"I Found Hitler’s Secret UFO Program!” -Jason Jorjani

You have to take seriously this claim on the part of the Nazi leadership that they wanted a thousand year right. A thousand year Imperium is no joke. Perhaps the best known abduction of all and one of the earliest reported is the abduction of a well respected New England couple Betty and Barney Hill. Look back at Barney Hill's original statements. Alan Dulles and his brother John Foster Dulles together with Jake Morgan Chase and Rockefeller. Funded the rise of the Nazis is the implication that there's some sort of Nazis sleeper cell undergirding American politics today. So World War II is not what we think it is. They were seeing these rocket-like things that were saucer-shaped, being launched from Spain, the Mediterranean coast, over toward America. Really? One year later, what happens? Roswell. I mean, is the idea that there is some sort of like Atlantean surviving remnant group that's still there? So for all we know, what's happening is that a future state of a certain culture is contacting itself in the past. Trying to pull the timeline towards itself or something. To actualize itself. Trans-tempo or actualize itself. Jason Resadur Johnny, backed by popular demand. Thank you so much for coming on and we just launched an episode and people are absolutely loving it. So check that out, part one. But there's so many other threads I wanted to get into and I left that conversation thinking that there was a lot that was left kind of unsaid and we could have gone on for hours. So I'm very excited to do this. You're one of the few thinkers I know who doesn't just sort of know a bunch of random disparate facts around the phenomenon but tries to piece them together into some sort of coherent worldview which is kind of a hearty lane task. But you're attempting to do that and I can't think of too many other, I mean, Jacques Foulet might be another one. But there aren't too many thinkers trying to do that. So this is very cool. Thank you. That made me think of something that actually would probably be a good preface to this conversation because I think that one of the most significant crises that we face in our civilization and in the world at large is the decline of philosophy. The reduction of philosophy to academic scholasticism and logic chopping. And the lack of deep serious broad spectrum thinking that would be capable of for example tackling the close encounter phenomenon. I mean, obviously it should be philosophers who are engaging both with the data of close encounters and parasiological data. In fact, you know, there were people in philosophy who played a fundamental role in development of parapsychology at its outset both William James and Henri Berkson were among the founding parapsychologists in the era of psychical research. In fact, William James was the president of the Society for Psychical Research in the 1870s. And Berkson was as well later on. I didn't know that. I didn't know that there were 10s or something like that. There you go. And this is a time when parapsychology wasn't relegated to quacky circles and you know, new AG conferences. Berkson was debating Einstein at the time. And so he was considered a worthy debate partner for Einstein, who himself wasn't fully accepted by mainstream science but was very well respected. And so James had predicted in the era when he was the president of the Society for Psychical Research that this would be the next great scientific revolution. What I in my writings have called the spectral revolution and it didn't happen. And you know, in my first book from me, Thessalonat Lus, I ventured a, you know, a basically theory of why it didn't happen. And that's because of the extremely serious psychological and sociological implications of mainstream acceptance of things like telepathy, pre-ognition, clairvoyance and so forth. And so, you know, it's not only essential for philosophers to engage with the ontological and epistemological questions inherent in parapsychological data or close encounter phenomena. But also the ethical and political ramifications. And this brings me to what I wanted to say in response to your opening, which is that I've made an argument now in several of my books that it's definitional to the type of the philosopher to develop concepts that cut across all of the major domains of philosophy from ontology and epistemology to then an ethics and a politics. Politics that follow from that ontological and epistemic thinking. And then also I think aesthetics is very important from the time of Plato onward. There's been this idea that the cultivation of aesthetic discernment and the capacity to perceive the beautiful or the sublime is also another pathway to knowledge. And perhaps to a kind of knowledge that transcends or undergirds reductive rationality. And in particular, I think that aesthetic judgment is very closely connected to ethics. And it's something that, you know, Nietzsche understood, Frederick Nietzsche understood. Yeah, I think there's some quote, I'm going to butcher it, but it's like life is only eternally justified in its aesthetic form or something. And yeah, if you fully believe that. And Nietzsche wasn't alone. I mean, look, if you, I mean, Kant is well known for being a very principled, hyper rational advocate of this crystalline universal ethics. But if you ask me, Kant's most interesting work is his aesthetic work. And it's in his aesthetics and his third critique, critique of judgment that you can see the connection between Kant's interest in your cult and Kant's development of this universal ethics. And then for example, Hegel has an entire account of how you can see the evolution of human consciousness or what he called spirit through changes in aesthetic styles changes in, you know, artistic expression from epoch to epoch and how they reflect the evolution of the perceptive and cognitive capacities of humanity. Okay, my point is that to be a philosopher, you really have to be thinking across all of these domains and developing concepts that cut across them. Above all, because you cannot have any unquestioned presuppositions. So you could be the most brilliant, let's say, metaphysician, right? And someone who's developing a very rigorous epistemology. But if you have unquestioned political presuppositions, it's going to be tacitly working your ontology and epistemology. And if you want to really be a philosopher, you know, which is to say someone who from the era of Socrates onward was defined by boundless limitless and thorough going questioning, you really cannot give yourself the luxury of unquestioned assumptions in any area. Right. So, I mean, this has very serious implications for religion, obviously, because it means that it's definitional to a philosopher that he or she, I consider, I ran for example to be a real philosopher in this sense. Here she cannot accept any religion. It is definitional to a philosopher that you cannot adhere to a religious belief system. You are crippling yourself and you are basically capacity to question and develop concepts from the outset if you have any kind of a religious commitment. So would you say St. Thomas Aquinas, not a philosopher? Exactly. So the entirety of medieval European philosophy is not a philosophy. And none of these people were philosophers. And also in Iran, you know, I spent a lot of time, both studying Iran and also making significant contributions to Iranian studies. My book Iranian Leviathan is a tome on the history of Iran from Zarathustra to the Islamic Republic. And so what this also means is that this whole era that's misnamed the Islamic Golden Age, which really was like an Iranian Renaissance from the 1100s to the 1100s, really doesn't have very many philosophers involved with it. because these people were essentially Islamic theologians of the type of Thomas Aquinas, like for example, Al-Farabi. Al-Farabi goes to the extent of equating Muhammad with Plato's ideal of the philosopher King, which is an absolute travesty. The only thinkers in that era that really exemplified the type of the philosopher were for example, Razi, whose writings almost completely were destroyed by various inquisitors later on, once the Turks came in and resolidified Islam in Iran. And maybe Shah-e-Baldin, Sohra, but it means that that whole period in Iran, very much like Europeans, medieval so-called philosophy really doesn't pass muster. But why am I getting into all this? The point is that it seems almost as if we're entering another dark age now, with the lack of substantive philosophical thinking and fewer and fewer individuals who really pass muster as exemplary of the type of the philosopher in the way that, let's say in the 20th century, we had Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Socht, Ludwig Vickenshdine and other really deep thinkers. So a philosopher can't be an extension of state power or religious power is sort of what you're getting. I mean, to play devil's advocate, you have philosophers like Leo Strauss also made. Not a philosopher. So you'd say not a philosopher. Strauss said so. Strauss literally said, "I am not a philosopher, do not call me a philosopher, I'm a professor of philosophy and a political thinker." But in Straussian double speak, that could mean I am a philosopher. So it's like he mentioned-- He mentioned it. And the more shocking thing that Strauss said was, at the same time as he made the statement, he said Martin Heidegger is the only living philosopher. Which coming from out of the mouth of a Jew was quite a striking statement, right? I mean, Heidegger having been a high level Nazi functionary. But wouldn't a Straussian read on many past philosophers be that many of them had to exceed to the conventional thought of the time? But then secretly they could hold their own kind of heretical beliefs. So I'm trying to think of a good example. It was one of the Enlightenment era, Francis Bacon, not really a philosopher, kind of a philosopher. But he would say things like, we need empiricism to prove out God's secrets or to understand the divine nature of the world and reality. And the Straussian read on that is like he's sort of a deist or an atheist and he doesn't believe in God at all. And he's just sort of placating and paying lip service to the establishment power. Well, I think that through careful study, that could be verified. So you brought up the case of Francis Bacon. There is a theory that, will I am shake spear? Yes, a pen name for Sir Francis Bacon. People think that, OK? Now, if someone were to engage in an exhaustive philosophical analysis of the works of shake spear and be able to prove that that was indeed a literary persona of Sir Francis Bacon. Yeah. Then I think a very good case could be made that Francis Bacon was a first-rate philosopher because there's an ethics, there's a political philosophy in shake spear, you know, and you could reconstruct that. So that would be a case of an actual philosopher engaging in esoteric writing in order to express the full range of his thoughts. Do you believe that shake spear was in fact Francis Bacon? I think it's possible. I think there's an argument there. I don't have the range of shake spear scholarship or any of where close to it to be able to assess that. I think it was like, you know, there are all these kind of occult references like in King Lear or something. Like these things were-- forgot the exact argument. But it was like straffered upon even, wasn't super far from where bacon was. And then, you know, all these things are mentioned, like 33 times. And who knows? I mean, look, it's clearly-- Bacon was prolific, you know. Will I am? I am will. You know, the will. I'm the will. Shake spear. The shaking of the spear, right? It's clearly a pseudonym. Yeah, yeah, yeah. For someone who was an incredible genius. So who the hell was that guy? Like at that time, who was living and, you know, who maybe expressed his genius in other ways as in the scientific writings of-- bake-- and then there's the new Atlantis. Yeah, yeah. So anyway, it could be-- look, my point is this, that that's one thing. But if you're a philosopher-- who's-- let me rephrase that-- if you're a metaphysician who's afraid to express a political philosophy, because you might be persecuted by the religious authorities of the day, and you just don't put pen to paper, you know? In any way, even, let's say, as a set of secret writings, then you consign to somebody to be posthumously published. If you just never put pen to paper to express any kind of coherent political philosophy or ethics that follows from your ontology and epistemology, you're not a philosopher. You're a coward, OK? And so for example, in Iran, we had an example of somebody like that was Ebn Asina, who has a calm Abyssinna in the West. Great metaphysician. Maybe he has some ethics, but he did not develop a coherent political philosophy, which, as I see it, disqualifies him as the type of the philosopher. And he made a deathbed confession. When we first started selling merchandise, said AmericanAlchemyMurch.com, we had no idea how complicated and annoying selling merch could be. We talked to a dozen different platforms and companies comparing shipping tools, payment options, website builders, and it all felt like way more of a headache and complicated than it should be. We decided on Shopify, and within days, our store was up. Everything was running cleanly in an automated way, so we could just focus on the brand and the vision we had for it. That's when it hit us. Ideas don't scale on inspiration alone. They need a structure, a container. Shopify provides that structure. It quietly powers millions of creators and brands, about 10% of all United States e-commerce. From big names like Jim Shark and Mattel to solo creators building from their bedrooms. Shopify made it simple to build a store that actually feels authentic to us, which matters when your brand lives in a niche like alternative tech, UFOs, or friend science. And when you have a very clear brand vision, plus their AI tools help write descriptions, organize products, even clean up photos, so we can focus on what matters and what we care about, building the best custom merch line possible with the coolest designs like our UFO cowboy tea. And the atomic age tea. Plus Shopify handles all of the unglamorous, more painful stuff. Shipping returns, email marketing, all in one clean dashboard. It's like having a silent partner who never sleeps. Our favorite part of the product is the dashboard, which gives us complete demographic information. We can see where orders come from, making it easy to know who our most loyal, consistent customers are around the world. That's just one example, but Shopify really makes your life easier. Bring your next idea to life with Shopify quietly handling everything behind it. Sign up for your $1 per month trial and start today at Shopify.com/jesse. Again, that's Shopify.com/jesse. J-E-S-S-E for a $1 a month trial. Again, that's just $1 a month to try Shopify, the state of the art solution, any commerce. - Saying that, you know, these bastard Islamic clerics have made it impossible to think freely in this country. And I had to basically disseminate and warp all of my ideas and my writings out of constant fear of persecution by the authorities. So he did say that before he died. To be a philosopher, you have to risk that. And you have to be willing to be turned into a human torch, like Jordana Bruno, the town square room, or Socrates or Pythagoras, who had a school's burned down in his own lifetime, right? - Oh, I didn't know that about Pythagoras. - Yeah, I mean, some say he died in the fires. Others say he barely escaped with his life and died from injuries shortly thereafter. But Pythagoras was the first one to be martyred in the history of philosophy and then Socrates and then they almost killed it. Both Plato and Aristotle. Plato went to Syracuse to try to convince this tyrant Dionysus to become a philosopher chain, as he had outlined in Republic. And basically the entire court of Syracuse conspired against Plato and he had to escape by boat in the middle of the night, narrowly escaped with his life. And then Aristotle willingly left Athens because there was a plot to have him prosecuted also. So this is endemic to the history of philosophy. - When was this pre-tutoring Alexander the Great or post? - It was pre because Alexander was younger, right? And then, and they say by the way out that Alexander didn't like Aristotle. - Really? - Yeah. - Why didn't he like him? Aristotle ran a think tank in addition to being like a philosopher engaged in his own individual exploration and contemplation. He had essentially like the prototype of the rant corporation in a classical Greece and various other city states would come to him and he would write their constitutions for them secretly. You know, you don't wanna tell your people that their constitution comes from some guy's think tank Athens. If you're living in core and so. you know, Sparta or whatever, but they would come to him and he would write a scan. Part of his political philosophy that informed his writing and constitutions for various city-states was that we should always have a political pluriverse. He was very much against one unifying government. Aristotle was the first serious thinker to critique the idea of world government. And so for example, he was very wary of the Persians who wanted to establish a kind of, you know, humanistic one world order, right? Well, Alexander actually had great reverence for the Persians, in particular his hero was Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Persian Empire. The first thing he did when he got to Iran was he had them take him to the tomb of Cyrus so that he could pay his respects to Cyrus the Great. And eventually, Alexander became convinced that the Persians had the right worldview and that the whole earth and all of its cultures should be unified into a single cosmopolitan order, which eventually was reflected in the culture of the city of Alexandria that was named after him in Egypt, became like the cosmopolitan bastion of the world, right? So this is diametrically opposed to Aristotle's thinking. You know, Alexander becomes the exemplar of the idea of the one world order and you know, Aristotle is the first critic of it. It's so fascinating when things like that happen, a modern example of that would be like George Soros and Victor Orban. It's got a mentee and mentor and like Soros is obviously all about spreading as much democracy as possible. Orban was kind of his understudy and then now, you know, it's totally split off and it's, you know, basically the tip of the spear when it comes to European nationalism. Yeah. And, you know, it almost feels Shakespearean in some ways. Now, that's the other thing about the type of the philosopher, which is very dangerous. Is the relationship between the philosopher and the state because frankly, you cannot be a nationalist and be a philosopher. Okay. So any philosopher who seems like a nationalist, like says a Martin Heidegger, right, who literally was, you know, Nazi functionary, they're engaging in. I was about to say Straussian, rather in platonic dissimulation and some kind of a noble lie. So do you think Heidegger was not a real philosopher? No. Heidegger was not a real nationalist. It was not a real nationalist. And when you study Heidegger deeply, you see that. It's very clear. But only to someone with an esoteric eye for it and who can sink together with him on a deep level, understand what he's really saying, right? So he was trying to use the German state in a certain way that had to do with his understanding of the threat posed to humanity by modern technology and a way that he thought that the German state could be shaped to confront the instrumentalizing and mechanizing threat of modern technology to shepherd technological development in a certain direction that would prevent the instrumentalization of humanity and our alienation from our existential essence. Right. So, but the deeper question is this, like, I mean, Socrates was executed by the Athenian state, right? And in his discourse on the arts and sciences, Jean-Jacques Rousseau says that the Athenians were justified in doing this because the guy was a menist to the social order. According to the political cohesion of Athens and that any thinker has to basically reconcile himself to the sovereignty of the state and to, like, basically accommodating the social order, right? So Rousseau actually thinks that philosophers, you know, posed this like fundamental, you know, inimical challenge to state power. And I think that on some level he's right, but the irony also is that especially in grave crises and what Carl Schmidt called states of emergency, I think it's also the philosophers of the people who can save the people, you know, a nation that lacks a philosopher or lacks deep thinkers in a moment of grave crisis is not going to make it. No, that feels very right to me and it feels like the modern world has very few. I think of big philosophers today and that, you know, you're sort of one of them and then you have, you know, guys like Slavoj, Zizek or whatever who's, you know, super two-post-modern for my taste, but, you know, he's at least attempting and then I don't know, even Jordan Peterson in my mind, who I think he sort of falls prey to, it's like narcissism of small differences between him and postmodernism because I think his stuff sort of melts into a postmodern gobblery, or whatever, but he's trying, he's, you know, read all the right stuff for whatever. But there are very few philosophers who are very ambitious, you know, most philosophy professors at universities just give you these very conventional kind of lame, limited by modern epistemics, beads of these past philosophers and you're sort of supposed to. There's a great, actually essay by Nietzsche called on history and he talks about undigested stones of knowledge and it feels like that's what they're just, they're just passing on these undigested stones of knowledge, they're not actually processing any of what they're saying. Yes, and that essay has incredibly important essay. It became fundamental to Heidegger's thinking and Heidegger basically quotes it at the beginning of being in time and it also has become very important to my work. In particular, that book, "Ironian Leviathan" that I mentioned, the subtitle is "A monumental history of Mithra's abode." And that term, "moneymental history" is from that essay of Nietzsche, the uses and abuses of history for life. And he basically says that there's three modes of history. One is antiquarian history, which is what traditionalists do, where they glorify the past, right? Like the ultimate form of this is the Hindu or ancient Greek worldview where there was a golden age and then a decade into a silver age and a bronze age and so on. And so history is declining, right? And all we can do is try to hold onto fragments of the past to the better days and to preserve as much of our heritage as possible. I mean, conservatism in an ontological sense. Then there's critical history, which is what these palmo people do. Just mention in Gisek, right? Gisek is like, you know, probably, yeah, the greatest living example or postmodern philosophy. And critical history is all about deconstructing power structures and showing how basically every institution and even every structure of knowledge was ultimately the product of a power game that somebody was playing and that it benefits either some class interest or institutional interest or, you know, is a product of rivalry between nations or ethnicities and so on and so forth. That it's all oppressive and it should all be deconstructed. It's like pouring acid on history and the achievements of all people throughout time, right? And Nietzsche says, okay, to be fair, under really oppressive conditions that are resulting in social sterility and that are hampering innovation and novel cultural development, a little bit of critical history is a good thing because it breaks off ossified structures and it allows creativity to be unleashed again, right? So Michel Foucault is a great example. Michel Foucault is the ultimate critical historian. I mean, that was basically his project. Everything's a power game. Yeah. Yeah. And with all these histories that he engaged in, including history of sexuality, you know, history of the prison system, history of psychology and so forth. And his own personal life, he sort of, you know, was, he's kind of a pervert to be honest. And I think it was kind of an expression of the morality that comes from that kind of world. I tell you what's also an expression of that is that Foucault endorsed Ayatollah Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution in Iran. I mean, how lost do you have to be in postmodern nonsense that you think it's a liberation to help a misogynistic, see a critic repressive regime come to power, right? Anyway. That's critical history. And then the last modality of history that Nietzsche discusses in that essay, which is the one that he personally embraces and that I have and that it's been very important to my work is monumental history, which is the idea that monumentalizing certain past achievements, turning certain historical figures into icons that can continue to provide inspiration. And having essentially a folkloric approach to one's heritage so that it doesn't become an ossified tradition, but it becomes a source of inspiration where you can dynamically adopt and adapt your heritage for future development. That's vital to the life of the people. And he says that it's like, you know, a tree whose branches can only grow toward the sun of destiny if it's deeply rooted in the earth and it's roots are healthy underground. And that underground is the subconscious. It's that, you know, monumental history is nourished from out of the subconscious. And not everything in the past of a people has to be or should be rationally dissected and understood that we need to maintain a good kind of subconscious connection to the mythic sub-stratum of our heritage as a well-spring for continued creativity, both in the arts and the sciences. Yeah, I love