HIJACK! Terror Attack Thwarted, Pilot ATTACKED Over Saudi Arabia w/ Lt. Governor Micah Beckwith

A terror attack thwarted, at least that's what everyone thinks right now. We have been getting conflicting reports all day. Initial reporting was that a pilot attacked a co-pilot. I guess they're both just pilots. So who's the co-pilot? Then Fox News said, no, the co-pilot was attacked or attacked the pilot. Two pilots. One guy tried diving the plane down a fight breaks out. There's a stabbing. Apparently the guy who got stabbed kicks the latch, bust the door open, allowing people to get in and regain control of this flight. It was on route to Tel Aviv landing in Saudi Arabia. The story is absolutely crazy with new information breaking all day and conspiracy theories. So we're going to talk about this. This is the big, big news. Of course, we have a bunch of other little bitty news. There's this funny thing happening with America.gov that new AI and a lot of people are like, it's broken. It's going crazy. They found an Easter egg, a Minecraft reference and people think it's going crazy. We'll talk about that. And a bunch of smaller stories. But of course, the midterms are a month away. We got big questions about what is going to be happening. So my friend smashed the like button, share the show and all that good stuff. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more. We got Micah Beckwith. What's up, Jamie? How you doing? I'm doing great. How about you? I'm good, man. This is awesome. You guys, you just take me back to the days I loved in college, man. You guys have this place decked out. I'm like, she goes up. There's guitars. I'm just saying, man, where's like Jesus? Let's go. The skate park and everything. All right. Well, so who are you? What do you do? Yeah. Well, I'm the Lieutenant Governor, State of Indiana. I'm just kind of a normal guy. I mean, I got in the politics guy. I hated seeing kind of what was happening in America. I was, I got a pastoral background, music background, but was working with students, saw government policies and public schools just taking kids down and path that I just didn't I knew wasn't true. And objective truth is under attack and I said, well, so I'm going to jump in the fight. We're going to we're going to make sure that we we stand for what's right and true and and not not care who knows it. So I come out of politics. You know, considering you're such a man of good moral standing, will you apologize for stealing my football team? No, absolutely not because the Indiana is better than Illinois. So better. You better Illinois. No, I actually aggressive for the show. I was like, I my hats off to Indiana. They did everything they could for a great football team doing really well. And Illinois and Chicago dropped the ball and it's their fault. So I say congratulations. You got a great team now. Thank you. Well, and you know what? Once we're done with that, then we're going to go down to Cincinnati. Take the bangles and bring them over. And then once we're done with that, we're going to rename Lake Michigan to Lake Indiana. And then our reign that will be complete. But but in all seriousness, I think this shows that Indiana's priorities are better than Illinois. As a look me, you know, a bunch of my buddies here, we were all from Chicago. Yeah, we're all pissed off. And we're like, Indiana's taking the cake. Totally well. They're doing better. Listen, Illinois spent $2 billion on services for illegal immigrants over the last year. That think about that for a second. We offered the Chicago Bears a $2 billion stadium. There it is right there. So if you wouldn't be spending all your money on people that shouldn't be here and clamp down on immigration like Indiana has done, you'd be fine. You'd have money to get the bears a stadium and continue to invest in your city. But because you're stupid and you do all this leftist progressive policies, then, you know, okay, Indiana will will be your Huckleberry. We'll take that. But this is this is a bigger picture. There's a bigger picture here too. I mean, I'm trying to explain some of my friends. They're like, I don't understand how the state and the city could allow. You know, it's one thing if the bears go to Arlington Heights. Yeah, it's it's the Chicago land area. So we all kind of roll our eyes. But how could the state lose the bears? And I said, because the voters in the state no longer care about its traditions. Could you imagine a 1990 if they if they were like the bears need money? Oh, dude, listen, they they they'd have they'd have dumped whatever dollar all the money in the world for the bears. But when demographics changed, a question is asked for all the newcomers, they call them come into Illinois. And the politicians running for office ask a question, how many of you care about the bears and the newcomers say the who? So then when it comes to allocation for budget, what do they do? Migrant services like you point out instead of the traditional Chicago, the Illinois team that is iconic and has the bears that everybody knows. So we got I don't want to rant too much. We'll talk about it real quick on that. Can I just say last thing? This is multiculturalism and what it does it destroys nations it destroys cultures because when you bring in all the other cultures of the world, you lose the culture and the heritage of what made you great to begin with. That's why nobody cares about the bears because multiculturalism has pushed the culture of what made Chicago a great city and Illinois great state push it out. It's really that simple. We we've used this analogy on the show quite a bit where it's like you got a hundred people living in town. They all come together to build a baseball field and they take care of it. That you then bring in 101 Haitian migrants. And I say this with all with all the respect for legal migrants, they're not going to vote for what you built and what you love or what your grandfather grandfather built for you because they're just like, well, our interests are not aligned with that. So 101 vote against you and say we don't want to allocate money. We want healthcare services for immigrants and then your baseball field is gone or it goes to Indiana. We're going to talk about this. Of course, we got a lot more to talk about, especially with the midterms coming up and how the stuff is going to play out. The boys are hanging out. Yeah, what's going on everyone? Yeah, you guys you guys are very fortunate in the of Illinois, like literally right there. So you can just be like, I don't know, like look what they're doing. We do that a lot. Yeah, just go look. It's right there. Do the same thing in New Hampshire. Just like Massachusetts and people like, yeah, you're right. You know, I am my parents are very, you know, West Virginia has got Maryland. Yeah, Maryland. Virginia right there. Yeah, a lot of case studies. There's a lot of, there's a lot of red states next to blue states to put it simply people flying around. Yeah. Well, yeah, because if you're like an Arkansas, they're like, oh, like we got some bad cities in Arkansas. I mean, low rocks aren't doing great. But yeah, what's up everybody? I'm Phil Carter. What's up, everyone? Um, pumped to get into it. Before we do. Before we do get a great sponsor, it is Keat.io. Guys, download apps that aren't tracking you and stealing all your stuff. Go to Keat.io/timcast.iol. Here's a question for you guys. Why, why does your messaging app need your private information? Why does it ask for access to your, to your contact list? I'm going to let you guys in on the secret right now. This kind of, this is off script. There's something called shadow profiles on Facebook. Let's say your mom never signed up for Facebook and says, I don't like it and don't want to use it. Guess what? She's got a profile. Why? Because when you signed up and it asked you for your content, hey, let us help you find your friends. It puts that 555123 phone number in its servers attached to the word mom. Then your uncle signs up and does the same thing and it says Janet. Now they know Janet has this phone number and that's her son and it builds a profile and it's been this way for a decade. This is what all of these big tech companies have been doing. Well, here's the thing. Well, most people have accepted technology companies are, I just collecting enormous amounts of our information. What we click, where we go, what we buy, then information is valuable because they can, they can resell to other advertisers. Your time and your attention is valuable. Keith takes a radically different approach. It's a free messaging file sharing and video calling app built peer-to-peer, no centralized company databases holding your conversations, no metadata tracking, no phone number or email required. Your messages are end to end encrypted and move between the people in the conversation. Your private life shouldn't be another crop in somebody's data farm. So again, go to keet.io/timcast. IRL. Keith.io, shout out. Thanks for sponsoring the show and by coffee from Casperoo.com. If you haven't already, go to Casperoo.com. We've got a bunch of great options. Sold out of our cold brew big bottles. We've got the six packs and the little bottles of the Casperoo Vault Black. Check it out. Whole bean coffee, ground coffee. We have Ian's graphene dream low acidity coffee for people that need it. So check that out at Casperoo.com. Don't forget to also smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. As I already mentioned, let's get to the news. We got this from the BBC. What we know about the stabbing on the fly Dubai flight to Israel. The quick news is that a fly a flight from Dubai to Israel. The pilots were fighting, guy gets stabbed. One pilot kicks open the lock, door flies open passengers go in. There's backup pilots. They take over crew members are seriously injured stabbed. They divert this to Saudi Arabia. It's believed to have been an attempted terror attack. Some are hyping it up like it could have been a 9/11 where they were going to crash this plane and heard a bunch of civilians. We don't know exactly, but we do have new information. We have names here on the stabbed pilot. There, of course, conspiracy theories running rampant. But that's the quick. Let's give you guys the the quick updates here. They say the stabbed pilot identified as Indian national captain, Smith, much jahar. As I used to say, probably, probably pronouncing it wrong, was staying in the hospital to the flight land and later called a hero by the Israeli Prime Minister, Israeli Defense Minister, Israel Cass is called the incident and attempted to jihadist terror attack. The BBC is yet to receive official statements from police, emergency services, or investigators regarding any motive. This is flight, Dubai's FZ 1073 took off from Dubai International Airport in the United Arab Emirates and wrote to Ben Green Airport in Israel. It was carrying 150 people, almost all the passengers were Israeli. Data says that it made a rapid descent, dropping more than 17,000 feet in two minutes. Minute later, the plane said on an emergency code, it diverts, starts to climb back up. We know that there were two pilots in the back. I think think they were British or one guy was British or not entirely sure. There are a lot of conspiracy theories. Some were saying they believe it may have been, they think it was an attempted false flag because, you know, hey, the internet's going to do what the internet does. But either way, considering where we are with the state of the Iran war, I think it's fair to point out while I'm not saying it's definitive correlation, reporting over the past few days has been that Iran is crumbling. They are losing control of the state of Hormuz and they're being worn down. I surprise at their weakest after a long drawn out war and wiping out of much of their leadership, you get this attempted terror attack. We don't know for sure. Maybe, maybe not. There's been some speculation that this guy maybe was just suicidal and said, I'm going to take everybody down with me. But either way, we're lucky that it was stopped and it's a crazy story. The pilot who got stabbed kicked the lock so the door could open. And if he did not do that, nobody was getting in that cockpit to stop this plane. That's crazy. Yeah. The motivation is unclear, obviously, but we know that the perpetrator was an Omani national. Oman, obviously, good relations with Iran. We kind of use them as a mediator. They mediated the first round of talks in the last year, actually. And then they were mediating all the discussions and the lead up to the war. So again, it's impossible without any explicit, you know, like, oh, I wrote down why I'm going to do this or whatever. It seems unlikely that it was like top down from the IRGC that just doesn't, this doesn't seem like something that they would do, especially that they would have a connection with the Omani national. It could be, I think my gut tells me it's overlapping. So okay, Oman is real not popular there. So it would make sense that that would be a motive for him, right? There's a literal war going on between what many people view as even between the Muslim world and Israel, obviously. And then additionally, you could probably just be mentally disturbed, but clearly he's mentally disturbed. We've seen in the past pilots go haywire before and try to take the plane down or attack their co-pilot. It's not the first time it's happened. I think it happened. It was a German that did this fairly recently. So I think it's kind of two things probably happening here, suicidal pilot or, you know, mentally disturbed, whatever you want to say here. And then the context that he's Omani probably gives you a bit of motivation. I want to take down a plane over Israeli airspace because he knows like, okay, if anything happens to the plane, it's going to fall down and, you know, someone's going to get hurt. Yeah. I mean, I'm not so sure about any of the stuff that I, the kind of conspiracy theories, you know, the plane was full of Israelis. So there is kind of the idea that the Omani guy was like, well, you know, this is my chance to hit back at Israel because there were so many Israelis on board. Um, again, the pilot that actually landed the plane, I think he was, he was in Israeli as well, right? No. So the two backups, one was British and the other one hasn't identified yet. Okay. But they were, so they were backup pilots. Yeah, it probably wasn't in Israeli because those fly do buy, I doubt they would hire something. Yeah. So yeah. So they, they had, but it's good. They obviously, it's good. They had, you know, backup pilots on, on the flight because the, you know, would crash without it. So I don't see what Iran would get out of it, you know, by just taking down a commercial jet. Um, they don't, they don't stand to gain anything. No, Iran doesn't. But in terms of the conspiracy theories, if this plane crashed and killed a bunch of Israelis, I mean, the war would dramatically escalate well, I mean, I don't know that I don't know that these Israelis would automatically say, well, you know, this, this was definitely something that, that Iran did, if they could somehow pin it on, if there was somehow evidence that Iran was involved, sure, but, um, I'm just saying the conspiracy theorists are making the argument because they have theories for literally everything. Yeah. In terms of the war, I think the simple answer is like you were pointing out, this guy's probably sympathetic. Yeah. Well, I mean, we've seen in the past, obviously not maybe necessarily pilots directly taking on the plane, but commercial jets getting shot down, there's countless examples of there's a conflict going on, a faction that's sympathetic with one of the bligerents then shoots down a passenger jet. We saw it with Ukraine, uh, in Ukraine, Russia, where some sympathetic, there's a, there's a creature flying around here. It's a lot of things. It's called the moth. Yeah. A creature. A creature out. Small beast. Yeah. Yeah. Sort of a massage. I don't know what's going on here. Uh, I mean, we saw this with, uh, the KLM, I think it was KLM flight and they got shot down by pro-Russian, obviously had nothing top down from the Russian government, they're sympathetic with Russia. Um, we saw this a lot during the Redezion Bush War. Um, I think on two separate instances, um, rebels that were, you know, trying to, you know, abolish Redezion or whatever, shot down commercial jets that were flying over, over the airspace. Um, but in those instances, it didn't lead to a full blown escalation. This is a full blown escalation. Now, if we want to talk about a true, we want closer to this, uh, here you go. A little battle taking place in the studio talking about the war. Yeah. So with the moth. So it's not uncommon for sympathetic elements, uh, to sympathize with the belligerent and a current conflict, um, similar to what we're seeing now, it's like sympathizing with the moth. Like poor things are scared. No. You gotta die. Yeah. Got to die. It's some sort of Zimbabwe. But, but, but what bugs do you sympathize with? Because I feel like a lot of people are going to be like the moth, they kind of sympathize with a little bit. Well, it's a failed butterfly. It's