How To Win Your Auction Draft This Season (Episode 1009 with Adam Levitan and NFFC Hall of Famer Chris Eibl)
48m 32s
In 2026, the auction draft landscape sees heightened demand for running backs in snake formats, but Chris Eibel emphasizes that the most effective strategy is to pivot away from trends and focus on undervalued wide receivers and a stars and scrubs approach. He highlights that in shallower leagues (10–12 teams), overpaying for top-tier stars like Bijan Gibbs or Jamar Chase is not only acceptable but strategic, as it allows for stronger roster construction and waiver wire flexibility. Chris advises early nomination of mid-tier players such as Jonathan Taylor or Drake London to create bidding pressure and drive prices down. He cautions against overpaying for hype-driven players, noting that preseason highlights often lead to inflated bids that don’t reflect actual value. A key strategy is to maintain a stars and scrubs model, with 60–70% of the budget on top stars, and to use a flexible, adaptive approach to roster building, especially in deeper leagues where injuries can derail a single star. For Superflex leagues, he recommends securing two quarterbacks at 80–85% of value to ensure coverage, and he highlights undervalued running back options like Deandre Swift or David Montgomery as potential low-cost, high-impact picks. Chris also stresses the importance of price enforcement only on players you're comfortable winning, avoiding bidding wars that waste money. He notes that auction players should use personal values and market data to identify undervalued players, such as DK Metcalf or downfield options, and that the most successful players are those who stay adaptable, avoid groupthink, and prioritize risk-adjusted decisions. Ultimately, he views auction drafting as the purest, most fair form of fantasy football, though its popularity is limited by time commitment. He encourages fans to use ETR’s auction values and strategies to improve their draft outcomes and to stay vigilant against overhyped players.
(upbeat music)
- Hello and welcome to episode 109 of the official
established the run.com podcast.
My name is Adam Levitan.
I am one of the co-founders here at ETR
and with drafting season nearly upon us,
it is time to discuss the purest form
of Fanny's football drafting, the auction draft.
For this, we are joined by old friend of the show.
One of the sharpest auction players I've met,
he's in the NFFC Hall of Fame.
I can't believe there's an NFFC Hall of Fame,
but there is and he's in it.
Has insane results and auctions
that has led him to third on the money list there.
It is the one and only Chris Eibel
from the high-stakes streets.
Chris, how's it going today?
- Doing great, just like I said,
just got back from a family vacation in Maine
and gearing up for the usual trips
to New York and Vegas for some high-stakes auctions.
- Very exciting stuff.
On today's show, we are going to discuss
all things auction drafts 2026.
Strategy adjustments this year's auction landscape,
best auction practices for this year and lots more.
I just also want to say huge thanks to Chris
for doing this.
He's playing big, but he still comes on here
each year and tries to help out his fellow auction bros.
So I always appreciate the time and candor from Chris.
Before we get into it here today,
reminder that if you have a fantasy football draft
coming up, we can help.
Our NFL early bird bundle product is now live
that prices up for a limited time.
It combines draft kit pro with our in-season product.
Draft kit pro, of course,
includes all of our auction values,
auction strategy, and she players to target
and then in-season, we will have Thormin's rankings
and tons of other season long content as well.
So for more details on the early bird bundle
or just draft kit pro, head to the subscribe tab
on establishedtherun.com.
All right, Chris, I want to talk about the landscape first
here in 2026 because I think we've seen
some important changes.
In snake drafts, the thirst for running back
once we get past the first three wide receivers
is absolutely out of control.
In snake drafts, I'm expecting 12
of the first 20 picks this year to be running backs.
What do you think that means for the auction streets this year?
- So I always want to pivot against trends,
whether it's running back thirst or any other position.
So doing the same thing as everyone else
doesn't give you any type of edge.
So if everyone else is panicking about running backs,
that just means discounts at other positions.
So I'm seeing really good opportunities
to stack your wide receiver three spot this year
with like Devon to spith, Zey flowers.
And I've always been comfortable,
especially in these standalone leagues
where you're not trying to compete with a large field.
Rostring guys like Montgomery, Bucky Irving, Javonte Williams,
just guys who can get you by at that running back position.
So yeah, the punchline is like, you don't win auctions
by overpaying for the same position everyone else is changing.
- Yeah, excuse me.
- Yeah, do you think that these first running backs
are bloated in price like, you know,
I like a lot of these guys, Jonathan Taylor, Kenneth Walker,
James Cook, Chase Brown, I could poke some holes
in H&N and more in Hampton certainly.
But I guess coming into it,
my thought wasn't that they're overvalued,
necessarily they're just expensive,
but it sounds like maybe you think they're also overvalued.
It's not so much that they're overvalued.
I've just always found it easier to construct a team
where I'd receive her first
because it allows you to use your waiver wire ability
to pick up running backs as guys get hurt.
So that's always just been an easier approach for me
more so than anything is wrong with the guys you mentioned.
- Yep, okay, that makes a lot of sense.
Yeah, and that's like the auction specific strategy
that I think is important to think through
when you're playing auctions.
You know, most auction players, most successful auction players,
employ a stars and scrub strategy.
If you are passing on some of these expensive running backs
and going for maybe undervalued stuff,
Zae Flowers, Devonta Smith, you mentioned might be cheaper
than they should, which I think is certainly possible
as well, are you still into stars and scrubs
based on this year's landscape?
- Yeah, so I would still go stars and scrubs.
I still think especially in 10 or 12 team formats
that that's the preferred way to go
because you're really allowing yourself
to get all your money into your starting lineup.
And then that prevents you from making mistakes down the line
like having too much money left on the table at the end.
And for like I said, a waiver wire grinder,
it's kind of a dream to just be able to rebuild
the rest of your roster as the season goes along.
So no need to pivot from stars and scrubs this year,
especially in those, those shallower formats.