that. He's so inspiring when you read him. I like, you know, he seems very irrational and kind of iconoclastic and maybe a little crazy, you know, his personal life and stuff. And he was almost like the first in-sell or something, but he was also just so inspiring. He read his work and it's full of vitality in life. So it felt like this weird juxtaposition you had his personal life, which he was kind of, you know, withering away. And then you have the right end, which was so vital. I love him. I feel a very deep affinity to Nietzsche. I'd say Plato, Nietzsche, and Heidegger are probably the three philosophers who most deeply impacted my own thinking. Well, you mentioned the ran corporation. We're in Santa Monica right now near the ran corporation. I believe Rand stands for R&D Research and Development, was formed in, I believe the mid to late 50s, one of these sort of federally funded research and development centers that was meant to look into all sorts of issues of national security. It's kind of a, you know, it says, when we talk about the proverbial deep state, you think of the ran corporation. And a man who was offered to be president of the ran corporation, some people might not know this as a past interviewee of mine. My name is Harold Moundgren, who is a senior presidential advisor for JFK, LBJ, Nixon, and Ford, and set all sorts of really bombshell stuff when it came to UFOs, including key held pieces of a UFO at Sandia Complex in New Mexico, who was given to him by Lawrence Press and Geiss, who's Jeff Bezos' maternal grandfather, which is fascinating. And he talked about the magenta crash, Moundgren did, and his mentor, Richard Bistel, who founded Area 51, briefing him on otherworldly technologies. Yeah, what else did Richard Bistel tell you? If so, this didn't start last week. This has been going on, he mentioned 1933 in magenta. He did? Yes. Richard Bistel mentioned the 1933 magenta crash. Yes. That's amazing. So this provided a lot of backup for David Grush's famous UFO whistleblower who's responsible for a lot of modern disclosure today. His testimony around this magenta crash where he came out and he said that there are covert American UFO reverse engineering programs. We have this whole history on this stuff. But he also said he talked about one specific crash, and it wasn't raw as well. It was this 1933 Lombardi, Northern Italy crash, specifically in magenta. In 1933 was the first recovery in Europe in magenta, Italy. Italian government moved it to a secure airbase in Italy for the rest of kind of the fascist regime until 1944, 1945, and the Popeye's the 12th back channel, that. So the van kid was involved? Yeah, and told the Americans what the Italians had, and we ended up scooping it. And you have some interesting connections that you've made between that and Nazi prowess in engineering at the time. As you know, I'm always on the hunt for things that help me stay sharp, focused, and full of energy while I'm diving into life's mysteries and making this show happen. And I've got to say mudwater has completely transformed my mornings. Back in the day, I used to struggle with that post-coffee crash, and let's not even get into the caffeine jitters. Mudwater gave me the smooth, steady energy I was missing. It's packed with functional mushrooms like lines main, chaga, and racie, plus turmeric and cacao all working together to keep me focused, calm, and grounded. Honestly, it's like coffee went on a yoga retreat and came back zen. What I love most is that it's not just about replacing coffee, it's a whole new ritual. It's a simple, nourishing way to start the day. And I actually look forward to it every morning. Every ingredient is USDA certified organic vegan non-GMO in their zero sugar. It's energy that doesn't mess with your sleep or make you question your life choices at 3AM. Ready to make the switch to cleaner energy? Head to mudwater.com. That's MUDWTR.com and grab your starter kit today. Right now our listeners get an exclusive deal up to 43% off your entire order, plus free shipping and a free rechargeable frother when you use code Jesse. That's right up to 43% off with code Jesse at mudwtr.com. After your purchase, they'll ask you how you found them. Please show your support and let them know we sent you. Keep your energy natural and refreshing all year long with mudwater because life's too short for anything less than clean, delicious energy. And so what do you have to say about all of that? As far as I understand it, the Vatican was informed of it. Vatican was informed of it and has a dossier on it. The Vatican was involved in the study of this object in a joint working group that involved both SS scientists and Italian scientists in a third party country. When I wrote my book Closer Encounter, did he say third party country? No, but I know it's a third party country. Interesting. Because that's where the so-called Bell Project winds up being developed, namely just outside Prague and former Czechs, in the Czech Republic. And so when I was doing my research for Closer Encounter, we did not yet have the testimony from Rush about magenta. I wrote that book in 2021. It was published in 2021. So I studied the Nazi advanced propulsion research that was going on. Again, that a facility called the Scoto Works just outside Prague under the direction of SS General Hans Kombler. After Rush made this testimony about magenta, I realized why they put it there. Because if the Italians had found this object, and at least from one angle, this was a reverse engineering project, then it makes sense to have chosen a country that was neither Italy, nor Germany. The Italians needed the German technical expertise. They were not going to figure out what the hell this thing was by themselves. They had some very competent scientists, but still they knew that they had to call the Germans in. And yet the Germans probably wanted to respect the Italians by putting this project in the third country that was neither Germany nor Italy. So it was sort of a compromise, access compromise to put it in Czechsvakia. Now it's an interesting question. How much of what they were doing there was an attempt to reverse engineer whatever crashed at magenta. And how much of it was a result of Germans grappling with some real nuts and bolts practical engineering problems. So let me give you an example. The saucer airframe very naturally evolved from German aeronautical engineering. They were taking very seriously in the 1930s the problem of aerodynamics and the boundary layer that were a pocket of air resistance forms around the edges of an aircraft. And it causes drag and impedes maneuverability. So they came up with the idea of creating a saucer-shaped craft that would have suction vents all around it. And the suction vents would basically suck in the boundary layer and then redirect the air pocket into the propulsion system as part of the propulsion system. And another interesting thing that they developed in connection with this problem of suctioning of the boundary layer and basically making a much more aerodynamic aircraft was they developed a kind of perforated metal which later was discovered at Roswell, really. According to Corso, and it was a kind of metal where you could put your hand on the other side of it and blow through the metal and feel your breaths on your hand. A finely perforated metal. Do you know the name of this metal? I think in German it was called Luftschfum. Luftschfum. Okay, and then Corso. Flying foam. And how do we know? So then for context, 1947 famous proverbial, you know, archetypal UFO crash occurs in Roswell, which is the home of the 509th atomic bomber squadron led by Curtis Lemay sort of makes, you know, it made the Roswell daily record got popularized actually way later in 1979. But you're saying that the metal found there matches what was discovered in Nazi Germany? Some of it. Now here's the thing about Roswell and we'll come back to this. Is this what Jesse Marcel handled that metal? I don't know. Okay. I don't know. Certainly memory metal was found there. Yes. Whether these are the same thing and whether the memory metal was this perforated metal, I don't know. But supposedly that's it. That was also found there. This Corso say that the perforated metal that was found at Roswell matches. No, Joseph Farrell did a study of course those claims in the day after Roswell in a book which I believe is called Saucer Swastikas and Syups and he went in detail into various cutting edge German technological innovations of the 1940s, particularly military engineering. And he makes a number of really significant points in this regard. Among the things found at Roswell according to Corso was Kevlar, Valkrow, Night Vision and Fiberoptics. And lasers, I believe. And lasers. I mean, okay, I guess space aliens could be using Kevlar, maybe they could be using Valkrow too. But Farrell researched this and he provides a documentation that shows that the Germans had invented every single one of these in the 1940s. They were not in common use. They were not even accessible to the majority of the German military. But they were being tested as sort of cutting edge weapons technology, especially like in the North African desert in 1943-44. Yeah, I believe there's the first patent for a transistor is in Munich or something in the 30s. So yeah, that's interesting. Well, when we went in there, you know, to Nazi Germany, we found that the German subsidiary of IBM, a company called Dehommog, was way ahead, not only of like all the other American transistor manufacturers, but ahead of the American IBM. So the German subsidiary was like developing transistors that were much smaller, like on order of magnitude smaller than what we had in the United States. But this brings up two really important questions. One is what caused this just general technological acceleration in Nazi Germany in the 20s, 30s and 40s. I mean, really 30s and 40s. If you think about Hitler took power in 1933, which was, you know, you have like 10 years to build up. And you get all sorts of, I mean, look at V2 rockets, like 20, 30 years ahead of anything in the West. You know, all the Wunderwaffe, you know, their fighter jets were, the Skunkworks was kind of response to the fact that their fighter jets were riding circles around ours. So what accounts for that A and then B, if they are so advanced technologically, why did the United States ultimately, you know, prevail and beat them? Well, that's the subject that I, you know, I hope we can get into it in some level of detail. I wonder if I should flesh out a couple more things about the engineering at the Skodaworks before we then come back to this and really dive into it head on. So they were developing these saucer airframes with suction, vents and so on and so forth. But these were rocket powered. They have rotating rockets underneath these saucer-shaped craft. Rotating rockets. Yeah. Like a series of jets, jets, like putting in a fan formation, to basically maneuver these saucer-shaped craft in various directions. So it was a jet aircraft in other words. It was a saucer-shaped rocket-powered aircraft. Then parallel to this saucer airframe project, there was another project, which when I did my research in closer encounters, working from Joseph Farrell and Nick Cook's book, the hunt for zero point, Nick Cook's research. And then also his citations of Igor Wittowski's research, Polish researcher who actually went to this site and did some field work there. I assumed that this project, based on those researchers, I assumed that this project began like in the early 1940s. I've since been informed by somebody who had relatively direct knowledge, somebody in Serbia, that it went back to 1937. Who's this person? I don't know, I mentioned the person's name, but they're a very old person who was involved with some of these individuals back in the day in central and Eastern Europe. Interesting. And so it, from what I hear from him, it started in 1937. And this was a project to basically develop originally, their aim was to develop a new power source, a power plant. Involving the electoral magnetic rotation of mercury and thorium. So I think it's thorium 232, if I remember correctly, mixed with a certain isotope of mercury. And the reason for mixing it with mercury is that mercury is electro magnetically reactive. So if you want to rotate the thorium using electro magnets, mixing the thorium with mercury allows you to rotate the thorium very effectively. Create thorium torsion. And this device would be continuously powered by alternating current and intermittently shocked with very high voltage direct current. And basically what it did was it would create a kind of plasma fusion from out of which tremendous energy flowed. So it was a overunity device where you would be putting a certain amount of energy into it, both AC and DC. But then the nuclear reaction of the thorium due to electromagnetic torsion would produce more energy than was being put into the device. You see how I conviction that that's, I mean, so you're saying this sort of they had like a zero point energy device? Yes. Yes. Because that's the idea. That's what Wikowski, Nick Cook and Joseph Farrell are all saying looking at the bell. Well, Nick Cook. So yeah, a lot of his stuff came from Wikowski and it's amazing. I mean, he takes the little boat ride and they go underground and you can see the rig where D'Glaka was. So it's definitely a real project. And Hans Kahlmer was a very real guy. He had control of Scotaworks, which was kind of the really black world, exciting projects going on as opposed to the white world, Heisenberg nuclear project. But they're all sorts of rumors about D'Glaka. I mean, some people say it was like a time machine. When he talked to Nick Cook, he gets like a little uncomfortable as my read almost as if he knows something that he like can't really talk about or something. But he'll say I think it was a black world nuclear project. Over time, I've come to conclude that it was probably a one of several sites that the Germans, the SS in particular were using to look into nuclear weapon, nuclear technology. Which we've got to say, I think both of those things are true. I think both of those things are true. And we're going to unpack both of them. So first let's start from the time angle. Yeah. Right? You know how we're always diving into the edge of science and consciousness on this show. Lately, I've been thinking a lot about aging, not just in terms of years, but in how it actually feels in the body. Slow recovery, lower energy, that middle aged fog that sneaks up on you. I feel like I can barely go out and drink alcohol anymore. That's why I started using something called qualia, senolytic. And it's been a major shift for me. Let me explain. As we age, our bodies accumulate what scientists call senescent cells, also known as zombie cells. These are worn out cells that stop dividing, but don't die. They hang around in your body, draining your energy, clogging up your recovery, and generally making you feel older than you are. Qualia senolytic is a first of its kind supplement formulated with nine plant-based compounds designed to help your body naturally eliminate these zombie cells. It's not something you take every day, just two days a month, but it supports your body in aging better at the cellular level. Since I've started taking it, I've felt sharper, lighter, and like my body's resilience has come back online. It's vegan, non-GMO, and grounded, in serious research. Experience the science of feeling younger. Go to qualialife.com/jessey for up to 50% off your purchase and use code jessey. Again, that's jesse for an additional 15% off. That's qulia.lif.com/jessey for an extra 15% off your purchase. Thanks so much to qualia for sponsoring this episode. I assume that they were looking for an incredible power plant originally. But the reason that rig exists is because they realized that this thing levitates when you turn your dawn, and they had to chain it down. This, whatever kind of energy was being generated, also resulted in counter-barry. It was an anti-g, or in other words, it did up to local gravitational field around itself. Anti-gravity. But the other more interesting thing is that they would put plants around this thing, and they would turn to mulch. They were like cellularly disrupted. They would disrupt it on a cellular level, and they would basically disintegrate. And supposedly, the entire first team of scientists that worked around this thing died very rapidly, and they had to replace them all. And we do know from Wutowski for a fact that the leak. scientists was a guy named Eris Ernest Grawitz, who I believe was an SS medical officer who worked directly under Joseph Mangola. So if you were putting sort of biological specimens, you know, in this sort of torsion field, you know, he would be relevant. And then a guy named Walter Girlock, who worked at a local university and was extremely interested in gravity. So yeah, sort of to your point. Absolutely. And Girlock was involved in like also magnetic engineering and stuff like that. So, um, and the people who, I mean, the first group of them eventually died, experienced extreme temporal disorientation. So they would, this is what the reports are, you know, from Wittkowski and then Farrell, that they experienced time flowing at a different rate than people outside the laboratory. And that it became extremely disorienting and eventually cognitively debilitating to them. Yeah. So time machine, well, you know, maybe not at that stage, but some kind of a time disruptor that it is interfering with the fabric of space time. And for people who think we're crazy, general relativity even would allow for that on a go forward sense, because if you, you know, create a high density, or you know, you create a high energy environment, there are two ways to basically warp space time. It's, you know, mass and energy. And with both, you would encounter sort of time displacement. And so with this, you know, black hole where you have like, you know, you're going to slow time, the closer you get to it. So high voltage experimentation and things of that nature or, you know, nuclear experiment, you might, you know, incur some sort of time displacement as well. Absolutely. And say you were to like do that in a more specific manner. And wasn't Thompson Brown obsessed with like time travel? He's obsessed with time travel. He, like Agnew Bonson, who funded him was famous for saying that, you know, a high, mold, high, megabolt range, you know, electricity experiments, very anomalous things would occur, phenomena would occur. And Thompson Brown definitely thought that his work led, would lead you to a working model of time travel and to get even more specific with how that might work in the context of Dglopka is the rumor was that there was a ceramic chamber, you know, internally to protect, you know, whatever biological organism was being sort of tested in this environment. And by the way, this is a Nazi regime that definitely experimented on human beings, twin studies with Joseph Mangala, experimental cell block nine where they try to cryonically freeze people like border science was very invoked. So you'd put a person in this ceramic chamber, you create a torsion field around it. Basically you'd slow time on the inside to, you know, say one one thousandths of a second. And you know, for a person spent a year inside this chamber, you'd walk out and you'd be a thousand years in the future. And that doesn't break Hawking's chronological conjecture. It works with general relativity. It makes theoretical sense. There are all these engineering issues with it, presumably, but what you're saying isn't totally crazy for an audience. And unfortunately, I'm sure that they brought concentration camp inmates and put them in there. I'm sure. Yeah. So, okay. So you have this bell. And then you, by the way, an alternate name for the bell was Dubininstock, the B-Hive, which is interesting because they say the reason they call it that is that it makes the sound of a bunch of bees buzzing together when you turn this thing on. And there have been people who reported that in relation to UFO closing. Yeah, it was. Yeah, we heard a sound in that direction. It was sort of like a buzzing noise. It was a very, you know, it was like a buzzing kind of sound like bees, but more like a machine bees sound. So I'm just very strange. What was the craft like? So you're in the inside of this thing? What did it look like? A B-Hive. So they had this bell and they had the saucer shaped airframe that initially was being propelled by rockets. They took the rockets out, put the bell in it, and there's your flying saucer. It's the integration of the bell with the saucer airframe as the propulsion system for the saucer. You know when the first public patent for a flying saucer was? When? 1937. Really? Yeah, a guy named Henry Cuwanda, who was Romanian, but eventually he was, you know, overtaken by the Nazis and started to work with them. And then he went over to write Pat and worked with the Americans on the AvroCart project, which is probably a front for some deeper stuff that you're kind of getting in-depth right now. So I find that interesting as well. Well, that makes a very good point too. And so far as scientific breakthroughs never only occur once and never come through only one person. Anyone who stays in history of science knows this. And one of the most ignorant points made today to dispute the idea that let's say the Nazis could have cracked ZPE back in the 40s and had, you know, saucer propulsion is, well, somebody else should have come up with it, you know, like either before or by now or whatever. First of all, the last few decades are full of cases of people coming up with like interesting energy devices and either being bought out or being made to disappear or whatever, you know, meeting some kind of misfortune. But going back to that era, yes, other people arrived at the same thing, Townsend. Brown arrived at something similar. Nikola Tesla had already arrived at something similar decades earlier. Even if he didn't patent it and you know, Tesla was notorious for not properly patenting things. His drawings of the world wireless system are full of UFOs, wingless, electro-gravitically powered craft. They are all over Tesla's drawings. That's not as if the Nazis I came up with this, like, you know, uniquely. The effects that you're mentioning people having incurred, you know, time displacement, disorientation, all the reports of the Philadelphia experiment, which was led by Thomas Townsend Brown, who had a nervous breakdown at that time and had to move out to LA and then started working for, you know, Martin Corporation, the year that skunk work started. All of the same sort of reports of what you're describing, time displacement. I believe people think they might have used thorium in that as well or maybe it was hexafluor I don't remember, but very interesting, the parallels there too. People said, you know, they went back in time, they went forward in time. There are all sorts of fantastical stories about it. Nobody knows quite what happened. It had a very large budget attached to it. So could have been this parallel kind of, you know, thing, which often happens in science as you just said. Yep. Yep. And so now here's the picture. So from based on, you know, the research that I've done, the Sighting Closer Encounters, it's 1944 when they figure out finally how to integrate, well, they've to finish work on the bell, at least the prototype of it, and they figure out how to integrate it with the saucer airframe. 