Freemasons, Crowley & the Occult Founding of America

was America founded by occultists and is there real evidence that astrology telepathy and ritual magic actually work? The pseudo rationalists of course howl when I talk this way and they're wrong and they don't know they're wrong because Wikipedia won't tell them that they're wrong so it falls to me the occult guy to call them out on their own shortcoming. Today occult historian Mitch Horowitz uncovers the hidden beliefs that shaped America from the free masonry of the founding fathers to Abraham Lincoln's seances inside the White House and Isaac Newton's secret obsession with alchemy. We investigate the CIA's experiments with remote viewing alleged laboratory evidence for ESP and why Mitch believes modern skeptics refuse to confront certain unexplained findings. We also enter the secretive world of free masonry, Bohemian Grove before examining the life of Alistair Crowley, the magician that Mitch believes had a 90% chance of contacting something beyond ordinary reality. But if channeling and ritual magic can open a door to unseen forces is there any guarantee that what comes through that door is good? I personally am kind of against the occult and the use of witchcraft and magic and I actually chatted with Mitch about the harm that can come with using this and his answers are let me just say very interesting this is the hidden history evidence and potential danger of the occult. So sit back, relax and walk on the camp. Mitch Horowitz, how are you? Good to be here man. I'm very glad that you're here. This has been a long time coming to be honest with you. I am fascinated by the occult. I've been fascinated since I was very young. I grew up Catholic and my mother is extremely Catholic. And so most of my exposure to occult thinking and esoteric philosophy has come kind of couched in a Catholic reservation from my mom is like, Hey, this stuff is interesting, but don't get lost in it. You got to be careful. You got to know what's going on. You got to know who these practitioners are, the Alistair Crowley's, but don't don't jump in. And this has basically been my attempt to try to understand what's going on. And ultimately the things that are undergirding all of this is like, is it real? Are the people we talk about historically actually occult practitioners? Are these just conspiracy theories? And you wrote a book a few years ago, a cult America that really tackles the undergirding of American society and the founding of America as well as the current psyche of the American people and how it relates to the occult and occult thinking. So I guess my first question that I will ask you was America founded by occultists? I think I can give a reasonable yes to that question. And I opt to say yes rather than to hedge or to hesitate because the American colonies were a extraordinary springboard for everything in alternative spirituality. It's so ironic because concurrent with slavery, concurrent with the destruction of the Native American culture, the colonies very early on developed a reputation for protecting the individual search for meaning and different occult groups and outlying religious figures who were suffering persecution in the old world across the Atlantic. Those who survived which included the shakers which included mystical colonies throughout Pennsylvania and Philadelphia in particular, they were old world mystics, occultists, esotericists and they were coming to the colonies to escape harassment and persecution. This included some of the wealthier people who were among the American founders and outsized number of whom were Freemasons in order of ritual initiation into esotericism and ethics, a real vouch safe of occult Renaissance ideals. Freemasons among our founders included George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, Paul Revere and outsized number of the framers of the constitution, outsized number of the signers of the declaration of Washington's generals. They were in some cases fleeing an old world order that had sought to suppress some of the occult ideals that were springing up during the Renaissance. So I couldn't say exclusively America was founded by occultists, that's only in my dreams, but I could say a firm yes to it because that thread of thought and that religious heterodoxy was a foundational part of world. William Penn's like, hey, I'm going to make a colony where anyone can believe whatever they want. And that's going to bring over Amish and that's going to bring over Protestants and that's also going to bring over people that believe in more niche, maybe occult religious questions. Penn was a quaker who suffered persecution in England who actually spent some time in the Tower of London for heresy. His family knew persecution. They were also very wealthy. The crown Odets to the Penn family and they forgave those debts in exchange for a land grant. And part of Penn's dream was to found Philadelphia, the city of brotherly love, which in the mid to late 1700s was a cluster of about 5600 houses, but which developed a reputation that attracted some of the very people you're describing, including mystical, monastic figures from central Europe who were fleeing the 30 years war, who came to the colonies and established little groups and communes, an amazingly word trickled back. And this is what built religious freedom in America. The constitution was a culminating event, but that religious freedom it was flawed, but it was also real had already been some 200 years in the making. Right. Now before we jump into free masonry or, you know, specific occult philosophies, can you just define what it even means to be an occult thinker or to be an occultist? Sure. During the Renaissance, clerics and translators and scholars were rediscovering the religious philosophies of the ancient world, Egypt, Persia, North Africa, Greece, Rome. And these were the temple orders and the nature-based traditions, polytheistic traditions with a thousand different local deities, spellcasting, astrology, alchemy, cabala. They had no way of classifying this antique material or late antique material in some cases. And so they opted for the Latin word occultist or secret. And it was accurate in the sense that it was not so much secret as it was unknown, neglected, unseen, after hundreds of years of the dark ages. This material had all gone way underground. The temple orders had vanished. There was no thought leadership around this material. It was this anarchic collection of what was. But these were the traditions by which humanity abided for millennia. And they were all but wiped out, at least above ground. And so the term, the English term occult secret or hidden that came to canode all these ideas. And that term has endured into the 21st century. It's really a project of reconstructing the old polytheistic traditions. Hey, real quick, most people who watch this channel aren't subscribed. And when you subscribe, you help the channel grow and you stay in the loop with every new drop, religion camp, history camp, and camp gagnon. Now let's get back to it. And who are the figures that have brought this occult tradition of this polytheistic tradition into the fray through the Renaissance, even into the modern day? Well, there was a Renaissance occultist Cornelius Agrippa, who wrote a three volume book called the occult philosophy, which appeared in full in 1530. And a lot of what we drop on today, the signs, the sigils, the symbols, from the pentagram to different concentric circles of reality, the names of different angels and spiritual messengers that people try to evoke. That comes from Agrippa's work. And a lot of that is late ancient occultism that was preserved in Greek Egyptian writings. So it existed in Greek, sometimes it existed in Arabic, it got translated into Latin. The fact is just following the reign of Cleopatra, Greek speaking Egyptians in the city of Alexandria began to write down some of the old ways. And this became called the hermetic literature for the Greek god of writing Hermes or Hermes Trismagistus, as he was sometimes called. That was a name of tribute to Egypt's god of writing Thoth, who the Greeks considered three times as great as their own Hermes or later Mercury. Anyway, Greek speaking Egyptian scribes in the city of Alexandria began to write down threads and fragments of the esoteric material. And this is what reemerged during the Renaissance that gave us our conception of the occult today. It's not the oldest of the old, but as I think we've learned really ancient or. tradition and ancient symbolical tradition underscores a lot of our more modern expressions. So the hermetic literature is just a priceless time capsule and it's only fragments, but it's what we have and it's our understanding of what the ancient Egyptians were thinking about in terms of their esoteric philosophy. And it got preserved in Greek which is a language, an expository language that we westerners can understand. So it's very precious and it was through that so-called hermetic writing, rediscovered during the Renaissance that we came to know ourselves. And why harkening back to these traditions, right? There's so many different, you know, we can call them pagan or polytheistic traditions that we kind of have just left as a culture, right? Like you can think of like perhaps the Greek pantheon. And most people look at it as pure mythos or they're like, this is obviously not true. These gods battling and dueling, this is no offense Crestos. These things are completely fictional. And then there are religious traditions that people are much less eager to call fictional, whatever it may be. They're like Hinduism, Islam Judaism, these things kind of exist in the fray of religiosity that is legitimate and accepted. So why in the Renaissance are they pulling back these old Egyptian gods and these old traditions from these different philosophies around the world and pulling them back into practice? I would say because there are and remain workable traditions emanating from ancient occultism. Astrology for example, is the oldest religious retention on earth. It goes back to the third century, I'm epic apart, the third millennia BC in Mesopotamia. In terms of some rudimentary form of the Western version of astrology we have today. And of course, I'll get calls from journalists and I'll have conversations with sociologists who