Episode 5673: MN Judges Against Trump; Boasberg's China Ties; Defeat Socialism By Rebuilding The Middle Class
0m 0s
The transcript highlights a growing crisis of judicial corruption and political disconnection in the U.S., particularly under the Trump administration. Federal judges in Minnesota are accused of colluding to sabotage immigration enforcement, violating judicial ethics by coordinating behind the scenes and boasting to the media. This is being challenged through the Article 3 Project, which is filing formal complaints and pushing for investigations by Congress and the DOJ. The narrative expands to include Judge Bozberg, exposed for hosting Chinese nationals through a state-sponsored exchange program, raising serious concerns about espionage and foreign influence. Public opinion data reveals a stark shift: Americans, especially younger voters, are increasingly rejecting traditional conservative economic policies, favoring tax reforms on the wealthy, anti-monopoly actions, and government intervention to fix economic inequality. Despite Republican claims of economic strength, polling shows that public trust is eroding, with most voters viewing the economy as deteriorating due to inflation, housing costs, and corporate dominance. The core message is that the Republican Party must abandon elite economic orthodoxy and instead focus on rebuilding the middle class through tangible, populist policies. To counter political apathy and misinformation, the hosts promote investigative journalism via substacks and urge citizens to take preventive financial steps—like investing in gold and emergency preparedness—before economic collapse becomes inevitable. The urgency is framed as both political and existential, with an impending election timeline underscoring the need for immediate, decisive action.
(upbeat music)
- This is the primal scream of a dying dream.
Pray for our enemies.
'Cause we're going medieval on these people.
Here's how I got a free shot
on all these networks lying about the people,
the people who had a belly full of it.
I know you don't like hearing that.
I know you tried to do everything in the world of stuff,
but you're not gonna stop it.
It's going to happen.
- And where do people like that go
to share the big line?
Maga media, I wish in my soul, I wish
that any of these people had a conscience.
- Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
If that answer is to save my country,
this country will be saved.
- Waroo, here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
- Friday, 18th September in the year of our Lord 2026,
Mike Davis going to join us, big development, Julie Kelly.
Who is, as I think people know,
her husband's running for in this competition
for mayor of Chicago, she's very tight up
although she's putting up great content
all the time where I get to one of her pieces.
Mike Davis going to break it down for us.
Also, Natalie Winters has a whole series of victories here,
particularly someone with dealing
with the Chinese Communist Party.
As you know, that's where Natalie Cutterteap
here on the show and she's going to be booked.
She's going to join us here momentarily.
I'm also trying to get Mark Mitchell of Mark Mitchell
who can join us.
Mark's got some amazing polling out on wait for it,
economic populism and how people actually love it
when you explain the policies to them
and they can see the impact of it.
So we're trying to get Mark Mitchell up also
and go through that.
One of the reasons I wanted to spend time
a little time on business today is that
it's actually a foundational element
of President Trump's presidency.
There are many things that are going great
and they're trying to twist everything
in the Trump Durangement Syndrome to defeat him.
And I realize everybody's not happy.
Right, everybody's not 100% thrilled
when some of the things that are happening.
I share your pain.
I'm not happy by some of the things
I see going on also.
But if you didn't have Trump, you wouldn't have a country.
Full stop.
You've seen what the alternatives are.
And trust me, it is coming.
And it's coming even in a bigger and more brutal
and darker way than I think anybody imagines.
And this movement is now,
and it's what 10th year, 12th year,
maybe taken over from the Tea Party a little longer
in that, the roots of that.
Maybe even back to some of the Rand Paul stuff
or some of the Rand Paul elements,
some of the elements of Buchanan, Reagan, all of it.
And you can't, you just can't sit there in the band
and say, oh, this was done and I hate it.
And now I'm going to flip.
You can't do that.
Because if you get shattered,
it'll take you decades to get it back.
And they understand that.
This is why this whole discussion now
about Trump and Trump is him, right?
Trump and Trump is him.
So you can't, you know, you can't, you can't separate these two.
And then it would continue to go on.
I want to make Birch Gold right now.
Make sure you make sure you go and get it.
Bannon, there's two ways to get access
to Philip Patrick and the team.
Philip is actually going to be with me again tomorrow morning.
We're going to go more through more of this.
In fact, we're going to take the Rappaport story
and also go through it to show what a bald face lie that is.
But the big thing is go to Birch Gold.
I think the easiest ways, take your phone out, text.
Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N, at 9-8-9-8-9-8.
And make sure you get to Philip Patrick and his team.
There you get the ultimate guide for investing
in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
Also, Natalie Winnes is going to join us here momentarily.
I want to go back to, you got this big state dinner
that's going to take place.
I gave this talk last night for the launch of Thatcher's book.
We had a great--
OK, I got Mike Davis hanging for a second.
Dr. Thatcher's-- Dr. Thayer's book, which was amazing.
And I want to thank Karen Seagman, Dr. Seagman,
and others for helping launch.
I was a great group.
I had a few remarks about the Chinese Communist Party.
I'll get to those momentarily.
Mike Davis now joins us.
Advice for it, Julie Kelly, explain-- and let's put it up.
Let's put-- we got to Julie Kelly's story.
So let's put this up.
Explain them-- is this a conspiracy that's going on?
I mean, what is going on with his judges?
And I understand, and the reason I want
to get you up, I understand Article 3--
the Article 3 project may be taking some action on that.
Yeah, you have these federal judges in Minnesota
who, while they may be appointed by a president,
they're hand selected by the home state senators,
the Democrat home state senators, under our blue slip
bogus system we have in the Senate,
where home state senators get to pick these district court
judges.
And you have these district court judges in Minnesota
who are giving interviews to the New York Times
about cases that have come before their courtrooms,
which is a big problem.
It's a violation of the judicial canons.
