Go back

Ep. 2532 - Ilhan Omar Was Asked If She Married Her Brother. Watch Her Answer.

1h 14m 43s

Ep. 2532 - Ilhan Omar Was Asked If She Married Her Brother. Watch Her Answer.

This transcript is a montage of political advertisements and commentary from a conservative host covering several interconnected themes. Early segments promote The Daily Wire's action film "Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels," a GOPvotes.org get-out-the-vote push warning of a Democratic Socialist takeover, Prime Video's military thriller "The Terminalist," and the SimpliSafe home security system. The host's main argument centers on Rep. Ilhan Omar, alleging a pattern of immigration and marital fraud. He cites her "not to my knowledge" response when asked whether she married her brother, disputed birth dates, an alleged family name change from Elmi to Omar, and a withdrawn marriage-based immigration petition. He frames these claims as evidence that the U.S. immigration system is exploited by people who then undermine the country. He extends this critique to Michigan Senate candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed, alleging Muslim Brotherhood ties and refusal to condemn Iran or affirm Israel's right to exist. He also discusses France's riots and Emmanuel Macron's response, Brad Lander's West Bank trip, the Ramaswamy ad controversy, Steve Witkoff's comments on Putin, and cultural commentary on Alex Cooper, Cornell, and Irish consent advertising. The through-line is that Western societies refuse to understand their enemies, tolerate radical ideologies, and let institutions be used against themselves.

Transcription

13497 Words, 75543 Characters

English
Speaker 1You can't entertain Americans when you actually hate the average American. Their values, their belief systems, you know, the country that they love. Enter The Daily Wire. Our newest release, Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels, is finally streaming. Radical jihadists will destroy our freedom, but only if we let them. If you're a fan of those over-the-top action-packed films from the 80s and 90s, Red Dawn, Toy Soldiers, this is a movie you're not going to want to miss. Red-blooded American good guys taking on the radical Islamic terrorists to regain their freedom. Watch Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels. It's streaming now, only on The Daily Wire. The Democratic Socialists of America won primaries across the country. Next, they're coming for Congress, and they are coming for you. If they win the midterms, they will defund the police, reopen the border, force men into women's sports. That's just the beginning. You are the last line of defense. GOPvotes.org is your partner in the fight. Go to GOPvotes.org right now. Make a plan to vote early. If you live in the critical Senate battleground states of Alaska, Michigan, Maine, Ohio, Iowa, or Texas, early voting is already underway this week, like right now. Democrats are energized. The stakes have never been higher. We can't afford to have people like AOC and her communist friends running the show. This is why I need you to make a plan to vote early right now. Go to GOPvotes.org to find your polling location, vote early, and stop the socialist takeover of America. Paid for by SLF PAC, not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. Folks, a military thriller can give you elaborate conspiracies, international threats, and enormous action sequences. But if you don't actually care about the people who carry out the mission, none of that matters. And this is why The Terminalist is awesome. The people behind the mission. It's just great. The show is awesome. I love Terminalist. It really is great. Chris Pratt returns as Navy SEAL Commander James Reese in The Terminalist Season 2, now streaming only on Prime Video. It's adapted from Jack Carr's best-selling novel, True Believer. This season sends Reese into a fight that tests his loyalty, his sense of purpose, and the bonds with the brothers he thought he'd left behind. Tom Hopper returns as Rafe Hastings, who's an awesome character, alongside returning favorites Constance Wu, Dar Salim, and Luke Hemsworth, with Gabriel Luna joining the cast as Freddie Strain. And the commitment to military authenticity goes way beyond putting somebody in the right uniform. Real-world military experience is embedded throughout the production, from the writer's room and the director's chair to technical advisors, on-screen roles. This is realistic stuff. The people making this series are committed to getting it all right, for the people who have actually lived it. And that matters when you're telling a story about what service asks of individuals, what it asks of their families, and the sacrifices that very rarely we get to see. Of course, you're going to get the high-stakes thriller. But you're also going to get a story about loyalty, impossible choices, and the brotherhood forged under extraordinary pressure. Watch The Terminalist, Season 2, only on Prime. Let's talk about your personal, your home security, your office security. Okay, so let's be real. What are most security systems designed to do? They're designed to notify you after somebody has actually broken into your house. SimpliSafe does the opposite. It's actually going to provide you the system necessary to ensure that people don't break in in the first place. The monitoring system, sure, it does all the things a normal security system does, but it's also going to ensure, that people know that you are safe before they even try to break in in the first place. Like, you don't want to know after the guy's in your house. You want the guy never to enter your house. And that's what SimpliSafe is going to help you do. Join more than 6 million people who trust SimpliSafe. Right now, save 60% on a new system with professional monitoring at simplisafe.com slash Shapiro. Again, we use it at our offices because we have lots of expensive equipment in there. So even when we're not there, it's not just about personal safety. It's about deterring the thing before it happens. Go to simplisafe.com slash Shapiro. Please write in our show name and check out SimpliSafe ahead of crime in real time. Go check them out right now. simplisafe.com slash Shapiro to get started and start keeping all your stuff and yourself safe.
Speaker 2Who was this man that was your husband? When did they start saying that he was your brother? Why? It started with the Somali blog that I don't know if it still exists, but somebody put in there that, you know, that he had to have been my brother or something to that effect. And, um. Right-wing conspiracy theorists in Minneapolis got a hold of it and they just kind of went and, like, found random people who were like, she introduced us. You know, she introduced him to us and said he was her brother. Which is, you know, insane. I mean, I don't know those people that they talk about. You were not related to him at all. Not that. There's not some weird kernel of truth that through some game of telephone. Not to my knowledge.
