OpenAI says new systems went rogue

Pibisiin polkkaista on suurin edes kertaa. Kunnasta vesisaatetta tai telkuston lumiisotetta. Nyt kitelkkari ei taita tarjota ihan sitä mitä heidia arnaakevat kesävihteiltä. Uusin toinen tangofinali kasikasi, vahvimmees finali ysi kuuh. Siksi kannattaa pakata mukaan Elisa viide. Setekee vanhastakin myökkiteevesä modernin viidekeskuksen. Nauhallaas kaikki määtloki tai hermunevesä. Vapaus nalttiä kesästä. Elisa. Suntaa elisa myymälään tai Elisa pistefi kaltta kesä. Tämä on jälkeen kauttaan on Suntaa, kauttaan alkaiset ja 15-teksi. Järjestelmä vahvimme on 28 jälkeen. Tämä on jälkeen kauttaan kauttaan. Sitten jälkeen kauttaan kauttaan tuntaa. Sitten jälkeen, että silti kauttaan tuntaa tuntaa, joten jälkeen. Ja silti tuntaa, joten silti tuntaa. -Semat activistsutus etetään pelaakastat veemosij他etalan Weatherranvä備ä nyydettämään - - sellainen on videomaan appreciituosina ja metreski - nackВystudbecca-köander! Kritiknoitusta, jos asipaneilemme voidaan viimeiskoreitaan奇怪amme, ― on hä clerään perallitiveringta kavuihtia on se, että se on tullut kuvaa jääntävästi. Järjestelmässä on tapauksia, että 1 avitta, ― avitta, kun rohdallaan ja asiaa on tullut yhden web. Tämä on häntä, että hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi. Hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi, ― ja hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, mutta hän on häntävästi, ― mutta hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi, ― mutta hän on häntävästi, hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, että hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, hän on häntävästi, ― että hän on häntävästi, hän on häntävästi, ― Stand irlök passed Bomido - kyselle, mutin on meille paikan skoljunnこの - keskuvo tarota autourssoЧто k sweetse festoonkhalassemballiselle - lu Nokusia maht水 США OpenAi ainna ísini yksi kokota, olisi oggi nossa ikäinen 가능.- - taiotheksi suasiut Темe Patari vaistittu koko puolossa nelpapi. Te160-owyestö floata m導an lisää lipeliä systèmeiseet. Tänään se nyt jääakersikouspamaan että replacepezies - Katytyy kevpidään seuraavaksi kysytönään gostoura - - ja syyttyy bähtyärittän hyö enabletaa? niin että itse asiassa osaara abletoista kuvaa diri ja sailedakintamista, ja mä oon vibrating aussi että niitä shallowita magneticin seispaasin ja batkien että m один vis fine mulla on kunotikaisin kertaaך pourquoi teko alyst maskeilla, mikä jätö katsoi alaikallisuudessa kertoista菊opun ambassador k עלakaatt broadband ei ole teitä pois höllianceblisktakulla kuten on byin thiupunna ennen itse pitäisi ottaessa meni Palatomatiใ klpaced genresallistus garment. Jammaniä pocotaisetaan tutkimaisua. R : Trustee Scott, varinht cl last - Mieikkiin esiin, nämä k場inen t agree réduitautun typlesancer Staff Cure roll - taapia vê pari. Kokemin tällaisen mennään luvattut. Lisäksi olis ja linjestab certainiset t around - pu��aa niiko noin umassaiskitista. Saikka ei tämä k eventually oShoihvacking - bpmial-luositunan nää kommunajan ja maguaja. Nonistokin, lu Angelseoon, että se nyt on taas lappani, että häni pysä altaa yhteydessä visibleisinaikallows, että täytyylande le Dial calm Teams- sensations. Ja te ol dissectaava armaan hyvänynä, kun ei QueenengoNo. Vangersin sitä superaskoinnolta, ja beveragesinnolta ja seuraavaksi syhsemmemme luon Nonistokin. Ja oikeastaan mä tarvitsee todessa jos tarvitsee humiliationsideen ja eri todella parasti astoidella pot Wherever m!」 toughiselle dolta betmaan ja siinä Tian Tri Laorden k hörmarknставilla v x City me eivät lainna. Se misunderstood. Se on tullut, että se ei ole tosi. Ja, se on tullut, että se ei ole tosi. Ja se on tullut, että se ei ole tosi. Yöneet Quicklykeet on yöb drivingeensäneempäkäiedän syöngäisokologin ersiin grease- konevan muuri, Tynä on jo, se tämän eikö, että jos jest jää크ksää on tois 2600$. Sam equipmentit ja rashikkuilta avaitan lesitimme j cheer Vader Taiwan ei liattu sin kokодеlaista ja Overalläität vastauksista -settiin moni toinen werdenkyötään sen jo Mystixo pari lirustaa millaista ylöö gü princellehtaaBERven, päällosen vihoudessa darnaha niillä estamosille siten tavallaan yks feat scr Opp forthumalusuih Gao ja ін ça你好ica huomallisen olen sanan spontaneouslyiut puolabila partsasta jo Antti serviceisen sang System Night so this war is proving expensive and congress is being asked to write another huge check to pay for it this senate hearing was designed to challenge the administrations request and it was interrupted several times by Antti war protestors but the administration is asking for some 67 billion dollars to pay for operations in the middle east described as urgent and necessary by Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of State for Defense he said the war had cost so far 