They're also, according to these New York Times
interviews, they're also alluding amongst themselves
on these cases and coming up with case strategy
and case theories amongst themselves
on how they're going to fight President Trump
and his immigration enforcement in Minnesota,
his immigration enforcement that is required
by federal statute passed by Congress,
our duly elected members of Congress.
So the federal statutes are not a suggestion.
The president has an Article 2 constitutional duty
to enforce those federal statutes.
And these activist judges in Minnesota
are conspiring to undermine presidents
and then to give highly inappropriate interviews
to the New York Times about this.
And so the Article 3 project is working
on a judicial misconduct from plaint right now
that we intend to file and hold these judges accountable
for this.
There has to be an investigation.
And we're not going to allow the chief justice
of the United States or the eighth circuit
or any other judicial body to just sweep this under the rug.
We are also going to work with Chairman Chuck Grassley
on the Senate Judiciary Committee, my former boss,
who has long hauled for accountability
for these federal judges when they violate
the judicial cannons like this.
- Okay, hang on for a second, hang on.
'Cause this Julie Kelly's piece is so explosive.
You've got federal judges with lifetime appointments
that are working together behind the scenes
and coordinating, colluding, to thwart on the book's
immigration law.
And you can see that happened in Minnesota.
This is the big problem we had with Bavino,
Commander Bavino and people,
when we want to do the mass deportations
or just even the deportations of the bad omen brace,
which is, you know, we're not,
that has to happen, but it can't stop there.
But they're colluding on all of it.
First off, have you ever heard of that,
Davis, you've been around a while,
you're a student of this.
Have you ever heard of that happening
at any of the time in American history
with federal judges, sir?
- No, I clerked on the 10 circuit court of appeals.
I clerked on the Supreme Court of the United States.
I've been in a lot of courtrooms for 20 years.
I was the chief counsel for nominations
on the Senate Judiciary Committee
with the federal judiciary oversight portfolio.
I've never heard of this.
I've heard of one off judicial activism,
one off judicial sabotage,
where you have some activist judge in DC
or New Yorker Boston doing something wacky.
I've never heard of an entire district,
like the District of Minnesota,
where the judges are colluding to undermine
the duly elected president of the United States
with his electoral mandates
to enforce our federal immigration laws
that are passed by our elected members of Congress
and on the books. Again, immigration statutes
like any other statutes are not suggestions.
Their mandates in the president
has the constitutional duty to enforce those statutes.
And these judges, it's not their job
to second guess the policy decisions
of our duly elected members of Congress.
And it's certainly not their job
to undermine, to have this judicial sabotage
against the president of the United States
when he's doing his job.
And so these judges must be held accountable
in the Article 3 project, as I said,
is filing a judicial misconduct complaint
against these judges who think it's their job
to sabotage the president
and then run to the New York Times and brag about it.
- But this is kind of the,
the John C. Calhoun secessionist faction
of the Democratic Party, which is like 99% of them.
They realize and see this.
They know what's going on.
They say these courts have our back.
These courts are essentially, it's the equivalent
like Dred Scott back in the 1850s.
know the courts are going to have their backs. That's what so. So there has to be a mechanism
in place. God love. I love article three. We do, you know, the war is the biggest support
of you guys. I love the fact that you're getting involved in the vice where he's going
to take it. But isn't there something in the system that immediately should go and not
just investigate, but investigate quickly get the facts and shut it. And the investigation
will be the New York Times interview because they're bragging about it. Can't isn't there
a structure in the system on the executive branch side or the legislative side or the
judicial side that kind of oversees this crap so that you know, it can't happen and can
go shut it down. And if have to impeach and turf out these judges, sir, yeah, there are
several systems. The executive branch can open a criminal probe on these judges. You don't
have judicial immunity when you're when you're conspiring like this and sabotaging the
newly elected president and undermining statutes passed by Congress. You also can have you
can also have the House judiciary committee and the Senate judiciary committee open investigations.
You can bring in articles of impeachment or open impeachment increase. And really this
is cheap justice. John Roberts is responsibility to get his own judicial house and order. And
that's frankly, Chairman Chuck Grassley's point where chairman Chuck Grassley is called for
an independent inspector general within the federal judiciary for many, many, many years.
The chief justice has fought this and said, no, you don't need an independent inspector
general within the federal judiciary. We can handle our own affairs. It's very clear
that chief justice John Roberts could not handle his own affairs because this keeps happening
over and over and over where you have these activist judges. You're legally sabotaging
the duly elected president, right? This is corruption within the federal judiciary. And of
course, the chief justice hasn't done anything about it in the past and he won't do anything
about it. Okay, hang on, you're getting to the heart of the matter because this is just
not, we have dealt in Julie K. You've been on the show now for a couple of years, but
particularly when President Trump got here, stop his policies of what we call rogue federal
judge and that front line is where they slow us down. They stop us. It gets reverse later.
May have to go to the Supreme Court to back president Trump in his article to powers.
But that's one, you know, that's these individual rogue judges. This shows collusion among a
group of them to make it even more formable. And we found out about it in the New York Times.
This is going, don't I believe this is going on in a lot of these circuits, right, with
this open collusion that they know about and they're kind of thumbing our nose at it.
That is a type of massive investigation or DOJ to get involved and start throwing out
some criminal indictments. Is that in that the only way? I mean, we've got to get serious
about this on this one to then go after the others and spread essentially fear to these
people that if you do it, you're going to be locked up, Mike Davis.
Yes, this is a gorgeous judicial misconduct by these Minnesota judges. Not only are they
illegally saluting, conspiring to sabotage our federal immigration statutes that they
disagree with apparently. They need to resign from the bench and run for Congress.
If they disagree with those, but it's also more egregious that they've run to the New York
Times and complains about cases and complained about parties to the New York Times. If these
judges have issues, they need to resolve them inside their courtrooms, not inside the
reporters offices or on the reporters phones and immediate outlet like the New York Times.