- Yeah, one thing that I was thinking about stars
and scrubs format is that, I don't know if you feel this,
but I feel like there's fewer good fantasy players.
And we can see this in the data too.
Like scoring is down, passing yardage is down.
Plays per game is down.
And some of that I think is like kickoff rule stuff.
I think some of that is also offensive coordinators
responding to soft defenses by running the ball more.
And so I think there's like been a macro change in NFL
where it's harder for me to find round 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
snake draft picks that I like.
Does that flow through to auction
where it's harder to find $1 or $2 guys
to complete out a stars and scrubs type of construction?
- I still think there are enough guys,
enough committee backfields, for instance,
where you don't have to necessarily know who's gonna be best,
but you can acquire the whole Washington backfield,
the whole Carolina backfield,
and still fill out those stars and scrubs lineups
with pretty good players.
Some wide receivers get suppressed in those formats,
like the Colts and the Green Bay guys that I think are people like,
but we're still not seeing the prices catch up to that.
So I still think there are ways to fill out your roster
with the stars and scrubs approach.
- You know, as I'm saying that,
it does kind of strike me that the stars are even better.
In other words, what we see is that wide receiver threes
and wide receiver fours are getting worse.
They're on the field, last teams are throwing less often.
And then you get the wide receiver one
and riders rear two competing more against tight ends
and running backs for targets.
They're gonna win that battle.
So like, yeah, the stars, yeah, it makes more sense,
it makes more sense to me that there are,
the stars are even better this year,
as it gets more condensed in terms of how teams
are using their players.
Oh, we always get the same question.
When we talk about stars and scrubs, Chris,
they want to know what you mean by stars and scrubs.
How much of your, how much of your budget is stars?
Should they be having all stars
and then like $61 guys or something like that
or where do you draw the line on what's too much stars
in a stars and scrubs construction?
- Yeah, so for, this is gonna be format specific,
but if you're typical like 12 team league
where maybe you're starting three receivers,
you don't really wanna go more than like 60% of your budget
on those like top couple guys
because you don't wanna leave
both your wide receiver three and your flex spot uncovered.
But where I start to get really aggressive
is if there's two wide receiver formats or 10 team formats,
I don't have a problem like,
you think of a typical 10 team league.
If I get like beach on in Gibbs for $75 a piece,
like I can still get guys like Parker Washington
and Devonte Adams in that format just to fill out the roster.
So definitely the shallower that roster is like,
that format is like the more you wanna push
up big prices on those top stars.
- Yeah, okay.
I mentioned that I thought it was an interesting year
or thinking it's an interesting year for stars
to really separate from everyone else.
Of course, stars are the hardest to acquire
because even in casual leagues,
not high stakes or whatever,
there are everybody's gonna want,
Jamar Chase, Gibbs, Puka, et cetera.
How do you think about building around expensive guys
and are there any quote unquote,
unsexy guys near the top of the board
that you think might get overlooked?
- Yeah, we've talked before about how drafters
are often timid early at the start of drafts
and I've always theorized that it's because
there are probably multiple guys
game planning around exactly the guys you mentioned,
Bijan, Gibbs, Chase.
And they kinda wanna hoard that cash early
because they've mapped out their holder
after round those guys.
So I think that's the perfect time
to nominate like the tier below,
a couple of my expensive favorites are Jonathan Taylor, JSN.
And nominating those guys,
well, Bijan, Gibbs and Chase are still on the board,
kind of forces everyone else to make a decision on them
before they're really ready to.
And Taylor in particular, we saw expanded past game usage,
still has running back one ceiling,
but he's still viewed as somewhat of a boring option
by a lot of people.
So the hope is by nominating them early,
you're getting Taylor in the 30s or JSN
at more of the lamb Jefferson price than the Puka price
when guys are holding onto their wallets
until those big four get nominated.
- Yeah, a couple guys that came to mind for me
as like top of the board might go overlooked.
I don't know what you think.
Drake London feels like people aren't that excited.
It's like price and force or run you up your price on it.
and also, I was gonna say Chase Brown,
but I think he's gotten more steam lately,
and then definitely Devon H&N, like I'm not on H&N,
but there's a lot of people like me that are also not on H&N.
So yeah, and he thought some of those guys going
overlook London H&N or Chase Brown.
- Yeah, I see that second tier running through H&N
and Andre Klondon.
So I don't think player takes are super important.
So like those guys exactly fit into the tier
of the kind of guy where you nominate them early.
People are gonna be like, "I don't know what to do."
"I want to dispend all this money on Bejohn and Good."
- Right, yeah, take a lot of sense.
Okay, anything to say not to you at Quarterback this year?
For us, we have this huge tier of similarly projected
Quarterbacks from basically like Dak Prescott,
all the way to Goff, and that tier includes a lot of guys
that frankly, I like Jackson Dart, Trevor Lawrence,
Stafford, Jordan Love, Kyler Murray, Bonix, Purdy,
Mahomes, and I mentioned Dak and Goff already.
That kind of stands out to me that there's such a huge tier
that we have projected similarly this year.
Any thoughts on applying that to auction
or any other Quarterback thoughts?
- Yeah, and like interesting observation for me,
like I don't base my values off of Vegas props,
but like I was just looking at season leader passing props
for fun, and four of the five favorites
to lead the league and passing and passing touchdowns
are like two dollar guys this year.
You got Dak, Goff, Stafford, Purdy.
You've got rushing upside with Lawrence
who might be my favorite in that range.
So yeah, my instinct is to wait on this massive
like middle tier of guys you mentioned
and just take two of whoever is cheapest.
It's not to say I won't bid on Mayor Burrow
when there's like a discount to be had,
like by that I mean when they drop to like a $78 range,
but yeah, sign me up for that middle tier
if I'm not getting a discount elsewhere.