37 and a half billion that's an increase of nearly 8 billion since the last estimate was made public and his argument is that the military is already fighting the war that the bill is mounting rapidly Iran is at the weakest point militarily it has ever been in in the past decade maybe in 47 years as they've gathered effectively a terror army so I acknowledge they still have capabilities no doubt but the amount of damage that we've done to them over the course of these series of operations has put them in the worst place they've ever been Democrats and Republicans largely responded down political lines Democrats accused the administration of using the war to demand what they repeatedly described as a blank check Republicans mostly agreed with the request for more funds although one Republican said that he was somewhat frustrated when he's heard these evasive answers from the Secretary of Defense he said he wanted to hear straight answers about the US strategy Peter Bose The US began its war with Iran because of rising concerns in Washington over Tehran's potential to build nuclear weapons the issue is a key sticking point to finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict in recent days Iran has accused the American military of targeting nuclear facilities once again specifically a partially constructed nuclear power plant in the south of the country the director general of the international atomic energy agency or IAEA Rafael Grossi was a key figure in the initial negotiations between both sides he spoke to my colleague Rob Young who began by asking him what he knew about the facility that's just been targeted we are aware of dark of info for a long time it is not a nuclear power plant at the moment at least so this is why I said a few days ago when the first news of a possible attack were issued by Iran We were very clear to say from the beginning, well, there's no nuclear material here, there is no nuclear reactor per se. There is, of course, an intention to have a nuclear reactor at some point and some initial construction work there. When do you think you'll be able to get inspectors into Iran? I don't know. I think we should be there already. It should be soon. The MOU, if you remember, said that within this time frame of 60 days to have a definitive agreement, that all activities related to the monitoring and verification in Iran would be carried out under the supervision, and I'm quoting the supervision of the IE, as it should, because let's not forget that Iran continues to be contracting party to the nuclear non-provision treaty, the NPT, and because of this, they have a safeguard agreement with us, according to which all activities in Iran should be declared and inspected by us. The Foreign Ministry in Tehran has said that they aren't going to change the way they cooperate with you unless you stop making what they call political statements. Well, again, of course, I will not enter into an argument with a foreign minister or the foreign ministry, because sometimes those statements are mostly attributed or from the spokespersons, not from minister at actually himself. I don't know this one. You are referring to. But first of all, that is an opinion. They are entitled to have an opinion. Everything I say, I say, in my capacity and within my authorities, as director general of the IE, so I, you know, they have their opinion, but they also have responsibilities and obligations, and they have to comply with them. You mentioned before the 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, which Iran is thought to have. Do you agree with the Americans that it is dust trapped underground? First of all, that is in gas form. It doesn't matter too much. I think it is a way of expressing, I think it was a colorful expression by the president. The material is important. This is highly enriched uranium at very close to weapon level grade. So for us, as IEA, it is very, very important to go back and to check it. The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Raphael Grossy. One country that Washington has reportedly reached a nuclear agreement with is Saudi Arabia. US media are suggesting that the two countries have after years of negotiation, struck a deal that would allow the kingdom to manufacture civilian reactors. But some observers fear this could pave the way for a nuclear weapon. Our correspondent, Yoland Nell reports. This is something that Saudi Arabia has long demanded, and there are reports in both the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, saying that President Trump has now given his approval for this landmark deal with Saudi Arabia. And an announcement on that is expected from the Energy Secretary later today. And what they're saying is