side because
on the one hand yes there's so many moments in the movie like that moment you're talking about
when kitty finds him crying over dean yeah and she says you don't get to commit the sin and get
us to feel sorry for you because it has consequences like that could be the thesis of
of the movie right so it's just sort of like uh he's he's a great people throughout the movie
tell him he's one of the most important man right yeah um but also we watch him feel uh you know
his soul get rotted out from underneath him because of what he did so you're so nolan is saying then
there's the moment when oppenheimer says is anyone ever going to tell the truth about what happened
here yeah um
in terms of his uh encounter with jason clark that that whole thing and then you could just
almost hear christopher nolan from off camera being like i will you know and then like and
then we're supposed to be like cheering for strass when he gets his comeuppance like he's the villain
of the piece so then there is this way in which just by the con the dint of the construct of the
film it valorizes oppenheimer and like there's a ton of people who don't who didn't even really
know who oppenheimer was
so just by existing as a piece of art it elevates him that's my point it's both yeah it's it really
is both it's like i think oppenheimer can both be seen as this complex figure who did things that
um without enough consideration that he let his ambition lead him but that also he was
railroaded by a bureaucratic state that effectively like fucked up the 20th century in america right so
to me the dynamic of both of those things being true is part of what makes the movie very exciting
for me yeah um and doesn't draw me back and doesn't make it feel like it's a movie that's
like a fusty 1982 hollywood claptrap kind of awards prestige movie like it is to me it feels
much deeper than that well you mentioned of course lawrence of arabia and um i saw i told you this
that i saw this uh as part of american cinema tech 70 millimeter i mean they show it every
hell yeah uh all the time every year uh whatever but i saw it uh again on the big screen this
summer so thinking a lot about that portrait complicated portrait of a of a man and not such
a nice man to you lawrence exactly yeah uh but i think it's a really good movie and i think it's
uh you know peter o'toole so handsome so charming but then you're like dear god and he's also like
dear god oh my um you know and then i also i saw jfk for the first time i had never seen it and so
thinking about it uh as and it's that is such a one of the messiest films i've ever seen in my
entire life and i was like kind of shocked by how messy it was because i think i had this sort of
like more stayed idea of what i thought it was just sort of like i think kevin costner and i
like i know what like the courtroom moments were a total fever dream understand how insane it was
and so thinking about all those other ingredients in this do was was really fun and i'm so glad i
had just freshly re-watched this when we watched the odyssey but i could sit there in the in the
theater and be like the trojan horse is the atomic really fun i you know obviously the the term
american prometheus that we've already mentioned a few times comes from the text comes from the
the um the source text that uh
nolan adapted here but the way that that is incorporated into the film you know it's the the
opening uh language in the in the first few visuals we get uh neil's saying you're an american
prometheus the man who gave them the power to destroy themselves and they'll respect that then
your work really begins so you i think we understand why nolan is drawn to the account
like american prometheus you can feel that pulling him in magnetically like whether he
wanted to be pulled in or not because the idea of the prometheus like the tight
right the godly titan who is the the way that and this is kind of you know joe has tracked over the
um as a you know a jonathan nolan lover the differences of maybe onto your emotionality
point and i think i'm i'm slightly more drawn to some of the emotional beats and like like
inception for example like i find that movie to be deeply moving but like
the other side of the or the related aspect of are these movies always like um pulling on your
heartstrings is there's an
intellectual rigor to them and like the way that he is saying that nolan is clearly interested in
just uh what is the capacity for achievement you know what is the capacity for achievement and so
there is there are those moments where it feels like there's admiration undeniably i agree joe
but even still there's always a little bit of a tether to i'm like studying this scientifically
almost like well how are people capable of these things and if you are one of the people who's
capable of those things and what is your impact on the world and then how do you feel and because
he thinks he's one of those yeah i mean think about it practically one of the interesting
technical takeaways from the odyssey was that this is the first feature film ever shot
completely with imax cameras and the only way to accomplish that was to build these sound
blimps around the cameras yeah so that you it effectively would not be too loud and you'd be
able to have dialogue sequences and you could hear dialogue of course an issue in many of nolan's
films i will note also oppenheimer it's uh one of the great achievements of that movie is you can hear it
everyone's saying to each other um yeah because it's more of you know it's a talky movie it's a
much talkier movie than almost all of his films but the idea of him pushing the that format so
aggressively and pushing the technology needed to execute that format in full to deliver to audiences
his perception of the grandest stage is really interesting to me because you know one of the
drawbacks of that technology is that final sequence which i love in the odyssey of uh odysseus you know
stringing the bow firing the arrow and then taking on all comers is wonderful and very exciting and
the second time i watched it i was like oh this is quite herky jerkily edited because it's very
hard to shoot action of this scale with cameras like this and there's a lot of questions going
forward about whether or not he's going to do this again because he may not be able to you could not
shoot the action intended with those cameras at least not with in any consistent um long sequence
you know it's his very modest version of like we spent all this time time trying to figure out if
we should we never thought about whether or whether we could we never thought about whether we should
and like he also likes to kind of bump up against the limitations of his own design so i do see even
if i can't personally psychologize some of the things i do see a lot of the strategies that he
brings to movie making into the characters that he is most fascinated by and that's a fun thing that
he does like most filmmakers you can look at their work and they also have these recurrences but
they're not so easy to make and they're not so easy to make and they're not so easy to make and they're
map like you guys have been talking about him for over a year now you can see it's not just that he
likes the same couple of story ideas it's that they're like resonant in all these different
directions through every movie that is very fun to kind of pick apart which is one of the reasons
why he's really the filmmaker of the century that he's like somebody that people love to talk about
and they love to think about on that note and then and then i do want to get to our superlatives but i
i was thinking a lot about you know you you made this great collaborative list of the best nolan
everyone's nolan list is different yes and beautiful in their own way yeah it's very special
no i was i'm not i'm not here to bury your list i think i think what is you did that in real time
yeah you're like this is an outrage and you guys owe me a blood debt yeah i also look took my hands
off the wheel big time in that one i was like this is this would not be my list at all but it's almost
like like an enneagram it's because the stories are being kind of retold again and again and again
to decide which version of that story which are again the same themes over and over again which
one like you know plucks this the string of your particular bow and resonates with you i think is
really interesting and like thinking about again some of the movies feel emotional to me and some
of them don't but they're they're always rife with these ideas yes and so it's sort of like
okay what is the what is the most central idea and why is that you know resonating
with me there's this great brendan hodges um essay about um it was the one on oppenheimer where he
says
um about Nolan films uh they are the dream catchers of universal fears shared between him
his characters and it seems us the wide audience and so what I love about that is like what is the
what is the core fear you know Chris when he was on here talking about Dunkirk was talking
you know his his most beloved Nolan film was talking about this this repeated theme of trying
to get home right and how he's like all of Nolan films are about trying to get home or when when
Rebecca came on to talk to us about Tenet and she was talking about the family unit and how Nolan's
preoccupation with like reuniting the family in the family unit and so I was like why the prestige
for me and I was like oh like those feelings of like competitive inadequacy and like you know
competition and like will I ever be satisfied with my achievement I'm like oh yeah that's the thing
