Olivia Rodrigo Attacked Over Cornell 7 Case & The Truth About Trump's "Fox News Problem"

"Making Kelly's now threatening to expose the Jane Doe and the Cornell 7K's told a levier Rodriguez to shut up, and you now have people calling her a hypocrite. Trump's now threatening to let Iran take out LA and San Diego, but you've got people freaking out about ash dikes. Texas is now targeting pediatricians for giving kids vaccines. McDonald's is facing some heat for using AI to rig its menu prices. We're talking about all of that, even more. On today's brand new Philip DeFranco show, you daily dive into the news starting with this. Let's talk about this Cornell 7 Megan Kelly situation. You've got a lot of people sounding off on it because Maiden Kelly she just went on this rant and applying at the Cornell Jane Doe claims that she was gang raped at a fraternity was probably thrilled to be admired by multiple men because she was not attractive. No one will even consider the possibility that this woman made a decision to get it on with four men total, not seven, and enjoyed it because I'm just going to be honest, she's not the most attractive gal. She's extremely beefy in like her arms and her legs. This is probably a first for her. She's probably thrilled to be so admired because she clearly didn't grow up the incredibly beautiful one. I'm not trying to be insulting. I'm just trying to tell you the narrative that is likely to have occurred here in my opinion. And why can't we account for that possibility that the girl who was never the most sought after suddenly had four guys who wanted to have sex with her and she counted this. Yeah, in her inebriated state as a win and liked the feeling of being sexy and desired and wanted. It happens. Sorry, it does. And that's why she kept saying yes, why do we have to go right to she's a victim? Even she took weeks to get there. Okay, so there's a lot to unpack there. But most immediately you saw people mostly horrified that Kelly was bringing the looks into this whole thing to suggest an alleged rape victim should essentially feel lucky. So with that, you might wonder, you know, how does Megan Kelly even know what Jane Doe allegedly looks like? And well, that is because Kelly claims that she does definitely know her identity and is even debating whether or not to publicly expose it. I've been seriously considering just saying it. And the reason I haven't is because I don't want to do anything to hurt this young woman to get her hurt or to add to the pain I'm sure she's feeling. My real complaint is that she doesn't get named and the young men do. That's what I'm pissed about. I haven't totally made my decision. I haven't. But these are the considerations I'm weighing. I have no wish to unleash a lynch mob on her. And seemingly as far as how she knows it, she didn't really say anything other than generally noting that people claim to publish your name online. So there it's important to note that like some of the efforts to name Jane Doe online have actually targeted the wrong women. But then also at this, there were other remarks from Kelly that actually made news as well yesterday, right? And that in part because you decided to go on this tirade against Olivia Rodrigo who recently wrote on Instagram. Shame on Cornell and every institution who protects rapists and abusers over women saying I stand with Jane Doe and adding her bravery reverberates across the country and the crimes against her will not go unpunished. And what she lived through matters and so does the failure of those who could have intervened but chose not to. With Olivia also sharing other infographics about campus sexual assault, right? And then in response to that, you had Kelly kind of just lose in it. Shut up and stick to singing. I like you better when you were in front of a microphone singing your weird little depressing songs. Shut up. You don't know what you're talking about. It's better to keep your mouth shut and let people suspect you're an idiot than to open it and prove them right. Adults are talking, okay? Take your seat. We don't need the participation of no nothing morons who have been auto-tuned into fame and suddenly think they have something profound to say on the culture wars. Sit down and be quiet. Got it? Or I'm going to have to start pulling your music and your lyrics and take a deep dive into exactly the kind of messaging that you are pushing on young women because I guarantee it's not going to end well for you, Olivia. So a very weird threat for Megan. I don't know how your analysis of Olivia Rodrigo's lyrics actually poses a threat to her career. It feels like you're more like teasing a video that your audience is like, yeah. But like Rodrigo, she's currently on a sold out world tour. I don't think she's concerned about a person that got just crushed by Donald Trump years ago to the point that she had to cosplay like a decent person pull away from society and then come back just groveling at his feet. So with that, there's been no shortage of people arguing that Kelly, she's just trying to prod Olivia Rodrigo into some sort of attention, hoping to get a response from her or her fans. But also like a big thing with