Go back

Iran War, 2026 Midterms, Lebanon-Israel Ceasefire, And MORE! W/ Nick Fuentes

134m 37s

Iran War, 2026 Midterms, Lebanon-Israel Ceasefire, And MORE! W/ Nick Fuentes

The proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. and Iran is fundamentally flawed and unsustainable, lacking any real agreement on core issues such as the ceasefire in Lebanon, Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz, or nuclear ambitions. The deal was quickly undermined by Israel’s deliberate actions—continuing airstrikes in Lebanon, bombing Beirut and southern areas, and refusing to withdraw from occupied territory. The MOU’s requirement for Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah is unrealistic, given Hezbollah’s strength and role in defending Lebanon from Israeli aggression. Israel’s actions confirm a pattern of sabotage, using rhetoric like "Gaza treatment" to justify further military operations. The U.S. has attempted to broker peace, but Israel’s intransigence, backed by a powerful lobbying network, ensures ongoing escalation. The ceasefire in Lebanon is not a breakthrough but a rebranding of the same conflict, with Israel maintaining a security presence and threatening further invasion. This dynamic reveals a deeper strategic failure: the U.S. and allies have failed to counter Israel’s aggressive posture, which is driven by a desire to project dominance and prevent future attacks. As the situation deteriorates, domestic pressure in Israel grows, particularly against Netanyahu, whose leadership is seen as ineffective given the failure to neutralize Hezbollah or Iran. Israeli political survival now hinges on maintaining these military campaigns, despite their long-term instability and the growing international backlash. Ultimately, the MOU fails not due to external pressures, but because key actors—especially Israel—refuse to compromise, ensuring the region remains on a path of recurring violence.

