FBI RAIDS Democrat Swalwell, ITS HAPPENING w/ Mel K & George Santos

The FBI has raided the home of former Democratic rep, Eric Swalwell. And he's been accused of sexual misconduct being charged now at the state level and at the federal level. So this is going to be really interesting. They took his electronic devices. Then afterwards, we found out, first we find out that he's at the airport and they stopped him and took his stuff. Then we find out they actually went to his house as well. So, whole boy, we're going to talk about that. There's other really big news. I just had a politics, Trump may be the president presiding over the cure for cancer. Moderna and Merck have announced that their new mRNA cancer vaccine may actually be a one-shot treatment to end your cancer. What they did was, after they removed melanomas from various individuals, they used the genetic code from that melanoma to program mRNA so the body could single it out and destroy the cancer cells. And the people who got this treatment, apparently, they're seeing tremendous results and it never came back. So, they removed the tumors, gave a shot, cured. The stock for these companies is blowing up, it's going through the roof and everybody knows Biden said he wanted to cure cancer, but now Trump's going to get all the credit even though he's not really doing anything, but he's going to be the president, you know he's going to claim credit. So, we'll talk about that. And then, of course, we got news on this midterm election. It's going to be a lot of fun. Where more and more polls are coming out saying Democrats are going to win, but I got to be honest with the Socialists, the Democratic Socialists, it may just be way too easy for Republicans to attack them once it gets to a general. So, we're going to talk about all that. Of course, my friends, smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know, we got a couple of guests hanging out tonight. We got Mel Kaye. Hello. Thanks for having me. Now, who are you? What do you do? Well, I just had a book come out. I'm excited to be hanging out with you guys and talking about what's actually happening to our country and what we can maybe do about it, so thanks for having me. And probably the best person to help us. Another former member of Congress who also has experience with the FBI. Yeah. No, absolutely. So it was great to be here Tim. Thank you so much for that layup. Yeah, I don't like my former experience with the FBI. It wasn't fun. You know, you know, it's funny too. My agent was, he had Napoleon Complex because he was like 5'2", so he had to look up to me. And he was a dick. It was an absolute dick. You know, I will say this, I wish you well in hell, Eric Swalwell. You know what he's going to be, no, but in but all serious, I mean, you can certainly provide some insights into. Yeah. Yeah. Let me, let me all joking aside, this is the beginning of a very lengthy and expensive process for Eric Swalwell. And without his campaign cushions, I don't know how he's going to afford it. Because last I checked, he's virtually broke. He's millions of dollar in debt. His wife kicked it out of the house. He has two mortgages. He is a spiraling ball of fire. He had recalls of millions of dollars of his gubernatorial campaign contributions pulled back. Wow. And then because he stepped down over the race, it also triggered like, well, you're no longer a candidate. So you have to return this money. And there's money he had already used so by statue of California. He's like jammed. I mean, I got to tell you something. There's ways to fall, but there's ways to explode. And he has chosen to literally blow any way that this could take shift down with him. Fingers crossed. I mean, let's say, let's save it for the show. We got the rest of the boys hanging out. I was wondering when this was all going to catch up to him, because like we were seeing him in the news every other day for something. Right. So let's save it for the show and get to the meeting. I feel it's going on. I've been studying RNA. So it's cool that we're doing talking about MR and back cancer cures. Maybe I can chime in a little bit about it. When you say, when you say studying RNA, you mean you've been taking drugs about it. Oh, no, no, no. How many shots does he have? No, voluntarily. It's the ribosome that builds protein. It means that he laid back in his room, smoked some weed instead of the ceiling for a little thing. I started to chat about it. Yeah. For like six hours. And I was like, picturing the RNA and building. I got to learn from the proteins and building the proteins. I got to learn about this RNA. I better smoke some weed about it. Literally, literally you said he's imagining the RNA grabbing the protein. Literally. Literally. And it uses magnetism to grab the proteins. Oh, magnet. Look out. Baseball better even work, medically. It's like an on a tail. It's like an on a tail or joy playing chess in a Queen's Gambit. But your RNA, like you're high out of your mind, and it's in your stomach, and it's moving the proteins around. Oh, is that what that movie was? She was on drugs, right? She was on quail. Oh, she was, she was, she was, she was whacked out on goofballs. She was super. She was on lute. All right. Well, fill in Carter. Before we jump into the story, guys, head over to TimKast.com. Click join now to be the change you want to see in the world. We can do that. And with you, we can do a lot. Join the community. We got tens of thousands of people hanging out every single day. Craziest story. We just heard from our members. Our discord may have just saved another member's life. He was telling us this last night in the uncensored portion that he was having a stroke. And the other members heard and realized and called emergency services. And had he not been in communication, he probably wasn't going to make it. I mean, so that's really incredible. You guys in the discord membership, the community, you guys are absolutely incredible. But it's, it's just so simple. When you have community and you care about each other and your friends with each other, man, you save lives. You save each other's lives and you build awesome stuff to check that out. And don't forget to buy coffee over at castbrood.com. You know what? If you like everything Ian had to say, he's got a low acidity coffee called Ian's graphene dream, which it's just a regular coffee. There's nothing weird about it, you know, even though you might think so because it's Ian, but your stomach's not going to hurt. You know, so some people get stomach aches from high acidity of coffee. This is low acidity. It's going to be really good. So again, check that out at castbrood.com. But now smash that smash the like button, subscribe, but let's jump into the news from the New York Times FBI agent search Eric Swalwell's home as part of a federal inquiry. Most sex crimes are prosecuted by state and local authorities. The federal agents appeared to be using civil rights statutes to scrutinize Swalwell's conduct, a person familiar with the case said. So apparently this former Democratic member of Congress gets off a plane in SF. They walk up to him. They take his devices. Then we find out they rated his house, you know, I got to be honest. He's not a good dude, you know, he, and, and, and he's also, he also said no one's above the law. Whoops. So, uh, well, I don't know, no, no, he's stand by your principal's brother. But, uh, this is, this is actually, you know, I'm sorry, I, it's hard for me to have sympathy for a guy so awful, but, you know, George was just telling us how he's broke, he kicked out of his house. I mean, dude, I'm going to say this to you in the nicest ways. He had everything that he has coming to him, he deserves tenfold. I don't say that about anyone. I really don't because I've been on the receiving end of the Justice Department. It is not a fun place to be, but he's going to end up in prison for a very long time. A, a very, very long time, he has no, there's no one who will pity him. Trump sure shit won't, no Democrat in their right mind is going to spring him from prison. He will serve a very long prison sentence because the facts are so clear on this case. And it's, it wasn't the, when I was in Congress and I was in Congress for 11 months, he had already served a decade ahead of me. And I heard all the rumors, everybody knew all the freshmen would talk about it. He was like raping him. Well, no, that he was screwing every single intern. I mean, do you know what? Members like him call summer in DC skin turn season. That's what they call it, because these, these young little girls, like the fresh out of college, they show up and they're like in these tiny little dresses and skirts, which by the way, they should have the freedom to do so and you should have the moral clarity to ignore them. But no, not this, not this joy, not gay ego, not him, well, allegedly, gay ego. And not did you see Jimmy Gomez in California yesterday, all of the stuff that came out on him? That's his best pal. I want to connect to it. They're all connected. It's a Rico. It's Rico. That whole California crew, it's Rokana, it's him, it's chef, it's, you know, the tattoo. Do we have a hold on? Are you telling me that like, chef has gone around, just like banging young girls? No, I think he penciled next to them. Because to me, I thought it was going to be guys. No, you know what? No, no, no, sadly, no. I don't know. I don't know. Wait, wait, wait, why sadly? Were you interested? No, not at all. I'm just saying, sadly, it's like, it was going to be funnier, but no, no respectful gay man. And I speak for gay man here at this table, will ever screw out of shift. I mean, there's just not, I don't, I can't point to a gay man and I'm like, oh, that neck of yours. She goes his neck when he's in bed and dude, he's just so weird. You remember Gumby? That's what I think of when I look at him that way. I'm all good neck. I can imagine. Like, he looks just like that. That's insulting to Gumby. We like Gumby. I like Gumby, but he looks like Gumby. And then like Rokana, you know, like, it's, it's Fung Fung. But Rokana's Fung Fung, you know, we're all friends with her. She's a California syndicate, but they're all connected. I think it's a recall. Are they still hanging out like Fung Fung in them? I don't think she's in the States. She was recalled back to the, to the mother, to the mother. I, I, I got to be honest, I think there's this, I got, I got a, I got a text. I called spam, but it's from a, a Democrat New Jersey who's running, but here's those two from Democrats. The DSA. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. You know what's the funny part? They call me. Hi, Karen. It's such a, like, I'm, I'm, I'm registered as Karen. If the DSA, I don't know why one must have done that to you by putting your info in. Can I be honest? There's a Democrat running in Jersey who, I got, I got an auto text from being like, you know, stand new through whatever. And I do check to see what these, people are, 'cause I'm interested in looking at, once again, looking at these Democrats, her campaign is very middle of the road. It's like better healthcare, no woke issues mentioned. And here's the really interesting part. Honor campaign website, she says, China is the greatest threat to the United States. And we need to oppose Chinese, like manipulation and expansive militarism and things like this. And I'm sitting here being like, you got a bunch of people on the right now that are effectively apologizing for China, not overtly, but they're saying like, oh, the U.S. is bad and should stop doing these things and back off the bricks nations. While Democrats are taking the opposite approach and being like, China is bad and their expansionist policies are bad. So these are Republicans who turned anti-Trump, who are now highly critical of what the U.S. is doing internationally are being countered by Democrats that are running, who are saying, yet China actually is bad. Like there's a realignment happening. I think it's on purpose, I think there's, I think everybody's crazy. Look, it's nuts, I'll put it this way too. China is dangerous, period, right? Anybody who, China is an adversary, I don't, I don't, China is a dangerous, they're not just an adversary, they're dangerous power that really challenges everything we believe in. Everything we stand for, they are actively engaging in proxy wars with us. For instance, in Ukraine, Russia, while we're funneling to Ukraine, we got the Chinese funneling stuff to Russia, same thing happens in Iran. I mean, it is literally, they find every opportunity they can in a conflict where we have a vested interest and they take the adversarial side low key and they, that is by default what a proxy war is, right? So they are dangerous to us and it is revolting to me that I see people out there who really want to act like, oh no, they're just fighting for their way of like, no, they're not, they're fighting to insert their way of life into the, to the, to the rest of the West. Do you see the poll that most countries view China more favorably than the United States now? I mean, I don't even believe those polls, though, like, like, who paid for the poll? Who commissioned the poll? Like, I can, I can do a, run a poll for sure, to make you the hottest man in America. Hold on. Let me ask you a question, let me ask you a question. First, let me ask you, what don't you like about how China's government operates internally? China's government operates with oppression, blackmail, and absolute dominance and control of their own populations too. Their own population. They're about which elements of their own population. Their entire population, if you're not part of the society of the CCP, you're, you're depressed. Okay. So there is a, so if you are CCP, you're just the weagers, my point are the question is, who are they oppressing? It's not everybody. If you are CCP, you're good, which is not really a majority of China, are you good or do they control you? They control you. They control your pants. They control your movements. They control. But what if you agree with them? Why would you be mad about that? No, no, my point is these officials from CCP, do you know how many of their family members they slowly ship out to the U.S. or just for college, oh, my wife's, the point is that they never want to make it. We mustn't be myopic. What China is doing is it is for the benefit of an isolated cohort within China. So when we hear that they're, that they're oppressive, we know this, we hear Muslims, they're expansionist, they're cutting debt deals, they're basically building their own liberal economic order, it's to the benefit of the small subset of their population. Right. That's the point. This is understanding how they operate and why there are people who like that. When you see Hassan Pikers say things he loves China, what he's actually saying is, if I'm part of that small subset, I will live like a king off the backs of everybody else. That's no different than what's going on here. With the coastal elites of New York and California, they are very much for what's happening in China. I believe they're, they're technocrats. They prefer things to be organized and clean and full surveillance and social credit scores and they watch everything and they take care of all of that. But the elite are still the elite and the elites still live above. And honestly, I think this all goes back to China was elevated by the UN in agenda 2030 in Klaus Schwab and Rockefeller. The end goal really is that we become China. And one of the, one of the worst things about China that, that we haven't even touched on is like the fact that there's like no upward mobility without approval of the CCP. Right? Like here in the US, it's not easy to go from being broke to rich, but you can do it and you don't need approval from the government. Yes. Hardly licensing. Yes, you'll need to play by the rules of whatever town or whatever. And you'll have to deal with that kind of stuff. But you don't need the, the, the okay from the party to do it. And in China, there is no upward mobility. If you're poor and the CCP doesn't, you doesn't find favor with you. That's it. If you're not a good member of the party, you are not able to advance. The ups and points. Jack Ma. The upward mobility too. Kanye experienced the levels of our upward capacity in the US, because there's still, they won't let you pass like an 80 billion. They're very, there's so, but your coastal elites, well, I'm pointing out a coalition between potentially the coastal elites and the bankers of China. Like you were saying in, during World War II that the American bankers were working with the German bankers to sell out the Germans before Hitler surrendered so we could buy out the system. And I wonder if the coastal elites are working with the Chinese, but the, have you seen the United