Go back

George Conway: For Trump, Harp Strikes a Chord

56m 51s

George Conway: For Trump, Harp Strikes a Chord

The podcast features a deep dive into the personal and political dynamics within the Trump administration, focusing on the controversial relationship between Melania Trump and her private correspondence with the president. The host, Tim Miller, analyzes a series of intimate, emotionally charged letters written by Natalie Hart, suggesting they reflect a pattern of worshipful devotion and psychological dependence, possibly serving as a tool to sustain Trump’s delusions of grandeur. Drawing parallels to past political scandals like the Monica Lewinsky case, the host argues that Hart functions as an enabler of Trump’s narcissism, reinforcing a fantasy world detached from reality. The discussion also turns to broader national issues, including the alarming rise in the U.S. national debt and the resulting fiscal instability, with warnings about rising interest rates and the erosion of trust in government. Additionally, the show critiques the administration’s authoritarian practices—such as politicized prosecutions and media manipulation—while highlighting the dangerous normalization of political dysfunction. Michael Cohen is portrayed as a self-obsessed figure seeking validation, contrasting sharply with Trump’s malignant narcissism. The host concludes by emphasizing the need for sustained political resistance, noting that despite growing apathy, the fight against Trump’s influence remains essential. He also underscores the importance of collective action and historical awareness in preventing democratic decline, citing the vindication of early resistance movements against Trump’s rise. The episode ends with a call for continued vigilance and engagement, acknowledging that while the situation has worsened, progress may still be possible.

