Go back

He Was Deported to a Country He’d Never Heard Of

27m 16s

He Was Deported to a Country He’d Never Heard Of

The Trump administration has intensified deportations by sending undocumented immigrants to third countries—often ones they have no ties to—such as Eswatini, El Salvador, or Equatorial Guinea, where human rights are severely lacking. This practice, known as third country deportations, has drawn criticism from civil rights groups and legal experts, who argue it violates due process and fundamental human rights. A federal court previously ruled that these deportations are illegal because they deny individuals the right to appear before a judge and challenge risks of torture. The administration has appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking a temporary stay to continue the policy, a move that reflects past judicial deference to executive immigration actions. While the court's decision is not yet clear, legal precedent suggests it may allow deportations to resume. The case of Roberto Mosqueda—a man from Cuba who spent decades building a life in the U.S. before being deported to Eswatini—illustrates the human cost: he now faces indefinite detention without charges or legal representation, with no prospects of return. He and thousands of others are trapped in a system where families are severed, dignity is eroded, and hope is lost. Experts warn that without intervention, such deportations could result in long-term entrapment, mirroring the fate of Guantanamo detainees. The broader issue raises urgent questions about the U.S.'s moral and legal obligations in global human rights standards.

Transcription

4267 Words, 22936 Characters

English
From The New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams, and this is The Daily. In its effort to deport as many undocumented immigrants as possible, the Trump administration has relied more and more on a highly controversial strategy. Deporting people to countries, they have no connection to. The practice has drawn outrage from civil rights groups and immigrant advocates, and last week, the federal court ruled that it was illegal because it violated people's rights to do process. The administration has challenged that ruling, and now, it's in front of the Supreme Court. And so today, my colleague, Nicholas Casey, explains what it actually looks like to be sent to a country you do not know. It's Monday, September 28th. Nick Casey, welcome back to The Daily. Thanks, Rachel. So Nick, late last week, we got word that the Supreme Court was basically poised to decide whether to block the Trump administration's ability to deport people to countries they are not from. This is known as third country deportations. It's also practiced that you've been following extensively. So tell us how this works. So a third country deportation is when the US deport someone not to the country that they're from, but to just another country. It can even seem to be like a random country, often the person has no connection to the place that they're being sent to. And this is a strategy which has become a hallmark now of the Trump administration. It came to office, obviously promising to really ramp up deportations. And this is very much part of it. But this goes beyond really anything that's been done by previous administrations largely, because many of the countries that people are being sent to now have really spotty human rights records. And the fact that the US has been sending people to these countries just kind of raises fundamental questions about America itself, like, what is our relationship to these places that have got bad human rights records? What's our relationship to people that we are deporting? What human rights do we grant these people? And so this week, the Supreme Court is going to decide, essentially, can this practice continue? And what do we know about the people who are being deported this way? Yeah. I mean, according to the administration, this is a tool that it's been using to go after people with criminal records. They've even called them depraved monsters. They've said that they are the worst of the worst. This is why it's doing it. And it is true that in the case of people that have committed crimes in the US and have served jail time, it's pretty common that there are countries of origin may say no when America is asking to send them back. But I've been looking into these deportations. And I've seen like this practice is sweeping up people with all kinds of different backgrounds, not just people with criminal backgrounds. It is true. There are a number of people that had committed crimes that are getting deported this way. But there's also another class of people that's also quite large that are being deported this way, who are people that immigration judges had banned from being deported to their countries of origin. Because if they were, they faced a credible threat, usually of torture. And these are the reasons why the Trump administration has had trouble deporting these people. And for the last few months, I've been talking to one man in particular who's been swept up in this. And his name is Roberto Mosqueda. So tell us about Roberto. Who is he? Hey, Roberto. How are you doing? I'm doing okay, man. Okay, good. Roberto Mosqueda is 59 and he's been in the U.S. almost all of his life. That was born in Cuba, but I was raised in America. He came in 1980 from Cuba in a boat lift. I came here with my mother and my sister, we were running away from that communist, you know, in Cuba. And Roberto was only 12 when he came. So this is the only country he's really known as home. He remembers a little bit about Cuba. He doesn't remember that much. And they settled into Miami. I had no father and my mother. She tried best, but it was very difficult to us, you know. And it wasn't long after they moved that Roberto began to get into trouble. I wish I could change things, you know, and do better with my life, you know. He became a rebellious teenager and he joined a gang. I was just like get the freedom that I needed on the streets, you know. We had the kids like hanging around fighting. There were a lot of car thefts, shootings, you know, attacking rival gang members in the street. And eventually he ended up going to trial for a shooting that took place. Somebody got shot, a lot of my friends got killed. Roberto says he actually wasn't part of the shooting. He admitted to all kinds of crimes, which he committed over the years, but he said this was one that he actually hadn't done. And