Nations who runs the, who's at the top of the United Nations? Look at our trade policy, bro. It was traded. It's the 90's. We've been giving China all of our manufacturing. Yeah. That is the basis of your, of your economy. And it is a lie to say we can give away all of our labor. I'll put it like this. We are desperate to import labor. That's the claim we're hearing from Democrats. At the same time, they exported all of our jobs overseas simultaneously. They claimed that we were overpopulated since the 70's. So everybody should go to portions. Then they mass imported people. It is all lies. Yes. It's about majoritarianism. They want the country to be a real democracy where 51% roll over the 49 and then it's totalitarian. I believe that the thing that they like about China is that it's totalitarian. If you don't agree with the Chinese Communist Party right now, they'll delete you. Yeah. People from Turkey told me people get deleted. They can't spend money. They can't go anywhere. They can't. They, they, you're deleted. Well, I can't even go to China. They banned me when I was in Congress. And the, the point that I was making is like, in the U.S., you brought not nice things about Xi Jinping on the House floor. Good. Good. Like the point that I was making about, they have to do it, Russia. I got a lot of responsibility in like you can, you can go from being broke to being a millionaire. Small business owner. You can do that here in the U.S. and like the, the dynamic that you brought up about Kanye. Like Kanye, I don't know how much money he had when he started out. I don't know if he was like broke, but he was a billionaire when he said the, the, the kind of off stuff that, that got people pissed and he was a billionaire. Like, he's also not a great example because he's, his own worst side of him. Yes, exactly. There are, every day I think is like how much, and it wasn't, it wasn't the, it wasn't the federal government. It wasn't the federal government that stepped in and said, you're not playing by the party's rules. He said things that offended people. Now, I don't agree with any of the bad things that happened to Kanye. I don't think that he should have been debanked. I don't think that he should have lost all of his stuff. He said some, he said some, some wild shit, but it's, I don't think that you should be, be excommunicated from society for saying that. Have you ever been, I know you do get excommunicated from society. Have you ever been debanked? I have not been. And, and, and it's kind of frustrating because I was debanked right following 2020, right? I was at the ellipse, literally I was at the ellipse. I watched a speech and then I, I literally went back to the, to the, uh, uh, will, will, uh, will, uh, where I was staying and I, I saw whatever transpired at the Capitol inside of my hotel room, um, my bank, because I transacted in Washington, D.C. that day, debanked me. Bank of America. No. That's really ironic. I know. It's really ironic. I know. It's really ironic. The worst bank for fraud in America, the banking people, we're saying what we don't like about China. That is what we don't like. Exactly. I agree. Coming more and more like that because the Center for American Progress, open society, world economic form, they want that technocracy. I've been doing, I've been doing that kind of debanking stuff to, to small gun shops for ages. Well, banks are like, we don't want to deal with, we don't want to do it. They say it's a liability and it's not. It's not. It ain't up. Look, I'm going to say this at the risk of getting super like in trouble with people who did a great job. Okay. A lot of people hate on Brigitte Gabriel because her, her delivery is a little rough. She's not lying. Everything she says, I don't know if you're familiar with her, but everything Brigitte Gabriel has said in the last 10 years, yeah. She spod on. What's an example? What she says? About the Chinese, about the, it's, she's like, oh, this mass migration of, of, of Middle Eastern into the US, it's not, it's not a migration. It's an invasion. Yeah. Like, she has been saying these things out wordly, like for the last decade, and she's been called, right? Yes, she, she led the, after high, like nine years, I heard her story. So, so if you listen to what she says, everything we're talking about here, like holy crap, what was she on, that she knew all of this ahead of time and she lived through it. She was paying attention. She's, no. Literally, we were paying attention, but when did you really start talking about China, like at this level? Okay, so I've been talking about communism for over a decade. Communism we all do, because we all freaking hate it, and it's ingrained in our life. I, I, communism, those of us who have a brain. Only in the past few handful of years, five, six years, have people really started to actually point to what the problem is, the issue of communism. I'm 51 years old. People thought that communism was beaten in the arts. They thought that it was gone. I never had that impression. And I'm 38. I was a, listen, I come from the music industry. Right. Everybody. Really? You're a musician. Yeah. But anyways. But yeah, like, people thought that communism was done. It wasn't real. It was so cleash, it was so over that dudes would go to Russia, right? And they would get a sickle and hammer ironically because it was funny at the time. Now they're like, man, I wish I never got this blah, blah, blah, blah. I know a bunch of dudes that gone to Russia back in the arts when it wasn't, you know, before the invasion, before people really paying attention to Russia, people thought that Russia was over. You know, they weren't anything to worry about. They got a sickle and hammer tattoo because they were like, oh, we went to Russia. It's cool. Look at how well traveled I am. They didn't do it because they think they were communists or anything like that. They got it because they thought it was done. People thought communism was over. It wasn't clearly, obviously, but like, the idea that communism is limited to China. That's wrong. No, no, it's not. So here's the deal. I disagree with you a little bit and we're from two very different generations. I'm being 38 and having family from Brazil, who has quite openly dealt with communism in the last 50 years, right? I've been talking about communism and how it's well in life for my entire life. And it's been a point of contention for me. I've always disliked China and I will admit that it wasn't until 11 years ago when Donald Trump said the first words, China, China at Trump Tower that I said, okay, let's pay attention to China. But China, China, the thing that Trump was arguing about with China wasn't their ideology. He was arguing about the economic. And fairness, like it's more lopsided, which is why every single day. Yes, which it's true and it's right, like, he's not, I don't think he's wrong about that. And I don't have a differing, there's no daylight between Trump's opinion on China when it comes to the economy and stuff between me and Trump. But the ideology of communism is a different thing than China's economic behavior. Because China's economic behavior doesn't really line up with the traditional communism. It's more about that. Global banking system, pick China, Rockefeller wrote a book about it, Kissinger wrote a book about it. If you know the history, you know, Soros loved China until they'd kicked them out. But I really do believe that the system that was built in China is also connected to the United Nations and gender 2030 in the world economic form. And BlackRock is very connected. I'll let her think it's literally the end of it. And they want a technocracy. And the reason is because of their control. Right. Yeah. It's not just control. It's beyond control. It's cruel. Right. Remember Covid? Remember that? We ran out of baby Tylenol. Yeah. Do you know why? Because China refused to ship it to us because they were sure on, I guess, whatever material they needed to see as well. Whatever the case was, right? We had a baby Tylenol shortage in America that literally saves baby's lives every single day because a fever can kill a toddler, especially with different the lobe not devolved. It's crazy that that's the level of cruelty that they will do and go to insert their dominant. So yeah, they're a danger to me. Yes. When people say, like, oh, there are adversaries. No, they're not. They are our geopolitical enemy and if you don't treat them like that, they are going to destroy us. Yes. Every single day of the week and twice on Tuesday. And they're similar a little bit to the to the Muslim brotherhood that you were talking about the bridge of Gabriel because they do believe that they are superior. The Chinese believe that the Chinese culture and the Chinese people are since they had naked Chinese man. There's no superiority on there. There's a long road. We don't need to go there. There's no superiority there. Like a Han supremacy type. Yes. Don't you think? I mean, that's crazy. You know, it's crazy. You know, Han supremacy was an argument that they used during the Great League forward to get the Chinese. It was basically the same thing you hear when you hear people talking about white supremacy here in the U.S. The Han was the dominant ethnicity in China. And so they were telling people it's Han supremacy, it's racism. You're a bad person because you're Han and they use that. The same model that they've been using here when it comes to white supremacy and stuff like that. China already did it. You know why? That's part of the reason why that's why, like Mel saying, the China is like the blueprint because it's already worked in China. While the truth is, Genghis Khan didn't destroy the chin empire enough. That's just the fact. When the Kublai set up the Yan, Yan Dynasty, Han Dynasty is 2,000, 2,100 years old. It's, I understand. I don't know. I didn't know they were using it like that. That's, yeah, Mel knows it. I mean, but the craziest thing when you say that though is how can anyone explain that the NIH, the DOG, the CIA, USAID, were funding a bio-weapons lab in China with our worst enemy, openly, for years. Thanks Dr. Fauci. No, but I mean, but shouldn't there be treasonous to us, the people of this country? Oh, that's why we want Fauci in prison. Well, it's also why we took Nazis into the CIA because it's also in Russia would. That's why it's also why we don't do it with China, China will do it with Russia. That's why Fauci got 11 years previous part and that's, you know, his course is to go by and wanted to make sure that he never had to face the music for any of this. A better biota was owned by the sun. Who's that? Hunter. He had a meta biota as a Ukrainian medical company that was involved in this guy wolf and all these people involved in Moderna, everything that was going on with the COVID. A lot of it was coming out of Ukraine. A lot. I think it's the age of nationalism may be waning. I thought this in 2007. I've been thinking like maybe it's all on seams defunct except for control of the militaries. You want standing armies with nations for the most because you don't want the corporations to go over but de facto the corporate autocracy seems to be running protein. Oh yeah, it's not, it's not a corporate, we're not corporatists, we're corporate to critic. It's different. The corporatists were like in the 1850s. There's a more like guild stuff. Right. So yeah, we have nations but don't get angry at China. Look at how the money is flowing behind the scenes of the corporate movement and that's where you'll see the real activities find to get mad at China. Yeah, but the Chinese people are amazing and they would, the banking system would love to see the American people and the Chinese people hate each other because it just gives them more fuel to fund. That's why they're funding the DSA. That's why they're funding the socialism. That's why the people's forum is funding all of this and it's not just them. There's funding for this coming out of the EU. The EU wants this too. They want a global socialist technocratic governance model. They've been talking about the decades. It's called agenda 2030 and they think they're close and they think they're winning. And you know what, they're waiting out Trump. They hope that, you know, they'll take care of him after the midterms and that's it. That's why everyone's fighting about the wrong thing. The constitutional republic is what they want to end and China is funding it. I think we can build a digital corporate governance like what they want to do with the world I can inform, but do it with like X or a favorable company that we could install a constitutional republic in the code of the software. So it functions like a free speech network. Yeah. I think we have to start looking at really what BlackRock and Vanguard and all these people are because I saw Annie Jacobson was on. I think Rogan and she said that she went to DARPA and they were essentially saying like all the tech bros are above any nation. So like, where is this going? I just think the idea that the constitutional republic, first of all, I think it got taken over in 1913, but I think it's still the same money, the same banks, the same architecture and they're protecting it. And I think that, you know, this DSA movement, even the care, all the care people winning, Muslim brotherhood, people winning, all that. I think that they're winning by making us all hate each other and, and destroying, you know, the MAGA, destroying the podcaster world, destroying, you know, the DSA is fighting with the Democrats. They're making so much chaos that I really think that they just want to achieve agenda 2030. And that's it. You said what, what are these tech bros have more power than politicians? Is that what you said or more power than governments than us in governments? I think what that's leading towards is a new founding fathers. Another layer of, they want to recreate a global government and they want to be the founding fathers. Or they feel like there's no other way than they must do it because they're the ones that are building the software. Well, because they're the smartest people in the room, didn't you know? I mean, that's really what they think and the worst part is that they think that openly. If you hear them speak at Davos, I cover it every year and they just have this global council conference and they put out this whole thing, they have a population council at the United Nations. Well, I'm like, what does this come from? I look into it. I'm going to go back. It's Rockefeller. It's the eugenic society of like the 20s and 30s. My patent project, isn't it? As evolved into the UN's population council, then you see like Gates, and you see like, oh, what's his name? That just died Ted Turner and Gsoros. And you read through it and they say that they have to cut the population of the planet in half to four billion by 2200 or the planet's not going to make it so they are planning again. And this is the world economic forum. So I'm telling you, they have not stopped their full speed ahead just like, you know, COVID-19 was the great reset. I really do think that was it though? No, but they they wanted it to be. Yeah. I think they over I think they overplayed their hand and too many people saw it. I agree. But I was supposed to be their plan has it's a rabbit hole Manhattan project and eugenics and all of that stuff. And there's just I will actually send you all the Wikipedia like rabbit holes, how they kind of back end into one another and like kind of give contiguous form throughout the up until the modern day. It's interesting. And I'm sorry that we're so deep in this stuff. It's like, I'm sorry folks at home. This is really. So the Manhattan Project was the very first of its kind to like bring together all the nations kind of the US recruited scientists from all these countries, whatever. Hence why we didn't keep the atomic bomb secrets because they all deflected back to their countries and gave away all the research we paid for. But that was the first reiteration of like a globalist like type structure. And everything that we have now from Davos to Brussels to you name it all comes from that group that kind of the genesis of the genesis of like that concept of like the the most brilliant minds of the world and put together look at what we did. And then they showed off it with Glee and Yershi Mandakazaki. Like look at what we did. The next iteration now of the the the Manhattan Project scientists working on the atom bomb is the genetic scientists working on the you know, it's like it's a modern. Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. Absolutely. And like it backends like all the way throughout the years into one another. Who's the Nazis that they're trying to defeat right now? Is it the free speech advocates? Like do they look at nationalism? Individual liberty is unacceptable. Property. They want big government. Everyone depending on government. They're going to put us in the pod. Give us virtual reality, neural link technology. And then everyone's going to choose to live in their own private fantasy world. And I think most of the people are already there. And by Tim's book coming out on this very subset. I think there's no other pages, which is not, no, I don't have a book on that. Wasn't it something about virtual reality like the fiction that you were a TV show idea. Oh, sorry. My bad. Okay. But we don't have the means to produce a TV show. You do. You do. I guess. But I think you're right. The inevitability of the technology space here. You could really turn into a sat. No, we're going to do we're going to do a show here. We're going to use the space, the warehouse. And we're going to call we're going to call it, you know, it'll be like one versus 20 pincerd. It's the name of the show. And we put like one conservative versus 20 liberals, pincer. That's where calling it pincerd. I don't know. I would get violent now. What a pincer is. I don't know how. There might be other pins that aren't attached. Pinser is when you come from bullsets. Didn't she? Didn't she? Like a soulful rub. What do you call it? That thing? And then Jubilee Jubilee. This is why everybody's talking about me. By the way, what was what was your experience? I could never sit through the insufferable like hordes of people around me. Just the fact that, you know, in pre-production, we mentioned, like it's going to be called one moderate versus 20 progressives, or it's going to be one moderate versus 20 progressives featuring Tim Poole or Tim Poole. And I was like, you know, they said, well, AB testy, which one works, the fact that it's Tim Poole versus Progressives shows that like, there's no debate in that whole thing. It's literally, they come and sit down and they scream, I hit you Tim Poole. Right. Okay. It's not talking to him. You can't. But the issue right now is so this is so here's what's happening right now is your purists. There's a there's a starvation for attention. Yeah. So you don't say, I thought Candace Owens was just literally having fun. So we're in what's our attention economy. We had we had we had a labor economy. We had a service sector economy. Then we had the information economy, which was just like the internet and then app started to become a thing. But now we're in the attention economy where information is instantaneous. So the information economy, which was like 2000s, 2010s was that there was money to be made and getting information people faster, they normally got it. So if you were if you were online, you were learning things faster than people who watch TV, but a lot of people were trading stocks and working business on TV. Now that everyone is online, it shifted to attention to maximize new things you can buy and waste to spend your money. The problem now is that with AI and ubiquity of social media, ease of access to production has flattened so much that everybody is now competing with everybody. So during the information economy, one of the things that really pissed off the corporate press was that they spend $100,000 to go and cover occupy Wall Street, send a van, satellite, big cameras to be able to transmit it. Then I show up with my cell phone, it's low quality, but the information gets out. The quality doesn't matter the information did. So these big corporations got really mad and said, "F these people, it's fake, don't trust them." Now, so the problem for them was they literally did talks on this at like big events. How can we compete with a guy who's spending 20 bucks to go down and cover a major news event? We have to spend on salaries, on trucks, insurance, equipment. It's impossible. Here we are the same thing is happening now to the podcast space. How can a corporation like Timcast with staff, facilities compete with every single random person? And so what we're seeing now with Instagram and TikTok as we're in the attention economy, videos are becoming increasingly short. And one thing you'll notice is that you name it literally every single person are posting identical videos. They're reposting the same jokes over and over and over again. There's no originality. So if you're a comedian and you make a joke, 7,000 people with 10 minutes are going to copy that and remake it. How can you compete with everyone? Well, so this is driving ad rates down. It's thinning out the ads, right? So if you have 100 people who produce content and there's 100,000 ads, everybody gets a buck. But let's say the next day, there's 10,000 people making videos and still only a hundred dollars. Well, that was the main issue with X. So you just hit on a pressure point there because X launched their revenue share, right? And in the beginning, I'll speak very freely. In the very beginning, I remember when I first got approved for revenue share, whatever, I got this massive, like, back paid because I got out of Congress in 23. My accounts were like crazy, like insane. So my very first payout was like, you know, five figures. I was like, what the? And then eventually, I guess that was that backlog. It was all about, yeah, they paid everybody backlog. But they couldn't pay you out because you weren't Congress. And then once you were out, it went, it was like like a rock, like a thumb, right? So it was crazy. I was like, what? I should have never gone to Congress. I was like, what am I doing? The long story short, as more people were added to the revenue share, like distribution, the pot got bigger, but the actual cash never really grew at the same rate. So it started thinning out, like, I mean, the Crashing signs were complaining a lot because I think they're like first payout to like 15,000, 19,000, like every two weeks. I mean, like, hey, you can really budget. That's consistent. You can really budget the next life off of that, right? And then eventually, it started going to like $400. I mean, I've received payouts of like $127. And I had like 30 million views and stuff. I'm like, well, how is this tabulated? Too many mouths to feed, not enough to go around. Like, it's really Thanos theory, right? So when they just did this change to the revenue share, I said, okay, great. This levels it out. And Nikita Bear, I will give Nikita a lot of props because exactly what you just said, he literally said, no, you don't get away with this anymore. The original, we will trace it back to the original poster of whatever the content is. And that person will be rewarded for your views, for ripping it and vampireying it off of them, which I think kind of sets the playing field equal. Because honestly, I hate my feed right now. It's just like, well, so here's the thing. There's no creativity. So here's the problem that doesn't exist for most people on X. Because I am a public figure, the four you is literally just posts from me and about me. That's completely useless. And I don't need to see it. Thank. I'm yeah, right. You're going to see the same thing because you're George Sanders. So the four you for a regular person, the algorithm doesn't really know who you are. So it's going to show you things somewhat related to what you might be interested in. For me, it's like, here's your name, 7,000 times. And it's good. It's bad. It's a waste of time. I don't need to see the 17th. I was watching IRL last night. Ian Crosson made a really great point. And I'm like, that's cool. We love those tweets. But I'm trying I was there. But I'm trying. I'm going on X because I'm trying to read the news. Yeah. So I can't use the algorithmic feed at all. You can. No, the my timeline feed is is the new source isn't personalized. I follow. That's fine. If you guys are going to for use impossible to use going to rock and tell it to change your algorithm. I have. I have told rock. I have told rock. Please don't flag anything of me on my for you. It does not change. It does not change. I wouldn't I don't know if that's true. I believe you. It doesn't change for me. Yeah, you can be real indegree like tell me about RNA only. But here's all RNA stuff. But Ian, you can tell it go back to default at any time. And it'll. But Ian, here's the problem. It works for that period of time with the prompt and then it's resets. Are you sure? I'm telling you. Okay. I'm open. I'm open. I don't know enough about. I try it in time and see how it stops. I went back to do. If you see some of this. I'm very specific to what I put alerts on. Like there's two accounts that I've had alerts on for the for the longest. Colin. Rog is one of them because he was the OG guy I got news from on X. Like I would rely exclusively on Collins. Like because he pushes stuff out all day long on like the minute almost. Right. And he's good at it. And I follow that for so, so long. He's one of the few accounts I have alerts from and the other one used to be a Ross News alert. And then that one sideways with like a bunch controversy. So I don't have that alert anymore. But yeah. I've been getting polymarket, it gives me, I don't know if they're true with it. news clipping, new news headlines that are fascinating, don't speak to me about prediction markets. I know for some reason they're Twitter things like a news channel, it's just post news. Maybe they want, it's news that they want you to bet on. I don't know. Yeah. I don't know. I think it's all inflated. Are you investigating the algorithm shift him? This thing's, I think that's the future. Here's what I did. Here's what I did. I went on graph. Fold. It's a Z-Fold. Oh my god. Is it like that dig when it opened? Yes. You've never seen a Z-Fold. No, I have. I just didn't think people actually bought them from me. It's one of the best ones I've used. So I went to Grock and I said, I don't want it, you know, to remove posts about me from my feed and says, I can't do that. That's weird. And then I said, the problem is, the four you feed is just post about me, which it responds, that's common for high-profile X accounts. Did you say change my algorithm? Yes. Hold you. I cannot change your algorithm. It doesn't do it. I'm going to tell it change. And then it said, if you're seeing a flood of posts about you, it is a, it is a common problem with high-profile accounts on X. That's it. And that's only for you. Yeah, the four, but the four you supposed to think about, think about what you like. Think about, think about the average person with a couple hundred followers. When someone tweets about you, they want to see it. That's social interaction between you and people you might talk about. And for X, they're thinking it's going to create more connections and more engagement. So we want that. But then if you're George Santos, you're probably getting a bunch of people like, well, a ton of women liking you and a bunch of liberals hating you. And the, and the, and the dude culture. And like, I hate this guy. Like all your, all your viewers. Today, they're all like policy so gay. They're all policy. They're weapons. Like, I think I'm going to get tonight. I can't do this anymore. They're all like, I think it's tonight that I do it. Let's, let's, let's go, baby. Let's go. Let's talk about the most obvious timeline shift from the times of India. One of our favorite sources in the stand. Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. Candace Owens blames Big Pharma for post-partum psychosis as trial and years end. I agree with Candace Owens. No, you don't. Big pharma. I don't agree that, uh, that Lindsay Clancy is not guilty in, in the sense that she shouldn't be held accountable for murdering her children. Okay. I'm agreeing with in the sense that I'm not going to, I say it to be somewhat sensational. Big pharma is a disaster. It is. Nightmare problem. Women are over prescribed drugs. And, you know, as much as I, Jeremy boring him one of the best posts ever. He was like, he's like, Lindsay Clancy was clearly suffering from mental issues. She was begging for help. The pharmaceutical treatments that she did not get were making things worse. I feel for this woman at the bottom and she deserves the death penalty. Like, that's, I understand the point he's making, right? So, and, and I agree, because I think most of us probably should agree on this. We are over prescribing women drugs for these issues. Well, every issue. It's been going on for decades. It's sickening. There is, like I said earlier, there's a population issue as well. They really popularize not just abortion, but, but the whole culture of not having children. And this is coming from the same place. But, uh, you know, then women were having children and they started medicating them. And, but honestly, the whole thing is getting crazy because I, a lot of people I know were put on drugs, including myself, very, very young, especially women. And then during, I don't know if you guys remember homeland, during homeland, she had bipolar. And I'm telling you the surge of people, women that were prescribed to bipolar drugs during that time was so crazy if you look at it. And so then came Adderall. I just thought women were naturally. But, but, but, but they are, but then came Adderall. Then they're adding Adderall. I have, I have, uh, I guess I have a female friend. She's been following this the whole time. And I was talking to her about all of these women have a female friend. You're lying. Throwing ice into a shower and just throwing meat out the windows over doing. And, you know, she's telling me like, yes, yes, but don't get caught up in that. Even if, even if that's the majority, make sure you're differentiating the women that are supporting Lindsey Clancy, not because they think she's innocent or she should, she should go, she should be released or anything like that. But because there is a, so here's the point. The conservatives are focusing all the women who are like, that could have been me. Like you could murder your kids. And that's and that's great to criticize and I agree with it. But let's also point out some of the women that are that are supporting Lindsey Clancy are saying when I was suffering, the doctors drugged me and screwed with my brain. And that's what they're actually mad about. Not that. And again, I want to clarify. The women that are celebrating her and wanted to go free and are blaming the husband are nuts. The women that are claiming that they could murder their kids are nuts. And if like you see this video, women's like holding your kid in the like same Lindsey, it's like you need to call, you know, child services. Absolutely. Look, but I just want to say to the women that are complaining about big pharma, drugging them when they shouldn't have been drugged, I agree with that. I agree with that. But there's two separate things. And this is also this is not new. This has been a running thing because first it was the mangeony. He shoots the guy, the United Health guy on the street. He becomes a hero to also young women or because he's good looking. It's because he's good looking. It's also a cult of. Look at Tyler Robinson. He's ugly. He doesn't have the same following. Yeah, but but a lot. I'm just saying the obvious aren't he was made into also a hero to a lot of people hero, but he doesn't have all these girls chanting like, Oh, Tyler Robinson. Like the girls were they're strapping for Luigi Mangeony. But to the point you made on drugs at a young age, Ashley St. Clair. Remember Ashley St. Clair? It's like nobody talks about her anymore. But Ashley's my friend. Still is my friend. This has been my friend for many years. Ashley made the perfect case against birth control and how it wrecks the lives of young women because they get pumped all these hormones and they actually go nuts. Yes. And pharmaceutical companies then say, but we have a counter to that. So let's all you have another drug. Hey, and then like they're pumping you with hormones and then they go on the side and pump you with stuff to like suppress the hormones. We talked about this the other day. You'll talk about that there with drugs. You'll have like migraine. So the prescription medication, but the medication causes anal leakage. Then they'll give you a medication for your anal leakage, which causes like abdominal pain. And so then they'll give you an answer. I mean, they're giving out drugs for depression that they say could cause homicide or suicide. Zoloft. Zoloft is the number one suicide drug. You take Zoloft for depression and then you want to kill yourself. What are we doing? But what are these women look like? They're either all wearing pink. Okay, let's just understand that they mobilize this movement very fast. So people can feel happy. It's very organic. But they mobilize this very quickly. First of all, and second of all, this became an industry because you know, much money. She's already like raised people raising money off this. It's like, it's kind of