that sort of like animates me and so that's what's so great about the repetition inside of Nolan is
it's a repeated story again and again
but slightly focused in on one corner or another it's refracted you know and you bring a lot of your
personal experience I of course am a great man and so Oppenheimer is my pick I get it
I've always thought that about you all right should we do our our uh our categories our superlatives
production wow graphics sheesh
um I feel like I'm on who wants to be a millionaire yeah you are you're welcome here at the
Sycamore complex
anytime soon we'll have sort of the lighting change like a dozen who wants to be a millionaire
I would love that for us okay we're doing our Oppenheimer top 14 it was going to be top 15 but
then uh we saw the odyssey so we're no longer doing that looking forward at the odyssey category
uh so we're starting uh as we often do with why so serious funniest line or moment of this
incredibly hilarious movie uh Sean fantasy would you like to go for it yeah I mean
my favorite quote is the quote that you have for a later category but I'll just utter it now which
is amateurs seek the sun get eaten power stays in the shadows which is of course not uttered by
Oppenheimer um and is not true and is sort of the the inverse thesis of the movie in a lot of ways
you know that power feels the need to rise you know and that one of the reasons why the third
act of the movie works so well for me is because power and ambition and ego are intertwined in such
a unique way and that there's no person like Oppenheimer who very quietly just like does his
work and achieves something special and I think that's a really good quote I think that's a really
good quote I think that's a really good quote I think that's a really good quote and gets no credit
and we never hear about him again and the same is true for ambitious drivers like straws um and
it's also just uh it's a very amusingly delivered line in the movie that doesn't sound like anything
anyone would ever say yeah and that is a that is a constant in Nolan movies where people are
frequently saying things where you're like what'd you say like why would you say it that way um so
I'm a fan of this one I don't uh would you say Krumholtz's character
Robbie who like quietly like takes over uh Oppenheimer's role um is he sort of someone
who just sort of quietly and effectively does his job and is sort of always has a snack on
the warm moral center of this nice orange loves fruit important love him um I you know David
Krumholtz just announced that he uh stepping back from acting I know but then he like came out and
was like just kidding I'm not yeah we'll say it's hard to know I he didn't say he was retiring right
he said he was gonna step back and he was like I don't know I don't know I don't know I don't know
step back but uh I hope he I hope he doesn't because he's wonderful in this movie and in many
other movies um yeah I think maybe you could say I think that that's that's more to me that that
part of the story is a sign that one he was a part of a large scientific community and two that as
soon as someone in a meaningful role steps away there will be someone there to fill you in right
away like no hole is too big to be filled uh but I love that it's him and not someone who you know
not like teller or someone else who we sort of like resent uh Mallory um I have
uh a few lines that make me laugh early in the movie that kind of fall into a bucket of like
delivered in casual conversation to rib the other person that really make me chuckle in this movie
so they're of a piece the the the the straws um no I'm not trained in physics or anything else
I'm a self-made man and Oppenheimer says I can relate to that really yes my father was one
just absolutely kills me the entire straws Oppenheimer
so I'm not trained in physics or anything else I'm a self-made man and Oppenheimer says I can relate
origin scene is you know it's just barb barb barb and it's such an effective setup not lowly just
a shoe salesman actually incredible stuff I also quite like in the Oppenheimer gene chevalier
sequence that I'm sorry I read it in the original German iconic hysterical just the very kind of
like organic way that he's able to and it does help us feel that superiority you know because
you have the adoration that people look at but then they're like okay this guy's like
full of himself um and then I like when he's on the other side of that
one grows uh you know uh I'd like to see um well if that's how you treat lieutenant colonel for the
have this dry clean with nickels I hate to see how you treat a humble physicist if I ever meet
one I'll let you know ouch it's good it's not a like laugh riot movie but there are some amusing
lines and the rhythm of the language for people who are supposed to be that smart kind of has to
deliver some rejoinders like that some singers that feel like they land and I think the first
hour in particular has quite a few what about you joe oh no I mean I do think I my real answer is
that entire Strauss Oppenheimer uh you know back and forth I'm gonna put a snarky answer instead and
say but the biggest laugh for me is always when poor senate aide played by Alden Ehrenreich has to
say uh Kennedy John F Kennedy it's the corniest moment of the whole movie and it's very funny
let me I agree it's very corny if one of the reasons why I love JFK is because I saw it at a
in the film as a kind of American gospel sure not understanding history at all and not being
yet taught about JFK's assassination well I think a lot of people yeah and I think of this movie in
a similar way where like if I had seen it when I was 13 I would have been like what John F Kennedy
who I just learned about in school yesterday you know like there is a kind of and I've said this
many times about Noel like there's a kind of adolescent glee with a lot of the writing that
he puts in his films where it's like a little dopey and it's a little like
overstated you know no I'm sure the moment when he was like reading American Prometheus or whatever
and he's like wait yeah JFK was involved in this draw searing do you guys think that's a little
breadcrumb though like tipping at interest in a future JFK story for Nolan the way that the
Oppenheimer quote was previously would welcome it I don't I just feel like we've had so many JFK
we have stories I want we had gotten a lot of coming um what if wishbones episode about
the odyssey had stopped Christopher Nolan you're right or the return your favorite movie that you
talked about you know Ralph Fiennes shows this dick what am I gonna do um how'd that go great
great what did you do with that information I looked at my I looked at my television and I
paused and I kept looking and then we hit play and I said to my husband can you go back once more and
he did oh that's nice Adam's the best um one of the things this this genuinely makes me laugh it's
not a funny line but it's just the way Damon says it as Groves when they're trying to recruit the
various scientists and he goes why why how about because it's the most important fucking thing
in the history of the world how about that it's just incredible this is so it is really funny
isn't it the bitchiest he's ever been on screen oh man yeah it's between that and cantaloupe right
if only he wore the tiny shorts in this movie okay you either die a hero you live long enough
to see yourself become the villain who is the real villain of this movie Mallory Rubin so I mean
obviously we've already talked about this it's it's not just literally straws and that character
but specifically
um
through the lens of Nolan assessing Oppenheimer it is the idea of inadequacy right where does
your insecurity lead you and like if you feel uh feeble in comparison to somebody who is achieving
other things then what do you do so like when Kitty has that line you know the truly vindictive
patient is saints so the lowly shoes man a shoe salesman not lowly you know that look on his face
that you mentioned the isotope of all the like the things that we cut back to or forget about
forward to many many times the isotope with a beer bottle and you do you know it's a more useful
than a sandwich and then that lingering look on straw's face like this guy made me feel embarrassed
and so I am going to destroy him and engage my every decision I make for the rest of my life
and my career through ensuring that he can never impact policy again because impact policy
is not going to happen again and so I'm going to destroy him and engage my every decision I make
impacting policy means that he is undermining and dunking on me both publicly and just every
minute of like every conversation that we have the um you don't know scientists like I do counselor
they resent anyone who questions their judgment especially if you're not one of them like the
way that he is projecting in that moment with that line he should be thanking me well he's not
so so so good um I think the best the the the real bow on the line is that he's not
this idea of like you are uh so desperate to be the one everybody looks at and calls great and
calls accomplished when he keeps talking about straws keeps talking throughout the film about
this einstein moment in the moment by the pond and what did he say what did he say he couldn't
even meet my eye and then senate aid all that aaron rex said you know since nobody really knows what
they said to each other that day is it possible they didn't talk about you at all is it possible
Well, they spoke about something more important.
