Ex-Tesla President: The Unconventional Ideas Behind Tesla's Hypergrowth
64m 37s
The discussion centers on leadership and operational insights from working with Elon Musk at Tesla. A core principle is Musk's use of ambitious, order-of-magnitude goals to force innovative thinking, such as increasing digital car sales by 20X. His unique hiring methodology involves deep, problem-solving conversations to assess whether a candidate has truly done "world-class work" and possesses exceptional ability, prioritizing the conversation over the resume. To scale Tesla's culture, Musk and co-founder JB Straubel served as the final interviewers for managerial hires, a practice the speaker now uses. The speaker stresses that leaders must prioritize talent acquisition, revealing he spent 60% of his time on interviews. Finally, the conversation highlights practical leadership tactics like "mystery shopping" or directly observing frontline operations to rapidly identify and solve critical business constraints, illustrated by a story where fixing a simple sales follow-up issue helped Tesla meet a quarterly target. The overarching theme is that effective leadership combines high standards for talent with hands-on, ground-level problem-solving.
Part of this secret to Elon's secret sauce is he sets these order of magnitude improvement goals. So 10X, 100X. He came to me and said, "Hey look, we gotta figure out how to sell cars online." Because nobody was buying $120,000 thing, side unseen online. And so he turns to me and says, "This is your goal. Proof digital sales by 20X." So now it's like, "Oh crap, I gotta think what are you differently about this?" ♪ I feel like I could rule the world and know I could be what I want to ♪ ♪ On a road let's try what we want to do ♪ All right, so I guess to start, I mean, I almost want to rename the podcast, How Lucky Are We. It's like, "Oh, we get to sit here." With the guy who was the president of one of the most important companies of our time, Tesla for years, you got to work with one of the greatest entrepreneurs ever, Elon. You yourself have this crazy entrepreneurial track record you've built and sold, you know, five, six different startups, like the force and gump of the tech industry, just going into different spaces and you go into, you know, auto repair and cyber insurance and all these different spaces. And so I'm pretty fascinated that we get to talk today and I got a bunch of questions for you. But I want to start with less of a tactical question and more of a movie scene. So you go into a job interview with Elon Musk. It might not have even felt like it was a formal job interview, but your first conversation with them. What's that like? All right. So the setup to the scene is we're introduced by a mutual friend. And he is intense and in nice cities, we're about two sentences and then he said, "Hey, I got this problem in manufacturing. Have you ever seen it before?" And then we were right into it. And two hours flew by because I had had that experience in manufacturing. I'd seen that problem. We started to break it down together and then we started to move deeper and deeper and deeper into the problem. And we looked up in two hours. He was like, "Oh man, I got a lot out of this. I got to go. I'm going to go down to the factory floor and do it." We just talked about. So that's the first, that's the first combo. So your problem solving together, he skips a small talk. And then is he testing you? Or he's just genuinely trying to solve the problem right now. Like, did you get any sense of he was poking around to see kind of where your capacity was? Or he was, "Oh yeah." Oh yeah, that's exactly what it was up to. So his hiring method is he wants to determine whether or not you can do world-class work. And his method is to interrogate a particular problem and go super deep on it. And it's better if he tries to skew it to a problem that he knows. Right. So that he can-- He can't-- You're bullshitting. Exactly. And he can take you super deep because he's in it. And he just likes to know like, almost like a video game. Like, how many layers can this player get through before they're stopped? And so that's exactly what was going on. We were getting to know each other, but 90% of it was, he was evaluating. Later, when you worked, I knew the president. Did he try to teach you kind of the method or say, like, "Hey, here's what I'm doing when I'm interviewing?" Because I'm assuming for the first ex-hires that test on the key hires, I think I've read something before that he interviewed the first thousand people at SpaceX. I don't know if that's kind of like folklore or real. But, you know, the idea that he's basically figured out how he likes to hire. Did he try to implement that with you and others so that it's the whole team is hiring that way? Or he just does it in his own idiosyncratic way. You do whatever you want to do. I'm glad you raised this because this is a hack I don't get to in the book, but it's the thing that a lot of entrepreneurs think about, which is as your company scales, how do you protect the culture? Right. And he and JB Strawble, the co-founder of Tesla, came up with this method to imprint the culture on every hire and a test for culture. And that was they would be the last interviews. That's a hack that I've taken forward now from that Elon experience. And now I do that too. But the way that translated was that he would say, like he said to me, "Hey, look, we know as fast as this thing is growing, we're going to split this up. And you and I are going to interview everybody that's hired at a manager level and above." So we didn't interview everybody, but growing from four to 40,000 employees, there were a lot of interviews we were doing. In fact, 60% of my calendar was interviews. Wow. 60%. That's unbelievable. Yeah, but it was super important because you totally win and lose on talent. So that's another hack for entrepreneurs to think about is how much of your calendars devoted to the number one driver of your success, which is talent. But to you, the point of your question, he said, "Hey, we have to determine whether or not these people can demonstrate evidence that they can be world class. And to do that, we've got to dive deep into these problems." So he basically articulated what he had done with me as we were getting to know each other and going through that interview process. And then we started dividing concrete. Like we literally were the last interview. And oftentimes I would include in my senior senior hires, I would include J.B. Andy Lone because they were both such great talent selectors. J.B. especially has this unbelievable knack for talent selection. And what did you pick up? So what's the, okay, so I hear the overall method, which is you want to be looking for this sort of world class work, evidence of exceptional ability. You are going to, how do you do that? You go super deep on a problem that they've worked on or that you understand. I've heard Elon say a couple of things that I liked, which was, he's like, I'm trying to say, wow, wow, wow, in the first 20 minutes. And if I'm not saying wow, wow, in the first 20 minutes, probably not there. Exactly. And trust, trust the conversation, not the resume, because you could have a great resume. But if the conversation is not giving you wow, wow, wow, it's not there. And if it is, forget the resume, it's, you know, this is legit. So I picked up a couple of extra things in over the years and some of his interviews. But I would love, you know, forks to go from white belt to blue belt here. So what are the nuances? What's a little, what's a question? What's a, a little red flag or a trap that you've learned to avoid? So one trap to like try to identify is, did this person actually do the work? Are they claiming the worker their team? In other words, a lot of us have been on teams of eight or 10 or 20 that have done unbelievable work. We've been on those teams. But it wasn't our work. We weren't leading the team. We weren't leading the curiosity or the discovery or whatever. And so that's the trap that you're trying to like dive into so deeply in the problem that you start to determine, did this person actually do the work or not? And it's tricky because there are companies that are fully matrixed. So take like Nike, Nike is a fully matrixed organization. You pull a marketer out of Nike. That marketer has never had full P&O responsibility, full creative responsibility, full distribution responsibility. They have a very nitchy job. And it's really hard to determine did this person do the work or not? And so you go way deep on trying to figure that out, knowing that it's a risky hire to hire from a matrix like that because you really can't put your finger on who really does the the breakthrough work. That's kind of, that's one. The second is I would present a much like Elon did with