Go back

Oil Price Shock Chaos, Trump’s High-Stakes Gamble, and AI’s Dark Frontier

68m 18s

Oil Price Shock Chaos, Trump’s High-Stakes Gamble, and AI’s Dark Frontier

The discussion centers on the severe global economic and supply chain disruptions caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz amid the Iran conflict. This closure has halted an estimated 20 million barrels of oil per day, a disruption four to five times larger than historical oil shocks, leading to wild volatility in oil prices and financial markets. The crisis extends far beyond energy, threatening the supply of sulfur (critical for batteries and industry), semiconductors (due to Taiwan's LNG-dependent power supply), and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which half the global population relies on for food. While governments may coordinate strategic reserve releases, these are temporary fixes. The narrative emphasizes extreme market skittishness, the pervasive challenge of propaganda and AI-generated misinformation obscuring the truth, and the significant risk of prolonged economic "short-term pain" without a clear path to "long-term gain" if the strait remains closed. The overall tone is one of high uncertainty regarding the conflict's resolution and its deep, cascading global consequences.

Transcription

13019 Words, 70923 Characters

English
Good morning, everybody. Welcome to the Tom Bill you show live and happy Monday. By the way, I hope you guys had an incredibly delicious weekend. It was wonderful. Excited to see everybody and excited to see that White House press secretary Caroline Levitt says that Trump is leaving all options on the table in Iran, including a draft for U.S. soldiers. That would be insane and the end of his presidency. Oil prices are all over the map as investors grapple with where the war in Iran is actually headed. Five of the Iranian women's national soccer team are seeking asylum in Australia after their incredibly ballsy move to silently protest Iran. I don't know if you guys saw that. We'll be talking about that later. AI related job eliminations continue a pace at Amazon video and in the world of finance writ large. The numbers coming out of the jobs market are distressing. I will say another person departs a high profile position at open AI due to AI safety concerns in a sign of things to come. Human brain cells were grown and placed on a microchip and taught to play doom in a week. This is getting wild. All right, Drew. Oil prices are all over the place. People do not know what to make of this. Maybe it's because the oil refineries on fire. Literally, if you get thrown it up, air is going crazy. Crazy from Tehran. There's that image and there's an image coming down the highway. This looks like a world ending movie. So no surprise that gas prices might be a little bit higher. This weekend, I spent more time verifying things that I have seen than literally any other time that I've ever engaged with social media. It really is getting incredibly difficult to parse out what is just naked propaganda. By the way, I'll remind everybody propaganda on all sides. Your own government is lying to you. Foreign governments are certainly lying to you. Everybody thinks that they see the truth. I really try to be honest about the fact I cannot see the future. So I will do my best to lay out what I think where I think things are right now, but it certainly will all change. And then because of AI, it's like so much of this stuff. It looks real, but it's like, I have a feeling if I fact check this one that it's not going to be real. And then if we layer on top of that, you've got AI being systematically trained to have a bias. It's like it really, it's tough out in these streets. These AI-laden streets are not for the faint of heart. And it is getting sparing. Speaking of the streets, if you went to the gas pump, it is crazy. I was in Phoenix this weekend and literally gas prices are a dollar higher. Then it was six weeks ago. It was crazy. Crazy. I was just there. And I was like, oh, I was getting fine. Some for $292.75 for $15. I'm just like, am I in LA? How do they set like instantly? So kind of break it down to us. We're seeing a lot of these images, things on fire and stuff like that. But what is actually happening on our level? What's causing this blowback? Yeah. The thing to look at is that oil prices have become insanely volatile. It's the wild swings both up and down that give you a clue to what's really going on. Oil prices have gone up 35% in just eight days. And Daniel Jurgen, the guy who wrote literally the definitive history of oil, said this weekend, but the world is looking at the biggest disruption in oil production in history. Okay. Again, this is not like a random pundit. This is a guy that actually wrote the book on oil disruptions throughout history. And he's just saying this is completely unprecedented. That reality caused the WTI, which is basically the benchmark that you evaluate the cost of crude through. It caused that to spike to $119 a barrel. But it then crashed nearly $20 in the exact same trading session. The market just cannot make up its mind right now as to what is actually happening. This is everybody trying to look into the future. This is why I say that the markets are a casino. People are gambling and they're trying to reach into the future, figure out exactly what's going to happen. And they're coming up completely confused, which is pretty befitting of the situation in Iran to be honest. We're going to talk more about that later. I don't know that we can bank on the propaganda that we're receiving from our own government painting a clear picture, or an accurate picture, I should say, about what the sentiment is on the street. I think it's far more divided, which means that this could go on for far longer. We'll see. To give you guys a sense of the scope of the disruption, the Iranian revolution back in the 70s cut 5.5 million barrels of oil a day. The 1973 oil embargo, which was like the oh my god moment of oil cut 4.5 million barrels per day. The Iraq Kuwait war cut 4.3 million barrels per day. The current straight of Hormuz closure has cut roughly 20 million barrels per day. Yeah. This is much, much bigger than the disruptions that we have faced historically. So this isn't like 20% bigger. You're talking 4 to 5 times this size of the disruption. Now, what is causing the trigger of the pullback in the markets? The report that the G7 finance ministers are going to be holding an emergency talk this morning to coordinate a release of strategic petroleum reserves through the international energy agency. So people are like, okay, they're going to release the reserves. Based on that, the market immediately sold the headline prices dropped nearly $20 off the intraday high. Now, this is a sign that the market is so starved for good news that an announcement of a potential meeting moved the price by 15%. So that's markets doing what markets do. I would not take that as a sign of what the reality is on the ground. Now, add the top five historical oil shocks together and you get roughly 20 million barrels per day. We've got that much in just eight days. That's where you're actually at. Now, does that mean that this can't unwind quickly? No, it doesn't. They're supposedly an emergency meeting. That Trump is going to be having, I think, today at just before 5 p.m. Eastern time, people are predicting that what he's going to be announcing is a ceasefire. We'll see that is rumour, that is conjecture. So completely unknown right now, but the messaging around all of this is creating these huge ripples in the markets. The thing to take away from that is that markets are skittish. Markets are super reactive. Anything that happens in short term periods is traders playing a totally different game than the way that I highly encourage all of you guys to think about this, which is long term, very non-reactive, have a strategy, let it play out. One thing that I remind myself when we hear about all these historic pullbacks from somebody like Warren Buffett, and they're sitting on all this cash. Remember, they're sitting on the cash so they can redeploy it when things become cheap. So if you don't have an extraordinarily detailed map of what cheap looks like per company, don't try to take what Buffett is doing as a signal of what you should be doing. They are playing a totally different game that has everything to do with reading a gazillion quarterly reports and having mapped out, okay, this company at this price is a deal, this company, at that price is a deal. And if you don't have that kind of thing, you should be thinking about index funds and sat and forget thinking in years movements and not the kind of day trading stuff that you're going to read about or hear about all this stuff. All right, the global reserve response sounds reassuring to many, but I really wouldn't read it that way. Not at this scale. OPEC, spare capacity sits at roughly four to five million barrels per day. Strategic reserves, though, are a bridge. They are absolutely not a long term solution. They buy you days, not months, and there's only going to be so much that's put away in storage. So be thoughtful about how you read that situation. Iraq has already cut production by a reported 60 percent because it physically has run out of storage space because they can't export anything with the straight of hormones closed. Kuwait has also cut Saudi Arabia has cut and these cuts are going to echo for a while, especially since we have no idea when the straight will open up again. Asian markets are already pricing in this reality. South Korea, which is just getting battered by all of this. The Caspi, KOSPI, they trigger to circuit breaker this morning, which means they stopped trading because people were freaking out. Japan's knee K fell over 6 percent. US futures are also deep in the red. So the G7 meeting might study the next 48 hours, but it is not going to change the underlying math, which is that if you don't open the straight again, you've got problems. And right now, the straight is still closed. And thus, the problem is growing bigger by the day with only question marks as far as I can tell on the horizon. We just don't know when this is going to end. So all eyes on Trump's announcement later today, which could be totally unrelated or could be him saying that we've reached