Global Government and Citizen Assemblies: Rethinking How Humanity Is Governed | Mohamed Nabil

Pierustin pyöräilyvää teitä valmistavan ornotin vuonna 2013. Mielestäni parasta Shopify saan se, että voimme harjoittaa liiketoimintaa ilman teknistä osaamista. Voimme hallinoida yrityksen taustajaristeelle mien ja front-endia sekä myydä verkossa, vaivattaa. Jos Shopify olisi pyöräilyvaruste, sollisimielestäni itse polkupyörä. Sillä asiat hoidetaan ja meidän liiketoiminta me hoituu Shopify'sssä. Aloita ilmainen kokeilu, Shopify piste.com sivustolla. Sivustin pyöräilyvaruste, sollisimielestäni itse.com sivustolla. Liiphan jossa vaikka se grim tuolla asia kamgigglinguita vastuwatulla se radiohuja pitää redirecty joh 8 joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. joh 8. We're currently having a few billionaires taking all of the benefits from these technological breakthroughs and that's why massive layoffs will happen. If we flip this scenario and we share the benefits together, we can dramatically reduce these working hours and we can have universal basic income and people will still work. You can imagine that we'll have more philosophers, more authors, more painters, more artists and more people that are involved in work that requires creativity. Right, right. But then who will take humanity to Mars? Because that also seems to be a big sort of a topic for some of the people. Some people believe that we have to be multi-planetary species or we may just get wiped out in the coming future, whatever reasons. Either we destroy ourselves or something else happens from outer space. That's a very interesting thing. There is, according to SpaceX, so the one associated with the idea of taking us to Mars and being a multi-planetary species is mainly Elon Musk. So according to SpaceX, one million people and one million tons of and millions of tons of cargo should be delivered to Mars in order to build the first city. At the same time, there are multiple governments are engaged in a new space raised to the moon. So let's talk about these celestial bodies. There is an agreement called there is a agreement about this, about adapted by the UN on the use of celestial bodies. It's titled Treaty on Principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and outer use of space, including the moon and other celestial bodies. Absolutely. Come in. I'm sorry, it took me too long. I did not mean to interrupt you, Carryon. I just thought maybe you have finished your sentence that because of that gap. Carry on. Carry on. Okay. So by this agreement or resolution, all states should refrain from placing nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit around the earth or in any celestial bodies, which is a good thing. Celestial bodies cannot be subjected to sovereignty or occupation. They shouldn't include fortifications, military bases or installations. Most importantly, in one of its articles, it stated that any state party of the treaty may give notice of its withdrawal one year in advance. The mentioned treaty is ambitious, aimed at benefiting humanity as a whole from scientific advancements in the field. Yet it's unrealistic. The very competing structure of nation states as governing bodies contradicts with the most ambitious articles in the treaty. The treaty implicitly implies that whoever can find resources on the moon or other planets can take advantage of them before others do. So let us learn from history and apply the lessons to outer space. If new life is established on Mars through space access plan, we may witness a new tyrannical private rule by space access on Mars, similar to that established by the British East India company in India. As history has shown us, a private company can have its own powerful military presence and the political force required to rule vast regions. So the main questions are whether humanity can unite a planet and then eventually multiple planets along with their moons, whether we can collectively believe in unity and cooperation or we may simply prefer the vision and competitors. Absolutely, very good point, Nabil. So Mars will have to wait for humanity has to get united on Earth itself. And coming back to the Earth then, you talked about the world government model. Forget about the world part of it. Maybe if we look at the country's part, other things that you know everyone will have a say, everyone will get to do a lot of things that they want. It almost sounds like communism in a unprecedented day if you look like or the way it was envisaged. How do you think that you know this sort of a model will succeed? Then a lot of brilliant people they will say, "We don't have any incentive. Why should we keep on working?" Whereas a lot of people who do not have want to work, they will just be, you know. The system will tell everyone to be mediocre. Well, there is a Muslim pyramid of needs. You have at the very bottom, you have physiological needs and then you need safety and security, then you need love and belonging, and then you need self-esteem and self-actualization. So let people work for self-actualization, let people work to become recognized in various fields. And I believe you and I, we don't have a problem with physiological needs. We're not going to eat food from this recording, this podcast right now, but we're actually seeking self-actualization, which is a much higher layer. So that allow other people to join us, expand the middle class, allow other people to seek self-actualization, and then we can go look together according. Absolutely. I love that idea about self-actualization. And that is indeed something very beautiful that humanity can move or should move towards. Even if a global government is not proppedified, at