Go back

🚨 GERMANY REVOLTS! Political Establishment’s “Firewall” CRACKING As Conservative AfD Party Begins Its TAKE OVER

26m 36s

🚨 GERMANY REVOLTS! Political Establishment’s “Firewall”  CRACKING As Conservative AfD Party  Begins Its TAKE OVER

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has achieved a breakthrough victory in Saxony, securing nearly 44% of the vote—far surpassing the CDU’s 17% and marking a significant political shift. This surge reflects deep public discontent with Germany’s handling of immigration, welfare costs, and taxation, where many citizens feel exploited by a system that sends billions to the EU while offering minimal returns. The government’s attempts to isolate the AfD through coalition alliances are collapsing as voters demand accountability. Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his party have responded with extreme rhetoric, accusing the AfD of promoting "ethnic cleansing" based on race or origin—a deeply sensitive issue in Germany’s post-Nazi history. However, such claims fail to resonate with voters who see the AfD’s platform as a response to real economic and social pressures, including inflation, strained public services, and uncontrolled asylum benefits. The AfD, founded in 2013 by economists and not rooted in extremist ideology, now stands at the edge of power, challenging the political elite’s ability to maintain control. The broader trend signals a crisis of legitimacy in Germany’s mainstream parties, driven by a loss of trust in institutions and a desire for political change. As the AfD approaches a majority, the firewall designed to block it is breaking, revealing a deeper societal shift where ordinary Germans demand a political system that values their economic well-being and national sovereignty. This moment mirrors similar political realignments seen elsewhere, where economic grievances and feelings of disenfranchisement lead to the rise of populist movements.