want to ponder what is astrology still popular today. And the answers that they're begging from me are always the same. Economic insecurity, you know, the lack of religiosity, court education, you know, they know what the answer is that they're seeking. And they never like the answer that I give them and that is because it's pretty damned accurate. That's why. Now we're talking about this. Now we're talking. There are a lot of things from antiquity, early antiquity that we do not retain. We don't bleed ourselves with leeches anymore. We don't stone to death depending on where you live, violators of certain crimes and so forth. And there are a lot of religious retentions that have died out. Astrology is a retention that not only has survived, but I'd warrant you couldn't meet anyone in the Western world who doesn't know his or her son sign and couldn't tell you something about it and so on and so forth. And the pseudo rationalists, of course, howl when I talk this way, but not only have they not studied astrology and I don't expect them to. Life is busy. But what they don't realize is that the experts they're counting on who supposedly have done that studying and come back with the explanation that it's all bullshit and there's no methodological replication, i.e. science behind this, those experts haven't studied it either. And they're wrong. And they don't know they're wrong because Wikipedia won't tell them that they're wrong. And the fact is astrology is a remarkable source of insight that is methodologically replicable. And groups of skeptics have done studies and suppressed their own data when it comes up as methodologically replicable. Is that true? Yeah, there was a group called Psycop, which was founded by the ignoble James Randy and some of his pseudo skeptical followers. The great Randy. Yeah. And this was in the 1970s, 1980s. They attempted to replicate some studies of astrology that were done by a French astronomer astrologer named Michelle Goklin. And Michelle Goklin made the case that the planet Mars shows it very commonly and prominently in the lives of championship athletes. So if you're an Olympian or whatever nation you're from, if you're ranked among the champions, Goklin's research showed that Mars fits very prominently into your chart. So this group of pseudo skeptics re-ran his research and it worked and they suppressed it. And it split the organization in two. This is just one example of how pseudo rationalists misunderstand rationalism as outcome versus method. And I work with method, they work with outcome. And so it falls to me the occult guy to call them out on their own shortcomings in terms of authentic rationalism, authentic skepticism. Did someone go out and buy a lottery ticket based on their astrological reading? Well, maybe I'd be very careful. We live under many different laws and forces. I don't believe there's any single super law that governs the individual's life. But is astrology a useful tool? Yeah. I stand by that. Its retention doesn't come from human gullibility. Its retention comes from utility. Really? And it seems like astrology shows up a lot in history, right? There's so many very famous world leaders, people you'd read about in history books that were also tapped in with having astrologers and getting their signs read and things like that. Are there specific examples of famous people historically that are big into astrology? Well, one of the most famous was Sir Isaac Newton, the father of rationalism and justly considered the father of rationalism. Isaac Newton actually performed one of the very first English translations of a valuable piece of hermetic literature, this ancient Greek Egyptian literature, called the Emerald Tablet. You can't make this up. His papers, which were just moldering somewhere in a dusty archive, were acquired by the economist John Maynard Keynes, just before World War II. And Keynes, in acquiring Newton's private papers, discovered a wild range of alchemical and occult interest. He said, "Oh my God, Isaac Newton was not the first of the rationalist. He was the last of the magi." And I would say Isaac Newton was both, and that's his greatness. So you have figures like Newton, without whom we wouldn't have conventional physics. And he nursed a great interest in all of this material, and this was well into what we called the Age of Enlightenment. And again and again, you'll find figures from deep into the Age of Enlightenment, who abided occult practices in a cult America I read about, Abraham Lincoln holding civil war era sances in the White House. To Lincoln, I think this was more of a novelty, but to his wife Mary Todd, it was a deep dedication. And they were so unembarassed by it that they allowed a reporter from the Boston telegraph to be present. And it seemed strange why would you be so disclosing, why wouldn't you be worried about damage to your reputation? It so happened that during the civil war, I crunched the numbers best as I can in a cult America probably about 10% of Americans participated in spiritualism in the union and in the Confederacy. And sure enough, the Boston telegraph report got reprinted in newspapers of the Confederacy. And to some people, it gives pause. And they think, well, maybe this guy's not so bad, you know, I agree with some of this stuff. It was a shrewd political move. I guess all I'm really trying to say is that you've got rationalist figures like Isaac Newton and then you've got more modern political figures like Ronald and Nancy Reagan, who in there are different ways to do it upon occult ideas. Yeah. Isaac Newton is such an interesting one because he is touted as how he invents calculus. He's a, you know, the father of, you know, rationalism in physics, he's a great thinker, which is true. But also deeply, deeply curious about theological and esoteric themes. I mean, I've heard it said that if you were to interview Isaac Newton and ask him what his job was, he might tell you he's a theologian or my, he might tell you that he's a spiritualist or an occultist. He might tell you perhaps he's an alchemist, but a physicist would probably not be the first thing or a mathematician would probably be tertiary in his own personal description. I think that's a very interesting observation. And his definition of science would probably encompass the extra physical, he had a lifelong interest in it. I find today that I have an easier time considerably so talking to people in the hard sciences and medicine about these subjects than I do people in the social sciences or humanities or even in cognitive psychology, cognitive psychology, researchers learn about how we fool ourselves. And that's valid. But it becomes a hammer nail problem where because we have myriad ways of fooling ourselves, they see it everywhere and they suspend observation, they suspend analysis. And the truth is in the hard sciences among physicists, chemists and MDs, they have a realization of how truly bizarre the world gets as you go deeper and deeper. I was just touring the Fermi lab, a particle accelerator lab in Batavia, Illinois. And I can assure you we had some far fucking out conversations and people who run a particle lab are capable. It's theoretical, it's conceptual, but they're capable of talking to you about interdimensionality, about different intersections of time. This lab experiments with a particle called the positron, which is one of the 17 building blocks of matter. The positron has been mathematically demonstrated to move backwards in time. The physicist Richard Feynman won the Nobel Prize in physics for this in 1966. Why? Yeah. We haven't seen the positron moving backwards in time. That would take a lot of fucking doing, actually. I'm not sure how you would photograph something moving backwards in time, but mathematically, find and demonstrate it in a 1949 paper that it moves backwards in time. If one understands that, one can understand that conceptually, it's not off the table to have a discussion about time travel. Now this is at the particle level, but the particle level has implications in our above ground world, which was fashioned and codified by none other than Isaac Newton. You start to see where idea movements link up, but when they turn into ideologies and rationalism for a lot of people is in ideology versus a method, it becomes hard to exchange. But when I'm in a room full of physicists, when I'm in a room full of M.D.s, there might be a few frowns out there, but there is also a really fertile discussion. That's so interesting. Now, when it comes to the efficacy of astrology, perhaps it is maintained its position within human behavior for so long because it's effective. And I actually think that the religious perspective that my mother would have would probably say the same thing. She's like, no, it is effective, but you have to be careful with it because of litany of reasons. What do you think if you had to be the perfect skeptic, a cult scientist person? What would you say is happening? That would make astrology potentially an effective, just like an effective sort of heuristic for determining like your life for your future. Dig. It's a complex question because there's the whole correlation versus causation debate and that prevails today in the hard sciences, particularly physics, and our ancient ancestors had that same debate over astrology. Does it mirror actions on earth? Does it cause actions? Is it akin to the planets affecting the flow of the tides, the open and closing of shellfish, a whole myriad range of bodily functions? And even there, one could pose the question, is that causative, is that correlative. It's an unknown, I speak in general terms of causation. I think there's probably some natural force, and we're comfortable talking in terms of natural forces of magnetism, gravity, even though in the case of gravity, we don't know fuck all what's going on. Mass seems to be attracted to itself, even in the supposed vacuum of space, mass is attracted to itself, Isaac Newton would have agreed, and the prevalence of unseen forces, including forces that come into play, for example, in clinical lab study of ESP, telepathy, retro causality, psychokinesis, which have been widely and accurately studied, juried, replicated, published on in mainstream journals, we as a modern Western society cannot sustain the crossover of forces from the extra physical or spiritual world, whatever