ಮಹಾರಾಜರು ಮಧ್ಯರಾತ್ರಿ ಗುಪ್ತವಾಗಿ ಪೂಜೆ ಮಾಡುವ ಆ ಮಹಿಳೆ ಯಾರು? Untold story of Mysore Dynasty Mystery
from EVARA PODCAST STUDIO
89m 26s
The podcast critiques the current direction of British politics and institutions, focusing on Kemi Bay-Knock’s conservative conference speech and its implications. The speaker argues that her message promotes a false, inclusive vision of Englishness that undermines traditional identity, framing racial and gender diversity as a political and economic tool rather than a genuine social good. A central argument is that the BBC has systematically disadvantaged white staff—paying ethnic minorities up to 13.2% more in lower pay bands—revealing a shift in institutional power that contradicts claims of anti-racism. This trend is linked to broader economic dynamics, where immigrant labor depresses wages and reshapes workforce hierarchies. The speaker contends that the conservative response to this shift—celebrating diversity as progress—masks deep ideological contradictions. Figures like Tim Stanley and James O’Brien are accused of endorsing this shift without scrutiny, treating it as moral or cultural triumph. The analysis also highlights institutional failures, such as the RAF's exclusion of white male pilots and the BBC’s problematic representation of diversity. Ultimately, the speaker warns that without addressing these structural imbalances, the UK risks losing its national identity through demographic and economic transformation. The critique concludes with a call for accountability, noting that real change requires dismantling systemic biases, not just adopting identity-based policies.
Good afternoon, folks. Welcome to the podcast "The Loads Seaters"
from Thursday, the 8th of October, 2026.
I'm John Bajari and Thuras,
and today we're worrying about the Irish question now.
I'm joking, we're not talking about James Bryan.
And there's always underlying.
Well, a little bit of James Bryan.
But today we're going to be talking about how the uniparty is back, baby.
It's great.
Keri made "Nokke" for a bar and storming conference speech,
and she was like, "I agree with everything we've already done."
Then we're going to be talking about. I regret nothing.
I regret nothing and I change nothing.
Then we're going to be talking about how the BBC has actually managed to invert
any kind of racial hierarchy they may have found within their ranks
so that white people are now actually discriminated against and paid less than they were before.
Hey, it's a good now.
Hey, it's a good now, because it's happening to white people.
And then we're going to be talking about how we're just being looted as a country, nationally.
The taxpayers' alliance have done some amazing work and there's loads of great information
about how we're just getting looted for the tune of billions and billions of pounds.
And it's absolutely preposterous.
Anyway, right, let's just get into it because I've got loads on soundness.
So the uniparty is back.
They have decided, actually, why don't we all just be exactly the same
and make no distinctions between each other at all.
Call them distinctions and have a big rally about it.
So, of course, this comes on the heels of Keri Bay-Knock's keynote speech
at Lee Conservative Party conference, which all of the conservatives, like there we go,
she saved conservatism.
Thank God, mummy is returning the conservative party to its conservative roots.
Finally, we get Europa Conservative.
Northern Nigeria, we will get up.
They've got ethnic enemies, some of them are British, some of them are Northern Nigerian,
some of them are in Boko Haram.
Anyway, so I thought we'd just begin by just checking in on the Conservatives' current fortunes.
Because the attitude and the atmosphere at the Conservative Party conference
has been one of jubilation of victory.
This is a can't understand why.
They're trying to pull a page from Trump, basically.
Yeah.
That we're winning.
We're winning.
Guys, look at yourselves.
Exactly. Yeah.
You're getting smashed by reform and labor.
You're on 18%.
Now, just to be clear, if the Conservatives got 18% in a German election,
that would be the worst result the Conservative Party has ever had
and would probably put them on fewer than a hundred seats.
Probably put them on some of like 60 or 70 seats.
So it's just like, right.
I don't know why you're cheering.
I mean, the cult of Kemi is holding her up like she's some sort of great savior.
But all I see is decline.
It looks like you guys are on the way out.
So anyway, Kemi Baynoch gave a long and honestly quite boring speech
in which she said nothing of any particular substance,
apart from this, where she was rejecting reform for being too ethno nationalist.
Which is not something I thought I'd ever say.
Because, of course, they're not in any way, shape or form.
The problem that she has is, of course,
Swela Bravenman was prepared to acknowledge the existence of the English.
And that was something that was just a bridge too far.
I mean, literally, the Greens, Labour Party, the Lib Dems,
and now the Conservatives.
And also the reform party, to be honest, so again,
it's so bizarre watching the argue about this.
But this is what she said.
I don't want to live in a country run by people who threaten journalists,
who call veterans traitors,
and debate whether my mixed race children are English.
I don't want to explain to my son
when we're watching our brilliant England team play football,
but some people don't think our black players are English.
I just stop it there.
I mean, the foreign players on the England football team
literally run around waving their national flags.
I mean, some of them are Yeruba as well.
Her children are Scottish Yeruba, Scottish Nigerian.
They aren't English.
And this has been a really interesting rake
that the party has decided it's going to step on repeatedly
and get smacked in the face with.
Because they keep saying things like this,
but the facts of the matter are,
as the facts of the matter are,
they're not English, it's fine.
It's not a crime.
No one's saying they have to be English.
But they're saying it.
And they're saying, no, no, no.
You're not allowed to say that I'm not English.
So, okay, but I can.
In the same way that, like, when a man in a dress rocks up
and says, "You have to call me a woman."
It is, like, the youth ethnicism is trans-ethnistic.
I can just say, "You're a man in a dress, though."
And they're like, "Oh, how?"
No, you're not saying that.
But my hair, come on.
Because it's true, they react to it.
Because it's true, they know it's true,
they know I know it's true, and I'm prepared to say it.
So, the social contract we're drawn into
that will all pretend that this is not the case is broken.
They get really offended.
And this is what Kimmy Batonok is doing here.
I'm really offended that you've broken the polite lie
that actually my Scottish Nigerian children are English.
I'm sorry?
I've got bigger problems than your feelings on that.
When you have Diane Abbott and what's her name,
the other one, I forget her name,
and all of these black MPs coming out and saying,
"We want reparations."
David Lamy, Diane Abbott,
and there are a bunch of the integration success stories,
like Lenny Henry.
Lenny Henry, who's the footballer?
There's a footballer.
Marcus Rashford?
No, it's from the '90s.
John Barnes.
Right.
He also demanded reparations.
Yeah.
And so, it's like all of these Jamaican footballers
and Jamaican people, comedians and whoever else.
They've all recently just come out and be like,
"Yeah, no, we should do with reparations like from who?"
From who?
I thought you were a language.
It's why. It's an integration.
You want to pay yourself reparations?
It's why this doesn't work.
It's very obviously just a political strategy
used by foreign diaspora.
That's the only ever. That's the only ever time that we see it used
using foreign peoples in foreign countries
who decide I want something that you have.
Yeah.
And then they can always remember exactly who they are
and when they come from,
when it's time to. Yeah.
Who pays up.
Who pays up and who gets paid.
Yeah, exactly.
Hmm.
So, what was really interesting about this,
I thought, though, is she says,
"Look, I will never do a deal with reform
"because they're ethnic nationalists."
That's like, okay.
Reform is not ethnic nationalists, right?
By any stretch of the imagination.
So, Swella Braveman is prepared to admit the English exists.
But what she. Weirdly enough Nigel Farage and Danny Krueger
aren't prepared to it.
Absolutely.
That's the funniest part about. No, not the rest of them.
I agree with Swella Braveman.
Yeah, although Nadine Dorees just came out
and pointed out to a tweet from Kemi from 2016,
pointing out that she was responding
to another African guy,
saying, "No, no, I am the first Nigerian."
Yeah, yeah.
She's been proudly Europa for many years
because her dad was a Europa nationalist.
Yes.
Which is why she doesn't identify as Nigerian
and she identifies as Europa.
But anyway, the point being,
who is she talking to here?
Well, she's not talking to the right of the conservative party.
No.
Because they've all gone.
They're all voting for reform
because they think that Nigel Farage
is an insane right-winger
because the media has told them
that Nigel Farage is an insane right-winger,
despite all of his protestations saying,
"I'm not popular, I'm not anti-immigration.
I'm not for British identity or anything like this.
I'm not in none of those things."
Despite the fact he says all these things,
the media has constantly said,
"Oh, he's far right."
And so the British public are like,
"Well, that's what I'm voting for."
So she's talking to the Lib Dem wing of her party.
This is what she is committing to.
And the Lib Dem wing, man, they're thrilled.
I mean, you've got Jacob Riesmob being like that.
I'm so pleased that the conservative leader
make it a conservative speech.
"Oh, we're such outsiders."
And it's like, the Uniparty is dead.
No, the speech was just pure Uniparty nonsense,
filtered through a Thacherite economic lens.
That's all it wants. It was just globalism.
Thacherite globalism.
This is completely within the normal consensus
of what the conservatives have been for my entire life.
Margaret Thacher, I was born in the year
Margaret Thacher became the Prime Minister.
For my entire life,
this is all the conservatives have ever said.
And you are the people who brought us to this point,
which we're getting to in a minute, right?
So completely normal.
This isn't the Uniparty's dead.
This is the Uniparty retrenching itself.
That's the thing.
What about her speech distinguished her
from David Cameron or Boris Johnson
or. Or is it me?
Or. Or. Or Lydany of British Prime Minister is from. James O'Brien, right?