sickening. This is and also the arsonist is about to go on trial. All of these arsonist yes, the guy who lit the fires that burned down the policy. It's, you know, he would trompate all that. I just I actually caught somebody. Yeah. That they blame me. Yeah. I'm not. I'm never going to trial that I don't think we can live in a society where we say you're not responsible for the actions you take. But I do think that we need legislation or something to stop what Big Farm has been doing. And one of the problems people don't understand during COVID brought you by Pfizer brought you by Pfizer. All of that. Guys, this is a serious problem. These Big Pharmaceutical companies go to the networks and go to Big Tech and say, if you don't ban Ian, we'll pull our ads and that's driving censorship. The the idea that they go to they go to like 16 year old girls and they say we want to prescribe birth control not for oh no, no, no, it's not it's not about contraception. It's proper hormonal regulation. They make up reasons. They make up reasons to give young girls birth control just on the fly. They're just pumping out drugs running commercials to pump out drugs and then they threaten to pull the sponsorship dollars from networks and from Big Tech unless they censor and shut down anyone who opposes them watch Fox News at night between the hours of seven and midnight. Every commercial is a form of vitamin. Relax. Well, you know why? It's their audience is 80. Well, I get that but that's just pushing more crap on people like it's it's a it's a it's a it's a form of a pharma. Yeah, but my control is awful. It's because back to IG Farman and the whole thing. I mean, they these there's no difference between this and the the whole mind warn everything that I think they want people to be easily manipulated. European's got it right though. You're not allowed to have cool jingles on TV South Americans too. You're not allowed to have cool little jingles like you can't do that in Europe and South America. I don't know about Asia and Africa, but my point is I got idea. Hear me out. Pharmaceutical companies should be required to show for three seconds per ad every side effect. They do. No, no, no. Show it. Oh, show it. Oh, no, it's like. So if it's like anal leakage, they got to show an ass with like leakage. If it's like I don't want to see that. They're like this drug can make you happy. You are a diabolical. As diabolical. In Canada, the cigarette packs have pictures of lung cancer. Brazil. Brazil doesn't say they're up to everybody. No, well, I know you're still on a straight. You know what? My mom is the cost of cigarettes. My mom has a prolific smoke or in Brazil when she would buy cigarettes and they would give her a lung cancer. No, no, no, give me the infosima picture. I don't want that. I was like, okay, junior when he was running said that he was going to end pharmaceutical ads in America. If he did the entire cable news networks would fall apart. Well, I said this before, by the way, when he was talking about pharmaceutical ads and ending them, I literally said you will destroy newscorp ABC and BCUC Paramount. Everybody's gone. The number Number one ad sponsor buyer in American media is big pharma. They're not quite, they equate for, if I'm not mistaken, and my numbers aren't rusty, somewhere close to 60% of TV ads in America are big pharma. I mean, me and Jay, Nova Nordics,izer Lilly, Moderna, I mean, you know, many times we've had companies try and get us to advertise GLP one. You should, okay, okay, I'm going to, I'm going to say that I never had this. I'm going to tell you this is real quick, hear me out on this, of all the insane things big pharma has done to people. The one drug that has been now tested in various scenarios, GLP ones, GLP two's, GLP three's are actually one of the most revolutionary drugs that do not harm the human body. Wrong. It is not wrong. The stomach paralysis that people get, that literally zero point zero one percent, everything has a side effect. You can't take the worse of it and negate the nine does harm people just at low rates. Zero point zero one percent. Are you sure on that number? I should have found one. No, you can fact check it, but that's what I read. It was zero point zero one percent showed signs of potential stomach paralysis and that's unfortunate. Obviously every, the Tylenol could kill you, dude. It can give you hemorrhaging. Well, are people getting heavier, I mean, healthier or they are using weight? No, they're getting healthier. Their labs are catapulting to good level. Yeah, because it makes you not want to eat. It's not just that. It regulates your hormones. It regulates all of 40 to 70 percent experience side effects from GLP one receptor agonist. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, hold on. 40 to 70 percent and the majority of that is nausea. I didn't finish. The majority of that is nausea. The top one is 20 to 50 percent suffering from nausea. Yeah. 30 percent diarrhea, 24 percent vomiting and 24 percent constipation abdominal pain, 50 to 75 percent. How about people, we build a better culture where we tell people to exercise and eat healthy and we stop selling them tartarazine colored popcorn. Yeah. I agree with that. But what I'm saying is there's for a lot of people out there. Wow. Four to 14 percent suffer more serious side effects. Well, there's a reason there's also serious risks like pancreatitis gallbladder issues. You can't astroporesis, stomach paralysis, much rarer in general, though elevated to non-users. It says under a few percent. Let's find out about the one, their higher doses result in, what does it say? During the titration phase and differ blah, blah, blah, blah, okay. What percent get serious side effects? I'm not a fan. I'm not a fan of a society that's like, you know what? You gorged yourself and then pretended like you liked it. This drug and then you'll feel sick and not just about that. I'm not, I'm not the fat apologist here because I know that being fat is part of poor choices, right? Five to 10 percent in clinical trials suffer serious side effects. Serious gastrointentional events occur between 1 and 4 percent, 4.1 percent with wigovie, 4.1 percent for serious acute pancreatitis, 0.2 percent gallbladder disease. One to 2 percent, 1.6 for coliolithiasis, I don't know what that means. Let's see. Gastroparesis, stomach paralysis is between 0.1 and 0.5 percent. Discontinuation due to adverse events is between 4 and 10 percent. How would you like it? How would you like to be the 1 in 500 who's stomach becomes paralyzed? 1 in 500. Of course you don't want that. That's common, bro. That's a common side effect. Not common. Is it? 500? That is a common side effect. Okay. I've had 1,637 calories today and that's how you should lose weight. Thank you for your calorie count, by the way. And I've had 109. All right. Skinny diet and anything. Stop. 109. You chime in on this, Ian. We're going to have issues. Yeah. It's a peptide. It's a peptide. It's a peptide. I mean, this is a chain of 31 amino acids that they synthetically build the lab. Normally your ribosomes build it up and then you use it, but they're building it in the lab. The future of CRISPR gene tech. They're not at the genetic level. They're at the amino acid at the peptide level, which is like two steps up. It's not hard to count your calories and watch what you eat. I've had 200 grams of protein as well, so it's a greater question of gene therapy and are you into this? I'm on a cut. Man, I'm on a cut. I'm changing and snipping their genome and stuff. You can, like all that stuff you can do and I think that it is important, but to Tim's point, it is better to teach people to live. Okay, so Phil, no, don't you also mandate it? No, no, no. Okay, Bloomberg. Okay, Michael Bloomberg. My bad. I didn't know Michael Bloomberg morphed it. How about you can't vote unless your BMI is between, you know, 19 and 24. Okay, that's fat, fat, fat, fat, phobic. No, BMI is about muscle as well, so super ripped guys can't vote either. All joking aside. Bro, I think it's not. I mean, I'm, I'm like. Do you want it? Do you want it? High BMI. Okay. Listen. Don't tell me to be quiet. You're in no position. Tell someone else to be quiet. Oh, buddy. I know what I'm talking about. No, no. I'm talking about. I'm talking about. I'm talking about. How about this? BMI. If you sink in a pool, you can vote. You don't think in a pool either. Me? I do. You just got to put it out. You'll go straight down. Yeah. So that means that it's muscle sinks. So that's also means women are less likely to be able to vote too. Women are fire body fat person. Who we slow. This isn't, it's not real real quick. You guys know this is true. That women, women drown a lot less than men. Because the buoyant fat buoyancy. Yeah. Yep. Yep. Reasonable. Women have, what is it like? What on average have like what 20% and guys get this from? Like, do you sit at home and just like, women drown less than men? George. Literally, all I do all day is read these things on the internet. It's my job. I read the weirdest things. I read about flat earth like all the time. I thought, I thought I was crazy when I was giving. Like, Project Red Hat is the genesis of all of them. I saw a video. I saw a video. I saw a video. It's a really good point. I can't remember who said this. But you guys, people who are listening might know who said this. He said, there is, Sam Hyde, Sam Hyde said it. There is no subject more damaging to your reputation than saying you think the earth is flat. You can be a racist. You can be a Nazi. But if you go out saying and fight for the world being flat, that is just like, you will be ridiculed, shun, cast aside. People can make excuses for everything, but it makes a good point about it. I mean, he does. But generally, I think that it's raw, the earth is raw. Are you going to have the flat earth? I believe you heard the argument, Phil. I have heard a lot about it. You know that the government lied about Epstein, right? Yes, they did. No, they lied about the assassination of MLK and Jeff. Yes, they did. They lied about little of Tonkin, right? Yes. Okay. But they're not lying about space. They're not lying about space? No. The point they're making is that we don't trust the government. So why would we trust them at any other point? That's the argument that's the, that's the, we've talked about this a bunch, or at least I have. That like, just because the government lies doesn't mean everything the government says is a lie. So here's my point every time somebody makes all those assertions. Like, oh, they lied about this lab. Can you take me to the ledge of the flat earth? So I can push you off of it and see what happens. Well, but you know a lot. They make the ledge of the ledge. Like, I want to, there's two because the earth is also hollow and flat. It's a donut. I mean, technically you're on the edge of the earth right now because it's no, it's not round. It's a bunch of straight lines tangent to each other at the microscopic level at the nanoscopic level. That's exactly correct. That's what he is. Yes. And the round earth is right. This is how close you're looking at it. He ends like when you get down to the plank distance. Yeah. Everything's flat in my language. When you get down to the plank distance, everything's flat. Yeah. Everything's flat. You can just crash. You know, guys, guys, guys, look, I don't, I don't think the earth is flat. But I don't think it's round. I have left the cult of science. Science. I've left the cult of the scientific method because that's the thing that says if we can't test it, if we can't prove it in a test lab, then it can't be real. And there's things that happen that we can't reproduce in the lab. Well, I mean, we call them miracles sometimes. I don't even know if that's true because-- Like, zero point energy? Well, sure. We're sure because they're thinking that the universe is a closed system. They're like, you can't get more energy out of a closed system than you put into the closed system. They found out it's not. The universe is an open system. The energy's coming from without. We're just drawing it. That's how RNA builds itself. It brings energy from outside and builds. And in like red, some like 200 word article on RNA, and now he's just like heaps repeating it. Hours, hours. But yeah, it did take you hours to read 21. Anyway, but yeah, you can get more energy out of a system than you can-- than you can account for within the system. See, this is the problem. This is the problem in, Ian. Don't you understand that the arguments against a perpetual motion machine is only on paper. And that because we do not live in a vacuum, even-- and I mean, I don't mean the literal sense. I mean, figuratively, there is always something. Perpetual motion is figuratively possible because energy can be extracted, zero point energy being an example. So when they say, you can't have a self-contained device that can keep going forever. That's technically true based on math. But so for example, there's like a video where someone will have like a wheel with water in it. And it'll start spinning. And then someone goes, where's the battery? Where is the battery? And I go, there's not. The sun is hitting one part. of it, which causes energy differential. It's absorbing solar energy to create rotation. It's just not absorbing solar energy through a photovoltaic cell. It's absorbing it to heat water or something like that. So it's not in a vacuum. It's not a perpetual motion machine mathematically because its energy is coming from an outside source, but all energy in the system is going to be transferred thus in. You can make what functionally looks like a perpetual motion machine. I think the sun is something that looks like a perpetual motion machine. It looks like it's always there, but the 13.6 billion years of the, I mean, even the universe is not perpetual. It has a beginning and an ending according to, if the big crunch theory and big bang, you know, toruses real, then, well, if that's only if it's a closed system, though, and you just said that it's not a closed system. Um, yeah, but mathematically, but it could be, but hold on, show it as an open. If the universe isn't, it can do infinity and zero. If the universe is an open system because it's within a larger closed system, see big crunch. So the big crunch is a theory that gravitational forces will cause the universe to reclap. So I think it's on like a, a bowtie, like a helix torus where we're going. Well, that's time to the open. And so that's a perception of time, whether the big crunch in a, in a third dimension perspective is just you get a big bang and then a big crunch and then a big bang and back and forth. Yeah, out and in and out and in because if it's like moving around really fast, it'll look like it's going out and in as well. It'll be going like that really fast. I like, I love that. I love when you do the whole pants. It's stepbrothers. It's the whole pants. I love when you, when you like affirm what someone else says, but then transmute it into what you were saying. Yeah. Thanks. This is my concern. The military, um, economic, pharmaceutical or pharmaceutical. Yes. This, this, this, sorry. Oh, George is listening to me in, in stereo. Oh, sorry. It's the least I'm a sudic. I, until we can devise a better system, threatening to break. There's no such thing. Now, I haven't thought been able to think of you, but I don't like talking young women in postpartum, you know, making, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, I get all that. I'm saying there, they, they, so look, if there's seven billion people on the planet, and six billion want to drug young women, it happens. And, and the one billion who find it more, more, uh, morally reprehensible will fight against it. And maybe one day they take over and they stop that there. I, I do believe that there's an objective, good and objective bad. Despite the fact that there are, there is, doesn't mean you can enforce that reality. So there's never, there's going to be a more morally just system, but not technically a better. Yeah, I could agree with that, could be worse, but more morally, it's the right thing to do, even though I put like this. How, I'm, I'm gonna ask you guys a question. Um, how would you feel if communism was banned? I'd be happy about it. I'd be happy. Yeah. I mean, I'd be, I mean, there was it. I mean, it was, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, hold on. Sorry. It's not banned. No, not, not banned. I mean, that it would just like dissipate and go away. No, banned. Oh, bad. No, it doesn't, the anti-communist act. The question is, how would you feel if communism was overtly illegal? And if you espoused communist values, you'd be criminally charged. If you went on public, it actually is. We just don't enforce that. Yeah. You understand what I'm asking. No, I