For decades, the Mafia was the face of organized crime in America. But while the mob's power has faded, organized crime itself has become more global, more sophisticated, and harder to track. Virginia Commonwealth University criminologist Jay Albanese has spent decades studying how criminal organizations adapt and survive. In this conversation, he explains how law enforcement weakened the traditional Mafia, how criminal enterprises shifted from controlling neighborhoods to trafficking across borders, and why he believes corruption remains one of the most important challenges facing modern societies.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcription
4998 Words, 28851 Characters
Audible Subscribers can binge new seasons of American Scandal early and ad-free right now. Join Audible in the Audible app, or by subscribing on Apple Podcasts. From Audible Originals, I'm Lindsey Graham, and this is American Scandal. For much of the 20th century, organized crime in the United States was almost synonymous with the Mafia, a small number of powerful families dominated cities around the country and their influence ran through gambling, labor, and local politics. Today, those families still exist, but they are a shadow of what they once were, and the organized crime landscape is far more complex and far more powerful. Criminal activity now moves through gangs that stretch across borders, through cyber operations that never touch a physical street corner, and through networks that can sit uncomfortably close to legitimate businesses and even state governments. My guest today is Jay Almanes. He's a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University and one of the country's leading scholars on organized crime, criminal justice, and corruption. He's advised the United Nations on transnational crime and spent decades studying how criminal organizations form, adapt, and survive. Our conversation is next. Hi, I'm David Brown, the host of Business Wars from Audible Originals. In our new season, sweet and low, equal, and splendor are locked in a bitter fight, battling for billions while scientists and regulators threaten to shut them all down. Make sure to listen to Business Wars on Audible or wherever you get your podcasts. Police Center of our California are investigating the double murder of a young couple in the parking lot of their apartment complex. A double homicide grabs the public's attention by the throat. They've identified Christopher Dorner as a suspect in this double homicide. A former cop and still in the loose, considered armed and extremely dangerous, and scariest of all, he left something behind. A particular interest in multi-page manifesto. This manifesto on Facebook is 11 pages long. Trace, this manifesto from this suspect who's targeting cops, it's stunning. Listen to the show The New Yorker calls one of the best podcasts of the summer. Dan Tabersky's Manifesto. And I tell you, this manifesto, excuse the hell out of me. Listen to Dan Tabersky's Manifesto, wherever you get your podcasts, or bend to the entire series right now, only with Audible. Jay Albany's, thanks for speaking with me today on American Scanner. Thank you. It's great to be here. Now, the mafia certainly had a heyday, and the creation of RICO laws is often credited as one of the keys to weakening the mafia. But I'm just wondering how much of the credit for the mafia's decline is due to law enforcement action, versus maybe economic, technological, or social changes? Yes, it's a very difficult thing to sort out. The mafia clearly is not the force it once was. And the law enforcement effort of the '80s and '90s, which was clearly the most significant law enforcement effort against organized crime in the history of the U.S., a lot of it was made possible by the racketeering laws, which passed in 1970, but was used for the first time to my knowledge in 1980. It's a long, complicated law, but it enabled law enforcement to be much more effective in the way that rather than going after somebody for illegal gambling or conspiracy in the usual offenses, if the prosecution can prove that they were engaging in three or more crimes over a period of 10 years, I could prosecute you as a criminal enterprise. And that could dramatically increase the penalties of up to 20 years in prison. So the stakes went up dramatically. And given all the changes in contemporary society and technology since the year 2000, there is no single group in the modern world in organized crime. And that's due to all the changes that have occurred over the last generation. So you're correct in saying, you know, the mafia is not what it once was, and perhaps will never be what it once was. But you know, I think, you know, rumors of its demise are premature. Let me just give you a quick example just from the past year in New Jersey, right? The big case, 39 defendants was multiple locations of illegal poker games in the rear of legitimate restaurants. And there was also an illegal online sports book involved. And of course, it was associated with members of the Lucaisie crime family. These are all very traditional organized crime activities, illegal gambling, extortion by having to, you have to threaten sometimes people to make them pay. And then you have to do something with the illicit proceeds, right? You can't go to a car dealership with $10,000 cash and put it down toward a car anymore. All right? Because we have money laundering laws. So money laundering has become a separate art in itself to disguise the source of illicit proceeds. So when I see this case, which again happened just a year ago, I said, well, this is about a traditional organized crime as it gets. So the structure has changed. That is, there's many more legitimate characters and businesses involved in this. So it's fewer mob guys, but more business people in this Jersey case, there was some councilman of some town in New Jersey who was in on it. But the underlying activity is pretty much what it's always has been. Let's dive into some of the other changes that might have affected the mafia's, for lack of a better word, effectiveness as an organization. How about recruitment or maybe lack thereof? Are younger people less interested in getting involved in organized crime? Currently, in the popular conception, this was almost a