How Damaged Are US Middle East Bases?

Perustin pyöräilyvät teitä valmistavan ornotin vuonna 2013. Mielestäni parasta Shopify saan se, että voimme harjoittaa liiketoimintaa ilman teknistä osaamista. Voimme hallinnoida yrityksen taustajaristeelle mien ja front-endia sekä myydä verkossa, vaivatta. Jos Shopify olisi pyöräilyvaruste, sollisimielestäni itse polkupyörä. Sillä asiat hoidetaan ja meidän liiketoiminta me hoituu Shopify-ssä. Aloita ilmainen kokeilu Shopify-piste-com-sivustolla. It's Friday, September 18. We have a new look at the war in Iran, and it's not pretty. We start here. Stunning images from American service members in Iran shed new light on the conflict. And you see an Air Force jet blown in half destroyed by Iranian fire on March 27. Alarm bells are going off in Washington. We'll tell you about it. Congress passes a new sanctions bill, but it's tariffs that have some Democrats worried. They just don't like the idea of giving the president that additional authority. We've got the impact it has on both Iran and Russia. And is the Kennedy Center reno going to become a demo? That the president was looking at a poster-board-sized photo of what appeared to be the Kennedy Center in Rulans. Why the president is apparently considering tearing down a DC landmark. From ABC News, this is Start Here. I'm Mike Deboski. Hey, happy Friday. Brat's out again today, but I've got you covered. As the war in Iran has dragged on, we've heard a lot of mixed messages from the Trump administration. First, this was a combat operation that was only going to take a few weeks. This is actually our excursion. It's just something that should have been done for 47 years. Now, more than six months later, there's still confusion over things like who controls the Strait of Hormuz and how open the Iranians are to negotiating over things like nuclear weapons. But one consistent message we've heard from the Trump administration is this. We're winning. America is winning decisively, devastatingly, and without mercy. While American strikes on Iranian targets have been ratcheting up in recent weeks, so have the Iranian strikes on American targets. Now, ABC News has learned the toll those strikes have taken on US bases. Maybe much greater than we originally thought. Let's start the day with ABC's Chief White House correspondent Mary Bruce. Mary, thanks for talking to me. ABC was able to give its hands on some pictures from American bases that have been attacked by Iran. Just tell me what these pictures show. Mike, these pictures really do give us a rare look at the toll that this war is taking on American military assets in the region. We were able to obtain these images which were sent to us by active service members who we are not naming, but it does show the extent of the damage. And you see an Air Force jet blown in half destroyed by Iranian fire on March 27th at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. Buildings at that same airbase are just completely torn apart. There's another image that shows the extensive damage from an Iranian attack at a US Army base in Kuwait. The date of that is unclear. And then at another base in Kuwait, we see this image of these containerized housing units that have just been completely shredded. So it is sounding some alarm bells and raising a lot of questions about American defenses and whether the administration is being forthcoming with the American people. Right, raises a lot of questions for the Pentagon and the Defense Department specifically. Have we heard from them in this at all? Well, we certainly have reached out to the Pentagon about these images and so far they're declining to respond. But keep in mind that since the early days of this war, Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth and the administration have downplayed Iran's attacks on US assets in the region. But it was just earlier this week that the Pentagon's watchdog did acknowledge in a report that Iranian strikes have damaged and destroyed hundreds of buildings and structures at US bases and saying dozens of US aircraft were destroyed or damaged. And when you think about the broader toll of this war, of course, 18 US service members have been killed. Over 800 have been wounded since the war began. One American service member who served in this war tells us, quote, the American people are unaware of the extent of the damage that American bases are taking in, adding that it's being kept a secret and we're acting like it's no big deal. But there are drone strikes and ballistic missile strikes actively landing on bases every day. And this service member says that the bases have been irreparably damaged, that it is going to take quite some time to rebuild. That this isn't just something that's going to happen, you know, quickly in six months. Right. And of course, this comes against the backdrop of President Trump saying that the war could be nearing an end. We learned recently that the president has said he's weighing some next steps with regards to what to do. What are we hearing from