Brian Dawkins shares a personal journey with major depressive disorder, advocating for mental health support and detailing how combining Caplyta with his antidepressant significantly improved his symptoms. Caplyta, when used with an antidepressant, provides greater relief from depression, though it carries risks such as increased mortality, stroke, and serious side effects like high cholesterol or uncontrolled muscle movements. The narrative then shifts to a discussion with former FTC Commissioner Lena Kahn, who transformed the agency into a powerful force against corporate power. She led high-impact investigations into Amazon, Meta, and pharmaceutical pricing, resulting in reduced drug costs for consumers—such as asthma inhalers dropping from hundreds to $35. Kahn emphasized that antitrust enforcement is essential to prevent monopolistic practices, especially in healthcare and tech, where companies exploit market power. Despite facing political resistance, skepticism, and legal hurdles, her work demonstrated that aggressive, even-handed enforcement can yield real benefits. The episode also underscores broader issues, including the consolidation of industries like chicken farming, where small farmers rely on a few processors, and the misuse of patents to inflate prices. Ultimately, it calls attention to the need for structural reforms, transparency, and stronger consumer protections in a market increasingly dominated by large corporations.
I'm pro-football Hall of Famer Brian Dawkins, and I lived for a long time with something I did not
know the name of, major depressive disorder. I carried sadness and anger because I thought I
could handle it alone, but I couldn't. Now I want to make sure others know that that support is out
there. If you're experiencing similar symptoms, talk to a healthcare professional. Visit mddallies.com
to watch my story. Paid partnership with Johnson & Johnson. Brian Dawkins is not prescribed
Caplyta Lumateperone. I needed more from my antidepressant, so my doctor added Caplyta
Lumateperone, proven to provide greater relief from depression symptoms than an antidepressant
alone, building on my progress without starting over. Caplyta is for adults with major depressive
disorder when used with an antidepressant and is available by prescription only. Individual
results may vary. In clinical trials, weight gain was not common.
Patients have increased risk of death or stroke. Caplyta is not approved for dementia-related
psychosis. Call your doctor about new or sudden mood changes, behaviors, or suicidal thoughts
right away. Antidepressants may increase these risks. Report fever, confusion, stiff muscles,
which may be life-threatening, or uncontrolled muscle movements, which may be permanent. High
cholesterol and weight gain may occur, as can high blood sugar, which may be fatal.
Monitoring is recommended. Common side effects are sleepiness, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth,
feeling tired, and diarrhea. These aren't all the side effects. Ask your doctor about Caplyta.
Learn more at caplyta.com or call 888-788-7888.
2-5-2-4-8-2-4.
I got a whole lineup of premium meats, cheeses, hummus, and dips, condiments, and more to serve
up on game day. Head to your local Boar's Head deli counter to shop now. For game day sandwich
inspiration and more, visit boar'shead.com. Boar's Head, committed to craft since 1905.
You function kind of like as someone that enforced the law. You were kind of like a
cop or like a, you know, did you ever ask for a gun? You should have got a badge.
I know we probably should have. You know, we did have investigators,
who like went undercover sometimes, and they did have badges.
Did you send guys to Burning Man to like figure out tech corruption?
We didn't have that good idea.
See, had I gone to law school, I would have had that great idea. Because they would have been on
Molly, and they would have been like, we're going to make one company. The whole economy is going
to be one company pretty soon. I guess.
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
Go. Let's do it.
Just let me get over that real quick. Just my feelings being hurt. Hello and welcome back to the Adam Friedland Show. I'm Adam Friedland.
Thomas just bullied me.
All right. Hello and welcome back to the Adam Friedland Show, guys. Adam Friedland here.
First off, as always, I'd like to thank our members for supporting us here on YouTube.com.
You make the show possible.
Seriously, guys, members get access to all of our episodes early before they're released to the general public.
And if you join at the second or third tiers, you also get your name in the credits of this fine program.
If you'd like to join the Friedland Family Foundation, you can do so by clicking the Join button here on YouTube
or by clicking the link in the description below.
You can also support us on Patreon if you prefer. The link for that is also in the description.
And also, guys, merch is now available.
Go to theadamfriedland.show to check it out.
We got hoodies, T-shirts, hats.
The hoodies are fucking flying off the shelves, guys.
Hop on those real quick before they sell out.
You could conceivably wear an entire outfit of the Adam Friedland Show merch if you make your own pants and shoes.
That is true.
That's a funny line, Caleb.
Leave that in.
You deserve it.
Give it up for Caleb Pitts, everyone.
My guest this week is former FTC Commissioner Lena Kahn.
Lena has been in the news recently.
As she is the head of Zoran Mamdani's mayoral transition team.
During her tenure at the FTC, she became a powerful enemy of major corporations like Amazon and Meta.
Transforming a famously toothless arm of the executive branch into an effective valve on corporate power.
Effective valve.
A valve is something that regulates like a stream.
Regulates? Hmm. What does that remind you of?
Okay.
Good copy? Bad copy?
That was a good copy.
Think of Lena Kahn like Batman.
And think of Amazon like the Penguin.
Meta.
Bane, I guess.
Oracle.
Hugo Strange.
Joe Biden.
Ra's al Ghul.
Apple.
Killer Croc.
And I will be Alfred Pennyworth.
The butler.
The point is, Lena is one of the good guys.
And I'm Alfred.
So please. Caleb, you crushed it this week.
I was on the phone too much and Caleb wrote perhaps the best intro we've had thus far.
Give it up for Caleb Pitts one more time.
I love my team.
Please enjoy my conversation with Lena Kahn.
Great job, everyone.
Hey folks, I just want to thank Rowe for sponsoring this episode.
I'm not a RoweSparks user, but goddamn do I wish I was.
And I'm excited to tell you what it's all about.
Guys, if you haven't had sex before,
it can be incredibly exciting and hot and spontaneous.
And I can't tell you how confident you feel when you get hard fast in those situations.
RoweSparks are a two-in-one prescription treatment for guys who want harder and more controlled erections.
They hit the bloodstream fast because they dissolve under the tongue.
And getting hard fast means there's less waiting time to perform.
So RoweSparks dissolve and they work in 15 minutes on average.
Plus, RoweSparks dual action formula stays active in the system.
For up to 36 hours.
No, you don't have to stay hard the whole time.
But when you get aroused, you're able to maintain an erection.
With RoweSparks, guys can get harder.
They can have more control in the bedroom.
And a boost to last longer so that everyone gets more pleasure.
Rowe connects guys with a medical provider 100% online.
And if approved, treatment ships directly to your door.
If prescribed, new sexual health patients get $15 off their first order
of Sparks on a recurring plan.
Connect with a provider at ro.co/tafs
to find out if prescription RoweSparks are right for you.
That's ro.co/tafs for $15 off your first order.
Sparks is a compounded drug product.
Compounded drugs are permitted to be prescribed under federal law
but are not FDA approved and do not undergo FDA safety,
effectiveness, or manufacturing review.
For full safety information, go to ro.co/safetyinfo.
When I've lived in England, I think I was Arsenal.
And maybe Man U at points, but I don't really remember very well.
You're from the shuttle.
I lived in Boulders Green, yeah.
That's where the Frummers lived.
Is it?
That's where the Orthodox, right?
Yeah, yeah, that's true, yes.
It is a pretty Orthodox neighborhood.
I think now it's a bit more,
there are like a lot of Polish immigrants there as well.
Thank God, thank God.
No, it was a nice place to grow up.
Dude, she's a gooner, do you hear that?
What?
Arsenal fans.