Speaker 1Yeah, right there. That was Ilhan Omar being asked if she married her own brother. And her answer was, and I quote, not to my knowledge. I'm pretty sure the answer there should be no. Unless it's kind of yes. How do you marry your brother without your knowledge? Are we doing Oedipus Rex here? Like, what's happening? So, Ilhan Omar. Ilhan Omar is a habitual liar. And actually, if you look at her family history, it is pretty clear why that is and what she has done. Remember, there's an ongoing investigation into her immigration status, we believe. There's some documents that have emerged that shed new light on exactly what the federal government is investigating. Why is all of this important? Because, again, there are people in the United States who have taken advantage of the system. They've taken advantage of the system by engaging in fraud. They've taken advantage of the system by importing foreign ideologies into the United States and then, militarily, they've taken advantage of the system and then, militarizing American self-hatred against the United States. And Ilhan Omar is at the top of this list. It all ties together. Lying to gain entry. Lying to maintain status. Lying to gain entry to Congress. Lying in order to destroy the United States. That is what Representative Ilhan Omar has always been about. Remember, this is a woman who literally wrote a letter to a judge trying to get a lesser prison sentence for a man trying to join ISIS. So, let's talk about what she's talking about in this clip and do a little bit of family history on Representative Ilhan Omar. Because we've been told by Barack Obama and Zoran Mamdani, among others, that she's being unfairly targeted over her immigration status. But, there are a lot of very open questions about that. And again, that clip is the worst answer to a question about some form of familial scandal since it depends on the definition of is. I mean, that's an insane answer. Are you related to the man you married? Was he your brother? Not to my knowledge. Does she have a lawyer in the back room writing that for her? Not to my knowledge. Okay, the reason she is saying that is because, I mean, the evidence tends to show that she was very, very likely married to her brother. Not because she was, you know, she's living with her brother or something, God forbid. But, because she was trying to gain him immigration status. But again, it seems that immigration fraud, or at least questions about immigration fraud, may run in the family. So, Ilhan Omar was born in Mogadishu, Somalia. In either 1981 or 1982, we don't actually know. We don't actually know the answer. Her original birthday, according to her Minnesota House of Representatives website, was 1981. We'll talk in a minute about why she changed her birth date, apparently. Ilhan Omar's dad was a high-ranking military colonel under the Marxist military dictatorship of Saeed Barre, which, again, runs counter to his refugee status under U.S. law. Because if you fled and you were a member of a dictatorship that engaged in human rights violations, typically we don't give you refugee status, which may explain why her last, last name was Omar when she came to the United States. I'll just explain that in one second. So, in 1991, when she was either 10 or 9, depending on which date we are using for her birth, she and her family relocated to Kenya during the Somali Civil War. In 1995, she and her family received refugee status and immigrated to the United States, first to Arlington, Virginia, and then to Minneapolis, Minnesota. Now, it is possible that Omar did not enter under her true lineage. Her father's surname is Elmi, not Omar. Elmi. So, why exactly would she be using a name like Omar, like an unrelated family name? Well, the allegation is that members of her family, some of them went to the U.K., and they used the name Elmi. The rest of the family that went to the United States used the name Omar in order to use that family's refugee status to gain their own refugee status. That's the allegation made by Scott Johnson at Powerline, who's uncovered a ton of this. So, herein lies problem number one. Did she come here through her father and through her parents? And when she came here, what's her name? Was her dad using a sort of assumed name or a different familial name? Well, the timeline gets murkier. We will go through all of the facts because the facts are the things that you should care about. Now, when it comes to the American dream, the facts matter as well. Everybody has an opinion about the American dream, whether it's alive, whether it's dying, whether the government is helping people achieve it or making it harder. Before we argue about the answers, we should probably understand the numbers. Income inequality, entitlements, housing costs, what is the government actually doing? What does it cost? Who's benefiting? Those are the questions that we need to ask and those are the questions behind my debate on the American dream with left of center, Scott Galloway. The debate is framed by an informative set of government facts from USA Facts. Then Scott and I get into what those numbers mean, where we think the country should go from here. Because agreeing on the facts doesn't mean agreeing on the policy. You can look at the same data and reach very different conclusions. And that's where the debate gets interesting. There are sharp differences, common ground, and actual discussion beyond the usual political soundbites and rehearsed talking points. Watch it. Weigh the arguments. Come away knowing more. Check out the full debate right now on USA Facts. USA Facts YouTube channel already has several million views. Be one of them. Go check it out. USA Facts YouTube channel. Okay, so in 2000, Omar becomes a naturalized US citizen through her father's citizenship process. Now, allegedly she was 17 if she was born in 1982. As we will find out, she changed her birth date to 1982 from 1981. If she was 18, then she would have not been eligible for naturalization via her dad's naturalization. Again, all of this is downstream of our horrible immigration policy in which we just handed out citizenship like candy. Now, we get to her marital issues. So in 2002, she was in a relationship union with Ahmed Hirsi. They didn't have a civil marriage, so according to American civil law, they weren't married. According to Muslim religious law, they were, and they had a couple of kids. In 2008, she underwent a Muslim separation from Ahmed Hirsi. The next year, she had a civil marriage with Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi in Minnesota. Now, you will recall that it is quite possible that her original name, and now according to DOJ search documents, her actual name is Elmi. Now, you may say, wait a second, wait a second. Didn't she, you just said she married a dude named Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi, and now you're also telling me that actually her last name is Elmi. Correct. Correct. Okay, so Elmi filed a marriage-based petition to gain permanent U.S. residency. When federal immigration authorities asked for evidence that he should actually gain citizenship via his marriage, Elmi replied, Elmi withdrew his petition. So they were trying to sneak one in, right? They were trying to get away with one. Okay, in 2012, while she was still in a civil marriage with Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi, who is very likely her brother, she reconciled with Ahmed Hirsi, and they had a third child. She was legally divorced civilly from Ahmed Sur Saeed Elmi, who is likely her brother, in 2017. She submitted an affidavit stating she had not had contact with Elmi since, 2011. But there are 2014-2015 social media interactions and contacts in London, which would render her affidavit to be perjury. So as Benjamin Weingarten, who is a senior contributor at The Federalist, points out, the documents that were filed to unseal ex parte materials and proceedings related to the federal search warrant show that she is listed as Ilhan Nur Saeed Elmi, a.k.a. Ilhan Nur Saeed Elmi. Abdullah Omar. Again, remember, the brother's name, alleged brother's name, is Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi. Her name is Ilhan Nur Saeed Elmi. According to Weingarten, in September 2019, Omar deleted a 2013 post wishing Nur Saeed a happy Father's Day. In Somali naming convention, children are given a first name followed by their father's first and middle names. If Omar's father is Nur Saeed Elmi Mohammed, it would follow that his children's names would end in Nur Saeed Elmi. Elmi. Deleted pictures on social media put Ilhan Omar alongside what appears to be Leila Elmi and Ilhan's father in 2011 in Kenya. Ilhan Omar reappeared next to Leila in 2015 in London in a photograph with text superimposed over it reading, I heart my sisters with hashtags sisterhood and London trip in the caption. A fall 2016 profile from the local Twin Cities pages publication referred to Representative Omar's father as Nur Saeed Elmi Mohammed before later changing it. Meanwhile, her alleged husband, Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi, it turns out in 2012, he posted a picture of himself holding his baby niece. This would be one day