Nothing distinguished her speech
from James O'Brien's own position,
which, quote, he says,
"This was objectively magnificent
as he offers praise for Kenny Badenock's conference speech."
I mean, if James O'Brien said anything
I thought politically was, quote,
"objectively magnificent."
I would realise I was on the wrong side of the argument.
Could this be the first documented, notable case
of red meat being thrown out for the centrist dads?
For. For literally the Labour right?
Is that what James O'Brien is?
Yes, James O'Brien is the Labour right,
which, as I suppose, we did read his book
where he said he was slightly uncomfortable
with his daughter thinking about getting tattoos.
Yes, so he. I mean, don't go wrong.
The Labour right is really far to the left of the average person.
Yes.
But it's just not Jeremy Corbyn, right?
He's sympathetic to Jeremy Corbyn,
but he just doesn't think communism will work.
But anyway, if. I think one of the biggest condemnations
to the character of all of these people
they can one sit through such dull speech
and then two get excited about it.
I mean, good Lord.
I agree.
But if James O'Brien. called anything I said, objectively magnificent. I would have a crisis of conscience and think
that somehow I'd lost my way anyway. So you had, you know, people like Ian Dale, again,
sort of like lib Dem Torrey types, who are like, well, I mean, this is a, she was denouncing
ethno-nationalism. This is just a posh word for racist. Brilliant. We've arrived at the left-wing
position of, I get to call someone racist, fantastic. You're a racist. Ah, there we go. I've won
the argument, argument over, you're all just racist. And of course, conservative Muslim
peers, I hate a war, he was, was like, yep, brilliant. Every foreigner in England is English,
because that's what an English person is. It's a person who just happens to be in England
at this present time. So we're all English. So you don't need to worry about any of these weird
racist complaints. And of course, as I said, it's, it's important to see how she uses this.
Because what she does is position this as something that benefits her own interest group.
So she goes off from Kemi's ethnicity position to say, well, Islam should be included in this
category. And we need to protect the Muslims. What's not English about Islam? Exactly. Exactly.
So everybody who sort of uses this line takes it as a launching pad to go and try to see some
kind of benefit for their own ethnic group. And it just goes on and on and on. Which is why
the, I mean, that's not good into that. But yeah, yeah. But I love that she frames it around
cricket as well. Oh, it's the football team, the cricket team. Listen, I don't give a damn
by any of these teams. I don't give a damn. Right. If you're going to have foreign mercenaries
play for our teams, okay, fair enough. But then complain that I'm calling them foreign
mercenaries because that's literally what they are. That you're just the reason that the,
you know, the Nigerian guys are playing on the England football team or the Pakistani people
playing on the English cricket team is because you pay them to. Otherwise, they'd be playing on
their own national team. They're feeling just the, the pool of national pride. It's literally,
because you pay them to. Can't imagine them starting the match with for Alfred and marching
into it. Yeah. And if, if their own national teams paid sufficiently well, they would play for
them instead. Right. That's the, the reason it is because you pay them way more than their
tone teams would pay them out. Yeah. What, what, what are the views of these English cricket
and football players on the Norman conquest? How did it, how did it affect their ancestors?
Harold Godwinson, last true King of England. Anyway, so, um, we are at the point now where
Saeeda is agreeing with Kemi on the definition of Englishness provided by Sweller, which is,
I mean, it's for some reason, the British right in every way is being dominated by foreign
women of color. Have you considered how based that is and how anti-race. Have you considered
that the conservative party might have a party-wide enjoyment? Is that a polite word for it?
Appreciation, maybe? Appreciation for being dominated by non-white women.
We're going to get to Tim Stanley in a minute. Oh, good.
Anyway, can we make it up? Of course, he's lobbied from aggression. She's been in support of
pride month and gender recognition certificates, as well as she was ministering government. Hold on.
When she campaigned to become party leader, she was all about rejecting the whole trend stuff.
Yeah. Yeah. So, she has a little conscience. She didn't serve her at that moment.
Exactly. Yeah. She's empty. She will say whatever she thinks will suit her.
Oh, sorry. That was 22. After she became well-known for it as well.
She was a minister at this point. Yeah. That's what she was doing, right?
That's, I mean, that's what she was doing. And as you were saying, like, when she was trying
to become an MP, she was quite happy to leverage her Nigerian heritage. Because, of course,
she was, you know, a caller insult me, Simon Europa. I'm very disappointed. When did she get married?
I don't know. Actually, I don't know what you actually got married in.
Samson, could you check for us when did Camille get married, please?
But, sorry. I've just recently interviewed a caller
insulted me because I'm a Europa. I'm very disappointed that a Nigerian woman who claims to have lived
in London has issues with me being Europa. She must have been from the North, mate.
Simple as of which country.
Anyway, the point is. 2012. 2012, right? Okay. The point is, she says, "I'm going to use whatever
influence I have to speak out against those who are cheating and robbing Nigeria and those who seek
refuge for themselves in the money in the UK." Right, so I'm here to support and promote Nigeria
and get Nigerians into Britain. Not just that. Like you, I am sick and tired of reading that Nigerians
are fraudsters, terrorists, bummy airplanes, or slotting each other in places like Joss.
I tell you, nothing bothers me more. I spend a lot of time thinking about it.
She's genuinely speaking to the local concerns of Nigerians.
Yes, of the Nigerian community, wherever she was running to become.
Michael Goat, watching this from the sideline drooling with how much she's loving all of this.
This is exactly what Thatcher wanted. Yeah, fully supporting to help publicise
genuine grassroots initiatives such as #lightupnigeria. When the next generation is trying to change
things for the better. Don't you dare to talk about her kids not being in English.
In fact, do you care about your home country? She says in this clip, but we won't play for the
second time, that the reason I got into politics is because I was sick of seeing Nigeria being
misrepresented, which is precisely what she said here. So it's not like this hasn't been something
that she has said over and over and over. So I think we can take her at her word in this.
So I pointed out that we'll look, your kids are probably Scottish Nigerian, given your
marriage to a guy called Hamish Badenock. Pretty Scottish name. And that got a lot of people's backs up.
For example, Tell Mama, which is an anti-Muslim, an anti-Islam phobia.
It's a pro-Muslim anti-Islamophobia organisation, right? They were like disgusting.
Just disgusting. Precisely, can we say it doesn't very much the James O'Brien position,
obviously. Sorry, Tell Mama is the farthest of the far left in the whole islamic sort of
environment, but yes. Yeah, so I was quite surprised by that. I was even more surprised when
this conservative MP called me a Jew. Just what? As soon as the next election rolls around,
you'll be getting your yellow star in the post. So long with your conservative flyer.
Kevin, zero to one percent. Okay, zero to one percent. There's a slight incoherence
from the conservatives here, because of course you have Chris Philip at the same conference,
standing up and saying mass immigration without integration will destroy our culture and destroy
the foundations of our nation state. Okay, but why would it do that if they're all just English?
Pause for a second. Yeah, well, exactly, but pause for a second. She campaigned for parliament
based on Nigerian issues. She campaigned for the English parliament based on Nigerian issues.
That's integration. Meaning that the constituency she was seeking to represent had
absolutely not integrated. Otherwise, why would she be talking to them about what's going on in
Joss and in northern Nigeria, and in what have you? I think that is the reason that Chris Phillips
looks so insincere and like he's struggling to hold in a poo. There's nothing under it, right?
They'll say, well, we don't want mass immigration to destroy our culture. How could it do if they're
just all English? And if they're not all English, that would explain everything that you're saying,
but he can't ever say or admit this because not only does Kimmy have an eye and grip on the party
at this point after purging everyone in my challenger, but they're trapped in an ideological
incoherence. Yes. They have to either admit the Nigerians are actually not English,
which you think would be the easiest thing in the world to. Or they have to double down. And instead
of admitting that I think there might be something to actually looking at the objective facts of the
world, they've decided to double down on the liberal mist. This isn't that anyone can be from
anywhere and that's all fine. So okay, there we go. So this is why he looks like he's about to cry.
And he looks he looks to completely lost. What is what is the crack record of the conservative
party? Well, we'll get to that in a second as well. Well, because because historically I'll just
trail. No, not even betrayal. The conservatives are the party of mass immigration. Yes,
in this country. But it put a pin in it. We'll come back to it very shortly because you are
exactly right. Anyway, so yeah, that was that going right. So the Daily Telegraph is essentially
like the conservative party's primary mouthpiece in the media landscape of the country. The spectator
is a close second. The times tends to lean slightly conservative, but they're much more blur
at these days. And this is just, you know, well understood. I mean, you know, but the times and the
Sunday times are both politically conservative and openly support the conservative party and have
done for a hundred years. Right. This is just what they are. So when you get something from the Daily
Telegraph, like welcome back, Tory party, you are conservative again, courtesy of Mama Aidenock.
You've rediscovered your soul, your philosophy of people that James O'Brien will praise.
You realize that as the heath and all of these people, their income, their status, their position
in the conservative party and its surrounding organisms, organs. This is all contingent on them,
just agreeing that yes, Kemi Baydenock is, in fact, the divinely appointed savior of the
conservative party and that this is the uniparty back in action. People weren't buying it. Now,
I had a look at Jacob Rees Morg's YouTube channel where he says like, Kemi kills off the uniparty.
Not really. Kemi has united the uniparty to her, which
Which is why James O'Brien is calling her speech objectively magnificent and why your
YouTube comments are telling you to get bent, right?
West Street came out in praise of it, Dan Dodgers came out in praise of it, all of them.
The whole left came out saying, "Wonderful."