exactly what it was. It was a fly. They'd be like, get it down. It was a butterfly. I got the fly. There's a fly here. It's like, dude, you had one job and you couldn't do it right. Yeah. You didn't become a butterfly. Close, you know what I mean? Yeah. Yeah, literally. Let's bring it back to IRGC. Like, they're the moths. They're the moths of this analogy. Is that what I'm getting at? Is reals of butterflies or who's? I don't know who's who. Well, no, I'd say IRGC is more like a house fly, uh, and I don't mean that in terms of their scale. I'm saying it's like people are annoyed by them. Yeah, that's right. They're buzzing around causing problems in the Middle East with trade and all that stuff. But it doesn't mean I want to see my neighbor come out with a gun and start shooting it. You don't want to hit it with a bazooka necessarily. With a bazooka. Yeah. Well, it's a figure of speech. You don't kill a squirrel with a bazooka. We had a member called me. I never heard that. Yeah. Is it for real? What do you think is the proper caliber to shoot a squirrel? Probably not a bazooka. Sure. I don't know if it's a small rifle, maybe it would make 17. Look, something like that. It's as big as your mark. Turn it. It's like the biggest thing you can use it. I love gun guys because it's like, uh, probably like a 36. You're like, oh, yeah, do totally. I'm like, probably a four, uh, probably six, nine, six, five, five, five, six is almost a universal cow. We're all a BB gun is probably sufficient. That was what I was saying. You could stop. It's sufficient. You only need to get in with that thing right. It is a brain, a brain, a musket. That is a union civil war musket. Yeah, shoot it with that. Yeah, why not? Go Lindy. Go back. You are not hitting anything. You're going to aim that as you go. You're going to go sideways. Well, the good thing about squirrels is they're not particularly afraid of humans. You can get usually within 10, 15 yards where that might actually be. Yeah, dude, just hold some peanuts in your hand when it comes up. Just kick it. Try shooting that with the moth with that thing. Let's see what happens. Don't kick squirrels. Squirrels are fine. You know what I mean? They're so on fine. They're so on fine. Which is the, in this analogy, we'll bring it back. Like the squirrels are sweetened in this analogy, right? We just, they're fine. It takes your lane. Right, yeah. Nobody ever really cares about them. Yeah, it's snapped together. It's pretty nice. And Ukraine would be like a cow. It's like, why? Ukraine has the most farmland, the most caring farmland in Europe. Yeah, there you go. So it's this big animal. Hey, they're tough. Yeah. But it's not a lot of meat and everybody wants it. That's right. And then the Philippines. And then the Philippines are like puppies where it's like they're cute kind of charming. Kind of innocent. They're not going to hurt anyone. Americans marry them. I mean. Yeah. But they can get a little annoying. They might pee on your rug. And then you're like, okay, you know, there's kind of a little too much. You know, passport is a golden passport. What was that? Philippino passport. Is it? So I'm, it's, it's not literally. So like the U.S. is considered a golden passport because it gets you visa entry in all these countries. But I, I learned this when I was working with a guy who was Filipino, he was Filipino American. Because Filipinos are fishermen, they basically get visa entry to tons of countries because they're just laborers. Yeah. So you, they can show up basically anywhere. And like, so they can go to Iran. Just walk on in. What? Yeah. Like, for the United States, of course, we're barred from going to North Korea, Iran and like a bunch of these countries. Filipinos just show up and they're like, yeah, come on in because they're not going to do anything. It's like, they're not a threat. They're not dangerous. I guess we have tables that need to be waited on. I guess. Filipino like gang bangers, do you guys know what leather neck, like, have you heard of leather necks? Yeah. Because the Filipinos had knives so they wear leather on their necks because they, they were so good. Oh my god. What basically what I mean is like when Filipinos come to other countries, they just work. You know, they don't really bother anybody. We don't hear your stories about like Filipino gang bangers killing people in America or terror text. No, they just, they come here. They, they do really well. They make a good amount of money and they just mind their own business. Look, they should be deported if they're here legally. Just saying, just saying. And to piggyback on both of those points, I would say it's unlikely that this attack was a false flag because I think Israel, if they wanted to ramp the war back up, they wouldn't need to justify it to anyone. They probably would just do it. We saw this in Southern Lebanon where they sort of re-engage there. The Americans are upset about it, but that directly ties into the conversation we were just. No, but I completely agree with this because we, like, with October 7th, people like here are these conspiracy theories and I'm like, guys, I've, I followed foreign policy in my whole life. I, I was, uh, I was in the newsroom advice when they had teams going out during protective edge. Israel's never needed a reason to just flatten any part of Gaza they wanted to. That's why people get like mad at them because they don't, right. They just kind of do it when they really want. They don't need a false flag, guys. They just do it anyway. It's called mowing the lawn every few years. they're going, they start taking out Hamas targets, which of course they're gonna be under schools or media centers or whatever it might be. I'm not saying it's good. You can complain. All you want about it, I'm saying they don't, they've never needed to cast his belly. - Yeah, they're like, okay, we need to, we need to excuse the launch of missiles that are wrong. Let's just like take out a fly Dubai. It's like, they would just do that anyway. It's Israel. They already kind of understand that they're standing on the, I mean, they've spoken about this openly, that their perception on the world stage is decline massively. So I think they're kind of in a position where they're like, we're just gonna kind of do whatever we want for the, - You're gonna hate us anyways, essentially, you know. - And I just, I can't imagine where Israel does still, they still do think that the relationship with the Gulf states could still be there. They still think after this war is over that they could sort of form a sort of anti-Iran power block that was kind of what the Abraham Accords were. So it's unlikely they risk that by staging a false flag with the Dubai, or if they would probably just shoot down a domestic flight, or if they were to do a false flag, they would just do something domestic. - Yeah, I mean, excuse me. I think Israel, the goal of having like a unified block against Iran is worth putting the effort in. So the idea of them doing things that are gonna put that in jeopardy. - Yeah, I don't think it would happen. And Israel's winning this ideological war, I think, because Iran keeps lashing out at their Muslim neighbors, right? I mean, so they're going after the UAE, they're going after Saudi. I mean, Iran's really turned into sort of the scourge of that region. And I don't think Israel needs to do anything to make the other nations hate Iran more, 'cause I think people are getting pissed. I mean, when you're shooting rockets at the UAE, Iran's like lobbing them into their big public spaces. I mean, that's all you gotta do to isolate Iran. Now the whole world is against them. So I think, yeah, to your point, I think it would be really stupid for Israel to do something like this. So I don't put a whole lot of thought. The Iranians have been kind of playing off of the Gulf states where they kind of understand that the Gulf states are in many ways caught in the middle. Even though a lot of the Saudis and the Emirates were like wanting this to have the initial strikes to happen, 'cause they understand like, if we bomb the Saudis, well, if we bomb the Emirates, the Qataris, they're going to go to the Israelis and the Americans and be like, hey, what the heck? This was supposed to be like limited strikes. Now we're getting bombed. So the Iranians kind of like have a strategy and so far as if we bomb the Gulf states, they hate us anyway, but then we can use that as leverage. So then they'll go and complains the United States and then it turns into this whole kind of tug of war. I want to talk about the midterms, but before we get into the hard politics of it, I want to pull up this tweet from Mark Mitchell on his pollster. Ooh, Fox News views in the demo were down around 50% year over year in September and it's an election season. We have this follow up from, give me three steps. They posted the actual data. Boomers are consuming less slop, not good for November. So we take a look at prime time, 8 to 11 PM, 2025 to 2026, down 39 to 49, 49% in the key demo. They're down 49 in the key demo. Total day down 48% in the key demo. We have this post as well. Total views for the same window on Saturday, 765,000 total viewers. This is absolutely insane. It's not just Fox News, I'm not singling out Fox News 'cause Fox is beating CNN and MS now. But what happened in the last year where basically everybody just turned off the TV, stopped watching everything, 'cause I'm gonna stress this. It's not just to a hammer, everything looks like an ale. And so you get these pollsters, they live in politics and they're like, whoa, Fox News, views are down. Yeah, well, sports views are down too. Where did everybody just go? What happened outside? Maybe I don't know that that makes sense. We have phones. What happened where just abruptly over one year, 50% of people were like, I ain't gonna watch TV anymore. I mean, apps, videos, podcasts, whatever. Was it all fake? I mean, maybe I suppose if you've got decline in viewership and stuff across the board, multiple genres, not just news, what you're talking about sports, you're talking about everything. Maybe all these industries were padding the numbers and now you have something that reflects reality. I think the only, I've heard this from a lot of people 'cause we have ad sales teams and stuff like that. And I'm hearing people say like, well, do you think habits just changed? And I'm like, habits don't change in a month. Like September of last year, it just drops off and doesn't come back. And that is not a habit we've tracked in media, even watching the change in habit with the younger generation, the older generation. I don't think a bunch of boomers just died. We are expecting there to be a rapid decline, but that would be month over a month, you'd see a rep, you wouldn't just see, it looks like the numbers were fake the whole time. - Yeah, yeah, I think that's probably likely as they were producing their numbers. And I don't know, maybe some metrics. - The idea was juicing the numbers for everything. - Yeah, USAID combined with like maybe they, I don't know if FTC or something, maybe demanded different metrics or something. I don't know what the internals are, but something had to. 'Cause it's not like all these people got Thanos snapped. - Well, I'll mention this. We talked about this last night, briefly in the uncensored portion of the show. Obviously, anybody who watches this show knows that our concurrent viewership is down. A year ago, we were doing 67,000 concurrence live on YouTube. That sounds amazing. It's like, wow, we're the biggest prime time show on YouTube. Right now, we got about 11,000. On YouTube, we got about 12,000 on Rumble. Our views to watch time ratio has not changed. So I'm sitting here being like, how is it possible that we're doing, we do about 250K on YouTube, we do about 250K on Rumble, and then we've got between like X Facebook and the podcast, another 200,000 or whatever. How could it be that our concurrent views go way down from 60 to 15,000 in the course of a year, but we get the same viewership, and the same watch time per viewer. That math makes literally no sense, unless the argument is nobody watches live, and they're now watching the show. No, that doesn't make sense either, because in the show wraps, we check in the two hours the show is live, we'll get about 150,000 unique viewers, and we'll get the same average watch time that we got a year ago. Literally it makes no sense. I'm gonna have to go there, guys. USAID was faking everything, maybe so that people around the world and other countries presumed US culture was dominating all forms of media, I don't know. All I know is it makes no sense in an election year that we're seeing all news go down, and we're also seeing sports go down, and YouTube and everything that makes no sense to me. Yeah, I mean, I would have to go off the charts. I'd like to know, you guys probably know this better than I would. Who controls these numbers? Who's the wizard behind the curtain, pulling the strings that these numbers come from? Like, is there an overarching authority that says, "Hey, these are legitimate numbers." It's just random, is it YouTube? You got to trust YouTube? Well, who gets to-- Look, I'll say everybody's lying to varying degrees, because it's hard to know for sure, so you just, everybody goes with the best possibility. Yeah. So, you know, it's like, well, look, I got, you know, a million on Instagram. How many of those actually watched the video? Yeah, we don't really know. We just know that at some point that person clicking the-- Can you trust Instagram that they are being honest with that million number? Maybe that's the issue right now, is that they weren't before, and now they know. They know they're starting to be honest, yeah. Yeah, I mean, so there was a big story when USAID gets shut down. Five months later, rap isn't on the Billboard Hot 100 for the first time in like 30 years. And now we've got-- It stayed off, too, it hasn't. There's been a few that have popped up, but not hit anywhere in the top 10, or anything like that. So, the liberals come on and go, "What do you mean?" Like, here's a few rap songs, like that clearly made the charts, and you're like, "Yeah, of course." But it's like, country is taking over. The belief is that, I don't know how, or if USAID was involved, but something was happening behind the scenes, and I think it was psychological operations. Yeah, I agree with that. You get-- So, I'll give you an example. When Elon Musk announced he was going to buy Twitter, what did we see? I don't know if you know the story. All the major liberal influencers lost millions of followers, and the conservatives gained millions. Now, how does that make sense at all? It was very, very weird. The argument we heard was, liberals are fleeing acts because Elon's buying, and it's like, "Whoa, Elon did not buy it, and the sale was blocked at the time." They were saying he wasn't going to be able to buy it, and liberals were making fun of Elon for failing to purchase Twitter. Yet, somehow, we saw accounts like Jank Euger losing insane amounts of followers. One theory was that Twitter was intentionally padding the numbers for liberals, and suppressing the numbers for conservatives to make it look like liberalism was popular when it was not. I couldn't agree with you more. I think we've been lied to more than we realized in the last 10 years, 15 years. And I think it's one of the best things I think Trump administration has done thus far is gone after USAID. I mean, and people talk about the midterms, Tim. So we'll talk about, I know we're saying, "Oh, man, this is going to be a hard year for Republicans, maybe." But remember, the last election cycle that we had, USAID was pumping tons of money into getting Democrats elected. They don't have, this is the first election that they will not have that money. I think that's going to play. big dividends for honesty in actually this election. So maybe it won't be quite the bloodbath that some are saying for. I think it's all fake. Yeah. Look at this. This is from after the sale. Big accounts on the left are losing followers. Those are the right are gaining followers. The people on the left who are leaving aren't deleting their accounts. They're just not logging in. So this just it's all fake. I think there's some kind of conflict at the like we know there is an elite civil war going on like they try to put Trump in prison. Trump's obviously at odds. We've got Jack Smith testifying saying Trump's breaking the law. We get it. The ultra wealthy powerful leads in politics are all fighting each other. This I think this is proof of it. Yeah, I agree. And listen we have been I praise God for president Trump because I think he's the only person that could break the machine the way he's done. Now he has he done everything perfect. No, but he has broke he's broke the machine to where we would have still been being lied to. We would have still seen the business as usual. It would have been rhino, GOP, weak sauce, Republicans trying to say, oh, we're standing strong and they would have been steamrolled by all of these tech titans that have been lying to us. And I mean, listen, I think we're starting to see a little