Jewish Infiltration into the Catholic Church through Vatican II: They Have Uncrowned Him #5

Good day, ladies and gentlemen. We're going to talk about something controversial today. If you're seeing this episode, it's because it's a public episode of this series I'm doing on my sub-stack and for YouTube members on the book They've Uncrowned in By Archbishop LeFev. We're going through Archbishop LeFev's, you might say Magnum Opus on the kingship of Christ, likely the most important book he ever wrote. This is episode number five, the first four are behind a paywall for subscribers, for YouTube memberships and sub-stack subscribers. Both of the links for those are in the description area to this podcast. So, if you'd like to see the rest of the series, then you can sign up, but also just enjoy this episode for free today as well. If you click the link in the description area, you can see here on the sub-stack, you can go to meretradition.substack.com. There's a lot of podcasts. I put everything I do there. That's both public and private, but some of it's behind a paywall. The last episode we did was number four, which you can see where my cursor is right there. The same thing is true for YouTube memberships, although there is more available, the sub-stack just given the type of platform it is. YouTube doesn't have as many functionalities. In any event, we're going to talk about the next portion of this book, which I'm just going to bring up for you here today, and the notion of Jewish influence on the Second Vatican Council and in the trajectory of the church in the last 100 years or so. Before I continue, I do want to make a couple of qualifiers. There is such thing as anti-Semitism. It does exist, even though the term racist or Islamophob or homophob, these terms have just been co-opted to mean. Nothing because of wokeness and all that sort of thing. Nonetheless, I do want to read something quickly here from this book called the Mystical Body of Christ and the Reorganization of Society by Father Fahy. The reason I have chosen to read from this is because Father Fahy was probably the best English language author in the 20th century on this topic of the kingship of Christ, of the world's societies, Judaism, and all these things, free masonry. All these things you're not supposed to talk about, but he did. He did so as a very holy priest, so he did so with the heart of a priest, which is very different than a lot of the rhetoric you find online. In any event, on page 195 of his book, he wrote, "We must distinguish accurately between opposition to the domination of Jewish naturalism in society." We'll talk about that as we go. And hostility to the Jews as a race, a latter form of opposition, namely hostility to the Jews as a race, is what is designated by the term anti-Semitism. As Catholics, we believe that every single human being is made in the image of likeness of God, and as a result, all are created by the Creator. And it is irrational, sinful, wrong for us to despise a person because of where he's born or who he's born or who his parents were and so forth. These are immutable characteristics, so if one is of a particular ethnic group or tribe or clan or whatever, hating that person, de facto is simply un-Christian. Christ was a Jew in the sense that he was of that tribe of people and he was incarnated as such. Therefore, the biological and physiological nature of the race that we call Jews today, there can be nothing evil about this anymore than there's evil nature about any race. We can definitely talk about ideas. We can definitely talk about cultural characteristics, which are real. We can definitely talk about the habits of peoples, which are real. And those things must be distinguished between those things that are matters of how people act and the intellect versus the fact that they just exist as a type of person. Christ prayed for his enemies. St. Stephen, the first martyr, was persecuted and stoned to death by the Jewish authorities and he did not go off on any tangent of whatever, quote unquote, anti-Semitism or anything. Those activities are not Catholic. This is the same for all people because if you think somebody is your enemy, if you think somebody is against the faith, against Christ, then to be honest, we're supposed to pray for enemies and we're supposed to love our enemies and the more they are our enemies, the more we're supposed to love them to the point of conversion. That is the Christian response. I just want to make that very clear because I know this topic is very sensitive. Now, obviously the term has been weaponized to the point where you say Christ is king and you're an anti-Semite. That's obviously ridiculous. But hating a group of people because of who they are, just in a basic sense of where they're born or who they're born to, this is wrong. So, all right, let's bring up the book by Archbishop Lafeb. And this is, let me just pull this up here. This is chapter 9. I've gone through the other chapters on the sub-stack in YouTube memberships. And if you're new to this series, I don't, I don't, what's the word I'm looking for? I don't