NBA Power Poll 1.0, Plus a ‘You Can See Everything’ Breakdown With Wesley Morris
from The Bill Simmons Podcast ·
2h 14m 38s
Brian Dawkins shares his personal journey with major depressive disorder, stressing the importance of mental health support and encouraging others to seek professional help. He discusses Caplida Lumateperone as a supplemental treatment that enhances antidepressant effectiveness, noting its benefits and potential side effects while emphasizing the need for medical supervision. The Bill Simmons Podcast segments include a live horror movie rewatch, a critical examination of the WNBA’s chaotic scheduling, and a detailed NBA season preview. The host analyzes team performances, highlighting concerns about roster depth, player health, and team chemistry—particularly in Miami, Phoenix, Milwaukee, and the Spurs—while praising strong early performances in Dallas, Portland, and Golden State. He critiques poor planning in the WNBA, calling the scheduling of Game 6 in Atlanta a major misstep due to lack of coordination and poor broadcast strategy. The analysis also touches on injury risks, contract issues, and coaching decisions, with a recurring theme that long-term team success depends on health, balance, and adaptability. Overall, the commentary blends personal advocacy with in-depth sports observation, offering both emotional insight and strategic evaluation of current league dynamics.
I'm pro-football Hall of Famer Brian Dawkins, and I lived for a long time with something I did not
know the name of, major depressive disorder. I carried sadness and anger because I thought I
could handle it alone, but I couldn't. Now I want to make sure others know that that support is out
there. If you're experiencing similar symptoms, talk to a healthcare professional. Visit mddallies.com
to watch my story. Paid partnership with Johnson & Johnson. Brian Dawkins is not prescribed
Caplida Lumateperone. I needed more from my antidepressant, so my doctor added Caplida
Lumateperone, proven to provide greater relief from depression symptoms than an antidepressant
alone, building on my progress without starting over. Caplida is for adults with major depressive
disorder when used with an antidepressant and is available by prescription only. Individual
results may vary. In clinical trials, weight gain was not common.
Caplida is not approved for dementia-related psychosis. Call your doctor about new or sudden
mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts right away. Antidepressants may increase these
risks. Report fever, confusion, stiff muscles, which may be life-threatening, or uncontrolled
muscle movements, which may be permanent. High cholesterol and weight gain may occur,
as can high blood sugar, which may be fatal. Monitoring is recommended. Common side effects
are sleepiness, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, feeling tired, and diarrhea. These aren't all
the side effects. Ask your doctor about Caplida. Learn more at Caplida.com or call 888-788-8888.
The Bill Simmons Podcast, brought to you by the Ringer Podcast Network, where we put up a new
Rewatchables. Yesterday, we did it live on Netflix. We did A Nightmare on Elm Street,
one of the best horror movies of all time. It was me and Ben Lathan and Chris Ryan. We argued about
whether it was the best horror movie of the 80s, had an interesting result to that argument.
Ben tried to do a hottest take where he defended Freddy Krueger. That was interesting.
Really fun podcast all around the world. We'll see you next time.
That wraps up Horror Movie Month. We did It Follows, Friday the 13th, Texas Chainsaw Massacre,
and A Nightmare on Elm Street. I was going to wait until after Brewers Rays World Series Game 4 and
then realize that not one person in my life has texted me about this World Series except for
my buddy Chip Cain, who's a diehard Brewers fan. The Rays had a chance to make people care about
this series, and then they shit the bed over the weekend. We are where we are,
probably going to be one of the least remembered World Series in a long time.
At least we have the WNBA to make fun of because the WNBA announced this week that Game 6 is going
to be at 1230 Eastern Time in Atlanta because they couldn't figure out all the stadium stuff.
The Hawks had games. The Warriors had games. It's not like they had time to figure this out
because they just found out what the finals was two weeks ago. Oh, wait. They're supposed to have
a bunch of contingencies. Atlanta was the four seed?
And they were completely blindsided that they were going to make the finals. This is the dumbest
thing that's probably. Even for a league that has gone out of its way to seem stupid this entire
year and has, I think, made 12 or 13 major decisions this year, and I've disagreed with
all of the decisions, literally all of them, this is a new low for them. They can't even simulcast
Game 6. It's on USA, which is bad enough that they are showing any finals games on USA, but it's on
USA. And then. It's being simulcast. It used to be on CNBC for the primetime games, but the market's going on
during the day. So now it's on, I think, SyFy, Spike TV, the Playboy channel. I don't know where
it's being simulcast, but this is just a massive embarrassment. And the commissioner's already
announced she's stepping down. Commissioner Cathy, who is singularly terrible down the stretch here.
I think she should step down a second time. And I don't know who is going to be the next commissioner,
but I promise they'll be better than Cathy Engelbert was. I just can't believe how dumb this league
is. People want to like this league. I don't even care about the finals anymore, and I've cared about
this entire season. I've moved on. There's college football, there's NFL, there's NBA. They delayed
it with the FIBA. They delayed this final. It started eight days after both teams had clinched,
and we're still going, and they're just driving away their audience. Good luck to everybody. I just can't.
I just can't understand how everybody can be this incompetent. But anyway, good luck to Atlanta,
Golden State, game six at 930 a.m. Pacific time. Coming up, I am going to do a power poll for the
first week of the NBA season, and then we're going to talk to Wesley Morris about You Can See
Everything, the new Nathan Fielder movie about Elizabeth Holmes. That is next. We're going to
take a break, Pearl Jam, and then power poll next. This is the Bill Simmons podcast presented by
FanDuel. Make every NFL week more rewarding with FanDuel.
Rewards Club. You heard me. Just bet like you normally would. Earn points in eligible
settled bets, win or lose. Keep collecting points, level up, and unlock bigger rewards.
So keep an eye on your Rewards Club progress and see what you can unlock.
This is your most rewarding season ever, and it's with FanDuel.
All right. My first power poll of the NBA season. We've only had a week.
I'm going to try not to overreact. We're recording this before Tuesday's games. And the only one that
really matters to me for the purposes of the poll is Pistons-Knicks, because I think there would
have been lessons from that game, but just going to have to work on what we had. Going from 30 to
one, separated in categories, and I'm going to try to zip through this as fast as I possibly can and
come up with like one or two takes on each team. First group is called the Dregs. It's always
called the Dregs. And guess what?
Nobody's surprised. Sacramento is there as the 30th ranked team. They're 0-3.
I, of course, went to King's Reddit this morning because it's one of the funniest places on the
internet. And the top, if you do the hot, and that gives you like the hottest posts of the moment,
the top post, it was somebody posting,
Amen, just those four letters, to an embedded tweet. And the tweet read,
When I die, bury me in my Sacramento Kings jersey so God knows I've already done my time in hell.
789 likes. So there's your Kings season so far. My favorite Kings fact, they're paying $49 million
this year to Keegan Murray and DeAndre Hunter. $49 million combined. If you combine them
and called them Keandre Murder, I guess you could just call it Keandre Murder at this point.
Keandre Murder, I think that's the worst contract in the league. Two swing guys. I don't think
either guy would play for the Celtics. And the Celtics aren't even one of the top five teams in
the league. Kings. Acuff, kind of fun to watch from a league pass standpoint,
but this is as grim as we thought it was going to be. So they're 30. 29 is Brooklyn. 0-3 playing
Boston tonight. I'm going to flag this now. Michael Porter plays really well against the Celtics. Kind
of worried about this game, but Brooklyn's where we thought they were going to be. They'll trade
Porter at some point. They'll start playing rookies. And the good news for them is Houston
gets to swap picks with them. Oh no, that's terrible news. So they don't even have the
first round pick technically. So we'll see what happens with them. This feels like a trade machine
team to me. 28, Milwaukee. 1-3, won last night against Indiana without Zubats. I watched it.
I watched basketball. It was great last night. There was the, I got to say the multi-view,
NBA.com or whatever the league pass thing is called. They fixed the multi-view. So now it's
just the four games, all just the four squares like in NFL. It's wonderful. It's really great.
We appreciated NBA. It made up for all of your terrible co-running of the WNBA that you gave us
a full multi-view, but I was watching all the games. There were some really good ones last
night and Milwaukee did beat Indiana. So Milwaukee has Miami's pick, which I guess is the good news
here with the way Miami's looked so far. The bad news, Gary Trent's just getting zero minute games
here. This is somebody who stopped playing over the course of last season, who did not look like a road
rotation player just in general. And then they gave him the $64 million deal that clearly was
about as fishy as that place they always show in Seattle before Seahawks games. When they show the
people throwing the fish, it was about as, that's where the contract should live. They're going to
get punished. They're going to lose a pick in this. I think everybody in the league is expecting
them to lose a first round pick. So we'll see if it has anything to do with this year's pick because
I don't think they would take the Miami pick away, but they might take something away. So anyway,
guess what? Nobody in Milwaukee cares. Like literally nobody. The Brewers are about to win
the world series. The Packers look like a playoff team. The Bucks traded Giannis. They got back a
bunch of whatevers and some picks from a team that probably isn't that good. And nobody cares.
And if you looked at the beginning last night, there was a great
screenshot picture, a wide shot of them announcing the starting lineup. Tyler Harrow
with the hammer, unclear if he's the worst hammer
hammer guy of all the 30 home teams when they announced it's between probably between him and
Brooklyn. I didn't see who got the hammer with Brooklyn, but whatever it was probably not the
greatest choice ever. They showed the wide shot and there's just nobody at this game and that's
just going to be the bucks. So congratulations to them. They won the title in 2021 and it's been
really, really grim ever since. Number 27, Chicago watched them last night. Caleb looks like he's
going to be an easy 22 and seven guy this season, uh, probably on bad teams. That's really all that
matters for them this year. I will say there was one thing I liked. Of course I watched the Celtic
game to the bitter end. The Celtics were up by like 40 the entire game with like a minute to go.
They got a steal and they threw it at a Hugo and Hugo, sorry, sorry, Hugo. They threw it ahead to
my guy, Hugo, who was about to go up for a dunk. Caleb Wilson with the hard foul behind.
And it was like 45 seconds left. And then he angrily stalked off to the bench and I liked it.
You know what? He's trying to set the tone and a 40 point blowout. But I appreciated that. Uh,
I appreciated the competitiveness. I think they're in good shape with that dude.
Number 26, Phoenix one and two. This was the only other team Reddit I went to son's Reddit. The top
post was, this is going to be a very long season was the written thing. And it was a meme of sad
Ben Affleck, sadly smoking. It was a meme of sad Ben Affleck, sadly smoking. But wearing different sons jerseys. So that's where the son's mindset is. Eddie Johnson heard some of
the announcing for this one last night. And, um, he was pretty appalled by the defense by, uh, by
Booker's. I don't know what Booker was doing that game. He Booker had a, I don't care if I'm traded
kind of performance where he just really didn't shoot. And, uh, the center situation's bad.
Miles Bridges, Jalen Green,
you just have two guys you can attack all the time. Now, last, last year, there was,
they were much better. I thought defensively than what we're looking at this year and Booker,
not shooting is weird. And the vibes are weird. And guess what? They don't have their pick. It's
going to Houston. So this is grim. We knew it was going to be grim because there should be a traded
basically all their first runners, but did make me wonder is I know Booker's contract is appalling
and just gets worse, but it did make me wonder if there's something there with Booker and bam.
Trade machine bill did kick it around and study it, but that is a really a classic good trade for
both teams. Now you have bam who would never ever leave Miami. Allegedly you Booker who would never
ever leave Phoenix allegedly, but are both teams better? If you make a trade like that, I would
argue. Yes. Number 25 last team in the dregs is the Utah mustard juice. They are one in three and
you're not going to do this, but Jared Jackson's heard already. He has played 13,000 career minutes.
This is season number nine for him. He has played 1800 plus minutes three times. And if you're a
jazz fan, you are now entering the, the think zone here of we traded some stuff away for
Jared Jackson jr. And then we got some stuff back for, for Kessler. Would I rather have just kept
Kessler and not traded anything for Jared Jackson jr. That's where my head would be at as a Utah fan.
Peterson looks okay. He doesn't look busty. He's not jumping out of my TV there. He looks fine.
He's a playable starting guard. Doesn't look as good as boozer has didn't look even close to as
good as Yaxa looked last night against Denver. Um, you might take Wilson over him too. I wouldn't say
he's the top, one of the top three rookies I've watched, but again, and I'm going to say this
only four times during this.
Segment. It's only been a week. I am not overreacting. I am just pointing out what I've
watched for the first four, for the first seven days. And he has not jumped out of the TV to me
yet, but I'm going to give it some time. Okay. Next category, panic time. Only one team here.
Number 24, Miami, their own four and every single possible heat fear that you would have had heading
into this season has happened already.
You have the,
the honest bam fit has looked horrible. Bam looks like he has no idea what to do on offense.
They're playing too fast for what their talent is. They bet on clay who has looked washed.
He looked washed, even though the percentages were okay for him last year. I thought he looked
kind of washed last year. It looks worse this year. Three point shooting in general for Miami,
30.6, not where you want to be in a team with the honest, who is not the easiest guy to play with.
Let's be honest. Um, you have to build the right kind of team.
around him. He needs a head of steam. He needs the ball all the time. And we have not seen this
work now for five years, which was one of many reasons why I was worried about the Celtics
training for him. They paid Wiggins who hasn't looked good this year either. I've watched a ton
of heat this year for some reason. Wiggins might be a, we should only paid him year by year guy.
They gave him an extension, but he has not looked good. The Jovich extension from last year was one
of the dumbest extensions anyone's given in the last five years. It's been a disaster. He's
unplayable. They traded too much of depth in the honest deal. They don't really have any moves now.
And I think the bigger issue, forget about how they started. Cause they easily could have been
two and two. They had some crunch time luck. I just wonder 10 years ago, you could get away
with Yanis with Yanis and bam as your two guys. And you could put around some league average guys
around them and probably win 50 games. I think the league's too deep now. I don't think you can do
it. I don't think you do.