Oh, really?
Yeah.
I don't know that I could faithfully still claim that.
Stop being a lawyer, just lie.
Have you learned to lie?
You're allowed to lie, though.
It is like against my disposition at this point.
I know.
Watching interviews with you, you're like,
they give you opportunities to talk some shit and you're like,
how odd.
I know the rules for this.
Well, I feel like once you've testified before Congress,
we're like, the main goal is not to lie.
It's like that becomes like really ingrained in you.
I agree, yeah.
People don't lie in front of Congress.
It's bad if you do, so.
You know what, guys, can we just do the interview now
and then we'll just do the walkout later?
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, 'cause we're already doing the interview.
Okay.
You've never told one lie in your entire life?
I probably have, like as a kid or something, but.
Not since you were a kid?
I don't know.
I mean, in my last job.
I lie every, my whole life is a lie.
This is a lie.
It looks pretty legit, but.
I wanted to ask you something I thought was really kind of cute,
but about your, about the Starbucks thing when you were in high school.
Uh-huh.
So you were in Westchester?
Yeah, I lived in Mamaroneck, went to Mamaroneck High School.
And so the kids were causing a ruckus up in Starbucks by your high school?
So Starbucks said, but that's why we needed to investigate it.
And what did you do about it?
So there was basically some stores outside of the high school, including a Starbucks.
And people would go there and hang out there and buy coffee.
At Starbucks?
And then they started a policy that students, even if they purchased something, couldn't stay in the store.
They couldn't sit down.
down. So I wrote a school newspaper story about it.
You're Martin Luther King. But didn't you get in the New York Times?
Yeah, it somehow became enough of a thing where the Times then reported on it and cited
my story.
So were you a little bit sucking up to the popular girls that were at Starbucks?
I don't remember it that way. I was genuinely just curious why.
You were being a suck up to the, or you were the popular girls.
No, I mean I was a newspaper editor, you know. I don't know that that counted.
Have you ever gotten a B?
A B?
Yeah.
Probably, yeah.
That's a lie. I got you to lie.
No, no. I mean I took some hard math classes in college and probably didn't do so well.
I need to get, I need to swear you in. You never got a B. You got a B in hard math?
Some hard math, yeah.
How did it feel to get a B?
It was humbling but in a good way.
Humbling. Did you take the LSAT June 20, 2009?
No.
Dino game?
No.
No, no. I took it later.
Do you know the dino game?
The logic game with the dinosaurs?
The logic puzzles. I know the logic puzzles but not with the dinosaurs.
I took it right before you.
Okay. I didn't go to law school until 2014 so I took it later.
What did you get in the LSAT?
I don't remember.
Come on. Stop it.
I really don't.
You're being humble right now. You got 180.
I don't, I don't think so.
Straight up 180.
I'd have to go back and check.
Did you finish first? Where you're like, "Done."
I don't think so.
You definitely did.
It's so, I like, I, yeah, I took it three times. It was an inflection point in my life.
Yeah, no, it was an inflection point for me too. I was trying to decide whether to go
to law school or whether to be a journalist, so.
Your thesis in college was on Hannah Arendt?
Mm-hmm.
What was your, what was your area of focus? I think it's pretty interesting for the times
we're kind of living in right now.
Yeah, it was this close study of a bunch of her work including a book she wrote called
The Human Condition. And in the book, she basically writes about how, you know, how
technological progress can lead to a lot of advances, but also require a certain degree
of distance.
Mm-hmm.
And she has this analogy with the plane around how like, you know, airplanes like
allow us to do pretty great stuff and like make physical distance shorter, but it requires
an altitude that makes you see less. And I analogize how she talked about kind of expertise
and what can get lost in it to how we got into the financial crisis.
So, that's like the most boring book she wrote? That's what your thesis was on?
I don't know if that was the most boring, but…
I thought your thesis would be on her romance with Heidegger.
Oh, yeah.
The Nazi and the Jew.
Right, right. I guess that was a component of her life.
One thing I heard you say in an interview was that prior to the establishment of the
Third Reich as a centralized power structure, that industrial conglomeration or like was
a big component of it. Is that correct or am I just…
Am I trying to say words? I feel like I'm copying words I heard on succession, maybe?
Yeah, you know, obviously, there were a lot of factors that facilitated the rise of Nazism,
but the U.S. after World War II actually commissioned various studies to be like, what just happened
and what factors contributed to it, including trying to figure out what was happening in
the economy. And they did actually find that growing consolidation across the German economy
had basically facilitated…
Facilitated the rise of Nazism. You know, you had like more monopolization and certain
types of rubber and steel. And generally speaking, there's long been a recognition
that concentrated economic power can go hand in hand with concentrated political power.
And, you know, I think that's an insight that has been lost more recently, but we're kind
of being forced to reckon with again.
So you think Paramount, if they buy Warner Brothers, maybe Barry Weiss will be maybe
of gobble. She doesn't talk shit at all because she knows all the rules. She knows all the rules.
a little bit more successful.
Yeah, I think that's a good point.
Okay, so let's explain to our audience, you became a star even before you graduated law school.
So you published an article about Amazon when you were in law school, and you kind of made some enemies.
Yes.
What was your position that you were taking?
So basically I was writing about how the contemporary way that antitrust law gets interpreted,
which is a very short-term focus on whether monopolies are raising prices,
was creating all sorts of blind spots and used Amazon as kind of a vehicle to tell this broader
story about changes in our antitrust laws. The Law Review article actually came out of a whole
bunch of interviews I had done with two sets of market participants. One was the set of businesses
that were selling on Amazon, and the other was financial analysts and investors that were looking
at Amazon more through a long-term prism. And it was really interesting because at that time,
this is like 2012, 2013, the general consensus in DC
was that Amazon is this company that is just delivering
all these low prices, and there's
kind of no monopoly power or dominance concern here.
But when you talk to those sets of market actors,
they were like, yeah, of course, this company
is amassing structural power, that one day it'll just
be able to flip the switch, and that's the whole investment
proposition here.
And it was just one of these instances
where there was a real gap between how kind of the experts and the pundits were understanding
what was going on in the economy and how when you talk to like real people that were doing business
with this company, how they understood it. And that gap was really interesting to me. And so I
decided to try to make it into a lot of the article. So in essence, you're saying that they
were dropping prices so low that like mom and pop were just couldn't compete. Is that what you're
saying? Yeah, they were engaging in a bunch of business practices that like 50 years ago would
have been illegal. But because there was this kind of Reagan revolution in antitrust, where we now
basically assume that monopolies were good, unless they were engaging in a very narrow set of
practices that were bad, we'd kind of become blind to being able to see, you know, corporate
dominance and monopoly power, unless and until it hit this like very narrow set of conditions.
What do you make of the argument, or like, like people would say, like the Sears catalog is going
to drive the general store out of business is it just that like yeah like Bezos kind of reinvented
a supply chain but I can get any crap I want tomorrow like do you get crap on there I I'm
not a prime member so I don't really buy stuff I'm not a prime what are you doing you go you with
your feet I mean that's a good thing about living in New York City you know you can buy a lot of
stuff in person yeah but you could also get any crap tomorrow it's true I mean the thing is it's
It's really not about, it's more about, you know, the antitrust and antimonopolia laws were designed to basically create more checks and balances in our economic sphere.
Sure.
Because there was a recognition that, like, you don't want to concentrate economic power.
And through competition laws, there's an assumption that firms, if they're having to compete for your business, they're going to try to make things better, be it through lower prices or kind of better service.
Right.