me. I'd flip the tables and present a current problem of mine. And then I want to see their level of curiosity, their level of analytics, their level of problem solving, their ability to ask really great questions, get some data from me and get me engaged. Right. And so it's basically it's that basic like go into a problem of theirs, then flip the table and go into a problem of yours. And that's that's the knacket Tesla. It was like, let's turn complex into simple. And so if you've been a leader there, you can identify these leaders because they have the ability within a minute or two to take a really complex question and boil it down into principle. Hey everyone really quick. If you're enjoying this episode on CEO stuff, so delegating, having hard conversations with your team, hiring, then I've got something for you. So the team at HubSpot, they actually went and fit together a bunch of best practices that Sean and I use in our own companies. And they put it together and something that's really easy to read and understand. And so if you want to just save yourself 10 years of headache, and heartache, then you should check it out. I wish we had this long time ago, or to help me a lot, but there should be a QR code on your screen that you can scan or a link in the description. So check it out. It's totally free and totally awesome. I've had the two traps you just mentioned. I've had the exact experience in the last week. I interviewed somebody they're like, oh yeah, I was there from one million of revenue to 93 million of revenue. Oh fantastic. They weren't the one driving that revenue. So even they're claiming the work of their team. It's they're claiming the progress of the overall company. And they lived in this corner over here that had nothing to do with driving the growth. And they really didn't understand the core engine of this business is is a you worked on B over here. And I need to find people who the guy who built a because a was the reason that business one. And that's what we're actually trying to understand and trying to try to do our own version of. So I've definitely felt that. And then the other side is there's people who have come from these great companies. Like I'm a marketer. Nike. Well Nike has great marketing. And so your brain associates this like level of talent, but they're not maybe the people who are there at the beginning. The ones who made the key decisions or one thing that I found is with salespeople. There's a great piece of advice. I think from Ben Horowitz or someone he's like higher salespeople from the ones who had the the shitty product. He's like if you hire salesperson from the people who's the product was just being pulled by the market. They you know, the fish were jumping in the boat. And you don't know if that person's a great fisherman just because they were just being handed inbound organic warm leads and they were closing them. That's that doesn't mean anything. You want to go to the guy who was selling on the tier three company still beating quota. Even though their company was not the winner, their product was not the hot one because that person actually knows how to sell. And that's really helped me with some of my companies. So there's these like small, heuristics that can actually like improve talent selection sourcing. I 100% agree with that. Like our head of retail came to me and he said hey, my heart's
and a lot of Apple people from Apple stores. And I said, time out. You can work in an Apple store and you were an order taker. Go down the hall to the people at the Microsoft store who have to sell a slate. Two doors down from a MacBook Air. Those people know how to sell. The fact that they're not starving is unbelievable. So go higher though. - Well, one of the stories I loved in the book, so I have the book here. So I have like highlighting all my favorite stories as we go. A Tesla sales story. Can you tell that story? I thought it was a great one. - So the context is, Elon and I are having these discussions. We're getting to know each other and eventually he pops the question. He said, "One should join." My first direction is, "I'm not sure I'm your guy." Like your company's twice as big as my biggest company already. "Don't you need a big company guy?" And he says, "No, no, that's the opposite of what I need. I need a fellow entrepreneur who knows what it's like." - You need him. - Yeah, totally. He's like, "I need a fellow entrepreneur who knows what it's like that you glass and looking to the abyss." His famous quote. And you know how to allocate capital and no big company, person's gonna know that. So I said, "Why don't you let me go poke around the business? What is your biggest challenge right now?" And he said, "Oh, biggest challenge is top line." Like we've promised this street, we're gonna sell 12,000 cars this quarter. And it's a month and a half in and we've sold three. I'm like, "Oh crap, that's a big problem." I said, "Tell you what, I'm traveling to town the next week. I'll call you in a week." So I went out as I was traveling to Tesla stores and I test drove cars. - So your first move was to Mystery Shop, which is exactly. - Which is exactly. - 'Cause you get this idea that it's all intellectual, it's all strategy and you're like, "No, no, no, no, no, no. Let me go see ground floor truth of what's going on." - Totally. I'd read the same Walton biography. And the biggest thing I pulled out of that book was the management hack of secret shopping. 'Cause you get to sense, like, frontline employees knew exactly what's wrong with the company. They will tell you what the customers are complaining about, the three what the organization sucks at. And so that was my first instinct, like, go to the front line. So I go to eight stores, I test drive, use different email addresses so they don't know who I am. And the test drive is supposed to be the full-room of the sales funnel. Like you hit the accelerator and you can't stop thinking about buying a Tesla. - Right. - I ain't got a single call back. And Elon introduced me to the head of sales ops. So I called the guy, I said, can you tell me why I'm not getting called back? And he said, I looked at the system, you're not flying. I have no idea. I said, okay, tell me how many people have gotten a test drive in the last 30 days that haven't been called back? So he cranks through the CRM and he comes back and says, 9,000. And I'm like, 9,000, you're gonna make your quarter if you just call these people. I said, okay, look, this problem has to get solved now. So I'm kind of in CEO mode. And like this problem has to get solved now. Can you cut off any new leads to sales people until they call all their previous test drives back? He's like, yeah, I can block that in the system. I said, okay, do it. He's like, great. It'll be done in two hours globally. - They weren't calling back not out of laziness, but because the incentive structure, right? They were getting, they sort of commissioned was tied to the test drive, right? Not to sales that closed from a follow up. Is that what, there was some incentive problem, correct? There was an incentive problem, but there was also a profile problem. We were hiring people that didn't know how to ask for the sale. And that was the root cause. So when you force them to, then stuff started moving. So I talked to the guy the next day, he's like, I already have the results out of Asian Europe and like sales are flying. And I said, yeah. I said, no surprise. Like all you have to do is call people back. Like if you want to close the sale. And then it dawned on me, oh crap. I made this decision like I was the CEO. I don't even work for Tesla yet. And so I said to the guy, like, I got a call Elon and telling what we did. And I said, I'll take the blame. You're not gonna take the blame. I'll take the blame. And so I called Elon and I said, man, I got a bigger forgiveness. I haven't, I haven't not been a CEO for 20 years. I've had six companies. I haven't had a boss. And when I see a problem, I want it gone like immediately. And so here's the problem I saw on your top line challenge. Here's what's happening in your stores. Here's the change we made yesterday. And by the way, I think with this change, you're gonna make a quarter. Long silence. Like uncomfortable silence. This is before I knew about this signature Elon long silence. And tell me. Let me talk in 10 seconds, 30 seconds. It had to be at least 60. And to the point where I was just about read asking where you're still there. (laughing) And what I have now come to learn is like that's his processing mode. He shuts down all other sensory inputs and he just lets the compute run. Right, you're literally like AI, right? You can say go to think mode. And it's exactly, it'll take time. That is the think harder button. So he comes back on, he says, you know what? I think you're gonna fit in here just fine. You've proven to yourself into me, you could be useful. So why don't you just join? (laughing) That's an awesome story. Yeah. You've done this kind of over and over again where you sort of go into problem solving mode. And I wanna talk a little bit about that, a little off book here because I was at a dinner somewhere and I got bumped into a dude who had taken over a CEO of Lime Scooters. You know one of the scooter companies, I knew like Hot for a while, exact bird or lime, and then it kind of crashed. But there were a public company and they were struggling now. And so this guy comes in and I was like, so what'd you do? 