read the whole thing. Nonetheless, I do sort of go over different parts. So, this is about liberty of conscience and of forms of worship. And the quote at the beginning is from Pope Louis XIII. And he says, "Under the seductive name of freedom of cult, they proclaim the legal apostasy of society." Now, if you were with us for a last episode because you remember, then you'll see here, right here, if I can just highlight this for you. This sort of sums up the information from the last chapter. I'll just highlight that in yellow. It says, "The liberty of forms of worship or liberty of conscience and the forms of worship is the first." It is, as Leo the 13th explains it, "Claim as a moral liberty of the individual conscience and as a social liberty, a civil right recognized by the state." And this is a quote here from Leo. First in regards to individuals, let us examine this liberty so contrary to the virtue of religion. So, Leo the 13th believes that religious liberty, and this is the consensus of the Pope's of all time up until the Second Vatican Council. He believes that it is against the Catholic faith. He says, "The liberty of cults, as it is called, a freedom that rests on this principle that it is permissible for everyone to profess such a religion as pleases him, or even not to profess any. However, all to the contrary, it is indeed there without any doubt among all the duties of man, the greatest and the holiest, that which orders man to render to God a worship of piety and of religion. This duty is only a consequence of the fact that we are perpetually in the dependence of God, governed by the will and providence of God, and that having come forth from him, we must return to him." So what Leo the 13th is saying here is that this notion of freedom of religion is against, essentially, the natural law. It's against the teachings of the church. It's against common sense because what it is, it is this idea that all religions have the same rights in a positive sense in society, which is impossible because that is like saying error has the same rights as truth. And it's a pretty common saying that error has no rights. Again, you may permit certain things that have to do with tolerance for reasons of keeping the social peace for, you know, potential governance, and that's always been a consideration of all societies, even when there was the kingship of Christ and that was very official and things like that. But unless liberty of religion is not Catholic, it's against Catholicism. It's been condemned a number of times and only since the time of the council has it been turned into this positive right. And it really is an error. Gary Gula Grange was arguably the greatest to the most of the 20th century. He did a deep dive on it during his life, published his findings and basically said that if it's not a heresy, it's at least an error, religious liberty. Now, error doesn't mean, oh, it's not that bad. No, error is still a mortal sin to propagate and believe religious error knowingly. Heresy is worse, but error is still really, really bad. So next page, Archbishop Lufive is compiling these things. And he has, he goes on to include another quote here from Louis XIII and I'll show you that here. I've highlighted it for you. He says, "Liberty of forms of worship considered in its relationship to society is founded on the principle that the state, even in a Catholic nation, is not bound to profess or to favor any cult." We should also add here that the word cult is a technical term that refers just to a religion. It must remain indifferent with regard to all and take them all into equal consideration legally. This is an error, by the way. It is not a question here of the de facto tolerance, which in given circumstances can be conceded to the dissident cult, which I've spoken about. Rather, the recognition granted to them of the very rights that belong only to the one true religion, which God has established in the world and has designated with clear and precise characteristics and signs, so that everyone can recognize it as such and embrace it. Further, such a liberty indeed places on the same level truth and error, faith and heresy, the Church of Jesus Christ and any human institution, whatever. establishes a deplorable and deadly separation between humans and God's society and God's author. It leads finally to the sad consequences of state and differentism in religious matters or what comes to the same thing, its atheism. And the next line that I've highlighted there is religious liberty necessarily means state atheism. Okay, so here is where we're going to get into the controversial bit. So I'll read you a quote here, but I'll give you a little background. Archbishop Lafeb is writing here about how Cardinal Bea, who was one of the modernist liberals, you know, sort of bad actors at Vatican II, on the eve of the council, he had some dealings with Ben-Ibreath. What is Ben-Ibreath? Well, Ben-Ibreath is a Masonic group that is for Jewish members, it's Jewish Freemasonry. And here is what was done. And I'll actually show you the proof that this isn't just some sort of conspiracy