It's just that even though that final stretch.
That's a terrible line that Alden Aaron has to deliver.
Is not my favorite part in the language and deafness of the dialogue is not the best in that stretch.
The idea behind it is quite effective.
Oh, yeah. I don't think about you at all.
He's Ginsburg, you know?
What's your answer here?
Well, the movie isn't a nest full of vipers, right?
You've got William Borden, the lawyer and hack who's brought in to lie about something that Oppenheimer didn't do.
You've got Boris Pash, the incredibly menacing and dangerous military intelligence officer that Casey Affleck plays.
You've got, obviously, Strauss.
You've got Edward Teller, who sort of betrays Oppenheimer ideologically and even practically.
You've got Roger Robb, who's the vicious, I guess, prosecutorial attorney.
You've got Heisenberg, you know, who's sort of a traitor to the idea of science and working with a corrupt empire.
I think there's something really interesting in Ernest Lawrence, the Hartnett character, who is a compatriot and a fellow traveler in some ways but not in others.
And you'll encounter someone.
You'll encounter someone like this in any career, or somebody who seems to be on your side.
And when things are good, they're with you.
And when things start to turn, their allegiances wilt a bit.
And it doesn't mean that they hate you or you hate them, but you're not all in it together.
And I think this movie is an interesting portrayal of, like, a lot of different kinds of loyalty or the absence of.
And so I don't know if there's any one true villain throughout the story, even though Strauss is so demarcated to be the bad guy.
But rewatching the movie last week, I'm thinking about using someone like Hartnett, who was meant for this big, fancy Hollywood career and kind of flamed out.
And was always a good actor and an interesting actor and one of those classic, like, Brad Pitt character actor and a leading man's body types.
And he's so tall and so handsome and he's so, like, on the side of right and this is what the American cause will be and your attempts to unionize this shop or your inability to really.
communicate to the military that you understand what's really at stake here with this story shows that, like, compromise is kind of at the heart of all of this.
And it depends on how much of an ideologue you are, I think.
As I get older, like, I'm much less of an ideologue because I think that's impractical.
And, like, I'm just trying to get to the second half of my life in many ways.
And so you find a lot of people.
And so, like, I do relate to Lawrence in some ways, but I also feel that the movie is kind of ungenerous towards him in a very subtle way, in a movie that is not very subtle.
And that's such an interesting I'm glad you brought him up because he is a really interesting, interestingly deployed character.
And, like, I find it I always find it fascinating revisiting it to see that in a movie where, like, there's a routine conversation among different parties and characters about who can you trust?
Is there a spy?
What don't we know?
What information is making it out the door?
Even something like Oppenheimer eventually having to give up Chevalier's name when he tried.
It's so hard not to.
The idea of, like, when do you have to bend?
Where Lawrence, even though he's doing all of the things you outlined, he never hides his intention ever.
He is in some way, like, the most forthright and true character.
He's like, I'm telling you to your face.
I can't put you on the project for this reason.
I'm telling you to your face.
I've been to those Berkeley meetings.
You shouldn't go.
Now, we don't have to agree with him.
And I'm sure many people are appalled.
I'm sure many people are appalled by the morality of his stance.
But the fact that he's not trying to hide it from Robert or other people is interesting.
And then building toward the fact that, like, he, when he shows up, when he's called to.
That's the moment I respect him the least.
And then he, like, shrinks out.
That he, like, was going to do it and then he, like, leaves.
Got shamed into it.
Yeah, got shamed by Izzy.
Case of colitis.
And then slinks away and is like, ugh.
Yeah.
Dummy.
What's fun?
So, like, a couple, I want to mention a couple things.
I love how you talk about the, how the casting of Hartnett himself tells its own story.
And, of course, like, everyone.
I said this.
But the way in which he, Nolan, casts all these familiar actors in, you know.
So, even down to, like, Jack Quaid being here or whatever.
Helps us, orient us so we don't get lost in the sea of millions of characters.
Such a smart idea.
It's really, really smart.
Lawrence is so funny because growing up in the Bay Area, the Lawrence Hall of Science is, like, where you, like, you go and you see all the.
Like, it's this, like, place you go on a field trip.
And so, every time they say, like, Lawrence, I'm like, it's named after Ernest Lawrence.
I was like, the Lawrence Hall of Science.
The Lawrence Hall of Science in the Bay Area.
But, like, he's such a nobody, nothing, not accomplished character.
But, like, is the name I knew better than anyone else.
I mean, but, you know, like, he's almost probably a person who could sustain his own biopic.
You know, given his own accomplishments.
But he's sort of a necessary tool in Oppenheimer.
The other thing this movie does that I love is as we revisit scenes, the way in which, like, other characters are revealed to have been in the room.
Just the camera didn't show us.
The camera didn't show us earlier.
You know, the big one is, like, when we move the flower arrangement.
You're like, Dane DeHaan, what are you doing here?
Whatever.
Jump scare.
But just sort of, like, turning around the table, you're like, oh, Lawrence was there in that scene or whatever.
Or, like, the big one is, like, oh, Strauss is, you know, like, et cetera.
I'm going to give it to not a person, but just the concept of restless ambition.
And that hits a number of people on the power front and on the pursuit of ideas, you know, Jurassic Park front.
Okay.
Are you watching closely Most Exquisitely Gorgeous Shot?
I'm going to go first here and give it to – it's a superhero suiting up moment.
And it's after Ravi, Krumholtz's character, says, they need us for who we are, so be yourself, only better.
We see Oppenheimer take the military uniform off and put the hat on and pick up the pipe.
And just, like, as the light is streaming in and he's standing in front of the window and the gorn's in score,
he's going crazy, like, it's – and then he walks out.
And in the screenplay –
He had that shit on.
Yeah, he had that shit on.
In the screenplay, which is told in the first person, it's an insane screenplay.
It's great.
I pull on a jacket, run a hand through newly shorn, close-cropped dark hair, put on a pork pie hat, pick up my pipe.
And then exterior Los Alamos under construction moments later, I walk the main drag like a sheriff,
nodding at construction workers as I pass the iconic J. Robert Oppenheimer.
So, this is –
This idea of, like, Nolan and the concept of costuming, which we've talked about since following,
like, this is the thing of, like, sort of what does it mean for Guy Pearce to be wearing that suit in Memento
or what does it mean for, of course, Batman to suit up or, you know, all of these various moments.
And I think about Nolan himself.
Sean is very responsibly, like, restraining himself from psychoanalyzing Christopher Nolan.
I love to psychoanalyze Christopher Nolan.
And, like, the fact that he has, like, created his own directorial uniform, you know.
Did you see those photos recently of him in shorts at Universal?
No.
Studios?
He was, like, at Universal Studios.
For shame.
And I was just like, nothing for shame.
Was he playing, like, a game, like, a pick-up hoops game?
No, he was just out at the park and he was a man who was, like, it's oppressively hot, I want to wear shorts.
But I was, like, where's the overcoat?
I don't –
I know.
I don't – like, Christopher Nolan needs to be wearing an overcoat and a crisp white collared shirt.
Like, he has his own uniform.
Well, he wasn't at work, right?
If you're not at work.
That's what I'm saying.
But at work, no shorts.