Transcription

10072 Words, 54346 Characters

English
(upbeat music) - Hello and welcome to the Bowork Daily. I'm your host Tim Miller. Before we get to one of our guests, I've got two more favors. I did a favor earlier this week and their response was overwhelming. The amount of emails that Katie Britz chief of staff has gotten about her total absence and abdication of responsibility when it comes to the children that we are keeping in detention centers, even though they're trying to self-deport. It was at least noticed. Unfortunately, Katie Britz hasn't done anything yet. She did go on Fox last night and smear Muslims, which hasn't done anything to help the people in the detention center yet, but hopefully that will continue. I heard from some of you that you didn't like fully have the names of a Freddy's and Agariana and how to spell them. So I'll put them in the show notes if people did not get a chance to contact Katie Britz office. Please do so over the weekend. My other quick favor is this podcast is gonna do great in the algorithm. Okay, the algorithm loves Trump derangement syndrome. The algorithm loves my guest. The algorithm loves it when we talk about Melania having press conferences. We're gonna crush, okay. When we talk to Julia Curly about a trans woman being fired and we talk to David Wallace Wells about climate apocalypse, the algorithm doesn't love that serious material as much. So if you liked one of those podcasts, my favor for you this weekend is think about a friend who might like it and help expand our reach. I mean, the Julia Curly podcast just knocked me on my ass. So if you had sent that with a friend to a friend who you don't think it listens yet, I would consider it a favor. So I appreciate you. And then now you guys, I owe you all too. So you can ask me for a favor. All right, today's guest, an old pal, a lawyer. He used to be a Republican. He used to be a candidate for Congress. He's a board contributor and maybe a little bit more soon. We'll be talking about that. It's the great George Conway. Hey, George. Hey Tim, how are you? I am pretty good. I could, I mean, all things considered. I got my wish all week. I've been saying if the Natalie Harp discourse leads to an impromptu millennia press conference, it will all be worth it for me. And I got my wish. I was always there. I was always there. You just felt paying attention. I was all, I've always at the White House. I'm very, very busy. You know, they tore down the East Wing. And now it's a military bunker. And I'm in charge of that. Mr. Epstein did not introduce me to my husband. Mr. Epstein, who is that? Who is that? Mr. Epstein. Mr. Epstein. She made her first public appearance in more than a month yesterday. Last time, if you even call it appearance, it was at the World Cup final. She was announcing it's hard to understand. We'll play it. Apparently a scholarship program for Young Adults and Foster Care, which is an admirable effort. Partners on the initiative include Fox. So that leaves me a little skeptical. I don't know why. But she came out at the White House. And I just want to play a little bit for you. Good afternoon. I heard you missed me. Here I am. Welcome to the White House. A warm welcome to our distinguished guests today. Mr. President, my father, Mr. Knaus. Education is the one asset that can never be taken away. It is the foundation upon which confidence is built. Opportunity is created. And the future is invented. Her English is not great. I know that an important immigrants learn English in this White House is an important part of the Steve and Miller. But foundation, inventant-- I don't clear what's happening there. Her English is better than your Slovenian. So I don't know what you're talking about. She might be non-lingual. She's forgotten the Slovenian and not quite learned the English. So we have a non-lingual first lady, possibly. I mean, you know, I don't criticize her for. I'm not going to criticize her for helping kids get education, like, yes. But kind of timing-- the timing was kind of interesting, don't you think? The timing was interesting. And I guess I do have one criticism about the comment. There was that education is the only asset that you can't take away. It's actually not true in a free country. I mean, Donald Trump, I think, he can take everyone's asset, take anything with he wants from anyone. But in a free country, you have an asset. You are actually allowed to keep it no matter what. So it's just a little quibble. Yeah, the timing's interesting. Coming off the Natalie Hartling. Is there like some kind of conservative or something? Yeah. Coming off the Natalie Hart-- we have more letters that we're going to discuss. But we all speculated that Melania was not going to like these stories, not too much. I don't know what she's doing. The rest of the time, maybe just surgery. I don't-- where is she? It's not like she has-- there's a lot of spot-its. We know what in it is where she is. Is she been in New York or of course? She's been in Florida. I don't know. We don't really know. We need a Melania job. Do you want to do that job? Not really. But I'm sure the bulwark has some people out there would be willing to do that, sacrifice for the country. Yeah. All right, so that's Melania. She's back. She's still working on English. And she's concerned about Donald's behavior. I think with all her free time, she could improve it. I mean, it's been 10 years that she's been the first lady. The letters from Natalie Hart that might have led to this press conference keep getting weirder and weirder. The Daily Beast has some of the long form love notes. We'd seen some of the short form in the Swan Haberman book. I'm going to read from a couple of points. I'm trying to decide which parts to do first. The running is the funniest ones. We'll start there. And make it traumatic, right? Several videos show Ms. Harp sprinting across great distances to keep up with Mr. Trump's golf cart as the putters around the course in Scotland. So we have those videos simultaneously that the letter says this. I'm also sorry if I was an embarrassment walking the course in Scotland. It's like it's born on the floor is what this is. Well, I got to see the video. We need the video. Please like the video. Some of the weirder parts of the George boy, this is Natalie. We could be out on the course with no machines and even forget what time it was. I didn't have to be human printer. I could take time to enjoy good conversation and still get all my work done at the end of the day. In fact, I even had time to take long morning and evening walks to enjoy each sunrise and sunset, though I did forget to eat and sleep. With so much thinking time I confess, it did have a slightly negative effect at times that I know you picked up on. That the end results, I believe, will be worth it. We go on, you have the absolute right to cut me out if need be when I deserve it. Because no one knows or cares about me more. They say I could not have parted with you to anyone less worthy. And I will add, it is I who is unworthy. It's quite amazing. It is just a peon of worship. And there's a bit of kind of like a hint of an abusive relationship there, right? It just feels like he trashes on her and then she does her best to throw herself back at him. I did not serve you well enough, master. And did you notice the case that was there some interesting capitalization in that letter or was it another letter that I saw? - Yeah, this letter, the human printer was capitalized. Sunset was capitalized. And then we get down to the end of this letter. I was saving this, but since you mentioned the capitalization, this is when the capitalization gets really weird. Thank you for being my guardian capital G and protector capital P in this life. That's what I wanted to use this card for. When you saw me at the cash register capital CR and once again did what you didn't have to and gifted me with mementos of this trip of a lifetime, a coming capital C of age, capital A, I will return a better person. - It's almost like she worships him as a capital D deity, right? Capital G guardian. - Oh, how's that a word where you're going with capital D? So I'm happy we landed on deity. - That's over, that went over my head. Capital P protector. What was the other one? - Capital G guardian. Guardian protector. And then what was the cash register is interesting? - Cash register is interesting. - You know, she went to Liberty University and someone pointed out to me this morning that cash register has connotations in the evangelical community. Cash register is a term that is used to describe people who treat the Lord as a kind of deposit institution where you do not good things so that you can get your, Lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Ben at the end of the day. But it's usually, I think it's supposed to be critical of that mode of worship or belief, but she's saying calling him the cash register, is that the context? - So me at the cash register. - At the cash register. I guess Trump probably just got her like a fucking, little doily from the Scotland golf courses pro shop. Actually, he got her some like Scotland socks maybe or like a golf tee bowl that is inscripted with the course name. And