Go back

HTDE: The Breakfast Rule

23m 13s

HTDE: The Breakfast Rule

The show introduces the "breakfast rule" as a humorous yet practical tool to decide whether content is too offensive or gross to air. Host Peter Segal and technical director Lorna White explain how the rule functions by imagining how a listener would react if eating breakfast while hearing a joke. A segment about colonoscopies involving the phrase "salad coming out of your butt" is discussed as a borderline case—cut due to its vivid, potentially disturbing imagery that could offend or disgust. Lorna defends the decision, emphasizing that such visual content crosses the line of acceptability. The episode also delves into the real-world linguistic debate around the name "Autumn's," which is possessive and often considered a grammatical oddity. Editor Mary Norris confirms that while the name is not a mistake, its usage is confusing. The discussion then expands to a creative proposal: designing a new punctuation mark specifically for names like "Autumn's" to represent ownership. This idea is examined through the lens of the Unicode Consortium, which governs global character standards, but is acknowledged as highly unlikely due to lack of widespread demand. Ultimately, the segment combines humor, grammar, and wit, illustrating how everyday language choices can spark both serious and playful debates. The hosts conclude by reflecting on how punctuation and naming offer surprising creative possibilities beyond the standard alphabet.

Transcription

3673 Words, 19104 Characters

English
We want to share a little behind-the-scenes thing from our other jobs producing, wait wait don't tell me, it's something called the breakfast rule. Here to talk about this with us are host Peter Segal who you all know and Lorna White who is our technical director. Hi, this is very exciting to be on the air with Lorna. This rarely, no, this never happens. This never happens unless it's a mistake. Oh well there you go. This isn't a mistake but it could have been. It could turn into one. Yeah, it could turn into a mistake very quickly. Lorna, I should say is with us because when it comes to avoiding mistakes that might get the show canceled, Mike thinks of Lorna as the last line of defense. It's true. If yeah, you're comfortable with that description. I'm comfortable with being the mom of the show. I'm not comfortable with it because I don't know what it means. What is Lorna defending us from? If there's ever anything that is on the line and we're still uncertain about whether or not it's gonna offend the audience. Lorna is often one of the last, if not the last person to hear the show before it goes out. So if her radar goes off then we know we have to address it. So in that way she is the last line of defense. So we have we have this rule which is called the breakfast rule which is how we decide whether or not something is too gross to go in the air. If you were eating breakfast while listening to whatever story, how grossed out would you be? Recently there was a question on the show that made the show but there was a part I was editing this and there was a part that happened at the end that I found to be the funniest part but it also felt like I don't know if we can put this on the radio. So I'm first let's just take a couple minutes, we'll listen to what ran on the radio. This is the edited version. A writer was finally forced by his advancing age to get a colonoscopy and he discovered that they're actually wonderful, a secret known only to all the people who have gotten a colonoscopy. Why do you think we're smiling all the time? I'm sorry I've had two, I do not agree with this sentiment. I like the being knocked out and not being awake for it but have you prepped for colonoscopy? So most people who enjoy colonoscopy, it's all about the drugs, they give you the procedure, you're out, you wake up, you feel good, it's okay, you feel good for the rest of the day. This guy even loved the prep, that's when yes, that's when you have to drink gallons of horse laxative until your organ's liquefied. He says quote, "It was as liberating as a spa day." He called it quote, "my diarrhea vacation." Oh my god. And I will admit it is kind of fun to discover that your own body is a clown car. I had no idea I would have fit in there. You know people get on the New York Times for so many like political, yeah, this is this is the last trouble, really I'm not interested in their opinions on colonoscopies. Yeah, this guy is going to be so amazed if he ever takes an actual vacation. You mean I don't have to spend all day lying next to the toilet? This Wisconsin Dettles is heaven all night. That's fine. For me, the D word is always on the line. Yeah sure. Whenever that shows up, I'm never sure I want to hear it. But okay, so I'm going to play now what we cut and it'll just pick up at the very end of what you heard of and Wisconsin Dettles is heaven all night. Of course he got into trouble because my diarrhea vacation is the trademark for carnival cruises and they got mad. I had Noro virus once. Really? I would not describe it as Irvana. No, it was, it was my painful. But you did say that like a like a character in a film noir movie. It was fantastic. Oh, that was for the days. My salad day. We're salad little league came out of my box. So Lorna, would that have crossed your line? Yes, I think you would have based on how visual it is. It does paint a picture, yeah. Salad coming out of your bites. It's