this is you've had people noting that Megan's been talking about this case on her show for a while now and noting while she claims that she is not defending the accused, she spends most of her time condemning Jane Doe and questioning why it took her several weeks to report the incident. If you were violently gang raped repeatedly over the course of an evening, do you think it would take you three weeks to call the campus police? Right in that line, specifically might be why you've seen Megan Kelly popping up in your feeds because you had many arguing that, "Hey, Kelly herself should know why a victim might take so long to talk about what they endured and realize what happened." Right noting that she was first harassed by her Fox News boss, Roger Ailes in the mid 2000, but didn't go public until there was a wave of allegations against him in 2016. She also later told ABC News that when she first tried to tell a supervisor about the encounter, they vouched Ailes and told her that he was a good man and since she and Ailes ended up having in her words a healthy working relationship after that, she dismissed what happened as him pursuing some kind of affair with her because he was dealing with marital issues. And then also with that claiming that if she took her allegation public, it would have been career suicide. And so because all of those on the record things, you know, people saying, you know, she should know what a victim's dealing with, what they're wrestling with, even if there's a difference in the alleged crimes. And so there's all of that with Megan Kelly that's playing out right now, but we should also use this opportunity to talk about some quick updates to the whole Cornell situation. Right in that part because Cornell's faculty senators introduced a no-confidence resolution over how school leadership is handling the case, and you had a draft of that saying that the faculty senate has no confidence in the ability of the central administration to effectively address the ongoing crisis of sexual assault at Cornell University. And you've had their goal really being to just put pressure on the administration of the school to get them to change policies regarding assaults on campus and to just admit that they messed up in this case. Also of note, we're seeing this case being connected to other stories off campus. Right, and so for example, you had police in Idaho now investigating a group of high school football players who were accused of threatening sexual violence against a female student, and then a group chat when allegedly wrote, "Think Cornell was bad, just wait for us." But then others allegedly threatening to rape and kill the female. And so then with that, there's been a ton of outrage in the local community over this, and you've had a petition demanding that the students involved be expelled or removed from the football team. But then next up from that, content is king, right? But is it really worth dropping yourself into the middle of the Congo basin and facing the most aggressive wildlife and the deadliest illnesses known to man? That is a question you have a lot of people asking about ash dicks. Right, in a little background on this guy, right? So he's a 35-year-old extreme athlete and explorer from Wales, and he's actually got five Guinness World Records since 2014, or with journeys across Mongolia, Madagascar, China, and the Amazon. So there's no shortage of experience traveling to some of the most dangerous locations in the world with it. But this Congo basin trip, it might be one of his craziest ideas yet. Because dikes, he's setting out to travel over 434 miles, the length of the Sangha River, all the way to the Congo River in an inflatable kayak, with the plan being to post in livestream throughout the whole thing. Oh wow, there are a number of reasons why people do not usually venture over there. And some of the main ones, crocodiles, hippos, elephants, gorillas, snakes, spiders, malaria, ding-dee fever, and parasites. This has also been posting these ominous previews of paying a picture of what it's going to be like. With that, I'll say you don't need the scary music to understand how terrifying this is. Also, you've got a lot of people focused on the inflatable kayak parts, saying that it's kind of un-serious for such a serious situation. But apparently, there's a good reason, and you had dikes explaining. An inflatable kayak is important to the success of this expedition, believe it or not. If we come across a pod of hippos, for example, further down the way, and we're like, it's suicide to continue paddling. We can deflate it, pack it into a backpack, chuck it on our back, and then we can actually walk a huge detour around them to inflate the kayaks and continue. And as dikes, he's going to be facing hippos and everything else, there are going to be millions of people following along. So, of course, no pressure or anything. But with a very least, even in person, he's not going to be alone out there because he somehow convinced a few other guys to join a local guide and a photographer. And together, they'll cover roughly 20 miles a day, finding spots to set up their tent and camp each night. And while as of right