The podcast discusses the ongoing tension between highly priced Fed rate hikes and the lack of dollar strength, despite strong inflation data, particularly in core services. Analysts note that the dollar has failed to respond to inflationary pressures and elevated rate expectations, suggesting valuations may be cheap. This conundrum leads to a focus on currencies that offer resilience through high yield, strong fiscal positions, and structural advantages. Within the G10, sterling, Nokia, and the Swiss franc are highlighted as key candidates, with sterling benefiting as a high-yield oil importer and a relative outperformer. In emerging markets, Mexico, Brazil, and Hungary stand out due to solid current account positions and improving central bank policies. While the euro remains weak due to low yields and geopolitical risks, the carry effect continues to provide support for high-yield currencies. The consensus remains constructive on these resilient assets, even as the dollar struggles to gain momentum. The analysis underscores that while rate hikes are priced in, actual policy delivery and global risk sentiment will ultimately determine currency performance. The discussion emphasizes that carry-driven currencies—especially in Europe and emerging markets—remain among the most insulated from a hawkish U.S. cycle.
[MUSIC]
>> Hello and welcome to JP Morgan's Add in E-Rate Podcast.
I'm Mira Chandan, co-head of FFX Strategy at JP Morgan.
Join today by my two colleagues, Patrick Locke and Octavia Pesky from G10FFX Strategy
and then a Nash Guckers, so we're from EMFX Strategy and Nash Guckers.
We didn't get a special request for you today, so I'm glad you could join.
But look, we've had an event for a week and if I sound a bit downbeat, it's for a good reason.
I think we've had a load of developments in the past couple of weeks.
The Jackson Hole hawkish delivery, from Warsh, from Chair Warsh.
We had the hot payroll sprint and then we've had the hot CPI print today.
We've got energy prices at the highs and the dollar just won't strengthen.
And for dollar bulls such as ourselves, that's quite a frustrating thing.
But it's also kind of interesting in the sense that it's leading to a lot of
introspection on our side, part of what we've been talking about in the debate corner.
If so much is priced and already for the Fed and rates markets and if all central banks
are hiking and growth is good everywhere, does the dollar really deserve to strengthen?
And now that it's all in the price and the dollar still hasn't been rewarded, we've
been making the argument that valuations are cheap.
Then what is it really going to take for the dollar to strengthen here?
It's been quite a conundrum in our mind, to be honest.
So yeah, we are obviously sticking, well, we are sticking with the constructive stance
on the dollar, particularly going into the FMC next week.
And what I want to focus a bit on today for the topics, I really, what are the currencies
that can withstand a fed hiking cycle?
I think we've got north of three hikes almost for now, priced and for the Fed.
What are the currencies that can actually withstand it?
And before we do that, Pat, maybe we can get a rundown from you on the CPI and what the
outlook is for the Fed next week.
Yeah.
Thanks, Mira.
So some important developments, obviously, over the course of the last week, going back
to NFK, which was pretty holistically strong, but going back to the worst checks and
whole comments, he did kind of suggest that inflation really is the problem right now.
So we knew coming into this week that CPI was ultimately going to be the determinant
probably of what we get next week.
You know, CPI was solid-ish.
And then CPI today ended up beating on the core by a tick, looked at 29 basis points.
Super core came in hot at like 51 basis points.
That was the hottest since January.
So there's definitely some upward pressure on the core services block, even though kind
of like Brent and things like that were actually on the soft side.
So yeah, I mean, it looks increasingly like next week is very much a possibility.
As you kind of note, though, I think the conundrum for the dollar is it?
I mean, it's more than a possibility, it's 90% price at this point.
Yeah, exactly, right?
It's, I don't know if I've ever seen the Fed not go when it's when it's that aggressive
thing price.
But so what's it going to take then, you know, really for the dollar, the major response
in after the 830 data was directionally consistent and probably the magnitude as well in terms
of what you would normally expect.
But it's all all been given back the gap, you know, DXY, I've been tracking September
F.O. and C pricing quite closely for some time.
But even that's lagging now, so there's obviously a chasm here.