the Trump administration? What are some of those next steps? And just kind of what are the next couple weeks look like here from what we understand? It's a really good question that doesn't necessarily have a clear answer. The president continues to insist that the war will be coming to a close soon. He has said several times over the last few weeks that he thinks that the war will end after the midterm elections. We control the straight and lots of other things. So for a little while, I would say this shortly, but right after the election, because they'd like to have it that way, but right after the election. But he still hasn't explained how this war will come to an end. What will a broader nuclear deal look like? How will the straight of hormones reopen? Because of course, the longer this war drags on, we continue to see oil and gas prices spike, which is hitting quite hard here at home. Yeah, absolutely. With gas prices well over $4, a gallon now diesel prices even higher as we've talked about. Mary Bruce, I know you're going to continue to follow this story for us. Thank you so much for breaking it all down. Thank you. Next up on Start Here, Congress passes major news sanctions on Iran, and that's not all. That's coming up after the break. This show is sponsored by Horizon 3. A weird thing about life. Can you feel secure without actually being secure? I don't know. Have you ever accidentally nicked yourself while chopping vegetables or shaving? You've done those tasks a thousand times in your life. Enough that you barely think of them as having any risk at all. But familiar is not the same as a risk free. It's the same thing with cybersecurity. The threat you need to worry about isn't usually the risk you see coming. It's the risk you didn't even know existed. Horizon 3 is an AI native proactive security platform that changes that. It's a way to see what a hacker would find in your environment before they do. When you integrate with Horizon 3's node zero platform, you can securely hack your own environment at machine speed. They can cover the entire attack service in a single test and deploy in minutes. Horizon 3 is run more than 225,000 production safe tests. See exactly what an attacker would find in your environment before they do. Go to Horizon 3. That's the numeral3.ai/starthere and request your free node zero demo. Again, that's Horizon 3.ai/starthere. Horizon 3.ai/starthere. No commitment required. Results in hours. Not weeks. Today, I want to tell you about an exciting new deal from our friends at CozyEarth. Take a moment and think back to the best night of sleep you ever had. Did it feel like you might never sleep that well again? Well, good news. You can give yourself an amazing night of sleep every night by upgrading your bedding to CozyEarth. CozyEarth offers luxury bedding at an incredible price. Their ultra soft temperature regulating sheets, coverlets, and duvet covers are the perfect companion for a night of uninterrupted relaxation. The sheets come in all different colors and stripes so they're something for everyone, whether you're doing a big fall refresh for your master bedroom or updating a guest room in time for the holidays. And as comfy as they are on day one, they actually only get better from there because they are designed to get softer with every wash. Best of all, with our limited time deal, the already great prices are even better. You can get 50% off a wide assortment of bedding options by going to our unique link. That's right, 50% off, but hurry. This deal is only for a very limited time. Get yourself the bedding of your dreams. Right now, go to abcsecretsavings.com/starthere for 50% off the best bedding you will ever sleep on. That's abcsecretsavings.com/starthere Speaking of the war on Iran, one of the key levers for the Trump administration in this conflict has been sanctions. Well, right now, a new sanctions package is about to make its way to the president's desk. Let's bring an abc's alley pecoran to tell us about it. This bill is actually not just about Iran. There are measures aimed at Russia here as well. Just give us the general overview. What can you tell us about what's included in this bill? So, this bill is a package that had been a big effort by the late Senator Lindsey Graham. It was sort of his baby, this bill, because Graham, as you might remember, was a big ally for Ukraine. The Senate is united when it comes to standing up to Putin and those who prop him up to end this bloodbath. So, he created this bill in hopes of sort of knee-capping Russia's income stream. And this bill picked up momentum on Capitol Hill shortly after Graham's death. In fact, it's named after the late Senator the Lindsey Graham sanctioning Russia bill. Now, this legislation does a few things, perhaps the most obvious, is that it sanctions Russia. It sanctions Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian government officials, oligarchs, Russian banks, and financial institutions. And, as you mentioned, it also extends the President's sanction authority in