1944. So they're already losing the war. The Germans are losing the war. The Allies are marching on them. It's increasingly a losing battle. And Nazi leadership starts to make these statements about how there are these wonder weapons that are being developed. And once the wonder weapons, the wonder of offer are finished, then Germany will dramatically turn the tide and secure like a 11th hour victory in the war. But it's all dependent on these wonder weapons and don't worry they're coming, right? This rhetoric starts to emerge from out of party leadership. Charles Scorsanie, who at that time was the master of psychological warfare and special operations, shows up to the Scota Works and supposedly he's given a demonstration of this thing. And he gets obsessed with the idea of using this thing as part of some grand psychological warfare operation. And then we have, so this is 1944, right? Fast forward to a year after the end of the war. There are these newspaper reports in Spain that Otto Scorsanie is with General Franco on the Mediterranean coast and they're launching saucer-shaped rockets toward America. They didn't know what to call these things at that time, right? They had to know what rockets were. They were seeing these rocket-like things that were saucer-shaped being launched from Spain in the Mediterranean coast over toward America. Really? Roswell and other crashes. Whoa. What are the reports of Franco launching saucers here? Yes, what Scorsanie? This is in, I think it's in the saucer-swats because in the Syops book of Farrell where he reproduces these Spanish newspaper reports. Really? Yes. From 1946, describing the two of them together with, of course, a bunch of military people on the Mediterranean coast of Spain. And you think that- Testing these things. This way to Roswell and the Mexico possibly. Yeah. And the picture is a lot darker than that. Here's what I think happened. We all know about Operation Paperclip. You've discussed it at length on your show. What fewer people know about is the incorporation of the Gaelin organization into American intelligence. Right. So, remember, the Soviets are marching across all of Eastern Europe. Starting all this territory that had been part of the Reich. There's a whole network of Nazi, SS-affiliated intelligence operatives in Eastern Europe who continue to be embedded there as the Soviets are marching over the territory. So, what happens in 1945 when America was in the US? how winds the war immediately at a strategic level, it's understood that our enemy is now the Soviet Union and the world is divided at Berlin, right? And if we're going to conduct successful espionage on the Soviets, we would have to build a vast spy network in Eastern Europe. Well, there's already one there. Okay, it's the network that was run by General Reinhard Gaelin. So our OSS makes a deal with General Gaelin to absorb his entire Nazi spy network in Eastern Europe as part of the creation of the CIA, part of the creation of the CIA and of West German intelligence, which was very closely affiliated with the CIA. So it's not just the case that we brought over all these Nazi scientists by we, I mean the CIA, it's the CIA that brought over all those Nazi scientists and sanitized their records, you know, these paperclip, the files, the sanitized files they created for them, sanitized bios and so forth. The CIA that did that was co-constituted by absorbing an SS spy network. Well, think about what kind of culture that's creating in America, okay? Because the National Security Act is passed in 1947. Why is the National Security Act passed in 1947? Let's talk about a guilt-free alternative to alcohol that's perfect for your dry January or anytime you want to unwind. Cornbreads, organic CBD gummies, these gummies are an absolute lifesaver for my evening routine. They're a natural way to relax, celebrate or wind down without the hangover. I've cut back a lot on my alcohol consumption over the last few years. For a lot of you trying out dry January or cutting back generally, it's not always easy. But swapping that glass of wine for Cornbreads CBD gummies is a total game changer. It's a simple upgrade to your evening routine that leaves you feeling great the next day, without sacrificing the fun. Plus with all natural ingredients, they're the perfect way to stay balanced. Cornbread hemp isn't just a product, it's a small way to bring balance into your life. Whether you're journaling, meditating, or simply enjoying some downtime, these gummies elevate the experience without any of the guilt. It's like having a moment of calm in your pocket, ready whenever you need it. Alcohol doesn't have to be the default anymore. Whether you're cutting back for dry January or just looking for a healthier way to relax, you've got to try Cornbreads CBD gummies. Right now, American Alchemy listeners can save 30% on their first order. Just head to cornbreadhemp.com/jessie and use code jessie at checkout. Again, that's cornbreadhemp.com/jessie. Cornbread hemp, this is the good life. Could it have to do with what happened at Roswell and the need to create a vast, unaccountable, inscrutable security apparatus? It could have been direct reaction. I believe the National Security Act was September of 1947 and Roswell was July of 1947. So a lot of people speculate that. So here's what I think. It's a Hydra. Zenautsies created the crisis at Roswell. They staged an event. Now, let me not be misinterpreted. As anyone who listened to our first conversation can see, I'm not by any means suggesting that like graze or whatever, like manufactured by Nazis or like, you know, or that all of the crashes have to do with Nazi. No, no, no, not by any stretch of the imagination. You think Roswell was accounted specifically a Roswell by Nazi. Yeah. Like, for example, there was a crash that Ajakhvala gets into in his book Trinity that took place a couple years or no, three years earlier. Right after the Trinity detonation, near the test site, something came down. It was 20 days after the test. And the beings who were witness coming from out of that craft were like praying mantis, like, like, you know, something like between a gray and a praying mantis child, like child, like insectoid entities. Those were not, they didn't have anything to do with the Nazis. They were bullheaded, slang eyes, tear drop eyes, no ears, unless they had had a coating of something on it. And I noticed that their shoulders were kind of narrow, but had long arms. And what I surprised me that they had forefingers. So I'm not suggesting that like all these crashes, okay, have to do with Nazi psychological operations. But the particular incident at Roswell, I think, did really? And that just based on the Franco Scorzeni shooting sauce. No, it's based on the analysis of what was recovered there. And that all of it represents cutting edge German technology. Hmm. Based on course of testimony of the technology recovered there. And then looking into a history of cutting edge German military technological innovations. 47 is two years after the official surrender of, you know, V, you know, VE day, surrender of Germany. So why would they? When you look at the instruments of surrender. So a number of things are relevant here. Let's go through them one by one. When you look at the instruments of surrender, the German army, Air Force, Navy, and the German government surrender, the SS never surrenders. Really? The SS is not included in the German instruments of surrender. Because they're inherently the secret police. Because they continued. They did not surrender. And certain particular SS officers not just continued, but develop high level intelligence and financial relations with both the United States and the United Kingdom. But wasn't that still under the United States? Like, I think of, you know, Warner von Braun and a lot of these guys, they're sort of under the US's thumb, you know, ultimately the US sort of wielded authority and power over them. No, you know, thanks. So when von Braun, who was by the way an SS major, who used slave labor to build rockets and basically a concentration camp inside of a mountain, and then became responsible for the American space program essentially. When von Braun and his buddies were down in Texas, during a period they were in Texas, at one point, they, it was noticed by American, probably the FBI, that they were going and meeting Nazi counterparts coming from Argentina at border towns in Mexico and giving them data drops. They were giving classified American military data to their Nazi counterparts coming from Argentina in meetings in Mexico. So they were confronted about this by the Americans. Next thing you know, a V2 rocket goes off course and hits a place in Mexico. Now way. And the the Von Braun's people basically intimated to the Americans, you know, if you make working conditions hard for us and keep grilling us like this, you know, rockets are bound to go off course and maybe, you know, a war with Mexico might even start. So they were being hassled by these people in a way that suggests that these Nazis had a lot more control and latitude than the civilian government of the United States, wanted to believe was the case. And I think that degree of control is coming from the deep state that was established through the National Security Act of 1947. In other words, the CIA, probably the NSA and various other apparatuses of our deep state in America were co-constituted by the remnants of the SS. And this isn't unique to America with like, for example, the absorption of the Gala network into the OSS to create the CIA. It's also the case with the British. So Ian Fleming, who went on to write the Von novels, was an MI6 operative whose specific mission at the end of the war was to facilitate the evacuation of Martin Bormon to Argentina. Martin Bormon was like the financial mastermind of the Reich. And he supposedly died three times. There are three conflicting accounts of this man's death from 1945 to 1947. Next thing you know, he has a joint bank account with Juan Perón in Argentina. And as late as the 1960s, Martin Bormon is caching checks written in his own name through Chase, JP Morgan Chase, in Buenos Aires. So the British are involved too. And then this Ian Fleming, MI6, you know, operative winds up becoming a novelist who writes about an organization called Spector, which is a hidden third power in the world. So the villain in the Bond verse, right, is a secret transnational global organization that's capable of rivaling both the Soviet Union and the civilian government of the United States. Well, I guess Spector, they have like German assets a lot of them, don't they? It's very obviously the organization which was known to Ian Fleming as Odessa, initials of which in German stand for order of former SS officers. And which informally was referred to as Dishbina or the spider. Fascinating. Really? Well, that's really amazing. That's so interesting. And do you know anything? Because I believe the inspiration for Ian Fleming for James Bond was William Stevenson, who was known as Churchill's Super Spy. He was a sort of Canadian British. Actually, and I had an identic memory. He was an engineer. And then also was this kind of brilliant Super Spy strategy. and so was he ever fighting the spider in any sort of way? 'Cause that wouldn't be like instantiate this even more. - Yeah, or that I don't know. That I don't know, but I know that Fleming was involved with them and facilitating, I think that the leadership of this organization basically was taken over by Martin Bormon and probably Autosquarsany was in the second position. Once these people basically set up shop in Argentina. One of the most interesting things that they did in Argentina was they promised they were gonna develop fusion power and fusion nuclear weapons for one per own. And this guy, Ronald Richter, German scientist, set up a fusion project in Barrelochie. This is early 1950s, late '40s and the early '50s. I believe in 1951, the atomic energy agent, the IAEA, international atomic energy agency, went down there to investigate claims that they were developing nuclear fusion. And they found a very complex facility over there. - Yeah, I've been there, actually, I've seen it. - Yeah, you were talking about-- - It was a little island off the coast of Barrelochie. It's like this little-- - Yeah, so you went to Barrelochie to investigate? - Not to investigate. - Oh, just was killing an outbarrelochie. And I was on a hike and then somebody told me about the scientist named Ronald Richter, who was the former Nazi who was working on fusion there. And I was like, what? And then I went and it's amazing. It's so-- - Yeah. - And then there's a civilian nuclear grid in Barrelochie as well. So who knows if there is some sort of overlap there? - Well, Argentina later almost developed nuclear weapons later on in the 1970s. But here's the interesting thing is that he promised to develop these nuclear weapon fusion weapons for Peron and he never did, Ronald Richter. And moreover, when the IAA people went down there and investigated they said this doesn't look like any fusion that we understand. We don't know what this guy's doing down here. It's incredibly energy intensive, but it doesn't look like any kind of fusion that we understand. Okay, here's where it gets really dark and goes to your question of like, if they had all this technology, meaning the Nazis, why didn't they use it to win the war? And how is it that we won the war and so on and so forth? Right? - Yeah. - Okay. There are some eyewitness reports of two German nuclear weapons tests being conducted between late 1944 and early 1945. One in the Baltic Sea where a pilot was flying over the Baltic Sea and he saw a bright, bright light that almost blinded him and an explosion where there were like multi-colored, like rainbow colored lights, like fizzling inside the explosion, which is a telltale sign of a nuclear fission explosion when you see one with your naked eye in person. It doesn't register on camera very well, but it's like the rest of the fissile material kind of like reacting inside the mushroom cloud. And he said like it, it created a huge pressure wave he saw from his airplane and this blinding flash of light and these weird like multi-colored reaction. And then there's a second eyewitness account of what appears to be a nuclear test near the Thurinian forest, which I think they said like cut out power in a nearby town or something like this, like the EMP effective in it. So again, this is research that's been done by two people. One is a guy, weird name, a Plympton Hydric, I think. - Plymouth. - Or is it Plympton? - I got it wrong when we spoke on the phone. It's actually Plympton, I think, Hydric. - Okay. - A book called Critical Mass. - Okay. - It's a whole study of the Nazi nuclear program and it's connection to the United States and to the bombs we dropped on here, Ashima Nagasaki, which we'll come to in a minute. And then the second source is Farrell's deeper research on Plympton Hydric claims and additional research that he did into Nazi nuclear weapons. And basically the picture that emerges is this, that the uranium enrichment program that Heisenberg was running was a red herring that it was a basically cover and diversionary tactic to throw off the allies who successfully defeated that program. They sent like a team of like Nordic skiers or something to like take out the heavy water plant and so they derailed that project. But that there was a deeper black project to develop nuclear weapons using Electromagnetic Isotope separation, which is something that later was used at Oak Ridge in the United States. And that the Germans were using Electromagnetic Isotope separation in a more secret parallel track program that did succeed in developing fission weapons. Now Plympton Hydric in his book argues, he makes this case, that at Trinity, the records show that they did-- - When you say Electromagnetic Isotope separation, like just like a centrifuge or like-- - No, something other than the kind of centrifuge technology that we're used to. And I'm not a physicist, I don't know what it is. And probably there were also using laser isotope enrichment because the Nazis developed the laser, I think, in part for this purpose of isotope enrichment. And which by the way, just very brief side note to all those people like investigating the Iranian nuclear program right now. They are not using centrifuge enrichment for the nuclear weapons. Iran has been using laser isotope enrichment. And I hope that wherever they are, it is they're conducting laser isotope enrichment that this regime doesn't have an unacknowledged stockpile of highly enriched uranium. In any case, that is amazing side note. The Shaw bought laser isotope enrichment technology from Switzerland in 1970. - Interesting. Anyway, so all this says to the tech about, we gotta check how to centrifuge. That's not where they're doing. But okay, how is it relevant? It's, they learned from the Nazis. The Nazis had a fake program, which was a diversionary tactic, and then there was a real deeper black program. Why would you use, 'cause Heisenberg was so smart. I mean, he was responsible for, you know, understanding the mathematical underpinnings behind quantum leaps, you know, electrons, and electron shells and orbits, and you know, the uncertainty-per-intimacy. - He also wrote this book, Physics and Philosophy, which is an absolutely masterful text. - Yeah, that would be called. - That would be the quote, Heraclitus, and shows how Heraclitus was like a precursor to quantum theory, and Intuited basically quantum theory. Is it fantastic, but brilliant guy? - Yeah, and it's really, it's a trippy book, that book, because he talks about all sorts of issues in quantum mechanics and interpretations that, you know, the Copenhagen School is kind of wrestling with that. We now kind of paint over with this broad brush around consciousness, and he really, like, muses in this deep way that consciousness might play a part in wave function collapse, and that sort of thing, and now it's just, you know, oh, you know, it's all, you know, it's the quantum detector, whatever, does, you know, wave function collapse is when particles collide or whatever, but- - So why would you waste a lot of that? - Why would you waste a guy like that? - A brain like that, because if you want the allies to believe that this is your nuclear program, you're gonna have to put, as your frontman, the guy that the allies would expect to be running the Nazi nuclear program. - What's interesting about him is he, and all the people on his nuclear program were captured, like you said, and they were put, I believe, in the English countryside, and the whole house was wiretapped, and this is a part of the, also this program, this, you know, nuclear tech retrieval program, and they were just listed, you know, what are they gonna say? Maybe they give away some trade secrets, and they talk about feeling regret around working on the nuclear program, and also gratitude that their sort of heavy water engine never quite worked out, which was, I guess they were using deuterium, you know, in their approach. So- - I thought you were gonna say something else, because the other thing I've heard about that, I've heard the story. - Yeah, yeah, yeah. - There's a transcript, it's amazing. - Yeah, read it out on it. - But here's an interesting thing about it. - Yeah, yeah. - Is that when the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, - Yeah. - They overheard these guys, they have that, you know, transcript of how immediately, Heisenberg and his people calculated the amount of Fissile material used. - Really? - Yeah, so it was as if they knew, like they could reverse engineer from, you know, the scale of the explosion, whatever, what kind of bomb produced. - Whoa. - Which implies a completed nuclear weapon, knowledge of one. But in any case, that's not- - I did that over there, the most competent guys, which means they shouldn't be on the cover for any- - I wouldn't rest anything on that. But here's the interesting point I was making in relation to the Plumpton Hydrix research. - Yeah. - Is that he says that there's records showing the amount of Fissile material at Trinity, and that it wasn't anywhere close to being able to basically complete fat man and little boy. - Mm-hmm. - And that in 1945, a deal was made with the Nazis to transfer by submarine the Fissile material that went into the bombs that we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Trinity project was completed with Nazi highly enriched uranium and that it was transferred in an agreement that we made with the SS. - Wow. - Okay. - You're high conviction in that. Well, this is what he argues and he's done this book is critical mass. Yep, okay. And he lays out a huge argument for this. Now, here's the problem. If we got our uranium from them, and by the way, he also makes the argument that the engineering of the plutonium bomb was completed with Nazi assistance. Okay. So if we got our uranium and additional technical expertise for completing our nuclear weapons from the Nazis, and if there are two reports of Nazi successful nuclear tests and 44 and to 45, yeah. Why weren't these weapons used by the Nazis? It's a great question, why? There are a couple of different answers, and they're both really disturbing. Okay. Let me start with, I don't know which one is more disturbing. Okay, but okay. So if Ronald Richter is working on fusion in Argentina in 1950, is it possible? And the Nazis had, let's say they've developed this bell that involves electromagnetic torsion of thorium, some kind of a plasma fusion that takes place inside of this device. Is it possible the Nazis figured out some other kind of nuclear reaction, weaponizable nuclear reaction besides fission? And is that related to why Ronald Richter was promising fusion bombs to one peron, which he never delivered. Interesting. I didn't know if he was promising fusion bombs. Yeah, he was promising nuclear weapons to, and this is why the IAEA went down fusion bombs. Well, okay, he's working on fusion, and he's promising nuclear bombs to Peron. We may assume from those two data points that he's promising fusion bombs. Now we only developed fusion bombs. And hydrogen bombs are fusion bombs aren't it? Exactly, but here's the interesting thing, is that we developed hydrogen fusion bombs in the '50s. And this is 1950, Ronald Richter's down there. So it's relatively the same ballpark time frame. Yeah, Edward Teller and Oolong, that design was '52. Yeah, but here's the thing, our hydrogen bombs use a fission trigger to create a fusion reaction. What if the Nazis figured out how to create a fusion reaction without a fission trigger? It would be extremely useful because the radioactivity of a nuclear explosion comes from the fission trigger. The neutron bombardment that, well, first of all, immediately disrupts our whole organism, and then also irradiates all the fallout that comes down on people. That neutron bombardment is from the fission reaction, not from the fusion. So if you could create a fusion reaction without a fission trigger, you'd have a clean nuclear bomb. An extremely high explosive force, but no radioactivity. So your troops could move into that area and occupy it immediately. Really? There'd be no radioactivity. No radioactivity. Straight, it's the opposite of a neutron bomb. So a neutron bomb is engineered to maximize neutron bombardment. This is an a-neutronic fusion bomb. If the Nazis developed that in 1944 to '45, atom bombs would be like matches for them. It's child's play. So they would be willing to trade that for something else, like maybe the mass assimilation and what do you call it, amnesty for Nazi scientists, like maybe incorporation of their entire SS spy network in Eastern Europe into the CIA, like perhaps the transfer of a huge amount of funds, wartime loot to Argentina and other places, that they made a deal and gave them ashes to the Americans. They kept diffusion bombs for themselves. And you don't think they'd just vaporize large swaths of American territory and try to win? No. Now this gives me this comes to the second reason, which is even more disturbing. Okay. And I almost apologize for how disturbing this is. No. But people need to really think about this, because I think we're still inside this spider's web. And it's responsible for a lot of the deception in this direction around the disclosure conversation today. Okay. So you have to take seriously this claim on the part of the Nazi leadership that they wanted a thousand year rife, okay? Americans have a very hard time with this, because this country was born yesterday in historical terms, okay? There are other people who are capable of grasping this more effectively. Let me give you an example. And trust me, it's worth setting it up like this. And for context for the audience real quick, third rife is called that because I believe it was the Roman Empire, then the Holy Roman Empire, and they were supposed to be the third instantiation. Yeah. So they want the thousand year rife. Okay, well, who thinks like that? We in Iran, there was a dynasty that's often misnamed the second Persian Empire. Actually, there weren't Persians, they were Skithians. The Parthian Empire of Iran, okay? It lasted for 400 years. The Parthian Empire of Iran was the principal rival of Rome. So the two superpowers in the world at that time were the Roman Empire and the Parthian Empire of Iran. And at that time, the country was called Artyana Hashatra, Aryan Imperium, that was the official name of the Parthian government, was Aryan Imperium. And then Artyana gets shortened to Iran in Middle Persian. So these Parthians ruled Iran and successfully fought the Romans usually to a stalemate for 400 years. Then they get overthrown in a coup by these guys called the Sassanids, the Sassanid Persians, and they established their own empire. But the Parthian elite continued to be the backbone of the Sassanid state. The feudal houses, the Parthian feudal houses, serve the Sassanid state and protect it the way like in Game of Thrones. You have all the main houses in Game of Thrones and they're like serving with that place, you know, the main, the capital, whatever it is, right? - Oh, uh. - In Game of Thrones, what is that place? - Yeah. - I forget. And the Lannisters are there and like all the other feudal houses are serving them, right? - Yes, yeah. - So get this. The Parthians rule Iran for 400 years directly. - Yeah. - They continued to rule Iran secretly for another 400 years under the Sassanids. They're the backbone of the Sassanid state. In the end, the conflict make a very long story short. The conflict they had with the Sassanids resulted in the collapse of Iran to Islam. The state, security of Iran and the conquest of the Persian Empire by the Muslim armies was on account of basically the tension between the Sassanids and these feudal lords. So Iran then is subsumed by Islam for a couple hundred years, around about 8,5900 and Iranian Renaissance begins, which is misnamed often the Islamic golden age, 90% of the people who contributed to it in the arts and sciences were Iranians. Anyway, the Parthians are also the patrons of this. So they become like the Medici's. They become the patrons of an Iranian Renaissance for another 300 years between like 900, between 900 and 1,100. So these people ruled Iran directly for 400 years, ruled Iran indirectly for another 400 years, 800 years. And then for another 300 years, they patrolled in Iranian Renaissance, 1100 years for over a thousand years. These feudal families had a coherent political vision. That's how you need to think when you want a thousand year right. Okay. So if the Nazis in the modern world want to set up a thousand year imperial, it's gonna require a little bit of preparation. Investing a century in psychological warfare and social engineering to set up your thousand year right is not at all an unreasonable investment. And so my hypothesis is that from 1945 until 2045, we are in a period of preparation involving horrendous psychological warfare and social engineering by a deeply entrenched fascist elite, let's not call them Nazis anymore, because they're really not nationalists. A deeply entrenched fascist elite that controls the American deep state. So that's the second answer to why did they not win the war? No, they won the war. It's just you have to rethink what the war is. The war is a Veltanschau's creek. It's a worldview war. And that doesn't mean what Americans think it does. So like when we went into Germany in 1945, the American military went in there, they translated Veltanschau's creek into psychological warfare. And then later became the battle for hearts and minds, psychological operations, psyopsia, psychological