'Cause he actually turned the company around. They got to profitability. It's not like it's the best company in the world, but it was about to die. And it did not die. So you know, as a ER doctor, he did well. And he goes, the first thing I did is I went and I sat in the warehouse and I just sat there for eight hours. And people were like, hey, do you wanna do meetings? And he's like, no, I just wanna watch. And he just watched and he's like, okay, he's basically watching where all the waste is. 'Cause if he wants to make this thing profitable, he has to find out where all the waste and expenses that's not driving revenue to the company. We're gonna spend the money, but we're not getting paid to do these activities. He's like, oh, so that guy, he's doing this, but there's a bottleneck over here. And that's because they only have one person and they're all waiting for this. And he's like, I sat there for eight hours and it kind of like told me what I needed to do for the first two weeks. And I remember thinking this idea of mystery shopping or going and sitting in the factory, going and sitting in the warehouse and just watching what's going on. There's an immense amount of power to that. And I think for most CEOs, we sort of think that a big impact has to come from a big high level thing and not this kind of roll your sleeves up. Just go watch. You don't need a 2000 IQ. You just need a simple thing. - Yeah, like I think, the biggest, your biggest job as an entrepreneur or as a leader is to like stack rank the problems that are constraining your business. Stack rank them and then pull the biggest problem off the top pile every day and work it. And the first principle that I learned from a guy that was a mentor of mine, he taught me, he used to haul me down to the, like I had a software business, he would haul me down to the customer support teams. And he'd say, just sit here on a chair and listen to these calls. And his first principle that he kept saying to me was, I'm gonna introduce you to the most powerful analytics you have as a leader. You're two eyes and you're two ears. Use them because you will get insights so much faster than the data can get to you to give you insights. And it was true. And so when I started at Tessa, we were having a super big problem producing Model X's and getting the Falcon Wing doors to fit. And in Elon and I had shared this favorite book, The Goal, which is all about manufacturing process. And he grabbed me when he said, okay, the goal guy, come on, we're going down to the line. And I said, he said, help me solve this problem. I've been sleeping in the factory trying to work on this. And I said, okay, like we're gonna walk up the factory line to where all the inventory is stacked up on these doors because that's the clue where the problem exists. If, if throughput can't get through there, it's all stacking up, that's where the problem exists. So we're just gonna stand here. So we walked to that point, sure enough, a bunch of doors stacked up. And I said, I said, they think my mentor said, I said, you're gonna now use, and I'm gonna now use the greatest analytical instrument in the world, our eyes. And we're just gonna sit here for an hour and this is gonna drive you crazy, but we're just gonna watch these people work. And so we stood there and watched them work and you could all of a sudden see, ah, these people can't see where the bolt goes because it's blind. And so they're threading a bolt blind and they're missing the angle and therefore the door is going on crooked. What do they need? They need a jig. After 10 minutes, you could see this. And so he got antsy, I got antsy. We're like, okay, just have the maintenance guys build a jig, bring it out here and let's start to experiment and whether they can get the bolt done correctly. But that was an example of, just go out there. Don't depend on data, don't depend on anybody else's opinion. Just go see it with your own eyes. And that will lead most likely to an insight that you can then teach people. Like here's what I was looking at, here's what I saw. So if you're the leader of this little team, next time you look for this and you can solve this problem. I, you don't have to wait for me to come down here and sleep on the factory floors that President or CEO. - What's, it's funny, it's like, is there a double-slit experiment problem here where as soon as you start observing it, it behaves differently. Some of you are sitting there watching with Elon, all of a sudden the doors are going through real fast. Is that, is that or no? like it's my pleasure.
usually a process constraint no matter how hard they're trying to work. No matter how hard they're trying to work, it's usually a process constraint, but that does happen. And so the problem can like can, can fool you because people do start to have the white coat problem where you're the boss is standing there and they're like, now they're hustling, now they're trying to impress the boss. But most of the time you can see it. Like if you stand there long enough, they're going to forget you're there. Right. And there's also, you know, you talked about being there for an hour and after 10 minutes, you see it and you get antsy, you want to go fix it right away. There's almost actually a benefit in just feeling the pain a little longer than you're supposed to to just really like actually drive home the importance of it. So we did this. I, you know, I'm not in the manufacturing business, but I have an e-commerce business. And in our e-commerce business, we're at this, you know, leadership off site. And we're all talking about the strategies. And it's like, has anyone tried shopping the site or watching someone shop the site? Hey, let's get somebody here to shop right now. And they're trying to find something that we know we have and you can't find it on the site. It's painful. And we think this is so, yeah, just click that thing. And they won't click it because it doesn't look obvious. And feeling the pain of watching somebody use your product. It's surprising how many CEOs don't actually use the product or watch average people struggle to use the product. So I was with a group of bank executives a few weeks ago. And I asked them to raise their hand if they use their banks app in the last week, their consumer app. And no hands go up. And I said to them, I could have guessed that because I'm a consumer of two of your banks and your apps are terrible. Right. And if you use them, you couldn't live for another day without terrible this was. So you'd be calling whoever could fix it to fix it ASAP. And a little bit to your point, like I learned this technique from Scott Cook, the founder of Intuit. And he's got this process he calls, follow me home. And what it means is you look over the shoulder of real customers who are using your product. So sometimes you can't use it. And there's a lot of cases of that. But you want to see how an actual user thinks about using your product. And when you look over their shoulder, you see all of the friction you're putting into that product, like how difficult it is really to find what you're looking for to make the right clicks do whatever. And he has his senior executives do this on a really frequent basis. So that they're getting the feedback loop through the eyes of the customer. And oftentimes those customers will turn around and say, would you just fix this or would you just do this for me? And they get new product ideas too, where they they would get to like an accountant doing the end of the month payroll close. And they one of them in this exercise turned to a senior manager and said, be it whole that easy if the payroll was just done by QuickBooks. And boom, that idea was like right back into the senior management team discussion. Instantly like, hey, I just heard this from a customer. Should we get in the payroll business? Now that's a huge business for Intuit. But it came out of these like just follow the customer home and watch them click. And then have them tell you not only what's wrong with the product, but what's missing in the product? Does it does a proctor and gamble do something like this where you, uh, I think they have like research teams that will literally go