Episode 75: Why “Calories In, Calories Out” Is Terrible Weight-Loss Advice
25m 24s
The podcast challenges the oversimplified "calories in, calories out" approach to weight loss, arguing that it fails to account for the complex biological and emotional factors influencing hunger, satiety, and metabolism. While calories do matter as a basic energy balance, the equation ignores critical elements such as hormones, sleep, stress, food quality, and individual physiology. The host shares her personal journey of shifting from rigid calorie counting to a more compassionate, nourishing approach centered on protein, fiber, and satiety. She emphasizes that hunger is not a sign of weakness but a signal from the body, shaped by genetics, diet history, and daily life stressors. Meals that are satisfying and nutrient-dense—like those rich in protein and fiber—help regulate hunger and improve overall well-being, reducing midday cravings and afternoon crashes. The body adapts to restriction, often increasing hunger and reducing energy expenditure, which makes long-term weight management harder. The host highlights that medical interventions like GLP-1 medications reinforce the biological nature of appetite, showing that hunger differences are normal and valid. Ultimately, the goal is not to minimize calories but to build meals and habits that support feeling full, strong, and in tune with one’s body. This shift from guilt-based discipline to mindful, personalized nourishment is key to lasting wellness. The host offers one-on-one coaching and focused wellness resets to help women understand their unique needs and develop sustainable, realistic habits—offering a faster, more compassionate path than years of self-blame and trial and error.
If losing weight were a simple math problem, I should have been great at it. I spent more than
20 years as an accountant. I understood the equation, eat fewer calories than you burn, and you'll
lose weight. What I couldn't understand was why following that equation felt so much harder for
me than it seemed to feel for other women. Why could someone else eat the same meal and feel
completely satisfied while I was still hungry? Still thinking about food and wondering why I couldn't
just stop. For years, I assume the difference came down to willpower. But the truth is calories
in, calories out may describe part of what happens in the body, but it's far from explaining everything
influencing it. Today, we're talking about what that equation gets right, what it leaves out,
and why just eat less is not actually a useful weight loss strategy. But before we jump in,
I do want to ask you to please take a moment to follow our subscribe to the show. Every follow
in download helps us reach more women who need to hear these conversations and allows me to keep
creating them. Thank you so much for your support friends. Now, let's get into it.
Welcome to the Inspired Wellness Podcast, the show where we dive into what's really going on in
your body as you journey through perimenopause and beyond. I'm the inspired wellness coach Michelle
White, certified nutritional therapy practitioner, and I'm here to empower you to take control of your
hormones, your health, and your life. This is the place for real talk about your changing body with
practical tips and expert insight on balancing your hormones naturally. From nourishing your body
with the right foods to embracing lifestyle shifts that bring you back to feeling amazing,
we're breaking the silence and smashing the myths. Get ready to reclaim your energy,
your confidence, and your sense of well-being because you deserve to thrive at every stage of life.
Let's dive in. Hey friends and welcome back to Inspired Wellness Podcast. I'm Michelle White,
the inspired wellness coach and a nutritional therapy practitioner, helping women in midlife stop
chasing the body they used to have and start building the health, strength, and energy they want
for the years ahead. Today is going to be one of our shorter episodes, no guest, no co-hosts,
just you and me, and I want to talk about something that has honestly been a struggle for me
for most of my life. And that is the idea of calories in calories out. Even saying that phrase can
still be a little triggering for me because for years it made me feel like there was something wrong
with me. The basic message was always, if you want to lose weight, eat fewer calories than you burn,
that's it. It's simple math. And if you weren't losing weight, then you must be eating too much,
moving too little or somehow not trying hard enough. I understood the equation. I have always
understood the equation. I am not dumb. I get math. Heck, I was an accountant for 20 years.
What I didn't understand was why it seemed so much harder for me to live it out than it did
for some other women. I could look at a friend who appeared to eat the same amount I did, or sometimes
more, and yet our bodies looked completely different. But honestly, the part that affected my
confidence, even more than that, wasn't simply that our bodies were different. It was watching
someone else eat part of a meal and then effortlessly deciding she was finished. Meanwhile,
I could eat the exact same meal and still not feel satisfied. I would watch another woman push
her plate away as if stopping were the easiest, most natural thing in the world. In fact, I'll never
forget being at a dinner with a group of girlfriends when one of my friends, who has always been naturally
thin and as so is pretty much every woman in her family, she said that she reaches a point
during a meal when she just feels grossed out by the food and doesn't want anymore.