least self-actualization is something a lot of people can try to. That will move them beyond their security needs and something much more beautiful each of us need. Today, be that as it may, let's understand your AI top thing better in terms of enlightened populism that you talk about, especially in terms of AI top. Okay, so AI top or AI DUP, which stands for AI debates from one's publication. It's content creation framework by which a content creator prompts an AI tool to criticize their own content, engage them back and forth, argumentation with the tool and publishes the entire unadded the prospect within 24 hours of the exchange. The goal of these debates isn't to win or lose the main objectives include stress testing ideas through AI effectively making them sharper by responding to criticism, refining one's own thoughts, simply accepting criticism as valid or agreeing to disagree in certain points, inviting readers to explore the mechanisms of the whole process instead of simply asking them to accept conclusions and documenting where AI tools stand at the time of publication. A dot or AI DUP encourages enlightened populism. Enlightened populism is a behavior pattern of communication which involves listening to multiple experts trying to understand how to reach certain conclusions and investigating the information to discover the tools. It contrasts with the two dominant behavior patterns of communication today's world, blinded in criticism, which entails blindly following an expert to run elite on a certain issue and ignorant populism which also involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings or trends. Absolutely. So a lot of people will think you know Nabeel that you see the wave our society is moving the world is moving we are almost moving towards a dystopia dystopian sort of a future whereas listening to you and the way how a lot of people will think it is not possible in the present way we are going towards it's almost sounds like utopia. How do you suggest if at all there is a semblance of it coming into you know in in life? How do you suggest one can get start working on this? Who do you think will initiative will start taking initiative on a global government? Well a life populism doesn't fly in popular charismatic leaders it may only work if it's practiced by the masses the same can be said about establishing a global government it may require multi-generation efforts that must be about a map transition so at this stage we just need to spread the idea that we need a global government we need to convince us as much people as possible that we need a global governance and then we can organize social movements across countries and start acting accordingly to reach our objectives this can happen in in terms of you can this This can have multiple things. scenarios. You can have people running for office to establish this global government or take care of the sovereignty of each individual state under the banner of establishing a global government or you can have just the social movements working together to reach a global referendum and then we can overturn the current nation states. The exact way of organizing or of running things in terms of organization isn't established yet. What we have at this point is just raising awareness. We need to inform as much people as possible that we need the global government to work together and we need to be ruled by hyperlocal system assemblies. We need to take matters into our own hands instead of voting for people to vote on our behalf. What happens to the ambition of so many people who want to have political power and so many people who are part of those complexes, what happens to them? Will they come under the umbrella of global governance or they will continue to keep on fighting to keep their sane everything the way they are doing? Well they have to push hard and we have and on our own part we'll have to push hard as well. This is a long-term game, a multi-generational game, it's struggle. It will take struggle but it's but in my own view this is the only way to get rid of the problems of today and get rid of and solve the problems of tomorrow. Right, so if you look into the future, do you think this will get realized maybe now, maybe 100 years down the line, lesser or perhaps more or it will never be, it will remain just an idea. How hopeful or realistic do you see the way you see it? The way I see it may take tons of years to be established for the global government to be established. I don't know if it will be established in my own lifetime, I don't think it will be established when I'm still alive but I can see the initiatives while I'm still alive. This is how hopeful I am. It means you see that this will be the only way actually that will be there for humanity to actually be doing a collective thinking. Yes, we need to move beyond the current state of toxic competitiveness. We need to stop spending trillions on weapons to protect ourselves from each other or attack one another. We need to elevate humanity and think of ourselves evolving societies. We can phone this one world government and stick together. Absolutely, there is so much to learn about all this from you, Nabil and I'm sure that people would want to learn more from you about all these things also from all the books that you have written and so what's the best way for them to do so? They can explore my philosophy and my books through my website, MuhammadNabil.world, moh, am, ed, and ad.wlld. It would be helpful if you can leave the link to the website in the description. Wonderful. With this, it's a wrap on this very special edition of the Kajah Masterclass Live. Thank you so much indeed for joining us. Thank you.