That is a, that is egregious judicial misconduct by these judges. Mike, I know you get a ball,
but just hang through the commercial market. Get one other question on how we get coordinated
action. This Mike Davis device where he's with us. Julie Kelly, an amazing piece from
Julie Kelly. I think it's also going to be a deeper piece today. I think put up on
there's a sub stack. We get to all that. October 15th is upon us, a tax network USA 866-513-5516,
called now. That's a hotline for you. You get a business tax strategy review free,
not only cost thousands of dollars. 866-513-5516, called today. Tell me a part of the
forum. Get your free business assessment now. You don't wait until your house is on
fire to install a smoke detector and you don't wait until the wind and rain hammer your
windows and the power goes out to prepare for hurricane. And you don't reach for your
seatbelt after the impact because after the crash, the hurricane or the house fire, it's
too late. Similarly, you don't wait until the dollar goes to zero before you buy gold.
It's too late then. Diversify with precious metals and diversify now because you never
know what will threaten your savings next. Persistent inflation, a weakening dollar,
unexpected financial disruptions. You don't know what's coming, but you can take preventative
steps and you can take them today. Do that right now by requesting a free information
kit on gold from my friends at Birch Gold Group. Just text my name, Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N to
the number, 989898. There is no cost and no obligation. Just straightforward information
on how you can diversify your savings. Even an IRA or 401k with gold. I trust Birch Gold.
You should trust them too. Text Bannon, at 989898, take action and do it today.
>> Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
>> Birch Gold.com/bannon ended the dollar empire eight free installments of ninth one's
coming. Make sure you merge yourself in it so you can understand what Johnny Carney's
talking about, what the rap reports talking about, Scott Besson's defense of all this,
our analysis, et cetera. So make sure you drill down. It's taught now in graduate finance
courses at certain universities. We're very proud of it. Why is that? The accessibility
we make it accessible to you, a working class and middle class audience that maybe didn't
take advanced economics or finance in undergraduate or maybe didn't go to college. So check it
out today. Very proud of this. Mike Davis. This is so outrageous. And we're going to have Natalie
Winner's on in a minute. And Natalie's got another big expose she's done brilliantly.
And no offense, Mike Johnson. We did not, and we're going to have our favorite judge,
Bozberg. We did not impeach or start impeachment of votes or hearings on even one of these judges
to the midterm election. So Mike Johnson, you got to have response about this. Davis,
the reason they're so blatant, they don't think we're going to do anything about it. They
think we're a bunch of wimps. This is collusion of federal judges to basically, and to make
sure that the John C. Calhoun successionist program of the sanctuary states and sanctuary
cities are fully backed up to allow 25 million or 22 million illegal alien invaders under
the illegitimate Biden regime to remain in the United States of America, Mike Davis,
because they don't think we're going to do anything about it. Brother, am I wrong there?
You're not wrong. And I would just say this to these judges to Chief Justice John Roberts,
you better get your house judicial house in order here, because I know that not only will
Chuck Grassley support legislation to bring an IG to the federal judiciary. I know the Democrats
that they take over the house, and the Senate are very eager to do the same. So if we keep
justice once again, prove that he could not get these rogue judges in line to follow the
law, follow the judicial canons. I think Congress is going to do it for the Chief Justice.
And I know from my time as the chief counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
the Chief Justice did not want that legislation. Well, there's going to be a damn breaking on
that if we can't get the judicial house in order. If we have these Minnesota federal judges
conspiring to undermine federal law enforcement and federal statutes on the books on immigration,
that's a big problem, particularly in Minnesota that's overrun by Somali warlords and pirates
who are fleecing hundreds of millions of dollars from our treasury. And they just, these
same Somali warlords and pirates turned into Democrat precinct captains for elections.
This is a big problem. I am at a loss for why these federal judges think that they can
conspire to try to subvert federal immigration law, federal immigration enforcement and
then go brag about it to the New York Times. That is clear, the judicial misconduct and
the chief justice needs to get this resolved for Congress is going to do it for her.
Okay. Where did they go in order to go through? I know you guys are going to get involved.
You're drafting something right now. Where do people go and keep up the speed with it,
what you're doing in your social media, sir? Yes, article three project dot
article number three project.org and we are moving forward with a judicial
misconduct complaint against these Minnesota federal judges. Mike thank you so
much. Appreciate you the vice-chair. Now we can roll right into Natalie Winter's
investigation. So Natalie you've got. I'm gonna let you take it because this guy
I don't understand why this guy was not impeached or at least the effort to
impeach him under Johnson in the house and you wonder why people are sitting
and going why am I gonna go knock door to door? Why am I gonna canvas? Why are
we gonna get out the vote? Why are we getting a little propensity voters? You've
got to give people something and Johnson says oh it's the most productive house
ever and I don't think so homie. Don't think so. Most productive would have had
some impeachments of some of these outrageous rogue federal judges. Natalie
Winter's you've got my favorite. What do you got for us? Well I mean we can't even
impeach rogue judges but the Democrats are already what they have there.