And it's not entirely clear to me that even if they do deliver, which is basically just
validating the pricing next week, that that necessarily will force the dollar to correct
tires.
So looking ahead to kind of a skew of risks, you know, I'd still like to think that if
they deliver and if there's a sufficiently hawkish message that can, you know, take up
terminal a little bit higher, dollar should still continue to get some kind of like traditional
fundamental support in addition to the valuation tail end.
But, you know, on the other hand, the 22 basis points now priced does set up a bit of kind
of asymmetry in terms of a larger kind of like downside tail, if they just kind of like
underdeliver in terms of hawkishness, you know, even if they do hike, if they just take
less of a tone.
So I think, yeah, I agree with you in terms of just kind of framing it for the dollar hasn't
done a lot, despite a lot of good things being thrown at it.
And now with 22 basis points, it gets harder, I think, in the next week.
Yeah.
And we have a couple other important center bank meetings next week, isn't it?
That tactically, we think should be relevant for markets, because the third, we're, you
know, obviously constructive on the dollar are going into it.
We've got the B.O.E. I think sterling has a window of opportunity here.
You actually do pretty well next week as well.
It's one of the high yielders tends to be more insulated against, against rising U.S.
yields.
You've got the B.O.J., which should be interesting.
You know, Yana is certainly one of the more when we've been tactically constructive on
that.
But again, we are getting to the point now where we need to see some actual delivery policy
delivery here.
So depending on what the levels are going into next week, there could be a risk of disappointment
here as well.
But for all three of those currencies with the central bank meetings next week, whether
it's sterling the dollar or yen, we are actually tactically fairly constructive going
into it.
But let me move on now to, you know, sort of the main topic, which is, you know, what are
the currencies that should be insulated against what looks like is going to be a fed hiking
cycle.
So I mean, I can kick off at the Euro and then maybe Octavia, I can hand over to you for
some of the other European currencies.
But on the Euro look, we had the ECB, it was hawkish, but, you know, obviously that was
sabotage to a large extent by the rise in energy prices.
The growth story in Europe has been fairly strong, but at the end of the day, if I look
at a global ranking, the Euro is still fairly, you know, sort of lower end of the spectrum
is absolutely not at the absolute lows, but certainly on the, on the lower end of the
range, a spectrum as far as carry concerns.
So it's a low yield there.
I'm not particularly optimistic about the currency, it's really hard to be despite growth holding
up so well.
You've got a lot, you've got a lot to contend with.
I mean, the biggest one to believe is energy prices, given its important status, and the
second thing is that have been political developments and some noise around budgets in different
countries as well.
So, you know, and of course, the latest German state elections.
So it's hard to be constructive over the medium term on that.
So to me, I still prefer to use it as a funder.
Obviously, we've been preferring, preferring some other lower, you know, yielding candidates
in the Euroblock as a proxy for that stockies once such example, but I would say that my
expectation is that Eurodollar should be, should be lower here, but now I've been saying
that for a while.
So I sound like a broken record.
So acknowledging that completely, but Octavia, maybe we can turn to you within the DM
Euroblock.
What do you think are the most insulated currencies in your space to Fed heights?
Hey, Mira, yeah, reviews on the Euroblock and more broadly have been pretty consistent
with the Fed having a hiking bias.
So the most insulated one on a hike would be Nokia and Sterling, there'd be the one
we'd expect to outperform considering the rest of the low yielders would be hit more.
And then that also means that tactically on a Fed skip, it would be stocky and Swiss
that would get to benefit, but I'd make four points more broadly on on those currencies.
The first is that on stocky, we've been bearish with high conviction due to the global
yield and carry environment.
We're conscious of the better domestic data and cheap valuations on some metrics, but
we've been downplaying these due to stocky sensitivity to US yields and that's still very
much the case.
Second, on the other hand, we're structurally bullish Nokia.
We think it's a turnaround story as it's undergoing a structural shift being a high yield
or now within G10, which means two things, most of all, firstly, that a premium to fair
value is justified because historically, high-carry has resulted in Nokia trading rich and the
converse has been true when it's been a low yielder and most cheap at the time.
And the second is that it's become less sensitive to energy price declines than it
done back when it was a low yielder.