bit of honesty come back into the world around us. And I think that's a that's a win because I think once once the honesty happens, then I think our side starts winning. I think the the ramifications of USAID being defunded and and basically being dissolved can't be overstated. I think that you're seeing like global impact not just here in the US, which I think there's great results here in the US. But like I think that if you think I think if you look at like South America and the elections that have been happening down there, there's a ton of countries that have been left wing for decades. And I think that the reason that they're they're electing, you know, either centrist or or right leaning or sometimes far right candidates is because it wasn't a moth by the way. What was that? It wasn't a moth. It was like just some goofy looking air moth man. I am not. What is it? Is it entomologist? Yeah. Yeah. But yeah, I think that you see South America. There's a ton of countries that have elected right wing politicians. And then it is possible. Obviously, we don't have any kind of metrics on this, but it is possible that the lack of USAID money is affecting things like entertainment, things like what people are what the numbers are saying. You know, it could very well be that that NGOs and stuff were paying a lot of the social media companies are paying for to pump up ads so they could get better ad rates, you know. Into the point about, you know, hip hop not being on the billboard, you know, top top songs. I mean, I think I think culture was being shaped by radicals who controlled the USAID funds. And culture means everything means the entertainment, the music, the politics, the family life, what you believe about liberalism or conservatism. I mean, so I think we've seen the breaking of the system. So now we can actually, you know, the light starting to shine in. And I think I think it's going to be a different season going forward. Yeah, I hope you're right. I want to believe that whether or not that's going to turn into Republicans winning in the midterms, I don't know. I'm still the opinion that the thing that really drives people to the polls in the in the midterms is if they're angry. Yeah. They won't there is if they're happy. They'll go in the vote if they're not happy. They're not going to go, you know, because people still kind of look at, I mean, you have to have, you have to have a really, really pissed off electorate to get people to go out and vote, which the left has. They hate Donald Trump. That's all they got. They, you know, orange, orange man, bad, right? That's what they do. They're pissed. They're going to go vote because of that. They have no, but the right, they might be mad, but they're not pissed, right? They're like, I don't like how this happened. I don't like what Republicans are doing here or the Iran war or gases too high or all this stuff. And it's like, okay, guys, that's great. But we have to save our nation. Yeah. Get your butts to the polls. I think there's, there's a vocal minority of people that are really, really, really upset about the Iran war. But I think they are a very small, narrow part of the electorate. I think that the average Republican still looks at Israel. And I'm talking about people that are not super plugged in politically. And they're, if they're like, if they're positive, if they have a positive opinion, they're like, well, yeah, you know, they're, they're an ally. So I guess, yeah. Or they're indifferent. The, the people that are angry, they're going to be vocal. They're definitely, they're definitely not going to go or they might go and cast a protest vote. And I'm just hoping that those people that are really angry, either look, I can't tell you to go and vote, you know, can't tell you to vote for. I would like to see people vote for Republicans because I'd like to see Donald Trump doing more of what he's been doing because a lot of the things that he had, that he has been successful in passing or whatever, they're all from the, from executive action. There has been no significant legislation since the Big Beautiful Bill. And I would like to see those kind of policies continue. I'd love to see Congress actually pass some bill and codify codifying because there's a lot of things that we talked about that were, we will start to see some kind of benefit to the United States. But these things are probably a couple years down the road because he's setting the, he's basically setting up the conditions for the U.S. to be in a stronger position. Two, three, four, five years down the road. That's what people have to remember. It takes time to fix the chaos that four years of Biden and Democrats did to this. Not just four years. Well, yeah, it's 60 years. Yes, you're right. I mean, you can go all the way back. But like, think about just the border, right? The last four years. Now, we've had a border problem before Biden. But the Mattel last four years was awful. And so to clean that mess up, I mean, it's going to take time. And so we've got to stay the course. We've got to be persistent. And if we, if we get into this like, you know, instant gratification sort of, you know, mindset, we're going to give it right back over to the left and they're going to continue to destroy us. And the more the people that seem to be most upset, they are looking for immediate things. Now, there are some things that they're upset about that there 100% justified. There's a lot of people that are upset about the fact that nobody that nobody is being held to account for all the COVID stuff, right? There's, and there was a lot of absolutely atrocious behavior by the federal government surrounding COVID. There are a lot of people that are upset about a lot of the things when people were attacking Trump. There hasn't been investigations about some of the stuff. And I get that. And there, I think they're right to be upset about that. But at the same time, that doesn't mean that you derail the entire administration. So that way things like the border, which in my opinion, is the most important thing the US is facing, facing so that there can't, so progress on the border and, and reducing the number of illegal immigrants here can be, you know, pulled back. Americans are real bad at thinking long term. We think like here and now, short term. And that can be, that can be one of our greatest weaknesses that we, yeah. Look, I try to, I try to be sympathetic because look, I go and I fill up my car. Totally. You know, I got, I've got a Tesla, but I've also got a Jeep. And like it costs, it costs me 70 bucks for like two thirds of a tank the other day, you know, and so I get it. It's fundamentally, because it's not a uniquely American problem. I mean, it is a natural function of democracy where the leader has to basically think into your timeframes. Like it's a very unfortunate sort of reality. I mean, there's benefits of democracy, obviously. But, you know, when you're global foes on the worry about elections, you know, they're, they're, they're, that makes them a bit more agile. They're able to think longer term. Yeah. I mean, Iran just put out a thing saying, look, go vote for the Democrats because they know, yeah, we'll put out a big message to the American people, go vote for the Democrats. And they, the, the, the, the, the, really, actually, yeah, they get in the regime chain. The release that they did could have been written by any of the libertarians out. Love it. It could have, it's literally point for point. All of the arguments that libertarians, well, and, and this is what makes the situation difficult. I mean, this is why Iran was such a misstep because I completely agree. I mean, I was making this argument for a long time, which is, yeah, like it's unrealistic. They're going to get like 20 million deportations in the first year or something. Yeah. Okay. We do need to see it ramping up, etc. But I do, I am like an agreement that, okay, yes, this does take time to sort of sort this out. I mean, just to get us to back to 20, you know, 20, 20 levels of legal immigration. It's going to take time. So what I'm getting is this is why Iran was such a misstep because when you blow up the economy, or you blow up inflation and, and, and cost the living right before an election, even if people are going to the polls and they're saying, I'm so, they're not saying, I'm so mad about the Iran war. Like most people aren't necessarily saying that, but it's this sort of constellation of fall out from all of the different, you know, aspects of American life that have been affected by Iran. People get really upset with the ruling party. So we can, you know, say, oh, well, you know, stay the course. And I, I mean, I agree. Like this is going to take the long time. But the reality is that's not how voters operate in a democracy. You kind of have to play ball with like the situation you're in. And that's why it was such a misstep to take on such a large, long foreign policy strategy. When we only know if we're going to, you know, hold the executive in two years. Let's jump to this next story. So we were just discussing how Fox News key demo viewership is down nearly 50% year over year in an election year. That's absolutely insane. People are largely tuning out, but it does seem strange. Now, is this translating? Are we seeing something in politics? Cal, she's got it at Democrat sweep 62%. Democrat House Republican Senate, 28%, which does seem possible, but is dropping. And we've got this poll from Wall Street Journal Americans want populist policies that defy traditional political labels. They say the top 10 policies with highest support among both Democrat or Republican voters pass a lot of banned surprise medical bills. Require insurance companies to cover services and medicines prescribed by doctors, cap the max of prescription corruption drugs, cap credit card interest rates at 10 percent, stop illegal immigration at the border, restrict large institutional investors from buying large numbers of single family homes, which Trump did create a pathway to citizenship for long term immigrants who contribute to their communities. Yes, if they're here legally, cap child care costs for working families. All of these are fairly populist. The question is, why aren't Republicans campaigning on any of these things? Well, I mean, because it's, I mean, it goes back to the cost of living. I mean, this is, this was the Republicans bread and butter and Trump 1.0 because we had a rock star economy. I mean, even Democrats were saying, you know, you can go look at some of the polling from the first term and even Democrats were saying they trusted the Republicans more with the economy than the Democrats. And when you don't have that, again, that is like our fastballs Republicans. You can say this, that or the other, but at least we're going to have, you know, a rock star economy. If you lose that, you know, it puts you in a really difficult situation. So a lot of these candidates are going to the stump and senators to a degree, but representatives can't go up there and make these promises, like, hey, we're going to cap credit card interest at 10%. That's got to come from the executive. Maybe governors have some bandwidth there. Senators have to go and defend their party's record. That's the reality of the situation. That's how people view politics now as they don't even, like, for example, in Michigan, I'm sure there's people that really like El Said, but generally speaking, most people are just thinking, okay, that's the Democrat and that's the Republican. And I'm mad at the Republicans right now. So we're going to go for the Democrats for that sort of block of swing voters that still exist. So they have to go up and they have to defend the record of the last two years. And we don't supply them with the economic ammunition that they need on the stump. It's going to cause problems. So like, I agree, you know, it would be nice for Republicans to kind of come up with these out of the box or populous policies on the stump, but they understand that that's going to bite them in the butt because they're not going to be able to pass any of that. They can't even pass stuff like the SAV Act, which is, you know, universally popular, actually, if you look at the polling just there, I mean, the bill, the independence, love it. So it was on the bill that the Senate just voted down. All the Democrats voted against it. It had the SAV Act in it. And that's the argument that Democrats are making. And this was this was voter ID, which is 75 80% popular with the American electorate in total Democrats and Republicans. And then there was the stop insider trading, basically, which is again, extremely popular with the American people. But, you know, they're they're consistently Democrats and Republicans saying we should stop this. And every single Democrat voted down, voted no on this. And it was because of the voter ID, which again, is popular with the American people. They were, it was basically politically insulated, but they still voted it down because it was going to be popular. It would help Donald Trump at the polls. And it would cause issues for, you know, Democrats that don't want to show ID when they vote. It's just with those specific policy proposals. It's really rare that a politician can propose governors is a different ballgame because governors can actually make those promises and implement them. Probably even state reps and state senators. But for senators and US representatives, it's really difficult for them to run on one policy. Because typically all these policies that are on here, although people say they like them, like low salience, people are going to ultimately vote on vibes and vibes. Oftentimes are derivative on how well am I doing right now? And if people feel like they've gotten poor since last year, they feel like their money is not stretching as far. They're going to get upset about that. I mean, again, we can sit here and and bemoan that, but that's just how politics works. Someone like Mike Rogers is in an especially difficult situation because Michigan has uniquely high gas prices for the region. I mean, this is great state of Indiana. Gas is like a dollar cheaper than it is in Michigan right now. And while, yes, a lot of those high gas prices in Michigan are attributable to the Democrat governance there. That's absolutely true. The problem is L side can go and easily blame it on the around war. And you kind of lose that plausible deniability when there's two factors that are causing the Michigan gas prices to drive up. So puts Mike Rogers in a tough situation because that race is ultimately a referendum on the Trump administration. Well, how's it? How's Indiana doing? Good. I mean, a great new football team. Okay. Good for you. Bears are coming over. I'm going to go after the bangles here pretty soon. No, are you actually? No, but I mean, don't tempt us, you know, but I, I say Indiana is doing well. Now here's what we've done. So we've got good governance in Indiana. So we've got a balanced budget. We've had it for a long time. We've been in the black, not in the red like states like Michigan are struggling. They can't do what we did. Like we kind of see what we did with Illinois. But Michigan and Indiana, what we've done is we've cut our gas tax. So we've suspended our gas tax. That took 60 cents off of the pump right there. And so we've seen, you know, huge gains. I mean, a gas, you know, I filled up earlier today. Gas was like three, 74, three, 80, roughly give or take. That is the most very most right? Little, little, little high, like, but not where you're going to Michigan. And it's 480. It's five bucks a gallon. I mean, that's when you really start, you know, hurting. And so, but it's again, because we, we can do this. Like we can. So our governor did this a few months ago and he's going to continue to extend that to say, hey, we're going to give relief. And listen, we're going to keep cutting taxes in Indiana. Like right now, like we can do better. Like we're a great state. We've got great tax policies. Super, super low taxes, very limited government, very low regulation. However, we can do better. And that's always got to be the mindset of every politician is, hey, we can do better. Because a lot of times people will say, well, Indiana is good. Like, look at the Illinois. Look at Michigan. We're good. And I'm like, yeah, yeah, that's fine. That we're much better than Illinois or Michigan. That's a low bar. Let's do, let's do better, right? And let's cut more taxes. Let's limit government, government anymore because I'm going to tell you, government's natural state of being is growth, right? It will always grow and grow and grow until somebody comes in and says, we need to cut it. And so every, the natural state of being for every politician has to be cut government. Where can we cut taxes? Where can we limit government? Because if we don't do that, if we don't counter the natural state of government growth, then we will just allow this thing to grow out of control to big problems with government. And programs can't fail because they're lost programs as it is and bills never sunset. So you get laws on the books that just stay forever. That's right. With a private enterprise, you can go to business and then you're gone, problem solved. But when the government says, we're going to spend X amount of dollars here. What happens when there's a budget shortfall? What do they do? New taxes. And it just is, it's an addiction that keeps getting worse. We see this in Indiana with our with our property taxes. So property tax, we've got a lot of Republican local governments. And for the most part, they do a good job. The problem is they will say, hey, we've got to, we've got to keep up with inflation in the, in the economy. So we're going to, we're going to tap into more homeowners on their property taxes. So even Republicans fall prey to this trap that in some cases, well, we're just going to, we've got to raise money in revenue. So we're just going to tax more. And they'll say, you know, we, we come in as a state, say, hey, we want to limit property taxes. We want to get rid of property taxes because we think it's a moral and you shouldn't have to rent from your property from the government. And then you'll hear local officials a lot of times, even, you know, local Republican officials say, hey, that's our money. And you have to remind Republicans, no, it's not that's the taxpayer's money. That's the citizens money. It's not your money. Well, how are we going to pay for stuff? Well, I'm sorry. I'm not concerned with government paying for stuff as much as I am the, the homeowner or the, the family member or the parent paying for stuff. And so we just have to, we just got to check ourself and never let it run out of, run away from us to say, hey, oh, government deserves to spend more, to build more. And even, oh, well, it'll be good. Like, it'll be good for the community. And then people want to live here. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Great. But just like everyone else, if you don't have the money, you got to live in a budget. And sometimes government forgets that they have to budget live within a budget because to your point, Tim, they can just tax, you know, it's the only industry where, if, you know, people buy less, you can still get more, right? Just print. It's pretty, I mean, it's pretty nice. Actually, if you're, if you're a business owner, it'd be nice to have a printing machine. Well, it's pretty nice if you're working for an NGO outside of DC and USID is dumping money, your bank account, no matter what you do. Okay. It's what made it interesting about Trump is, because this works really well at the state level, but at the federal level, you just have so much gridlock. I mean, a great example is Amtrak, where, you know, Amtrak, they have like one profitable line. It's the sell line that actually makes money and it makes a lot of sense to have a trillion line there from DC to, you know, Boston, you got Philly, New York, etc. But then you have these, you know, lines that go from, you know, I'm just spitballing here, but like New Orleans to Seattle, it's like just loop, I mean, hemorrhaging money. And any logical, you know, it feels like if it was a business, you just cut that line and bolster the sell line. And then when you make enough money, maybe you can try and expand a Florida or something. So whenever these fights come up in the Senate, I'm just gonna pick on them. I don't know what his record is. I'm just using them as a stand-in. It's like, you know, John Brasso in Wyoming, and we like, you know, Brasso's whatever. But, you know, if there's a, if there's an Amtrak line running through Wyoming and they're saying we need to cut this line. It's not making any money. He's saying, I'm gonna, I'm gonna lose 3,000 jobs for my constituents. I can't justify that. So we're keeping that line in. So it's like, it's all built in. It makes it impossible to actually cut anything from a bunch. And I mean, I mean, Doge found this out where Doge did make some cuts. But, you know, they were promising $2 trillion in cuts. And we got like, you know, I think 20 billion that you could like read on a spreadsheet. And the primary reason it's no fault of their own that they realize this a lot of this is approved by Congress. And they can't justify even losing 200 jobs. Because their constituents, they're in a town hall. They're gonna get raked over the coals on it. And then their opponents can use that and attack at or put them up on stage. And it's just, so at the federal level, it's all like baked in. So what I like about Trump is he kind of realized this. Trump was just like, austerity measure is probably not gonna happen until we like sort this country out long term. So he's like, I'm just gonna use the money to like get my agenda across. So that's the big beautiful bill comes, you know, across everyone's desk. And you have these budget hawks come out and they're like, no, this is gonna expand the budget. And Trump's like, the budget's gonna get blown out anyway. Let's at least like channel the money from USA. to like ice, right? Like it's kind of logical. And so I kind of like that approach where it's like, I think states like an unit that's smart. It's not even austerity measures because you're just cutting like fat, like just stuff that shouldn't even be on the state budget in the first place. But on the contrary, I kind of on the flip side at the federal level, from my perspective, it feels like the Republicans constantly promise we're going to cut the budget and then it never actually happens. Trump just is like, I don't know maybe, but we're going to actually just reallocate this money and then put it into, you know, government programs that actually benefit America people like ice. It's kind of this balance, but you know, in an Indianapolis is an interesting thing going on. So we have this terrible bus line called the red line and it's not any good. It clogs up. They took a lane of the streets and they allocated it for the bus. So now traffic is worse, right? They're pushing everyone into this public bus line. It doesn't do well. It doesn't make any money. Well, they thought it'd be better because it's a Democrat controlled city to put in another line, the red line going, you know, the, the other direction or the North, one's Northwest or Northeast, North, North, North, South, the other one's East West. And so, so what, but what you could find is with this bus line that's putting in, you'd be able to buy every resident a new car for the same amount of money that they are spending on this bus line that's going to congest the traffic even more. It's not going to be as efficient. It doesn't make money. These things hemorrhage money. They never break, they never even break even. And so, you know, if you're a business owner, you'd be looking at this and be like, ah, it's not really practical to put in the bus line. Why don't we just buy everybody in an apples and a new car. That's a lot cheaper. We'll save money. And people will be able to get around a lot more effectively and efficiently. And, but yeah, in government, you can't do that, right? You'd reignite the auto industry. You would. All right. But it's, well, it's funny because, you know, and this is, again, what kind of sucks just about the situation we're in as, you know, and civics broadly is like, you can't even try necessarily, I mean, I don't know what's going on in the end, but like broadly, you can't even try like solutions, like, for example, in China, they're having all this grid locks. We're like, all right, we'll just build high speed rail and the people that don't want to drive, they can get on the rail and they get from point A to point B. Well, we try it in California. The Democrats try it to be fair. And they blow out the budget. And they don't even have a train. It goes from like Merced to Baker's field or something like total disaster. And so it's so frustrating. So everyone just kind of throws their hands in the air and they're like, I guess we can't have, you know, high speed rail or anything like that. And then additionally, you know, when you do build the high speed rail, we can't even get the bombs off of it because we have all these, like, we can't even enforce vagrancy laws. So you go, you know, you go to like, you know, you go like on the subway in New York, a marvel of, of, you know, the infrastructure, I think it's a fantastic, I mean, it's unbelievable to New York subway. It's like the most robust metro system in the world. But and there's like homeless people everywhere. So it's like, we have the problem where we can't, we can't build new infrastructure anymore. But then when we do build it, we can't even enforce like laws in the books to make it safe. We don't want to want to take the train in the first place. Let me, let me tell you a story, young tape story of a woman named Alexandria Ocasio Cortes. So Amazon wanted to open a warehouse in New York City and it was going to generate billions of dollars. They, they negotiate with the city and said, here's what we'll do. You give us a discount on our tax bill. We'll build there, we'll end up paying you billions of dollars in tax revenue, but make it cheaper for us than anywhere else and you win our business. So the city was like, praise be because our infrastructure is crumbling. Our trains are running down and we need the money to fix them. So protesters who don't understand math, gather in the financial district in New York, AOC joins them and AOC gives a quote, why are we giving Amazon $3 billion? These activists genuinely believed that a tax discount was the city giving cash to Amazon and got them to shut down their bill. And New York has faced a budget deficit ever since. And now, and this is news, we'll get into actually we'll jump to the second and second. Zoran Mamdani is like, let's just tax everybody and then make the state pay for it. AOC sabotaged her city and state. And now they're blaming the wealthy. Let's do this. Universal. We got this is a mistake. We got this from New York Times, judge orders New York to scrap roll out of second home tax and start over Staten Island judge, sighted with a group of homeowners who had sued the city over its introduction of the tax, dealing a blow to Mayor Zoran Mamdani. So he says what we're going to do is we're going to tax anybody who's got a second home in the city. Basically go after rich people. This is insane because you've got penthouses with a lot of money they pay at ins and amount of taxes and they're barely there. So it's almost no footprint. A lot of these properties are in skyscrapers that are that are in use. This was an insane play that would drive people out of the state. Kathy Hockel at a conference said we've got to get these people, these rich people back from from Palm Beach, they're leaving. And we got to convince them to come back to New York, which brings me back to the story of AOC, when Amazon wanted to build this warehouse, they said we're going to bring something like 20 to 30,000 jobs. That's going to boost the economy. All of those people are going to pay income tax to the city and we're going to pay property tax and corporate tax to the city as well. And AOC, because she's not very smart, and I'm not saying it to be mean, she genuinely believed when the city offered a discount on taxes to Amazon, meaning if Amazon would have owed 10 billion, they said we will charge you only seven billion to come to New York. Amazon said that three billion in savings means we still have to pay seven billion, but that's lower taxes than the other locations we're looking at. So we'll take the deal. AOC claims after the fact, I did nothing to do with this. It wasn't even my district. No, she went down to the protest, the financial district where they were rallying to stop Amazon from coming in. And it helped convince Amazon, it's not worth the hassle of people are protesting. So New York didn't get the tax revenue they needed, which would be going to fix the infrastructure right now for which Zoran Mamdani says they have a budget shortfall. So we're going to tax property owners or take it from the state. They do this to themselves, guys, go back and pull that story about AOC and that protest. And it is fascinating to see now something like six years on the ramifications of her insane misunderstanding, resulting in real budget crises in New York. This is what you get with Kami policy. Right. Well, I mean, it comes down ultimately to does the company that they're seeking to punish do they like it or not? I mean, it's kind of, it comes down to you because a similar project just took place in New York City over by a city field. It's like all chop shops around there. I'm actually kind of sad because he has to go park over there when I go to city field. And it's like always reliable parking because it's chop shops, someone wants to get stabbed. And they're bulldozing all of them. And New York City FC, an MLS team that's owned by Manchester City FC, it's been in the news recently because it turns out the Abu Dhabi sports group, which owns the team was cooking the books to the tune of like a billion dollars. It's neither here nor there decides we're going to build our stadium, you know, across the street from city field, you know, tax breaks, you name it. We're leasing the property to a city football group instead of allowing them to buy it, which means they're losing all the property tax revenue on it, et cetera, et cetera. Not a peep, not a peep from any of these people who derailed Amazon thing because they like, they like, you know, the idea of having a soccer stadium there. But what's funny is the people funding it, it's, it's a foreign investment group. It's the Abu Dhabi investment group when you go up the chain. So it's just like completely, you know, compared to Amazon where, look, I mean, I'm not going to bat for Amazon here necessarily. But at the very least they're an American company, you know, I mean, you gotta at least can't, you know, credit records do where, you know, NYCFC, it's the MLS. It's not even like this age old institution, like a baseball team. It's like a new startup league from the 90s, you know, et cetera. So it's just completely ridiculous where they pick and choose when to antagonize companies just based off of these. Well, look, take, take, I pulled the story up and I have this hammer. I'd like to bash myself in the face with having to read this over and over again because this was, I was looks maxing. Yeah, I was looks maxing, you know, learned it from Clivicular AOC celebrated Amazon pulling out of New York, but the governor says it costs the city 25,000 jobs. And now we're seven years on and Zoran Mamdani is saying, we have a budget shortfall. And if we don't fill it, we're going to have to tax the working class. So we've got to go after people's properties. We need the state to bail us out. How about you all just blame Alexandria Ocasio Cortez? Now I know she goes, it's not my district where they were doing the warehouse, no, but she is a national level politician with millions of followers who rallied people against Amazon and helped shut this thing down. And now they're suffering because of it, but the problem is, this is seven years ago. There's a 24 year old in New York right now, who's got their first job. They don't understand why their city is falling apart, why the L train isn't working and they can't get from hipster Williamsburg into the city for their job. And they hear the politician say, it's the rich people's fault. When they were 17 years old and living in the suburbs or outside of New York, they did not know this was happening. And now these people are in the workforce and they're going to vote and they don't understand the woman they're supporting burned their future to the ground. Okay. How do you convey this to the Gen Z people for the first time entering politics, don't know this happened. Well, it's, it's, it's, it's kind of a chicken and egg problem here because the, the 24 old in New York, he's accustomed to the L train not functioning properly. He doesn't remember, he doesn't actually remember a time when New York had functioning infrastructure. And this is what makes like declines so pernacious is because, you know, we have this idea that eventually people will snap and they'll be like, okay, we got to fix the city. It's not how it works. People kind of get accustomed to how bad things are getting and then young people come in who are used to that level of, you know, standard of living or whatever. So it can only get worse. It actually just kind of creates this downward spiral and the New York city because they have so much third world migration, you know, they're used to, you know, horrible infrastructure. So even a broken L train is like, you know, a miracle to them. So it just creates this like situation where there's really zero accountability for public officials because once again, younger people accustomed to the rot, newcomers, immigrants or whatever from the third world, it's already like, this is fantastic compared to where they come from. And then the people that get so pissed off because everything's falling apart, they just leave. Carolina, the people that you need to bounce AOC from office, all the New Yorkers that, you know, were there on 9/11, et cetera, they're all in North Carolina and Florida now, high and large. I mean, or New Jersey even. But to Tim's point about, you know, the blaming rich