Go back

Episode 51 - The Madness Wherein Now He Raves

8m 38s

Episode 51 - The Madness Wherein Now He Raves

In this episode of *The Hamlet Podcast*, host Connor Hannity analyzes Polonius’s speech to Claudius and Gertrude in Act 2, Scene 2 of Shakespeare’s *Hamlet*. Polonius insists that Hamlet’s madness stems from Ophelia’s rejection of his advances, which Polonius himself orchestrated by ordering her to "lock herself from his resort" and refuse his messages. He describes Hamlet’s decline as a "declension" through stages: sadness, fasting, sleeplessness, weakness, lightheadedness, and finally raving madness. Hannity highlights Polonius’s characteristic wordiness and self-congratulation, noting his ironic claim to make "a short tale" while delivering a lengthy explanation. Claudius questions Polonius’s certainty, and Polonius boldly stakes his life on his theory, offering to uncover the truth even if it were hidden at the earth’s center. Hannity compares Hamlet’s symptoms to other Shakespearean lovesick figures like Romeo, suggesting the audience would recognize this trope. He also speculates on Gertrude’s tentative agreement, hinting she may suspect other causes for Hamlet’s behavior. The episode concludes by foreshadowing Hamlet’s next entrance and the complex dynamic between him and Polonius, inviting listeners to explore further on the podcast’s website.

Transcription

1296 Words, 7439 Characters

English
[Music] The Hamlet podcast, episode 51. Hello and welcome to this exploration of Shakespeare's Hamlet with me your host, Connor Hannity. The last episode ended with Polonius in full flight, holding forth with more words than might seem necessary about Hamlet's behaviour. He's really been stressing the point that he's faithful and honourable to use Claudius' description, presumably to cover up that he's meddling and interfering with what could perhaps be written off as just two young people in love. But what would, true and Claudius, have thought of him if he'd observed this budding relationship with idle sight? God forbid he lose their good opinion. So he continues explaining that, "No, I went round to work, and my young mistress thus I did bespeak. Lord Hamlet is a prince out of thy star. This must not be. And then I preset-scover, that she should lock herself from his resort. Admit no messengers receive no tokens. Which done she took the fruits of my advice, and he, repulsed, a short tale to make, fell into a sadness, then into a fast, then to a watch, then into a weakness, then to a lightness, and then by this declension into the madness wherein now he raids, and all we mourn for." Polonius really is a great man for the precepts. It seems that few moments pass between him and his children, in which he doesn't find a means of sharing a few of his nuggets of wisdom, or what he might call wisdom. Polonius explains to Claudius that he told Ophelia, back in act one, that she was to have nothing to do with Hamlet. Back then his description was, that Hamlet had a larger tether than maybe given to Ophelia. Now Hamlet is a prince out of thine star. In other words, he's out of her orbit, her destiny, or even her social sphere. In other words, despite even Polonius' proximity to power, Ophelia has no chance with Hamlet. This must not be. Polonius reiterates his instructions that she should lock herself away from Hamlet's access to her, resort. Admit no messengers receive no letters or tokens. Ophelia seems to have done so, although in her description it seems that Hamlet had no difficulty getting into her chamber. As prince of the realm, perhaps nobody would have said no to him. Regardless, the plot has to keep moving, and so Hamlet did get through to Ophelia in her closet, in his peculiarly distressed state. She had perhaps taken the fruits of her father's advice, and she does repulse Hamlet, though the father insists. The folio says repulsed, but some editors choose to say "repelled," which would match directly with what Ophelia herself said in the previous scene. Shakespeare then gives a little gag for Polonius, having him preface the rest of his speech, saying, "a short tale to make." Long story short is really not a phrase that we can associate with the senior statesman, as he immediately proves, Hamlet, repulsed or repelled by Ophelia, fell into a madness, then into a fast, then to a watch, then into a weakness, then to a likeness, and by this declension into the madness wherein now he raves, and all we mourn for. So much for brevity being the soul of wit. I always enjoy the idea of Polonius getting rather excited over this description of Hamlet's distress, as he falls further and further down this rabbit hole, before catching himself and realizing that he's getting carried away in front of Hamlet's mother, herself liable to be distressed about all of this, and so he has to relish in with the politically appropriate comment that, of course, everyone mourns for the princess decline. Polonius here is describing Hamlet with all the symptoms of a love-sick romantic. He's fallen first into something like a sadness, then he stops eating in a fast, then he keeps watch, in other words he cannot sleep, and then into a weakness which is unsurprising in one who isn't sleeping or eating, and then to likeness or lightheadedness, again not surprising. Hamlet isn't the first young man in Shakespeare to brood like this, when we first met Romeo, he was comparably forlorn in love, he thinks, with Rosalind, and then in, as you like it, Rosalind has her wonderfully playful description of all the symptoms that a lover should display, which also echo Hamlet's current plight. The doleful lover was obviously a figure that Shakespeare's audiences were conditioned to recognise. Polonius plays on words here when he calls the process a "declension". Obviously there's the continued sense of Hamlet falling or declining through these stages, but declensions and classical grammar are the variant forms of a noun, so Hamlet is displaying the varied forms of distraught lover, and Polonius is showing how clever he thinks he is. Claudius has to wonder though, he asks, "Do you think this?" Perhaps he's asking Polonius if he genuinely thinks that this is what's going on, or, in my opinion more likely, he's asking Hamlet's mother. Gertrude answers tentatively. It may be, very likely. Does Gertrude think it might be something else? She's already tried to explain away Hamlet's sullen behaviour as a reaction to her, or hasty, wedding. It is be handy enough for her if Hamlet's continued strange behaviour could be blamed on someone else. Polonius answers, too, and unsurprisingly, brings it back to Polonius. Have there been such a time like they know that, that I have positively said, 'Tis so' when it proved otherwise. Polonius would really like to know if there's ever been a time when he stated that something was positively the case wherein it proved otherwise. Claudius replies, "Not that I know." The King acknowledges that, "No, this has not been the case." Now, Polonius points to his head and shoulders and says, "Take this from this, if this be otherwise." He's staking his life on this claim, that Claudius take his head from his body if he's proved wrong. A more tepid version might be that he points to his staff of authority and suggests that it be removed from his hand, take this from this, but personally I prefer the more severe threat of decapitation. Having thus upped the stakes, Polonius offers to continue his great slew thing work. If circumstances lead me, I will find where truth is hid, though it were hid indeed within the centre." In other words, if he can get his hands on enough circumstances evidence, he will figure out the truth of this situation even its hidden at the centre of the earth. The centre of the earth was traditionally considered an impossibly difficult place to access, but if he must, Polonius will go there to find the truth of his whole situation. For the actor playing Polonius, there's a lot going on here. His relationship with the king might be on the line, since his daughter and the king's steps on or nephew are at the heart of this whole affair. One hopes that there's also some concern from this father for his daughter's health and happiness. And who knows, perhaps there's even a relationship between Polonius and Hamlet himself. They both spent their lives at court after all, and so presumably there's some kind of a relationship to explore. Conveniently enough, Hamlet is about to re-enter, and we'll start to see what might be going on between these two men in the next episode. Until then, feel free to visit the website, as you know by now it's the hamletpodcast.com You can follow us on Twitter or even leave a review on iTunes if you feel like it. Thank you as always for listening, and I'll speak to you next time.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. Polonius explains to Claudius and Gertrude that he ordered Ophelia to reject Hamlet, believing Hamlet is "out of her star" (socially above her).
  2. Polonius claims this rejection caused Hamlet to decline through stages—sadness, fasting, sleeplessness, weakness, lightheadedness—into madness.
  3. Claudius questions whether Polonius is correct; Polonius stakes his life on his theory, offering to find the truth even if hidden "within the centre" of the earth.
  4. The host notes Polonius’s verbosity and self-importance, comparing Hamlet’s symptoms to Shakespeare’s other lovesick characters like Romeo.
  5. The episode sets up Hamlet’s imminent re-entrance, hinting at a deeper relationship between Polonius and Hamlet to be explored next.