now, they haven't been dropped into the basin yet, dikes has been vlogging their travel journey. It would start at a few days ago with lights from London to Paris, and then Paris to Yaunday. And you had dikes revealing that the team was actually delayed due to one of their bags getting lost, and it was an essential one. They're the bag with the pumps for the kayak, as well as the tense food and water. Unfortunately, it showed up two days later, and after that, you're the team picking up a few less things with a mission. So, we've got a couple of machetes that we're getting. We're just passing through this small town, so we need to pick up a few machetes, so that obviously we get with the jungle. And from there, with all their bags and the new machetes, they set out on an 18-hour drive to Nola. At the point on the Sunga River, they'll start kayaking. And notably, on that drive so far, they've already faced a few corrupt checkpoints, according to dikes. And you had them saying that their driver potentially saved their asses. But also, after those few hiccups, they're getting closer to the Congo base. And as this thing gets started, you have more and more people paying attention and asking questions. And as far as, you know, what the online discourse is, you know, people are asking, does he want to die on this trip? Saying it seems like dikes is in a place where he's fully aware of the magnitude of the risk, but also taking every precaution that you can with something like this. And with that, you had him telling people magazine, the Congo is the world's most dangerous and deadly jungle for a reason. Saying it's like the diseases are right from the animals are big. And adding it is an adventure, and as experiences I am, I can anticipate what might happen and try to understand based on experience, how I usually react to those situations. And in his videos, he's talked about the extensive planning that's gone into all this, including scouting the route, getting the proper vaccines and pills, medical kits, evacuation plans, and insurance. And with this, he does seem to believe that his several near-death experiences have helped him prepare for anything. I faced much tougher before. Madagascar took me 155 days. You know, I was held up at gunpoint, across crocodile and festive rivers. I contracted the deadly strain of malaria. I had to hunt and gather to stay alive. I was pulling off leeches. I had spider bites which infected. But also, if you think that he is insane for the Congo Basin, it kind of just gets crazier from there. But because the Congo Basin is actually just part one of six expeditions that he's got planned as part of his so-called Project Six series. Brain Project Six is supposed to be this year long undertaking with six of the most extreme environments on Earth. And the end result of all this should be a documentary series. Right, so assuming that Dyke survives the River Trip, he's not gonna be just going home or going on a vacation afterwards. So there are lots of different opinions on this. Or because, well, many, they're just excited to sit back and enjoy the content. You've also got this other crowd shaking their heads and saying this is typical dumb white guy stuff. It's some going Dyke's out for posting constantly about his trip but neglecting to comment at all about the humanitarian crisis there. Others, meanwhile, are expressing concerns that he might bring back diseases. - I think it's who's going to ensure that he's not a biohazard upon return. Is there going to be a quarantining, a decontamination of bleaching, a death-alling? And so we'll have to see how all of this plays out. But also, if you were looking to get into his brain a bit in a TikTok last month, you had Dyke's giving some insight into why he's doing this. - I don't even know how to answer this other then. When I was young, I had a passion for the world for meeting new people, exploring new cultures, new traditions. I was also highly competitive. I used to fight in boxing in Muay Thai. I used to love playing football, rugby, athletics. You name it. So I think my curiosity for the world and that competitive drive to push myself physically and mentally drove me to take on these expeditions. - So yeah, good luck to Dyke's. And hopefully I am not covering you on the show for any other reasons, other than this being kind of a cool idea. And then there's even more that we can dive into in just a minute, really quick. We're going to take a break with a sponsor. I want to give a shout out to all you beautiful bastards that have entered our weekly $500 Seaky giveaway. Because today's sponsor Seaky, they've rolled out nearly $60,000 to you guys. They get you off the couch and into the comedy club, the stadium, the concert hall since 2024 and it's been awesome to watch. If you haven't entered yet, great time to do it 'cause fall is here and the events they're stacking up. Football, baseball, tours for Bruno Mars, hairy styles of your favorite comedians. Get out there and with this, it's free to enter and it takes two seconds. Seaky is the number one rated ticketing app with over 28 million downloads and tickets to over 70,000 events, sports, music, comedy. Theater, you