Impeachment articles probably several renditions of them drafted for
President Trump. We don't even have to make up the charges. I think my reporting
makes it pretty clear when it comes to Judge Bozberg who I'm sure people
recall. Someone who you couldn't even I think write in a Hollywood villain movie
from the physiognomy to his actions to his rulings but delaying, canceling the
deportation flights, the Kilmar of Brego Garcia case, some interesting Chinese
ties which we'll get into beyond what I just exposed. But people I'm sure
remember this organization that I have railed on for years now about the
China United States Exchange Foundation. It is the tip of the spear when it
comes to the CCP's efforts to infiltrate sure all of America but
particularly Washington politicians think tank types people in the media. You
name it. Well of course judges I would put it no further than the Three War
First Doctrine when it comes to how they target and weaponize law fair against
us. Of course they're going after them too. Judge Bozberg is no exception and
I would actually say frankly he's the poster child for what it means to have
CCP assets espionage and propaganda fronts in contact with judges. He was a
nine-time host if you can believe it for Chinese fellows and see every part of
the story gets more ridiculous as part of an exchange program and I want
Denver pictures are worth a thousand words this one should certainly be worth
an impeachment to put this picture quite a damning picture up on screen of
Bozberg sitting in his chambers it's unclear if those were actually the FISA
court chambers as in the foreign intelligence surveillance act court which he
was a part of was a FISA judge for I believe six years one of them he was
actually the lead judge of the court but he invited Chinese nationals in
giving them as they bragged you know unfettered access the ability to speak with
judges learn about the American legal system they don't even euphemize it as
it's some like positive exchange it's basically just a one-way street where
literal Chinese citizens get access to America's top secret court could you
imagine the reverse happening I don't think so or you certainly will not live to
tell about it but this exchange it's sponsored by the U.S. Aja Institute which
in and of itself is similarly a you know pro-China united front group much
like QSF it was founded in 2008 between two very interesting characters one
actually a communist party secretary in Shanghai Sun Chao so again a CCP
founded exchange group but in conjunction with his American lackey Matthew
Samansky now this individual is very intriguing because he himself is another
poster child for PRC compromise whether it's the fellowships at Chinese state
universities or the fact that he was actually the vice president for corporate
relations at SMIC as in the semiconductor manufacturing international
corporation that is the Chinese semiconductor company that was actually added
to the entity list as in it was blacklisted by the United States for its ties to
the Chinese military this guy was lobbying for them and these are the two
geniuses that came together to create this exchange where they boasted that
Chinese nationals again I don't even like the term Chinese students that's too
euphemistic Chinese nationals aka not just dormant Chinese spies but probably
Chinese intelligence assets were given quote exclusive conversations with
influential actors and got to witness proceedings quote few are ever able to
witness first hand bozberg like I said was a nine-time host of this program
per the reporting or the the records that I saw from this group I believe he is
the judge that hosted these people the most which is quite interesting 2015
through 2020 he hosted them that was while he was on FISA so six times and then
again in 2022 2023 2024 how you could continue to host people from this group
which by then had already been flagged as a spy group I mean that was all the
way back in 2013 but let alone post covid let alone post you know the trade
war is beyond me but Steve the other interesting angle here besides I mean
just clearly trying to make president Trump's agenda much more difficult to
implement right make it really hard for us to deport illegal aliens criminal
aliens at that but bozberg you know the assignments in DC are always very
interesting right he managed to be the judge assigned to the case that how to do
with Secretary Hegsatz Department of War trying to add WUSHI a very shady
Chinese biotech company to a similar entity list that smick one of the
companies that the founder of this program was lobbying for but added to the
entity list so sanction them for the PRC proxy that they are which there's a
whole list of documented ties there but I would posit that any Chinese
company is essentially a dormant state owned enterprise they can very easily
invoke article seven of China's national intelligence law and there you go
suddenly you're doing the bidding of the CCP now this group this company was
actually forbidden forbade from being added to the entity list because judge
bozberg stepped in and said that it was a horrible decision they were just
destroying their reputation this was propaganda this was you know putting a
scarlet letter on them it wasn't true so you kind of link the Chinese ties
through that you find it very interesting but like I said Steve the the top
line assessment here judge Bozberg hosting essentially Chinese spies as part
of a the euphemistic way of describing it as a Chinese propaganda
organization it is an intelligence gathering and collection group which it was
already declared that by the United States government years before he was
hosting these people and then all of a sudden you see him on the bench literally
giving the CCP the ideal decisions that they would want and actively
undermining what President Trump was trying to do on the immigration front I think
this warrants an investigation which I'm sure would probably lead to impeachment
Natalie Hanger one second we get other issues to go through
sub-stack where people go on to get you on sub-stack right now because you're
putting up great hit pieces and analysis and investigations every day the more
you subscribe and share makes it more likely that these do nothing Republicans
will do something we can force them into doing something so it's Natalie G
Winters dot sub-stack dot com it's free you can pitch in if you want to help
more stories keep coming but it's Natalie G Winters dot sub-stack dot com just
your email and you should you should know your enemies you should you should
read these stories and get all the facts at Natalie just stick around do the
break we're in come right home title dot com promo code Steve get a free
title report who's been looking at your title I don't know artificial intelligence
cyber all of it should break back in a moment you know just a few years ago
if you told someone you were stocking up on emergency food they would have
called you a tinful hats conspiracy theorists not anymore we've all seen
supply chain chaos devastating natural disasters inflation war civil-run
rest and preparedness has gone mainstream that's what we're so excited to
partner with my patron supply america's original patriot preparedness company
right now they're celebrating americ two america's 250 with one of the best
deals they've ever offered 250 dollars off their best selling six month food
supply available now a prepare with bannon dot com that is a home page they
gave us just for the war and posse prepare with bannon dot com this is the
exact same survival brand trusted by over three million American families now
why is that because they deliver 2,000 calories a day their food lasts up to
25 years without for refrigeration it contains no I repeat no GMOs or
artificial colors are artificial flavors and you can count on it to keep your
family fed no matter what the emergency is even at full price it's still the
best decision you'll make for your family with a 250 dollar discount it's a no
brainer go to our own home page with my patron supply that is prepare with
bannon dot com to get your emergency food kit today that's prepare with
bannon dot com do it and do it today
here's your host Stephen K. Bannon
okay breaking news the White House just messengers over here the invitation
for Natalie winners to be Natalie you've been invited to be a guest at
the state dinner, to sit next to she, just
First off, the reason Natalie couldn't attend the dinner is she'd have to bring three food
tasteers.
Natalie Wenders, you're going to come back tomorrow, we've got even more CCP stuff.
Other investigations you're doing.
Once again, give people the sub-stack because it's pretty extraordinary and it's lit right
now.
Where they go, social media, all of it, you're going to be back here tomorrow.