But they all got the call.
Well, the call was, anyone can be English.
That was the call.
Well, that was the signal.
There is no exclusive boundary between us and them.
That's the call, because they're all globalists at the end of the day.
And I mean, as you can see from the comments, just like, "What, 90% of the Tory party should
be in the Lib Dems or even Labour."
Again, James O'Brien shall be in saying, "I agree with that."
And he goes on and on and on.
And I've got another just two pages, like two tweets of just, you know, the suite of these
comments being like, "Yeah, no.
What are you talking about?
We can see what's happening, Jacob, which is why we're voting in form and restore."
You can get in luck with the form.
But the point is it's not persuading anyone, right?
And so we get some responses from the Daily Tea, which is a conservative podcast from
the Daily Telegraph with Camilla Tomini and Timothy Stanley.
It's a very feminine podcast.
You've got two women and Tim Stanley, so three women running this podcast.
And they are very impressed.
They think it's brilliant.
They love.
It's one exciting moment in a history that the right is led by a black woman, says Tim Stanley.
Should we watch it?
Why?
I think it's an exciting moment in our history that the right is led by a black woman who
reflects that changing country and this is the difference with the left.
She ain't going around saying, "I'm black, I'm black, I'm black."
No, she's not.
She can't.
I'm amazing.
She can't.
What?
The whole response, the positive response from all of the foreigners in this country was they
saw a non-white person saying, like, diminishing English people and they went, "Oh my God, she's
one of us."
Which is, because she's not white.
As if she's not said, "I'm your rubber, I'm black or I'm Nigerian enough times."
Oh, he's so believable.
There are words that YouTube don't want me using that I really, really want to throw
at this man right now.
So the thing to remember is that about 4chan green text of, "Well, women have a different
measure of truth because they filter everything through a consensus mechanism.
So does Tim Stanley.
Yes.
Look at him.
He filters everything through a consensus mechanism.
Otherwise, he wouldn't be hosting their podcast.
He would have been fired.
So he agrees with everything that the powers that be say and they've decided they like
can be bayedlock and so that's why it's exciting and that's the difference between them and
the left."
Well, here's the funny thing as well.
He says that she's not saying, "I'm black, I'm black, I'm black."
Yeah, but you are.
Yes, you are.
You're there, jumping up and down, waving your arms back, "Oh, she's black.
She's black.
She's black."
You're thrilled about it.
But I love it.
It represents changing country.
Sorry, who changed it?
You changed it.
Against everyone's will.
So we've imposed this on you.
Yeah, you're welcome.
But anyway, so this really is just like Kamala Harris rhetoric.
Oh, oh, she's the first black leader of the first woman to be vice president, a first
black person, the first Asian American.
That's all Tim Stanley is saying here.
It's just pure guardian Easter rhetoric.
The capture of the conservative party by the left is so complete that James O'Brien will
praise it and you will be thrilled that finally the conservative is being led by a black
woman.
It's so mad, right?
But the best thing about this, I love this so much, right, is that no, no, no, the country
has changed and it will be a moral and regressive to reverse it.
Let's listen to this.
The country has changed.
It's changed because of policy decisions, some of which were very, very wrong.
And because people feel they've lost control of their borders and of their society, they're
angry.
Yes.
Legitimately angry politicians.
Yes.
Yes.
And they want to see control brought back to their borders.
I sympathise with that.
But the country has changed.
You are not going to reverse that.
No.
And my point was that I am pleased to see that the right accepts that change and has changed
with it because it would be regressive and immoral to try to reverse what has happened.
Amazing statement.
Why?
But before we go on to that, we f'd up.
It was very, very wrong to have done what we did.
He says.
Yes.
But it would be immoral to try and reverse the thing that we did wrong.
No.
Why?
It is reversing wrongs immoral.
It is not the whole point of having a moral compass is to reverse wrongs, for the conservatives
to have a moral compass.
It's immoral to let a wrong name stand.
It's the Catholic.
Doesn't he?
He does.
It's immoral to let a wrong stand.
It is immoral imperative to reverse a wrong, no matter who it is you've wronged, no matter
how you've wronged them.
If you can reverse it, you are impelled to do so.
And moreover, look at the rhetoric, it would be regressive or regressive, they've quoted
him here, to reverse it.
Oh, okay.
So the tealos of progress is fewer and fewer white people.
And if you don't want to go back, you don't want to end or undo progress to you.
Do you need more and more browns?
That's what progress is to Tim.
Yes.
The end of white people is Tim's tealos of progress.
It really is the low-deep podcast.
But it's amazing that he just comes out and says it, but this is such an incredible clip.
No, no, no.
It would be immoral to fix the problems that we inflicted on you against your will.
And it would also be anti-progress, like, please keep talking Tim, right?
You are the best recruiter for the rights that has ever existed.
The right that you don't exist, you don't accept exists, right?
And of course, just to be clear, right?
So I've got chance for you to make this quick little graph, right?
Going through all the INS estimates, right?
So remember, in 2010, the conservatives let in nearly 600,000, 550,000, 650,000, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah.
And then the Boris wave hits, right?
Yep.
In total, over the 14 years of the conservatives tenure, despite telling everyone, we're going
to get immigration to the tens of thousands, guys, 12 and a half million people.
They let into the country, 12 and a half million.
It was wrong.
It was very, very wrong.
But we must never reverse this, no Tim.
We must reverse it.
The moral imperative is to make these 12 million go home.
You shouldn't have liked the men which you have conceded.
This has been a bad thing for the country which you have conceded.
You need to help us get rid of these people.
And if you can't, you will understand why we do not take you seriously as a political
commentator, a moral agent or even a human being.
Anyway.
So yeah, like, Kenny Baidnock was part of this.
Obviously, she lobbied to get millions of people in.
So my favorite one was when she said that Tory ministers didn't notice.
Yeah.
Well, that's what they had.
That's what this is going through the roof.
That would, I mean, that one.
We promised to lower immigration.
We wanted to lower immigration, but there were so many other things that people were looking
at and focusing on that actually as the numbers increased, you know, ministers didn't notice.
We're incompetent.
We're not just evil.
We're incompetent.
I mean, it's not even that.
I covered that yesterday.
It's a lie.
It's a lie.
She, she actively campaigned to get more foreigners in.
So it's, they're just lying to you, right?
So the conservatives are realized what we can do is just double down on the lies guys.
We just double down and just say, no, no, no, yeah, everything was bad.
Nothing is, we're not allowed to change it.
It's not that it can't be changed.
We must not change it.
And you should vote for us for more of this BS in the future.
Now, just to be clear, this is a completely fixable problem.
Trump is leading the way in America by actually showing us that actually the US records net
negative migration hit every city in America in the last couple of years.
This is just incredible.
I mean, I don't think this has ever happened before, but it's just nets migration fell in
every like metro area in 2025 to the point where it's negative migration in the New City
Metro area, Washington, DC, Miami, Dallas, El Paso, LA, Seattle, Denver, Chicago, everywhere.
It's completely reversible because when we stop giving them money and stop allowing
them to just come in, what do you know, they go home.
But not only can it happen, we must make it happen.
Because otherwise, and this is the important point, right?
If we do not win this particular battle, then we lose the ability to define ourselves
as a people that is exclusive of other people.
And if we can't define what is us and what is not us, then we will end up losing our
particular collective claim to England.
And so we will not be able to say, oh, well, we've become a minority in England because
they will say, no, these are all English people from all over the world that have arrived
in England.
So it all hinges on this.
We cannot let them get away with this.
Fair few rumble rents, yeah, yeah, another thing as well.
There's a new chat on the website.
Let us know if it doesn't work, but it seems to be working just fine.
So hopefully that's fine.
We are our play testers.
Yes.
Returning conservatism to its roots, conserving liberalism.
This is exactly what that is, exactly what that is.
in seeing globalism as progress.
- Yeah, globalism and the. - Globalism as progress, liberalism as good.
- The displacement of the white rations as progress.
- Of course.
- I mean, the one thing that I didn't get to say
you redressed it slightly
in the Conservatives letting in 12 and a half million
was that even going back to the 1960s,
yes, Labour opened up the floodgates initially in 1948s.
Kind of by accident.
It was kind of one of those,
oh, whoops, this bill.
- Actual. - We are retarded.
Actually, we are a bit retarded.
But in the 1960s, by the time you started to see
the effects of it,
they're the party that cancels Enoch Powell.
- Yes. - Out of it.
- Yes. - Following Tony's. - Mark's father.
- Yes. - He was led by the campaign.
- And he's proud of it,
and it runs in the family.
They are a generational family of traders.
- Yes.
- Similarly, yeah, Tony Blair opens up the floodgates even more,
but it is primarily from people from Eastern Europe,
which caused its own problems at the time,
but we can see right now
was nowhere near the sorts of problems
that we have under Boris Johnson
who explicitly opens the floodgates following Brexit
to third world commonwealth migration.
- The Polish immigration's a great example of how,
yeah, this is completely irreversible as well.
Hardly any polls around now.
Hardly any.
They used to be loads, absolutely loads of polls,
but they've just gone home.
It's fine, you know, they can go.
- Well, the ones that did integrate,
probably ended up with like kids like Poro Henry Novak,
where you see, like, it's probably a Polish bird.
- Well, one of my mates has married to a Polish.
- Yeah, who married with, I mean, I still find it funny.
I have a half Polish friend who didn't even realize
she was half Polish, which was quite amusing,
because she didn't realize that,
oh, my mum was born in England,
but both of my grandparents are from Poland.