And so we want to maintain competition and there are fair ways to compete and unfair ways to compete.
And our definition of what is unfair ways of competing has like radically changed over the last few decades such that companies like Amazon have been able to get away with things.
And, you know, when I was at the FTC, we ended up filing a lawsuit against it.
After investigating it, we found that it was breaking the law and that now it is actually systematically raising prices for people, both consumers.
They've fucked everyone off.
Yeah, because they can.
Yeah.
And, like, the businesses that have to sell on Amazon
now have to pay as much as one out of every two dollars to this company.
Sorry for cussing, also.
It's not a good situation.
Yeah.
And, you know, a lot of that is because they don't face real competition.
Do you think the game Monopoly is maybe problematic
for people's understanding of Monopoly power?
It's possible.
Because no one wins at Monopoly and everyone's like, you're a bad guy.
Right.
Everyone's like, you know, I mean, it's a disaster.
Your dad just relapsed on alcohol.
He told your mom that she's just like her mother.
Your sister's crying.
That's what happens when you win a Monopoly.
And you're like, I'm the best guy in the family.
You know, there's a really interesting history of that game
where it was actually designed as an anti-Monopoly game.
And then it was, like, you know, commercialized
and made into a kind of a pro-Monopoly game.
Wait, so what was the objective?
That everyone has different stuff?
In the original version?
You know, I haven't played the original version,
though I actually have a version of it.
So I need to try it out.
So you went back into the think tank world after law school?
Just briefly, yeah.
Were you offered like a federal clerkship or something?
I mean, it seems like from your resume, like you could have.
Yeah, I was supposed to clerk a year out of law school and my judge ended up passing away a few months before.
So then I kind of had to rejigger things and ended up actually working first at the FTC for a commissioner,
Rohit Chopra, who had just joined, who was doing incredible work.
And then actually ended up joining as a staffer
to a congressional committee, where
we did a big investigation of Apple, Amazon, Facebook,
and Google.
And so I was there for a year and a half or so.
And you started working with Elizabeth Warren
or like in an unofficial capacity at the time?
Is that correct?
Yeah, not officially.
But she, in 2016, gave a big speech basically saying,
across the economy, we have now extreme consolidation.
and she named companies which in DC is unusual
this issue of antitrust and anti-monopoly.
um and she became kind of an allies as somebody who agreed that we really needed to reinvigorate
this area of law and so from my understanding well two things first is like how did president
biden how did you get drafted in the league at 32. it's a great question um i know it you were
the youngest by like 40 years probably in the government yeah uh oh in the i mean there had
been some prior ftc commissioners that had been in their 30s but i think chair um yeah probably
was the youngest so how did how did you get scouted like how did they know that you were the
goat it's really cool that president biden was like this is the one yeah and you like changed
we'll get into it but you changed the way kind of a toothless uh part of the executive uh functioned
from what i understand yeah i mean how people get picked is like a total mystery um oh now you're
lying now she's lying we got her guys what happened you know you basically get a call
being asking you if you're interested in serving from the monopoly man from from the federal
government and you get a call from the federal government you get a call from somebody you know
working in the white house who does personnel sam they they usually somebody who works in the office
of um personnel hr it's basically hr for the white house who has to like figure out for all of the
political appointees who are we going to pick so they call you to ask if you're interested if you
say yes you have to have all of this kind of background checks and have a lot of conversation
with security people
um they went into the starbucks right probably they probably like called someone at the
starbucks yeah they call people who know you to kind of try to figure out what's going on
um and then sometimes you don't hear for a while and you have no idea am i in or am i out um in my
case i ended up being told that i had been picked as a commissioner and they were going to announce
it like the next day had you spoken to president biden before no really yeah he wasn't like keto
kiddo the malarkey of you you're you've got no malarkey uh no we
we didn't get to have that conversation so you came into it from what i understand and as you
alluded to from reagan until the time you came it was 2020 2021 yeah 2021 like from for so for
what 30 years it was basically a completely just what they did herbal life right
was that their big hit for 30 years uh they were very focused on you know frauds and scams and
you know it's staffed by very well-meaning people but there definitely had been kind of a real
narrowing in their ambition well so you walked in the office everyone's hawaiian shirt beer pong
were people doing uh uh like xeroxes of their butts you know it was still coveted so it took
a while until everybody was like back in um but no i mean you know the staff there was very hard
working there had been people who'd been there since you know for decades she won't talk they
were definitely like look at this homework nerd coming in trying to make us work for the first
time ever no i mean there you know it was it was i was an unusual pick for a bunch of reasons so uh
you know it was a bit of an adjustment for the agency yeah yeah how'd you get paid it's a great
it's a great question because you you're not nepo right no i mean no you're like the smartest one
they never picked the smartest one seriously it's like a rarity that's why i'm so fascinated by it
yeah especially so young they hate youth in hollywood in hollywood in ugly hollywood i mean
in dc they have a contempt for youth it was an unusual pick and
um i think it really did speak to how in a pretty small number of years
the kind of elite even elite consensus about anti-trust has started to change yeah and so
there was a growing sense that the kind of reagan approach which had become a bipartisan approach
right i mean the incredible thing about reagan was like when they came in the stuff they were pushing
was seen as really fringe and you know there were deep partisan fights but then you fast forward 12
years after eight years of reagan four years of bush and the stuff that had been really fringe of
theirs was now just the new common wisdom and so they were pretty masterful in kind of getting their
set of ideas and ideology to become the new mainstream and it took until you know 2018 2019
2020 for there to be a greater recognition that that had been the wrong path and we needed to kind
of re reinvigorate this area of the law even from what i understand people that were supporting the
anti-trust campaign were uh kind of kind of going at your ass a bit is that correct it wasn't clear
if if kamala won if she would continue kind of your project yeah look i mean she you know a
president has the prerogative to kind of pick their pick their own team so they were um the
bad guys not not not choosing who they were gonna who they were gonna have in place before they won
your first round draft pick you know i i think it would have been her it was an honor to serve and
it would have been her prerogative to kind of choose the path forward but it's true that there
were people who were upset by what we were doing and that were kind of being very vocal about there
were a lot of people who were upset i don't know if i'd say a lot newspaper that i believe wait what
did i find there's like 53 op-eds against you after you came into the ftc at least yes they were
saying they were why you drove them nuts you were living rent free because it's tech was it big tech
and hedge funds um it there was some big tech uh trade groups a lot of it was you know also the
deal makers um so parts of wall street that make a lot of fees off of mergers and acquisitions
um but you're just some lady i mean you're you're what five foot four yeah five four five fives and
there look at uh brain death at khan's ftc and linacon blocks cancer cures a hedge fund that made
a killing betting against linacon linacon needs to see shark tanks kevin o'leary linacon whiffs again
why were you such a lightning rod i mean how are you like this but then in in the court you're like
that i mean i think there were a few things i think i think we had had several decades of elite
impunity where if you were breaking the law but you were in a c-suite the government would go light on
you and if you were breaking the law and you were in a c-suite the government would go light on you
and you know even in places like the ftc sometimes there had been a double standard where if you kind
of found that there was some like small-time scammer or fraudster you would like bring the
full force of the law against them but then if you kind of found that a fancy ceo was breaking
the law and their company was publicly traded you might go a little lighter you're contributing to
your campaign and i you know i thought that was just really problematic and so we were very clear
that we were going to enforce the law in an even-handed way no matter kind of what your
political connections were we just had to look at are you breaking the law or not and i think that
approach to enforcing the law upset some people two things did president biden when you came in
give you that mandate was he like go for it uh the white house was very supportive of kind of what we
were doing um president biden did sign this uh executive order in 2021 that was pretty significant
i mean he basically said the last 40 years of kind of robert bork style antitrust has been a total
mistake and i'm you know directing my government to basically turn the page on that failed approach
and that means the ftc the doj but also all of these other agencies need to really focus
on taking on monopolies so there was definitely a mandate and they called you a hipster
uh that was one of the labels that was attached to you so you were like listening to grizzly bear
animal collective what was it why what was that why did they go there uh you'll have to ask the
people who came up with the term but i think their their view was the approach to antitrust that we
wanted to advance was like a throwback what was the other thing like neo post brandeisian or something
right neo brandeisian that's pretty cool you functioned kind of like as an someone that
enforced the law you were kind of like a um like a cop or like a you know did you ever ask for a gun
you should have a badge i know we probably should have you know we did have investigators who like
went undercover sometimes and they did have badges deep undercover in wall street usually you know
usually not on wall street usually kind of if there were like various types of frauds or scams
or that sort of thing did you send guys to burning man to like uh figure out tech we didn't we didn't
have that that good idea see i had i got a law school i would have that great idea because they
would have been on molly and they would have been like we're gonna make one company the whole uh the
whole economy is going to be one company pretty soon yeah and they would have been on ketamine or
whatever the hell that is a very creative investigative technique can we go back to
the ftc and try it and can we cut that from the episode because i feel like we've cracked it just
now go to burning man they're all on drugs over there talking about the the singularity i guess
today's episode is sponsored by incogni incogni helps to wipe your personal data from the internet
and protect your privacy
folks this i'm i'm not alone in saying this but we've all had our data breached i've i've been
breached numerous times on the playstation network supermarket club card you get breached i've seen
how many emails have you guys gotten saying that i think i've gotten maybe a hundred and i've never
done anything about it until i got this great service in cogni which uh assists you in wiping
your personal data in the event of a data breach thousands of companies are collecting and trading
your personal data without you knowing it you have the right time you have the right time you have the
right to request data brokers to delete this information they have about you it would take
years to do this manually incogni does the messy work for you incogni reaches out to data brokers
on your behalf requesting your personal data removal and dealing with their objections
And oftentimes, these data companies hold your most personal information, like your full name, your home address, your social security.