neighborhood job opportunity. Yes, it was. You might recall the opening line of Goodfellas when Henry Hill says, as long as I can remember, I always wanted to be a wise guy. Because in many of these working class, urban communities, especially in New York and Chicago, in the big cities, the people driving the nicest cars were in the nicest clothes who everybody would be very accommodating towards were the guys who were affiliated with the mob. And so that became sort of a alternative pathway, you know, to success. And when you look at the history over the 60s, 70s, 80s, you know, you had people who would say, well, okay, I got caught by the cops running an illegal gambling enterprise, maybe some extortion, and I got a sentence of five years. There were lots of people willing to do the five years. I'm a stand-up guy. I'll protect the family, protect the enterprise. Well, as time goes on into the 80s and 90s, there are fewer people willing to do that. That is the younger people saying, hey, look at, you know, I'm your friend. We commit crimes together, but I'm not going to do time for you. And then you combine that with the racketeering laws that had sentences of 20 years. You say, well, maybe I'll do a few years for you. But I'm not, nobody's doing 20 years for you. So you have many more people saying, well, I'm not going to play this game. So that the hold of that tradition of the mob, we have so many people who are interrelated and uncles, friends, even in the Mafia cops cases, you know, the two detectives at the center of that case, both of their lives before they became cops involved close associations and sometimes relatives who had strong connections with Mafia figures. So all of that is tied together. As time went on, there were fewer young people with that Italian family tradition that you do anything for the family. People increasingly said, hey, I'll do it if it's good for me, but I'm not going to be doing time for somebody else. I'm glad you brought up our two protagonists or antagonists in this story, Louis Epilito. As you mentioned, did come from a Mafia family, but he went on to become a police officer of some ill repute. But why would his ties to organized crime not be a red flag for law enforcement? Great question. I've often thought about that, you know, that the two detectives, I mean, Caracapa, right? He was a childhood friend of Tommy Balotti. Tommy Balotti was probably the closest person to Paul Castellano. He was Paul Castellano's driver and Castellano was, of course, head of the Gambino Crime Family. And at the very end, Castellano was going to make Balotti his under boss. So that, to me, that should come up as a major red flag on a background check. I just don't understand that. And then you look at Epilito and his ties are even stronger. I mean, his father was an enforcer for the Gambinos. His uncle was a captain in the Gambino family. So you have all of this mixed together and you say, these guys might have had a career doing something. Maybe they, I don't know, maybe they could have gone to law school and become a mob lawyer or something. I don't know. Is this officer? Yeah, it is shocking that somehow they made it to become detectives in the NYPD. I think you could perhaps invent a story in which these individuals with their mafia ties decide to rebel against that tradition and become police officers. But that wasn't the case for these two gentlemen. there were repeated warnings about both detectives
allegiance and behavior, but repeatedly dismissed. Is this unique in this time and place in the New York police department? Is there some sort of code that even the fledgling cops get looked after by other cops? - Back in that day, I think it was more the case. I mean, look at the case of Frank Cervico, the same kind of thing. And there it was accepting payoffs rather than mafia-related crimes. But it was the same kind of thing where you said, "God, it took a long time "for what was clear corruption to come to light." I mean, for a while there, every 20 years, it was a major corruption investigation in New York that has slowed down. I attribute that to the professionalization of policing. But there are some bad people everywhere. And that's the way it is. And when you look at the mafia cops, what is shocking was the extent to which they engage in criminal behavior. I mean, they were actually involved in homicides, which is rare. Most of the other corruption, if you look over the years, has been involved with taking money and payoffs from suspected criminals. - And what if AI could recreate the voice of somebody you loved who died? What if it destroyed your reputation with words you never said? And what if you fell in love with something that was never human? I'm Mark Finnell, and in my brand new Audible original podcast, I'm traveling the globe to investigate the very personal ways. AI is already changing our relationships, our memories, and our sense of what is real. Unreal, listen now on Audible. - James R. The Ray was a charismatic self-help guru who promises followers a path to wealth and enlightenment by becoming the best versions of themselves. But not all who followed him finished their journey. After Ray appeared on Oprah, thousands flocked to his events. But what many people didn't know about were his more extreme methods. Methods that push his followers to their limits, giving some the transformative experience they envisioned and killing others. For the best binge will series, like the one I just told you about, listen to the Audible True Crime podcast wherever you get your podcasts. Audible subscribers can get all episodes early and ad-free right now. Join Audible in the Audible app or by subscribing on Apple Podcasts. (dramatic music) - Let's discuss where the Mafia is today. If its dominance has faded, what might have replaced it? Who are the major players in organized crime today? And where are they? - For me, the major difference from the days when the Mafia control things to now has been territory. You control territory. So if I wanted to run some illegal game or a prostitution ring or whatever it was in that area, I better have you on board. And normally you would say no or you would allow me to do it for some peace of the illegal enterprise. So it's a very territorial place. And what has happened now, the