and it was in the newspapers that were written by Jews at the time and it's seen as a great triumph. And here is Archbishop Lafeb and he says, "You know well as a historical fact published in the New York newspapers then that Cardinal Bea on the eve of the council went to pay a visit to Ben-Ibreath, the sons of the Alliance, a Masonic sect reserved for the Jews only, very influential in the Western One World movement, in his position as Secretary of the Secretary for Christian Unity. Just founded by John the 23rd, he asked them, "Freemasons, what do you want?" They answered him, "Religious Liberty, Proclaim Religious Liberty, and the enmity between Freemasonry and the Catholic Church will cease." Well, they obtained it. This religious liberty, consequently the religious liberty of Vatican II is a Masonic victory. This is corroborated by the fact that a few months ago, President Alfonsohn of Argentina was officially received at the White House in Washington and by the Ben-Ibreath in New York. He was decorated by these Freemasons with the Medal of Religious Liberty because he had set up a regime of liberty of cults, of liberty of religion. So on the eve of the council, one of the most influential Cardinals goes to a Jewish Freemasonic group and asks what they want. And they say, "Give us religious liberty. This will make all our problems go away." If the Freemasons wants something, it's probably not a good thing. And I'm going to show you how this is verified and not just some cracked-bought conspiracy. So all the detractors can't say, "Can it just make this up?" This is just the ravings of an old archbishop, blah, blah, blah. I'm just going to show you that right here. So here is the Jewish Telegraph Agency Daily News Bulletin from 1965. And here we go here. Let me just be able to scroll this up. Rome, April 26th of Vatican's Secretariat for Christian Unity, headed by Cardinal Bea, has exclusive jurisdiction over the handling of the Declaration on Church Relations with Non-Christians, a spokesperson for the Bea's Secretariat declared here today. This statement was an obvious response to dispatches from Rome yesterday, which reported that an ad hoc commission of prelits has been planning drastic revisions of the Declaration. Primarily adopted last November by the third session of the Ecumenical Council. The Declaration has passed on November, in November by a vote of 1,9992 to 99 had categorically exonerated the Jewish people of the charge of D.A.S. side. Continuing here, New York, April 26th, Cardinal Bea arrives in New York tomorrow will be honored. It goes on to explain what happened. Anyway, it just goes on and on and on about how all of these things at Archbishop Lefeb is saying did in fact happen, that's not just some crap. I'll conspiracy. You can find many other examples of this. On the internet. This is not the only place where that is, but anyway, there it is for you. So let's go back to this book and just finish off this chapter here. So Archbishop Lefeb finishes off this last thing here. He says religious liberty is a legal apostasy of society. Remember this well. He again quotes Louis XIII right here who said, "It would be superfluous to insist on these reflections on several occasions already an official document addressed to the Catholic world we have shown by Aronius. How Aronius the doctrine is of those who using this seductive name of liberty of cult proclaimed illegal apostasy of society thus turning it away from its divine author." So here's the thing my friends. Lila XIII is saying here that there's he says it would be superfluous to insist on these reflections, meaning there's not even a point of bringing this up at the time of Lila XIII. The idea of religious liberty was so absurd that it had been condemned so many times. This represents the constant teaching of the Popes and it's a problem that it was rejected at Vatican II. So here's the thing. What we see here is evidence that for some reason, and this is not just of Jewish remasons, we're going to go into some literature here as well that shows one of the major rabbis of Paris, the Grand Rabbi of Paris, and the early part of the last century has things to say about this as well. This is not just some crack-bought conspiracy. There is an enmity between Judaism and Catholicism, and I'm going to explain to you why we need to rethink how we talk about that, and here's why. So loosely today, when we say things like Judaism, we assume that the religion that Jews practice, and again, Jews are people, they're an ethnicity, they're a race, they're a religion, so it can't make all the distinctions at every single moment, so please don't accuse me of something that I'm not saying. But for the sake of conversation, we have to use categories. Judaism is seen as the religion of the Jews, and it's a continuation of the religion of the Old Testament. But here's the thing. Judaism, as we understand it, does not exist, and I'll explain what I mean by that. So what I commonly believed is that basically there was this religion in the Old Covenant, this religion in the Old Testament. Christ came and basically