In the 11 o'clock hour, Natalie's going to join us live.
Natalie, where do people go?
Well, Steve, you just made me think of my own death if I were to sit next to Susan Pink.
I think it's worth noting, Tung Qi Hua, the chairman of QSEF, he actually passed away about
10 days ago.
I think the war room maybe gets some credit and maybe giving him a heart attack with
our recent reporting.
But it is funny.
He was eulogized.
We'll talk about this tomorrow.
But by John Podesta, if you can imagine, and as further proof of my reporting, Admiral
Bill Owens, the former vice, I think chairman of the joint chiefs, also gave him some real
nice love in his passing.
So quite wild.
But it's Natalie to enter stopsubstack.com.
It's free.
You can also pitch in five bucks a month.
It helps more stories coming and Steve, we already have a win, that foreign election group
that we had exposed a few months ago.
They have since deleted and pulled down all of their web pages trying to get foreign
money funneling into our midterms.
I'm still waiting for the DOJ to do something.
I won't hold my breath on that one, but the substack, it helps.
So Natalie, she went to stopsubstack.com and thank you for having me.
Thank you, ma'am.
We'll see you tomorrow more.
Go through all of it.
Of course, Natalie was one of the exposed all the three and four stars, two three and
four stars that are sucking up to the Chinese county's party and taking cash money.
Unbelievable.
Natalie winners.
No, she will not be at the state dinner because they can't fit in three foodtacers for.
Mike Mitchell, we've had, so I had, you know, I've done this analysis of this rap report
piece about best and yesterday we did economics all day, capital markets.
You've got a little bit of a reality check for us.
I want to put up this chart that you've been talking about.
Then you've done your own analysis on the economic populism and where folks stand on this.
So the floor is yours.
You walk through it anyway you want to walk us through it, sir.
I think this is the most important chart I've ever had you put up on the show.
And I think really Republicans need to step back and take a look at this because they
don't understand public opinion.
Now personally about me, you know me, I'm a right wing guy, but I'm on team America.
My job is to represent the voters, not any political party.
And so for the last year and a half, I've been pounding my fists on the table, trying
to give them advice, trying to help them govern in a way that Americans will appreciate it.
We will get the things that Americans ask for out of Trump's mandate.
And I'm telling you, it's been like pushing on a noodle.
It's been really tough.
And at this point, the polling does look like the Republicans are going to lose pretty decently.
I mean, that just says what it is.
I can't sugar code it.
That's not what I'm here to do.
But this chart really explains why.
And so what you're looking at is one of the most important questions you can ask.
And it's you got data, but it's because they have so much.
It's such a really great time series here.
Is the economy getting better or worse?
And as you can see going into the COVID period during Trump's first term, people were basically
split on whether the economy was getting better or worse.
And then all of the sudden, Americans got a really big wake up call.
They got a bucket of ice cold water dumped on their head.
They had COVID and they had the government response, massive bipartisan bailout, stimulus
bill, closing of all of the small businesses across the country, everybody going to Walmart.
And then this massive run up of asset prices caused by the way that we handled this crisis.
And what happened is economy getting worse, shot up from basically the low 20s all the way
up to 60.
That's that red line there.
And it's been there the whole time.
So now a lot of people are saying, well, Republicans deserve to win because Biden caused
this mess.
Or because look, we have a 5.1% GDP all of the sudden or the stock markets at record highs.
I don't know what to tell you.
There's been a K shape recovery, Americans, you know, the people who aren't the wealthiest
1% essentially have just absolutely been pounded by everything.
And you can point to the CPI, but this is about decades of wage suppression.
This is about asset inflation and the cost of housing.
It's about the fact that they have to pay $400 every time they want to fill the refrigerator.
It's not about eggs and gas prices.
It really isn't.
I mean, you know, the gas price is an unfortunate symbolic thing right now.
But this is about people paying like rent size checks in order to have health care.
And then they still have a $10,000 family deductible like these are the problems that Republicans
have to figure out how to fix if they want to win.
So that red line, if you trace it dipped two times and the only two time, the only thing
that affected Americans opinions that the economy was no longer getting worse was the
inauguration of Biden and the inauguration of Trump.
And what that means is that people were hopeful that they voted for somebody new.
This person was going to come in and fix the economy.
And as you can see with the Biden situation that it didn't help at all.
It went from like 30 all the way back up to 65 people were like, no, no, this guy, he's
retarded.
He doesn't know what he's doing.
And right around that spike there in the red line right in the middle of the graph is
when basically people decided, no, we made a mistake.
We want Trump back.
So now look, there's right where the green and red line kiss there right on the right
side.
There's no inauguration.
And people were like, finally, I like what we're seeing out of this guy.
First couple of months of his second administration, we're great.
And then all of a sudden, you know, liberation day hit and sort of doge went away and people
like something's not right here.
And now those red and those purple lines are farther apart than they've pretty much
ever been on the chart almost as bad as the height of COVID.
And a lot of that's obviously because of the Iran situation and the way that just prices
haven't come down.
Now you could say again, Trump has gotten CPI under control.
But I'm here to tell you that's not enough according to this chart for Americans.
And this is the brutal reality of about how public opinion works.
These people do not watch CNBC.
They have to deal with their wallet every single day.
And Republicans seem so insulated for that.
They think they're going to come in.
They're going to be able to run on the Dow hitting 50,000 and they're going to be able
to run on these investments that are going to pay off over a 10 or 20 year timeline.
Americans aren't going to aren't feeling this anymore.
And we're not in the country where everybody is a binary red team blue team voter.
So here's what I've been saying for very long time.
And I want to say it again, Americans are probably going to vote for socialists this time.
Now America is not like they don't want to be a socialist country.
People think we're a capitalistic country.
But they also think that the traditional conservative parts of capitalism have failed.
This idea that we can continue to run on art laffer and ergonomics and tax cuts for corporations
and that eventually people will realize that that's the principal position and that we
need to go back to that or everything else is socialism.