With Booker and Phoenix either. I think everybody, the regular season, you need depth. You need a
team that's almost built like how the Celtics or even the thunder who's just lost four guys
with the two massive injuries that we'll talk about in a second. Um, but still have enough
talent to at least be able to put basketball players out there. I don't know a team like this.
I went over on them before the season. Cause I thought defensively, I thought they'd be really
good and they haven't been. And maybe that's how they're going to be. I don't know. I don't know.
They get back in this. I think they're gonna have to play bigger. I think they're gonna have to play
Portis more. And in general, maybe bully ball this a little bit versus play the style that
they used last year. And I wouldn't bet against them figuring out, figuring this out with that
said, this is as bad as it could get. They are minus one 10 to make the playoffs on FanDuel.
So basically even odds. And when you think about how deep the East is and how Charlotte started
out better than we thought, I think they're behind the eight ball already. So we'll see how this
next two or three weeks goes, but this might be one of those things by, by December, they might
just decide this didn't work and their first round picks go into Milwaukee. So, um, this, this is,
this team's about as on the clock as we get for the non-playoff teams right now. Okay. Next category,
hot messes. I don't necessarily hate what I'm watching, but I also feel like it's a little
messy. Number 23, the Clippers, not a disaster. So that's a bonus.
And Kawhi's already hurt. So if you're a Clipper fan, you feel good about that too. You got a
Toronto swap that you got in that trade. Garland looks great. Garland looks great. Now we'll see
if he stays healthy the whole year, but he looks great. They're hitting a bunch of threes, which
can go up and down. There's been a lot of Brooke Lopez so far. That would be a red flag for me.
And Rui hasn't really shot the ball well, but in general, this, when you watch them,
especially though when Niederhazer will come back at some point, but it's a team that,
doesn't not make sense. So maybe they're not going to be as bad as, as, as we thought.
Now they don't have their own first round pick, but they do have that Toronto pick. So
in a weird way, they can, I don't know what the plate is with this team. The energy around the
team, not great. The fact that Kawhi is not kicking ass on Toronto probably makes us feel
a little bit better, but I have them in the hot mess category. I have New Orleans in there as well.
Number 22, 0-3 in the season.
They lost three games in the clutch. They blew an incredible game to Denver on Saturday night
where they had the game, blew it nine times. Their 0-3 in the clutch this year, headed probably for
0-70. They had the dopiest roster situation in the league. Just this, just threw some talent
together with no rhyme or reason for how it might work. And then they hired Jamal Mosley to, to try
to figure it out. I wrote down, it's like when the inventor of the bagel, egg and cheese sandwich,
was like, what could make this better? What if I put some bacon in this? And then they took a bite
and I was like, this is delicious. This is the opposite with Jamal Mosley trying to figure out
this New Orleans roster. He's buried Herb Jones already, which I don't understand at all because
it's not like this team's getting stops defensively. The funniest thing to me though, Zion Williamson,
who looks pretty explosive offensively, looks skinnier. I can't say he looks like a guy in the
team, except he has nine total rebounds this year. And Jeremiah Fears, who I think is like 6'1",
who plays point guard, also has nine rebounds. And I think this is going to be a subplot for the
season. Zion rebounds versus Fears rebounds. Nine to nine right now. Not a good sign for the Pelicans.
They are not a playoff team. Golden State, I was convinced before last night, I have them number
21, they're one and three. I was convinced before last night that this was one of the five worst
leagues and maybe one of the three worst. And the moment Steph got hurt, this was going to be
beyond grim. That leads me to my first overreaction.
after one week.
Overreaction number one.
Yaxo might have single-handedly
saved the Steph era.
Like, for real.
And I can't tell you how good he was
in this Denver game last night.
I watched the entire game.
Now, I was watching three games at once,
but I watched the entire game.
Yaxo looked like mid-2010s LeBron
in this game.
I don't say that lightly,
because mid-2010s LeBron was awesome.
He was doing it.
They were running the offensive room.
He was all over the place on defense.
He was rebounding.
He was initiating stuff.
He was getting in the basket whenever.
It was unbelievable.
I couldn't believe it.
I couldn't believe how good he was.
I don't know what this team does long-term,
because they have Draymond,
$27 million expiring.
They have whatever's going on with Porzingis
at $20 million.
And could put those two together
for something if they wanted.
And I keep looking at Sabonis
and Sacramento and wondering
if they flipped those two for Sabonis
and threw in some conditional pick
and Sacramento got out of the last year
of Sabonis' deal.
Could this team get really interesting
when Butler comes back?
I was done with them.
Yaxo sucked me back in.
So, there you go.
I have them 21.
And then 20 is Orlando.
They're 1-2.
Suggs is out.
Palo is out.
I didn't feel great about this team
to begin with
from the way they started this season.
And really, the big takeaway is
this team will not look the same
in February.
Something will happen.
There will be some trade.
I don't know who it is.
I don't know if it's going to be Palo.
I don't know if it's going to be
Suggs when he comes back.
Franz.
Something's going to happen with this team.
Okay.
Next category.
Possible panic time.
Only one team in here.
Denver.
1-2.
Obviously, my favorite
Western Conference team, as you know.
And they need Cam Johnson back.
They can't shoot right now.
They're 30% on three all season.
If they're not making threes,
they're not going to be a 50-win team.
They have two realities here
that are happening.
And if you watch the first three games,
they got killed in at least one half
of all three games
and really should have lost all three.
They should have lost the New Orleans game.
They won the New Orleans game
because Brazil had an out-of-control game
off the bench
and because New Orleans
is a stupid basketball team.
That's why they won.
There's two realities, though.
Post-prime Aaron Gordon is here.
2023,
great career.
I think he's moving into a different phase,
which is fine.
The bigger concern is
post-prime Joker might be here.
And there's a lot of,
there's a lot of chatter
and, you know,
there's social media stuff
and all kinds of things about,
is this guy 100% anymore physically?
Is he the same
since he had that injury last year?
The game doesn't look,
it doesn't look as easy for him
this season.
And I don't know if he's nursing
some sort of injury
that he's not telling us about
or if this is just wear and tear
from having to do everything
for basically a decade.
It doesn't look as easy for him.
It's, it seems like it's harder
to get his position.
It seems like it's,
it's harder for him to get
the plays and shots
that he either wants for himself
or somebody else.
Everything is just a little bit
more of a chore.
It feels closer.
Now, the worst version of Joker
was always those,
those Minnesota playoff series
where they would just wear him down,
but doesn't have his legs
on his threes.
And just in general,
seems like he's laboring a little bit.
And I'm concerned,
but again, it's week one
and he might be fine a week from now.
I'm just pointing out
what I've watched this first week.
Next category, proof of life.
I got Washington at two and two
as the 18th best team.
Yeah, I have my head at Denver.
No AJ yet.
They've still been pretty fun.
Trey Young just can't
really shoot anymore.
It doesn't matter.
He gets his points.
He gets to the free throw line.
He gets assists.
Um, he, any, any, uh,
remember that there was that stretch
where it was like,
this guy's going to be the next step.
Steph actually made threes,
but he has been putting up stats.
He's competitive.
Um, he gets hunted on defense
and it's fine.
AD has looked, I think, really good.
And as long as he stays healthy,
I think this is a 35 to 37 win team.
I would trade him literally tomorrow.
I would, I would trade him right now.
I would be offering him
to Golden State every day
because as long as he's healthy
and you watch how he's
running around, how he's moving,
how he's looking,
you trade him now
before he gets hurt.
They have two future playoff guys,
in my opinion.
And I haven't seen, uh, AJ yet
because he hasn't played.
But I think Kaishan George
could absolutely be a wing
on a really good playoff team.
And I think Trey Johnson,
you could see it.
He could be a heat check score
on the right kind of contender.
So they have those two spots,
whatever would Trey,
I guess they keep AD.
I don't know about SAR.
SAR doesn't shoot
or make threes anymore.
So we don't know what's going on.
And then we see
what happens with AJ.
But at least,
at least we're moving
in a positive direction.
Congratulations, Joe House.
Portland 2-0.
They've only have
two game sample size.
They beat Sacramento and Phoenix.
So hard to say.
They're playing the Lakers
later tonight.
Two short takeaways.
Dame looks great.
He really looks good offensively.
He's shooting again.
He has his lift.
And, you know,
once again,
it goes back to Milwaukee
doing that crazy
Miles Turner move last year
where they just could have
had Dame as an expiring
quarterback.
On a big deal this year
and a lot more flexibility
with that than how
paying him 22 million a year
for the rest of the tournament.
John Moran also looks fine.
He's not John Moran anymore.
He's not 2021 John Moran,
but he's at least competitive.
He's talking shit.
He's got a little swagger to him.
42 million this year.
Expiring next year.
They didn't give up anything.
It's fine.
But need to see them more.
But it's as weird of a team
as we expected.
All kinds of,
Drew Holliday's still playing
23, 24 minutes a game
for this team.
Scoots in there.
You never kind of,
it's like a hockey team.
You never kind of know
who's out there,
but I'm intrigued by them.
Number 17.
Number 16.
Dallas.
Two and two.
It's time for overreaction
number two
of my one week
of watching basketball.
Cooper Flag
looks absolutely spectacular.
Absolutely spectacular.
This is holy shit.
Shit level.
And my overreaction would be,
I'm not sure
it's possible for him
to be on an under 500 team anymore.
I actually think
you have to recalibrate.
Dallas, I think their over-under
was 33 wins,
something like that.
I can't remember
if I went over-under,
but it was a hard one.
He's a top 15 to 20 guy
in the league now.
He does whatever he wants
offensively.
He can go full speed left
or full speed right already,
get to the rim and finish
at age 19.
Which basically LeBron
is the only other guy
I've ever seen
be able to do that
at that age.
He's unstoppable.
He's competitive.
He does everything you'd want.
And it feels like he went up
a level from last year.
So you have that.
If Kyrie looks okay
and you have this weird
crunch time swing group
of they got to figure out
somebody from Max Christie,
Reese DeShay,
Morris Johnson,
one of these guys.
They need one of those guys
to be able to make threes.
But there's pieces here.
And if they're in
a game in the last five minutes
and they have Kyrie and Flag,
they have to figure out
they have two guys
who can get whatever shot
they want.
Kyrie, again,
hasn't looked totally
like Kyrie yet,
but let's see what it looks
like a month from now.
But this team's better
than I thought it was going to be
and it's because of Flag.
Number 15,
Charlotte.
Three and one.
You know who's really good?
Nas Reed.
Yeah.
You know who else
is really good?
Brandon Miller
had the best game
of his probably NBA career
yesterday
and looked like
a Paul Pierce,
Jason,
Tatum,
Jalen Brown level.
Like,
this is going to be
an all-NBA guy.
I don't know if that's going to last,
but that's how we looked last night.
They're only shooting
30% from three.
They're three and one.
They've had no Khan,
no Kobe.
Those guys don't come back
for,
I think,
at least one more week.
It's been a lot
of Dennis Schroeder.
Like a lot.
Like a lot of Dennis Schroeder,
especially at the end
of these games.
And yet,
my biggest fear with them
and the reason I thought
there were 11 possible
playoff teams in the East,
I thought they were going to be
the one to drop out
because I thought they were going to
get hammered
in this little stretch here.
And they're three and one.
If they can stay 500
until White and Khan
are playing
normal minutes again,
combined with what
Grayson Allen's been giving them,
Schroeder in there,
and, you know,
Nas Reed,
Steinbach.
I think it's a playoff team.
They're plus 155
to make the playoffs
on FanDuel.
And from what I've seen,
they look like a playoff team.
So,
they're holding the fort.
Last team on this list
is Memphis.
They're 4-0.
This was one of the ones
I felt the most passionate about
in the month
leading up to the season
that I thought they were going to be
better than people thought.
And nothing has surprised me here.
I'm not victory laughing
because I was wrong
on some stuff too,
but this was the one
I really felt good about
because you knew Boozer
was going to be good right away.
You knew Beef Stew
was going to be fun for them.
You knew Coward
was going to be good.
You knew in ED plays
that it's going to be good.
Nobody understood
what was going to happen
when Ty Jerome hit
the first week of the season.
So,
we'll see if it lasts
with them.
But just not surprised
by this one.
This team had the right look
and vibe.
And I thought
one of my biggest bets
was them to be a play-in team.
They might even
be a whiff better than that
if they can get a full season
from ED.
And Boozer,
getting him third
was a miracle.
It really was.
Like,
you shouldn't be able
to get a guy like that third.
And the reason they did
was because the top four
in this draft was so good.
But that's just incredible
to get that guy third.
That guy is a real,
he's an interesting guy.
appreciating stuff, he's rebounding,
He's competitive.
He's got it all.
I love Cam Boozer.
So there you go.
That's the top 14.
We're gonna take a break
and then I'm gonna rip through the top 13 teams
right after this.
The Bill Simmons Podcast is brought to you by FanDuel.
The NBA action just got even better with FanDuel
because this Wednesday with early win,
a fast start could be all you need to win big.
Pick an eligible NBA game,
apply the token, bet the money line.
If your team jumps out to a seven point lead
at any point, you win instantly.
That's right.
You don't have to wait till the final buzzer.
Check out early win on eligible NBA games
in the FanDuel app.
Just another reason why this is your most rewarding season
ever on FanDuel.
21 plus select states are 18 plus DC or Wyoming.
Restrictions apply.
See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com.
Game problem, call 1-800-GAMBLE
or call 888-789-7777
or visit ccpg.org slash chat in Connecticut.
This episode is brought to you by Uber Eats.
This week, buy a four piece signature chicken
from Popeye's, Joe House's favorite.
Get another one free.
On Uber Eats, when your watch party gets hungry,
order and keep everyone's attention
where it matters on the game.
