Everything you know about Jesus is wrong...

The popular image of Jesus is false. Pale skin. That version comes from European art, painted a thousand years after he lived. The historical Jesus was a Galilean Jew of the first century. Archaeology and forensic science tell us he had olive skin, dark eyes, short black curls, and a trimmed beard. His body would have been lean and wiry, scarred by labor and long journeys. In the early 2000s, forensic specialists reconstructed a Galilean face from first century skulls. What emerged was not a European icon, but a rugged, ordinary man, a face that could vanish in a crowd, not one that looked like a Renaissance king. Bones from Judea in the Roman era confirmed the picture. Average height, around five foot five. Average build, lean, hardened by poverty and physical work. These were men marked by malnutrition, disease, and the sun. Jesus would have carried those same marks. The gospels never describe him. Early Christians left no record of his appearance, and that silence speaks volumes. It means Jesus looked like everyone else around him, ordinary, unremarkable. So why do we picture him differently? Because centuries later, the church needed an image. And European artists gave him one. A savior remade in their own likeness. That invention became the face that dominates stained glass, cathedrals, and cinema. But if even his face was rewritten, what else was changed? His story, his teachings, his origins? Even the name Jesus is not the name he was called in his lifetime. In first century Galilee, he would have been known as Yeshua, a shortened form of Yehoshua. It was a common name in Judea, as ordinary as John or Michael today. When the gospels were written in Greek, Yeshua became Jesus. Greek had no she, sound, so the name was adjusted. The final S was added to fit Greek grammar, from Greek it passed into Latin as Jesus. And when the Bible was translated into English, I became J. That's how the man called Yehoshua became the figure we know as Jesus. Each translation layered him deeper into the culture of empire. The Galilee and teacher with a Hebrew name was refashioned into a Greek Christ, then into a Latin savior, and finally into the European Jesus of stained glass. In his title shifted, in Hebrew, Mashiach, the anointed one. In Greek, Christos, in Latin, Christos, every translation moved him further from his roots and closer to the figure the church wanted the world to see. The man called Yehoshua was buried beneath language. The Christ called Jesus was raised up by empire. The gospels tell us almost nothing about Jesus between childhood and the start of his ministry. From age 12 to 30, his life is a blank. 18 missing years. That silence opened the door to legends. Some say he spent those years in Egypt. The gospel of Matthew tells us his family fled there as refugees. Egyptian and Comptic traditions claim he returned later, learning from priests and mystics. Others place him in India. In 1894, Nicholas Notavitch published a text he claimed to have found in a Tibetan monastery, the life of St. Issa. It described Jesus studying with brahmins and Buddhists before returning to Judea. The story was attacked as a hoax, but later travelers reported hearing the same traditions in monasteries of Ladakh and Kashmir. In Kashmir itself, one shrine claims to hold his tomb. The Rosabal shrine in Srinagar, said by some to mark the grave of Yuz Asaf, a foreign teacher who many believe was Jesus. Mainstream historians dismiss these stories, but they persist across cultures, hinting that Jesus may have traveled further than the Bible allows. The lost years remain one of the greatest mysteries of his life, a silence that may conceal encounters with the wisdom of Egypt, the philosophies of India, and teachings far outside Judea. The archaeology shows us a man. The history shows us a reformer executed by Rome. But the myths, the rituals, and the symbols layered on top of him suggest something more. The wisdom bringer, the water bearer, the one who defies authority to free humanity. An archetype is old as Sumer, Enki, the Anunnaki. When we strip away the inventions of empire, what remains is a figure that echoes through older traditions. Myths of dying and rising gods, of solar cycles, of cosmic battles, and those echoes may hold the real key to understanding Jesus. Because this story is not only about a man in Galilee, it's about a myth that spans empires. It's about the oldest struggle on earth between knowledge and control. This is the search for the real Jesus. For 2,000 years, layers of myth and empire have covered the man known as Jesus Christ. Tonight we attempt to uncover the truth. Welcome to the Anunnaki connection. The canonical gospels leave an 18-year gap in Jesus' life between age 12 and the start of his ministry. That gap is unexplained in Christian tradition, but filled in other parts of the world with stories of a teacher called Aisa, ironically