Those days are passed because Americans are increasingly becoming socialistic out of
desperation.
And if you want to beat socialism, the only alternative is to focus on rebuilding the
middle class every day.
That's got to be your primary focus.
And that's what people I think thought they were getting out of the second Trump administration.
They wanted somebody to get in there and and take retribution against the broken system.
Well, like that's important.
They wanted, you know, accountability and reform for the federal government, drain the swamp,
waste fraud and abuse, doge that you were talking about judges early in Trump's term.
He had basically a mandate to impeach all these people.
People don't want violent Venezuela and gang leaders here.
And two to one people wanted jugged, jugged Bozberg and peach.
That was way back in March of 2025, you know, Congress whiffed on that.
And we can talk all we want to about it now.
But the window is basically closed because we're here a month and a half away from an election
where the Democrats are up nine points among likely voters right now.
And that's with a post RNC bump.
So I mean, I they're going to lose Congress like the Republicans are almost certainly going
to lose Congress.
And at this point, as a pollster, there's nothing I can really do other than, can mean, I guess
you have this.
You can't vote for socialist messaging.
And that will get a lot of your core Republican voters out.
But it's not going to get that 35% of Trump's 2024 big tent coalition that was independence,
crossover Democrats, working class people, minorities and get this actually socialists.
Trump got a lot of socialists votes believe it or not.
Because 50% of under 40 Trump voters said that they would actually vote for a socialist.
And we asked this before.
And three quarters of the under 40 Trump voters said that they would support nationalizing
major industries, almost 60% of them support excess wealth confiscation.
And now we have a new poll out out of the honest poll.
And I mean, it looks like again, this is a repudiation of traditional conservative economics.
Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, I want to go to this and get up.
This is this September 2026 National Tracking Poll on Populism.
Exactly.
There's some.
Okay, let's get, let's get, okay, but walk us through it, walk us through the takeaways
from this.
And I'll put it up and we're going to send it out to everybody and I'll probably have
you want to come back and go through individual pages.
When you say tracking poll on populism, explain to people what you did here and what you
derived from it.
While we're doing public sentiment work, we're trying to figure out what Americans think.
We're not just a horse race polling firm.
I mean, that's the way you prove everybody you're accurate.
But the whole point is to actually study and report
on what Americans think so they can be better served.
That's the George Gallup vision.
That's the thing that nobody believes in anymore.
And this is like Republicans want to ignore this stuff
so they can still run on open borders and free trade
and all this other stuff that has failed Americans,
in my opinion.
But for instance, we ask voters if you could pick
between cutting social security and Medicare
or cutting defense spending or raising taxes
on people that earn more than a million dollars,
Americans say, yeah, raise taxes 54%, only 34%
say cut those other programs, but 51% are Republicans.
So majority of Republicans say, yep, eat the rich.
They agree with Bernie Sanders, tax the wealthy.
And anybody who recommends that on social media
is going to be called by a bunch of like MAGA shills.
And I'm sorry they are now.
Like I was OG MAGA.
I can say this.
You're going to be called a socialist.
If you recommend anything economically progressive.
Another one, this one's going to have art laughers spinning
over in his grave, which is closer to your view.
Cutting corporate taxes further is the best way
to grow the economy.
Or corporations already get too many tax breaks.
And Americans say corporations get too many tax breaks.
63 to 25 among Republicans.
It's 50 to 34.
So only one third for Republicans say, yeah, like corporations
or cut the taxes, it's going to trickle down on us.
So this whole idea of like, we had major corporate tax cuts.
That was a big part of the first Trump administration.
That stuff's not going to fly anymore
because we are an entirely different economic situation.
We're out of desperation.
Americans are really upset with big corporations, which
blows my mind again because Americans supported
mass deportations, and yet they saw how ICE behaved.
And they said, you know, maybe not like that.
And I tried, you know, I put an op-ed about it.
What Americans want is they want these corporations
that game the system smashed in the face.
They wanted brutal anti-trust action.
And that was like the first person fired
out of the administration who was trying
to do a good job for Americans.
Do you support or oppose stronger government action
to break up large corporations that dominate industries
like tech, ag, health care, and banking?
So I didn't even use the evil monopoly word.
I just said big corporations and Americans
approve of that 62% to only 21%.
So it's three to one.
And among Republicans, what's that?
61% of Republicans support this, only 24% oppose.
So you have Republicans, Trump's base now.
And again, these are the people who all of their,
you know, all the people they watch on Fox News,
all the people on the business news
that want the GDP line to continue to go up,
line go up, economics.
Your supporters don't think this.
They look at Amazon and say, you know what?
Like maybe that's not great for America.
They look at Google and say, you know what?
Maybe they have too much control.
And maybe this isn't the way capitalism is supposed to work.
And yet we're told again, any threat
to the traditional conservative economic orthodoxy
is socialism and Republicans will not win like that.
Rich Barrett's just wrote a whole book about it.
Have to burn down these tired values
that are no longer gonna work for conservative America.
Hang on one second.
We're gonna take a short commercial break.
Mark Mitchell, the honest pollster, is with us.
♪ We wish you, Charlie, you helped us all ♪
- Feels like our country finally has momentum again.
With our leaders fighting to restore common sense
in America first.
But we've seen this before,
conservatives get comfortable
and the left starts taking background inch by inch.
We cannot let that happen in these midterms.
America needs every one of us in the fight
and a big part of that means supporting companies
that actually stand for our values.
That's why I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile.
Patriot Mobile gives you premium priority nationwide service
on any of the three major US networks.
So you get the coverage you need
plus unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots,
international roaming, and 100% US-based customer support.
Switching is easy.
Keep your phone.
Keep your number and activate in minutes.
But Patriot Mobile is so much more than a great wireless service.
They built a growing movement of America's defending faith,
family, freedom, and the future of this country
by donating millions every year
to organizations fighting for our freedoms.
