Drew, I'm so over it. I'm so over the election. - Yeah, all right. - I'm so sick of it. I think this is a really useful thing to talk about, especially this year, is how much we should give a fuck about politics? That's the fuck of the week. How much should we actually care about all this nonsense that goes on week in, week out? That feels like a soap opera that is on every channel, every podcast, every radio show, all the fucking time. I kinda just lost it this morning. I usually, I make my morning smoothie and I do some house stuff, and I listen to a podcast in the morning. It's like just, it's not my morning routine, but it's one of the things I do in the morning. And every podcast I listen to this morning had an election episode. - Even the non-political ones. Please. - All of the business ones, the finance ones, all of them. And now I'm here making an election episode. - I'm doing this too, right? - I've officially become what I hate. - Yeah. (laughing) - It's the subtle art of not giving a fuck podcast with your host, Mark Manson. - But seriously, I do wanna get into, how much does this actually matter? How much is it worth caring about? I think you and I were old enough now, we've been through many election cycles, we've been through many, quote unquote seismic shifts in the American polity. Like, how much has it really mattered? I don't know. - I'd like to discuss that today. - Cool, so yeah. - Well, I mean, how much should we give a fuck about? I mean, politics, like big elections, elections in other countries, politics in general. How much do you think we should give a fuck about it? Does it differ for everyone? So clearly we should give some fucks, right? Like you can't just pretend nothing's happened. - Right. - Like ultimately, you know, if you were blessed enough to live in a democracy, then it is, part of our responsibility to give somewhat of a fuck about what's going on among the leadership. I have two takes around this. They both took me a long time to figure out, and I think both of them are under broadcast towards the general public, but I think more people need to hear them. The first one is, I think people put way too much weight on the person and less weight on the party or policies. For instance, I don't like Donald Trump. I never liked Donald Trump. I've been on the record for many years. I'm not a fan of the guy, but if you look at what he actually did in his four year presidency, it didn't differ that much from what any other Republican would have done. - Right, yeah. - And you could say the same about Biden. You could say the same about Obama. You could say the same about George W. Sure, I think the individual can influence a lot at the margins, and there are maybe rare specific occasions where the actual individual does have a lot of effect. I think Obama's choice to go after Osama bin Laden is an example of that. I think some of Trump's choices foreign policy-wise are examples of that, but it's like the bulk of it. 95% of it is the party. And I think people lose track of that because it's human nature to glom onto personalities and find all the things you love or hate about certain personalities. And not realize that they're really just kind of figureheads of these like larger blobbulous movements that take place. - Well, I mean, personality matters still, though, right? The character of the person matters, right? So, this is something I might be changing my mind on. - Okay. - Okay, so this is low conviction. Like, don't hold me to this audience. I am playing with an idea, but this is something that I'm re-evaluating personally, because if I look back the presidents in my adult lifetime, the two people that I think were very high integrity people, I think George W. Bush was a very high integrity person. I think Obama is a very high integrity person. I think Trump and Biden are not high integrity people. If you look at who got the most done and who affected the most actual change and actual policy, like actually got their policy agenda through Congress and into law and actually affected the country and the world stage, the two guys, like I think Obama was largely ineffective and I think W was just made really bad decisions. Whereas I think both Trump and Biden, whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that they both were very effective at getting their policies done, right? Like, they both got shit done. So, I don't know, I'm re-evaluating that. I think it is important that you don't have just like a total criminal who's like trying to subvert everything, but like, I don't know if I need a saint either. I don't know if I need somebody who's honest, like well, first of all, anybody who gets shit done in politics is by definition not an honest person. Like, you have to lie to get shit done in politics. So, I don't know, maybe I'm becoming cynical with age, but I think people over index on the personality of the person and I think that's human nature. We tend to, we wanna like elevate people as heroes or denigrate people as villains when really they're just figure heads for movements of large interest groups. And I use interest groups in a very broad context, not just like limited to like certain corporate industries or whatever, but like also demographics of people, right? So, that's the first point, right? Second point is I think we over end, in the age of social media, we over index on global and national issues and we under index on local issues. I think there is a tendency we are overexposed to things that happen very, very far away that are often very terrible, but we have absolutely no controller influence on and they have no controller influence on us. Yet we wrap up so much of our emotional well-being and mental health and the outcomes of these things that happen on the other side of the world. I just can't help but feel like that's insane. Meanwhile, like your local school is underfunded, the