people, that's exactly what AOC was doing. Like the whole point of that was to stick it to Bezos, right? It was, look, he's a billionaire, he's got all this money, Amazon, such a big company, treat their worker so bad, all it was was just posing. It was a way for her to stand up and say, look, I'm standing up to the billionaires. We are going to do this because, you know, the billionaires, the mega corporation, Amazon is getting all this money from New York, which obviously it wasn't when New York wasn't writing a check for them. But that was the narrative and enough people believed it and made a bunch of noise, so Amazon doesn't build it there. And New York suffers because of it. This is something that happens when the left attacks business and it happens every time you attack business, businesses create jobs. They create opportunities. They create tax revenue. And when the left goes after businesses and goes after business owners, just because they're successful or because they're good at what they do, it hurts the people that are, that are literally they're protesting. Those people will feel the ramifications downstream. And again, to our point earlier, we have, as a society, don't think long enough term. And we end up voting and protesting for things that will harm the economy in the long term. Well, it's all, it's all like this entire saga was a battle between left wing populists and right wing populists that were dancing around the real issue here because Amazon wasn't perfect shadow boxing partner for AOC. She could say, well, this is clearly the reason why her city is falling apart. But also, you know, conservatives were also lulled into this idea that Amazon moving the town is actually going to maybe improve the city. And neither are really true. When you look at queens, I lived there for four years. When you look at queens and you look at what's actually really holding back people that are from queens and would like to have a high standard of living that live there, it is the biggest issue is immigration. Half the city's foreign born. So, you know, we're in a situation where the native population of the United States is declining. Like in sheer numbers, everyone knows this or TFR went negative in the 80s. So, queens and theory, the price should be stable or declining. Manhattan, it's, Manhattan's always been, it's always going to be expensive, et cetera. We don't have 10 of them in housing anymore. So, people got to have, you know, one better apartment or whatever. But queens, it's single family housing from basically, once you get past sunny side, it's all single family housing by and large. You have some occasional apartment blocks. So this is a place that should, as the population declines, be getting cheaper and or be an option for people commuting into Manhattan. But it continues to be exorbitantly expensive year after year, rent goes up, et cetera. Amazon doesn't solve that. Running Amazon out of town doesn't solve that. We're both shadow boxing in a way. The real issue here is immigration, not keeping crime under control, entire neighborhoods in New York City or off limits for normal people because the crime's out of control. So we have all these artificial, sort of, these artificial dynamics that are driving the price up that we should be addressing that, you know, immigration and crime. But it's like the two things that are keeping rent highest in New York City. So that was what kind of frustrated me about the whole saga. I'm like, we're kind of both dancing around the obvious here, which is, you know, Amazon doesn't really much to do with it. I mean, I agree. I think it's stupid to run them out of town. But I'm also not convinced that Amazon coming to Queens is going to be this golden bullet and solve their problems, you know, once again, after cities form born. I mean, you know, in the 50s and 60s and 70s even, around the 70s and 60s, people born raised in Queens, they would graduate high school and they'd be able to buy a home in Queens on a single salary. What changed? Was it like we ran out of jobs? No, it actually is a little to do with economics, it has to do with the actual demographics of the place changing. Well, more dangerous in certain neighborhoods, which made it off limits. You know, Jamaica, Queens, Trump grew up there. Now it's a war zone. And then additionally, all these people from the third world moved into the city. And I do think there's a major cultural component to it as well. All of these factors converging, you know, a lot of these lefty activists like to say that were the millennials of the first generation who have it worse than the parents before them. And I'm like, yeah, except for the fact that my parents didn't have cell phones or TV. You know, it's like you ran into an apartment, there was nothing in it. We have these added expensive expenses, unfortunately, because they become necessities like a cell phone. They're not super expensive, but now you have all these added things you have to pay for. So I think there's also, with Gen Z, they played video games when they were kids, where you were gambling. Like you were talking about this the other night, you play these games in loot boxes. And now what do we see? Gen Z was programmed to chase that double mean hit for sports, betting things like that. We weren't giving a younger generation a message of honor, loyalty, and hard work. We were giving a message of short-term gains, gambling, and goofing off. Yeah. Like with young people, and this is a major problem the GOP has. I was talking about it today on Twitter. If young people are underperforming, and let's just say you're making the case, it's entirely inherent of their generation. It is a complete cultural, something is derailed. There's something wrong with them. That's not an indictment of that generation. That's an indictment of the society that raised them, ultimately, because if, you know, I think we could probably all around the table say parenting is declined in quality over the last 100 years. So again, when Zoomers are, you know, there's a high proportion of Zoomers that are LGBT, you know, to use a PC term here, or that are socialists or something like that, you have to ask yourself, is there something just inherently wrong with this generation? Or perhaps there's external factors that created this environment where they're like turning into adults, and they're like basically arrested developments. There's the immigration component. That's a large component. But additionally, someone left the watch at some point between the 60s and the 2010s. Every generation is worse. Millennials are permanent children, Gen Z are worse children. I imagine Gen Alpha is going to be worse, hopefully, Gen Alpha just goes nuts and becomes like super based or something. But millennials are buying toys, right? Was that toys or rust story? Yeah. Well, millennials are a weird case because millennials are the ones who grew up when the social complex still existed. They became adults. It broke down and now they're mad. They feel like their inheritance was stolen. Their zoomers grow up, like I was born in '01, we grew up understanding that the social compact was already broken because we were watching how millennials were operating as young adults. So we answered this dynamic thinking, it's all broken anyway, and so you see a high proportion of realism among zoomers. So millennials and zoomers are slightly different dynamics. Here's the sad reality. The American dream, I would define the American dream as you can work hard, get a house, have a family or like, you know, I hear from a lot of young people, they think the American dream is that you're going to go to college, get a good job, and you're going to like be well off. It's like, you know, Americans are all wealthy, even poor Americans, we have fat, homeless people. The American dream, what it meant was back in the day when, you know, people came from Europe, whatever. It's like, we don't have upward mobility in our country. In the United States, there's an opportunity to work hard. If you work hard, you can succeed. The sad reality is because of this breakdown and social contract, it is still possible to get rich, but it's through dishonorable means. Not always, you know, you can make a great app that, you know, solves a problem. The old joke is make an app that can help people be lazy and you'll be a billionaire. Right. So figure out what that is. You know, make that program. But I watched the video today, and this is a recurring trend now with AI, where there will be a guy who's, I saw one work as a juggler, he juggles. Someone has stolen all of his videos and AI rendered a big tidied woman in the bikini juggling, reuploaded all of those videos. So it looks good. And they're getting millions of views and making money now, doing nothing unscrupulous. They don't care to steal from this person. They're going to sell sex to people. Real easy to make money if you want to be an only fans hoe. Do things that go, be a grifter online, lie to people. There's easy money you made and you'll get ahead. The problem is, these are the paths people are choosing. They are making their, the younger generation is like, I'm going to get mine. I'm going to get my bag. Who cares? Well, yeah. I mean, the American dream, like we have to cut through all the platitudes that have been offered up over the years to sort of explain what the American dream is. The American dream fundamentally is your quality of living is directly tied to the quality of your labor. That is fundamentally what the American dream is. As in, the more intelligent you are, the better you are at your job or the more, you know, the more you're able to offer society broadly, the output of that will be a standard of living that rewards you for, you know, your, your cunningness or your ability to work hard, et cetera. That started to break down in the last 50 years. And that is why people have felt like the American dream has basically been robbed or broken down. Just people can't quite articulate that. But that's fundamentally what the American Dream is, is that your standard of living is directly tied to the quality. I don't think that I disagree with that. I think that the American Dream is about the ability to actually own property and have your property be yours where you can control it because the people that came to the United States, they come here because they're trying to, or at least up until maybe the 60s, they came here because they were trying to escape governments and societies that didn't allow them to control their own destiny. Now, I don't think that the American Dream is about how wealthy you are. I think it's about being able to own something and control your own destiny. That's why the fact that people don't have the ability to have one job that pays for a house and a family. That's why it has such an impact on society. When you could work one job, pay for your family. Your wife could stay home to raise your kids, and you had a house that was yours. That mattered to the American people, and that I think honestly is what the American Dream was. And a property should be a byproduct of that would be part of the standard of living. Property, people came here, people grew up in America, and they didn't expect just to get property handed to them. I mean, some people inherited it, obviously. But people understood, if I put on a stay's work and the better my output is, the nicer my property would be, whatever. But people understood that ownership of property wasn't just handed to you. It was a result of working hard and/or being exceptionally cunning, inventing something. So I mean, I agree that property is like part of the philosophical ethos of the United States. But people tie that to like, okay, well, I worked hard, so I should have a property. That's why Zoomers are so frustrated, because the ones that do work hard, I mean, I'll agree there's like obviously a lot of problems, you know, culturally with Zoomers, but Zoomers can work hard. They're not necessarily guaranteed. They're ever going on a property, especially if they're a couple. >> They just got it on in middle of nowhere. >> Yeah, I was going to say, you can't have liberty without virtue. That's what Benjamin Russ said that George Washington, John Adams, and I think the American dream, we've turned it into stuff, right? That's not what the American dream is, it's not about stuff, it's not about the house that you own. It's about being able to come and live a life that it has liberty that's secured by government so I can pursue what I want to pursue. I may not get those things, and I think we told the world, if you come to America, you'll be rich. I think that's what people assume the American dream is. It's never been about stuff. It's never been about having a nice house or a comfortable living. It's about being able to have a life where I'm free to be able to pursue what I believe God's calling me to pursue. That's what the American dream is. The reason we're failing in America is because we've kicked virtue out. Think about this, there is no virtue anymore. It's everyone does what's right in their own eyes. That's what it is. >> Yeah, and so. >> I was just going to say, without virtue, you can't have liberty. You're going to have people saying, well, I've been wronged and well, by who? Well, because the government's not giving me my stuff. Okay, well, that's not virtuous to take stuff. Government doesn't give you stuff, right? That's not a virtuous thing to say. The virtuous thing to say is, no, what can I do on my own merit? What can I do on my own work ethic to go out and pursue something, and has government gotten out of my way and protected my liberty to do that? Once you get back to the fundamental value in American history, which is, we are a virtuous people. Therefore, we can be a free people. That's when you'll start seeing this crap like AOC saying, you know, oh, we should run Amazon out and you're just going to have negative effects if we don't have virtue. >> But the same thing. >> No, no, no, no. Every one, you know, when they enter their career, they're looking to make their mark. There are people who hope to one day be quoted, something they said mattered and it resonated with a generation. And right now, this is my moment. To say that quote, that will be copied and pasted and shared for a millennia. >> I got them off. >> A generation of Americans will know this quote, when your economy is based upon women showing their buttholes on the internet, your country has fallen. >> Well, yeah, I mean, because I think this is, I think this is like right there, a T-shirt somewhere. >> Yeah. >> Well, a nation whose economy is women showing their buttholes seven years ago is a nation that has failed. >> Well, I mean, that's true. >> This ties in directly because I mean, like when I'm getting at standard living, I'm not saying quantified by your net worth. When I'm saying a standard living is, it feels was hitting on it, which is part of it is like, I need to know that when I become an adult, I'm going to enter a community that I can participate in, that I'm going to be able to get married, I'm going to be able to have kids, my kids are going to grow up around people that are like them. That is all like wrapped up into a general standard living. Obviously, some of that's quantifiable through net worth, but some of that is not quantifiable. My neighborhood's safe is I find a wife and with Zoomers, part of the problem is what you're hitting on is, you know, for example, you know, sexuality has been commodified. So now the dating market is a complete disaster. And because women are, you know, flaunting themselves in the internet, that's certainly a component of it. Now, Zoomers have a complete inability to participate in the dating market. >> If I was China, do you know what I would do? I would get a bunch of those dudes, you ever see those videos where they got like a hundred cell phones all plugged in and they're all automated, sock puppeting. I would get 10,000 of those accounts if I was China and I would start dumping money into only fans, girls. I would convince a generation of my enemies, women to be horrors, to be hookers. >> Well, the problem is that's already happening. >> That's banned in China. It's not allowed. >> No, but you know what? That was already read in the congressional record that Russia, the Communist, we're going to do this in America in 1943, the congressional record, 45 tenants of communism. And it was, that was big, that was to normalize rampant sexuality and to make traditional norms go away and accept the extremes that, and that's what exactly, and you know, we were told by the Soviets. They told Eisenhower, they said, you won't be a communist, but your children's children will be communist. And we're going to do it by going after your traditional value. >> We should, we should subpoena only fans, they should be investigated to see if the subscriptions that are coming through are, how much of it is based in foreign countries, and particularly adversaries of the United States. >> I think we're, I think we're underestimating the degeneracy of the American people. >> No, no, no, no, no, no, no, I'm not, but I, but I'm saying I wouldn't be surprised