And I remember thinking, I'm sorry, what? Because I was looking at the food, still sitting on
her plate thinking, honestly, I kind of want a bite of that. She wasn't doing anything wrong, of course.
That was simply the signal her body was giving her, but mine wasn't giving me the same signal.
And I would wonder, why don't I feel that? Why does it take me so much longer to feel full?
Why am I still thinking about the food when she has completely lost interest in it?
Why can't I stop as easily as she can? And then, of course, the next thought was,
what is wrong with me? I spent years trying to manage that through sheer mental control.
I would tell myself, you need to stop eating now because if you keep going, you're going to feel
absolutely miserable in an hour. And I was often right. An hour later, the physical fullness would
finally catch up with me. But in the moment, I didn't feel satisfied. I felt like I was forcing
myself to stop before my body had gotten the message that I had eaten enough. And that experience
is one reason the calories and calories out conversation feels so personal to me.
Because when we reduce weight management to a simple math problem, we leave out the person
who is trying to live inside that equation. We leave out hunger, we leave out satiety,
we leave out hormones, sleep, stress, muscle mass, food quality, dieting history, genetics,
medications, blood sugar fluctuations, and all the signals constantly passing between the brain
and the body. So today, I want to talk about what calories in, calories out gets right,
what it leaves out, and how understanding the fuller picture really helped me develop a much
healthier approach to food. And I'm also hoping it'll help you do the same. So first off, I don't
want to replace one of really simplistic message with another. So let's start here, because calories
do matter. There is science behind this. A calorie is a unit of energy and changes in body weight
do involve energy balance. I'm not going to tell you that calories are imaginary or that you can
consume unlimited amounts of any food without it affecting your body. But saying that calories
matter is not the same as saying that managing weight is as simple as deciding to eat less.
That's where I think we've gotten into trouble. The calories in, calories out equation describes
what happens. It does not explain all the biological and behavioral factors influencing
both sides of that equation. It's a little like looking at your bank account and saying,
your balance went down because more money went out than came in. That may be mathematically
correct, but it does not tell you why it happened. It doesn't tell you what expenses increased,
whether your income changed, or what circumstances affected your decisions. In the same way,
telling someone to eat less and move more doesn't address what is driving her hunger,
how satisfied she feels after eating, how her body responds to restriction,
how stress or sleep quality is affecting satiety, or what may be changing in her energy expenditure.
It's an equation, not a complete strategy. And listen, hunger isn't the same for everyone.
This is the piece I wish I had understood much earlier. Two people can eat the same number of
calories and have a very different experience afterwards. One person may feel comfortably
satisfied and barely think about food for the next four hours while the other person may finish
the meal and immediately wonder what else she can eat. That doesn't automatically mean the second
person lacks discipline. It may mean the meal or her body's response to it did not produce the
same degree of satiety. Our appetite isn't controlled by one simple on and off switch. It is
influenced by signals from the digestive system, the brain, fat tissue, the pancreas, and other
parts of the body. It can also be affected by whether we slept well, or how stressed we are,
or how much we've been dieting, the composition of the meal, and for women in midlife,
the hormonal changes happening in the background. Even the speed at which we eat matters because
fullness signals are not always immediate. I know this very personally. When it takes
longer for satisfaction to register, being told listen to your body can be incredibly frustrating.
I am listening to my body. My body is telling me it isn't satisfied. My body is telling me I need
some chocolate before I can close out this eating session. And I'll tell you, this is one of the most
common things I hear when I sit down with a woman for the first time. She doesn't open with,
"I need a meal plan." She opens with, "I feel like I'm fighting myself all day."
Almost every single time, when we actually look at what she's eating, how she's sleeping,
what her stress level is, and what her body has been through over the last 20 years of dieting,
there is a reason. There's always a reason. It's just very hard to see that from the inside.
but that does not.
not mean we are powerless. It does mean we may need better tools than simply trying to overpower
hunger. So here's something I want you to know. First, imagine two meals that contain roughly the
same number of calories. The first is a pastry and a sweetened coffee. The second is eggs, perhaps
some turkey sausage or cottage cheese, vegetables, berries, and maybe a piece of whole grain toast.