No shorts at work.
This is a long-standing fantasy role.
Oh, okay.
All right.
But at play –
At play?
At play at City Walk.
Okay.
I think that guy loves City Walk.
He does.
It's his own base.
He's always there.
It's wild.
It's so hard to get in there.
Weird.
Do you think he has his own parking spot?
I don't think he has to go through security.
Yeah, he must have his own parking spot.
Sean, what's your answer here?
I already mentioned it, which is that image of him being hoisted and the American flag positioned directly behind him.
And, you know, the sort of, like, false promise of the future and a lot of how the second half of the movie is really about.
Right.
Like, destruction of lives and the soul.
Just that?
Just that.
I'll go with kind of an obvious one, but just the light wave, star explosion, atmospheric ignition, collapsing star, black hole, gravity well, interstitials that we get – that we cut to throughout the entire film.
Not only because – especially, like, bending light.
I'm not a physicist.
I'm not a quantum mechanics.
I'm not a scholar, a physicist.
You're not?
I'm not to the list.
But not only because they look cool, but because I think it also then further unlocks something that the movie does kind of amazingly well, which is actually inject a lot of quantum mechanics, physics, science without ever tripping you up on that at all.
Mm-hmm.
At all.
They're talking about black holes.
They're talking about splitting the atom.
They're talking about this – the nuclei, this and that.
Teller's running his calculations of uranium, plutonium.
Heavy water.
Oh, my God.
They made a mistake.
And you're like, don't need to understand any of that.
You see the big fireball, and you're like, got it.
You don't even need Mr. DNA to explain it.
Exactly.
You don't.
Yeah.
No, always will.
They do have the – I can't remember.
It's the uranium –
The marbles.
The marbles.
They do have these kind of visual signifiers of accomplishment, of sort of reaching a point that is also just, like, very simple, straightforward, but so simple and straightforward that most people wouldn't think to create storytelling that is able to communicate to you.
Yeah.
Like, we've made progress.
Like, especially in a movie with so much montage that you can kind of, like, stack the marbles over time.
It's very, you know, elegant little piece of storytelling.
So it's marble stacking and then suddenly Peter going from being a baby to, like, walking around and then there's another baby.
Like, little things like that.
Time passing.
Inside of just the Los Alamos stretch, because obviously we have Cillian Murphy looking quite different across time because we're covering many years.
But always handsome.
Just amazingly so.
Those cheekbones.
I also love, to your point about that, I love learning how much of that was done practically.
Like that in the behind the scenes, you can see the lights that they were just sort of like moving in front of the camera in front of a shot of Cillian Murphy to give us some of those images.
I can't remember to forget you the scene you think about the most, Sean Fennessey.
I think it's the Trinity test, right?
I mean, it's the best scene in the movie.
It's the most ecstatic piece of filmmaking I think he's probably ever made.
It's an event.
I was skewered on the internet when the trailer of this movie came out and I was like, we know this story.
Why do we need this?
Very foolishly.
And then loved the movie.
Did you know everything about straws, though?
No.
And of course I didn't know everything.
I was like, what the hell was I talking about?
You know what's fun about getting older is like sometimes it's really fun to be wrong.
It used to really embarrass me and now I'm just sort of like, you know what, this is so human.
I feel the exact same way.
Specifically about this where I was like, how nice that my own ego can be lapsed by my wonder and excitement about something because it would have been the former when I was younger.
But this one in particular, the whole point of a movie like this is not that you know the information.
It's experience.
It's experiencing someone's perception of the information.
And the Trinity Test is just bravura filmmaking and thrilling.
Yeah, it's incredible.
That's my runner up.
I think like you said earlier, there are kind of two contenders for this category.
It's Trinity Test or the post-bombing speech.
And that's my pick.
I think that sequence in the gym on the bleachers with the chanting and the stamping and we've cut elsewhere to the feet pounding.
The bleachers and we know the hold that moment has on him moving forward, you know, in the super meeting later when we're cutting to it.
But the way like we have the actual language of the speech that you already outlined, Joe, but then like, you know, the flash of light and the ash falling from the sky, the way that the sound is just sucked out of the scene.
So you see these screaming, cheering faces, but you don't hear them anymore.
We're hearing like the heartbeat we're hearing.
And then, of course, the cut to the face, you know, the flaking.
The flaking skin on Christopher Nolan's own daughter's face.
We're not going to psychoanalyze Christopher Nolan.
It's all right there.
Stepping into the burnt body on the ground.
And then amid the cheering and the celebration, the euphoria on this horrible moment and the guilt and shame, you know, that basically is the final stretch of the odyssey starting to creep into Oppenheimer right here on Oppenheimer's face in real time.
And then you start to see like it's not not everybody's cheering.
Somebody's sobbing.
Somebody's vomiting.
Like there are people who.
Realize what this means.
And then we cut right from that scene to the time cover.
The father of the atomic bomb.
It's just really, really, really jaw dropping.
So that's my pick.
But I did consider Trinity test because I agree.
It's amazing.
Those are both perfect picks for some reason.
The moment that even when I was more critical of this film and I am before I learned how to stop worrying and embrace it is the meeting where it's decided where in Japan they'll drop the bomb.
Oh, yeah.
And James Remar, who comes back as Teresa.
And the odyssey says, I've taken Kyoto off the list.
I honeymoon their honeymoon there.
And so just sort of the like absolutely poisonous, arbitrary nature of like, you know, it's great cultural significance.
And also I honeymoon there.
So we won't kill everyone who lives there.
There's a fascinating real world resonance there, too, which is the James Remar is married to a Japanese woman.
No, I didn't know that.
It's just a fascinating choice.
Yeah.
He doesn't speak English.
He does this with an accent thicker than sauerkraut sauce.
Most baffling.
Most baffling accent.
Easy pick.
Are you giving it to Brana?
I know for once I'm not.
I think every time.
Yeah, it's been Brana every other time.
But is it a Safdie brother then?
It is my guy, Manny Safdie as Teller doing his best Hungarian here, I guess.
Urge them to continue my research on the super is the line where I'm just like.
What's going on here?
And I actually think I actually think his performance as Teller is great.
There's the.
Just the right.
He's striking something really specific there from the minute he they want to keep him at Oppenheimer's like, like, keep him out and just barges right in.
You know, everything totally about the performance is great.
But the accent is confounding to me.
Yeah, I think that would be the go to for most people.
I do think Jason Clarke attempting like a semi New England prosecutor is like it's it's there's some moments that I noted that.
We're a little strange in a perfect emotional performance.
Killian Murphy is sometimes and my girl Emily Blunt is sometimes both are quite mannered from the UK.
All right.
No one cared who I was until I put on the mask.
Best use of a Nolan verse regular.
I'll go first.
I mean.
I would not have thought of dust Malkin as a regular, but and, you know, he's a.
A.
A very famous figure amongst horror movie fans and has appeared very many a lot of horror movies over the years.
And he's often used as like a goblin in movies, you know, like a like a boogeyman.
And he's a real American boogeyman in this movie.
He really is the person who like is potentially going to fell one of our great minds.
And I had just forgotten that he is so important.
Is it in Dark Knight or Batman?
Dark Knight, right?
As the Joker Allegiant dressed up in a police uniform.
That was like his first sort of I think maybe his first big mainstream part or was it really maybe something.