nature of organized crime has changed. For example, now if somebody said, well, what one word characterizes organized crime today, I would say that one word would be trafficking. All right, it's moving stuff around. So whether you're in the human trafficking, sex trafficking, labor trafficking, drug trafficking, trafficking in, you know, in antiquities, endangered animals, all kinds of stuff. All of that stuff has to move across borders. So it's changed the nature so that whole territorial part of traditional organized crime is much less important. For example, I asked a university class, I said, okay, how many of you have ever been to New York on a field trip when you were in school? Everybody's been to New York on a field trip. And I said, okay, when you go there, there's always guys with a blanket on the sidewalk selling fake purses or whatever, you know, stuff like that. Where did those purses come from? This guy on the sidewalk had nothing to do with those purses, so where did they come from? All right, so then you show them the data and there's been some great empirical studies by academics and NGOs and a few governments showing that the vast majority, and these are like counterfeit Louis Vuitton's and all these high-end purses, the vast majority of them are made in Southeast Asia. Most are made by people working in sweatshop conditions, human trafficking, it's underage workers, the whole thing. Those purses are then shipped to countries with money, like North America and Europe, especially. Well, how do they get them there? Well, you have counterfeit labeling, you have bribery at the border, you have all the ways to scam it in to get it into the country. Then when it gets into the country, you need people to distribute these. And then there are people around and they find dudes willing to sell his stuff on the street and you have a whole distribution network. So the guy selling them on the sidewalk in New York is getting a very small piece of the action. But my point and my point to my students and to any regular person is that by buying that purse, you are in fact funding a transnational criminal enterprise that begins in Southeast Asia and ends with you on the streets in New York. So if these more traditional revenue streams for them off, you still exist gambling and extortion, are they the prominent forms of crime for organized criminals across the world or has it moved like you perhaps mentioned to newer forms like trafficking? Yeah, absolutely. Trafficking in everything has become like a virus around the world. People like banned and stolen property, guns, animals, all kinds of stuff. And then of course, now we have trafficking in information, whether it's social security numbers, whether it's patient records that hospital will pay a fortune for me not to release. And there are sites are all over the internet. If you go in the dark web, you can buy almost anything you want. And you see some of these cybercrime cases, some of the people participating in the scheme have never met one another. And then along the way, somebody invented cryptocurrency, which for me is simply a way to hide a transaction. And so then you would say, well, why would any regular person need to hide a transaction? Well, you'd only need to do it if you of course were doing something illegal. So that enables the dark web. That enables me to pay somebody in some other country through crypto. I could never do it otherwise without having the bags of cash problem. And this stuff is very hard. A whole new set of enforcement skills is required. This has taken some time to develop, but I think we're better than we were 20 years ago. If you were looking 20, 30 years ago, I said, well, I'm going to make money and I don't care how I make it. You would have to have a physical presence somewhere. You have to rob from people, steal from people. I ask students in my university class. I said, how many people here ever carry cash? Not a single hand goes up. They don't carry cash. I said, how many of you carry a wallet? Almost nobody carries a wallet anymore, right? It's all on their phone. And their phone is password protected. This is why I pick pocketing has gone out of style because if I grab what's in your pocket, it gets me nowhere. So I would argue people are just disposed to steal as they were 100 years ago, but the opportunities have changed dramatically. Now, if you're disposed to stealing to get ahead, you can sit in your pajamas at home. All you need is a Wi-Fi connection. So you could do it at the coffee shop and not even have to pay for the Wi-Fi. And send spam emails to people, investment schemes, romance games, all the things that we all know and hear about. So the new communications technology that we've been spoiled by has given the criminally minded people opportunities to exploit. And I never have to leave my house. I never have to get out of my pajamas. Well, let me pose a question to you. If it does seem that it's easier to become a criminal in the modern age, what would you prefer? Would you rather investigate the Gambino family in 1985 or a modern transnational cyber fraud network today? Yeah. It makes you long for the old days. Law enforcement was easier back then because of the physical presence needed. When you think back to the three-gottie trials and all of the big mob cases of the '80s and '90s, wiretapping and informants were at the center of all of that. Because when you look at major drug trafficking cases, most of them started at the bottom. When somebody gets grabbed and they informed their way up the chain, well, now with these transnational schemes, you don't even know who's up the chain. You've never met the person. You've got some contact information, which has, you know, long sense expired. And that's the end of it. So it's just much more difficult to make a case now than it was back then. And this is why you need people with cyber skills. You need all kinds of skills that were not relevant back in the day. [MUSIC] One company changed the artificial sweetener industry forever by deleting four words from a tagline. Sales, skyrocketed, rivals sued. And a multi-billion dollar war was on. Hey there, I'm David Brown, the host of the podcast business wars. Every season we bring you the true stories behind the companies that shape our world.