Iran. Stop some of those authorities from lapsing when it comes to around. But the thing that it also does that sort of gotten a little bit more attention is that it kiitos, että se on tullut. to extend tariffs to countries that are the largest purchasers of Russian oil. That's interesting and we do know that not all Democrats, but some pretty prominent ones voted against forwarding this bill, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. What have we been hearing from the dissenters here about why they decided to vote now? Yeah, that's right now. I will say by way of legislation in recent congresses, this was pretty bipartisan. In the Senate, especially, this bill had a huge bipartisan showing too many people have died, too much blood has been shed. Now is the time to give the president the tools he needs to drive Putin to the table. Because today we send a message to vibrant Putin, you will not win this war. Even in the House, there were 53 Democrats that supported this legislation. That's not small potatoes in this very divided political moment that we're living in, but you are right. There were some large Democratic dissents, including the House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and one of the reasons that Democrats take such issue with this bill is because of those tariff authorities that I was just mentioning. What the bill does is allows the president to extend up to 100% tariffs on countries that are purchasers of Russian oil. That includes China and India. Now, there was sort of a narrowing of scope of that tariff authority from the original bill that was being proposed to get some more people on board, including the White House. But a lot of Democrats still have a problem with this because, as you might remember, tariffs are a pretty big sort of thorn in Democrats side here. They do not like the way that the president has been wielding his tariff authority, sort of this unruly use of tariffs. There's been a lot of discussion recently, for example, of President imposing tariffs on Canada, other countries that are considered allies. I felt that we had to do something decisive and meaningful when it came to sanctions and tariffs, and we given the president that authority. I hope he does not misuse it. There a little bit has to do anything that would extend his tariff authority. Even if it is a tariff on countries that Democrats might traditionally support extending these tariffs to, they just don't like the idea of giving the president that additional authority. It makes them uneasy. That reason, quite a few Democrats did ultimately oppose this legislation. Right. It's really fascinating to see how the Trump administration has been using tariffs, and now that showing up in other conflicts as well, beyond issues of trade, now issues of war. What do we know about where the president stands on this? He hasn't signed the bill yet. Is he likely to? Is he not likely to? What do we know? The bill is on the president's desk at this point in time, and now one of the sort of things that helped the bill pick up steam shortly after Senator Lindsey Graham's death was that Graham had announced two days before his passing that he had reached an agreement with the White House on this legislation. I've never been more optimistic than I am today, that we have the formula to end this war. Basically saying that the White House and him had agreed that they could move forward with this bill the way that it was written. And so because of that, there is a sense that the president has signed off on this. He was very adamant about the inclusion of these Iran sanctioned extensions in the bill as well. So those were included. That seems to bode positively. It's obviously not baked until the president inks the bill and puts his signature on it. But there has been some positive signs from the White House that this is something that he would support. And a White House official now tells ABC News the president does intend to sign that bill. Ali Picoren tracking it all for us from Washington. I appreciate it. Thanks so much. Thank you for having me. Right now in Washington, the Kennedy Center is closed. According to a court filing yesterday from Matt Flaka, the center's executive director, this is only a temporary thing, basically a matter of a couple days. This all comes against the backdrop, though, of the Trump administration's ongoing renovation at that performing arts center. Last year, Congress approved $257 million for this effort, but now the renovation is in doubt. Under President Trump said the project can't move forward unless his name is added onto that building. Let's bring an ABC Stephen Portnoy who's been following all the twists and turns of this case. Stephen still sounds very familiar to me. Wasn't President Trump's name on the Kennedy Center earlier this year before a judge ruled that he had to take it down before a judge ruled twice now, Mike. Okay. The name was on the side of the building after a vote in December of last year by the board of trustees that it should be