home. They'll go to the home of a average mom and they'll watch, you know, how they clean their kitchen, how they're, oh, they use the soap this way. Totally. I'm on a board with a guy named Chippurg, uh, chip started his career at PNG. He ended up being the CEO of Levi's, but he was famous at C at PNG for watching moms and kitchens. Like you said, and he invented, he and his team invented the swiffer because they're like the, the, the mop sucks. Like you got to get water all over the place. You got to dump it in the sink. It's totally janky. And so they invented the swiffer based on how they watch moms suffer with regular mobs. Right. I love that. Today's episode is brought to you by HubSpot. Did you know that most businesses only use 20% of their data? That's like reading a book, but then tearing out four, fifths of the pages. Point is you miss a lot. And unless you're using HubSpot, the customer platform that gives you access to the data, you need to grow your business, the insights that are trapped in emails, call logs, transcripts, all that unstructured data makes all the difference because when you know more, you grow more. And so if you want to read the whole book, instead of just reading part of it, visit HubSpot.com. You have a couple of other like business principles. And one of the things I liked was, uh, I'm an idea guy. Like my, my entrepreneurial style is a high variety style. I've done business and, you know, whether it's restaurants and biotech and cyber and, you know, a bunch of different industries and, you know, not all have worked, but like that's, I guess, just the way I'm wired. Whereas some people, they stay in one domain and they keep solving problems in that domain for 40 years of their career. Yeah. And seems like you're also in the high variety category. And one of the reasons why is you've learned how to sniff out opportunity because it smells like a problem. It smells like something that doesn't make sense. And it sounds like one of the tells that you have in the book is anytime you see something that's one size fits all. Yeah. So a little bit like you, I've been a variety driven entrepreneur. I think it's a little bit because I've got business ADD. Like I, I couldn't spend an entire career in a single industry without driving myself crazy. So I do look at these one size fits all in, uh, in as a clue of, ooh, there could be an opportunity here. So an example that is we took a look at the cybersecurity industry. And we started with this question of like a 30% of computers move to the cloud, 70% hasn't. When does the next 30% move? What opportunities is that going to create, et cetera? This is in my venture firm. And we found something surprising that 30% of compute wasn't moving to the cloud. It was small, medium size businesses like law firms, accountancies, et cetera. We have no compelling reason to go to the cloud. And they have a headwind of data risk. They, they have very sensitive data. They don't want to move that to the cloud. And so then we started to ask ourselves like, is there a one size fits all here scenario? And it turned out there was, we asked, we just happened to ask the question, how many cybersecurity platforms have been created for the cloud in the last five years? And the answer is like 1300. And then we said, how many have been created for the SMB in the last five years? And the answer was zero. All right. This is a one size fits all markets. Cyber is size to the cloud, which I totally get as a computer scientist. I get that it's easier to write to Amazon, Azure and Google. And it's super difficult to write to an infinity number of tech stacks in S and B. So that one size fits all is creating an opportunity. And then we asked one more question because then we felt like we knew the answer to this question, where are the ransomware attacks happening? And no surprise, it's in the SMB side because they haven't had tech in five years. And so we set out to build a company that is essentially a super modern cyber platform for widely variable tech stacks and introduced that. And it's got a ton of market traction and it's like one of the fastest growing companies in cyber right now. But it came from that first insight of like, ooh, we just tripped across the one size fits all. The market has been a hundred percent cloud. And there's this small medium thing hanging out here that isn't larger, extra large. How about we like split the market and go after where the competition isn't. I like that. In the book, you phrase it's like you use a slightly different intro to the story, which I liked, where you basically talked about like you're looking at the expense. I think you were on the board of two companies. Yeah. You're looking at the line items on the expense sheet. And it was like, uh, it was two different times. I was like, um, you're lifting. Lula Lula lemon, which is a retailer. They don't really have any personal sensitive data about any customers. You know, customer comes in swipes or credit card. They don't save it. And they were spending something like $7 million on cyber insurance. Yeah. And then somebody else was spending, um, you know, somebody else who had a lot of sensitive data. It was also spending $7 million. And you sort of had this like, huh? How could these two vastly different companies with vastly different risk profiles and vastly different industries have the same thing. And you were like, that smells a little fishy to be. And whether that became a successful company or not, I just liked the, the general idea of, um, noticing is actually a superpower. We talked about noticing for bottlenecks, but then you can sort of notice for things that don't make sense in the world. And an entrepreneur can come in and make it make sense by actually changing the way the world works. Right. Exactly. And actually change the system rather than try to just say, I guess it just has to be that way. Right. Right. And that's a perfect example of that. Like I think noticing is a trade a lot of entrepreneurs have because we do see like friction and say to ourselves, like, why does this friction exist in life? And how do we get rid of it? Right. And I have people ask me like, do you fly private? And I've got a weird answer. I said, no, I don't, but it for a weird reason. I don't fly private. I fly commercial because I want to experience friction of everyday life. That's going to give me my next business idea or two or three. And I think entrepreneurs are kind of wired to look for friction as a clue that there could be an opportunity. But they definitely, we all have, I think, a heightened, spidey sense for where that friction is. Yeah. As an entrepreneur, if your life gets too comfortable, you lose your ability to spot problems. Exactly. The mediums, when comedians get too rich, they fall off a cliff because they don't have relatable jokes anymore. Because life is completely unrelated at this point. Right. And they don't see the everyday things. OK, so I want to go through a couple of the steps of the algorithm. So you can book this called the algorithm. And the idea is that, let me, let me phrase what I took away from the idea. OK. So the idea is there's a certain way that you can run a company that will lead to faster growth and more success, obviously. And what I liked about it is there's this feeling that Elon's just the super genius alien. And maybe he is, but let's say that the success of the companies are because you
you have this super genius. It's a very nice story, fits well in the sort of Hollywood way of looking at the world. But he said, "Or is it that he is really smart and ambitious and talented?" But he surrounds himself with really smart and ambitious and talented, a legion of smart people who are empowered by a way of working, a culture of working, a method that leads to this level of success because he's got all these different companies, one man can only be doing so much and can only be in so many places at once. Is that accurate how I described the premise of what we're talking about? - Yeah, it's kind of three layers. First off, he's brilliant and he is unique as an entrepreneur in our time. Like I can't name any entrepreneur who's created four or five companies, all worth tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds of billions of dollars. Yeah, Zuck has had one, Gates had one, Jobs had two, Beating Off said one, Ellison's had one. You go down the list of entrepreneurs of our time, there's nobody like him. And so he is pretty special, dude. He does surround himself with world-class talent. And but the idea of the algorithm was to give that world-class talent a framework so that we could push decisions to the edge and people could drive innovation without us showing up and having to drive it ourselves. And a framework is super helpful in that. So you combine world-class talent with a framework and a method