their rivalries, their reinventions, and their spectacular rises and falls. In our new season, we're diving into the bitter battle to own sweetness. When scientists discovered that chemicals could deliver the taste of sugar with none of its calories, sweet and low, equal and splendour fought for space on table tops, in diet sodas, and on gross restore shelves across America. But as health scares hit, and regulators came knocking, the fierce competition between the top three artificial sweeteners turned ugly. Make sure to follow business wars wherever you get your podcasts. Audible subscribers can binge all episodes of business wars early and at free right now. Very personal ways. Unreal. Listen now on Audible. You've called corruption the biggest problem in the world. Why is that? Yeah, that's because it creates every other problem. When the UN and many other groups internationally have ranked the problems of the world, right? We live in a world of limited resources, so we should spend time on the most important problems. And they rank them. They go through them all. Whether it's climate or poverty or inequality or disease. And you can give them all metrics and rank them. But when I look at all those, corruption either caused a problem or made the problem much worse. In every single case, and the corruption sometimes is governmental corruption, sometimes it was for private sector, corruption, sometimes it was malfeasant, sometimes it was non-feasants, failure to act when action was required. So that's to me why corruption is the most important problem. And the one that we should be going after proactively all the time. Because corruption rarely results in a complaint to the police, right? These always require proactive investigations involving following the money, following people doing suspicious things, and law enforcement and prosecution agencies have to be very patient, because these cases take time to build. And in all the cases, it's people in positions of authority abusing their position for personal gain. Usually it's money, sometimes it's power and influence. But the motives are much more similar than they are different. Now, in the last few years, the Panama papers and the Pandora papers have also exposed how global financial systems help hide wealth and enable corruption and organize crime. What do you think these revelations tell us about how the modern illicit economy works? One, it shows that even in quote unquote non-corrupt locations around the world, there are still people engaging in self-dealing that violates laws against corruption, bribery, nepotism, obstruction of justice, all the offences in the orbit of corruption. So it just shows it exists everywhere, but when you read about the Panama papers and the others, to me, the most interesting thing I always look for, what it took for them to get this information. Usually it takes months and months and months, sometimes years of digging to get information and to put it together. And when the government isn't doing it proactively, well then it's up to civil society. And when you look at the cases you mentioned, they were brought by journalists by and large. And I mean, take the big picture. There's only three segments of society. There's the government with the power. There's business with the money and civil society, where the vast majority of people are. We rely on the government to protect our rights. We rely on business to provide an economy that people can all work and make a living. And when those are not working well, when they're corrupt, when they're self-dealing, and they're ignoring civil society or persecuting or exploiting civil society, well then you need civil society to rise up. And so when I see something like the Panama papers, I said, this is civil society making noise. This is civil society saying this is happening. And of course with those cases, some actual criminal cases were made. But the point is you can't just rely on the government and business to make things better. Civil society is the biggest segment of society and they have a loud voice. And they're responsible for making a bunch of very important cases, all usually involving corruption. Now another element that has become more and more modern is the integration of geopolitics with organized crime. During the Cold War, organized crime was often very separate. There was no real national identity to the mafia other than heritage, their Italian or Sicilian heritage. Today though, things like sanctions evasion and cyber operations are criminal organizations that are sometimes state led. So our criminal organization is becoming geopolitical actors in their own right? Yeah, although I'm not sure it's criminal organizations. I did a study that came out last year looking at this corruption organized crime link. Normally, traditionally, organized crime is viewed as corrupting government. And where organized crime is the predator in government is the victim. I looked at a whole bunch, several hundred corruption and organized crime cases, but specifically cases that involve some element of corruption to see what the relationship was. Because if organized crime was corrupting government, well, then you would see cases that involve extortion, intimidation, threats, things like