Transcription

3762 Words, 20799 Characters

English
fireworks in Germany. Did you see what's been going on in Germany? Something extraordinary is happening in Germany. Not simply because the conservative populist alternative for Germany, known as the AFD, just won the state election there, but because it won so overwhelmingly. So overwhelmingly, the Germany's political establishment has run it out of ways to keep it from power. In the Eastern state of Saxony, on halt, the AFD captured nearly 44% of the vote. You get the governing Christian Democrats, you know, the party of Freddie Mertz. Fred Mertz. Yes, Friedrich Mertz collapsed around 17%, not good, not good. The AFD did not merely beat Mertz's party. It actually received a lot of support. It actually received more than two and a half times as much support. Mertz's party. And it more than doubled its result from the previous state election. 43.8%, CDU got 17.2%. And I'll tell you, it's happening for a reason. It's happening for some of the same reasons that Donald Trump was so successful right here at home. The similarities are amazing. Germany's establishment has created what it calls a firewall around AFD. The major parties out there, they have pledged not to form any kind of coalitions with it. So even when the AFD wins, the most votes, the other parties, they all gather together to combine forces and keep the AFD out of government. But how long can that go on? I don't think much longer. I don't think you can keep stitching together these other parties and ignore the elephant in the room, which is how the people really feel. The AFD has now learned that winning is not enough, you see, because in order to break through this firewall, they're going to have to have a full political ground sweep and outright majority. So large that the other parties no longer have the numbers to stop it. And I'm telling you, they're getting there. They are getting there. And that's why today's confrontation in the Bundestag, their parliament, I like saying it, became so explosive. Elise Vidal, she stood across from Chancellor Merz and she declared that voters have had it and they've delivered their verdict. And she went after him on taxes and energy and Ukraine and welfare, but I mean she just let them have it. Watch. We must significantly limit payments to the EU, she says. Almost a billion euros flows to Brussels every week, but only a fraction of it comes back. We want our money back, my friends. Yeah, I mean think about that. The Germans are sending all the money to Brussels instead of keeping it in Germany. She doesn't like that. The people that voted for her, they don't like that. That's not working out so well for them, not at all. And not to mention taxes, taxes and more taxes. Listen to Vidal here. I'm going to stop this. I like German a little bit. I actually don't love it. I prefer Italian, but it's kind of interesting to hear it spoken. Mr. Merz, she says, Germans are not too lazy to work more. They see the hard work, not pay, becomes an unfair tax system that takes everything away from them for every euro earn, she says. Only 46 cents is left. And that is robbery above all people notice when they are being thoroughly fleeced and ripped off and sexually unhelt. Voters did not just punish you. They pulverized you. Your party, the CDU, in Maconburg, Western Germany, it's already a minor party. And nationally, you are well on your way to becoming one, a minor party, rightly so, she says. Boy, oh boy, because you just keep taxing and taxing. You keep sending it to Brussels. And the people have had enough. You know, and then she dared to go where you're not supposed to go. I mean, it actually gets even worse from here. I'm saving the big, big firework for her later. But first, here what she had to say about Ukraine. And while the US is making another attempt to end the murderous Ukraine war, you are escalating war, propaganda, confrontation with Russia, and burning even the last bridges to distract from your own catastrophic political track record. Finally, advocate for peace negotiations just as the US is doing. Thank you, Elise Videll. Boy, I heard Mertz didn't really appreciate it because the president congratulated her on the win there. And now he's not having the call that they were supposed to have on 9/11, taking things a little bit personally. But I told you things I really hated. And I was saving the best for last because at one point, she started talking about remigration. And Mertz has a big issue with the AFT's policy on remigration. What is remigration? They want to go around and say, okay, all these foreigners that are here illegally, and maybe I don't know the specifications on this, but they basically want everybody out. They want them to remigrate back home. So they want to get rid of the foreigners and deport them. And so Mertz is out there accusing her party of proposing what he calls ethnic cleaning, removing people from Germany based on their origin or their skin color. Listen here. Okay, so the translation here is the term remigration is nothing other than a synonym for ethnic cleansing based on origin and skin color. If those who work in Germany are forced to leave the country again because your champion remigration and the skilled trades in Germany will no longer be able to function. Then not a single nurse in home will be open and not a single hospital in Germany will continue to operate. Then not a single restaurant could stay in business in Germany. Huh, we've heard similar arguments. Have we not right here at home? I mean, but he's going there. He said the words ethnic cleansing. Okay, those are pretty explosive words. It's a pretty explosive accusation, especially in Germany. Okay, elephant in the room. We're talking Germany here. So notice what Mertz is doing. He's combining two completely different categories of people, legal immigrants who work. I actually think AFD is okay with that. Legal immigrants who work who pay their taxes and fill essential jobs. And he's combining them together with people who enter illegally commit crimes or had asylum applications rejected. And so the AFD is saying it's remigration policy is actually aimed at that second category. And Mertz is accusing it of wanting to expel people in the first category based on race. Like this is the argument that they're trying to sell in Germany. You know, I would just say that, you know, that's quite, you know, they tried that here too, right? They tried that here that Trump was a Nazi that he's Hitler. I mean, how many times have we heard that on the view for goodness sakes? But you know, when you start saying that in Germany, it's really loaded. Okay, so I think a lot of Germans are looking at this and they're saying, hey, wait a second, you know, why can't we have legal migration? Why can't we have legal immigrants for what we need? Like, why can't we have a border policy where we say, gosh, this sounds just like us, right? Hey, you know, we need nurses. So let's go get some nurses from the Philippines and make sure that all their paperwork is done, right? And that now we got nurses. Let's let's plug these holes. But let's not say, hey, come