Order a four piece signature chicken from Popeye's.
My Sunday football one,
I always try to go a little healthier on Sunday.
I don't try to do this all the time
because I got the podcast on Sunday night.
I don't want to be live.
I want my brain to be working.
So I'm a big salad and soup.
I was trying to get,
maybe I'll get a little chicken nuggets or something.
But for the most part, that's my Sunday.
Other people are different.
Other people get wings, pizza,
whatever.
But that's the thing about Uber Eats.
You can get whatever you want.
Basically, whatever game day calls for,
you can get almost, almost anything on Uber Eats
with deals every week.
Uber Eats, official on-demand food delivery partner
of the NFL.
Order now.
For alcohol, you must be of legal drinking age.
Please enjoy responsibly.
Product availability varies by region.
See app for details.
All right, 13 teams left in the power poll.
We are going to move to the next category,
which is the contender crock pot.
These teams aren't contenders.
But they're on the crock pot.
Like when you're making a beef stew.
Sorry to bundo.
And the stew is just percolating.
And you don't know how good it's going to be yet.
And you keep tasting it.
It's like, no, it doesn't tell.
But it's just going to,
it has to simmer for a lot longer.
13 is Atlanta, two and two.
I just need to watch them more.
The rebounding seems to be the big question mark
where they, you know, they have Jack Landau
and obviously Okongu is the centers.
Are they going to be able to rebound against good teams?
What's somebody like Dern going to do against them?
But athletically, you know, they look like they did last year.
They're able to hang with all these different teams.
The Houston game was interesting last night
because Houston just had a little too much for them.
And it felt like there was a talent disparity
between the two teams.
The what if with this team is that they had taken
Yaxel instead of Fleming's,
what this team would have looked like
and how he would have fit in with this.
I was fine with the Fleming's pick.
I'm not, I'm not second guessing it.
It's just,
when you see how good Yaxel is,
especially at age 24,
that would have been a fun run.
Number 12, Indiana.
Two and two.
Feeling it out.
Crunch time five.
Hasn't had enough reps yet.
And Zubat's got hurt in the first quarter
of the third game against,
I think it was Brooklyn.
So this is a classic.
Make no assumptions.
Have no takes on this team for a month.
Just wait.
Let's see the crunch time five.
Let's see them.
Get some reps.
The one thing I will say,
Ty looks great.
Ty and Siakam,
their pick and roll is still,
I think one of the six or seven best plays in the league.
And this team,
I still think is a 50 win team.
Number 11, Toronto.
Two and one.
And Kawhi's already hurt with the knee swelling.
He's made it 52 minutes.
Will he get to 1200 this year?
1500?
What would you get to bet your life?
What would you bet?
I don't think I would bet.
I bet my life on any number of minutes with Kawhi's knee.
I wish I could play Karma Police by Radiohead right now
because it just seems a little bit fitting
that he destroyed the Clippers
and went to Toronto and made it two games.
But for them,
the reason I have them 11 still,
even with Kawhi out is
because I think this allows them
to unleash Murray Boyles and Graves.
And I mentioned Graves before the year.
I just really like him.
And I like Murray Boyles even more.
And I do feel like they can establish
some sort of identity.
Then it would be young guys while Kawhi's out.
So we'll see what happens.
Number 10,
the Dennis Green division
for they were who we thought they were.
This is where I had the Lakers
3-0 playing tonight.
We'll see if this is the best it ever gets
for Laker fans
because they have Kessler who's healthy.
They have Luka and Reeves averaging 61 a game combined,
which is even higher than like
your highest Shaq and Kobe season.
They have Luka with a 42.3% usage rate
through three games,
which would bring them to the top.
So I think that's a good thing.
I think that's a good thing.
would break the record the record was 2017 russ at 41.65 which was the biggest ball hog season
of my lifetime other than maybe 2006 kobe 2006 kobe was more justified but 42.3
and uh all the overs for luca look great he was 34 points a game i think was around even 36 points
a game was like almost three to one i i think he'd get to 36 points a game if this is how they're
going to use them number nine i have the knicks of new york who i saw in person on friday night
sal and i talked about this a little on sunday i'm not going to overreact if they get killed by
detroit later tonight then maybe it's time to start overreacting wondering what's going on but
this is you knew this was going to happen everybody was so selfless last year they win the title they
climb the mountain now it's the next year now guy it's the disease of more uh combined with the fact
that the bullseye
is on them night after night even when they played in boston the game i went to on friday night it
was a close game down the stretch i waited for brunson to take over boston was able to take
them out the knicks took a couple bad shots tatum made a couple really really tough shots boston wins
i didn't think less of the knicks it's just kind of what happens it was a way more important win
for boston because they need to get over the hump of that team the only thing i would say with the
knicks that i think you have to flag i do wonder about the dolan stuff with this team the behind
the scenes stuff with the organization
uh the phishing email that came out last week some of the stuff with the rings just
the uh the fact that he actually got the title how is he going to behave what's what's the
environment going to be like how long do leon rose and and worldwide west how long do they
want to stay do they have extensions are you locking them down longer and if this team shifts
more to the dolan side is there going to be collateral damage with that
so i'm just i'm just just watching that one okay the contenders i have five
and i'm putting them in alphabetical order because i couldn't decide what the order is so
alphabetical order boston two and one i'm going to give you one note on each of these five contenders
boston paul george 30 minutes a game 50 from three and they're playing brooklyn tonight so
those numbers will probably be even better if he plays
can they get a full year of what i've watched in the preseason in the regular season from him
because what i've seen is somebody who fits in absolutely perfect with the missoula style
with tatum he doesn't care if he has the ball that much he's just there to help out he's at
the perfect point in his career uh defensively he is way better than i was expecting at age 36
watching some of the stuff he did in the next game in person um his ability to guard different guys
different uh guys and guys that are going to be playing in the next game
different heights he could guard brunson you know it was defending towns at one point like
if you if you're gonna just basically take last year's team put tatum in the jalen spot
and then add somebody who is just a selfless i don't care i'm just here to help type of guy
this is the type of guy you'd want and it seems like he loves it there the team loves him the
franchise loves him so the trade's been a home run and uh i keep thinking back to when i came
out of the colonel's office and i was like i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this
and i was like i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this i'm gonna do this
and found out they got paul george and how bummed out i was i really enjoyed watching him can they
get 65 games out of him would be my question can they get he's playing basically 30 minutes a game
can they get 1800 minutes from him and can those 1800 minutes look like what they've looked like
in the preseason in this first week would be my question uh fyi the the tatum brown stuff is
ridiculous and i hate it and i just wish it would go away i think it's stupid i think it's beneath
both of those guys they want a title together just stop talking
cleveland is my next team they're two and one i watched them play minnesota last night which was
about as entertaining as you're going to get in october for a basketball game on league pass it
was just an absolute delight to watch it was really really fun my big question for them can
peyton watson actually be their fifth guy they paid him like it they traded stuff for him um
they're taking the tax hit for him offensively he looks lost so far and this is my fair i mentioned
this before this season i'm not going to say anything about it but i'm going to say that
it's a really good season so you get somebody basically off this 19 game sample when yokage
wasn't out there when he had the ball all the time for denver and the offense is running through him
and he looked really good okay now i'm on cleveland mitchell and harden have the ball all the time how
do i fit in over on the side in this situation was my big question and right now he looks lost he's
two for 14 from three and uh the defense has been good the energy all that stuff from what i've seen
but that's the
thing to watch again it's not an overreaction it's just we've watched a week
and this is not what they paid for so far.
Detroit, 3-0, playing the Knicks tonight.
15.7 made threes a game, 42%.
Is that real?
Duncan Robinson's averaging almost 20 points a game.
He's never come close to that his entire career.
Javante Green's making threes.
John Collins is shooting 50% from threes.
Is any of this real or is this just a hot week?
We'll keep watching.
It turns out for two weeks.
I think I said this on the pod.
Did the overrunners with Zach and House,
and like a week later, I think the ones I would have flipped
were Detroit and Miami.
And I didn't.
I'm going to live with my picks.
But the home court advantage they have plus Cade,
plus how hard they play every night,
I think it's really hard for them not to be
in the high 40s.
Unless they have major injuries.
So there's the trait, Minnesota, 3-1.
Big question for me, is this Ant's MVP season?
Are we looking at it?
He's right now at 33.3 a game.
He's shooting 26 times a game, 37.6 usage, all kinds of swagger,
going toe to toe with everybody.
And you could say it's partly because they made some chemistry moves and he's
having fun playing with LaMelo.
LaMelo, LaMelo's playing 25 minutes a game.
He has 25 turnovers and 25 assists.
He's taken 32 threes and 17 twos.
I can't say LaMelo's been even good for Minnesota so far,
but Ant's been great and obviously loves playing with LaMelo.
So maybe that's the win in that.
But I thought LaMelo against the Cavs last night was really unimpressive.
And he's just too sloppy with the ball soon,
but that's kind of the vibe that they want.
And Ant feeds into it.
He's plus 650 forever.
He's MVP right now, and I think he's the best bet if his knee holds up,
which seems fine so far.
But he's on a mission, and this team's going to be probably a four or five seed,
so he's in the range.
I would say him and Luka would probably be the two bet.
Luka's like plus 450 on Fando.
I'm not allowed to bet on this, but from what I've seen in the first week,
I feel like Ant went up a slight level,
and it feels like we're headed for a career year with him.
So more shots for him, too.
It's a team that makes more sense.
It was interesting down the stretch.
Against Cleveland, especially in the OT,
they basically played the four guards and swings with Gobert,
which we were wondering, is that going to be their destiny in these crunch time games?
And that's what they did.
Gobert didn't end up getting the big rebound down the stretch and whatever.
Philadelphia 3-1.
There's only one question.
Well, there's two questions, because one would be,
can LeBron at age 42 hold up?
But the bigger question, what happens to this team when Embiid goes down?
Because he will go down because he goes down every year.
They have Adam Bohn at center, and they have LeBron at center,
and that's basically what they're going with.
So if Embiid's gone for a month, what happens to this team?
How do they play?
How small can they go?
How much can they put on LeBron?
How much can Maxine Brown and Vijay Edgecombe kind of carry
with Embiid not playing for a month or more,
and then LeBron being unable to play four times in a week
because he's 42 years old in December?
That would be my question.
But we have so much time to talk about Philly.
When Philly dials it up and plays their fast, fun lineup,
when they're just like, we're running on everything,
it's about as fun of a team to watch in the league.
So there you go.
Last group, the contenders.
I put San Antonio third.
They're one and two.
I did not like how they started this season.
I thought the three-guard lineup is the kind of thing that makes
me sad.
It makes me not trust their coach.
It's just stupid.
Like the whole thing you had to do this year was get Harper to buy in
for one more year to be in the six-man, and instead they did this.
But we're only going to play this three-guard lineup for nine minutes
a game.
We're not really doing it, but it just looks like you caved
because you wanted all three guys to start,
and you didn't want the locker room issues, and I didn't like it.
Bring Harper off the bench.
He's 20 years old.
He'll be fine.
It's been good for Fox.
It's looked good this year, and they don't have Tobias Harris yet,
so you could say when Tobias comes back, maybe now you do the two guards
with Tobias and bring Harper off the bench.
It's fine.
32% from three, predictable.
Wemby, 37% field goal.
Not ideal, but we've only played three games.
The big question for me, the scrutiny over the course of the next couple
months here, the spotlight, they're not the young and fun Spurs anymore.
They're not coming.
They're not coming out of nowhere.
They're not on that rollercoaster ride up.
Now we're going down a little bit.
Now we have some twists and turns.
Now you're the lead segment on different ESPN shows and different basketball podcasts,
and you have just people picking you apart and wondering what's going on with you all the time.
How are they going to handle that?
They're being treated like they won the finals last year, even though they didn't,
but with that kind of scrutiny, which they just never had until February, March last year,
and in February, March last year, it was all about, oh, my God,
they're so much fun.
Wow.
This is the other side of it.
How you deal with the backlash.
And it's not just basketball.
It's any other aspect of being a public figure.
How you deal with the backlash after you've had some success determines the next phase
of your success.
And that's what I want to see from this team.
Thompson blocking Wemby at the, at the buzzer on Friday night was a moment.
It really was.
It was a moment for Houston, which we'll get to in a second.
And it was also an interesting moment for San Antonio.
It was people were.
Rooting for Thompson to stuff, Wemby in that moment last year, they would have rooted for
Wemby to stuff it on Thompson.
And this is the kind of shit that happens when you've had real scrutiny and you've had
some failure.
So how are they going to deal with it?
And is Mitch Johnson the right guy to deal with it?
That would be my overreaction.
Number two, after one week and three games is Mitch Johnson, the right guy for everything
that's about to happen with this team and the scrutiny that they're going to be under
for the next eight months.
Number two, Oklahoma city, they're four now.
And on Saturday.
I was looking at the odds for them for 65 wins, 70 wins, 70 wins was down to, I think
like plus one 30 on Fando at one point.
That's how good they look.
They were just killing everybody and they had the look.
It looked like everything that happened to them last year, which was bad culminating
in them, not winning game seven was the best thing that could happen to them.
This season, J Dub looked incredible.
The team Mara looked like so much better.
Better than you ever could have expected from the 12th pick in the draft.
And then they had the most devastating, I think 24 hours in, in recent NBA history where
they have, not only did they lose J Dub to just a brutal, awful Gordon Hayward type injury,
but then we learned that they lose Wallace too.
And Wallace, this torn labrum happened early enough in the season that maybe you could
see him in April, May, but this was somebody that with, with J Dub out, you would have
assumed, Oh,
we'll case and Wallace and play more.
So he's gone too.
So you lose two of your best five.
They're not going to win 70 games now.
Um, and it's the kind of adversity that you just feel the whole season.
It just changes.
Watch it happen with the Hayward season with Boston.