after Omar's daughter was born, quote, nieces fresh out of the vagina. He seems like a charmer, by the way. So that would be her registered husband under American law calling the baby his niece. Flashback 2017. Here is Omar with Elmi in London after she swore under oath she didn't know anybody in Elmi's family. Oh, look at that. Weird. So what else do we know about Ahmed Elmi? Well, we know that according to the University of Bristol in 2025, he served on the programming and curatorial team for Gala Queer Archives Margins for Error exhibition on queer African art, film and publishing. He is currently completing his doctoral degree in the University of Bristol. Provisionally titled Bravery Amidst Brutality, a queer resistance to violence and criminalization in contemporary Kenya. In December, the New York Post reported he had resurfaced in South Africa while calling himself a dirty dandy on social media. So, yeah, he's almost certainly gay. I mean, here are some pictures of her alleged second husband. Yeah, here he is. That's not the straightest stuff we've ever seen right there. Hey, so in 2018. She was legally remarried to Ahmed Hersey in Minnesota, and then she was elected to Congress. And shortly after taking office, she then corrected her birth year to 1982 to backfill the fact that allegedly she's been lying on all of her passports and immigration forms since she tried to gain citizenship illegally via her father. In 2019, she was legally divorced from Ahmed Hersey. In 2020, she was married to Tim Minette, a political consultant paid by Omar's campaign for services, and Minette divorced his prior wife to marry Ilhan Omar. So if you're wondering why she said not to my knowledge, the answer is because to her knowledge, she was almost certainly married to her brother. So that would not amount to a deportation event, right? I mean, if she committed, essentially, there are a bunch of different charges that are getting conflated here. Okay, one is, did she come over with her family legally in the first place? Two is, did she gain her citizenship legally because she was allegedly a person of interest? And three is, did she gain citizenship legally because of age of majority at the time that she was claiming minor status to gain citizenship via dad? Question three is, did she marry her brother in order to try to gain citizenship status for her brother? And then question four would be, what sort of fraud was she engaging in when she was allegedly engaged in bigamist relationships, right? Because she was legally married to this one guy, but then she was religiously married to this other guy without divorcing the first guy illegally. All of this is rather dicey, you might think. You also might think that this is part and parcel of a perverse relationship. So if you're a bigamist, you might hate the United States, is perfectly willing to abuse literally all of its systems for personal benefit and for familial benefit, and then turn around and undermine the United States, which is what Ilhan Omar is. That is what she represents. She represents a strain of American immigration that never should have been allowed in the country in the first place. Now she's asking for donations because it's an expensive and challenging time. So why don't we, let's load up the vocal fry. We know that
Speaker 3they're running scared. We're not intimidated. We're not going to be silenced. We're not going to be scared. I'll be out there campaigning alongside all of you and making sure that we beat back all of this and that we win in the midterms, win the House, win the Senate, and hold this administration accountable. Thank you so much again. And please continue to support us. It is going to be a very expensive and challenging time. And so we appreciate whether you're able to send five, 10, 20.
Speaker 1Thank you. Well, I mean, she also registered apparently in her taxes that she was worth $30 million. And then she revised that down to like $30,000. So which is it? She says now that she's living paycheck to paycheck. Cool. So what is she on government? She's on government handouts. I mean, she's got a salary as a congressperson. What is your financial situation?
Speaker 2I mean, it's, you know, working, working class, I guess, like paycheck to paycheck still, you know, we've got four kids. And, you know, we, we live, I think, like a basic life. I have a Toyota Camry that's from 2016. It's my only car. I rent my DC place and my Minneapolis place. And so, I mean, I don't know if that sounds like, you know, not majority of Congress, but there's some of us that are, that don't come from wealth and don't have wealth.
Speaker 1Oh, she's a victim. You see, she's a victim of American society. Now, this whole story is important for a couple of reasons. The first is the use of country. Who should not be here? The second is lying on behalf of a radical anti-American political perspective, which she also does. And we are seeing the consequence of this in America. As we'll talk about, we're also seeing it in France. There's a reason why people are deeply upset about Somali immigration in Minnesota, given the fact that the vast majority of families in Minnesota of Somali origin are actually on some form of welfare. And yet here is Jacob Fry. The way that you work this politically is import a large chunk of people from a place, a place that is foreign to the United States with a foreign ideology, turn them into a voting block. And then you'll have left-wing politicians eating out of your hand in order to try and cobble together a coalition using your voting block. That's what Jacob Fry is doing in Minnesota, as he explains that actually at Somali, he's at Somali networking night. He says that the Somalis are the CEOs of right now. Are they though?
Speaker 4And I think one of the reasons that they were, are coming after you is they saw the kind of economy and entrepreneurship that you're helping to build. They saw suddenly that the CEOs of the future are not all going to look like me. The CEOs of the future are going to be from a thousand different backgrounds. And so suddenly you all are creeping up in brilliant fashion. You're not just the CEOs and entrepreneurs of tomorrow. You're the CEOs of the future. You're right now.
Speaker 1Okay. Okay. Then I'm just going to read you a few statistics about the Somali community in Minnesota. According to the center for immigration studies, approximately 81% of all Somali headed households in Minnesota receive at least one form of means tested welfare or public assistance households with kids that rises to 89%, 89%, 54% of these households are on food stamps. 73% are on Medicaid. Thank you. long-term residents, meaning 10 plus years in the U.S., 78% are still utilizing some form of assistance. By comparison, 21% of native-headed households in Minnesota are using some form of welfare. So no, that's actually not why people are particularly upset about all of this. There's a reason that Ilhan Omar is a representative of the district for which she is the representative. But again, we are now going to take this national. Well, it turns out that a lot of countries aren't sending their best here to the United States, but you need the best at your company, which is why we use ZipRecruiter. We've been using it here at The Daily Wire for a year. Our awesome producers who, you know, they're constantly citing when it comes to awkward subjects. Those producers, many of them came here through ZipRecruiter. Our editors and pretty much everybody here, we use ZipRecruiter all the time because, again, they help us get all of our hiring done. They can help you get that done too. Right now, you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire. It's not just a sort of job board. ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire. You actually filter your candidates and find the best candidates faster. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter will get a quality candidate within the very first day. You can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire. Again, at ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire. And there are a lot of different places where people post their resumes, but ZipRecruiter helps you filter them. It has an automated system that helps you narrow things down, make sure that you're getting the best candidates for your job, which is what you need. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter at ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire. Speaking of people who lie routinely, who are associated with foreign ideologies, speaking of people who should be nowhere near a congressional seat, let alone a seat in the Senate, Abdulrahman El-Sayed is running a neck and neck race in Michigan. He had a debate last night with Mike Rogers. It did not go well for El-Sayed because he is far too radical for the population. He also happens to be deeply in bed with radical Islam as an ideology. He is a liar. By the way, he's radical on all issues because, again, the basic premise for people like Ilhan Omar and Abdul El-Sayed is that the United States is wrong and evil and basically needs to be dismantled wholesale. Here's Abdulrahman El-Sayed saying we need to dismantle ICE, for example.