- Yeah, so like on our suggested values,
like we have Josh Allen for 27,
and this is out of a 200 budget,
you know Josh Allen 27, Lamar 18, Jaden 15,
Jalen hurts 13 like in a vacuum,
I think those are all good values,
but if you tell me that I can get Trevor Lawrence for two,
it seems really bad to spend 30 or whatever it takes
to get Josh Allen, right?
So like I don't know, like I don't know if people are gonna be,
I don't know if everybody thinks that
or people are gonna be like clicking the button
on Josh Allen Lamar a lot.
- Yeah, I think if you just go into an auction agnostic
of like who, you know, which one you get,
you know, all those guys you value at like 10, 11, 13,
like yeah, they might be worth that,
but one of those guys is just because of the depth
is inevitably gonna slip through for five bucks.
So yeah, I like to be in on every player
from the sense that I'm bidding 50, 60% of what they're worth,
and hey, if I win one great, but like totally comfortable
at that middle tier.
- Okay, yeah, we'll talk more about Super Flex here
a little bit later and price enforcing also,
which Chris just brought up.
I didn't want to touch on the Titan landscape here.
So Elite Titan is a controversial subject this year.
There are people who think Brock Bowers
is going to break the league and next year be a top five
overall pick in Snake.
And then there are people who think that taking Bowers,
McBride, Loveland is too expensive,
given the Titan position.
So it's tough in auctions, certainly you still need a Titan,
but what do you think about handling the Elite Titans,
Bowers, McBride, and the Loveland steam,
which I assume is coming.
- Yeah, I'm fine with like Bowers, McBride, Loveland at cost,
and you know, similar to that tier quarterbacks I just mentioned,
I'll throw in bids of like 70% of what I think they were,
80% and maybe I get lucky, maybe I don't.
But there may be not targets of mine
unless I'm in a shallower league,
like a 10 team league or a home league
where I can really build up my wide receiver
and running back positions easier.
And the reason there's just not maybe a target
and maybe more difficult leagues is because,
like I know you're comfortable with the top eight this year.
And when I look at that fan in craft pits or Laporta tier,
it's the same thing as the quarterbacks.
I don't know which of those guys is only going to go
for five or six dollars, but because there are four of them,
I know one of them will.
And so I think you're getting a fairly high floor
and ceiling from all those guys that like in a tougher league,
I'm sticking with that range.
- Absolutely, yeah, and like craft Laporta fan in pits,
I agree with you, like all four of them,
I think are similar-ish outlooks and bets
like I have personal preferences,
but we certainly have them pretty close there.
And then beyond that, like even if you missed on that tier,
which in auction, I don't think you really should,
but even if you missed on that tier,
I mean, you have George Kittle later,
you have Duncan Kade later.
I mean, there's some like legit options
that are maybe going to be very, very cheap.
Like do you think you can get King Kade or Kittle
for like a dollar or two?
Is that possible?
- I haven't seen Kittle go for that cheap.
I think there are enough people excited about Kittle
in most auctions, but yeah, you might like those guys,
I might like Isaiah likely just to see if he can cross
that next tier.
I think there's enough to make you feel like
you're leaving a draft with some upside at that $2 range.
- Yeah, okay, let's go to roster construction.
I wanted to ask about balance builds.
I know we talked so much about stars and scrubs
on here, are there any dynamics that would lead you
to a balanced build this season?
- The only time I'm intentionally going shooting
for a balanced build is those deeper formats,
like with a 14-teamer, where if you do go stars and scrubs,
you might only be one injury away from starting just as hill
and hoping he catches a couple dump passes for five points.
So yeah, and 14-teamers, I might skew a little more
towards like I'd rather have the collection
of Mike Evans, Devante Adams, and Parker Washington,
then like a single Justin Jefferson.
But in general, like I think, you know, with myself,
I think a lot of your listeners probably fit
that waiver wire grinder mold where I feel like that shines
best with the stars and scrubs approach.
- Right, and yeah, if you're going to go stars and scrubs,
like Chris is saying, you better be prepared
to grind the wire, you know, like we're going to help you
as much as we can with the shows and the Q&As
and our waiver wire lists and everything else
as part of the product.
But yeah, you got to be in there to grind the waiver wire
if you're going to go stars and scrubs.
So yeah, certainly be sure that you are up for that.
Oh, we got a question from someone.
I forgot to write in the name.
He said in more casual leagues, the stars will go for more
than they should.
What is our strategy if so?
So it's kind of like what we already talked about here
where there's certain guys are going to go,
the star is going to go for a lot.
And it's what happens to get in a room
where everybody's trying to go stars and scrubs
and even Jonathan Taylor and Drake London
and Devine H and all these guys are getting over bid
based on your values.
How do you respond then?
- Yeah, I think I still want to anchor my team to one star.
So maybe the first thing I'll say is like a lot of times
I'll get questions where people say these stars
are going for too much.
Just make sure you're not in one of those shallower formats
'cause like, I don't think 70 something is too much
for Bijan Gibbs in a shallower format.
But let's say they truly are going for too much.
My preferred strategy is to zag then.
And like, well, I think it's appropriate to zag.
Like I think the mistake people make doing that
is they wait until like the round four type guys
to start buying.
So my preferred approach in that instance
is maybe a one star hybrid
where like I'm playing a slight premium
for that one star just because I have to
the markets making me.
But as soon as the top tier clears out,
if they're truly paying too much for those top 24 players,
like I should be able to get the meat next tier
like Olawe or George Pickens or something's wrong
with my math.
And so like I usually handle that with an inflation tracker
and Excel which sounds complicated
but it's really just actual winning bids against my projections
going in and if guys are going for too much
like that discount should come in the next tier or two.
- Yeah, well the average budget that people have remaining
is just going to keep going down
which obviously you should be tracking during your auction
to how much money your opponents have left
and how many spots that they need to fill.
How much is an overpay I guess?
Like let's say you have Josh Allen for 27 as your value.
How bad is it to pay 30 for him
or how bad is to pay 32 for Josh Allen?