It just changes the complexion this season.
It adds like this sadness to it.
That just, it's like this little black cloud that follows you everywhere you go.
Um, not to mention this is now two straight.
Major injuries for, for Williams.
Um, this one's way more major than last year, but you know, now he's basically lost two
years of his career here.
Uh, he's only 25 years old.
At least like there's some fibula tibia stuff that he has the better version of that leg
fracture.
Hayward had the worst version.
Maybe he could come back in April, May.
I don't know.
It was about as fluky of an injury as you can get.
And for this team, this is.
The bigger, the bigger point here, something I wrote about in my book, something we talked
about on this podcast, a bunch of times, it's just really hard to win the title.
And I say this as simplistically as I could possibly say it.
You need so many things to go, right?
You really do look at the Knicks last year.
Everybody stayed healthy, the whole stretch when they had to stay healthy, right?
Everything came together.
And that's part of winning, winning the title is things come together.
Guys lift each other up.
You need good luck with injuries.
You need guys at the right points of their career.
And it felt like OKC had that this year.
And now it's flipped the other way where this is now a what-if team.
I don't think they have enough now.
And what's harder for them is there's not really a trade.
You know, when Sal and I talked about this on Sunday night right after it happened, and
I mentioned how it was hard because they have big salaries and small salaries, nothing in
between.
There's tax stuff with them.
They have a trade exception.
You know, could they give up one of the. They still have a trade exception.
They still have some good picks left.
Could they give up one of them for somebody like Herb Jones?
Sure.
Could they get a little more aggressive and maybe use the Hartenstein contract and some
other stuff to go get a bigger one?
Maybe.
But my guess is they're probably going to bet on their young guys and bet on all these
guys, all these picks they've stockpiled, guys who barely played.
Let's throw them out once and for all.
Let's give everybody minutes.
Let's try to tread water and still be a top three team in the West.
and see where we are.
early february right before trade deadline and then make a decision then and not before then
but maybe they just decide we're gonna get at least wallace back in april may and um nobody's
probably gonna pull away from us and that's how they handle it presti is not a panic guy the only
time i ever remember him really kind of panicking was that last kd season before kd went to the
warriors when they made that it was like a dion waiters trade and they they went over the tax for
the first time and um they just seem like oh shit we got we got to do stuff what how can we add to
this and that was the only time he wasn't patient and careful and calculated so i think he's going
to be patient careful calculated big question for me with this team hey chet holmgren
you you're on a max on your second contract you've made an omba team
and right now you are clearly the second best guy in this team you are going to have to go up a level
sj i'm not worried about but um we're gonna need chet to be i think like a at least a 20 and
20 and 8 or 20 and 9 guy right to take up some of this but really a bummer i loved watching okay see
that first week this is this was really sucked and then everybody comes on the pods and the tv shows
like oh man prayers up for j-dub like i just hate all of it i hate injuries fuck injuries i don't
understand why we're having more of them the j-dub was more of a fluke i do feel like there's stuff
to look at with the sneakers for some of these other injuries we're having and the fact that
we have all these low tops and now we're having all these injuries below the knee and i something's
fishy about all of it i it can't just be the wear and tear and basketball being harder i wonder if
the technology because guys love the ability to do euro steps and do all these other things
i wonder if the technology is actually working against them in some cases i'd love to read a
huge study on this anyway i've okay see number two and then houston a team that i tweeted about
during the weekend saying they had the look it was an old mike lombardi phrase about when uh when
teams have the look when he's just like man that team looks like they could they they think they
can win the title houston has the look shangoon went up a tiny level he's basically 25 9 and 7.
the team chemistry seems way better i don't think we can overstate the weird burner scandal with kd
last year combined with the fact that they lost van vliet and it just seemed like a rudderless
team like you look at van vliet and smart it's not even like they're playing that well
like they're certainly not shooting well they're shooting 27 combined from three but the vibe
when you watch it this seems like a connected team thompson went up a level
jabari smith definitely went up a level um and it's a team that's played with each other for a
while they've had a little adversity van vliet's hugely important to them and it feels like a team
to me that thinks they can win the title that's what i've seen so far so what's their move would
be my big question because they have they can swap a first with brooklyn after this season so
that's gonna be a really good pick they have the phoenix first in 2027 next year if you know phoenix
has been bad those are two pretty juicy assets so what would the move be
and what does this team need because if you're trading either of those things i want somebody
who can play at the end of games right so right now i'm looking at van vliet i'm looking at jabari
kd shangoon and either eason or smart as my five so if i'm trading one of those assets i want
somebody basically who's either a better point guard than van vliet who i think is the leader
of this team and i wouldn't trade him or somebody who could be in that eason smart spot and maybe
eason is the answer maybe it's eason at the end of the game but i think it's the leader of this
team but i think eason would be a better pick but what they do with that um that'll be what
determines their destiny they are 19 to 1 to win the title they had the eighth best odds on fanduel
and i think they're absolutely i have this group i called this group the contenders too but i guess
this is the uh the favorites i should have said san antonio okay seeing houston i think right now
these are the three best bets to win the title now this could change in a week in a month i'm
not at all i think this this team is as good as anybody else in the league and it's a really
interesting moment for kd you know who comes in the league in 07 who really hasn't had a relevant
playoff moment since the 2019 playoffs when he was i thought the best player in the world until
he got hurt he went to that was apex kd he went to another level really that down the stretch and
then that first playoff series and then that first playoff series and then that first playoff series
before he got hurt and really hasn't gotten back there since and now he's you know headed toward his
20th season this is 20th season jesus and still looks really good and still can get shots you
know in the spot gets his shots in the spots that he wants them and uh i don't know this team has
the look i don't know what to tell you but this is what we get after after only watching a week
of basketball this is the team that's jumped out to me the most i think they're a legitimate contender
so there you go that's my
power poll 30 through one it'll be interesting to see when we do this in a couple weeks how
different some of these uh some of these rankings will be so that's it for the power poll we're
going to take a break and come back and talk to wesley morris about you can see everything after
this fando has a new nba promo called hardwood hero this friday i like these goofy names they're
giving out all you have to do is opt in use a 50 pbt that's a profit boost token on any nba bet
minus 200 or longer if anyone
that evening scores 40 plus points you win your pbt we've had edwards ty jerome luca jaylen brown
scored 40 lucas playing golden state that night that is the easy one just do luca go luca against
any not elite defensive team i would go 40 frame remember you don't have to bet a 40 piece i threw
his place a minus 200 or longer wager on the nba slate and any player who scores 40 plus everyone
wins check it out this friday fando
your most rewarding season ever i'm pro football hall of famer brian dawkins and i lived for a long
time with something i did not know the name of major depressive disorder i carried sadness and
anger because i thought i could handle it alone but i couldn't now i want to make sure others know
that that support is out there if you're experiencing similar symptoms talk to a
health care professional visit mddallies.com to watch my story paid partnership with johnson and
johnson brian dawkins and i will see you next week
is not prescribed capybara luma teperone
i needed more from my antidepressant so my doctor added capybara luma teperone proven to provide
greater relief from depression symptoms than an antidepressant alone building on my progress
without starting over capybara is for adults with major depressive disorder when used with
an antidepressant and is available by prescription only individual results may vary in clinical
trials weight gain was not common
elderly dementia patients have increased risk of death or stroke capybara is not approved for
dementia related psychosis call your doctor about new or sudden mood changes behaviors or suicidal
thoughts right away antidepressants may increase these risks report fever confusion stiff muscles
which may be life-threatening or uncontrolled muscle movements which may be permanent high
cholesterol and weight gain may occur as can high blood sugar which may be fatal monitoring is
recommended common side effects are sleepiness dizziness nausea dry mouth feeling tired and
diarrhea these aren't all the side effects ask your doctor about capybara learn more at capybara.com
or call 888-252-4824 this episode is brought to you by pnc bank in today's sports everyone is
constantly trying to outdo each other trick formations infield shifts constant rotation
changes yet it's proven time and time again that strong fundamentals are the thing that will lead
you to victory banking no different while everyone else tries to outdo each other pnc bank just keeps
going right down the middle with steady calculated money moves and the financial wins just keep
coming pnc bank brilliantly
boring since 1865 brilliantly boring since 1865 as a registered mark of the pnc financial services
group incorporated pnc bank national association member ftse i think october november 1994
i saw hoop dreams at the coolidge corner theater in brookline massachusetts
and it was the best documentary i'd ever seen in person last friday
took the tea because i was visiting my but my daughter what took the tea to the coolidge corner
theater and saw at 11 30 a.m you can see everything uh first time i deliberately avoided
everything written and said about the movie i didn't know what was going to happen i had a great
time so i've seen two of the best documentaries of my life in the same theater i'll just start
there i knew you would enjoy that oh my god you did double coolidge
for the great documentary experiences of your life i i'm very touched by that i'm sure the
coolidge people are very touched by that great theater it's a non-profit theater they rely on
funds from everybody uh wesley morris is here he used to work for the boston globe and probably
saw some movies in that theater now he's at the new york times any a movie at the cool you know
what i saw at the coolidge corner like like memorably unmemorably um i believe that is where
i got shown um the human centipede oh oh no
now the coolidge is probably going to send me an email saying there was no way you saw that there
but i feel like that's where i
saw it like they it was it was just like a critic screening like i think i was only person in the
theater well listen i'm there friday 11 30 and it's it's pretty nice out you know for boston it's
60 in october the sun's out and the the place was half full i was impressed for for this documentary
that got very little promotion it's become a phenomenon it's become for a documentary to hit
the point where everybody in my life has been like have you seen it yet what are your thoughts
i want to talk i'm sure it's been the same for you it's pretty rare to get these it's the only
thing anybody wants to talk about in my i mean you know it's funny there's the midterms right
and you know it's funny the other thing if you live in new york i mean this is a pretty national
thing and i'm going to try to figure out a way to make it relate to so you can see everything but
you know in new york the big thing
you know the big thing is that you can see everything but you know in new york the big thing
is that you can see everything but you know in new york the big thing is that you can see everything
you know did you read this wise was this piece that nicole hannah jones written about sending
her daughter like her daughter asking her why she sent her to the schools that she went to that was
like a that was the felt like a national firestorm jesus and then uh but then this documentary opens
and i just feel like this is a very interesting moment for reading reading and reading
i just feel like this is a very interesting moment for reading reading and reading and reading
Let's start there.
Wow, Bill.
She is.
No, I mean, I'm not arguing.
I'm amazed that people fell for her act in this movie
because we have all this evidence from the past
that this is an act.
This is great.
And she is clearly trying to steer the narrative
a different way so people feel bad for her
and use words like neurodivergent
to explain how she processes stuff.
And she's a pathological liar.
And this is how she got the Theranos thing.
I watched the Amanda Seyfried show.
I saw the Gibney documentary.
I followed all this stuff when it happens
because I thought it was really interesting.
And I thought she was so manipulative
and so good at lying
that she was one of the great liars we've ever had.
And now you have Nathan Fielder,
who is a performance guy, first and foremost,
who just wants weirdos with a canvas
that he can just paint on,
basically on his weirdo canvas.
And he obviously becomes fascinated by this lady.
It's like,
how can somebody to the bitter end
be this much of a liar?
I wonder if I could just spend time with her
and see if she's actually lying
or if there's more there.
And then it becomes this cat and mouse game
and turns into heat.
This is Pacino and De Niro.
They're at the fucking diner table
for three hours.
Two hours.
Months at a time.
She's like,
I was having coffee with Elizabeth Holmes
half an hour ago.
This becomes heat.
He's just trying to figure out
what her next score is.
What her next score is going to be.
And she's trying to figure out,
oh shit,
this guy's on every move I have.
It was like watching two boxers
circle each other in the ring.
And Holmes is like,
oh God,
he knows my jab's coming.
Oh, he's ready for my hook.
I'm just going to be dumber and dumber
in this movie
and hope maybe that's my move.
And then by the way,
it didn't work.
It just didn't work.
I love this read of this movie.
I love the impossible to get around
and she has all the control
and obviously Lance Oppenheim,
the director and Nathan Fielder,
the co-director and ostensible subject,
co-subject.
There is this sort of fight for control
and what I have been made to understand
is that the way that she controls
is to pretend that she doesn't have it.
Yeah.
Oh, my controlling, domineering boyfriend
slash husband, whatever.
He's doing everything.
Come on.
Are people really buying this?
I did.
I bought it.
I fell for that.
I've been,
but you know,
I mean,
I think this movie is operating in stages, right?
I think that,
you know,
you see it a couple times
and your mind begins to change.
I mean, I feel like,
well, you know why?
Because she has,
she has a very trusting face
and she keeps eye contact
for abnormally long times
and usually when people do that,
you assume that they're truthful.
Her human cues
match somebody who is truthful
and it's like this complete fucking magician act.
Mm-hmm.
I think that, you know,
as a, you know,
bringing somebody in,
so, you know,
there's a world in which, like,
she knows everything about Nathan Fielder, right?
You know,
she and,
you know,
Billy, Evans, Herb.
It's funny that you don't want to say husband either
because I don't feel comfortable with that word.
I think legally,
I think they're married.
But he just is, like,
perpetually,
he seems like a boyfriend.
Right.
He's like the guy in a TV show
that it's like the rich sister
in the Dynasty family
ends up with the Billy Evans.
They're like,
ah, I don't trust this guy.
What's he up to?
He's the Kardashians
the Kardashians don't trust.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Right?
Like, he's that,
he's that boyfriend.
Anyway, I,
there's a world in which, like,
she knows everything about Nathan's project.
Oh, no, I'm worried you got sucked in by her.
No!
I, I, I think that I'm,
well, I mean, I did.
Okay, here's the thing.
Because my wife got sucked in.
That's why I'm concerned.
My wife was like,
I feel bad for her.
And I'm like,
you gotta,
you gotta read some of the 2014,
15, 16 stuff.
