Episode Title Question Everything: AI, Ideas, and the Courage to Challenge Yourself Guest: Mohamed Nabil

Right, hello everyone, welcome back to another episode on the podcast. Now every great idea begins with a question, but wisdom doesn't grow when we only seek agreement. It grows when we are willing to challenge your own beliefs. What happens when artificial intelligence becomes your toughest critic instead of your biggest supporter? Welcome to the wisdom transfer. We experience speaks to the future. And my wonderful gift of today is Moabed Nabil. Now Moamid is an awful social thinker and the creator of AI Dope. Ah, man, am I getting that correctly? Yes, they aid up for AID OP style, which stands for AI Debates Among Publications. Wonderful. Okay, man is the creator of AI Dope AI Debates on one's publications and innovative approach that uses artificial intelligence to basically examine and offers own work to open, transparent dialogue. Moamid has written numerous books, explored, exploring philosophy, politics, justice, economy, technology and the future of society. His work encourages me to embrace intellectual curiosity, challenge, assumptions and engage totally with complex ideas and accepting them at his value. At the heart of his work is he believed that the meaningful progress begins with open inquiry, honest debates and courage to examine our own thinking. Moamid is an absolute pleasure to have you on the show. You are welcome to the wisdom transfer. It's an absolute pleasure to join you here tonight and thank you for the warm introduction. Ah, thank you for coming, Moamid. Now, Moamid before we get to the main conversation, can you just say there's a little bit about yourself? Well, I graduated from mass communication, major advertising and PR. I worked as a freelance work consultant for a few years. When I developed my skills into becoming an author and a philosopher, with three main pillars for my philosophical approach, I have AI/DUP, which you previously mentioned. It involves a content creator, a prompting an AI tool to precise their own content, publishing the entire analysis, the transport of back and forth argumentation within 24 hours of the exchange. I codified enlightened populism as a behavior pattern of communication and I'm advocating for the establishment of a global government. I only fight global government. We ruled by hyperlocal system as well, please. Amazing, not too amazing. Now, Moamid, you've chosen to invite AI to publicly criticize your own publications. What inspired you to make your own ideas the first subdates of examination? Well, I believe I don't have an opulence of tools. I can only seek it. I can only seek the tools. By the way, I have a book title, "Tools of Sexy", so I believe tools seeking is appealing for me. So instead of having the ideas debated by human beings years later after I'm dead, I rather have them debated now right now and I'm still living first, so I can provide counter organs. So I started seeking consistent from human beings takes time because the book's take time to spread and then the ideas take time to spread over the ease and then you have to wait for a long period of time to start actual discussions. So I sold AI tools. You can get consistent in a matter of seconds. You can get consistent on your own work and provide counter organs accordingly. Well, absolutely amazing. Now, you created AI DUP. You know, or actually called it in the beginning of the conversation when you said AI debates on one's publications. How does this process challenge traditional ideas and about, story, about authorship, criticism and intellectual groups? Well, the goal of these debates I get into debates with the AI tools on my own published content and then I publish the entire exchanges. So the goal of these debates isn't to ignore rules. The main objectives include start-setting ideas through AI effectively making dumbsharp by responding to criticism. Refining one's own thoughts, simply accepting criticism as valid or agreeing to its agreed certain points, inviting readers to explore the mechanisms of the full process instead of simply asking them to accept conclusions and documenting where AI tools stand at the time of publication. Now, Mohamed, your concept of enlightened populism encourages people to investigate ideas before accepting them. You know, why do you believe critical thinking has become more important than ever? Well, critical thinking is becoming more important than ever because we are overwhelmed by the amount of information we have, information, disinformation, misinformation, we have all kinds of data around us and we need to investigate the truth. So we need to think deeper to find the truth. So enlightened populism is a behavior pattern of communication that involves listening to multiple experts, trying to understand how they reach certain conclusions and investigating the information to the current truth. It contrasts with the two dominant behavior patterns of communication in today's world, blinded by the criticism, which entails blindly following an expert or an elite on a certain issue, and ignorant populism, which also involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings of trends. So I believe these three steps are vital. People need to listen to multiple experts, try to understand how they reach certain conclusions and investigate the information to the current truth. Wow, amazing. And the ultimate alternative is rapidly changing how we create and consume knowledge. How do you use or how do you see AI strengthening not replacing human reasoning? Well, it depends on your own use. At the end of the day, AI is just a tool, our Alan lambs specifically, I'm just tools that we use in our daily lives. So for instance, if you use it for idea generation, if you use it to come up with questions for your interview, for instance, instead of developing your own, your own mind will become numb over time. Same goes for others. Same goes for authors who use it for ghost writing. So at the time, your mind becomes numb and you become incapable of coming up with ideas on your own, because you've relied too much on to do that for you. Do your own role on your behalf. However, if you use it like I do, if you use it as a tool for radical transparency and intellectual humility to stress your own ideas as you publish them, this way helps you strengthen your own ideas and helps sharpen your own brain. Use it as a debate tool. Use it to criticize your own content, engage in back and forth argumentation, and publish the whole exchange for the word to see let people formulate their own opinions based on the arguments and counter-arguments, instead of asking them to simply accept or reject your conclusions. Wow. Now, many of your books explore just this, the book is see and the future of society, what experiences, keep your interest in these questions. What experiences? Yes, what experiences? Do I have personal experiences? Do I have related to these questions? The question was, many of your books, many of your books, explore just this democracy and the future of society, I was actually asking you what experiences, keep your interest in these questions. Well, over the years I've developed my own value system and this has been a tough job for me over the years because I had to identify who I am and what I believe in. So my own value system is composed of justice, freedom, truth, telling, compassion