and you start to get innovation breakouts that are really unique. And a lot of people said, hey, do you have to be willing to do this? My answer was no. That's why the book is told through the eyes of people who are actually on the edge doing this work and telling their story. So you can see there was no senior management team hanging around here. This was like frontline people taking on these big problems and saying, we just wanna solve this and give them a framework to solve it. And they do crazy things like inventing mobile car service from an OEA from a manufacturer inventing one-click loans and inventing insurance and bettering car payments. Like just stuff that was flowing and moving so fast because people at the edge were empowered but they were also equipped with this framework. And one thing that's not in the framework but it seemed common was that the starting point for a lot of the stories was, we had this problem, you have this one in there about online sales. It's like Tesla is this high tech, kind of the most tech forward company but actually the e-commerce, the online sales were pretty weak at the time. Right. And so you have this problem and it's a weakness in the company right now. And instead of just saying, hey, let's improve our weakness a little bit. Let's get back up to par. Elon's method, it seems like starts with a crazy goal that's not only is this, not only are we gonna go from weakness to average, we're gonna go to world class or best in class in that same category, which I think is not how most people think. It's not how I operate. When I see that, I'm like, that's not what I would've said in that situation. For example, with the online sales, it's like online sales are weak. Okay, here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna 20X our online sales or something like that. We are going to lift this and it's gonna be the number one driver, right? Of sales. And so there's this crazy ambitious goal to start the thing. And it sounds pretty unreasonable. Especially because you're starting not from a position of strength, but from a position of weakness. Can you talk about that side of things that like let's just start by laying down the gauntlet of a somewhat impossible goal on something that today is actually a weak area. - Goal setting can determine like what outcome you're gonna get. And so if you set a goal for five to seven percent improvement, you're probably gonna get three to five. If you set a goal for an order of magnitude improvement, now you got people that have to think way differently about that problem. 'Cause you can't tweak the status quo to get to a 100% improvement or a 20X improvement. And so part of this secret to Elon's, part of his secret sauce is he sets these order of magnitude improvement goals. So 10X, 100X. And it forces you to think way differently about how you would solve that problem or what you would do with the product or what you would do with the process, et cetera. And so like you're referencing this example of, he came to me and said, he look, we have continuous demand challenges. We got to figure out how to sell cars online, which sounded crazy at this time because nobody was buying $120,000 things, side unseen online. - Click, click. - But we both knew, 'cause we'd both been in consumer that every click you have, you asked the consumer to make your conversion goes down. And that's, I'm saying in obvious, every entrepreneur in Ecom knows that, but we looked at our clicks and they were 64 clicks to buy a car. And so he turns to me, he says, improved, let's improve digital sales. This is your goal, improve digital sales by 20X. So now it's like, oh crap, I got to think way differently about this. I can't think about like tweaking here and there. And so he said, how many clicks does it take to buy a domino's pizza on their app? I have no idea. He's like, let's pull it out. So we pull it out, it turns out it takes 10, 10, thumbtaps to buy a domino's pizza at that time. He's like, we are 64, domino's is 10, let's go to 10. And the first thing that that calls into question, it was a core tenant of the business at that time, which was producing custom build order product. And that was religion there. Partly driven by the fact they didn't want to be a typical car company, they wanted to make you the car you wanted versus the car the car company wanted to sell. Right. And it's something everyone will nod their head to fully customizable, of course. Totally. But that led to like 360,000 different combinations of a car that you could choose, which is driving a lot of clicks, plus a lot of decision fatigue for people. And so we went around the data, my team were in the data, and we came back and figured out that people weren't buying 360,000 versions, they were buying two. And it was either what is known today as a standard or a performance. And so I went to the head of manufacturing Greg Reikow and the head of engineering Doug Field. I said, hey, look, I'm the new guy here. I've never been in the car business, so I could be completely stupid about this. But let me show what the data says. The data says that out of all these 360,000 combinations of build order, people are really buying two. And what would it mean to you guys is side of the business if there were only two? And sorry, just to clarify, what you're really saying is, it's not that they're buying two configurations. It's like the job to be done. The thing that the customer cared about was they wanted either high performance, like the tap the pedal that it flies, or they want the safety plus EV plus whatever. So a lot of this range battery they could afford. Longest range battery, good. I'm gonna have that. And actually, we can pre-customize, we can pre-configure cars to solve those needs without letting them choose what color the strip is on the side of the door. Exactly. And that's exactly it. And so Greg, who's running manufacturing, says, oh my God, I've been waiting for this day for somebody to really drive this because you know what they have to do with our factory? Totally simplifies the factory, simplifies the supply chain. We could increase throughput dramatically. Turn to Doug, was it mean for engineering? He's like, are you kidding me? Like, I don't have to design all these parts. I don't have to test them. I can port engineering's time on the stuff that really matters to the job to be done for the customer. I'm totally in. So then walk into the senior management team meeting and one of the team members was like, hey, you are the new guy, you don't understand. Like it's religion here, we do build order. And like it might be religion, but that religion might take you to the grave. Here's why. Here's what happens to the business. If we do this, we're gonna get rid of a lot of clicks, a lot of decision fatigue. If we just get down to two configurations. And you can make it three if you want. I don't care, but you can't make it 360,000. - Right. - And Elon, he's super rational. He looked at the case, and listen to Greg, and listen to Doug, and he was like, yeah, we have to do this. So if you go to buy a Tesla today, you'll see you've got two or three configurations on there. That's it. And the fear was we would look like Honda, but it turns out we didn't, because we had a completely different product. We had software on wheels. We were making, we're taking away all that decision fatigue from the customer and all that friction in the sales process. Just by questioning, at the end of the day, we questioned the business model at the time, which happens to me as an entrepreneur, happens to a lot of entrepreneurs. You fall in love with your business model, and you don't really accept any challenge when somebody says, should we chuck this business model because it's actually what's in the way. - Right. And I wonder what you learned when you went to work for someone, 'cause you said, like you said, I've been CEO for 20 years. I had the same experience where we got acquired. And I went from a 20 person company, and I'd always been my own, I was always the CEO of startups for 10 years. And then suddenly, I now had to go and report to, and I forget the report to it. I just had to bring my plans of what I'm trying to do to the table with somebody. I had to learn how to talk to a CEO who was thinking about the business separately. And I had never really been on that side of the table. And I had to learn how to communicate upwards. What does that mean? How do I simplify? I think the language that they're trying to understand in order to do this well. Do you have any tips for somebody who's learning how to communicate to a CEO? And you know, you were doing it with Elon, right? Maybe there's something specific to Elon. But what was your method for when you go into those meetings of how you present information in a way that is productive versus wasting time?