that, right? People from the outside saying do this or else. And when you looked at hundreds of cases, and this was not only the US, but also international cases, that almost never came up. The overwhelming majority were cases where people in positions of power were using organized crime to carry out their goals. In other words, to enforce debts to punish competitors they didn't want in the market. And it was much more of a bribery type relationship where they were working together to accomplish a self-interested goal, usually of making money or consolidating power. So I don't see the criminal organizations at sort of the source of all this. They are enablers, they're facilitators, but I see the corrupt actors in government and business being the drivers. So with all the changes in organized crime, its methods, its aspirations, its availability to individual actors, how has law enforcement been able to keep up? It's difficult. Law enforcement is not an easy job. Just to give a local example, we have career fairs for the students all the time. And one of them, we had the Dallas Police Department coming 2,000 miles to Virginia to our career fair. So I talked to the Dallas PD guy, said, "What are you guys doing in Virginia? We just can't get a big enough applicant pool just by staying local." So there's two issues, right? Number of people interested in that kind of job, which is obviously a very, very fascinating job, but it's a hard job, right? But then too, yeah, it's a moving target, right? You know, you could argue and I have argued that, you know, larceny was the characteristic crime of the 20th century. That is, I would take your property when you were away or weren't looking. That was clearly the most common offense. And in the 21st century, the most common crime, of course, is going to be fraud. That is, I can't take your money because, well, I want I can't get access to it. You're not carrying it. What I need is your information. That's what I need. So you have many more crimes of fraud, which is basically as larceny by trick. I'll trick you out of your thing. So that's why we have all these romance scams and labor scams and all these kinds of things, human trafficking, recruitment scams. So to make these cases, it takes surveillance, it takes information gathering, it takes police officers who can, in fact, talk to anybody on the street and have a conversation. You know, it's really a fairly unique set of skills. You need people with a dedication to public service and, you know, people who are assigned the cases that matter. Well, Jay Albany's thank you so much for talking with me today on American Scan. I was pleased to be here and thanks so much for the conversation. That was my conversation with criminologist Jay Albany's. He's a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, and has written or edited more than 20 books on organized crime and corruption. For laudable originals and airship, this is episode five of Mafia Combs for American Scan. In our next series, a fan favorite. On January 28, 1986, the Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight. All seven crew members aboard were killed, including school teacher Christa McCullough. The winner of a competition could become the first educator in space. But the challenger disaster was not a freak accident. Long before a Christa McCullough was even chosen to become an astronaut. A series of design errors and ignored warnings had set NASA on a course for tragedy. American Scandal is only possible because of listeners like you, so thank you, and don't miss an episode. Be sure to follow American Scandal on Audible or wherever you get your podcasts. And Audible subscribers can binge new seasons of American Scandal early and add free
Right now, join Audible in the Audible app or by subscribing on Apple Podcasts. And to find out more about me, including my other podcasts, my live show, the history tours I'm arranging and all sorts of other things, go to historyishuman.com. That's historyishuman.com. American scandal is hosted, edited, and executive produced by me, Lindsey Graham for Airship. This episode was produced by John Reed, senior producer Andy Beckerman, managing producer Emily Burk, audio editing by Molly Bach, music by Thrum, sound designed by Gabriel Gould, executive producer for Airship is William Simpson. Executive producer for Audible is Jenny Lauer Beckman, head of creative development at Audible, Kate Naven, head of Audible originals North America, Marshall Louis, chief content officer Rachel Giazza. Copyright 2026 by Audible originals LLC, sound recording copyright 2026 by Audible originals LLC. (dramatic music) Imagine you're reading Pride and Prejudice, except you're not reading it. Harris Dickinson and Marissa O'Bella are reading it to you on Audible. Her Barb sting you. His coldness sends a shiver up your spine. Your heart aches, your ears burn. You yearn for Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy to profess their undying love for one another. You can't bear it any longer. Well, maybe a chapter longer. Performance is so good, you'll give love a second chance. Audible, stories that speak to you.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Summary:
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.