This is a person who knows what she's doing.
And, you know,
it's funny because,
because at some point,
Nathan does present to her,
like, a partial list
of the things that she has said and done
over the course of the life of this,
of this, um,
Right.
this Theranos project.
And you're like,
oh, yeah, that's right.
She did do,
she is reported to have done
and has been convicted of doing
several of these things.
Um,
I think what I got tricked by
is good filmmaking.
Right?
I,
I think that one of the,
one of the exciting,
one of the excitements of this movie is
a person that I,
I, Wesley,
had no feelings about at all.
Like, I didn't care about this case.
I did not care about this woman.
She was yet another one of these
Silicon Valley fraudsters.
Yeah.
She arrives at the same time
as the WeWork guy,
um,
Sam Bankman Freed.
Uh,
there's another guy
that I'm not even remembering.
And like,
you could throw in Zuckerberg too,
as,
as people who,
who twist the truth.
Yes.
But,
there,
with those other three people,
there is a legal dimension,
right?
These were three guys,
these were three people who
wound up
being revolted against.
Yeah.
Um,
because of their,
because of the fraud
that they tried to perpetuate.
And,
I just kind of got a little
sickened by
the cultural interest
in these people
as main characters.
And,
I think,
you know,
I listened to the podcast,
uh,
the,
um,
and I list,
I,
I did not watch the Alex Gibney documentary.
Um,
because I just was full at that point.
But then,
this movie shows up
and my,
my feelings about it,
I don't know,
they don't change,
but I'm like,
okay,
Nathan Fielder has found this woman.
There'll be something,
something interesting
is going to happen here
because somehow
he managed to get into her life.
So you cared less about the Theranos stuff
than,
um,
the cat and mouse game
of the documentary
was the thing that got you.
Oh,
yeah,
for sure.
For sure.
But I mean,
I think I went in knowing
how important the,
I mean,
she's going to prison already.
We know this.
For 11 years.
Right.
This is not,
this is not an attempt
to like exonerate her.
But,
what's interesting is,
and this is the,
this is the sort of tug of war
of the,
I don't know,
the sort of ethical tension
in this movie is,
you find out at some point
that she and Billy
are at it again.
Like,
they're going to do
Theranos 2,
Electric Boogaloo.
Yeah.
And so,
I'm like,
wait,
so what lesson
got learned here?
It's going to work though.
Well,
I mean,
okay,
so this is what I'm really dying
to ask you.
Like,
like related to,
to what I'm thinking about
and the journey that I've been on
and the thing that I was interested in,
which is,
you know,
the thing that,
that this,
that we're all kind of
sitting with,
is like,
how much
are we thinking about
what's true
and what's real?
Who's sitting with that?
What do you mean?
How does somebody
know anything about the past
and then go into this going,
I don't know,
maybe,
like to me,
here,
here's my take.
To me,
this is Nathan Fielder
whose whole career
is built to some,
has been building
to something like this,
right?
Yes.
This is somebody
that,
first he took a real interest
in weirdo people
that he threw himself into
and created
weird business things with.
Then he does the rehearsal.
The first episode
of the rehearsal,
which was unbelievable.
unbelievable where he just completely goes over the top to throw into this whole teaching somebody
how to be like part of this bar tribute thing right yeah it's all leading for him to try to
figure out is this person a liar or not i think she is but i want to dive into it dives into it
she has already decided to the bitter end i'm gonna pretend i'm a dope who doesn't know any
better and i'm being controlled by whoever i was with and i just don't know how this happened and
i'm just not that smart of a person and i don't get what who's on first is i don't what was funny
about that i don't get and she's committed to the bit to the bitter end nathan fielder's whole
comedy bit is i commit to the bit to the bitter end so now it's just it's a fucking death match
between these two to see who can win until she goes away and by the time she goes away
i feel like she won
like i felt like he was kind of i don't know how much she played up for the documentary or not but
i felt like he was kind of in love with her that she was a victim okay that there might have been
there might have been she might have been taken advantage of that she might not be a liar and
then he in the second part of documentary when amanda seyfried comes in and he starts fixating
on did she know or not that they were getting paid when the answer is clearly obviously yes
yes she knew she was getting paid and that becomes and then he slowly eventually realizes
that she's a liar at the end and that's the end of the movie but then he shows them at the end in
the beach when he's we never know if he's in the beach with her it's mentioned he's like i can't do
that and then at the end he shows he shows them in the beach which i think is his way of saying
even i got a little duped by this lady i went in the water with her but now i know what she's about
but again like i think that
the genius of this movie is that
it works on the level that you're coming at it from right it works as a
it works as a comedy a comp well also but but a kind of um i'm gonna use this term and i'm sorry
that i'm doing it but it's the thing that came to mind first it's almost like a dialectic between
in people who's special like a person who specializes in
lying and another person who specializes in the performance of life right yeah and
what happens when these two people come together to spend time trying to he's trying to figure her
out and she is kind of enjoying the game that he's trying to play with her and she knows that
there's no way that she's gonna crack i don't even know what cracking looks like for her at this
point she knows the whole time i will never ever admit anything i am going to play dumb until i go
to jail but this movie is also it's a movie right and it's a movie that like the way we're talking
about it just describing her not cracking you know who i thought of katherine trammell
and i mean honestly that's the perfect analogy
we still don't know if she was gonna murder michael douglas at the end of the movie we don't
know we don't know would i be dumb enough to if i was gonna kill my boyfriend to write about it in
a book and say i was gonna kill him before i killed him nobody would be that crazy katherine
so i think that
that's what came up and i think that you know you think about hitchcock with this movie
you think about you know an entire history of a verite movie making
you think about the priorities of improv comedy here i mean there's just so much to think about
but then there is just the fact that the thing works as a movie well so that's my question
big picture is this a movie or a documentary and this is something that is a movie you mean
like a feature is it like like how do we think about but this is where to put this on the video
i'm gonna sidetrack us so mark where you are and we'll come back to it because this is gonna be a
sidetrack to me the more fascinating the most fascinating thing out of all this with this
movie to me was that it flipped what has happened with documentaries for the last 15 years which i've
made a few in my day um something that was happening behind the scenes with documentaries
that i don't even think the average person realized what was happening which is they
weren't authentic anymore and most of the people especially like in the sports ones or movies or if
you had sliced alone stock on netflix whatever it is the subjects are getting paid to be in them
or they're getting an ep fee or they're
production companies their name is somewhere in the credits they are somehow getting a check from
it and it forever changed how we made documentaries because once these became things that could
establish production companies and give them value once they became things that could make
money and get awards this wasn't hoop dreams anymore you know if you did hoop dreams down
2026 those guys arthur agee and henry gates so what was the no henry not henry william gates
yeah william gates arthur agee they would have probably gotten
10 of the profits each right there's the only way they're participating so when my wife is talking
like i saw this documentary and like do you think she got paid or not and i'm like the way people do
documentaries now she absolutely should have been paid so 824 is just going to make all the money
from this the only reason they were able to make the movie was because these people give them the
time and it was interesting that this became one of the cruxes of the movie it's like oh my god
they wanted money out of this like look the fuck around this is the documentary
business now this is the world everyone has chosen people get paid to be in these things
and i don't think they're documentaries anymore i think that we need a new name for them
they're like docu films or something they're not documentaries they're selfies i mean they're
selfies they're selfie selfies i think but you know that well i love that you're you're
identifying this and i don't know if we're going to get back to wherever i was trying to go no we
will i'm going to steer you back but but i but what i i love
and sit here for a second because i think that what you've got here is a kind of serious old
school relationship to non-fiction filmmaking which is gone new industrial model which is
fuck you pay me and i want control over the depiction of myself i want to be a stakeholder
financially and editorially um in in the direction of this project
or you don't get to make it i remember when this changed for 30 for 30 and i think i've talked about
this before i had this orlando magic idea i want to do about how shack and penny fell apart in
orlando had this huge pitch the nba didn't want to do it because you know and they had to greenlight
all the nba stuff they didn't want to do it because it was basically a small market team
that blew up and the star went to a big market they didn't want to do it i was pushing for it
i was like this is a great idea we got to do this this is the best what-if team of the 90s
finally convinced them to do it and what
happens shack and penny don't want to be in it unless they're eps
and we're going well we don't these are documentaries that's not normally how we do
stuff like this it wasn't going to happen guess what happens shack and penny become eps the first
shot of the documentary is them getting together with this inauthentic oh we're still buddies and
it's like i don't know if they're still buddies but they're playing in the camera and i remember
thinking to myself this is feels like a moment i feel like documentaries are shifting right now
into something different where i'm not sure what we're capturing is actually what's what is the right
thing to be capturing and it's it's been the case of documentaries ever since well i think it's the
thing that makes i mean what you're identifying is what i mean i've been calling this movie a
culturally destabilizing event and part part of its cultural part of what's destabilizing about it
is that you there was a before and everything
it feels like so much that is happening in the wake of this movie is going to change because of
it um i think it's going to feel strange for subjects to even broach the conversation that
that that billy is kind of um performing happening like having with nathan and in the in the a24 team
yeah um behind elizabeth like out of the earshot of elizabeth holmes who clearly went away and it
was planned
and she went upstairs and the way they reenacted it was absolutely what happened
yes and i think that the movie's cynicism about the selfie occasion the selfification of
of you know non-fiction portrait filmmaking is kind of i mean it's a little bit what what
killed what got ezra edelman's prince documentary killed a little bit it's what got ezra edelman's
prince documentary killed point blank i think that
there's a real fear of
complicated storytelling about people and i think when you ask whether or not i like like how could
i fall for this or like did i fall for this i fell for it because what i'm really interested
in here is the questions that it's that it raises about and i think this is true for
all of us i think there's a real desperation to kind of understand each other
and no matter where on the video store shelf
you wind up putting this movie,
what you are watching is one of the great works
I've ever seen about relationships.
And. Well, and one of the great,
whether we call it a documentary or whatever it is,
it's on the short list of all time now, I think.
Yeah, yeah.
Because what's really great about it,
I knew, again, I knew nothing.
The movie just could have ended when she went to jail.
I agree.
And it would have been awesome.
I agree.
I've been like, wow.
So wait, sorry, you. She goes to prison and you're like, what?
You know there's 90 more minutes?
Yeah, I'm like. I honestly didn't know. When I say that I avoided everything,
I avoided everything.
So she goes to prison
and I'm like, where are we going?
And then. I was like, wow,
this movie doesn't get out for another hour and 20 minutes.
What's happening?
And then Amanda shows up
and it becomes a completely different movie
and it's one of the most riveting. First of all,
when does somebody just come into a movie
with more than half of the movie done
and completely take it over?
It's like the all-time Dion Waiters
in the history of mankind.
I was going to say,
this is the key check of all time.
It's unbelievable.
And by the end of the movie,
I'm like, I have. Like every other guy I watch this movie,
I have a huge crush on her.
I have to completely reevaluate
every movie she's ever been in that I've seen.
This is one of the most fascinating celebrities we have.
That is a really interesting phenomenon
that's going to happen as a result of this movie.
And she fits into the rest of the movie.
It's like, she's another one.
I don't know what's real and what's not real.
Because we have Nathan talking about,
I just went through a breakup
and is clearly. Like he's putting himself into this
and he doesn't really put himself
into a lot of stuff that way.
But he's putting like his stuff in the movie
and then she comes in
and it's like,
is she. Is she acting?
Is she really that interested in this?
Does she feel bad about being in the TV movie?
Then when she gets mad at Billy Evans,
which is the best scene in the movie,
when all of a sudden it just starts escalating
and it's like an actual real argument
that you never get.
I just could not have been more compelled.
Yeah.
I mean, I will say
I knew this was going to happen
going into it the first time I saw it.
And I still. Like nothing can prepare you
for the depths
because I thought she just was in it
to reenact some stuff, right?
I just assumed she'd be doing
some cute Nathan Fielder-oriented things.
But this is much. You know, she's a therapist.
She is a BFF.
She is like the best friend
of the person in a romantic comedy
who is like,
this girl is bad news.
But then you're also rooting
for them maybe.
It's like maybe these two have a chance.
Right.
Maybe Nathan's a little sweet on Amanda.
Maybe this is how it's going to end
with them together.
I was prepared for anything
at the two-hour mark.
And Amanda Seyfried
is also the best example
of what acting is good for.
And I don't mean because her acting
is so great.
But I mean, I just. You rarely get to watch a movie
about an actor, a good actor,
where you're thinking,
thinking about, like,
what the value of the art form even. Like, what the value of the art form. Why we love acting.
Why we love going to the movies.
What it is that an actor is doing for us
when they play these real-life people.
Well, but beyond that,
the skill of sliding into a person.
Yes!
And becoming a different person.
And this is somebody who is a child actress
who is just clearly good at it.
And she's, like, sliding in between.
Oh, I think that's. I think that's what the real Amanda's like.
And then she's acting.
And then she becomes Elizabeth Holmes
in the reenactment.
And then she's back to being Amanda again.
I'm like, this is fucking incredible.
This is like watching
what Meryl Streep's process is or something.
But I mean, again,
like, the process of acting,
but also the sort of morality
of playing a living person.
Of playing, like, a problematic living person.
A living person who's been convicted of crimes.
Which she didn't. She didn't feel like she had really
100% come to grips with.
It was like, yeah, you. You took advantage of this situation
like everybody else did.
You were able to get an Emmy out of playing
this disgraced character.
And don't act like there's not a little blood
on your hands.
I mean, and I think that she
was willing to
be punished for that.
Right?
I think that, you know,
I think that, you know,
we don't know
where the truth begins and ends
in so many areas.
In so many areas of this film.
But at some point,
I think Amanda. Amanda Seyfried shows up to. Agrees because I think that she feels. I think she might feel like
there was both more to say
and something to atone for somehow.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Well, by the way,
she's an actress
and she realizes it's smart
for her to be in this.