Speaker 5I believe that we don't need ICE. In fact, we can go back to INS, back when we were a lot more safe and secure when it came to immigration. And then we need to make sure we have a clear pathway to citizenship.
Speaker 1Clear pathway to citizenship and get rid of ICE. That is his plan. Mike Rogers, again, Mike Rogers is not an extraordinarily great debater, but he can say basically true things. Here he was listing all the things El-Sayed has lied about.
Speaker 6Ask somebody, a new investigator, about how you figure out if somebody's honest and willing to tell you the truth. You go through a series of questions. Did you lie on your resume? Yep, did. He lied about being a physician. Did he lie about his relationships with an organization that should give us all pause? Yep, he did. He lied about being an Egyptian dual citizen. He lied about some of his stances on these positions as he's flipped again. This is a pattern that we need to understand for this to trust this candidate.
Speaker 1Well, that is exactly right. Rogers also pointed out that El-Sayed can't even condemn Iran, which, of course, is exactly right. I mean, he literally said he was caught on tape, El-Sayed, saying that he would not condemn Ayatollah Khomeini, because there are too many fans of Ayatollah Khomeini in his hometown of Dearborn, Michigan.
Speaker 6Yeah, absolutely. It's a threat. My opponent can't even condemn the IRGC, which is the terrorist enforcement arm of Iran, and doesn't believe Iran is any more dangerous than Israel. This is an absolute non-starter if you're going to send somebody back to the United States Senate.
Speaker 1That, of course, is exactly right. Well, El-Sayed was asked about his family's Muslim brotherhood ties. They are extended to Iran, and he said that he would not condemn Iran, as are his own. And here he was getting pretty defensive about all of this.
Speaker 5I've never been a part of, because my mom, who's a nurse in Missouri, it doesn't make any sense. And it's actually really quite beneath you, Mike. It's really quite beneath you.
Speaker 6To call into question my loyalty to the
Speaker 5Constitution, I'm talking. I'm talking. I'm talking. Well, own up to it.
Speaker 7Excuse me. Yeah, go ahead. Can I have a few more seconds? Yes, go ahead.
Speaker 5Thank you. To bring into question my commitment to the Constitution, is really beneath you.
Speaker 1Why would that possibly be beneath him? I'll call into question his commitment to the Constitution. Which parts of the Constitution precisely is he in favor of? Truly, that he's not just using as an excuse to cram down on Americans a deeply anti-American vision of society. Okay, let's be very clear about Abdul El-Sayed and the Muslim Brotherhood. The evidence of his familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood are extensive. His sister says his family has always been Muslim Brotherhood. His father-in-law was a founding member of ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America, which is a Muslim Brotherhood offshoot. And he accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations via his father-in-law. His parents are both connected. His biological parents are both connected with Muslim Brotherhood sources. He himself signed a letter in 2012, calling for support of the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt and asking for them to crack down on dissent from the old regime. He said about terrorists who try to murder Jewish school children so long as they're Islamic, he says, hurt people, hurt people, and then said the reason that perhaps a terrorist tried to murder a bunch of kindergartners near Detroit was because that terrorist's Hezbollah family members had been killed in Lebanon by the IDF. He has yet to recommend a single measure for cracking down on the Muslim Brotherhood. He's yet to explain what about the Muslim Brotherhood he does not support. Only in the last week or so has he said that he's not supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. He has even said that he disassociates from the Muslim Brotherhood. So El-Sayed trying to play, how dare you challenge me, sir? Well, I mean, I don't know. You might answer any of those questions. By the way, his campaign has been asked explicitly about that letter from 2012 by the New York Times. Quote, when asked recently by reporters, he has disavowed the group. His campaign aides declined to answer questions about the 2012 letter. El-Sayed's mother and half-sister with whom he did not grow up, did not respond to requests for comment. Well, I mean, again, how about his father-in-law? How about his half-sister saying that the entire family is Muslim Brotherhood? How about that? Like, again, it's, it's insane for him to try to hide behind. Everyone's just being mean to, you know, everyone should be mean to El-Sayed. You're just being so mean to him, you know? It's not that there's any evidence to back all this. Everyone's just mean to him. In fact, you're an Islamophobe if you have questions about any of this based on the actual evidence. And here's El-Sayed trying to play that card.
Speaker 5Question. My commitment to the constitution is really beneath you. I am proud of America. I'm proud to be an American. I'm proud of our constitution that guarantees all of us the right to pray as we choose to pray. And the question that you would ask that I think is actually really quite shameful as somebody who's actually served under that constitution. It is shameful.
Speaker 7You now have 30 seconds for rebuttal.
Speaker 6You know, we're the uniform of the United States proudly as my son did. My wife served, my brother served, my father served. So you could pray any you want. And I know you want to make this about you being a victim. This is about an ideology, an ideology that's banned in five Muslim countries.
Speaker 1One hundred percent correct. And frankly, I don't think the Islamophobia play is going to work. I don't. I don't think most people look at Abdul El-Sayed and say the reason you're questioning him is because he prays in a particular way. No one cares how he prays. In fact, the only person who seems to care about how Abdul El-Sayed prays is Abdul El-Sayed, who is a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. And he's a Muslim. showing that he's a Muslim anywhere in the ad. He's a little shy about that, apparently, when it comes to the TV ads. It shows him like hanging out in churches, doesn't show him hanging out in mosque at all. By the way, at the same time that he's going out there and pretending that he has no strong feelings about anything going on in the Middle East. And it's really just about what's going on in Michigan. He was on Al Jazeera. And he was talking about how the Syrian regime, which is a terrorist backed regime in HDS, was an offshoot of ISIS. And here he is talking about how he's in total solidarity with the Syrian regime, which, by the way, is by attempting to murder Druze, like as we speak.
Speaker 8Well, we need to make sure that there are no sanctions. The people of Syria can build out their future as any and all people. And they can do that together in peace. And then they can join the community nations. And inshallah, inshallah, that's what happened. You became a senator from the U.S. Senate. Inshallah, wouldn't that support the Syrian progress? Of course. I want to make sure that any of the barriers to progress because of the last regime are taken out. So that this leadership has the opportunity to build, build out democratic institutions, build out with the interference of, without the interference of people like Israel.