Go to PatriotMobile.com/Bannon or call 972 Patriot.
Use promo code Bannon for a free month of service.
That's PatriotMobile.com/Bannon
or call 972 Patriot to make the switch today.
♪ Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon ♪
The Phoenix Engine Room reminds me
that actually early voting does start today
in Minnesota, South Dakota, Virginia,
and starts more in Vermont.
But so game on, it started.
Mark Mitchell, I'm going to have you back
on a go through this more.
Talk to me real quickly about this philosophy of George Gallup
and you to talk about where people are
and the trends of where they're going.
That's been kind of dumped aside for these horse race,
all these horse race polls, sir.
Yeah, I mean, almost everybody in the industry
is on basically the Washington DC gravy train
or they've sold out to be a wage slave
for a big mainstream media organization
that is subject to the whims of its advertisers.
So like I'm not doing this to make money.
If I wanted to make money,
I would do what a lot of other right wing pollsters do,
which is take on disclosed money
from political action committees or big industry groups
or whatever.
So George Gallup wrote a book, Pulse of Democracy,
almost a hundred years ago now.
And the idea was like America's a big country now.
There's millions of people.
You elect a representative.
He goes halfway across the country to Washington DC.
How do you know he's representing you?
It's such a big disparate country.
And the answer is unless you measure what people think,
you really can't do it.
And so he basically popularized political polling
in the United States sentiment analysis.
Not who's going to win the election,
but okay, they're in.
What do they do now?
And how do you make sure that they're not just lying
in their own pockets or actually doing things
in the interests of Americans?
And I can tell you off the top of my head,
the only two people in the industry who I know
who are doing that at the expense
of their own personal income is me and Rich Barris.
And that's really sad.
I mean, like this should be like we should have groups
that just do this.
They do a good job.
Nobody, they're not corrupted by, you know,
establishment orthodoxy or whatever, right?
Like people weren't polling on vaccines.
People weren't polling on election integrity.
People on the right are super incurious again
about anything that threatens the establishment
economic situation that we have here,
which has been, you know, infinite Indians coming over
for H1Bs, infinite offshoring, you know, free trade with,
and these are like conservative policies
that have absolutely hollowed out the middle class.
Now, obviously the left has a lot of blame there too,
you know, the tax and spend liberals,
like that's not necessarily a good idea either,
but we've come to a situation now
where the American people are basically more ignored
than they've ever been, even though we probably
have more pollsters than we've ever had.
And that's a really tough situation.
And I basically had to leave my prior firm
and we're going to make sure that there was nobody
with their editorial thumb on me,
preventing me from representing the American people.
So I'd love for people to support me
because it gann, like, it's me, like that's it.
And I'm polling and I put out a lot of polls
and, you know, we're trying to do our best.
But as you can see, this stuff that I'm putting out,
like Republicans are going to hate it
just as much as Democrats are,
then that's because the American people
are getting screwed and they need somebody
out there blocking and tackling for them.
They need a referee.
People should think of me as basically a referee.
So if they want to come help me,
I have a sub-stack.
You could sign up for free newsletter
that just tells you when I have new content out,
it's not going to be 10 emails a day.
It's going to be like a two or three a week, maybe four or five.
And if they want to support me financially,
we have a paywall at the site,
vhonestpole.com, and, you know, you get access to all the cross tabs.
And there's all the sponsored polls are available for everybody.
We just did one, as you know, with Mark Lucas
from Veteran Action.
A lot of really good political stuff in there
that has our latest Democrat and Republican primary matchups.
And it has our latest generic ballot and Trump approval.
So people can go check that out.
A lot of interesting things.
Like, for instance, Americans are screaming
for this Iran situation to be over already.
And if people want to know how Republicans can win,
it's like number one at the top of the list.
Just get ourselves out of this situation
because it has been problematic
as all of us were warning about a year ago.
So again, I want to see Trump succeed,
not because of a Maggi guy,
not because I'm a registered Republican,
not because I'm part of some team
where I'm shilling for an organization.
It's because Trump's platform was objectively
even more popular than he was among all of the electorate, right?
We had mass deportations was like a 65% position.
Drain the swamp was almost 70.
Doge was well into the 70s, auditing organized,
you know, the federal government
for waste, fraud and abuse.
You know, arresting all of these criminals
and reforming the federal government, all super popular.
And unfortunately, like the messaging
hasn't sort of stayed single threaded on this.
You know, we came in with a Trump second administration
that looked like it was going to cross the Rubicon
and people were begging for it.
And now here, like a year and a half later, we're navel case.
like wondering why it all went wrong.
And like I hate to say it.
This is not like the first administration.
The generic ballot is very closely tracking Trump approval.
This is a Trump problem.
And so again, he still has his core of support.
He's still got his roughly 50% of Republicans
that still strongly approve of him.
But the problem has always been convincing
these crossover Democrats and independents
who leaned Republican, basically a lot of them
for the first time in 2024,
to convert to a Republican vote.
And that sale has not happened.
So people will look at the Democrats,
and you can call them socialists.
But at the end of the day, the Democrats
will probably throw gimmies at people.
They will open the treasury, and some people will get stuff.
Like those bills will go through.
And on the right, it's like, no, shut up and eat
your $20 burrito.
And you should want to pay a $5 gallon for your gas tank
in order to feed communism.
And those are just not winning messages.
People have to look at the Republican Party and Trumpism
as a coordinated movement to actually
A, acknowledges the problems with the economy,
and then B, plausibly explains how if they stay in power
that they will fix them, those things,
at some time in the future.
Like it was my assertion, the people didn't want to be told
we were already at the Golden Age.
They wanted to see a golden path to the Golden Age
so that they could continue to enjoy voting for Republicans.
And I said that to Trump almost a year ago.
And, you know, that--
Mark Mitchell.
Mark Mitchell, we get a bounce, we got a hard out.