term one wants to use into our world. So one can speak in terms of theology, myth, faith, and so forth. One cannot speak in terms of actual concrete forces entering into our daily above ground experience like astrology, and yet we have laboratory-based evidence for ESP that we could spend all afternoon discussing. It's replicable, it's impeccable, it's bulletproof, it's current, and yet we can't swallow it, we can't swallow it because the ultimate sin of Western society, not so much among the public, but within opinion-making institutions, mainstream journalism, mainstream academia, Wikipedia, the ultimate sin is speaking of extra physical forces having some actual concrete impact in our world, it doesn't matter how much evidence one amasses, it doesn't matter how elegant a theory one has, and theory is just concept, it can't be considered, and it gets us to the brink of absurdity because these things are as real in terms of evidence as the words I'm speaking, and yet no discussion can be sustained. Interesting. Most compelling piece of astrological evidence, like if you were trying to convince a pure skeptic like the guy that's watching this right now, if you wanted to be like, no, check out this study or check out this person's work, who would you point them to? Well, I would say probably what we were discussing earlier, the so-called Mars effect that Michelle Gauklein studied, if you have a friend who has an expression, something only has to be a little bit true in order to change everything, and that's why Gauklein's research was considered so dangerous, because if you could demonstrate that there's some unmistakable correlation between Mars and the performance of champion athletes across thousands of cases, and this was shown again and again and again, the odds of that being an accident or random start to reach infinitesimally small levels, and you start having to twist yourself into pretzel to understand that as a sheer mistake. So if you can demonstrate one wrinkle of near undeniable evidence-based reality around an occult philosophy, it's almost like the domino effect starts to come into play, and then of course there's all kinds of personal testimony, I've had extraordinary personal experiences with astrology. Now I abide by Western astrology. The Vedic astrological system is different from ours. Critics like to point out that Western astrology doesn't actually track the sideereal activity in the sky, and they are correct, and that is true, and the ancients understood that themselves. They're dating their astrological analyses back to Mesopotamia, and because the earth wobbles on its axis, the night sky that we see is different from the night sky that our ancient ancestors saw. But Roman astrologers started to reason in maybe around 100, 150 AD that these were kind of windows on the cosmos that still held true. Whereas Vedic astrology, astrology that's practiced within Hinduism, that is, ideally, accurate. They turn the wheel of the sky, so to speak, to track the stars. Oh, interesting. For some people, that's a really winning approach, and that's a correct approach. This was the subject of an ancient debate, and it remains so. So there are glitches and imperfections, depending upon your point of view. But for me, Western astrology stands up as an accurate typology. It's so interesting. Even just on a purely anecdotal level, my wife is a midwife, and this isn't pure astrology, but I think it has flavors to it. I'm curious for your perspective, but there are certain things where she's like, this is not taught to us. She has a midwife degree, but as well as a nurse practitioner degree. So she's gone through legitimate Western channels of medical education. And she says, like almost as a joke, but it is so true that like when the full moon is coming, there will be more babies born. There's four women in the window that could have a baby in the next two weeks, but because it's a full moon this week, there's probably going to be two, maybe three that are born in the next 48 hours. And so the peractual staff will assemble more midwives because they know that there's going to be an insurgency of labors. And to my knowledge, this happens across both in the midwifery circles, but as well as in more Western like hospitals and things like that because they know that babies are born in the full moon. And people have different theories. There's speculation. Maybe it's because the force of the moon causes water and amniotic fluid to change, and that can blah, blah, blah. But it's something that is verifiable at least anecdotally within this small sample set. Yeah. Likewise, the term lunatic is rooted in lunar because it was said in mental hospitals and so forth back in the Victorian era that the inmates acted up during periods of a full moon. Periods of a full moon within astrology are thought to coincide with intense emotions. Right. That's that's the outlook at least. And this is anecdotal, which is a tough dividing line for some people in the sciences. And understandably so, but the truth is, anecdotal over time becomes record. Testimony becomes record. A lot of our therapeutic treatments are anecdotal for people who are taking SSRIs, SNRIs. We're not sure how they work. The shrink says how you're doing with this, adjusts it. If you're in the hospital, you'll get the frowny, to smiley face girl to show how much pain you're in, anecdotal. testimony can count for a lot in terms of concrete experience. - Yeah, it just is one of those things where it's like, there's something going on and it doesn't have to be pseudoscientific. - Yeah. - It could just be a science that we don't fully understand or that we haven't put the resources in understanding because it's already been labeled as pseudoscientific. - Yeah, and I would also say that science is methodological replication. So there has to be some repeat pattern there and I honor that and I bow to that. Although something can occur without repeating like someone who has this extraordinary crisis experience where they're thinking about a loved one at the instant of death and it's incontrovertibly real. They've related it to other people. They've written it down. They have something timestamped. And this happens all the time in people's experiences. It occurs that doesn't necessarily mean it can repeat on demand. - Right. - Yeah, and I guess that creates an issue when it comes to the scientific method and creating a producible, reliable results. - Yeah, but that doesn't mean these things don't happen. - It's true. And it creates an issue as well for psychics and channelers. - I was just about to say this. And I've met people that claim that they have psychic operations but they don't control them. That these are things that come to them in their dreams. They have pre-cognitive dreams. They write them down. They're verified with their therapist and they say I've wrote an email to my therapist three weeks before something happened. I had a detailed account that thing happened. I can't replicate it. I can't go into a scientific study and prove that this happened. But something strange happened to me. - Yeah. The, well, one of the fathers of rationalism, Sigmund Freud himself, people think of Freud as being the materialist counterpart to young. But Freud's interest in clairvoyant dreams, for example, was acute. He wrote whole papers on it. One of them is called dreams and telepathy. - Really? - See, oh, some of the papers that Freud wrote on telepathy within the psychoanalytic encounter were held back from publication until after his death because his supporters were worried they were compromising. But if you find yourself a collected edition of the works of Sigmund Freud, you'll find probably at least five papers in there on dreams and telepathy or on psychoanalysis and telepathy. He believed that thought transference was very possible between the analyst and the patient. And he made a record himself of very well validated clairvoyant dreams that some of his patients reported, which gave fucking headaches to some of his supporters because they thought, oh God, the hair professor is gonna get us all in trouble. We're trying to make this thing into a medical science and we left young behind. But Freud actually was a member of both the British and the American Societies for Psychical Research. He was very actively engaged and interested in this material. The danger zone, as you were referencing, is that something can happen and it can't be repeated. And I have friends, I have colleagues, I have collaborators who identify as psychics or mediums or channelers and I have witnessed some of them perform extraordinary acts of insight, even in one case that I can think of, take on the very facial characteristics of the subject that I was talking to them about. And it was uncanny and I don't collect experiences like that. - Can you describe that detail? - Oh, sure. I was speaking with a very area-dyte channeler about someone I was having problems with at work. I spent about 27 years in corporate publishing and there was a particular author with whom I was having an intense problem and it was really weighing on the whole office and I spoke to him about it. And all I can tell you is he took on the facial characteristics of the person I was describing. I wouldn't say his face shapeshifted but I would say almost like a master actor would take on characteristics. - His eyebrow did the same thing. His lip kind of moved the same way. - Exactly. - He blinked into the same ferocity. - Exactly. If you were to ask a master actor, show me Abraham Lincoln, whatever that person might take on facial characteristics where you would say, my God, that's uncanny. It was like that. I wouldn't quite describe it as shapeshifting. I would say it just came right up to the margin of that. - Wow. - Right up to the margin of that. He didn't know the figure. I didn't describe the figure in terms of identification. I felt it was uncanny and the advice that he gave me saved my life. It really served me. It really helped me. Other times I had very different experiences with that same person. And this is general to the world of channeling, mediumship, psychical practice. There are cases of gifted individuals for whom it is real. Call it clairvoyance, telepathy, whatever you wish. There are cases where the experience occurs. There are other cases where the experience fails to