if it found like 20% of all the money was coming from China or Russia. >> I don't, I mean, we watch Caleb Hammer show every single guy that goes on the show as a bunch of only fan subscriptions. I think, I think, I think the call came from inside the house in this situation. >> Well, that's a whole troll problem and we need to shake these guys. >> That is. >> But I think you can say I started by outside forces because those who knew America knew that we were strong, we were too strong to be taken down from outside. I think, I think the communist infiltrated, they got the, they got the wheels turning and now we've taken it to the umph degree on our own. >> Yeah, I mean, I, I think that's true, but this has always been the case through history where outside forces seek to destabilize an adversary, like for example, you know, the British imported opium into China to, you know, be able to start a war and they got a treaty poured out of it. So I mean, this, I mean, I agree that I do think maybe the inklings were so big. >> They ban only fans by our adversaries, but I mean, I, I, I agree, I mean, certainly, but I, I think by and large the American people, like I'm generally pretty dismissive of claim. Like our adversaries are making things bad. I'm like, Americans are kind of a part of the world. >> No, no, no rule for, for this show, anybody who we, we're going to hire one of the first questions we ask is, do you have an only fans account? What are you paying any only fans? And you got to, and if you lie to us, you're going to, you're going to sign your contract. I do not have only fans that I pay for it. And people who want to come on the show, if you're paying for it, no, get out. >> Do it, do it. >> Do it, do it. >> I do have a hammer show before the show. >> As a, as a pastor, I can say, I do not have an only hands down or am I paying for anything, I don't only fans. >> We should get a hammer style pre show, a financial audit for the pre show. >> I mean, to be fair, I love his show, I didn't watch it before, I didn't watch Caleb Hammer when he was a financial auditor, but I do watch him now when he shames leftists, it's fantastic. And it's like, he's mocking these people who have only fans on my, absolutely, thank you, sir, it's fun. >> That's awesome. >> When he roast these people who don't read books or Google search, the things they believe. >> Yeah, well, and what's so upsetting about the whole thing with pornography, it's like pornography. >> How do they go on his show? >> Well, that's, I think he pays them or something. >> I hear that we should do it. We should do that. >> I agree. >> Tim and Tate, takedown? >> That'd be great. I would love to go to people's financial records. >> No, we don't, we literally just be like, what do you spend money on? And they're like porn, it's like, you're a loser. >> Yeah. >> But the thing is like pornography is like nested inside of a much larger issue. The larger issue that needs to be addressed, which probably you can only socially engineer your way out of it, is that sexuality has become commodified. You know, you ban porn, it doesn't actually solve the main problem here, which is that sexuality in and of itself has become completely commodified. This is where I put on my sort of Christian hat here. I mean, I always have my Christian hat on. But I think Christianity addresses this directly is, you know, sexuality. The Christian's kind of the secret sauce. If you kind of reserve it within the bounds of marriage, it does solve a lot of problems, because it's like, you know, I think that you're kind of seeing it now with the whole Cornell 7 thing. Is that ultimately people do feel guilty when they sort of, you know, conduct their sexuality outside the bounds of marriage, and then they'll look for reasons why I might be feeling guilty, and they'll try to blame it on something. And I'm like, I think the reality is, you haven't lived a virtuous lifestyle according to our creator, and now you're living in the consequences of that, so you want to blame society. >> Yeah, exactly. >> Or that. And I would agree with that wholeheartedly. And you know what studies even show, if you follow that biblical lifestyle, you're going to be happier. There's the statistics. I mean, those who are walking in a monogamous marriage, right, they have better sex. They have a better healthier. family life. They're genuinely more happy and fulfilled than anyone else. I mean, there's a reason Kurt Cobain killed himself when he was at the pinnacle of his fame, the pinnacle of money, the pinnacle of success, and he still took his own life is because at the end of all of those things, there still is emptiness and tell you fill it with what our creator told us to fill it with. Yeah, well, and what's so disturbing about this is, generally, this is a good practical application, but now, because of feminism, a wrench has been thrown in, which is a lot of men get married and then they end up totally changed. They're totally just getting dominated in their marriage. And so what used to just be a fix all, just just get married and it's going to be fine. Now a lot of men are getting married and they're getting totally whipped by their wives as well. And that's what so alarming is, our society has eroded so much that you don't even have these safe bets anymore. I mean, I would say following Christ is going to be a safe bet, but if you're going to like quantify that step by step advice, there's multiple instances where an external factor can come in and just like totally take that sort of plank out. And that's what's so frustrating is like, you know, you really got to make sure it's not enough just to get married. You got to like be sure you're marrying like a sane normal woman because I think the Lindsey Clancy thing kind of exposed. It's like, you could do everything right. You could do everything your pastor says. And then she like, look, slimes out your whole family and you're like, okay, well, what happened here? So I'm not counters. I totally agree. I'm just saying like, it's just unfortunate that we can't even necessarily give that as it's like, just get married young. It's like, you know, there's a, there's a historical precedent for this. Every 80 years, there's a cycle throughout world history. You can see it of strong societies that turn into weak societies. And it's this cycle. It's hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men and weak men create hard times. And where you are in the cycle of weak men, I mean, this is straws how generational theory. Yes, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. And we are in what's called the fourth turning is happening within the next two years. 80 years ago, we had the world worse. 80 years before that, we had a civil war. 80 years before that, we had the revolutionary period. There actually was also, we don't really follow this because it was pre-American history. It was colonial history. But 80 years before that, there was also a great crisis with the UK in the, it was like 1690s. Yeah. There's a, there's modern, modern articulated articulation of that idea. And it's nicotine men create good times, good times create weed guys, weed guys create bad times, bad times create nicotine. I love it, man. I've heard that one. But to your point, King Phillips war. Yeah. Is that what it was? Yeah. 17, what? 17, what? It was 16, 70s. 16, 70s, all right. So it was, it was about 100 years. Well, actually, the American revolutionary period started in the, in the 17, 15, 17, 16, yeah. Well, we can end. I was going to tell you, I mean, and that's why, that's why the Me Too movement and this toxic masculinity movement is so dangerous because you're eradicating the one thing that God designed to protect society, which is masculine, strong men who are men that love fiercely. They love their families, they love their wives, their children, they love their communities and their neighbors. And they will be violent and go to war to protect that which they love. Yo. And so, yeah. I'm sorry real quick. King Phillips war is considered one of the bloodiest conflicts per capita in US history. And nobody talks about it because it was colonial. It was not American revolution. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It was the, it was the English going to war with all the Indian drives. Yeah. Yep. I think it was like residue from the French and Indian war. So led to like a sort of unification. To, to your point, there was just today Hillary Clinton was on warning Joe talking to, you know, Joe and me and she was saying that she was warning against the rise of Christianity. She said that white Christian men are causing such damage to the United States. The ID you can turn back, turn the clock back and try to recreate a world that never was dominated by, let's say it, white men of a certain persuasion, certain religion, certain ideology. It's just doing such damage to what we should be aiming for. I think the way she articulated it is actually good because it is doing damage to what they're aiming for. It is the response to what the left want to create and the what the left are creating what they want to create what they are creating is utter chaos. Well, it's feminism, which is, it's true. It is the spirit of Jezebel. If you go back and study the biblical times, the spirit of Jezebel hated strong men. And so I would say Hillary Clinton is the modern manifestation of that spirit of Jezebel in the flesh in America's, in American society. So yes, she's right. Strong Christian men are a threat to what she believes and everything she stands for. So yeah, she should be scared because strong Christian men standing up and saying we are not going to put up with this absolute destructive feminist worldview that you have that you're pushing on America. We're going to fight you at every turn. Yeah, she should be scared. Absolutely. And I'm, I'm tweeted, I retweeted it and it absolutely makes me happy that she goes on shows like Morning Joe and says this stuff because she is literally, she is actually saying the truth, right? Like strong, like I'm not even, like I'm not really a believer. I'm fairly, fairly agnostic. I mean, I'm, maybe I'm kind of, but you believe the principles of, yeah, I mean, you understand the principles, yeah, call myself Catholic curious. I was raised the Catholic and I don't have, I don't have a deep seated, strong faith, but I do think that if you're going to have a society that has to be foundational things that your society believes and I think that Christians get it right. That's right. And our history is rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics, which is, which is worked really well for all Western society. Now you have things like communism that when push God out, you have radical Islam that wants to come in and, and replace Christianity with a Sharia law, you know, death cult. And they are not shy about their religion. They are not shy about enforcing their norms on other people. And when Hillary Clinton sees the Islamists coming in and the radical Muslims who want to push this down our throws, they celebrate that. This will come on in, which is the wildest thing because Sharia law, Islam is totally subject to women. I mean, it completely, I mean, takes away any progressive feminist movement freedom that they fought for over the last 60 years. So it's kind of wild, but it's two demonic forces aligning, aligning so that they can tear down the one thing that they know would, would protect American freedom and our children's children. And that is strong men standing on Christian values. Yeah. I mean, it's, it's the red green alliance. It's exactly what happened in Iran. It's the reason why we are dealing with the situation in Iran today is because of that. And as much as the left refuses to acknowledge it, they will be absolutely crushed. Should they get their way? Yeah. The progressives, they don't have any way to defend against the, the Islamist, the, the, I believe, yeah, the Islamist, the Muslim ideology, they don't have any way to defend against it because their entire worldview is wrapped up in the idea that Islam and Muslims are an oppressed minority, even though they're not. Yeah. Their entire ideology is wrapped up in Islam is an oppressed minority. And so we can't tell them no. And because they don't possess the ability to tell them, no, should they get into power, they will be wiped out just like they were in Iran. That's right. And honestly, the UK needs to hear this too. They need to, they need to understand that if they continue down the path that they're on in 30, 40 years, the UK will be an Islamist. I didn't even take that long. I mean, I think it's, I think they're already gone. I mean, I, I don't know if there is any hope for the UK. I mean, see what I'm seeing now, they've given themselves over to the, and the strong men of the UK have either fled or have, have been pushed, have been, you know, subjugated themselves. Yeah. So yeah, I think, I think we are in a battle and you're right, absolutely feel where this is the red green alliance playing out all over again. It worked really well in Iran. If you go back and read news articles in the 70s about the Shaw and Iran, or when they were tearing down the Shaw, right, the communist tore down the Shaw and then the caliphate came in. Yeah. And established, they were saying of why I told a community back in the 70s, mid 70s, he was going to be a champion for women's rights. That's ridiculous. This is hilarious. The guy we just killed. We we sent his scud muscle up his backside a few months ago, like this, this guy was being championed as a women's rights activist. He gets in the power. He lists the communist due to the hard work of tearing down the Shaw and the traditions, the walls that protected that the Persian people for many generations. Now, the Shaw wasn't, wasn't necessarily a good guy. He was corrupt and greedy, but he wasn't a tyrant like what you saw the I told him become. And then they push him out. The communist pushed out the Shaw. There's a vacuum. And wouldn't you know it? The radical islamists come in and then they, they marched the communist out in the street a few weeks later and shoot them all. Yeah. And I mean, most people know this, or at least they, they have a sense of this. Iran used to be a western styled country. Same thing in Afghanistan, you can look at pictures of Afghanistan in the 70s before the, before the revolution there. Like it was a West, it was on track to be a western styled country. And it wouldn't be basically a basket case nation like it is today. Had they, had they not been overtaken by an islamist government. I don't know how it's here. I don't know what other parts of the country, but I can tell you in Indiana, you know, when I'm talking to legislators or people in government, and I'm saying, Hey, listen, Islam is the greatest internal threat that we have right now that we're dealing with. They say, Oh, well, it's, it's not really that bad. Oh, they're not very, there's not, there's not many of them. Oh, like they could never, Sharia law could never replace constitutional law. And I'm like, man, people are so short-sighted, they don't know history, they don't know modern history. And they certainly don't know the last 1400 years of what islam has done to what the western civilization, and they're, they're here to destroy everything we believe in. And I don't know what we have to do to wake these people up. are they just ignorant of history? Are they just like this idea of being blissful because of their ignorance? I have no idea, but we've got to sound the alarm and say, guys, by the time you realize, the danger with Islam is by the time you realize, it's a problem, it's too late. They've got their foot on your throat and your dead at one point. - I mean, look, there is example after example, after example throughout all of the Middle East of countries, and not only Middle East, but Asia as well. There are countries that used to be what you would consider on track to be a Western country that have turned into countries that are no longer that way. And even if you look at Saudi Arabia, they kicked all of the hardliners and all the extremists out. And there are people in Saudi Arabia, there are people in the UAE in the government that warn Europe and they warn the West. They're like, get rid of the Muslim Brotherhood, get rid of these organizations. We don't have the problems of radical Islam because we throw these people in jail. And Europe is not listening, the UK is not listening. - And for the people in the back that are listening, please understand, when people say, well, freedom of religion in America, Islam is not a religion. It's a political and military ideology masquerading as a religion to take advantage of our liberties here and our suicidal empathy that Americans oftentimes put out to the world so quickly. So Islam is not a religion. It is a political and military ideology that is hostile to the West. It's hostile to everything we believe and hold true in America. And if we don't see that and stop it before it gets a foothold, my fear is it's gonna be too late. - Yeah. I think we have a lot of various ethnic sort of enclaves that have formed in the United States that are all vying for power. I think Muslims are certainly a component of that. I think what's not talked about by Republicans enough is Hindus. I mean, Indians writ large, especially Hindus, also engage in this kind of ethnic nepotism. You can see it in the H1B data. I mean, it's so obvious what's going on here. And I mean, that's why I think both French was fantastic to call it out 'cause it really struck a nerve. 