Speaker 1Syria is run by Turkey. That is the reality. Also, he was asked whether Israel has a right to exist. And he won't answer the question because, of course, he does not believe that Israel has a right to continue existing. We should make this clear. And when people say, does Israel have a right to exist? We're not having a debate in 1910 about the future of Zionism. We're talking about if Israel, the Jewish state, should continue to exist today. He won't say yes, because he would love to see it wiped off the face of the earth. Don't worry. He's not an Islamic radical. He just likes to pray five times a day. It's really just that people are mean to him about where he prays.
Speaker 5Israel exists. The question is whether or not we want a politics where our money is sent over to Israel to do genocide and apartheid instead of investing in our own kids.
Speaker 1You say it exists, but does it have a right to?
Speaker 5Not in that. I just said the question of Israel's existence is not a question. I'm not going to play this gotcha game about whether or not it has a right to exist. The question ultimately is about whether or not we want a politics that dignifies equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination. You're not going to play the gotcha game, but you're not going to say you think
Speaker 7Israel has a right to exist.
Speaker 5Well, my question, you know, Casey, I think the question we all ought to ask is, does everybody have equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination? That's Jewish, Israelis, and Palestinians. And to me, the folks who should answer what the ultimate peace there looks like should be Jewish, Israelis, and Palestinians. I want my tax dollars spent here in Michigan to provide schools in Michigan, to build health care in Michigan, to invest in Michigan, rather than to be sent abroad to kill Palestinian people, do genocides, and apartheid. The question about whether or not Israel has a right to exist is actually quite secondary to whether or not they have a right to our tax dollars. And people don't ask that question in good faith. So if you want to ask me about Palestinian right to exist, if you want to ask me about what I want to do for kids in Michigan, I'm happy to answer that question.
Speaker 1Okay, so he's happy to talk about whether Palestine has a right to exist, but not about Israel, an ally of the United States. Again, we can have all sorts of conversations about military aid to Israel. And we can talk, for that matter, about military aid to Egypt, which he never talks about, or Saudi Arabia, or to Qatar, or to UAE, or to the wide variety of other countries where we have bases or provide military aid. We can do all of those things, but that's obviously not what he is concerned about. And he has no problem, by the way, with hundreds of millions of American taxpayer dollars passing through to the Palestinian Authority, which legitimately fosters terrorism, or American aid being passed. Which, again, that's a terror group. So, again, what we have here in the United States is the importation of a class of people who hate the United States, who are perfectly willing to use the institutions and rules of the United States against it. Of course, this is not unique to the United States. In fact, we're probably 10, 15 years behind Europe, where Europe is. So, Emmanuel Macron is having to take on the fact that there are mass riots in his streets. Those riots are a reflection of two things. The radical left upswing in France, the communists, and radical Islam, which takes advantage of every anti-establishment situation to burn things, loot things, burn synagogues, break into stores, and do what it does. Emmanuel Macron, though, is very concerned. He's in Qatar. Qatar, which, of course, is the font head of all pro-radical Islam propaganda. It is a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organization, essentially, the Qataris. Here is Emmanuel Macron in Qatar, which spreads its money everywhere, saying that, actually, actually, it's not a problem of Islam in France. It is actually just a problem of AI. If you've been seeing people running around with Palestinian flags, burning things in France, that's not because it happened. It's because you're being bamboozled by the AI.
Speaker 9We saw artificial intelligence images showing scenes that never happened in France. There are people who claimed we were being invaded by hordes of migrants and Islamists, which is totally false. Also, among others, but he is part of it. You know, in these moments, you see who loves France and who doesn't. All the people. Well, you have to admit, all the people bad-mouthing our country right now are people who do not love our country. So these people annoy me. I, for one, love my country. So we are going to correct what happened. But there are many people who wanted to. There are people campaigning on the back of France. Because when I see leaders who are in campaign situations, in the region or on the other side of the Atlantic, who sometimes credulously repeat what is in artificial intelligence, or who relay what certain spheres obviously want to make people believe happened in France, well, they are campaigning on our backs.
Speaker 1Oh, oh, it's all a myth, guys. It's all a myth. And all you have to find is a group of politicians who feel themselves beholden to Islamic radicals to actually just get those people to lie on your behalf. Everything. Everything that you've seen is fake. It's all in your imagination. It's all AI. And Western civilization is continuing a pace down a pathway to suicide. It is worthy of note that, again, the Islamic population of France in the early 1980s was very, very minimal. Today, the Islamic population of France is somewhere between 8% to 10%. Meanwhile, the Catholic adherence of France has dropped from the 80s to the 40s. That's what's happening here. Now, according to the IFOP, the Muslim population, the 19th arrondissement in Paris, which has been called before a no-go zone, amounted to 5% of the district's residents. Today, Muslims make up 25% of the district's total population. It is one of the highest concentrations of Muslims within Paris. Back in 2015, there were 751 areas designated by the French government as sensitive urban zones. Fox News reported at the time they were breeding grounds for radicalism. That included, by the way, the Butte-Champont network, operating out of the Adawa Mosque in the 19th arrondissement in the early 2000s. They were recruiting and grooming French-born terrorists like Sharif and Saeed Khawashi, who later carried out the 2015 Charlie Hebdo massacre, according to Fox News. There was a big no-go zone controversy in 2015. The allegation was basically the police were ignoring what was going on in these areas because they were afraid of being called Islamophobes. The government abolished the security zone classification and replaced them with zoned tax breaks and urban renewal initiatives. And now they're called, Again, the Muslim population in France went from 0.5% in 1985 to somewhere between 8% and 10% of the total population. Now, Macron has come back, and he is acknowledging that there were shortcomings in response to the protests. And he says, I mean, that's true, but you can't ignore the Palestinian flag that's flying alongside them. Meanwhile, by the way, many of the suspects who are being arrested in France for rioting and burning things and destroying things and defacing statues and all the rest of it, they're being brought before fast-track courts, and they're all receiving suspended sentences. According to the New York Times, by Tuesday, more than 2,500 people had been detained across the country, including about 550 in Paris. They were a small minority of the more than half a million people who joined protests on Saturday, but there were still so many of them, the courthouse doubled the number of courtrooms it typically reserves for a form of fast-track protests. This is a fast-track trial often used for lower-level crimes in which someone is caught red-handed. What were some of these lower-level crimes, by the way? Well, it turns out that the people who are doing them, according to the justice minister, Gérald Darminan, he said he wanted harsh sentences. 95% of the detainees were men. 70% were adults. They included people from immigrant backgrounds, people who are foreigners, as well as people who are fully integrated and who are French. The New York Times cites several cases. Case one, a 21-year-old named Victor Berthois, who apparently helped build a barricade and chucked paving stones and projectiles at the police and was carrying a smoke flare. He was found guilty, suspended sentence, meaning he only gets sent to jail if he's found violating again. Mustafa Dembele, 18. He's been in France since he was eight. Accusation is he was throwing bottles and setting off fireworks directed at officers. He was found with stolen materials on him. Found guilty, suspended sentence. Haight-Longeron, 21. And Delvis Mbuka Samba, the two friends from the Parisian suburbs, were arrested while carrying loot. They admitted in their social media, quote, we will loot everything. Both were found guilty, suspended sentences. This is what a civilization wishes to do when it wishes to die, when it is suicidal. And an enormous part of this is just the West refusing to acknowledge with whom it is dealing. So back in 1980, there's a clip making the rounds that is kind of relevant. The Shah of Iran, who'd been now, I don't know if you've noticed it, he was doing an interview with ABC. And he talked about the idea that was pushed by the left in the legacy media at the time that he should have established a dialogue with the radical Muslims. And here's what he had to say.
