La favola del diritto

From walking barefoot in the snow to hiking for miles for a view, it feels good to connect with our simpler side. Simplifying your wellness with Kachava's all-in-one nutrition shake feels good too. With 25 grams of protein, 6 grams of fiber, greens, adaptogens, and more. No fillers, no nonsense, just the highest quality ingredients. New customers get $20 off an order of two bags or more. Now through January 31st, when they go to Kachava, k-a-c-h-a-v-a-dot-com, and use code news. The 2016 started from less than a month ago. And we're already planning on the 2025. There are so many things happening. The world, day after day, is modeled in a new form that we don't know, that saves a lot of people. A form that we don't know, is that, and so far, it's sent us a rhetoric of supremacy and a imperialist politician that reminds us so much of the dark century. From Venezuela, to the Dutch, from the squares of the politicians in the United States, to boys, to boys, to boys and girls. And everything seems to be broken so clearly, I turn to a single protagonist of the United States of Donald Trump. But today we'll try to make a different story. We'll try to understand how Trump didn't really have created the world of today, but how the world of today has created Trump. And how this spiral that brings us more and more to the base is also inevitably with our own. Good evening, welcome back to the podcast "Ditaliano Manzato", the podcast for those students and those people who are not happy with the answers, but who love the questions. I'm Pietro, an Italian language teacher for foreigners. If you are interested in our contact details, otherwise, thank you anyway for following us. In the last few months, global events have always had more and more discussions, an expression that we believe solidly as the foundations of our society. It is that, instead, today appears famous as the faith that we believe genuinely from the kids. This expression is directly international. We were convinced, in sum, that there is the same rule that a pacific world should be based on the cosmopolitan concept that we are limited, invulnerable, that the nations, especially the superpowers, should not overcome. We were convinced that the people would have the right to determine that the sovereignty of a state could not be violated. And now, as a cold shower, the world is the same to wake up. To say that we have been in January, and that the reality is based on power, on the strength, on the leg of the jungle. It is like a person who is just woke up and who is not still of the entire light, we look back and we don't understand how it is possible. All this. What have you brought us to this point? Let's start from the fact that I renounce the logic prior to which the nature that is based on the strongest laws and therefore, is right to use strength, which is a bit of the argument of many today. Because the civility leaves itself in the opposite position to the laws of nature. The civility is made of rules, culture, and coexistence. If someone wants to bring the society to the state of nature, if there is someone who calls to see politics, behave like gorillas that beat their hands on the floor, and someone who would live in a branch of shimmy, who is in society. Now, observing how it is falling, the first instinctive reaction is inevitable, and that is to find a culprit. I did it too, we did it all. The problem is Putin, or the problem is Trump. The problem is the Americans who have voted Trump. This drop in the culprit can be useful, maybe, to react to the world we live in, but it must be in a more profound way, with the end of understanding not only what it is not in the world, but also what we are fighting for, because the only power we have at the end, the only thing we can do, is just to work on ourselves, to improve ourselves. And I think that the battle for rights we started to lose a lot of time. We are in a more or less complex and conscious way, that we have started to close the eyes on certain things that were easy for us to do. From the bottom of our world, the right to vote, the situation in the Western countries is always higher. Why? Because we are impregnated. Because we started to consider the rights not as a place, but as something of doubt, as an option of an automobile, in which we may not be able to spend less, but that we are happy that we come to proposals or rules. And, passing into economic issues, what to say is that we are happy to pay little or nothing for the products we buy every day, we have reflected the work under paid millions of people in many mountains of ours. There were no rights for that person, which means that countries where, to be able to enjoy resources, in particular the oil, we have imposed authoritarian regimes and with events that have influenced the population. This lack of rights made us comfortable. It makes us even more comfortable. And so much for us to not see, we went through the entertainment of distractions, of television, of social media, as a depressive, that has given us autos, because it seems that nothing has more sense, or because it may react too often. What to say is the direct author, who was totally stupid from the agencies who have destroyed the artificial intelligence with our content, our tests, our videos, our articles, our songs, someone thought of closing these agencies? No, why? According to me, for the same reason before, the comfort and the pleasure to be able to feel and respond to GPs makes us close to an eye. On the fact that those answers that they have given us are the fruit of content produced by humans, that they will never receive a reward for their efforts and their fatigue. Once again, the direct author has been called "Kalpestato" and has been our world to do it. And then, seeing it in this way, we can truly stupidly if the world is filled with gorillas, with weapons and bombs, that want to take everything that appears because they base every logic on power and strength, because it is to these people that we have delegated our power to thank them. Some for fear, some for stupidity, but above all to thank them. This is the world that we have created. After that, after that, forgetting things that have been combed in our minds, forgetting that to work a society needs our supportive support, forgetting that the directs are the first of all of where to go. I want to point out the attention at the end of something. A mistake that we have made according to me as a society. We have believed that to defend a society I would be at the point of the directs, the laws, no, to protect the society is the culture. Because the laws can be plagued in political visions, undesiderated. Think of an recent example, the rest of Maduro, in Venezuela. The United States had the need of a protest, because they simply couldn't just go there and lose it. And then what did they do? They forced the laws to the right to want it. If they would have been accused of drug trafficking, that Maduro could have been arrested not as dictator of a nation, but as a danger for the US security. And so it went. Putin, in Russia, doesn't attack the LGBT associations in terms of LGBT associations. No, it's just to say, instead, that they were terrorist associations. And here, which was improvised, had full power to limit them, catch them, destroy them. And let's make it clear, because the same thing can happen with citizens of a nation. Because the dictatorship is never illegal. First, they follow very well the law, and a dictatorship does not arrest you because you are a citizen. You arrest you because you are a subversive, terrorist, and you will arrest you, following the laws. So the laws are never enough to serve, culture serves a intelligent population that studies, that knows the past, that fits the present. And then we have to leave. Give us, inform us, understand, but above all, discuss how the culture is transmitted not with the study. With the study we acquire culture, but it's a personal action, which part of our private initiative, there are many people that went to school and that they did not have any culture, because they were not interested in following it. If we want, instead, to transmit the culture, we need to confront, discussion, debate, we need to counter us on the current terrain. Just to have the fear of the confrontation, because we do not want to offend anyone, or because we do not feel guilty. To confront ourselves is the first step to transmit ideas, and also to interrogate us, to understand new points of view, to end our critical instruments, our intelligence, also to do critical things. What do you think? Maybe it's absurd, what I'm saying. You also feel free to comment, write to me privately, I try to answer to all of them first, but it's necessary to confront ourselves. If this episode of the podcast was liked, feel free to advise it to your friends or to support us with a subscription. If, instead, you are interested in our Italian courses, visit our site. Write us and remember that better Arabic is not just your direct, but it's your duty. But that's all for today. I greet you. And bye bye.