some kind of pause in the fighting. I very much doubt that he's going to say that we're ending the aggression just pausing. That's a guess. We'll see. Taking a short break, but there's more impact theory after stay tuned. that's been protecting privacy online since 2008. Duck.ai lets you chat privately with chat GPT, Claude and other popular AIs all in one place. Your conversations aren't used for tracking, training or profiling you. There's no account required and it's completely free. Duck.go built this specifically for data protection, not data collection. They're designed to help stop your information from being stored, tracked or misused by hackers, scammers and data hungry companies. No sign-ups, no subscriptions, no learning curve. Duck.ai gives you access to the same AI tools you're already using, but without the privacy trade-off. If you want to use AI without giving up your privacy, visit duck.ai/impacttoday. That's duck.ai/impact, a private way to chat with AI from duck.go, where AI is always optional and private. A great wardrobe is not complicated. A few pieces that fit well, hold up over time and work in almost any situation. That's it. That's what you need. The problem is finding them without paying luxury prices. That's exactly what Quince is built around. I picked up one of their cashmere sweaters and let me tell you, the softness is amazing and the quality actually caught me off guard. This is 100% Mongolian cashmere. That makes it easy to build a great wardrobe, lightweight cashmere, linen bottoms, short sleeve, Mongolian cashmere polos, Pima cotton tees, all amazing quality. And every factory they partner with meets rigorous standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. Right now, go to quince.com/impactpod for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's a full year to build your wardrobe and love it. And you will. Now available in Canada too. Go to quintc.com/impactpod for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's quince.com/impactpod. The people who win, they're not smarter. They just absorb more ideas faster. There are thousands of books right now on business, psychology, leadership books that have already changed how the best operators think. And everyone you haven't read is a gap between you and the people who have. This is a bandwidth problem, not a discipline problem. And that's exactly what Blinkist was built to solve. It takes the world's best nonfiction books and distills them into 15-minute summaries you can read or listen to. Scott over 9,000 titles were talking atomic habits, thinking fast and slow. The hard thing about hard things. Books you know you should have read by now, done in the time it takes to drink your coffee. And because it's built for mobile, your commute becomes a classroom. Blinkist also sends you personalized recommendations so you actually build a daily learning practice instead of just planning to do one. Start your free trial at blinkist.com/impact. That's BLINKIST.com/impact. Start learning aggressively today. It will change your life. Thanks for staying tuned. Now let's get back to it. The messaging seems to be out on the Republican side. This is some of the talking points we heard on the news cast over this weekend. This is a short term disruption for the long term gain. Short term pain for the long term gain. Short term pain be for long term gain. We're going to have some short term pain with long term gain. Short term pain, long term gain, short term pain, long term gain. Short term pain, Drew. Long term gain. So is that going to be enough? Because right now, first of all, let's just focus. This is like a DLC that downloaded in the background. It's like you roll up, you plug into the game and all of a sudden it's like the NPCs have like glitched out. They're lines of dialogue. It's like, guys, guys, like this kind of scripted stuff drives me absolutely bananas. So yeah, is this short term pain for long term gain? We don't know. This could be short term pain for long term pain. It could be short term pain for the world just got better for everybody. Like if you listen to, and this is somebody that I respect tremendously, if you listen to Victor Davis Hanson, it's like, hey, taking out this regime, best thing you could do ever, you guys don't understand the axis of evil that's running between China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Like this is beginning to break that up. Trump is running a masterstroke. Cuba is going to be next. Like we're literally doing the thing that America's been trying to do since the 40s, which is effectively isolate all the communist countries, push them out of our hemisphere. Man, good days are coming. And I'm just like, bro, there's a lot of assumptions in that, Mr. Victor Davis Hanson. Nobody knows better than you that things can break badly in a war. So I think we're counting a lot of chickens before they hatch here. So this one, honestly, if you were to say, okay, put a flag right here, if this ends up going well, it's going to be that meme like, oh, they had us in the beginning. Because right now this looks like you've just destabilized things way too much. So man, if we're, if he were like, listen, we are not sending troops into Iran, like that's completely a no-go situation for me. We are going to be able to deal with the close of the straighter hormones in the following way. And yes, like there is going to be this temporary issue that we're going to have to deal with in terms of, you know, you're going to have two to four weeks of, you know, the instability as we line up the insurance and we line up the military escorts. But like, you don't have to worry about a bunch of ships getting blown up. We're going to get this all back. And then if I saw that Iran was like, call it 80, 20 in one direction of like, yes, we want a new regime. This is terrible. We're not willing to suffer this anymore. I'd be like, okay, but that is not what I see. What I see are our historic allies being like, I don't really want to get involved in this. And then when their bases get bombed, they're like, all right, all right. You can have like a couple bits and bobs. Maybe the francing is real and they're sending the only non-US nuclear powered carrier into the region. That's something. And I want to see what the rest of the Middle East does, the GCC countries. If they're like pro-America down with Iran, then maybe there is enough will in the region to see this thing through. But this went from like, hey guys, don't worry. You saw what I did with Fort Al, like quick lightning strike. You know what I'm about? You boots on the ground, no new wars, et cetera, et cetera. And their messaging is now slowly trying to warm us up to, what do you mean? I never said that, what do you mean? Like, we, all we do is war. What are you talking about? And so I'm like, hey, hold on. This is this incremental change in messaging, which by the way is brilliant. It works on humans every time, which is extraordinarily distressing. But if you just slowly like, no, hey, like you accepted that little bit now, take a little bit more. It's, they're running that playbook. And because the playbook is as obvious as the DLC download of the new NPC dialogue around short term pain for long term pain, it's like, oh, I see where this is headed. So, but that's the interesting thing is you put me on land, man. And ever since watching that show, I feel like I know all about oil economies now. But once oil hits $100 a barrel, it doesn't just affect gas prices. It like hits all these other points in the economy. So short term pain, long term gain is like, okay, yeah, it's cool. You might have to pay a little bit more for a gas. But if this goes up a week, two weeks, now everybody has changed prices, the grocery store changes, there's all these ripple effects into the economy. So what's that look like in regards to not just oil prices, but the larger macro puts up. So glad you brought this up because this is a thing that people just are not paying attention to. There is a massive knock on effect to the war in Iran that could be far bigger than just oil prices. Yes, 20 million barrels of crude per day has stopped moving through the straighter or moose. And that is a very big deal. But oil is best thought of as the first domino. The subsequent dominoes that may be falling are more immediately problematic. 92% of the world's sulfur, for instance, which nobody thinks about, because it's not sexy or interesting. But that comes from refining oil and gas. Without sulfur, you can't make sulfuric acid. Without sulfuric acid, you can't extract copper or cobalt. Without copper or cobalt, you can't build transformers, EV batteries or data centers, which are becoming more and more important by the day. And that cascada problem starts accelerating the very moment that refining stops and refining in several places has already begun to slow. That's not even to talk about the chips. So Qatar, which halted gas production after Iranian drone strikes hit its facilities, ships roughly 30% of Taiwan's liquefied natural gas through or moose. Analyst estimate, Taiwan has already, like down to 11 days of reserves left, yikes, TSMC, the company that manufactures 90% of the world's advanced semiconductors, draws nearly this is psychotic, 9% of Taiwan's total electricity. Taiwan is a country. One company takes almost 10% of the entire country's total electricity. So if they're not getting gas, means they don't have power. Given how much power they need, no power obviously means no chips. No chips means the components that run the majority of our modern way of life become hard to get. Remember COVID? Remember how quickly, like even used cars were like the hottest commodity ever? That's the kind of thing that we're going to be dealing with at this drags on. Then there's the single most important issue that we have to be talking about, which is food. Half, half of the humans alive today are only alive because of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. It's a real stat. Roughly a third of the world's nitrogen fertilizer feedstock moves through the straight. Okay, that's what's known as a "hyber Bosch" process. It turns energy that runs through the straight of hormones into food. So via sulfur, so you've got sulfur, semiconductors, food, three civilizational supply chains running through one 21 nautical