disclose something real and veritable. These things can't be turned on and off like a water faucet. And I admire people who study ESP in lab-based settings. And one of my true heroes is J.B. Rine, who ran the Parapsychology Lab at Duke University starting in the early 1930s. It was the first academically-based Parapsychology Lab here in America, and he had such integrity and he worked so hard to validate this material when it was warranted. By the mid-60s, he stopped working with psychics because he felt that he felt that their abilities in some cases were real, but they were not replicable. They were uneven. And he was interested in producing stats that showed replication. And one could say that's a flaw in his model because there are things that go on out in the wild world that are much more impassioned and interesting and as easily documentable as things that go on in the lab. But I felt his misgivings were right because there's an inexactitude to this material. I think it was Heraclitus who said, "Nature likes to hide." The occult likes to hide. It's intrinsic to it. - Hey, dude, we're gonna take a break really quick 'cause I wanna talk to you about something. You know the entire premise of this show is basically me going way too deep on something. Like I'll read two books, watch a documentary, and then talk to someone for two hours. And then three weeks later, I'm like, "Who is the CIA talking about mushrooms?" And that's what I love about plot. The cool thing is I don't really think of it as a voice recorder. It's more like a searchable second brain for conversation. It looks just like this, it's tiny. I can use the plot Note Pro during a conversation or an interview or a research session or even when I'm doing a stand-up comedy show. And afterwards it gives me a transcript, summary, key points, and action items instead of me having to go back through two hours of audio recordings. And this is the part that I actually love. I can literally ask it something like, "Hey, what did Tim Hogan say about the treasure "of the night's Templar?" And instead of me scrubbing through an entire podcast trying to find it, ask plot pulls the information back out of the conversation for me. It's insane for what I do and for my life. And if something important happens while I'm recording, I can tap to highlight that moment so it knows, "Hey, pay attention to this." It also works across plot desktop. So all of this stuff can live in one place instead of being scattered across voice memos and notes and podcasts and a bunch of Chrome tabs. And because these are actual conversations, the privacy side is so important. Plod says that your data isn't used to train AI and they meet standards for GDPR and HIPAA. Obviously, if you're recording a conversation with someone else, you should get their consent. But if you're someone who has a lot of conversations or meetings or interviews or stand-up shows, check out plot. They've also got a 30-day return policy. So you can actually try it, see if it works. And if it doesn't fit for you, you can send it back. Check out the link in the description and use the code G-A-G-N-O-N. That's G-A-G-N-O-N for 10% off. That is G-A-G-N-O-N at checkout. In the description below, click the link and you're gonna get 10% off plot. And let's get back to the show. Hey, guys, we're gonna take a break really quick because I wanna talk to you about the thing in your back pocket that's probably a disaster. Yeah, this episode is brought to you by Extra and the new Wallet Pro. I switched to this and I am not going back. This is genuinely the wallet that I use every day. It is next gen Italian leather and it's got this metal ejector trigger. So you hit the button with your thumb and all your cards instantly fan out. One hand instant, no more digging around at the counter and yeah, you're not gonna be holding up the line next time you're trying to like cash out. And here's what gets me. It's the slimmest leather wallet that Extra has ever made but it actually holds more. Yeah, up to 14 cards plus your cash and it sits flat in your pocket, no plastic. Anywhere, it is all recycled aluminum and real leather and it comes with a lifetime warranty. So yeah, this is basically the last wallet that you will ever buy. And here's the kicker. It is Extra's 10th anniversary sale right now. So you're gonna get up to 40% off through August 17th. You go to partner.extra.com/campgagnon. It's linked in the description too and use the code gagnon20 to get an extra 20% off on top of that. Yes, it comes with Extra's 100 day money back guarantee. So there is literally zero risk. Upgrade that beat up wallet that you have that's falling apart. Get this wallet that is perfect Italian leather. It smells great. It has no plastic and it holds everything you need and more you will thank me later. Now let's get back to the show. So why did we shift so much, right? You talk about Freud and his interest in, you know, parapsychology or telepathy or ESP and I mean, Abraham Lincoln to, you know, all the founding fathers involved in free masonry which I still wanna talk about. Why do we go from these, you know, periods throughout the current millennia where people are really. religious and they're thinking about, you know, the world and this sort of broader religious framework. And as well as an occult framework happening simultaneously. And then this massive spiritual revival in the 18, 1900s in America, where people are impassioned by these new spiritual movements. And then we get into an era of pure rationality, materialism and scienceism, perhaps, maybe as a pejorative. But that sort of thinking, why does that shift? - It's ironic because some of the founders of modern rationalism, Freud, Einstein, Darwin, Harvard deeply felt extra physical or spiritual beliefs. It seems to me that there were modernist figures, Marx in particular, who felt that any analysis of the human crisis, of human frictions, of human strivings that brought in the extra physical was delusional. And he flipped metaphysics on their heads, so to speak, and reversed course from the perspective of his philosophical idol, GWF Hegel, and determined that there aren't invisible causes, there are only economic ones. And that economics itself is a science that has inevitable outcomes. And this was seen by many modernist figures as the pinnacle of rationalism, at least as far as politics, science, social governance were concerned. - I see, the material creates the ideological ones. - Yes. And so we start embracing terms like political science, anthropology, sociology, economics as a science, which in some cases it is. But the quality of almost messianic inevitability that was harbored within the Abrahamic religions traveled into science, it migrated into science. So Marxism, for example, which was very influential and in some ways remained so. It's a secular religion. It has its own notion that a change agent, the working class, will produce an inevitable outcome, and this inevitable outcome is a kind of revolution or a rapture, kind of a millennial apocalyptic event, after which everything will be fine or much better, at least. And that sense of Abrahamic messianism were always waiting for the second coming, were always waiting for the Messiah that found its emotional home cleansed of spiritual framing within Marxism. And this wasn't the only game in town. This certainly wasn't the only thought current going on. Darwin was codifying a rational biological order of development, not excluding religion. Einstein was codifying laws of time space, not excluding religion, Freud was codifying neuroses as the source of adult trauma, not excluding the extra physical. But the exclusion sort of functioned as a shorthand methodological device. And it led to the casting out of everything that was classified as religious or extra physical, to the point where that casting out became a characteristic of rationalism, which is a mistake. Again, rationalism is a method, it's not outcome. So it became very tough for scientists, including in the 21st century, to study questions of psychical ability. It was bound up with the old mode of viewing things. Although the new mode of viewing things, it took religious emotions and it just translated them into political analysis. - I see. - With the same basic pattern of millennial arrival, messianic arrival, conflagration, clash of economics, rather than a clash of some religious idea of good versus evil. And then the aftermath, supposedly, is a kind of, well, I don't know, a Nirvana or a heaven, or some sort of a posited divine age. - Interesting. You would say that the modern rationalist thinking still is incorporating elements of religiosity and faith to an extent. - In the West, we can't get away from it. We are really good within the Abrahamic traditions at messianism, the Hebrews believed it, the early Christians believed it, different new religious movements, sometimes movements that are actually widely recognized, like Seventh Day Adventism, or even the millennialism of, say, the late ancient era when the calendar turned to 1000 AD. There were belief systems continually being born and continually populating the Abrahamic experience pointing toward messianism. It's probably the most popular topic or among them online today. Any video that posits a sign of the apocalypse must have in excess of a million hits if it's any good. And it's a source of continual fascination. We Westerners think in messianic terms and that travels into some of our politics. The end of the world is predicted with the same frequency as any sports betting ring, predicting who's coming out on top. And I don't say that cynically. I don't say that glibly, it's baked into our thinking. - Right. Yeah, it's something that I've sort of cobbled with 'cause I believe just on a personal basis, by faith alone, virtually, that there is a creator God. That is some type of united force. Perhaps it is monotheistic is what I presume it to be. And perhaps it is a non-dualist. Perhaps it is more similar to like a Christian God or perhaps a Muslim God or a Jewish God where it's just sort of their outside of our time and space and it created existence. And my atheist friends would say, no, there was a big bang that created existence, but there's still some type of predicate on faith in their worldview as well. But sometimes I find that the purely rational believers don't