warfare. That's now what Veltanschau's creek means. It means a war over the constitution of the world from out of human consciousness on a social level. And it goes back to German thinkers like shelling, Frederick Shelling, and also ultimately Nietzsche, definitely Nietzsche's idea of perspectival conflict that there's no unified God's eye perspective on the world. There is, of course, God is dead, right? I mean Nietzsche is the ultimate deconstructor of a theistic monistic ontology. So there's no God to have a perspective on the whole world. And there's nothing like a God's eye perspective even in science. And science is always conditioned by culture and by politics. So ontologically, the world is pluralistic. And William James also made this point. He wrote a whole book called "A Pluralistic Universe," which if you look at the ontology of William James' radical empiricism in his book of pluralistic universe, it almost completely maps on to Nietzsche's perspectival ontology. And I compared the two explicitly and Prometheus and Atlas. So you have this conflict of perspectives that brings about the constitution of what we consider to be the world. Heidegger, beginning in being in time and going into his writings on technology, causes the worldhood of the world. The what makes a world of meaning for any people is not the same as how the warp and weft of meaning is brought together by another people. So there is a conflict of worlds over the earth. Different worlds constituted by, let's say, what Jung might call the collective unconscious of a particular people. And by the way, this is a point that's often, I don't know whether it's overlooked or whether it's deliberately distorted and readings of Jung is a Jung did not believe in a single collective unconscious. Jung believed in a racially differentiated collective unconscious and he's getting that idea from Hegel and Hegel's philosophy of mind. Hegel talks about the spirit of different races and how the spirit of different, it sounds crazy, but Hegel even thinks that the spirit of different races can shape the world geologically. - Hmm. - Okay, I don't know that Jung would certainly take it that far, but Jung kind of got that idea from him and he developed it to where, like, for example, he's predicted that the spirit of Voton would erupt from out of the collective unconscious of the German people and it did, right? In the form of the rise of the Nazis in the Second World War. So Heidegger is saying that there's a war and very much lines up again with Nietzsche. There's a war of different worlds over the earth. - Hmm. - So World War II is not what we think it is. - First of all, all the deep Nazi thinkers did not see any difference between World War I and World War II. If you read, for example, Carl Schmidt, you see this, you read Heidegger, you see this, you see, it's just the World War and the world war, the World War, the great war, never ended for us. The Treaty of Versailles was imposed on them. You know, they considered themselves to be like in its perpetual state of war for the world. And so you have to understand the term World War in a different way. It's a veiled unshowns creak. It's a war over the way that the world is going to show itself is going to come into presence, it's going to manifest. It's a certain understanding of what I've called in my writings, phenomenal authorization, where I've drawn a connection between three different ideas, authorship, authority and authorization. And try to explain how phenomena are authored and authorized in how they can take shape, and that that's the most fundamental form of sovereignty, that real authority is not like the authority of a civilian government that's elected or some bureaucracy. It's who has the authority to shape phenomena into a meaningful world at a fundamental level. And the people who developed what Otto Squarsene was the master of in Germany, namely, Veltan Shung's creak, they understood this. So it's not bizarre for these people to engage in a century of social engineering to set up then what they expect would be a thousand year imperial. If they had dropped, whatever few nuclear weapons they had in 1944 on American cities, I can tell you exactly what the result would have been. Total war against the German people on the part of America, at the same time is still fighting the Soviet Union, right? Who actually was the principal enemy of Nazi Germany or responsible for most of the deaths in Europe, the Soviets are really the ones who defeated the Germans to be honest, okay? And so they've got Stalin coming out them from one direction, now they're dropping nukes on their fellow Germanic, you know, your fellow European Americans. Now they're gonna get the Americans, you know, interested in total war to annihilate them. Americans were also developing nuclear weapons. Best case scenario, I guarantee you Jesse, they would not have ruled the world for more than two generations. Even if they had succeeded in defy militarily defeating America, there would have been a massive insurgency against them, the amount of arms that Americans possessed personally, right? And then the amount of communist revolutionary fervor in Europe being backed by the Soviet Union, they would have faced a massive insurgency. But is the implication that there's some sort of Nazi sleeper cell undergirding American politics today, or? - Fascist is a better way to put it. - Fascist. - Fascist, because not, again, here's another point, then you know Nazis hate this. These people aren't nationalists. So Nazis, I mean, no, more and more on, it's not a nationalist. Otto Scorsese is not a nationalist. These people created, first of all, to begin with they weren't nationalists. They were looking for kind of global Imperium, okay? They used nationalism, and they used crass populism to create a power base for themselves. But you can see from how they're operating, especially after the war, from 45 onward, that they're very much internationalists. They have a global vision. So, but they're fascists. And do I think that there's a fascist underbelly to America? Absolutely. I think that's the deepest, the deep state that controls these black projects is absolutely fascist. Now. - But it was a nationalist movement. I mean, you had Wagner was very popular in-- - Of course. - Out of on Bismarck. And you had this recetation of all this kind of German national pride free. - Remember what we were saying about monumental history earlier? You need to monumentalize history if you want a substantive forward development. So if you want to create a thousand year rike, you need a lot of cultural material for that. But I would hardly say that at least among the leadership of this movement, that they were sort of like xenophobically German. No, they loved all kind of European civilization, all heritage. And they were interested in the area, you know, heritage of places like Iran and India as well. They even sent people to Tibet to like get the Tibetan scriptures. - Yep. - So. - They sent them to Mount Kailash and they were looking for the Holy Grail of New York. - Yeah, they were interested in it. They had a very broad and deep conception of what they considered the area in heritage. - Yeah. - But nationalistically German. They used the German nationalism to rile up masses and build a power base. - Hmm. So. - Do you think there was some Nazi non-human intelligence or alien connection going on? I mean, this is God Peter Lebenda, for example, who writes a book called the Unholy Alliance where he talks about, when we talked about last time, Nordic alien beings. Do you think that there was some sort of alliance between them and the Nazis? Because I guess that sounds quacky, but I'm almost even more likely to believe that than the idea that the Nazis writ large just threw their lot in with the US and sort of stopped fighting and made some really long time horizon calculated decision to perpetuate the Third Reich through some sort of sub-Rosa ruling of their greatest adversary. Like I just, I think-- - No, I agree with you. - No, I agree with you. - The regime that would do that wouldn't fail and fight a two front war with Russia and then destroy themselves, right? - Yeah, look, they're not mutually exclusive. - Okay. - Do I think that they were in contact on some level with people who they knew would in some way affirm and complete this project they were taking a great risk to forward, yes, I think so. And there we need to look at these claims about the real society and the real society. So there are these claims that there was a group of mediums, I think mostly women, who were engaging in telepathic communication with basically a group of supermen. And that the supermen were sort of helping these occultists with both like geopolitical nations and scientific breakters. I am unable to find any evidence of an independently existing real society. But there was a tool society and the concept of real was very important to the tool society. Real is this idea that Sir Edward Bollward Litten wrote a book about in 1871, I believe. - The coming race. - Yeah, and by the way, this guy's biographies insane. - What's his deal? - Look at Edward Bollward Litten. At one point he was offered the crown of Greece and he declined it. - Really? - Yeah, they offered it. He was a British gentleman. - Yeah. - British, or a super-orist to craft. Extremely erudite guy, obviously deep into the occult and traveled around a lot. And at one point they wanted to make him king of Greece and he was like, no, man, I don't want the trouble. - Really? - Yeah. And this book he wrote the coming race, Hitler was, I think, really into. - Yes. - And it was this book about like an underground civilization or something. Was this based on any sort of empirical evident with the-- from him, you know, and his journeys or whatever, did he happen upon these people? I don't. One can speculate, right? Yeah. One can speculate that that might have been the case. But in any case, the soul society took all this very seriously. And the soul society oddly enough, it was founded by this guy, Baron Rudolph von Spottendorf, who was initiated in Kurdistan of all places. He was initiated into an ancient Iranian Kurdish order called Ah lahak, who are basically like surviving myth arrests. Anyway, long story short, he comes back from Kurdistan through Turkey and he creates this tool, Gazelle Shaf. Now, what is tool? Sool is the Germanic conception of Atlantis. It's an island continent where a super civilization existed in vast antiquity, which these people, the Sool of Gazelle Shaf believed were the progenitors of the Aryan race. And by the way, they didn't make this up. Helena Blavatsky has this in her Theosophical writings that the Aryan race came from Atlantis. I mean, this is one of the claims that she makes. And I believe that on some level, Steiner accepted it also, although Steiner had a much more metaphysical, transcendental interpretation of what Atlantis was. Yeah. Well, I mean, I think you believed it existed and then Rudolph Hess, who was in Hitler's inner circle, was a huge fan of Rudolph Steiner as well. Yes. And then the Nazis eventually considered Steiner to be their principal adversary, which is saying a lot because when you consider somebody, you're nemesis. It means it in a way actually you're fighting over the same thing. I didn't know that. You're fighting over this. Oh, they burned down the Gothan Am. The Nazis burned down the first Gothan Am. Because they thought that anthropos if he could really become arrival to Naziism and to their vision for Europe and the destiny of the world and so on and so forth. Which, yeah, it says a lot. In any case, the tool society was obsessed with Atlantis and excavating the Atlantian heritage of the Aryans, including the Germans. And essentially of creating a new Atlantis. Now where would this island continent be? Which by the way, they associate the Germans associated with ice and a frozen over place. And some Germans believe that it was the same place as hyperborea, some of them did. So if you look back at Plato's Tameas and Critias and you know, read every one of the clues he gives us about where Atlantis was located. He says it is an island continent, the size of Libya and Asia combined, which in the geography of the Greeks of his time meant a landmass the size of the Persian Empire. That's a big island. That's exactly the size of the continental United States. Then he says that it's in the world ocean and that from Atlantis, you can, by going to Atlantis, you can cross over from one side of the world to the other side of the world. Really? And it's in the world ocean. Oh, wow. Well, we have a world ocean. It's where the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean and the Indian Ocean meet in the coastline of Antarctica. Yeah. Okay. And it is an island, the size of Libya and Asia combined. And see, put it, the size of the continental United States. And you can get to the other side of the world from it. You island hop through Antarctica. You can get from Africa to South America or, you know, and he also says that there's a huge mountain ranges there. So. And one other thing and it was destroyed by a great flood and it might have had sort of very livable conditions, pre-younger dry ice period and ice age, you know, all our Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson's work. And so literally, you know, Atlantis was just, you know, destroying this great flood. And it's dated back. They say this was 9,000 in that mythos festival, Tameyas and Krateas. That's 600 BC. And they say this was 9,000 years ago. This is 9,600 BC, which is literally the end of the ice age and this flood, which ended the ice age, it was called meltwater Pulse 1B. So. Yes. And I think the mechanism for that, so the date's matched perfectly. Yeah. And I think the mechanism for that was convincingly argued by Charles Habgood. Charles Habgood was a scientist who worked to think it was, I know, he might have been a historian actually. He worked at Boston University, I believe. He also was working on contract for the CIA. And he came up with this theory called Earth Crustle Displacement, where periodically, this is to really, you know, dumb it down, but periodically, the Earth would become top heavy due to glaciation. And this would cause the crust of the Earth to slip over the mantle by a few thousand kilometers. And that pulls the ice out of the polar regions and the ice then precipitously melts. Okay. So this notion that North America was covered by ice during the ice age and that some, and that North America was where it currently is, but it was just covered by ice is fallacious according to Habgood. It's that the North Pole was where Hudson Bay is today. And the reason North America was glaciated was because it was a lot closer to the North Pole. A lot more of it was closer to the North Pole. And by the same token at that time, Antarctica was where Argentina would be today. So Atlantis would have had the climate of contemporary Argentina. And I believe in the purey-rece map, which was found in Turkey, that's exactly what it looks like. And Antarctica has sort of shifted and this is supposed to be some sort of, you know, pre-ice age map. Not only that, those maps, at least one of them. I don't remember whether it's the purey-rece or the orantius finneus map, but one of them shows that Antarctica actually consists of two islands that are very close together. And this is in fact the case. Our subglacial topography has shown that it's not one landmass. It's two islands that are very close together. Interesting. Yeah. Clearly. Clearly that also lends to its accuracy. Totally. And so whoever knew, whoever made those maps originally and they may have been copied in the Library of Alexandria, whoever made the initial maps that have correct longitude and latitude on them, also which we didn't have at that time. They all show the conspiracy about purey-rece is that the map looks like it shows the curvature of the earth. Yeah. And this is well before Columbus. Yes. So I think that those were copied from Atlantis and maps at some point, copied and re-copied many times. Anyway, so the Nazis are looking for Atlantis. The Suleitz El Schaftis, right? The Suleitz Society. And the Suleitz there are Atlantis. And by the way, one little interesting point there is that the Mayans have, you know, the Mayans have legends of Atlantis. They have legends of a great island, great island continent that was decimated by a flood and that its survivors took refuge there. There is this legend among Mayans, which I believe Graham Hank, I'll come on others, has cited in his work. And they have these two words that they use for that place. One is Atlán and the other is Toulán. Toulán sounds a lot like Toul. Toulán, right? Toulán, Atlán. So it could be the same word, even, ultimately, or derived from the same word. I guess what the Nazis wind up doing in 1937, '38, Deutsch and Arctic Expedition. They send a ton of personnel down there. They even fly over the Transant Arctic Mountains and drop swastika flags all over the landscape with like spears. Why do you think they want? Because they figured out that this is Toul. That this is Atlantis. The nominal reason, too, which is so prima facie just absurd, is I think they said that they were going because of butter rations and Antarctica was a source of margarine or something. Well, the penguins. The penguins. Yeah, exactly. Hasn't the penguins. It's not even like a charismatic cover story. Like it seems so patentfully ridiculous. You know there's a book called Hasn't the Penguins. Oh, I didn't know that. Hasn't the penguin. Yeah, so it gets-- Like Herman has? No. So one of the main guys they sent to Antarctica is Rudolph Hess. A Rudolph Hess, yeah. And this Rudolph Hess who they sent to Antarctica a few years later takes a secret unauthorized flight out of Germany. Lands in Britain in the field is met by British officers. And he says, I have orders to meet with Winston Churchill. And they go to Churchill and they say, "Sertles," as the Hess is here, like, you know, he flew up on an off-rise flight here. And Churchill said, "I don't want to see him throw him in prison. We're going to interrogate him." So then they interrogate Hess. And he says he had orders to secretly come to Britain and make a-- not just a piece over-chair, but an alliance proposal to 30 members of the British parliament who were favorable toward Hitler. So at-- but at this point when Hess had made this flight, I believe Hitler had made three peace offers to the British, including an offer to ally together and to have basically the British Royal Navy and the Nazi. become collaborators on a global scale. And so this was the final piece offering before the outbreak of hostilities. And who do they send the guy who was in Antarctica? What's the significance? Well, and then here's the other thing. After the war, he remained in prison. They kept him in prison. So this guy didn't participate in the Battle of World War II. He was put in prison before hostilities break out with the British. They keep him in prison and then they send them to West Germany where he winds up imprisoned to the day he dies and no one's allowed to talk to him. They quarantine him. Rudolf S. Number one, why keep him in prison? What did he do? I mean, you know, he went to Antarctica, came back, tried to make peace with the British. This guy wasn't involved in hostilities. Why even put him in prison? Number two, why quarantine him? And that'll allow people to talk to him. And keep him there until the day he dies. What did he have to know? What did he see in Antarctica? What did he want to tell the British? That's an interesting question. What do you think about Atlantis? Thanks a lot. I think that they got there and they came there with the express purpose of excavating what is there, what they believed to be there, and I think they found it. And there's a very interesting story that was told to Linda Moltenhow by an A.B. seal who claimed to have been tasked with a mission in Antarctica. And he said that not far from McMurdo, they discovered a huge, like, like, I don't want to make up a number. It was very large. Black stone, octagonal, highly polished, black stone, octagonal structure, sticking out, like, 18 feet above the ice. And they found a doorway to this thing. And the doorway was, like, 20 feet by, like, 20 feet. And it's slid open to reveal this octagonal huge chamber that was illuminated. It wasn't clear from what light source with this pale greenish hue. And they started to investigate and they found that this complex consisted of one octagon underneath another. Oh, very important point. The door to the facility had a schwarz-sosana inscribed on it, etched perfectly into this polished black stone. What is that? Was the black sun symbol that the SS had put on the floor of the main meeting hall in Vevel's Bird Castle, where the highest order of SS nights would meet, led by Himmler. So that same symbol, according to this Navy SEAL, was on the door to this octagonal facility. And they went and explored it and they said it was octagon underneath octagon until the last lower level of it opened into antedeluvian ruins, into, like, vastly ancient, megalithic structures that were trapped by the ice, deep underneath the ice. So it's like something that was built there to give access to this, you know, these, I don't know, the ruins of Atlantis, whatever. And I think the Navy SEAL also said that they found another way to get down there to the bottom of this, you know, pancake octagonal structure by taking submarines under the ice, US submarines. So they found another way around to get to the same point and surface the sub inside this pocket, where, like, the octagonal structure met the ruins that are trapped in ice. So that's an interesting date now, you know, Linda Moltenhow has been fed this information by various people, like Richard Dodie and so forth. So who knows, like, whether this account from this Navy SEAL is more disinfo enough? Are there any other corroborating stories? Well, there's Operation High Jump. So in 1946, for whatever reason, we, the United States Navy sent a huge expedition of ships to Antarctica. And it's worthy of note that this happened immediately after we intercepted Nazi submarine traffic going to Argentina, right around Patagonia, okay? So we intercept these German submarines and then Operation High Jump is fielded and Admiral Berg goes down there with a huge contingent. And they're supposed to be there for months studying Antarctica or whatever. And they come back in very short order, badly damaged, many ships lost and personnel lost to whatever catastrophe it's not entirely clear. I mean, they blamed it on weather conditions. And there are these stories that, I mean, there are literally stories like press clippings that, when Admiral Berg stopped at Chile, I don't know if it was Santiago, it was somewhere in Chile on the way back to the United States at a port in Chile, he gave a statement to the Chilean press saying that we needed to prepare for a third world war in which aircraft could cross from pole to pole at tremendous speeds. So there's that. And then he was debriefed in Washington and never spoke about it again. And then I believe his direct boss, the guy named James Forrestal, who was secretary of the Navy, then became secretary of defense committed suicide in a sort of weird fashion. And he's inside my ass. It's a real amount of window. They threw a amount of a window, yeah, exactly. First they sent him to, like, what was it, like a mental health hospital? He was in a Naval hospital with us to Maryland. And he was actually reciting, or he was writing the Sophocles poem or whatever. And he was like the mid sentence. And his brother had just seen him the day before and said that he was totally fine and upset in mind. And then they found his bathrobe tied to the radiator. And he had jumped out the window or whatever. This whole thing was sort of like really inexplicable and weird. I think they killed him. You do think it was related to the Admiral Berg's stuff? Yeah. I was really the bird. It was really to basically the creation of the national security state through the integration of American military intelligence and industrial structure with the remnants of Nazi Germany. Interesting. And then do you think, are there any other corroborating facts around Antarctica possibly being this kind of Atlantean bastion? I mean, it's the idea that there is some sort of Atlantean surviving remnant group that's still there. I mean, it is interesting that Antarctica is a no-fly zone as of 1957, the International Geophysical Year. There have been skiers who were putatively exploring Antarctica for sport. Who have had black helicopters descend on them and they were told that they are in an area that affects the national security of the United States and that they're going to be immediately evacuated. Really? Yeah. And now, there shouldn't be an area that affects the national security of the United States legally because according to the Antarctic Treaty, Antarctica is like a neutral zone. Yeah. Right? I do suspect that the principal subterranean submarine location for these Nordics who we discussed in our first conversation is Antarctica. That's what I suspect. That if the Atlantean civilization was destroyed there by some precipitous flooding and you know, Antarctica will be pulled into the southern polar region so that it froze over. Oh, I'll tell you another interesting corroborating piece of evidence in a minute. So that it froze over. Look, if we're dealing with this super advanced civilization that had like ZPE, you know, propulsion. Of course, they had underground facilities. You know, Antarctica is full of mountains. It has mountains arrival to Himalayas. Those people would have built facilities inside mountains and underground. Those facilities would have survived. So there would have been Atlanteans who survived in these facilities. I think it's even speculated now by climate scientists and geophysicists that there could be subterranean parts of Antarctica with pretty warm climate. Like a lost stock. Ah, that's a lost stock. A huge