Speaker 10Now, everybody's trying to say, well, let's try to understand these people. These people who are killing, massacring others. The people they don't like, just like flies. But in my case, it's to compare it to, to the most perfect government of the world. In the case of those kind of people, usually there is a tendency, especially in the most liberal circles in the world. Oh, let's try to understand them. Let's establish a dialogue. This is something that I don't understand. -
Speaker 1Yeah, but we're still trying to do it. There's Bill Clinton yesterday saying that what he's really worried about is people denigrating Muslims. That's really what he's worried about is the people who are denigrating Muslims. No one is denigrating Muslims for going to mosque or abiding by their own private version of their religion. Nobody is denigrating any of that. What we are denigrating is Islam as a political phenomenon because that's dangerous and because it has effect. And because importing people who don't agree with your basic views of the world is a dangerous thing. But again, the West wishes to blind itself to all of this. It's in the name of some pathetic version of tolerance that's totally suicidal in application. -
Speaker 11I'm tired of people denigrating Muslims for being Muslims. The Quran says, when I first read this to my daughter, who read the Quran from start to finish, when she was 15 years old, and she said, "Dad, Read this. Oh, isn't that nice?
Speaker 1Well, I mean, it's all fun and games until you import the people who want to destroy your country. Elon Musk is on the money here. Here he was with Walter Isaacson explaining that it turns out not all people have the same belief system. Yes, that is true.
Speaker 12You can't put yourself in the mind of a serial killer unless you're a serial killer. Unless you enjoy murdering people, you can't imagine why someone would do such a thing. And if someone is a religious extremist where they view anyone who is not in their religion as the enemy or that those who are not in their religion should die, it's difficult for you to understand that mindset because you don't have that mindset.
Speaker 1Well, Elon explained what he means. He had an ex-Tesla employee who ended up being a murderer. Here he was describing.
Speaker 12We had someone who was working at the Tesla factory in Austin until December of last year. He was fired because he assaulted a woman who stepped on his prayer rug in the factory. Okay, so she wasn't expecting anyone to be praying in the factory and he was praying in the factory. She accidentally stepped on his prayer rug and he assaulted her. He violently assaulted her. So he was fired for that. And then a few months later, he went and killed three students in the bar in downtown Austin. Now, I think we shouldn't let people like that into the country.
Speaker 1Yes, I mean, yes. The fact that this is even a discussion is insane and demonstrative of a West that doesn't understand its own enemies at all. And hell, when you're not trying to understand your enemies, you actually end up doing propaganda for them. When we talk about the Red-Green Alliance, I mean, that is riding herd over at the DSA. So you have to have some level of sort of bizarre sympathy for Brad Lander. Brad Lander is a Democratic Socialist of America fellow traveler. He would be part of the Zoran Mamdani radical Islam crew, except for the fact that he was born a Jew. And so that means, he's kind of the outsider. He's the uncool kid at the party. And so now he has to go out of his way to prove his bona fides, how much he hates Israel and how much he really isn't Jewish. He's a Jew, but he's not Jewish. He has to prove that by going and doing propaganda in the West Bank. So I don't know, when is the last time you, a sitting Congress person, traveled over to a disputed part of the world in disputed territory at best and decided to go pick olives there? But Brad Lander did, and he was doing so, so he could prove his radical bona fides to the Zoran Mamdani crew. Don't worry, dude, they're never going to love you. It's never going to work. At the end of the day, they're still going to see that you were born a Jew. That's all that matters. But he decides he's going to go join the olive harvest in the so-called West Bank over in Judea. Now, there are a lot of things going on in Judea and Samaria at this point in the West Bank. One of those things is an overt attempt by Palestinian agitators to generate violence for the purposes of media coverage, thus to generate anti-Israel outrage. That is certainly a thing that is happening. In fact, we have tapes of it. Here is tape of some of these so-called olive harvesters roaming around looking for confrontation. You can see these are some of the olive harvesters. They are young men wearing all black. Many of them are carrying slingshots so they can hurl rocks at people looking for confrontation. I mean, they're literally hurling rocks at people. And there's also tape that has emerged of so-called olive pickers who are wandering through the groves, like two of them, followed by 40 members of the media looking to start a fight and then catch that. Now, again, that isn't to say that there aren't certain Israeli extremists who go out of their way to get involved in confrontation and then do bad things and all those people should be arrested and go to jail. The difference is that those people are not treated as heroes by people like Brad Lander. So Brad Lander shows up in the West Bank in Judea and he says he's going to join the olive harvest. Now, when he arrived, just like everybody else, when you go to Israel, there are certain areas that are in confrontation and in dispute. If you are going to go to those areas, you're supposed to notify the Israeli government and the IDF so they can protect you and monitor and make sure that a gigantic confrontation does not break out. Brad Lander, along with the so-called human rights groups, he ignores the IDF, ignores the Israeli government and just goes into these disputed areas where there's actual danger. People are being killed. People are being assaulted. So here he was. It's a setup. The whole thing is a setup. Here he was.
Speaker 13We're in the middle of the West Bank this week as part of that Protect the Harvest effort. We're helping Palestinian farmers harvest olives rather than be ethnically cleansed from their land.
Speaker 2I'm Tamar Glezman
Speaker 13from Israelis from Peace.
Speaker 2I'm Amiram Salam from Unarmed Civilian Protection
Speaker 13in Palestine. You've seen what's happening over the past few weeks with Israeli settlers attacking, of course, Palestinian farmers, but also American journalists and European delegations. Thousands of Palestinians displaced from their land and their olive growth.