How strict are you with your values going in?
- The only time I'm really wanting to overpay
like I said is if it is for like one of those top 20 type
talents so like you'd never catch me
unless it's like a Superfect Flex overpaying for Josh Allen
but if I am trying to overpay to get that star in my lineup
like it can make sense to do 20%
if I'm just trying to force like a single star in my lineup
because like I said if you get left out until like the fourth round
then you risk having like guys you spent a lot on
end up on your bench and that's just of no use to you.
- Yep, okay.
You mentioned a little bit about nomination strategy already.
General more general nomination strategy
should you be nominating guys you want or guys that you don't
and then early late anything else on who to nominate
when is your turn to throw a guy out there?
- Yeah kind of expanding on what I mentioned about like Taylor
and JSN I always think you're it's easier to guys
when you're nominating just a single tear below
like the current crop of players who's being nominated
so like that extends down the board where like if Kenneth
Walker's the last like second round type running back left
that's the time to nominate Breeze Hall or Javonte Williams.
The only thing I'll caution there is like don't go too far
far down your board because like if Jonathan Brooks
is your sleeper you're nominating him like no one's gonna
you buying Jonathan Brooks is an impediment to buying Kenneth White.
or like just stick to a tear below.
Aside from that, the other nomination will I go by
is just to adjust on room, like the room temperature,
basically if guys are going for too cheap,
you should be buying as much as possible,
nominating guys you want at that moment
before people realize they are going for too cheap.
And conversely, if guys are going for too much,
then that's when I wanna throw out in that moment,
the guys on less interested in.
- Yeah, what about endgame nomination strategy?
Like you're down to six bucks, you have four spots to fill.
There's certainly strategy in like bidding too
when your opponents only have one dollar left on a guy
that you want anything else for endgame nomination strategy.
- I would say second to knowing what your league
has paid in the past for prices.
Like the most important prep thing you need to do
is set those one or two dollar guys like targets.
Like I know you recently had like a late round flyer article
where you listed one injury away guys.
Like that's the type of thing I'm looking at
and being like who am I targeting for one dollar or two dollars
'cause my bench, I want that all to be about contingent upside.
So like step one, get that list out,
be prepared of knowing who you're targeting.
And then step two, like look around the room,
see who has money.
If everyone has one dollar except for two teams of two dollars
and one of those is the say-quano owner,
like don't nominate tank Biggsby.
Like you know you just wasted your nomination
as that guy's hanging on to his two bucks.
So like the little more advanced strategy would just be like
to be really careful about like other team's rosters needs
who have more money than you and can kind of like lay down
a hammer on you.
- Yeah, we have an article in the auction section
of draft kit where we're updating
and continue to say maintaining a list of our favorite one
and two hour players or players we expect to go
for one or two dollars.
So yeah, you can certainly take that to your draft
and certainly bring some of your own there
as well really important for the end.
Okay, so about some of trends going on this year
in auctions, we mentioned the running back thirst.
Is there anything else you've seen
in terms of auction trends this year
that is unique to this season?
- Yeah, nothing too crazy.
Like I think it is a little different to see guy,
like like genty through walker tier of running backs
like above the AJ Brown, Drake London, Nico Collins types
but I don't think that running back thirst
is necessarily permeating to like the middle of the draft.
So in general, I don't know that there are any differences
that are too substantial that auction players need
to take into consideration just from the overall landscape.
- Okay, I don't know like if these auction,
most of the auction opponents are like on Twitter and stuff
but there is some crazy steam going on like players
going up five, six rounds in ADP based on hype, et cetera.
Are there any players you think are going to get bloated
at auction this year? We already talked about some
of the running backs at the top.
But gosh, I mean, you know, I log in now,
I go to do a draft and I see Martian Lynch going in,
sorry, Martian Lloyd going in round 13
and Jayden Blue going in round 14
and Pat Bryant going in round 15, you know,
these guys are like one dollar players in auction.
I understand that but my point is that the steam
on this can get really add a controller.
Are there any players in the auction street specifically
you think I can get bloated this year?
- Yeah, I think it happens every year
with like the preseason highlights and young ride
receivers in particular.
Like I think the like the first time Jordan Tyson makes
one of those like spectacular pirouette catches
that like we've been seeing in highlight videos,
like he's going to become a one shock me
if he became like a $20 player at that point.
Like Colonel Tate same thing.
So I think those are kind of the guys that are going to get
steamed up as we get closer to the draft.
You might have another got class of players
that have really high upside,
but are maybe being paid at that upside.
Like people are clamoring over a book.
I keep seeing him go higher and higher.
Maybe the other two guys you hit on one of them,
Marsha on Lloyd.
Like the second Marsha on Lloyd and Jonathan Brooks
like pull off a preseason run where they look healthy.
Like I think we're going to see some real heavy steam
and I like their prices today,
but I don't know that'll like them tomorrow.
- Yeah, and I assume you're not chasing things
like Tyson and Tate up the board, right?
- No, I definitely think it's best not to get caught up
in the high play. I think like as we see people rise in fall,
I think it's important to analyze like,
whether what drove them to rise or fall,
like really matters or not.
And I don't necessarily think like, you know,
preseason depth charts might,
but preseason highlights don't really sway for me.
- Do you get the sense that people are more anchored
to their prices in auction?
I'm sorry, more anchored to ADP and Snake
than like prices in auction.
Other words, like I know people, including myself,
like before this Lutherburton injury,
Lutherburton injury really wanted to take him,
but I still wasn't going to be like,
oh, third round Lutherburton, no problem
because I'm more anchored to ADP.
But in an auction, I could see myself getting like,
out of control, like, hey man,
you're not taking Lutherburton for me, you know what I mean?
And so like, I guess my point is that I think
the steam on guys like Burden or Parker Washington
or I don't know, maybe Parker Washington is a bad example,
but the steam on guys who have a lot of hype,
getting more out of control in auction versus Snake.