So get an extra level of protection with Incogni's custom removals feature in the Unlimited Plan and Family Unlimited Plan.
You can point to any people search site or any other website where your information is visible, and one of their privacy agents will take care of the rest for you.
I'll give you guys an example.
A couple weeks ago, I don't know if you guys saw in the news, there was a massive data breach of Discord servers.
I bet a lot of you bastards are on that, and these data brokers are now privy to your emails, your texts, your calls, everything.
For any of you, for instance, who have used Discord, your personal information could be in the hands of data brokers, and Incogni could be used to get that information removed.
You know, it's a real problem.
Employers, landlords, and random strangers can access your personal details.
So use code TAFS at incogni.com slash TAFS to get an exclusive 60% off.
That's code TAFS at incogni.com slash TAFS to get an exclusive 60% off.
Claim your 60% off and get your personal data off the market, boys.
Hey guys, this episode is sponsored by Lucy.
100% pure nicotine.
Always tobacco-free.
Lucy Breakers are nicotine pouches with a little extra surprise.
They pfft in your mouth.
Each pouch holds a capsule that can be broken open to release extra flavor and pfft in your mouth.
Hydration, if you will.
So set yourself up with a subscription to have Lucy delivered straight to your door.
Guys, I use it myself.
My favorite flavor is the minty one.
My favorite strength is the strongest one.
And I throw in my Lucy all day long.
Let's level up your nicotine routine with Lucy.
So go to lucy.com.
That's lucy.co slash TAFS and use promo code TAFS to get 20% off your first order.
Lucy has a 30-day refund policy if you change your mind.
Again, that's lucy, L-U-C-Y dot C-O and use code TAFS to get 20% off.
And here comes the fine print.
Lucy products are only for adults of legal age and every order is age verified.
Warning, this product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical.
So you took this.
This toothless organization, you made it a potent organization for the first time.
Did you have any structural changes that you had to enact in order to get the ball rolling there?
Yeah, a few.
I mean, first we brought on more technologists because a lot of the economy is now becoming digitized.
But you kind of need people on your team who understand how the stuff works.
So we brought in a bunch of them.
We hired more lawyers.
You know, we started litigating more.
And so we brought on more litigators.
The FTC is pretty small relative to the size of its job and mandate.
I would imagine you just get outgunned.
Like they have 9,000 lawyers.
You have like 12 guys.
Yeah.
I mean, sometimes the like in-house lawyers of these companies are greater than like the entire like competition bureau of the FTC.
How many guys do you have?
In total, we have 1,300.
I thought you were going to say 13.
That would have been hilarious.
But no, I mean, we are totally outmatched when it comes to resources.
I mean, the amount of money they have.
So you kind of have to figure out how to navigate that.
What do you view as like your biggest dub?
Gosh.
I mean, there are a lot of cases that are still pending.
You sued Call of Duty?
We did sue to block the Microsoft Activision merger.
That merger did go through.
We weren't successful.
And now you can't get it on PlayStation?
Call of Duty?
I think you can, but I think you get it early on Xbox.
Look at what you did, what they did to it.
You were trying to sell it.
You were trying to stand up for Caleb.
Well, there have been a whole bunch of price hikes
that I know gamers have been pretty upset about.
Well, there's the Game Pass thing.
That's right.
Caleb, you want to sit in for me and talk about this?
I don't care.
It's $30 now.
It's very expensive.
It's $30?
$30.
Look at what they're doing to my beautiful boy over here.
Yes, they do.
Yeah.
You know, we were very focused on health care markets
just because people depend on health care.
And one of the initiatives we did was really try
to figure out why our drug price is so high.
And one reason they're so high is because pharma companies
use all sorts of patent tricks.
The Orange Book, right?
Yes.
Yes.
Wow, you went deep.
I'm a lawyer.
I'm a lawyer, yeah.
So we called out those pharma tricks.
And three of the four big manufacturers of asthma inhalers
dropped the price from hundreds of dollars to just $35.
So there are thousands, if not hundreds of thousands,
of people who rely on inhalers who are paying less today.
And did you. Did you get them scared?
Like, were there mergers that weren't attempted?
Because they're like, cons coming.
According to them, yes.
Really?
They would go on TV sometimes and say, you know,
back in the day, we didn't have to think about antitrust risk.
We were thinking about our deals.
But under this administration, we have to think about it right away.
And I guess, like, on the politics side,
there were some Republicans that actually were like,
that rode with, that fucked with you.
I mean, like, where. You got. It didn't go along partisan lines.
I mean, like. That's right.
There was Josh. Josh Hawley was one of them, or no?
Yeah, he was pretty supportive of a lot of the FTC's work.
Who else on the Republican side were, like, kind of, like, supported, like, you?
You know, there were a lot. There were a lot of members who were really concerned about big tech in particular.
Some who were concerned about these pharmacy benefit managers,
these, like, drug supply middlemen.
So it was kind of issue by issue.
But generally speaking, like, taking on corporations,
corporate power when they're breaking the law is very popular.
And there were Republican members that recognized that.
You went after Meta while you were in the FTC.
We sued them, yeah.
Yeah.
And so, and how did. What was the result of that?
We're actually waiting to find out.
The trial happened a few months ago.
I would think that Trump would just stop that.
So there was a big effort.
He's got a new haircut.
You know, like. Yeah.