changed this thing. And that's partially true because there's obviously new covenant, and there's certain dispensations and certain disciplines and certain rituals that are no longer required, and then we have the fulfillment of those and so forth. But it's not really true that the patriarchs and the faithful of the Old Testament were of a quote-unquote different religion. And I'm going to show you exactly what the scriptures say about that so I can make my point here. The term Jew is a later addition in the scriptures, and it refers to the tribe. But before that, we don't hear of Adam being called a Jew or Abraham or Noah, et cetera, with this term eventually comes, and it refers to the tribe of Judah, and this term Jew becomes sort of the placeholder term for those who adhere to the religion of the nation of Israel and the Old Covenant. And of course, it's still an ethnic group today. But we'll see here that Abraham and Moses and David were actually all Christians. Now that sounds crazy to some people. They're going to say, what are you saying? I'm going to show you using the words of Jesus Christ and the words of the Holy Ghost, inspiring the authors of the Old Covenant, the Old Testament. So you can make your decision that way. So I'm just going to bring those up quickly here. Okay, so here is, let's go back to Abraham. Well, this is Jesus talking about Abraham, and then I'll show you Abraham as well. So here is from the gospel according to Saint John, it's chapter 8. I'll also shout out to Sam Shammun, who's done the legwork on this on many of his shows, so I didn't have to spend all my time leafing through my Bible because he mentions the verses on his channel all the time. Verse 56, this is Christ speaking to the religious scholars and so forth of the day, trying to trip him up. And let's just read up here too. He says, Amen. Amen. I say to you, if any man keep my word, he shall not see death forever. The Jews therefore said, now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead and the prophets and thou sayest, if any man keep my word, he shall not taste death forever. Art thou greater than our father Abraham, who is dead and the prophets who are dead? Whom do I stow make thyself? Jesus answered, if I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my father that glorify me, glorifyeth me of whom you say that he is your God. And yet you have not, you have not known him, but I know him. And if I shall say that I know him not, I shall be like to you, a liar, but I do know him and do keep his words. He's already accusing the Jewish authorities of the time of perverting the true religion. As I understand, if you understand this is that heresy was already running rampant and Christ came to fulfill the true religion and fulfill the commandments and so forth. His verse for 56, Christ says, and this is the second person of the Holy Trinity speaking, Abraham, your father rejoiced that he might see my day. He saw it and was glad. The Jews therefore said to him, though are not yet 50 years old and hasdousine and hasdousine Abraham, Jesus said to them, Amen, I may say to you before Abraham was made, I am. They took up stones, therefore to cast it in because, but Jesus hit himself and went out of the temple. So one more time, Jesus says, Abraham, your father rejoiced that he might see my day. What is Christ telling us there? Well, if you look to the commentaries of the fathers and all the great theologians and saints of the church history, Abraham was saved by his faith in Christ. Abraham was a Christian. Now, he was of a tribe that is, he gives the seed for what becomes the tribe of the Jews, but Abraham was saved as a Christian. And St. Paul is very clear on this. All those works of the law in the past, they don't actually say. There's a reason why those laws were put in place, and the laws were put in place for a number of symbolic prefigurement reasons to establish the liturgical character of the people and so forth, which became the true sacrifice. We could do a whole other million-part series on the liturgy of the Old Testament and so forth and why that becomes the mass. That's a different conversation for another day. But the point is that it was, they were justified through Jesus Christ as they awaited his coming and Abraham rejoiced in Christ. I'm going to show you where he's promised this as well. This is in the book of Genesis. So here it is. I'm not going to read the whole thing, obviously, it's a long chapter. This is chapter 15. And let me just find, there it is. So right here. And immediately the word of the Lord came to him saying, "He shall not be thy heir, but he that shall come out of thy bowels, him thou shalt thou have for thy heir." And he brought him forth abroad and said to him, "Look up to heaven and number the stars if thou canst and he said to them. So shall thy seed be." Now everyone understands this where God promises Abraham that his children will be, his offspring will number like the stars and everyone gets that. There's a part that people often forget. So this is in the same day. This is in the same day. And let's look at this