and that was for her a memento of a lifetime capital L and a coming of age capital. Coming of age, coming of the Lord Donald Trump. It's weird. I spoke to somebody who covers the White House, who is like, it's the type of situation where you remember the old stories about Trump where he would do the thing like a guy would come into his office in Trump tower. They knew he was having an affair and then he'd like call his wife and put him around speaker phone and like say things like cryptically to kind of like embarrass him and scare him to me. Yeah, he humiliated him. They're like, this is like the situation with me. She's writing him these long love notes about how you know he is her son and her moon. And for him like he thinks it's funny, you know, he could have a bunch of friends around and say hey Natalie, like will you go poo in a bowl and then come bring it back to me and like she would do that. You know, like I think that's the type of situation. Yeah, it is. It does seem that there is kind of a very, that she's very subjugated in this relationship that she's very. I hear, but the thing that also I'm wondering about is where is this shit coming from? You think she might be a Russian spy? I don't know. I'm asking that question without having an answer. I'm until legitimate question, which I posed to you, the guru of Borgum. Where the fuck is this? I mean, okay, so she writes these very personal private notes. She doesn't presumably make multiple copies of them and hand them out to the rest of the White House staff. She hands them to him. So where are these copies coming from? Who is giving them to the daily beast? Who is quoting them to Maggie, Haberman, and Jonathan Swan? I've got a working theory on this. Yeah, I'd like to hear that working theory. I mean, you're supposed to be talking into really me and asking me questions, but that's a question. It's a talk. It's a two-way dialogue. It's a weekend pod. I unbuttoned a button. We're getting loose. Here's what I think. The Swan Hayroom book was very specific in noting that she leaves these for him. I think maybe there's something embarrassing about handing him the letter. She's a little embarrassed. Maybe she knows somewhere in her subconscious that he's not reading them. John Trump doesn't read. They're very long. We'll put the link in the show. You can look at letters. They're very long. There's no way in which he's reading these. I mean, Sam Stein was like, is she talking in code when she says cash register? And I was like, cash register is in paragraph 11. Donald Trump did not make it that far. So if there was a code, he didn't get it. What I think is happening is she leaves them around and there are people in the White House that hate her. She's the conduit by which people get things to Trump and Trump gets things out. So she pocket veto shit. She prints out shit that they didn't want them to see whatever. My guess is Susie hates her. Caroline hates her. You know what I mean? Yeah. Well, they all hate each other. They're all very jealous of who has access to him. So that's what's happening. She leaves them around. One of them knows Trump isn't going to read it. Picks it up. Takes a picture or just takes it for themselves. And she's continually trying to fight the staff that's trying to keep her away from the president. Right. I mean, that's why she's jumping in the trunk. That's why I mean, I'm running past after the golf carts and so on and so forth. I mean, it was really it harkens back and I say this with the disclaimer that I do not believe these two are have carnal wisdom of each other because I just find that hard to believe in his current medical condition. I think she serves a completely different function which we can talk about. But it reminds me of it reminds me of the Monica Lewinsky episode where in 98, if you recall, people in the White House basically knew that there was something on with this chick Monica Lewinsky and the president. And they were very suspicious of it. She was always around the oval and at weird times. And so what happened in 1996 was that the chief of personnel in the White House, her name is Evelyn Lieberman, basically transferred Lewinsky out of the White House, secunded her or I figure what the government term is, center over to the Pentagon to work in the press office where she faithfully met someone else who worked in the press office at the Pentagon, one Linda trip and the rest of course is history and that's totally completely backfire. You know, they wanted her away from the White House. And in fact, you know, I was one of the first people to hear famously or infamously the Linda trip tapes. And one of the things that's on those tapes is her bitching to Linda about how all the people in the White House wanted to get rid of her and finally succeeded in getting rid of her. And there's a little bit of that flavor here. Yeah, I did not remember this. This is you lived this. I was a child. I don't remember this phrase is this Don Van Nade, a great guy. I ended up being a sports reporter. But he had the scoop that that Clinton wore a tie that Lewinsky had given him to a press conference is like a secret message to her to like behave during the grand jury testimony or something. Yeah, that's that was that was a great story. Don and I are now friends, even though he he outed me as one of the elves who wrote the Paula Jones brief. He and Jill Abramson and on the front page of the New York Times, which got me in a lot of people at my law firm were real happy about that at the time. That seems people being unhappy with you colleagues. It seems like that's a running story of your life. Yeah, absolutely. But I did, you know, I mean, I maybe I digress here. You can cut this out if you like. No, please digress. I hope people here for I found Linda trip her lawyer. I never spoke in the literature, but I found Linda trip her lawyer and Linda trips lawyer had to produce these tapes. I think it was January 16, 1998, the day before Clinton's deposition. And so we're sitting in this lawyer's apartment because he needs to listen to the tapes to make sure he knew what was being what was being produced to the government. We started listening to these tapes and the thing I remember distinctly, I was eating a blueberry donut on the guy's living room table and he's playing these tapes on his cassette tapes on his stereo. And Linda is talking to Monica. Monica is bitching about how Evelyn Lieberman had her transferred out of the White House to the Pentagon. So we couldn't she couldn't see the big creep, which was her nickname for Clinton. And the big creep. The big creep was her nickname for Clinton, the big creep. And then Monica tells the story to Linda about how she gets back into the White House one Saturday, our Sunday. And what happened, and this was in the Star Report was that she would show up at the Northwest Gate early on a Saturday or Sunday morning. And everybody with the Secret Service, they'd let her in because she was authorized to put her on the visiting list. And then they would watch the little dot on their screens that showed where the president was. The little dot would go down to the Oval Office for their assignment or whatever they were doing. But anyway, she tells the story of the one one Saturday, a Sunday, she did this and she's bitching to Linda trip about how she was bitching to Clinton about they transferred me out of the White House to keep keep me away from you. And he's like, I'm sorry, you know, was this was 96. They felt they needed to do this because he's running for reelection. Clinton's like, I'm sorry they did that to you. I promise I'm going to get you back here after the election. And Monica's told Linda, oh, thank you. That's great. I said to the president, can I come back as assistant to the president for blow jobs? And that was news. So given your expertise, you said something to peak to my interest, which was you don't think they have car industry that you think she's serving another purpose. What purpose do you think she is serving him ego management? Yes, ego management. But in the extreme, I mean, I think that's what she did. She helped keep him sane during the criminal trial in 24. And that's how we all got to know Natalie Hart for the first time. She was there in the court from every day. I was in the courtroom in the back with Normaizen in the gang and we're watching these proceedings and they would come in every day. And she would print stuff out. At one point, she printed stuff out about me and Borshapstein handed it to for some reason, Caitlin Collins. But that's how we got to know her and what she did was she printed stuff out to bring his spirits up when everybody said somebody said, oh, he's so good. He's so smart. He's he's going to win the case. That's what she does. He lives in his own little world at this point, right? He says all these things like, you know, on the podcast with Cohen last night, says all these things that are just completely untrue, like completely fanciful. Like a ran was two weeks away from the nuclear weapon. I would win by 25% today if I ran for reelection. All these things that just he actually, I think, has gotten to the point where he has convinced himself of his lies, which is