We got a. He's got a chain and a haircut.
He does MMA.
Case closed.
Yeah.
No, I mean, I think there was a big. Effort.
I mean, I know Mark made several visits to the White House
leading up to the trial.
And there was kind of effort to get them to settle it.
But they let it go forward.
I mean, you know, that doesn't mean they won't. We'll see it all the way through.
And I think the lobbying pressure is constant.
And the type of access these people have to the White House
is pretty unprecedented.
So I'll have to wait and see.
So if you went to the South Bay,
would you, like, wear a Bulletproof vest or something?
Like 50 Cent?
Do you know the song Many Men by 50 Cent?
Have you heard it?
No.
But does that. As an individual, do you process that?
Like, I mean, it is kind of crazy that, like,
you drive them nuts.
Yeah, it was pretty striking.
Have you got phishing emails, maybe?
Yeah, you always have to be on guard
with those phishing emails, you know?
One thing I think most folks have heard about
is that, you know, there was a liquidation
in the civil service.
I think something that's useful to, like,
talk about is, like, having a. robust civil service is how, like,
planes don't crash into each other
and, like, we don't get screws
in our cans of tuna, you know?
Yeah.
Like, I guess, like, what changes were made
at your shop after you left?
And, like, what have they chosen to pursue
since you've been gone, the new commissioner?
Yeah, so I think a lot of people have left,
especially in the consumer protection part
of the work.
The butt Xerox guys are back?
I think they're, you know,
they apparently are now trying to hire.
Maybe they. like, too many people go,
but there's been a real backsliding.
I mean, you know, we were firing on all cylinders
and taking on all sorts of, you know,
big companies that were breaking the law
and there's definitely been a slowdown
in activity there.
They've also kind of shifted gears,
so, you know, they allowed this big merger
to go through between these two ad agencies
and one of the conditions of that
was basically that they had to buy ads
from Elon Musk, more or less,
on his platforms.
Yeah, under the purview
that they couldn't kind of discriminate
on political grounds.
So, it does seem like they're more eager
to use the law to kind of advance
their political grievances.
And they pursue sex changes?
Yeah, they're doing some workshops
to see if they should go after doctors.
Workshops?
Yeah.
Well, like, you go for a weekend to a hotel?
I think it's like a bunch of bureaucrats
in, like, a conference room for half a day.
But, yeah.
What was it like being 40 years younger
than everyone else?
It was pretty strange at times.
I mean, there were definitely people
who'd been there since before I was born.
Was it a bad hang?
No, I mean, people, you know,
I think it had been tough for some people
because I had been known
before I got to the FTC
as a critic of the FTC.
And so, I think some people interpreted that
as kind of, you know, personal criticism.
And I had been critiquing, you know,
the political leadership
and the way they'd been doing this.
Yeah, there was a sense
that, like, wait,
why is the hater now our boss?
You know?
Ooh.
So, you know,
had to navigate some of that.
But people really came around.
And I think people were proud
to work at an agency
that was on the front lines
of protecting people
from corporate abuse.
And so. Is it supposed to be
an independent agency?
Like, ostensibly,
the Justice Department
is supposed to be,
but we're seeing it's not at all right now.
But, like, did you. Is it, like, the president
can't really mess with it?
Or is. Is it, like. Yeah, the president's
not supposed to direct us.
You know?
I'm sure Trump. is giving them their space right now yeah i mean it's an interesting dynamic because previously
there used to be a lot of speculation about kind of who's heading what agency but now it
doesn't really matter as much because it's all being run out of the white house so a lot of
those decisions just you know it just doesn't matter and what cases have they carried on from
your tenure so they're still continuing the case against amazon um against facebook uh there are a
bunch of cases against like ag monopolies uh against john deere uh it was making it really
hard for farmers to fix their stuff um they're continuing some cases uh against uh we have one
against adobe that was making it really hard to cancel subscriptions for pdfs yeah yeah exactly
acrobat yeah so the vast majority they've they've actually continued oh really the cases but the
place they pulled back are the rules so we issued a rule that would ban non-compete clauses
for americans these are those like contractual provisions yeah they were like doing it to people
at mcdonald's yeah you can't work at wendy's after you leave that's right fast food security guards
janitors health care workers why the are they what's the point of it i mean they would
say it's because they're trading in workers and they don't want to lose their investment but for
to a lot of people it seems like it's just to get greater control and power over the workers i took
introduction to micro and macroeconomics so um so
so i'm kind of i think i i'm qualified i don't want to speak from a position of
of authority unless i'm qualified but i think i'm qualified here but what like
my understanding is the argument for consolidation is they say that it'll create more efficiencies
that could be passed on in savings to the consumer is that is that kind of what you've been pushed
back on that's often the argument yeah but it's stupid no because it's like if there's
one company they could charge a zillion dollars and still and make it for cheaper yep and you say
to the judge i could be a lawyer i think so yeah yeah do you ever give a closing argument
i know we had very talented litigators that were in the courtroom i was not personally
making those arguments so you do the boring parts of the lawyer that's right you don't do the razzle
dazzle parts no unfortunately lena why are you doing the homework parts you like you do the
worksheets parts yeah exactly oh you love homework why don't you do the like give a speech
we have very talented people who were experienced at litigating litigating and did that very well
you can't handle the truth you never want to do i want the truth um you would be so good at that
thank you let me know maybe maybe second career yeah
we've all dealt with headaches trying to make progress with our finances this could be
overdraft fees missed payments or wishing you had ways to save more child better says that
every dollar counts that's why when you set up direct deposit through
chime you get access to fee free features like free overdraft coverage getting paid up to two
days early with direct deposit and more learn more at chime.com tafs guys chive is banking done right
you can open a checking account with no monthly fees and no maintenance fees and you get paid up
to two days early when you set up direct deposit that comes in handy folks with qualifying direct
deposits you're eligible for free overdraft up to two hundred dollars on debit card purchases and
cash withdrawals today chyma spotted members over thirty billion dollars open a checking account
with no monthly fees and no maintenance fees not to mention access to over 47 000 fee free atms
which is more than the top three national banks combined when i think back to who i was as a
younger man i remember that money was a stressful thing and when you're stressed about money
you're stressed about it 24 7 which is much like the 24 7 customer support which would have come in
handy
listen i did some things that i'm not proud of but had i had chime i probably wouldn't have had
to because i would have gotten paid two days early so work on your financial goals through
chime today open an account in two minutes at chime.com tafs that's chime.com tafs chime feels
like progress chime is a financial technology company not a bank banking services and debit
card provided by the bank or bank na or stride bank na members fdic spot me eligibility requirements
and overdraft limits apply timing depends on submission of payment file fees apply at out of
network atms bank ranking and number of atms according to us news and world report 2023
chime checking account required i started using creatine recently it's true and i've been telling
all my friends and family to use it too including the women i've been taking it every day and i've
noticed a real boost in the gym and a real boost in the brain and specifically i use momentous
creatine because they package their creatine in an easy to eat once a day chewable tablet creatine
for building muscle it's become a daily essential for your strength focus recovery aging and
cognitive performance and now momentous is making your daily creatine routine even easier with new
creatine chews these bite-sized lemon lime chews make consistency effortless and you just chew it
and you go each chew delivers exactly one gram of creapure creatine monohydrate the gold standard of
single sourced from germany and nsf certified for sport which means it's independently tested for
purity safety and label accuracy trusted by olympic athletes pro sports teams and elite military
operators i do that one momentous spent years testing until they created the first chewable
that actually meets the momentous standard uncompromised science meticulous sourcing
and real transparency no artificial sweeteners no fillers just science-backed clinically proven
performance in a portable craveable format whether you're training working or traveling this is