verse here. This is verse 16. And when the sun was set, there arose a dark mist and there appeared a smoking furnace and a lamp of fire passing between those divisions. Now people missed this part. People missed this part. But what is this saying? It's saying God takes Abraham outside and says, "Look to the sky and look at the stars." And Abraham understands that this will be his progeny. Hold on a second, it's the daytime. There are no stars that you can see in the daytime. It's an expectation of what will come but he won't see. And this is an allusion to the fact. And then the sun sets later on, meaning it wasn't set at that time. Therefore he was looking to the clear day sky. You can't see the stars. It's a matter of faith in what is to come. His covenant with God was made with the assumption that there would be the redeemer to come and then his children would be spiritual offspring. This is what this means. It's not just a genealogical group of people. It's the offspring which would be his children in the spiritual sense, which he cannot see because the sun hasn't set yet. Now we can also move on here to another portion of the scriptures. And this, let's go to Moses. I'll make sure I have the verse here. Just give me half a second here. I want to pull this up for you. So here is Christ in the Gospel of John. What chapter is this? This is chapter 5. Here is John in the Gospel of Jesus in the Gospel of John. And you all know this line. If you did believe Moses, you would perhaps believe me also for he wrote of me. Moses wrote of me. Jesus is saying, "Moses wrote of me." Now that's very important. Why is that important? Because Abraham saw the coming of Christ and rejoiced. Moses wrote of Christ and knew him. These were men whose faith was a faith in Jesus Christ. You might say, "Hold on a second, Jesus hadn't come to earth yet." Yes, but there was never a time when the sun was not. He was incarnated at a particular time, but he existed from all eternity because he's part of the Holy Trinity. He's God. Abraham saw Christ and rejoiced as faith was in Christ. Moses wrote of Christ. His faith was in Christ. And here is David saying something similar, and I'll bring that up for you right now. So here is which Gospel is this. This is Mark chapter 12. Here's Christ speaking. For David himself, and this is where the Trinity is, by the way. So for David himself, Seth by the Holy Ghost, so Christ is saying this, what David said, "The Lord said to my Lord, 'Sit on my right hand until I make the enemies thy foots to all,' said the Lord, the Father said to my Lord, 'David therefore himself calleth him Lord, and once he has then and once, is he then taken his son and a great multitude, and he has heard him gladly." And he said to them, "In his doctrine, beware of the scribes who love to walk in long robes and be saluted in the marketplace, and to sit in the first chairs in the synagogues and to have the highest places at suppers who devour the houses of widows under the pretense of long prayer, these shall receive their judgment." So what he's saying is, "David inspired by the Holy Ghost, says the Lord said to my Lord, 'Sit on my right hand until I make the enemies thy foots to all,' David therefore himself calleth him Lord and once he has then his son." So what is this referring to? Christ is the son of David, but David calls Christ his Lord. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, it's the Trinity. David had faith in Christ. He recognized he would be a descendant in the flesh, but that he preceded and pre-existed David from all time and would eventually be incarnated. David also had faith in Christ. These are just three examples. We could go over the prefigurments and things like that. But what's the point I'm trying to make here? The point is that when Christ comes and speaks to the religious scholars of his day, he's explaining to them that you've perverted the religion and he points to the patriarchs for the evidence that they had faith in him. So Judaism, as we call it, in the modern sense is not the religion of the old covenant, not just because they don't offer sacrifices in the temple and so forth. Someone could make an argument that the temple was destroyed, but they still have the Old Testament or something. That's an argument people make, but they don't actually have the religion that their forefathers had. It was Christianity in a foreshadowing way. It was a Christianity in potential where the patriarchs were saved because of their faith in the Christ to come. That's how they were saved. This is why again, Christ says Abraham saw my day and rejoiced. So the Jews at the time, there's something that Christians need to understand. This whole idea of these two covenants just makes no sense. What this means is that the religion that we called Judaism today is a heresy. It's a heresy of an old covenant. It is really a heresy of the Old Testament prefiguration of Christianity because it's lacking the faith of the patriarchs. Therefore it is not salvific. Obviously, there's a new covenant now, but even in general, it's just not salvific because they don't