So that I mean, that's that's a very interesting little Nolan esque callback.
So I like that.
But he I mean, he's great at this.
Like he's got a huge troop now.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I do like that.
His first role.
That's amazing.
Fun fact.
He's got one of those faces.
I don't know.
The pick is obviously killing Murphy.
It's like hard to make the I can't really talk myself into making any other case.
But I will say.
I really like I admire the commitment to getting is like we're going to get Gary Oldman in here.
We have to find a way.
This cast has a thousand people in it.
And that that scene in the Oval Office is so good.
But also, obviously, the address and other moments.
That's another outrageous accent in this movie.
Yeah.
I mean, it's been fun for us to track.
And as you know, my answer, as much as Brana has been in the accent category, my answer has often been.
Yes.
Killian Murphy, because I'm such a huge Scarecrow Jonathan Crane fan.
I love the way in which Killian Murphy.
And we.
We talked about this with Damon as well.
This sort of like showing up for small roles and being rewarded with like the big, shiny center stage.
That's Melchion starring role.
When?
Yeah.
That's my question.
Yeah.
Are you going with Jefferson Hall here?
Are you going Tylan Lannister?
I'm going to go with Damon.
I just like.
Yeah.
I love how Damon is used in this movie.
He's great.
I just think he's.
And like the way he looks in this movie, the mustache.
And also just like what you learn about Groves in terms of like the performance he's putting on.
Mm hmm.
You know, and then Oppenheimer's like, um, I looked into you.
Yeah.
He went study engineering at MIT.
Like, this is weird.
So like the performance inside of the performance inside of the performance of Matt Damon.
And also just like the meta nature of Casey Affleck also being here is just quite fun.
I think.
All right.
Amateurs seek the sun, get eaten.
Power stays in the shadows.
Said by one Mr. Straws.
Stealth MVP of this movie that not enough people talk about.
Difficult movie.
For this category, given how many aspects of this movie have been literally awarded with an Oscar, but also celebrated in many forms.
I'm going with the size of the cast, specifically the commitment to incorporating that the volume of scientists who the film finds some way to name or give one line to.
Like, I tend to forget when I come back.
I watch this movie and I'm like, yeah, Jack Quaid's in this movie, you know?
Josh Peck is here.
Yeah.
Which wolf brother is that?
Josh Peck is here is a great one, you know?
Like, is that that guy from CW show The 100?
It is, you know?
Like, they're all here.
And the thing that I think it achieves is just giving you a real sense of how many, despite this movie being so fully about Oppenheimer's, we've talked about how many people had to contribute to this and participated in this.
It's like the film's version of that Groves-Oppenheimer exchange.
Where it's, like, hard to put a price tag on it.
It's like, not really.
Just, like, add up all the bills, you know?
Hard to give you a sense of how many people were involved in the Manhattan Project.
Put, like, 400 of them in this movie, you know?
So, I think it achieves something that is necessary to balance out centering so much of this on Oppenheimer himself.
Sean Fennessey.
I didn't know you could do that.
You could answer questions by saying the totality of something.
Pick anything you want.
You can do anything you want with these categories.
That's cheating.
You can also just be, like, the editing.
The cinematography.
Oh, okay.
You can do anything you want.
Yeah, I didn't think about it that way.
I am doing anything.
Yeah.
I was going, see, I was, that was when I had first, but, like, you know.
She won an Oscar.
I know.
But people don't say her name enough, I think, so.
She's wonderful.
I interviewed her for this film and is just, like, the most normal, down-to-earth person.
And this just, I think editing Christopher Nolan's movies, they sound like hell to me.
Probably challenging, yeah.
And this one in particular is just, the tonnage.
It's insane.
And, you know, you talked about it with the size of the cast.
I mean, there's just so many speaking parts and there's so many intersecting and interweaving plot lines.
and film stock styles
and the music
and the way that it has to
kind of match perfectly
with so many of the images
that are created
and so I think
that's a great pick
I mean I was just going to
pick David Krumholz
because I just think
he's the heart and soul
of the movie
and
I was going to pick Krumholz
but my memory
and I think it's just because
I'm in like a certain
or three years ago
I was in a certain
corner of Twitter
like my memory was like
so many people were like
Krumholz should have won
the Oscar
like instead of Downey
I was one of those people
yeah
Krumholz should have won
and it's one of those things
where it is kind of
a little
microcosmic snapshot
of how the Academy Awards were
where like there was
never a moment
not even a second
where David Krumholz
was even going to be nominated
that was not on the table
because this is a very
mechanized system
where when this movie came out
it was very clear
that Downey was going to run
and that he was going to
have his moment
and if it wasn't going to be Downey
or if there were going to be
two nominations
the other one probably
would have been Matt Damon
and then you get on the list
and like maybe Krumholz
is third or fourth
but
you know
I think it's kind of
important over time
to continue to give
performers their laurels
even if they're not
recognized by the Academy
and it's very common
for bigger stars
to get their awards
in supporting categories
when they've been overlooked
you know
but Downey should have won
for like Chaplin
like 35 years ago
you know what I mean
it's one of those things
where like
why did that not happen then
I don't know
do you think he'll win again
for playing Victor Von Doom
I don't
but you know what
who knows
if Downey had won
for The Judge
which is what he wanted
to have happen
that one year
or what if he had won
for that documentary
he made about his
dad
oh
yeah senior
yeah that he was really
like there were these
like he's running
he's running years
and then it was like
he's running
and he has a path to it
but like we were talking
about this with like
this year as we talk about
Anne Hathaway
versus Samantha Morton
like is this a moment
this is the exact same race
the exact same race
is Anne Hathaway
getting her second Oscar
and when she came out
on stage at D23
I was just like
Jesus Christ
she's brought down the house
until
yeah the entire stadium
erupted for her
like seven months pregnant
yeah until she drops
that baby
like she is going to be
on every single stage
um
that's all about
whether she picks
supporting or lead
or whether
whatever they pick
we were discussing that
but and my question was like
what if the critical groups
start
because in supporting
I really feel like
those critical
sorry
I always talk about the Oscars
but like
those critical group awards
when they start gathering
steam behind like a
Patricia Arquette
or something like that
like it can go
so like if Samantha Morton
starts winning those
the narrative could change
and if Krumholz had like
started winning those
critical group
like
yeah it's possible
like Regina
King and Beale Street
like that kind of a thing
like those things do happen
yeah
um
it's why
part of why Amy Madigan
was able to like
you know make it all that way
so
that was one for sure
that's like the one path
if Samantha Morton like
starts cropping up in those
that's the one path
she could have
otherwise it's
and to your point
category
for the record
I like Downey in the movie
I think it's very overstated
his performance
because I think he doesn't
really know how to act anymore
but um
it's not
I find it's appropriate
for the movie
because he is written
as a villainous type
so
I like him in the scene
scenes
with
Oppenheimer
yeah
like I think those scenes
are really good
um
I just
it might be more of a writing issue
but to your point
like I think he should have won
for Chaplin
or
a number of other things
that he has done in the past
that I'm
delighted he has an Oscar
um
okay
you're waiting on a train
a train that will take you far away