one, come on. The next thing you know, you got 15% of your population being foreign, not to mention that all the young people are all from the foreigners, 4 out of 10, young people now are from foreigners. So you understand, like the country feels like they're being pushed to the point in no return that nobody looks like them, sounds like them, has a culture like them anymore, including a culture of work. I mean, Germans are very, you know, work oriented. And now they're welfare oriented. So March is going for the most inflammatory accusation he can possibly come up with in Germany, in Germany, where yeah, the people don't appreciate that 12.4 million people out of the what 80 some on million there are actually all foreign 83.5 million 12.4 million are foreign and then the number is something even bigger somewhere around 30% of the population that has foreign ties. I mean, it's really kind of out of control. And then you just keep taxing them and taxing them and taxing them and taxing them and say, if you dare challenges, if you dare, then you are part of the darkest period in German history. Part of the period that annihilated 6 million Jews. You see, they try and equate you with Nazism just for saying, hey, I don't want to pay so much in taxes. I'll tell you, that's going to get old fast in Germany, just like it got old here. And the reality in Germany is that the public thinks the state has lost all control. And, you know, the public is right because when you see billions of dollars being spent on asylum benefits, while local communities are struggling with housing and crowded classrooms and strained public services, what are you going to think? You know, you have people whose asylum claims have been rejected and yet they get to remain in the country and collect all the welfare, does this sound familiar or does it sound familiar? They have a welfare system that is completely out of control, that has allowed for uncontrolled migration, has allowed for massive financial obligations to be undertaken by the German people and has allowed for their society to reach a breaking point where you have mass inflation, roughly 21% between 2020 and today and barely any economic growth at all. The German government's own statistics show, right now, 400,000 people receiving asylum secret benefits with direct spending totaling somewhere around 6.2 billion. I mean, that is a burden, okay? It's a burden for a small country, a small economy, relative to ours. You got millions of people working, you got millions of people paying taxes and millions of people that are suffering and all you do is care about the migrants. That's not going to fly, okay? You can tell them that they're turning into Nazis as much as you want and I get it. It has a very special and very specific and very ominous and scary meaning in the country of Germany. But at some point, the people are like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, you get a least vital from. I mean, this party, by the way, I just want to point out, it was created in 2013. It did not begin as a Nazi movement, okay? No matter what Murz tries to tell you, it was founded by a bunch of wonky economists and academics who basically looked at how stupid that Eurozone bailout was in Angela Merkel. Her management of the European debt crisis was a disaster and the whole thing got put on Germany. And they're like, we don't think so. We don't want to pay for Greece, right? So it was actually nickname the professor's party. And Elise Fidel herself, she's an economist. She worked like a gazillion years for Goldman Sachs in China. She speaks fluent Mandarin and she happens to be gay. I mean, it's neither here nor there, but painting her as a Nazi. I don't think is really going to work. She has a Sri Lankan girlfriend that is the mother, they have two children together. So guys, I get that Murz wants to do this because it's the easiest place to go. We see them try and take that tactic here in the US as well. And I get that it's hard in Germany. And perhaps very expedient and very tactical in Germany, given the horror of their history, right? Any nationalist movement that comes along is immediately going to face this level of hysterical scrutiny that, you know, wouldn't necessarily happen anywhere else, right? In fairness, right, that you've got to understand that they have that history. And then also in fairness, they have had some people within the AFD who have had some rather extreme views and very bad views and have said some very bad things. Like, you know, that happens in any party. So you can't just say that Elise Vidal and everybody that supports her, you know, is of the opinion that some whack job was because you got one whack job in the party. It doesn't mean that the entire party is that way. But that's what they're trying to do. They're trying to attach it to her or they're trying to attach it to the entire party. It's like, it's just like what happened with us, right after J6? What happened? Okay, if you support Donald Trump, then you are a bad person. You are, you know, you're for all these conspiracies. You're a Trump or da, da, da, da, da, da, da, you know, maybe, you know, maybe you're just, I don't even want to say, okay? So that's what they're doing. And I would say just like in the US, German people are speaking up and Saxony on hold is a very big deal. Very big deal. It's, it's going to keep happening. This firewall that they've put out for the deplorables, you know, to keep them away, a firewall is only effective when the parties behind it retain enough votes to build an alternative majority. At 20%, a party can be isolated like AFT. I get it. They can be isolated there. At 30%, isolation becomes a lot more difficult, but at nearly 44%, the system begins bending itself into very unnatural shapes just to keep the election winner from governing. And if the AFT gains only a few more points, guess what? That firewall, it does not bend. It breaks. And that is the arc that we are watching right now in real time, play across Germany. A party founded by economists only 13 years ago then transformed by the migration crisis is now approaching outright power. And Germany's political class believes they can stop it by making it morally unacceptable and morally untouchable. But I'll tell you, the voters of Saxony on hold, they delivered a very different message. You may refuse to join them. You may call them extremists. You may construct an alliance of every other party to try and keep them out. But unless Germany's leaders address the forces driving voters towards the AFT, which is immigration, welfare, insane taxation, economic decline, energy costs, and the feeling that ordinary people just don't matter anymore, ordinary Germans are somehow irrelevant. You are not going to stop them. You're not going to have a firewall that's big enough to stop the people themselves, because this really is about power to the people. I'm very much in the news today, the US has taken out five Iranian tankers, guys, five Iranian tankers. Let's look at the video from St. Com, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, okay? So you're seeing these