We actually had this bit of a game for a while. I think it was this idea. He's like, let's try to get done to three sentence emails. What is the problem? What's your analysis of the root cause and what's your proposed solution? And he's like, I think we could run the company on three sentence emails. And so we did that. And what that taught me about executive communication was that level of efficiency is so helpful. Like if you can give me three sentences, so I turn to my people and said the same thing. Like tell me what the problem is. Tell me what the root cause is. Tell me what your proposed solution is. And in that proposed solution, you gotta have like how much it's gonna cost and what's gonna do the economic size sort of stuff. But the thing executive is, if you're talking to a CEO, the most precious commodity that CEO has is time. And it's information inbound absorption time, information processing time, decision time. And so if you can get super efficient in communicating to CEO and say, I'm gonna minimize your information absorption time. I'm gonna minimize your information decision time. You become a very valuable member of that team. Very valuable. And it sharpens your own thinking. You think you're doing it for them and then you realize actually I didn't fully have clarity on this until I was forced myself. Totally. To be clear to them. Now I'm clear to myself. Actually, it's so funny you said that those exact three when I went into my first meeting with Emmett, the founder of Twitch and I said, how do I talk to you? How do I use these? I don't wanna come here and just, you know, chit chat, you know, like we could do that, but I'm guessing that's not what you want me to do. And he goes, yeah, three sentences, he goes, what, why, so what? What is happening or what happened? Why is it happening or why did it happen? And so what are we gonna do about it? And he's like, that's the way I like to communicate. What, why, so what? And then I've now taught that to my team of the same, so funny, the same basically. Almost the exact same thing. We just had different labels for the same exact communication structure. I love that. In fact, I'm gonna steal that 'cause I think the world of Emmett, but that's a great, that's a great way to think about communication. And I think the other way I, the other thing you made me think about is, as an entrepreneur, if you're successful, the most likely outcome of your business is somebody's gonna buy it. And that means you're gonna have an owner that you're gonna now be subordinate to. And that's a different form of mindset. And I got it wrong, like the first few times that we sold companies to, every time, we sold a company of mine, we sold it to a public company. And so then I would come in and I know that company a year or two. - Right. - And I'd have to work in their structure. And at the time I was young and, and so I was trying to keep this bullheaded entrepreneurial mindset. And that doesn't work in large corporations. And what I've now learned, if like I had a redo, and I apologize if anybody's listening who bought one of my companies, he had to put up with this pugmatious entrepreneur, who didn't get it. Now what I get is, I should have sat down with him and said, what drive success for you? Like what do you care about? Like you bought this company, what has to happen? In your mind to make it a success. That's often different than the bullheaded entrepreneurs if thinking about it. And I think that's a different set of challenges when you sell yourself to another company. The first thing you gotta realize is that you don't own it anymore. They do. They have the keys. And if you go, oh, in a year or two, you might not make that miserable. You might as well make it fun. And the way to make it fun is to figure out, okay, like how do I make this thing work for you and for me? Right. And if you do that, oftentimes you gotta nerd out and it's gonna work for you too. Yeah, that's great advice. I wish I had that advice earlier. Me too. Me too. Man, I stumbled so badly. You sort of discovered the hard way. I wanted to ask you about the collision repair business. 'Cause this was fantastic. Can you just tell the story of, 'cause I only know part of the story. I want to know the whole story. So what's the story of how you got into that business? Like how you discovered the problem and what actually happened with that company? And 'cause I think it's pretty fascinating. 'Cause it's not a venture tech business. It doesn't sound to me, at least like a venture tech business. No software, but you built that. And it sounded like a pretty interesting success story. Can you tell that one? Yeah, I didn't have to have a lot of software in it, but it starts with a little context. I grew up in the back of my grandfather's auto repair business. And so I was a tech. I had the dirtiest jobs 'cause I was a kid, didn't have any skills. So I was changing oil and changing tires and that sort of stuff. But learned how to hang out and talk to auto technicians. And so decades later, my wife's car gets hit by one of our neighbors. And now I gotta go get that fixed. And so I go to a large body shop and drop it off, get the estimate, agree to have this place fix it. And the guy says it'll be done by Friday. So this is Monday, I come back on Friday. Cars not done. He's like, "Ah, it's parts didn't come in. This is kind of typical next Friday." So I show up next Friday. Cars not done. Tech didn't show up. (mimics) I said, "You know what? I've just sold one of my businesses. I got a curiosity about how your business works. Can I just come hang out here?" He was like, "You're the first customer ever to ask that, but I don't want you back there 'cause you're gonna get hurt and then I explained him, no, I know my way around a body shop. I know my way around auto repair. I'll stay out of the way I will get hurt. In fact, I'll just run parts for you if you want. So I went home that weekend and I started to do research and found out the auto collision industry is a $50 billion industry. And then figured it then found out that there were 38,000 of these. And so the average business is around 1.2 million. So pretty small. And I had been exposed to advance manufacturing and I could get a sense of that was not what was happening in the back of these shops. So I went and just observed, I was running parts, just observing and what I saw was essentially a hair salon. Every technician had two bays and they were on commission and they made money off of those two bays. So they had no interest in how fast that car went through because that car was sitting in front of them as a cash register to make money. And so I thought to myself, what if this was $50 billion industry is modernized? What if you put these cars into a production line like Henry Ford did? And what if you paid the entire team a bonus based on cycle time and throughput? Right. I didn't understand. So why doesn't the technician want the cars to go through more cars equals more commission? No, why not? They want to control their paycheck and so they would surround themselves with three or four cars and they would just cherry pick hours off of those cars and they got paid by the hour. But not so the car didn't have to get finished. They were getting paid by the shop just on the hours they worked on that car. So that car gets it there for a couple of weeks, they didn't care. And you had these two terms, cycle time and touch time. Can you explain what it was doing? Yeah, so I went to the shop owner and I said, tell me what the average time it takes between a customer dropping it off and a customer getting their car back. And he said, yeah, I can tell you that it's 18 days. I said, how do you know that? He said, that's the average rental car time. I said, okay, that's pretty good proxy. I said, how many hours of labor do you build on each job on average? He said, oh, that's easy. Six to eight. And I went 18 days to get six to eight hours of work done. That looks like an opportunity because that's the difference. Cycle time is the 18 days. That's from the beginning to the end of the process. In touch time was the amount of time that those technicians were actually touching the car six to eight hours. And I went, oh, that looks like an opportunity to maybe turn this industry around for the consumer. What if you could go to market and say, you'll get your car back in a day versus the 18 days of the rest of the guys down the street? That's when I started to diligently say, let's start a business. So I grabbed some guys that I'd worked with and we started to work on just doing that. We ended up with the largest at the time, collision repair chain around the country. What was it called? It was called Sterling, then it's now called service king. It's owned by Carlisle. It's got several billion dollars in revenue. But the whole premise was, we're gonna get your car back way faster because we're just deploying assembly lines versus a hair salon. That's amazing. What do you have a name for that moment where you're like, what if you could get it back in the same day? What's the name of when you do that? When you say, we're all the way over here. The same thing with the Elon 20x online sales, right? It's like the industry, the expectation of the customer, the current workflow is all the way here. What if it was all the way on this side? - I do have a name for it. I have a name for it, I call it an epiphany. Like I just, and so my teams that I've worked with now, they hear this phrase a lot 'cause in that moment, like I'll sit down, I'll write out a Slack or an email and say, like, in the subject would be, I just had an epiphany. And it's kind of a realization moment where you're like, ooh, there's a big opportunity here to move the market and that word for me is an epiphany. It's just like, ooh, it's this sudden discovery where you've been like, you've been piled. And now you can see the other side. - Right. - Yeah. (upbeat music) - Today's podcast is brought to you by my friends at Mercury. They make the world's best banking product. I think you know this already. I use Mercury for all of my businesses. I think I have like maybe seven or eight businesses. We use Mercury as our business banking across all of them. And now they actually just launched a personal banking account. So I have my personal account there. I moved off of Wells Fargo and Chase. I'm just all in on Mercury. Why, I like products that are easy to use. I like products that get me and,