name it. You can go right now or after show. Look for tickets to literally anything. Just download the app, hit that link in the description and use code fill 10 for 10% off your purchase on Seaky. That's her new customer's an old, right? And this is a key part. Add that code to your Seaky account. That gets you the 10% off and enters you in for your chance to win the weekly $500 giveaway no purchase or choir. And for the Seaky vets, you're in this too, right? We'd never leave you out. Add code fill 10 to your account and your enter. So yeah, scan that QR code or click the link below. Add code fill 10 and go make some memories. We'll be then jumping from that to other news. As every day passes, the midterm is getting closer and closer and the picture for Republicans, it's getting worse and worse. Right, as far as specifics, let's start with the polling 'cause you have a few more polls that we can talk about now and they're all pretty much pointing in one direction. We're starting with this one from The New York Times in Ziana University that show Democratic Senate candidates leading in Alaska, Ohio and Texas, all states that Trump won by double digits two years ago. You also somehow have the party's candidates, neck and neck in Kansas, where a Democrat has not been elected to the Senate in 94 years. And even in reliably read Iowa, the Democrat is narrowly trailing his opponent. Right, and that's it. In the house, you have another poll from CBS and UGUB leaving Democrats a nine-point lead on the generic ballot. And in fact, yesterday, the House Democrats campaign arm added six more Republican-held districts to its target list. Now, that's that. Republicans have been quick to note that historically, Democrats haven't flipped red districts, added to the target list, this late in the election. And you have the margaming that because Democrats are short on cash and so many districts have been gerrymandered, the GOP still has a chance to hold onto power. But you're also seeing some Republicans seeing a blood bath for their party in the coming month, especially if they're retiring and feel free to speak their minds. And so a good example of that is outgoing Senator Tom Tilesu just published his book, How to Lose Friends and Intagonized Presidents. Well, in it, according to PBS, he writes, all along we've had multiple chances to get off the path and avoid the giant bronze monster chasing us down. With him criticizing the tariffs, the ice raids, the war in Iran, and numerous Trump appointees. He even admitted that his deciding vote to confirm Pete Hegseth is the biggest regret of my career in that he also should have stopped RFK Jr. And you then and I'm going on to write, I know for a fact that there are others like me. Republicans who agreed to go along with the early demands of the Trump team, no matter how ridiculous they were, believing that failing to do so would mean the end of their political career and who now see that things have gone way too far. And you had him adding that he can count at least 30 of his GOP colleagues who have expressed reservations to put it mildly about many of the president's actions in private, but when the reporters showed up with their cameras and microphones, they'd have nothing but nice things to say. And so really quick, just to take things to opinion down, if you will, just a slight detour, I just have to say this. Fuck Tom Tilesu and all you other cowardly motherfuckers who all of a sudden feel like you can speak your mind when you're leaving and/or writing a fucking book that you're trying to sell. Like there is part of my brain that goes, "Oh, I should, I guess, I guess give some credit for noting that the emperor has no clothes." But then no, even what you just said, you are part of the reason that Pete Haggs at the RFK Jr. are where they are. You and so many others, you are part of the reason why the country is being destabilized from the inside out right now. And not like destabilized in a gooey, I think a lot of people on left and right, they know that the government hasn't been working for them. But when it suited you, you were seemingly fine, helping Trump enrich his bodies and himself and his family. But also, I'll note with Tiles, he's not alone, or we've talked before about how some Republican candidates have been distancing themselves from Trump because they view him as a liability right now. And well, with that, you had a new writer's Ipsis poll putting Trump's approval rating at just 32%. So just absolutely miserable numbers in the worst of his career so far. Despite that, you have Trump still insisting on attaching himself to the party's campaigns, telling voters to pretend like his name is on the ballot. And so with that, he's been tore in the battleground states, most recently in Nebraska, where he gave just this insane speech yesterday. And I mean, he just said so much nutty stuff. I mean, he repeated his promise at least three or four times. If Republicans win the House of Representatives in the Senate, I am going to give all adult citizens in the United States of America $5,000. He also openly boasted that he distributes aid money to states based on whether or not they voted for