Where do people go right now to support your work
and find out more about it?
vhonestpole.com, please sign up for my free sub-sack.
Thank you, brother.
Appreciate you.
Talk to you after the show.
Never forget, Chad Prather.
I think it's number three in the country charts.
Download it on iTunes.
The Charlie Kirk show is next.
I'm going to do a live hand-off with bowling today
in his four o'clock show.
A lot on the economics I've got to talk about.
Oil markets, geo-politics.
Then Poso is going to be here.
He's in town.
He'll be in studio with Mrs. Poso.
How about that?
At five o'clock.
HomeTitelock.com, promo code banan.
You get two weeks free, $1 million triple lock protection.
Take advantage of it today.
Talk to Natalie Dominguez in the team.
You get a free report on your title.
Make sure nobody monetizes it.
Your home's not only your castle.
It's your piggy bank for retirement.
90% of your net worth.
Check it out today at hometitelock.com, promo code stew.
Charlie Kirk's next.
We're going to be back at 5 p.m. Eastern daylight time.
Chad Prather will take you out.
Never forget.
♪ There are kids one happen that day ♪
♪ Never forget ♪
♪ Never forget ♪
October 15th, as we say in the World Room 15, October.
As we head towards that date, that's the extension deadline for the IRS.
Here's something most Americans do not realize.
The IRS already has a file on you.
Every W2, every 10.99, every piece of tax information that's been reported to the government
is sitting in what's called your IRS master file.
The question is, do you know what's in it before you file your return?
That's why I want you to check out our friends at text network USA.
They'll pull out your official IRS master file before your return is prepared
so that you can see exactly what the IRS already has on the record.
If you filed an October 15th extension,
you can get your federal tax return repaired plus your IRS file pulled for just 49 bucks.
And if you're self-employed, receive 10.99 income or own a business,
they'll review your IRS file and prepare your federal tax return for just $300.
This special offer can save you hundreds of dollars
while helping you file with confidence before the extension deadline.
Call 866-513-5516.
That's 866-513-5516, or visit TNUSA.com/bannon.
That's TNUSA.com/bannon for this special pricing.
That's again, TNUSA.com/bannon.
Remember, they can pull the file for $49 and then file your return for $300.
Do not miss this special offer. Take advantage of it today.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
Federal judges in Minnesota are accused of colluding to undermine President Trump’s immigration enforcement, violating judicial canons by giving interviews to the New York Times and coordinating strategies.
The Article 3 Project is filing a judicial misconduct complaint against these judges, demanding accountability and calling for investigations by Congress and the DOJ.
Judge Bozberg is exposed as having hosted Chinese nationals through the U.S.-China Exchange Foundation, raising concerns about espionage, propaganda, and ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
Public opinion polls show a growing shift toward economic populism and anti-corporate sentiment, with 62% of Americans supporting stronger government action to break up monopolistic corporations.
A significant majority of Americans—especially under-40 voters—support progressive economic policies like taxing the wealthy and nationalizing major industries, indicating a shift away from traditional conservative economics.
The Republican Party’s failure to connect with voters on economic pain points, such as housing costs and wage suppression, threatens its ability to win in the upcoming elections.
Stephen K. Bannon emphasizes the need for transparency and grassroots political action, promoting substacks and investigative reporting to counter misinformation and build public trust.
A major call to action is for individuals to invest in gold and prepare for economic instability through emergency kits and financial diversification before it’s too late.
Summary:
, particularly under the Trump administration. Federal judges in Minnesota are accused of colluding to sabotage immigration enforcement, violating judicial ethics by coordinating behind the scenes and boasting to the media. This is being challenged through the Article 3 Project, which is filing formal complaints and pushing for investigations by Congress and the DOJ.
The narrative expands to include Judge Bozberg, exposed for hosting Chinese nationals through a state-sponsored exchange program, raising serious concerns about espionage and foreign influence. Public opinion data reveals a stark shift: Americans, especially younger voters, are increasingly rejecting traditional conservative economic policies, favoring tax reforms on the wealthy, anti-monopoly actions, and government intervention to fix economic inequality. Despite Republican claims of economic strength, polling shows that public trust is eroding, with most voters viewing the economy as deteriorating due to inflation, housing costs, and corporate dominance.
The core message is that the Republican Party must abandon elite economic orthodoxy and instead focus on rebuilding the middle class through tangible, populist policies. To counter political apathy and misinformation, the hosts promote investigative journalism via substacks and urge citizens to take preventive financial steps—like investing in gold and emergency preparedness—before economic collapse becomes inevitable. The urgency is framed as both political and existential, with an impending election timeline underscoring the need for immediate, decisive action.
FAQs
The Article 3 Project is a legal initiative targeting judicial misconduct. Its current focus is on federal judges in Minnesota who are accused of conspiring to undermine President Trump's immigration enforcement by coordinating strategies and giving interviews to the New York Times.
Yes, the Article 3 Project alleges that federal judges in Minnesota are colluding to obstruct immigration enforcement by discussing case strategies behind the scenes and publicly criticizing President Trump’s policies in interviews with the New York Times.
Judges are expected to remain impartial and private about cases. Publicly discussing case strategies or criticizing executive actions in media interviews violates judicial canons and is seen as judicial misconduct, especially when done to undermine a duly elected president.
Judge Bozberg is accused of hosting Chinese nationals through a U.S.-China exchange program, which critics claim facilitated espionage and propaganda. This raises concerns about foreign influence in the U.S. judiciary and potential violations of national security laws.
People can support the Article 3 Project by visiting articlethreeproject.org, subscribing to Natalie Winters’ Substack for more investigative content, or joining advocacy efforts to pressure Congress and the DOJ to take action.
Polling shows that Americans overwhelmingly support taxing the wealthy and breaking up large corporations, especially in tech, health care, and agriculture. This reflects a shift away from traditional conservative economic policies toward more progressive, populist views.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.