the problems that I have. So like, it's really easy to make a joint account with my wife. Very easy to spin up virtual cards. One click and I get savings yield. It just has all the stuff that I need in one place. So if you're looking for the best banking product on the market, it's definitely Mercury. I will fist fight anybody who disagrees with me on that. Go to mercury.com/personal and learn more. Mercury is a Fintech, not an FDIC. You insured bank. Banking services are provided through Choice Financial Group and column NA members FDIC. What do you think now with AI? I feel like you've been doing this for a long time. Just when you're probably like, I'm a veteran of this game. The entire board game changes. Somebody flips the table and now there's a whole new game to be played. Where's your head at with AI? How do you think about this? Man, I'm excited. All the way back in college, I worked my way through college writing trading algorithms at the world's largest options in futures trading platform in Chicago. I went to college in Chicago area and worked my afternoons coding. Way back then, we were using the very beginning neural nets to try to get an edge in the market and try to try to robot trade in a way that people hadn't been able to in terms of the accuracy in speed. All these years later, now that this has emerged, I'm completely psyched because we were using what looked like rudimentary computers to do this stuff. Now you've got real compute power. Javeman AI. Totally. Now that you see this unleashed, I'm like, "This is what we were trying to do three decades ago." I'm super excited by it. Largely because every technical revolution and breakthrough like this that has happened in history creates enormous opportunities for entrepreneurs. I cannot name a technical revolution that's happened that's resulted in less GDP and less jobs. I can't. It just doesn't work that way. There's a lot of hand-drying though at the beginning of every technological revolution because humans are really good at seeing the first order effect, which is the job destruction, but they're not good at seeing the second order effect, which is the job creation that happens by entrepreneurs on the back end. I think we're right in the middle of this. We're applying AI at the core of each of our companies, but I think more importantly, I think there's going to be just like we're keeping our eyes peeled for big, big opportunities that are being created by this. I give an example. This example would date me. When I was growing up to make a long-distance phone call, you had to dial zero and talk to a human being and that was usually a lady in your town who would literally plug the local phone network on one end of a cord and then plug that cord into the national phone network and that would create a connection for you to do a long-distance call. In other words, humans were switches. And sometime in the late '60s, early '70s, Bell Labs invented an electronic switch that would do this. By the end of the '70s, there was a lot of hand-rearing that there were 800,000 people, pillars of our communities. There were employee desorporators and 100% of those jobs were going away. And sure enough, by the late '70s or early '80s, 100% of those jobs had gone away. Those humans were replaced by electronic switches. But what people couldn't see while they were doing the hand-rearing was what was going to happen on the other side. And what happened on the other side was now that a long-distance call is free, it doesn't require human labor, just requires electrons. Now you could offer toll-free calls. And so some entrepreneur said, "I'm going to use these toll-free calls. There was a single airy code, 1-800. And I'm a great business. 1-800 flowers, 1-800 junk, 1-800 insurance. We want to enter this, that." And what those 1-800 numbers required was now centralized answering a phone calls because now people are calling like crazy because it was free. And so this industry got created called call centers and support centers. And a few years into the 1980s, there were now millions of people employed in call centers. Hundreds of software firms that were created. And my first startup was a software firm and then 90s serving call centers because the technology was still nascent. When people were just deploying electronic switches and people were lamenting the end of these jobs as operators, nobody could see on the other side that these entrepreneurs were going to create toll-free dialing. They were going to create businesses on top of toll-free dialing. And on top of that, they were going to be this whole layer in our economy called call centers that millions of people are going to be employed in. This kind of creativity to see the other side. And so now I tell our teams, like we cannot see through the other side, but we can get a hint of where this stuff is going to go if you think creatively. And so that's the thing I'm most excited about. We're going to have entrepreneurial opportunities like crazy over the next few years based on what this technology is going to unleash. I love that story. So keep going. So let's say, if we can think creatively, we can start to get a glimpse of what maybe is possible. What do you see as the kind of first generation businesses that you're excited about and what the second order effect might be? Well, now we've got intelligence that is so rapid and non-latent. So you can solve problems way faster that are really complex. So one of the businesses that we've got that are most excited about is we pulled a team out of Tesla that built the supply chain automation platform at Tesla, which is super sophisticated and way beyond anything anybody had in the industry. And they built this with ML in like 2017-ish. And we said, how would you like to build it today in AI? And what AI allows that team to do is solve a super complex problem really quickly, but also use a genetic AI to understand the workflows of their clients super rapidly. So they just went into one of the biggest grocery delivery platforms in the country. I don't think I can say which one yet publicly, but it's one of their newer customers. And their agents could go in and understand the work rules of that ginormous platform within hours and then design a system in a workflow within hours that you really have to have two special things to be able to do. You have to be expert in that particular thing, which is supply chain optimization, to know which rules are good, which rules are bad, what to tell your agents to do, etc. And then you have to be able to judge, okay, what these agents are bringing back is character. It needs to be tweaked or redirected or whatever. So you definitely have these humans who have got AI as exoskeleton, like super strength. They're now building a business that's grown like a rapid fire because it's got this incredible commute, the compute to actually fuel the business and deliver value back to the customer way faster than you could otherwise. Like what they're competing against is standard ERP systems that take nine to 12 months to implement and they can implement them period of days and deliver that value back. And that's the kind of business. Like I think we're going to see more and more and more of as its capabilities unleashed. Yeah, that is the weird thing about this that the software essentially works like labor, right? So what you're describing is like, yeah, exactly. Essentially a consultant that comes in and it learns your workflows, it documents it, it figures out how things are currently working and then it starts to improve or automate or that's right. So the weird thing is like, there is a question of is it different this time in terms of the job? Because it's like, if the software is fundamentally like human labor, like equivalent, then even the business it creates won't the workers in that business also just be AI labor mostly that's doing that right? And do we all just become sort of like mechanics for the robots and for AI, right? That's one part I haven't been able to wrap my head around. I haven't either. I haven't heard the case for why we do that is compelling enough to me. The most frequent example I hear is, hey, in the 1950s, there were skyscrapers full of humans who were humanly calculating spreadsheets. And then the real spreadsheet came along and