As you know, it's harder to short a high yielder when energy goes down.
And sure, it's still a near-term risk, but that would, if anything, provide an opportunity
for Nokia.
So we still think Nokia can strengthen further from here.
It has solid carry, the terms of trade support, the strong fiscal position.
Soki also has that strong fiscal position, but it's really the relative yield that stands
in a part here.
And then my third point is that on Swedish we still remain bearish.
It's the lowest yielder of the mall and pressured both by yields and then also by better European
growth there.
And lastly, on sterling, so like you mentioned, it's a high yielder and then also an oil
importer within G10, but it's more insulated than other importers in the Euroblock because
of its higher yield.
And even though medium-term, we may have the focus on fiscal pickup around the October
budget, into the BOE, we do think risks are tactically bullish given the strong data
and that it's been running above BOE forecasts into the meeting.
And it's a high yielder within G10, so it should net net benefit relative to a currency
like Euro and stocky from this kind of environment and be one of the most resilient to high-fed
yields.
Okay.
Thanks a lot, Octavia, for that.
And that's fairly consistent, I think, with our broader view in DM within the other
their high beta currency as well.
So for example,
Ozzy is the other high yielder that's been one of our, you know,
favored sort of expressions of this, this carry theme. And it's got
the right way terms of trade exposure. We've actually, our
economists have just penciled in another hike for the RBAs. And
now it's going to yield 4.6%. Actually, the market is pricing
in more than that. And so the gap in yields between the DM
high yielders, like Ozzy and, and not key, both of which have
pretty decent fiscal positions. And I'm both a commodity
exporters versus the low yielders, like Swiss francs, for
example, or even again, even though, you know, we are
constructive. And yeah, I mean, the gap is just sort of
continuing to grow pretty solidly. So those are still pretty
good, pretty good candidates in our view. And of course,
Patrick's been pointing out that can use as a funder, both,
both within the DM space. But also, you know, also versus EM
Latam, Max, for example, has been in a pretty interesting
pairing there as well. And that's something that we've been
working on with our EM strategist as well. But speaking,
speaking of EM and Ashka, maybe I should turn it to you,
obviously, you know, this, this, uh, movement rates is obviously
been something that's still in the show, the movement commodities
and effects, at least in my mind, has been a bit of a slideshow
in comparison to the magnitude of these moves. What are you
thinking from here and which currencies do you think are the best
candidates to consider that might be insulated from this
bad hiking cycle? Yeah, so effects has been a little bit of a
slideshow, but actually a very interesting slideshow,
because when we look at GBIEM returns, which is our main index for
local markets, effects gains have actually been
sufficient enough to make the overall index in positive numbers
despite the bone cello, which I think it's quite remarkable.
When you talk to the start of, you know, Doha not gaining
on the recent developments, well, we have been bullish EM effects,
we have been constructed. But even, and it's actually also surprising how
well EM effects has done considering the challenges. So even
approaching it from a bullish perspective, I must say I'm a little
bit surprised by the resilience we are seeing from the start of
due to our older usual drivers that we've put monitor for EM,
US real yields, all prices, not got prices,
all have been challenging and yet the GBIEM effects photo return has been
very decent over the summer and even very recently. So I think the
resilience has come through, we have expected it, but I think even
compared to the expectations, it's surprising a bit to the upside. Now in
terms of what's most resilient few, if had hike, obviously we would
rank it from currencies that have the highest carry protection,
that would be very standard. So we have the usual candidates there
on the immediate reaction, we are, for instance, should so it's the absolute
normal. Guangbin, Pesso, Brazilian reality,
these are the usual kind of high carry candidates. I would also
mention that several others clean in that category for other reasons.
So for instance, Mexico does not have very high carry,
but we also see that the positioning continues to be quite low
and the kind of fundamental BOP sports quite high. So I would put that
in the resilient category too. In this region, another one that stands out
to me is Hungarian foreign, where we are finally seeing signs that the
central bank is a bit more concerned about the FX behavior.