called the Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Center. Right. Well, Judge Christopher Cooper ruled in May of this year that Congress created the Kennedy Center as a lasting living memorial to John F. Kennedy. That only Congress can change the name of it. And so Trump's name had to come down. You saw the tarp and the scaffolding. They took the name down, but the tarp still up. And then over the summer, last month, the board voted again to honor the president a different way. I will to be the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, renovated and restored by Donald J. Trump and possibly endowed by the Trump Kennedy Center fund. Well on Tuesday of this week, Judge Cooper said that too violates the law, law dating back to the 1980s, which says that there can't be any other memorials at the Kennedy Center other than to John F. Kennedy in the public areas. So that resulted in the president reacting by saying that if he doesn't get his way on this, if the appeal is rejected by the DC Circuit and ultimately by the Supreme Court, well then the renovation won't take place at all. There's been a conversation here in DC, Mike, of the whole thing being torn down because the president, as he flew to North Carolina on Wednesday night, was asked by our colleague Karen Travers, why this is so important to him. I think that the Trump administration can certainly have recognition because frankly if we don't do that, it's going to close, it'll end up being ripped down. You have the president saying that the whole building may have to be ripped down. And on Wednesday night, as he was arriving back in Washington, a photographer for Ajance France Press, a very talented photographer named Brendan Smilowski, noticed that the president was looking at a poster-board-sized photo of what appeared to be the Kennedy Center in Ruins and the headline of the poster said Kennedy Center demolished. So yesterday, there was a flurry of court filings where the Ohio Democratic Congresswoman who has brought a lawsuit in this case urged an emergency hearing where she was basically trying to get the judge to say, "You've got to stop President Trump from whatever he's got planned here." Every time there's an issue that comes up, it has been connected. We will consider it to this by or unless it has Donald Trump's name on the building. The judge ultimately declined to schedule an emergency hearing, but he did issue an order that said that he wants 30 days notice before any change in the renovation plans, including a possible demolition of the Kennedy Center. So again, this seems like it has gone from a renovation effort to now the possibility of this historic building, possibly being torn down. I imagine that's having huge reverberations in Washington. What are we hearing from lawmakers on this? Well, R.J. O'Brien spent all day yesterday stalking the halls of Capitol Hill to get reaction. Here's what he heard from North Carolina Republican Senator Tom Tillis. I think it's absurd. Demolishing a memorial, a world-wide known venue for art. Now, Tillis happens to be a retiring Republican Senator from North Carolina. That perhaps is a bit more free to express his views, but generally speaking, you get the sense on Capitol Hill that this is not something that the American people are focused on. It is clearly something the President and to a large extent we are focused on. I love the President Kennedy. I think it's right to honor him. I just, I've got other issues on my mind. A lot of Republicans wish that the President weren't so consumed by this question of how he's going to be honored and recognized. And Stephen, if you could just put this in context for us, obviously, the Kennedy Center has been an institution in Washington for decades at this point. How big a deal would it be if it were to be torn down? How seriously should we take the possibility that it will be? Well, those are two distinct and different questions. Let me attack the first one, which is, you know, what would the impact of the demolition of the only memorial here in Washington, D.C. to the late President, John F. Kennedy beyond the idea that it's the preeminent performing arts space here in Washington. I mean, it really is a landmark that is historically and culturally, architecturally significant, but also it has deep meaning to the country after it was dedicated in John F. Kennedy's name in 1964 by the Congress, by Lyndon Johnson. And so to tear it down would be to demolish a memorial to a late President. Now the President, the current one, Donald Trump has it in mind that he wants to renovate it and make it different. Well, he's also talked about demolishing it, building an amphitheater in its place. I mean, it really gets to this question that would you ask of, can you do it? It's a novel question in many respects. I mean, he's appointed a board. He fired the former board, he is the chair of the board, and the question is, can he tear it down? It'll have to make its way to the courts, but remember in the case of the East Wing, remember