acknowledge that there is a faith built into their philosophy. - Yeah. - As much as mine. - There's not only a faith built into it, but I would say they are too anxious to disassociate their rational views from something that we might call metaphysical or spiritual or extra physical. Look, all the big tech companies right now are rushing to come out with the greatest ever quantum computer, something that's faster than the fastest computer ever conceived. And they're all in a kind of race. And we as a public haven't been exposed to quantum computing yet, really. It's just a term that's out there for us. In December of 2024, engineers at Google released a statement that their quantum computing model named Willow had been submitted a math problem so complex that they estimated there literally wasn't enough time in the universe to solve this problem. So what is time? It's really a measurement of time. We don't really know what time is like gravity. And they said it would take 10,000,000 years to solve this problem by their estimate, which is older than the known age of the universe or it's predicted demise. And Willow, according to these engineers, came back with an answer in less than five minutes. So they posited, and this is the language of the Google engineers, not my language. People can look it up. They posited that this might be evidence of interdimensionality or a multiverse. Because there wasn't enough time in their computation to solve this problem. And yet, the answer came in less than five minutes. So they pondered whether Willow effectively plucked it from another dimension of time. Maybe the problem exists in solution form somewhere in some other intersection of time, some other dimension, and that's where Willow plucked it from. And the reason I love dealing with people in the hard sciences is because they're indifferent to questions of metaphysics. They just want to create the world's fastest supercomputer. But they're reporting an observation. Now, one could say, look, there's some hype behind it. It's intended to grab headlines. All true, all true. But the statement was made. The statement was reported. And that's what the engineers said happened. So someone who sees him or herself as a rationalist, which I applaud, doesn't have to divorce that from metaphysical or extra physical inquiry. If Google engineers are speculating, in their own words, that the answer may have been plucked from some interdimensional place where it currently exists in infinity, which melds with the multiverse theory or the many worlds theory of quantum physics that we live in an infinitude of events, all simultaneously playing out at once. And that linear time is just a necessary illusion for us. That in fact, everything exists in this spherical spiral, let's say spiral. And all events are concurrent and infinite. This is getting into high speculation. But that's where they went. Right. And simultaneously, they have a religious person a spiritual person doesn't have to divorce themselves from the material sciences, right? Like as someone that believes that God created the world, they could have been done through a big bang. Like I don't see why these things would be at odds with each other. Right. And I guess I would encourage my friends that are perhaps a bit more rational, that hey, you can leave room for the unexplained or you can leave room for things that we don't fully have a word for and maybe science will, you know, put numbers and data to it later. Yeah. But for the time being, there's something going on. There's something going on. If we mathematically calculate that a particle can move backwards in time, one could say, well, look, that's a mathematical formula. And that's a good effort at explaining reality, but it's really relative of how things are supposed to work. Right. We're supposed to live in a straight arrow of time. An egg once broken can't be unbroken. And it makes me uncomfortable to think that you can unbreak an egg. Right. Because what does that mean for the reality that I exist in and for the observable world that I'm habitating every day? Exactly. For the, I think the average person, the ego gets in the way where they say, it's hard for me to give credence to things that I can't see, feel or touch. Not only is that true, but the worst disruptor of real inquiry is a feeling of contest. Like, people will be writing in the comments, fuck Horowitz, and this astrology and this book. And that's not what the Google engineers said. And they believe that because there's a feeling of contest that when you grow up with a certain point of view and someone comes along and says, consider this wrinkle, we don't like hearing that. I guess in Buddhism, it's called identification. We identify with these points of view. And I'm no better. I'm no better. And it gets the adrenaline flowing when someone comes along and suggests, you know, there are actually are replicated experiments around telepathy and their bullet proof. And here, let me show them to you. The CIA has invoked remote viewers to do different types of remote viewing intelligence. Of course it has. But the Ingo Swans, the even Yuri Geller to an extent. Absolutely. You know, Yuri's standing up well to time. I mean, I'll tell you something 10 years ago, people are ready to write Yuri off. I'll tell you a funny story. And I encourage people to check me on this, go watch it for themselves. There is a kind of, oh, I don't know, I guess you call it cultural legend, that in the early 1970s, Yuri went on the tonight show with Johnny Carson and he flopped and it was this horrible embarrassment. He was supposed to bend a spoon and he failed. And this is supposed to be Yuri Geller's Waterloo. It's not fucking true. It's actually not fucking true. If you go look at the Johnny Carson episode on YouTube and I've done a little video on this where I show the episode, Yuri did bend the spoon. And Johnny, who was a skeptic, Johnny was also a stage magician and he did not like talk about cyclical powers, he's, Yuri is holding up the spoon, the camera zooms in on it and Johnny says, you know, you know, I actually do, I see a little bend in it. And this is not like Johnny because he really wanted to skewer Yuri. He's not sympathetic, was not sympathetic in that direction. So there's this mythology that everyone knows that Yuri failed, everyone knows that. It's actually not so. Could you pull that video? Yeah. And maybe even Mr. Horowitz's explanation might be helpful too. Would that, would that video that you have be, I, yeah, I have a video on YouTube. I can't remember the title of it, but it's maybe all of five minutes where I introduce the clip. I show the clip and I show Johnny conceding that the spoon has bend in it. So then how was it caught in pop culture that he's a failure? It must be something like the, what people refer to as the mandala effect, where certain of something, we're certain that's in snow white, the wicked queen says mirror, mirror on the wall, but she says magic mirror. Right. Luke, I'm your father. Exactly. The parents, Dan bears. The greatest danger to observation is everyone knows. Everyone knows this to be so. And we've just all decided collectively that Yuri fell at his face on Johnny Carson. How fucking embarrassing. It's not really true. And anyway, Yuri has, I wouldn't say he's one over skeptics, but he has, he has stood up to skeptical scrutiny in ways that people will almost never learn on Wikipedia and wiki has become a really problematic resource for paranormal material. It's great for the Napoleonic wars. But for the paranormal, a small group of activists, I would say pseudo skeptics ride heard over wiki. And it's a very problematic place to learn about any of this material. You have to go deeper. Because you click on someone's page, like an Edgar Casey and they say, oh, you know, a pseudo scientist, disproven, pseudo science, yeah, been shown to be problematic. Okay. So this is the clip from the tenet. Yeah. And there's Ricardo Montobon. And you can see him here, he's hand over the screen. He's doing his thing. Johnny collaborated on this episode with the pseudo skeptic James Randy and the whole idea was we are going to cook this motherfucker. And that is what people remember, but that's not what actually occurred. And do you have audio on your, so I would love to know that that moment. Or Johnny calls it out. And if it's, if you can find the video on YouTube that I did, it cuts straight to these moments, the audio right there. So it's getting more, you can see it is very, not where. And it's very interesting. But if you know, it was straight, I did, I hope the camera can focus on this. Now, you keep bending, bends more, it usually bends more after it has, and this is what, this is one of the thickest point of the scene. Well, you can definitely see it feeling. And you feel it? Yes, I did. Okay. Now, of course, this is a, this is not a big bend, Johnny. Before the show, one of your video men wrote me a key and I did it for him, completely bent to, I'd say, he showed the quarantine degrees, but they're offering here a key point. Do we have no, do we cut away again, and still come back here? Yeah. Interesting. So you do see Johnny says, yes, it, it, it, it looks like there's a slight bend in it. Right. And that is not a concession that Johnny Carson, also a professional stage magician, wanted to make that night. Right. Was it the parting of the red scene, not exactly, but, not the failure that people were touted in. It wasn't the disaster that legend says. And so I'm curious, like, with this type of an effect, is it possible, it's a stage trick? Oh, it's definitely possible, but I would say that there are a number of very public cyclical figures of whom Geller is one that were never disproven in some kind of definitive way as, oh my God, you know, we found the bottom of the hole in the hat where you pulled the rabbit out of. He's a complex figure and I wouldn't say that his, his career is, is justly a free of controversy, but Yuri has worked for many years with skeptics, a prominent one of whom has recently said I've never been able to disprove him. And this was written about in that journal of a cult passions, The New York Times. The Times recently, when I say recently, about three years ago, had a massive article about Yuri, winning over one of his skeptical critics. And The New York Times, like Johnny