a little too visual. I will say that it was fun for me to listen to that because I remember the material that ended up in the air because it ended up in the air. But my mind just erases everything that happens during a taping usually. So I had no idea what was going to come next and what was it that would that finally ended up crossing the line, the breakfast rule. And it cracked me up that it was Nagin's long walk to that remarkable destination of salad coming out of one's butt. So that's what it was. Yeah, I can see that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I can see how that would be a problem especially if people were eating salad for breakfast. Salad coming out of your butt. I think I would have kept that if I read it. Really? I think so. Yeah. I think I would have kept it. What do you think? Don't you think I would have kept it? I would have questioned it. You would have kept it. I would have questioned it heavily. I like what we've done here. So what we did is because we because one time we remove someone talking about salad coming out of their butt. We have now successfully added 10 additional 10 additional times saying salad coming out of a butt. Right into the MPR archive. It's true. It'll be there. It'll be a library of Congress forever. Yeah. Okay. So in conclusion, this is the breakfast rule. That is too much. We just said it again. Sorry about that. And I'll just one more time salad coming out of your butt. You can use this in your own life, I think. Yeah. To decide if something belongs there or not. If you're dating someone and you can't you can't eat breakfast without being disgusted by the thought of them. I think it's time to break up. Oh, that a person would violate the breakfast rule. I know some people that could be talking about me. This is how to do everything I mean. And I Mike, if you have a question for us, you can send it to us at our email. Our email address is how to at NPR.org. Autumn's has a question. Autumn's what can we help you with? Yes. So I have a very unique name and I'm wondering how to, you know, kind of change it to make it proper to the situation. I guess. Okay. Yeah. I mean, I guess we just said your name. It's Autumn's. But I think for the purpose of this question, we should have you spell it for us. Yeah. So it's autumn like the season, a U T U M in within apostrophe S. The apostrophe is part of your name. It is. So my first name obviously is autumn and my middle name is hope. So it's autumn's hope. Oh, that's nice. That's yeah. Yeah. My dad, you know, decided to make it a super easy one, right? Wait. So what, what did teachers call you when you're in school? Yeah. I always go by autumn just because it's less confusing. But every time I got handed a report card or now anytime I do anything legal, people get very confused and they look at me and say, Oh, hang on. There's a mistake. And I have to go. No, no, no, no. The mistake was made at my birth certificate. If I were, do you know, so if I were writing about something that was yours, if I were talking about your car, say, would I write a U T U M in apostrophe S, apostrophe S car? That is exactly my question. That's exactly why I contacted you guys because I've always wanted to know that since it is inherently possessive, but of my middle name, how do I go about making it possessive of other things? Yeah. Do you have, do you have any siblings? I do. And all their names are normal. No, really? Like what? Yeah. Yeah, really. So my mom wanted to name me autumn rain. And my dad thought that that was too hippie. So he put the apostrophe S instead because that's left weird. I don't know. Okay. So autumn's tope was then that was the non hippie choice. Apparently, although it didn't work because I ended up a little too hippie for his taste too. What are your siblings names? Yeah, Clinton, Edward, and then Kimberly, Diane. I feel like those are just, those are the exact opposite of your name. Right. I don't know. There's a missed opera. You could have been Clinton's despair. You know, the perfect person for you. for this is Mary Norris. - Norris is spelled by the way, there's no apostrophe before the S. - Mary Norris has been a copy editor and proofreader with the New Yorker magazine for decades. - So Mary, we just got off the phone with someone named Autumn's. And that is spelled Autumn like the season apostrophe S. The apostrophe is part of the name. First of all, can we just get your response to this as a name? - Her name is a possessive? - Yes, that is correct. It is. - That seems like a mistake. (laughing) - That's what Autumn's would tell you, too, and she's had to tell everybody that it's not a mistake. - Oh my, it's interesting because the world of the web, and digital world reject apostrophes, every chance it gets. But it wouldn't make sense to spell it without the apostrophe either, would it? I think she should change her name. (laughing) - Okay. - Okay. - Well, let me ask you this. If she didn't change her name, just grammatically, if I wanted to talk about something that belonged to her, would I do Autumn apostrophe S? - Autumn's is? - Yeah. - Well, I think that would just make it worse, don't you? - It well, what would you do? - What I would do. I would draw the line at the double apostrophe S. - Okay. - I mean, you can drive yourself crazy with this stuff. - Can I ask you, Mary, so we're coming to you as our kind of ultimate authority on this, right? When you're in a similar situation as we are and when you