that? And the White House ballroom, you know, there was a lawsuit that did work its way from the District Court to the Circuit Court ultimately to the Supreme Court. And what the divided court held is that the people who brought that lawsuit didn't have standing to do it. So I guess in this case, the question is. question would be if the president and his hand-picked board of the Kennedy Center did want to tear the building down, who might have standing to sue? Who's injured so much that they have a personal vested interest in what happens on that federal land? Stephen Portnoy, really fascinating story. I know you're going to continue to track this for us. Thanks so much for explaining it to me. You bet. OK, one more quick break when we come back, a new catch has dropped. The last thing is next. The last thing we have to say is that if the president and his hand-picked board of the Kennedy Center did want to tear the building down, who might have standing to sue the president and his hand-picked board of the Kennedy Center did want to tear the building down, who might have standing to sue the president and his hand-picked board, and we can't really talk about Shopify. Let's talk about Shopify's com-sivist. Probably lives up to the name, right? It's a big cat. Well, yesterday, scientists published a new paper in the journal Current Biology about a new cat species they've discovered that's decidedly little. The cat in question is orangey brown with black spots, kind of like a leopard, but it only weighs about 5 pounds and is smaller than a common house cat. What it lacks in stature, though, it makes up for in historical significance. This is the first new species of cat discovered in over a hundred years. This all started back in 2016 in Bolivia, when a biologist and National Geographic explorer named Paola Nogales Asgaruns got a call from a local wildlife sanctuary in the subtropical part of the Andes Mountains. A local man had dropped off a weird cat he found by the side of the road, they said. When Nogales Asgaruns went to investigate, she discovered an animal that she assumed was a member of leopardist Tigrinus, basically a species of very small spotted wild cats. Over the next few years, however, she realized, "Huh, this doesn't really match the illustrations we have of this species. Its spots are way too big, and as her and a team of researchers tried to place the animal on a family tree, they came to understand this isn't just a new branch of an existing species, this thing is going to need a branch all its own." The scientific name they're proposing, Leopardus Tiltkail, in honor of the word that locals have taken to calling the animal. No one really knows where that word "tiltkail" comes from, it doesn't have a distinct meaning in Spanish or the local language of Ketchua, and that's not the only thing we don't know about this weird cat, their natural source of food, their predators, how they reproduce, all still very much a mystery. In large part, that's because of their size. Small animals are harder to pick up on trail cameras and therefore harder to study. What's more, researchers don't know how big this population is, and that could have a big impact on conservation efforts. But as scientists begin the work of figuring out the answers to all those questions, one thing is for certain, if small wild cats like Leopardus Tiltkail are to survive, we're going to need to get our heads in the game. Leopardus Tiltkail is a good name, but you can really name cats anything, it's not like they're going to listen to your commands anyway. Start here is produced by Jen Newman, Anthony Ali, Aaron Ferrer, Emily Shuts, and Vika Aronson. Ariel Chester is our social media producer, Josh Cohen is director of podcast programming. Brad Milke is our managing editor, Aiman McNiff is our executive producer. Thanks to John Newman, Tara Gimble, and Katie Dendass, special thanks this week to Trevor Hastings. I am Mike Debosky, in for Brad Milke, who's back on Monday. In the meantime, have a great weekend. [Music] The first time we've been working on the project is about two or three years ago. We've been working on Shopify for a while, so we can see how the company's technology is going to be. We can see the production of the products and the front end, and the production of the product. If Shopify had been a product, it would have been a real success. We can see the production of the product and we can see the production of the product. We can see the production of the product and the production of the product. We've been working on the production of the product and we can see the production of the product and the production of the product. Even though we're not at the front end, we're at the front end where we're going to be in the opposite direction. If Shopify had been the best, it would've been a lot of trouble. That's how we're going to be, and we're going to be able to make sure that we're in the right place. We're going to be able to make sure that we're going to make sure that we're in the right place.