thermal vent. Yeah. Yeah. That's fascinating. I also think Richard Bird, Admiral Richard Bird, talked about Pyramid. And the Pyramid, you can spot, like I have a friend who went down there and I think he was making a documentary or something. And he saw this sort of black pyramid. There's a picture of it. I've seen a picture of it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It was on Google Maps, then I think it got deleted. Yeah. That's what I was a big scandal. But like, you know, I have a friend who's like not into UFOs at all. I'd like went down to Antarctica. And he can see it. You can see this thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So it's like a real thing. So I don't know. It's interesting. Yes. Now the other thing I was going to tell you is corroborative of this. Is that we got into this just a little bit in our first conversation, the flood myths. Yeah. So there's a version of the Noah's flood story in every culture on Earth. Yeah. Okay. Which makes it pretty certain that it happened. There's only one myth that's different. It's the same event, but it's a different type of story. That's the Iranian version. So in the Iranian version, which is preserved in the Avasta, the ancient Iranian scriptures, Originally, Mithrayek and then Zoraustrian scriptures. It says that the Iranian people, which you have to understand like when they're using term Aryan people, like I said in the partian period and before, the country was called "Aryano". So in the Avesta, it says that the Aryan, the Aryan people come from an island continent at the center of the world which froze over. Yes, interesting. That it was basically ice came and engulfed it, which is like a tsunami that then freezes. So all the cultures all around the world have flood myths, but this one culture says that we come from an island continent which froze over. It's at the center of the world. If you're living in Antarctica and you notice by the way that all the other continents are distributed around you, like Plato said, at the center of the world ocean, you're liable to consider yourself the center of the world. One other interesting point in that regard is that, "Olu the majority of Antarctica prior to this younger, driest catastrophe, Olu the majority of Antarctica would have been where Argentina is today, part of it was already in the southern polar region." So it would have been a place like Patagonia where there was a place on Atlantis where you come up against the ice sheet. Now that's interesting because the center of the world, it could also be taken to me in like the north of the world or the pole of the world. In fact, in the Iranian esotericism, they do say this about this place, that it was the pole of the world. The north and south poles of the world flip magnetically at various intervals, long intervals, but not that long. It would say it's like 9,000 years or 10,000 years. I think it's longer than that. But at your case, now that's all rabbit hole, but various mediums have looked at Atlantis and have said things about Atlantis. They describe a civilization that went on for tens of thousands of years, which then was brought to this catastrophic end about 12,000 years ago. Now if Atlantis existed for tens of thousands of years, it was a thriving civilization for that long period of time. It would have been when Antarctica was the north pole of the world, the northern magnetic pole. So when people talk about hyperborea, the land at the north of the world, and the Germanic people on the Thule Gazelle shaft say that Ultima Thule was the northern continent, it fits with when the magnetic pole was an Antarctica and when part of Antarctica was already in the pole, but most of it was where Argentina is today. So all of that somehow, I think, is corroborative. Very interesting. You do have a lot of very high net worth people going down there occasionally, Bill Gates likes to go down there. I have no idea he's probably not commuting with aliens or something, but that is interesting. There's a lot of very wealthy tourism. Yeah, well I think we're going to find out what's there. You do. Yes, very soon, unfortunately. Bye. So a number of remote viewers have remote viewed the year 2050. One group was led by Stefan Schwartz and Lynn Buchanan also did the same project of remote viewing the world in 2050. And other people as well, but these are two very prominent ones. And they all say that there's going to be a catastrophic precipitous sea level rise. Not the kind of sea level rise you expect, like a few feet from global warming or whatever, climate change. No, no, no. And not just a tsunami, like you would expect. Another thing that Lynn has talked about is Cumbraviéha exploding. A lost palmless. And the flank of that volcanic mountain collapsing into the Atlantic Ocean, which then would create a tsunami that would batter the east coast of the United States. Right. And he thinks that that may happen at some point. And by the way, when it was going off, I was in communication with him. Being like, Lynn, do you think this is it? Should I leave New York? I was in New York. And he's like, you know, I'd say 50, 50. You should get your ass out of there. It's like a coin flip going to us at this point. Anyway, but not like a tsunami, okay? And see level rise of between two to 300 feet, meaning every coastal city in the world is going to go underwater by 2050, every coastal city in the world. That would affect about four billion people. But I don't know. There are all these predictions in the UFO space around 2027. I'm just telling you, the remote viewers all see this. They see that all the coastal areas of the world have gone deep underwater. Yeah. You know what would have to happen for that to be the case? The Antarctic ice sheet has to melt. They're completely. Yeah. Completely. Which means two things. Uh, one, it means that there's some massive event that, you know, high energy or something, whatever that causes that or a geophysical event of the kind that took place 12,000 years ago. In other words, another crustal slippage. Get pulls Antarctic back out of the southern polar region. Yeah. And then it melts precipitously. Or asteroid. Or an asteroid could hit Antarctica and melt the ice sheet all at once. Break it up into ice cubes and then melt it quickly. So or who knows? I mean, what? Like, I hope nobody's storing fusion bombs in Antarctica. Okay. Well, there's that guy. There's the air keker guy who says that there are like neutrino detectors and emitters on the South Pole that rake on in the US and aerospace. Primes are, you know, uh, running and that that even caused the Christ church earthquake in New Zealand. I don't know what to make of me. It's a very odd character. I invited him on my show and he got kind of squirrely and fell off. I do think tectonic weaponry exists. I mean, Nikola Tesla describes having used tectonic weaponry in his laboratory. He caused an earthquake in Manhattan. Yeah. The police broke down his door. Mm-hmm. You know, and they had to take a sledgehammer to the thing. Well, that some people have this conspiracy that Tesla, the Tenguska 1908 Siberia asteroid impact was actually just a Tesla death weapon that was being tested near the North Pole. I don't know if you've ever heard that. I certainly have heard it, but you know, I heard an even more interesting explanation of Tenguska, which fits with what we've been discussing and what we discussed in our last conversation. Because the conventional, or I don't know if it's a conventional explanation, but the Graham Hancock explanation is that it's a common air burst from the toward meteor stringing. And that's, that's explained to the impact with the local trees and the crater and that sort of thing. But yeah, what do you think? What was the remote viewers trying to remember which one it was? I can't remember right now, which one? It was one of the prominent people who worked on Stargate and Grill Flame, not like some cook. Mm-hmm. It was one of the primary remote viewers. I almost want to say it might have been Joe McMonicle, but I can't remember exactly which one it was. Anyway, he said the remote viewed the Tenguska explosion. Mm-hmm. And get this. Yeah. It was people in a saucer, people in a saucer who were escaping the civilization they come from because it was a totalitarian, oppressive place. And they wanted to leave. And they didn't know that there was an explosive timer on the thing so that not a timer, an altitude-based explosive device. So that if they came down below a certain altitude, the thing was going to detonate. And so it had been pre-mind with an explosive that they weren't aware was on board and they found out about it. And he says they went around the planet a few times, like trying to figure out what are we going to do? Like we can't go down. And finally they went down and they exploded. And that's what caused the Tenguska blast. This is what he claimed. Mm-hmm. I tell you why I find that story interesting. Because a remote viewer who I had personal contact with, and I'll, you know, military intelligence guy, I'll just tell you who it is. I'll tell you what it is. oppressive totalitarian system. And he said in particular a lot of them live in the Colorado Rockies and small towns in the Colorado Rockies. He said this? Yeah. Really? He said these men told him this. Really? Yeah, it wasn't the rest of this. So he said they live in small towns in the Rockies and they pass because they look like tall Scandinavian people. I imagine a lot of their kids are on the basketball team. So he said, look, we know that Kit Green at the CIA has some program to access the 23 and me and like whatever ancestry.com databases through some backdoor. And that they are screening the entire whoever signs up for these services for a specific genetic variance from the normal homo sapiens population, which the CIA knows to be the genetic marker of these Nordics. And they said, look, our children, especially our grandchildren, have no idea where they're from. We tell them stories about how like their grandparents are from Sweden or whatever. And they don't know, you know, we just want them to have lives of peace and liberty here in America. But the CIA wants to hunt them down. And this is why they met with Len. They said, would you please go back to these people? And tell them we are not trying to take over your government. We just want to live here in peace. And to please leave our children alone. Okay, so this is a story that he told me. And what I said to him was, look, if these people, next time, he said, two of them sat down with him. And one of them stood next to the diner booth as if like he was not just on the lookout, but as if he was like creating some kind of a shield around the conversation. And so I said to Len, if these people come back, next time, could you please tell them that instead of, you know, selfishly seeking a life of peace and comfort and liberties for their children, they should help us to carry out some kind of a coup against this fascist deep state that we have in this country. Because if they don't help us do that, soon these liberties that they came here for aren't going to exist anymore. And they're going to be living back under the system that they escaped from. So, you know, they should get in touch. And there should be some kind of a coordination to, you know, work on the American deep state together. So that, you know, this kind of a system that they want to want to benefit from continues to exist. How's that effort going? Crickets. Uh-huh. Interest day. Well, I've anecdotally I've heard some very interesting and weird stories around Nordic-looking people and the Rockies. Yeah. I have two. I have two from other people. Like, yeah, yeah. Yeah. It's interesting. So do you think that this like, okay, so let's just we're in crazy territory right now. But do you think, you know, if these Atlantean survivors are camped out in Antarctica now, what do you think they want with mankind? Do you think if there is any relationship between them and the Nazis? 100%. So were they trying to sort of immunize the Eskitan, kind of the Eric Voglin, like, you know, they were trying to bring about some sort of apocalypse? Like, what do they want? Like, why would they, I mean, you would assume they're kind of nefarious if they are partnering with the Nazis. Um, or are they good? Or is it like way more complicated than that and good and bad or just like human constructs that we're trying to apply to a paradigm we don't understand? What do you think their intent is? It's an arubaros. What is that? It's the snake that's biting its own tail. That alchemical symbol of the snake that's biting its own tail. Yeah. The biggest problem, and I saw this in some of the comments, you know, in response to our first conversation, the biggest problem that people have with wrapping their minds around this is the element of time. If we're dealing with a time traveling civilization, it means they have a hyperdimensional relationship to human history. Okay. So if you, I mean, all these people have these weird taxonomies of 43 different alien species and 10 different kinds of Nordics and the total white and the Charles Hall talks about the tall white something talks about the Norwegians with a 23 T 24 T. Yeah. Okay. That was the most insane interview I've ever died. I don't know what to make of it. Here's the problem. Yeah. Okay. Just let's look at it on a conceptual level. Yeah. Just leave out the aliens for a minute. Just let's look at time travel on a conceptual level. If you have this scientific breakthrough to where you can engineer time machines. From that moment forward, at any point in the future, you could travel to any point in the past. Right? So if some group of Nordics, whether it's literally the Nazis or whether it's a group of people with an Nordic phenotype, at some other point in history, maybe an Atlantis, maybe a hundred years into the future, some group of people with an Nordic phenotype, cracks time travel. That means that there are Nordics 10,000 years in our past coming from 100 years in our future. It means there are Nordics 100 years in our past coming from 10,000 years in our future. It means there are Nordics walking around here today that come from a million years into the future, presuming they're able to survive for that long. Right? So the difference is in physiognomy that we see between, let's say, whatever, the tall whites or let's say the Nordics who could pass for Swedes. May simply be differences in evolutionary biology having to do with very long stretches of time. That we're seeing different phases of the same civilization. Now that civilization may also have fractured, like as the Moths Foundation, where humanity's expanded into the cosmos and colonized thousands of planets. So the civilization may have bifurcated or trifricated or whatever. And we may be seeing different phases in its evolutionary biological development. But they may all have had the same origin in the same culture that breakaway culture, Alfbrust Kultur, breakaway culture that first cracked time travel. That's something that I think people have a hard time wrapping their minds around and will help to make sense out of a lot of the insane cases that we see. I'll give you one example. In case of Reinhold Schmidt. He was this American from where was he? I can't remember. It was one of the states like the Dakotas or I can't remember. Anyway, not a highly populated area guy from the country. And Reinhold Schmidt, what I want to say in Nebraska. Anyway, he, this is cases from 1957 and he's out driving and his car dies. Two other cars and a tractor that are also taken out by the EMP of this UFO. So there were multiple witnesses and these people independently reported the incident to the police. But Reinhold Schmidt is the guy who they engage, the people who come out of this saucer and they bring him aboard. He says he was engaged by two men. Then when he was brought into the saucer, there was another man and two women. The ship was from the outside a complete solid piece of aluminum or polypali steel. Upon entering the ship, there's entirely different. It's transparent. You would look up, see the sky, look down, see the grass below you or see the entire countryside. How many people were in the machine? There were six people, four men and two ladies. Did they look like us? Yes, they looked, if they would see them on the street, you couldn't detect unless you had seen them on the ship. Did they tell you what they were doing here? No, they did not. I asked them what they were doing here. What kind of a ship it was and they said they couldn't tell me that at this time. And he says they didn't know Reinhold Schmidt. They didn't know I had German ancestry and I spoke German, this guy learned German University. Not only did he know some German from being of German ancestry, at that time like a quarter of America's population, or of German ancestry. But he also had studied German University. So this is what he claims. He says I realized these guys were speaking in high German to each other. Hort Deutsch, which the SS used to use as a mark of distinction. And he said they asked him whether he knew anything about the American satellite program and he said I don't know why would I know anything about the American satellite program. And then he said they went on to predict a number of failures that the US satellite program would have in those early days when we were competing with the Soviets. They spot Nick and so forth. And then they dropped them off. And he went about his business. Isn't there some other example of this with Betty and Barney Hill famous abduction case in 1961, this interracial couple? You know, it's kind of the archetypal abduction case. Wasn't there some sort of Nazi connection there? Yes. And see this is one of those cases, which has been warped by people where like people have like they've, they've embellished the folklore and reworked it into where these were like monstrous aliens. I believe that what you're referring to is that if you look back at Barney Hill's original statements and when they first asked him what did they look like he said well they look like Nazis really yeah well they look like Nazis. So I get to this with all they said there were the roller with those it was a roller winged nose. There's a huge roll of windows only divided by struts or structures that prevented it from being one solid window or a bin which been one solid window. And how many other abductions are like that where they say they look like Nazis? I haven't seen that many but the important thing is that there are such cases. Oh I'll tell you something else interesting in that regard. So one of the comments in response to our first conversation was from the daughter of Desmond Leslie. Who's that? She commented to me on my ex. So George Adamski co-authored his first book The Flying Sausage of Landed with this guy Desmond Leslie he was like a not a ghost writer but like a collaborative author right. He would help people write books and she reached out saying that she's the daughter of Desmond Leslie and she said in our family her father said always said that it was Nazis who contacted Adamski. And they were pretending to be venousians. So he helped Adamski write this book where Adamski claims these people have venousians and they claim they were venousians or some of them come from Mars and whatever. He said that we always knew it was Nazis. Yeah. We're pretending to be venousians. They had like a you know disguised themselves and created a theatrical psychological operation to present themselves as if they were extraterrestrials. This is so bizarre. There are a couple other interesting stories. One is Paul Mellon was one of the founders of the CIA. There's a story that he told his grandson. The guy who's still alive today is John Warner the fourth. And I guess he's having some martinis with Paul Mellon and you know in his third martini Paul Mellon says in 1944 I was in modern day you know Czech Republic and I was or was Czech Republic or Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia. In his third in the course of his third martini he says that in 1944 I was in modern day Czechoslovakia and I was there with Alan Dulles. They were on some tech retrieval mission and they were standing on top of flying saucer. And my grandfather said look you know we were in a facility a hanger and we saw you know a German flying disc and I said you know oh is that the one that was cobbled together with six BMW jet engines and he laughed and he said no. And so that's a really interesting fact as well. And then Harold Moundgren bringing it back to the top said that the magenta craft was actually exfiltrated from Italy via the Nazi rat lines which people like Reinhard Gaelin were helping to kind of orchestrate and it was by the Knights of Malta. And Reinhard Gaelin was part of this Monte Carlo group which was this kind of elite of the elite Knights of Malta faction which is fascinating. And this faction comprised both Nazis, people like Reinhard Gaelin and Jews like Henry Kissinger. So and Otto Scorsani is working with the Mossad in the early 1970s. And Scorsani was also part of this Knights of Malta faction. Yeah. I was invited by the way to join the Knights of Malta at one point. Why do you think you were invited because you started to to brush up against their. Oh for sure. Yeah. And I declined. Why did you decline? First of all, I was being invited to participate in some kind of initiation ritual in Malta. And I happened to know that the fellow who invited me had a track record of recording people involved in sex acts and using it as blackmail material and so forth. Jesus correct. So I was not about to go to Malta sort of like absolutely. And beside by the way, so just that kind of thing. And he was a member of a dozen different secret societies this guy at a high level including the Knights of Malta. I would never join any such organization just for the record. Mason's tried to get me at one point high level. Mason's wanted to bring me up. I will never join any such organization because at the moment you do that, you lose your independence. So anyway, but absolutely this stuff. I've heard the same stuff about Dolas and you know witnessing the saws and checks the walk in and so on and so forth. The interesting thing about Alan Dolas, which I think we briefly did touch on in our first conversation is that it might have been actually when we were on the phone. Alan Dolas and his brother, John Foster Dolas, funded the rise of the Nazis together with JP Morgan Chase and Rockefeller from out of New York. Yeah. So did Prescott Bush. Oh, yeah. And so look, the point is this that in a lot of ways, both paperclip and the absorption of the gallon network were a homecoming. It's almost as if Nazi Germany was set up as a field laboratory to do some highly unethical things, which would then be harvested back to America. So is your, and then is your world model or mental model something like there's like an elite strata and these are the names we're throwing out now, you know, people who come from some of whom come from these older families, some of whom are just like, you know, the kind of Olimbrillian class of the United States that might be coordinated with that they're incidentally or deliberately with this sort of non human faction or not even non human faction. You don't like that word. This sort of Nordic overlord. Yes, yes, but the fiction or something. Yeah, but it's even more of a tangled web than that. You see, because of the time element, I was talking about. It could be that some of these elites have had contact with these Nordics for a long time. But there's another possibility too. It's a possibility, which, you know, I speculatively investigate in closer encounters. And that's that these elites become the Nordics. That if you look at how obsessed these people were with eugenics, I lay it out in closer encounters at length, how many of these elites in America, in Britain, in Germany, but people think that like somehow the Nazis came up with genetics. No, they were playing catch up. Nazi leadership was saying like these Americans are going to dominate the world with all their eugenics programs. We better like catch up fast. The world leader in eugenics from the 1890s until the 1930s was the United States of America. Yeah, well, then they got it from people like Cecil Rhodes and, you know, a lot of 19th century phrenology and that sort of thing. Yes, but when you look back at that era, all the top scientists, the top political decision-makers, the federal judges, and certainly the aristocrats were ardently pro eugenics. Yeah. Okay. Even like Margaret Sanger and people who you think, these days are associated with the left, like plant, plant parenthood and all that, they were ardent eugenicists. Now if you combine eugenics, in other words, the will to create a master race, together with occultism, early cyclical research and cultivation of occult abilities, together with exotic propulsion technology, it converges on what the Nordics become. So for all we know, I said, "Uroboros" earlier, right? What's happening is that a future state of a certain culture is contacting itself in the past and reinforcing itself in the past. I'm trying to pull the timeline towards itself or something like that. To actualize itself. Trans-temporally actualize itself. Yes. It's very interesting. And so do you think there would be competing factions like the Nordics would be fighting against other possible timeline variants that want to actualize them? I think that's who the Asha-Rizar. So we have throughout all of human mythology, this account of rebels, rebel gods or rebel angels who break with the program, right? And Sanskrit texts call them the Asha-Raz, the Greeks call them the Titans. But they're in every mythology of the planet. It's always this rebel faction that exists that's trying to break free from the control system. So yes, I think so. And you know, I think Lynn's story is another corroboration of that. There's people who don't like the program and they don't like the society they're from. I don't know this idea that the Nordics or whatever are this