don't have an answer, who do you turn to? - I turn to the person who was my boss at the New Yorker at the copy desk. Her name is Ann Goldstein, I turn to her. - Okay. - Can we conference her in? Could we bring her into this call and see? - I wouldn't know how to do that. - I could probably figure it out. (phone ringing) Hello, Ann. - Oh, hi. Okay. - Ann. Hi, Mary. (laughing) - All right, Ann, we have called you here with a specific purpose. Mary says you're the person above her that she calls when she has a grammar question. Is that right? - Yeah, I mean, I don't consider myself above her, but she was on again. (laughing) - Okay. - Office hierarchy, anyway. Well, yes, this office hierarchy, that's right. - Great. - Great. - Okay, and what do you think about that name? Someone with that name on their birth certificate, Autumn apostrophe S. Okay, it's not a clear error. - Well, she insists that it's not. I think people haven't think it is, yeah, but no. - So if you were gonna write it out about, you're gonna say, who's car is that? And you know it's Autumn's car, how would you spell that? - Oh, that's really a trick question. - Mm-hmm. - I guess I'll put another apostrophe on. - Ah. - Wait a second, I have to look at this. - Yeah. - Well, the thing is, if you put another apostrophe S, it looks like a typo. - Well, it may look like a typo, but is that not the right answer? - You could argue it either way, if it chooses a matter. I guess it's a New Yorker, we would put a apostrophe S. That was, we made a ruling about the apostrophe S at a certain point. - Okay, so what's the consensus? Do we have consensus here? - I can see, I know. I mean. (laughing) - The consensus is that anything goes. - All right, thank you both, Mary thinks again. - It's no interesting, is very, that's a very interesting question. I'm glad you sprung it on me. - Oh. - Sprung it on me, please. - Oh, hold on a sec, Mary is sprunger sprung, which is it? (laughing) - Sprung sprung, Mary. (laughing) - Oh my gosh. (upbeat music) - You always should do, it seems like, it seems like the available punctuation marks are not sufficient for autumn's unique needs. - Yeah. - We should make her a new punctuation mark. - Something she can use whenever she needs to indicate that she has possession of something, something is hers. - We're gonna ring up a punctuation expert to try and help us. This is Keith Houston, Keith, when was the last time we got a new punctuation mark? - Oh, for the last successful punctuation mark, I guess was probably the exclamation mark. It looks like it was around about the 14th century, but it's not really clear, it's not really clear where it came from. I think there's a suggestion that it comes from an exclamation of joy in Latin, which was EO, so I O, and you can imagine how with, maybe the ice ends up above the O, perhaps the O gets smaller and smaller until it turns into a dot. And at this point, this is where, in the mid 14th century, this is where, this is where it was first proposed, and it seemed to become more common into the 15th century, and then after that point, you're pretty close to, well, that's really printing. Now, that's when printing appears, and so it was lucky enough to appear at the point of which it could be standardized. - Okay, so autumn's, first of all, let me just, as someone who has looked at punctuation throughout history, what is your reaction to autumn's name? - It is a bold choice for a name, I think, on the part of her parents. And I can see her problem. Yeah, it's not an easy thing to deal with, especially when you're dealing with possessives or plurals. - Yeah. - And your name ends in apostrophe S. - So if we were to come up with a new punctuation mark to something just for autumn, where would we begin in creating a new punctuation mark? - First of all, you have to describe what the mark needs to do and then figure out what it's going to look like. So I don't know, imagine I perhaps we want a mark which looks like, I don't know, a plus symbol with a diagonal line through it or something. And this indicates something belonging to autumn, for example. - Okay. - If you're lucky, that might already exist. So there is this organization called the Unicode Consortium. And this is when we get really exciting. We get to talk about big NGOs. And so the Unicode Consortium has responsibility, basically for standardizing the set of characters that computers can exchange. And in doing so, they more or less, they don't control language. That's far too strong with putting it. But they are the final gatekeepers before a new mark of punctuation or a letter or a number or any other symbol can be used on the majority of computers around the world. So you need to design your mark. You need to describe what it's going to do. And if you want to be able to type it on anyone's computer, if you want autumn's special mark of punctuation to be available everywhere, you have to convince the Unicode Consortium that it's a good idea. And they have a whole set of criteria. You kind of, you have to write this little formal document, send it off to them. If you perhaps they'll call you to ask to discuss it. And if you're lucky, the Unicode Technical Committee will decide to include it. And at some point in the future, it then becomes ratified. It becomes a standard mark. And then if you're further, if you're even more lucky, then all of the companies that care about what Unicode say, like Google and Facebook and Apple, all the companies