him. Peter Ricketts is, I said, I don't want to talk to him. He's always asking for money for Nebraska. And I always give it because, you know what? I love Nebraska. I want it. Pete's calling. Sir, it's been horrible. We had a flood. Could you send us $25 million? I said, Pete, that's a lot of money. But you know, I won it three times. I said, I owe it to give him the money. Easily the comments that got the most attention came when he was talking about Iran. We're kicking Iran's ass. You do know that, right? And that will end very quickly. One way or the other very soon, maybe a little after the election, maybe a little before the-- but it's going to end very soon. When that happens, the oil will come tumbling down. And again, remember, with the Warchester Artificial, it's a little bit high. It's a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe. They can take out a city. Let them take-- let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego. That's-- this is a very small price to pay. And it's going to be over with very soon. Right, and despite seemingly part of Nebraska cheering for California to what? Get new? In addition to those people, you also had a lot of people going, wait, I'm sorry, what? And so for example, you had San Diego's mayor, Todd Gloria, saying San Diego is not collateral damage. We are not expendable. And we are never a small price to pay. Keep our city out of your reckless war talk. You also had Governor Gavin Newsom's press office writing, let's be clear, the president is advocating for an attack on 10 plus million US residents in two of America's largest cities. This is not normal. None of this is. And then with all this, on the right, you had a lot of people saying, oh, Trump, he's literally just joking. He's just triggering the libs. At least one person who wasn't laughing on that side was Jim Desmond, the Republican running for Congress in San Diego. And you had him posting, I vehemently disagree with President Trump's comments. To America must stand up to Iran and defend our interests. But the first responsibility of our commander in chief is to protect the American people in our homeland. And saying, as an AP veteran, I serve to protect Americans, not write off American cities as an acceptable price of war. Saying no, American city is expendable, and no American family should ever be treated as collateral damage. And also, if you want to be cynical about why he's speaking out, he is in a neck and neck race right now. So you know, he's probably worried that the president joking about the place he wants to represent getting nuked, that might affect voter turnout in a way that is not beneficial for him. And with this speech in particular, Trump stood up there and he just attacked the media over and over and over again for almost an hour and a half, like from start to finish. And a big thing is that Trump, even when after Fox News, though, apparently for him, it was the network whose name shall not be spoken. I'll say I didn't miss you again. I mean, it's a total communist. But, you know, the more middle and right, they're always putting, like, El Sayyad was interviewed just a little while ago on a certain network. I won't tell you which way. They let this guy talk, talk, talk. They hardly fight him at all. Why are they putting these people on our television? That works. Why? - And it appears like he's referring to this interview that Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul Al Sayyad gave defoxes Martha McCallum yesterday. And Trump is correct in so far as the interview was not as hostile as the one that El Sayyad did with Jesse Waters. So that's also because Jesse Waters kind of just bounces between weirdo to fucking unhinged. But the idea that McCallum hardly pushed back on El Sayyad in the interview, that's kind of just nonsense. Whereas he spent the entire first half of this thing just grilling him about Islamic terrorism. And El Sayyad, he just kept responding with pretty much the same thing. Terrorists are bad and war is not the solution. - I just want to say, there was no war. And then there was a war. And more war has made us less safe. It has increased our prices. - Lawsweider challenging him on his support for single payer health care. - More than half the people who died in England in that year were on the NHS waiting list. And they couldn't get any care. So why would that be a better system for us? - Well, number one, I'm not advocating for the same system as the NHS. Number two, we are the richest, most powerful country in the world. The idea that we're going to point to another country who does something poorly and say, we can't possibly do it better is ridiculous because we're the greatest country in the world. But then the second point I'll make here is that, do you know what the average weight time for a cardiologist in America is? - Tell me. - Two and a half months. You even are fighting him on his support for taxing billionaires? I understand, you know, thinking that some people have too much money. But I guess the question is, where do you draw the line? I mean, we're the engine of the world for all these things. And some of those people end up being billionaires as a