five Iranian oil tankers getting taken out. And this means that, you know, they only, what did they have? We talked about this yesterday, 30 million barrels, and it looks like now they're down to 26, okay? 26. That's all they got left. He's running thin, and the Secretary of State says, hey, you know, you keep going after us? And there's going to be more where that came from. There's going to be a whole lot more where that came from, because we're just going to keep retaliating. And every time we retaliate, we take out your tankers and we take out your oil. Remember, I told you yesterday that they had a little bit of oil that they had siphoned off. And so it was sitting out there in the water, and they're just trying to sell it to China. And so that's, that's what's happened, you know, they're not going to be able to sell all that to China. They just lost about 4 million barrels. Here's Marco Rubio saying, you guys keep doing this, and we'll keep doing it too. It was in Iran. Can you speak about the U.S. strikes on the Iranian tankers, and explain what the back and forth has been in the last 24 hours? Yeah, the back and forth is pretty straightforward, and that is that Iran continues to try to hit U.S. naval ships. And for every time they do that or try to do that, they're going to lose tankers. And I think you'll see that again today. And what happened a little bit more? I know you've already addressed this in Spanish, but for the English speakers here, about the security cooperation. The Wall Street Journal reporting U.S. strikes Iranian oil tankers after Tehran targets navy ships. The American attacks came after Iran targeted some U.S. warships as fears grow that Tehran's missiles are becoming more sophisticated. That was the title of that article. I'm going to tell you right here. This is what we took out. OK, so I was telling it up. These are the IRGC's shadow tankers who talked about these shadow tankers before. Basically, they switched the flags on them, and they kind of try and float them under the radar so you don't really know that there are Iranian ships. But, I guess what? We do. We know that there are Iranian ships, and we just took them out. So here's the name of all five of them, and here's how much oil that they had on board. In one case, you had liquid natural gas, but you're talking about two million barrels there, and then 800 million, wait, so it was 800,000, OK, so it goes on down the list. In sums, it was a grand total of 3.9 million barrels. So 3.9 million barrels that they no longer have as of today. That's kind of a big deal, right? Kind of a big deal. Send-com, meanwhile, saying no U.S. navy warship has been struck. So they tried to attack, but they didn't succeed. All IRGC attempted to tax fails, failed, meanwhile, U.S. forces have successfully destroyed 10 Iranian tankers in just the last week. So 5 or 9, 5 earlier in the week. These vessels were part of a billion dollar, multi-billion dollar shadow network that funds the IRGC and Iran cannot defend them. Again, this is a big deal, because that's a dwindling oil supply. We heard from Bescent who's telling us they're down to their last 30 million. This was yesterday. Now they're down 4 million more, so we're at 26 million barrels and counting Iran. Things we've done, and what the President's done is fantastic sequencing. So we are running Operation Economic Outcast right now, and this is the greatest economic isolation operation in the history of the world. We are going to fixate this regime. Now we have the blockade, and because of the blockade, oil is not getting out. So there's probably only about 30 million barrels of Iranian crude oil left. The China hasn't bought it. So that will run out soon, and there will be no problem with China buying because they have no product. So the blockade is working. It's working like nothing we've ever seen, and the combination, everyone says, oh, sanctions don't work. I can tell you blockade and sanctions are one of the most powerful one, two. new punches in the history of economic isolation. - Wow, wow, I wanna show you, here's the blockade, okay? So the blockade, if you look at the orange on that, Matt, you see all the very important ports from Iran, and then you've got the blockade, the US blockade, our Navy is saying, okay, none of this is gonna get out. None of it. So some of it was outside the blockade already. Those were the five tankers, the shadow tankers that have been destroyed. So if you think about, they were at 30 million that they had managed to get out before the blockade went in again, and all that oil's hanging out there, and we just took out five boats, which means they're now down to 26 million barrels, and they're gonna go through that pretty quickly. So the squeeze is on, what happens when all those ports that you see in that red line, they just start overflowing with oil, and all of their facilities, like they can't take it, they don't have so much oil in there, and they can't get any of it out. That's entirely how they make their money. They're not gonna have access to anything. They're not gonna be able to pay all their row groups, right? They won't be able to. They're not gonna be able to access dollars. They are gonna have themselves a good old-fashioned, big old problem once the 26 million barrels of oil are gone. I'd like to find the rest of the shadow tankers and take out the 26 between now and next week. And we may actually wind up doing that, because again, going back to what Marco Rubio said, we're just gonna keep doing it, all right? You keep doing this to us, we'll finish this. And we'll finish it fast. Good to have you guys here. Reminder, if you haven't gone to my 76 research, please go over there, check out those portfolios. We have three major portfolios, American resilience, inflation protection, income builder, all of them have done extraordinarily well, so I encourage you to be invested and to benefit from, there's a lot of good stuff going on. I realize, you know, the oil markets are a little bit scary, today, oil is going up, too, right now. But overall, there's a lot of good stuff going on, and I know AI is scary, believe me, I get it, but there's gonna be a lot of opportunity. And we wanna make sure that you are part of that opportunity. Thank you so much for all the good comments. It is wonderful to have you here. We'll be back live on the program again tomorrow. I will see you then.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) won a historic 44% of the vote in Saxony, surpassing the CDU and doubling its previous result, signaling a major shift in German politics.
  2. Germany’s political establishment has attempted to block AfD governance through a coalition firewall, but this strategy is failing as public discontent with immigration, taxes, welfare, and economic decline grows.
  3. The AfD’s rise is driven by voter frustration with uncontrolled migration, massive asylum spending, rising taxes (leaving citizens with only 46 cents per euro earned), and a perceived lack of political accountability, while leaders like Chancellor Mertz have responded with inflammatory accusations of "ethnic cleansing" and Nazism.