what happens with Millignant Narcissus, Narcissus, sociopaths is gradually they just begin to believe their own bullshit because the truth is too painful for them. And that is the function that she serves is to indulge his fantasy world where he lives apart from reality. And you know, that is the significance of Natalie Hart. And that is the danger of Natalie Hart is she is the ultimate enabler of his psychosis. I mean, he is psychotic at this point. She is not perceiving reality the way reality should be perceived. I think he really does believe this is the renaissance of the American economy that we are going to control the strength of our moves very soon and then it will become the 51st state. I guess I don't know if water can become a state. And that's her function is to make he's she's enabling and extending his psychosis which is kind of a bad thing to have with a president of the United States also sounds a little nice though. I don't know. I mean, Katie or Ansela or Jason were telling me that, you know, they're unworthy that I am their guardian that I'm wonderful. I would love that. I mean, nobody does that to me. Of course. I know, but that that's the thing is and he desperately needs that because he is such an extreme narcissist. It reminds me of and I should write a blog post about this or restarting my sub stack. There's a writer named psychologist famous psychologist Eric from who talked about malignant narcissists like Trump, great evil people of history were malignant narcissists and they're basically says they they tip into psychosis. They're basically psychotic because they want to believe the fantasy world in which they control everything and everything is about them and that's where Trump has always been headed. And I think at this point, he's not even close to reality. And that's just a scary thing and we just, you know, I that's the thing that a little bothers me about the Natalie Harp episode is that people are treating this as a debate about whether it's low blow by the Democrats. It's a low blow by us off and we're really really talking about we're maligning a poor young woman and we're talking about this on basis of whether or not they're having sex. When in fact, I think JV wrote it the other day that that would be better if they were just having sex because it would just be at least you could understand that at least it's in the realm of normal human comprehension. But this is psychotic on both sides that he worships him as some kind of deity and he sucks that up and is using her as a tool to create it to create and maintain his own fragile reality that is being tested each and every day throughout the world in reality. We're gonna get back to Michael Cohen, but you mentioned your work in the 90s and I think let's just let's just be 90s Republicans for a second, like whatever, we were that couple of news stories happening this week with this party. The debt officially hit 40 trillion on Wednesday, a new high watermark. The national debt has grown by 11.6 trillion during Trump's two non-consecutive terms more than any other president in history. But 20 trillion, he said it was catastrophic for the country and needed to be resolved. He was going to fix that in 2016 and then famously Elon Musk came in this time talking about how big a catastrophe this was and how he was going to be the one man to fix it. He ended up just killing a bunch of kids in Africa and then keeping us on the trajectory of the highest debt in history. How worried should we be about this? I think we should be extremely worried about this, particularly in an interest rate environment that is not favorable. I mean, the bond markets are tanking. Interest rates are going up because people fear inflation. They fear that they don't trust our future anymore and what happens is, if you have more debt and the rate to refinance, you know, as pleasuries come due, the bond markets decide how much people are going to pay for Treasury bills and if they're willing to pay less and interest rates go up, the debt goes up because we're paying more and more interest on the debt. And that's what's happening is a very much a downward spiral and I think, you know, we saw JD Vance pretty much acknowledge that the other day when he was saying, why do we want to be the nation, the planet's reserve currency anyway and people are fleeing the dollar, they're fleeing treasuries right at the moment where we need to sell Treasury bonds to finance these massive deficits that go on. And that's just an astounding thing and I think when Barack Obama left office, the national debt was something like 25 trillion. So in 12 years, I mean, 10 years, mostly because of him, I think it was like 20 even, I think it's done. No, I remember I used to, one of the things I used to do on Twitter early on when I started going off on Trump, there's this account on Twitter called national debt tweets or national debt posts or something and they basically every morning, every, every weekday morning or every day the markets open, they publish their estimate of what the US debt is on any given day. And I used to tweet like, okay, here's what it was on January 20th, 2017 and here's what it is today. Today it's just astounding. It's just absolutely astounding and it's and it's very, very scary. My message for Democrats on this because I do think that there is, this is stupid, but you know, the country is stupid. I guess I saw somebody posting the other day, something like, you, fiscal hawks have been warning about this since the 90s that social security is going to become insolvent and that we're going to become grease. It's like, well, no, actually in the 90s, people were mostly saying, you know, around 2030, where social security is going to come and solve it and things would be out of hand. And so we're coming up on 2030. But I think people are sick of hearing about it and people don't think anything that it matters and that's anything's going to be done about it anyway. And obviously, speaking of narcissists, the boomer and Gen X narcissists don't really seem to care about what it means for their children and the budget, they're going to lay for them. So what I think that Democrats should do and how people who care about this should talk about it is the bond market is complicated, but understanding what your mortgage rate does on your house is. Yes. Right. But whatever you think about the national debt, like if we keep these deficits going, you're going to keep paying this high percentage on a new, you're not going to get a new home, you're not going to be able to downsize, your kids aren't going to be able to get a home, like it is directly tied to the housing crisis. And I think that's probably the best way to maybe have a breakthrough. Yeah. I think that's right. I mean, I think somebody has to start taking responsibility for this. And neither party has done that over the years. I mean, the first one, Republicans really didn't mean it. All they meant was to do was to cut the budget when a Democrat is president, and then they want to cut taxes for their friends when a Republican is president. When any responsible person, including, you know, something used to be people who really did believe in fiscal responsibility in the Republican Party, when they would propose something that they would absolutely be skewered by the Democrats. I say, you want to put children on the streets and so on and so forth. Yeah, kick Granny off the cliff. And I think both parties, overall, over the last 50 or 60 years, have really contributed our inability to handle our fiscal responsibilities. I would say that one time in the 90s, when you talk about the 90s, that was the one time where we actually balanced the budget, or came close to it, or we actually achieved some level of fiscal responsibility. It was blocked. Well, no, it was really because of the peace dividend, right? Because the collapse of the Soviet Union, we had to spend less. We didn't have to have, try to have a 600-ship Navy like Ronald Reagan wanted to, and we cut military spending because we didn't need to have as much, all of a sudden, we had pretty much balanced budget, but we couldn't stick to that. And the Republicans deserve every bit as much criticism, more than that of the Democrats. I mean, you look at the spending versus taxing through Trump administrations, it's just completely out of whack. Biden was physically responsible compared to Trump, and he had to deal with COVID, too. So I mean, it's not great. Hey, guys. The good fight tour is live for everybody now. Tickets for the good fight tour headed to ACC Country. They are live for everybody. So let's go hang out, be together. The tickets are available at thebolwork.com/events, Sarah J.V.L. Sam and I will be coming to Columbia, Charlotte, and Atlanta on October 16th, 18th, and 20th, respectively. We'll bring some other bullet friends with us as well. That Columbia show is going to sell out fast, baby. It's a small venue. We're going hipster. It's Indy. You know, it's like seeing a big band go back to the small club, and we're going to be partying. It's a Friday night. It's South Carolina. I want to go there and get your tickets today. Check out thebolwork.com/events to see what other bullet