mile passage that is being shut down because ships can't get insurance due to the IRGC threatening to bomb them if they try to pass. Now we're not in a Doomsday scenario, at least not yet, but Trump has floated Navy escorts, France's dispatched this nuclear carrier. The straight is effectively closed due to insurance, not to a physical military blockade. That's good. Some ships are seeming to be able to get through by turning off their transplonders and basically sneaking through at night. But every day that this holds the cascade gets worse and is going to be hard, not harder to reverse, but it's going to take longer to reverse. That means that we'll be stuck with whatever the negative consequences are for longer. When you start talking about food supply disruptions, now you get into really dark territory. We have oil on one side. We have food disruptions, possible down market, same manufacturer, and chips, TSM like that. For some reason, I think we're becoming the Israel of the Israel-Palestine Media War a couple months ago. What do you mean by that? We are losing the media war and it comes to this where the New York Times is reporting that a video has been new video evidence suggests that a US missile was likely to hit the Iranian school that killed 175 people. Majority of them are children. It was Iran did it. No, that was Israel's missile. Now they kind of actually pulled up a video and it seems like it was an American Tomahawk. And then that same image that was just showed with the oil refinery on fire. I had to retweet it. Imagine these horrors in general believing the US is there to help the Iranian people. The same kind of chipping away at America's credibility is kind of what we've seen happen a couple months ago with Gaza, Israel after October 7th where the media is now saying, why are we fighting this war? Why is America being the bully? America needs to relax. It's only America. It's only America. You have the external pressure that why are we even in this war? It's not justified. You're being a war monger. And we have the pockets pressure where gas prices are high, food prices are high. It seems like I don't know how the administration is going to spin their way out of this because even with the growth thing is at least we can point to yeah, I'm like, they're going to save us, but it seems like we're getting hit on all sides when it comes to this war. If he doesn't win, it's game over for Trump. That's the reality of what's going on in Iran. He is running an all-or-nothing strategy. I've been talking about this for a while with his other strategies. Everything he does, if it works, then it will be financially beneficial to the US. It will alienate our allies. It can cause huge problems on the world stage in the long run, but it will be economically beneficial to the US. That is the current strategy in Iran. If we can take over Iran, remember you, all of this stuff, even though I will often not bring this up, it is always in the back of my mind, this game is largely about China. And so understanding that you are caught in Thucydides strap, you've got a rising China, declining US, and you've got a populist moment that brought to power, a person like Trump, who is like, there is one way to gain an advantage for the US, for at least another generation. Of course, he's not thinking like that. He's thinking it's going to perpetually extend America's dominance forever and ever. But the reality is that the strategy that he sees is this big all-or-nothing we go in, we use the remaining power that we have to bully enough countries to get on board with us, such that we can diminish the connectivity of China so that it is unable to continue its rise because its rise counts on a lot of the US economy, first of all. And by not having access to the US economy, the way that they have historically, that forces them to basically dump sheep goods into their own economy, into surrounding economies, which will then cause them to backlash against China in the same way that we are now, because it hollows out your own ability to manufacture and everybody understands that in a time like this, having your supply chains offloaded to somebody else that could potentially be an adversary is bad news. So the US is trying to isolate China, is trying to disrupt this interconnected web. China, Russia, Iran, North Korea being the four major players. The attack on the US dollar, trying to disrupt that as well. Obviously, from where I'm sitting, the physics of the situation is such that this comes back to central banking, so I will certainly forgive anybody that thinks that it's shadow bankers that are doing all of this, whether they're actively involved in any of these discussions or they're simply systemically important to the incentive structure that makes this the actual play. This really is where we're at. So Trump is going, cool, I'm going to take out Venezuela. That's sheep oil for China. That's a knock against them. Then I'm going to take out Iran, which is another source, a larger source, in fact, of sheep oil for China. And so if he can do that, not only does he start to remove China more from South America, which is going to be very important as they were trying to leverage that to build the gold corridor to have one of its main assaults on the US dollar in terms of its supremacy, but also just keeping people out of your backyard is a very smart play as a world fractures and you've got multiple powers now instead of just the one US power. Then on top of that, you absolutely have the Israel of it all. So you have an ally in the region that wants to make sure that their investments in terms of dollars into the US political system pay off in terms of getting us to help. And then I still, man, listen, history may prove me wrong, but I still believe that the Freudian slip or the honest answer that Rubio gave about us making a move and we did because we knew that Iran was going to be struck by Israel. And so we wanted to get in there first. It's so wild. I still believe that that was accurate. Hey, that's one guy's feelings. We will see Rubio who I think is extraordinarily good at his job just really wants us to believe that that isn't how things played out and it was taken out of context. I've seen the context still feels pretty real to me. So anyway, I think that that's all a real part of the equation. So you put all of that together and if Trump pulls it off and we are able to isolate China, we deal with the costs of oil going up now only to come back down as the US is hoping obviously to get a friendly regime in place in Iran. If they do that, we're able to take advantage of putting that oil under US sanctions and getting better deals for us, then all of this works out well in the end. If he pulls that off, if he puts boots on the ground and you're getting even dozens of Americans killed, yo, if this is dragging on at the midterms, peace out. Homeboy is toasted cheese like there's no way. Listen, I've been wrong before. So if somehow he's got boots on the ground and dozens of Americans are dying or God forbid hundreds of Americans are dying or God, thousands of Americans are dying and he is reelected, that I will admit I don't see that one coming. I'll update my mental model as reality forces me to do so, but what would that surprise me? I just think the backlash is going to be swift if that is what actually ends up playing out. I think he is counting on something abrupt and aggressive in terms of a victory for the US. So I will again, plant a flag for me to just check my own thinking against because trust me, I do not over esteem my ability to be right about this stuff and the fullness of time. But the way that I'm thinking about it now is that Trump would leave Iran and chaos before he would put substantive boots on the ground. He might do like special operations stuff, like they're talking about taking over a distribution hub that's like an island that I could see them actually doing and being able to fortify, but like boots on the ground in mainland Iran. Woo, I would be shocked. So we'll see how it plays out. We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead so don't go anywhere. Let's talk about a clock you can't see. Every day without active cellular support, you're compounding damage you won't feel until it's too late. By the time you notice you're already playing catch up, most people's longevity plan is just avoiding bad stuff. That's not a plan. Real longevity requires offense. Actively fortifying your cells every single day. at Nondica by peak is built to do. I've tried it and I'm telling you right now I'm a fan. Nondica is a ceremonial cacao-neutropic designed to support your cells from the inside out. Every ingredient is selected for maximum bioavailability. The result is calm, sustained energy, elevated mood, sharper focus, and you're actively building long-term cellular resilience with every cup. Stop playing defense with your health. Get 20% off at peaklife.com/impact. That's P-I-Q-U-E-Life.com/impact. This stuff is really good. Let's talk about the hidden cost of running your business off personal phones. We know everybody's doing it. When someone leaves your company, they walk out with customer relationships and conversation history in their pocket. You've zero visibility into what your team is saying and you're mixing business with personal, so nothing is secure. That's exactly why over 90,000 businesses switched to "quo". The number one rated business phone system on G2 with over 3,000 reviews. You get one shared business number for your entire team. Everyone sees the full conversation thread so there's no more disconnected handoffs. Quo's AI automatically logs calls, generates summaries, and highlights next steps. Make this the season where no opportunity and no customer slips away. Try Quo for free. Plus get 20% off your first six months at Quo.com/impact. That's Q-U-O.com/impact. Quo, no miscalls, no miscustomers. Let's talk about gold. Gold is the right asset these days, but most people are using it wrong. They buy it, hold it, and then wait for the price to go up. But that price is still denominated in dollars so you haven't actually escaped the system. You're still playing by its rules. That's the shift monetary metals helps make possible. They've built a way for your gold to earn yield, paid not in dollars, but in more physical gold. Up to 4% per year. More ounces compounding in hard money every single month. You're growing the quantity of the hardest asset on earth and storage and insurance are included. So there's no hidden fees that are going to eat away at your yield. Most people are passively absorbing inflation. This is exactly how you actively compound your weight out of that. Click the link in the show notes or visit monetary-metals.com/impact to learn more. Again, that's monetary-metals.com/impact. This is a paid advertisement. Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action. It's interesting that you brought up the China Vita. I've seen the report that allegedly China is recording the US war and kind of keeping track. So to this point, if you say to these traps, we're kind of showing our hand on what happens when we do a lot of offensive. What happens when somebody punches his back? What happens when we mobilize? Which one of our allies are actually dependable? Which one of these allies are actually running operations from? So it's kind of like scouting the other team before the Super Bowl. You're kind of seeing what they would do. I see a couple of weaknesses there. Let's see how the reload time isn't stuff like that. So you're starting to kind of see the strategy from a world perspective. I got a lot of pushback in the chat from me saying that we're kind of acting like Israel where we're being a bully. We shouldn't really bomb the school and things like that. Trump logic aside, what do you think is actually happening in this war? And how do you think it actually turns out? I know you're not a crystal ball reader. I know you're not a military strategy. I'm not like that, but lay it out to us. Do you think that this is something that we can come back from? And it's just going to be a blip in the map of history? Well, we can definitely come back from it. All anybody ever cares about in the fullness of time is, did you make my life better economically or not? And I know that even my community just does not like that blanket statement. But I am just I'm a gas that all of you, I'm going to be completely honest. I do not know how you look at the world and continue to walk away thinking that this is anything other than economics. Even with like all of the religious element to this, which is very real and gives people motives and all of that, you're not going to be able to get even religious fighters to fight unless you were supporting them economically. This is why everybody has choked out Iran historically by denying the money. You're not going to see people in Hezbollah or Hamas if they feel that they've been abandoned economically. Keep going like I just I can't I don't know what people are gluing together when they look at the world and think, oh economics doesn't matter. Economics isn't the foundation of this. This is religious. If that were true, then people would just keep fighting with her without money. But they tend not to do that because they have to buy weapons and the world just grinds to a halt when you find someone in your supply chain who's like, yeah, God's great in all, but P.S. by the way, where the fuck is my money? And then it just all stops. So anyway, I'm looking at this from an economic standpoint. And when you look at this from an economic standpoint, I get the incentive for the U.S. to get in there to do its thing in terms of trying to block out China, get control of oil. It's all there. Now how this is going to play out is I there is a key piece of information that I need that I don't have. And I think that Iran is far more divided than people want to believe. We want to believe and we're certainly being propagandized to believe that like 98% of Iranians want to go back to a 1978 Iran before the revolution. And I don't think that that's going to end up being true. So I don't think that you get I don't think that you get 47 years of this kind of theocratic rule without raising people that that's all they know. You've got at least two generations of people that did not experience in any way, shape or form, the pre-Islamic revolution Iran to be able to say that was better. So this is all they know. So while I will certainly say it seems self evident that Iran is divided in that you've got people on the streets that are that we're willing to die. They were protesting in massive numbers. But the question is now that we see they have the opportunity to like break out again and to really stand for something and really like take the streets back. You're seeing pockets of it, but you're not seeing like a big concentrated effort. You're seeing and again, I don't know how big this is. I don't know if it's 2%, I don't know if it's 20%, I don't know if it's 50%, I have no idea. But you're seeing people on the other side that are coming out and waving their flags when they announce the new Iatola. So I don't know. And I need an answer to that question before I know how all of this is going to play out because if we try to top down change Iran, I think we are in for a world of hurt. If we loosen the military infrastructure such that there is a bottom up uprising, then you've got a shot. And I just don't know which way that's going to break. Yeah, I'm pulling I'm showing the footage right now. People out on the streets, 330 in the morning, honking horns and celebrating. It seems like they didn't take it as hard as we thought they would take it. Here's the thing. Think about America. If I show you Minnesota, you're going to look at that and be like, yo, these guys are against their government. But if I show you Florida, you're going to be like, yo, these guys support their government. And so I have a feeling Iran is the same. Remember Iran is enormous. It is enormous. It is modern. It isn't like so. I used to have an Iranian employee lived here in the US, but he like accent the whole nine. Did you ever meet Farhad? So he was always like, Tom, you don't understand. Like, Iran is beautiful. It's lush. It's green. He's like, you guys have this propaganda that Iran is just like a big desert. And he's like, that's not what Iran is. Now listen, Iran has desert. But it isn't just like one big pile of sand. And he's like, I think that's what Americans think Iran is. He's like, it's not that. And so when you see it and you see that, oh, yeah, like any country, there are people that are for the current regime, which is exactly how they stay in place. And then there are people that are against it. I have, I'm just not on the ground. I have no sense of like, what are the proportions? Even in the US, and I am on the ground, it's hard to tell like, where is the actual, the silent majority and all that that's supposedly in the middle? It's like, if you want to blow up on YouTube, pick a side. So that tells me something. Tells me that like we're pulling farther apart. If you want to get elected to political office, pick a side. So it's like, I'm not seeing a lot of evidence that there's certainly mobilization in the middle. So people do seem far more animated in the extremes. And so it's tough to get a sense of, okay, which side is bigger? And without knowing that, it will be very difficult. The only thing I will tell you is Iran is not America. You're not going to bomb them into looking like America. And so what is that going to become as they rebuild their own structures and start moving forward? I don't know. We tried turning Afghanistan into America. That didn't work. We tried turning Vietnam into America. That didn't work. We tried turning Iraq into America. That didn't work. So it's like we have to understand culture matters a lot. We're gonna get into some of the, like issues that America's having, importing people that have different value systems, namely Islam, that's just gonna become a bigger and bigger thing. It matters, culture matters. You don't even have to say one is better than the other to say that everybody inside their own culture thinks theirs is better. And that dynamic of I think mine is better. You think yours is better. Empirical truth is either impossible to ascertain or nobody cares. And so now it's just two worlds colliding. And if Iran has two worlds colliding, I need to know which one is bigger to predict what the outcome is gonna be. - Yeah. And what's actually happening, I'm pulling up the Australian, Iranian women's football team drama that's happening. You would think that this isn't happening while some people are saying, Iranian people are fine. They didn't need liberation. The women will love it there. And then suddenly you're hearing these stories that directly contradict. So to your point of starting the show, there's so much media spin that. If you look at one section of one city block, it's like, oh, they love it. They want IOTO La Part 2. They hate America, they have to America. And then you look over here where literally there's women internationally protesting carrying the backs of their civil rights, trying to make like legitimate change. So it's hard to kind of parse those two. But I'm gonna be honest, I'm at the headline level with the Australian thing. If you catch us up really quick on what's going on out there. - The Australian soccer team is utterly fascinating. It is in one moment explaining exactly what's going on in Iran itself because they're divided. Even the team is not coming up with a unified response. But if you guys don't know the background of this story, after an Iranian soccer player flashed the international symbol for help. As they, so they were coming out of a soccer tournament, they at one point had stood in silence. It was really an incredible move during their own national anthem. They stood in silence at some point, I think a couple games ago. And then there was a ton of pressure for them to, hey, the next time the cameras are on you, you better be like singing along to the national anthem 'cause if you don't, we're gonna hurt your family back here. So it was like, okay, what's really going on? And then they lost and were removed from the tournament while in Australia. And one of the players, at least one of the players, flashed that international symbol for help. 200 Iranian supporters in Australia swarmed the team's bus to stop them from getting shipped off to the regime that had promised to treat them like wartime traders. This was on their national TV, obviously it was a big deal. And so it was known that they were going to get