have the faith that justified them because they don't have faith in the Redeemer. This has led to an enmity between Christianity and Judaism because you have to understand here, my friends. Here's the thing. Here's the thing. The three major faiths of the world, let's call them that, Islam Christianity and Judaism. Let's call them the three major faiths that seek converts because the rest of them don't only seek converts. They all want world domination every single one. Christianity wants to conquer the world through grace and has in many ways in many centuries. Islam conquers the world through the sword. Judaism has a different understanding because the way that Judaism today understands the Old Testament is a heresy. It's a heresy of the Old Testament because they look at the selection by God as a purely biological thing in general. And that chosen race of people, their flesh is the chosen people. Now they were chosen by God to be the custodians of the tradition that was the guardian of the faith that would flower with the coming of Christ, and there are particular reasons for that. But God did not choose the Jews because of some sort of racial superiority. And this is why historically we've seen two sort of, what we said, the major conflict of the Second World War. And this is very uncomfortable for people to talk about. But the notion of modern Zionism that is common amongst Jews today is not dissimilar in many ways than the notion of national socialism. Now that I'm not going to get into specifics here about Second World War and the Holocaust and so forth. And I'm not equating, you know, I'm not making any more, I'm not saying anything more than I'm saying. Just look at this from the meta perspective, okay? Before we start saying, angry thing is in the comments. But this notion of Judaism as it is understood today, this heresy of the Old Testament religion, is that there is something essentially divinized about the people as such, that their election by God is by way of them being created to be a special race. That's the notion. People don't realize when they say things like they're God's chosen people. Well, they're not God's chosen people anymore, and they were chosen for a purpose. That purpose has been fulfilled, and those who followed the faith of the patriarchs like David Abraham and Moses did the right thing, and those who rejected it rejected the Messiah. The national socialists believed the Germans were a special race with divinized qualities. In many ways, why there was such an enmity between Jews and the Nazis is because, quite frankly, they both had similar notions about sort of divine election, the specialness of a particular race. This is something inherent in the notion of Zionism today, and it was already in place back then. This is not just to fight any persecution or anything bad. I'm not saying that. All I'm saying is that the philosophy when you follow it through, it is something that must be considered. Whereas Catholicism, Christianity does not consider any single people as having some sort of extra specialness because of their tribe. St. Paul is very clear, there's neither Jew nor Greek, meaning when we're baptized, we are all members of the body of Christ. Obviously, certain cultural differences are important and we should foster those things, and there's sort of symphonic diversity to things. There's nothing wrong with wanting to stay in your own culture. That's, in many ways, a beautiful thing. But this notion that this people has a special nature about them because God made them to be special, and that makes them more special in some way than others. This is anti-Christian, and it's the same error that many Zionists and many Jews fall into, if we just follow their logic through, and it's the same error that National Socialism falls into. And this is what's so annoying when you look at a lot of these people trying to talk about Zionism and things like that on the Internet. They fall into the errors of the National Socialists and they don't realize they're making the same errors they hate. Christianity is the solution because there's neither Jew nor Greek, meaning there's no difference in quality, or, you know, everyone who is part of the. The body of Christ is part of the elect. It's not a matter of where you're born, not a matter of who your ancestors are. There was a time when that served a purpose, but even then it was faith in Christ that saved the patriarchs. Now, I want to read something here. This is from Father Fahe's book. And this is from an old commentary on St. John's Gospel that Father Fahe's sites. And he says, "The Jews refused firstly to accept that the supernatural life of his Mesmetic Kingdom was higher than the National Life." That's the error we see today. This is why when you say Christ, "Is King you get accused of anti-Semitism?" It's very simple. "Was higher than their National Life, and secondly, they utterly rejected the idea of the Gentile nations being admitted to enter into the Mesmetic Kingdom on the same level as themselves." Thus, they put their National Life above the supernatural life of grace and set