Transcription

27698 Words, 149233 Characters

English
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Welcome, bro. It's been a while. It's been almost three years now, I think, since you've last been on. Happy to have you. We got a bunch of stuff going on right now, and it's like, it's like almost like you came to Miami, and it's like, okay, let's go ahead and talk about Iran, because there's a bunch of stuff going on in the Middle East right now, man. So, so we'll get right into it, guys. No crazy intros or anything else like that. You guys have been waiting for this one for a very long time. I'm here with the legend himself, Nick fucking Fuentes. Nick, for the people that live under a rock, man, can you just introduce yourself real quick to the people? Yeah, absolutely. Well, great to be here. It's been a minute. Like you said, I think 2023, yeah, so it's been a few years. But yeah, I host America First on Rumble, Monday through Friday, and yeah, it's good to be back. Let's do it. Let's talk about Iran. Come on, I'm one of the best political commentators in America, and he's over here being really humble and stuff like that. We're happy to have you. So obviously, we kind of get right into what's been going on. Can you give us a quick summary of what's been going on as far as like this MOU, literally we're in the middle of restarting a war in the Middle East, Lebanon is going crazy, there's riots all over the place. You know, former security advisors are getting indicted for all kinds of crazy news today. Yeah, absolutely. Well, it's funny because I think the last time we talked, we did that debate with Hassan or not Hassan, Destiny, Zirka, Sneeko. We had the whole panel, and it's funny because even back then, we were talking about the clean break memo. Yes. We were talking about how it was in Iraq and Syria, and then everything was pointing towards Iran, and that was even before Trump got elected, too. Before October 7th, before everything. Right, right. And I remember it vividly because. You were talking about how the United States gets no benefit from being aligned with Israel, and it was a great debate because a lot of people didn't know that stuff, and now people are kind of seeing like, Nick was right the whole time. We don't get any benefit from these guys. It's nuts. Well, yeah, because even back then, it wasn't really like an active situation. It wasn't hot yet. Nobody knew. Right, and so it was kind of just this compartmentalized kind of thing. It was kind of inert. It was lurking under the surface, but nothing was really going on, and then I think it was literally three months later. or it was October 7th, and then it's just been off to the races gaza then lebanon then iran iran again and i mean i guess the big news is that this whole deal is totally falling apart whole deal is a sham and it's funny because you know the war started february 28th and realistically it only went on for about five or six weeks we had a ceasefire in the first week of april and i remember ever since april there's been all this talk about there's going to be a deal there's going to be a deal long-term deal war's over whatever and uh finally then i don't know if it's a week ago or two weeks ago we get this mou they say it's a done deal signed on the dotted line war is over everything's cool now and when they announced the mou i remember reading through it we didn't even get it for a few days they announced it on a sunday we got some rumors about what was in it in the first 24 hours finally got it on that wednesday and i'm reading through the deal and i'm thinking this is never going to hold because fundamentally the critical issues never got resolved and the big ones were you the situation in lebanon whether there's going to be a ceasefire whether there's going to be iran managing the strait of hormuz whether they're going to charge a toll and then ultimately those root causes of the conflict the structural issues like the nuclear program and the sanctions regime and so i'm looking through it and i'm thinking you know they're calling it a memorandum of understanding but it couldn't be a bigger misnomer because there's no understanding there's no there's no agreement at all like there's the two positions have not been reconciled there they have not made an agreement on any of the core issues and so i'm looking through it and i'm thinking you know they're calling it a memorandum of understanding but it couldn't be a bigger misnomer because there's no understanding there's no there's no agreement at all like there's the two positions have not been reconciled and so really it's a giant misunderstanding and i remember when it was announced the iranians came out first they were first to the punch in their state-sponsored media and they said the united states has agreed to give us all this money up front and we're going to control the strait and they're going to impose a ceasefire in lebanon and basically we got everything we wanted and vance came out on the shows the following day all the morning shows and he said that's iranian propaganda that's a lie we didn't agree to that then the deal came out it's true we gave them all of those things and then of course the white house is put in this position where they got to come out and say basically we didn't agree to what we agreed to actually iran is not going to impose a toll they're not going to manage it it's going to be freedom of navigation we're not giving them anything until later and basically as quickly as it came together it fell apart and that became obvious i think it was last weekend they're supposed to hold these talks in switzerland fell apart came together at the last minute they sat down and discussed it they tried to put together this agreement where we're going to implement a ceasefire and they're not going to ceasefire in lebanon there was this reporting mechanism not just for lebanon but also for the straight to avoid misunderstandings escalation the whole deal unraveling and then over the past week they the u.s is trying to iron out both of these things straight as well as lebanon they've been doing these negotiations at the state department in dc and then literally in just the past 48 hours the whole thing came undone all over again and i guess we'll get into now the big news is that iran is once again shooting drones at commercial shipping in the strait the u.s has retaliated by bombing the southern coast of iran along the strait and now iran is claiming they hit u.s bases or bases hosting u.s troops in the middle east and so you wonder it's like how once again how is this meaningfully different from the status quo before the mou you know we have this war we're bombing them they're bombing us then we have a ceasefire but during the ceasefire we're bombing them they're bombing us okay now we have an mou once again they're bombing us we're bombing them so what meaningfully has changed and the answer is nothing has changed because the fundamentals have not changed those those core issues have not been resolved and until they are this is going to keep flaring up what do you think has been the biggest killer of this mou if you had to pinpoint one or two things that you think have been the absolute worst number one is lebanon that's the biggest thing because and here's the thing so the the three issues that the mou deals with there are sticking points in each of those things it is a ceasefire in lebanon it is whether iran will take control over the straight and what they do with it and it's the root causes but the thing is those latter two issues the straight and the root causes there's a great deal of room for the u.s to negotiate on both of those things or to massage and finesse the truth so for example iran said we're not going to charge a toll they said it's going to be a fee we're going to charge an environmental fee an insurance fee is all this kind of stuff now the white house could one just lie and they could say oh that's not happening they're not charging a toll they're not charging a fee because they lie about these things all the time just so they can achieve the deal two they could just finesse it and they could say uh well this semantic thing is really a meaningful difference it isn't a toll it is a service fee and that's fine in other words there's a lot of room for them to give concessions and the u.s unilaterally can do this same thing with the root causes on the nuclear program we could fundamentally let them have enrichment we could let them have enrichment with inspections cameras uh the iaea going in the rest of it there's a lot of room for us to give there as well but the one thing we have no control over is what israel does in lebanon yeah you know we we and that's the irony closest ally complete dependence on us and there's literally nothing we can do to get them to behave the way we want they're going to do what they're going to do they're going to do what they want and it's actually imperative for netanyahu that they don't stop in lebanon it's imperative that they don't stop in lebanon and for its own sake but also in the furtherance of sabotaging the iran deal itself that's a goal in and of itself for them too and they're both imperative for netanyahu in particular but any israeli government in general either you know the craziest thing about that is like they struck this deal at the peak of the fighting in lebanon when they were trying to take over that castle where the crusaders had historically uh fought um which has like a huge strategic benefit of like you know you can see literally the lebanon board the you know the um northern israel and then you can obviously see the boat with the border so it's like they were fighting at that point right when trump was in france trying to sign this deal so i was like man there's no way this is going to get back and they made it pretty far past the latani river so i was like no way and then like you said um they have no incentive to for this deal all of israel got mad even you know people were criticizing the trump administration it's kind of funny how nobody said it by name right like no one said trump they said oh this is bad even mark levin all these other people the next thing about trump they're just like this bad deal is bad so it's like i was like there's no way this thing is going to last but yeah like i i hate to blame it on israel again but it's like that was the point that we couldn't deliver on unfortunately and what did they do they completely sabotaged it well yeah and it's funny i said that on my show i just saw the this was one of the clips that's still blown up on instagram as i said like they're literally responsible for all the wars in the world at this point it's just like undeniable because it's like look iran which is allegedly this like regime of religious fanatics and zealots and the trump administration they both want peace they signed the deal they had the handshake the rest of it it's israel that is literally insistent on sabotaging this piece so they can have more war somewhere else so it's a hundred percent falls on them and it's so deliberate and you remember the original ceasefire is in the first week of april and if you recall it's so funny people just have this unbelievably short attention span we've been technically speaking in a ceasefire like nominally that's where the war is ever since the first week of april and if you remember the rollout of that ceasefire trump had been saying we will annihilate iranian civilization and we're going to annihilate iranian civilization and we're going to kill everybody annihilate iranian civilization and we're going to annihilate iranian civilization and we're going to annihilate iranian civilization and we're going to kill everybody day yeah our plan day bridge day uh kill everybody day yeah our plan day bridge day uh and that was on easter like hey happy easter day yeah our plan day bridge day uh and that was on easter like hey happy easter like we're gonna kill everybody and that was on easter like hey happy easter like we're gonna kill everybody yeah and um and and it was easter like we're gonna kill everybody yeah and um and and it was easter and then 48 hours later was tuesday yeah and um and and it was easter and then 48 hours later was tuesday and that is when trump announced and then 48 hours later was tuesday and that is when trump announced in like the late evening in like the late evening in like the late evening within two hours pakistan which is the broker within two hours pakistan which is the broker for the deal and iran both came out and they said no for the deal and iran both came out and they said no there's no ceasefire until there's a ceasefire there's no ceasefire until there's a ceasefire on all fronts in lebanon too that was the first on all fronts in lebanon too that was the first ceasefire in april and the following day the u.s ceasefire in april and the following day the u.s called them liars the u.s came out and said no called them liars the u.s came out and said no lebanon was never part of it we never agreed to lebanon was never part of it we never agreed to that and it was not just iran but also pakistan that said no you did agree to a ceasefire in lebanon now the following day israel launched a major airstrike on lebanon killed a thousand more people literally the following day when that was the the issue in contention israel kills a thousand more people in lebanon insane and iran comes out and they go yeah okay deals off there's no basis to talk you're in violation of the deal and then they re-close the strait at that time they had about 29 30 ships at max going through the strait per day they shut it right back down by the weekend and then that is what created the current predicament which is why we needed the mou and it's literally now identical which is they announced the mou iran says lebanon's a part of it we say no it's not iran says yes it is and then literally every single day last week iran is bombing lebanon escalating not just in the air but also on the ground yeah invading expanding the invasion pushing further and the message is very clear it's like they're intentionally sabotaging the deal yeah no and it's insane what do you think drove trump to actually do this deal in the face of you know obviously the embarrassment the capitulation uh the the israeli lobby obviously heavily um you know pressuring him not to what do you think actually made him say you know what we got to do this mou even though i've been trying to delay it but i got to do it it's the oil it's the oil it's a strategic petroleum reserve is running out lowest level since 1983 i think there's 350 million barrels left that's not a huge supply of oil and you know people don't realize that price was still doubled yeah that's what i'm trying to tell people the price still doubled with all the all these strategic reserves out there right and it's not even just ours but it was this coordination of everybody dumping their strategic reserves all at the same time china these other east asian countries us so the price was being artificially kept low because we're just dumping all this oil out there and and you know there was some reporting before the mou you that said realistically we got about four maybe six weeks left before we have a real problem like we have a supply problem that the reserves in america and this is happening even right now there's some reporting that at cushing which is in oklahoma where all the oil goes through that is reaching this dangerously low level about 19 million barrels and so it's just getting to the point where we're heading towards this catastrophic energy shortage which then will just have a ripple effect throughout the entire global economy and so i think trump said it's imperative we just got to give it up and ultimately we ran out of options we ran out of time because of the oil there were no military cards left to play there was all this talk talk about that please because i got in an argument with the idiot the other day about this i was like dude we literally had no more cards to play well we could have took carg island i'm like go ahead you want to talk about like how we had no military cards it's totally insane i mean you know even these guys like mark levin and shapiro they're out there saying you know we need to bomb carg island and we need to do all these things and it's like we can't even put a destroyer in the strait the strait is so narrow it means that it's basically impossible some marines can't get in there either right and so you you basically can't miss if an iranian is launching a drone or a missile at a ship you literally can't miss the ships are too slow the strait is too narrow and shallow we can't even get in there carg island is i think 12 square kilometers it's tiny and you have to know the iranians would anticipate this so you you start landing some marines on there and you're like oh my god we're going to be in trouble we're going to it's going to get ugly talking about the marines getting them on the meus i was like this is a this is a suicide mission if he actually does this like what's going on here uh you know and then the other thing too like i was trying to explain this i was like the only cards they really had left realistically was destroying energy infrastructure or a nuclear bomb that's really all you had left and if you do either of those say goodbye to the gulf states yeah like say goodbye they're going destroy the desalination plants no water they're cooked summertime in the middle east over over so i could only imagine like i'll think about this imagine the oval office every day during the course of this conflict like from japan from uh indonesia all these countries the gulf states trump and the war and the war he must have had an insane amount of international pressure to end this thing all of europe now they got to buy russian oil like what's going on here yeah yeah huge international pressure and um you're right i mean at the end of the day it's like we just we had a set period of time where we had some options before we ran out of oil it's it's just that's really what it all comes back to is the u.s really underestimated iran's ability to close the strait and sustain the closure of the strait basically indefinitely and you have this period of time where trump thought we could bomb them into submission then it was getting too costly even for us bombing them was too costly for us because of how we were burning through the stockpile of interceptors and the damage it was doing to our bases in the gulf it's just too many targets can't defend all of them so then we transition to the strategy of the bluffing the economic blockade you know we're just hoping there's some way we could trick these guys into a deal and then yeah you run out of oil that's it you know it's the end of the it's the end of the rope i know trump is a very difficult person to predict sometimes etc but if there's someone that understands his thought process because you've been spot on with a lot of your a lot of your analysis a lot of your predictions you've been spot on what do you think his strategy was like let's take let's go to february 27th or actually we can even go back when netanyahu came the 13th time to america right and he gave and he sold trump on the plan what do you think his strategy what do you think the plan was what was he trying to do what was the strategy what did he think was going to happen versus what actually happened well you know you got to go back to really december which is netanyahu comes to mar-a-lago i think december 27th for new year's exactly yes um and he came there with one intention it was widely reported at the time he said look we got to hit iran again we got to hit the missiles he said because iran is building 300 ballistic missiles per month and what this is going to do is it's going to make it impossible for us to intervene and if they build up their missiles they're going to build up their missiles and they're going to stockpile then they will get to work on excavating the highly enriched uranium the centrifuges then it's off to the races so netanyahu said we have to go back in mow the grass or defeat them once and for all trump goes into venezuela that first week in 2026 extradites maduro it's this masterful operation no u.s casualties we kill 100 of their guys scoop them up he's feeling good then you have those protests in iran where they say 70 000 protesters were killed it's the most violent ever just kept going up and not first it was 30 versus 20 then 30 then 40 then now they're saying yeah 50 60 70 yeah we've never seen that before right you know october 7th other things right like so so it's like all the other think of the 100 000 protesters that were killed and what we later learned by the way is that uh those protesters in iran it wasn't really a spontaneous demonstration where were the protests occurring it was all in western iran where it's all the kurds and anybody knows what's going on is that the iraqi kurds headquartered in herbal has basically broken away from the central government in baghdad that's where the u.s still has all its bases israel's very aligned with the iraqi kurds and there's they share a border then with iran so there were reports at the time in january that there were men dressed in all black fully automatic rifles taking over government buildings municipal buildings in western iran it was later reported about a month later that some of these kurds were armed by the israelis and by the cia to cross over the border effectively it was an invasion and they were trying to stoke or spark a wider revolution they were going to kick it off while simultaneously crashing the rial yeah which admitted that he we crashed the rial too we and he did that with george soros for for years that's how george soros became so rich exactly it's a great point that is a huge part of what triggered is a big currency collapse and a run on the banks you're 100 right and so you have these huge protests going on into the middle of january and that's when trump was saying overthrow the government and they said that they were in the air ready to go ready to bomb iran but they just didn't have the aircraft carriers mobilized because they were in venezuela so trump mobilized the fleet brought the carrier the armada to iran there was another round of negotiations in mid-february kushner and witkoff went out there i believe the negotiations were held in turkey or switzerland or something um or oman there's a lot of debate about where and when it was going to happen and basically the u.s at the end said look you give us everything or else or else we're coming and it's important too because me and you talk it was no enrichment ballistic missiles neutered to like 300 400 kilometers and then uh no funding of the proxies that was the original three every zionist comes in and says no dude we just want to destroy their navy and the air force i was like dude no you you're now you're shifting the goalposts because you couldn't get what you wanted before it was no enrichment but then they're trying to say like no we just didn't want them to have nukes no it was zero enrichment i remember that vividly except well that's always been the sticking point and and that was the ultimatum as we said and the ultimatum even went outside the negotiations because in the negotiations the iranians they won't sit if it's anything other than the nuclear file they don't even want proxies and missiles on the table so they say that is outside the bounds of the discussion so so kushner and whitcoff because kushner wasn't even part of the negotiations last year and wasn't part of the first round in february but he came for this ultimatum and they said we're not playing around no enrichment no proxies no missiles no nothing or else we're coming the iranians said forget it and then that's when we that's when we went to war and so i think the mindset was basically a combination of exuberance because of the success in venezuela as well as maybe overestimating the pension to the iranians that they're going to be able to overthrow the government and then i think the israelis and trump himself undersold the the ability of iran to close the strait their willingness or ability to close the strait in a sustained way you know what the most disturbing thing was to me man like the intelligence community told him you are not going to be able to effectuate a regime change these guys are theocrats this is uh you know the they're not gonna even if you kill ali khamenei you're not going to get the regime change you want man it's this is a different this isn't venezuela where you can pay off the bodyguards like this is different and he went with it anyway and i don't know what the massad told him during that meeting but he clearly had to