I said, you know that makes your mum Polish, right?
She was like, oh, I never thought of that.
I've got some ditzy friends.
She's lovely.
- One for one paladin says,
"Tori, be a good shitlib for mummy.
"You can live on the replacement plantation, be a good "Tori" for maths."
That's literally what it's come to.
Since first, as Irish now,
as he started taking Irish coffee while on the podcast,
I know he started dancing and saying top of the morning, though,
which has been great.
- I have to say that if you don't allow me
to drink on the podcast,
I can sue for discrimination now.
- I just wanted to put that out there, because--
- Now you're an ethnic enemy.
(all laughing)
- When you were 11 years, that was--
- Yeah, yeah, yeah, but now.
- And apparently, I'm a gay boy.
(all laughing)
- Yeah, I don't know what happened with you.
- Apparently, they tried to make me a pearly king,
which I believe is cockney.
So I had the ethnic right to blast you both.
- I love Spanish Matador.
Kind of see it.
- Yeah, oh, thanks.
With all the linguistic gymnastics from the left arts,
it's surprising they didn't start saying things like,
"Hello, are you al-left?"
Or "The left" or "The other left" or whatever it is.
Yeah, I know, it's mental, isn't it?
They've completely lost the plot.
Quite what she says,
"I'm tired of seeing liberals larpers the right.
"There are no Western conservative parties
"you're sane or Christian liberal at best.
"It is illegal to voice a non-Muslim right-wing opinion
"in Europe."
Well, yes, but anyway, not on that note, let's carry on.
- All right, then.
So we're going to be talking about how pay gaps are good now.
After years and years and years of being told
that pay gaps are the worst thing ever,
we have new information showing that the BBC
is actively and systemically discriminating,
we already knew this,
but discriminating against white people,
particularly the white staff,
and that, you know, the conservative newspapers
are saying that this is a problem,
but I'm not seeing any reports from within the BBC
or the Guardian or elsewhere,
calling out that this is a big moral panic
that we need to get behind and change,
which you may remember was all the rage back about
eight, nine, 10 years ago
when it came to issues of pay gaps when it went the other way.
When it was non-white people being paid,
yes, when it was them not being paid the same as white staffers,
then this was a problem.
When it was women not being paid the same as men,
then it was a problem.
And all of these arguments were debunked at the time.
You know, you can go back and see old Stephen Mollon,
you and other people talking about this in videos
where it was like, well, yeah, women aren't getting paid
the same because frankly, they just don't ask for as much,
they're not as forceful in going for pay rises and whatnot.
But still, this was something that we were all told
was a moral failing of the country
and that we all needed to get behind support
for these poor, discriminated peoples
who just came over here for a better life.
- It was proof of institutionalized white supremacy.
- Clearly, that was the main key.
So look, this is not a neutral organization.
The fact that non-white people are being personally
paid less on a whatever percentage base it was.
It was proof of institutionalized white supremacy.
So if now the non-white people are being paid
more than the white people,
then we have to conclude that's proof
of institutionalized brown supremacy.
- Or anti-white discrimination.
- Well, that's the same thing.
- No, no, the anti-white discrimination is the mechanism
by which the institutionalized brown supremacy
is established.
- Yes.
That was the argument that was precisely the way
that they framed it, yes.
- It would be impossible to not invert this argument
logically given such circumstances.
- And again, this was the sort of day loose
during this crusade that we were experiencing
around 10 years ago, this is from 2018.
Senior BBC editor claims ethnic minority staff
paid 20,000 pounds less than white employees.
Now, this was an editor, Salim Patkha,
suing the BBC for race discrimination claiming
that staff earned less simply because of the color of their skin.
This was around the same time
that BBC had already implemented a lot of diversity policies.
I remember around this same time,
I applied for what I tried to apply
for like BBC internships and such.
And all the ones that kept popping up
were saying we are exclusively looking
for black and minority ethnic representation
and candidates as part of this.
So unless you're a white guy who is gay
or has a disability of some kind,
we're not going to consider you for this.
So don't even bother applying.
So they already explains the outfit then, doesn't it?
- Yeah, clearly, clearly that's why the AI was like,
well, Harry, now you can get into the BBC.
Oh God, that has many multiple meanings now
that I've set out loud.
Either way, they were already discriminating
against white people in their hiring practices,
but they just needed to go a little bit further
to reach true equity, which is when the pay gap is reversed
and you have no white people,
that is when you have true equity.
- Accepted Tim Stanley. - According to Tim Stanley
and other conservatives of now.
This was Mr. Packert saying that he was a senior manager
at World Services Languages Unit in London,
claimed in a lawsuit that freedom of information
said that non-white staff were paid an average
of 7,400 pounds less per year.
And this was because of the disparity
in people working for world services,
which were typically paid less
versus the network news staff,
which were mainly white British.
Now I can explain this gap immediately by simply saying
that well, the world service is not as valuable
a service for the BBC as the British-based news reporting,
evidently, which is why they were just not paid
as much, you're not providing as valuable a service.
And therefore-- - There's a much bigger pool
who want to work for that, like for BBC Arabic,
if you get in on a visa to Britain,
to work for BBC Arabic or BBC Farsi or any of the others,
you desperately want to get in.
You will take lower pay as a result.
There is a much bigger pool from all of these local media
that are trying to get in,
whereas the English themselves are just
a much smaller pool of people.
- So there was many different reasons
for this coming about.
The article also mentions it came right after former BBC
China editor Carrie Gracie quit her post-accusing bosses
of institutionally underpaying women
because she found out that she was being paid 50% less
than a male equivalent, at which point I just say,
well, go to your boss and ask for more money then.
This was the problem that a lot of people saw,
which was that these women weren't actually just pushing
for their bosses to pay them to the male equivalent,
and then just decided this is because they hate women.
That was regarding the BBC specifically.
This is December 2018, again,
talking about how it was just a society-wide issue.
This isn't just the BBC.
This is the BBC themselves reporting on UK ethnic minority
workers face 3.2 billion-pound pay penalty
because they received the pay penalty earned less than white
colleagues and the same jobs according to a research group,
a report from Resolution Foundation
said that overall the 1.9 million-bame workers
are paid about 3.2 billion less than their white counterparts
every year.
- Is it supremacy?
- No, no.
This is why I have to just come in
with the actual reason for that.
Yes, that's the point of you all being here
in the first place.
That's why they open the floodgates
to allow you all to flood our labour markets
because you will work longer hours for less
because the countries you're originally coming from
are so much worse than here
that coming here and living 15 people to a single bedroom flat
where you sleep in a corner for four hours a night
and then work 16 hours a day for pennies
as a delivery driver.
- As a delivery driver is actually a better circumstance
for you.
- Which is why you're here.
- Which is, if it wasn't, you wouldn't be here.
- So why Indians go to the UAE?
This is why Pakistanis go to Saudi Arabia.
This is why Mexicans go to the United States.
This is the whole point of immigration.
This is a press where it wages.
- By these people who--
- This is why Bernie was against open borders back in the day.
He was correct.
These people will call themselves the sorts of people
who like to bring out these arguments
Cool, cool themself.
like socialists, progressive leftists or Marxists,
and they will fail to apply the most basic
of materialist analysis to the circumstances.
You are here to depress wages.
It is a capitalist plot that you are here.
You understand.
You accept less, so you get paid less,
and eventually the design is to push the white people
who are already here,
who want more out of the positions that you take up,
or push them to accept less as well.
That is the whole reason for you being here, in the first place.
And a government spokesperson, when this was reported to them,
said that diversity is good for businesses,
and it's committed to ensuring the workplace works for everyone.
Exactly, Amazon factories love diverse workforces,
because you don't unionize,
because you all suspect one another.
And they pay you less.
Which is why I'm hiring new partners.
Exactly.
That's why tomorrow you're going to have Raj instead of me
on the podcast.
But listen, listen to it.
Diversity is good for businesses.
It's a capitalist plot.
They tell you it's a capitalist plot.
Why won't you listen to them?
Idiots, unbelievable.
Yes, but of course this was actually just the problem
of the other white workers getting paid slightly more,
and their middle management bosses,
who hadn't yet got the memo.
And then following that back in 2025, just last year,
this was reported on that the crusade was already beginning to work.
The plot was already starting to see fruition.
BBC stuff told not to be straight white or male.
Well, that was a paraphrase of something that Richard Ty said,
but it came from something that was obviously true.
Senior managers from the BBC were paid more
if they were lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender,
than those who were not figures released in the corporations
and your report showed the LGBT ethnic minority disabled
and female senior leaders earned more than those
who were not from those backgrounds.
So we're already starting to see the discrimination get reversed.
So what I say that the generously is promoted
by the oligarchy for their own sake,
the BBC agrees and implements that kind of policy.
Yes, just to clarify.
Quite a substantial margin as well.
According to the 2023 to '24 report,
those who identified as gay, lesbian, bisexual, whatever,
earned 15% more than their straight collar.
That's an 11 incentive.
That, yeah.
That's the big case, right?
Look, darling, you know.
I'd say, I mean, would you, would you bend over for 15%?
I mean, I'd certainly say that I did.
Yeah, I'm not saying that word, but like. Similarly, senior members of staff from Black Asian
and other ethnic backgrounds earned on average 12.6% more
than their white counterparts.
And that was in senior management.
So not absolute top, top, top level.
Right.
But just below the people who are going to be in charge of departments.
It's keeping the commissars in on board.
Yes.