result. But don't we all benefit from being this incredible powerhouse in the United States from their ingenuity? Well, the issue is not that some people have too much money. It's that the engine that created their opportunity to make money is being underfunded. We talked about public schools. We talked about health care. We talked about child care. We talked about infrastructure. But then also, when less substantive moment of the exchange has gotten quite a bit of attention, has been McCallum bringing up Hassan Piker. Right in for context, she read out this quote that he gave to New York Magazine when it asked him whether he felt abandoned by El Sayed, given how they kind of put some distance between each other since the primary. And you would Piker there saying it doesn't matter because he's moving the fucking needle. Saying he will push the boundaries on what is permissible on Israel and I trust him to do that. Saying I think he will try to do the very best to hold Israel accountable as a senator. So I don't give a fuck that he's trying to move away from this conversation because as I've said over and over again, it's a mind he's trapped. What do you say to that? Look, this campaign was never about a streamer in California. This campaign was always about the price of gas and groceries, whether or not you could see a doctor when you get sick in the United States. I know every time I have a conversation here that he's going to come up. And the question is not about a relationship I got with a streamer in California. There's not a relationship. The reason I have a conversation with him is the same reason I have a conversation with you. Because I want to talk to the folks out here who I want to have a conversation with. Yeah, ultimately the political drama and chaos moves forward another day and I cannot wait for November 3rd. And actually, you don't even have to wait till them. Feel free to pause and screenshot, but early voting starts in your state right here. You got it? Make a plan? Vote.org. But then next step from that is attorney general Ken Paxton, bullying pediatricians to stay in Donald Trump's favor. So you've got a lot of people asking right now because also you may remember that Paxton recently announced that he was opening an investigation into the American Academy of Pediatrics, or with him accusing them of quote deceptively promoting childhood vaccines for financial gain. And he said that they're just part of the sprawling for-profit conspiracy between doctors, drug companies, and insurers to press your parents into vaccinating their kids. Now obviously you're the Academy at large pushing back against that, saying in a statement that its vaccine advice is rooted in decades of peer-reviewed science. Also adding that Paxton's investigation serves only to undermine public health, so confusion and put more children at risk of preventable disease. And you then add Dr. Catherine Edwards, a professor of pediatrics at Vanderbilt University, saying, "Everybody thinks of pediatricians as these mild, mannered people who have animals on their stethoscope and would not fight their way out of a bad. And adding this is another attempt at intimidation, but they're not being intimidated because their moral core is about the well-being of children." And despite Paxton's promise that his investigation would be directed toward the state's largest medical providers, vaccine makers, and health insurers, this New York Times report revealed that it's actually the little guys that are bearing the brunt of it. Over the time, he's talking to a small Texas pediatrician, who they called Dr. Rachel to preserve her privacy. Dr. Rachel said that she recently received a notice from Paxton's Consumer Protection Division demanding her vaccine purchase records over the last 10 years. And you had that notice saying they believe her to be in "possession, custody or control of material, involving potential misleading or deceptive acts regarding incentives associated with the administration of childhood vaccines." Which they said could be against Texas deceptive trade practice as well. And then on top of that, they also demanded her practice as vaccine policy. They made a point of saying that citing the childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC would not be enough. So Dr. Rachel, she had to spend nearly $15,000 in legal fees in order to answer the demand of her records. Records, by the way, consist of receipts for $18 vaccines given a decade ago, and details about a $40 batch of cookies of vaccine makers represented have brought to her office. But then even still, she sent in the records only to get hit with another demand from Paxton's office, dismissing some of the initial responses as frivolous or improper. And so she's gone back and forth with them twice now and is currently waiting with no idea what's coming next. And before all this, she planned on keeping her practice open for years to come, but now, between the stress and the legal fees, she's reconsidering that stance. Retelling the time to the very idea that she was getting something out of encouraging parents to vaccinate their kids or that she's motivated by greed is offensive in