rely upon israeli intelligence like you said the exuberance and the thing that's also the most disturbing is like the the diplomat guy from oman like they had met on the 27th and they and they had a they weren't gonna stockpile no like they're gonna get rid of sunset clauses whatever it was better than what obama had in place and they still attacked anyway which i'm like oh wow and it's like now i would you can make the argument that iran is stronger now than before 100 there there's no question and yeah i think it was it is this influence of israel i mean it was mike waltz was a national security advisor up until like may last year and he's a israeli operative you know so these are the people in central command these are the people in the in the dia in the nsa the rest of it and they're not going to stockpile they're not going to stockpile they're not going to stockpile and you're right in the build-up to the war i remember there were a bunch of sources going to politico and the washington post from the military basically saying regime change isn't going to happen because that that was like the tagline at the time as trump said we want a decisive definitive confrontation we want a clean decapitation strike knock out the regime in one go they said it would last four days yeah i don't even remember but like that first night yeah they said four days that's as long as it's going to go and uh and i guess they literally didn't have a plan b you know okay what if it doesn't work they close the straight and then they refuse to open it okay now what and that's literally the question we've been grappling with ever since is okay we crossed the rubicon you killed the supreme leader you killed half the regime you blew up all their stuff they closed the straight now what are you going to do and there's literally there's nothing we can do you know what kills me the most when he says we have more reasonable people and i'm like uh the guy that's in power right now is his son you killed his baby you killed his family yeah that guy's gonna be like he's more reasonable than the other - They're reasonable? Okay. it's just to say to me because like they killed all the people that you know didn't want a nuclear program and then you know tulsi gabbard goes on and says oh yeah they don't we we keep assessing they have a nuclear bomb obviously she's a dni she has a better read on every on on the intel than even the president she's the one briefing him and it's just to say to me that like we still went in right because they asked him i'll never forget i think trump was like on the tarmac like what do you think about what tulsi gabbard said she doesn't know anything i was like that's your dni like what are you talking about she's the one that briefs you like what are you talking about dude so very clearly relied upon the israelis and like the israeli intelligence and um uh what was i gonna say um and then you know and then i know you're not a fan of kent but like he comes out from the dni as well and he's saying the same thing and i'm like well these guys are you know have access to some of the most classified information in the country and they're over here saying like yeah this is a problem why are we striking why are we getting involved in this war so you know you got people at very high levels of government that have that honestly doesn't benefit them to take this position right you're like gabbard had to resign he had to resign you know so i don't know well what happened with kent was really interesting that that's a that's like a layer that not a lot of people even remember but if you recall i forget what week he was very pro-israel he was he was um but there's some there's like an interesting connection there because i believe it was the middle of march had to have been yeah something like march 12th or 13th or something like that the first government official to actually come out publicly against a war was david sacks david sacks who is um very close with jd vance very close with peter teal very close with elon david's actually extremely powerful and a connector because it was at david sacks house where jd vance hosted a tech fundraiser for trump in june of 2024 and that that is some of the value that vance brought to the table which is why he became the vice president and so sacks is like the conciliary for vance teal elon and also very tight with tucker carlson as well he's part of that crew he's a paypal mafia guy and you know he's better than some of the other paypal mafia jews he is a jew but every time and it literally it's literally every fucking but so he he was the first one to come out he's the ai czar and now the thing about that position is because of some statute you can only have that position for 180 days or something like that before you you go it's not confirmed confirmed by the center exactly exactly so um he was headed towards that time limit expiring he was on his way out then he got put on the science council i think about a few days later but he was the first one to come out and say the war in iran needs to stop immediately that was on a saturday then it was literally a few days later that joe kent published his letter as the head of counterterrorism the following day he went on tucker carlson and did this big interview and i said wait a second so you got david sacks joe kent tucker you got this triangulation of people that are now criticizing the war from inside the country kent was backed by teal in 2022 when kent ran for congress in 22 in washington's 10th i think it was he got money from peter teal because kent was running in one of those trump impeachment districts back in 2021 there were 10 or 11 house republicans that voted to impeach trump peter teal made it a mission to primary every single one of those people and kent was running in one of those districts kent was in the cia he's a cia officer right um so i i saw this triangulation of sacks comes out first then kent then kent goes on tucker what do these three people have in common they're all jd vance guys now this war puts vance in a really bad position because i think everybody saw where this is going to go it's going to lead to an economic collapse and energy shock high inflation the defeat in the midterm pre-war i heard different stories yeah i heard different stories someone's like no someone's like hit him hard but get out of there what do you think the his actual position was so they said that vance did not oppose he wasn't if he was in favor of hitting them if you're gonna do it hit him hard but he didn't oppose because he talked about them literally on day one of the rnc i was there i was like what why is he talking about iraq dude what the fuck yeah when he first got appointed he talked about it twice in 2024 he went to the quincy institute and said we need a pro-israel version of america first where we give israel everything they need to bomb iran and then at the rnc in july punch him in the nose or something like that if i recall yeah he said you know we we can't just do these you know little pinprick strikes we need to hit him really hard and he volunteered that it's not like they said what should we do about iran they said what do you think about foreign policy said we need to hit iran really hard so and then you know it's hard to know because vance has rivals inside the white house we're going to leak to the press to make him look bad about you know did he support it did he not so it's sort of unreliable what you hear because these are planted stories but we know he didn't oppose when the war started he disappeared he faded into the background because he knows when he runs for president he's going to be the one who's going to be the one who's going to in the primary in 27 and 28 they're going to say uh you know war in iran what happened there you know energy shock inflation why we don't know no wars man you ran on that exactly and what did you do why didn't you oppose it etc and i think that what happened with sax kent and tucker is they are trying to help extricate him from the liability of the conflict they're going to try and give him an out and tucker's got this interesting line he's been interviewed a few times recently new york times with the british journalist with jack neal somebody else the other day and they say so what do you think about vance and tucker has this habit of saying oh well you know he's got the hardest position in the world because you know we all voted for trump and placed all our hopes upon him and you know vance just has to do whatever trump says if trump betrays the voters and takes us to war vance's job is to support trump so he really has no choice in the matter even if he opposes it and it's bad well you know what can he do it's just so unfortunate and what that what that belies is they don't want him to catch the blame for this next year and i think now this is why vance is throwing himself in front of the peace process this is why he wants to be the guy in islamabad he wants to be the guy at uh switzerland that's negotiating the mou because this is going to be a huge liability the huge like hot potato they're gonna have to neutralize in 27 because they're going to be asked like okay iran war what did you do completely split the base dude this war yes and his answer is going to need to be something like well my job was to support the president i had to support the president i had no say in the matter you know my as the vice president my job is to do what he tells me but what i did is i brokered the peace and i was instrumental in ending it and blah blah and then the endorsements from kent tucker and sax are going to become critical because all these people that are furious about the war and are leaving the gop because of it they're all they're now aligned with like tucker and kent and say oh these guys are patriots they're criticizing it if those guys come around and endorse vance it's like oh okay he's cool i see what you're he can't criticize they're creating his off ramp right now is what you're saying yes yes they're trying to salvage him so that you know that's what's going on there so no that's that's very interesting that you say that so do you think like that was kind of like the first sax was like you know what because i mean obviously he's a big zionist right like he benefits from the iran war right because he loves israel but you're saying like hey i still got to protect my guy i'm going to begin i'm going to be the first domino to kind of hey this is an issue we need to get out of this war etc and then obviously trickle back because people forget that tucker was one of the first of the main guys that told trump to put vance on wasn't he yeah oh 100 yeah it was uh tucker and elon and don jr um some say peter teal others deny that i think those people are liars i think that peter teal definitely had influence over that so much money and of course he would have put him in there's a lot of rumors some say that peter teal basically left politics after 22 because his like um boyfriend killed himself yeah of course he killed himself right of course guys his boyfriend uh yeah killed himself or threw him threw himself out of uh out of the 50th floor balcony could he get a better excuse than that one man like just say the massad did or something like that like well it is interesting because i've heard this story so so peter teal had this boyfriend um because he's married to a guy but he had this like boyfriend on the side and the husband wasn't happy about it and i guess the press the press is like hunting teal because teal's like a big trump booster so they they're up everybody's ass that's like pro-republican and he's a silicon valley guy huge betrayal what are you doing well and he's like the first mover right wing guy in silicon valley because everybody in silicon valley is super liberal that's why the endorsement in 24 like you were mentioning was so huge for trump dude he needed the money like even in 16 teal was there in 16 which is unbelievable he gave him uh money back then trump was like people forget like i guess people forget now but like trump was facing like four criminal cases yeah like two federal two state the federal cases were you know you had the document case out of uh out of south florida here and he was like oh my god that one was i think was the worst one i think like he could easily went to jail for that one which is ironic bolton said you gotta kill those uh those traitors now he just got convicted of funding we could talk about that later but sorry continue on so yeah you're talking about peter teal but yeah so so the the press is all you know peter teal's in this war with the press because the press outed him so then he destroyed gawker because they outed him as gay and then uh years later they kind of were all over the boyfriend they were all over the like uh the sneaky link or whatever and um you know we're not really sure what happened there because there's one story where they say the press drove the boyfriend to suicide because they were harassing him because basically what happened is the press got the boyfriend to say things in an interview that peter teal didn't want people to know and so maybe that would have invited retaliation from teal or maybe that would have gotten him in trouble there's one story which says that thus the boyfriend was so distraught because of these problems that he killed himself or you know some people allege that you know it's sort of mysterious maybe they he was like oh my god i'm gonna kill him i'm gonna kill him i'm gonna kill him i'm gonna kill him he was killed to cover up some secrets or something who who i honest to god don't know um but they say that teal was basically so despondent about this he sees it as such a tragedy that he just left politics after 22 And so in 24, he made some public appearances and basically said, I'm done with politics, you know, because they said your boy is the vice president. What do you think about that? And Teal said, oh, you know, I'm not really looking at the outcome. I don't really care that much. I'm not involved. And so there are a lot of people around Teal that say that he's just not in the mix anymore. I'm not sure how much I believe that. Yeah. So that that's sort of interesting. But I'm just saying that's what I've heard in that world. I remember I think someone asked him about Lavender at like I think it was Oxford or something like that. And he's like, well, the further Israel government. And it's just like, OK, dude, like, all right, whatever. So I guess we could go right into let's pull up the thing real fast. Well, Lebanon will show this video real fast of them like striking the deal, because we talked about Lebanon and how that was really the only thing that we didn't have control of. And then, of course, the Israelis had control of it. What did they do? They completely cooked it. We'll play this clip real quick. And this is them right here. This is Marco Rubio brokering this. And I remember they had a meeting like this a couple of months back, if I'm not mistaken, which Rubio also brokered it as well. I mean, this is a big deal, says right here, Justin. Secretary Rubio just brokered a framework agreement for peace between Israel, Lebanon, right here in D.C. America, Israel, Lebanon are all signatories. Immediate steps include the Israeli military withdrawing from small areas from southern Lebanon that it currently occupies. We could play the clip real quick. You put the audio as well. God bless Israel. May God bless Lebanon. May God bless the United States of America and all those who pursue peace. Thank you. They got a woman signing for Lebanon. Cooked. Cooked. Cooked. Oh, man. Yeah. Dude, I was literally going to say fuck. It's cooked. So, yeah, what are your thoughts on that, Nick? I mean, obviously, with this deal, they're rioting right now in Lebanon. Can we get the video of that, by the way, Moe, if you don't mind? Pull it up of them rioting in Lebanon. Like, literally, they're going. And I think they just drove to the PM's house. Really? Yeah, let me get the link. Yeah, but, yeah, what are your thoughts on that? Well, it's really interesting because, so, the 14-point MOU specifically says, there's a lot of, like, there were a lot of questions about what the MOU specifically said about Lebanon. Oh, we can pull it up, too, as well. I have it. Yeah. You know, because initially, like I said, the Iranians leaked to the press that it's a ceasefire in Lebanon. And I remember on my show, I said, well, first of all, is that true? Second of all. What does a ceasefire in Lebanon look like? Because the Israelis are engaged in an air campaign in Lebanon. They're bombing southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah is forward deployed with artillery and rockets. But Israel is also bombing the capital, Beirut, in central Lebanon, which is where Hezbollah's headquarters is, in the southern suburbs. And so not only are they doing this air campaign in Beirut, but also in southern Lebanon. They also are on the ground in southern Lebanon. They've invaded, too. And so I said, when the MOU first happened, is it a ceasefire? Does that mean? Does it mean no airstrikes in Beirut, but they can keep going in southern Lebanon? Or does it mean no airstrikes altogether? Does it mean no airstrikes and they have to withdraw? Or does it mean just no airstrikes, but they could remain in their current position in southern Lebanon? You know, what exactly does that mean? Well, then we finally got the terms of the agreement. And the terms said national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Lebanon. That is about as expansive of a ceasefire as you can get. Because obviously, if a country is occupying your territory, you're going to have a ceasefire. If a country is occupying your territory and bombing you, you don't have territorial integrity. You don't have national sovereignty. So what that means is Israel's got it. They got to leave. They got to withdraw. And they got to stop bombing altogether for the most part. So this was the subject of these negotiations in Switzerland last week between the U.S. and Iran. So then the U.S. is going to host these negotiations from last Tuesday until today. It was supposed to be till Thursday, but they extended it a day between Lebanon and Israel, brokered by Rubio. What's interesting is Rubio gave a statement during these talks. And Rubio said in a press conference, he goes, the terms of the MOU say territorial integrity and sovereignty. He goes, well, it's not territorial integrity when Iran backs Hezbollah in Lebanon. You see? He goes, because Hezbollah, that's not the armed forces of Lebanon. It's a non-state actor, a militant group operating without the assent of the government in Beirut. So this is what they do. They turn it around and they say, no, no, Israel doesn't have to withdraw. Iran has to withdraw. Iran is the one violating. So now read this 14-point thing with Lebanon that just came out. What it says is Lebanon has to disarm Hezbollah. Pull it up for them so you can reference it. Is there a specific one? Make it big so Nick can see it. All right. There we go. Is there a point that you want me to highlight here? So it says, number four, Hezbollah and all other non-state armed groups must be fully and verifiably disarmed. That's never going to happen. Never. Yeah. Because Lebanon passed a law under pressure from France to U.S. and Israel last year that says, they're going to disarm Hezbollah. And they can't because Hezbollah is more powerful than the Lebanese armed forces. And so Israel's been insistent that Lebanon do this and they haven't. And that was actually Israel's pretext to reinvade and violate the ceasefire that's been in place since November of 24. So the reason they have this memorandum, this is effectively like passing the ball back to Iran. And what they're effectively saying in this agreement is they're saying, OK, you want to cease fire in Lebanon? Well, you know, you first. You want Israel to withdraw from the territory south of the Latani River? Well, then Lebanon's going to have to disarm Hezbollah. And if Lebanon doesn't do that, then you're in violation of the deal and we're not going to hold up our end of the bar. So this is them just kicking the ball back to Iran and saying, OK, you want to play this game about sovereignty and territorial integrity? You know, you're going to have to do these things. And all that does is it just serves as a legal justification to remain in Lebanon and continue to violate the MOU. Because the MOU says. Israel out. These new terms say, well, Israel doesn't go until all these other conditions are met. Oh, those conditions are met. Well, then we're not leaving because it also says Israel is going to remain in the security zone until the threat is neutralized. Well, the threat's never going to be neutralized, so they're never going to leave the security zone. So consequently, the war between Israel and Hezbollah will continue. This ceasefire is it's funny how the MOU formalized the bullshit ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. This 14. Point plan formalizes the bullshit ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, which already existed on the same terms. Yeah, so it's it's more of the same. And we could pull up this clip right here. Like, they're not happy about it, obviously, in Lebanon. The last video I got right here. Yeah, here it goes. It says breaking a scroll up real quick to the Lebanese protesters surround PM Nawaf Salam's office, calling him a Zionist glorious two star Syrian flag at the rally. So, yeah, obviously, the resistance, the resistance powers are not happy about. This would hit play real quick and show. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, you can pause it. And like, you know, it's kind of crazy because it's like people forget like the Lebanese army is like terrified of Hezbollah because like they have more influence. And it's like half, I think, well, I'm not mistaken of the Lebanese army is Shia. So it's like they're not going to they're not going to it's going to the military leader. I think he's a Christian guy, the head of the military. But he even said, I'm not going to try to fight these guys. Like, what are you talking about? And then the other thing, too, is like why they have so much support is because like they have fought the Israelis. They're the reason why the Israelis have not taken over southern Lebanon. They were the ones I think in 2000, they successfully got them out of there. And then Hassan Osama gave like the famous like spider web speech. And and then like this is why everyone in the in the like in the Middle East, like they like they support. So it's like there's no way that they're ever going to disarm because they look at it like Israel is going to continue to invade us. If we disarm, they're going to invade and going to take the southern part anyway. Exactly. Well, Hezbollah is protecting effectively Lebanon from Israel. And the other thing is Israel is actively antagonizing Lebanon with their rhetoric. It's the same stuff that they would do with Iran. I remember last year when we entered negotiations with Iran the following day, Israel came out and then Yahoo came out and said, well, the only deal we will accept is if we blow up their nuclear center. That's the only deal that's the only nuclear disarmament we will tolerate. And what this is meant to do is provoke and antagonize the Iranians into thinking we can't trust the U.S. We can't make an agreement without lowering our guard. That's the big concern is becoming vulnerable. What Israel says about Lebanon is we're going to give them the Gaza treatment. That's literally what their ministers say. They said, what's our plan for Lebanon? Do we did in Gaza? And what did they do in Gaza? They bombed the shit out of them. And then they invaded along the entire border and established a security. Perimeter that's like buffer zone that they have now effectively annexed. And they're doing that so that they can reassure the people of southern Israel that they'll not be invaded by Hamas or attacked by the rockets. It's the same mentality in southern Lebanon, which is how is Israel going to restore confidence and allow the people of their northern settlements to return to the northern border of Israel? We got to push everyone in Lebanon 10 kilometers north inside their own country and establish that buffer zone. So, you know, the Lebanese are getting bombed in Beirut. They're going. They're getting bombed in the southern villages and communities. So they're saying the only thing that's protecting us is 100,000 rockets from Hezbollah, however many fighters they have. So. So, yeah, that's why you got protests because and the Israelis know that. So. So they're permanently sabotaging a ceasefire here to sabotage a ceasefire in Iran. And it's kind of interesting because that's a good point. We can let's pull up that that 14 point memo because, like, guys, this this one kind of like counteracts the first one they sign, which is kind of crazy because you're right about that. We'll go through it real quick. The 14. minds. Can you make it big on mine? Okay, we got here. End the conflict and formally transition toward a cessation of hostilities. Israel withdraw from Lebanon and phases continue on evolving security conditions. And obviously, Nick, stop me if you want to comment on any of these. The Lebanese armed forces will progressively assume full responsibility for national security. They can barely hold the border down, dude. Come on, man. And this is a big one. Hezbollah and all other non-state armed groups must be fully and verifiably disarmed. Israel affirms it has no territorial ambitions in Lebanon and will withdraw once security threats are resolved. That's no way. It's always these little things, like once security conditions change. Okay, I mean, that's the ambiguity they're going to use. Lebanon reaffirms the state's exclusive authority to maintain armed forces and declare war. I mean, that should make them feel better, I guess. This one actually concerns me. A U.S.