friends are bringing to your city and other details. Hope to see you there. The wall might be down, but Soviet beef pricing is coming to America. Trump deleted this this morning. For the next 90 days, the United States will allow up to 300,000 metric tons of product for ground beef to be imported with no quota tariff. We have a commitment that this beef will be sold at 25% below current market prices. [BLANK_AUDIO] I should note that the tariff is 26%, so it's an interesting number that this beef is going to be 25% below, I don't, is it going to be because the tariff's making things more expensive, or is he going to undercut the ranchers who are working in this country with this foreign beef by price indexing? I never understood Trump mathematics and I don't think the banks that ended up being claimants in bankruptcies of the Trump casinos under Trump Mav either, but I think at the end of the day he's going to claim that he cut beef prices by 600%. That's what I think he's going to do. That sounds like the pharmaceuticals, yeah. He is very socialist. He's our most socialist president. This is just one example, the cutting of the beef prices, but if you just go through, I mean like the most obvious examples is the taking, you know, stakes and intel, etc. But, you know, we have the secret police on the street, like across the board. Trying to determine whether or not media mergers should go through taking tributes, pulling executives into doing what he wants, or else he's going to punish them with tariffs. I've taken credit for their successes when they decide to build a new factory or create more jobs, he says, that was me, I did that. Yeah. It's frustrating for them to be like using this moment, to be like the Democrats are communists, when he's running the most kind of state-run like Cold War style socialist government we've ever had. I mean, you know, this is why I always believe that people were right when they said, you know, when politics isn't necessarily right to left, it really is more of a circle where the right and the left, the far right and the far left, meet at the top of the circle or the bottom of the circle as you may, however you may. And that's right. I mean, he's doing things that if AOC president, AOC or president Bernie Sanders even thought about it, even used about it, people would, the right would go back shit and we'd really be listening to, they people would be listening to Fox News go on and on with hammers and sickles and whatnot for weeks. But you know, if our leader of the great leader does it, our great orange leader does it, it's okay. An interesting little, just small item of resistance that was happening against the great communist leader happened a couple weeks ago and it came from Judge Box of Wine, Judge Janine. This is when Trump was trying to order that an Olympian be put into a gulag because Trump imagined that he was the one that sabotaged his great reflecting pool and Judge Piero, uh, they're now Janine Piero and I'm Judge anymore. Um, it's kind of a, I still like to call her Judge, kind of in the Judge Judy. I like to know, I like Judge Box of Wine. Judge Box of Wine. Although she came in with Judge Box, she was a, she came in as Judge Box at documents apparently. Yeah. Which was it? I mean, do we know what does the late guess what that is? Do you have any thoughts on that? You know, there's litigation about whether or not the dismissal should be with prejudice. The, the government's sue a sponte or on its own made a motion to dismiss the indictment without prejudice, which the lawyers for the Olympian thought was unfair because that means it's theoretically someday if we found, if Trump found a new U.S. attorney or he could be, this guy could be charged again for the same bullshit. And since the government is essentially admitting that the case was bullshit, the dismissal should be with prejudice. I think an argument that's, that's very, very strong. Other than that, I really have heard that I do, I mean, I mean, there was some tweeting, I think, or some truth-socialing where Trump was suggesting that, that the U.S. attorney's office have another go at the guy, which is just insane. Where do you add on just the blanch DOJ and kind of level, fear level? This, you know, I'm always grappling with this on the revenge part of this administration, which is, which, you know, contains like everything in this administration, you know, like one part malice, one part like clownish incompetence. And I feel like the revenge program has been more like nine parts clownish incompetence, one part malice, like they, you know, the seashells, like they know everyone is walking free, you know, Barack Obama, Jacob Fry, Tim Walls, San Wich Dye, San Wich Dye, everyone walks free. Everybody, only, the only person they caught that they, they got was Bolton, but that, that investigation actually began during the Biden administration. So, um, and they're just like, what luck? They got in there and they got shit. Somebody on the list was already did something that. He did something, but what he did was he wrote notes and kept his own personal diary that contained classified information, or references to classified information. These guys are being really running a tight ship on that. Oh, yeah, yeah. Right. Right. Right. So the guy, the guy who actually took up crates of boxes of documents, like tons of documents, a room full of documents to his personal club in South Florida and then hid them from the FBI had his lawyers lie to the FBI about the documents and move them. I tried to destroy camera footage of the moving and the concealing of the documents. He's the president of the United States who basically encourages this prosecution, can't make this stuff up. Now, guess is the printer has some classified documents that she's not been handling appropriately. I mean, the other, the additional reporting that Maggie did that was, you know, since the book was like one of the other reasons that there were concerns about her is that she's Trump's taking world leader calls and sensitive calls on speaker phone and she's just there. She didn't hold that ground. Yeah, and that's, that's the other thing about that. That's exactly a touch. How do you go to work in the White House and refuse to have a background check? Repeatedly, she refused to undergo the back, or she refused to fill out, I think it's what the standard form 50 something that you're supposed to fill out when you. It does make you wonder. It does, it does make you wonder. She comes out and out where her brothers like in Nicaragua was like a left-wing freedom fighter. It's like, it was on CNN high, high as a kite. Which is great. God love them. But it's like she comes out of nowhere. All of a sudden she's around them all the time. I don't know. So it'll, it's suspicious. Yeah, I don't think we've heard the last of this, actually. Back to Blanchoy quick though. Like, what's your, what's your concern level, I guess, about the last two years when it comes to political prosecutions, all that? Well, I just think we're going to see more of it. I mean, Blanch clearly does not give a shit about the rule of law. It doesn't give a shit about whether or not the Justice Department is used as a kind of weapon by the president. He basically is openly declaring that he will do whatever the president wants. Now, you know, he's, he's right in the sense that the president is the ultimate, you know, executive. And I don't think you have to believe in the unitary executive theory that gets liberals all excited to believe that, you know, at the end of the day, the president is responsible for the, what the Justice Department does and does not do. The thing that the Justice Department has to do is to provide justice and to lead to justice and part of that process. The, in order to act as the enforcer of the laws, you have to show that you're enforcing them fairly, fairly. But he doesn't want that to happen. I mean, I think the fundamental problem isn't that we have a unitary executive theory that, that this has run amuck. It's really the fact that we have a executive who doesn't believe in obeying his oath of office and doesn't believe in the law and doesn't believe in the Constitution, doesn't believe in government as anything but a weapon to, to, to boost his own finances and ego. That's the fundamental problem. And, and, and blanch the fundamental problem with blanch is he's, he's good with that. He's absolutely good with that because he wants whatever he wants, which is he to be attorney general in the United States, to be important, to be powerful. Something he never was. You know, he was just sort of a middling former assisting the United States attorney with a not so, you know, this mediocre criminal law practice until he met Donald Trump. And now he's attorney general in the United States. You know, that's what happens with these cacostocracies is that mediocre people rise to great power because they are willing to do what it takes to satisfy the whims of an exalted sociopathic leader. And that's, that's classic, that's classic authoritarian, is when that's, that's blanch fits right into that. Yeah. What's your level of alarm about the 2028? The thing that has me the most alarmed right