crime in your neighborhood is going through the roof. There's like a housing crisis in your city and nobody's paying attention, nobody cares. Like to me, that is just absolute insanity that you would over index on this thing that's happening 5,000 miles away while ignoring your neighbors and your schools and the streets that your kids walk down. So, that's another drama I've been banging on for a long time that I just think people need to like, again, it's good to know the things that are happening on the other side of the world, but I don't know if we should be basing so much of our, like investing so much of our emotional well-being. - Totally agree on this one. And yeah, just this morning, so I took this one to heart, you've been saying this for a while, like you said. I took this one to heart a year or two ago and I signed up for like my local newspaper, I live in a fairly small city and it's like, I don't really know what's going on and there's been like, I didn't know, there was this whole long debate about closing schools and everything that I had no idea about. And that affects my neighborhoods, even too, that I live in. So I wouldn't have known about that had I not been paying attention to what was going on in my own community. And just this morning, actually, too, there was some data that came out. They do the survey in Colorado every two years, mental health of the kids in school. And actually, it's improved drastically in the last two years for 2021 to 2023. - Sure. - So they collected the data in 2023. That's not reported, nobody probably sees that. Hardly anybody in my city probably sees that. - Right. - But at a local level, great, that's a great thing. Things are improving in that way. But you would think if you're reading the national news, everything's going to hell on a hand card. - Oh, yeah. I think this is probably a third really good point. Is that bad news will come to you. You need to go find the good news. - Oh, yeah. - Because there's actually way more good news than there is bad news. Like if you, we've got a book on the shelf here, better angels of our nature. Stephen Pinkert, it's an 800 page book. And it's just, the whole book is essentially charts and data and graphs showing that by most metrics, we live in the best time to ever be alive. Like there's less crime, less violence, less war, less disease. People are living longer, they're more educated, there's more freedom, there's more equality. Like all of these things are the best they've ever been. And if you watch the news all the time, or if you're like doom scrolling TikTok all the time, your instinct is to not believe that. Because you're simply not exposed to all the amazing things that are happening. But if you do go dig into a lot of data like that, things are getting better all the time. Like there's, there's improved, there's vast and drastic improvements happening in all sectors of society, on a pretty regular clip. So it's like, again, it's finding context, I think, is the thing to give a fuck about. You know, it's, yes, you should care about what's happening in the world. But instead of getting sucked into whatever narrative is going viral that week, which there's always a narrative going viral. Like the thing you should be giving a fuck about is finding the context, finding like, okay, what, that narrative is nice. But like, what is actually changing? What is actually going on with, you know, the world economy or education or like whatever's going on, you know, like whatever the story of the week is. - Right, and I think, you and I were talking about this the other day, like.
There are times where it's almost impossible not to get sucked into it, right? Like even for sure, like July was crazy for politics. You know, yeah, a assassination attempt on Trump, Biden drops out that whole thing. Yeah. Um, it's almost impossible not to get sucked into that. But what you just said about putting that into context. So somebody is getting sucked into this. Sure. Like, how would you, how would you recommend that they do put that into context? One of the things I thought about anyway through all this was like, I, I get, I will nerd out about the procedural stuff. I'm like, oh, the, the Democrats now have to find a new replacement, you know, all that kind of stuff. Or, you know, what is the history of assassination attempts in the United States? It's a kind of a complicated and active history. Yeah. What do you, how does somebody put that into context? You've, you've mentioned before, like reading history books, yes, learning about history more. And if you want to think globally, is that, is that how you do that? You think more historically and larger context or what do you think? I think reading history is hugely important because it just shows you that there's nothing new. Like nothing that's happening is unprecedented or new. We've had multiple present presidents drop out of the race. We've had multiple presidents with like major mental health or health issues who are still in office. We've had many, many, I think, like almost a dozen assassination attempts and four successful assassinations in our country. 