some sort of harsh penalty when they returned. And it's, it is a very big question in terms of how this is all going to play out. So you've got five of the members of the Iranian national women's team that is now seeking asylum in Australia. But the rest of the team is preparing to go back home. And the coach has said that they're eager to return home. So the question is how did you get all of them to remain silent? Did they all want to do that? Did they feel it tremendous amount of pressure from like a team captain or something? And so they wanted to do their part to show solidarity with the team. Or is it as straightforward as they had their moment, that looked like things were going one way? And they felt this tremendous wave of optimism. And then the threats start rolling in. And all of a sudden you realize, oh, maybe the regime is not as weak as we thought or as we had hoped. And so now they're just worried about what's going to happen to their family. And so it's like they know if they don't go back, does something bad is going to happen to their family. I don't know any of the specifics. And I don't think anybody does about the five people that have chosen to stay behind. But if the five people that have chosen to stay behind, for instance, are people that have little to no family back there, or they have family that are old from militant about wanting a regime change and are willing to suffer whatever consequences come their way, that tells a very different story. And so I don't know if this is a team where some people really do identify with Iran and they want to get back. And other people are feeling pressured or other people really are like, I don't care. What comes of this, there's no way that I'm going back to Iran. I want to see the regime change. So this is one of those, it's all happening in real time. But the fact that five of the players are seeking asylum, let's you know that they were serious, that they probably really did flash that symbol. It's been verified by a bunch of different outlets. So while I was looking at the bus footage, I couldn't see clearly what they were seeing, but it has been verified. And to be honest, I don't even know, do you know what the universal symbol for help is? God, I hope people haven't been flashing me for years. And I'm just like, hey, what's up? He was waving at me because I, yeah, I know. He just waved so weird. What's wrong? What that is? So we'll see how this one plays out, but it is a good reminder that it is right now impossible to ascertain exactly how divided Iran is. We don't know. Nice. Speaking of women's day, yesterday was international women's day. Happy international women's day to everybody. It's kind of funny though, that it was on spring forward and it was only 23 hours. That's hilarious. So that's hilarious. Did you enjoy February 28 days, Black History Month, Jero? Yes, Black History Month is every day. I don't know why they gave us 28 days. Oh, that's not the time. You're Morgan Freeman? Oh, yeah, I'm no Black History Month. Let's go. Because you want to see a deeply integrated into just normal history. I feel like eventually we got to realize that these people that were been here 400 years, next to the Irish dudes that's been here 400 years, next to the Italian dudes at the book. Yes. We're all Americans and at one point in time, we got to kind of understand our contributions to each other. Okay, back to politics. Karen Levitt casually threw out on the table that she might be okay with doing drafts. Trump is leaving all his options. Wow. Mother's out there are worried that we're going to have a draft that they're going to see their sons get in and out. Trump set it up. Take days in Los Angeles. What do you want to say about the president's plans for troops on the ground? As we know, it's been largely an air campaign up until now. It has been and it will continue to be. And President Trump wisely does not remove options off of the table. I know a lot of politicians like to do that quickly, but the president as commander in chief wants to continue to assess the success of this military operation. It's not part of the current plan right now, but the president again, wisely keeps his options on the table. Waisley keeping his options on the table. Yeah. (laughing) So this one to me just feels like political suicide. So yep, I mean, look, some people will just keep doubling down, doubling down, doubling down, until they get that victory, 'cause they're at the table and it's like, "I'm down a half mill now. What's a million drew?" And they just keep trying to dig themselves out of that hole. Now, I'm not saying that Trump is in a hole right now with Iran, I think it's too early to tell, but I think that the science coming out for my money, like this is showing that it's got legs. So in terms of remaining a conflict where you do not get the settled down aspect that you want quickly, again, Trump could be today announcing, "No, no, no, we've worked something out. "We'll see, but I think that would be him leaving Iran "in its current state, "because you've just replaced the Ayatollah with his son." So it's like, his son who you just killed, like half of his family members, including his wife, his mom, one of his kids. So it's like, this guy is not gonna be like, "Hey, everybody, let's hold hands." You know what, I just wanna make it happen. I wanna forgive like what happened everybody, if we could just say, you know, "Amen and love, love your neighbor." I don't think that's what's gonna come out of this. So I would be very shocked that there would be stability that would come out of that announcement if he makes it. We'll see. So yeah, telling the American people that you are not going to remove a draft, like there's a one-to-one with poll numbers going down on that. So we'll see. We'll see. This is, it is very interesting to look at. Trump is a transformational figure. Imagine having 100 years of distance from this moment and what this will look like because at that point it's just all outcomes. And so if this goes horribly awry, it's just like what a moron he was completely unhinged. This is what happens in a populous moment. You elect dictators and they fucking go nuts and they run about the world and it all falls apart. Or if it all works, you look back and go, "Ooo, America finally elected a president that wasn't afraid to take action, who did the hard thing to isolate China one of the few times." You know, they were coming up in an era where 12 of the last 16 times that a rising superpower collided with an established superpower, they ended up in war. And yet, Trump somehow was able to isolate China by systematically going after these different proxies, breaking their access to oil, forcing them to move all to solar. And you know what I mean? Like you can see how it like would break down where you look back at and go, "Whoa, like actually a very impressive move." But if you looked at it, you would say, "But what was it like on the ground at that time?" Because everything is so uncertain. And that's where we're all trapped, which is we don't have the historical perspective to know which way this is gonna go. But it still remains up in the air that, yeah, he could end up pulling this off and pulling this off to me means he stays in power long enough to make this economically advantageous to the US, not that it will ever be morally justifiable. So when I think that, I think that that's one of the things that people take away from me. And every now and then, I am so interested in just fighting with the people in chat that I see every now and then. But unfortunately, that has not proven to be good TV. So I will resist. But yeah, I'm so curious to know what people's best take is like where this goes. I'm out. I'm gonna have to put your feet to the fire. - I love it. - Because Trump is juggling down. This is his true social post. Great job by hardworking Scott Preslar. I'm FoxyFriends talking about using the filibuster or a trucking filibuster in order to pass the Save America Act, an 88% issue with all voters. It must be done immediately. It supersedes everything else must go to the front of the line. I as president will not sign other bills until this is passed. I wanna just pause right there for a second. 'Cause see, the point he's in the middle of the war, he has all these things working against him and now he's not gonna pass anything else until the save act. It seems like he's definitely pushing his chips all into the middle with this one. - Well, it's interesting. Yes, I would say his chips are way more all in in Iran. Iran from a political standpoint is far scarier in terms of the Republican party's future. This, I think, is one of the things it gets at the heart of your politicians that are not working for you. In poll after poll after poll, American people want there to be ID for voting. Just full stop, they support it. It's 88, I've never heard that poll. Maybe it's changed. I've seen 84 and that takes into account Democrats and all that. I think it pulls for Democrats in the upper 70s. So it's like boys and girls, you've got to understand that the American people writ large, regardless of party affiliation, want you to protect voter integrity. Period, end of story, simple as it should be the easiest saying in the world. Now, whether Trump has the ability to just like veto things that come across his desk or refuse to sign, I don't know about the refuse to sign, but certainly presidents can veto legislation. So he does have, unless there's a super majority, he does have a pretty big tool in his arsenal. And if this is the one that he's gonna burn the political capital on, I get it. I just, I am aghast that the Democrats are not getting behind something that their own voters want. I get them being obstinate about something that their voting block doesn't want. But when their voting block wants it, this is insane. And then it's like it goes back to, I did a deep dive on what I think is really going on with elections. And I think that it is aggressively importing immigrants and just a large population of the immigrants that were brought in, it's certainly over the last four years were illegal immigrants to boost the senses to give their party more control so that they can get a one party state. And nobody should want a one party state. I don't care what side you're on. You should not want your own party to be the only party. I don't know how else to say that. You, it will go into tyranny very rapidly. You will become parasitized by your own extreme wing. This is exactly what happens when there's only one party. So like boys and girls, please sort of love God, forget that one out. AI has been taking over the world in a bunch of different places. But I think what is happening lately with the Claude de Bacchol of Department of War, and now we just seen that somebody resigned at Open AI, the line between the other one. AI, robotics, and war is starting to collide a lot more than we are more comfortable admitting. So this is from Caitlin Kalinowski. I resigned from Open AI. I cared deeply about the robotics team and the work we built together. This wasn't an easy call. AI has an important role in national security, but surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without American authorization. Our lines that deserve more deliberation than they got. This was about principle and not people. I have deep respect for Sam and the team and I'm proud of what we built together. So a bunch of CEOs last week said, "Get out your feelings. This is the military. We're not going to let some guys from Silicon Valley dictate it." But when are we going to have this conversation? Like it keeps getting pushed. And more people are leaving. The contracts are being avoided. You're not going to have this conversation. No input at all. This is what it is. Drew, Drew, Drew. Here is the terrifying reality. 