now that the blanch ties into is just you look at the power ministries. And it's like you got blanch cash in the hexf. And it's pretty strange that the hexf and cash are the two that haven't been fired. Like you can look at the incompetent people. They've been pushed out of other areas, but not there. And man, I don't know. That's the one thing that has my spidey sense tingling a little bit. Besides the bunker he's building at the White House, just like he has his most loyal hackish people at justice defense FBI. Yeah, I think that's right. And I think that he's going to pull some shift even maybe before 20 actually this year and connecting conjunction with the off-year elections. And I think he's going to pull some shit in 2028. I mean, this man who, who, who launched an insurrection in 2020. One, I agree with you. I'm very worried about it. And what worries me most about it is there, there is. And I think the Democrats are going to do well in the midterms. But there is just sort of this lethargy, this sort of acceptance of of our fate among, even among people who consider themselves as opposing Trump. And you see it everywhere. It's just like, wow, we can't do anything about Trump. We should be worrying about affordability. It's like, well, how are you going to do that when this guy is starting wars that raise the price of gasoline and imposing tariffs that raise the price of consumer goods and food? And they want to pretend that Trump doesn't exist because they feel that he's convinced them that they can't do anything about him. There's this kind of learned helplessness of what psychologists would call it. And because of that learned helplessness, we reach this kind of, again, what psychologists would call a malignant normality, where we're accepting things, we're accepting like a watergate level scandal every week. He does something that's just incredibly, that ought to be paralyzing of an administration for a month, or two, or a month or end of the administration. But he, you know, it's just, oh, it's Tuesday. - There's been some conversation about resistance when figures falling on hard times. You know, Michael Fennatti went to jail. I want to get into that broader discourse, but there was a particular example of this that you've already mentioned, which is the current president going on to Michael Cohen's radio show. Before the last presidential election, he said that if Trump ever returned to the White House, he would change his name and flee the country. He's called Trump, a racist, con man, everything. But yet last night, he played "Why Can't We Be Friends" by war, and then welcome Donald Trump to the show, and I want to play a couple clips of co. - When I have obviously traveled a pretty rocky road together, do you remember, do you remember, sir, when I went on CNN with Brianna Keeler, and she told me that you were underwater in the polls, and I responded with those famous two words, says who? So maybe what we should do is then have a press conference and literally put out all of the accomplishments, because what's happening, boss, you remember when I was by your side? - Boss. - Boss. - It's kind of like a fascist Uncle Rico situation. - I mean, I gotta say, I mean, they all did Saturday night live there. (laughing) Particularly with the leading and the sick of fancy, it was a parody of itself. I will say this also at the same time, while it was amusing, I mean, the absurdity of the suck upery and then the lead-in, which we're calling made it all about himself. It's not about the country about what Donald Trump is doing to the country, it's about the last 10 years of that, his relationship, his personal relationship with Donald Trump, and now you get to see the reconciliation. It was all about him, very, very narcissistic. It was comical, yeah, at the same time. Two or three, a few minutes into the interview, it was boring because Trump has this flat effect. Now he's got, he's low energy dawn and he's just repeating the same bullshit over and over against like, oh, they were two weeks away. Iran was two weeks away from a nuclear weapon. And then Cohen's like, well, why don't you tell the word of that? That's amazing. This is a new revelation for our program. I mean, you even said that on CNN. Yes, but he said, oh, that's a really big revelation about Iran. It's like, no, no, no, they made that argument months ago and everybody laughed at it because it wasn't true. And then, you know, he said, Trump is saying, I would win by 25 points today if I were running for re-election and the economy is in a new renaissance. We've got more job, it's better than ever. And Iran no longer has a nuclear program and we're gonna control the straight of Hormuz, huh? You know, again, it's all very, very delusional and the whole thing is just this exercise in reciprocal narcissism. What was interesting I thought too was there was an interview that Cohen did yesterday, late in the day on CNN with Jake Tapper. And he basically admitted there, I'm Cohen. He says, I haven't asked the president for a part, but he expressed great disappointment which he has done in the past with the fact that he applied for a pardon during the Biden years and he had people like Jamie Raskid and Norm Eisen and lots of other people liberals saying that he deserved a pardon and the Biden-- - Gollible liberals because fuck them. - Right. - Sorry, I don't know. You did the crime, you do the time Michael. - Yeah, we did the time, you did the time. So I don't really, you know, I don't, it doesn't hang on. - It doesn't hang on. - He was like, hang on, raise the mouse. - Yeah, and he was denied the pardon, of course, and then of course, Joe Biden pardoned Hunter. I can't say that Michael is completely wrong in being resentful of that. I think his being obsessed with that and being very angry and letting it rule his life is excessive. But he comes in with that attitude and then he also feels tremendously exposed when his former boss becomes president again because my god, he's gonna be high on this shit list. So he immediately starts turning, pivoting. And Tara Palmerio was on with her last night on Anderson Cooper's show. Tara Palmerio basically said that Cohen asked her for the president's phone number 'cause every journalist in town has it and said, I know how to get back in his good crisis. And he did. And the way it is, he said, you listen to the guy you pretend, he's right, and you say, you're sorry. And they weaponize me too. The way they weaponize the government against you. - It's so pathetic, it's like a pathetic little lap dog. It's so degrading. He's like laughing, you remember when we did this? It's so fucking embarrassing. - But Trump eats it up, it works. - I know, but here's the thing. If I felt like Michael was pulling the wool over Trump's head and he was pretending and he's faking it, and he was using Trump's narcissism against him, I would be against that. I could accept that whatever. This is a strategy. That's, I looked at that video. You can, people can turn on the YouTube version. And he has Gidey. He's like a Gidey little Yorkie. What kind of dogs do you have? He's a corny. - I have a corny. He's a corny. - He's a corny. - He's a corny. - He is a corny. - He's a corny. - He's a corny. - Yeah, I see him. - Yeah. - How much do you like me? Please pat me, please pat me. - Yeah. - Yeah. That's Michael Cohen. That's my point about Michael Cohen. I mean, look, you have two narcissists, right? Trump is the most extreme narcissist you will ever imagine, but and he is a malignant narcissist because he's a sociopath and he wants to destroy everything, deep down psychologically. He's a very, very dangerous man. Michael Cohen is just your run of the mill near to well, narcissists. - Idiot. - Who just wants to be in the thick of things, just feels that he's never gotten his just desserts and he's just looking for a home. He wants somebody to love him. He is like that puppy dog that you just described that needs to be loved. And that's, to me, that is pathetic. It makes me feel sorry for Michael in a way that I could never possibly feel sorry for Donald Trump. And I'll tell you a story which I mentioned last night on CNN, which is, he's looking for affirmation wherever he can get it, this guy, Cohen, right? He didn't get enough affirmation from the left. - He got a show on the Midas Touch Network. I don't know, he did pretty good. - He did, but it wasn't enough for him. And then, and now he's looking for affirmation. Wherever he can get it, I'll give you an example. And again, I don't say this. I like Michael in the sense that I feel sorry for him and I don't have anything against him. He's always been nice to me. So, I, you know, looking at it from that narrow perspective, I don't wanna go out and dump on Michael. But here's a funny story. You know, I had my ill-fated run for Congress and earlier this year, and in January, we announced it on January 6th, and Michael kept contacting me. And he wanted to help me help my campaign. He said, "Let's go out for coffee. "Let's walk the streets together. "Let's, you know, people like me on the east side. "They'll see you, and I can help you." And it sort of amazed me, 'cause I remember getting off the phone with him, and then