46 presidents. Right. Like these things are not uncommon, they're not unprecedented. I think one thing to keep in mind, you know, coming back to the narrative thing is like people have to remember that the, the best marketing and publicity minds on the planet are working around the clock on US election years to suck you into their narrative. So you are like, you know, people love the complaint about advertising and the unrealistic marketing messages of like such and such industry and how it's like skewing people's perception of reality. It's like, dude, those are the minor leagues. Like the people who are who are writing the narratives and pushing the narratives today are like, this is the big leagues. And you've probably like surrendered and gotten sucked in the one without realizing that you did. It's important to understand like the playing field and the playing stakes that we're on. But you know, to your point about just like the inevitability of getting sucked in in these moments, I'm always trying to zoom out and reading history is one way of doing that. Looking for the broader statistics, historical statistics is another way of doing that. Again, fighting against the human inclination to put all of my hopes or hate onto a single individual and realize that like, they're kind of just writing this wave of large demographic and economic interests. And so pay more attention to the demographic and economic interests and less attention to like the person who happens to be surfing on top of it. Right. And I think kind of related to that point too is that it's something probably somewhere between 95 and 99% of people have already made up their mind. Yeah. Right. And why even give a fuck about the weakly, you know, gyrations of the media landscape when you already know who you're going to vote for. I mean, and you know the issues you know, the talking points are going to hit. Sure. Why? Why pay so much attention? And there's also the point that there's a significant overlap between the two parties. Like there's a whole swath of policy decisions that are going to be the same no matter who's enough. So you mentioned earlier about carrying about elections in other countries. I was doing some interviews in Australia. Oh, by the way, speaking to our in Australia coming up, check it out on the plug. Yeah. Quick plug. I'll actually be there during the election. Oh, yeah. Thank fucking God. But I was doing some interviews to promote the tour in Australia and it was funny because like they kept asking me about the US election and it is funny. There's like this, this love, hate relationship that the rest of the world has with our politics. Like they can't look away, like they want to look away, but they also can't because we are the biggest economy on the world. And we also have the best marketers and publicists working 24/7 to like get these narratives out. Right. So how much should you care about politics and elections happening on the other side of the world? Again, I would argue not a whole lot. First of all, like the vast majority of the influence, you know, unless you live in like a very like a rival country, like unless you're in like Russia or Iran or, you know, Israel, like what happens politically in the United States is not going to have that much of an effect on like what happens in your country. What happens with the US economy is going to have way more of a difference with what happens in your country. So again, focusing on the demographics and economics and again, putting most of your attention on the demographics and the economic waves and less attention on the jackass, the surfing on top of it. Right. Right. Cool. So we'll be right back with another edition of Brilliant or Bullshit. Quick message from our sponsors. All right. We're back. All right. Mark, for this brilliant or Bullshit, we've seen this data for a few months now being passed around. There's a political ideology gender gap opening up right now. So what they're finding across many different countries actually is that young women especially are becoming more liberal while young men are either remaining conservative to moderate or getting more conservative. And there's been a widening gap recently in them in recent years. In some countries, it's huge like in South Korea. There's now like a 50 point difference between how conservative and liberal young men and women are in the US. It's like a 30 point difference. Most of the most the effect seems to be driven by women becoming more and more liberal. Young people have always been more liberal than older people. Yes. But what's happening right now is that they're diverging. Young people are diverging from one another. What do you think is going on here? I find this super fascinating, especially because to my knowledge, previous generations, it was much more about age than it was gender. Yes. And what we're seeing now is that genders are polarizing across generations, men are becoming more conservative, women are becoming more liberal. I have a theory about this. I have no data to back this up, but this is just, and maybe I'm being biased because this is just the world that I live in. But correct me if I'm wrong, that, the polarization starts around like 2019, 2020, right? So my theory about this is actually, it has nothing to do with politics, it has everything to do with the for you feed on social media and TikTok. Okay. So what most people don't realize, I think this is one of the most under reported, significant events of the past 10 years, is the rise of TikTok, people, people mistake what actually made TikTok successful. Most people look at TikTok, TikTok had two innovations. The first one was short form video. And I think that's what most people associate with TikTok success. That they pioneered the short form video and that they were, you know, this gave them inroads into the social media environment and everybody got addicted to it and everybody had a ton of fun. There's a bunch of dopamine, yada yada. There might be some truth to that. I think the thing that is way underrated that people miss is TikTok's second innovation, which is the for you feed. So it used to be prior to TikTok, all of the social media algorithms were based on something called the social graph, which was essentially it looked at who your friends were and it looked at who you followed. So it would understand like, okay, so he's friends with this guy and he's in a relationship with this, this woman and he follows this famous actor. So he's probably going to be really into, I don't know, like Quentin Tarantino movies. So like, let's show him a Quentin Tarantino movie and the social graph was really effective