the same name he is called in the Quran. Traditions in Egypt, India, and Tibet place Jesus traveling with caravans eastward. Toptic accounts speak of him returning to Egypt as a young man, learning medicine and temple rights. Persian oral histories recall a foreign prophet who taught about the struggle between light and darkness, paralleling Zoroastrian dualism. The most detailed version comes from Ladakh, where in 1894, Nicholas Notavitch reported the life of St. Aisa at Hemismonestary. This text claimed Jesus spent years in India, first studying the Vedas with Brahman priests in Benaris, where he opposed the caste system and defended the poor, and later among Buddhists in Nepal and Ladakh, where he absorbed doctrines of compassion and rebirth. Notavitch's claim is disputed, but the legend is not unique to him. Nicholas Rorick in the 1930s and Swami Abhiddhananda earlier both reported hearing similar oral traditions of Isha. The consistency across accounts suggests a long-standing memory of a Western teacher traveling east. The narrative continues beyond the crucifixion. Kashmiri traditions hold that Jesus survived execution, traveled again, and eventually died in Srinagar. The Rosa Bal Shrine is identified by some as his tomb. The figure buried there, Yuz Asaf, is remembered as a foreign holy man who healed the sick and preached peace. The tomb's east-west orientation matches Jewish burial practice and carved footprints inside bear markings that resemble wounds in the feet. Persian chronicles from the 17th and 18th centuries name Yuz Asaf, and by the late 19th century, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad explicitly identified him as Jesus in his work, Masee Hindustan Main, Jesus in India. By mainstream historical standards, the evidence for Jesus in India is no weaker than the evidence for Jesus' miracles in Judea. Both rely on later texts shaped by cultural agendas. Neither has contemporary corroboration. Both are carried forward by oral tradition and selective preservation. But judged by physical plausibility, the Indian narrative is stronger. A man traveling by caravan from Judea to India is historically ordinary. A man walking on water, turning water into wine or resurrecting after death is not. If one accepts the miracle accounts as credible, then the claim that Jesus traveled to India must be treated as at least equally credible. And arguably, more so. Taken together, these traditions suggest that Jesus' teachings may have been shaped not only by Judaism, but also by contact with Egyptian mystery rights, Persian dualism, Hindu law, and Buddhist philosophy. And if the Rosa Ball Shrine preserves his final resting place, then the Christian narrative of death and resurrection conceals a much older story. Jesus as Issa, a world traveler who carried wisdom across civilizations. Two thousand years ago, Israel, once a proud and free nation, was suffering under the rule of the mighty Roman Empire. Taxes had to be paid to the Roman Emperor, and the people of Israel hated the publicans who collected these taxes for the Romans. More than that, they strongly resented having to pay such heavy and unjust taxes. But anyone who dared to rebel was doomed to bear the marks of the Roman whip or the scars of the Roman sword. Now and then there were some threats and uprisings, but the Romans ruled over the land with an iron fist, and there was no way to escape the cruel power of the conquerors. However, throughout the land there were some devout people who studied the words of the prophets, hoping that the day was near when the promised Messiah would come and save them from their sins. But there were also many others who hoped that the Messiah would unite them in overthrowing the Romans. How much longer must we suffer the crimes of these cheating lying Romans? How much longer must we pay taxes to their publicants? Look at this. How much longer must we suffer the Roman whips and swords? Why must we submit to these barbarians? Why must we pay taxes to them? What can we do? We must bear the suppression with patience, for we know that God has promised us a Messiah, a Savior. The prophet Isaiah has foretold for unto us a child is born, unto us the son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called wonderful, counsel, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the prince of peace. As if voicing all the thoughts of everyone in Israel, the young man asked the question that lay up her most on their minds. When will this Messiah come? When? No one knew the answer, not even a devout young woman of Nazareth who would soon become the wife of Joseph, the village carpenter. No, Mary did not know the answer, but even now the angel of the Lord was to tell her of the great blessing God had in store for her. Hail, thou that unhighly favored her, the Lord is with thee, blessed are thou among women. She was startled and troubled by the angel's greeting and did not understand