adding. I took it very personally because I take pride in what I do. It felt like it was such a slap in the face and an insult. And that's something that you've seen echoed by a lot of pediatricians. Right, this claim that they're raking in dough from vaccines is ridiculous. Most of the time, they have to pay for the vaccines upfront, store them, and then puggle with insurance to get them covered. And then the craziest part about all this isn't even that Paxton is investigating pediatricians for literally doing their jobs, or which includes protecting kids from potentially deadly diseases. And the crazy part is that Paxton might not even really care about this. Saying that this whole investigation smells like a political maneuver on Paxton's part, and he's saying, "Damn the consequences." Right, and more specifically of some saying the entire investigation was just an attempt to try and get and maintain from approval in the competitive primary earlier this year, and then the tight general election against James Tyleriko next month. And with that, you went to Dr. Heidi Russell, a pediatrician and director at the Center of Health Policy at Rice University in Houston, saying that leaning into the anti-vax thing, it means that Paxton aligned himself with R.F.K. Jr., and doing that got him the Trump endorsement. But also, actions have consequences, and we could be seeing a serious ripple effect here. And we just don't know yet how many small practices, like Dr. Rachel's, have been targeted in Paxton's investigation, and we don't know how many are considering closing their doors like she is. And so you've got advocacy groups, like immunization partnerships, saying this whole thing, it can make a lot of pediatricians think twice about opening practices in Texas altogether. And then there's even more we got to dive into in just a minute, but really quick, another break with a sponsor. The internet has reached this fun point where one bad click can turn into I'm checking an email to cool, now I have a cyber security problem. Or because phishing links, fake websites, sketchy downloads, they're getting harder to spot, and sometimes differences literally one convincing looking URL. And that's why I use today's sponsor, NordVPN, which is evolved beyond the VPN, into an all-in-one digital security app. Right, obviously, you still get the VPN, which helps encrypt your internet traffic, and keeps what you're doing online more private. But NordVPN has a built-in, next-generation anti-birus designed to identify fake shops, block scam, and phishing sites, and scan downloads from malware. Or which I appreciate because my personal cybersecurity strategy can't always be, "Ah, I think that link looks legit." And then there's also dark web monitor, which can alert you if information associated with your email shows up in a known data league, giving you a chance to actually do something about it. And one NordVPN account, that can protect up to 10 devices, so you're getting multiple layers of online protection without needing six different security apps doing six different things. So yeah, give your online life an extra layer of protection with NordVPN. So yeah, scan that QR code, or go to nordvpn.com/fill for the exclusive NordVPN deal, plus four additional months on a two-year plan. That's nordvpn.com/fill. And it's risk-free with NordVPN's 30-day money-back guarantee. And then, diving into the final block of today's show, let's talk about some more news you need to know pretty quickly. First up, you know, they've spent over a century committing lynchings, burning down people's homes, and terrorizing black people. But now, you've got the KKK looking to rebrand. Because for the last decade, you've had experts warning about how right-wing politics and social media are feeding into this revival of white supremacists. And now, you're getting reports from actual clan leaders, like Pastor Thomas Robb, claiming that it's given their numbers a boost as well. And Robb, he's the head of what used to be called the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. But now, you've got them shortening that to the Knights party, saying that they're rebranding to focus on family and faith. So you could also say that's been part of their branding this whole time. Family isn't anybody who's white, and faith is in Christian nationalism. But since Robb took over in 1989, he's tried to tweak what that's looked like to get more supporters. But he said that people are often hesitant to become a member, which I'm sure has to come with a territory of being known for brutal racist murders. But then also with that, one of the changes that he's made is that new members can now participate confidentially through the mail, so no one has to know what kind of shit you're supporting. He's also working to a distance group from the violence they've been known for, with that type of outreach. He's even changed his title from Grand Wizard to National Director to try and sound a little less clannish. But then with all that, one thing has stayed the same, and that is the racist. He said that they're still based around their white nationalist church, so the social and political beliefs they haven't