I don't know if you feel that or think that's true.
- Yeah, it's really hard to predict,
but you do see some of those auctions where like,
let's say a burden, a burden is like the perfect,
I mean, no, you know, you just got hurt a little bit,
but like, he's exactly the type of player.
If you run into one where two guys just love Lutherburton,
maybe they're both bears fans, I don't know.
You see these outrageous bidding wars
where like you see like $35 for Lutherburton
and you're just like WTF that puts them
at like a second round pick.
So it's really hard to predict
because it always takes two to do something like that.
But yeah, with these hype guys, it'll happen.
- Yeah, and it's certainly like, you know, in homelings,
there's gonna be a lot of people that don't show up
with their own auction numbers.
How tied do you think they are?
I don't know, you probably don't play much
on the Yahoo ESPN sleeper types up,
but how tied do you think they are to these suggested values
that are on those sites like ESPN and Yahoo and Sleeper?
- I do think they're often tied
just because like for a lot of players,
that might be all they have to go off
of that side of unless they're like really
into their home team or whatever.
Like I do think they are pretty tied to those, you know,
expected auction values that ESPN has.
- Right, and it seems like a huge value add
to like either have your numbers
or have ETR's auction values to see it like tied
to something that is not in the draft applet, you know?
And like, yeah, it should make a huge huge difference.
Okay, we mentioned players might go
bloated at auction, what about players that might go
under looked maybe in the mid range or anywhere else,
any under looked players at auction, you think this year?
- Yeah, I think I annually like that whole tier
of like $15 receivers.
Like I always just think like the Jamison Williams,
Mike Evans, Adams, Parker Washington are a great tier.
And in certain home leagues,
I know you mentioned Parker Washington having some steam,
like I still don't think certain home leagues
have caught up to that.
Further down the list, like a couple of guys who like,
I think like have the potential to be really valuable
that everyone, that for different reasons,
I think people are lower than they should be on like,
DK Metcalf, like he could have had a thousand yard season
if not for the fan incident.
And yeah, gaining pitman hurts,
but losing Arthur Smith helps.
So he's a guy who like, I just don't hear any buzz on,
wouldn't expect to hear any buzz on,
but like if he's falling for five, six at an auction,
like I feel really good about having them
on my wider receiver core.
And then like you guys have mentioned downs
and I still don't think the price has really caught up
to where it should be, but like with everything breaking,
like totally perfectly so far.
And yeah, there's some keen and Alan risk,
but downs might be, might be just so much better
than killing Alan, keen and Alan that maybe we shouldn't care.
- Yeah, that's what I said about Lab McConkey last year,
Chris, we shouldn't care about Keenan Allen
and that was an expensive mistake.
- Yeah, and I think last year I was cool on McConkey
for the keen and Alan reason,
but I think we saw some decline from him
that like I don't think we had quite a little more decline
that I don't think we had quite seen
with his previous year with the bears.
So I think it's more plausible that
Keenan Allen goes there and just doesn't make an impact.
- One guy that came to my mind for undervalued an auction
is just a guy who if you pick him and snake,
like no one's even gonna respond.
They're not gonna say nice pick.
They're not gonna say anything.
It's David Montgomery, you know?
And I don't even really love David Montgomery this year,
but gosh, I could see him going for way too cheap
in an auction 'cause he is like the least sexy pick
you could make for a guy that probably is gonna get
through to the touches.
Like I don't really want David Montgomery
in season long that badly, at all.
Like where he goes around like 50th overall,
but an auction if he went for something crazy cheap.
I mean, let me see.
We have him for 20th, 20 bucks and half a PPR.
I could see him going for 15 or less.
Any thoughts on that one?
I was kind of expecting the same thing,
but for whatever reason, I mean, people,
I think people are interested enough in the team change
that I am still seeing Montgomery go for 20.
I think eight-time players, which is teams,
there's just like a level of uncertainty
and that adds some intrigue.
Like I think that's the right idea.
I think I'm kind of seeing it happen in practice
more with like Deandre Swift
where I am seeing him sometimes go in like 10 to 15 range.
Sometimes like if you have enough people
where like everyone just doesn't want to touch Josh Jacobs,
like he might go down to 15 to.
But yeah, I can definitely see it happen
with Montgomery and some drafts,
but I think the switching teams
has helped his popularity just a little bit.
- Yeah, I like that Deandre Swift one.
Like I take Deandre Swift ahead of Deandre Montgomery
personally and Snake for now.
So yeah, I think that's an interesting one.
Let's go to some miscellaneous topics here.
We already talked about end game strategy a little bit in terms of nominations.
Anything else you want to say about end game strategy for this year?
No, I mean, the players, I do have the players I like.
Like, I think, Marshon, Lloyd, Jaden, Blue, Tank, Bigs, Beard, Great, Home League options.
If you're in the high stakes world, like, you might have to dig deeper to, like,
Ray Davis, Brian Robinson, but like I said, it's definitely my strategy to focus solely on those
contingent, like one injury way upside guys. Yeah. Do you think Chris Rodriguez is going to go
for like one or two dollars or you think he's the type of guy where there's enough buzz around him
that he'll go for more? Yeah, I've been seeing him go for three, four dollars. It wouldn't surprise me
to see him go for a couple dollars. And he's another one where, you know, even if you want to like
stack your running back bench with like the real high upside guys, like the more exciting guys,
like Blue or Marshon Lloyd, like Rodriguez can give you that floor, even if he's in the split
at like a very cheap cost that's going to ensure you against like injuries to your backfield.
So I like Rodriguez a lot. Do you think the handcuffs go for what they should? Like,
the handcuffs strategy is super interesting. I think super league dependent, like I really like
Tank Bigs B as a guy to have on your bench all year this year because I'm so confident if
sake one got hurt, he would absolutely smash. I'm not nearly as convinced that Brian Robinson or
Isaiah Pacheco would smash if their starters went down. But yeah, how do you think handcuffing
should or typically does go in auctions? I think, I mean, I think these guys go at the right
price. It's just that tier where like you want to be the first person to nominate them.