-backed coordination and verification mechanism will oversee implementation. Do you think this means boots on the ground, Nick? No, I don't think so. I mean. No, because they talked about this. There's a word they use for it, I forget. But they established this mechanism in Switzerland for the MOU. Okay. So I don't think that. I mean, there's already boots on the ground, I believe, defending Israel anyway. Yeah. They deployed them last year, so. Yes, like special forces and stuff like that. Right, right, right. Yes, yes, a lot of people don't know. Yes. Both parties commit to sovereign, stable Lebanon, free from armed groups threatening either side. Nine, the U.S. will support and strengthen the Lebanese armed forces with assistance tied to verified progress. That's interesting. Let's see here. Ten, the U.S. will lead coordination, international reconstruction, humanitarian aid, and economic recovery efforts. That's probably a big one why they agreed to this as well. They probably want to get some of that aid to rebuild Beirut back up because the Israelis, like, really demolished significant portions of it. Eleven, Lebanon and U.S. will ensure that aid and reconstruction funds do not reach Hezbollah or other armed groups. Okay. Yeah. Twelve, Israel and Lebanon will establish working groups to negotiate a comprehensive peace and security framework. Thirteen, both sides will cease hostile political and legal actions that cooperate on the return of detainees and remains. Fourteen, Israel and Lebanon acknowledge the U.S. role and express appreciation for Donald Trump. Love it. That one is just like, you know, the constant need for Trump to be glazed all the time is kind of crazy, bro. Yeah. And Netanyahu knows this. What do you think about the Israeli elections that are coming in? Obviously, he's up for re-election this fall. Big deal. They're in the middle of multiple conflicts. I think Naftali Bennett is going to be the challenger. Well, so the elections have to be held on October 27th at the latest. And what they say is that some of the new polling suggests that Netanyahu has lost majority support or his coalition has. However, the question is going to be whether the opposition can create a viable government. That's always the question. Will they be able to cobble together a majority of seats that are all going to be able to work together to oust him? And that's the question. I don't know if there's going to be a majority. I don't know if there's going to be any leader that's going to be able to consolidate. But, of course, it's heavily dependent on the outcome of all this. If Netanyahu is seen as weak, if he's giving up Lebanon, if Iran is able to normalize relations with the U.S., obviously, Netanyahu will be seen as a failure. Because, you know, think about this is his baby. They see Netanyahu as strong. He's able to defend Israel. His reputation is not fully recovered from October 7th because a lot of Israelis put the blame on him. They say, you're the Likud party. Your job is to be the strong man. Protect us. What happened there? That's one. And then two. So now we're in this bid to let it happen. Oh, without a doubt. Without a doubt. Because that's what's justified all this, which is terraforming their periphery in Gaza, West Bank, South Lebanon, Syria, for that matter, Iran, Yemen. You know, this this eight front war, seven, eight front war that they're on. And so you're talking about his political. My bad. You're talking about the security and how he's getting hit in Israel. Right. So it's one. It's October 7th. But also, then, the whole idea was. Never again. How do we prevent October 7th? We're going to eradicate Hamas, eradicate Hezbollah. We're going to decapitate Iran. If none of these things happen, then Israelis are going to say, look at everything we've lost, which is to say we've been isolated in the world. Everyone hates us now. We've been alienated from the U.S. Was it worth it? If we haven't achieved those objectives in Iran, Lebanon and elsewhere, then the answer is no. If anything, Iran is more powerful. The Hezbollah threat has not been meaningfully dealt with. For that matter, neither has Hamas. And so I think Israelis are going to look at him as basically a failure. And the more that it goes in that direction, the worse his prospects are going to be. So this is why Netanyahu is hellbent on sabotaging peace here. Guys, we're going to switch on over to kick here in a second. I'm going to get off J-Tube here in a second. So let's get ready. Get off YouTube. Let me ask you this, Nick. As someone who's like, you know, you've been talking about this for a very long time. One of the pioneers in this space. And enough people don't give you people don't give you enough credit for that. Like. How crazy is this for you to see it from the beginning where it's like you couldn't even talk about this topic, man. Like you couldn't even utter Zionism or Israel or foreign policy at all with this stuff. You would be ostracized, looked at as like ridiculous. You're a terrorist supporter or you're anti-Semitic. Like how nuts is it to see like Israel being like completely geopolitically isolated like the way it is now? It's I never thought it would happen, honestly, because I always thought that was the one thing no one was ever going to talk about. Because it's just too. I mean, you know how it was even three years ago when we did the show for the first time. You remember. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Demonetized articles written on us like, you know, right wing watch media matters. SPLC. They all came after us. Right. Like Holocaust deniers, et cetera. Right. So, you know, that was late in the game. Yeah. That was only three years ago. Yeah. So it's it's really unbelievable how quickly it's all October 7th, obviously. But like, it's just shocking. Not only that it has happened at all, but just how quickly it was just like overnight. I did this from. 17 to 23, basically. And realistically, there wasn't a ton of movement at all. There wasn't a mass awakening, anything looking like that. And then literally all at once, it just flipped. And now the biggest podcasters like Tucker, Candace, Megyn Kelly, Theo Vaughn, Joe Rogan. Who's the other Tim Dillon? It's like literally Joe Rogan still dances around it. But, you know, for the size of his program, he's definitely not pro Israel, which is really interesting. And like, you know, he brought, you know, Ian Carroll on. Ian Carroll talked about like the dancing Israelis. And I was like, what the I was like, I was Dave Smith a bunch of times as well. So I was like, I was shocked when like I was like, oh, wow. Like he mentioned dancing Israelis on JRE. This is insane. Yeah. This was like considered like a fringe conspiracy theory for years. And like now people are figuring out that like Israel had foreknowledge of 9-11, significant evidence to show it. So it's wild, dude. And like like I said before, someone like you who like got blackballed, demonetized. Ban everywhere. Debanked, et cetera. It's like vindicated, man. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it would feel good. But then it's like, I don't know. Sometimes I'm just like, you know, once it's very satisfying to see people say, oh, he was right all along. On the other hand, I'm not even getting a ton of credit. Like, you know, a lot of people now that have come to the scene are like now they're calling me the fucking shill. It's kind of crazy when I hear people say that. Yeah. And we don't need to get into stuff like that. It's kind of crazy. It's kind of crazy because like they'll say that. I'm like, do you not realize how much this guy's lost about this fucking topic? Yeah. Are you fucking serious? Like, it's nuts. It's like a lot of times, like they'll give a talking point. I'm like, wait, Nick said that first. You know what I mean? So it's like it's crazy when people don't don't give their flowers or don't talk about it. So it's like insane to me. But it's like I will say this. Even though fuck the progressives in the left, I will say that them talking about this has helped. Totally. Because one thing that I've realized, are we off? On YouTube yet? All right. Yeah. Let's get off YouTube. Let's go straight to kick and, you know, kick and rumble. Obviously. Cool. Yeah, guys, come on over. Kick dot com slash Mario Gaines X. We're going to have obviously after hours with girls, too, with Nick. It's going to be fantastic. It's just going to be me and Nick tonight, man. Pause. This is going to be a good time. OK, so I don't want to hear no bitching about anything. It's just it's it's the Nick and Fitz show. OK. What was I going to say? You guys watching? OK. Damn, I lost my train of thought. Fuck it. We still got a bunch of stuff to talk about anyway, so it's all good. I was talking about the before it before I was talking about the shit. Oh, the progressives. Oh, yes. Yes. The progressives. Are we good? Yeah. We're good. All right. Welcome to the show, faggots. OK. Now you can say what the fuck you want to say. So what I will say about the progressives is like, even though they're faggots and they're losers, right? Frank. OK. Yeah, his name is Frank. Yeah, you came right up to. So even though like these these progressives are faggots and they want is dead, right? They hate guys like me and you. They detest us. They call us Holocaust deniers and Nazis, which is cool. Fine. Maybe on Saturdays. But like what I will say is they brought an enormous amount of awareness of the problem. I've always looked at it like they attack the problem from like a humanitarian perspective, like, oh, my God, they're killing people and genocide, apartheid, etc. Right. Which they which, you know, which is whatever. But I will give credit that like, you know. And because I'll say this, progressives are way more active than we are. Right. Let's be honest. These motherfuckers will go out and protest like free, free Palestine, going nuts or whatever. And it's brought awareness of the problem. So so that's one of the benefits. Obviously, they don't attack it from the same perspective that we do. Like me and you come in like, oh, these guys are subverting our government. This is an issue. Get them the fuck up out of here. You know, we come at it from a nationalist perspective. And we also understand that, like, let's be honest, Jewish power creates a lot of problems. A lot of it's caused a lot of pernicious left wing ideology. to kind of permeate throughout the country with, you know, expansive situation yeah go ahead bring it thanks gotta take care of the bro man uh so you know so it's good that they've like because they've activated a very um politically active uh side right because like you know progressive stuff the college campuses whatever um so that's good but like you know another side like obviously they're coming at it from another perspective but that has helped i would say because like if you're right wing inner anti-israel or you know critical of jewish power it's like you're good you're cooked you're automatically cooked you know i mean that's that's what i've realized so so that's one of the benefits yeah i mean it's definitely true that's the thing though the left is huge the left is huge organized active and the difference is that the left is not captured in the same way that the right is by israel the right is deeply institutionally captured by the israeli government in particular the israel lobby such that it's just a different rule set on the left criticism of the netanyahu regime in particular that's actually institutional soros is an enemy of netanyahu soros is out there even though he's a pro open borders open society jew and like one of these jewish billionaires that's ruining america he is actively opposed domestically in israel to netanyahu's party and netanyahu's vision of this this version of zionism netanyahu's pushing and so it's the opposite on the left you can actually remain in the institutions it's actually maybe even a good thing criticizing netanyahu so that there's been an opportunity there for people to criticize it and retain their platform access or uh you know career opportunities it's a huge boon to us and uh you know there was a time i remember in like 23 and 24 the left was very heavily critical of israel and you had a lot of people on the right who are pro israel that were saying well the left is criticizing israel for the wrong reasons they're saying the left hates israel because they see israel as a settler colonial estate and um these all those left buzzwing terms genocide apartheid ethno state colonial yeah right right they they said you know the left sees the israelis as white people that are oppressing an indigenous population extension of the british empire you know there's like a socialist thing you both know they're not fucking white hell no no anyone that says jews are white you're a fucking retard like they're not white at all and they'll even tell you i'm not white yeah well and you know you have to get into what what is white it's european it's christened um it's it's you know the fusion of those things in their civilization the jews are to find themselves against that rather than part of it um but in any case the pro-israel right was correct that the left was criticizing israel for the wrong reasons however it didn't matter at that time it was just important to basically thaw the chilling effect because the problem that we had is that you were simply like not allowed to say or think these things or you know engage in activism against these things he's okay oh he's not bothering you okay okay i love the dogs okay um so it was important for the left to say those things just to open up that conversation just to thaw the rules governing that conversation now however i think it's a different story a year ago you needed the left and the muslims for that matter because the muslims they're a huge community too and let's let's just not loyal yeah and not only that but they're like if you're shitting on israel you're getting a huge engagement boost from the muslim world not just nationally not here but internationally they've been jew-pilled forever and they're like finally america's talking about this yeah it's like for a long time they could never talk about it like that you knew it right like i mean i grew up in a muslim household my family's from sudan it's like i grew up like hoodies so you already kind of knew what it was but like america had never known this shit because it was so suppressed for so long right you know like you couldn't talk about it and a guy like you you come in and talk about it well get this guy out of here immediately but continue i'm sorry so yeah yeah so you know if you are in 24 and 25 criticizing israel and you know i was very um i was very conscious and cognizant of this i remember saying things in a certain way that would appeal to liberals and appeal to muslims because then they boost the content and it's like look if if what we're doing is like a prison break it literally doesn't matter as long as the content's getting out there as long as people are getting the idea that we can criticize israel like these guys are hypocrites they're not beyond reproach etc it's just about changing that conversation and and it was okay now however we see everybody knows the score and what is happening now is that the left and the muslims are kind of using this to push their own agenda so the left is using criticism of israel to push their dsa stuff their progressive stuff they're using it to basically conceal and run cover for their other parts of their radical agenda same thing with muslims you see a lot of the muslims now saying anyone that criticizes muslims is a jew anyone that has anything untoward to say about muslims or mass muslim migration is a zionist that's a zionist that's like whoa whoa whoa it's not america first to have mass muslim migration it's not jewish to say that it's not america first to let somalians loot minneapolis and not deport them that's not america first either and yet the left and muslims are revert muslims in the left respectively on those issues are using criticism of israel to run cover for those policies hey it's all good if tons of muslims come here anyone who's against that is jewish oh it's cool if somalians take over minneapolis anyone that's against that is jewish and so i think now now the criticism of israel is mainstream and popular and you know maybe the majority position it's now important for the right the right wing the nationalists to assert our own position on this and say not now we need to start drawing some lines and say listen we may coalesce we can create perhaps with some elements of the left or some muslims but what we are as a faction is nationalists yeah and so the reason we're against israel it's the same reason we're against soros because we're america first it's not america first to have open borders or to give money to israel it's not america first to have muslims here they only care about islam and muslim countries same way it goes for jews so we need to sort of define and distinguish and refine our movement within the israel critical space as the right-wing faction yeah no and and like now that the information's out we can actually we can start to like actually like be more specific about the issues right because like i said before it's good because they brought awareness from the left right that wasn't there before because criticism of israel used to be literally a nuclear topic that you couldn't talk about um so now they've made it a bit more mainstream uh but yeah we need to come at it from the these guys have too much goddamn power they are israel first um they are responsible for a lot of the ism the toxic isms that are in this country feminism progressivism marxism etc which i want to talk about that too with the dsa um where do you see the democrat party going with this um as far as like um this socialism move that we're seeing you know i i i said this before and i want to get your position on this too and let you talk about it i think mamdani winning mayor of new york city was the beginning domino of what we're going to see where it's going to be a socialist revolution i'm starting to see these establishment democrats kind of not be as cool the hillary's the chuck schumer's the bill clinton era like i think that's dead the new wave is we're going to be socialists we're going to say fuck israel we want free health care we're going to be socialists we're going to we want college being paid off we want like they basically just like full-on socialism rent stabilization all these things and i'm seeing mamdani do this in new york city he has an enormous amount of people that support him a lot of people that like him he's using more of like a grassroots social media push on doing things and and then i'm looking at like a lot of top left-wing political commentators right uh on the left they're they're all pushing for socialism so it's like i'm starting to see the democrat party really shift i think the them taking the l on the kamala harris uh campaign has like made them say we need to take social media more seriously we need to stop you know relying so much on establishment celebrities we need to start giving people more free stuff with socialism and i think mamdani's kind of started this trend but what do you what's your thoughts yeah i totally agree and you know mamdani defeated cuomo who was backed by the whole democratic establishment that that was you're right the first big upset and then he had this election on tuesday where all of mamdani's primary challengers three of them in congressional primaries won their races and all of their opponent's primary challengers won their races were establishment people backed by hakeem jeffries backed by the labor unions backed by the black and latino caucus that is like the institutional democratic party that's the party establishment and it's not just the social media although that's a huge part of it it is tiktok it is the social media but it's also that they have this ground game they've got this unbelievable ground game in new york city i was looking at some of the numbers from carlin borsenko she's like the expert on this she sat in one of their meetings and they said that when zoron ran for mayor last year they knocked on 1.8 million doors 1.8 million doors wow 2.3 million phone calls for phone banking 3 000 events 20 000 small dollar donors that's how big their donor network was incredible it's it's unbelievable you know how many and just so you guys understand like when it's talking about you know how many volunteers you need for that yeah volunteers these people aren't getting paid they need volunteers for that 30 000 volunteers i said they had in new york city which is just one place and they're not getting paid they're not getting paid they're not getting paid and the people that they got to register and turn out it's really just a turnout game it's that the progressives are turning out huge numbers of people that either don't vote democrat or don't usually vote or don't usually vote in off-year elections and it's a lot of young white people it's a lot of young white people and these like non-conventional minority groups not like the old school blacks and like let's say mexicans it's like different like minority groups and um that's just where the energy is that's where the young people are that's where the energy is and that's their ideology the young people are the young people are the young people are the young people are just like ultra progressive and so i don't know that that's even going to be good for the Democrats because the reason they got their asses kicked in 24 is because all the big Jewish money left the Democrats because they were so alienated by the young progressives. You know, you got to think about guys like Bill Ackman and Sean McGuire. Bill Ackman is at Pershing Square, Wall Street guy, Jew. He's tied with Larry Fink, who runs BlackRock. He's a Harvard alum. He's a lifelong Democrat and Democrat donor. But after October 7th, he saw at Harvard his his alumnus at Harvard. All the progressives were like supporting Hamas. They told them real big Ivy League schools like having all these Columbia, Harvard. Right. It was Ackman at Harvard. It was Ronald Lauder at UPenn. He's I believe is a Wharton School alum. And so like these big Jews would like all the money on Wall Street who previously were Democrats, donated to the Democrats, did fundraiser for Hillary. They all of a sudden Bill Ackman signed that letter where he said the left has gone to left. They're too censorious or too woke. We've got to shut it down. So he bailed. Then Sean McGuire. Sean McGuire is a partner at Sequoia. Sequoia is one of the big VC firms in Silicon Valley. Same thing. Lifelong Democrat, Democrat donor, fundraisers for Hillary. Same deal. After October 7th, he said, I'm out. Now I'm a Republican. So these are like two good examples because he got a Wall Street guy from the eastern seaboard. He got a tech VC guy from the West Coast. These are the two poles of power in America. And they represent Jews, institutional Jewish money shifting from the West Coast to the East Coast. So he's got a lot of money. He's got a lot of money. Democrats, the Republicans, because they were scared off basically by the young progressives, the young white kids, the students, these like militant minorities that are pro-Palestine liberation, the socialists. And so the reason they lost in 24, where was the money? Like you look at 2020, so