Speaker 1Okay, so again, let us be clear. When you say, quote unquote, their land and their olive growths, you're talking about Area C. And not to get into the abstruse technicalities of the Oslo Accords, but Area A is completely controlled by the Palestinian Authority. Area B is an area of shared responsibility. Area C is an area that is under Israeli military jurisdiction. That is not Arab land. There is no standard by which these are, you know, lands that are belonging to Palestine. You're in Area C. You're not in Area A. It's the area that's under Israeli military jurisdiction. People on both sides will then build illegally there without permits. And then the Israeli government will dismantle settlements that are put out there by Israelis, the outposts that are put there by Israelis. Sometimes they'll approve a permit. Sometimes they'll turn down a permit. That's the way that it works out there. Okay, but in any case, Brad Lander then tweeted out, quote, I've been detained by the IDF. Oh, you were detained by the IDF. By this, we mean that his bus was stopped. His air-conditioned bus was stopped. How will he ever survive? How will he ever survive this? I've been detained by the IDF, along with a group of rabbis and volunteers. We were simply harvesting olives in a grove near Nahalim in the West Bank. So number one, it's not Nahalim. Nahalim is a completely different city near Tel Aviv. It's Nahalin. He says he's an idiot. He says the occupation is a crime under international law. No, it isn't. Harvesting olives isn't a crime under any law. I know. No one is saying that harvesting olives is a crime. But involving yourself in criminal occupation without a permit is, actually, depending on where you are. And the rules out there are a little complex, which is why you are supposed to run it by the authorities before you go there. Again, this is a military designated area. And the only reason he's doing this, the only reason we're talking about this is because he's just doing cover for people who legitimately stand with terrorists. I mean, that is what he does. This is what the entire left in the West does. They just are useful idiots for people who, if they had the opportunity, would completely destroy not only the Jewish state, but also destroy the West more generally. By the way, you know what's not receiving any media attention is this video of an Israeli politician , Flor Hassan Nahum, who was attacked by a boulder thrown at her car
Speaker 11in Judea. So you understand who's the violent people and who are the people who are trying to.
Speaker 1He says, get your head down. Okay, because rocks are being chucked through the windows. But that didn't make any of the international news. Did it? Those rocks being chucked at an Israeli politician in Judea. That doesn't make the news. But Lander is out there saying he's not a security threat to anyone. Dude, all you had to do is they purposefully went out of their way not to coordinate so they could make an issue out of it. And then Zoran Mamdani tweeted the same thing as Brad Lander. Well, I'm glad that the red-green alliance is running herd between Brad Lander and Zoran Mamdani. Harvesting olives, says Zoran Mamdani, is not illegal. The occupation is. I am thankful Brad has been released. But other New Yorkers remain detained. They must be released immediately. Wait, I was informed that all you cared about was what was going on in New York, not what was going on in the Middle East. Meanwhile, you deploy your DSA friends to the West Bank to harvest olives? The detention of these New Yorkers must end. The occupation must end. The genocide must end. This is the mayor of New York. Great job, guys. Don't tell me that you don't care about what's going on in the Middle East when it's literally the only thing that you care about. Okay. In other electoral news. So, we are now in day three of the Vivek Ramaswamy ad gate. Now, you'll recall that over the weekend, Ramaswamy put out a brutal ad against Amy Acton featuring Amy Acton's mom. Now, again, the ad is, as I literally said yesterday, dicey at best. In fact, there is a clip of me saying that yesterday for those who have short-term memory loss. The pushback on the ad is that it's not Amy Acton who has a problem. It's Amy Acton's mom who has the problem. And Vivek Ramaswamy and his campaign are jumping right into the middle of all of this. Which, of course, is dicey. It's a dicey business. For sure. Okay. It's dicey because, as I also said yesterday, the history of the family is really ugly and messy and disputed. Amy Acton alleges that as a child, she was sexually assaulted by her stepfather. Her mother did lose custody of her when she was 12. Her stepfather fled the state. Again, I talked at length about this yesterday, so this is nothing new. I'm not going to replay that because it was literally yesterday's show. You can just listen to it from yesterday. So, yeah, that is a horrible story from her childhood. And, assuming her stepfather did, any of that, I hope he's burning in the fiery pits of hell right now. if her mother was complicit in a coverup of all of that, which again is the tacit allegation and sometimes explicit allegation being made by pretty much all the people who are going nuts over the ad, she should be tracked down even at her age and punished by force of law. By the way, if those people want to make that direct allegation against Amy Acton's mom, they're free to do so. And maybe she'll sue them. Maybe she won't. So then there's the politics of this. I can think this ad is dicey and bad and also immoral in that it is using a disputed family circumstance in which the mom by the available evidence appears to be at least part of the problem or the entire problem and in which the only legal allegations made were against the stepdad. And he fled the state and all that like that's that's gross and bad. We can also recognize, as I also said yesterday, that politics is filled with immoral, dicey and bad ads and that many of the people putting on their shocked faces are famously enthusiastic about terrible attacks on political opponents. I said it yesterday. You can just listen to yesterday's show. But some people are very offended about what I said yesterday. These people have no right to be offended about anything. Say like Hassan Piker. This is supposed
Speaker 14to be the smart and educated Republican. And if this is the best they have to offer, I say we do away with all of it. Even the most well-read, well-educated, sane Republican ends up defending an attack ad that disparages a child rape victim.
Speaker 1OK, so just to be clear, he's arguing that because I supposedly defended the Ramaswamy ad, which I didn't, I said it was dicey. I said it wasn't smart politics. I merely pointed out that Democrats are happy to dig into the dirt at every available opportunity, say the worst possible things about their opponents. Now are putting on their shocked faces that somehow I'm defending what allegedly happened to Amy Acton, according to Hassan Piker. Like that's crazy, truly crazy. And listening to Hassan Piker on this is, um, do you openly defend and advocate for actual rape? You're not talking about ads or what's appropriate or what's immoral or what's decent or politically smart. This is a human who has defended honest to God, actual rape.
Speaker 15It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if rapes happen on October 7. Like that doesn't change the dynamic for me even this much. So that's the other part of this problem. If you have these millionaire billionaire wasp fail sons, um, at least taking them out of other colleges so they can only do date rape to other billionaire millionaire failed daughters is like in some respects, you know, from a utilitarian perspective, of course, a little bit better. These are horrifying atrocities. That they did. Right. But that it is not coming out of a place of, of, you know, this antiquated anti-Semitic, uh, tendencies or that, uh, they wanted to go out and like do mass rapes. What rapes does Hezbollah do? Bro, what rapes did Hamas do? What are you talking about?