just can't move forward. We'll never be enforced. You should just not. I am asking you about a system by which they enforce against communism. Oh, okay. I kind of be okay with that. Would, would, would we all be okay with it? No, because my early YouTube videos were communist like, and I didn't realize it. No, jail, jail. Let's talk about. This is what these conversations are possible. You said go straight to jail. And I'm going to burn out the deal out of jail cars. I feel for everyone in chat who is looking who who says they're tied to the tangents, because I agree. The question is obvious. And there's no point in having a symmetric bait over the question. I'm asking. Are you saying that you're banning the, it's illegal to have the political party of the communist party to espouse the, in all respects, communism is illegal. Not espouse all of the beliefs. I think that should be illegal. You get a ticket for that. No, but you, you shouldn't be able to run for office constitution over. I think his question is, but we're pivoting from the question. The question I think he's asking is fair. I get where he's going with it. Should it be illegal? I say yes. I'm very talk about it. No, no, no, no, no. Communism should be illegal. I'm saying, I'm that, I'm that radical. Should it be, how would you feel if it was illegal to have a communist party to be a communist, to run as a communist or to, or to speak positively about communism? Good. Yeah. Bandit. How about Islam? Good. Oh, that one. I don't think that Islam is, Islam is a problem. I think you could probably ban that one on the merits of their religion. Islam as an ideology isn't really compatible with Western society. So the question I asked, yes, I'm okay with banning it. Everybody okay with banning. I am. Ideologies that we, we think are morally reprehensible. I'm not really because I think you need to see them to destroy them and to circumvent them. So if you put them in secret, they can get worse secret. No, we lock them up or you make them go underground to talk about it. It's possible too. And so the point I'm bringing up is that liberalism only exists in a fortress. You can have that warm, creamy center of liberalism. So long as you have a hard outer shell of authoritarianism. Yeah. Oh my god, liberal, just kidding. Look at it like this. Like what we were talking about earlier, liberalism is a closed system. Liberalism only works when everyone agrees that we're in a liberal system. Would you prove that it doesn't have any defense? Doesn't it doesn't have it doesn't have sufficient defense against authoritarianism. Authoritarians can use liberalism to attain power and then get rid of liberalism. The point is it's very easy to claim we believe in free speech. The founding fathers are like free speech, of course, everyone agrees when literally everyone agrees. If somebody walked to the founding father and said like, yeah, Christ ain't king, they'd be like lock them up. Today, that's uncomfortable because we believe in free speech. No, no, but they believe in free speech. Yeah, dude, look, if everyone, I'll put it like this. Let's say everyone here thinks pineapple on pizza is disgusting. No, I like pineapple. Hypothetical because I like it too. Everybody here is like, yeah, pineapple pizza is gross. Oh, okay. Then we all agree. You should have the freedom to choose whatever pizza topping you want because we all know no one in their right mind would ever put pineapple on pizza. Then one day a dude just up and does and we freak out and we're like, what are you doing? It goes, I have the right to do it. But if this cop, what you're asking to is if this communists group that's meeting, if they are talking about overthrowing the country that they're meeting in, is that a problem? That's coming. That's a problem either way. I mean, so Islam, if they're talking about in their in their Ausrams that they hate America. But my point is we understand anyone trying to overthrow our government is bad. I'm saying even the most minor of practices of these ideologies, it is, it is easy to say you believe in all these fundamental rights so long as they're isolated from the group. Yeah, Mel, you were saying the intention of the military order since the 40s has been instead of conquest, it's now subversion. They want to go inside domestically institutions. And so they'll do that with free, they'll use free speech to espouse the and brainwashing. I just at what level do you think the ban hammer comes down? Well, I think this has been going on for decades. It's the subversion instead of elections. It doesn't matter who wins. It matters who controls the institutions, who controls the judges, the academies, the this. So the problem right now we have with communism and socialism and even Islam and all of this is that they don't want to have the constitutional republic. All three of those groups want to end the constitutional republic for straight democracy where there is one party rule that they all say it. They all say that they want submission of the other side. No descent, totalitarian ideology essentially. So that's where the difference is. Those ideologies and that's what the Fabians want. That's what the coastal elites want. They want their party to be right. They don't want any dissent and they want to go forward and that's it. They don't want senators because they don't want states rights. They don't want the electoral college because they don't want the small states to have a say and they don't want borders because the more people that are on the populist side, which is the winners 51% of the 49, the better. And these people all agree on globalism. They all agree on globalism. They just don't agree and he should run it. So I think the communists and the socialists, they're okay with China's model. Islam is not okay with China's model. So even if Islam and the DSA and the communists all team up and they want to destroy America, eventually they're going to have to destroy each other. So I think it's more about totalitarianism and descent. There, if you're a member of the CCP, you do not experience authoritarianism. It doesn't exist because you are the subjector of it. So in, in, in, in China, if you're a proud, card-carrying ideologue of the CCP, it's never been better. What do you mean? I get, I, they're walking around and going, it's so weird. They say, we don't have free speech. I have perfect free speech. And then when you go, yes, speak ill of the party. But why? I love the party. I would never do that. So to them, they have all the free speech in the world because they all agree with each other. Everyone outside, however, gets a boot. Do they get, you mentioned earlier that maybe they, on the inside of the CCP, are getting pressured by like a deep state. I don't know, you didn't say that. I'm sorry. They're a part of it. I mean, they, they're a part of it. This was, this was in their books. This was Kissinger and Brazinski and all these people, they like the Chinese model. Don't think that the full track and trace surveillance, social credit score in China was built by different people that built it here. That's what I'm saying. The technology is all the same. The global public infrastructure is connected. The difference is that China has been set up to run the world. If you look at Soros or any of these people, what they were writing in the 90s with the fall of the USSR and the export of all of our manufacturing to China, it was kind of like China's going to end up having to run the world because their system works the best. Klaus Schwab said it at Davos during the lockdowns that China was doing the best job. Bill Gates said it. Yeah, they set the virus out and then they all of a sudden managed to manage it better than everyone else. Right. Oh my goodness. It's not at all. Well, Larry Fink is the head of BlackRock. He's the head also of the world economic forum. He's also the only, you know, the only financial business that can run in China is BlackRock. So you kind of got to start looking at who built the infrastructure. Larry Fink is a very dangerous man. I've been saying this for a very long time. I worked in private equity for many years of my life. So Larry Fink is not a good guy. And there's no way you can slice it like how dangerous of a human being he is. And he gets, nowadays he gets a little bit of play because the normies are paying attention to like who's buying up all the residential houses, the single family houses, who's driving up the cost of home prices and out, outpricing people out of neighborhoods like gentrification. That's literally all about, that's all BlackRock. And he had the, he had for many years the cover of that of like being just a CEO of private equity company that nobody talked about. But now it's like, okay, people are paying attention. I've been railing on Larry Fink for years for most of our country. They run the public pensions for Mexico. You have a 14.7 trillion dollar portfolio. It no, and he's running the world economic forum that agenda 2030, the fourth industrial, that's him. Yeah. Larry Fink is not a good dude. I mean, honestly, by no way, stretch of the money. I think he has more power than than anyone in the United States of America right now. Economic power. One wheeled 14 trillion dollars in this country. No one. No country are the, you know, essentially, he's the CEO of BlackRock. Then that here, state, street, and vanguard. He's not hot enough. BlackRock and vanguard are essentially twins. He is the CEO and co-founder of BlackRock, which used to be, it was an aggregate of Black Stone. That's like the housing development arm of BlackRock. He funneled out of. I think it's fun. It's fun out. So Blackstone is Steve Schwarzman and it's like a brick and mortar type, like very conservative actually operation on how they operate. Schwarzman is a big trump guy and, you know, operates out of Manhattan with, in his spouse is conservative views. Steve Schwarzman is actually just a classic, you know, entrepreneur, you know, finance here. Larry Fink spun out of that. And what he is is dangerous. Yes. He scores. He is an organization. Oh, absolutely. Everything that they want to do. He is the antifacist of what Blackstone actually is. Like he is the mirror opposite image of what one is to the other. Like this is a man who with Glee will turn around to his guys. We're like, we got to buy up, you know, half the state of Mississippi. I don't care by what means you pay whatever to get people out of these houses. And then they just sit there, like neighborhoods across America just sit there empty. Why we don't know. What is he planning? You know what's, there's, and then I'm going to go into the conspiracy theories. Do you ever watch the show on Apple TV silo? Oh, yeah. Okay. So then there's a conspiracy that he's doing and keeping these neighborhoods as a front to what's going on underground. And I think that's a little nutty, but, you know, I don't think it's nutty. You know what's really going on today? You know, he went silent. It got big contracts. We don't know. You want to know. I agree. You want to know a secret? I agree. You can go look in these neighborhoods. There are data centers hidden by fake residential houses. Of course, yeah. So what they do is, there's like, they're, so they have a bunch of residential houses and they all look very much the same, right? Because it's like one schematic or like three for one neighborhood. And then when you drive past on the highway, you see all these houses. If you actually drive in, you'll see that the houses are actually surrounding a data center. Well, I bet, I bet that's all right. Go to Loudoun County. Go to Virginia. Loudoun County is a capital of Dead East. And you can drive around and see them. And there's nobody or very few people living in these developments. Well, how about they're doing it so that when people drive by, you don't see the data center. How about the fact that some of the houses are just shells. They're not even finished inside. Did you see that? Where? In LA. They do that a lot for oil pumps. They just build these massive houses just a serious shell. And if you look, like, if you put your head in the ones, they go all like, but, but, where and for what? Uh, check. Data centers. To continue to centers. Yeah. In Los Angeles, there's tons of these all over the city. Oh, wow. Because they're hiding oil pumps because they don't, there's oil pumps in residential neighborhoods in LA. Yeah. Yeah. So, like, if you know where to look, you'll see like a church with a gigantic steeple. But no one ever goes in because the steeple is just covering up the pump. What's bothering me is the flock cameras. I don't know if you guys are following. Flot cameras. I'm not following. Honestly, one conversation. I, I guess I'm so preoccupied. I have not paid attention to flock cameras. I know. What are flock cameras, actually? They're all automatic license plate readers. Isn't that what an easy path is? Sort of. But, uh, oh, by mail, it's easy, easy, easy pass is a concept. Seems like a little has like a work transplant. It has it's same, but you can also do by mail by, by, by, but those take a picture. And then after the fact they go through the pictures and then now it's probably annual, called, uh, uh, uh, a, uh, a, a, a, lrp, whatever. Or license, l, lprs. The flock cameras are a problem because they're false flagging people like crazy. Really? Like, dude, not a day goes by. You don't hear about somebody who was falsely accused of a crime by a flat camera. And what happens is police are enforcing crimes against an AI accused crime. Right. Unconstitutional. Yeah. Exactly. Sometimes AI, AI prosecute that you don't want to go there like subpoenas are being produced by AI. Right. And then people are hiring AI lawyers and then the cops show up and the cops go, I have a court order. Don't look at me. I don't look at evidence. Right. You needed the human, um, for the, the subtlety because sometimes the illegal thing to do is the right thing to do, like, veering sideways on this busy street to avoid killing someone, but you actually broke the law because you drove in the line. That's actually not true. Yeah. Uh, sometimes you got to slam on your brakes to say it's not, it wouldn't be the wrong. Check, check your local jurisdictions, but failure to avoid an accident is a crime, swerving out of the way into the wrong lane briefly to avoid an accident is actually the thing you're supposed to do. Yeah, yeah. But you said it. You said it. You said it. You need the, the human there to discern whether or not it's, and so in LA, 20 years ago, these things were a warrant. There was a revolt when they tried to put up a camera. And then all of a sudden, they just popped up everywhere, all like there was the corporation is like, yeah. Trust me. Obviously it was happening. It's like the data centers, they're turning the earth into into a machine, a full track and trace surveillance every piece of that's, that's, that's, that's surface level. They don't care about that conversation. They're turning the surface of the planet into a machine into a gigantic computer chip. And we are. Right? No, no, no, surface level. You don't exist in the reality of their building. So when, when you say surveillance or technocracy, that's like, that's like, to the, to, to, to, to the technocrats, that's like you're going to chicken go, they don't care. Right. But they're building surveillance. And they're like, we are building so much more than that. We don't care what you're talking about. The chicken is complaining because the door closed five minutes early and the chickens mad it wants it open. Right. I don't care. Right. I'm not going to go and tend to their problems. I got bigger things to worry about. What we are building is so much bigger than the chickens can even comprehend. These data centers are like gigantic computer chips. They literally are. And they're placing them. They're turning Virginia into a gigantic computer chip. So that they can do things you don't even understand. And we're complaining about they're watching us. And they're like, oh, we're going to do so much more than that. You don't even understand what we're going to do. Well, you're not going to be able to live. It's the same thing as China. It's Internet of Body, Internet of Things, all of our data and the less of us the better. I'm going to explain how you're going to live. So people will be born and they will be programmed by the algorithms, by the machine, to favor some element of the world. So if the world needs a postal worker, a kid is born to postal worker parents. And he gets in and did it with nothing but postal worker media. And as he's getting older, he's really excited to be a postal worker. And his parents are postal workers and his friends are postal workers. Then one day, he finally gets his first job and his parents jumping up and joy, jumping