Summary:

In this episode of *The Hamlet Podcast*, host Connor Hannity analyzes Polonius’s speech to Claudius and Gertrude in Act 2, Scene 2 of Shakespeare’s *Hamlet*. Polonius insists that Hamlet’s madness stems from Ophelia’s rejection of his advances, which Polonius himself orchestrated by ordering her to "lock herself from his resort" and refuse his messages. He describes Hamlet’s decline as a "declension" through stages: sadness, fasting, sleeplessness, weakness, lightheadedness, and finally raving madness.

Hannity highlights Polonius’s characteristic wordiness and self-congratulation, noting his ironic claim to make "a short tale" while delivering a lengthy explanation. Claudius questions Polonius’s certainty, and Polonius boldly stakes his life on his theory, offering to uncover the truth even if it were hidden at the earth’s center. Hannity compares Hamlet’s symptoms to other Shakespearean lovesick figures like Romeo, suggesting the audience would recognize this trope.

He also speculates on Gertrude’s tentative agreement, hinting she may suspect other causes for Hamlet’s behavior. The episode concludes by foreshadowing Hamlet’s next entrance and the complex dynamic between him and Polonius, inviting listeners to explore further on the podcast’s website.

FAQs

Polonius claims that Hamlet's madness resulted from being repulsed by Ophelia after he instructed her to reject Hamlet's advances, leading Hamlet through stages of sadness, fasting, sleeplessness, weakness, and lightheadedness.

Polonius means that Hamlet is above Ophelia's social sphere or destiny, implying she has no chance with him due to their differing ranks.

Polonius describes it as a 'declension'—a fall through sadness, fast, watch, weakness, and lightness into madness, using a wordplay on grammatical declensions to show his cleverness.

Polonius stakes his life on it, saying 'Take this from this' (likely meaning his head from his shoulders) if he is wrong, and offers to find the truth even if hidden at the center of the earth.

Claudius asks 'Do you think this?' possibly questioning Polonius or Gertrude, and later acknowledges that Polonius has never been wrong before, saying 'Not that I know.'

Gertrude tentatively agrees it may be love-sickness, but she previously blamed Hamlet's sullenness on her hasty wedding, suggesting she might suspect other causes.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.