and everybody was hooked on social media and everything. I think the side effect of the social graph is it pushed people in a very tribal direction so people became very like conscious of the group affiliations that they had. What TikTok did is TikTok said, I don't give a fuck who you know or who you like. I'm just going to pay attention to what you actually watch and then I'm just going to serve you more based on that. So the 4u feed is based on what's called the psychograph, which is essentially what do you enjoy actually looking at because sure, maybe your friends like this thing, but you're different than your friends and maybe there are things that you like that you don't talk about with your friends or that you don't show to your friends, but TikTok will figure that out based on your viewing patterns of all the short form video. And so the 4u feed is it segments people not by group affiliations and relationships. It segments people by their personalities and their just their inherent likes and dislikes. Now when you look at people, what are the things that, what are the greatest determinants of what they're likely to like or dislike? Well, one of the biggest ones is gender. You see very consistent differences between preferences between men and women, what they like to watch, what they like to listen to, what they like to read. And sure, not all women and not all men, but on average, men and women didn't have some of the biggest differences in content and media preferences. And so it would make sense to me that the 4u feed would create new epistemic bubbles, echo chambers of content that were largely
based around gender. And the reason I thought about this when I saw this data is because we are experiencing this in our industry at the moment. Like for the first 10 or 12 years of my career, both men and women read my content and roughly equal proportion. Suddenly in the past three years, there's been more men showing up and that trend is accelerating. I haven't changed anything. I'm not changed like I haven't changed my messaging. I'm not targeting men any more than I used to. I'm not speaking specifically about men's issues. I think what has happened is that the for you feed is just picked up that as an older man myself, I tend to resonate more with younger men. And so that's those are the people that are getting exposed. Those are the newcomers to the audience more and more whereas women, they're getting shown, you know, women thought leaders in this space more and more often. So you're starting to see a polarization in the self-help industry between what men consume and what women consume for the first time in like 15, 20 years. And yet nobody's really, like it's not like we all got together and like it's like, all right, you take the men over here and you will take the women over here. It's just like everybody's doing the same thing they always did. It's just the algorithm that assorting who's exposed to what has fundamentally changed over the past few years. Right. Right. I've seen some data too about the for you algorithm for TikTok. And it only takes something like 30 or 40 minutes of using TikTok for them to figure your psychographic out basically. And you think about that like Netflix has an algorithm, right? You can't watch a show in 40 minutes and it takes them weeks if not months to figure out what you like. They can figure it out in 30 to 40 minutes. I don't know. I can't tell if that's if that is scary, that TikTok is that smart or sad that we are that simple. Like 60-second video just wiping and they can figure out like we always know what you're going to like. We all like the thing that we're like you sophisticated, like thoughtful people with like very nuanced taste. And it's like, no, TikTok's got you figured out like 20 minutes. No, for sure. For sure. But yeah, this is it's wide spread though too. And so I think you're right. I mean, it because it's cross country and cross culture like it can't be it can't be like you can't blame like Trump or you can't blame, you know, some political thing. It's anything that is that multinational. It has to be something like very fundamental. And to me, technology is just kind of the most obvious. Right. Like anytime you see anything happening across the world simultaneously, the first place you should look is technology, information technology for sure. Yeah. To me, then there's there's a concern here that this could have wide ranging effects. Now, we should say that a lot of people who research this not everybody quite buys this story just yet. It's early on. It's kind of a sudden shift. And sometimes these things will go now regress back to the mean. Or there could be something in the data collection. Yeah. So there's there's like proceed with caution a little bit here. Yeah. But if this is a real thing, what do you think are something like the second and third order effects that we're going to see? Well, I find it deeply concerning because I feel like there's always been a little bit of a battle of the generations. You know, the older generations have always skewed much more conservative. Right. Younger generations have skewed much more liberal and progressive. And that to me, that makes sense. Like that, that there's like a balance in the force to that. Gender feels scary because like ultimately men and women need each other. Right? Like polarization around gender. Like to me, it is a little bit scary because it's, you know, now you start to get into repercussions in the dating market. You start to get into repercussions around household formation, family formation, fertility rate. Right. Just children like fucking propagating the next generation. It worries me for sure. And I don't really, I don't know how you solve for it. Like I don't know what the counterbalance is here. I saw a related statistic just recently, just the other day. And it was, it was like married men. I