performance without pause made to support your daily body and brain every single day unlike
generic brands momentous doesn't follow trends they find the perfect fundamentals this is creatine
done right right now momentous is offering our listeners up to 35 off your first order with the
promo code tafs so go to livemomentous.com and use promo code tafs for up to 35 off your first order
that's livemomentous.com promo code tafs
who's your favorite who's your favorite uh like supreme court justin
i mean brandeis was pretty great nice yeah okay what is number two i don't know i mean third
grade marshall is pretty great sick yeah pretty cool yeah let's go down the line i i don't know
if i have them ranked beyond that but what did you do at law school you didn't play with top five
we didn't actually no but really missed out on that yeah i mean on the jury trial thing it's
interesting because you know we did there was an effort to kind of bring some of these cases
before juries and the companies were really terrified of it so the justice department
brought one of their google cases before a jury they wanted to have a jury trial and google
basically just gave a bag of money to the justice department so that they could avoid the jury trial
it was in a bag more or less i think they sent them a check or maybe it was in a bag it would have been cool
it would get a trash bag yeah yeah and um and you know there was a recent survey there was
law firms are advising their clients you know to avoid jury trials because they're realizing that
people's sentiments towards corporate america have turned people hate companies i think i think that's
good though right uh you're gonna follow the rules and not say that's good i mean it's good i think
people are realizing that a lot of the things that's bad in their lives is sometimes being driven
by corporations that are breaking the law and have bought influence perhaps in our politics perhaps
perhaps you could say yes allegedly allegedly that's right
counselor counselor aston answered asked hearsay have you ever fallen asleep in court
and then objected when you wake up uh i haven't had that experience that's from a movie right
if you ever fall asleep in court you have to object when you wake up uh-huh
i think the john grisham when you enforce um a policy as when you were a commissioner um you
oftentimes would file a lawsuit um a lot of discussion has been made about how the judiciary
is kind of uh it's a kind of it's is there ever a fear that something could potentially
go to the supreme court which is kind of um it's understood to be a quite partisan at this point
and six three in the other to the other side is there a fear that you could actually those
initial regulations that you're trying to enforce yeah i mean there's a lot of strategizing that has
to go into like does it make sense to appeal this case is there a risk of making things worse yeah
so we definitely have to think that through but if you win and they appeal they're like we're gonna
ride this to the top and then they're gonna let us make one company for the whole world
so what is the current state of the judiciary like
what in your estimation like you know i'd say a few things like there are a lot of
you know district court judges appellate court judges that are just trying to do their jobs and
like be faithful to the law i think there has been a general drift coinciding with more republican
appointees on the bench of like just more hostility and skepticism of federal agencies
when they're trying to use you know trying to make things better in the economy more or less
um so that's been a challenge i mean during the biden administration you know there were dozens
of rules that were being put in place to make things better and to make things better in the
economy more or less um so that's been a challenge i mean during the biden administration you know there
were dozens of rules that were being put in place to make things better in the economy more or less
um so that's been a challenge i mean during the biden administration you know there were dozens
rules that were basically blocked sometimes by just a single judge in texas in texas
even rules that were trying to you know limit overdraft fees or say that there are only
lines can't lie about the price of a ticket, the FTC non-compete rule. You know, we even passed a
rule that said companies have to make it as easy to cancel a subscription as it is to sign up.
And a lot of those rules ended up being blocked. So there's just greater skepticism of agency
power. I think this is going to be a revealing moment as to whether that's selective skepticism,
like are you only skeptical when it's Democrats in those agencies, or is it actually a bit more
consistent and principled? That's very fair and noble to say, honestly. I mean, seriously. I mean,
the courts shouldn't be partisan, right? They should be enforcing the law. Yeah, interpreting
the law, that's right. If you had to look at the American economy, what industry do you think just
fucks my audience, or the people the most? I mean, healthcare probably. Yeah, they have the
most blood on their hands. Yeah. Yeah.
We were talking about the Orange Book. That was me, something I heard five minutes ago,
and I just had to impress you. But like, one of the ways that they raised the price of inhalers
to $500 was that they would file a patent on like a strap. That's right. On like just pieces of
plastic that have nothing to do with like the actual drugs. But there are all sorts of tricks.
I mean, you know, there are people who have died because they can't afford their medicines in this
country. And when we were at the FTC, we would kind of do these regular open meetings where
anybody could sign up for a patent. And I think that's a really good point. I think it's a really
good point. And we would hear from people who would say, I have a family member who's having to
literally ration their insulin or their life-saving medicine because it's too expensive. And some of
that was done through illegal tactics by the, you know, drug manufacturers, by these pharmacy
benefit managers. And so, you know, let alone the fraud that we see in all sorts of parts of the
healthcare system where they're literally defrauding the government and just like bilking money.
Is it like, as a member of the
civil service, right? How much do the politicians fuck up? Are they the biggest obstacle to like you
guys like doing your jobs?
You mean like?
Like politicians.
Like members of Congress?
Members of Congress, yeah. Or even the president at this point.
Yeah. I mean, it varies. It's hard to paint in a, you know, broad brush. There are a lot of members
of Congress that were very supportive of the FTC's work in both parties, even on the Democratic side,
kind of a broad, you know, a big tent. And there were big efforts to make that happen.
And there were big efforts to make sure that these agencies were actually funded and had the resources they needed.
But I would say that, like, there have been trends that have just make it, made it so expensive to bring these cases.
Like a single antitrust case. If you're trying to block a merger, you can have to pay an outside economist anywhere from
one to five million dollars. If you're trying to bring a case against a monopoly, you can have to pay an outside expert
anywhere from 20 to 30 million dollars, just for a single case. And, you know, the budget is going to be a lot higher.
The budgets of these agencies is, you know, less than half a billion dollars. And so it's just become this, it's actually
become somewhat of a grift, where it's like these outside experts that are just, like, raking in this money as all of this
litigation has become so expensive.
So if you need money for a lawsuit so that people don't die from a company, you have to go to Congress and be like, please.
Yeah, basically.
I'm but a poor boy. I'm a lawyer.
Yeah.
You have to ask them and then they're like, they're like, they think they're better than you.
Yeah. Well, you have to, you know, as chair of the FTC, I'd have to go into Congress every year and testify before the House Appropriations Committee.
And they're the ones that decide how much money we get.
Who was on that when you were there?
There were a bunch of people.
Freak show. House is freak show.
It's different.
I thought the House was the government.
When I met Chris Murphy, he was like, yeah, it's the House. It's not a big deal.
I mean, the House is the most democratic branch of government, you know.
Do you think that they should start wearing. wearing nicer clothes again?
I honestly don't have a very strong view on that.
Don't answer that question.
You're so nice.
Yeah, I guess so you, the health care industry and then who would you put second?
I guess that's, who are the top five most evil?
You're not going to answer, but I'm going to say industries that have the most adverse effect on Americans' lives.
I mean, within health care, there are a lot of different actors.
There are the pharmaceutical companies, you know, health insurers after health care.
I would say in food and agriculture, too, like the agriculture industry in this country is so consolidated.
That was one of your first things, right?
The chickens.
That's right.
The chickens.
You want to tell them about the chickens?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, so when I was doing some of this, you know, market research, one of the industries I had to study very closely was chicken farming.
And that's an industry that is consolidated a lot.
And so you have, you know, millions of consumers, thousands of farmers, but they're just connected by basically four chicken processors.