The calories could be very similar here, but those meals may create completely different experiences
over the next several hours. The second meal provides more protein, more fiber, nutrients,
and food volume. Your body also uses more energy digesting protein than it does digesting
fat or carbohydrates. So you've got to keep that in mind. And more importantly for everyday life,
that meal may help you feel satisfied longer. That matters because what happens after breakfast or
whenever you eat your first meal does not stay confined to that one meal. If your first meal leaves
you hungry an hour later, you may spend the rest of your morning trying not to snack. Then by
lunch you're starving. You grab whatever is easiest, eat quickly, and possibly continue eating because
satisfaction still has not caught up. That is not a moral failure. It may be a predictable response
to beginning the day with a meal that didn't provide what your body needed to feel adequately
nourished. This is actually one of the very first places I start with my clients when we discuss
nutrition. And it surprises women every time because they come to me expecting me to take things
away. And instead, the first thing we usually do is add more protein at that first meal, more
fiber, enough fat to make it satisfying. And then within a week or two, a lot of women tell me
the mid-morning hunger and three o'clock crash just stopped. Not because they got more disciplined,
because their body finally got what it was looking for. This is why I care much more
now about building a satisfying meal than simply trying to make it as low calorie as possible.
When I was younger, I thought the best choice was always the option with the fewest calories.
A tiny breakfast, a very light lunch, fat free, everything. And I would try to save as many calories
as possible so I could use them later. But if the low calorie choice leaves you preoccupied with food,
fighting cravings, and feeling deprived all afternoon, it is not the choice that serves you best.
Sometimes eating a little more at a meal, especially more protein, fiber, or nourishing fat,
can make it much easier to eat in a way that feels calm and intentional for the rest of the day.
The other problem with the simple equation is that we imagine calories out as a fixed number.
We reduce the calories from the inside and assume that the outside will stay exactly the same.
But the body is not a calculator, it's an adaptive system. So when we repeatedly
or aggressively restrict food, the body can respond in several ways. Hunger can increase.
Food may become harder to stop thinking about. We may feel more tired. Our workouts may
become less productive. We may unconsciously move less throughout the day.
The body can also become more energy efficient, particularly after weight loss.
This means it burns fewer calories doing the exact same activities. Again, this does not mean fat
loss is impossible or that calorie balance does not matter. It means the body participates in the
process. You are not adjusting numbers and a spreadsheet while your biology just sits quietly
in the background. And from an evolutionary standpoint, that makes total sense to me.
Our bodies were not designed to celebrate a calorie deficit. A prolonged lack of available
energy could once have signaled a serious threat to our survival. So the brain has mechanisms that
encourage us to find food when hungry and to conserve energy when restricted. That doesn't mean
your body is broken or working against you. It means your body is trying to protect you.
Even if those protective mechanisms feel incredibly unhelpful in our modern environment.
Especially with the latest craze that Skeletor Skinny is a good look. Which, by the way,
I do not agree with. And I do want to say something here because this is the part I can't fully
cover in a single podcast episode. If you have a long history of dieting and most of us in midlife
do, there's often another layer underneath all of this. Your minerals, your thyroid, your blood
sugar, how much muscle you've held onto, what your stress load has been doing to you for the last
decade. That is the layer I love digging into with women because that's usually where the
why isn't this working for me? Answer actually lives. And it's very hard to AI your way to that.
It is much easier when someone is looking at the whole picture with you.
Also, I think it's important to briefly touch on the GLP ones here because the effectiveness
of these medications has exposed an important truth about weight loss. Hunger is biological.
These medications can reduce appetite, increase feelings of fullness, slow digestion, and quiet
what many people describe as food noise. I hear a lot of people say I can finally stop eating without
constantly fighting myself. And that really tells us something. If appetite were simply a matter of
discipline interrupting those natural appetite signals through medication wouldn't make such a
dramatic difference for so many people. And listen, this is not an episode about whether anyone should
or shouldn't take a GLP1 medication. That is a very individual medical decision that you need to
make with a qualified healthcare provider. And there is a lot of considerations that need to be
taken into account. But I do think these medications help demonstrate that two people can experience
hunger and fullness very differently. Now listen, that doesn't remove personal responsibility,
but it should change the way we talk about it. And it should give us more compassion for ourselves
and for other people that experience hunger differently. So what do I do with all of this?
How has this knowledge helped me specifically? Because understanding the science is great,
but at some point I still have to sit down and eat dinner. And for me, the biggest change has
been shifting away from asking, how little can I eat? And towards asking, what does this meal
need to help me feel nourished and satisfied? So protein is obviously a huge part of that for me.