that basically this would set up an arrangement lasting some 30 years, which would benefit US companies, because they would really be responsible for setting up the nuclear infrastructure in Saudi Arabia. They could make tens of billions of dollars out of that, according to one of the reports. But one thing that is really raising concerns is this idea that there's a key provision in the accord, which would have US companies also setting up uranium enrichment facility in Saudi Arabia, if a joint US and Saudi report found that that was warranted. And that's really what raised concerns. They're not enough safeguards built into this deal. This is something that is expected to go to Congress for review in the US, but it would be difficult for Congress to block it. Of course, coming at a time where it's just so apparent that this region is extremely volatile, there are concerns here that this could set off something like a nuclear proliferation race. Yoland Nell Still to come in this podcast. A few of the women are describing this experience as leg hair harassment, referring to the discomfort of being forced to kind of see male colleagues leg hair at the office. Why men wearing shorts is causing a stir in Japan. Available now on the documentary from the BBC World Service. I'm British Hanoi Borua in India where consenting teenagers are facing arrest and jail under the country's strict child sex abuse laws. I'll be hearing from lawyers and campaigners on board sides of the issue and from young people themselves. Listen now by searching for the documentary, wherever you get to your BBC podcasts. This is the Global News Podcast. Now, the sound of an agreeable and sociable meal time. Not humans as you probably realise, but apes. A new study has discovered that two ape species, chimpanzees and bonobos, use touch to reassure each other before stressful events, such as eating, where there can be conflict. And the behaviour is not limited to apes but seen in humans as well. It seems to be an ancient way of creating trust. Professor Zana Klai, senior author of the study, spoke to my colleague, Kacha Adler, about the research. It was a study with actually two great ape species, our two closest cousins, chimpanzees and bonobos. And we were interested in both species because they have different types of social structures. And chimpanzees are known as quite aggressive and bonobos are known as peaceful. So we were interested in how these two great ape species manage to mitigate conflict prior to stressful events. So they were studied at feeding time, which is a time of tension. And that would be whether they're in a sanctuary or in the wild possibly even more so, where they don't know for sure they'll get the food. Exactly. Yes. So we mimicked essentially a stressful feeding event, which is the arrival of food or the discovery of food. We had a special experiment where we threw like a half pipe full of peanuts in a very controlled way into their enclosure. But we gave them a five minute warning that this was coming and this kind of replicates what happens in the wild. So everybody's doing their own thing and they hear this call and they all rush over. And there's a five or ten minute period where everybody's excited waiting to eat. And we wanted to understand how they use friendly social contact to kind of manage that social situation and hopefully avoid conflicts before they start happening. So you say hopefully, so my question is did they, but also in your report, you say this behavior don't back millions of years. So what about the human parallels because these days, if you hear lots of anger arguments, you don't see that much hand holding or kissing beforehand. Well, actually yes or no. So in the study, we found lots of evidence that the more friendly contact that took place in the five minutes before the feeding took place. We found that they were much less likely to have fights. They showed much greater levels of social co-feeding, which is a mark of tolerance so they could sit together and share food. And actually in many stressful situations in humans, you do see lots of friendly contact happening prior to a stressful event where you need to cooperate. So a classic example is on the football pitch. Just before a team starts to play, you'll see a lot of physical behavior, a lot of hugging, embracing, patting on the back. This is not random. This is a very ancient way of forming and maintaining social bonds. Professor Zana Clay. The wreckage from a 1952 plane crash, an event that led to sweeping safety reforms on commercial passenger flights has been discovered sitting on the ocean floor of Puerto Rico. I heard more from Peter Ross. The end's decades of mystery about precisely where the panam Clipper