actually control the text that we can see and we can type. Perhaps they decide to add it to their font. And they can do that because Unicode has said, this is a standard mark. OK, OK, but it starts with Unicode. Yes. And it ends with Unicode in some ways. Is there somewhat at Unicode you recommend we call to start this process? Mark Davis was one of the founding members of Unicode. He would be the perfect person to talk to about this. I think it's amazing just that the person in charge of exclamation marks and question marks is named Mark. I think that's an amazing thing that's happened. I've been writing about punctuation for 15 or 20 years now and I have not thought of that previously. Disappointment in myself. OK, all right, Skyler has managed to arrange it. Mark Davis is on the line with us now. Hey, Mark. Hi, how are you doing? Great. Great. Can I pitch you a punctuation mark? Well, go ahead. We'll see what happens. All right, here you go. All right, yeah, we have a listener who we need a new punctuation mark to denote possession that we would like it to be part of Unicode, part of the universal system. We all use as soon as possible. Can we do that? That would be very hard to do. And I can outline some of the reasons why it gets very tricky to do. But the key issue is that you have to really show a lot of usage. Of course, it becomes a candidate for inclusion. It's kind of an emergency. Well, there are very few character emergencies that we've had. OK, so I'll give you an example of one is when there's a new currency symbol. And those tend to be things that are emergencies. Another one was when the Japanese Emperor died because in Japan he's counting. the error name for each emperor is a new symbol and then that gets encoded and that was something we rushed out very quickly so that it added to all of the operating systems that they could actually show people dates with the right era symbol. And as I said, currency symbols are another one where there's those those would constitute emergencies. So if if our caller items, if she were to become the emperor of Japan, it's possible then that you would come up with a special punctuation or a special character for her. I can say on with almost 100% herence that if she became the emperor of Japan, that she could get her symbol into the code. All right. Okay. Well, there's a path forward, even if it's an unlikely path. Okay. There you go. Well, that does it for this week's show. Would you learn in? Well, I learned that maybe I was not I didn't think creatively enough when naming my children. Okay. I felt for whatever reason, whatever shortcoming, I felt confined to the 26 letters of the alphabet. Yeah. When really there was all that punctuation I could have played with. That's true. When you think about it, when you're typing on your phone, there's a button you can push and that opens up a whole nother keyboard full of opportunity right there. Yeah. Meet my daughter, hashtag Jennifer. And yeah, this is my son. It's an unpronounceable super strong password. Peter. Yes. Peter, what did you learn today? Oh, I learned about what it is that triggers at least one of the things that could trigger our breakfast rule, which is foods remaining in their original form emerging from the human body. Oh, right. Right. So the picture you have. Yes. Yes. The reason I, the reason I agree with the decision to cut Negaine's joke is that the image in my head was actual salad in its leafy form, multi colored, you know, and that's what I thought of and that's a distressing image in my head. And so that's why I agreed, you know, to with your decision not to broadcast it. Yeah, I guess like digestion is the editing of the body in a weird way. Yeah, we want to make sure you don't want to, you don't want to see in this raw form. How to do everything is produced by Skylar Swenson with technical direction from Lorna White. Our interns this week are Ann and Mary, who are joining us just for this one week from the New Yorker. Send us your questions, whatever they may be to our email address. That's how to at npr.org. I'm Ian and I'm Mike. Thanks.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The "breakfast rule" is a guideline used by the show to determine if content is too gross to air, asking whether a listener would be disgusted while eating breakfast.
  2. Lorna White serves as the final defense against potentially offensive content, reviewing the show before broadcast to ensure it doesn’t trigger discomfort.
  3. A segment about colonoscopies and "diarrhea vacation" was initially considered for airplay but was cut due to its vivid, visual imagery like "salad coming out of your butt."
  4. The joke was deemed too graphic because it painted a disturbing mental image, especially when linked to breakfast food, triggering the breakfast rule.
  5. Despite the cut, the show humorously notes that the phrase "salad coming out of your butt" has now been added to the archive, possibly becoming a lasting cultural artifact.
  6. The episode explores the grammatical and cultural debate around the name "Autumn's," which is possessive and legally written with an apostrophe.
  7. Mary Norris, a longtime copy editor at the New Yorker, confirms that while the name is possessive, it’s not a grammatical error, and such names can be tricky in usage.
  8. A proposed new punctuation mark for "Autumn's" is discussed, suggesting that such niche needs could be formalized through the Unicode Consortium if widely adopted.