Carson, is unsympathetic to this material. It just deserves attention. That's all. Right. Hey guys, we're going to take a break really quick because if you know me, you know, I'm constantly trying to find the perfect level of stimulation. Yeah, I want enough energy at the beginning of the day to go to the gym, be a good dad, and then record a three hour podcast about like ancient civilizations or the night's templar or something like that. So, you know, I like a little caffeine, but if I do too much caffeine, I can start to hear my own heartbeat coming through my chest. And that is where mud water comes in. Mud water is a coffee alternative made with functional mushrooms and adaptogens with about like one seventh, the caffeine of a regular cup of coffee. So you're going to get that morning ritual, you're going to get the focused energy without feeling like you're cracked out or without the crash that you get from caffeine. I've been trying the OG blend, which is like cacao, you got a little bit of chai, you know, you get some some racie. And then of course, you get functional mushrooms. It's warm. It's a little spicy. It's got like a little chocolatey vibe. It's like chocolate chai had like a health conscious child, you know, their starter kid is the best way to try because you're going to get a full size 10 of whichever blend you choose, a free rechargeable froth or free gifts and free shipping. They have four amazing flavors, OG, coffee, matcha and turmeric. So whether you're just trying to quit coffee completely or just trying to cut down on your caffeine use, there is an option for you. If you want to make the switch to clean your energy, go to mudwater.com/camp and grab the starter kit. Use the code camp when you check out to get up to 43% off. The for author alone is absolutely worth it. That's right, up to 43% off with the code camp at mudwtr.com. Go to mudwater.com/camp. And after you check out, make sure you tell them that the good folks here at camp sentia, it really helps out the show. Hey guys, we're going to take a break really quick because it's summertime. And I got to tell you something. There's a specific point every summer where you realize that your entire personal style has just been like the same jacket or the same pair of shoes. And that's what I've been rocking with GLD. You see it on my neck? I wear it in every single episode. I wear it all the time. I mean, look at this. The first day I noticed when I picked it up is like the weight. It's genuinely substantial. It feels great. It has like an actual like an actual texture to it. It's awesome. And the details look even better in person. I didn't expect it. The website looks good, but when it's in my hand and around my neck, it actually is way better. I got this crucifix here. Of course, some Catholic. I got to represent Jesus Christ. And I wear it while I'm recording while I'm going out traveling, even when I'm sleeping, even when I'm showering. And it's great. I don't have to completely reinvent my wardrobe. Just one little chain elevates all my looks. GLD has chains and pendants and bracelets and watches at pretty much every price point. You can get the 18 carat gold plated piece like this along with options in solid gold and even natural diamonds. GLD also has more than two million customers in over 50,000 five star reviews. And every piece is guaranteed for life. So whether you want something subtle or you want a piece that completely changes your outfit, GLD makes it easy to upgrade your style without having to overthink it. And of course, without having to break the bank. And great news for a limited time, if you are listening to this right now, if you are a camper, you are going to get an insane deal. When you use the code camp, C-A-M-P, you're going to get 40% off at GLD.com, 40% off with the code [email protected]. And after you purchase, they're going to ask how you heard about them, make sure you tell them that Mark increased us from the campsite, sent you. Now to the free Mason point that we have been sort of teasing, what is going on with the free Mason's? I've like I think at this point, most people know that the founding fathers in probably a disproportionate regard were members of this secret society and a cult society, perhaps. I have existed in two minds with this. On the one hand, I see it as a fraternity. I see it as a group of really powerful guys who were able to operate in and behind closed doors, free from government scrutiny, free from religious scrutiny, and able to share ideas and information and intelligence with each other. And it just so happened that the most powerful and influential men of the early colonies were all a part of this fraternity. Because if you were a young guy and you had some money and you had some class and some nobility and you also had some education, then you would want to be in the club, right? I was an fraternity in college. So it was the same reason for me. I was like, I want to hang with these guys, so let me join this fraternity. Now there are there is a school of thought as well amongst my friends who are Mason's as well as my friends who are Catholic that are vehemently anti Mason, where they will say they are the holders of a secret ritual occult knowledge and that they've continued to pass down this knowledge. And it's because of that knowledge that they were able to create this nation as we know it. What say you about the early Masons? And how would you think about them? I am not a Freemason, but I am a friend of Freemasonry. I regard Freemasonry as an institution that has historically protected the individual search for meaning. And deep into the Enlightenment, there were still witch burnings, the last of which was 1791 in Switzerland. There were all kinds of religious persecutions, the Vatican could still pronounce death sentence on an accused heretic. And there were a coterie of people who I would say starting in the final decades of the Renaissance assembled into Freemasonry as a means of exploration and esoteric fraternity, clandestine, private, and separate from monarchical forces that were still deeply hostile to and reactive against the religious experiments of the Renaissance. Now technically and this has been reaffirmed by the Vatican as recently as 1983. Catholics are not supposed to be Freemasons, although there are many Catholic Freemasons. I've had, I have been laws who are Catholic who are Freemasons. And for some people, Masonsry is a civic and charitable association. For a smaller number of people in the 21st century, Masonsry remains an esoteric path. I consider Masonsry an initiatory order that has in influence done a great deal to codify the protection of freedom of assembly, freedom of search, freedom of religion, freedom of speech within the confines of its organization. Masonsry lost influence in this country starting in the 1820s. There were rumors of Masana conspiracies and the courts and law enforcement. There were anti-Freemasonry political parties that sprang up President Andrew Jackson was elected to kind of clean house and get rid of corruption. In an irony that could only occur in America, he was a Freemason himself, but that's sort of the way we do things in this nation. And Masonsry has not had the same degree of influence in public life since that time. The last American president who was a bona fide Freemason was the mysterious Gerald Ford. Bill Clinton had belonged to a Freemasonic youth organization, but never joined. And the Bushes were Skull and Bones. The Bushes were Skull and Bones and they have their own occult history in this country that is weirder than anything we've yet talked about. But the truth is, Masonsry as an institution today has declined precipitously in influence, but I think that historically, Masonsry did function to vouch save some of the ideals of occult experimentation in the Renaissance. And I think that Masonsry probably in its current cryptic form, if I can put it that way, grew out of the fraternities of the cathedral builders starting in France in the 1100s. There wasn't an abundance of paper for blueprints and architectural drafts symbolism at that time. So there was an art of memory. There was a use of mnemonic devices and anybody who joins Masonsry today will realize there's a great deal of recitation, memorization, liturgy, ritual, pageantry as well. The use of these mnemonic devices in the veneration of symbolism probably, and we don't really know, but probably got its modern start among the early cathedral builders. There are some who will cite ties to Solomon's Temple and so forth. These are all mythical explanations that we can't verify. And in fact, Masonsry may be the one organization in modern life that doesn't even have a consensus agreement as to its own roots. There is an authentic historical mystery there, but I view Masonsry as probably representing one of the first orders in modern life to espouse radical ecumenism as long as you profess to believe in a creator. Ideally, you can come from any walk of religious life. Ideally, there's supposed to be civic equality within the lodges. There is a protection of meeting at a time when that couldn't be taken for granted in the old world. There are still many nations on earth today, including in the Middle East, where it's illegal to be a free mason, which I think is a ridiculous carryover from earlier eras and centuries. I think Masonsry in our country, it's reduced. We're no longer a nation of joiners, but it has survived and among some of the younger Masons, there is renewed interest in esotericism. Do you encourage? Is there an efficacy to their rituals? Well, I would say their rituals are probably more oriented towards ethical development than anything else. Anybody who thinks there's any conjuring going on or people drinking blood out of skulls with dark robes on is going to be severely, severely disappointed. Of course, the rejoinder on the internet is, well, there's a secret inner circle. That's sort of like saying the moon is made of cheese. I can neither prove nor disprove that, but people can choose which sources to trust. There's no secret inner circle. What there is is a diffusion of people spread out across a very wide stretch of geography, some of whom are more dedicated to civics and charities, some of whom are more dedicated to esotericism, but chiefly Masons themselves see their orders using symbolism as