racial descent from Abraham according to the flesh on a higher plain than spiritual descent from Abraham by faith. And this is a commentary on St. John's Gospel. That's a traditional commentary. This is what we describe when we talked about Abraham's promise given by God. And then here, Father Fahe, he quotes actually a man named Julian Wail, Wild Wail, I don't know if you pronounce it. He was a French rabbi from Ripon. And this is what he said. This is back in. Well, this is before 1950. I don't know exactly the date, but anyway, it's a book called La Foi d'Israel by Julian Wail, I think it's hyper-naudcent. This is what this rabbi said. "Jewish faith aims at procuring the emancipation of Israel, suffering and downtrodden, and at the same time collaborating in the emancipation of humanity for which it has still the ambition to be a light and an instrument of salvation." So emancipating humanity from its shackles, that includes Christians emancipating Christians from Christianity. Father Fahe's commentary here, he says, "This writer in the early part of the same work has already pointed out that it is Judaism rather than Heresy which has prevented Christianity from becoming the faith of the majority of believers in God." And that instead of Christianity, "finishing Judaism," Judaism may succeed in "finishing Christianity." In other words, he hopes that instead of the Jewish nation accepting the one true supernatural Messiah, our Lord Jesus Christ, a pretended supernatural influence, of our Lord will decay and finally disappear making way for the naturalistic realm of the new Messiah's. This sounds like a bunch of conspiracy, doesn't this sounds very antisemitic? Kennedy, what are you saying? I am saying, I am saying, what is in the Bible? This is what will happen at the end of time. This is what the church fathers say will happen. And by the way, this rabbi here is just, he was a, seen as a hero. He was not some fringe person. This was him, he died. And he died in 1950. So yeah, it was from a long time ago. And he was seen as a hero of Judaism, et cetera, et cetera. So this is the same rabbi. Anyway, the point is that there will be this finishing off of Christianity through an instrumental application of naturalism. What is naturalism? I've talked about this on my show. Naturalism is the notion that God does not have sort of his sovereign will over the society. And we don't look up, but we look sideways. So the idea is that heaven is found on earth. It's what the name sounds. It's not necessarily materialism. Naturalists don't have to be atheists. But you find this in the words of men like Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro, the other day, it's something like one of his quotes, you know, just because we're chosen, the chosen people doesn't mean we're special. It's like, yes, it does. That's exactly what it means. But anyway, so again, Ben Shapiro is representative of mainstream conservative Judaism. His faith, his belief is representative of the sort of main current of religious Jews. And you have to recommend remember as well that even if people don't consider themselves religious Jews, it's like people who don't consider themselves religious Christians, you know, if you're from a society that has those Christian beliefs about everything, whether or not you go to church on Sunday, you still have those same beliefs about basically history, metaphysics, civilization, those things are imbibed in everybody. This is why, you know, we have these major problems with mass migration. And these places like Germany or Britain or Canada, where ordinary citizens are freaking out at these cultures that come from these pagan or Muslim lands, and they don't like the way that they do things. And they're like, this isn't the way Canadians live. This isn't the way the German live. And they're right. But what they're really saying is this isn't how Christian society functions, but they don't realize that they still have the same beliefs about how society ought to run in the basic sense. All these things they take for granted, all these protections and freedoms and rights and so forth that are part of Christian charity, the true rights. And they have people coming from a society that doesn't recognize those things and they get upset. And it's like, well, you can't have one without the other. But anyway, everyone has religious beliefs about everything, even if they say they're an atheist, and they're just a bunch of weird doctrines recently. The famous atheists talked about how he's a cultural Christian. Everyone is a cultural whatever society they're from, whatever tribe they're from, whatever religion they're from in their history. Everyone has those beliefs. And it's the scriptures read Taylor Marshall's book, Antichrist and Apocalypse I Did Narrow At The Audio Book. Read it. And it talks about how what will happen will be the suppression of the faith and the rebuilding of the temple and the subjugation of Christians to the false Messiah who will manifest himself as the king of the Jews, a political leader that will install himself as the Lord of the world. The basic