And I'm with you on Pacheco, like it's difficult to envision any world where an injury makes him
like a stud all of a sudden. But with the Falcons, like I do think they lack enough other players
that like Brian Robinson, any running back with a three down roll, is going to hit the RB2 ranks,
like just through volume. And I think he can do that. And so no, I think I do think that $1 to
$2 range should really be focused on on those guys because if you're getting down to that wide
receiver class, like there's always going to be waiverware guys. Those guys are super replaceable.
They're not going to have upside and injury doesn't give them more production in most cases.
Yeah. Do you ever like try to build around cheap guys? In other words, like there's a guy
know that I can get for $2 and that's part of my plan going in. Like maybe you think you can get
stribbling for $2. And that's a huge part of your plan because it allows you to access more.
Do you ever go into a draft with actual targets to build your team around at the cheap range?
Not that cheap because like you can feel like as good as you want to feel about struggling,
but like I don't think you should be that aggressive with your player takes that you know
stribbling is going to be great. Like we hope he is and he's a great pick. But he sees a gamble
and anyone who says otherwise like I think is a little too confident. But I do go into drafts
like where I might get confident. You know, I mentioned the example of like maybe getting
bijon and Gibbs on the same team. There are like $4 guys that like at the wide receiver position
where I'm like I can see starting Jacobi Myers like he was on pace for $900 to $1,000 with the
Jaguars last last year. I can see starting Jalen Coker like once he was healthy like it's not
inconceivable that he could keep up with those six round guys. So I wouldn't go down to like
$2 guys. But like yeah, there are $4 guys I really like where their presence like gives me
the confidence to bid higher on stars. Yeah, do you think some of those wide receivers?
You mentioned receivers that I think you can start also like also going in that range would be
Matthew Golden, Xavier Worthy, Jaden Reed sometimes, Steph Diggs like do you think those guys
are going to stick in that $4 range for the most part? Because if so, that seems like a great
part of the plan. Yeah, I do. And outside of Worthy, who I just really struggle to ever envision
trusting until he shows it again, like I think you absolutely nailed the type of players you can
feel comfortable like starting like there's there's enough volume like Reed, Golden, those are
great picks. So yeah, that you get the nail in the head there. Yeah, I mean, even like the browns
guys, you know, like Denzel Boston, I was in a draft last night. Somebody said Denzel Boston
like 120 overall, you know, I'm not going that far, but there's a lot of Denzel Boston hype.
Right now it conception also on our list for cheap wider seekers to target to I like the browns
guys for like basketball, but like I'm still skeptical that we're ever going to see a browns
receipt for this year that we can put in a lineup and like know they're going to get 40 yards.
Yeah, okay. I know you look at the ETR values. Are there any players on ETR in our
actually values or rankings that you have differing opinion on versus our stuff? I always find
it interesting when people push back on our rankings. Yeah, I don't. So like as a starting point,
like I think you guys do a great job with rankings, which is always makes this question difficult
because I do think you do a great job of filtering what matters and doesn't, but like there are
subtle differences and kind of how I value players that have just made it so that I don't have
any of them. And a couple of examples are probably Justin Jefferson, where I'm pretty cool on him,
just like, you know, a couple months ago, I had a strong belief we were never going to see nine
play again. And great news that we have confirmation that Murray's starting, but like we build in
all this risk with Trey McBride that like Carson Beck's going to be a starter later in the season.
The fact that the Vikings haven't shot JJ McCarthy to the moon, like still makes me fear that he's
going to be the quarterback late in the season. So it's really hard for me to absorb all that risk
in a player who's being valued like in the seven to ten range. So that's one example. I guess
another is like I'm really high on sake one, but like I just can't take him because I feel like
in order to hit where he's ranked, he needs more check downs and he needs jail and hurts to do it.
And there's a clear path for that because I think that's how he's effectively used, but I'm just
always nervous projecting past catching volume from running QBs. And so like I honestly just feel
safer about guys like Chase Brown or even HN. Interesting. Yeah, you know, I think in in high
stake stuff, HN might go for significantly cheaper than sake one. Like I can't find many people
that I know who actually want to click on HN this year, you know, and so including myself,
but you know, we'll see. Okay, let's go to Superflex. We have to do Superflex because ETR CEO Taylor
Kaby plays in a Superflex auction league. And so we're not allowed to do this show without talking
about Superflex auction. I don't even know how much Superflex auction you play if it all Chris,
but if you do or have any thoughts, what adjustments do you think people need to be making an auction
forced reflex leagues? I don't play in as many Superflex, but dabble a little bit. And so like,
I think the most important thing for me when I'm doing those leagues is, you know, everyone knows
you want two quarterbacks, but even more so than usual, like soft in your player takes on the top
20 top 21 and be in on every single one of those players because I want two of them. It's difficult
to predict which quarterbacks are going to take off or not. And so that means I'm actively bidding
on like almost every single one of them at like maybe 80, 85% of their price. And I don't care
which I get. Like I said, I just want two of them. The other thing I'm doing, I kind of mentioned
this approach with the backfields of like you have these ambiguous situations where like we had
it with the Cowboys last year, you could get just being about running backs. Like you could get
Javante Williams, engine blue for $3 a piece. You didn't have to be right. You just had to start
running back for six bucks. And I'm not saying these guys are going to be stars, but like the ability
to corner the Raiders or the Falcons quarterbacks get both of those guys for a few bucks.
That makes I'd much rather do that than pay like a Jalen Waddle price in a Superflex for
for Cam Ward or Bryce Young. And that's that's what I've seen them go for.