I build my meals around a meaningful source of protein instead of adding a few bites to a meal
that's mostly carbohydrates. I also always try to include fiber rich plants and enough nourishing fat
to make the meal satisfying. And I try to eat in an order and add a pace that gives my body time
to register what's happening. That doesn't mean every meal is perfect or that I never eat past fullness.
Of course I do. I am human and I still do not have that automatic off switch that some of my friends
were clearly born with. But I no longer treat hunger as evidence that I'm failing. I try to get
curious about it. So some questions that I ask are, did I eat enough protein? Was the meal satisfying
or was it simply low in calories? Did I barely eat all day and then expect myself to demonstrate
perfect restraint at dinner? Did I sleep poorly last night? Am I stressed? Am I eating quickly or
while distracted? Am I physically hungry or am I looking for comfort, stimulation or relief?
These are literally the questions I walk my clients through and I'll be honest with you. Most
women can't answer them at first. And trust me, it's not because they aren't smart. It is because
they're too close to it. It took me years of self-research followed by a desire to get certified
in nutritional therapy to see my own patterns clearly. It takes most of my clients about two
conversations because someone else is looking at her situation and highlighting the key questions.
And sometimes the answer is simply yes I am still hungry. And in that case I can choose to eat more
without turning that choice into a judgment about who I am. I also know that mindfulness cues
may take longer to catch up. So rather than demanding that I magically become the person who
easily abandons half her dinner, I work with what I know about myself. I build a balance plate,
I slow down when I can, I pause before automatically going back for more. And I remind myself that
I can always go have more food in an hour if I'm truly still hungry. That feels completely different
from telling myself you're not allowed to eat anymore. One is punishment and the other is a pause.
That distinction has been really important for me,
but finding those important distinctions is different for everyone.
I wish I could go back and tell my younger self
that struggling with hunger didn't mean I was weak.
Having a different body from my friends
didn't mean I was doing something wrong.
And another woman's ability to leave food on her plate
wasn't proof that she was more disciplined,
more virtuous, or somehow better at being a woman.
We can eat similar foods and have different bodies.
We can follow similar patterns and get different results.
We can even eat the same meal
and experience completely different levels of satisfaction afterwards.
However, that doesn't mean our choices don't matter.
They absolutely do.
But our choices do not happen in a biological vacuum.
So, yes, calories matter, but protein matters, fiber matters,
muscle matters, sleep matters, stress matters, hormones matter,
food quality matters, your history of restriction even matters,
and your individual experience of hunger and satisfaction matter.
You are not simply a math equation.
And if your entire approach to wellness requires you to spend every day fighting your own body,
it probably isn't going to become your long-term solution.
The goal isn't to find the fewest calories you can tolerate.
The goal is to build meals and habits that help you feel nourished,
satisfied, strong, and able to make supportive choices
without constantly battling hunger.
That is a much more compassionate approach,
and it's also a much more practical one.
Because the best strategy isn't the one that looks perfect on paper.
It's the one you can actually live with.
And I'll say this gently because I lived on the other side of it for a long time.
You can absolutely piece this together on your own.
I did, eventually.
It just took me about 20 years, a lot of energy and a certification to get there.
It does not have to take you that long.
I am here to cut out that time and energy and help women get there much faster than I did.
So friends, thank you so much for spending this time with me today.
I really hope it was helpful.
And before you go, I do want to tell you what I actually do,
because if today's episode had you thinking,
"Okay, but what does this actually look like for me specifically?"
That is exactly the work I love.
I work with women one-on-one in two ways.
The first is the Inspired Wellness Program.
That is my one-on-one coaching program.
It's for the woman who is ready to stop guessing and rebuild her foundations for real.
We take eight weeks and we look at the whole picture.
Your nutrition, your protein, your blood sugar, your sleep,
your stress, your minerals, your history.
And we build a plan that fits your actual life.
Not a plan that looks good on paper.
One, you can actually live with.
The second is my focused wellness reset.
That one is shorter and more targeted.
A more personalized experience for the woman who wants to help fine-tune one or two specific concerns.
So maybe it's exactly what we talked about today.
Hunger and satiety and building meals that actually work for you.
Maybe it's your energy, maybe it's your sleep or your afternoon crashes.
If you don't need a full overhaul, but you do want expert eyes on one or two things, this is the one for you.
So if either of those sound like what you need, there are two easy ways to reach out to me.