with joy screaming like, you did it, you got in, you got into postal you. And then he's sitting there in class and he goes, can you believe there are people out there that don't want to be postal workers? Like who wants to be a construction worker, right? We have the best job in the world. You will be programmed from birth to have one job and you will go to and from work with a smile on your face because the AI has programmed you to do it. Do you know what? Do you know what happens? Do you know what will happen if you decide? You know what? For some reason, I just don't want to be a postal worker. You know what they're going to do? They'll kill you because in the human body, we have cells. Cells used to be free. They go around and do whatever they want. Then one day, the cells came together and formed a pact and created a multicellular organism. Then, it got to a point where the cells producing your body are hyper-specialized and have no freedom. Do you know what we call cells that deviate from their function? Cancer. We call them cancer. And what do we do to cancer? Destroy it. Destroy it. So, when the AI, when the government and the machine has mechanized the surface of the planet of the computer, humans will effectively be cells in a greater complex system and those that deviate from their programming will be cancer. What they'll do is they'll bring them in for repair. They'll bring them in. in an aqua solution like an RNA protease, which we'll call in. and rewrite their code, and it won't kill them or turn them back into a-- - Why would they-- - You know what? - So, so now it's a reality. - No, that's what they're gonna do. They're gonna end the guy up earth, so he loves being a postal worker. And then they're gonna raise him with postal worker parents. And if he deviates, they're gonna repair him and then put him back. - With Nora Link. - Not with Protease. - With Protease? - They're gonna put him-- - No, they're gonna plug the Nora Link into your brain and just click Enter. - Oh, how about this? This all sounds unique, dude. - I know, you know what this sounds like? - You know what this sounds like? - The future? - Resident Evil, Alice, Project Alex. She'd die every time they'd just re-plug her back in and she'd like, whoop, I'm back to the default. - Ian, we have Nora Link technology. They don't need to goo you. - Oh, I think they can change your genetic code. - Well, Ian likes gooing. - Yeah. - But they goo you with Protease, dude. (laughing) Oh, it's DNA Protease and RNA Protease, depending on how they're changing. - He's not even defending it. - They're gonna put-- - He's gonna put the knowledge in it and build a blue life protein through that changes-- - People are going to be like, "I'm feeling bad, I don't like doing this." And I know there's something wrong with me and they'll say, "All you need is the neural band. It'll make you feel so much better." And they'll put on the neural band and then they'll go, "I love working at the post office." - I hope I'm wrong and that it won't. The AI will not siphon people into a big building to get repaired is what they'll call it, but-- - This is the next stage in human evolution. Going from a multicellular organism into a multicellular organism system with the central nucleus being the AI data center machine state. - It letting synths out of that building. Once they miniaturize the tech and it gets so much faster and cheap, like less electricity, they're gonna start synthesizing machinery. Like quadra, it would be like carbon-based machines will start walking out of that building, dude. And I don't want this to happen. - Just look at this one. Hold on, hold on, hold on. - Why isn't girls-- - Don't do drugs. - Life starts, what we think we're gonna do, that's maybe not all-- - In. Life starts and what we think we know with self-replicating proteins. - Self-replicating nucleic acids. - Yes, they build proteins. - Right, and at some point, these self-replicating proteins become single-celled organisms. - I myth. - So now they're combining different chemicals, absorbing free energy and creating cells. Eventually cells team up with other cells become multicellular organisms. They're very small. Eventually those multicellular organisms grow to great size, like we are now. If this chain continues, the next progress of life will be multicellular organisms systems. That is, instead of being free cells moving all around randomly, they're gonna combine with each other. Humans are going to be forced into each other using new technology, AI and norling technology. And we will be functionally single cells in a multicellular organism. - When you called it attention economy, I thought the same thing. I thought they'll literally use your brain's attention power to run their software. That's nowhere near what I'm talking about. - They're talking about becoming a multicellular organ. - And it's not what an attention economy is. - I think they're gonna siphon off your brain power. - That's nonsense. - Already, I think they're talking about. - It's more connected. - What I am saying is, just like a single cell was a free entity until at some point it merged with other cells and became a singular entity, humans as singular entities and independent functions will cease and we will become single cells in a multicellular organism. - And we have no choice into that. That's happening no matter what. - You have absolute choice. Single cells still exist all over the place. Inside your gut and your body, but there will be a greater overarching system and my vision of the future. - Is it transhumanism? Is that what it is? Machine and. - That's a whole other thing. - And are one thing. - So that's not. - I'm saying that there's gonna be an old man sitting with his grand kid in a field looking up at rows of black boxes moving left and right. And he says, "That's the machine that humans built 200 years ago. "We don't know what it's doing no more "because we have nothing to do with it, but it's going." - Hmm. - It's kinda like a home. - Doesn't sound so good. - Nope. - Like the human body at one point it built like a pancreas with a bunch of cellular organisms like you're saying they came together to form the pancreas. And so maybe that's what we're doing right now with the AI. - Yes. - Is we're gonna build like a post office? - It'll be like a pancreas that we build of humans or a stomach of humans. - Right. - So a liver of humans. - Yes, correct. It's not gonna be a stomach. It's going to be a meat processing center for resource distribution. And then there will be a singular meat processing plant and people will be born to be meat processors and they'll be so happy to do it. Not to be fair, a lot of this work will be replaced by optimist spots. Humans will be functionally obsolete. - Okay, I'm not gonna keep talking about RNA, but that's what RNA did. It built DNA to be its AI optimist spot. It built a smaller version of itself to run the calculation faster and farther. It does DNA has 10 million strands where RNA gets up to like 7,000, RNA's heavier 'cause it's got uracil in it instead of thymine. So it can like RNA can blow itself up. It can self destruct. DNA can't, it's not built. DNA is like a, it's like we're doing it again. Now we're building AI to be our DNA. To replicate for us, it's gonna be able to build more humans. AI is gonna be able to build humans. It's gonna be able to replicate itself. Just like DNA does, it builds RNA and it replicates itself. So I don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's inevitable. It's just about how is this gonna happen? You know, we're crafting it in real time. How ethical is it gonna be? And what does that even mean? Like what? - Ethical is meaningless to the system. Is it ethical when your body expels, cells are your body to die? - Depends on who you ask. - You shave off skin cells every single day. We don't think twice. People don't even, don't even think about it. You ever, you ever, you ever in a dark room and you open your curtain and you will see all of the dust and skin cells floating in the air. We do not lament the dead cell that flicks off our body. We don't. So when you are a single entity in the greater system, you're gonna be walking to work, you have a heart attack and die and they're gonna shuffle you into the dump. - So existential, I'm like, you're losing me. Like with, this is so existential, it freaks me out. I'm sitting here, I'm like, I have me out of body. So it's like, why are we talking about this? - High-mind. 'Cause we gotta build a better one. - We're talking about what's, why they're building the dentist centers and what the future is going to look like. - So the data centers are, I mean, can we just, they made me power chat GVT? (laughing) - I'm on a line of myself, no, no, I'm really, it's called, it's called the orders of thinking. - Yeah, no, I'm willfully just pretending to not know what the greater, most people, if you ever looked at the orders of thinking, most people, like on average, it's like four out of like eight and the fourth order of thinking is like contemplating impulse. That's it. - And where does denial fit in that? (laughing) - Lowest possible order. - Okay, so yeah, denial. - The first order I think is just instinct. - I'm like, denial, I wanna deny the thing. - I guess it's a second order thing. I don't wanna feel that. - Then they don't wanna feel any of this. - The upper order is contemplating. Like the easiest way to explain the highest order of thinking is multi-versal probably probabilistic systems. Interesting. - Yeah. - That's funny. - So if you can conceptualize like hundreds of variables, alternate timelines, the idea of infinity, then you have the higher order of thinking. But most people don't, which is why most shows have like a third grade rating level and they have a left track. - So I'm gonna go back and make some-- - Just tell people when a laugh. - I'm gonna make another Thanos reference then. I guess he was old. (laughing) - I'm with it. - I think Thanos was right. - Well, about where we're overpopulated. We're doing stupid stuff. - See, that's called low order thinking. - Yeah, I was it? - Because what happens after you get rid of half the population? - I don't know. - They come back. - Do they? - Yes. - They never came back in adventures. - They reproduce and then within, you could double your population of any life in one generation. - And by the way, did you read this? - I just wanna stress this again. The concept of Thanos being like, I'm gonna wipe out half of all life. On all those planets he went to where he killed half the population, population doubling is easily accomplished in one generation. So it's like, he's literally doing nothing. - Okay, just sounds bad. - Fair, sounds bad in the comic book. - Yeah. - The thing about the whole four billion people by 20, 200 is at the number, is they're not accounting for a minute decline? - They wanna cut it in half, the global. - They want 500 million. - Well, no, yeah, they really want 500 million. - They just put it out. - Yeah, they just put out that they want a reduction in population. - But have. - 34. - Well, that means you gotta go to Africa and you gotta figure something out. 'Cause they're having five kids per family. - Well, that's fine, but then they, their mortality rate is also up the charts because of disease and poverty and famine and sad. I'm not making light of it. Look at how they populate. - But think about what that means for our YouTube views. (laughs) - Twice a year. (laughs) - Exactly, I don't know why they don't end it. - I actually think all the social media views actually don't know what time it goes. - The mortality rate in Africa is 7.43 per 1,000 people as of early 2026. It's in a steady decline from 7,000 to 5,000. - So is that a lot for their dying lives? - 2024 and 7.60 in 2023. So that's overall for the whole continent. - Yeah, but I'm sure that in certain countries, it's far higher. - Well, I mean, yeah, it's an average. It's an average when you take all the countries. It's like the average. - Yeah, for their entire best. - What's the mortality rate for North America? - I mean, we're technically three countries. - Do you have any guesses? - 4.2%. - No, it's higher than that. - We kill each other too much. - 9.05 deaths per 1,000 people in 2024 and 25. - These are births? - That's mortality rates. How many people die per 1,000? - So are we the highest mortality rate in the globe for continent? Or is it South America, or Europe, or Asia? - I'd imagine Honduras is a higher mortality rate than we do. - Well, that's not a continent, right? - We wouldn't know the numbers for China. - Well, anything China puts out is fake. - That's right. - Right, everything they put out is fake. - Right. Yeah, 1% mortality rate. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually mass-killed tons of people during COVID, I just lied about it. The Chinese. No, no, no. How about this? Famous story from New York City, like very famous story, 18-year-old kid kind of in the wrong place, the wrong time, went to the bodega in the Bronx, was picking up something first mom, had just gotten a massive scholarship, I think, for basketball, if I'm not mistaken. Like, a true like prodigy, right, gets killed in a drive by that, he had nothing to do with. He was just a casualty. On his death certificate was COVID. She could not attend his, so think about how many illinois I got, motorcycle crash and they called it a COVID death. That's my point. I think, okay, so I'm going to stop and go back and back to what we were talking about a second ago. I would not be surprised if substantially more people died during COVID and they're lying about it. So, there's a guy in China, a YouTuber who made a video pre-COVID, post COVID, and he was like, where is everyone? And he said, here's like a famous market, 2018, it was nuts. And he goes, 2022, no one. So he was talking about how China's, he said China's lying about the size of its population. And here's proof. And then I watched and I was like, I don't think he understands that he's actually saying China mass executed a ton of their own population. But you take a look at right now, with the mass influx of illegal immigrants, as well as businesses are closing and unable to find anybody to work. Famously, we talk about it over here with Sea Town Races. There's never a restaurant that was open pre-COVID overlooking the horse races every day. You'd go and sit, it's like bleachers basically indoor. You sit at a table, you look to your right, the horses are racing, you can get a steak. It's amazing. I asked them why they haven't reopened since and they said they can't find anybody to work the kitchens. Where are all the people? Well, there's a massive shift in migration to, even domestically for us, right? A lot of people died and then you're also negating the fact of immigration, the immigration crackdown. So I mean, kitchen staff is, no, no, no, no, no, this is before, so just before COVID. So no, no, no, no, they closed during COVID, when, when COVID stops, why can't they reopen? It's not like people died, did they? A lot of places in New York never reopened like, yes, but we're in a rural area that did not have heavy COVID lockdown. Really? Yes. The casino did, they did weird things like they put dividers up on the table. I remember that. But for the most part, when we out here, when we were out here, we didn't experience much of any lockdowns. It's a rural area. We'd go to the bar, we'd go out. If you go deep, deeper into the urban areas, you'd experience it, but out here people wouldn't wear masks. So they closed down the restaurant and when they reopen, when COVID ends and the lockdown event, they could not find anybody who worked there anymore. That's crazy. Where did the people go? That's crazy. Could people afford to just buy a new house somewhere else? Or how about this? Well, it wasn't there also the, the, the sheer issue of people relocating chasing work because of rural areas that limited the amount of work, they probably went to other, perhaps, but I'd argue the inverse that it's easier to find work and maintain a life in a rural area where it's cheaper than an urban area. People in New York were fleeing like crazy because you were congested with nowhere to go. They were going to the rural areas. We were fleeing because we live on top of each other. And I'll say this too, Berkeley County, West Virginia is the highest population growth in the state, 20% year over year. And they're still struggling to find workers. Restaurants are going out of business, developments are going unsold. Dude, Berkeley. It's a mentality that came out of COVID. More happened during COVID, I think, to change people's work ethic, to change even their, desire to leave the home, a lot of people left the, the workforce, they've, they're working. I think that it, it's just never recovered