'Cause all of a sudden, it's all a lot of Republicans who correctly, you know, chest beat about Muslim, again, correctly. Like I support a Muslim ban, remigration, et cetera. But also like, we gotta like address all of these problems 'cause we're seeing the same things with, again, Indian immigrants and their descendants also engaging in a lot of the same behaviors. Granted, they're not gonna go blow up a city bus or anything like that. But the long term damage to the country is still there. I think the priority ultimately really needs to be putting Americans first and like actually determining what an American is first. - I think that you hit it on the head. Determining what an American is. That's the problem. You go to any ridiculously expensive, you know, valueless Ivy League school and you ask any professor to say, can you please identify what being an American is? What is our core value system? What are our core beliefs? Like what do we, and I think you're gonna get a thousand different answers. I think they will all be radically away from the truth of what we really are. And so we've gotta redefine who we are as Americans. Not redefine it in the sense that we're making up new definitions, but go back, take back what the culture has stolen, say, no, we're going back to the beginning. What did our founders believe being American actually met? And then if you come here and if you immigrate here, do it legally and assimilate into our culture 'cause immigration without assimilation is invasion. And we have a lot of people invade our country 'cause we're not assimilate. Well both French pointed out, I loved what he said and I shared it like he's pointing out, this is not assimilation. - They're all hanging out together. - I'm like, where are, where's this beautiful melting pot picture? Does it not look like a melting pot? It looked like we had just totally been taken over by a completely different culture and what happened? - Yeah, it was a salad of the giant tomato, and that's all we know. - I hate tomatoes, I like tomatoes. - I know, that's so true. And what is an American thing? Super easy. We don't even need to do any like introspect. I mean, I know I like doing it, but we don't necessarily need to do all this like introspection. We just had to ask Japanese people. And the Japanese were like, oh, like Mike Trout, you look like that. It's very easy, just go ask the Japanese, like what's an American? And they'll tell you. - There's a lot of it in their video games. - There's a lot of things we should ask the Japanese and act on their advice, the Japanese. - Like why did they start bringing in third world migrants? - Yeah. - Oh, I don't know if we can just be, they brought in like 10,000, we brought in millions. - I mean, they stopped. - I know, I know. - And asking them like, yeah, why would you, they're stopping and they already elected a really nice one. - No, it's because their birth rate is so ridiculously low. - Yeah. - But like, it took like 10,000 third world migrants, which is like a drop in the bucket for 127 million people, for them to elect like a full-blown nationals, who's like, we're not letting a single one back in. So the Japanese like lock in. I have a lot, you know, I've made the point. I think Japan's the only Western nation left doing really truly thing. When you truly think of what it means to be Western Japan. - Oh, bro, there are Japanese. - And they're hardcore about it. - Yeah. - Yeah, I mean, the new lady comes in and she's like, oh, Mario and Luigi are foreign. Get them out of here. (laughing) Let's go. And oh, so funny, oh, so funny. We were like Trump, like, I guess, he may be under, I don't know, but he like didn't understand like Pearl Harbor was like really touchy subject there. So he was like, you know, like the surprise attacks. Like the Prime Minister of Japan with Pearl Harbor, you know? And he's like saying, no, great work. He's almost like complimenting him and she's like disturbed. - So funny, dude. Oh man, I loved it. I love prison trouble. - Yeah. - There were a lot of Japanese people on X that were like, that were actually appreciative of his making a joke about it like that. Because to them, though, at least the way that they were articulating on X, they were like, look, it makes it okay for us to address this now. It's something that we had, you know, we don't want to talk about, or the Japanese people had dead bills. - Because they're not irony poisons there. Like here, we can't take any things, basically. - Yeah. - They don't have that. So they're like, well, Pearl Harbor must be really sensitive for them. Why are they joking about it? Like, did we joke about like 9/11? - Did you imagine though, if Japan was like, hey, maybe it's not a good idea to attack an American military base. Let's just not do that. - Maybe not. Then basically, all of East Asia would just be Japan. - Yeah, no, that's a very true. Yeah, it's a huge thing with the Japanese where they refuse to apologize for anything. Which is like fine, that's their prerogative, but like the Koreans. Where the South Koreans and the Japanese should like literally on the same page about everything because they have an adversary right there. But they still like every three years, like a row happens diplomatically. And they get really mad that Japan won't apologize for the comfort women and all that. Really fast into the Japanese, like dude, they just, that's why if you read the media around the time, I was talking about a pre-show and Obama went over there like apologized for the nuclear bombs, which is like the gayest thing ever. The Japanese are like, what is he doing? What's wrong with this? - The Japanese recognize what actually happened after we were to the blessing of liberty actually came to their shores. 'Cause we, this, we're the only nation that says, we will go to war with you. But after you surrender and after we make peace, we will help you rebuild. In a way that actually benefits your society. I mean, no other nation does that. No, we just say, hey, give us enough, give us enough space to bury our dead that we just, that we fought. And now we wanna help you be set free. - I am. I dream of a Starbucks on every corner in Tehran. (laughing) - The American dream. The American dream is gonna be McDonald's, hard-wrot cafes, Gucci's and casinos. (laughing) - Wait 'cause the cultures that emerge out of the countries that we, you know, we were victorious against always vastly different than the pre-war culture. Well, the Germans, you think about the Japanese. I mean, you can look across the board of all of our, you know, people that we've defeated. - Do you know, I wonder what's gonna, if we beat Iran, what is Iran anime look like? I don't know, what is Iran and Pikachu? Persian Pikachu. Persian Pikachu is really fascinating to think about. - Do you know the story of the Yata song? - No. - Japanese song, Yata. Yata, Yata, Yata, Yata, Yata, it's a big meme. So apparently post-war generations were depressed and miserable. Young men in Japan were hopeless. There was nothing to look forward to. And this song came out called Hooray Yata Japanese. And it was like lifting people's spirits up 'cause they were like killing themselves like crazy, just with hopelessness. - Well, the Ministry of Culture in Japan, they have a Ministry of Culture, which I guess would be their equivalent, like some sort of like soft power exercising or whatever. They after the war were like everyone thinks were like, you know, samurai and stuff. So we need to like soften our image. They think about kamikaze, we think about Japan. So they're like, okay, we gotta get everyone into a room and we gotta like figure out how we can soften our image to the world, you know, makes a lot of sense. You don't wanna be viewed as like, still the big bad Japanese empire. So they came up with Hello Kitty. Hello Kitty was quite literally like pushed by the Ministry of Culture to soften, you know, and it's funny 'cause Dave Chappelle had a bit and it was like a funny bit that he came up completely independently, but he hit the nail in the head of this what I'm talking about, where he had a joke where he said, you know, we bombed the masculinity out of them. Like we dropped two nuclear bombs. He's sort of drawing Hello Kitty. And it's like, actually, he's completely correct. That's exactly what happened. As they said, we're too masculine. Like people think like Mishima and stuff when they think about Japan, which Mishima's kind of based because separate from the whole fascist thing kind of. Anyway, the Ministry of Culture was like, okay, we gotta like soften our image up. So let's push the Hello Kitty. So it's funny that Dave Chappelle, and Sailor Moon, was like giving the correct history what happened there. Well, I mean, it counters the whole thing. You know the funny thing about anime is like, every character's white. Yeah, it's like Naruto, it's like one of the most popular anime in a long time. It's a blonde hair blue eyed kid. Japanese are white. Yeah, the Japanese, that's what I mean. I said this, it's still like awesome. I'm saying like Sailor Moon is blonde. Do you know why? Almost look Japanese a little bit. I mean, just when I'm Japanese. Are you? I'm five percent Japanese. That's why I was gonna say five percent. 20% Korean. It's a five percent log, 20% scale. - That's true, that's correct, that's why it's true. - 5% Japanese. and what, 95% West Virginia. - 95% Korean. - 95% love of the game. - That a bunch of random European American nonsense. - And did you do, like, how do you know this? How, are you just guessing, or did you actually get. - No, no, my grandmother's from Korea. - Oh, you didn't do a 23-year-old man? - No, no, no, no. My mom did, but my grandmother's literally from Korea. - Okay, cool. - And so my grandmother was 20%, Japanese. - Okay. - Which has implications if anyone understands what that means. - You get free school, I don't know. - No, it means the Korean, the Korean women weren't intentionally becoming Japanese. - Oh, gotcha. - Those are just percentals of Romeo and Juliet. - Yeah. - That's what I'm saying, because we had a super chat once, and they were like, "How dare you dishonor Japanese people. "They did nothing wrong." And I was like, "Guys, I'm not gonna pretend "that, like, some Japanese guy and some Korean woman "had a forbidden love." (laughing) And, you know, like, and eloped. Like, it was probably war rape. - Yeah. - So, there you go. - So my grandparents were missionaries to Japan after World War II. So they were men in that missionaries. My mom was born Tokyo. - Oh, wow. - So they were on the north side of, they didn't missionary work in the North Island, which is Hokkaido. And little village called Hombetsu is where they-- - My great-grandfather is from what would now be North Korea. At the time, it wasn't North South Korea. It was just Korea. - Okay, just Korea, yeah. - Oh, my great-grandfather, he lived in Okinawa. He was fighting. He was in war. People don't understand. Okinawa is like, deep, deep far south from Japan. - It's like, it's like Japan's Hawaii. - Yeah, there you go. - I met a Japanese guy when he was like, "My great-grandfather lived there." And he's like, "Really?" I was like, "Yeah, he was killing you guys." - He was killing you guys. - He was killing you guys. - He was like, "Oh." - Hi, Starbucks. - He wasn't, he was an engineer for the record. - I don't ever get offended by any of this history stuff. - Yeah. - I mean, real quick, I did find out I was Japanese because of my mom's 23 in me. Because we didn't know my grandma was part Japanese. She was a Korean woman from Korea. - Okay. - But then it's like, "Oh, would you look at that?" - Okay, that's cool. - Did you say that they would've been in North Korea? - My great-grandmother would've been in South. My great-grandfather was in North. - Okay. - Wow. - Yeah. - Wow. - But there wasn't North in South Africa. - Yeah, no idea. - It was just a bunch of farmers. - Yeah, yeah, yeah. And again, going back to just kind of, if we knew history, this communist uprising in America would, I mean, people could just look at North Korea. I mean, look what communism gets you. And just fly over North Korea at night, you know. Do a-- - No, no, no. Have you ever listened to Greta Tuenberg? - North Korea is communist paradise. - That's right. - You live in the woods, you have no food. There's no animals to eat. I'm not even joking. I guess I just can't really say that. - Greta Tuenberg said several years ago, she says, "We don't want to wait till 2030. "We want to end fossil fuels today." - Yeah, I knew that. - Yeah, she wants to live like, these lefties want to live like North Korea. - That's crazy. - They want communism. They don't want the electricity. They want green. They don't want climate change. All of this. - They don't know history. And that's the problem. I mean, they really don't, and actually, they're not even looking around the world right now. - I don't know modern events. - Yeah, modern events, right? Yeah, that's right. - Right to that. - So true, yep. - Oh yeah, like the AOC thing, it's a perfect example. - Yeah. - You know what? I was just, I was talking to some friends. And I'm just like, no one gets to vote anymore. No one gets to vote. - Yep. - I saw a part, there's this video of these people in DC having a pro data center party. And I'm like, it's just so stupid. Like, you're allowed to be in favor of data centers, so you're not like, I'm just whatever. But like, to throw a party that's like, we love data centers, it's like, sure. Users shut up and they were like, they're stealing our water. And I'm like, oh my god. (laughing) - People don't. - Kevin O'Leary wanted to build the budget data centers in the middle of the desert. And they protested that. - Yeah. - Okay, they're not protesting anything logically. It's just, they're mad. And you say, I got a solution for you and they go, I don't want a solution, I want to be mad. - So it's like, okay, well they don't-- - Well, those are five-year-olds, yeah. - But they vote. - Yeah, yeah, it was crazy. - They shouldn't vote. - Yeah, yeah, I wish we could do sort of a constitutional litmus test before people get their voting registration card in my-- - Nobody votes. - Yeah, in my opinion, we need to shrink the number of voters down to a few million in total. - There's, we're talking about the same thing, and there's no way. The issue is, you don't need votes, you don't need laws, you don't need police when you have a morally and culturally homogenous people. So the example that I like to give is, you know, you said you're a pastor. - Yeah. - If everybody in this country, 100% were devout Christians, you would not need police. You'd need civil court because disagreements happened. But you wouldn't need any codified law because everybody would be living by their moral tradition, which is in Christianity. You'd have civil law, codified law for civil issues because you can be morally virtuous and still dispute a property line. But you're, and you would need probably facilitators for that. But you're not going to need a guy to chase down a gang banger who just shot a bunch of people. - Well, don't get me wrong. I am being hyperbolic because obviously you like-- - Right, I wouldn't never have that. - I just, I just beat over property, could result in two morally virtuous people fighting. I mean, yeah. - No, and you're right, like when you see faith increase, you'll see crime go down, right? And just, the Christian ethic will naturally push those things in society that are ills. They'll kind of make them obsolete to some extent. But I will say this, we're always going to have crap because of the sin nature, the fallen state of man until Christ returns someday. I mean, so, you know, God's ordained way was to have government that did not bear the sword in vain. I mean, that's even when, even when all the people, I mean, this was given, this was even back in the wilderness with Moses. All the people were technically, you know, God's people, right? They all said, "Hey, where is real life? "Hey, we recognize Yahweh as the one true God." There was still crime and there were still problems. There had to be, there had to be justice carried out. And so, and this is where the Hebrew Republic was birthed out when Moses was told by his father-in-law, "Hey, establish the 1000s, "the 100s, the 50s, the 10s." 