'Cause I don't want people to think that explaining something means you're happy about it. You like it. But the reality is in Los Alamos, we had to make a decision. If we do this nuclear test, it may light the atmosphere on fire and devour every living thing and just completely terminate life. We don't know. There is a non-zero chance that that will happen. And they did it anyway. So I don't have a clear example. Humans will develop any technology that promises an advantage. There has never been a technology in all of human history that promised a bigger advantage than AI. And truly, if we don't, China will. And I know that feels like that offers no solace. I'm not trying to soothe people. I'm merely trying to tell you how the human animal works. And so this is why people go, is it possible that we've never heard from an alien civilization because there was a great filter and evolutionary creatures which literally remember. We evolved to go, "Oh, you have cells I would like. I'm gonna come kill you and take those cells and use them for myself." That's what humans do. We eat other animals so that we may have their cellular structure. Okay, so people need to come to grips with how bloody in tooth and claw evolution really is. And so we have evolved to say, like here, let's make everybody real uncomfortable. What is one of the pieces of property that people have gone to war for over time? That's right, women. So they will go kill all the men and take the women so that they can reproduce. Like, bro, when you realize that humans will do that, it's like there are parasites in this world that will go in like there's this fungus, I think, or a worm that goes and like embeds itself in a wasp, makes the wasp like go to water, and then the larva from that worm eat the wasp while it's still living so that it can like reproduce in the water and all that stuff. Like, dude, nature does not give a fuck. It will just do its thing. So humans at least have some moral check in their programming, but we are going to develop AI, no matter how many safety, we, the population, no matter how many safety people bounce out, if America goes listen, we just can't do this, we can't be a part of it. And like we come together and we all just say, nope, maybe Tom's right, maybe someone's gonna do it, but it's not gonna be us. Cool, maybe we can count on China to say the same thing. You really think you can stop the Ted Kaczynski's of the world? Like bro, let's say you're a Ted Kaczynski psychopath and North Korea reaches out to you and goes, you're gonna need way more funding than you're gonna be able to get. So why don't you come on over and build it for us. It will happen. - If so, the fact is that it's one of those things where we see the negative ramifications of AI, but we just can't help ourselves. It's just like, let's, a little bit more. It's gonna be fine, it's gonna be fine. A little bit more just. - A little bit more, like, it is too powerful. And so yeah, I mean, God, how much do we wanna derail on this? When you look at evolution, lineage is die off all the time. And right now, humans are preparing themselves to be a midwife for a synthetic species. That is almost certainly true. And now will humans remain? And they don't die off. And we do colonize the stars. Maybe it's kind of a cool way to think about it that we get offered, and it's not just us, and there's us and synthetic. - The midwife thing is, like, I feel like when AI gets to that level of control, I'm kind of with boost amounts. I feel like this society is weird. We're just gonna go and beat and boot and do stuff over here. - Yeah, possible. Maybe they leave us alone. And then maybe things get better. Maybe it's like, okay, we got the face hugger of AI and it fucking pumps the little aliens into our gullet. And then it bursts out of the chest of a few people. And we're like, yeah, that was terrifying, but it is what it is. And now the rest of us, like the little alien creature runs off and starts colonizing places far beyond and leaves us alone and we rebuild. And we take the line out of Dune. We just go, no one shall make an AI in the likeness of a human mind. And we're just like, nope, no more of that. That game is over. - Cool. - Whatever. But the technology is going to come into existence. And then we have to see what ends up happening to humans. And I think that it's really going to be, I think that it's going to be ultimately spectacular. I think it is gonna be terrifying and bumpy. And I certainly understand anybody that's like, I just rather it didn't exist. But the reality is that the things that it lets you, intelligence is the single most profound thing in the universe. It's incredible. No one wants to see a bunch of lifeless rocks. What we cherish is consciousness. And so if AI can achieve that kind of state, it'd be incredible. - Well, back into the reality of what's actually happening on the ground of AI. Now, finance jobs seem to be the next sector that AI is eating. This is a retweet from Peter St. Orange, friend of the show he was on here. Finance and insurers jobs openings fell 117%. 117,000. In December to 134,000, the lowest level since February, 2020, as well. So you can see this graph. It seems pretty, pretty low. And that's right over the back of the recession, the great recession. So once they draft after another and then we have this economic pressure on the stock market, it seems. seems like this house of cars is starting to teeter when it comes to AI and layoffs. - Here's a way that I think everybody should think about AI in the jobs market. Right now, we have no reason to believe that this isn't gonna be just a reconfiguration. Every time we've gone through one of these technological changes, on a long enough timeline, the technology ends up creating more jobs than it destroys. So you had the industrial revolution, you had the electrification, you had the great internetification. All of those revolutions caused massive disruptions to the job markets. Remember, the internet one, the one that ironically feels the most invisible to us because we're just in the middle of it. The deaths of despair on the back of that from people that just could not get trained up to exist in this world. They were too far down the old path. The number of those deaths is so high that it has lowered the average life expectancy of the nation as a whole, okay? So it is an absolute catastrophe, but you end up getting through it and kids that grow up in the internet era, they end up building incredible things. And we are, look, there are downsides as well, don't get me wrong, but we are marching forwards, making incredible progress, doing incredible things. And now we're seeing this new disruption. Now, I think that this time is going to be different, but I have a rule in my life that says, anytime you say the magical phrase, this time is going to be different, just assume you're wrong. So I simultaneously believe it's true and recognize the foolishness that history has shown over and over and over of people that say this time is going to be different. So right now, I am saying, okay, I'm living in this moment, I can see what the real impacts of this moment are. And right now the reality is, you're not going to get replaced by AI, you are going to get replaced by a human using AI. So I'm using AI as much as I can, and it has been a boon to every aspect of my life. Now, like everything, there are people that have a drug, adult quality or relationship with it. And so they're getting addicted to it and they're using it in negative ways. I am not. I'm saying, okay, here are the goals that I'm trying to achieve. I don't want this to turn me to a pair of hands. I want to understand why it's doing what it's doing. I wanted to help me map cause an effect. I wanted to help me think out from first principles so that I understand it myself. So I don't need an output from that to be able to do something that I can actually understand the thing. Okay? So how you force yourself to interact with it is going to be a large part of this. Now, on a long enough timeline, does this usher in an age of abundance, an age of high income as Elon Musk has said? Probably unless it asks him to from an intelligence perspective, or we just cannot get our shit together enough to get energy going in appropriate amounts, I think that this just keeps going. But this is going to play out over a longer time period than any of us want, certainly longer than I want, or even some days longer than I predict. But that's just the way that things tend to go. They tend to take longer than you think, not be quite as cool as you think. And so in my more sober moments, I go, okay, I've probably got a transition that ranges somewhere between three and seven years where I still recognize the world that still seems reasonable. And that gives us all time to adjust to whatever's going to