I think that's really interesting. Obviously you're managing this league and so you know which
quarterback to start at which point Windows or Cousins, etc. Do you ever, how important do you think
it is to get three quarterbacks? Because given that strategy, if one of your targets is like Raiders
together for six bucks or something, maybe you could afford to have three quarterbacks or four
quarterbacks on your roster. How important do you think that is? Yeah. In a 10 team, yet you can
get three and that's easy, but in like a 12 team, that is how I prefer to piece together that third
quarterback. I want that insurance, but I'm looking at Atlanta Cleveland, Las Vegas and hoping
that I can get one of like a set of those guys for like, you know, six, seven bucks. And that's
preventing me from spending enough money to lose out on like a Jalen Waddle player. Yeah.
The Raiders idea is super interesting to me because number one, I think Windows is actually
going to be good. And number two, he has clean Cubiac. And number three, he's undervalued
Mendoza is right now because of this rhetoric that Cousins is going to start all year. I would be
shocked if Cousins started all year. And so, you know, the price is down because of those three
reasons on Mendoza, I think. Yeah. It feels like what any coach would say if they sign Kirk Cousins,
I mean. It's all fun with Kirk Cousins. So the first pick six. Okay. All right. Let's get to some
Some listener questions here have three of them.
Appreciate everyone who sent in questions a lot.
of them were topics that we already covered here.
Hopefully we covered yours.
So we'll do three here.
First up, friend of the show John Silas says,
how much has your overall approach changed over the years
as the landscape has evolved?
Fantasy players becoming sharper,
more resources available like ETR, et cetera.
Strategy's changing.
So yeah, any notes on changing dynamics
or changing strategy for you in auction over the years?
- Yeah, I would say for me, like observe the same thing.
People are better at this than they were 10 years ago.
But it's still important to find areas
where you can create your edges.
And for me, the biggest thing has been
become more adaptable in terms of roster construction,
like 10 plus years ago, maybe before 2016.
You could print money in these high stakes leagues
if you just spend all your money on four wide receivers.
And the reason you could is 'cause there was maybe
one other person you're like doing it.
Now you get in the room with all these sharks,
there's five or six guys trying to do the same thing.
And like I said, the beginning of this,
if everyone's doing the same thing, what's your advantage?
So I think it's really important to know when to pivot.
And I'm not going into any auction,
thinking I have to have four wide receivers
or I can't get three running backs.
So flexibility is more important than ever.
The second is, I think one benefit
of all this influx of information
is we have so much group think when players rise
and fall on draft boards and everyone's saying
the same thing on Twitter.
And one of the things I think your marketplace Monday takes
do a great job of us helping us filter
what news matters and what doesn't.
But I think that has allowed for some type of advantage
when I think in recent years,
we've seen some of these high players
like I was talking about just get steamed
so much closer to the drafts.
- Yeah.
- Question two from Autism Warrior.
He says, how does your strategy change
with a 10 team league versus 12 or more?
Are you more afraid or less afraid to overpay
for your must-haves in smaller leagues?
Yeah, we've touched on this some already.
We have an article up on the site
where you can read it in detail how we think
you should be attacking 10 team leagues
and 14 team leagues in Snake.
I assume some of the same strategies apply here
to auction, Chris, but anything more
for people in 10 team auction leagues.
- Yeah, most important thing is be
Uber aggressive on that top tier.
Like I said, it's shallow enough
that spend 70 something dollars on B-john and Gibbs.
You can fill out the rest later.
And so like overpaying for that top tier
is absolutely something I'm not afraid of in a 10 team league
versus again, the broader your lineup requirements,
like the less you wanna spend.
I only think it's ever advisable to like view
any players as like must-haves,
but I get it in your homelinks.
You might want your guy.
But if we are maximizing EV,
I think you gotta take the value as it comes.
- Yeah, the other thing that I'd say about 10 team leagues,
I mean, I'm way more likely to spend a lot on
Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, Brock Bowers, McBride,
Loveland because the waiver wire is just,
you're gonna find amazing running backs
and wider sewers on the waiver wire in 10 team leagues.
But you're not gonna find amazing tight ends
and quarterbacks that can match Josh Allen
or Brock Bowers.
Last question here from Matt.
I think historically I've done more harm than good
trying to price and force,
especially when going stars and scrubs.
I've been thinking about literally walking away
from the screen for a period of time mid-draft.
That sounds very drastic to me, Matt,
but he wants to know if you have any thoughts
on price enforcing and how to do this in a plus EV way.
- Yeah, so don't place bids
that you're not comfortable winning.
Don't get me wrong, it's like definitely a rush,
it's like a poker bluff,
but Fantasy Football is assessing risk versus reward.
And this is just a poor bet
because I'll see so many auctions
where like the guy who bought Josh Allen
like had to bid $7 on Jay and Daniels
'cause he just can't see him go for $7.
But the risk that guy's taking is that he's wasting $7.
And the only benefit he's getting
is some other player's gonna spend more than $2.
No, $2 more than he should, maybe $4 more than he should.
But that benefit doesn't even benefit just him.
It benefits 11 people,
but he's the person assuming all that risk.
It just doesn't make sense from a risk reward perspective.
So yeah, don't bid on anyone, you're not comfortable winning,
but also don't walk away mid-draft
because I do think at other positions,
I like to be on it in on everyone.
And I always wanna be there just to bid 60%, 70%,
just in case an extreme value actually does pop up.
And I feel like if you're not there to have the potential
to get Kyron Williams for like $12
just 'cause he's a boring player,
like it probably not gonna happen,
but why cost yourself that chance?
- Yeah, and this is the other reason
it's important to go into your auction with your own numbers
because Chris is saying, you know,
I can price and force on every running back
in wide receiver probably by bidding 60%, right?
And then like if I get 'em for 60% of my value,
I'll probably be pretty happy about it.
Even though if it wasn't my plan,
I'll probably be pretty happy with it.
Do you ever price and force up?
But let's say you bid 60% and someone goes $2 more than you.