budged. For example, you've said in a recent interview that he doesn't see politicians like Zoran Mamdani and Abdullah Sayed as Americans, reclaiming that only the children of white foreigners can count there. So it seems more like the rebrand is more of a repackage, which genuinely seems like you're getting the same old KKK, just with a different aesthetic. Which also makes sense because you could just start a new group. You could be like, "Hey guys, I started a whole new different thing." But according to Rob, this has been working for them. And while he said a lot of experts, you know, they credit Trump for the rise in white nationalism. He says it actually started with Obama. Saying since then, people have said that they've been angered by what they see happening to the country, claiming they're seeing more interest because the night's party gives those people a voice. But also with this, I'll note that he's refusing to provide any membership numbers proved that the movement has grown. What it is, I will say, at the very least off-putting that things are so bad with politics right now, that at the very least you could just look at the landscape and make claims like this and have them sound believable. Also, you've got McDonald's in the news because they are now being accused of using AI to rig its menu prices. And they can actually be facing a class section lawsuit because of that. Or because last week, you had reports saying that McDonald's pricing engine uses machine learning algorithms to attract transactions across almost 14,000 restaurants. And they reportedly use that data to generate what they call the optimal price for each menu item, which changes depending on the location. Apparently, the pricing tool alerts franchise owner if their location's showing any sensitivity to price based on things like customers willing this to pay. And while with that, McDonald said, "Hey, the owners are free to set their own prices, framing the software as a tool, not a man date," then had owners claiming that the company pressured them to use it. And you have reports saying that McDonald's even keeps a record of anyone who doesn't follow its pricing recommendations in their stores. And so now this new lawsuit filed by Michael Thomas in Illinois says that they violated US anti-trust law by working with independent franchises to fix prices using algorithms trained on non-public data. And you've got Thomas's lawyer arguing that McDonald's is leveraging its troves data and its franchise system to nickel and dime consumers down to the last french ride. Though I will say you have McDonald's pushing back on that saying at the reports that we got last week, we're speculative and uninformed, reclaiming that AI does not set the price of a big Mac or any other menu item and that the use of price recommendation tools is widespread across industries. But for now, I'll say this still has to be fort certified and so we're going to see what actually happens from here. And then last up today, it is official. Paramount, they just merged with Warner Brothers creating one of the largest entertainment companies in the world led by David Ellison. And if you've been following the story with me, you know this is coming after tons of pushback with from Hollywood and Washington. Right, Ellison had to settle lawsuits with 12 states and the writer's guild of America before we could move forward with this. We got a news from a G Rob Bonta, LA Mayor Karen Bass. They all got a lot of heat behind that as well. After all that chaos, you're now looking at a mega company valued at more than $110 billion. And hitting on just how big it is, I mean, mission impossible, Harry Potter, the DC universe networks like CB. B.S., CNN, obviously Paramount Plus and HBO Max. Those are now all under the same umbrella. You've got Allison calling this juggernaut company Skydance, or which he said was meant to retain the individual entities of Paramount and Warner Brothers Studio rather than combining them under a new brand. And now with that, he's about to get to work with his new co-CEO, Inan Price. And apparently, the first to do is to figure out how to combine these companies while delivering on their $6 billion cost savings plan. They're already expected to be about $80 billion in debt when it does settles with this. So you've got the financial pressure on and reports say that they're going to be trying to get up their streaming numbers, keep money flowing to their cable networks and put assets and seats at theaters. And also, of course, this is going to be one of the bigger things. They're going to be looking to cut costs ASAP. And really, it feels less like, are they going to cut and more how much are they going to cut? Whether that be projects, people, whatever. And that, my friends, you beautiful bastards is the end of your Tuesday show. As always, thank you for watching. Like and subscribe and being a part of these daily dives into the news wherever you're getting it. And hey, whether you leave from here, you click this video 'cause YouTube thinks that you really want to watch this video. No matter what you do, I'll see you right back here tomorrow for another daily dive into the news.