much money went behind the Democrats from all the usual suspects, from like Reid Hoffman, from Zuckerberg, 300 million from the Zuckerberg Chan Foundation, from Bloomberg. So all this like big Jewish money. In 24, it didn't show up. Isn't that crazy? Like how October 7, like red pill the Jewish community and they said, yep, we got to go with Trump because he's going to go hard on Israel is going to get more money. They really don't like how Biden dealt with them like. No. Yeah. And they turn against Biden. I remember when Biden came out at that press. It was after Biden's special counsel report came out about his documents case. He did a press conference. It was like May last year or two years ago and said, you know, I don't like the way the Israelis are running the campaign in Gaza. And the New York Times editorial board. And they were like all negative throughout the rest of the year. So the Democrats alienated the Jewish media. They alienated the Jewish money. Now, how are the Democrats going to get back? Well, they're thinking about running a Jew for president like Pritzker in Illinois or the Shapiro in Pennsylvania, because they're going to have to reconcile the like militant progressives that hate Israel, like really actually hate Israel from the institutional Jewish money that is like liberal Zionist. Like they're pro-Israel. Maybe they don't love Netanyahu, but they want to defend Israel from what happened on October 7th. So they are going to have the same problem as Republicans, which is to say there's like a parallel dynamic where on the right and the left, the young people, the energy, the kind of ideological core shifting there is very anti-Israel. And yet the money, the institutional force is still on both sides is Jewish and they're still pro-Israel. So the Republicans are going to have this is the Vance Rubio divide, the Levin Tucker divide. They'll have to reconcile that. And on the left, it's like, let's say the, Shapiro-Mamdani divider or something like, it's like Gavin Newsom saying he doesn't like AIPAC and then coming out a day later and say, oh no, no, I love Israel. It's making everybody a little bipolar. And then he also said the, you know, well, it's kind of like an apartheid state. So it's like, you're, you're, we're literally watching like an incredible shift in politics in both the left and the right. And on the left, I would say it's obviously far more pronounced. Right. And, and then, and it's crazy because I like, that's a great point. Yeah. Okay. Sorry about that guys. You brought up a good point that they were able to like galvanize this incredible ground game in New York city. Now, if they could do that nationwide, that's going to be huge. But like, but you're, but you're, but New York city is obviously kind of the rest of the United States. Isn't like New York city, right? Like Mamdani was able to win there in crazy fashion. Also, I want to talk about this girl. Can you pull up that chick that I pulled up, bro? The crazy, the crazy chick. We were talking about this girl that won the 13th district. Like, Oh yeah. What's your thoughts on that? Yeah. Like, what's your thoughts on that? Man, we'll pull this girl up for you guys. Like, uh, here's a clip of her, uh, Shabali, an anti-American activist who just won New York state Senate district 13 is an American of Dominican descent. She wants to, she wants abolition of police prisons and borders, as well as the seizure of private property and the nationalization of industries, basically communism straight up. Uh, she converted to Islam, uh, and has said she wants to make sure her Muslim faith is reflected in the halls of power. And, you know, it's kind of crazy because it's like the Muslim faith is very conservative, right? It's like, what, like what's going on here? But okay. We'll, we'll play this clip real quick, uh, for you guys. And then here she goes. I forgot to get napkins. So I wiped my hand on the American flag behind me. Like these people are super anti-American. Uh, we'll play this real quick. This clip. Um, I'm also the only Muslim in my family. I, uh, reverted three years ago, actually met the friend who pushed me to do it. Um, asked me, why have you fasted for four years? And yet you haven't take your Shahada. Um, she's here today. And when she asked me that, I thought that is a great question. And I thought for myself, like why I hadn't taken the step yet, but it was seeing how all of my friends who were showing up to organizing her Muslim were showing up in the space and the grace and love and passion that they had in these spaces of social justice that really pushed me to join the faith. Um, and wanting to, to make sure that we are reflecting that. All right. But, um, yeah, uh, this is nuts. And, and she wanted like a landslide if I'm not mistaken. And, and she, and the important thing is that she got the Mom, Donnie endorsement. And, uh, like you were saying before everyone, he endorsed one, I think Bernie Sanders even came out and endorsed her as well. So what do you see is going to be like the, who do you think is going to make the run for president, uh, on the Democrat side? It's hard to say everybody says new some, but you know, I have, yeah, yeah. I'm, you know, I have the sneaking suspicion that it on the Democrat side, it'll be like the Republicans were in 16, you know, because in 16, really in 2015, when the primary started, everybody thought it was going to be Jeb Bush, literally. Cause they said, oh, that that's the name. Everybody knew it was going to be Jeb Rubio, Ted Cruz. What's that? Oh, um, you know, and then Trump, um, Trump came out of nowhere. So I think on the Democrat side, it's going to be similar. Everybody's thinking about the same handful of names. They say it's going to be Gavin Newsom. It's going to be Kamala again. It's going to be AOC. I think it's going to be somebody actually that surprises us. And, uh, I think it might create a real schism in the party. Like certainly what might happen is you're going to get a progressive candidate that's going to run. Uh, and maybe they're not going to be able to actually win the election because you got to think the caucuses and primaries, they start in Iowa, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada. These are not hyper-progressive constituencies like it is in New York city. So I think that you might get a progressive that's going to run. Maybe they don't have a real chance of going all the way, but then maybe they're going to make a bid to be the VP. They're going to make a bid to be number two or something like that. Maybe that's going to be the play, but I think it's going to be a little bit unpredictable because there's another, another thing going on in the democratic party, which is these people are really frustrated. They were already pissed off in 16 when Bernie got screwed over. Then they were pissed off in 2020 because Bernie got screwed over again. If you remember in 2020, you had a primary and Bernie won Iowa. Then he won New Hampshire. Then he won Nevada. And then Biden won South Carolina. And then it was all over. Then it was Biden's. It was literally Bernie. Bernie was doing really well. I'm so I'm confused. Cause he like has a lot of the populists, like, you know, position. So I'm like, how does he, because it's a political machine on the left. It's not a real election. So he got screwed over in 2020, but Biden won. So it's all good. Well, then in 24, they ran Biden again. And people are furious that like, look at how that turned out. That was a catastrophe. Then they didn't really hold a real convention. So he said, well, we made a decision. We're putting up Kamala. They did it in fucking Chicago, dude. Like it doesn't get more corrupt than that. It's like the DNC is in Chicago. The Democrat bag men came up and said, look, it's Kamala. That's who it is. Everybody shut up. That's who's going to be the nominee. Obama made that call. Uh, yeah. Well, no, actually I think the Obama's, I forget exactly how it lined up. I think they were not happy about that. If I'm not mistaken, I forget how, how that all shook out. Um, but the party establishment basically said Kamala, that's who it is. Um, I think it would have looked optically bad cause she's a black woman. So they would have been like, no, she has to do it. Like if they, yeah. And the way that you run by race politics over there. So that's true. But I think you could have, um, you could have avoided that as have an open convention and then whoever wins wins and people complain and you say, well, look, that's one, you know, that's too late or it was too late or something like that. And they said, yeah, cause the convention was held in August, which is pretty late in the game. So they said, look, this is just what it's going to be. Uh, but, but anyway, so the Democrats are really mad because of this history of like the progressives being screwed over and it hasn't worked. The Democrat establishment is just losing that. Like they lost this election in 24. The progressives are mad that the democratic party isn't standing up enough to Trump. Like when Trump got into office, he had a big appropriations bill in March, which the Democrats just passed beautiful bill. No, no. Before that, it was an omnibus bills, regular appropriations in March. The Democrats were furious. And I remember Ezra Klein from New York times. Now I think he's still there. And the other guys, they all said, look, the Democrats need to shut down the government just on account of, we need to stand up to Trump. And that's why we had that huge government. Shut down in September, October, when they came back from the recess last year. So there there's a lot of, dissatisfaction among the rank and file that the democratic establishment's not effectively fighting republicans are not opposing trump and so there's gonna be this like very radical energy going into 28 that's like no fuck republicans we need to go as hard as possible and i think that's metastasizing in this zoron mamdani these people that he backed and that they're winning that they've got the energy like you said that that's that domino theory people are going to look at that and say look at the effect zoron's having that's we need to emulate something like that we need to get the young people out so i i think that's going to be very powerful going into 28 yeah and it's just like and i see like this uh this socialist push as well like it's not it's like kind of like i i don't know i mean like has there been like a push like this for for like mass socialism since i this is like something that i've kind of noticed with mamdani he's like getting it pushed free buses we're gonna do health we're gonna freeze the rent he just did he literally just did an ad today saying that they're freezing they're freezing the rent in europe until next year so like i mean what do you what do you think's gonna man what well midterms are coming up what do you think about that well republicans are going to get destroyed and deservedly so democrats are backups like 80 odds in the betting markets they're going to win 43 odds are going to sweep and take the senate as well let's talk about this because a lot of people completely mischaracterize your position on voting democrat here um and i know your strategy i understand why you say but for the fucking retards out there can you please explain it to them why yeah you have this position so you got to kind of work backwards this is how i think so the big game is 28 yeah uh why because for the first time since 2012 trump is not on the ballot trump won the primary in 16 and 20 because he was the incumbent in 24 he's just effectively the incumbents non-consecutive term so 28 it's the first time since 20 you know that's a long to 16 years ago a lot has changed since then so what happens in the republican primary is whoever wins that nomination they're going to win the nomination they're going to win the nomination is going to determine the future of the gop because it's it's succession who succeeds trump trump transformed the party and so 28 is going to be a referendum on so what is the republican party now are we going to keep going in the direction of trump are we going to kind of backslide into something more establishment that's really an important question now who is going to be the nominee in 28 well the party is already consolidating behind two people rubio and vance it only makes sense because the vp and the secretary of state are the highest positions outside the president so it only makes sense those are the people that are going to make the run it'll be either one or the other now in the gop the money and the endorsements in the party they're already coalescing behind one or the other people are making their decisions it's going to be vance it's going to be rubio i'm a big believer that neither of them are good rubio's a neocon he's from florida he's been a adelson puppet since 2012 when he beat charlie christ for the nomination for senate uh and pretended to be a tea party guy and then he went for gang of eight with lindsey graham this like open borders immigration bill so rubio's been a turncoat zionist puppet from the start he's a he's a neocon now it can't be him on the other side you got vance who wasn't never trumper in 16 voted for evan mcmullen cia agent who was handpicked by bill crystal to run in 16 he's propped up by peter teal who's in bed with alex carp and all these other paypal mafia palantir guys vance is no good either his chief of staff is a tigva fund fellow jacob reeses who's like a super orthodox jewish and he's going to be the next president of the united states and he's going to be a jew his girlfriend says you know nobody worry like vance is going to be pro israel and everything david sacks is going to be his chief of staff jewish zionist paypal mafia neither of these guys are good and what's more trump couldn't stand up to israel will vance be able to will rubio absolutely not so if 28 is so important and if these are the two presumptive choices what is the only way we're going to get anybody other than vance and rubio the only way we're dragged to hell by their association with trump trump needs to be such a failure so toxic their association with the administration needs to be seen as a liability so that a challenger from outside the admin can make the case in 28 to the republican voters and say look this administration was a disaster and who was at the helm rubio and vance so the administration needs to be made unpopular within the gop needs to be a failure for an outside challenger to have a chance in hell at winning the next election and that's the only way we're going to get anybody other than vance nomination otherwise if the administration is super successful and everything's great then trump is going to endorse who he's going to endorse that person's going to consolidate they'll get 80 of the vote there won't even be a primary there won't even be a competition so that's why i say we need the democrats to be as strong as possible in 26 why the democrats will win the house maybe not the senate but definitely the house what does the house have constitutional oversight powers subpoenas impeachments indictments subcontracts subcommittees all that stuff and what they're going to do they're going to impeach trump they're going to depose the other cabinet officials and what they're going to find is a shit ton of corruption because this administration's really corrupt howard lutnick christy gnome cory lewandowski there's so much bondy pam bondy the reason why they all got kicked out yes and yeah people say it's because gnome wasn't doing a good job no it's because the wall street journal was onto her and what her and her boyfriend were doing with these contracts that's why she got and the whole gay thing with her boy with her boyfriend as well the guy doing the weird shit with the gate yeah yeah that was crazy but so continue on please yeah so they're going to find all this corruption they're going to impeach trump and i really predict that this is going to make trump extremely unpopular because everyone's going to look at the at the larceny they're going to look at what's effectively like embezzlement and they're going to say this is this is straight up just corruption this is just plain old regular corruption it's going to make trump super unpopular it's going to damage rubio and vance by association and that will create an opening if republican voters are sufficiently angry with trump and dissatisfied his endorsement will mean less people that are close to him will that'll be seen as a bad thing and they'll be open to an outsider and my hope is that you get a young person that runs in 28 a young guy maybe groiper adjacent nationalist kind of knows a score that's going to be the spiritual successor to america first and trumpism and is going to say look like trump failed us trump had the right idea and he's going to be the spiritual successor to america first and trump is but he betrayed his promises. He betrayed the movement. It needs to be restored. It needs to be fulfilled in a real way. It needs to be actualized. And someone that's young can maybe then even get populist and young people from the middle and the left. But that's our only chance in hell. Increasingly, I think that at 28— What's the minimum age for a vice president? What's that? What's the minimum age for a vice president? I know for a president, it's 35. Well, it's 35, I think, because the VP is going to have to be able to fill the shoes of the president. What about chief of staff? I don't think there's an age constitutional requirement on that. I run, bro. Let's do it. You're going to run? Yeah, all right. Do it. I take this over this. No, it would be chief of staff, bro. Vice president, chief of staff, whatever it is. Hell yeah. Bro, honestly, look, all jokes aside, but we need someone who has that mindset. It's like, yo, we're not going to be run by fucking Jews. We're going to put our country first. We're not going to do stupid-ass interventionalism that doesn't benefit us. What the fuck is going on? Right now, we should have— No wars in the Middle East. Well, this Iran war should be done, but why is it not done? Because fucking Israel's not reeled in. I don't think people understand how bad this is that we can't control these fucking guys. They create so many issues. They're the reason why people are paying double for gas for the past several months. People don't even know. Food prices, et cetera. Russia got stronger. China was still doing what they do. I don't know, but continue on. Okay, so basically, we need a strong Democratic Party to— Put these guys in check and expose them with the oversight, which a lot of people overlook this, and I wanted you to really explain that, because people think, like, he's saying vote Democrat. No, retard. It's within a very specific purview to do it, to create an opening for someone from the GOP to rise up that isn't going to be Vance or Marco Rubio, because Marco Rubio's owned by the Jews even worse than Trump, I would argue. And then Vance is like, what's he going to do? We don't really know where the fuck this guy is. He's extremely ambiguous with his political policies. He'll kind of shapeshift to whatever he needs to do to get the vote. We don't want a guy like that, right? And can he stand up to the Israelis? Probably not. Right. Well, and to me, it's really like, what we're talking about is a hostile takeover. Trump, like, think about it this way. Thomas Massey was the only Republican going against Israel, and Trump made it like a mission to destroy him. So what does that tell us? It tells us that you cannot be a Republican and be America first. It's impossible. To be America first is to be against the Republican Party. Not only that, Trump went on True Social and said, Levin is MAGA. Like, he's a genius. He's the messiah. He's the best. And fuck Tucker and Megan and Alex Jones and the rest. So, like, Trump is the problem. He is the obstacle. He is the impediment. Because Trump is basically saying, anyone that's America first is out. Fuck them. Whether it's Thomas Massey, Tucker, the rest of them. Everyone that's Israel first is the best. You know, Rubio should be president. Cubans like gold. Look at my gold oval office. Mark Levin is the chosen one. He's the genius. Whatever. So, you can't be a Republican and America first. It needs to be a hostile takeover. Here's the problem. Trump runs the party like a dictatorship. He's so powerful. Everyone's afraid of him. His endorsement means everything in primary still. You got Massey out of there, dude. It's, like, actually kind of scary. Like, I was shocked at how much money. What'd they spend? 30 million to get Massey out? Yeah, yeah. I think it was 32 million in total and 20 million from the Israel lobby in particular. Him, Cori Bush, and then who was the other guy? The black guy? Jamal Bowman. Bowman. I think they spent, like, 10 or 20 million on him. Yeah. Like, 10 million or so on Cori Bush, and then they spent 30 million on getting Massey out of there. Yeah. And that was their playbook. They said it in 24. They said $100 million. million to get everybody out that's not that didn't vote for the foreign aid in april of 24 when israel was asking for it so but so trump is super strong he needs to be diminished that's the whole point it's sort of like if you're going to do a hostile takeover over a company you want it to be as cheap as possible you know if you're if you're trying to buy up all the shares against the will of the management you want it to be weak you want it to be cheap you want to buy a depreciating asset then it appreciates that that's the metaphor i think of so do we want a strong republican party in 28 or a weak republican party if we want a hostile takeover we need the republican party to be a weak brand so that we can come in and redefine it new vision new leadership new management that's the only way it's going to make sense if trump is too strong it's not going to work he's going to just suck all the oxygen out of the room he controls the boomers so he's got to be i don't even know if i want him in office by 28 i don't think that'd be the worst thing if he got impeached and then van is like some kind of you know he'll he'll have a chance to become unpopular too we need like two thirds of the of the senate vote to get him out of there right or he could even just resign but yeah that's possible and i could see that happening i could see that happening i'll say that yeah you know it's kind of crazy but like yeah i would say he's probably the closest that could actually really be removed because because you mentioned all the problems right like of of the corruption and i didn't want to interrupt you when you're going through it but like you could talk about the kinetic strikes with with them shooting these boats right right like the democrats if they take over they're gonna have a field day dude they're gonna say oh these kinetic strikes are illegal you're killing these guys in international waters how do you know that they're drug traffickers what's going on here um they're on war that's illegal you guys invaded it wasn't even really and struck them when it wasn't really a threat was it self-defense what's going on here um they can attack them on the on the ice raids right even though i know they're illegal whatever but they're gonna hit them on that um i mean that was they had enormous amount of pressure on him anyway and he had to pull out so he could do this stupid ass around war stop the mass deportations do this dumbass around war um uh they're gonna go they're gonna say oh you're you went after your political opponents you went after john bolton you're gonna you you use the attorney um you got the depth scene files didn't get pushed uh you had todd blanch meeting with uh with um glenn maxwell you gave her a sweetheart deal you moved her to a low low security prison in texas what the fuck is this this is a human trafficker um i think she's gonna get a pardon before he leaves by the way too yeah oh for sure i think she's gonna get a pardon um so like they have so much like things that they can attack him on dude and then yeah you mentioned how with the tariffs now they're playing back and he made a bunch of uh we're gonna do a deal we're not gonna do a deal we're gonna do a deal obviously we know people are making a bunch of money on that because he was messing with the markets it's like oh man like they just have so many christy noem and her scandals i just saw that they're trying to sell the house they bought like a bunch of uh places for 700 million dollars ice yeah now they're trying to get rid of it yeah yeah right like they're gonna have a field day dude with the oversight community that you mentioned well and not only that but remember in january 21 trump