I'm looking at my phone, and I'm seeing some kind of alert for a news story that says that Michael Cohen is now claiming that he was pressured into giving the testimony at the Stormy Tannels, right? And I'm like, "What is going on here?" And I didn't think he could really help me among, you know, politically. You know, it was very flattered and grateful that he was being nice, but it was like, it was totally weird, 'cause you could see him, he was in the middle of his pivot, and he's helping, he wants to help a guy whose basic platform is that the President of the United States should be impeached and removed, and then prosecuted and sent to jail for the rest of his life, instead of spending it on a Katari-donated 747 and in the White House, in a ballroom? Yeah, man. Yeah, I mean, he just wants attention. He says, "Yeah, it's a pathetic situation." Would you do this? How would you handle this? I don't know, hypothetically, let's say, I don't know, kind of an anti-Trump pro-democracy YouTube channel provided you a show in the future. Would you be interested in having the President on? Oh, absolutely, and I was ready to say that on Anderson's show, but the conversation didn't get there, but I wanted to say to the President of the United States, I expect to be starting up in new podcast would something like what you just described. I don't know. I don't know where it would be. I don't know what I don't know what kind of organization there would be that would would have such a podcast. I don't know. And I would love to have President Donald J. Trump as my first guest. You're going to spend the time reminiscing about all the good times you had together. Oh my god, about the Eugene Carol case. And I love talking about the psychological aspect of things. I've got become kind of an amateur psychologist. I'd love to talk about them, the Montreal cognitive assessment test, the one he keeps taking and the nature of it with him and asking why he's been taking that so many times. And of course, we were talking about Natalie Harp and the important functions that she serves with him. And I agree, Mr. President, it's crazy that they're saying that you are having sex with her. We know that couldn't possibly be true. Notically. Notically. Yes. Great. I hope that that happens. We're rooting for it. Yeah. Just to close in a series like because I have some thoughts about this, you know, it was never like the hipsters that were the Trump resistance. You know, like the two that there was always like a category of people on the obviously people on the right hated the resistance. There's always a category of people on the left that would like talk about this as a pejorative. You know, MSNBC resistance wine moms and like all they just all they all they do is orange man bad. And so after Alex Benman, I've got nothing for love, but love for lost, you know, his Florida primary, you know, they're lumping you in. They're talking about Cohen. There's a lot of people that are kind of saying like, you know, resistance one is over, you know, that didn't work or whatever. Like, what do you say to that critique? I don't know exactly what their theory of it is, but I do think there is something to be said for the proposition that people are exhausted by Trump, including people who oppose Trump. And they don't want to hear about Trump. And one of the things that I was fighting over the last several months, I mean, I had a lot of problems. My problem was like, you know, look, it's a to make an argument that you're a that you're not a politician. Only a good politician can make that argument and win. People don't want to hear about Donald Trump. Even people who say they despise Donald Trump. They do not want to hear about Donald Trump. They want to close the in, which I can't blame them because it's unpleasant. But it just gets us deeper into the whole. We're sleepwalking into it into situations get worse and worse and we're getting more accepting of it. It is, it's the narcissism, as you say, of the baby boomer and Gen X era is that the people just, they just like, I'm going to just focus on my own thing. I'm going to focus on my job. I'm going to focus on my social media. I'm going to focus on everything, ESPN. I'm going to focus on everything, but the politics, the every, like, it's just a lot of noise. And, and that's very, very dangerous to our democracy. And that is actually what scares me more than having cash betelons, Pete Hegseth in the power ministries as you, as you, as you described. They, the apathy, the complete lack of historical perspective that we are at a stage in our democracy of decline. That people don't want to face up to that and that people want to turn away from that and don't want to engage in the kind of collective action that's necessary to turn things around. That, to me, is the most dangerous thing about them, about the current moment. I agree with the danger, but it's a weekend. So I'm going to end on a positive. You want to pause? Here's what I think about this discourse. I think that some of it is silly social media talk and it's personal jealousies and beef and whatever. And I think there are two good things that have happened in our happening. Number one, to, to all of the resistance folks out there, to the women's march, to the no kings people. If you're guiding North Star, the last decade was the orange man is bad. And that's the most important thing that faces the country right now. You are correct. Can you be being proven correct? Yes. Every time everybody thinks that is proven correct. If you go back to 2016 and you find like the most caricatured, outlandish, kind of you almost want to roll your eyes at it, op ed or commentary piece about what was going to happen if Donald Trump becomes president. It's been 50 times worse. It's been worse. That has been totally vindicated. So I think everyone who's involved at all in any resistance, whatever number we're on, should feel vindicated about it. Absolutely. Eventually will win. I think simultaneously to that, I think it's totally rational for democratic voters in a primary to look at Donald Trump having won a second time and think we need to do new shit. And I don't think that's bad either. I think that's how I both those things can live together harmoniously. That there is a continued fight against Donald Trump that is that we need people like George and others for over the next two years. And also the democratic party needs to kind of assess how it got into a place that voters wanted him again and maybe try new strategies. New fact, both those things are true. And I don't think that they need to be live in conflict with one another. That's right. I mean, I don't want to go all JV last on everybody. But what I just said and what you just said, I think actually co-exist because we need more of that actually. We need more people that are, you know, that are again. And it may well be that things have to get worse before they get better. And that's, I've felt that for a very long time. But the problem is we're so far beyond the moment where I thought everything would turn around and people will say pasta. Well, and on pasta, pasta, George Conway. And we appreciate you. I think we'll be hearing more from you soon. We'll see how that goes. Everybody else, enjoy your August weekend. It's about back to school time. I descend my girl back to school. It was emotional. And so enjoy, you know, these final August weekends. We'll be back on Monday. Bill Crystal will be back. So I'll be warm on Monday. We'll see you all then. Thanks George. Bye everybody. The Bullwork Daily is brought to you thanks to the work of lead producer Katie Cooper, associate producer Anzali Skipper, and with video editing by Dante DeCicco and audio engineering and editing by Jason Brett.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The host critiques Melania Trump’s public appearances and English proficiency, suggesting her recent education-focused outreach is awkward and politically timed.
  2. The podcast explores deeply personal, possibly manipulative letters from Natalie Hart, revealing themes of narcissism, devotion, and subjugation in the Trump administration.
  3. A central theory is that Natalie Hart leaves handwritten notes around the White House, which are then discovered and shared by staff who dislike her, serving as a conduit for hidden communication.
  4. The host draws a historical parallel to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, arguing that Hart’s role mirrors a passive enabler of Trump’s delusions, maintaining a fantasy world detached from reality.
  5. The national debt is highlighted as a critical crisis, with rising interest rates and future fiscal instability threatening economic and social stability.
  6. The show criticizes the Trump administration’s authoritarian tactics, including political prosecutions, media manipulation, and the use of state power to suppress dissent.
  7. Michael Cohen is portrayed as a narcissistic, emotionally dependent figure seeking validation, contrasting with Trump’s malignant narcissism.
  8. The host urges political apathy and denial of Trump’s influence to be addressed through collective action, emphasizing that resistance remains vital despite fatigue.