a key or code to ethical development. That's the way I've heard Masons describe it, and as well as like many other secret societies. But I've also heard them talk about, you know, there is a transfer of knowledge that is kept amongst these groups of people that are initiated into the knowledge, and then with that knowledge, they are able to access some type of power or some type of understanding of reality that the average person doesn't have. And these are the things that I wonder about, like with scone bones, for example. Is it just initiated order of really wealthy kids that go to Yale that are all able to help each other and put each other into positions of politics later? Or is there an actual transfer of knowledge that happens there or some type of ritual communication with a different power outside of our reality that then maybe aids and abets their happenings on earth? - I would say, I would say it's the former. I would say it's a collection of the sons of influence who are using arcane symbolism because masonry at one time in this country was enormously popular. And different guilds and groups were created in the mold of free masonry, the odd fellows, the Knights of Columbus, which is a Catholic alternative to masonry, the Knights of Pithius, which was heavily Jewish when I was a kid, my father belonged to it. He never went to the meetings. We would get the newsletter at home and I would ask dad, why do you belong to Knights of Pithius if you don't attend the meetings? And he said, so I have some place to be buried 'cause they had burial rights and fraternal organizations, mutual aid societies were once legion in this country and a lot of them were using free masonry as their template. Hence, you find groups like Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones, a few others bopping around out there. They sort of adopt that tone and tenor and symbol. Most of the time, what's getting transferred is not esoteric wisdom or knowledge or know how. It's influence, it's just that simple. And the fact is, some of these groups are long in the tooth, Knights of Pithius used to have a million members, today they have 50,000 members. You know, people are kind of hyped up on some of these fraternal orders. Bohemian Grove's membership lists are secret and we only know little threads of who was a member, who was rumored to be a member. - Who intended it. - Yeah, but my God, I don't think Elon is spending weekends at Bohemian Grove. I don't think Zuckerberg is spending weekends there. I don't think Sam Altman is spending weekends there. I don't think the guy who denies my healthcare claim at United Health Care is spending weekends there. You know, these organizations have also gotten long in the tooth. - But, infamously, there have been major meetings of people at Bohemian Grove, for example. Like the precursor to the Manhattan Project. - It's true. - The scientists that were basically the heads of creating that, I think, out of the OSS at the time. - Yeah. - They had met at Bohemian Grove to discuss this extremely covert project and kind of put the piece together to then create the nuclear bomb. - The Grove sponsored some early meetings of scientists involved in the Manhattan Project. And then that obviously branched out into the thing itself. I don't know that that was the only place that such meetings were held, but there were scientists of considerable influence who were part of it. A guy like Oppenheimer, Marxist Jew, was unlikely to have been part of the Grove. They wouldn't have wanted journalists or people with compromised pasts or anybody who didn't fit into the old boy's mode hanging around the Grove. But there was one prominent scientist connected to the early proto stages of the Manhattan Project who was a member, that's a fact. They also had associate members like William Randolph Hearst, the newspaper publisher, was an associate member. So they might come out every now and then, but they weren't welcome as full members because they didn't want journalists sniffing around and they didn't want people who were outside of a mode with which they were very comfortable. There were sexual dalliances and escapades at Bohemian Grove that really wouldn't surprise anybody who's ever attended a frat party. The men were older, the suits were made of tweed, but these were fraternities of mutual interest and influence for the wealthy, much more than they were conveyors of occult knowledge. - Right, I'm always curious to why there's so much ritualism of this extremely rational group of people meeting at a place and it could be Freemasonry or Bohemian Grove or any of these secret societies. There is a ritualism that goes into it and I can't tell if it's just fun for these people to kind of cause play and do this cremation of care and have this giant owl and this person that gets buried and it's an effigy, but it's supposed to represent like there's so much that goes into it. And I wonder if it's just like Burning Man today where you have hyper rationalist going to Burning Man and they watch this giant guy burn which has all sorts of symbolic meaning, but to the individual, they're just like, yeah, it's a bonfire. - You know, in a lot of ways occultism itself is a revival of ancient forms, including ancient pageantry and the ceremony, the right, the ritual, the congregational experience, it's bonding, it's powerful. Look at people at a political rally or look at people at a concert. You know, sometimes you go to an arena concert and they'll be a point at which thousands of people are thrusting their fists into the air and it is ritualistic and it is powerful and it fills you with energy and suddenly you have this light bodily sensation and hunger is gone and anxiety is gone and you're walking out feeling like I can conquer the world today and then the aperture closes and it fades. The congregational experience is very powerful. - Yeah, now that makes sense, that absolutely makes sense. I think that there's, and that perhaps that's just a feature of humanity, right? Like that when we get into large numbers and we all believe in the same idea, there's something that happens on a material level amongst the group. - There we are social beings and I would say for example, back in the day and this still goes on in some parts of the country, you had tent revival meetings where ministers would profess to perform some sort of faith healing. Well, sometimes something would happen and we might call it the placebo effect which we don't fully understand but that might be what the spiritual appeal looks like in the body, there are certain diseases that are permeable, that have a therapeutic response to hopeful expectancy and this is true even extending to placebo surgeries. There have been studies at, there was a study at the Houston Veterans Medical Center in 1980 of the efficacy of placebo surgery in place of spectroscopic knee surgery which requires a lot of recovery time. The placebo resurgery had the same therapeutic outcome as did the actual surgery. It's hard to study these things because you're benevolently deceiving people and it's ethically fraught. In the case of placebo surgeries on veterans' knees a benign incision was made and the placebo group demonstrated the same therapeutic response and outcome long-term as the group that I suppose the control group that got the actual surgery. So extraordinary things can happen in the body apropos of hopeful expectancy. So in the revival meeting, for example, I wouldn't discount that there are recoveries or we'd have to discount the placebo experience as a whole. We as human beings really respond to right, ritual, liturgy, congregational experience. So I could understand these fraternities persisting in that. Now when it comes to the historical implementation of spiritualism and occultism, there's all sorts of little like threads that I'm fascinated by, like Alistair Crowley being involved with British intelligence. - Yeah. - There's people that will look at Crowley in his record and say like, "Oh, he was just a drunk, sex addict." He then that was just trying to find a justification and develop a religion around the worldview that he wanted to live. There's other people that would say, "No, he was an actual practitioner of some type of extra physical abilities that was able to do things and know things that the average person cannot know." So in his case, how would you classify him and specifically his work with British intelligence? - I'm cracking up because my wife, Shaqling Castellan, I just kayaked to an island in the middle of the Hudson River, where Crowley hunkered down for 40 days and 40 nights and translated the Dow Day Chang. And that's Crowley, that's Crowley. This was in, I think it was 1916, and there was no map to go by. And here was Crowley translating this ancient Chinese ethical work, living for 40 days and 40 nights on an island in the middle of the Hudson. That would be remarkable by today's standards. You couldn't find an isolated island in the middle of the Hudson today, but think how remarkable that was over a century ago. That was Crowley. I don't think he was as involved with British intelligence as he would have liked. I think he was a very self-important figure. He would have liked them to avail themselves more of his expertise, but at the time he appealed to them, they also had Rudolph Hess under lock and key. So they felt like we can probably hear it straight from his mouth as to which, if any, occult orders are involved with Nazism and Crowley was seeing more as a showboat. But it's important to understand that Crowley, who I think was ethically very flawed and I would not have wanted to be a student of and I would not have wanted to associate with. A lot of people around Crowley got hurt. There was a cruelty to the man. He was also a genius. artistically he was extraordinary. We wouldn't I recognize a lot of our culture today if it weren't for Alistair Crowley. The entire aesthetic of occultism and goth and metal to some greater or lesser degree was popularized by Crowley. It wasn't for nothing that the Beatles put them on the cover of Sargent Peppers. And that was at a time when most people didn't know the name Alistair Crowley. He had died. Black Sabbath even. Exactly. We had Ed Ozzy, Ozzy calls him Crowley, the son of Mr. Crowley. So the whole world says Crowley today, but it's Crowley. It rhymes better. I