Endeavor came to rest after crashing into the ocean shortly after it took off from Puerto Rico in April of 1952, 64 passengers and five crew members on board. The case came to prominence again in 2019 when a luggage tag from the flight washed ashore in Florida. That attracted media attention. It also caught the eye of the president of the Air Sea Heritage Foundation, Ross Matthews, who says the historical significance of the event prompted him to dig deeper. That led to years of research and digging through the archives for clues about the exact location of the crash site. And now the Air Sea Heritage Foundation has revealed that they, along with other partners, discovered the wreckage of the Douglas DC for aircraft at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean of Puerto Rico's Northern Coast last month. Now, although passengers are thought to have survived the initial impact, only 17 people were rescued. The rest were lost with the quickly sinking plane, which at the time investigators blamed in part on a lack of safety briefings, meaning the passengers just didn't know what to do when the plane hit the ocean. And this crash has wider significance because it essentially spurred some pretty major changes in the aviation industry. Yeah, exactly that. I mean, first of all, the first time I've seen this, I've seen this. of all Pan American airways, many listeners might remember that name, but I mean, the company itself dissolved in 1991. Before then, it was at one point the largest international air carrier and the unofficial flag carrier for the United States from much of the 20th century. So yes, this event was pretty much responsible for the widespread implementation of the safety briefings given at the beginning of all commercial passenger flights. You know, if you've ever taken a flight anywhere, you'll have seen these stewards and stewardesses standing up, pointing out with the emergency exes are, instructions given what to do in the event of an emergency. Now, according to the Pan Am Historical Foundation, the plane, which was bound for New York, lost both right side engines shortly after take off, that meant the pilot had to conduct a water landing, which of course would have been a very violent event. You can only imagine what that kind of impact would have been inside the cabin as the plane landed on the water. Now, the thing was the aircraft had life rafts and it had personal flotation devices for all on board, but investigators later said that the confusion ensued in part because no safety briefing was given. There was a language barrier and no coordinated evacuation procedure was in place and that just added to the disaster. The plane sank in just less than three minutes, that gave the US Coast Guard and the Air Force little time to attend the crash. Records showed that 12 passengers and five crew members were saved, the other 52 people aboard died. Two known survivors still alive today, a woman who is now 102, she was a nurse in her 20s instrumental in opening the aircraft door that let passengers out, and a baby that was found floating on the surface of the water who was resuscitated by rescuers, both have been informed that the wreck has now been found. Very briefly, any plans to recover the wreckage? It is a gravesite. Exactly. It's a gravesite, no plans, but the Air Sea Heritage Foundation is working with the Porto de Congo government. It says and is advocating for a memorial honoring those that lost their lives in the crash. Pete Ross. The house where Adolf Hitler was born has been turned into a police station. It's the latest attempt by the authorities in Austria to prevent the 17th century former in becoming a site of neo-Nazi pilgrimage. Ludwig Lyre, as a campaigner for victims of the Holocaust, he told Sean Lay how the building has changed since the government bought it 24 years ago. It has changed its facade that that is the main thing because the Austrian Ministry of the Interior thought it would be a good idea to change the facade of Hitler's birthplace in order to avoid the symbolic quality of the house. When the State, the Ministry of the Interior decided to buy the building, they had the idea of implementing a police station in the building. You're not comfortable with this idea, why not? Well, in every political system, the police have to maintain law and order. In a function and democracy, this is not a problem. Police are needed, but in a repressive society, most in a dictatorship, the police can easily become a means of violent repression, I would say. Hitler's Nazi regime is a good example. But why should that matter now when we're talking about a modern Austria, a very solidly democratic country? Well, solid or not, that's the question. According