he took a plea deal. Even though he said he hadn't committed the crime, he said that his lawyer had said, you know, if you don't take this deal, you're going to be sent to jail for many more years. So he served nine years in jail. And after being released after those nine years, we're talking about the 1990s now, usually you would be deported at that point. But in Roberto's case, that's not what happened. Roberto was from Cuba and Cuba wasn't cooperating with deportations of people from America at that time. Right. Roberto is one of these people who the United States government may have wanted to deport at one point, but effectively could not. Yeah, I mean, the US government was kind of in a bind here on one end. They couldn't just send Roberto home, but they also couldn't keep him in jail indefinitely. Because to do that to someone, you've got to charge them with something and they didn't have charges to keep Roberto like in jail. So for years, administrations, Republican and Democrat both determined the only option was to let people out to let them stay. And that's what happened with Roberto. So what were the terms under which he was allowed to stay like? How did that actually work? The idea was that if Roberto tried to stay out of trouble and made check-ins with immigration authorities, usually every year, he'd be able to get a work permit, get a driver's license, basically have a normal life in the United States. Man, my life, I changed, man, I changed my way, man, I try to do better, you know? And like a lot of people in his situation, he took them up on that offer. I didn't know how to do anything when I got out in prison, but then this man, okay, who runs this plumbing company, he said, man, listen, I'm gonna give you a break. He's on you if you want to take it, learn everything you came here and I will help you out. He did. This was the early 2000s, he started working as a plumber, I worked hard, I learned how to do plumbing, I become a former. He started his temp, then he became an apprentice and then he became a foreman. And he started a family, man, I worked so hard for my daughter's man. He ended up having four daughters here, all American citizens. I was trying to be the best father, the best way I could, you know? So he really established a life here, how long did things continue like that? It was for decades, he was in his head in American, even if he didn't have papers saying he was an American, he'd been here since he was 12, but all of that changed last June. And what happened last June? That morning I got up before I got to work, I had a Cuban coffee which I'm missing a lot. I got to gas station, food gas, and I went to the ice, the Tencent Center, like every year. Roberto went in for his regular check-in with ice. They took the paper and then they called me and they took me inside. But this time it clearly was different and I see this group of immigration officers talking to each other, they were looking to us. The agent who was there told him, "Your time in the U.S. is over." And that was it. He was detained for a number of weeks and then he's told he's going to be deported. And does he know at this point where he's getting deported to? What are they telling him? No, no one would tell him anything about where he was going. He thought he was going back to Cuba, he didn't know how that exactly was going to work. And they took him and four other people onto a plane and then when the flight took off after a few hours it was clear they weren't going to Cuba because it doesn't take that long to get there. Sure. This is where my mind got stopped running maybe where. You don't know where this plane is going taking you? No. I say, "What the hell are they doing?" You know, what will we go for? going, you know, and we just stop flying around like hours and hours. You couldn't see outside. Every time we're going to land the plane down to fill up with gas, or get a closer window, they don't want us to see what we at. And many hours later, seven hours. One of the officers came out. He goes, "Well, you and Africa." I said, "What the hell am I doing in Africa, bro? I don't want to go to Africa." They landed in Africa. So he was now getting off of this plane. And at that point, the plane was circled. He said, "By military vehicles, local military vehicles." Guns everywhere. There's around a hole, like a military. These men got out of the plane, and were loaded into what looked like a military truck that had what he described as sort of a cage fitted onto it. And then I see this big wall, and I told this guy, "Man, I think I look like a prison, bro." And then that truck drove into a maximum security prison. And that's when this iron door opened, and we went inside. And when he finally found out where he was. Eswatini. He was told he was in a country called Eswatini. A country he had never heard of before. This is the bad dream, you know? We'll be right back. Nick, I want to talk about what happened to Roberto once he arrived at this prison. But first, just for people who might be as unfamiliar as he was, tell us a little bit about Eswatini. Eswatini is a small country, landlocked in South Africa and Mozambique. It used to be called Swaziland, until its king, who was an absolute ruler, an absolute monarch, changed the name six or seven years ago. There's no freedom of speech. There are no political parties that are allowed. In fact, they're banned. And this is about kind of the opposite of what you would imagine, a place that you might send someone to from the United States, at least when it comes to human rights. And just to get back to Roberto's story, what happened when he got to this prison? Well, I mean, they treated him like you would any other prisoner. I came out of here, like a murderer, and like a whistle to whistle. They had him stripped down. They put him in a prison uniform, and they put me against the wall. He spends every day in a small cell with his cellmate from Yemen. The world thing here, who run the prison, may I ask him in so many times, we've got a lawyer, that we're going to see his own court room. And he wasn't able to talk to a lawyer. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, you're good. No, don't worry, buddy. This is all they used to say, right? But eventually, a friendly prison guard started to let Roberto use his phone every once in a while. My first call, I talked to my sister, and she said, listen, it's a lawyer. I got her numbers, she wants to speak to you. And the next week, a call. And Roberto made a call to a human rights lawyer in the United States. Now, this isn't a lawyer that's able to get him out, because the U.S. court system, once you're out of American jurisdiction, he can't tell an S.W.A. TV prison to release you. But at least it was a lawyer who could tell him what his right should be. And, you know, legally in S.W.A. TV, he has the right to have a local lawyer. But they don't give me no answers. They don't let me see no lawyer. They don't let me, you know, it's just bad, man, you know. But he wasn't able to do that. Bro, I was so depressed, man. And what Roberto comes to recognize is that he could be stuck here indefinitely. He's being held without charges. He's not serving a sentence with a discrete end date. He's just here. And there's no prospect that he can see that this is going to change. He's not easy to pass day by day in this place. And we don't know if I ever go back. Or if I know if I ever go see my daughters, you know, my people, my family, my life. Yeah. So there was a point where he was getting so desperate. I have to go on a hunger strike. That Roberto decided that he was going to stop eating. And that's it. One day, the captain came and said, "Listen, man, go on a hunger strike." And then he asked, "Are you losing weight?" "Are you losing weight?" Just getting weak every single day, you know. I prayed to God, you know. And during that time, he was writing. Do you have the diary that you sent me? Yeah, yeah. He showed me his diary. And a lot of it is about how much he was missing his life in the United States. And how much he was specifically, you know, missing his life that he had with his family before he got deported. He wrote a lot about his daughter, Faith, who was 10 years old. Tell me about Faith. Tell me about your youngest daughter because you're really close to her. Faith. My God, man. That's my later one, you know. And I haven't finished my job as a father, you know. And that will hurt me more. And Roberto wrote in his diary, "Every day I think about my daughter, Faith." I've never cried so much as I do missing my beautiful girl, my Faith. So sorry, my little girl, how much it hurts me. He wrote, "I felt like a father." I felt like the happiest father in the world seeing you happy. And another point he writes all for Faith is if the whole hunger strike is about getting her back in some way. Yeah, she was everything to me, you know. She was everything to me, man. And 30 days passed this way. Oh, my God. Yeah. It was with avoiding my eyes, establishing my vision, you know. And he had a call with his attorney who was in the U.S. She called me Roberto. Listen. I need you to get strong. I need you to get, you know. I need you alive, not there. His lawyer told him, you know, "Look, you've got to stop." You're not going to get what you need this way. We've got to find another way to try to fight this. The only thing that's going to happen is that you could starve to death. And then I say, "Okay, I stop." And so Roberto decided to call off his hunger strike. But it wasn't all for nothing. After I stop, he'd come back and give me the phone. After the hunger strike, he was allowed to purchase a phone. And that phone became his window into the outside world. That's how I was able to learn about this situation that he and others in SWATini were in. It was because of that phone. I mean, once you've learned about the situation that Roberto was in, what did you understand about how it had all happened? Like, how did the Trump administration come to adopt this practice? And prior to Trump, were third country deportation something the U.S. had ever done? Yeah, but in a really limited way. There was a practice where if someone's home country wouldn't take them back, you could deport them to what the U.S. had deemed to be a safe third country. I'm talking about a place like Canada. This might be a person that, you know, the U.S. wanted to deport, couldn't deport back to their own country, but maybe they had some relatives who were in Canada. And Canada, okay, sending them there. So that was one way to do it. But this kind of solution doesn't really scale. Most countries are not going to take back hundreds of deportees that have no connection to their country. But one way you could potentially get a country to agree to something like this, is if you offered them money. And you saw the Trump administration begin to go down that route last spring when it deported about 250, mostly Venezuelan men, to a maximum security prison in El Salvador called Seacot. Right, I remember this. We covered it on the show. The Trump administration accused all of these men of being gang members and criminals. And many of them turned out not to be. And yet they were still stuck in this prison for months. It was a huge story. Yeah, this was when a lot of Americans first learned what third country deportations were. It was with Naib Bukele, who is an autocrat, very close to Trump. And also was someone who received $6 million for this deal. Sure. And you saw the government go on now to cut other deals with about 35 countries, including SWTening, which we know from the record got $5.1 million to take deportees from the U.S. Do we have any sense of how many Roberto's are out there? Like how many people have been deported to third countries and have been caught up in this kind of limbo where it's not clear when or even if they'll be released? So fortunately, there are people who are dragging this. There's an organization called Third Country Deportation Watch. And the big number is an estimate of 25,000 people who have been sent through third countries to be deported. Mom. Now, the 25. 