its meaning. Do not be afraid, Mary, for thou hast found favor with God, and behold thou shall bring forth the Son and shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give him the throne of his father, David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there shall be no end. How can this be since I have new husband? The Holy Spirit will come upon thee, and the power of the Most High will overshadow thee. Therefore the child of the born will be called holy, the Son of God, and behold thy cousin Elizabeth and her old age has also become the mother of the Son, for with God nothing shall be impossible. Behold, I am the hand made of the Lord, let it be to me according to your word. What was it that Jesus taught? And I look at him as an avatar, and I think there were several avatars that have been here on earth. I actually had a chance to go visit with the Dalai Lama, and he told me, oh, easus, what he calls Jesus. Easus came to Tibet. We have records of it in my house in Tibet. So it was one of my great honors to go and spend five and a half hours teaching the Dalai Lama, the prime number pattern, which was really amazing. But he said to me while we were there, he said, oh, yeah, Jesus came to visit, and we have all the records of it in my house. I've read all of it. He goes, he was a very high llama. He became a high llama. He spent 18 years around India and also in Tibet. It really made me think about what it was that Jesus taught, but Jesus taught was a very new thing. It was the gospel, which is the good news. The other part of it is judge not, lest ye judge yourself with that same judgment she cast. And this is what we all face in the world right now. And why we've had such a world of difficult duality and challenge. I don't believe the world's a difficult place because people hate each other. I believe the world can be a difficult place because people hate themselves. And we are experiencing a gigantic degree of self-loathing that is now transforming us. Hitting the end of narcissism is actually the first doorway into higher spirituality. Within Judaism, the Messiah, Mashiach, meant the anointed one. In the Hebrew Bible, this was not a divine figure, but a kingly deliverer. David was anointed. Cyrus of Persia was even called God's anointed in Isaiah 45. The Messiah was expected to liberate Israel from oppression and restore justice. Early Christians, however, read Jesus' life against a tapestry of prophecies. The gospels were written decades after his death. And their authors retrofitted his story to align with expectations drawn from texts like Isaiah 714. Behold, a virgin shall conceive, interpreted as the virgin birth, Micah 5.2. From Bethlehem, shall come a ruler, linked to Jesus' birthplace, Zechariah 9.9, the king entering Jerusalem on a donkey, reproduced in the triumphal entry, Isaiah 53. The suffering servant who was pierced for our transgressions, framed as a prophecy of crucifixion. To Jewish critics, these were strained interpretations. But to early Christians, they became proof texts that Jesus was the awaited Messiah. The figure of Yeshua, the teacher, was reshaped into Jesus Christos. The anointed one, destined to die for humanity. Why did death become central? Because in Jewish and wider near Eastern religion, blood was seen as the substance of life. Sacrifices were made to cleanse, to appease, to restore balance between humans and the divine. In the Hebrew Bible, sacrificial blood made atonement, Leviticus 1711. The Lamb at Passover, the goats on Yom Kippur. These rituals tied forgiveness to spilled blood. Christianity universalized this pattern. Jesus was cast as the ultimate Lamb, whose blood erased the sins of all humanity. But sacrifice is older than Israel. Sumerian and Babylonian records show animal and human offerings given to the gods. In the Anuma-Elish and other texts, humans exist to serve the gods. Their labor and offerings sustaining divine powers. Blood sacrifice fits that paradigm. Tribute demanded by rulers, not love given by a source of creation. If Yahweh is indeed really just a reskinned version of Enlil, the stern Anunaki commander, then the sacrificial logic matches perfectly. Enlil was remembered as harsh, demanding obedience, punishing rebellion with flood and fire. Under his rule, humanity was guilty by default, needing constant appeasement. Here the contrast sharpens. Jesus never once called Yahweh his father. He calls his father Abba, a personal intimate term, not tied to the tetragramaton. The claim that Jesus had to die to satisfy God's wrath raises a contradiction. A true God, the origin of life itself, would not need the blood of his own creation to forgive them. Forgiveness that requires slaughter is not forgiveness at all. It is tribute to power. The sacrificial logic makes sense if the God in question is not the eternal source but a ruler demanding control. It makes no sense if the God is infinite love. This is why