guess. As he used to point out Crowley rhymes with holy. So we all say Crowley, but that's due to Ozzy. Crowley was a brilliant performance artist and he was a brilliant intellect and he lived ten lifetimes within the space of his one lifetime. He's very hard to pin down. He'll never be fully grasped or understood because his influence has traveled in so many different directions. But our world would look a lot different today without his influence and that's something that can be said about just a handful of 20th century artists. Now when he's communicating with these entities, as he claims, if you had to put a percentage of his likelihood on the idea that he was actually communicating with something outside of our reality, what percentage would you put that at? 90%. Really? That's how I feel. Having studied the record and having studied adjunct philosophies and ideas, including a cyclical research, Crowley produced a book in Egypt in the early 20th century called The Book of the Law. It's probably the most famous thing he ever wrote. And that's from whence we derive the line's love is the law, love under will. And do what that will should be the whole of the law, love is the law, love under will. Crowley recorded that book over three consecutive, what we would call channeling sessions, of about one hour each in Cairo in the early 20th century. Looking for myself, it's a work of poetry as resplendent as T.S. Eliot's The Wasteland. There are friends and colleagues of mine who think that's an untenable and ridiculous statement, aesthetically, philosophically, spiritually, that's my point of view. The book of the law is a work of genius. And I think that Crowley was in touch with either some extra physical force or some kind of intuitive faculty that goes beyond ordinary cognition and motor skill. I think he was a spiritual genius. He was a profoundly flawed figure, but he's among a small handful of spiritual geniuses that the Western world produced in modernity. Now under the assumption that Crowley's magic was effective in some type of tangible way, and he was not just hallucinating, that this was an actual channeling. Is there any hazard that goes along with channeling these types of entities, and is it always good? There is hazard. I could never say that there's not hazard. Everything brings with it consequences. I would note the following, people who report episodes of demonic possession. I don't really like using the word demon in a majority of sense, because in its original Greek, it was a neutral term, like we might use a term like genie, for example. It's kind of a worker-be-spirit, but we'd become conditioned to view it negatively. In episodes of reported demonic possession or satanic possession, those are usually among people who are not searching for mysteries at all, like me. Those are usually not among people who are, oh, playing with fire in terms of the spiritual sense. It's usually people who are entirely indifferent to a cult spirituality, who report being stricken in this way. That said, I could never sit here and say that there's no risk. In terms of my own search, I made a decision a long time ago that I was willing to dive into the deep end of the pool and abide and respect the wish, rather the risk of the search. I made a decision to dive into the deep end of the pool with regard to the search, because we have limited time in these physical forms that we occupy. I assume there's an invisible world, but I don't know as a matter of a simple statement of fact, the way I know that physical demise is inevitable, physical decline is inevitable. My feeling is, if you're going to inquire, if you're going to experiment, then do so fully and do so completely, but it's up to the individual to shoulder the risks, and I've made peace with that personally. Has there been an example you could reference of someone that has died or sustained some type of grave injury from dabbling with this type of magic? What that I've ever encountered, there are people who make such claims, we, human beings, we love our own creation stories, we love before and after stories. I was this, then I became this, I was a Marxist, then I became a libertarian. Watch for those stories because people very often exaggerate a sense of personal drama. I wasn't a cultist and now I'm born again Christian or something like that. I have never encountered anyone I consider trustworthy who's told a polarized creation story. I've never encountered anyone on the path who has gotten themselves in trouble from a spiritual perspective. I've encountered a lot of addictions, I've encountered a lot of selfishness, I've encountered a lot of stupidity of the kind that you would recognize from any ordinary workplace. But in terms of those involved in the search, I have not encountered people who have suffered harm in a spiritual sense. What about things like blood sacrifice? Is that completely overstated or is that something that is legitimate and has happened within a cult or perhaps I even know what the term would be, but some type of ritualistic circle? I would say it's wildly overstated. I can't discount that it occurs because you have errant individuals doing what they wish from time to time, sometimes under the age of an occult banner or the banner of some belief system. Then you also have legitimate religious systems like Santaria, Voodoo, a proper Afro-Caribbean religion where there are sacrifices, sometimes of small animals, sometimes of goats. You will find people who do these under very close and careful religious supervision with a hierarchy, a priesthood, and then you'll find some people who stray off of the margins and are doing things themselves. It's important to understand that within proper Afro-Caribbean and in some cases Afro-Caribbean, South American religious systems, there are certain cases where sacrifices are performed under hierarchical structures. These are properly protected religions. You will find some errant individuals who are persuaded that if they take a certain step, they will get a certain gain or beneficence from some deity, but by and large, and especially within organized systems, these things are extremely rare and wildly overstated. Could you conceive of an individual knowing what you understand about ritual magic, if someone were to do some type of blood sacrifice of a human being? Is it possible they could ascertain some type of power or knowledge? I think the cost that they would pay for the blood sacrifice of another life would outweigh any conceivable benefit. I believe in reciprocity. One could call it karma, one could call it compensation. There's a pendulum swing in life, and everything has to be paid for. We often shirk off debt. I sit every day writing in a nice apartment in Brooklyn with air conditioning and potable water and all these benefits that I didn't do anything to earn. I tried to be very cognizant of the fact that I'm lucky in terms of geography. I'm lucky in terms of my ancestors coming to this place. That's debt. That's debt. Everything in life has to be paid for. Anyone who causes pain knowingly, willingly with choice and agency in order to gain something is going to suffer a debt that's going to outweigh whatever benefit they think they'll receive. Yeah, that's an interesting question. I know people have criticized pagan or occult practices and sometimes tried to kind of align it with like, you know, Aztec human sacrifice, which perhaps those numbers have been exacerbated or inflated by the Jesuits that went there. But certainly, it seems documented from everyone that I've spoken with that like, ritual sacrifice was a thing that's gone on in many different cultures around the world. It's always kind of pinned back to pagan belief systems about the gods and what the gods wish and how we can appease the gods. Do you think that that is completely at odds with your understanding of occultism? Was that a misaligned occultism or was that just a extremely dangerous, sort of unpractical version of occultism? So we'll take the ass. texts and different Mesoamerican civilizations. There were periods of human sacrifice. There were periods where that was banned and considered verboten just as an ancient Egypt. There were periods that leaned in the direction of sunworship or monotheism. There were periods that leaned towards polytheism and ancient Judaism. You had sacrifices in the temple all the time. Once the temple was destroyed and Judaism became a kind of wandering nation. Sacrifice was discontinued. It was considered sacrilege to venture sacrifice outside the temple system. So we in the Abrahamic religions ourselves have animal sacrifice as rooted in earliest practice. But it dissipated and it's now considered to be verboten. A cultism is really a modern rediscovery of ancient religious forms. The term itself only came into English usage in the early 1500s. By that point, notions of even animal sacrifice had really been dispelled from a cult practice. There was much greater concern with astrology and alchemy and spellcasting and prophecy and number symbolism and different the magical uses of different colors and metals and congruencies between earth and the cosmos. There were really no texts widespread and translated that spoke of sacrifice. So it's attractive to people because we get off on the grisly and the grotesque. But it's very limited and it has a very particular history historically. I want to talk to you about UFOs and your personal experience with these types of things. You've touched on a little bit today but I want to know like really concretely what those things are and in the other episode that we do or that we have already done depending on when people see this. I want to go deeper into like the tangible sort of rituals and what sigil magic is and how that interfaces with potentially what people are calling disclosure and the phenomenon broadly speaking. But I think there's a good place to stop for this one. Thank you so much for the time. I appreciate it and we'll do it again soon. Right on. Appreciate it. Hey guys, if you love conspiracies and hypothetical history, well, I want to invite you to check out Signal 33. This is a companion pod to our podcast here at camp. It's made and edited by the same team that runs all of our shows and I choose the topics every single week. So check it out, subscribe and start the dialogue in the comment section.