We saw that on some of the, on the days of where a foreign was showing
higher beta to nut gas prices, it looks like it's starting to trigger
some reaction function and for that reason I also think although it
does not have the highest carry out there, that the resilience should
come through. On the other hand, on the other end of the
spectrum, two currencies could, for me, stand out in a lot of
anemia EMF as having recently shown more sensitivity to the
yesterday's reprising and that is Shekel and Chellian Pesto.
In both cases, I would say we probably see for the reaction if there is
focus reprising. Having said that, you know, if there is so much
price for the Fed, this could also be the ones that show
highest beta to the opposite direction too.
Fair enough and this is one good way to end it. I mean, I was throwing to
somebody else earlier this week who happens to be a dollar bear
and of course, I've been on the more dollar bullish camp and
the net result has been that neither of us are actually happy here.
So that tells you everything you need to know on the dollar but the carry is
certainly one thing that I think continues to deliver and if anything, this
high inflation, high growth environment is something that sort of keeps that
in play for the foreseeable future. So we look stop there.
Take a look at our publication for more details.
This communication is provided for information purposes only.
Please refer to JP Morgan Research reports related to its content for more
information including important disclosures.
2016 JP Morgan Chase and Company all right,
preserved. This episode was recorded on step 11,
2026.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The Fed is expected to hike rates, with CPI data showing strong core inflation, particularly in services, reinforcing hawkish expectations.
Despite high pricing for Fed rate hikes, the dollar has not strengthened, raising questions about valuation and fundamental support.
Sterling, Nokia, and Australia are viewed as most resilient to rising U.S. yields due to high carry, strong fiscal positions, and structural shifts.
The euro remains weak due to low yields, energy price volatility, and political uncertainty, making it a risky currency in a hiking cycle.
Emerging market currencies like Mexico, Hungary, and Brazil show resilience due to favorable current account positions and emerging central bank interventions.
Stronger-than-expected EM local market returns suggest resilience despite adverse global macro conditions.
Sterling and high-yield EM currencies benefit as oil-importers with higher yields, offering relative protection against dollar strength.
The market remains divided on dollar strength, with carry effects and fundamental data forming the key drivers of currency performance.
Summary:
The podcast discusses the ongoing tension between highly priced Fed rate hikes and the lack of dollar strength, despite strong inflation data, particularly in core services. Analysts note that the dollar has failed to respond to inflationary pressures and elevated rate expectations, suggesting valuations may be cheap. This conundrum leads to a focus on currencies that offer resilience through high yield, strong fiscal positions, and structural advantages.
Within the G10, sterling, Nokia, and the Swiss franc are highlighted as key candidates, with sterling benefiting as a high-yield oil importer and a relative outperformer. In emerging markets, Mexico, Brazil, and Hungary stand out due to solid current account positions and improving central bank policies. While the euro remains weak due to low yields and geopolitical risks, the carry effect continues to provide support for high-yield currencies.
The consensus remains constructive on these resilient assets, even as the dollar struggles to gain momentum. The analysis underscores that while rate hikes are priced in, actual policy delivery and global risk sentiment will ultimately determine currency performance. S.
cycle.
FAQs
The dollar has not strengthened despite strong rate hike pricing due to valuation concerns and market expectations. Even with aggressive Fed policy signals, the lack of a strong fundamental response suggests that elevated valuations and limited risk premiums are limiting dollar strength.
Core inflation, especially the super core component, has risen significantly, with a 51 basis point increase that was the hottest since January. This strengthens the case for additional Fed hikes, as it signals persistent inflationary pressure.
Nigeria and sterling are seen as the most resilient due to their high yields. Sterling, in particular, benefits as a high-yielding oil importer, while Nigeria is valued for its strong carry and fiscal position.
Despite being a low-yielding currency, the Swiss franc is sensitive to U.S. yield changes. The carry trade environment and strong domestic data have not offset its vulnerability to rising U.S. rates.
Higher-yielding currencies, such as sterling and Nigeria, benefit from carry trades. In a rising U.S. yield environment, these currencies offer better risk-adjusted returns and are less vulnerable to dollar strength.
Energy price hikes significantly impact the euro, which is already a low-yielding currency. The sensitivity of Europe's economy to energy costs, combined with political instability, limits its resilience in a hawkish rate environment.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.