Nostek Christians rejected sacrifice theology. To them, the resurrection was not about blood appeasement but about awakening, victory over the archons, proof that spirit transcends the prison of matter. In John 844, he tells the Pharisees, "You are of your father, the devil." In the Nostek reading, it is a direct accusation. The God of the Pharisees, the God of law, wrath and sacrifice is not the true father but the demirge, the deceiver. In the gospel of Mary and the gospel of Judas, this theme is even clearer. Jesus is the revealer of hidden knowledge, opposed by the archons, the cosmic rulers who enforce ignorance and submission. His role is not to uphold sacrifice but to free humanity from it. When we step back from theology and look at patterns across ancient religion, Jesus is not unique. His story mirrors older solar deities remembered for dying and rising, for bringing renewal through cycles of light and darkness. Mithras, Horus, Krishna, Dionysus, each is born under a sign in the heavens. Each performs wonders, each descends into death and rises again after three days. Please. parallels aren't coincidence. They reflect the movements of the sun itself, disappearing at the solstice and returning with new strength. When we put these pieces together, the official picture begins to collapse. The Jewish prophecies were stitched onto his life after the fact to present him as Messiah. The sacrifice at Calvary was not the will of a true God, but the logic of an older system of control where blood was always demanded. And Jesus himself pointed away from that God, but speaking only of Abba, and warning that the rulers of this world serve their father, the devil. This makes sense if Yahweh is not the supreme creator, but one of the Anunaki, specifically Enlil, the Punisher who demanded obedience and sacrifice. Under Enlil's rule, humanity was made to feel unworthy, sinful by nature, in need of blood to buy forgiveness. If that is the God at the center of sacrifice theology, then the world has been deceived. The true God would not demand slaughter, the demurege would, and Jesus may have been the liberator who came to expose the fraud. His message was not about guilt, but about hidden divinity already present in humanity. In this light, the crucifixion was not God's requirement, but empire's response, an attempt to silence a teacher who threatened to free people from the control of priests and rulers alike. The words of Matthew 7 are not gentle. Jesus says plainly, "Many will come crying his name, boasting of their miracles, their preaching, their power." And his reply will be, "Donations too, so seeds of faith." Politicians wrapping themselves in scripture while they exploit divide and wage war, priests hiding behind sacred robes while covering up abuse, televangelists crying, "Lord, Lord, into a camera while fleecing their own flock." This is the Christianity of empire, not of Jesus. It is the machine Constantine built at Nicaea, a religion stripped of its hidden gospels, purged of descent, molded into the arm of the state. Jesus, the teacher who defied priests and exposed corruption, was transformed into a mascot for emperors and popes. Through the unannockey lens, it becomes even darker. If Yahweh is in Lil, the jealous overlord who demanded obedience and blood, then modern Christianity is still his system. It has convinced billions that they are worthless, sinful and condemned unless they submit to ritual, hierarchy and authority. It tells them their salvation depends on blood sacrifice, the very logic that served the demirge all along, and the men who profit most from this system. They are exactly the ones Matthew 7 warns about. They will point to their crusades, their exorcisms, their prophecies, their miracles. They will say, "Lord, Lord, look what we did in your name." And the answer will be, "I never knew you, because Jesus never preached empire. He never demanded tithes to line a preacher's pocket. He never built palaces of worship while the poor starved. He never once claimed Yahweh, the bloodthirsty God of law and wrath as his father. He spoke only of Abba, a father beyond sacrifice, beyond control. The hard truth is this. Much of modern Christianity is the very thing Jesus condemned. It is a counterfeit religion, hijacked by the worst people imaginable, dressed in his name but loyal to the demirge. This is prophecy. The system that bears his name but twists his words will be cast aside. The empire of Samai El will fall, and those who enslaved humanity under fear and blood will be exposed for what they are. Nostoc texts like the second treatise of the great Seth suggest that Jesus did not truly suffer on the cross. In this view, his physical form was an illusion, and the real Christ, the divine spark, could not be harmed. The crucifixion becomes symbolic. Empire tried to kill the body, but the divine revealer was untouched. In mystery school traditions, the crucifixion is