best dead girl moment
we just had to do it
we had to do it
it's one of my favorite categories
Kelly Murphy being fucked
by the ghost of Florence Pugh
uh
inside of a hearing
uh
it's gotta be
it's gotta be either that
yeah
or
as we already talked about
um
Oppie flashing to the
hair
in the bathtub
as uh
Roger Robb
is just berating him
about whether he would have used
the H-bomb
like consequences of my action
dead girl moment
I'm with you on both of them
those seem appropriate
that seems right
or putting his daughter
this has been just
yeah or that
melting off of his daughter
or something like that
just a classic category
that's a good one as well
uh
it's just something he loves to do
and we were like
it's not gonna happen in the Odyssey
and then it did
okay
um
they won't fear it
until they understand it
and they won't understand it
until they've used it
clear as great man moment
we've already talked about
a lot of this
uh
when Sean raised this earlier
but anything you wanna
I'll just rapid fire
read a couple
um
emblematic quotes
sure
to kind of put a bow
on the discussion
we've had all pod
Lawrence
because you're not just
self-important
you're actually important
Chevalier
you see beyond the world
we live in
there's a price to be paid
for that
easy
when you speak
they hear a prophet
oh my god
incredible
Oppenheimer himself
are
our work here
will ensure a peace
mankind has never
seen
uh
Sillard
you're the great
salesman of science
Oppenheimer himself
calling it
divine
power
uh
and then
uh
straws with you know
great envy and jealousy
saying because it made him
the most important man
who ever lived
Robert built that damn place
he was founder
mayor
sheriff
all rolled into one
I really like the
scene when he comes to teach
and Lominitz is his
first student
and only student
in the class
and he immediately
starts lecturing
and you kind of see
Oppenheimer's mind
come alive
and you know
it's paradoxical
and yet it works
like that scene too
where it's sort of like
this guy's smart
and he's smarter
than everybody else
and he's gonna tell you
why he's so smart
as a sort of like
lead up to a lot of the moments
that you guys are describing
I love that
Sean an idea is like
a virus resilient
highly contagious
the line that hits hard
is three years later
maybe it is
it's paradoxical
and yet it works
which is like
I think it
maybe
the best defense
of this movie
that I could make
which is like
something that
is as overstated
in the third act
as it possibly is
should kind of
pull this thing down
from with inside it
but I still like it
like I'm still
it still
it still turns me on
fusion and fission baby
that's right
I'm tempted to go with
Bohr's algebra
is like sheet music
the important thing isn't
can you read music
it's can you hear it
can you hear the music
Robert
but it's been a category
title for us
so that makes me feel
like it's disqualified
because we've mentioned it
now 13 times already
on other podcasts
but whenever I hear
that line in the movie
I feel the
Goranson's
score
oh my god
I know it does
which I think it's called
can you hear the music
it gives you
it gives like you
a chill watching it
so instead I will go
with my guy Teller
and his flawless
pitch perfect accent
J. Robert Oppenheimer
sphinx like guru
of the atom
nobody knows
what you believe
do you
because I think
nobody knows
what you believe
do you
is actually quite
effective and pointed
in a good way
what about you Joe
our guy Chevalier
you see beyond the world
we live in
there's a price
to be paid for that
or
when Oppenheimer
is talking to
I can't remember
his name
the scientist
who he calls
a fellow traveler
where he's like
they need us
and he's like
until they don't
right so this idea
of like
going in tandem
with the great man
ideas is sort of like
they will worship you
and they will build you up
and they will be equally
excited to tear you down
like that is
part and parcel
of the whole narrative
yeah I love that
you think darkness
is ally
you're ally
but you really
adopt the dark
I was born in it
molded by it
most devastating
moment
this was one of the
easier categories for me
it's kind of obvious
but
but I do just think
the end
like the Einstein
Oppenheimer
scene
Albert when I came to you
with those calculations
we thought we might start
a chain reaction
that would destroy
the entire world
I remember
well what of it
I believe we did
and then the meme
the meme face
and then the atmospheric
ignition
it's like
that's a good ending
to a movie
it is
and so I'm like
the 30-ish minutes
that preceded
I'm like
and then at the end
I'm just like
Godfather 3
pulled me back in
it really hits hard
that was also my answer
that's a great answer
I'll go with it
can you hear the music
Robert
most unforgettable
Goranssonism
Zimmerism
really works better
than Goranssonism
Ludwigism
Ludwigism
you know I saw him
at Tartine
across the street
the other day
here?
yeah
our Tartine
sheesh
sorry not to call out Ludwig
also interviewed him
for this film
Lovely Man
genius
yeah
he's great
you're the best
well I did
you're the greatest
can you hear the music
is my answer
this is the
the
you referenced
this montage earlier
it's when
it's not just science
but it's also
modernist art
and it's also
he's reading
The Wasteland
you know
it's just like
all of the cultural
moments
that go into
the ideas
that are sparking
and coming alive
well yeah
I mean
it's a very
haughty thing
that if not done well
can seem so pretentious
but I love haughty
I do too
I mean
I wish more artists
would aspire to these things
that like
the intersection
between art and science
is real
and that form breakers
no matter what the medium
inspire people
and obviously
Oppenheimer's very inspired by
or
Nolan is very inspired
by Oppenheimer
in some ways
and he's very inspired by
these great artists
and figures who
you know
a man staring at a Picasso
and realizing
it doesn't have to be
I know
perceptionally
exactly what you think it is
is a little much
but I do like it
like it did hit me
I did
I was
I felt very forgiving of it
despite its obviousness
I liked it a lot
I'm going with
the final prep stretch
before the
trinity
test
and this has actually
been my pick for
the
can you hear the music category
in a lot of movies
the Zimmer ones
like when the score functions
in a Nolan movie
like Clock
you know the ticking
you can feel the ticking of it
the anxiety
the way that it heightens
that feeling in your chest
and in your gut
this is really like
an astonishing example of that
the way that there's like
a almost Geiger meter
like sound effect
incorporated
because of the fear
and the terror
the role
the incorporation to
the pairing with the score
of the natural
elements
like the thunder
the rolling in
of the thunder
and the clouds
the flapping of the sheets
you know priming us
for the bring the sheets
in music
and then I'm like
is that a fiddle
maybe it's not
I don't know
but just even the
choice of instruments
is very effective
and surprising
it's amazing
let me think
Goranson said about
sort of which
instruments he chose
is that they wanted to make
you know
and I love
when they talked about this
with the Odyssey
but for this
that they wanted to make
almost like Peter and the Wolf
style
that the violin
is the sound of Oppenheimer
because
because it can go from beautifully
melodic to like
horror movie screeching
yes
and sort of like
so it can just like
you know
be both this like
act of creation
and then just this
act of horror
at the same time
Sean Fantasy
anything you want to add here?
no I think it's that
first sequence
it's not the first sequence
it's the sort of like
after
he's been challenged
by Niels Bohr
and he goes into this
like state of
intellectualizing
about
fission and fusion
that I think is probably
the score moment
that resonates the most
for me
two more to go
and then we're done
with the Nolan rewatch
how sad
okay for me
I think this is the end
of a beautiful friendship
actor who has yet
to return to the Nolanverse
but should
this was much more fun
when we were doing
like way earlier
basically these are actors
who have not been
in the Odyssey
yeah exactly
but I'm gonna give it
to Krumholtz
who I said
Krumholtz who has quit acting
but I guess has
since walked that back
but Krumholtz should be
in everything
and
like would I put
Krumholtz in the Odyssey?