'Cause you can't do it all, 'cause people were coming to him and saying, "Hey, civilly, we need you to adjudicate something, Moses." But then there was also criminal stuff that was going on that didn't happen, so. - I interviewed Dave, the flat earth guy. - Yeah, yeah. - He was the earth's flat. He also on the culture war back in the day when we were doing those debates. We had a geocentrist, a standard, you know, modern astrophysics guy, as well as a flat earth around. I said to Dave, "I am not so egotistically attached to belief "that I get offended if you believe something "that I think is wrong." And I was just thinking, as you said this, I was like, it is unfortunate, I'm not a Christian, I'm not gonna pretend to be, but it is unfortunate that so many lefty, secular, and atheist types haven't even considered what their life would be like under Christian moral ethics, or, because it largely is still in this United States, or how their lives could be improved by it. - Yeah, I told you. Yeah, you're 100% right, Tim. I mean, I tell people when they say, "Oh, don't push your religion down my thumb." I was like, "I'm not pushing my religion down my throat." I just believe there's something better for you out there. Like, I want your life to improve, and I just think there's something over here that will help your life drastically improve. I believe that there's a creator. Well, first of all, our Declaration of Independence says there's a creator. I believe what the founders knew to be true, which is there's a God, none of us are him. Let's look to him. But I believe this God isn't just a creator that says, "Hey, I created you now just live and let live." I believe this creator says, "Hey, I love you more than you could ever even imagine. I know you better than you know yourself, and I have something so awesome in store for you, and I want to give that to you." And when people find that, it's like, it becomes life-giving. - Well, that's the philosophy, that's the theology, that's the faith, that's the spiritual, that is the transcendent. Even beyond that, I'm saying like, your houses would be cheaper. - That's right. - You'd have less murder. - Oh, yeah. - You'd work less, like the practical life that we live would be improved with a strong moral foundation. - 100%. And again, Thomas Payne was a great founder. He was an atheist. He was an atheist. He did not believe in faith that it was real to him. He was an atheist. However, he recognized that these principles of Christian values, if American Republic rest on these principles, it would make his life better, his family's life better, his neighbor's life better. You don't have to be a Christian, go into church, taking communion every single week to benefit when good ethics are the foundation of your society. - Well, we have diversity now, meaning you've got, you've got one enclave in say, you know, insert city where Democrats have imported an enclave. - Yep. - I'm not gonna single any out, any group out. But their moral tradition says that they can say, you know, give surgery to young girls. - Right, yeah, mutual immunilation. - Yeah. - And they're like, nothing's wrong with it. And we're like shocked and appalled by it. And now you've got in, in the United States, you've got China operating private police departments. You've got sharia patrols. You've got, what is it, mosaic law patrols? You've like Jewish groups everywhere. - Yeah, yeah, yeah. - It's crazy, it's like, what are we doing? - Yeah, and so I was doing a town hall. I do all these town halls around the state of India. I love doing just open mics, right? Like, hey, come on out. I get the leftist to come out and droves. He's the anti-god communist. I love it, I mean, it's amazing. And so they'll come out as one lady. We were in this like upper class donut county. This little town called Zinesville. And I just thought it's not in anapolis. And it's just like leftist hub of, you know, woke, you know, Karen's. And so this one Karen came out and she was ripping. I mean, she stands up to the microphone. She's like, get your god out of our government. Get religion out. We don't want anything to do with things. It's okay, fine. But who are you going to replace him with? What religion and what god will you replace him with? She was like, ah, that's crazy. We don't need a god. I said, okay, hold on a second. Every nation has a god. The only question is, who is it? When you figure out that that god of that nation says this is good and this is bad, every nation has one, then you build your laws based on whatever that god says. And she, and I said, so you go to Iran, they say that throwing LGBTQ members off of buildings is a good thing and their laws allow it. I said, I said, do you think that's a good thing? And she looked at me and she was like, well, no, that's terrible. I said, but who says you go over there and tell them they're wrong. They're going to say, no, you're wrong. Who's right? And I said, that's the problem. When you remove God, you remove any moral law giver, and everyone's objective truth becomes their reality, and anyone can do whatever they want to do. Here's my response to these lefties. So they say, "Get your God out of our government." So here's my question to the lefty. Okay, so do you believe that God is real? Do you believe that Jesus Christ is king? And how do you think they'd respond? So if God's not real, then what is this religion? It's clearly not backed by any deity or defined scripture. It would just be like a political ideology, right? If you believe there is no God, and there is no Jesus, then this is just a group of people who believe in a political structure. Right? Okay, what's the difference between their political structure and your political structure? Neither are backed by a God in your belief. You are the one who says there is no God. Therefore, these people just have bad beliefs. Okay, you have beliefs as well. The issue is that-- By yours and not theirs. As it pertains to law, the left when they say, "Get God out of government." They're saying, "Get your ideology out of our government." Right. My response is in what replace it with your ideology? Yeah. When people say, "Hey, leave, check your Christianity at the gates of the stay house, at the doors of the stay house." And I'll say, "Okay, wait, you, someone who's LGBTQ, you say they can bring their identity in." If a doctor comes in, you can bring their identity in. If a teacher comes in, bring your-- But because I'm a Christian, I'm a pastor. You want me to check my identity at the door? No, no, no. If you get to bring yours in, I get to bring mine in. And I'll tell you this-- That's one thing. You don't like Christians. That's right. Exactly. Anything but Christ and anyone but Christ and anything but Christianity. I was talking to one guy in my neighborhood once. He says, "Listen, I'm not a Trump fan. He starts ripping on Trump." I said, "Why not?" He said, "Well, because he's a womanizer and he's a cheater and he's a liar, steals money and all this stuff." I said, "Okay, hey, we're trying to get law on Indiana past where we put the Ten Commandments on every school room wall, right? Would you be okay with that?" He said, "Well, absolutely not. That's not-- there's no place for religion in our schools." I said, "Hold on." I said, "You're telling me, you're going to hold Donald Trump to a standard of "Don't come in adultery." No, it's steel. Don't lie. All the things that Ten Commandments say to do, but you don't want him up anywhere in our culture, don't hold this man to a standard you yourself will not promote in your regular life. Yep. Yeah. We're going to go to your Rumble Rants and Superchats, smash the like button, share the show with all of your friends. They desperately need to hear the show and you just need to grace the areas with it. That's how we do promotion here. We're good at it. And then the Uncensored show's coming up in a few minutes, but let's get the "Fland the Man." I have a give-send to go if anyone is able to help. Help our family move after eviction notice. We need to be out by Halloween. Sorry to hear it, brother, man. Best of luck. BMOBS says squirrels are rats with PR. Yeah, I come tree rats. They're tree rats, especially in New York. They're rough. All right. What do we have here? KC says, "How is Trump ending the 20-year war in Iraq, not the biggest news of the day?" Yeah, the last troops left, huh? Because it was largely drawn down as a couple hundred troops we had there for like an advisory position. Yeah, and it's still in the region, right? Even Central Command said, "Hey, we're still close by. We need to, if stuff gets out of hand." We're close by to everything. Grim Gaming says, "I helped my buddy at his farm in Illinois. It is $1.40 more than it is in Indiana, presumably saying for gas." Wait, how much was it? $1.40 more. Oh. Yeah, I assume he means gasoline. Yeah, why? It's, it's, man, Illinois is so. Yeah. Hey, moved Indiana. We want conservatives to move to Indiana. Don't just stay there. The opportunity is Indiana. Yeah. For my friends that don't want to leave Chicago, I mean, look, the bears found it. That's right. And it's, but look, here's the thing. It's really simple. Illinois said, "We don't care about the bears." And India said, "We absolutely do." Yeah. They paid. That's right. Did you see the story last year? I don't know if you saw it, but Illinois 33 counties voted in Illinois to secede from Illinois. Really? It came to our legislature last year. So we had to pass a bill to accept these 33 counties. Did you? Yeah, we did. The governor signed it, right? So, so we have a bill. We said, "Hey, we will take these 33 counties in southern part of Illinois to become part of Indiana." So now it goes back to the Illinois state legislature, which probably won't happen. Yeah. If they were to do it though, then we'd go to Congress and Congress would redraw the lines. I don't, I think, I think you guys should file a lawsuit and argue that. And look, I understand this Supreme Court. This may fall under a regional jurisdiction because it's going to be a state versus state issue. So it goes directly to the Supreme Court. I imagine the probably saying no because I view them to be largely politically motive. And most people are, they're political. Doesn't matter what's right or what's true, but this nation was founded on the principle of self-governance. That if a group of people determine they have a right to decide how they are ruled, that means if these counties say we are Indiana, Illinois should have no right to block them from doing so. Yeah. And I think the people there would be happier. Yeah. It would create political pressure on Illinois to fix their business. Right. We have seen this with Northern California, the state of Jefferson, with Greater Idaho. I did not realize we had 33 counties in Illinois saying it in Western Maryland. Three counties voted to succeed in join West Virginia. Yeah. It should be up to the people in those counties to decide which state they are a part of. Yeah. And this would be tremendous in my opinion because it would force the states to listen to the minority, to guarantee minority representation for these communities. Yeah. So let me tell you about Maryland, because you probably get it with Illinois and Indiana stuff. In Western Maryland, largely rural, you can't own certain guns because Baltimore has gun violence. That's ridiculous. Yeah. And I understand that they're like, we got a problem with gun violence in Baltimore, so we're going to pass them laws. Sure, sure. But how are you going to go tell a guy who lives in the wilderness in Western Maryland? Okay. He can't now have an M1, M1A, because you're scared about a guy in Baltimore who's got a block. Yeah. So M1As are banned in Maryland. They're considered assault weapons. Ridiculous. You have the problem in Baltimore's blocks. Yeah. It's absolutely insane with that state. Listen. You like bad politicians? They create bad policy and the whole people suffer. Well, this is this is the thing. I have this conversation all the time. One of our, one of our contractors is here. She's like moderate, kind of liberal, and I was like, you know, I went to the march for our lives years ago. I do not do the men of the street gotcha stuff. I was genuinely like, hey, I'm filming a vlog, which I like to answer questions. 99% of people at this gun control rally. I said, can you tell me why you're here? What you're hoping to accomplish? What did they all say? We want to ban assault rifles. And then I asked them, that's interesting. Are you aware that we actually did? And the United States banned the production and sale of civilian use assault rifles in 1985. And currently you can still buy them under something called the NFA to tax. It takes up a few months to get, but it has to be pre-empted in your five. There's very few of these. So effectively that ban did pass. They all went, I didn't know that. One lady actually had a sign and she folded it up. I showed her my phone. I was like, I'm not trying to get you. I'm genuinely curious. None of them had any idea what they were protesting for. Now, sad. You know, I said 99% because there was one guy who was like, I understand the NFA, I understand all that stuff. That's been done. These are challenges. My turn was, he was like, look, you've got handguns with 17 rounds that kids are buying, and we've got to figure out what to do. And I said, totally get it, totally get it. Let's grab some more of these. Sever, Sever's Lates, or Sever's Lates. Did we see that the Sec War wants pitches from states to build new bases? State of the forces was great today. Yeah. And their own power sources too, I think that was something, right? And Palmer Lucky and Elon Musk are slotted to be the advisors, or I forget what their actual title is, but for advancing U.S. technology for the Department of War. Palmer Lucky. Dude, Palmer Lucky is awesome. He is. I'm a big fan of that guy. Yep. He's just, he just smack talks people on. Does this thing? He just doesn't care. My big fan. Yeah. Shadev says Tim, Japan did not bring in their incompatible migrants because of their birth rates. The stipulation for accessing funds from the IMF and the World Bank, they didn't pick those individuals into resting. I don't know that. Was not aware. Well, to dig that story, that's interesting. Oh, right. What do we have? I love you. Lord says, do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth where moths and vermin destroy Matthew 6, 19. The one you just killed. It wasn't a moth. Oh, yeah, that's right. I'm sorry. I don't know what it was. Yeah. It wasn't. I promise. It was not a moth. No, it looked like a lightning bug. Screw it. No, it was not. It was not. Go find it. It was over here. It was like tan, but I'm not sure what it was. It was not a moth. It was not like it was. It was definitely not a moth. Yeah. It looked like it looked like we got a bunch of goofy ass bugs in the building. Lantern flies and stink bugs. Yeah. It wasn't a stink bug. Yeah. It looked like it had it. It's body looked more like a lightning bug, but so I don't know what kind of bug it was. We got a bunch of goofy bugs out there. We actually have a war going on and it's been going on for some time. It's really weird. Like, one day, there were a bunch of crickets in the ramps. Okay. And we were like, we got a cricket problem. Then all of a sudden, we had a kettiedid problem. And it was like, they kept cycling, like the different bugs were going to war and taking over. And we had ladybugs. Yeah. Stinkbugs are coming in though. Amazing. They're from China. All right. Let's grab one more quick one. Mauritius says, Tim, please look into the China show video, China shows video exposing embassy back CCP, CCP sleeper cells and Chinese secret police assaulting people with impunity on US soil during she's recent visit to DC. Whoa. I like it. I like the China shows premise. but the guy's on it kind of just yuck it up a little more than I think that uh. that is my taste we're gonna go to the uncensored portion of the show so smash the like button share the show with all your friends you follow me on x and instagram at Tim Kessor would you like to shout anything out well hey no thanks for having me uh. this has been great i'd love the conversations guys keep keep speaking truth right i think uh. yeah you kind of people ask okay what's the solution we talked about a lot of problems it's easy to hit the problems i i really think people just know the truth and speak the truth i believe more than anything that if you know the truth the truth will set you free right so if we believe in freedom speak the truth yeah sir so true working to find you uh. you can look me up on uh. google me i don't believe everything you read about me but uh. and then uh. yeah yeah right and uh. but uh. the michael back with on twitter and then you can also go to lieutenant governor michael back with uh. and then any uh. anywhere you know just just type my name in and social media you know it'll come up so well you can follow me on x_ and instagram at real tape brown and we'll be back tight at tomorrow at noon for the ten cast daily news live show be there be square fill i am filled remains on to it's you can check out my patreon that's patreon dot com slash filled out remains the band is all the remains you can check us out on apple music amazon music pander youtube spotify and these are don't forget the left-hand is for crying i'm carter banks you can find me at carter banks on twitter or acts uh. at carter banks official on instagram and check out the label at trash house records in the qr code let's get into the app to show we'll see y'all at rumble dot com slash tim cast i_r_l_ right now don't miss it we'll see you soon you