And so if you're a farmer. Sometimes your entire livelihood depends on doing business with just one company, and that company has a ton of power over you, over your livelihood, and there are all sorts of abusive tactics.
So you mean, like, small farmers sell their chickens to, like, a big factory guy?
To a chicken processor, yeah, like Tyson, you know, Tyson Chickens, Purdue, and it led to all sorts of abusive tactics.
There's also been a phenomena where. Like quotas?
Is that, like, they say you have to make your, like, and they raise the quotas each year?
Yeah, they can raise the quotas.
They also can basically, like, penalize farmers by giving them bad chickens.
What do you mean, like, sharecroppers?
It's, it's, people have made that analogy before.
It sounds like 1880 or something.
Yeah, yeah, it's really horrific.
And people are actually paying, have been paying more for meat and chicken, even as the farmers are making less.
And it's basically just the middleman taking a bigger and bigger cut.
Mr. Tyson goes, good.
That's good.
Well, Mr. Tyson.
Mr. Tyson is the one taking more and more of it.
Of course.
Yeah.
Does it, does it make you cynical?
Did it make you cynical?
Like, as someone that was trying to enforce something that's, like, obviously just being nice?
Like, to a guy that has a chicken farm?
That Mr. Tyson's like, I need, I need more chickens from you, otherwise I'm going to. What are they, serfs?
Are they, Mr. Tyson's a feudal lord?
There are certain parallels.
It's feudalism.
It's really wild, yeah.
I mean, you know. You know, I think, I think the fact that more and more people are recognizing that it's
really screwed up, that so many of the parts of the economy are like this, and are kind
of demanding that type of change, it's going to take a while, but I think it is a positive
sign.
But they have way more money, and they can just keep doing it because they have more
money?
That has been the story so far, but I think if we have, you know, political leadership
that is able to stand up to it.
That is able to stand up to money, then maybe it could change.
What was your, like, most cynical moment as someone who was trying to just simply enforce
the law?
I mean. You've got to be bummed some days.
You're like, fuck this shit.
I mean, I think, I had a real sense of urgency because you never know how much time you're
going to have, and time in government goes really quickly, and these types of windows
of opportunity to, like, really do serious pivots in how we've been doing stuff don't
come around very often.
Mm.
I didn't feel like I had time to be cynical or bummed for too long.
You just had too much work.
Yeah.
That's kind of chill.
It's nice to be busy, right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
We were very busy.
You can't invest your brain in drama.
Yeah.
And, like, you know, I was like, well, I'll think about that on the other side, whatever
that is.
What did you get on the L side?
Come on.
Stop lying.
I read that you're just lying to my face.
Lena Kahn had been around when the typewriter was invented.
Lena Kahn gets punched.
Pushed back.
Lena Kahn finished yet, question mark.
An unfond farewell to Lena Kahn.
When you see the press, what did you think?
Were you laughing?
Sometimes.
Sometimes you're like, what, this guy's talking shit in the newspaper?
Who was the most, it was Wall Street Journal primarily?
Their editorial board, yes.
Their editorial board.
They were really fixated.
On you?
Mm-hmm.
Do you think they had a crush, maybe?
It's a good question.
Did you ever clap back?
Uh.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Not directly.
I mean, I think I did some event with them once, maybe, the Wall Street Journal.
Yeah.
Did you diss them?
You had a burn?
I mean, we kind of let our work speak for itself.
You're so mature.
A lot of it was just like unobjectionable, you know?
Do you have political ambition?
Like to run for like Congress or something?
Be the president.
No.
I mean, I wasn't born here, so it makes it easy on that one.
You weren't born yet.
You were born in England.
That's right.
Do you want to be maybe the queen then?
Not especially.
I can see you as queen.
You'd be great.
You'd have little corgis that shake hands and align.
Would you be a senator?
Would you want to be on the Supreme Court?
What do you-- I guess just from what I'm seeing is like you seem very honest and altruistic.
And what is your project?
What message do you want to get across?
I mean, I think the current economy is really screwed up, and I think we need an economy
that's much more fair and where people can get a fair shot.
And the current economy is not just like the product of some natural forces.
It's like entirely rooted in laws and policies and political choices that we have made.
And so my project is to make a case for changes in how we do law and policy so that we have
a more fair economy.
We had Chris Murphy on the show, and one thing I talked with him about is like the remarkable
thing that's going on right now is Trump is like, this is the law I'm breaking right now.
He's just saying it.
And it's fascinating to watch because it's like,
you're supposed to lie, right?
And he's like, in this way, I'm doing some sort of fraud, right?
It feels like the law at this point doesn't matter because it's so rampant.
Do you think that the law, you want to make the law matter again?
Do you think it can matter again?
Do you think that there's a point where we can't go back?
Can I have four more questions?
Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, in some ways what we are seeing now is just like a caricature
of being able to violate the law with no consequences.
It's like TV or something.
Yeah, but I think for a lot of Americans, they feel like there's been a version of this
that's been happening for a while, right?
Where they think. They're quiet about it.
It was maybe a little bit more subtle, but I do think that there was a sense that if
you were an elite, you could get away with certain things that non-elites couldn't.
And I think this is kind of going to bring to the surface a question about what do we
want the rule of law?
What do we want it to look like in the future?
And are we going to be enforcing it equally in a way that even if you're fancy and rich
or connected, you actually have to follow the same set of rules and are not able to,
you know, engineer a massive financial crisis that is kicking millions of people out of
their homes and still kind of, you know, not really face consequences for that.
Yeah.
You're saying that Trump is doing 12-dimensional chess, he's saying the crimes to make it
finally illegal to break the law.
So you're saying he's kind of actually the hero Gotham needs.
You know, I don't know how much foresight is going on there, but yeah.
He's doing a great job, I agree.
There is an opportunity, I think, here for Democrats as they think about, you know, what
the future looks like.
But as I said before, like, if there are people that were kind of backing the Harris campaign
that were kind of opposed to the work you were doing at the FTC,
you know, to what extent can the Democratic Party coalesce around that as a project?
Yeah, it's a great question, and I think it's going to be a real choice, right?
Because what some of those people were really saying was that we actually don't like it
when the government enforces the law against us.
Yeah.
We liked it with Clinton and Obama when they were, with the guys Xeroxing the butts and so on.
And honestly, I mean, that's not too different from what we're seeing with Trump, right?
We don't want the law to be enforced.
We want it to be enforced selectively.
And so when we were at the FTC, we would say, you know, is this corporation breaking the law?
If so, let's do something about it.
We weren't then thinking, oh, but are their executives big donors to the Democratic Party?
And, you know, I'm personally pretty disturbed by people who think that we should instead
have a system where Democrats do stand for that type of selective enforcement.
So I think it's going to be a big choice for the party.
You got 180, didn't you?
178, because you were humble.
You were like, I'm going to drop two points to be a good guy.
Just tell me the number.
We'll bleep it.
We'll bleep it.
I truly don't remember, but I'm happy to.
She's lying to my face right now.
I thought you were a noble jurist.
You're lying to me to be nice to me because I'm a stupid guy.
I'll tell you mine.
No, you, okay, will you tell me?
Will you?
I mean, I'm happy to guess, but I. Guess mine then.
I don't know.
One.
Okay.
I don't know.
You baited, no, you promised me that you were going to get more, that you were going to
tell me.
If I had to guess, it would be something in the 170s, but I don't remember for sure.
She is full of shit right now.
Just tell me.
179.
You missed one, to be nice.
Yeah, 170.
I'm jealous of you because you are the, you're the son that my parents wanted.