Bible commentary 101, it's not anti-Semitic, it's not a conspiracy theory, it's basic scriptures, basic church fathers. It's something as old as the faith. The Judaism of today is not the Old Testament religion. The Old Testament religion is Christianity in potential actualized by the coming of Christ. And those who are saved is because they saw the day of the Lord and rejoiced. And like Abraham, they went outside, they couldn't see the stars, but they trusted the stars were there. Because of this, Christians need to have a little bit more wherewithal about how how this naturalism operates against their against their best wishes against what they want. And they need to understand that if you look at what has happened in the church with the mundane application of the liturgy with the desupernaturalization of everything, because that's what happened, right. a D supernaturalization you know. you know, church and the round and, you know, you hold the Nova Sordo liturgy face to people and hold the host in front of you, but don't like raise it up, you know, the way that you're supposed to do in the old mass and everything like, you know, just all these things that sort of tone down the nature of the supernatural trajectory of the life of the Christian to heaven and not to man. That's largely lost. And it has everything to do with religious liberty. And with religious liberty has everything to do with the desires of the Jews and the Freemasons by their own admission and with the acceptance of a cardinal who was very influential at the Catholic church. This organized naturalism has made its way through the church, namely through the council. And if you look at the documents and I've done other shows on this and I can't remember chapter and verse, but the documents are the second Vatican council, especially God, him, it's peasant different parts. And again, the documents of the council are massive. Almost nobody alive is right every single line of them. So you can find many things in them that are fine in some things that are strange and some things that are outright errors like religious liberty. But nonetheless, the tone of the documents is the glorification of human society. The tone of the documents is the glorification of man. This is very clear and this has been represented in how the bishops of the church and the prelates and the clerics of the church and the theologians have talked about man. I mean, man is the source in the summit of all civilization and so on and so forth. It's man first, God second, religious liberty is man first, God second. Okay, naturalism is man first, God second. It all comes from the same source. Christ was fighting it at his time. The church conquered it. And then many of the hierarchy in the church acquiesced to the false Jewish and Masonic errors that were always fought by the popes up until the second Vatican Council and then instantiated those things through the consular spirit. This is why this is the main reason why they went after Archbishop Lafeb. People think it had to do with the mass. Well, I mean, obviously they allow the Latin. I mean, Pope Francis has been a little bit more of a sick of fan recently than Benedict and John Paul too were, but they allow the Latin mass. It's not just not the Latin mass that they hated so much. Christ, Lafeb had to sign on to the plan of accepting the naturalism in the church and he wouldn't do that. He had to bend the knee to the naturalism. He said, no, that's why he was persecuted. He was persecuted because he stood for the rights of Christ the king, which is not allowed in the church since second Vatican Council. It's taboo. That's the main reason he did what he did. And that's why I'm doing this study on Dave on Crown Tim. So that's enough for today. Usually these book studies are about 45 minutes to an hour at 42 minutes here. And if you've enjoyed this, there's four more episodes. There'll be about 10 more episodes because there's about, I don't know, 29 or 30 chapters in the book. Usually I do two chapters each day or each time. It's about one episode a week. Lots of other stuff. They're on the substack for you. And I'm presently, I'm done about a quarter, maybe a quarter of my charismatic book. And very soon, the first chapters will be released on my substack with an accompanying audio recording of them, which will become the audiobook for paid members to sort of have a sneak peek at the book as it goes. I'm working with an editor and some theological advisors to make sure I get everything right. And they'll be released in an article format. I just want to make sure I have a few chapters stockpiled. So I'm not under pressure to write one every time it's out. And they'll be there for you as well. And so there you go. So there's lots of goodies over there. All right, ladies and gentlemen, last thing also, I'll be in Ireland in two weeks. Check out the link in the description area for this for the SSPX annual conference in Athlon, which is on August 34th first as well. All right, ladies and gentlemen, this has been mere tradition. Until next time, God bless you all, and I'll see you soon.