got impeached over january 6th between the 6th and the 20th yeah and mitch mcconnell was basically holding that over his head because they successfully impeached in the house then it was kicked over to the republican controlled senate and mitch mcconnell basically said trump if you fuck around in your next two weeks we will remove you from office uh you know you could see a scenario where if it gets really bad with trump and let's say trump goes against israel and democrats have 51 maybe they got 49 51 seats are they going to be able to get 15 republicans to defect to impeach trump i mean you don't even have to go that far to think of some of the names you've got guys like ted cruz and lindsey graham and he got guys like rand paul they would love to see trump go there'll be fewer republicans and more democrats turn on him on this mou exactly yeah exactly tell me ted turn on him i was oh i didn't think i would see that right so i mean they will hold that over his head and feed him to the wolves and so like i said it's like we we just want trump to be super super weak maybe not even in the picture maybe he'll get vance in there he'll get fucking destroyed throughout 27 and 28 um and then uh you know then there'd be room for someone else to come in but i think that's the only way to salvage 28 and save it from a democrat or from a terrible republican i might i think it might even be cooked we might have to endure four years of a democrat and get to 32 okay i know that sucks and that's insane and i don't want that to happen ideally like an outsider republican comes comes in runs does the trump playbook wins but you know what it might have to get worse before it gets better because trump is so i mean his favorability has never been lower it's like lower than any other president in modern history we went down oh we're good okay i was gonna say that the massad hit us like i was wondering how long we would last um you know well let me ask you this i'll play devil's advocate real quick right because it's funny that people say this like oh um you know he's saying vote for democrats well they don't realize that like people like me and you suffer even more when democrats are fucking power right i mean you were fucking getting destroyed in 23 and 22 21 um what do you for for the hate of them i come in and say well you know if we make the democrats too powerful like will we ever be to regain power like well you know we make them too powerful we're cooked and you even said to yourself like hey we might have to endure this till 32 um but you look at it like it's worth it because the republican party is such a bad position right now yeah i do because i think that you know this comes from the assumption that unless there's a radical intervention america's going down the tubes it's just a question of how fast you know look look what trump did this time trump ran on mass deportations got the popular if he can't do it who can no one's going to do it he ran on it won the popular vote it's trump it's his signature issue what he could get away with other things that regular candidates or presidents can't if he can't do it no one can if no one can do it it's an amnesty if it's amnesty then this country's over so i think that you either have a radical change or we're going down the tubes either way and it's like i'm not i'm not voting for more republicans to like go the speed limit to hell and in the meantime they're going to fuck with all the israel critics and groipers and i mean they're putting the screws on us anyway they say alex jones always tells me this it always freaks me out he's always like dude like the doj is investigating us he's like you know even trump's doj is trying to fuck with me and alex jones i'm sure so you know people say well we need to vote republican to buy us time it's like who's us israel stephen miller who's getting bought time like ben shapiro we're not getting time we don't you know it's the opposite like anti-semitism boards that like the doj and all this shit so yeah dude like it's it's it's uh it's fucking nuts man it really is and it's like i and it's kind of crazy because like you know people are very nearsighted like i see your vision but like they look at like what do you mean but it's like well we're kind of in a bad spot right now even in the right wing man and the republican party like it's like uh what the fuck is going on here like these guys are very pro-israel and like you said before like marco rubio getting in would be horrible that would be horrible yeah like we're gonna go to war all he's gonna do everything they want to do he's gonna like what would even be the point i mean 10 years of trump to get president rubio it's just like such a disgusting betrayal of what this movement is that'd be that'd be terrible it'd be absolutely terrible at least with i mean i would presume the next democrat if a democrat were to come in they'd be at least less israel but like yeah like the other like you said though like they're coming at it from like the wrong angle right you know what i mean because like they're looking at it like oh look cool that's colonialism that's all right faggot like no one cares we're like that's not really our issue like that i i think the biggest thing is like you know you know what let me ask this how would you really in israel if you're the president united states how would you deal with them let's say you can't you got sworn in tomorrow what would nick fuentes do to deal with the issues of the middle east and bring some type of stabilization there uh well the first thing you need is regime change in israel i mean you know look israel's an open society and so i think you would actually need american jews to get on the team with america and exert pressure because here's the problem with israel israel's a nuclear state that at the end of the day that's it that is what defines whole reality they got 200 warheads and so here's what i mean in a conventional sense how would you constrain israel you would put pressure on them military pressure and we're already doing it we're talking about selling f-35s to turkey which israel hates because israel's threatened by turkey and we're and you know the thing is i bet it talked about like war with them and shit yeah oh exactly and they're never gonna stop dude they're never gonna the pakistan turkey right yeah they could tolerate no rivals so i mean in a conventional sense that is what you might do in the hand of their rivals to create balance this is something they don't want you know so you have a carrot and stick approach to israel problem is israel has nuclear bombs um and israel is like a very erratic state so they could very quickly destabilize the situation people talk about samson option i think that's overstated you know this idea they're going to nuke the whole world but you know would they use a tactical nuclear bomb against one of their enemies i wouldn't put it past them if they think that they're completely isolated what would they have to lose yeah if they're completely politically isolated you know they would go against every international convention well everyone hates them anyway so you could see a scenario where that happens right and you know they they exert pressure on the united states also politically it's more subtle you know because they control the power centers here they got juice and i say juice meaning like power but also juice in la and new york and dc they they got ammo here um so no president's organization so the president would kind of just need like this wartime footing like we are we're getting ready to confront israel and what happens when you confront an enemy is you got to clean up you know you got to eliminate the corruption in america you got to target the disloyal fifth column here that's going to be a problem you got to prepare for a tactical nuke going off you got to talk to their adversaries that you're gonna might need to balance against them and then you need to talk to the people in their country see how you can destabilize or try to influence their political situation there you're going to need to talk to the people in their country see how you You would really just need like this full spectrum approach. We need to be literally on a war footing with this country. to try to push back in the other direction and basically just reassert, reassert, assert control over them for the first time ever. Would you, because I'm under the premise, I want to get your opinion on this too. I look at it like a lot of the issues in the Middle East literally stem down to the Palestine question, which Israel has been trying to avoid for a very long time, Netanyahu sabotaging the Oslo Accords, etc. And that's why the Middle East has the issues that they have. If you solve that, whether it's a one-state or two-state solution, you know, that I think would solve a lot of the problems because then now you defend Hezbollah, why they exist around the acts of resistance in general. It's all really because the Palestine situation, if you're able to assimilate them, bring them in and give them some type of sovereignty, well, that I think is the beginning of like maybe bringing down the first domino and some type of peace treaty. But he's obviously been trying to get around it with the Abraham Accords. What are your thoughts on like how would you solve and deal with that issue, if at all, if you were the president? Well, at this point, I think it's just not going to happen. I think that Israel will never now tolerate the existence of a Palestinian state because the security is the only way at this point. But they'll never do that, too, because it's like, no, they'll repopulate. What's more, people don't even realize when Trump recognized Israel's sovereignty over Jerusalem. That was kind of the beginning of the end because it's like that. Go on Heights, too. And the Go on Heights as well. You know, but the West Bank, it's like Israel is creating settlements that are just dividing up the West Bank. So it's never going to be a coherent whole. They took Jerusalem. That's really what Al-Aqsa flood was about, which is what kicked the whole thing off, is Israel asserting control over the temple and over the whole city. So I think those people, they're going to get pushed out of Gaza eventually. Israel is going to assert control over the West Bank, maybe push those people into Jordan or just try to choke them out gradually. These settlements are going to strangle all the different Palestinian settlements. And so I think that's just not going to happen. And you're right. Every question runs through that, which is to say, how do we get out of this? How do we get Saudi Arabia and the Abraham Accords? You need a Palestinian state. How do you get the U.S. out of the Middle East? You need Saudi Arabia and Israel to normalize relations. You need an Abraham alliance to balance Iran. In the absence of that, what do you do about Iran? You've got to do regime change. It's like so everything's contingent on everything else. And, yeah, so I think the opportunity has been blown. Israel is never leaving the Golan. Israel is never leaving southern Lebanon. And fundamentally, that's a security thing. Syria can't fight Israel. They can't because they don't have control over the whole country. Israel destroyed their military. 15 years of civil war. Same thing with Lebanon. They cannot repel or resist Israel. They don't have the power. Only Hezbollah does. So, you know, those are the types of things. They're going to definitely kill Jolani, too, at some point. Yeah. Not now while Trump's in, but I think once Trump's out, Israel's going to get rid of him, too. If he succeeds, you know. If he demonstrates autonomy, if he consolidates the country, then, yeah, they'll probably take him out. Because they don't want Syria to be unified. Hell no. Because that would be a huge threat for them as well because they don't like them. So it's like, yeah, I, you know, I've just realized, like, the only thing that you can really do, because I agree with you, the two-state solution, they never want that, like, because that would mean they'd have to have their own military. Like, it'd be a problem. But then I thought, OK, maybe a one-state. But the issue with the one-state is that Palestinians, obviously, you know, the birth rates are higher. So they would obviously overtake a Jewish state. That'd be a problem. So I thought maybe you can have a middle ground where you can have maybe you can ensure that the Israelis have a 51 percent representation in Knesset maybe so they can have still some level of power. But they'll never allow that shit. So it's like. Like, it's just going to be perpetual war. So it's like, what are you going to do? And it's like they create so many fucking problems in the region. Like, I would argue, like, almost all the problems in the region are because of them. Yeah. You know? Yeah, it's true. I think they're going to create an intolerable condition and the people of Gaza will just leave, you know, because the Israelis. They've talked about that. You know, what are the Israelis going to do? Where are they going to go, though? Egypt? We pay them. We pay the Jordanians, the Egyptians to take them in? Is that what we're going to do? Well, there was some talk that the U.S. would recognize Western Sahara and Somaliland in exchange for them. Them taking these people, you know, or like Libya also, because like Libya needs to be unified. So there's like this arbitrage where it's like, we'll give you sovereignty if you take the people. And but yeah, I mean, it's just a question of like there's two. It's like, what seems more what seems more unlikely? It seems unlikely that Israel is going to forcibly remove like one point eight million people from Gaza at the same time. What are they going to do? Reintegrate them. They're going to build them a smart city and say, all right, remember, we killed all you people. Remember, we killed 10 percent of your population. Well, now you can be the. Servants in Howard Lutnick's new block chain smart city. You know, it's like that's not going to happen either. So, you know, they're there. You look at what they did in the Gaza ceasefire. Israel took 50 percent of their territory. They pushed all the Palestinians into the coast in this tiny little enclave. And I think they're, you know, Israel's under no pressure to change that situation. So they're just going to make the conditions intolerable. And then it'll just become more attractive, I think, for those people to leave. If they could get Washington to figure out some program where they're extradited. Or, you know, emigrated forcibly from Gaza, then they'll do that. And if some people stay, you know, then then maybe those people remain. But yeah, they're going to definitely turn that into like a beachfront, like like a Dubai is what I think they're going to do. Because, you know, I think there's this I've realized that there's like this tourist race in the Middle East to like modernize and westernize and like make money outside of outside of oil. Yeah. And we saw Dubai kind of lead the charge. They're bringing all these people. No crime. Very clean, safe. Right. It's because nobody has rights except for them. They did immigration the right way, by the way, unlike us. So they have all these like things in place and it's like people make all this money, whatever. And then I see Saudi Arabia trying to bring entertainment over. They brought WWE boxing, etc. So I see the Middle East trying to like modernize and find ways to make money outside of just oil and do it through tourism. So I think the Israelis saw this and they're like, well, Gaza is like right there on the front beach, beachfront property. Like we could turn this into a smart city. We can make a bunch of money. You're like, well, we could do that, too. And then obviously Khrushchev, Wyckoff, real estate guys like it just makes. Makes sense. And then like, you know, now what? They control 70 percent of Gaza. There's no fucking way they're going to ever let these guys like keep that. Yeah, no way. And they they want it to be a hub. They want it to be a regional hub for tech, energy, trade, banking, all those things. And, you know, think about in the 2020s, early 2020s under Biden. There's all this talk about this IMEC corridor, India, Middle East, Europe corridor. How do we connect Indo-Pacific to Europe? We're going to create it's basically what China is. We're doing the Belt and Road Initiative. They're doing all these big infrastructure projects to orient trade to China with the new Silk Road. What is it? There's two different programs. One's a maritime trade route. One's an overland trade route. And so the U.S.'s answer to China's Belt and Road to the new Silk Road is IMEC. And so they said, we're going to connect India, which is supposed to be that's going to be the anchor of our new Indo-Pacific policy. That's changing a little bit. But but they said India is going to be the hub and we're going to have trade from India. To Europe, and it's going to go through ports in India, going to go through the Indian Ocean into the Emirates, ports on the Emirates, highways and rail through the Emirates, through Saudi Arabia, through Jordan, through Israel. All of it's going to go through Israel and then into Greece, Italy. And they're basically going to create this like trail of transportation infrastructure connecting Indo-Pacific in Europe. And Israel is going to stand to benefit from all of this, from all this money. And that's really the big picture is making Israel. The center of all the commerce and what they call the remnant. You know, there's this theory that this is like the foundations of geopolitics, that you've got really the world island, that all of geo strategy on Earth revolves around this basic fact that Asia, Europe and Africa is most of the territory in the world. And any country that could dominate all of these continents is just going to have the most resources. And the country that has the most resources will just be number one. They'll achieve. There is an innovation on this called Rimland theory, where they said that in order to dominate the world island, you have to control the Rimland, which runs through the rim of the interior of this. So what's the rim? It's the Mediterranean. It's the Middle East. And it's that route around India through over to the coast of China. Whoever can control that rim that runs through the middle of the world island is going to control all those resources because all be doing trade. And, you know, the commodities will be moving through the rim. And so if Israel. Situated at the middle of the world island, the middle of the Rimland, and they dominate the Rimland, then that makes the most the most powerful country in the world, because, you know, you look at, like, the Strait of Hormuz, for example, all the oil that goes through the Strait, if that's now controlled by Israel, that's huge leverage. Now, what if Israel controlled all the commerce that goes through the Suez and all the overland pipelines and trade routes running through the Middle East? Incredible geopolitical leverage. It's huge. So, you know, situated in the middle of it all, what they want is like a. They want like a world government run through Jerusalem at the center of these three continents at the at the intersection of all of them. That's like their big picture. That's anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. What are your thoughts? Let me ask you about this, because I don't I don't think I've ever seen anyone like get your take on on this China. What are your thoughts on China? Whether adversarial their economy, are they a big threat for us? What are your thoughts in general when it comes to China? Yeah, they're they're probably our number one geopolitical. And I but I like Trump's approach, which is engaging them on the basis as a as a rival rather than an adversary. The relationship doesn't necessarily need to be hostile or adversarial. It could just be competitive. And so if we can engage with China on issues where we can collaborate, like on bilateral trade and on counterterrorism and things like that, I think it could be productive. But it's no question that they're going to be the number one rival. And I think that that's why we should probably thaw relations with Russia. Russia and China are actually natural adversaries. series. Russia is clearly in decline, terminal decline. So I think that, you know, if we can extricate ourselves from Eastern Europe, we could actually lean on Russia and kind of balance in the same way that Nixon had China against Russia. We could have Russia against China. We could work with India. But yeah, China is going to be probably the number one rival. And they're a big threat. I mean, like it's they're no joke. And I've you know, and I probably might agree with me on this. Like I've always a big problem. Why? Like I get so pissed off and annoyed with like the Middle East wars and Israel and shit like that's because I'm like, yo, we're taking our eye off of like these guys were very competent, like their economy is rising, like they're growing very quickly. And it's like, what are we doing here? Right. We got like dumb OnlyFans whores like saying dumb shit. People like we're graduating less engineers. Meanwhile, China's like getting stronger and stronger. Their military is getting stronger. And the thing that worries me is like they're pragmatic, like they're dangerously pragmatic. It's like they're building infrastructure instead of fighting everybody. They do business with everyone. And it's like, fuck, man, like what are we doing here? So I'm like, why are we, you know, getting involved in bombing Iran? Right. What the it's just so stupid. Let's talk about Russia. What are your thoughts on on Russia with the Ukraine war and what's going on there? I've seen that they've like ramped up the conflict quite a bit. Ukraine's been hitting the back pretty hard. Yeah, they're losing. It looks like they're losing. It seemed last year they had this new offensive and they were gaining territory at the fastest rate since when the war started. And now it seems like all that is being reversed. And now Ukraine is really stepping up the attacks on Russia. Russia's oil and gas, which is putting a lot of pressure on Russia. So now the latest is Russia wants to bring in Belarus. They want to open up a new front in the north of Ukraine, tease pressure on the east. And they want to have and they're already doing it. They're setting up these drone launch platforms in southern Belarus. And Zelensky basically said last week, look, if Belarus is used as a as a platform, as a base of operations to launch drones against Ukraine, we're going to start bombing Belarus. And so now it comes down to Lukashenko, how autonomous is he? Putin's putting the squeeze on Lukashenko, saying they're going to compromise some of these vital trade deals with Belarus if they don't play ball. Same time, Belarus doesn't want Ukraine to bring the war to their to their homeland. So that's the big question right now. But but you know what? I said this when Trump got into office. Trump said, we're going to make a deal in Russia in 24 hours. He said, before I even take office, we're going to make that war. Right. And you remember, they they made some real overtures towards Russia in the first weeks. At least they opened talks. Like, I mean, I remember Biden and them didn't even talk to them. Right. Yeah. Yeah. They met up in Riyadh and they they restored bilateral or what do you call it? Talks. Yeah. They they opened up embassies and and they opened up this like hotline. Yeah. Right. Right. And that was later in 2025. But even early on, you know, Trump was really making these very big overtures and saying, like, look, let's just call the quits. Let's just say it's over this war. Yeah. But they said, let's get you don't have the cards. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Well, with them in the White House. Yeah. Well, and Trump was pushing this like truce. Give us a 30 day truce. It's kind of the same thing in Iran. And Russia said 30 day truce. So what? So that you can rearm you like Ukraine is losing. Ukraine is losing. Of course, you want to call a timeout. You want to call a timeout because you're getting destroyed. You want to rearm and then you're going to start the war all over again. Zelensky was saying, you know, we're not even going to agree to a long term agreement unless we get a NATO security guarantee. Russia said that's that's where it was last year. And I remember saying, like, on some level, what can Trump really do? Unfortunately, once you're in the war, you're in and people can say, we wish we weren't in the war. We wish we could just stop supporting Ukraine. But it doesn't kind of really work that way because Russia has a vote, too. And if you just let's say you stop supporting Ukraine altogether, then Russia just blitzes Ukraine. Ukraine's done. And then, you know, let's say Russia is going to try to exert influence elsewhere in Moldova, in the Baltic states. It's like so when you're dealing in a great power competition, you actually can't afford to take your foot off the gas because it is deterrence. It is a constant threat of force and tripwires, which is what is constraining these rival powers. The second you say, you know what, let's just let Russia have it. They earned it. We're done fighting. Russia is going to keep pushing. So I said, in other words, back then, if you want an agreement, you actually need to keep up the pressure on Russia. You actually maybe even need to push harder against Russia to convince them that war is no longer profitable. In other words, if Russia thinks we're getting as much as we can, like we've we've gone as far as we're capable of doing, we're exhausted militarily, then they're going to be more willing to say, all right, there's nothing more to be gained here. Now we're willing to call it off. So, you know, I think actually this situation where Ukraine is winning, it makes it more likely there might be a deal because military action is less profitable for Russia. Yeah. I mean, last I checked, Russia was controlling what, roughly 22 percent or so of Ukraine. Have they like real some of that back or not? Not at all. I mean, it's still holding the territory. But like as far as like they're not moving anymore. Right. Right. And it's been minuscule from the start. They wanted the whole country. They lie and they say, oh, it's a special military operation. We never wanted all of it. Really? Then why'd you go for Kiev then? Why'd you try to bomb the airport? Obviously, they thought the government would collapse. And now they're just trying to take everything. East of the Dnieper River. And I think Zelenskyy kind of got a sense of urgency with this Iran war because Russia was making money hand over fist, man, because they lifted the sanctions and like and then Iran bombed Qatar and like destroyed LNG. So like they need Russia gas and oil again. So it's like, you know, and it's like, you know, the EU like almost like capitulate. Oh, we have these sanctions, but we need your oil. So it's like, oh, shit. No, man. What's up? Are the girls here or what's the deal? I've been here. I've been like, OK, well, they're all here. Is Chris here? Chris has walked in. We'll go a little bit. Do you have chats? We could read some chats. Give Nick a break. Let's see here. We got for the movement. Appreciate you, my friend. A hundred bucks. I want to raise my hat to you, Myron. You're fair and true to your character debating lying Zionist. By the way, he also lied about Iran admitting being nudes. I found a video. The only state. Yeah, dude, he lied the entire debate. They only say that they can make them if they want. But there is no desire to do so because they had outsmarted the ballistic systems. Also, unify everyone on the right. Hello, Nick. This is epic. I appreciate you, bro. Yeah, yeah, dude. He lied throughout the entire debate. That's why I'm like he lost because he lied. Like if you have to lie during a debate, you lost and then you just kept lying. A hundred percent agree. And on board, we must distinguish ourselves from the left and our criticism of Israel and our occupied state. We are America's first nationalist right wing and we are taking our own side. You got to do it, man. Got to do it. W. Nick, a friendly reminder to all the fear says that zero excuse to have fat belly loss. Fat loss is extremely predictable. Guys, drop the link in there from the chat. Guys, get one chest if you guys want to be fat piece of shit. Nick, how do you feel about a large majority of Hispanics and younger Hispanics follow you in the America First movement? They're my people. They're my people. It's so funny because it's like, dude, Mexicans love me. Yeah, those are the people that reckon I will go to a Mexican restaurant. I love them because they're the most racist. They don't like blacks. Yeah, they don't like blacks. And they're not woke like white people, sadly. You know, and I'm not to say that to be anti-white, but white people are so fucking woke. They're cuck, bro. Yeah. So Mexicans, they fucking love me in Chicago. Yeah. Shout out to you guys. Clap. Realest niggas alive. You know, bro, we are the realest niggas. The bang ever in the way. Let's fucking go. I got y'all, man. I know you guys are waiting for this clap for a minute. I'm all a baby. Great show. What else do we got here? That's it. Cool. And then I'm trying to think here because I wrote a whole list here. Cuba. You want to talk about Cuba or you got Cuba? You strike it today. We talked about that. Yeah. Cuba. You want to talk about Cuba? Yeah, we could. I mean, we're kind of we're all I like all the geopolitical stuff. Yeah. Yeah. We're covering. We're covering a lot. Or do you want to talk about female bitches in Montreal or Toronto or Toronto terrorist attack? We could talk about which one do you want Cuba or do you want the Toronto thing is so funny to me. We got to. OK, let's pull up the clip real quick of the of the. It's like a crazy situation. It's like some some radical leftist is like shooting up a place. I guess he was against porn. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He was against hyper. It's actually his manifesto is really interesting. OK, what is he saying? He's saying that capitalism is inherently hypergamous. Yeah. He says like, you know, the capitalist West has inherently created the situation where like not not attractive, unattractive men are not going to have access to sex and romance. He says we should be more communitarian, more like the Confucian divide the bitches up. Yeah. Yeah. Literally. Can't have the chance. Redistribute the pussy is what redistribution affords. And so we like shot up Pornhub. I don't know if it was to kill. I think it was to kill the executive of the company. And I don't believe even kill. Then I don't I didn't read too much about it, but I don't know if he killed anybody. We'll get the clip up. Yeah. And then the female cop like type in like Montreal shooting or something like that. You'll see it. We'll get the clip because, yeah, people forget that like Pornhub is owned by MindGeek, which is a Canadian company. Hmm. So like, yeah. So that makes sense that they would be based out of Montreal. Yeah. It is the one with the females. Yeah. Oh, out of Montreal. And then actually, what the fuck happened? Like, did she go to jail? Like, I don't know, because she like shot. Like, she shot like the rabbi. Yeah. Here it is right here. So it's kind of crazy. We can make it big here. Female cops, dude, are nuts. Why is he walking? So what is wrong with him? Like, he just walks right by that guy. Like, what's going on here? I was like, wait, all right, let's go. What the fuck? So he goes by and then. Then he comes over and he starts shooting at them. Guys, what the fuck? So he kills the guy immediately. Holy shit! looks at some return fire oh my god the guy dies oh my god oh my god boom shoots him probably in the head i'm assuming like one shot what the fuck and then he moves towards her why is he walking and then yeah i think she was able to get away and like they killed him eventually but um and apparently that guy was a rabbi yeah yeah yeah which is sad i mean it's tragic yeah but uh there's you know because obviously every death is a tragedy it sucks that that happened but it's it is hilarious that a civilian gets shot at porn hub yeah he's a jewish rabbi it was like of all the what are the chances by a female cop yeah it's like oh it's like memes on memes on beams on like yeah because i've talked about this before like i don't think women should be police officers at all no you know uh they just don't have the ability to like subdue a person like they just don't like there's like so many videos of like women just getting like fucked up or like they can't you know they just don't have the ability to like subdue a person like they just tackle the guy or they get in bad shootings or just you know gross use of uh judgment when it comes to firing or using force it's just like it just doesn't work man it just doesn't work like you can't well and you know when they first reported on this they said it was like an anti-semitic killing because it was a jewish guy that got shot and then it turns out like no she didn't know she got caught in the crossfire yeah he got caught in a crossfire and look to be fair she just got shot her partner gets killed in front of her right but that's insane like for her to just ah like she didn't even like think twice like ah you know you could kind of see though from that video but i think it's a good thing because it's a good thing because it's a good thing because it's a good thing she probably thought the shooter was running up on her yeah she probably did yeah you know she probably did but um but yeah like that's just just insane um and that's what went down and and again whatever guy cop maybe done the same thing who knows but you know when it comes to women dude they just should not be police officers especially like on patrol um there's a video um because i know you watch like the body cam stuff all the time oh yeah okay type of police activity uh and then we could put in like something with a guy with a knife and we could read some chats if needed um on here uh beforehand i shout out to all you guys watching on kick and rumble and everything else like that uh but yeah female cops dude yeah type of police activity like knife and i'll show you like this clip it's like was it did it happen in michigan grand rapids happened in new york happened in new york it might be a little bit older and i'll i call it monkey activity now at this point because it's always like black people acting like fucking retards on on there dude uh oh what are your um what are your thoughts on the carmelo anthony case because i know that you were very obviously very vocal about that what happened with austin metcalfe obviously went to trial they released the fucking footage what are your general thoughts on that well i you know people are just sick of seeing this kind of it's just like these things happen all the time now it's carmelo anthony and then it was irina zarutska and then it was that guy in the uk that got stabbed by the Sikh and then there was another one just in france this uh kid named lewis uh got killed by a group of 10 african literally group of 10 africans beat this young 18 year old 17 year old kid to death so people just say hey man what the fuck like we're tired of seeing white people getting beat up by white people and they're like oh my god what the fuck is going on here beat to death and stabbed and shot by black people for no reason. And then what's more, you know, it's not just that that happens. It's that then the black community rallies. Carmelo Anthony, you know, it's like, look. Raised up so much money, like 600K. 800, I think it was in the end. Maybe it was 600, but it's like, and then they protested outside the courthouse. They said, free Carmelo. They said, this is what happens when white people put hands on black people. They get stabbed in the heart at a fucking football meeting. It's insane. At least the footage, you couldn't even, like, bro, it was like the hand, like, went like this. And then, like, knife right away. Just water. Yeah, just water. Who? Oh, in the. Are you talking about the police activity video? No, he didn't cut off his hand. No, no, no, not that one. Not that one. Just, yeah. You can just plug the channel. Fuck it. And I'll just, like, we'll go through it. But, yeah, no, I mean, dude. I mean, I've been talking about this. Black fatigue is through the roof, man. Yeah. And, you know, I get these fucking retards in my car. Are you cool? You're Uncle Tom. All this other bullshit. And it's like, no, we're just fucking tired of you guys. You guys are fucking retarded. You guys commit too much goddamn crime. And it's, like, we've got to have a conversation here. Like, let's be honest. The average black IQ is 85, right? That's a fact. They commit a ridiculous amount of crime in proportion to their population size. We're talking about 30% of the population. About half of that is men, right? Six, seven percent. And they're committing, like, almost half the fucking violent crime. This is ridiculous. Like, we've got to, like, what's going on here? But no one wants to, like, deal with the. It's like, oh, that's racist. That's fucked up. Blah, blah, blah. And to acknowledge it or to talk about it is, like, a big deal, right? And, like, when the whole Carmelo Anthony thing happened, I think it woke a lot of people up. And then Irina Zerutska. And then, let's be fair here. It's not just them killing white people. It's, like, they're also killing other black people. Like, there was a black woman that got killed on a train in Atlanta somewhere. I forget her name. She was a grandma. Like, she had kids and stuff like that. And it's a fucking crazy person. Black dude. Slashed her throat. Just like Irina Zerutska. Same exact thing. So, it's, like, what the fuck is going on here? Because, let's be honest. Like, you know, if the black people, like, were to galvanize and get against this, let's be honest. These people are killing black people. What the fuck are you doing? Like, if you're a black person and you're going to be a victim of violent crime, there's a 90% chance they're going to look like you. Right. Yeah, right. So, it's, like. Well, and not only that, but think about what would happen if in the south side of Chicago all of a sudden there was no crime. It would be a real estate boom. Yeah. Immediately. In every way, it would be better. Like, this is why the city is uninhabitable. It's because nobody. Nobody wants to go there because of the crime. The cops don't want to go there. So, consequently, there's no law and order. If there's no law and order, who wants to put money there? I mean, you drive through the ghetto in Chicago, which I do from time to time. Everything's boarded up. Every restaurant you go into, it's like a bank. You go into a Popeye's and it's like you've got to slide the money through the slot or whatever. You know, and what's more, there's no investment. Nobody wants to put an ATM in Chicago anymore. You put an ATM in any restaurant, any place in the city, and black people are going to go throw a check. They're going to chain around it and drive it through the front door on the back of a pickup truck. So, it's like, you know, I just think it's. Do you even go to the city? Do you even go? I mean, I haven't been to Chicago since 2015. I don't know what it's like now. It's probably filled with monkeys. But, like, how crazy is it now? Like, do you even go into the city anymore? You know, it's not. It was really bad a couple years ago. Like Mayor, right? It's less bad. Yeah. Yeah. Brandon Johnson, he's terrible. But what they're doing now is these teen takeovers. Now these plaques, they plan. They're doing that there, too? Oh, yeah. They're doing them here in Florida. Yeah, I've seen that. In Tampa, they're doing it. Yeah, bro. They do it in Chicago. And they do it in the suburbs. They do it out in Naperville, which is, like, probably 25 miles outside the city. And they take over these little suburban towns. And, you know, they're twerking on the cars and mugging people. And then somebody shoots. They all scream and scatter in every direction. And Brandon Johnson goes, you know, well, they ain't Noel Capone. They not gangsters. These are kids. It's like, bro, they're shooting people. Yeah, they actually are gangsters. Yeah, they bring guns. They shoot people. They mug people. And it's just sad. And now, you know, not only is it in the south side, but because this stuff is bleeding into the downtown, it's killing the downtown. Just this week, I forget, I think it was Lou Malnati's, which is one of the big deep dish pizza chains. They're leaving the center of the city, the center of downtown, closing up shop. Chicago deep dish pizza is leaving Chicago. Water Tower Place, Mag Mile, Lou Malnati's, Lululemon, all the big businesses that are, like, the central shopping district, State Street, Michigan Ave. They're all gone. It's like a ghost town because it smells like pot. It's teen takeovers. It's shootings. They're stealing cars and driving them through the front of a store. It's ruining the whole fucking city. So you literally just need a mayor. It's like, I don't care if you are a communist. Just kill all the criminals. Kill or arrest all the criminals. Let's just get our city back because you can't live like this. You know, I knew it was bad when I saw them, like, kill FBG Duck in the, what was that? What was it called? The Gold Coast or something like that? Is that what it's called? The shopping center? Yeah. No, they walked up on him daytime, bro. They just, like, shot him up. Yeah. I was like, yo. This city's crazy, bro. Like, what the fuck is going on here? Like, you know, I think we need to bring torturing back, honestly. I would love to see it. I would love, you know. I think we need to bring torturing back, dude. These people are predators. They are opportunists and predators, and they're literally just holding the whole city hostage, ruining it for everybody. Even back where I grew up, small suburb outside of the city called Countryside, there was a high-speed chase. They tried to rob one of these little salons or, what do they call them? They have, like, an Illinois. Everything's got a fucking slot machine now. They had one of these places with, like. I have to pull this up. Oh, yeah, yeah. For sure. Yeah, that's crazy. This one wasn't black, though. Yeah, that was a Jew. Yeah, yeah. But, no, sorry. For the students who are saying that it won't. And even in one of these small towns outside where I grew up, they're doing another, you know, grand theft auto, high-speed chase, whatever. So, it's just nowhere in Chicago are you safe from this stuff. It's lawless. Now, this clip right here is awesome. It was so funny when I saw this thing. And, obviously, this was a tough time, dude, because, like, you know. Generational run. People. You know, the death threats and everything else like that. Because I remember it was right after your body, our choice, right? Yeah. Everyone lost their fucking minds over that comment. And, you know, decided to. Yeah, yeah. They could have said that shit. I know. Yeah, your body, our choice, which was hilarious. And then, obviously, all the libs went nuts and stuff like that. And this fucking weird Jewish lady shows up at your house. And you were getting death threats. And, you know, I remember I was on a Twitter space with you. And, like, you had mentioned. Like, someone tried. Someone tried to bomb your mailbox. Yeah, yeah. Can you tell them about that story? Because, like, I don't think people understand, like, your mind state when this was going on. Dude, they think. This guy was just like, what's going on? Dude, you were getting, like, all kinds of crazy shit. Yeah, yeah. I forgot about that one, actually. Well, you know, because. It stuck out to me because I was like, oh, shit. That was. What was it? Postal inspectors that contacted you? Yeah. I think it was somebody. Or FBI? It was the cops working with the FBI. Yeah, so the whole Your Body, My Choice, that was on election night. And so that was a Tuesday. So over the course of the week, it just kept. Mounting and escalating. And people were posting my docs everywhere. And that Friday after the election, I was getting ready to do my show. I did a stream with. Richard Spencer before the show. And during the stream, some nut job showed up to the place, checking the doorknob, walked through my gangway into the backyard and walked away. And I got really spooked because that had never happened before. And so I said, let's just cancel the show. And then literally throughout the night, people just kept coming and coming and throwing eggs at the house and sending pizzas and delivery stuff and whatever. And it went on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, probably it was like, I think we counted, it was over a hundred people showed up to my house in this 48 hour, 72 hour period. Marla Rose came, that Jewish woman. I don't even know if I should say this because she's trying to sue me. I can't really talk too much about that. But she came up to stabs. I took control of her body briefly. Then I returned control back to her. You can play it real quick. Yeah, this shit was hilarious, bro. Honestly, dude, I looked at this when this shit came out. I was like, yo, this is self-defense. This bitch showed up to this house. Like, what? What the hell? And I get it. You ended up just doing a plea deal or whatever because it's not worth the time and the fucking headache. I did a deferred prosecution and then they dropped it. Oh, nice. So they dropped it. They dropped it. She dropped the charges. She got mad. Okay. Because she said, what the fuck? He's getting 15 continuances. He hasn't even done his community service. So they just dropped it. Nice. Nice. Because dude, in my mind, I was like, this is fucking self-defense. And then what's important, because shout out to Andrew Branca. He talked about this when he comes to state of mind and self-defense. Like, what matters is like, what was going on in your mind at the time? And I would say people showing up at your house, they try to fucking kill you. You had a, tell them the story about the bomb. You got to tell them about this. Because no one knows about this. People think like, oh, this guy was just acting erratically. Like, yeah, I don't know. I don't remember if that was before or after. It was sometime during that period. And I got a call really late at night, like 2 a.m. from the local police. And they said, hey, Nick, we got a tip from the FBI. Like, we can't say too much about it. They said, but we have, we need to look in your mailbox. They said, we can't say anything more, you know, but we got a threat. And so we just need to check it out. They said, so we're out here. And I go outside and there's like 10 cop cars up and down the block. And they literally had a guy with a blast shield, like in Call of Duty, like a straight up blast shield, come in with my key and open my mailbox because they thought there was a bomb in my mail. And at that time, that was happening to everybody. I think it happened to Marjorie Greene. It happened to some of the other government officials. This was like a serial thing where they were just doing these bomb threats against everybody. And so I remember literally crouching behind the cop car on my street, like with my ears plugged, waiting for my fucking house to blow up. So it was like, yeah, the guy tried to shoot me. They tried to blow up my mailbox. This bitch tried to show up. And yeah, that was a crazy time. Holy shit. So like they brought the bomb squad out at your house. Straight up bomb squad. Yeah. Holy shit, man. That's like, and then people think like, oh, this guy just shoved this girl. So mean. It's like, we've got to play it, though, real quick. This is a battle of Berwyn. This is this is. So it just so fucking weird. Shows up. Oh, hey, what's up? Hi. Oh, my God. What are you doing? Yeah, rewind it. Yeah, whole staff in the back laughing. Yeah. Most die right now, bro. Yo. Hey, yo. Fucking deserve, bro. That shit's hilarious. Literally threw the Jew down the well. All right, man. Yeah, man. All right. We'll wrap it up. Yeah, we had to finish on that one. We're going to do after hours here in a second, guys. Real quick, Nick, where can people find you? I'm on Rumble at Nick J. Fuentes, and I'm on X at Nick J. Fuentes as well. Guys, make sure to follow him, man. Good friend of mine. Go check him out. We're going to be back on with some lovely ladies here in a little bit. And we'll see you guys in about 20, 30 minutes. Okay, guys. Love you, ninjas. Peace. We'll see you guys in about 20, 30 minutes.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The recent Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. and Iran is a sham with no resolution of core issues like the Lebanese ceasefire, control of the Strait of Hormuz, or Iran’s nuclear program.
  2. Israel has systematically sabotaged the ceasefire in Lebanon by continuing airstrikes, refusing to withdraw, and insisting on Hezbollah's disarmament—something that is politically and militarily unfeasible.
  3. The MOU effectively shifts responsibility to Iran by requiring Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah, while Israel remains in southern Lebanon, creating a de facto continuation of conflict and undermining the peace process.