come on the other side. Now, AI is the first technology that just continues to surprise me day after day after day with its rate of doubling. So take that with a grain of salt. But that is the way I think right now to think about it. Use AI, deploy it in your life. Don't get so doomer that you're only looking at the dark side of what could happen. I think spending some time there is warranted, but spending all of your time there is not wise. And so even if I'm right in my most aggressive prognostications and three years from now, capitalism just doesn't exist. Right now today it does. Right now today it matters. Right now today having a job is important. And right now today the way to keep your job is to be the one that uses AI the most effectively. So look at all of this stuff, not as like, oh God, my head is on the chopping block. Look at it as the people who are being willfully ignoring AI, not finding a way to use it in their jobs. They're going to be the ones replaced by people using AI. So you have the life raft that you need just to master AI. - Man, we really need to get this hip-sylfax over and you cook in the neighbor. - There it is. AI has been making tremendous breakthroughs though. I thought this was like satire. I was like, oh, this is a Babylon B article. This is not real, but just in, there's a peachy dish of human brain cells grown on a microchip has learned to play doom. I wish that's a full set and so that is it. And this is footage of the gameplay that happened like below here. You can actually see that they're taking real neuron gameplay and they just laid it on a microchip. - Bro, this is so crazy. Believe it or not, boys and girls, that statement is true. A peachy dish of human brain cells grown on a microchip has learned to play a video game. Welcome to the era of biological computing. Things are going to get wild. Developers can now literally write code to living neurons via the cloud. Okay, there's two stories that have dropped recently that most people are treating as novelty, but they're not realizing that when these two things are combined, it tells you the direction of travel that we're going. When you put them together, they point to a transformation that I'm not sure it is singularity like in that it will be very difficult for us to predict on the other side of this. The first story is a scientist at Princeton in Cambridge have spent years mapping every single neuron in an adult fruit fly. Okay, so they've mapped a fly's brain. It's nearly 140,000 neurons, 50 million connections. They've loaded the entire wiring diagram into a computer simulation. Then they simply fed this simulated brain sensory inputs. So there's no separate behavioral training, okay? It is just architecture. So there's no reinforcement learning applied to the outcomes, it's just the structure. And the simulation correctly enacted the real flies brains motor responses, including the circuit, second control walking with no one telling it what walking was supposed to look like. The lead researcher's quote says it all, one fly had to be sacrificed for this experiment, but that fly will now live forever in a simulation. Now I hope part of you just got excited and I hope part of you just became terrified with that story too. You've got an Australian company called Cortical Labs. They took 200,000 living human brain cells. 200,000 living human brain cells, they were grown from adult skin, placed on a silicon chip, and then they built what they call the world's first code deployable biological computer, okay? An independent developer was zero neuroscience background, used their Python API to pipe Dooms video feed into electrical signals, sent those signals directly into the neurons and an under a week, the cells were navigating levels, targeting enemies, firing weapons, all in real time. Now to give you a sense of the insane rate of progress here, they had done something similar in the past with the game, Pong, if you're young, you may not remember what that is, a very simplistic game, and it took them 18 months. Dooms, a far more complicated game, took only one week. Things are speeding up dramatically. Now for anyone worried about the energy consumption of AI, I've got some good news. The energy economics of slapping brain matter onto computer chips is insane. A full rack of these bad boys draws just 850 to 1,000 watts combined. The human brain runs in just 20 watts, but a single GPU cluster, training a large language model, can burn through mega watts. Biological compute is wildly more efficient, and just as a reminder, it's already here. This is not some insane thing way down the road. It's already here, and the investor list reflects exactly who's taking this seriously. You've got horizons ventures, blackbird, and reportedly in cutel, which is the CIA's venture arm. Now I want to be clear, the InQTel thing is unconfirmed, so that may require a tinfoil hat. We'll see where that goes over time. Cortical Labs is now selling access through a cloud platform that they're calling wetware as a service. Developers deploy code to living neurons remotely. You don't need a lab, and it's priced like a software subscription. This is so insane. Now when you put it all together, on one side, you've got proof, you can load a complete biological brain map into a computer and have it predict behavior from structure alone. And on the other side, you have proof that living human neurons on a chip will learn in real time. Drawing on four billion years of biological optimization that so far no-silicon ship has been able to replicate. Synthetic brains, man, they are coming to a server hack near you. AWS is about to get a second win, boys and girls. Things are going to get nuts. People are going to get so weird with what they, how they respond to this. And honestly, understandably so. There are so many moral implications of what's going on with this. We're talking about growing brains and strapping them into data centers, man. But this one, This one's gonna be one for the ages. - That fruit fly, one is crazy to me. - Yeah. - That it's just walking around. And does it know that it's in the simulation? And is it just a copy of it? And what's the, we were talking about this in Slack, me, press, and I've had gotten to like a rabbit hole of like what actually is consciousness? And how do we map consciousness? And Ed was like, well, I think it already is consciousness. And I'm like, I think the question now is gonna be what is the definition of consciousness? It's just like, what is the definition of truth? It became, oh, it's easy. But then you take away religious standards. Oh, it's easy. Then you take away society standards and then it becomes like this like mushy, like sliding scale. And I think consciousness is gonna be the same thing. So the fact that they could do that with fruit flies, my conspiracy theories, every time government or scientists do something to an animal, they immediately do it to humans in the military. Like that's the pipeline. So we cloned a goat, never heard about goat cloning again. They've been cloning people. I know I just can't prove it yet. Same thing with this fruit fly. They got the fruit flies like brain maps. What's to stop them from like stealing like a terrorist somewhere, mapping his consciousness in a box and saying, you're gonna live here forever unless you give us the secrets. And then they kind of like torture him in that way. Like it's perpetual torture, even though his real body is not tortured, he's somewhere else. But we mapped her body into the make believe land to interrogate you there. I might actually write that. That's a good pilot. That's a good, actually. I can spear see myself. Just like, hold on, hold on. Live right there. Cut that part out. Oh, no, that's right, that's out. But you know what I'm saying? There is this, we're going back to moral thing again where it's A.I. is now becoming more and more powerful and there's starting to be so many applications is like, wait a second, this thing is just going in different directions. Like at the same time we're taking over fruit flies we're firing finance bros. College grads can't find a job. But now, grown brain cells can play doomed by themselves. It just seems like everything is happening at the same time and it's like my head's on a swivel. It's just interesting how we're progressing at such a rapid pace. Well, may this be an incredible week for you? Take care, peace. Let's talk about a pattern that is guaranteed to be killing your progress. You know what you need to do. You need consistent nutrition. We all do. You need vitamins, probiotics, greens. We all know that we should be doing more of it. When your morning gets chaotic, you skip it. When you travel, you skip it. When your routine breaks, everything tends to break. And that inconsistency compounds against you every single day. A.G.1 is designed to solve the execution problem. One scoop, eight ounces of water, and you're done. You're getting 75 plus ingredients, vitamins and minerals, pre and probiotics, nutrient dense superfoods, everything that used to require six, seven different supplements, and perfect planning now happens in one drink that takes about 30 seconds to make. Right now, A.G.1 is giving you $87 worth of free gifts with your first subscription. You get a welcome kit, travel packs, vitamin D3 plus K2 and flavor samples. Click the link in the show notes or visit drinkaag1.com/impact to claim this offer.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to the Iran conflict has caused a massive, unprecedented disruption to global oil supply, estimated at 20 million barrels per day.
  2. This has led to extreme volatility in oil prices and financial markets, with significant knock-on effects anticipated for critical global supply chains, including semiconductors, fertilizers, and various industrial materials.
  3. There is widespread uncertainty and difficulty in discerning factual information due to propaganda from multiple sources and the increasing challenge of AI-generated misinformation.
  4. Government responses, such as potential releases from strategic petroleum reserves, are seen as short-term bridges, not long-term solutions to the supply crisis.
  5. The situation's economic impact extends beyond fuel prices, threatening broader inflation and potential shortages in essential goods if the strait remains closed.