think it was married men like 70% voted Republican. Married women, it was 52%. Single men, it was like 60%. And then single women, it was like 75% Democrat. Right. Right. And so then you get into, there's like a, if you like, you know, dig down further into the data, you maybe you get this effect where it's like, okay, the only women getting married and forming families and having kids are the conservative women. And then it's just like you have this like this loose demographic of single women who are just like becoming more and more radicalized left wing. I don't know. I don't know. It's like, it's a weird thing. It seems on like, I don't know. There's nothing that I know of in history. I mean, women have only been voting for like a hundred years. So like, there's nothing that I know of in history that like was similar to this. Yeah. Yeah, but I mean, if we use South Korea as kind of the, the harbinger of this though, because they have the, the widest, so far, studied the, the widest gap. Sure. Um, they have one of the lowest birth rates of all. They do have the lowest birth rate. Yeah. Yeah. That's right. Yeah. Yeah. And it's under one per woman, under one child per woman. Right. Point seven eight or something like that. So they're not even close to replacement rate, you know, which needs to be two. I feel like there's, there's another aspect of this, which is just the, the transition to the service economy. Definitely. Like, like, like, I, you know, there was this book a long time ago that got shit on a ton. It was called, I think it was called the end of men. I think her name was Hannah Rosen. I think it came out around 2010, but she pointed out, and then Christina Hoffsommer's like wrote a book on this, uh, I think in the mid 2000, like, there were people, there were women who were like pointing to this coming a long time ago. And what they pointed out is they said that like, starting in the 90s or so, girls started performing much better in school by like the 2000s that by far getting in the college more often, they were getting more degrees, they're getting more graduate degrees. Now we're at the point where it's like, I think up until about age 30, women are out earning men by a significant amount. And it's like that, that statistic, you know, every, every decade that statistic creeps up, you know, another five or 10 years. And I do think that like if you are a woman who has worked her ass off throughout her life, gotten a good degree, have a great job. I think there are two, two things start happening. One is, uh, you know, the, the opportunity cost of getting married, settling down, having children becomes much, much greater, um, and much, a much more complicated decision. And then the second thing that happens is that like, you're, you're dating pool of acceptable men, like if, if you are a high achieving woman, then the vast majority of the men you're going to meet are less successful than you, less accomplished than you have had fewer life experiences. That's a great idea, Jim. You know, and like, that's not an exciting dating pool. Right. Right. So it becomes harder to find a partner. And so yeah, I don't know, like it just, I see, you can kind of see how all these things, you know, we've talked to, talked about all these subjects. We've talked about like the, how weird the dating market is now. We've talked about, you know, some of the educational attainment. We've talked about loneliness. Now we're talking about politics and like you're seeing the same, like echoes of the same pattern show up in a bunch of different places. But back to my point about like paying attention to the economic and demographic wave and less attention to the people writing it. Um, I think a lot of this can simply be explained by the world is largely switched to a service economy. And women are more like women seem to excel in service economy. They're like, it's men's natural advantages are in physical labor and blue collar work. And you know, and it's you could argue that women's natural advantages tend to be more in service service jobs, care oriented jobs dealing with people relationships. And like, that's the economy we live in now. Right. So I don't know. I don't have the answer. But it's like, I can see where the threads are connected. You know, I don't know. Like what do you, what do you think about it? Back when I was doing research, I did a little bit of research with a political scientist actually. He was looking at like physiological markers and how they relate to political polarization. Yeah. More or less. But one of the things he found, which was really interesting to me was that your political views actually predict your, your mates, political views more so than like any other measure that they like smoking. Right. Well, even like one, it's more likely that you would be a non-smoker and merrier smoker than to be like a liberal, a merrier conservative. Interesting. Like that sort of thing. So this like really, really matters. And that makes sense to some degree because it's like a values thing. Sure. So the more, this was back in the late 2000s too. When we thought polarization was going crazy, and we had no idea what was inside of us, you know, well, I don't want to, I don't want to interrupt the generations ago. That wasn't true. Right. Right. Right. That's another, that's another interesting thing is that now more and more people, I forget the exact number, but more, more and more people are saying I would not want my son or daughter to marry someone of the opposite political party, which that's getting a little bit scary at that point. Because now you're starting to see them as the other. And that's not too far of a really sorting society in the two camps. Yes. And yeah, that doesn't, that's more, there's more and more super districts now too. I think I'll super districts where, you know, one day,