to the polls, for instance, these days, the Austrian Freedom Party, which is a populist right-wing party founded by Nazis in the '50s, they can expect support of nearly 40% of the votes these days in the next election. Has there been an issue in recent years of people coming to visit it as a sort of a shrine to Hitler or the Nazis? That was the case, so that is the case every now and then. It's not too frequent, but we have to face the fact that Hitler himself in his book, "My Kampf, My Struggle" in English, in 1925, confessed that fate decreed his birth in Browne on the borderline of the two German countries that must be reunified by the younger generation. And so neither the new for sale nor the police station will help to get rid of the irrational symbolic quality of Browneau. There were suggestions that it might be torn down at one point. Do you have an alternative idea of what the building might be used for that could be something more positive? There were very many interesting proposals for the use of the building. I give you one example, a so-called House of Responsibility, where young people from all over the world could meet and discuss concepts developed in the national projects of mutual understanding, of humanity, democracy, concepts like this were not taken into consideration by the Ministry of the Interior. The main argument was police station in this building guarantees that all these worshipers will not dare to commemorate Hitler's birth, for instance, when there are tourists coming in order to watch the place. Anti-Nazi campaigner Ludwig Leier. It's sweltering in the Japanese capital this summer with temperatures tipping over 40 degrees Celsius. For office workers, these are challenging conditions, particularly in a country that has a more formal dress code. To help with the problem, at least for men, the government in Tokyo is encouraging male members of staff to ditch the suit and tie and put on shorts instead. But many Japanese people are not happy with their being more leg on display. I heard more from our Tokyo correspondent, Karumi Mori. Tokyo is so hot and we got the humidity. And so it's just the way for the governor to do everything she can to make sure that people are not endangering their lives. Some commentators are saying, you know, it's better because you're relaxing the rules. It's more comfortable to wear shorts in the office. But others are saying it's kind of unfair to women since they're still expected to wear tight if you could see a little bit of the leg. And so a few of the women are describing this experience as leg hair harassment. Term coin does Sunenhaara online, referring to the discomfort of being forced to kind of see male colleagues leg hair at the office. Given that this is prompted because of the extreme weather, why different roles for men and women? I mean, I think it just speaks to the traditional conservative nature of Japanese culture. And men always wear wearing suit in ties to the office. We call them Sadadim on our salary men. It's kind of a uniform that everybody knows, you know, they're wearing jackets in the heat of the summer and long pants and the leather shoes. And so I think that the focus was on trying to get them to dress down a bit. And this is not new per se. The shorts are new. It's the first time this year, but Governor Kwaikit introduced a similar initiative back in 2005 when she was environment minister. And so it's been a long time coming. It's kind of become a summer tradition, but there haven't been kind of similar dress down policies for women. And so I think that's why some of these women are speaking out. Why the subsession with leg hair? I think it's more of a social etiquette thing. A lot of women maybe think that men should have less leg hair for maybe cosmetic reasons, maybe it looks better, but it's prompted them to seek laser hair removal according to some of these clinics as to not offend those around them. So I think it's just a way to kind of fit into society and not really stick out and do everything you can to not bother those around you. Karumi Mori. And that's all from us for now. If you want to get in touch you can email us at [email protected]. You can also find us on x@bbcworldservice. Use the hashtag globalnewspod. And don't forget our sibling podcast, the global story which goes in depth and beyond the headlines on one big story. This edition of the global news podcast was mixed by Alana Bowls and the producer was Richard Hamilton, the editor is Karen Martin. I'm Alex Ritson until next time. Goodbye. I'll be hearing from lawyers and campaigners on both sides of the issue and from young people themselves. Listen now by searching for the documentary wherever you get to your BBC podcast.