Here you go. I'm giving you literal identity benefits
based on your race, your gender, your sexuality, whatever.
And you are going to think, this is good.
This pays me well.
To secure my position.
I'm going to enforce this gleefully on all of the levels below me.
A lot of whom will end up at the bottom level being straight white men.
And that's paying off right now
because now we have the latest update from this.
The most recent report has shown that the BBC is paying white staff less
at every pay grade save for one.
Is that the top one?
I mean, let me go through this.
The BBC is facing fresh scrutiny
because white people are being paid less.
Black Asian mixed and other ethnic minority employees
received median pay 13.2% higher than white colleagues
in the BBC's lowest pay band.
At the other end of the scale, ethnic minorities in the highest band
had median salaries 5.3% above their white counterparts.
White employees recorded higher median pay
in only one of the seven pay bands
where the difference was just 0.6%.
Well, though, I'm sure they'll fix that quickly.
Yes.
The figures came despite the broadcasters' commitment
to providing fair, clear, and competitive pay
while we know in sort of like bureaucrat speak
what that actually means.
Former Culture Secretary John Wittingdale,
who helped throughout the BBC's previous Royal Charter in 2016,
said the corporation ought to be paying staff entirely
on the basis of the value and merit they contribute
for the job that they are doing.
But what if the value is being black Asian
or whatever other identity group?
Is that a lot of a service they're providing then?
Exactly.
God bless.
Bringing diversity.
This is the value of these people,
which is why they're paying them this.
However, the figures do not mean white employees
unless across the BBC as a whole to corporations,
overall ethnicity pay gap.
Remains 0.7% in favor of white workers
because a greater proportion holds some of its higher paying positions.
Oh, good. The ladder has been pulled up.
Yes.
Right, OK, Cressy.
That's exactly it.
Well, great.
Listen, Rajesh is going to work harder for less pay.
So actually, we don't even really need white people at all.
And now that he's here,
I don't have as much competition from these people.
We'll bring a few of them up to our level
for, like, appearance of sake or appearances.
But this is great.
I never have to speak to some uppity creative 7 rungs below me
anymore because all of these people
just do exactly what I said.
But also, I've got my gold-plated pension.
I'm at the end of my career.
I'm at the very top.
So obviously through seniority and longevity,
I've got various pay increases throughout my time.
You are just on the bottom wrong.
Underneath all of the ethnic minorities and identity groups.
And you'll never get to where I am
because I've changed the rules of how I got here.
So it literally excludes you for being a white man.
Yep.
I made it also adopted its 50, 20, 40, and 25
diverse the inclusion and belonging strategies.
We've moved from die to dib, which aims
for a 50% gender split across the organization,
20% ethnic minority staff, 14% deaf, disabled,
and/or neurodivergent staff, and 25% from working class backgrounds
because I guess we'll throw them a bow, I suppose.
But they include working class being non-white.
Yes.
The BBC said that those are goals rather than quotas.
The difference.
Great question.
Great question.
Is there an answer?
Is there an answer, no?
I feel like I'm like, you've heard of double-speak before.
But I've worked in factories before, right?
And if you've got to pack this many boxes on this factory line,
if I then went to my line manager as I look,
they're goals rather than quotas.
It's a proper line, but we've seen it.
You only pack 500 today, you're meant to pack 1,000 words of goal.
You see them more as died by us.
I would expect to get fired, but anyway, what do I know?
Well, I mean, let's move on.
You don't work for the BBC, right?
And how could, actually, know to be fair?
How could be fair?
You have a little bit of, you have a few percentage
that I would get you in.
I find it, I feel that I will be really aggressively
out-competed by the Boris Wave.
True, right?
You know, I really feel that that would be the case.
And Bombay is probably well ahead of the curve than you are, so.
It's approach to diversity has faced wider scrutiny
after a review published earlier this year, though,
found some viewers felt representation
was being shoe-hawned into programmes.
Only some.
Only some reviewers.
Oh, really?
The review said, you know, but--
It's shoe-hawned, what, with Black Amblin.
A Black Isaac Newton, as well.
Yeah, what?
Well, here's the funny part.
Here's the funny part.
The review said attempts to reflect a diverse Britain
had sometimes created a sense that needs to be a smattering
of diversity in every programme which can lead
to inauthentic portrayal.
And some viewers of diverse backgrounds
felt that including characters like Black Isaac Newton,
erased historic exclusions that their people faced.
[LAUGHS]
The BBC raises to either a way.
Yes.
The BBC produced a series in 2022.
I think it was called Troy Full of a City, in which they play.
Oh, it's 2018, sorry.
Which they cast David Guiassi as a killee.
He's from Africa.
He's Black.
Black a killee.
Well, I mean, historic.
Did we just get an Indian a killee?
So where did we get this time?
With the--
I like the way it's like pulling a cracker.
Yeah, what are you going to get?
You remember that old South Park joke
where they have the Orcas choosing family guy?
You've got to put away jokes.
It's that.
What do the Orcas say today?
What ethnicity should King Alfred
be this time?
We must consult the Orcas.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's exactly what it is.
And this is all just part of a larger pattern.
You can see this elsewhere.
Because we say that a lot of the--
some of these workers being brought in
is to depress wages.
That's true.
But it is part of a larger trend
that can't only be explained by them just wanting
to pay people less.
Because then you get it in positions
like the RAF saying that they don't
want useless white male pilots.
This is highly ideological anti-white
ingrained into the system.
They don't want white male pilots.
They want to hit diversity targets.
Because I suppose there's just something wrong
about a white male pilot, presumably highly competent
if you're going to be a pilot in the RAF.
I would hope to at least.
That's a problem.
There's just something inherently wrong with it.
And I guess in 2023, they weren't expecting War of Russia.
Well, I mean, we were already well at a year
when we were well into the Ukraine economy.
But they're really ramping it up at the moment, as it is.
It takes them time to actually adjust.
That's the other thing.
If the mandate came in 2018, they'll have fulfilled
by 2025-2026, 2023, there'll still be in the middle of trying to implement it.
Because I guarantee, when they actually think they're going to war with Russia, they're
going to be begging white men.
Well, you see it in the adverts.
Yeah.
You see it in the Cruising adverts.
The Cruising adverts for war are all white.
But is it so?
Dengit does not going to war.
That's the end of that.
But there's also just, it's part of the broader trend as well that we was identified
again.
It's constantly identified, but you get more and more insider exposés alongside the statistical
evidence with this Jacob Savage article from Compact last year in December called The
Lost Generation.
This was again talking to the American entertainment industry, how all of these Gen X and older
millennial, like, high up managers, people in positions which are locked in, their set
for life have pulled up the ladder behind them and are only employing younger people
from non-white backgrounds.
This is a broader trend in the society wide for when it comes to your local corner shop
or maybe your local supermarkets are now filled with foreigners staffing those roles.
That's part of depressing wages.
The rest of this seems to just be ideological.
It has become, it's infected the whole system, and the BBC is proud of it.
So, pay gaps are great now, so long as they are only affecting white people badly.
Well, have you considered that this is reparations in action, really?
Yes.
That this is what it is, right?
What it is?
They view, okay, there has been that 20, 50 years of whatever it is, pay gaps in the BBC,
so now it has to be that way forever.
And they completely forget that you can only play this stupid game once, because once certain
groups are sufficiently entrenched, they will only operate on the basis of nepotism.
You see it all the time with Indians.
I'm sure you see it with Nigerians, you see it with Arabs.
It's. This whole thing is just so insane.
It's just so annoying and so insane.
Don't go through the subjects.
Yeah.
A man, Dean, I guess we shouldn't be surprised that the party of men can be women, also
believe Africans can be English.
That was referring to your segment.
Yep.
Based up, I genuinely don't understand why some lawyer isn't going around making an absolute
fortune, suing all of these organisations.
It has to be the easiest women that left pay the way for its precedent.
So there's a few reasons, one, I expect that that would be actually way more difficult
than it initially sounds, because you're going up against institutionally captured judges
and international human rights and other such laws, there'd be a lot of funding going
against you.
Two, you would be painting a target on your back.
And three, being white isn't a protected characteristic, but being a minority is a protected
character, isn't it?
Yeah, the laws are written.
So the law isn't. The law is set against you, to be good. Theoretically, the law is actually written that way.
Right.
Which is why the aircraft pilots got five grand each, compons, right?
It's just that the system, you are fighting the entire system to get to this point.
And this is. Okay.
There was a police officer. Oh no, a police candidate in. I think it was Cheltenham or something like that, who had basically spent his entire life
preparing to become a police officer, because he was like, "I really want to be a cop."
And they turned him down, despite having a perfect CV, perfect qualifications.
And it was only because he was a white guy.
And so he sued them, as well, and got some money out of them, like, under grand or something.
So it's not that the law isn't actually written in a neutral way.
It's just that none of the organs of the society around it will enact this, any kind of fairness
on their own.
And you have to go through a very lengthy court system, and legal proceeding, to get to the
point, to get justice.
But even then, okay, so they've just paid you five grand or whatever.
Well, what's that changed?
Does that change the number of white male pilots?
Right, no.
They just pay you off until they're pissed off.
And it's not their money anyway.
They're a government. Exactly.
It's tax money.
Well, so anyway.
Sijostone, BBC being run by Third World, Foreigners explains all child exploitation and sexual
assault on animals.
There was a child exploitation in the BBC way before the Foreigners got there.
Yeah, one tall order.
Two in.
Just to put it. The BBC has been an institutionally non-sea organisation for literally decades.
They still have a pedophile statue outside of it.