Does she?
I mean. I think she does.
I think she obviously knew
what Nathan's work was
and she was like,
this is going to be good.
Did you think that she knew
that this was going to be
the movie of the year?
She got to watch
the first half of it.
That's fair.
That's how they got her to do it.
I mean, we watch the first half.
We see her watching the footage.
So she's like,
I'm in.
How can I help?
Because she's smart enough
to realize like,
holy shit,
this story is still going.
I mean. I love the cynics on this movie.
I mean, this is the most
cynicism proof
but cynicism absorbent
movie I've ever seen.
It can handle
all your skepticism
and like just real,
real industry,
your industrial real talk.
I don't know.
I just love how
indestructible
and elastic
and
absorbent this thing is.
Well, and also the tricks
that it plays on you and I
and every other person
who's watching this
where you're on
the rollercoaster ride
of understanding
how people could have
gotten snookered by this.
lady. It makes after two and a half hours of it, it makes sense to me. It's like, I get it. I get
it. She, she just, she bats her eyelashes. She seems super smart. Oh yeah. No, she, she does
the opposite of batting her eyelashes. Just stares you down, has that low voice. There's something
that you want to protect about her as you spend time with her. You're like, oh man, I feel bad.
You don't even know why you feel bad for her. And you know, she can cry on command and make it
seem like it's the first time something's gotten to her, but she can basically do it whenever she
wants. She's the actor. She's as good an actor as Amanda Seyfried. A hundred percent, you know,
a hundred percent. And then she has this Billy Evans who she knows is, you know, kind of a
scumbag. We got to talk about Billy. Well, I, I, I, the one thing I did know was that I was going
to see his crank at some point in the movie. Cause my wife came home. It was like,
there's a penis in this movie. I was like, what's going on? Uh, don't tell me more. Uh, but yeah,
but he's, there's a very important penis in this movie. It's important. So I read, uh, I read,
I read a lot of the news kind of stuff about this after, and, and they, somebody wrote a whole piece
about the penis and how he's like, I, they kept coming home from the gym, him and Lance, the
director. And he's like, I had a shower. He's like, you can film me showering and leaves the
door open. And you're like, you'd like film you naked shower. He's like, yeah, I don't care.
Like for some reason he wanted to do it, which is fits into the premise of you can see everything,
I guess. But just to do that is so bizarre. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think that, but you know,
in the world of the movie, it really works because what we see, what we're, we're not
looking at Lance Oppenheim, officially looking at Billy Evan showering. We're, we're seeing Nathan
see Billy shower. Right. And so there is this,
there is the creation of a tension of a, of a, of a jealousy from Nathan to Billy.
The throuple dynamic is looming. Yeah. But I mean, I also think that there's a world in which
we're watching a blank from hell movie, right? Well, it starts out that one shot early on
when Nathan's just watching through the window with that crazy look, it does seem like Rebecca
D Mornay and hand that rocks the cradle state standing outside the house.
Deciding whether she wants to go in. I do think that like the part, like he clearly,
I think that it's interesting to me that you are, I mean, you can correct me if I'm wrong.
You're sincerely wondering if Nathan got took by Elizabeth Holmes. No, because that's the point
of Nathan. I am wondering, but with Nathan, everything's on the table at all times. You'll
never know. He's, he's basically a magician with this shit. So he's, he's putting in there stuff
that he wants me to either think or question at all times. This is what he does. This is why he's
the best. But the whole time I'm like, is he falling in love with this lady? And they have
that long scene near the end when they're on the couch and they're just staring at each other about
as long as you can possibly stare at somebody without starting to make out. And same thing
at the end, when they say goodbye in the car, when they're standing like this. And at that point,
like if I had to bet, Oh, they're, they're, they're almost there. I mean, that's like two
Yeah. So if I had to bet was Nathan sweet on this woman by the end of the first half of the filming.
yes or no i would bet yes i think he got taken by her and you knew the whole time that she was a
liar yeah but like is it like you're my people but this is but this is basic instinct this goes
back to your basic instinct thing yeah this is like michael douglas's character going i should
fucking run the opposite direction this lady but i i think there's a fucking magic to this i i'm
alive my blood's boiling i'm ready for this you know in basic instinct she knows right katherine
trammell understands what does she say you you you you like the heat nikki you like the fire
or something like that yeah yeah yeah i mean it's it's well she says at the end i'm almost done with
my book that means that means you have to go which is basically what elizabeth holmes i'm almost
about to go to jail which means you have to go it's not like she's gonna see this guy again
but she but but you know he does he does not give up no and i feel like this is i mean
you know bill this is like a film noir you know the the femme fatale goes to prison and the dupe
is trying to like if not get her out then at least body heat yeah oh there we go yeah yeah this is
like this is this is like just film noir territory there is but there's also something about him
as a character that i think is really compelling because he wants
he wants to get to the bottom of her but he also
he kind of can't believe that what is happening is happening right like he knows
every single thing that she did he is fully prepared uh with the legal case against this
woman the moral case against this woman and yet i think that the that the effectiveness of the
project for us as viewers who had our questions about this woman and i think that the effectiveness
of this woman and i think that the effectiveness of this woman and i think that the effectiveness
about whether it was possible that elizabeth holmes really seduced all these like old white men
to give her you know all this money um and to help this company what he does you know the
performance art dimension of this is he becomes one of those guys right and the money the potential
for money here because if you think of what how many days till prison when this money conversation
comes up like not many like we're talking days right because they start filming 34 days
34 days left when did the money conversation happen because i think that's the point at which
uh before she goes well it's definitely before she goes to prison yeah but i mean how many more
days i don't remember but it's like such a clear like his value and the value of of the proposition
i think changes when the money goes out of the picture like so i i guess my question with that
they make that like the big fulcrum of the last part of the movie right this is this becomes the
big litmus test of whether you you think she was a liar all along or not and he has some real
hesitation to well it's a documentary you can't pay somebody for documentary if she knew this is
all a lie and i i think they this is the one thing i'm pretty convinced they played up for the movie
sure oh you mean wait the the filmmakers i feel
they're his character in the movie being this discombobulated about the possibility that she
might have been in on asking for money to be in the movie i just feel like any rational person
is going to assume that they're going to want to get paid this is billy evans who's making
an ai elizabeth holmes thing that people can jerk off to i'm pretty sure he's going to ask
for a documentary about that this guy will try to make money from anything he's not going to
try to get paid to be in the documentary these people care about the ethics of old school
documentaries the way we did them in the 1970s like no fucking way but i think that playing it
up is really brilliant because 100 yeah yeah yeah i mean because it makes it makes it makes the
documentary a kind of theranos it does but it also it also plays on people that don't really know how
documentaries actually work like my mom was my oh no that's my wife was like oh my god i can't believe
if she really wanted to get paid for that and i was like i hate to break it to you but this is
what happens in documentaries yeah it's like if you see like fleetwood mac which they're finally
doing the fleetwood mac documentary which has been the best music documentary idea out there
for 20 years right um it's gonna be an apple i'm pretty sure probably some checks were cut
to get stevie and lindsey buckingham and all these people you know to talk now i don't know
that for a fact but this is just how it goes now if you're watching you know an adele documentary
billy eilish whoever they're getting paid so does that change how you watch it when you know that
going in to me it does like when i watch stuff like quarterbacks or you know whatever lebron's
documentary is going to be this is it's not going to be like this authentic slice of whatever like
when we were kings which is probably the best sports documentary of all time that's a documentary
that's just footage and you know some interviews and and this guy is just embedded in this crazy
circumstance of a fight and it's awesome that's a documentary i also think that it's i like the
you a useful thing and i really and one of the things that i think that is going to make this
movie infinitely teachable yeah is that you know one of the things you learn when you start studying
non-fiction filmmaking and really any kind of like non-fiction endeavor is that you're really still
as much as
as much journalism goes into you know the making of of you know the nuts and bolts and skeleton
of of the story being told and you know the arguments being made uh in a documentary or a
piece of you know non-fiction writing it's still an art form and the thing that you learn you know
i agree with that right the thing that you're one of the hardest things to do you you're basically
writing a magazine feature as a video and you're doing you're putting
everything together it has to be edited perfectly you have to walk the viewer through stuff
you have to decide what you're leaving in cutting out they're really fucking hard to make
and so much of what we're talking about is the choice our choices but also the the sort of the
sort of existential question or like maybe it's more than existential like it's just
the it's not inherently true because it's not scripted you know quote scripted unquote it's
there are there are there are forms of truth and there are ways of performing in a documentary i
mean you know errol morris's thin blue line is you know a classic example of of of where these
questions are are thriving um with respect to reenactments um and the way in which errol morris
is kind of bending the truth bending one truth to get to this larger truth um i think that's
i think this movie is doing a version of that um no matter what happens in terms of who knew what
and agreed to do what and maybe even like took something over again whatever that operates
the larger truths here and the larger questions here about the relationship of this woman to this
man and billy you know this this this marriage yeah the filmmaker the subject to his to to to
the filmmakers i mean these are still questions that are still being asked and i think that's
something that's still being talked about and i think that's something that's still being talked
about because in many ways they're unanswerable and they're classic non-fiction filmmaking
non-fiction art questions well there's two things with the documentary there's two questions
fundamentally it doesn't matter what the documentary is first question is what am i trying to answer
with this documentary okay yeah yeah the second question is if i'm a viewer how much of this do i
believe how much of this is 100 authentic and if it's less than authentic now it's on my brain to
figure out how to decipher how authentic this is or not which brings me to my favorite music
documentary ever the eagles history of the eagles part one which i wrote about for grantland which i
just watched one of my favorite bills one of my favorite bills i just love it so much and one of
the reasons i love it well it answers the basic question is why do the eagles break up this was
the biggest band in the world why did they break up
all right so that's the premise of part one but then the underlying premise is are they telling
us everything here because the eagles are being run at that time by don henley and glenn fry they're
coming up with all these different reasons why the band didn't break up but they're ignoring the
elephant in the room which is like they clearly broke up because these two guys couldn't coexist
in a band anymore because henley had ascended a little higher than glenn fry right so they're
kind of singing around about ways but they're not singing around about ways but they're singing around
about ways but nobody's saying it and it's like it's don felder's vote he was at the alan alan
cranston speech and he made a face and so we stopped the band it's like i don't think that's
what happened i think you guys flew too close to the sun and you had two alphas that wanted to run
the band and bands flame out after seven years but nobody will say it so it's on me as the viewer to
be like all right i'm a smart person i can i'm gonna take all the stuff you give me but i'm also
gonna draw my own conclusions and i'm gonna take all the stuff you give me but i'm also gonna draw
my own conclusions this documentary the fielder one the big question is is this person a liar or
not yeah and then the sub
is where it gets really interesting
because the Eagles one is like,
what was going on with
Brian Henley?
What was actually happening there?
This documentary,
there's five things
I'm wondering about.
Yeah.
Did Nathan fall in love with her?
How big of a scumbag
is the husband?
Was the father afraid
of Billy?
Because it seemed like
he kind of was.
And he definitely
doesn't like Billy.
That's clear.
And was the father
the only actual
sympathetic character
in this whole thing?
Because he clearly
loved his daughter
and felt like she was
led astray by a couple people
and that she had some trauma
in her past.
And it seemed authentic to me
as I watched it.
Bill,
you're leaving out
a major character detail here.
What is it?
About the dad.
Yeah.
And, you know,
like daughter like daddy.
This guy worked for Enron.
Right.
I don't know what he did
at Enron,
but like,
I mean,
I don't know.
I mean,
Elizabeth can read.
Right, right, right.
She could read
as a little girl.
Wasn't,
wasn't great.
So then you have
on the other sub questions,
this whole paying them
for the documentary
and how real was this?
What actually happened
when he went to visit her
at the end?
Because the,
the thing,
the reenactment we're seeing
is just his memory
of being in a room
where he couldn't have notes
or a recorder,
which is really hard,
especially as you get older
to remember every detail.
And then
you have the whole
Amanda Seyfried thing.
I said it right that time.
Um,
of
how authentic
is she in this or not?
Is she an actress
or is this really her?
So you walk out
of the theater
and you're like,
my fucking head
is doing 360s.
I have 40 questions
and I can't really
answer any of them.
It's time for a new segment.
Greatest plays of all time.
It is brought to you
by State Farm.
We've witnessed
some truly legendary plays
throughout football history,
plays that can never
be recreated
because they're designed
for that precise moment
on the field.
It's the same reason
why State Farm
helps personalize coverage.
You need a plan
designed to suit
your unique situation.
But back to those
iconic plays.
Some people talk about
Dwight Clark with the catch,
Joe Montana,
San Francisco,
Dallas,
there's the Music City Miracle,
Beast Quake.
I still think
the two most famous plays
ever are Super Bowl plays.
It was Malcolm Butler
with the pick
against Seattle
to save the Patriots
Super Bowl
and the Seahawks Patriots
the first time they played.
And then the helmet catch
with David Tyree,
which sort of
swung the Giants past things.
I think those are the two
most famous plays
of all time
because of the impact
of when they happened.
When it comes to coverage,
you need a game plan
that fits your unique situation.
State Farm
takes the time
to get to know you
so they can help
personalize coverage
for your life and budget
like a good neighbor.
State Farm is there.
Ulcerative colitis
and Crohn's disease symptoms
don't pause
for the moments that matter.
That's why understanding
your treatment options matters.
Discover what's possible
with Trimp Vaya.
Gucelcomab.
Trimp Vaya is a prescription medicine
used to treat adults
with moderately
to severely active Crohn's disease
and adults with moderately
to severely active
ulcerative colitis.
Serious allergic reactions,
increased risk of infections,
or lower ability to fight them
in liver problems may occur.
Before treatment,
get checked for infections
and tuberculosis.
Tell your doctor
if you have an infection,
flu-like symptoms,
or need a vaccine.