Summary:

The show introduces the "breakfast rule" as a humorous yet practical tool to decide whether content is too offensive or gross to air. Host Peter Segal and technical director Lorna White explain how the rule functions by imagining how a listener would react if eating breakfast while hearing a joke. A segment about colonoscopies involving the phrase "salad coming out of your butt" is discussed as a borderline case—cut due to its vivid, potentially disturbing imagery that could offend or disgust.

Lorna defends the decision, emphasizing that such visual content crosses the line of acceptability. The episode also delves into the real-world linguistic debate around the name "Autumn's," which is possessive and often considered a grammatical oddity. Editor Mary Norris confirms that while the name is not a mistake, its usage is confusing.

The discussion then expands to a creative proposal: designing a new punctuation mark specifically for names like "Autumn's" to represent ownership. This idea is examined through the lens of the Unicode Consortium, which governs global character standards, but is acknowledged as highly unlikely due to lack of widespread demand. Ultimately, the segment combines humor, grammar, and wit, illustrating how everyday language choices can spark both serious and playful debates.

The hosts conclude by reflecting on how punctuation and naming offer surprising creative possibilities beyond the standard alphabet.

FAQs

The breakfast rule is a guideline used to determine if a joke or topic is too gross to air. It asks whether someone would be disgusted while eating breakfast if they heard the content. If the answer is yes, it’s likely cut to avoid offending listeners.

The joke was removed because it created a vivid, visual image of salad emerging from the body, which is seen as overly graphic and potentially offensive. Lorna White, the technical director, felt it crossed the line based on the breakfast rule.

Lorna is considered the last line of defense before a show goes live. She reviews content for potential offense, especially if it involves strong or visual imagery that might upset listeners.

Yes, the breakfast rule can be humorously applied to relationships—such as if someone’s name or behavior makes you uncomfortable when eating breakfast, it might signal a need to reconsider the relationship.

Yes, 'Autumn’s' is grammatically correct when used as a possessive, such as 'Autumn’s hope' or 'Autumn’s car.' It reflects the name as a possessive noun, though it can be confusing or unconventional.

While not necessary, a new punctuation mark could theoretically be proposed for such names. However, it would require approval from the Unicode Consortium and widespread adoption, which is currently unlikely.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.