party basically has monopoly on this. That's more and more common now. It's like one in four people live in one of these districts now or something, something crazy like that. I have never lived in a state where my vote mattered on a national level. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So I don't know. I mean, the trend is very, the trend is scary. There is a lot of second and third order effects, fourth order effects that we probably can't even think of right now. I don't know. I don't like this. I don't like it either. You know, the wanting your son and daughter to marry somebody like that. That's super fucked up because I remember seeing data around that too. And they were comparing it. They were saying it was so back in the day, back in like the 1950s or 60s, they would ask people how they would feel, they would ask people that question, how would you feel if your son or daughter married a person of like X trait? And the largest, the two things that had the largest disapproval were somebody of a different race and then somebody of a different religion. And today, those are like almost a non-issue. Yeah. There's like all very, very, very few people give a shit if you marry somebody of a different race or a different religion, which is great. That's like where we want to be. The problem is, is that they seem to have replaced that with political stripe. You know, so now it's like people will say, I'm, I disapprove of my son or daughter marrying somebody of an opposite political stripe. Just as much as people 60 years ago said, I'd just prove my son or daughter marrying, you know, somebody of a different race like that. I feel, it feels like we've just replaced one problem with another. And I hate the set, like, I don't know, I don't want to be one of these people who like inflates the meaning of words, but like, I don't know, maybe we've replaced one form of bigotry with another form of bigotry. Like you and I are both from red states, grew up in, in very like rural middle America background. So like, I have a ton of right-wing people in my family, a bunch of friends at home who are right-wing, but I've always lived in very blue states and very left-leaning places, New York, Los Angeles, Boston. So I've always lived in both worlds. And it does like, it does concern me just how blind so many people I meet or talk to are to the other world. Right. Yeah. You can't, and you can't communicate that to them. What I find is very hard to communicate that to them anyway or like show like, you know, these perceptions that you have that these people are completely wrong. Yeah. You can't go to somebody like, no, you're wrong. Yeah. I found that very difficult. And it's like, yeah, but like you and I, when you have one foot in both worlds, it's kind of, I don't know, it's kind of a mind-fuck, it's hard to navigate. This is why we get so depressed every election year. Yeah. That's true, because I just, yeah, I've tried not to get sucked into it, but here we are. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. All right, we'll be right back. All right, we're back. Mark, I got a couple of questions for you from some YouTube viewers. Okay. This first one, is it possible to get fully numb to all the tragic world events with all the wars and conflicts going on? Well, we eventually become more apathetic and give less attention to things like genocide. Is there a limit to the amount of empathy we can give to larger tragic events? Oh, for sure. I mean, people are already numb to it. I mean, nobody gave a shit about the genocide in South Sudan. Nobody gave a shit about the genocide in Syria. Nobody gave a shit about the Uighurs in China. Nobody gave a shit about the Civil War in Yemen or the Civil War and all the murders in Somalia. Congo has been in the Civil War. I think there's been 10 million people killed over the last 40 years. Nobody gives a shit. Nobody's talking about that. People are already there. People are protesting at college campuses over the fucking Civil War in Congo. Again, coming back to the smartest marketing and publicity minds in the world are constructing narratives around certain interests. And so if you're getting swept up in one of these narratives, I'm sorry, maybe I'm maybe I'm jaded, but like, I don't think you actually care about the thing you think you care about. Like if you actually cared about genocide, you would have been protesting every day of your life since you were an adult. You were old enough to read the news, right? The fact that you're only protesting or upset today means that you've bought into a narrative that you've been manipulated. Yeah. So yes, you are already numb. We are all already numb to massive tragedies. And we hear about them all the time and we don't care, don't listen. In less, we find that specific narrative intriguing enough to buy into and get invested in. Okay, well, this next question is a follow up and I think you can elaborate a little bit on that then too. So how do we deal with uncertainty in these troubled times when so much sad news is around us? Yeah. The general trend of the world is getting darker every day. Not true. And it makes me more anxious. So how do I not give a fuck about the status of the world? You should give a fuck about the status of the world, but you should have an accurate perception of the world. And news media is not going to give you an accurate perception of the world. One of my favorite studies ever, and this is cited, I did a huge article on the website a number of years ago. I think it's literally called why you should not watch the news. Yeah, I should put the news. Yeah. And there was a study and I found that people, the more news that people consumed the less informed they were about specific topics than they had watched. And so like news media is actively making you less informed. You are more informed on like in the abstract, like you're more aware of certain things that are