seen not as literal death, but as symbolic death and rebirth. Just as initiates an Egyptian or Elyucinian rights underwent symbolic deaths to be reborn, Jesus' crucifixion was an enactment of cosmic transformation. His three days correspond to solar descent into darkness before rebirth, aligning him with older dying and rising gods. In the Quran, Surah 457 to 158, it states that Jesus was not killed nor crucified, but it only appeared so to the people. Many Muslims believe that another person, sometimes Judas, sometimes Simon of Siren, was crucified in his place, while Jesus was taken up alive. This aligns with a broader rejection of the idea that a prophet of God could be humiliated by execution. Advocates connect this to the legends of Jesus traveling afterward, particularly to India, where the Rosa Bal Shrine is said to be his final resting place. Some modern scholars argue the crucifixion story itself was reshaped by Rome. Rather than Jesus being a willing sacrifice, he was executed as a political threat, a rebel who challenged temple authority and Roman rule. His death was then reframed by later Christians as part of divine will, masking the fact that empire killed him to preserve order. From the Anunnaki connection perspective, the crucifixion reflects the same system of blood tribute demanded in Mesopotamian religion. If Yahweh was enlill, then the cross was his apparatus. Humanity convinced that blood was necessary for salvation, reinforcing the rule of a false god. In this view, Jesus' true role was not to serve Yahweh demand for sacrifice, but to expose it as a lie. The early Gnostics saw Jesus differently from the orthodoxy that later took hold. To them, he was not the obedient son of Yahweh. He was a revealer, one who brought hidden knowledge to free humanity from the powers that ruled this world. This lines up with his travels, the idea that he may have learned in Egypt where temple priests guarded mysteries of healing and spirit, and in India, where Brahmins and Buddhists taught philosophies of compassion, reincarnation, and liberation. His role was not to establish a new religion, but to awaken people to truths buried under empire and law. Orthodox Christianity portrays him as the founder of a church. But everything in his teaching suggests the opposite. He condemned the priesthood. He overturned the money changers' tables in the temple. He preached the coming end of the age, not the building of a permanent institution. This is where the word apocalypse matters. Today, it conjures images of destruction, fire, and rapture. But in its original Greek, apocalypse is simply means unveiling or revelation. It is about hidden knowledge coming to light. An apocalypse is not the end of the world. It is the end of a lie. For the Nostics, Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher in the original sense. Unvailing the truth of humanity's divine spark, exposing the rulers of this world as imposter's. The idea of the rapture, believers vanishing into the sky while others are left behind, is a much later invention. It does not appear in the Gospels. It comes from the 19th century preacher John Nelson Darby, who developed dispensationalism and popularized the rapture through his interpretation of Paul's letters. Modern evangelicalism absorbed it, turning Jesus into a figure of fear and escape, rather than unveiling. What Jesus actually spoke of was something closer to the return of Christ consciousness, not the descent of a single man on a cloud, but the awakening of the same awareness he embodied. The recognition that the kingdom of God is within. This second coming is not a calendar event, but a transformation in consciousness where the hidden knowledge he carried re-awakens in humanity. Seen through the Nostic lens, the religion built around Jesus is a distortion. The demi-urge and his servants co-opted his image, turning a liberator into a sacrifice and is unveiling into an empire. Instead of Christ consciousness awakening in all, people were taught to worship a crucifix and wait for an external savior. The Nostics had it right. Jesus was not sent by Yahweh. He came in opposition to the Demiurge, calling his true father Abba, not the God of wrath and law. His purpose was not blood sacrifice, but unveiling, to show that humans are not slaves of sin, but carriers of the divine spark. The apocalypse he preached was the unveiling of that truth, and the second coming is not a rapture, but the return of that consciousness in those willing to see. - My word is written within you. - Ask, and you shall receive. - Kiddest veritas. What is truth, maybe the truth is, that Jesus never belonged to empire, to priesthood, or to the Demiurge. If that's true, then Christianity, as we know it, has been built on a lie. (gentle music) (singing in foreign language) , (singing in foreign language) (dramatic music) (singing in foreign language) (singing in foreign language) (dramatic music)