sure
like Guzamo I love you
but Krumholtz?
as Eumaeus?
he's wonderful
that would be fun
I don't know
I think
Nolan needs to try
to write a movie
told directly
from the perspective
of a woman
and I think
with Florence Pugh
it would be interesting
this is my pick as well
let's get Pugh back
let's get Pugh back
in a Nolan movie
you don't think
if he finally makes
a movie from the point
of view of a woman
it's definitely gonna be
Hannah Hathaway
it's gotta be Hannah Hathaway
like she's put in her time
I know
it's her time
yeah I just think
there's gonna be a second woman
in that movie
that would be shocking
oh what
maybe it could be
would they talk to each other?
never
would they talk to each other
about anything
other than a man?
not only can they not be
in the same room
they can't be in the same time
they will both die
so don't worry about it
yeah I just
I feel like Florence Pugh
is one of the very few
like under 35
female movie stars
in America
and has had kind of
a weird five years
where
I don't really
you know
no shots of Thunderbolts
which I like
fuck off
this is
Yelena Belova HQ
right here
it is
and I like her
and I liked her in
Spider-Man a lot
but like
she's
there's more there
I've watched a bit of
East of Eden
it was good
oh okay
like what she's doing
that's TV
it's a TV show
yeah
but come on
she's a movie star
why did she make a TV show?
unbelievable
because Silk is
unbelievable
come on
come on
she's supposed to be
like our Barbara Stanwyck man
like she's like
brassy and tough
and smart
and sexy
and like a very
classy
movie star type
that I love
and I think she brings
again
a lot of gravitas
to a weird part
like Jean has written
very strangely
in this movie
stuff she has to do
while wearing no clothes
is
would be questionable
I think with most actresses
and she I think makes
what is very unbelievable
on the page
I think work in the film
and so I like to see her
get a little more to do
same
I look forward
to you walking back
your brisk merging
of East of Eden
when you're like
I finally watched Andor
and guess what
it was a masterpiece
I know
I mean two of the
formative voices
in my life right
East of Eden
is Steinbeck
yeah
and George Lucas
yeah sure
okay
Tony Gilroy
and Zoe Kazan
like
yeah
I love Zoe Kazan
I know you do
alright
Mallory
pew pew
as well
pew pew pew
alright
some men just want
to watch the world
burn the most
Nolan thing
about this movie
I don't have anything
to add beyond
what we've already
covered today
I mean it's a
astonishingly
edited
movie
, filmed,
scored,
practically
effects enhanced
non-linear exploration
of a great man
confronting his
impact and legacy
on the world
and it's
you know I guess
maybe one thing
worth talking about
given that this
and Odyssey
were back to back
it's just like
Nolan's era
of adapting
history
or historical works
versus like
original
storytelling
that's interesting
do you think
he'll stay in that
stretch for a while
or go back to like
the tenant
well
if we get our
JFK
yeah
JFK told from
this perspective
of Jackie
as played by
Anne Hathaway
I'm in
I'm interested
you have my attention
I have seen the film
Jackie starring
Natalie Portman
I love that movie
yeah I do too
very interesting movie
I
what he does next
is fascinating to me
yeah
you know he's
he's hinting around
at making a horror movie
which I think
would be a lot of fun
based on what we saw
in the Odyssey
yeah the Odyssey
is a horror movie
in terms of like
those germs
of the next movie
being in the movie
it'd be really great though
if he was just like
I'm rebooting
Nightmare on Elm Street
like
he's obviously
not gonna do that
I
I think this is
kind of the summation
of the style
right
yeah
and
a lot of the things
that I
bumped on
in previous films
I felt more forgiving
of in this movie
I think maybe because
stylistically
and narratively
it felt like
a step forward
and also
like
it's a true story
and
and didn't
doesn't seem to take
very many liberties
with the truth
in a way that a lot of movies
like this go under
the microscope
so
yeah
when you
Sean Fantasy
if there's a storyteller
that hasn't worked for you
and then they do something
that hits for you
you know
and you're like
you know what
Nolan movies aren't really for me
and then you see off
and you're transformed
but that will
see that
that's a misnomer
about my relationship
to Christopher Nolan
and I've been saying this
like a thousand times
but
I was all in
on Memento
I saw Insomnia
in theaters
I liked it
I really liked the prestige
and I always said that
to me the bump
was where most people
were like wow
you know
Dark Knight Inception
that's like
the greatest thing
that ever happened to me
because I was 14
when those movies came out
and I understand that perspective
I have my movies like that as well
but Inception in particular
was a movie that just
didn't really
labyrinth yeah
I mean it happens
well my question was
and this is not about
changing your score
of Inception
I'm trying to think
of who's a director
who like made five movies
that I didn't like
and then their sixth movie
I did like
you don't have an answer
for that
I mean I guess my
it's usually the opposite
it's like Zack Snyder
like I really was interested
in the first couple
of Zack Snyder movies
and he really went
off the rails
I think I find
here's what I'll say
that like
I guess
the entire body
of Nolan's work
just enhances
all the previous films
for me
and this rewatch project
has you know
and so just sort of
like being able
to think of it
as one
large story
and so when you
when you have a stretch
of Nolan that you appreciate
and then he sort of like
goes off the rails
for you commercially
whatever it is
and then he like
comes back around
to a sort of
haughty intellectual space
that you love to exist in
does it like
reflect a shine
back on some of
these other films
where you're like
that didn't really
work for me
but I see how these ideas
have been percolating
inside of them
and you need them
to get here
I don't know
I mean it's been
it's been
I rewatched Inception
and Interstellar
during
COVID
just
in a real like
I'm having a family
I'm buying a home
like having this kind of like
maybe I should revisit
some of my strongly held opinions
and in both cases
I kind of landed
with those movies
where I had always been
which is like
like some things about it
don't like some things about it
the things I don't like about it
I find it very hard
to
certify
loving the movie
and I love a lot of movies
it's not
that uncommon
for me to love a movie
and I want to love
most movies
but
and I don't think
either of those movies
are cynical at all
I just think they're
a little immature
and
I don't think that
his most recent run of movies
are immature
Tenet is like a big experiment
it might be the most
immature movie he's ever made
but it's such a fun experiment
that I can't help
getting caught up in it
we love a swing
we do
we love a swing
these last two though
they're
they're movies
made my
I'll say made by a man
in the second half of his life
who's
who's no longer aspirational
and more just
trying to use
the powers and skills
and tools that he's
figured out how to work with
and
and to try to make something
a little bit bigger
and like dare I say
like more lasting
and meaningful
right
whereas James Cameron
took the same opportunity
to be like
what if hot
cat blue
alien people fuck
well yes and no
but I mean
I'm more forgiving
of those movies too
because he's like
we are living amidst
an ecological disaster
and I'll make a parable
for our times
about this disaster
and about the military
industrial complex
which I had previously
valorized
you know
uncomplicatedly
in the past
Sean don't make me
reconsider Avatar
I can't do it
I you know
you can still hate it
you got really
you got really close
right there
that was impressive
I don't
it's the same thing
where like
I think a lot of these guys
when we start
when they start thinking
about their legacies
they sometimes take swings
that are very self-serious
yes
and that can really backfire
Nolan is the case
for me
where it's really working
he's like
what like
what is my life all about
yeah
and how can I see it
through
yeah
these people
to me is
more interesting
than I've made
a third Batman film
sure
but that had Bane in it
I know
you guys remember Bane
I get it
I like Bane
Bane rules
I'm gonna end by
returning to this
again this
you don't want the last words
of the
Bane rules
15 month project
to be Bane rules
guess what
you can end on that
we'll come back to it
something to think about
Ciara incepted
this idea of like
trying to go home
right
and I've been sort of
thinking about it
and so thinking about it
as it returns to
like
how it pertains to
Oppenheimer
and the Odyssey
of like
not just trying to go
you can't go home again
so this idea that
Robert Oppenheimer
took
his idea of heaven
which is New Mexico
this like
very nostalgic place
and
made
hell
of his heaven
like turned it into
an inferno
and then made
you know
in the same way that
Odysseus is like
I broke the world
I can't go home again
I'm trying to go home
I don't really want to go home
because I've forever
changed our society
and I can't go home again
so like
these last two
really being
the
you-can't-go-home-again movies.