happening, but you are completely unaware of like the details, the context, the data, the historical context around certain stories or pieces of news. Like those are as a rule, like news is optimized for the moment. It's not optimized for truth. Right. It's not optimized for getting the data right. It's not optimized for historical context. So my advice to this person and to everybody is spend way less time watching, like I'd say cut out 90 plus percent of your news diet and replace that with readings of history and looking up and trying to understand historical data or the data of certain issues, certain conflicts. What you will find is that most data is either bullshit or it was created by one side or the other to feed a narrative. And what you will find when you study history is that none of this shit is new. It's been going on forever. So whatever thing you're upset about, whether it's Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, you know, a presidential candidate being shot at a pandemic, go read history, go read all the other times this has happened throughout history. And the first thing you'll discover is that it happens all the fucking time. And actually it's typically been much worse than it is today. And we still got through it fine. But the second thing you'll discover is that a lot of this historical context will start to inform your opinion about what's happening today. Like you will have a much greater context and understanding of the different forces and interests and and backstory and history that are involved with whatever is happening today. In my case, my mind has been changed by reading history more than anything else in my life. News media has never changed my mind about anything. Listening to a politician has never changed my mind about anything. Arguing with friends has maybe very, very rarely changed my mind. Finding good data and statistics has changed my mind a decent amount, but it's very hard to find good data in statistics. But reading history, man, reading history, that will fucking change your mind about stuff because you can't argue with 100 years of human experience. I remember during the pandemic, I started having a freak out and I decided I'm like, I'm going to go buy every history book about every pandemic and plague that I can think of. And it was crazy. It was like all the stuff that seemed completely unprecedented and like unacceptable in 2020 happened every single time. It was like people behave in the exact same way every single time. And yeah, I don't think I heard there were unprecedented more than any other time during that period. Of course, everybody's, everything was unprecedented. Again, it comes back to news because if you news, it's like everything has to be unprecedented because that's what's going to get you to watch. It's like, this has never happened before. Stay tuned, right? You know, and it's, if you just go to a library, you're like, oh, wait, no, this has happened like a hundred times. It was funny. Actually, I was reading during the pandemic. I was reading Ron Cherna's biography of George Washington, which is fucking fantastic. By the way, huge recommendation for everybody. George Washington's underrated. That's another, that's another topic though. It was funny. I was reading the biography of George Washington. And so there was a cholera pandemic in the United States, I think in like 1794 or something like that. And it was funny because Washington was like, there's this huge cholera outbreak. All these people were dying. And so he, he gave like a stay-in-home quarantine order. And like, like all fucking pandemonium broke loose. Like people started protesting conspiracy theories emerged. People started saying that Washington like invented the pandemic for his political purposes. Like it was all the same shit. Like is the exact same stuff all over again. I'm like, wow, like literally nothing has changed. Right. Right. Yeah. Well, we're some of these other books you would recommend though too.
historical books, so we're talking about, to learn about history in just a general. It really comes down to like, so this, if I could just succinctly put my recommendation into a single sentence, it is whatever, like whatever issue in the world you are really concerned about, that you're really upset about, that seems absolutely horrible and unprecedented. Go by two or three books on the history of that region, of that conflict, if it's in an event, if it's like a pandemic or a president getting shot at, like it's like, you know, go by all the books about the previous times that event happened. And what you will find is that A, things don't really change a whole lot, B, every single time the thing happened, people thought it was the worst it's ever been, and this has never happened before. And C, it just helps you understand that like the interests and the stakes are like way more complicated than you think they are. And there's like, there is history and precedent going back centuries, most of which you probably don't understand, most of which like a lot of people within like whatever issue, whatever conflict probably don't understand either. So it's, the worst case scenario is you become very informed and you have the same opinion. Best case scenario, you learn so much that you change your opinion or you realize that like, oh, this is just how the world is, right? This is just what happens. Right. Okay. So do you have any recommendations then for news as well? Like for me, I actually do, I subscribe to, there's, it's called espresso, it's from the economist. And it's just like, here's five stories for today, like a paragraph of each of them, big things going on. It's the economist. So it's very like, yeah, vanilla, it's not, it's not taken aside, aside or on either way. I do that. Then like I said earlier, I also subscribed to my local newspaper, which I read almost every day as well. There's