Talk to your doctor
and explore what's possible
or call 1-800-526-7736
to learn more
about Trimp Vaya.
And visit TrimpVayaRadio.com.
Hey, I was lucky enough
to get a son and a daughter
through their early teens
and their mid-teens
in the social media era.
And even though
we were constantly monitoring it,
there's still a whole bunch of stuff
that can go wrong.
And that's why Instagram teen accounts
have automatic protections
on by default.
Built-in content settings
for the content teens can see.
Contact limits
for who can contact them
and time management tools
like daily time,
bedtime limits,
and sleep mode.
Teens are automatically placed
in the teen accounts.
Teens under 16
will need a parent's permission
to change any of these settings
to be less strict.
Instagram will continue adding
built-in safety features
to help create
age-appropriate experiences.
Learn more about teen accounts
and Instagram's ongoing work
to protect teens online
at Instagram.com
slash teen accounts.
I have other questions.
Yeah, I'm sure I left some out.
And I mean,
but I don't think you're going
to like my questions.
Because they're about
they're about the like
the world of the movie itself.
Okay.
And I really did think a lot about
what it must have been like
to be Elizabeth Holmes
in a relationship with a man.
I mean, at the end of the day,
no matter what kind of liar she is,
I don't think liars are born.
I think liars,
like certain liars,
pathologists,
anthropological liars.
Circumstances create those people.
And I think that the thing that you're,
I actually,
I tried to watch it
the way you were watching it.
And I think for the most part I did.
But at the end of the day,
I'm still aware.
And I think the movie,
one of the movie's achievements
is that it's still aware
that we are watching a person,
like a human being.
And the thing that I love
about that moment,
that disturbing moment with the dad
where he's like,
just blurts out that she was raped
and that explains everything.
I think there's a world
where it does kind of explain everything.
We know nothing about this incident,
including whether it's true.
It's by far her most sympathetic
as a viewer
where you actually like,
oh shit.
Yeah, yeah.
But I think it's a thing
that you keep thinking about
because we learn that
before who's on first.
And I mean,
do we have to explain who's on first?
I mean,
not as a comedy routine,
but as a moment in the movie.
So I thought that was her biggest mistake
in the entire film.
How do you mean?
Because that's when it became clear
that she was committed to the bit,
to the bitter end.
Because I have two kids now
that are older.
Either of my kids at age five
would have understood who's on first.
Like you're talking,
you need an IQ like 80 and above
to understand who's on first.
And she's like,
I don't get it.
I don't understand.
I don't understand why it was funny.
It's like to not be,
for her to claim
that she didn't have any opinion
on why somebody would have thought
that was funny,
to me,
it was disingenuous.
Because you could be like,
even if she's committing to the bit
and being like,
I don't get it.
She could at least have asked him,
is it funny because of the delivery
that they have back and forth
or their chemistry?
Like,
help me understand.
But she's just like,
I'm stupid.
I don't understand.
I don't get it.
I don't know.
How does somebody not understand
who's on first?
Who's on first?
Come on.
God,
no, no, no.
I'm with you.
Except,
she's,
this conversation is,
this moment is happening
with Nathan on one side of her
on this sofa
and Billy on the other,
at the other end of the sofa.
Who's like rubbing her head
to keep contact with her
as it's happening
to keep her little control on her.
on the one hand,
Nathan's explaining comedy to her,
right?
Like she says,
I don't get it.
And it's interesting
what she doesn't get,
right?
What she doesn't get
is that this is like,
this is a form
of human relationship.
These are two guys
who love each other
and the way Abbott and Costello
express love
is by fighting,
right?
Like it's by arguing
with each other.
Right.
I think that,
you know,
Nathan's explaining comedy to her
and Billy is explaining her
to her.
And I think to the extent
that like you feel sympathy
for this,
this,
if you don't feel sympathy
for this one woman,
I think,
there's been many a woman
who's been in this situation
where you're being
double mansplained
and just the paralysis
of being accused
of being humorless,
not understanding
a major form of communication
in comedy,
and then having your entire
personality kind of reframed
as being too special
to be normal
to even dance
to get the joke
of who's on first.
It's like,
well,
shit,
what am I supposed to do?
I just don't believe it.
You don't believe it.
This was the only scene
I didn't believe it.
I thought she was like,
I got to keep the ruse
to the bitter end.
We have decided
before these documentary crews
came here
that I'm just going to play dumb
and defer to Billy
at all times
and I'm never going to admit,
ever,
in any way
that I tried to deceive
these people with Theranos.
I'm never going to admit
I don't know why people,
it did work.
She's just committed
to the bit forever.
It's like watching somebody,
you know,
it's like one of those
Twitter videos
where somebody walks in on,
you know,
their wife with another guy
and she's like,
I don't know what you mean.
And it's like,
but we just saw the guy
climb out the window.
Why are you still lying about this?
That's what she's doing
for three hours.
Well, I mean,
this is interesting
because,
but the other,
the other,
there are a few things
the movie gets hung,
a few very important
and interesting things
that we don't know
that the movie gets hung up on.
One,
the sort of ethical questions
about whether or not to pay
Elizabeth and Billy.
Yeah.
But the other thing
is that New York Times profile
that Amy Chozik wrote
of Elizabeth Holmes
in which she is quoted
as saying
that that's not me,
that's a character
that I created.
Right.
And then they have
the big battle about,
by the way,
did that Times reporter
ever come up with the quote?
No.
I mean,
we just ran a,
piece where, you know, they, the time
calls Amy Chozik to like explain what happened. And I mean, her explanation was perfectly logical.
She had the notebook and then she tossed it. Like not because, I mean, we throw out notebooks all
the time. It's just not, you can't keep all the notebooks. Although I do keep all my notebooks
and I'm not even a reporter, but her explanation to me made sense. It did not seem strange at all.
Right. Um, what's strange is that they claim they recorded every conversation that happened
and couldn't find it, but can't produce the conversation in which this alleged not quote
took place. Right. Um, but that's the point is I think she was playing characters really this
whole time dating back to, she played the Theranos character. Now she's playing the,
I don't know how all this happened to me. I'm sympathetic. And they thought, so the bigger
question to me, tying into what you just said, why would they want to do this film? A,
why would they want to do this film with Nathan Fielder B?
Well, this is the part where, and I have not heard an adequate explanation. It takes five
minutes to Google Nathan Fielder. Billy Evans, clearly online. It's not like he's,
I don't know if they know what it means. Like, I don't, I actually don't know. I mean,
maybe Lance Oppenheim was the way that this, this movie got started. Right. And Nathan came
attached. So Lance, but this is where they've been very tight lipped about how much did they
know about Nathan and did Lance do the documentary and be like, I'm going to use Nathan as like my
host for the documentary and somehow convinced them this was a good idea.
I, I do think that Nathan was probably just kind of around and I don't know. I mean,
I don't even want to venture a guess about like the, the, the sort of the, the, how the form of
the documentary came to came, but this is the classic, but I'm going to let the coyote and
into my, my chicken cage. Yeah. What could go wrong? He seems nice. But I also think that that
is how blind to hubris they are. Right. I actually think that the Theranos two electric boogaloo part
is huge to this movie. Like it isn't just for a different idea for why they did it. Okay.
I think he's a really well-liked respected award-winning comic.
Who's good at making stuff. I think they felt like if we can convince this guy.
Oh, interesting. Oh, no, you're actually a victim. Oh God. We went for D. Okay.
If we can win this guy over, everyone will think that you're the victim that you didn't realize
what you did and you're going to be a sympathetic figure. So they basically,
they were like, let's go to the NBA finals of this. It's we're not just doing a documentary.
We're going to try to win over Nathan Fielder to make it seem like he believes in us. And guess
what? It backfired. Well, I think that last shot is, is extraordinary. I think that last shot or
the shot of them in the prison. I think the, the, the ocean shot. Yeah. I think that having Amanda
Seyfried, you know, like her not having this person, you know, Amanda Seyfried, who like really
it's just so game to do all the exploratory sidekicking co-hosting, you know, passenger seat
ruminating that you just want in a homie. She's out of an eighties movie. It's like
Alice in war games. Like, Hey, do you want to go to the island to see where the war games guy is?
Yeah. I'll go with you. Yeah.
Yeah. She's Mary Stewart Masterson and Martha Plimpton. And, you know, like, like, yeah,
so many other, like the Mathis and pump up the volume Halle Berry and boomerang like this. She's
just ready for, I'm going to help our hero for the last half of the movie. Let me just figure
out how I can be of service. Yeah. I want to be of service. I also, but I do think that her,
the stake that she holds in this film has everything to do with
the fact that she was a previous interpreter of the same information, the same story. And I think
she's as curious as we are about what Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim have learned in the
years since we last saw a fictional Elizabeth Holmes, by the way, it goes by Amanda Seyfried.
He goes, Billy Evans saying, yeah, we should have it up and running in a year. And then the next
thing is two years later. Uh, there's some really great editing in this movie like that, that are
really funny. They did such a good job. I had a bigger question with you about Amanda. Okay.
I know what your question is. Can she be best supporting actress for this? I think she can.
I mean, if the actors want to go there, let them go there. Cause she does reenact stuff for,
you know, she's on, she's on screen reenacting Elizabeth Holmes for at least 10 minutes,
but this bleeds into this weird, we've never had this for an Oscars category,
where she's real her, but also pretending to be Elizabeth Holmes, her, I think she should be
eligible. And I also think this is going to be eligible for best movie. I don't think there's
any question. I think it's, I, it can be Nathan. Nathan can't be best actor. I don't think.
Well, he does. I mean, if, if, if Amanda Seyfried
is acting in those prison sequences, isn't Nathan also, you know, I mean, doesn't it then sort of
isn't that the mouse hole spots, right. But he wins, he wins. So they get, if the film gets
nominated and the directors get nominated, I don't, nobody that we're not talking about Nathan
Fielder. We're talking about Amanda Seyfried here because that is the revelation. And I think that
the, the thing that you say that that's a revelation.
Cause I think we feel the same way on this. Is this like when an athlete,
when you're like, wow, there was a little more in there than I thought. Yeah. Yeah. I mean,
like Jalen Brown carrying the Celtics to 56 wins last year, I was like, wow, didn't know he had
that in him. And it was the same thing with her in this movie where I'm like, I didn't know.
I, you know, I think a really important part of this whole Amanda Seyfried journey is the
Testament of Anne. Um, that shaker movie that came out last year. Did you ever see that? No,
I don't like it. I don't, I don't think it works. Um, Mona Fastfold, who is also co-
responsible for the brutalist, um, that Brady Corbett movie that came out two years ago with
Adrian Brody won him his second Oscar. I, Amanda Seyfried plays, um, she stars in that film. Okay.
And I think the, it's a, it's a strange movie. A lot of it is just, a lot of it is her
character being, it's about the sort of creation of the shaker of, of shakerism, um, as a, as a
religion. And a lot of what Amanda Seyfried is doing is singing like a kind of like a rhythmic,
um, choral songs, um, that the shaker sang and doing a lot of, um, Holy spirit caught the spirit
dancing. And I think that it's the boldest performance she's ever tried to give. And I
think she put it over the housemaid. Yeah. Uh,
but, oh, but Bill, those two films happened at the same time. Yeah. Those two films came out within
like weeks of each other. And I think that she, you know, you and I talk a lot about what happens
when actors ripen, you know, when they get a certain bloomers. Yeah. Yeah. They just, I mean,
she's always been good. I've, I mean, I've always loved her, but I think that now there's like, um,
and a wisdom and a down-for-anything aspect to her
that makes her as a performer really exciting.
And so the thing that's the other revelation here
is not just the kind of actor she is,
but the way that her acting is used here
is almost philosophical.
Like she herself is
making a case for the importance of acting.
And it isn't in like a James Lipton sort of way.
It is by doing.
Her mere presence isn't. She's not hitting you over the head with it.
Right.
Yeah, she's just doing it and showing it.
And in that sense, I don't know.
Does an actor playing themselves,
playing someone else,
playing that they've already played,
I don't know what kind of bylaws
this is going to run up against,
but I think she should be eligible.
And to the extent that it matters,
I think she should be nominated.
We agree.
Well, then you add this other piece of Nathan Fielder
who by the end of the first part of the movie,
you feel like he might be in love with Elizabeth Holmes.
But then you also feel like he's falling
for Amanda Seyfried a little bit in the second part,
culminating in the rehearsing of the things
where she's now basically the two people
we might think he might be sweet on
have now blended into this super person
that he just seems so delighted.
So for him, as somebody who followed him
for 13 years, basically.
This is. This is vertigo, baby.
This is it, man.
He climbed the mountain with this one.
This is everything his career was leading to.
I did the first podcast with him, I think,
at Grantland in 2013.
Yeah, he came in because Lewis sent me
like the first six Nathan For Yous.
And even before it came out, I had him on.
I was like, I just love this show.
He was a Canadian guy.
You know, he was probably a little nervous
to even do media for something he did.
And now 13 years later is, you know,
has a chance to win the Oscar.
And I think this is one of the best
documentaries, for lack of a better word,
we've ever had.
Like this to me goes into all the greats
that I've seen in my lifetime.
This has to be mentioned on the shortlist
with any of them, I think.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, I think that, I mean,
just in terms of it's being a meta text, right?
Like I love a documentary that is also
about itself in some way.
Well, it's also really well framed
and well edited.
Like, could it be 15 minutes shorter?
Like, sure.
I don't know.
What would you say?
What would you cut?
I was never, there's never a dull moment.
I mean, I'm sure a professional
could find ways to do it,
but I didn't have that feeling
where it was too long.
But, you know, you're, you, you cut.
It's like almost three hours.
But no, I mean, I certainly didn't get bored.
It wasn't like, I was like,
oh man, an hour to go.
As soon as Amanda Seyfried showed up,
it was like, it was like,
it was like a trade deadline trade.