all those jobs are eliminated. And then that's where the story ends for them. And I'm like, hey, time out. I was just in New York City. Those skyscrapers aren't empty. What happened? And what happened was a plethora of things. And I would use just one tiny little example of what happened that created trillions and trillions of dollars of market cap. Once in a, once a spreadsheet was available that was digital, it could count things in complexity way faster than those humans and those skyscrapers. And so all of a sudden, you could have sophisticated pricing engines like black shoals at your fingertips. And that meant that you could now price options in futures and derivatives that didn't exist before. And so entire markets got created on top of that one technological change that employ hundreds of thousands of people. And again, that was unknowable on the on the other side when this spreadsheet was just being invented that somebody would deploy black shoals and somebody would figure out how to price puts and calls and derivatives and make entire markets like the options exchange, the Merck, etc. possible to be able to syndicate loans. Like none of that stuff was available. And now it's all available. And that's the kind of thing where I think, okay, make me the case that all the sudden, now the computers do all of that and take all that creativity and all those jobs. I just haven't seen that in history. And I don't know that I can, I can fully buy into that in because
point. What do you think happens with the different AI players? You've got like, you think Elon is called the highest elo game in the world, right? So it's the highest level chess game being played between the smartest people with the most capital behind them going all out for the biggest prize. You've got Zuckerberg and then you've got Google and you've got Elon, you've got Sam Albin, you've got Anthropic, you have all these players. How do you see this playing out? You've seen a couple of tech waves, you know, at least some of the players, maybe even all of them personally, how do you see this playing out? I sort of wonder if they're creating a app layer or a tooling layer. And what I mean by that is I think they're creating the tooling layer that then a lot of us are now using to create real businesses on top of. So I kind of go back to the internet, freight through an internet revolution and think about, okay, like the browsers, everybody was super excited about the browser business. And Mark Andreessen made a career out of a net scape. But I wonder if like those, now browsers are a commodity, but what got him, what got built on top of a browser web, were things like Facebook and Airbnb and E-Trade and you named the businesses, like tons of GDP got created on top of that tooling. And it sort of feels like to me, we're getting really excited like we did about net scape and internet explorer. We get really excited about these hyper scalers, but what you really want to be looking at is what businesses are going to get created on top of this tooling. And so I'm psyched for the work they're doing. I think it's amazing and it's breakthrough level, but I am also much more excited about what's going to get built on top of it. Yeah, me too. I can't wait to see it. I almost want to fast forward. It's like, I don't want to miss it, but at the same time, I'm so curious how this all plays out. What the world looks like in 10 years is probably the first time that I feel like I have no idea what the world can look like in 10, 15 years. But I do know it's likely to be very completely different. For sure. I bought a Tesla this year and it has self-driving that's perfect. It's amazing. It's so good and I just don't drive anymore. And I'm just like, you realize you don't have to drive anymore? That's now. And I can't believe that more people aren't freaking out about this. One change let alone total whether it's robots or it's AI that AI assistants and everybody's pocket or totally. There's so many different ways that I feel like the whole world in 10, 15 years is going to like my kids won't really understand. While you used to have to do all that, you used to do that. That's so funny that you used to do that's horseback riding, right? Not cars. And it seems like we're on one of those transition points. Totally exciting. Totally great. Well, John, I appreciate you coming on. Everybody should go get your book, the algorithm. I don't say that, usually most people come up. But I actually am reading the book and liked it a lot. Awesome. Thank you. Big fan of it. And you know, thanks for coming out and doing this because I feel like we get a lot of biographies. Oh, they grew up this way and daddy issues and bumble-ble, but like, you know, what's AI which is which is entertainment. It's great. But what I really love is tactical, practical, and how do you actually do things? How can this be useful for me? Me too. It's reading about somebody else's life. And so I'm glad you wrote this book if I think if this book didn't exist, and it can only be written by somebody who's kind of there doing it side-by-side with other people and has, you know, the experience doing it. So congrats to you and thanks for riding the book. Thank you. I'm glad you're joining it. All right. Take care. All for the road. Let's travel. Never looking back. If you made it this far, then you're going to love what I'm about to tell you. So there's this amazing entrepreneur named Neil Patel. He's been on MFM. He's one of our favorite guests and he has a podcast. It's called Marketing School. And it's brought to you by the HubSpot podcast network. Marketing school brings you daily actionable digital marketing lessons learned from years and years of being in the trenches. They have over a hundred million downloads and over 2,500 episodes. Marketing school gives you bite-size marketing wisdom that you can implement immediately whether you have a new website or you already have this huge established business, you're going to learn about the latest SEO content marketing social media, email marketing conversion optimization and general online marketing strategies that work today. You can get marketing school wherever you get your podcast.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Elon Musk sets ambitious "order of magnitude" improvement goals (e.g., 10X, 100X) to drive innovation.
His hiring method focuses on evaluating a candidate's ability to do "world-class work" by deeply interrogating a specific problem to see if they genuinely did the work and can solve complex issues.
To scale and protect company culture, Musk and Tesla co-founder JB Straubel implemented being the final interview for key hires, a practice the speaker now adopts.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of leaders dedicating significant time (e.g., 60% of calendar) to hiring, as talent is the primary driver of success.
Practical leadership "hacks" include secret shopping or direct frontline observation to identify and solve core business problems quickly, rather than relying solely on high-level strategy.
Summary:
The discussion centers on leadership and operational insights from working with Elon Musk at Tesla. A core principle is Musk's use of ambitious, order-of-magnitude goals to force innovative thinking, such as increasing digital car sales by 20X. His unique hiring methodology involves deep, problem-solving conversations to assess whether a candidate has truly done "world-class work" and possesses exceptional ability, prioritizing the conversation over the resume.
To scale Tesla's culture, Musk and co-founder JB Straubel served as the final interviewers for managerial hires, a practice the speaker now uses. The speaker stresses that leaders must prioritize talent acquisition, revealing he spent 60% of his time on interviews. Finally, the conversation highlights practical leadership tactics like "mystery shopping" or directly observing frontline operations to rapidly identify and solve critical business constraints, illustrated by a story where fixing a simple sales follow-up issue helped Tesla meet a quarterly target.
The overarching theme is that effective leadership combines high standards for talent with hands-on, ground-level problem-solving.
FAQs
Elon Musk sets order-of-magnitude improvement goals, such as 10X or 100X, to push teams to think differently and achieve significant breakthroughs.
He skips small talk and dives deep into solving a specific problem he knows well, evaluating how many layers of understanding a candidate can handle to determine if they can do world-class work.
Elon Musk and co-founder JB Straubel implemented a practice where they conducted the final interviews for all manager-level and above hires to imprint the culture and ensure alignment with company values.
Avoid candidates who claim credit for team or company achievements without personal contribution, and be cautious of hires from highly matrixed organizations where individual impact is hard to verify.
Leaders should use 'mystery shopping' or firsthand observation, like visiting frontline operations, to gather ground-level insights and prioritize solving the biggest constraints daily.
Salespeople were not following up with test drive leads due to misaligned incentives and hiring profiles. By blocking new leads until past test drives were contacted, sales immediately improved.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.