Summary:

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has achieved a breakthrough victory in Saxony, securing nearly 44% of the vote—far surpassing the CDU’s 17% and marking a significant political shift. This surge reflects deep public discontent with Germany’s handling of immigration, welfare costs, and taxation, where many citizens feel exploited by a system that sends billions to the EU while offering minimal returns. The government’s attempts to isolate the AfD through coalition alliances are collapsing as voters demand accountability.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his party have responded with extreme rhetoric, accusing the AfD of promoting "ethnic cleansing" based on race or origin—a deeply sensitive issue in Germany’s post-Nazi history. However, such claims fail to resonate with voters who see the AfD’s platform as a response to real economic and social pressures, including inflation, strained public services, and uncontrolled asylum benefits. The AfD, founded in 2013 by economists and not rooted in extremist ideology, now stands at the edge of power, challenging the political elite’s ability to maintain control.

The broader trend signals a crisis of legitimacy in Germany’s mainstream parties, driven by a loss of trust in institutions and a desire for political change. As the AfD approaches a majority, the firewall designed to block it is breaking, revealing a deeper societal shift where ordinary Germans demand a political system that values their economic well-being and national sovereignty. This moment mirrors similar political realignments seen elsewhere, where economic grievances and feelings of disenfranchisement lead to the rise of populist movements.

FAQs

The AFD won nearly 44% of the vote in Saxony, the highest share in a German state election, signaling a major shift in public sentiment and challenging the traditional political establishment.

Major parties formed a coalition to prevent the AFD from entering government, creating a 'firewall' to isolate the party and avoid a political shift driven by voter concerns over immigration and taxes.

Voters are responding to rising costs, high taxes, economic decline, uncontrolled migration, and a sense that the government is failing ordinary citizens and prioritizing foreign welfare over domestic needs.

The AFD's remigration policy is criticized as targeting legal immigrants and skilled workers, with opposition leaders accusing it of promoting ethnic cleansing based on race or origin, a deeply sensitive issue in post-Nazi Germany.

The AFD is not founded on Nazi ideology and was originally established as a group of economists criticizing the Eurozone crisis. Critics like Chancellor Merz use the term 'ethnic cleansing' to delegitimize the party, but this is seen as a politically charged accusation.

Economic issues such as inflation, high taxes, and strained public services have fueled public frustration, making the AFD's promises of fiscal responsibility and sovereignty more appealing to voters.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.