Summary:

The discussion centers on the severe global economic and supply chain disruptions caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz amid the Iran conflict. This closure has halted an estimated 20 million barrels of oil per day, a disruption four to five times larger than historical oil shocks, leading to wild volatility in oil prices and financial markets. The crisis extends far beyond energy, threatening the supply of sulfur (critical for batteries and industry), semiconductors (due to Taiwan's LNG-dependent power supply), and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which half the global population relies on for food.

While governments may coordinate strategic reserve releases, these are temporary fixes. The narrative emphasizes extreme market skittishness, the pervasive challenge of propaganda and AI-generated misinformation obscuring the truth, and the significant risk of prolonged economic "short-term pain" without a clear path to "long-term gain" if the strait remains closed. The overall tone is one of high uncertainty regarding the conflict's resolution and its deep, cascading global consequences.

FAQs

Oil prices are volatile due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which has cut roughly 20 million barrels per day, creating unprecedented supply disruption and market uncertainty.

The current disruption is much larger, cutting about 20 million barrels per day, which is 4-5 times the size of major historical oil shocks like the 1973 embargo or the Iranian revolution.

The disruption threatens critical supply chains, including sulfur for industrial processes, semiconductors from Taiwan due to energy shortages, and synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which affects global food production.

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital 21-nautical-mile passage for oil and other resources; its closure due to insurance risks from threats, not a physical blockade, is causing major global supply chain disruptions.

The G7 is considering an emergency release of strategic petroleum reserves, but this is only a short-term bridge, not a long-term solution, as reserves are limited.

Some argue that current economic disruptions, like higher oil prices, are temporary sacrifices for long-term geopolitical gains, such as destabilizing adversarial regimes, though this outcome is uncertain.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.