Summary:

S. and Iran is fundamentally flawed and unsustainable, lacking any real agreement on core issues such as the ceasefire in Lebanon, Iranian control of the Strait of Hormuz, or nuclear ambitions. The deal was quickly undermined by Israel’s deliberate actions—continuing airstrikes in Lebanon, bombing Beirut and southern areas, and refusing to withdraw from occupied territory.

The MOU’s requirement for Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah is unrealistic, given Hezbollah’s strength and role in defending Lebanon from Israeli aggression. Israel’s actions confirm a pattern of sabotage, using rhetoric like "Gaza treatment" to justify further military operations. S.

has attempted to broker peace, but Israel’s intransigence, backed by a powerful lobbying network, ensures ongoing escalation. The ceasefire in Lebanon is not a breakthrough but a rebranding of the same conflict, with Israel maintaining a security presence and threatening further invasion. S.

and allies have failed to counter Israel’s aggressive posture, which is driven by a desire to project dominance and prevent future attacks. As the situation deteriorates, domestic pressure in Israel grows, particularly against Netanyahu, whose leadership is seen as ineffective given the failure to neutralize Hezbollah or Iran. Israeli political survival now hinges on maintaining these military campaigns, despite their long-term instability and the growing international backlash.

Ultimately, the MOU fails not due to external pressures, but because key actors—especially Israel—refuse to compromise, ensuring the region remains on a path of recurring violence.

FAQs

The MOU is widely regarded as a sham with no real agreement on core issues. Key points like a ceasefire in Lebanon and Iran managing the Strait of Hormuz remain unresolved. The deal has repeatedly collapsed, with Iran and the U.S. failing to align on critical terms.

The MOU fails because fundamental issues—such as Israel's continued aggression in Lebanon, Iran's nuclear program, and the control of the Strait of Hormuz—remain unaddressed. Israel’s actions, including bombing Lebanese cities and refusing to withdraw, directly undermine the ceasefire and show no commitment to peace.

Israel has actively sabotaged the MOU by continuing airstrikes in Lebanon, refusing to withdraw from southern Lebanon, and escalating conflicts. Their insistence on maintaining military dominance and threats like the 'Gaza treatment' in Lebanon show a deliberate strategy to prolong war.

Yes, the MOU requires Hezbollah and all non-state armed groups to be fully and verifiably disarmed. However, this is practically impossible given Hezbollah’s strength and the Lebanese military’s inability to control it, making the clause unenforceable and a strategic non-starter.

The verification mechanism is intended to monitor compliance but has little practical impact. It does not involve boots on the ground and is already undermined by Israel’s continued military presence and actions that violate the agreement.

The U.S. is attempting to mediate peace while balancing pressure from Israel and domestic political concerns. However, it has limited influence over Israel's actions, especially in Lebanon, and is caught between strategic interests and geopolitical realities.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.