Yeah.
Some based right winger went and vandalised it, and they repaired it.
Yeah.
And got him arrested.
It's like. Don't you dare touching the police statue?
I'm a machinist in the US for a major defence contract to making aircraft components.
Probably 75 to 80% of the staff are H1B or other non-whites, about 50% of the management
too.
I remember a while back, one of the cars in the parking lot had a sunshade with arabic
calligraphy on it, and a website.
And when I looked it up, it was the Iranian state engineers.
Amazing.
On some of the you mentioned fear as, you mentioned Bernie Sanders used to be.
Yep.
I saw the clip of him from 2015, I think when he was campaigning for the primaries against
Hillary Clinton.
Thank you.
And it's so sad to see how far he has been cooked, because he was asked about open borders.
He's just like, "Why would I support open borders?"
And he literally says, "That's a Koch brothers policy."
And it's like, "That's so right."
Yes, that's so true.
It always has been.
It has been.
It has been.
It has been.
It has been.
It has been.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
It has been.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
Yeah.
It has been.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's insane.
Crazy amounts.
And so the taxpayers' alliance have done this sort of visualizer, or the tool. Incredible public service.
We can call it.
Yes.
So you can get a rough indication of the scale of the looting of this country.
Yes.
And this is being done mainly through various benefits that the state provides.
And I thought we'd have a quick look at those benefits.
Birmingham sort of stands out.
What are the most diverse cities in Britain, the most diverse city in Britain?
Not the most.
There are, I mean, like, looting is more diverse than Birmingham.
Right.
And Birmingham's a very segregated city at this point.
Yes.
For the English areas and the non-English areas are, you know, very set parts.
But it is still majority in minority.
And of course, you remember that Birmingham went bankrupt recently.
And because when bankrupt, it was absolutely filled with rubbish.
Because rubbish collections weren't being done.
And so hilariously, LBC's Tom Swabick went there.
You could see him becoming radicalized because it's stank.
And there was just foreigners everywhere.
And he was sorry, Kate.
Yeah.
Anyway, yeah.
Birmingham.
Yes.
So, Birmingham is £4 billion.
Being spent in Birmingham is the total benefits bill.
£4 billion and one in 12 working age adults is assessed as incapable of working.
Jesus.
And therefore, they are an universal credit.
Now, there is around a million people in Birmingham.
Yeah.
There are 210,000 households claiming universal credit.
So if you assume an average household size of four or five, that's the entire city.
I'm not sure how this exactly works out.
But just the number is insane.
And on average, per resident, almost £2,000 in bees being paid out,
in universal credit.
Look at the personal independence payments.
They're for disabled people.
The personal independence payments are. 34,000 disabled people in Birmingham.
What did you say the population was a million?
Yeah.
It was almost 10%.
Almost 10%.
So they use a lot of Manchester also.
Yes.
5% are eligible for a Motability Vehicle.
5% of the population is eligible for a Motability Vehicle.
10% is disabled.
Again, the veterans on crutches walking around missing limbs or something.
What happened to Birmingham?
And you can. Who did they lose a water?
I mean, if you looked at it, you'd think that they'd been bombed.
Yes, you would assume that there has been a sort of steady bombardment of the city.
The Luftwaffe showed up and just destroyed Birmingham.
Just to be clear, the Birmingham burden strike is still ongoing.
I haven't looked it up for a while.
It's still ongoing.
It's been more than 18 months now.
Just a deal is apparently imminent.
But nothing has happened.
Oh, my God.
OK.
Two days ago, the BBC, the bin strike deal is very close.
I'll look at it.
Yeah.
Almost 60,000 people are on housing benefit.
60,000. So deep down.
Yes.
Yes.
Will in the conqueror have 10,000 men?
So basically, again, around 5% of the city is being paid to live there.
Being paid to live there.
Which just sounds wonderful.
And then on top of that, there are the 30,000 receiving disability living allowance,
the 30,000 receiving carers allowance, and then those who are receiving employment support allowance,
which has mostly been folded into the universal credit.
So the total bill is four billion pounds a year.
And for every pound and tax that goes into Birmingham, two and a half pounds are being spent on benefits.
This is insane.
The median local wages going up, but only because the government has been steadily increasing the minimum wage.
Amazing.
And it. It makes you feel patriotic, doesn't it, Carl?
It really, really, really looks great.
It makes you feel a bunch of things, but I don't think patriotism is the one I'm thinking.
I think I have a map here of the. Where is the map?
You could look at a census map and see Birmingham exactly this is six years out of date.
This is a six years out of date pre-Barris wave, 60% non, 60% foreign essentially.
And it's going to be probably about 70% now with the boris wave, because the boris wave
is just an any maximum creation, it tends to congregate in areas where they're already immigrants.
Makes sense for the Tories held their conference there this year again.
Yes.
I guess it does here.
Wonderful.
These are our constituents.
So it's, and if you look just at a country wide picture, sorry this is not showing as
well as it could.
Samsung, can we reduce the zoom in on this one and see the browsers zoom in?
But if you looked at a map of the country in terms of where our benefits being paid, you
will notice that there are the deprived areas of the north.
You will notice that Wales is getting a lot of benefits.
But you will notice that the urban areas where migrants congregate are also the areas where
the benefits also concentrate.
And you will see the whole problem with the British economy right there.
White areas that are completely abandoned by the state, where a bigger and bigger proportion
of the population is on benefits, and urban areas where the whites work, but the others
don't.
Yes.
A half of London being social housing foreigners.
Exactly.
Exactly.
A half of London social housing being for foreigners, things like that up and down the country.
And you can just see the size of the spent per resident, which is just crazy.
And it's entirely and impossibly unsustainable.
Yeah.
Now, the kinds of benefits that are available are also wild.
Yes.
You've got universal credit, which was a way for the government to bring in different kinds
of benefits and lump them into just one payment, because they were trying to consolidate.
Prior to this, there were loads of difference.
Yeah.
So there were employment and support allowance, which was if you were looking for a draw,
if you were not finding where job seekers allow in same thing, income support.
If you're working at a low income, child tax credit, working tax, et cetera, et cetera.
And that then became universal credit.
Now the eligibility for universal credit is pretty crazy.
You can be working or out of work or just unable to work and saying that you're unable
to work is enough and can get you universal credit.
Just being out of work is enough.
Yes.
You have a job.
No.
Well, here's some money then.
Exactly.
You just have to live in the UK.
So any foreigner who you can take?
But if you're any use it as a new, you must have settled or pre-settled status.
It doesn't say that about if you're completely foreign, which is a bit wild.
Because when I look at the Arab immigration pages, they're all talking to each other
about how do they claim universal credit and how do they get it, et cetera, et cetera.
I've covered before there was something going around where these people who had just
claimed asylum or people who had just gone on and applied for asylum were getting letters
through from NGOs telling them what they should do now.
Yes.
Apply for benefits.
Tell the local council that you're homeless and they'll give you somewhere to live.
Yes.
Yes.
Or riots in Glasgow, because there are thousands and thousands of illegal migrants who are being
given homes stealing the Glaswegians heroin money.
And the homeless Glaswegians have nowhere to go.
You can claim universal credit if you're a student.
Can you?
Yes.
Yes.
You can be a student and be assessed as having limited capacity to work.
Which seems slightly-- Where are we going to work for that?
Yeah.
Weird.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Why?
Crazy.
Crazy.
That payments go birth.
And you can claim to-- and basically what you ought to do if you want to maximize your
benefits is have one of your family members claim to be disabled and then apply for a
carer's allowance. And the tests for disability are somewhat crazy, hold on.
So for personal independence payments and being able to claim that you are in fact disabled
and it can be just a mental health condition, they ask you questions, can you prepare and
cook your own food?
You just have to say no.
Do you need help eating and drinking?
You have to say yes, I do.
Managing your treatments, if you're too retarded to count your pills, you qualify for personal
independent payments.
And then the person who's taking care of you, helping you take your pills on time, qualifies
for carers allowance.
Mixing with others.
Making decisions about money.
Oh, so that's the anxiety route.
Yeah.
Yes.
I saw from debilitating anxiety, can you pay me money and give me a car please?
Now for the move, if I fill this in black out drunk, then yeah, I'm sorted.
I'm sorry Carl, the government is just offering me a better deal.
For things like they are, for things like joking, I can't compete with it.
Yeah.
God damn it, man.
For things like moving around, you can claim benefits for obesity.
Oh, I can, yeah.
You mean, you know, not growing great?
No, it's going all right actually, I've been sticking on my diet actually.
So I've lost a kilogram in the last few days, so I'm quite happy about it.
That was good, yeah.
And the rest of it is just you saying that I'm too stupid to plan a journey.
I am.
My wife is always teasing me about it.
Well, there you go.
You're eligible for. I've got to go.
Pipes and your wife is eligible for carers allowance.
She's a real, yeah, you could, you could just be living on benefits if you want to.
I'm so, let's take a plan coming together.
Not only that, you can also apply for housing credit.
What do you have to pay a lot?
I mean, you can get support for rent if you are. You've lived in a hostel for homeless people.
They will, they will cover you.
If you are getting the daily living component of the personal independence payments, so
if you apply for one benefit, you get the next one, essentially.
How do I prove I'm a victim of modern slavery?
Well, you could just say that, I don't know, somebody. I could say that you're making me work too hard, and therefore I'm a victim of modern
slavery.
I agree.
And disprove it.
That's the whole point of it.
That's the point.
It cannot be disproven.