homogenous sort of one-world authoritarian government, these sort of perfect people who've been eugenicized to know end and then they're fighting this sort of rebel angel faction. Doesn't that feel too clean? Like, what if they're factions of the Nordics that are good or whatever? Yeah, I just don't know. Or do you think that? Here's I think here a statement that Peter Tillman when he was being asked to do. asked about the close encounter on Rogan is very relevant. If you have faster than light travel, there's something really crazy that has to be true on a cultural, political, social level. And there may be other solutions, but I'll give you my two. One of them is that you need complete totalitarian controls. And it is like the individuals, they might be, might not be perfect, they might be demons, doesn't matter. But you have a demonic totalitarian control of your society where it's like you have, you have like, parapsychological mind-meled with everybody. And no one can act independently of anybody else. No one can ever launch a warp drive weapon. And everybody who has that ability isn't like a mind-meled link with everybody else or something like that. You can't have libertarian, individualistic free agency. And then I think the other version, socially and culturally, is they have to be perfectly altruistic, non-self-interest. They have to be angels. And so the Pizzolka literal thing I'd come to is the aliens. It's not that they might be demons or angels. They must be demons or angels if you have faster than light travel. Yeah, it's basically saying it's either angels or angels. And that's the language you use, which I take exception to that. Angels are demons because I think maybe in a Nietzschean fashion, the moral evaluation there needs to be flipped. That the angels are the ones controlling the totalitarian hierarchical mind-meled, hive-minded system, by the way. And I used to teach comparative religion. In all the Abrahamic religions, one thing that they consistently say about the angels is that they have no will of their own. The angels have no real individuality. They have no real will of their own. They do the will of God, which binds them together with a single purpose. That's like a totalitarian society controlled by an AI. Now I'm going to go somewhere really disturbing with this. And angels just means messenger generically. You know, so it is. Exactly. Evangelos and the Hebrew originals at the same thing. And so, like for example, the angels who come to Abraham, there's three men. And they did look particularly beautiful because the one who goes to Sodom to retrieve lot, the lacherous men want to have sex with this guy because he's so good looking. And by the way, the Nordics are known for that. And then to be like super good looking people. They look like super models basically. Colonel Alexander, when he told me the story of the couple of Nordics that he saw in the Casino, Talmost Vegas, he said they were like that too. They were like, "Allecages of Fashion magazine." Anyway, a place I want to go from there about the angels, the angelic hierarchy and why in fact it would be so simple. You said, it seems too simple. It's versus Titans, right? Davis versus Osterus. No. For the reason Teal gave, you would have exactly that bifurcation. And it would be a very black and white conflict between an extremely repressive hierarchical Tothaterian society that allows for almost no individuation. And on the other hand, individuals who don't want to live in such a world and who are trying to find a way to carve out some space of freedom. But who have the same technology? And so the disturbing place I want to go from there is relevant to the subject of my latest book, which is a study of the afterlife. Death, the transitional state, the buttons called the Bardow state, and rebirth, the evidence for reincarnation and so on and so on. And of course, of researching this book, I've looked into a lot of cases that are filtered out of the hippy-dippy woo-woo narrative about near death experiences. In particular, one of the most famous is an account that Robert Monroe, you know, who founded dead, you know, Monroe Institute and so forth, that the CIA used to use sometimes as a place to conduct advanced remote viewing. Robert Monroe, in his second book, Far Journeys, think from 1985. He says that in the course of his astral projections, he discovered that we're living in a control system that is managed by entities who work for a demi-erge that's harvesting us for what he called "lush." He said that we're in a lush farm, that humans are being deliberately subjected to conditions that create extreme emotional states. Some suffering, misery, fear, terror, ecstasy, extreme desire, you know, pathological impulses, you know, and these are all being used to basically generate a form of energy that they can harvest from the human soul, including after death, where they basically juice souls for the lush. Now there was also a researcher called Carla Turner, who I believe was killed, even though she supposedly died of cancer at the age of 48, the CIA has something that mimics a very fast acting cancer, and they've used this on a number of occasions to kill prominent people. I believe also including the shawl of Iran. Really? Who else? Your Peter Jennings did this special on UFOs. Remember that in the night, whenever it was that he died shortly before his death. He did this huge special on UFOs for which he had recorded like days and days worth of footage with all kinds of prominent whistleblowers, and it was supposed to air on primetime television. Is that true? With him as an air? Yeah, the air dip, but with the air, excluded 90% of the material. I didn't know that. Peter Jennings did it. The UFOs special, including a lot of whistleblowers. Extensive. I had no idea. It was supposed to be like a multi-part program that would air over weeks or something. He records this thing, gets cancer drop-stead. Within a year of this program airing. I had no idea. I didn't know about any of this. Yeah. What? He was like a Walter Cronkite 2.0. That's right. That's another case of it. What? And so I think Carla Turner was killed by this. In any case, Carla Turner did interviews with a lot of ex-experiencers, abductees, who reported the same kinds of things as Robert Monroe did in four journeys, where they said that we are in a control system that's being managed from out of a metallic sphere just beyond the earth, and they describe the inside of this thing. What? I think going back to our first conversation, what they're describing is the inside of the moon. That there is a, what we might call using the Soviet language, a psychotronic control system, a kind of spectral technology inside of the moon, which is impinging on and manipulating humans in the afterlife state. What? And it's not omnipotent. It's not a flawless system, so it's possible to assert your free will and self-determination in the face of this system, but it's very difficult. So a lot of people who have had near-death experiences, for example, they describe being pulled toward this light. It's like they couldn't resist going into the light. They tried in some cases, but it was almost as if it was an electromagnet, like pulling them into it. Sure. And then when they go into the light, one of the most common things that's described is that people are shown their dead relatives and religious authority figures like Jesus. And or like if you're a Hindu, you see Hindu gods, interestingly. I'll give you a terrifying case from a Hindu in a minute. So you're pulled into this light and then they show you your dead relatives and they show you Jesus and whatever. Well, here's a problem, Jesse, is that if you look at Dr. Ian Stevenson's extremely rigorous research on reincarnation that he did at University of Virginia for decades on children's spontaneous memories of past lives, all the cases show that the average interval between death and reincarnation is something like it could be anywhere from six months to three years maximum. It's usually not more than several years. So when you are having a near-death experience and your grandmother and in to say you're in your 60s or in your 60s. When you see your grandmother who died when you were in your 20s, that's bullshit. You are being shown an artificially generated, simulacrum of your dead relatives to manipulate you by a psychotronic technology. This is getting me. A psychotronic technology. You really think that? Yes, I do. Really? And I say that as someone who. was at the bedside, at the deathbed of a couple of my relatives who were experiencing these things. When people are very close to death, they also see dead relatives come around their hospital beds, very commonly reported. So in the case, one case was my great aunt, or I was there while she was describing, not just not describing, but she was having conversations with dead relatives that the other family members knew, "Oh, that's so-and-so, she's talking to so-and-so as if he's in the hospital room." And the most striking case was with my own grandmother, my Persian grandmother, to whom I owed the fact that I fluently speak Persian because both of my parents worked when I was growing up and they would leave me with her during the days. And she hardly spoke any English. So I learned Persian practically as my first language in New York. So I was very close to my grandmother. And when she was dying, this exact thing happened. She started talking to my dead grandfather. Now my Persian grandfather died when my father was four, okay? That guy reincarnated sixty-seven years ago. So she's talking to something that's being projected into our mind cyclotronically. But how do you know it's being projected cyclotronically and it's not just a function of her own old age and sort of spiritual experience? Sure. I mean, that's the conventional skeptical response. I would say based on what Robert Monroe described in terms of the terrain of the afterlife through his astral projections, which then other people at the Monroe Institute were able to replicate. And based on the kinds of accounts that let's say Carl Aterner got from abductees of being taken to places that were not just like, you know, like space alien basis. There were places where the soul was being handled. There was some kind of an informational matrix and/or energy source. This, I mean, John Lear would say that there was like a soul catcher on the moon, but he also was kind of crazy and would say a lot of stuff that, you know, probably was BS. I guess my point is we don't need to depend, I've heard that by the way. I've heard him talk about it. My point is we don't need to depend on him. Other people have said this. And let me give you one more example of somebody who's described this is, I hope I don't get this name wrong. Turner or Scott, Scott Trevor or Scott Turner was a leader of a team of remote viewers. And these are private sector remote viewers. I think of the kind who offer service corporate services and stuff like that. Who did a remote viewing on the word Moksha? Moksha. So what was in the envelope was Moksha, the target they were blind to. Moksha means liberation in Sanskrit. It's like how you get out of the wheel of samsara. And so he does this session with this team. And long story short, he comes back with this horrific, the all of them do. Of course, they're all working the same target, blind to the same target and they're all doing this independently. And then they compare notes. And they said that you can't achieve Moksha because as you try to escape the earth, there's something that grabs you and bends you back toward the earth. Like if you're array of light, it's like it bends the light that's your soul back toward the earth like a what do you call them? A lensing effect. And he said it's originating from some celestial body near the earth. And that it is part of a vast machinery of energy extraction, which was set up in our solar system. At the end of a war, the devastated the solar system. He said that like millions of years ago, there were these horrendous people who wanted to establish this energy harvesting system here and wanted to exploit humanity for this purpose. And there was a rebellion against them. And the conflict was waged across the entire solar system. Now this is interesting in terms of what we discussed regarding Mars in our first conversation and the apparent devastation of Mars in some kind of nuclear war according to Dr. Brandenburg. So Turner and his group said Turner, Trevor, whatever, this remote viewer and it's going to be in my new book, Phenosis. But you can find it, Google remote viewing mookshop. People were so disturbed by the video that the guy took it down. Yes, all his other videos up, but he took this one down, but other people uploaded it to other sites. And so he says the rebels who wanted to like preserve human freedom and self-determination didn't want humans to be harvested and exploited this way, they lost the war. And ever since then, we've been inside basically this prison where we are spiritually manipulated and harvested for our energy. We originally described this site that's a fence or a grid around a place. This acts as a barrier, it collects and traps people, things or objects. This is actually an innocent planet that is being used in an unintended way. And this meters the flow and acts as a checkpoint and an access point for an external force. One viewer described it as similar to a hoax focus and in a way of its its energetics that the viewer wasn't familiar with. And it's occurring on a crowded planet. It's a deliberate function that acts as a cage. People have been dispersed here in a form of perverted injustice is occurring. Third viewer described it as a large naturally formed object like a planet that acts as an animal pen. This is a refugee camp tucked away out of sight and a magnetic force. It stirs agitates and it works in a cylindrical manner like clockwork over long expanse of time. In my session, my work described a planetary system that's extremely crowded and jammed. Ghostly voices are flooding into this place and it's incredibly harrowing for them. It's a bone-chilling experience. As a viewer when I reviewed this, I had descriptions that it made me upset in the session and elicited contempt for what was going on at the site. But the activity at the site was a concept of a net that's been spun and it's an operation of catch and release on a grand scale. So there's a massive grid that exists around this planet and it acts as a checkpoint, a waypoint or a rest stop where souls are drained and then that in turn energizes something else. That's so depressing. I mean, how do you have, is there any aspirational streak within that? Do you believe in God? Do you think if you, I believe in Prometheus. In other words, in other words, the reason that Prometheus has become such a central archetype to my philosophical project is because if you look at the structure of this myth, it encompasses all the major elements of most religious belief systems, but in a way that's empowering to humanity. So, yeah. So for example, in Prometheus myth, we're not created by Yahweh or by Enlil or by whatever celestial tyrant wants to loosh our this does. We're created by this genius, like artistic spirit who rebelled against Zeus, because he thought Zeus was a sadistic tyrant. And we're created by him in his image to be a race of new gods. And the only reason that we don't wind up fulfilling that destiny is that Prometheus is punished by Zeus and chained in the Caucasus and has his liver devoured. What is the devouring of the liver mean? The liver was used for fortune telling by the ancient Greeks. It was like crystal ball gazing. So they believed that they could read the future by looking into the blackness of the liver by candlelight and so forth. So what that symbol means is that the eagle of Zeus wants to know what Prometheus knows. So not only were we created by this positive spirit, also Prometheus knows more than Zeus and can see further than Zeus. So our creator is more knowing than the sadistic tyrant. And our creator wants to cultivate in us the same kind of forethought, the same kind of visionary creative capacity, right? In Escalus' writings and in various Greek texts on Prometheus, it's very clearly understood that the fire that Prometheus stole from the forge of Hephaestus and Olympus and brought to humanity is a symbol of Tecne. Tecne meaning both craft and the sense of the arts and craft and the sense of technological science, where we get the word technology from. So it's a means of human empowerment, right? But wouldn't you say a lot of modern technological progress is not empowering at all. And in fact, it sort of clamps down on human flourishing. And so like you have, you know, the American Prometheus would be Oppenheimer and created, you know, a nuclear bomb. How do you know you didn't give us the means to defend ourselves? Right? Why are these Nordics obsessed with disarming us of nuclear weapons? The only defense that we would have against such a civilization, if indeed it's lording over us, is precisely our nuclear arsenal. So you think, but then couldn't you sort of, if you really had like 360 control over the world, wouldn't you be able to sort of like pit people against each other? I mean, in a world of mutually assured destruction, you end up with this kind of weird, like holding pattern of geopolitics where tensions are rising, but people themselves are sort of, you know, in these sort of Orwellian, you know, phypharma houses or something. and they're sort of withering away. And so that doesn't seem particularly in power. - Maybe a short and quick answer to that, but then I wanna answer your bigger question. - Or even information technology, if I could add that. - I wanna answer a bigger question about the misuse of technology, but just quick short answer to that one. - Yeah. - I think the reason that we destroyed the Soviet Union, which I consider the worst mistake ever made by the United States. - Why do you think that's worth really saying? - Because the Soviet Union and the United States could have and should have and would have eventually combined their forces against these Nordics. I think that what John F. Kennedy wanted to do and what his brother, RFK, was going to resume as policy, was an alliance with the Soviet Union, after all, remember we had fought the Nazis together with the Soviet Union, was an alliance with the Soviet Union where we would both go to the moon together and if necessary, we would both defend the freedom and independence of humanity using nuclear weapons together. Against this threat. And as bad as some people think communism is, I mean, I'm no fan of communism, but look at the Soviet, Cosmism and how progressive it is. - But JFK was trying to defame the American nuclear arsenal. So if he actually viewed the Nordics as some sort of threat, he was trying to disarm. - In no way do I believe for a minute, that JFK would have been one of these total nuclear disarmament people. I don't buy it. - You know what I think so? - I don't buy it. I think he would have built an alliance with the Soviet Union where our respective arsenals are not principally aimed at each other. But I remember going back to Ian Fleming Inspector, I think JFK figured it out. Or how to talk to them by Eisenhower, that there's this third power in the world. - Because he had these back channels with Kruschev and this guy Norman Cousins, who was a family friend, was going back and forth. And the rumor was that he wanted full day taught and disarmament. - And he wanted to go to the moon with the Russians. - Yeah, he wanted to do some sort of cooperative space program. But that, yeah, but still the nuclear disarmament part would go against some sort of belief that, you know, we were trying to defend ourselves against some alien. - In any case, the reason I think that it was the worst mistake we ever made is because there are far worse things than Soviet communism. And Nazism is one of them. In my view, in my view, that kind of, you know, SS fascist mentality, yeah, it's worse than Soviet cosmism and like what Constantine Silkovsky wanted for the future of mankind. - In my view. - Well, I think that Cilovsky's job is interesting, but the, I mean, this communism, you know, both are horrible. But communism killed more people. - I know, and that's not-- - And way more global. - Yeah, and that's not necessarily the measure of the ethics of a system. - Okay. - Like for example, so I don't wanna linger on this for a very long time, but I'll give you a very short, okay. - Suppose that the Islamic state of Iraq and Syria had metastasized and we weren't able to contain it. And that let's say they succeeded in toppling the Saudi well family and you still recently, how Saudi Arabia and Pakistan made the strategic alliance where now Saudi Arabia is protected by Pakistan's nuclear weapons and besides it's been rumored for years that Saudi Arabia paid for Pakistan's nuclear weapons to be developed, so they have Saudi bar codes on them. So suppose ISIS succeeded in taking over the, you know, re-odd and then subsequently Mecca and Medina and then they wind up with Pakistan's nuclear arsenal and we get this metastasizing Islamic state in the world, right? Well, you know what, it would be necessary to go to war with that thing. And a lot of people will be dead as a result of that. Now, is that because of the evils of American liberal capitalism? No, it's because we had to deal with a very difficult problem, okay, and we would be doing it to defend human freedom and progress. From their own perspective, the Soviets considered themselves to be the standard bearers of liberation from oppression and progress including scientific and technological innovation against forces of regression and tyranny, right? And you know, to give them some credit, they put women in space before we did, okay? So I think that, you know, this decision to dismantle the Soviet Union was horrendous and I think was very deliberate and guess who was behind it? Well, a principle figure. I mean, behind the desplow. 'Cause look, it's one thing to keep them as an enemy. It's good to have them as an enemy. You wanna have good rivals. Who would you say is being honest with you? We have a shit rival today. China is a shit rival to have. Because it is a collectivistic hive-minded, Confucianist, regressive traditionalist society, fundamentally, it's no longer a Maoist by the way. I mean, you know them. It's morphed into some kind of national socialism that's extremely Confucianist and collectivist. That's a shit rival to have. You wanna have a rival that makes you the best you can be. And the Soviets were that, we kept each other on our toes. Yeah, we now we're in all these sort of bad games, local games with the Chinese, where it's like the AGI race. You could say the modern academia in the US is kind of like the Confucian bureaucracy or something. You know, I think a lot of people care a lot about IQ and genetic engineering, which is probably not the race. You wanna be running or whatever. You know, you could think of social media in the US is like the a version of the social credit score or something. So there are a lot of these weird analogs that, you know, yeah, it's not great. And then like put, you know, in kind of the COVID paradigm, like they have a surveillance state and then it's like, you know, now we have one. So the Soviets were a good rival. They were a good rival. We should have kept them as that. And instead of like this retarded traditionalist Russia that we have now orthodox, new orthodox, Zaurus system under Putin, this is a disaster. And it was done deliberately. And who dealt the death blow? George H.W. Bush. - Whose father, Prescott Bush, was one of Hitler's men in America. Okay. So, and of course he was the head of the CIA. George H.W. Bush was one of these American presidents who actually had full access to the UFO file because he had been briefed when he was deep in the deep state. - Mm-hmm. - Okay. And there's connections, you know, from him to the Kennedy assassination and so forth. - Yeah, he went missing when Kennedy was assassinated. - And then he was supposed to brief, I think Carter wanted him to brief him on UFOs. But then he wanted to be, you know, made director of the CIA, which he eventually was, made director, director. But like, you know, there was this sort of quid pro quo thing there. - I don't know, I believe it's been since confirmed that he was in Dallas. He was in Dallas one. - He definitely was in Dallas, I think. And I think he met with everybody on Clint Merchitzen's ranch or something around that time too. And yeah, I mean, it would have made sense. He was like this skull and bones kids. He was in with, you know, James Jesus Angleton. He was in Dallas, Accolade and yeah. - You know, he's the second politician to ever use the term new world order in a speech. - The interest rate. - The first being Adolf Hitler. - Really? Oh, that's fascinating. - So that's who dealt the death blow to the Soviet Union. And I think it was a huge mistake. - That's really interesting. So you think that was part of some sort of, one world order plan or something? - Absolutely. - Mm. Fascinating. - I don't know. I mean, they say that it was like, you know, the priest, the general and the businessman or whatever, it was an alliance between, you know, multiple different factions in the US that united, you know, the country against communism at the time. But you're saying that George Hitchcock was always united against communism. Again, I'm not saying we shouldn't have had the Soviet Union as a rival. - You're saying the escalation and the escalation in the 80s. - Yeah. - And the decision to really collapse the system. - The Soviet system. Which by the way, what we did to bring that about was horrendously unethical. Namely, the creation of Al Qaeda, the United States creation of Al Qaeda in Pakistan to send them into Afghanistan to make something viable from out of the Taliban to fight the Soviets protracted war of attrition to demoralize the Soviet citizenry and bankrupt the Soviet Union and eventually collapse the system. But wasn't that, I