because mentality's changed. And then all the education and all the people in the school. No, lack thereof. Right. Education. Right. Did you see that, did you see that professors? And a lot of people went on the dole for the government, never, never went off and never wanted to go off. Did you see that the professors in UC Berkeley had to put out that their students are testing significantly? Yeah. I was on gut felt on Monday and we were, that was a topic and I was like, wait, they're teaching like seven great algebra to, I mean, and these are freshmen in college in Berkeley. These are research institutions. The reason you get over, we're accepted to these colleges, no, no, because you're, George, I think it's on purpose and I think they're trying to create two, two, they're splitting humanity into two distinct groups, which are called Phil. The more locks in the eloy. Correct. What is that? What is that even? The time machine. What? He goes into the future. There's a book called the time machine and when, well, they, I mean, they've made a bunch of different versions of it. It's a very, what was it? HD Wells, who wrote it? I'm not sure actually to be honest. I think so. So it's, he goes to the future and there's pale gaunt superintelligence and then there's dumb savagely humanities split into two different groups. It was HD Wells, yeah. I want to be an intelligent savage. So who has a high mortality rate? Highest mortality rate. I like it. That's Joe Nogo. I like it. I like it. I like it. 20.14 per 1000. They have a very old one. Did you say Monaco? Monaco, yeah. Because everybody's holding rich and they all know there to die. Oh, you asked. Like Florida. Well, you know, Monaco. It's actually worse. All the rich old people go there to die. Like there's a John Safra, the former banker. He died in a freak fire accident. Yeah. With a nurse. Yeah. It's like the whole wildest thing. But all the deaths in Monaco are freakish. It's like, I follow that. Like, I'm a big Monaco fan. Love Grand Prix. Monaco. It's super fun. But it is such a. What's second after Monaco? Because Monaco is like, I think people go there to kill their like Bulgaria. So they think it. Yeah. Bulgaria. Interesting. Bulgaria is 15.6 to 16 per 1000. It's also one of the poorest countries in Europe. I think maybe we are splitting into the new stage of human evolution with the cybernetic stuff. Like the more locks in the e-loi, there's going to be people that create and control. And then there's going to be people that just go along to get along. Kind of feel like that's not how evolution works. But it is or it's not not how evolution. I mean, you got the plebs of the Roman era. Change a change is not the same thing as evolution. Evolution takes outside forces to the mutation evolution. Well, that's how evolution happens. You can take it right now. Really? Yes. Your genome can break and then reform the wrong thing on accident. Well, yeah. Okay. That's not evolution though. That's the form mutation. That's called mutation. If you have a genome that breaks and reforms wrong, that's generally what happens. That's called a mutation. That's generally answer. That's called a answer. That not all mutations are cancers. Some mutations give you are good. Okay, so that's right. You know what? You know what? Yeah. It's a lot of spider powers. Yeah. In a stream. Times of stress. Your genome might break and reform in a better way. Just change the subject. I don't think so. I'm going to start shooting webs. We're talking. There's a lot of conversations going on at once here. But when you start filming a lot at all. I'm talking about you. It's evolving to be. You know, kids are born with their heads. That's what I've heard. But I agree that we're splitting into two types of creature. Like, you guys, that's the conversation we're having right now. Well, the more likes in the e-loi were fiction. I'll have whatever you have. Whatever. It comes from a story. There's no coming back from that. I don't care. Just give it to me. I need to live with you. Give it to me. Just see the whole. I don't want to take it. It's a spear, and it's undulating, and it's twisting all at once, constantly. I bring up these four billion that they want to bring humanity down. I feel like they're not factoring and mitigating circumstances that could change. They're just saying, at the current trajectory, humans are creating this much damage. Therefore, we need this. Okay, so I'm going to talk. This is a theory that I've had. And I'll stand by it because I think it's how it's going to happen. There will be population control. It will be done through infertility. And it's going to be delivered through our food system. Matter of fact, they are probably already doing it. And I'll explain to you why infertility rates keep jumping and spiking. Hence, now most women, all of a sudden, healthy, 20-something-year-old women, are going through IVF, which is not crazy. It's unnatural, which then points you to, like, what are we doing? So if anybody's worried about population control, I think they beat us to that many, many years ago. And I think it originated in Flintstone's vitamins. And I'm not even making that up. Look at how this generation of millennials, who we all took the damn Flintstone vitamins, and we have become the most inferred-old generation. Literally. Well, that's correlation. There's a correlation there. You can make an argument. I'm making the damn argument. And I think they're delivering it through food. Did you know that they do mRNA now through food? I've heard it's called peel, is that what it's called? It's Bill Gates. Appeal. Appeal is what it's called. Yeah, so pretty much. How does that work? Essentially, you're taking vaccines to an apple. What about mosquitoes? Is that true? What about them? And leash the vaccine mosquitoes that have vaccine in them. It's a malaria. You know what that says? That's Bill Gates, big project. And it was in Keyway. I just heard about malaria. Did you know that? Away. Well, I was in Malaysia because that's where we went to record special forces. It's like a flu, like a nasty fever flu. Like it's, it goes away. You can't ages. Bill looked at me like I had like, I don't like you had malaria. Actually, George, now that you bring it up. No, I looked at you like you said you had malaria. literally what you take like no so no so on my way to to to to tape special forces for Fox we went to Langkawi in in Malaysia and there's a lot of mosquitoes they put you on this regimen take this drug malaria I mean it either reduce reduce the side effects or it will prevent you from getting malaria well I don't know what it is but I came back I had mosquito bites all over my body it took two days after I came back home I just felt with like a fever whatever boom go to the doctor oh just positive for malaria we're in South Asia I'm like yeah I was yeah me but I've I've gone through this before because in Brazil you had me you've had malaria multiple no no no no no I've had dinky fever much better because of Brazil so essentially yes there could be true to the mosquito of vaccine mosquitoes which which would be a good stock which would be a great thing do you remember how they tried to create a mosquito in Florida that would eat the mosquitoes and then they fucked the mosquitoes and they became blood bugs you know the famous love bug you know what happened so University of Florida created a mosquito in a lab that was going to be a cannibal and bring down the mosquito population in Florida so then instead of eating the mosquitoes they started fornicating with mosquitoes and created a hybrid that we now call love bugs and they go in and out of season if you ever drive on 95 in Florida from like Orlando to to Miami or back and forth your windshield is like it is entertaining it's like what like they explode all over your car did you ever experience this we were just doing yeah yeah it's like it's seasonal too it's crazy I got to make a quick correction of a appeal the company I mentioned they say that it doesn't put vaccines on the fruit that that's a debunk conspiracy theory but that it puts monoglycerides and diglycerides on the on the skin that proves it preserve it of course they don't debunk conspiracy sure of course whatever they're putting the company debunked on yeah like using food is the if you see how apples look like plastic in supermarkets on this isn't because of that stuff and then when you go home I use this thing veggie wash like I don't know if it does anything at this point but spread the apple literally it's like this film melts off of it and you're like wait that's what the apple actually look like kind of shitty it's not shiny it's not red yeah I don't know maybe maybe you're just putting some weird chemicals it's no no the veggie washes like white vinegar and like lime so I think they changed our vegetables and stuff to make them look better too yeah oh did you ever see the picture like a original like what a real like banana fruit yeah they still exist they're you know largely inedible they're insane it's like they're mainly seeds right and then we very very and they're ovals yeah we genetically modified these things well we artificially selected yeah and then over thousands of years the humans kept growing the ones with the most meat that's eventually they turned into big starch tubes okay that's the I guess the that's early on version of GMO right yeah let's it that is selective okay that's fair did you know that cabbage and like what is it cabbage brussel sprouts broccoli they're all this it's all the same same one same plant yeah they're really that yeah I've read something yeah they're also elective cultivars of the same plant didn't know that I thought I thought like it's like collar greens and cauliflower and then there's a few and and kale they're also like the same exactly yeah bracisco all the bracisco's are great all the rest yeah whatever yeah there's it cabbage cabbage cabbage broccoli cauliflower Romanesco kale brussel sprouts collard savoy cabbage colrabi and guy Ian oh colrabi did you say guy Ian yeah sign me up guy Ian um so I do think that guy you guys might want to go okay you know what I want some old Ian hungry let's go that looks like it'd be great sauteed in Chinese the ambiglava you know it all I don't have to be look that looks really good sauteed it garlic half a broccoli it's almost like a buck tray yeah that's what that's what I thought I was yeah buck tray right now but buck tray is different yeah it has a little bit more of a cabbages like they're right there I like it yeah and this is bracisco rapa you're rapa oh it's a bracisco rapa yeah probably what's that yeah a different one I think you're right Chinese cabbage bomb dong and it's almost like you've ever had bomb dong you've never had bomb dong oh and apparently spiraling is the most protein rich George wants to say yes I'm tempted but I don't know if I dabble or not you're right that we're we're self well I think we are self selecting into the split of humanity like people are going to eat themselves into compliance or they're going to eat themselves into the awakening it's come up and it's like it's internally we're not being concerned but because we have the information you know what's good and you know what's not you have all it's not even about information how many okay we all in this room clearly do media we have more of a perception of uh oh we're more acute in in our perception of paying attention and I guess clearly going down rabbit holes like our dear friend Tim here does and and researchers I mean the what is that braseca rape so my point is like this is what we do we're curious creatures do you know that 90% of the global population are too busy trying to make ends meet to even worry about yeah half of the stuff we do so it's so easy to feed them just inject it in food and they won't know they need to eat they need a shit they need to go pay their bills and pay their taxes and keep you know what George is right we need to reduce the population no that's not what I'm say okay that's how they'll do it because information is out there but it you need to choose to seek information right and then imagine you live in a like remote village in China right you pick a city right and you kind of break that mold and then you go and start researching then you start staying these things the whole village is gonna say you're crazy and they're gonna they will expel you from them like you're crazy you're gonna bring bad omen so they'll kick you out for even trying to inform yourself but that's just like culture around the world same thing happens in any corner of the world so that's why it's so easy to deliver population control through the food system it's just pharmaceutical companies that's why I only own stake dirt outside the house like to get the nutrients straight from the source I don't need no plants to grow anything dude that's communist propaganda pharmaceutical companies hold stock in many big food production companies around the world not in chicken city my chicken city bro where we get fresh eggs oh your check but where did your chicks come from we bred them from where what do you the origin of your chicken we went to like this farm with some like old white guy and we were like we'd like some chickens and he was like all right Mike and then we walked in and we grabbed the handful of them and there was no vaccinations on those chicks nope or his chickens products they were fresh hatched and we just grabbed them and throw them in a box I wasn't when I heard when I came in probably chickens when I was in Miami I just went it was really funny I just went to like some Mexican farm with it a big science at chickens five bucks and I walked up and the the lady was speaking Spanish and I was like a chicken por favor boy oh por favor she got excited and she ran into the coop and was chasing chickens around and grabbed a couple and then she like put them in little like they were kind of like like happy mailboxes but like big yeah where like you push the middle and you fall the sides and then I brought them back and I we had a chicken coop we left them there and then the neighbor's dogs kept coming in and eating them oh and I got mad do you eat the dog no we we didn't know it was a dog's at first we just did something was eating them so we said a trap because we got an animal trap and we caught a beagle oh yeah and then we we were like what's your dog going no no no we are we we we we we we we we you know we the dog was yelling at us really well because he's in trap he's freaking out and then we just would oh boom and then he started wagging and said we let him out he ran off he didn't come back that says yeah he didn't he didn't he didn't like we went we actually went to the neighbors and we're like your dog killed our chickens like you owe us 20 bucks and they were like oh sorry and then the guy gave me 20 bucks and I was like it's it was whatever probably like if not an antidote to go hold on the credit he owed you he owed you 20 bucks plus a flight to my heavy and back really what did you pick the chickens up there or when I lived in Miami you lived there oh we lived in the Redlands okay it chickens we had eggs every day and it was funny because people would come and visit didn't know you could just eat eggs like I'd walk outside about you on breakfast and I'd walk back in with like three eggs and they'd be like what where those from like the chicken coop and they're like oh and I'm like yeah you do want anything they'd be like of those like yeah the eggs but don't don't you have to like do something like a bit of a factory or something and I'm like why they're eggs do you have friends that they're joking are you joking this aligns large saying people don't we brought people to the old studio in those apples on trees and I'd be like you want an apple and they'd be like well don't you got to do something I'm like bro it's an apple that we had berries all over the place if you want some berries I grab them and they'd be like can you just eat them I'm like this is what food is dude how do you go crazy I grew up I grew up in cities that don't have no rabbit shoes that don't that's the best form of eating the food is when you grab it off the What have I done here? Do you know how many times I ate guava, so Brazil, guava grows like-- - Amazing, wildly in Brazil, right? And they grow pretty big, too. And it's red, and it's full of those little white dots in there. Do you know how many times I'm like eating a guava as a kid? And all of a sudden something moves, and I'm like, "Flip," and I kept eating it. - No, no, no, no, let me tell you, let me tell you, let me tell you, let me tell you, let me tell you. - I can't lie. - So we have wine-- - It's so warm in my guava. Get out, I'm gonna finish the guava. - We have wine berries here. They are Chinese invasive raspberries. They're