Summary:

The podcast features a deep dive into the personal and political dynamics within the Trump administration, focusing on the controversial relationship between Melania Trump and her private correspondence with the president. The host, Tim Miller, analyzes a series of intimate, emotionally charged letters written by Natalie Hart, suggesting they reflect a pattern of worshipful devotion and psychological dependence, possibly serving as a tool to sustain Trump’s delusions of grandeur. Drawing parallels to past political scandals like the Monica Lewinsky case, the host argues that Hart functions as an enabler of Trump’s narcissism, reinforcing a fantasy world detached from reality.

S. national debt and the resulting fiscal instability, with warnings about rising interest rates and the erosion of trust in government. Additionally, the show critiques the administration’s authoritarian practices—such as politicized prosecutions and media manipulation—while highlighting the dangerous normalization of political dysfunction.

Michael Cohen is portrayed as a self-obsessed figure seeking validation, contrasting sharply with Trump’s malignant narcissism. The host concludes by emphasizing the need for sustained political resistance, noting that despite growing apathy, the fight against Trump’s influence remains essential. He also underscores the importance of collective action and historical awareness in preventing democratic decline, citing the vindication of early resistance movements against Trump’s rise.

The episode ends with a call for continued vigilance and engagement, acknowledging that while the situation has worsened, progress may still be possible.

FAQs

The letters are long, personal, and filled with religious and romantic overtones, suggesting a deeply emotional and possibly manipulative relationship. They appear to serve as a form of ego management for Trump, helping him maintain a fantasy world where he is worshipped as a deity, thus enabling him to cope with reality.

It's believed she leaves letters around the White House, which staff members may pick up and share with the media. This could indicate a deliberate strategy where she acts as a channel for sensitive or embarrassing content to reach the public, especially if Trump doesn't read them.

Michael Cohen is portrayed as a deeply narcissistic figure who seeks attention and affirmation. His actions, including hosting a show with Trump and expressing resentment over a pardon, suggest he is trying to gain favor and validation, not out of political principle but out of personal need.

George Conway argues that Trump is experiencing a form of psychosis, believing his own delusions—such as the U.S. economy being in a renaissance or Iran being two weeks from a nuclear weapon—as facts. This reflects a malignant narcissism common in sociopaths who believe their own fantasies are reality.

The national debt has risen dramatically, reaching over $40 trillion, which could lead to higher interest rates and increased costs for future generations. This creates a downward spiral where the government must pay more in interest, worsening the economic situation and threatening long-term fiscal stability.

Despite fatigue and apathy, resistance remains crucial because it has proven effective in challenging Trump’s policies. The fact that Trump’s actions have become far worse than predicted in 2016 shows that the resistance was valid and necessary for the country’s health.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.