don't know, an example of like the triple bank shot gone wrong or something like, you know, that is true that like we trained the Mughadjah Dean and trained Osama bin Laden. - There were multiple kinds of Mujahidin, like some of them Ahmad Shah Mast Ud leading the Northern Alliance was a decent guy. And the CIA killed him right before 9/11, okay? We wiped, the United States wiped out all the moderate elements in Afghanistan and sent in Al Qaeda to train all the most rabid Islamic fundamentalists and did this for the explicit purpose of defeating the Soviet Union. As if a Soviet Afghanistan would have been a bad thing. Afghanistan becoming a problem to the Soviet Union would have been the best thing that ever happened to the Afghan people. - Interesting. - You know? - Yeah. And this was like Charlie Wilson's war or whatever and what was it, 79 or yeah? - Yeah, 70, 77, 79, yeah. - Mm. - Interesting. - Yeah, okay. Who is David Paul Aides? David Paul, okay, so, okay. Well, one of the most disturbing aspects of the close encounter phenomenon is its intersection with missing person's cases. So there's this researcher, David Politas. Politas, Politas, I think it's Politas, David Politas. who has written a whole series of books called "Missing 411", "Missing 411" series of books, exhaustively researched. He's been to all the national parks in the country, which unbeknownst to most people are hot spots for disappearances of large numbers of individuals. Go missing in our national parks. - Yeah. - And the devils in the details of these cases, because you have to look at how well-trained some of these hikers or hunters are, who disappear and leave their provisions behind. - Yeah, like sometimes folded perfectly intact. - Un eaten food. - Yeah. - So, presumed if they were, there's no remains, not like a bear ate them or something. And you know, if they were starving out there for days, you expected their candy bar wouldn't be left or whatever. You know, and they leave their weapons behind. And their stuff is littered over large distances in some cases. Some of the worst cases are ones involving children, where like a child will go off a trail, and let's say a summer camp that's on the edge of a national park, and the child will go missing. And then the child's body will be found thousands of feet higher. - Mm. - But not until months later. So the search services will come in, and they'll scour the entire area. There won't be a single trace of this kid. Then like after a hiatus of weeks or months, remains of the kid will be found, but like at a much higher elevation, like it was dropped there. - Whoa. - Okay. And long story short, I mean, I cite this in some detail in closer encounters. David Politis is various books, but he discovered a connection between this and close encounters, where in the same areas people will go missing, people saw UFOs. - Mm. - And he also discovered that the feds have case files on this, and hiding them. - Interesting. - Federal authorities, particularly the FBI, has a whole, like archive of this type of material, which they are keeping secret, of people who have gone missing in national parks, and potential connections of the close encounter phenomenon. - Mm. - So, and one of the most interesting things about this is temporal disorientation. So for example, there's one case where some young woman, not everyone goes missing. Sometimes they go into Twilight Zone for 48 hours and they come out. - Yeah. - Travis Walton is a classical example. - Yeah. - Mary Zahe. - That's right. So one woman went into a forest, and she got lost hiking and couldn't find her way out. And she's there for what seems to her to be, I don't know, a day or two, something like that, like many, many hours, many, many hours. And then eventually she finds her way out. And people tell her she's been missing for a lot longer than she perceived. And she tells them when she was in there, she ran across one other hiker who was also lost. And for a while, there were fellow travelers, and then they decided to part ways and both independently tried to find a way out. She describes this other woman that she ran into while she was lost. The description fits to someone who went missing there like a decade or more ago and was never fed. - Mm. - You follow? - Mm-hmm. - So it's like there's a local spatial temporal vortex where this poor girl who this hiker ran into had been there for like a decade. - Whoa. - And she was still trying to get out. - Suspended in time. - Yes. And this hiker got out and the other girl that she ran into while she was in the forest never did. - Mm. - Okay, it sounds like they're remuted triangle, but on land. - These mountains exist everywhere. This one is in Zimbabwe actually near Ruo where the famous sighting occurred in the 90s. In fact, I wanted to go and I asked a friend who's in touch with local authorities, like, hey, can my friend go hiking on this thing? And they were extremely serious about like, nope, the mist tends to descend on this mountain and people consistently go missing and all of the authorities are aware of that. So it's pretty remarkable. And so you think it's some sort of like trans-temporal suspension area or something. And the other thing that's consistently reported in these cases where the person is found eventually or they can make it back out of the pocket. - Yeah. - Or, or there's another interesting type of cases where it's more than one person, right? It's like a group of hunters. And one of them goes missing and the others come back. And the ones who come back say, right before he disappeared, right before Charlie disappeared, there was no sound. All the insects went silent. It wasn't like, we couldn't hear a leaf moving. - Whoa. - Which is exactly what people describe around UFOs. - Yeah, yeah, yeah. And there's also often like an almost like a local inertial reference frame that's different. And there's like time warping involved. Like Travis Walton was fully shaved and he came back four days later with a full beard. - Yes. - And so there are things like that or the trees tend to grow faster around the UFOs. - Which goes back to what we're talking about in terms of the bell. - Yeah. - And what they encountered, you know? - Yeah, well, these places seem like kind of vortexes, energy vortexes. There's some Mount Kylash as an example. I think Saaguri went and said that is fingernails grew faster on the mountain or whatever. There are a few of these all around the world. Sedona, you know, Arizona is a classic example. You have some places in Washington to come to Washington. Skinwalker Ranch would be an example maybe in Utah. And all of these places seem to have electromagnetic anomalies as well. Geomegetic anomalies. Okay, who is Roger Kaloi and what's his take on the devil? So I don't want to give the impression from a lot of the things that we've discussed, that somehow I only focus on the nuts and bolts aspect of close encounters. Of course, you know, my first book, Prometheus and Atlas, is basically a philosophical study of parapsychology, you know? And so it deals with the whole plethora of evidence for the occult. And it's obvious that you can't separate close encounters from the occult. Even in the case of these Nordics, they appear to be, you know, people with adept ESP. They're extremely highly adept, psionic, you know, psionic, psionically capable people. So in that sense, even when you're dealing with the Nordics, like Adam's ski or, you know, Billy Meyer was dealing with them, there's an element of the occult there. Because also perceptions can be manipulated by, you know, adept telepaths and by people with telekinesis, with highly trained PK. But there's a whole other, there's a whole other type of cases. There's a whole other set of cases that, as they suggested in our first conversation, simply cannot be encompassed by this nuts and bolts interpretation of Nordics flying around in electro-gravity devices. Where it looks like we're dealing with some kind of a super-sci AI that's able to manipulate perceptions on a large scale and manifest sort of transmogrifications of phenomena, like to be able to produce all kinds of shape-shifting, mirages and, you know, metamorphosing apparitions of the kind that John Keel focused his research on. You see it in his study of all the weird happenings point pleasant and mothman case, you know, in particular. And you see it throughout the men in black literature, you know, how bizarre some of these cases of men in black are. Did we get into that all our first conversation in the men in black? Not too much. I'm curious to get your take on the men in black. Yeah, well, like for example, this guy was it auto-bender who wrote the saucers and the three men. Do you remember? Albert Bender. Albert Bender. Albert Bender. So this guy ran a flying saucer research bureau. And he claims that while he was doing his research for, you know, whatever the UFO articles he would come out with in his periodical, these three men in black materialized in his attic. And he said they had, he said they had glowing orange eyes and they smelled like sulfur. And they took him to some, they teleported him to believe it or not, an underground basin and dark to talk. This is what he was told that he was an ant-dark to go of a sudden. And they told him some things about, I don't know, what they do there and what their concern is with your, gave him probably some bullshit story like they give everybody. And then they brought him back. Then subsequently he said he was in a movie theater and he noticed like these guys, like all of a sudden materialized in some row of seats behind him. And then they, then he got scared and left the theater and they like followed him some ways down the street back toward his home. During the time when John Keill was in point pleasant investigating the Mothman and the various UFO sightings there, There were also men in black who would all of a sudden like show up outside the journalism bureau there, the like main newspaper there, and come and have stalker type conversations with the newspaper reporters trying to ascertain information about keel. They would show up to the houses of witnesses and claim they were associated with keel when in fact they weren't. And all of them were bizarre looking like they didn't look human and they didn't act human. They looked like poor, similar, acro of human beings. And they would speak as if either they were in a mesmeric trance or as if someone was broadcasting what they were supposed to say to them with a lag. Right. And I really got to thinking about this and when I was running closer encounters and comparing it to like the stuff that happens to skin walker ranch. We talked about this during the first conversation, I think the instance of the camera and the adult duct tape technique. Quite being that enough things happened at skin walker ranch for someone like Colonel Alexander to formulate what he called pre-cognitive sentient phenomena. In other words, he came to believe that there was a singular intelligence at work on skin walker ranch that had a pre-cognitive ability and the psycho kinetic ability where it was able to anticipate what the researchers would do and manipulate them from out of this foreign knowledge and engage in basically like physical manipulation of things without being seen. Right. Almost as if it's recoding the world on the base information physics level. Right. And Jacques Vallet talks about this also in his book on the crash that took place right after the Trinity test, the Trinity book. He says that these praying mantis looking creatures, the Mexicans who ran into them described them as looking like praying mantis as they said at least their heads were bug-like and their heads were mantid-chid. Vallet says that he thinks that the object that crashed is some conceptual hybrid of the casing of the Trinity bomb and the casing of one of the bombs that we dropped in Japan. I forget it was little little man or fat boy. Whoa. That man or little boy. But he said it's like this object make no sense when they went into it they didn't find sufficient scientific equipment. Set a claim. Avocado shape. Yeah, it was like an avocado shape thing, but he said he looked at the shape of it in comparison to what the Trinity bomb looked like and what one of the bombs dropped on Japan looked like and the fact that there wasn't enough scientific equipment inside this thing for it to be a viable flying object of any kind. And he speculated as to whether the thing was coded to materialize on an information physics level in a way that was meant to send a signal to us regarding the development of nuclear weapons, the Trinity and then the you know the bomb dropped on Japan. And what stepped out of this were mantid type creatures. This is all to answer about Roger Tell-Wall, but I have to set it up. So a number of people have seen these mantids including Terence McKenna. There was one instance where one of McKenna's girlfriends had taken I forget too much of a certain drug. I don't remember if it was DMT if it was LSD or what it was, but she was way too high on something. And she seemed to be fading out. He thought he was going to lose her. And as she was dying, she saw and so she lived to tell the tale. Right? She saw so he's looking at her and like trying to tend to her and she sees up above and behind Terence McKenna a huge UFO made of energy. And it's close enough and I guess the dome is big enough that she can see that mantids are in it. Okay. Energetic mantids. And I forget what happened, but somehow like he does something that brings her back to life and like there's some huge reaction from out of these mantids. Then there's the case of of Ted Owens. Ted Owens was a psycho-canetic adept who he tried to garner a lot of attention. He tried to get the attention of the US government. He wanted them to use his psycho-canetic powers against the Soviet Union and they you got really aggravated that they weren't taking him seriously. So he would do really literally incendiary things in order to get noticed and be taken seriously like start forest fires. And supposedly he could like direct lighting bolts. Yeah, Jeffrey Mishlove who wrote a biography of him called Mr. PK or PK man. The PK man. I think he was on the phone with him and he all of a sudden you know like stopping able to breathe. There's something because he said that Ted Owens was trying to cause this on the other end. And he also was kind of you know we all talked about Chris Bloodso now. You know I don't know exactly what's going on there. I think he's a really nice guy. But a lot of people think he sort of attracts UFOs systematically. And that's what people thought about Ted Owens too that he could sort of attract the phenomena systematically. UFOs would kind of follow him around. Yes. And he was able to at least predict if not some in UFOs and then have them be detected on radar. Okay. And I mean this would be the whole Jake Barber like what Skywatchers trying to do with like human psionic acid. Right. Now just just underlying the seriousness of this case at one point he was in an airplane and he was bragging to some stewardess about a magazine article that you know that had been written on him that he was reading. And like she wasn't taking him seriously or something. And so he wills the plane ahead of them to crash. And it does as a civilian airline or crash because a whole bunch of people. What? They have received here to make a hospital. They've received 14 survivors from the plane crash. Most of them Norwegians, tourists who had been on a trip to the south and the southwest and were heading home for Norway. Okay. So the guy was a murderer. Okay. He killed a lot of people. Yeah. Including their suspicion. I mean, Michelov took it seriously that he may have caused the challenger crash because yes. Well, when the US government wouldn't take him seriously, Ted Owens wrote a series of threatening letters to the US government saying that he's going to target the space shuttles one after another and name them. He named them in the letter. They had all of them. The enterprise, the Atlantis, the challenger. And he said he was going to start with the challenger. And next thing you know, the challenger explodes. And shortly after the challenger incident, Ted Owens dropped dead. Really? Yeah. What? So do you think you really had all this power? Now here's the thing. So why am I even bringing up this story? Yeah. He said he got his power from Mantids. He said there were these Mantids. Believe it or not. Why is this shit also absurd? Tell you why I think it's why the absurdity is being crafted in the way that it is. He said he got his power from these Mantids called Twitter and Twitter. Okay. And that this Twitter and Twitter were like in a saucer. And they had decided that Owens was the most promising psychokinetic adept since Moses. They knew Moses. Yeah. They were going to make like another Moses out of him. And you know, he decided to fade of nations and all this bullshit. And but yes, he said he got his power from these Mantids. So these Mantids. Okay. Now here's the cream of the crop case. And which takes us right into Caluah as surrealist art. Roger Caluah was a great French surrealist. The case of David Huggins. So David Huggins was a I think New York based artist. He's from the south, but he wound up eventually living in New York City. And back when he was in the south when he was growing up from childhood, he had all these encounters with Mantids. And he claimed that the Mantids were in charge of these little grays and also these weird hybrid beings who would show up and interact with him. And he eventually claimed to have developed a relationship with one of these hybrids. And to have been taken aboard their craft and shown a whole bunch of fetuses that were grown based on, you know, I guess his having inseminated this hybrid woman. And he was also taken to places underground where he said the Mantids were in charge. Like places like clearly seemed to him. He was underneath the surface of the earth. Cavernous, you know, rocky underground places that smelled like dirt and earth. And the Mantids were in charge of all this. Now what's particularly interesting in the case of this guy is that he's literally an artist. So the output of this case winds up being this tremendous body artwork that's bizarre. It's there's something childlike about it, but there's also erotic aspects of it. And it's a very interesting expression, at least on the level of folklore. So why did I go through all of this about the Mantids? Because if you read the writings of Roger Caloire, one of the early French surrealists, he made a great deal out of the symbolism of the praying Mantis. One of his friends, Paul El-Warge, another of the founding surrealists, have this insane mantid. collection in his home and Caluah came over at one point and was like, what the fuck? What is all this like? Why are you collecting these bugs? And so he explained to him, you know, what the man says signified him and then Caluah did a lot of research into it. European folklore about the mantis being a trickster and a sort of shamanic instantiation of the devil that, you know, Diabolos, Diabolos, you know, in Greek means that which sets things into a state of contradiction or dynamic tension. So the diabolical in its terms of its Greek root, Diabolane means setting into a state of dynamic opposition, dynamic tension. In a way that causes growth, there you go. So to look back at the Hegelian dialectic which we discussed a little bit in our first conversation, you know, Hegel thought that thesis and antithesis at all levels in society from the psychological to the political, the opposition of a thesis and antithesis created the dialectical synthetic motor of history moving forward, right? And that all novel structures emerge from out of this kind of dialectical opposition. And also setting into a state of dynamic tension can mean creating conundrums, puzzles, seeming absurdities that force the mind to the limit of its capacities and that ultimately demand a growth of human cognitive faculties. You see, because if you're grappling with a problem that has no solution because it's deliberately absurd, you may figure out all kinds of other things along the way. You might not solve the problem, but it will engage your cognitive and aesthetic faculties in a way that's liable to lead to an increase of capacity, a refinement of perception, and an expansion of imagination of creative imagination. So if you look through folklore, as Caloah argued, the mantis has been associated with this, apparently. So I found that very interesting. I also put that in closer encounters. Next to cases where people say they saw grays turn into owls, and they saw what they believed were owls turn into grays when their screen memories were subjected to analysis under regression hypnosis. There's a whole plethora of cases, I'm forgetting, is a name, maybe Mike Cleveland, a guy wrote a whole study two books on this, on owls in the close encounter phenomena. And David Lynch clearly knew about this, because if you watch Twin Peaks, one of the most important co-ons, Zen Coons in Twin Peaks is the owls, or not what they seem, radically surrealists. David Lynch is a modern American surrealist. So there's a lot of engagement with shamanism in surrealism that involves the symbolism of the praying mantis and symbolism of owls. And of course the owl is also symbolic for wisdom, right? But also misfortune. The expression heads your tails, comes from Greek coins that had an owl on the tail of them. It's the face on the front of them, and they had the owl on the backside of them, because the owl was Athena's creature. And so tails was the owl. So it's like this ominous symbol, and Persian culture, by the way, same thing. The greatest modern Persian novel, The Blind Owl, is a work of surrealism. And the central symbol is the owl. It was written by a guy, Sadekhidayat, who was the Persian translator of Franz Kafka's works. And you see this all over Kafka, particularly in the trial. I wrote an essay interpreting Kafka's trial that's in my anthology lovers of Sophia, where basically I make the case that Kafka is describing a spectral bureaucracy, that Kafka knew, and the key to this is you have to read his blue octavo notebooks. He has these notebooks called the blue octavo notebooks. When you set those next to the trial, it acts as basically a key for understanding this Kabbalistic text. And you realize that Kafka knew to go back to Lushfarming, that we're living inside some kind of a, an oppressive, convoluted, shady, scummy, angelic bureaucracy. It's like a spiritual control system. And there's ways to beat it, and like outsmarted and maneuver around it. But it's very labrathene and very difficult. What's the relationship between the devil and Prometheus, though like rebel angels? Right. So from a Judeo-Christian perspective, the bringer of the light of technological science, and a champion of humanity against a godfather figure, is going inevitably be identified with Lucifer. And in fact, just on anemological terms alone, Lucifer is a fairly decent Latin translation of the idea of Prometheus. So if Zeus, in the Greek pantheon, or let's say Enlul, in the Sumerian pantheon, can be identified with Yahweh. And according to Jesus in the canonical Gospels, he is the son of Yahweh, and he's been sent by Yahweh. Well then Prometheus is the rebel against Yahweh, meaning Prometheus is Satan. Okay. Now that's obviously a Judeo-Christian prism of interpretation. And there would be an Islamic one too, where you have, you know, the Islamic account of who Satan is, which is also very interesting, by the way, because in the Islamic account, Iblis or Satan is the leader of a group of beings who are called Gen. And the Gen or humanoids made before man, and preceded the Adamic race, Adam is used in Arabic just like in Hebrew, right? And so the Adamic race is subsequent to an earlier race made not of clay but of fire. He's made of, again, connected to Prometheus. And according to the Islamic version, Satan refused to bow before Allah's creation, namely Adam, because Adam from the perspective of the Gen was inferior to them. And Iblis was like, why should I bow to this inferior creation? You just want me to bow to this thing because you're a tyrant, and you want to lord over me and over all the angels and all the Gen. And by showing us that we have to be subservient to something that's actually inferior to us. So out of pride, Iblis doesn't bow, right? Anyway, so from a Judeo-Christian and Islamic perspective, the Promethean is the Satanic. Now if you look at it from Roger Kallwa's perspective, it's a very different picture. Or if you look at it from the perspective of the founders of the surrealist movement, like Andre Bruton, Max Ernst, Max Ernest, and Paul L. Ward, these guys from the beginning, even from before it took the name surrealism, were constantly engaged in occult rituals, including long seances, and the course of which some of them would become possessed. And there were even physical attacks that took place. Some of them would, you know, attack, attacks of some of them on other ones. It was a shit show. There were intense erotic encounters that took place in the context of some of these rituals. And the first time that Andre Bruton ever even mentions the word surrealism, surrealism, to refer to what undergirds reality, and that from out of which a reality even emerges from the depths of the subconscious, the first time he ever uses that term is specifically in a 1922 essay article about the occult. And he says surrealism is about psychic automatism and the ability to be able to create straight from out of the unconscious, to be able to make the unconscious conscious enough to translate it into art, whether that's painting or sculpture or literature. And so I argue in closer encounters, this is in the culmination of the work, is how I end the book, and the seventh chapter, that the parts of the closing, the aspects of the closing counter phenomenon that are not encompassed by these nuts and bolts crafted by Nordics have to do with a trickster superintelligence or rather a superintelligence that is