5,000 figure aren't all people in Roberto's situation, and a large number of those people most of them were sent to Mexico largely immediately after they came over and usually not to prisons. But there's a subset of the cases and I estimate this is probably about 5,000 people who were being sent to many different places, often maximum security prisons, sometimes hotels for weeks, sometimes months at a time, these people were sent all over the world. And we talked about there being a precedent for sending people to places like Canada. Well, now the US is sending people to countries with active conflicts, middle of wars in some cases, and just recently the Times reported that detainees who were sent to Equatorial Guinea, which is another country notorious for human rights violations, they were being beaten in a hotel by guards who had custody of them. I can imagine a lot of legal objections to what you just described, but just to pivot back to the case before the Supreme Court right now, what is the question that the justices will be deciding? Well, it's actually a pretty narrow one. So the lower court ruled that these third country deportations are a violation of people's due process rights. Essentially they said these deportees aren't getting an opportunity to appear before a judge to say, hey, don't send me to a third country because, for example, you know, I might get tortured there. That lower court's ruling had an immediate consequence for federal government, which all of a sudden had to stop these deportations. And so the Trump administration appealed the Supreme Court to ask for an emergency state. Basically, they want to allow these deportations to continue, as this case continues moving through the courts. Okay. So this is one of those temporary Supreme Court decisions that is less about the merits of the case and more just about like does everybody need to stop what they're doing until we get a chance to actually consider the merits of the case in months or years or whatever. But for now, do we know whether or not the Court might agree to this to grant this temporary stay? We actually have a fairly good idea just because this question has reached the Supreme Court before. Basically, the lower court, you know, paused third country deportations. And then when that happened, the last time the Trump administration went to the Supreme Court and asked the same question, can we continue to do this anyway? And the justices said, okay. Did they explain their reasoning, Nick, when they granted the stay before? No, not really. In these cases, when they're acting on an emergency basis, they don't issue a written opinion. But what we can say is that the Supreme Court has been very deferential to the Trump administration when it comes to immigration in the past. They see the president as having very wide latitude here. Okay, so it sounds like there's every reason to think that the court would do the same thing this time and let these deportations continue. That's right. And by the way, even if the court does decide to pause these deportations, the thing is it's not quite clear how this would affect Roberto. This case most immediately affects people who are about to be deported. And Roberto, of course, has been deported and he's still in SWT. Right. He's already stuck in this legal limbo. What do you think is going to happen to him, Nick? He asked me the same question the first time that I talked to him on the phone. And I said, I didn't know. And I mean, when I was a teenager, it was when America started sending people to Guantanamo Bay. And it was another situation where after the war on terror had begun, there was a haste to move people out of the American justice system to put them in another corner of the world where there weren't human rights. These people in this case, in SWT, aren't terrorist suspects, but they share what's going on with Guantano Bay. And the fact that they are out of U.S. jurisdiction. And so we're better. We don't know what's going to happen to him. He could be there for a few more months, but he could be there for a few more years. And if these cases are completely forgotten about, it could be very much like the situation in Guantanamo where you still have people, prisoners who have been there now for many, many years and don't have any way of getting out because no country seems to be interested in taking them. And I think that there is a deep fear that Roberto has that he is just going to get forgotten in this prison. Are you hopeful that you're going to get back to the United States? Do you think that's going to happen? Oh my God, I don't want to lose that hope. Nick, I dream for that. I don't know if it's going to happen. I don't know. But I'll be fighting for that for a long time, for 13 months. But you know, it's nothing I can do now. I'm in gas here. Easy, thank you so much. We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today. The British police arrested five men on Sunday on suspicion of preparing acts of terrorism after receiving a call that three suspicious vehicles were headed toward an air force base used by the US military. The base, RAF Fairford, is primarily used by the US Air Force to deploy some of its largest bombers. And American bombers have launched from Fairford on missions to Iran since the war began in February. It is not clear whether some of this incident is connected to the conflict in the Middle East, but investigators are looking into whether there's any link to Russia or Iran. Today's episode was produced by Claire Tenniskeder and Lexi Dio with help from Michelle Bonjo. It was edited by Annie Minoff and Devon Taylor. Contains music by Leah Shaw Demeron and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Wunderly. That's it for the daily. I'm Rachel Abrams. See you tomorrow.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The Trump administration has expanded third country deportations—sending undocumented immigrants to countries they have no connection to, often with poor human rights records.
  2. These deportations have drawn legal and ethical criticism, with a federal court ruling they violate due process rights by denying individuals a chance to challenge deportation to unsafe countries.
  3. The Supreme Court is now considering whether to halt these practices, with the administration seeking a temporary stay to continue the policy despite the lower court’s ruling.
  4. Many deported individuals, like Roberto Mosqueda, are sent to countries such as Eswatini or El Salvador, where they face torture risks, indefinite detention, and lack of access to legal counsel.
  5. A growing body of evidence shows that over 25,000 people have been deported to third countries, with an estimated 5,000 placed in maximum-security prisons or hotels with no clear release date.
  6. The U.S. has used financial incentives to secure agreements with authoritarian regimes, such as paying El Salvador and Eswatini to accept deportees, raising serious legal and moral concerns.
  7. Roberto Mosqueda, a Cuban-born resident of Miami, was deported after years of rehabilitation and family life, ending up in Eswatini where he faced harsh conditions and lost contact with his U.S. family.
  8. Critics warn that without intervention, deported individuals may remain in detention indefinitely, echoing the fate of Guantanamo Bay detainees and risking permanent human rights violations.