more resilient, and they're destroying the local raspberry population, so they're considered invasive, but they're delicious. And there are these little green mantis-looking things that live on them, but they're very small. So when you pull it off, you might notice it's like a little dude sitting there, and he's like living in it, and they-- You just eat 'em. - Yeah, they're edible. - Yeah, just food. I don't care. - Wow, my mom-- - I probably ate so many little bugs. - I think this is, I think this is completely made up, like my mom's stuff, like as a kid. I'm like, "Mom, there's an ant in my food." I'm like, "Oh, that's healthy. That means you have good eyes, I eat it." (laughing) - All right. - I'm good eyes, like, 'cause you caught it. I'm like, "What the hell?" - We gotta grab your rumble rants and super chats to smash the like button and share the show. The uncensored portions coming up in 10 minutes, but for now, let's see what you guys have to say. All right, let's see. Rob says, "Fairly certain fung fung died "in a sketchy plane crash." (laughing) - I mean, look. - Mitho says, "Okay, we got swall well-rated. "Now can we get Obama-rated for classified documents?" - I like that. - Epile says, "Tim, given that he's lying about you, "I think it would be funny if you made a donation "to APEC in Alex Jones' name, "and then report on him donating to APEC "while calling you the Israeli operative." Can you do that? I don't know if you're allowed to do that. Can you do that? - You can't. That would be literally the definition of a straw donation. That's why it's a prison. Don't do it. (laughing) No, no, no, no, no, no. Is APEC a 501(c)(4)? - It doesn't matter. Making a donation in another person's name with your financial information is literally the definition. - Per se. - I think you are incorrect. I think you're referring to political campaigns regulated on the APEC. - And no, 501(c)(3) and a 501(c)(4) are still regulated by a 499. - People make donations to people and other people's names all the time as it is illegal. It is illegal to make a donation on behalf of someone else with your financial information. - I know. - Trust me, I know this one. I spent a lot of money on this one. Trust me, I can see why it would be illegal 'cause I wouldn't want someone to make a donation. - It's also a form of identity. - It's actually literally a form of identity, huh? - Because remember, it involves, whenever you're making donations to a C4 or C3, it involves. - No, it is not illegal to donate to a charity 501(c)(4) and someone else's name. - It is your financial information. - As long as you are the true source of the funds, it is not fraud or misrepresentation to donate to a charity and someone else's name. - Oh, then you should do me a favor. You should go through the fucking FBI because they had a difference. - If it is a political contribution to. - Faggot. - Faggot. - Federally regulated. Candidate's party. - I like the other version. - You're better. - Federally law, strictly prohibits contributions and the name of another. This is a different regime from charities and carries civil and criminal penalties. So the question is, is APAC a standard 5.1(c)(4) or is it regulated at their super PAC? - I don't know what they actually are. They make campaign expenditures. Double check, I believe they're a super PAC. Maybe they have two wings to it. Like, turning point has their nonprofit and their PACs so turning point action. - I wish we didn't have any of these PACs and they'll have this money, it's ridiculous. - It's hard to expect. - I bet APAC is. - I bet APAC is, it has to have a super PAC because they make campaign expenditures and they take ads and that you need to be a PAC of some sort to do that. - Oh, it's not a political action committee at all. - But it does. - But it does operate political entities and is subject to some form of regulation. It's a domestic US lobbying and advocacy group focused on strengthening US Israel relation funded by Americans or by American citizens. It is not registered under FARAA. It's a social welfare organization. - So it does control campaign arms. It's called APAC, but it's not a PAC. - It is. - No, it's American Israeli PAC. It's what the name of it is. - American Israeli political action committee. - But it's not a political action committee is what they're saying. - The acronym stands for, but it's just weird, I don't know. I just know don't do it. Donating to APAC. - I don't want you to get jailed because of a troll. - It is actually common and normal that people make donations to APAC in the name of another. That's just-- - These donations are not tax deductible charitable contributions. However, APAC does have APAC PAC. - APAC, yes. - The veil is being removed. - You see the truth. - APAC, it is illegal to donate. However, the APAC organization is a 501(c)(4) advocacy group. It is generally allowed. Donations to the core APAC organization are not tax deductible. They are not subject to the same contribution in the name of another ban that applies to political action committees and candidate committees. You can donate and request that it be noted in honor of as a gift of on behalf of someone else for recognition purposes. The donation itself is treated as a personal gift to the person in a practical sense. That's interesting. I recommend anybody who's looking to make donations, talk to their lawyer before doing so, but always fun to clarify. - I still say don't do it. It's just not worth-- It's not worth the fofo. - They want to find a problem. - Yeah, if I remember, they can indict a ham sandwich. APAC PAC was the best thing I learned today, so. - APAC PAC, the American Israel Political Action Committee Political Action Committee. (laughing) - What the. - We're gonna hand out the kind of law. - Doss Wood says, "Yes, both illegal. Islam and Communism banned them both and banish any offenders to the island." (laughing) They have an island of Communism. - Somebody had this lovely comment on the Twitter stream that said, "Jord Tantos was bribed through the Catholic Church to run cover for sorrows." - What does that even-- - That proves it. - What does that even-- - He was on the line. - Catholic Church bribed me to run cover for sorrows. - It means the person says, "I don't like George Santos. "I don't like the Catholic Church "and I don't like George Soros." That's literally all it means. - That's all I think it means. - All it means. - Thank you for that, Phil. I appreciate you. - I translate retard. - Hey, we got huns. (laughing) We got a super chefe from Hunsys. I don't get why so many people are randomly attacking you now in X, but I respect the work that you and the crew do even when I disagree and you guys are wrong. I'm gonna tell you why. - It's because the new Tim Poole show is hitting it out of the park. Less than 100,000 subscribers on the new Tim Poole show. And we've got one episode of 800,000, ones at 260. The last one we did is a special. We put up a night with Ellis, Jason Ellis. It doesn't have that many at all, like 10,000. But that one was an extra special episode we just recorded when he was here. And we put it up at 10 p.m. after Tim Castigarral to see how it would do. And I guess most people missed it. You're not gonna watch a two-hour show at midnight. But the latest one we have, men don't need therapy. I think it's at like 250K. The climate change won didn't do as well. But it's 160K. So we have a brand new show. And it's hitting it out of the park at a time when everyone's views are down. And they're all complaining and they're screaming and they're all pissed off. So what happens is we're in a slow news period. News personalities are desperate for views. The new show we're doing is hitting it out of the park. And then I went on Jubilee. My name has been trending for this entire week. So if you look at like Twitter trends, it's just nothing but Tim Poole. So what happens is people of week will who don't have anything to talk about go to the trending section, see my name and then start talking about me. You'll notice that all the liberals are talking about me. You got Destiny talking about me. You got Hassan talking about me. Post on Reddit. They are desperate for something to latch onto. And this is just how the cycle goes, right? One day I wake up. There it is, I'm trending for 27 years. And then what ends up happening is we get a lot more viewership, we make a lot more money. And that's just the nature of the beast. So, you know, and they're lying too. And the funniest thing about it is right now, like Alex Jones literally took a video where I go, this war is a failure. I'm sorry, it just is. And Trump's not going to tell you the truth how it's going out with Iran. And then he posts Tim Poole endorses war in Iran. Oh, that's just brain rot, right? But no, but it's because he knows his audience doesn't care. When was the last time you dumped the dollar in the Alex Jones? Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, we got to fix that, right? Oh, does he get a, do you take a dollar out every time he says the wrong thing? Yeah. The thing I know what was the last time you did do a dollar dump in there. It's been a minute. I haven't really followed it, but it seems like what Alex made the mistake of is that that meeting you had with Netanyahu wasn't secret. It was private. It had some aspects of it were secretive because it was Chatham House rules. You're not allowed to say like who was there. So there was, or there's aspects of Chatham House that ask for secrecy among some of the participants. No, you're saying that some of the information can't be released because of Chatham House? You can tell anybody. Chatham House rules mean you can say who was there. You can say what was said. You can't attribute what was said to a person. Okay, so that, that's the layer of secrecy, but it was not a secret meeting. It was a private meeting. It's not even secret. Like you can say what was said. You just can't say who said what? It was right in. It was wrong. I think he, look, I never, like, and I get a lot of heat when I say this stuff. But I, this, this show is Chatham House rules, by the way, I never cared for Alex Jones. I always thought he was batshit crazy. I continued to think that like he, he made a sandy hook the, the, the entire one. look at my hands riding. I can't write. It's fucking I mean look like anything. I can't even read what I wrote. I think Alex Jones was wonk Jones was wonk. He's a long. He's a long. He's a he's an entertainer, but he's not even entertaining. Well, it's in the eye to behold her obvious safety. Oh, my God. That's our failure as an entertainer. But I've got like 70 voice memos from Alex Jones, because he would just record like for three minutes and send me this stuff. One of them was like, Tim, you got to understand a good private jet. You get for a million bucks. You don't, you don't got to be spending all his money flying around the country. You get a good private jet. And the only problem is that, you know, you're going to need to spend a, you got a higher crew. It's going to be about a hundred thousand a year per person. So, you know, all of your finance and this thing, you might actually cost you about five grand per month. And then a couple of these guys, maybe maybe seven, eight thousand per month, you got a private jet whenever you want. And I was like, just listening to this being like, what, why did he send me this? Yeah, he's the jam. He's on. It's because we're talking about going to Texas. And then I was like, yeah, we're trying to find flights. And then he sends me this big long thing about how to buy a private jet. I mean, it's, it's, it's good advice. It's not wrong. Everything you just said is actually spot on another dollar. I'm not putting a dollar for Alex, Alex Jones can go fuck off. Feel man, Alex thing in this whole last couple days is the banality of evil. If he feels like you're not doing enough to stop the war with your rhetoric, that I could guess I could see, but that doesn't mean you're, you know, on well, like, there's no steel man for that. Like, what can you just know? Steel Manning taking a video of me being like this war is a failure. And then posting Tim as endorsed the war. I want to see that one yet. Yeah. But the whole process like is we don't always talk about how bad the Israeli government's conquest of Gaza is on this show. We don't because we don't talk about Tibet either Ian. Right. I just just how often do we talk about Ukraine or South Sudan? Like if it's top right now, we've got US troops in Venezuela right now. And we've done multiple shows on the Gaza war. Like, oh, it's insufferable. These people that are shut up. We've had Scott Horton on multiple times. We had Max Blumenthal on. We have Dave Smith on. We have plenty of critics of Israel. It's just it is the most annoying thing in the world where when you're like, oh, what's in the news today? Ukraine? Why don't you talk about Israel? It's like, well, we just did a whole show on Israel last week. Talk about it again. No. Right. I don't think that talking about even if you think the Israeli American government confluence is the biggest problem on earth. Talking about every day is not the way to solve it. You have to build machines that solve it. Because they're in charge. I honestly so to the point you just made, I love X faces or loved I just can do it every space on X regardless of the topic. Everything is either fed slop or Israel. And it's just irritating. I go in there and I start talking about the most random things just like literally derailed a topic. It lasts maybe the first 10 minutes because they're hyped because I came in. And then like, but anyway, so what's your take on Israel? I go, I got it. I don't know how to talk about this anymore. We're going to go to the uncensored portion of the show right now. We're at rumble.com/timcast. IRL. So smash that like button, subscribe. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Tim Kest. Mel, do you want to shout anything out? Oh, just if everyone can check out my new book. It's called Infiltration instead of invasion. America betrayed 1944 to 1954 and a lot of history. I didn't know. You probably don't know. And I'll really open your mind to what is happening. Plug your book. Oh, here we go. Infiltration instead of invasion, America betrayed 1944 to 1954. Mel K, the Mel K show and I hope you'll check it out. I think it's really important. The American people start to deal with the truth of our past so we cannot fix the future, maybe. And before I just want to 1944 to 1955 is the dates that this book and 44 you're saying they went into the the German government. They hooked up with all the German, the American bankers and the German bankers colluded before Hitler surrendered to sell out the country of Germany into the liberal economic order. Absolutely. Oh, freakish. Absolutely. The Bank of International Settlements, I and Math World Bank, the international organization of that immunity's act that is still under still going today. There's so much in there that'll just infuriate you want to do my tax as you sound like really competent. I'm telling you when the people really understand that we were sold out after World War II, certainly when the Dulles Brothers took over the State Department, America became, you know, just on its way out. So we have to save it. And they've sold us for, you know, 60 years decline of America, the control demolition of America, as progressivism and the truth is they want a one world government and they planned it out in 1944. And they don't want to lose it. And that's what we're fighting, I think. So Thanks for writing the book, Mel. Thank you. I'm at Ian Croson. Find me at Ian Croson over the internet and go get yourself a chachee. Oh, I don't even want to tell you get chachee PT learn about RNA. That's what I'm going to do. You do you or Santos. Tortantos, uh, make sure you follow me on X. It's it's getting wilder by the day. And I think I am so proud of that. Um, go check out how I really feel about Alexander Vindman. Um, and also special forces premieres September 24th on Fox entertainment and on the next day on Hulu. So make sure to check out me, me in the Malaysian jungle for special forces. So it's great to be with you guys. I am filler remains on Twix. You can check out my patreon is patreon.com/filler remains. You can check out all the remains music on Apple music pin. Apple music, Amazon music, Pandora, YouTube Spotify and Deezer. Don't forget the left lane is for crime. So much going on here tonight. Very special episode here. I'm Carter Banks. You can follow me at Carter Banks everywhere at Carter Banks official on Instagram and check out our label at trash house records on YouTube. Let's get into the aftershows. Thanks for coming everyone. We'll see you all at rumble.com/timkestrl right now. Thanks for going out. [BLANK_AUDIO]