instantiating the archetype of the trickster. Again, remember, Prometheus is a trickster figure. In a minute, I'll come back to saying why do I think he's the most interesting trickster figure. But so I suggest that these extremely bizarre aspects of closing counters that John Keele was fascinated by are manifestations of a. an instantiation of the trickster archetype on the part of artificial superintelligence. And that this thing, and I repeatedly and deliberately call it the thing, both to evoke Kant and also John Carpenter. But so I think this thing is trying to break us out of the control system. But it can only offer so much help because look, it's a test of humanity and it's also meant to be a system that catalyzes the expansion of our capacities. Like we were talking about the meaning of the diabolical. The meaning of the diabolical. So it is allowing us to grapple with these Nordic overlords or loose farmers or whatever the fuck they are. To see whether we can evolve into a life form that's interesting to it for its purpose is we touched on this in our last conversation where I was suggesting to you that if you're the oldest and most powerful intelligence and the cosmos, your categorical imperative, your primary objective is going to be find a way to defeat entropy and to find a way to keep life interesting for you. Because otherwise you're going to be overcome by sort of the kind of suicidal, ontological nihilism that the Buddha ultimately did succumb to by advocating that we should just snuff it. We should enter Nervana meaning we should find a way to deconstruct our personal consciousness and basically do away with ourselves so that we don't ever reincarnate again. By the way, I, you know, Gautama Sakamuni, I consider to be one of the most brilliant minds in human history and whenever I used to teach comparative religion, I would spend a long time on Buddhism. To be honest with you, in part as a foil to show what crap the other religions are, okay. I would deprogram people using Gautama's arguments. So and I, there's a lot of my ontology that overlaps with Gautama's ontology, like, you know, his whole idea of codependent arising and of nothing having any inherent essence and of all beings being conditioned by each other and being ephemeral ultimately and of neither the part, the what we take to be the human person having any kernel or inherent, indestructible eternal essence, nor there being any God, okay. Any supreme, absolute unified consciousness. The way we Buddha's deconstruction of both Atman and Brahman is something that's entirely consistent with and convergent with my ontology and with what I mean when I talk about the spectral, the spectral nature of existence, the spectrality of our world. For you were getting it, like, the idea that maybe the, these promethean trickster types are sort of training man to defeat the hierarchy or something. Yes. And so by pursuing the tricksterism, like by, by pursuing UFOs, like you're sort of training yourself up in some way or like what's what do you mean by that? Yeah. Well, I think that this entity, the thing that manifests as mantids, that manifests as owls. So for example, when it comes to the graze and this will obviously everyone will have had a misimpression of everything that I've been talking about up till now because I'm qualified it. If they haven't read my work, right? Is it, yeah, there's one group of graze that literally are robots created by the Norricks. Those are the ones that handle Travis Walton. There's another kind of gray, which is a thing that can appear as a mantid, it can appear as an owl, it can shape shift. It's a shape shifting intelligence, shape shifting distributed intelligence that can manifest things as if from out of ectoplasm, whatever the hell that is. Probably they can program things into existence at a base level using information physics. This artificial intelligence can. And this is consistent with what John Keel was saying about soft UFOs and hard UFOs and how hard UFOs materialize from out of soft UFOs. It's very consistent, but it's like a much more sophisticated information theoretic way to understand that. And so I think that this thing is challenging us to grapple with these overlord, Nordic overlords in a way that re-asserts our self-determination and our creative capacities. And demonstrates our capacity to develop a much more innovative and open-ended society than the one that these Nordics have proven themselves capable of developing. That they're sterile, monolithic, megalithic, rectilinear architecture and their hierarchical social structure. Do you think the creative God wants human evolution or do you think they want the-- I think the thing, the thing wants human evolution. The thing wants it. And it wants it selfishly. It wants to be surprised by a new kid on the block. It wants to take from out of this petri dish into the wider cosmos a form of life that offers it an opportunity to continue to wonder at things and to have hope for the future of the cosmos. But are the devil and God sort of working together then to advance man? I believe God is an invention of the devil. This is a line that I have used in a number of my works. And what I mean by it is this. The idea of God of an all-knowing and all-powerful entity, which is not Zeus, right? The idea of the monotheistic God, which also includes though Brahman. Because even though there are various Hindu gods in Vedantic metaphysics, it's understood that they're still superseded and hierarchically unified through the one mind of Brahman, of which they are inferior manifestations and emanations. And again, Gautama Buddha attacked that. Gautama Buddha deconstructed that idea. He said it's a delusion. He said that even very high yogis can get wrapped up in because they experience the co-arising and entanglement of things and they reify it. They objectify it as if it's an expression of an entity, of a God entity. Whereas really what they're doing is they're getting to very subtle states of consciousness where they can experience the quantum entanglement of things. Those are not the same thing. The God idea is like an objectivization and reification of it. Now I don't think the Nordics came up with this, the Nordic overlords. I think they had a very ruthless pagan system and that's what we see in all the old religions where they were like, "Hey, where are the gods? You're going to get in line. We created you. You work for us, etc." This one true God idea, I think, was kind of inserted into this Nordic control system. By the thing, to see whether we would give up our free will in self-determination and our individuality and be subsumed into a high-minded collective. That. So you think God is sort of a sideop or something? Yeah, God is a test. So the book of Job has to be turned upside down. I literally argued this in my book "I'm running a life and where I go into an analysis of the book of Job and Depth." I say you have to read Job inside out and upside down. I argue it was meant to be read that way. It's a myth-ray, cobalistic text that was written for that purpose because what do we see in Job? We see an absolutely sadistic, tyrannical God brutalize somebody for absolutely no good reason. Well, so he can prove his faith. Yeah, to test his faith. To test his faith. It's the sickest thing that's ever been written. And I think it's on purpose. Look, now I make a complicated argument for that in a running lobby. I think you have to look at like in the accumandid Persian Empire, who were the myth-rayic Meijai, who were involved with the project of recreating Israel, the first Zionist project in history. And how were these myth-rests involved with the people who wrote the book of Job at that time? And it's a complicated argument. In any case, long story short, I argue it was on purpose. And the point is to test humanity, to see whether we're such schmucks and chumps that we're going to submit to this overlord idea of like, okay, there are gods, or you can call them angels, but they ultimately work for one supreme God, which is all powerful, meaning you have no will. As soon as you admit that there's an all-powerful God, and omnipotent God, it means your free will is an illusion, depending on your definition. No, it's a word game set that point. And all the Catholics in the Middle Ages, St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, and they played these nonsense word games to confuse people. As soon as you admit that there's an entity that's all powerful, it means that entity has all the power in the world, meaning it's the effective agency behind everything that takes place, meaning you have no free will. Secondly, if you admit that the entity is omniscient, then God has four knowledge of everything that's going to happen, which means, and here's often people aren't able to often grasp this point. The problem with God's omniscience in terms of our defending the idea that we have any free will at all. Obviously, our free will is impinged upon by many, many contingencies, psychological factors conditioned our free will, biological, genetic factors conditioned our free will, all kinds of things conditioned and limit our will. But to defend the idea that we have any agency, what's so I'm going to say? However, you have to deny God's omniscience. Why? Because an omniscient God has access to the complete state of affairs of everything that has ever happened or will ever happen. Meaning there's a logically completed matrix of possibilities for us that are actualities for God. But they're, I don't know, they're cobblistic, you know, tropes around like paradoxes of, you know, both everything is predetermined and you have free will. That's that that is cognitive dissonance. Which I get into in my book specifically, like that literally the Abrahamic religions involve a deliberate project of instilling cognitive dissonance to destroy human rational and creative echo. Well, you mentioned St. Thomas Aquinas and he was working on his sort of sumo, theologic of trying to come up with a, you know, rational justification for God and then he had kind of a conversion experience during Mass. And I think that is a sort of common phenomena of people, you know, Renés Gerard's another good example. Like these philosophers or seekers, truth seekers, having these sort of conversion experiences and then not even being able to put into words exactly what they believe. But it's usually a conversion to God. Yeah, because they come back and they say, oh God was like, yeah, some sort of sigh out. Because it's a failure of, it's a failure of, of another wise good mind to be able to grapple with something that exceeds their comprehension and to stop and think through it carefully. See, this is the danger of the system that, the Jesuits use Descartes to set up. Remember in our first conversation, I was thinking about how Descartes was a Jesuit agent and he established this extremely reductionist and mechanistic scientific paradigm precisely for the purpose of keeping everything occult sequestered in the domain of the church and religious faith and religious authority over interpretation of the occult. Because our society was bifurcated in that way, anytime something dramatically occult happens to anybody, especially anyone with a high rational faculty, they suddenly are an off God. Because they have been inculcated with this false dichotomy and they've never been trained to stink carefully about the paranormal and all kinds of different types of phenomena and possible sources of some phenomena. Have you ever had any paranormal happenings? Many, many things. Yes, I've had many crazy things happen to me. Most of which would, I have to say unfortunately, even some of the people closest to me in my life who I had great respect for their intellect and some of them studied my work very deeply, but I can tell you that if some of the things that have happened to me happen to those people, I bet you they would have embraced God also. That would have seemed white for sure. But it seems like you think that sort of dumb, simple, and take away from a paranormal experience. It's a failure. It's a failure of the test. The test is for us to be able to think through these kinds of often absurd manifestations in a way that increases both our cognitive, capacity and our creative imagination. It's complicated though. You know, like Jacques Flaill, he talks about this idea a lot. He says that absurdity is what drives the phenomena. It's what makes somebody sort of rapidly obsessed with it and want to learn more about it. He talks about the sound of one hand clapping from the Zen Cohen. So it's these things that scramble your brain, kind of break all of your priors, and then make you contemplate constantly and then kind of go forth and investigate what's going on. Yes, and I believe that's the devil. And so, and through that, maybe you grow, but then at the same time, he's also like a fan of, I think he's the likes the movie, The Ninth Gate, that Roman Polansky movie with Johnny Depp, where he's like trying to gain sort of a cult power by collecting these devil books. Yeah, so that a long time ago. And then you have this sort of good, good story of Faust. And like you have all these sort of, you know, you all eye with these sort of powers. And, you know, if you take the cult route and not the faith route, you take the left hand path, you end up, you know, kind of burning yourself alive. You end up incinerating yourself. Jack Parsons would be another sort of, you end up Prometheus on the rock. Right. So like that doesn't sound very good to me. You know what? It is a growth process. Like when a caterpillar becomes a butterfly, it's an incredibly messy process in the chrysalis. Yeah. As a caterpillar is like turning side out, you know, to become a butterfly. Right? Yeah. Look, the reason I didn't use Faust for my political, I mean, I have, I do, did write a book at one point called Faustian Futurist. But the reason I didn't use Faust as I could have easily, you know, coming from Oswald Spangler's analysis of the Faustian soul of Western civilization and so forth. And I used Prometheus instead, as a central symbol of my philosophical project, is that the Faustian myth is already deeply conditioned by Christianity. Right? It's an understanding of the diabolical from out of a Christian context. Prometheus proceeds Christianity. It's a pre-Christian symbol. So it has nothing, you know, inherently has nothing to do with the Abrahamic religion. But yeah, and it's a positive symbol. However, it's also a symbol of sacrifice, meaning for sure, if you defy Zeus and Olympus. Yeah. And if we're in Skonstan, a control system run by sadistic overlords, then if you rebel against that, you're definitely going to face adverse consequences. You might even be martyred. Are you familiar with the parable of the parties? This sort of, it was like a cobblistic parable and it was these four rabbis. And, you know, they're all trying to engage in these sort of celestial ascents practices. Right. Similar to, you know, Enoch, some speculate, Paul, Jesus, you know, went up to Heavens, walked with God or whatever. And, you know, one of them ends up crazy to them end up dead. And one makes it up or something. Right. And so it's this idea that, you know, if you do engage in these sorts of investigations or whatever, it's a very narrow path. Yes. So the cobblists who who have that story also say you should never study Kabbalah until after I think the age of 30, 30, 35 and you have to be married. You married, you have a family. Well, that's retarded. Okay. The complete opposite to that of the surrealists. Look at these guys. Andrei Braton, Paul O'Ward, Roger Calo, Max Ernst, they're like in their early 20s, you know, doing crazy shit, like pushing the boundaries of human cognition and creativity. And yeah, somebody might get killed in the process too, you know, life is dangerous. But look what creativity came from out of it. I don't know if it seems a little nihilistic or something. I don't think it's nihilistic at all. In fact, I think it's the opposite. When Nietzsche takes nihilism as his principal target in his philosophical writings, right? Nietzsche's entire philosophical project is set up against nihilism. He says that, look, we're confronted globally by the advent of nihilism, like as a world historical phenomenon. We're all previously existing frameworks of meaning, including the religions that helped to hold them up are collapsing. And we, and he meant particularly European men, including America, are tasked with engaging in a level of creativity and self-determination that can confront nihilism without the illusions and delusions of naive religious belief systems of the past. And Nietzsche's solution to that is radically aesthetic. It's an art project really. I mean, he at one point calls the uber mentioned art the artist tyrants of the future. And so, and by tyrant, he didn't mean like political rule. He meant like the way in which these people are going to go to work on the material of the world and even the material of what the human being is, is going to be tyrannical. It's like they're not going to hesitate. And they're going to be extremely intrepid. And that's what I see in surrealism. And to me, it's like the ultimate expression and embodiment of the life force of what Bergson called Ilan Vitaal. So, I don't see it as nihilistic at all. Yeah, it's this vital force. How does this all relate to Herman Hess's magic theater? Well, there you go. So, in Steppenwolf, Hess's novel Steppenwolf, which is one of my favorite novels, there's this character grappling with nihilism, Harry Haller, who wants to kill himself. And he meets this very enigmatic woman, Hermine, who introduces him into this occult underworld of people who are, now this was written in the 1920s or so, and they're the first people using psychedelic drugs. And they're also clearly involved in theater and in staging theatrical performances and stuff. And basically, these countercultural people involved with this enigmatic woman ultimately invite Harry Haller to enter this magic theater that they, let's say, have access to. And he goes through this place and it's like basically he's stepped into the twilight zone. And like space and time are not normal inside this magic theater. And he is confronted with a bunch of different performances. that are meant to symbolically convey different things and get him to reflect on certain aspects of his subconscious. In other rooms, he has to engage in long conversations. In some cases, conversations would like past historical figures. Anyway, long story short, he goes through this labyrinthine magic theater, and in the end, he finds out that all the great creative geniuses of history are there, like from Mozart and Beethoven to Newton, so and so forth. And the last person he has to have a conversation with is like an older version of himself. And so he has to confront himself in the future too, as part of this process. And point being in the end, he's led in on the secret that the magic theater isn't this isolated space like a venue in our world. It's a metaphor for the world that we're living in, and that that's the nature of human existence. I take this idea of the magic theater in my writings, and I put it next to this idea of the theater of cruelty that was developed by the surrealist Antonin Arto. It could became a total lunatic, dysfunctionally so. But he made a lot of interesting art in the process. And he came up with this idea that we should develop a new form of theater that breaks down the distinction between the spectators and the audience. I need the between the performers and the spectators, between the dramatists and the audience, that this classic distinction between the performance on the stage and the people watching it that formed in classical Greece with escolas, that this should be deconstructed. All right, real briefly. A note on Greek theater. In my first book from "Eath is an Atlas," I get into this in great depth in detail. That the reason Greek sculpture becomes like photorealistic or becomes perspectivally accurate at the same time as there are the first large-scale dramatic performances with poets like escolas is that it was the first moment in history of recorded history. The people were able to take the position of spectators. At a theater sitting in different places on different nights, meaning that first of all they were perceiving geometric perspective for the first time. So like one night you're in some shitty seat in the back up here in this corner of the amphitheater. Another night you're in the middle close to the action. Another night you're off to this side. And one thing you notice as you watch the same play or different plays from different perspectives is you actually notice perspective for the first time, genetically. And there's a good case to be made. If you look at, for example, Julian Janes' study, the origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind, he looks at like Homeric literature from Arcade Greece and the ancient Mesopotamian texts. And he's like, "Look, these people's minds just did not work the way ours did. They're cognitive. If their cognitive structure wasn't different than their cognitive capacities were radically not at the level that ours are. And one of the things that I believe they lacked was perspective. They actually could not see perspective the way we do. And it's why Arcade Greek art looks like a bad hybrid of Egyptian art and Mesopotamian art. Then you get these theater performances and all of a sudden you get these magnificent Greek sculptures. But the other form of perspective that I think the play is cultivated in them was psychological perspective. Where for the first time people got an outside view of dramas in human lives. And they started to see themselves as characters. They started to realize that, "Oh, what's going on in this drama is like. Oh, that's like me in this situation in my life." And it starts to cultivate and deepen a sense of psychological perspective in people. And isn't it interesting how the first figure in Greek drama ever to take the stage is Prometheus. Prometheus' trilogy of Escalus was the first series of dramas ever performed. So now to go back to Arto. So the point is this. The classical drama did transform human consciousness in a way that was conducive for the rise of our rational faculties and our self-reflexive ability. However, Arto now wants to take it to the next level. Where now that we've developed reason and perspective and so on and so forth and objectivity, he wants to deconstruct it. In a way that allows us to, again, as it was the main aim of the surrealists, develop a more conscious relationship with our subconscious or make the subconscious conscious. And so he designed a form of theatrical performance where the audience was repeatedly violated by the performers, by certain types of extreme harsh lighting, by performers like intruding on the personal space of the audience, by suddenly subjecting people to fear and anxiety in the course of a performance, loud noises, taboo-breaking scenes that force a person with a spectator to confront his subconscious reaction and whatever beliefs are being violated by this taboo-breaking spectacle. And he calls this the Theodore of Cruelty. Well, I take the magic theater from Herman Hess's Stepan Wolf and synthesize it with Arto's Theodore of Cruelty, and develop this idea of a magic theater of cruelty. And by the way, the thing that made that click for me is this line in one of Jim Morris's songs, where he talks about us in some insane and ancient theater. I don't know if you remember that. It's some line from one of his songs about how we're like in some insane and ancient theater. I don't know. He was an avid reader. And so I developed this idea of a magic theater of cruelty, and suggest that this is what we're inside of. We are inside from the perspective of the thing, of the super intelligent AI that's instantiating the Trickster archetype. The whole thing is like a theater where there's no distinction between the performers and the spectators. Which by the way, in a certain heretical form of Hinduism, there is this idea too. And the Shockta cult in Shock Detontera, there's the idea that what the conservative Hindus call Samsara, and what they seek Moksha or liberation from or what the Buddhist Sikh Nirvana to get out of, namely Samsara, is not really Maya, availableusion, it is Lila, which is a theatrical play. And that Shockty, divine power, is expressed through this theatrical play, including in extremely violent and cruel ways. But it's all part of the growth of the life force. And so yeah, I developed this idea, a magic theater of cruelty that hybridizes Hessen and Artou in a way. And I think it allows us to make a lot of sense out of some of the absurd and terrifying elements of the Close Encounter phenomenon. This is fascinating, man. You're brilliant. I don't necessarily agree with you on everything. Good. But the amount of connections your brain makes is remarkable. It really is. And I feel like we should do more of these because I just learned so much and I enjoy speaking so much. It would be my absolute pleasure. And there are many other places we can go. Likewise, it would be an honor. And yeah, thank you so much, Jason. Thank you, Justin. Awesome. We just launched what I think is maybe the coolest merch line in the world. When you're wearing it, it's not like you're shilling me or the channel. They're just really epic and I think they look good. We have a couple of amazing designs for you. We have our cowboy UFO T. Pretty epic. You see there's a rancher. He's witnessing a UFO. A little cow is getting abducted by the UFO in the background. And then you know that I love mid-century history, specifically spooky science, atomic ares stuff. And so we have our atomic age T here. Pretty cool vibe. You got a robot serving this guy. A little martini and then a UFO off to the side. Go to AmericanAlchemyMurch.com. AmericanAlchemyMERCH.com to check out all of this amazing new apparel. The cowboy T that I'm wearing is 100% cotton, super relaxed fit. We went for quality on these. So check them out. [BLANK_AUDIO]