a thing called 1440, there's a newsletter called 1440, and like they really just prioritize like, this is what happened. This is what happened. Like these are the most important things that happened and like they give no take, there's no angle, there's no like whatever. It's really funny. Like I did this for a, for a long time, I stopped a few years ago, but for a number of years, I would actually just read the, the front page of Wikipedia. So Wikipedia has a, in the news section with, that has current events. And you know, Wikipedia by design is a political, right? So when an event happens, you just click on the article and then the article has been like highly edited and you know, there's like dozens of editors who are like arguing all the time of like, what, how things should be worded or whatever. So you, not always, but you generally get a pretty, a political telling of just the events without any sort of editorialization. I think it's really important to find smart people who, whose opinions you trust. I would say there's a certain class of thinker online who is really good at not getting sucked in the narratives. Those are the people that I look for. So like Tyler Cowan at marginal revolution, I think he's a great example, he's more libertarian than I am. I've been reading him for like 10 plus years. I have never seen him get sucked into a narrative. Right. Ever. I've never seen him get sucked into a political narrative. He's a real original thinker. He's super, super original and he, his commentary is almost always meta commentary, right? So it's like, you know, these are why these narratives are being created and these are why these narratives are being discarded, right? He's never like jumping into the middle of the fray and like arguing for team blue or team red. No, for sure. For sure. Yeah. And we'll post the article too that you wrote several years back. Yes. Why you should quit the news. I took that one to heart and I have really like way, way reduced my, my news consumption sits in and I cannot tell you how much just on a day to day basis that has helped my meat too. Just overall wellbeing. Me too. It's insane. So if you're somebody who's getting sucked into the news just, yeah, fun fact, I was brought on to the BBC had this show, I forgive what the show was called, but the BBC had this show. It was like a debate panel or whatever. And it was about the value of the news media. And they brought me on as like the anti news voice. It was me and three journalists, I don't think everyone saw this. It was, it was, they basically just sat on me for 20 minutes at the, like, there was one guy in particular. I have no idea who these people were, but there was one guy who was like in hysterics of like, but how are people going to know what's happening? Right. Like, I don't know, like Google, like, like, there's, like, you're not the bastion of a, you know, dispensing information that you were, you know, 80 years ago, sir. Sorry. That's the thing about the news media is going to self preserve, they're going to try to self preserve. Of course. So they're going to tell you, of course, that are the most important. Of course. It goes back to the manipulation thing. They're pushing this narrative. And do you want to get sucked into that? Right. Like, really ask yourself that. Well, I think there's also a very logical explanation for the deterioration of the quality of news, right? Because if you look at like, what was the news media's value, say in previous generations, it was, they were the ones who actually had the resources and means to go get the information. So they primarily just provided the information. Now the information is everywhere. The information is a commodity. It's cheap. It's not scarce. You don't need to pay for it. You can find it literally anywhere. Now what the news media specializes in is packaging information into narratives. And some news media is really good at packaging into blue team narratives. And some news media is really good at packaging and the red team narratives. And if you don't realize you're consuming a narrative, then yeah, you're just, you're the fucking mark. Yeah. You know, you're being conned. So that is what they're selling. They're selling the packaging. Not the information. Yeah. And I've, I've noticed you when I do get sucked into something that's going on, you know, where you just can't help it. Yeah. I've, I've checked myself and I'll, I'll check different source. I'll check one from the left one from the right. See what the narratives are being pushed. And I usually come back and I'm able to step back then kind of like, you know, Tyler Cowan does and take a more metal, metal look at it. So I think if you do just intentionally expose yourself to both sides and be like, Oh, okay, there are, there are narratives being pushed here. Which one do you give credence to if, if any at all? Yeah. That's a good way to do it, too. That's what I found anyway. Yeah. For sure. Yeah. Well, that's the episode. I'm a big fan of the, the wisdom of the week this week. There are a lot of political quotes we could have used. My favorite one and, and, and this is, this goes back, this harkens back to the point that like nothing is new. So asop the, the Roman poet, he, he wrote close to 2000 years ago. He wrote, we hang the petty thieves, but the big ones, we elect the public office. That's all for a show. Please like and subscribe, follow the show everywhere, leave a review. If you want to submit a question to Drew and I, you can send it to
[email protected] or you can simply leave it in the comments on YouTube. We will be back next week. And I guarantee it will not be about politics. The subtle art of not getting a farked podcast is produced by Drew Bernie, edited by Andrew Nishimura, Jessica Choi's, our videographer and sound engineer. Thank you for listening. and we will see you next week.
PodcastTranscript AI