Kort Forklart: – En bombe! Ny dom i Baneheia-saken

Today one of Norway's most talked-about and brutal actions started a new one, if not the final point. Jan Helge Andersen, born on 17 January 1981, was sentenced to sentence in 1902, 2003 and the 30th of January. He was sentenced for the first sentence, to imprisonment, with a sentence of two, two years at least. A more dramatic sentence than the two-year imprisonment, the state lawyer had asked for. Andersen has already served 19 years for one of the bailiffs, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, and for the other. You will hear briefly from Aftenposten, today about what is actually the difference, and what kind of consequences the new judge can get. It is Monday, the 31st of June, and my name is Jonas Brenna. Crime journalist Harald Stolt-Nielsen, you and several colleagues of Aftenposten have worked with the criminal case in Orvis. What actually happened in Gula-Ting, today? Today was Jan Helge Andersen, the state lawyer, and Jan Helge Andersen's defense team, to read the judge against Andersen. Now they have waited for several weeks for it to come, and it was a little exciting to see what the judges would end up with, but what they came up with was a little bomb, I mean more light experts. Andersen has already served 19 years for one of the bailiffs, and he has served for the other, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment. And what is happening now is the answer to a problem. Jan Helge Andersen has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, and has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment. Lena Schlögedal-Pawlsson, the case was before Viggo Kristiansen was sentenced, but he was sentenced to death, and the case was revised, and the police and the state lawyers said that Viggo Kristiansen did not have anything to do with it. And then, in fact, a new investigation was made by Jan Helge Andersen, which later resulted in him being sentenced and sentenced to death in the court, and now also in the law enforcement court for the arrest of Lena Schlögedal-Pawlsson. In a white and blue shirt, the two parents dressed the girls instead, for Jan Helge Andersen experienced the death of Elisabeth Deibol. She started the investigation with reading what Jan Helge Andersen should be sentenced to, and she says that Andersen should be sentenced to two years of imprisonment, with a minimum of two years, which is a little bomb for those who have filled the case in front of what the state lawyers would put their statement on, and what they mean is that Jan Helge Andersen should be sentenced to death. So, there were some discussions around where they came from, but they didn't do that, but the judges also came up with a completely different decision, the state lawyers said that Andersen should be sentenced to death. What was the reason for not knowing if we know about it? As far as we understand, the main reason is that it is a very long time since the incident in Baneja, and that the new law enforcement agencies, including the sexualized content that has been found on the data units at home and Andersen, do not know when the judges will be sentenced to death. So, when he is also sentenced to death, what has happened? How special is it? It is very special, Professor Asbjörn Srambackin says, that someone who is sentenced to death, when he talks about the identity, does not know about it at all. If Jan Helge Andersen had been sentenced to two years of imprisonment, he would have been able to get out of jail for quite some time. For the Norwegian law enforcement, it is possible to be released after you have been sentenced to two thirds of your sentence. With a punishment of at least two years, Jan Helge Andersen can in theory, and in practice, be sentenced to life imprisonment. 25 years ago, two young girls were brutally raped and killed, just like without Christian Sand's centrum in Baneja. And even now, as Jan Helge Andersen has been sentenced to life imprisonment, he will eventually be released. The Baneja case always comes to be such an open wound for many, because it is extremely wounded, it was extremely bad, what happened to these two girls in Baneja. And at the same time, we have the accusation of rape against Vigo Kristiansen, which has been recognized for 50 million kronor, which means that it is not enough, and that it is only worth 90 million kronor. The case is extremely sad, especially for politician Agder, who in many years also meant that it was not necessary to see the Vigo Kristiansen case. And in Söderland, there is still conspiracy theories related to Vigo Kristiansen. Brynja Melling, Vigo Kristiansen, defense lawyer, or lawyer, because he does not defend Vigo anymore, he is just the lawyer. I hope that this case in the law against Jan Helge Andersen can be more on the subject of a final argument in a way that speculates around where Vigo is involved in that at all. Even after he has become famous. Even after he has become famous, he has now been known and led to a wrongful action. And that has to do with that when someone else is sentenced for rape, then you have had an unclear rape. Jan Helge Andersen is accused of being a victim of rape. His defense lawyer Svein Holden is basing on the accusation. We have noticed that the police officers meant that the victims of rape were not charged, and they also meant the two victims in the law. And in light of that, it is clear that it lies in the case of Anke Reaktionsfasset Elsen for the Supreme Court. Is this a thing that you think should be done for the Supreme Court? Most of all, with regard to this injustice, both in the law but also in terms of the condition of the Supreme Court, I hope that Anke will be allowed into the Supreme Court. So the question is, does the Supreme Court want to treat it? We have talked today with Professor Aspjörn Strambacken from the university in Agdur. He says that had it been up to him, and if he was responsible for Jan Helge Andersen, then Anke would have done that. Because it is very unusual that the law falls into a criminal reaction and suspicion when the prosecution, the state lawyer, does not make a statement about it. They also meant that Jan Helge Andersen, who himself still says that he had been diagnosed with pedophilia and that he meant that there was a high amount of sexual violence and criminal action, that he would not die of suspicion, much because it was so long since the trials in Banaya. The Supreme Court can say that the law does not have well enough through the treatment, well enough, the question is whether the prosecution is a real criminal reaction, for example. And if they would come forward to that it is a false reaction, then many people will be able to send things back to the law court for a new treatment of what kind of punishment Jan Helge Andersen is going to get. You have heard a podcast from "Aftenposten", it was crime journalist Harald Stolt Nilsen who told about the latest updates in the Banaya case and the case against Jan Helge Andersen. You also heard journalist Andreas Bakufoss from the law firm in Bergen. This episode was made by me, Jonas Brenna, the rest is explained by David Vkoni, Karimette Hohle, Iris Raksnes Axtal, Helle Årnes and Olav Eggesvik. The sound you have heard is heard from NRK.