Summary:

The Trump administration has intensified deportations by sending undocumented immigrants to third countries—often ones they have no ties to—such as Eswatini, El Salvador, or Equatorial Guinea, where human rights are severely lacking. This practice, known as third country deportations, has drawn criticism from civil rights groups and legal experts, who argue it violates due process and fundamental human rights. A federal court previously ruled that these deportations are illegal because they deny individuals the right to appear before a judge and challenge risks of torture.

The administration has appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking a temporary stay to continue the policy, a move that reflects past judicial deference to executive immigration actions. While the court's decision is not yet clear, legal precedent suggests it may allow deportations to resume. S.

before being deported to Eswatini—illustrates the human cost: he now faces indefinite detention without charges or legal representation, with no prospects of return. He and thousands of others are trapped in a system where families are severed, dignity is eroded, and hope is lost. Experts warn that without intervention, such deportations could result in long-term entrapment, mirroring the fate of Guantanamo detainees.

's moral and legal obligations in global human rights standards.

FAQs

Third country deportations occur when someone is sent back to a country they are not from, often with no connection to that nation, instead of their country of origin.

The administration used this strategy to deport individuals with criminal records, often labeling them as 'depraved monsters,' and to avoid sending people to countries that would not accept them.

The practice violates due process rights because deportees are not given the chance to appear before a judge and argue against being sent to a country where they might face torture or harm.

Yes, but only in limited cases, such as sending people to Canada when the home country refused to take them back. This practice is now much more widespread and controversial.

People have been deported to countries with poor human rights records, including El Salvador, Eswatini, and Equatorial Guinea, often to maximum-security prisons or hotels.

Yes, the Supreme Court is deciding whether to allow the Trump administration to continue deporting people to third countries, following a lower court ruling that found such deportations violate due process.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.