Are you clicking back on that
or what point do you stop the price and forcing
if you don't want the guy?
- Yeah, is a general matter?
Like I want almost everyone except for like a onesie position
that I already have filled.
So totally agnostic to player when I'm coming in
with my values 60 to 70% on anyone, I'll take.
- Yeah.
So I'm not gonna see these clicking wars with people
and I'm like, you know, this is still below my value,
but I really, I just don't want, I like this guy,
I don't want you, I don't really need this guy,
but I don't want you to get this guy at a value.
So I get it's like these clicking wars, which,
you know, I want to stop.
Maybe I'll make it like 80% or something.
I'll stop clicking it back to price and force,
even on guys that I like, you know?
- Yeah, I find it hilarious when it gets personal.
It's like 31FU.
- Exactly.
- Exactly.
Why do auction, if it's not gonna give personal,
it's great.
Okay.
Anything else you want to say here, Chris,
about auctions before we get out of here?
- No, most fun form, most fair.
- Yeah.
- Form a community football, love it.
Wish it was more popular and hope it becomes so.
- Yeah, you know, it's certainly more fair, you know?
I mean, if you get the number eight pick this year,
you are not getting Jamar Chase.
Whereas in an auction, of course,
you can get Jamar Chase and there's so many other
different ways you can go, you have access to every player.
I said at the top, it's the most pure form
of fitness football drafting.
And I honestly think like, I think it's the time commitment
that people don't want, you know?
Like doing an auction for 150 players or 200 players
or whatever it is, it's like, takes a really long time.
I think that's partly a whole hell of auction back
from getting more popular.
I don't know, I don't know.
- Yeah, I mean, I always try to tell my kids
like life isn't fair, but like, I don't react that way
when I draw this 12th pick in a fantasy restaurant.
- All right, Chris, I don't know if you want to be found,
but if you do want to be found, tell the people
where they can find you.
- Sure, feel free to reach out.
I'm Chris Eibel, a Twitter.
As we get closer to my New York and Vegas drafts and auctions,
I may be harder to reach, but until then,
you know, happy to chat or correspond with anyone.
- All right, really appreciate the time.
From Chris, as always, huge good luck to Chris
and everyone else out there grinding
in the auction streets again.
If you have draft kit pro, you do have access
to our auction values for all formats,
our cheap players, its target, strategy articles,
and more.
Four, Chris, for Bruce Orion.
For sure Luke, I am Adam.
Good luck, everybody.
(upbeat music)
[BLANK_AUDIO]
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
In 2026, running back thirst is intense in snake drafts, but successful auction players should pivot by targeting undervalued wide receivers and using a stars and scrubs strategy to avoid overpaying for saturated positions.
Chris Eibel recommends maintaining a stars and scrubs approach, especially in 10–12 team formats, to maximize starting lineup value and leverage waiver wire flexibility, while noting that top-tier players like Drake London and Devonta Smith may be overlooked due to late nominations.
Auction players should use early nomination of mid-tier stars (e.g., Jonathan Taylor, Josh Jacobs) to create bidding pressure and drive down prices, while being cautious of hype-driven steam from young receivers or preseason highlights, which can inflate prices unpredictably.
Summary:
In 2026, the auction draft landscape sees heightened demand for running backs in snake formats, but Chris Eibel emphasizes that the most effective strategy is to pivot away from trends and focus on undervalued wide receivers and a stars and scrubs approach. He highlights that in shallower leagues (10–12 teams), overpaying for top-tier stars like Bijan Gibbs or Jamar Chase is not only acceptable but strategic, as it allows for stronger roster construction and waiver wire flexibility. Chris advises early nomination of mid-tier players such as Jonathan Taylor or Drake London to create bidding pressure and drive prices down.
He cautions against overpaying for hype-driven players, noting that preseason highlights often lead to inflated bids that don’t reflect actual value. A key strategy is to maintain a stars and scrubs model, with 60–70% of the budget on top stars, and to use a flexible, adaptive approach to roster building, especially in deeper leagues where injuries can derail a single star. For Superflex leagues, he recommends securing two quarterbacks at 80–85% of value to ensure coverage, and he highlights undervalued running back options like Deandre Swift or David Montgomery as potential low-cost, high-impact picks.
Chris also stresses the importance of price enforcement only on players you're comfortable winning, avoiding bidding wars that waste money. He notes that auction players should use personal values and market data to identify undervalued players, such as DK Metcalf or downfield options, and that the most successful players are those who stay adaptable, avoid groupthink, and prioritize risk-adjusted decisions. Ultimately, he views auction drafting as the purest, most fair form of fantasy football, though its popularity is limited by time commitment.
He encourages fans to use ETR’s auction values and strategies to improve their draft outcomes and to stay vigilant against overhyped players.
FAQs
Instead of overpaying for top-tier WRs, focus on stacking your WR three spot with undervalued players like Devonta Smith or Zay Flowers. This creates flexibility and allows you to build a strong roster without relying on overpriced stars.
Yes, especially in 10-12 team leagues. Stars and scrubs allows you to allocate most of your budget to top players and use your waiver wire to rebuild, giving you more roster flexibility and reducing risk.
Running backs like Jonathan Taylor or Chase Brown are expensive but not necessarily overvalued. Their value comes from consistent usage, and the best strategy is to use them as part of a balanced team, not as a sole focus.
Players like Drake London, Chase Brown, and Devon Herring may be overlooked despite strong projections. Early nomination of these players can force others to make decisions, leading to better bids for you.
Anchor your team on one star and use a 'zag' strategy. Nominate a slightly lower-tier player to create competition. If top players are overpriced, you’ll get better value in the next tier, especially in shallower leagues.
Yes, but focus on the middle tier of quarterbacks (like Stafford, Purdy, or Jordan Love) rather than the top. These players offer strong value and depth, and are often undervalued despite similar projections.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.