You can head on over to my website, theinspiredwellnesscoach.com,
and use the Reach Out option there to send me a message.
Or, and honestly, this one is probably the quicker way to get to me.
You can just email me directly at Michelle, that's M-I-C-H-E-L-L-E,
at theinspiredwellnesscoach.com.
That one comes straight to my inbox, and I answer all of those emails myself.
So either way works, I truly love to hear from you,
even if it's just to tell me where you're stuck.
And in the meantime, if you're loving these episodes,
there are a few things that help me out more than you know.
Make sure you're following the show so you never miss one,
and share this episode with a friend,
especially if it made you think of a woman who has spent years blaming herself
for struggling with food or weight.
Please send it to her, I wish someone had sent me something like this 20 years ago.
Sometimes, simply understanding that there is more happening beneath the surface
lifts a little of that chain.
And if you have a minute, leave me a rating or a review.
Those are always you can support me and help me get in front of more women like you
who would find this information helpful.
So truly, thank you.
And if you have a question or a topic you want me to cover
on one of these shorter episodes, email me.
I want these to feel like a conversation we would have sitting together over coffee.
So until next time, take care of yourself
and remember that your body needs support, not punishment.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The "calories in, calories out" model oversimplifies weight management by ignoring biological, hormonal, and behavioral factors like hunger, satiety, sleep, stress, and food quality.
Two people can consume the same number of calories and still experience vastly different levels of fullness due to differences in metabolism, meal composition, and individual physiology.
Restricting calories triggers adaptive responses in the body—including increased hunger, reduced energy expenditure, and fatigue—reflecting evolutionary survival mechanisms.
Meals high in protein, fiber, and healthy fats promote longer satiety and reduce midday hunger, making them more effective than low-calorie, nutrient-poor options.
Hunger is not a sign of failure or lack of willpower; it is a complex biological signal influenced by hormones, stress, sleep, and past dieting history.
Modern GLP-1 medications demonstrate that appetite is deeply biological, not a matter of discipline, and support greater compassion for individual differences in hunger.
A sustainable approach to food focuses on nourishment and satisfaction rather than calorie counting, leading to better long-term habits and well-being.
Personalized, holistic coaching helps women understand their unique body signals and develop practical, compassionate strategies that align with their lives.
Summary:
The podcast challenges the oversimplified "calories in, calories out" approach to weight loss, arguing that it fails to account for the complex biological and emotional factors influencing hunger, satiety, and metabolism. While calories do matter as a basic energy balance, the equation ignores critical elements such as hormones, sleep, stress, food quality, and individual physiology. The host shares her personal journey of shifting from rigid calorie counting to a more compassionate, nourishing approach centered on protein, fiber, and satiety.
She emphasizes that hunger is not a sign of weakness but a signal from the body, shaped by genetics, diet history, and daily life stressors. Meals that are satisfying and nutrient-dense—like those rich in protein and fiber—help regulate hunger and improve overall well-being, reducing midday cravings and afternoon crashes. The body adapts to restriction, often increasing hunger and reducing energy expenditure, which makes long-term weight management harder.
The host highlights that medical interventions like GLP-1 medications reinforce the biological nature of appetite, showing that hunger differences are normal and valid. Ultimately, the goal is not to minimize calories but to build meals and habits that support feeling full, strong, and in tune with one’s body. This shift from guilt-based discipline to mindful, personalized nourishment is key to lasting wellness.
The host offers one-on-one coaching and focused wellness resets to help women understand their unique needs and develop sustainable, realistic habits—offering a faster, more compassionate path than years of self-blame and trial and error.
FAQs
It oversimplifies the biological and behavioral factors like hunger, satiety, hormones, sleep, stress, and food quality that influence how the body responds to meals and activity.
Protein and fiber help create a feeling of fullness, slow digestion, and provide sustained energy, which reduces midday cravings and improves overall satiety.
Yes, repeated calorie restriction can trigger adaptive responses like increased hunger, fatigue, and reduced energy expenditure, as the body conserves energy in response to perceived scarcity.
No, hunger is a biological signal influenced by hormones, stress, sleep, and meal composition—not a reflection of personal failure or lack of willpower.
GLP-1 medications show that appetite is a biological process, not a matter of willpower, as they significantly reduce hunger and increase fullness in many people.
Building meals rich in protein, fiber, and healthy fats that satisfy the body and support stable energy levels, rather than focusing solely on calorie reduction.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.