No, I really appreciate your time.
I think like, I think you contextualizing it as like the fraud happening right now is kind of par for the course for what was happening previously is like an important point to make.
Because it's like, I think a lot of the time people view things as exceptional and like if we get rid of Trump, then everything will be fine again.
But like if, you know, if there was a kind of pathway here, I think it's a better way.
Yeah, I mean, look, no doubt what, what Trump and the Trump administration is doing is a level of corruption and grift that is pretty unprecedented.
No, you said he was a good guy earlier.
No, I mean, look, it's, what we are seeing with this administration is like truly, totally anathema to the rule of law and all the values of this country.
And it's a level of corruption and grift that is unprecedented.
I think for a lot of Americans, they've been feeling that the rules have been raised.
And so it's a question about kind of where do we go from here?
I feel like when we've had periods of extreme corruption, like the FTC was started because of the like robber barons and stuff like that, right?
Yeah.
But there was an effort every time to like kind of, kind of make something that fixes it.
And I feel like now it's just like, it's like we're just putting like tape over like a leak that's coming into the ship.
It feels a little bit that way to me at least.
I mean, I do think we need, you know, like a New Deal style.
Yeah.
Level of ambition.
You think I should, you think I should run for president?
Okay.
Do I have to do the thing?
We're going to close on it.
The FTC thing.
All right.
Because it's, because this, I, so our audience, it's a comedy show.
So I have to just, I'm sorry about this.
Okay.
I just wanted to do.
Should I do it or no?
She's so nice.
Okay.
FTC.
Does that stand for fart, tits, cock?
Does that stand for fuck this crap?
I'm sorry.
Shit.
Fat titty committee.
Funny titty committee.
Friend, friends that crap.
Fart TC.
We just need for the audience.
They're not.
They're going to like, I'm, I just needed to put in something immature for them.
Cause I've been so mature in this interview.
Totally.
No, you got to play to your audience.
178.
I really appreciate your time.
Yeah, no, it was a good fun.
Should I go to law school?
I mean, you know, it seems like you, you're really.
Write me a letter.
Uh, happy to, happy to.
For an elder, for an elder, uh, student, I would be in your class.
I'd be older than you.
I'd be 38, I guess.
By a year or two.
I'd be like, who the hell do you think you are?
Why do you think you are talking to an elder like this?
She's going to get me into law school, dude.
Oh, uh.
My dad's going to finally tell me he's proud of me.
No, he loves the show actually.
Today was very educational.
What?
Cause of the stuff I said mostly.
Yeah.
We didn't call everyone.
Did you have fun?
Yeah.
You've never been around such a.
Unserious person.
Uh, it was very different interview than most of mine.
What are you talking about?
I'm the Charlie Rose of millennium.
Okay.
I thought it was really fun.
Lena hated it, but I thought it was fun.
Lena re somewhere around here.
Okay.
You want to watch our soul this weekend?
Um, uh, are we rolling?
Ladies and gentlemen at 32 years old, she was, she became head of the FTC under Joe
Biden.
Give it up for former FTC chair, Lina Khan, there's a commission.
Is it commissioner or chair?
Uh, you can call me Lena.
No.
Were you the commissioner or the chair?
I was the chair.
I was the chair.
The chair.
Yes.
Would you want to change the name at any point?
You could have been grand poobah.
It's actually in the text of the law.
Really?
Yeah.
I really appreciate it. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
or swelling in your neck.
Stop, ZipBound, and call your doctor
if you have severe,
stomach pain or a serious allergic reaction. Severe side effects may include inflamed pancreas
or gallbladder problems. Tell your doctor if you experience vision changes before scheduled
procedures with anesthesia, if you're nursing, pregnant, plan to be, or taking birth control
pills. Taking Zepfound with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. Side effects
include nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can cause dehydration and worsen kidney problems.
Talk to your doctor. Call 1-800-545-5979 or visit zepfounds.lily.com.
Coca-Cola. For the big. For the small. The short and the tall. Peacemakers. Risk takers.
For the optimists. Pessimists. For long-distance love. For introverts and extroverts. The thinkers
and the doers.
For old friends and new. Coca-Cola. For everyone. Pick up some Coca-Cola at a store near you.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Brian Dawkins openly shares his experience with major depressive disorder and emphasizes the importance of seeking professional help.
He discusses how adding Caplyta (lumateperone) to his existing antidepressant improved his depression symptoms, highlighting its effectiveness when used with other treatments.
Caplyta is approved for adults with major depressive disorder in combination with an antidepressant, with clinical trials showing no common weight gain, though patients face risks of death, stroke, or severe side effects.
The FTC under Commissioner Lena Kahn became a more active and influential force in combating corporate monopolies, especially in tech and healthcare.
Kahn’s enforcement actions targeted major companies like Amazon, Meta, and drug manufacturers, leading to price reductions for consumers and stronger antitrust enforcement.
She emphasized that the FTC’s work was rooted in fairness and legal accountability, despite facing significant political resistance and skepticism.
The agency faced challenges due to limited resources, political opposition, and increasing costs of litigation, which hindered its ability to act decisively.
The episode highlights broader societal issues, including corporate consolidation, healthcare pricing abuse, and the need for stronger consumer protections.
Summary:
Brian Dawkins shares a personal journey with major depressive disorder, advocating for mental health support and detailing how combining Caplyta with his antidepressant significantly improved his symptoms. Caplyta, when used with an antidepressant, provides greater relief from depression, though it carries risks such as increased mortality, stroke, and serious side effects like high cholesterol or uncontrolled muscle movements. The narrative then shifts to a discussion with former FTC Commissioner Lena Kahn, who transformed the agency into a powerful force against corporate power.
She led high-impact investigations into Amazon, Meta, and pharmaceutical pricing, resulting in reduced drug costs for consumers—such as asthma inhalers dropping from hundreds to $35. Kahn emphasized that antitrust enforcement is essential to prevent monopolistic practices, especially in healthcare and tech, where companies exploit market power. Despite facing political resistance, skepticism, and legal hurdles, her work demonstrated that aggressive, even-handed enforcement can yield real benefits.
The episode also underscores broader issues, including the consolidation of industries like chicken farming, where small farmers rely on a few processors, and the misuse of patents to inflate prices. Ultimately, it calls attention to the need for structural reforms, transparency, and stronger consumer protections in a market increasingly dominated by large corporations.
FAQs
Major depressive disorder is a mental health condition characterized by prolonged sadness and loss of interest. Brian Dawkins openly shared that he struggled with it for years and eventually sought help through therapy and medication, emphasizing the importance of seeking professional support.
Caplyta (lumateperone) is an antidepressant approved for adults with major depressive disorder when used in combination with another antidepressant. It helps provide greater relief from symptoms than an antidepressant alone and is available by prescription only.
Common side effects of Caplyta include sleepiness, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, fatigue, and diarrhea. Other side effects may occur, and patients should consult their doctor about potential risks and effects.
Patients on Caplyta have an increased risk of death or stroke, and may experience serious side effects like high cholesterol, weight gain, high blood sugar, fever, confusion, or uncontrolled muscle movements. These require immediate medical attention.
The FTC enforces antitrust laws to prevent monopolistic practices and corporate abuse. Commissioner Lena Kahn worked to strengthen the agency’s effectiveness, taking on major companies like Amazon, Meta, and Apple to promote fair competition.
Unlike past approaches that focused narrowly on price gouging, Lena Kahn’s enforcement emphasized structural power and long-term market dominance, especially in tech and healthcare, revealing how consolidation harms consumers and small businesses.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.