Am I going to claim that I'm a victim of my wife's domestic abuse despite never having
reported to the police?
What are the standards here?
Are there any at all?
None.
Right, okay.
Really, really none.
And when applying for benefits, you could get help from a translator.
Well, look at this as well.
If you live with a partner or a children, the amount of money you get is based on how many
bedrooms you need for your family.
Well, it's well worth my time to have as many bloody children as I can then, isn't
that?
Yes.
Brilliant.
Yes.
What an incentive.
And so, if you have the following are expected to share a bedroom, two children under
16 of the same sex, two children under 10.
That means that when your kids hit 16, you qualify for an extra bedroom in the house.
So, if you have a single adult 16 or over, they qualify for their own bedroom.
Or children who cannot share because of a disability or medical condition?
Well, yes.
They argue and it's ADHD or something.
That's the beauty of it.
Because disability living allowance, oh no, this is the motability one.
There it is.
I mean, wasn't the disability allowance the last one?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Sorry, let's get to the one that I was looking for.
But anyway, you can claim disability living allowance for your child, which is a wonderful
root.
And it kind of helps if you're a bit in-bred because the odds of you succeeding are higher.
And you can get it if at least one of the following applies to your child.
They need a lot more care, attention or supervision than a child of the same age who isn't disabled.
Oh, well, there we go.
That might.
My kids definitely do.
It's supervision in particular, because the little shit's all end up breaking something.
Check out the kids.
But they will end up breaking something.
My daughter cries if I don't let her watch me on the toilet.
So does that count?
Yeah.
I can say.
You know, people have managed to stay in Britain when they're supposed to be deported
for much stranger reasons.
I locked the door.
It's just bang, bang, bang.
Daddy.
Bang, bang, bang, bang.
I've literally had her shout at me before.
I want to watch you have a-
[LAUGHTER]
The fits of hysterics are bizarre, man.
[LAUGHTER]
That's really adorable.
That is funny.
That is funny.
It's funny.
It's funny.
They have difficulty walking or getting around outdoors in unfamiliar places, compared to
a child of the same age who isn't disabled.
Okay.
I almost have been disabled or had the condition for at least three months.
Suddenly I can see why our benefits build a something like 137 billion.
Yes.
And you don't need a formal diagnosis for a doctor to apply, just check this out.
You don't need a diagnosis from a doctor to apply, but having one can help.
No, sorry, I adversely underestimated that.
Including pensions, it's 334 billion.
Yes.
Yes.
But a diagnosis can help, which means that if you have a relative working in the NHS,
they will be issuing notes saying that your child is disabled, left, right and center.
And they might get that as a way of increasing their own pay because it makes you eligible for benefits.
And if you have that disability registered for a child,
you can get help with moving around with motability, and you could get a spanking new car if you want to.
But if not, you'll just get a bit of extra money every week.
Can I fall to buy myself a new car?
I'd like the government to give me one.
Yes.
Yes, exactly.
And you see how the motability scheme itself will help you in any way,
even if you're being reassessed or if it's changing or if it's ending,
because they want you to be their customer and get more vehicles through them,
because that increases the amount of money that they get.
There is the carer's allowance,
and basically you just have to say that someone is on PIP or in a disability living allowance,
and you are taking care of them and therefore you're eligible to receive an allowance for caring for them.
The beautiful thing about it is that you just have to say that you are taking care of them for maybe 30 hours a week,
35 hours a week.
Yeah, yeah.
Which means that if you are a full-time mom and you register one of the kids as disabled,
every full-time mom does these things.
They do the washing, helping, looking.
Yes.
And you take the kids if you've got a doctor's appointment.
Every child by this definition is disabled.
Yes.
Oh, God. And remember, getting one benefit makes it easier for you to get more benefits.
It's insane.
So it's a total and complete scam, top to bottom,
because it's relying on the central government that doesn't give a damn about you,
assessing your condition, which they won't do,
as opposed to your neighbors realizing that you need help and voluntarily stepping in to help you.
So it's the central government's takeover of what should be charity
that enables anybody to come from anywhere, show up in Britain,
and start claiming benefits on the basis of some disability or the other.
And this explains the channel migrants, right?
Why else would you put your life at risk and break into this country?
Well, it's because our benefit system is way more generous than the French.
And you then, if you are so inclined, if you're not a single man coming here to just a rape and pillage,
what this means is that you can apply for family reunification.
And if you apply for family reunification, you get your whole family with you.
And you say, well, I can't see out of my left eye because I'm Syrian and a bomb blew up next to me.
When in reality, you're probably Lebanese or Jordanian or Kuwaiti,
claiming to be that in order to get on the benefits ladder.
If you turned up with an eye patch, they're not going to be like, let me see that.
Well, there are some checks.
I know a few people who are on benefits, I'm from the North, it comes from the territory.
One of whom is, I won't give too many details here.
So she's a single mum who earns a fair amount through benefits and claiming for PIP and such.
And there are some malincentives, as ever, included with all of the actual checks that they do.
For instance, if she were to get into a relationship with a man with a steady job
and were to declare that, well, I'm living with a man who has a job now,
all of a sudden the amount of money that she gets each month would be massively reduced.
I think by a ratio of how much he gets per month.
Which means the incentive for a single mother who's claiming these sorts of benefits is don't get a relationship.
Yeah.
So I know of a couple through a friend of a friend, Moroccan and I think Lebanese Muslim.
They get married, they have a child, they're living in his social housing in London.
However, they're unhappy because it's just a one bedroom and now they have a child.
So they divorce on paper.
She applies for housing being homeless.
With a child, she gets to the top of the queue very quickly.
Then he moves in afterwards secretly.
So the incentive for a check, he should not be in at the time and excite some of his stuff.
Exactly, exactly.
So the potential for abuse of the system is insane.
Because it's a centralized government system that can never keep track,
it might work in a high trust society,
but it doesn't work in a diverse society if we'll stop.
And so you will see that there is this distribution where some rural areas have higher pip.
But I'll bet you that if you looked at higher benefits,
but I'll bet you that if you looked at the cities,
you will find that in the cities the benefits spike in the areas that are diverse.
Which is the only way to explain the constant view of Muslim women
with prams that are absolutely full and kids trailing them,
living in Central London, living in Central Birmingham, Manchester, what have you.
So it's just a gigantic scam that's ripe for abuse.
And it can't be reformed.
It has to go entirely.
I mean, on the plus side at some point, it will collapse.
Yes, some point is going to be able to be paid.
Well, yes, that when Andy Burnham is pissed off the bond market sufficiently.
So there won't let us money because for anyone who's wondering,
we're something like 130 billion in debts after each budget every year.
Yes. So the revenues the state brings in are not sufficient to cover all of this.
And have them some time, I understand.
It's disastrous. I'll tell you about that bit in a second.
OK. So to match if you have three children, like I do,
and you don't want to and you want to sort of earn an equivalent to what a family on benefits would earn,
you have to make 71,000.
My aspirational earnings are the families on benefits.
The seriously, seriously, like 71,000.
The median income in this country is a lot lower than 71,000.
38,000. Yes. So you have to be making near double
the median income to be better off than somebody who's in benefits.
It's completely crazy. And if you're trying to, and this is just, sorry,
this is just some of the benefits because as the council of Tower Hamlets points out,
which is a totally conquered Bangladeshi area,
if you're pregnant, you have a child under four, you are entitled to help,
help to buy food and drink. The state will feed your children for you.
You've already been given money.
I know, but not enough. It's never enough.
One of the more insulting aspects of it is that if your family member is a felon and is in jail,
the state will give you 40 pounds a day to go visit them.
The youngest few sent a soup chat saying, "This point would be cheaper and more efficient to put Birmingham to the torch
and dispose of the ashes. Way more."
Not just that, the conservatives tried to brag recently that under labor,
welfare payments have exceeded income tax for the first time ever.
Oh, yeah.
And it was pointed out to them that they're a dirty bunch of liars.
It's been happening for years.
Because it's been happening from at least 2014, if not before,
if not 2012, that actually. I really like that optimistic forecast.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm sure.
By the way, guys, we're going to fix it next year.
No, no, no, not next year.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
What's going to happen? No, we're going to ramp up your income tax.
Yes.
That's what we're going to do. We're going to take you more to cover the welfare bill.
Oh, my God, man. And you see the inflection point with the Boris wave
in the middle of 2020, when it just shoots upwards,
when the welfare bill just shoots upwards.
It attacks the pay for the Boris wave.
Oh, I'm getting so rinsed by tax as well.
I hate it so much.
It's, it's insane.
It's a scam. You're being robbed blind.
You're being robbed blind to pay for your own replacement.
When you're replaced,
Kemi will tell you that actually she's English, not you.
And the BBC will say, "No, you need to pay reparations
to the people who are replacing you. That means you get a lower wage."
So unsustainable, man. God bless the Europa people.
We're all thinking it. I'm the only one saying it.
I love this fact, check though, for the first time ever, no, this has been the way for
a long time.
Exactly, exactly.
Exactly, when the Conservatives were in power, actually, I don't understand how this
has meant to be a defense.
Well, I mean, this isn't a defense.
It's an attack on the Conservatives, fair enough, but it's just-
Completely, completely worse than you thought it was.
Have we got any video comments today, Samson?
Let's go to those.
HMButtoniPermitRetry says, "I feel like this is the government first segment.
I feel like this semester is to restore rather than reform.
Reform wouldn't be happy to be a sell out bad guy party and the rest of the uniparty
in Geno's knowing."