It's like, oh, they have Rasheed Wallace now.
Oh my God, here come the Pistons.
But, but yeah, I wonder,
is this going to rejuvenate the form itself,
which I think has desperately,
desperately needed rejuvenation
for a whole bunch of different reasons.
Are we going to get back to our roots of,
yeah, these are big swings,
you know, or, or is this just a one-on-one?
I don't know.
I don't, well, nobody else,
who else could do this?
Nobody else could do this.
I mean, I think that every time
I try to draw some conclusion
from some major culture,
cultural creator that gets like left in the earth.
I mean, I can conclude,
I can talk about its meaning like culturally,
but industrially, I don't know.
I don't know.
I mean, you know, it's funny.
This same director made Primetime,
the, the To Catch a Predator movie
with Robert Pattinson that came out
and was, did pretty well earlier this year.
And I feel like there's a project here, right?
There is a project,
about that has something to do with
the confusion of what's real and what's fictional
and the sort of moral stakes of reenactment, right?
The, the idea that somebody else
is going to take this cause up seems rare.
I think you just let,
I don't, I don't think it's that.
To me, it's more,
you mean you're just,
you're talking about young filmmakers being like,
oh, wow.
I'm going to start thinking outside the box.
Maybe this is a way I could have my own version of this.
Well, I will say then to that,
to your, to your like larger point,
sorry to get myopic there.
This is a really interesting year
for young white filmmakers
because no Negroes have come up yet.
Or women for that matter.
But I, I, I feel like
this is a like, you know,
the Curry Barker story,
the, the backrooms guy,
Lance Oppenheim,
um,
yeah, these are all people 30 and under.
There's, there's an easy to understand reason though.
You're going to say what?
The internet?
The, what were you?
I think people under 30
have been filming stuff for most of their lives.
I think that is a huge part.
I think they, they see things through a camera
really from the time they're in sixth grade on.
Like my daughter can do social media editing
that I don't understand how she,
she never went to a class.
And I, I look at the stuff she can do
and it's like, she's just a different human being than me.
She's grown up with all of these tools that I don't really understand how to use.
But I think you have now everyone under 30 looking through something,
which is basically filmmaking.
So they're seeing things differently.
And also like you can, you can film when I was 40 years ago,
I'm lugging around, you know,
I had the video camera that had the side pack on it and I'm lugging around and we're
filming stuff and making fake movies in high school.
And it was a fucking pain in the ass.
You had to come home, you know, the VHS out,
you'd have to like have two VHSs just to edit anything.
And now you can, you know, anybody can make anything now.
And I think we're starting to see it.
I really do.
I think, I think you can see it drifting into the under 30 generation.
I also think to your point about, um,
I mean, the way we're thinking about like generations
and what you're asking about what happens to nonfiction filmmaking now,
I think.
I think that like at the same time,
because of the flattening of the way we are,
the, you know,
the diversification,
but also the flattening of the way we experience a lot of television movies.
I think people don't think about documentary versus,
you know,
some other form,
right?
No,
it's,
it's an hour and a half or two hours of content to kill time on a Tuesday.
People watch documentaries all the time.
You know what's telling?
You know what happened to Netflix this year?
When you look at those top 10 trends and you look at like top 10 movies,
what we're over and over again,
the top 10 movies,
they were these fucking lifetime movies that they were licensing.
And it was like the podcaster who killed his boyfriend.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It was like,
what's that quick.
You start watching.
It's like,
this is a fucking lifetime movie they made in Canada.
And it's number two over the Affleck movie.
They just paid a hundred million dollars for it.
Like that's,
that means something that people are clicking on titles and thumbnails.
Over filmmakers and stars and ideas to me is,
is something and probably a little bit alarming.
I just learned over the weekend that Mr.
Beast employs about 15 people,
possibly more to just do thumbnails for Mr.
Beast.
Just the thumbnails.
Listen,
I know from my son,
like he,
the Mr.
Beast games or a beast game.
It's whatever he called it.
My son,
like that's for his generation is survivor,
which is funny because beast games did a collaboration with survivor where Jeff probes came in.
It was like,
it was like a passing in the torch.
Almost.
I just think that the way that we think about them,
I mean,
clearly the models have changed,
right?
The,
the old models are broken.
The new models are here with us and they are active.
Well,
then you have those other weird models,
like the micro dramas and the stuff like that,
that.
I'm not a personal believer in,
but we'll see.
But I don't think,
but that's like an,
that's like a bad version of an old model,
right?
It's,
it's basically a new wave quibble.
Yeah.
I think that Mr.
Beast is like,
like,
you know,
a show like Mr.
Bird experience,
like Mr.
Beast,
that's a new expression of something.
I mean,
it might have some tendrils that,
that reach,
that connect to the past,
obviously,
but the way that show is put out into the world and,
and assembled and,
you know,
a bunch of shows like it.
I think that,
there's a real understanding that
streaming platforms are just a completely different medium and,
and,
and they need a language that makes sense there.
Or I could be super cynical and say,
it's all about what's in the thumbnail and that's really all that matters.
But maybe that is,
Bill,
that's part of the news.
I've watched four episodes of war.
First of all,
great thumbnail and McNulty's in it,
right?
I don't really like it.
I was going to say,
is it good?
Not really.
It's just dressed up British people kind of arguing in,
in,
uh,
like discipline settings,
like big group settings of people being just British and nothing's really
happened yet.
And I've watched all four episodes,
but I,
I always joke about the iPad test where I'm looking down,
up,
down,
up.
I'm probably at like 37% for war where I'm just going through basketball
box scores.
I'm like,
Oh,
somebody,
somebody's yelling at somebody back down.
And I think that's just a lot of shows now.
And it's really tough to cut through with something where it's like,
Oh,
and I think that's a real conundrum for these streamers.
It's it.
Yeah.
But that's why you can't really game it.
And it's also probably why you don't need to spend 150 or $250 million
on something when you just don't know what's going to happen.
Yeah.
When you can spend $3 million on,
Oh,
this,
this dude went in and,
and,
uh,
killed this,
killed this mailman outside his house.
Did he do it or not?
Next,
the mailman murders.
I'm clicking on that.
What is that?
I'm going to,
I just made that up right now.
You would watch the mailman.
You just made that up?
I made that up.
Oh my God.
Well,
you just,
somebody needs to mail you a check because mailman murders.
You need to like,
like copy that real quick.
November 3rd on Netflix.
Before we go,
uh,
I want to tell you,
cause I don't know if I emailed this to you,
but my favorite radio station,
WXPN in Philadelphia,
you know,
they do this annual poll every year of the,
you know,
885,
88.5 is their number.
They do like these countdowns.
And this year,
the countdown is the 885 greatest songs from television in the movies.
And,
you know,
you go to the,
you know,
WXPN.org and you just go,
you can go and vote in this poll.
I just feel like this is the newest thing of all time.
So is it like theme songs or anything you want?
It could be jaws.
it could be
you know
don't you forget about me
you know
my number one
on my list
is Fight the Power
from Do the Right Thing
I mean
I just
I don't know
I just feel like
this is a very fun thing
it's a great idea
and I don't know
this is such a
I'm going to check that out
when are you coming to LA
I don't know
soon
got to do a rewatch
at some point soon
sometime in the next year or so
sometime in the next year or so
no I mean
before the end of the year
sorry that came out wrong
I couldn't think of anybody
I wanted to talk about this movie
with more than you
great to see you as always
my friend
nice to see you too
pleasure
talk to you soon
alright that's it for the podcast
thanks to Wesley Morris
thanks to Gahal and Eduardo
and Jack and Chris
from the Spotify side as well
don't forget
new rewatchables went up
we did
A Nightmare on Elm Street
Horror Movie Month
is officially over
so go check that out
I'm going to be back on Thursday
with a bunch of NFL stuff
hopefully there are more trades
we had a trade today
maybe some World Series
stuff
if it's still going
and I'm going to try
not to record
during Game 6
of the WNBA Finals
which will be happening
at 9.30 Pacific Time
hilarious
great job WNBA
you killed it
I'll see you on Thursday
I'm a pro so I'll never lose
I'm a pro so I'll never lose
I'm a pro so I'll never lose
must be 21 plus
and president in select states
for Kansas
in affiliation with
Kansas Star Casino
or 18 plus
and president in D.C.
or Wyoming
opt-in required bonus
issued as non-withdrawable
profit boost tokens
restrictions apply
including any token expiration
max wage or amount
see terms at
sportsbook.fandler.com
game problem call
1-800-GAMBLE
or 1-800-MY-RESET
call 888-79-7777
or visit ccpg.org
slash chat
in Connecticut
or mdgamblinghelp.org
in Maryland
hope is here
visit gamblinghelpline
ma.org
or call
800-327-5050
for 24-7 support
in Massachusetts
or call
877-8-HOPE-NY
or text
HOPE-NY
in New York
for Louisiana
call
877-770-7867
this episode is brought to you by
Searchlight Pictures
Wild Horse 9
John Malkovich
and Sam Rockwell
I like those guys
star in the
sharp-witted comedy thriller
from Academy Awards
award winner
Martin McDonough
writer-director
of The Banshees
of Minnesharan
and Three Billboards
Outside Ebbing, Missouri
set in the 1970s
filmed on location
on Easter Island
Malkovich and Rockwell
play CIA agents
Chris and Lee
who are caught
in a dangerous game
of secrets
and survival
also starring
Steve Buscemi
another one of my guys
Parker Posey
and Tom Waits
Wild Horse 9
is being hailed
by critics
as a revitalizing shot
of pure entertainment
and easily
one of the best films
of the year
don't miss
Wild Horse 9
only in theaters
November 6
get tickets now
are you looking for support
in your weight management journey?
Zepbound
Terzepatide
may be able to help
Zepbound
is a prescription medicine
used with a reduced calorie diet
and increased physical activity
to help adults with obesity
or some adults with overweight
who also have
weight-related medical problems
to lose excess body weight
and keep the weight off
Zepbound is approved
as a 2.5
5
7.5
10
12.5
or 15 mg injection
Zepbound contains
Terzepatide
and should not be used
with other Terzepatide
containing products
or any GLP-1
receptor agonist medicines
it is not known
if Zepbound is safe
and effective
for use in children
don't share needles
or pens
or reuse needles
don't take if allergic to it
or if you or someone
in your family
had medullary thyroid cancer
or if you've had
multiple endocrine
neoplasia syndrome type 2
tell your doctor
if you get a lump
or swelling in your neck
stop Zepbound
and call your doctor
if you have severe stomach pain
or a serious allergic reaction
severe side effects
may include
inflamed pancreas
or gallbladder problems
tell your doctor
if you experience
vision changes
before scheduled procedures
with anesthesia
if you're nursing
pregnant
plan to be
or taking birth control pills
taking Zepbound
with a sulfonylurea
or insulin
may cause low blood sugar
side effects include
nausea
diarrhea
and vomiting
which can cause dehydration
and worsen kidney problems
talk to your doctor
call
1-800-545-5979
or visit
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Brian Dawkins openly shares his experience with major depressive disorder and emphasizes the importance of seeking professional help.
He highlights Caplida Lumateperone as a treatment that provides greater relief when used with an antidepressant, noting it is not approved for dementia-related psychosis.
The drug has shown no common weight gain in clinical trials, though side effects like drowsiness, dizziness, and nausea are possible.
Antidepressants and Caplida may increase risks of mood changes, suicidal thoughts, or severe physical symptoms like fever or muscle stiffness, requiring immediate medical attention.
The Bill Simmons Podcast discusses various sports topics, including horror movie rewatchables and NBA season analysis.
The speaker criticizes the WNBA’s poor scheduling and broadcasting decisions, calling them a major embarrassment.
He expresses frustration over the NBA’s roster and performance issues, particularly with teams like Miami, Phoenix, and Milwaukee, highlighting depth, chemistry, and contract concerns.
A key takeaway is the importance of team balance, depth, and health in long-term success, with several teams showing early signs of instability or potential improvement.
Summary:
Brian Dawkins shares his personal journey with major depressive disorder, stressing the importance of mental health support and encouraging others to seek professional help. He discusses Caplida Lumateperone as a supplemental treatment that enhances antidepressant effectiveness, noting its benefits and potential side effects while emphasizing the need for medical supervision. The Bill Simmons Podcast segments include a live horror movie rewatch, a critical examination of the WNBA’s chaotic scheduling, and a detailed NBA season preview.
The host analyzes team performances, highlighting concerns about roster depth, player health, and team chemistry—particularly in Miami, Phoenix, Milwaukee, and the Spurs—while praising strong early performances in Dallas, Portland, and Golden State. He critiques poor planning in the WNBA, calling the scheduling of Game 6 in Atlanta a major misstep due to lack of coordination and poor broadcast strategy. The analysis also touches on injury risks, contract issues, and coaching decisions, with a recurring theme that long-term team success depends on health, balance, and adaptability.
Overall, the commentary blends personal advocacy with in-depth sports observation, offering both emotional insight and strategic evaluation of current league dynamics.
FAQs
Major depressive disorder is a mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness and loss of interest. Brian Dawkins lived with it for a long time without seeking help, but later realized support and professional intervention were essential.
Brian Dawkins added Caplida Lumateperone to his treatment because he needed greater relief from his depression symptoms. It builds on progress made with his initial antidepressant without requiring a complete restart.
No, Caplida is not approved for dementia-related psychosis. It is specifically indicated for adults with major depressive disorder when used with an antidepressant.
Common side effects include sleepiness, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, fatigue, and diarrhea. Individual responses may vary, and patients should consult their doctor about potential side effects.
Call your doctor immediately if you experience new or sudden mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts, as antidepressants can increase these risks.
Serious symptoms such as fever, confusion, stiff muscles, or uncontrolled muscle movements require immediate medical attention, as they may be life-threatening or cause permanent harm.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.