Mm-hmm.
I think that's incredibly interesting.
So I really like that.
That's a beautiful observation.
I love the way that. But also Bane rules, you know?
Also Bane rules.
It's something to think about.
Your body.
Robbie, our guy, is he like. He voices that in a way
that inside of this question of like,
what have you brought in the world?
Like also, what have you. What has the impact been on your own circumstance
and the thing you cherish?
When Robbie's like, you drop a bomb
and it falls on the just and the unjust.
I don't wish the culmination of three centuries of physics
to be a weapon of mass destruction.
Like, what are you doing inside of your own life too?
And what is the cost of that?
I don't know.
There's something I think quite honest about that,
that that maybe has more of a hold on people.
We wouldn't like to think it,
but that probably has more of a hold on people
than what is the cost of the thing
that you did to the world.
And Bane rules.
And Bane rules.
Sean Fantasy rules.
You guys rule.
Sean, thanks so much for doing this.
What a project, what a podcast.
Thanks for joining us, bud.
When will you come back?
Will you come back to talk next year
about Oswald with us?
Well, sure.
I didn't bring my Oswald trading cards for Sean.
I'm sorry.
Did they show a trailer for that series?
Yeah, a little, like a cute little clip.
And they gave us trading cards.
They're commemorative from that night only.
And Joanna got one and was like,
I'm going to give it to a stranger.
Did Favreau speak of the Mandalorian and Grogu?
Did it come up?
It didn't come up.
He did come out and he said,
this is a really personal project
that I'm going to do.
And I went, aren't they all, John?
And it was the funniest moment of D23 for me.
It was really good.
Thank you to Sean Fantasy.
Thank you to our team of scientists,
Carlos Chiriboga, Scott Lee,
Jacob Cornett, Arjuna Renggut-Powell,
Jomia Deneron, all played by
Oscar-winning actors like
Rami Malek and Casey Affleck
and the rest, Gary Oldman.
Thanks to Christopher Nolan for making great movies
for a couple decades that we get to watch and talk about.
I've always been saying that.
What a treat.
Always been on the right side of history.
And we will be back with Lanterns
episode three on Monday.
See you soon.
Bye.
Fan rules!
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The podcast features a deep, non-linear discussion of Christopher Nolan’s *Oppenheimer*, with hosts reflecting on its emotional and intellectual depth across multiple viewings.
The film’s central theme of regret within accomplishment—particularly in the aftermath of the Trinity test—resonates as a powerful exploration of moral responsibility and personal consequence.
The movie’s structure, especially the first two hours, is praised as a cinematic achievement, while the third act’s focus on the Straws trial is seen as structurally unbalanced despite its thematic significance.
A key narrative arc examines the duality of ambition
The film critiques the "great man" ideology, portraying Oppenheimer not as a hero but as a flawed, human figure whose actions create widespread moral and existential consequences.
The inclusion of sexual content—particularly in the Gene Oppenheimer and Kitty scene—is interpreted as a deliberate humanizing element that reflects the film’s broader themes of desire, guilt, and interconnectedness.
The hosts compare *Oppenheimer* to Nolan’s earlier works like *Inception* and *The Dark Knight*, noting a shift toward emotional vulnerability and moral complexity in his later films.
The conversation culminates in a broader reflection on Nolan’s cinematic philosophy: his fascination with the tension between theory and reality, and the personal cost of achieving great power.
Summary:
The podcast offers a thoughtful, in-depth exploration of Christopher Nolan’s *Oppenheimer*, focusing on its layered themes of regret, ambition, and moral consequence. Hosts Sean Fennessey and Joanna Robinson revisit the film multiple times, praising its first two hours as a cinematic masterwork and acknowledging the third act’s structural imbalance despite its thematic weight. Central to the analysis is the idea of regret within achievement—the emotional toll of creating something world-altering, as seen in the pivotal Trinity test scene where Oppenheimer is hoisted on men’s shoulders, radiating quiet sorrow.
The film critiques the "great man" narrative, portraying Oppenheimer as a complex, flawed individual whose actions ripple through science, politics, and personal relationships. The inclusion of sexual content—especially in scenes between Gene Oppenheimer and Kitty—is framed not as gratuitous, but as a humanizing touch that reflects the film’s themes of desire, guilt, and interconnectedness. The discussion also draws parallels between *Oppenheimer* and Nolan’s earlier films, highlighting a shift toward emotional depth and moral ambiguity.
Ultimately, the conversation reveals Nolan’s enduring interest in the tension between theory and reality, and the personal cost of wielding immense power—making *Oppenheimer* both a critical and emotionally resonant culmination of his filmography. The hosts also reflect on how the film’s themes of accountability, guilt, and human fallibility resonate beyond the screen, offering a profound meditation on power, responsibility, and the human condition.
FAQs
Oppenheimer marks a pivotal shift in Nolan's work by exploring deep moral and philosophical questions about power, guilt, and the consequences of scientific achievement. It contrasts with his earlier films by focusing on emotional and intellectual complexity rather than purely structural or action-driven storytelling.
While 'Dunkirk' emphasizes collective experience and British resilience, 'Oppenheimer' centers on the individual's moral burden and emotional conflict. It introduces a more introspective and emotionally vulnerable tone, focusing on personal guilt and the human cost of innovation.
The sexual content serves to humanize the characters and reflect the film’s broader themes of desire, control, and moral ambiguity. It visually ties together the themes of power, violence, and personal consequence, reinforcing the idea of a 'hunger' that drives both scientific and human actions.
The scene symbolizes the intimacy and vulnerability behind the scientific pursuit. It highlights the personal, human side of Oppenheimer, contrasting with the cold, political reality of the atomic bomb, and underscores the film’s focus on emotional and moral complexity.
The film critiques the 'great man' narrative by showing how Oppenheimer’s actions have far-reaching, often destructive consequences. It challenges the notion of individual heroism, emphasizing that every decision creates ripples affecting families, nations, and global politics.
This moment captures the irony of triumph and regret. While it seems like a celebration of success, it reveals the subtle emotional toll and moral unease that follows, highlighting the film’s central theme of 'what have I wrought' and the burden of power.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.