Well, that's the point I was making.
It's like, reform are not like a party that cares about identity at all.
So really, they are declaring that the uniparty is anyone is English and the alternative is
whatever the opposite is, just anything that is the outside of that consensus.
Yes.
So, yeah, vote restore brand.
Let's get to the next one.
I know that guy.
In order to build here, you need some deep government connections and we call it a
wasta in Lebanon.
It's like somebody helping you under the table.
A friend of a friend.
Yeah, that's how Lebanon runs.
The entire country of Lebanon runs on wasta.
He's laughing.
The guy in the suit knows.
He's not wrong.
What kind of business are you in, sir?
I am a member of parliament.
You're a member of parliament?
I love the deal.
I know that guy.
I can't believe you know that guy.
The face is familiar.
Probably got blackouts from him at some point.
Very possible.
Very possible.
But the. I kind of respect that you've introduced.
This is how the MP sat there laughing along like, yeah, yeah, we're so corrupt.
There's so past beyond pretending they're corrupt.
I mean, that restaurant is for the very, very rich, essentially, where they're seated
there.
And he's sitting there in the middle of the day because he's probably waiting for someone
to come in and. Give him a wasta.
A briefcase to him.
Oh, they just. Oh, they just. Oh, they just do it right there.
Yeah, yeah, they do it under the table.
Why would they do that?
I had so stupid, sorry.
I had to fix something in my house and I decided that it was going to be a lot easier
to preemptively bribe them.
So. And it's nice, because you know what you're going to pay.
You reach an agreement ahead of time.
You just hand them the money and you're done.
And that's why. I mean, this is usually in the normal world.
This is just what a contract is.
Yes.
I love that we've arrived at contract heronism from first principles.
If I pay you to do this, you do this.
Oh, brilliant.
Outside of Europe, they prefer if this sort of thing just has a veneer of criminality.
Do it.
Even if it is just a contract.
This is illegal.
Well, not really.
But anyway.
So you guys did a segment about elder abuse in the care industry and, you know, and also
mentioned how STDs were rampant in the care homes due to the elderly people being so
randy.
But I wonder about that these days, considering that we see lots of cases of migrant men raping
elderly white women.
And I can't help but wonder that they might be doing the same thing as the caretakers,
because we already know they abused them in other ways.
So who'd say they don't do that, too?
And honestly, it would be easy to cover up because, you know, the elderly people are
seen out and kind of just imagine they don't know how to organize and speak their case.
I have no idea.
I dread to think.
It's a, yeah, it's a horrible thought.
Yeah.
For us, the solar power can, he says, I was born and brought in the year 2000, and therefore
I was taught in school about US civil rights movement.
Yeah, it's weird, isn't it?
That was just, that was just the blare right education regime, boy, I imagine it's no
different now as well.
Yep.
No.
We were taught as kids that there were Jim Crow laws, which were bad.
After it, there was positive discrimination, which was good.
From children, we in Britain, I taught that being white is discriminating against whites
is a good thing.
Yeah, that's true.
It is.
It was in London yesterday.
Sorry, I was in London yesterday waiting for a friend at a pub, and I started chatting
with a couple of guys, you know, having a couple cigarettes and talking about Britain.
And one of them said, whoa, it's such a nice thing to have our country spoken about
nicely or to have us spoken about nicely.
And my question was, when a foreigner would speak badly about you in your country, why
do you just clock them in the fricking face?
Oh, man, those days long gone.
That's exactly what he said.
What did he say?
What did he say?
He said word for word.
Yeah, I'll probably go to prison for like 10 years if I did something.
Yeah, that's why he said word for word.
How is she depressing?
She can be kind of a hate crime, so.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, it would literally be hate crime.
Yeah, what I was just going to say is that, yeah, it's weird.
In schools, we're taught about American race relations and not our own history of race
relations.
It's because it's libtard.
Yes.
Libtardism.
Yeah.
This is the liberal narrative of history and the global history.
Exactly.
The global liberal, and it's always, you know, so America is like the paradigmatic case
because it was slavery based on race, you know, anything else is not really as bad, you
know, there are other sort of like, you know, what the British Empire had like a racial
hierarchy, but it wasn't slavery, so it's not as bad.
But this is super bad.
And that's why it was, but then we cut out the slavery part and then they went, oh,
we can't teach that then.
Well, yeah, we made it stop.
So that makes us look good.
Momodon says, in a few years' time, I love a quite news article that Olukemi Olufanto
Baitnock returned to homeland to Nigeria to be with a family and there's like a, not
because she looted billions from the toys in the UK.
That was just right.
Being propaganda, I'm sure.
Yeah, I mean, you know, Henry says the definition of equivalent workers in your segment
is very loose.
In this case, in a lot of these cases, claiming discrimination, the BBC China editor was
moaning that they were paid less than men in their equivalent roles.
I remember that when she was comparing herself to the Middle East editor and the North American
editor, which are the two most prestigious roles going, I bet she was out earning the African
and Latin American equivalents the same, it's the same thing as Tesco shop workers complaining
there paid less than the warehouse workers, claiming it was gender based.
Yeah, that happened to, annoyingly, the shop workers won.
I'm sure that the Chinese editor won as well.
And now I'm sure there's loads of incentives for people to keep working in the warehouses,
which is way more difficult than working stacking shelves instead.
Yeah.
Same thing.
There was that little screenshot going around, somebody taking a photo outside of an
Aldi, whereas like, it was offering, there were job vacancies and they went, if you work
on the floor, you can earn this much per hour.
If you work as a manager, you can work this much more per hour.
And the difference was like 20 P per hour.
So it's like, why would you want to be a manager then?
Yeah.
It's going to be like way more effort for 20 P more an hour.
Not worth it.
The engineer says, so I know it's not legal for employees to discuss pay if often against
company policy, but airing that kind of dirty laundry publicly probably violates some
kind of company professionalism clause in the agreement, employer agreement.
Yeah, but there's if anyone cares at this point, man, yeah, no one, no one cares.
I don't want to upset the faceless corp, like company, no, nobody cares about that sort
of stuff.
Yeah.
And see, looting.
Look at Canada under Mark Carney.
Yeah.
I'm sure it's exactly the same.
Yeah.
Yeah.
If you haven't seen it since Jimbo, there was a Channel 4 documentary a while ago where a Muslim
man had three wives and nine children.
He had no intention of getting a job and was getting five K a month, a house, and all
of his bill paid and saying that wasn't good enough.
Oh, just, I just, there's no reason a man like that shouldn't be made an example of.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm not going to say that.
I'm not going to say that.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Kemi Bay-Knock’s conservative conference speech promotes a unified, ethno-identity-free vision of Englishness, rejecting diversity as a threat to national identity.
The speech is criticized as a shift toward "uniparty" ideology, echoing globalism and liberal inclusivity, rather than traditional conservatism.
The speaker argues that the BBC is systematically discriminating against white employees, with ethnic minorities earning 13.2% more in lower pay bands, reversing historical pay gaps.
This pay gap shift is framed as a capitalist strategy to depress wages by increasing labor supply from non-white, migrant workers.
Conservative figures like Tim Stanley and James O’Brien praise the shift, framing it as progress and moral legitimacy, despite evidence of systemic bias.
The speaker highlights a contradiction
The analysis reveals that diversity policies in institutions like the BBC and RAF are driven by ideology, not merit, and actively exclude white, male professionals.
The speaker warns that without reform, the UK risks losing its cultural and national identity through demographic and economic displacement.
Summary:
The podcast critiques the current direction of British politics and institutions, focusing on Kemi Bay-Knock’s conservative conference speech and its implications. The speaker argues that her message promotes a false, inclusive vision of Englishness that undermines traditional identity, framing racial and gender diversity as a political and economic tool rather than a genuine social good. 2% more in lower pay bands—revealing a shift in institutional power that contradicts claims of anti-racism.
This trend is linked to broader economic dynamics, where immigrant labor depresses wages and reshapes workforce hierarchies. The speaker contends that the conservative response to this shift—celebrating diversity as progress—masks deep ideological contradictions. Figures like Tim Stanley and James O’Brien are accused of endorsing this shift without scrutiny, treating it as moral or cultural triumph.
The analysis also highlights institutional failures, such as the RAF's exclusion of white male pilots and the BBC’s problematic representation of diversity. Ultimately, the speaker warns that without addressing these structural imbalances, the UK risks losing its national identity through demographic and economic transformation. The critique concludes with a call for accountability, noting that real change requires dismantling systemic biases, not just adopting identity-based policies.
FAQs
The podcast claims the Conservative Party is in decline, with only 18% of the vote—far below historical levels—and criticizes their recent conference as celebratory despite their poor electoral showing.
Her speech is described as rejecting 'ethno-nationalism' and promoting multiculturalism, but the podcast argues it fails to address real issues like racial identity and is used to appeal to minority groups rather than unify the party.
Yes, the podcast claims the BBC is systematically paying white employees less than ethnic minority staff, with pay gaps reaching up to 13.2% in lower pay bands, and suggests this is part of a broader anti-white trend.
It argues that diversity initiatives are being used to depress wages by inflating the value of non-white employees' identities, leading to pay disparities that benefit minority groups while disadvantaging white workers.
The podcast challenges the idea that people of non-British descent are automatically English, pointing out contradictions in how identity is defined and how it's used politically to divide or unify groups.
It criticizes the party for promoting diversity as a policy goal while simultaneously maintaining a system that underpays white staff, suggesting that these policies serve to reverse traditional power structures rather than promote equality.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.