and solidarity. And that's exactly all. So I hope that through my works and through my writings I can achieve these values, help these values rise and become more prominent. Amazing, obviously amazing, Mohammed. Mohammed, some of your ideas challenged, widely held as omissions and purpose and purpose and purpose and vision, visions from global governance and human rights. What role do you believe this? Flex food debates, please when discussing controversial topics. Well, I believe the debate has almost had the thing, it's the beginning of everything. We need to openly debate everything in our lives, even in our daily lives, to be able to come up with the best conclusions, to be able to come up with the best ideas for the future. We need to break taboos, generally considered taboos, and we need to stop identifying ourselves with a certain set of opinions on any matter. We need to realize that opinions, attitudes and beliefs can change over time. Even my own values, the ones that I just mentioned to you, I mean the future have the right to reprioritize them or introduce something new along the way. So, as a human being, I should always be open to discussing my own own thoughts, developing my own beliefs and attitudes through debating them. And I expect the same from human beings all over the world. When we all strive for consistency, we may find the consistency we are seeking within the boundaries of onset by embracing the fact that opinions, attitudes and beliefs are changeable over time. Amazing, absolutely amazing, Mohammed. No Mohammed. Transparency appears to be, you know, to be a recurring theme throughout your work. You know, why do you believe people and institutions benefits when ideas are oompling, oomfully talent? Well, I believe in your own personal life, you can have all of the privacy you own. But in the public life, if you're throwing something at the public, if you're presenting something to the public, then we have to be transparent about it. This is my own belief. Whether it's proposing a new system, word governance or proposing a new behavior pattern of communication, a different behavior pattern of communication that people are used to or proposing a content creation framework, I'm always trying to be transparent about the method, transparent about how I reach these conclusions and transparent about the reasoning so people can follow it and maybe they can tweak it in the future or maybe they can improve what I've reached in the future because they can understand the reasoning behind. So I believe anyone offering something to the public needs to reach the same level of radical transparency. Yeah, absolutely true. And I execute within my course fiction philosophy, politics and technology. Now I'm still detailing, you know, how to communicate ideas that might otherwise feel abstract. Well, storytelling is, we are species of, we are a species of storytelling. So when you tell a story, you make everything easier for the audience to understand. So I tried this twice in nine books. I've only written two novels. The first was titled The Bachelor of the V-Jup. It tackled a brief era of enlightenment in the Egyptian society, 2011-2012. People had eye hopes for the future and they had the urge to know everything. So book readership was on the rise and the internet usage was booming back then. So this was a beautiful era. And then despite all of the crimes that happened, which were documented within the story anyway. And global justice is my second novel. It's about introducing the concept of global governance. It's about a global movement that aims at abolishing monarchism, establishing a unified global government. So one idea seems too radical or too tough or too far away, too unorthodox. And people can't believe it at the beginning. It's always easier to introduce it with a story. And sometimes you need that story to start the public debate. So as mentioned earlier, the debate can be a healthy beginning for everything. Respect for the debate as you mentioned. Amazing, amazing response. Now for someone who wants to become a better thinker or rather than simply, you know, a better debateer, what's daily habits would you recommend for them? The most vital habits will have to do with our use of the media. We have to be aware that traditional media organizations offer polarization on the surface while remaining united in terms of agenda setting imposed by the corporate or state masters. We need to normalize long form debates across fields, not only politics. We need to realize that social media relies on personalization showing each person content based on their historical interactions within the platform. This ultimate creates a situation which a person's use of social media is an endless state of vice confirmation. Even if the person doesn't suffer from confirmation bias, even search engines and dollar lambs can turn into exchange burs if not used wisely as they both rely on historical data of interactions using private and cognitive modes. Occasionally while submitting queries through multiple search engines and digging deep for multiple sources is advisable. Same goes for all alarms with the additional feature of intentionally getting into a debate with the alarm by prompting it to take a position opposing to yours. So the main common thread here is the idea of seeking opinions and beliefs that are opposing to yours, seeking them to understand them, understand the logic behind them, and then see where it goes, see whether you still believe what you believe at the beginning or you're mind is changing by the end of the conversation. Absolutely amazing, Mohammed, Mohammed, my final question to you. We very much like to the question. I want to first of all say thank you so so much, you know for taking time out of your busy schedule to come here today and enlighten me and my audience. I am audience weather. Thank you so so much for your time, Mohammed. I really appreciate that invitation. It has been a pleasure to join you here. Thank you. Mohammed, the final question is when you think about your life's work, what legacy do you hope you've left for the future generations of readers, thinkers and innovators? Well, my own philosophical framework is composed of the three elements I told you about previously, AI debates on unspublications, enlightened populism, and proposing a global government. Maybe in the future I can add to this, but the main core message I'd like to leave for future generations is that you will always have to remind yourself that you'll never have an opening on the truth. Truth seeking is a virtue in itself. Amazing, absolutely amazing. Mohammed, for anyone listening right now, this was a conversation as I said with, and they would love to know much more about your work and what you do, how can we find you? They can find me through my website, MohammedNabeel.weil.moHAMED and a VIL.WORLD. It should be hand-fell if you can add the link to the description. Wonderful. Thank you so much, Mohammed. Honestly, it's been a pleasure. The absolutely, you know, that was absolutely amazing. Thank you so, so much for your time. Thank you. Look forward to anything you will again in the future. Definitely. Not all my listeners who joined us today to listen. Thank you so, so much for, you know, joining me and Mohammed and turning it into the wisdom transfer we experience this is the future and I will see you all on the next.