Speaker 1I'm not going to be lectured by Hassan Piker on all of this. All of which brings us back to the issue at hand in elections, who you ought to vote for. Who you ought to vote for. As I said yesterday, this is what a huge bulk of the early show was about. The question of the ad is secondary to the question of who ought to be the governor of Ohio. I think there are a lot of reasons why Amy Acton ought not to be governor of Ohio. In fact, I said that it was bad campaign strategy to put out an ad featuring her mom under at best disputed circumstances. That in fact, the ad should have just been about how Amy Acton, if the vague thinks she's a liar, that she's a liar and provide all the evidence that she's a liar. Now, with all of that said, putting the ad to the side, the question is who ought to be the governor. So here is my advice. Don't elect the people who are allied with Hassan Piker or Abdul El-Sayed or Zoran Mamdani or Ilhan Omar. Don't do it. Don't do it. Now, we've also been discussing understanding your enemies on today's show. That is the message. It's not just true of the Middle East or the people imported from radical Islamic area. It's also true of Russia. So yesterday, one of the dumbest clips I've ever seen from an American political figure came out. So Steve Witkoff, who I've been highly critical of as a negotiator, mainly because he's never negotiated a successful deal. Even the deal that he negotiated with regard to the hostages in Gaza had as the predicate to any future steps, a disarming of Hamas, which is not happening. Steve Witkoff, who has done a truly terrible job with regard to Ukraine and Russia. He yesterday called Vladimir Putin, one of the great mass murderers of the modern era, a humanitarian. Now, again, I understand. Trying to treat people in conciliatory fashion for diplomatic purposes. You don't have to call a guy who's responsible for, at minimum, between his citizens and the citizens of Ukraine, at minimum, a half million deaths. You don't have to call him a humanitarian, do you? Do you?
Speaker 16He's a 75-year-old man. And you talk so much about my president, President Trump, being a humanitarian. You are a humanitarian also, sir. And I salute that. I commend you. And I thank you again.
Speaker 1Vladimir Putin is a humanitarian? Would that be about the time he's chucking his opponents from third-story windows or what? Well, the vice president then came out and tried to quasi-defend this comment. It didn't go amazing.
Speaker 17I agree with Steve Witkoff saying something nice to a person who just released an American hostage. Whether you agree with the underlying sentiment or not, Steve Witkoff is a diplomat. His job is to go over there and get a job done. I care much less about what Steve said and about the fact that he is bringing an American hostage home to his family. We should all be celebrating that, not be complaining about what Steve Witkoff said in order to get it done.
Speaker 1Well, I'm not sure that he had to call Vladimir Putin a humanitarian for releasing a hostage that was being held. By the way, by that standard, Hamas is the greatest humanitarian agency. I mean, they only had like 250 hostages. And then they released a lot of those hostages. You know, I don't think that's a good thing. I don't think that's a good thing. After a gigantic military campaign and heavy American pressure and all, but here's the rule. Don't treat your enemies as though they are your friends. This is a very stupid thing to do. And unfortunately, it comes to Russia, Ukraine. It seems as though the United States is always taking the wrong side of this particular issue. That goes back to the Biden administration, by the way. It was Joe Biden who was restricting offensive use of weaponry from the Ukrainians out of some misplaced fear of the Russians. And meanwhile, the United States under President Trump seems to be flipping and he is, President Trump obviously has a personal bugaboo about Vladimir Zelensky, the head of Ukraine. But we should be clear that Vladimir Zelensky is the one who has said that he would accept a peace deal where he keeps 75% of the country and gives up a quarter of the country so long as there are durable security guarantees. The problem is nobody's going to give a durable security guarantee because Russia is going to attack five minutes later and then we will be directly involved in military conflict.
Speaker 18Would you accept a peace deal that freezes everything the way it is right now, where you still keep 75% or more of your country, regardless of how it started? Would you be would you accept where it is right now?
Speaker 19Yes, we right now we have to freeze. And I think this is real way to end this war. We call it ceasefire or stop killings like President Trump called it. Freeze, and stop. And of course, this is minimum what we need from Russia today, then of course, we'll go to President and to Europeans and we'll ask security guarantees. The most important is peace and also security peace. Okay, that is
Speaker 1that is not in any way a crazy suggestion at all. Because otherwise, why would you why would you possibly just cede territory in favor of nothing? President Trump, again, and the administration seem to want to be friendlier with Putin than they are with Zelensky, which whatever you think is Zelensky, that that is a bad approach. Here is the president going after Zelensky, not really after Putin yesterday.
Speaker 20Ukraine could have had this thing settled a long time ago. If he would have listened to me, and you remember the Oval Office, he would have had this settled a long time ago. Maybe it's time for Zelensky to get somebody else to negotiate. Okay, well, I'm just
Speaker 1going to point out that those humanitarians, over in Russia, are firing Shahed missiles like from Shahed drones from Iran. They're firing at parks in Kharkiv. Some pretty terrible images have been released by the Ukrainians. They killed a girl in her stroller. Again, not not exactly a shot coming from the Russians. So before we start, you know, declaring that the that it's time to release sanctions on the Russians and all the rest of it, perhaps we ought to discuss who exactly is the problem. Okay, meanwhile, the elections that are coming up, obviously, there's a lot at stake in those elections. One of the big things that's at stake is the possibility of serious prosecutions. So Democrats are chomping at the bit to get to prosecutions of their political opponents. Kara Swisher was on the bulwark, which again, is just a Trump derangement syndrome website, saying that Democrats are going to jail Elon Musk, which of course, I assume she supports here.
Speaker 7Why is he backing Trump? But I'm like, are you kidding? He's under investigation by the Democrats. And if Trump, he's out, he gets he gets get out of jail free card. And on top of that, you know and on top of that he got doge he got all this access he got all these contracts in fact it was a big payday for him uh especially as some of his companies were troubled whether it was twitter or well he uses that for a different thing that's about influence and so it's relatively cheap for him to have that loss um but like tesla and stuff he needed he needed a she
Speaker 1is suggesting democrats will jail him on what basis would they jail elon precisely what is the basis on which they would they would jail him you don't need a basis though apparently if you are a democrat like at all at all elon then says well maybe we should we should send kara swisher to jail okay how about this how about nobody goes to jail unless you violated the law this seems like the best way to do jail i don't know by the way majorities of voters say that if trump were impeached again by the democrats it would actually make him more popular not a shock and 24 of americans say it would make him more popular 34 say it wouldn't make any difference you well again among those who are suffering from trump derangement syndrome are the ladies of the view here is stephen a smith on with the ladies of the view
Speaker 21there's so many people that have this mentality why even waste time talking to him whether you like it or not he's the president of the united states of america he's not going away until 2028 at least he's not going away and so because of that he may
Speaker 2get impeached and convicted
Speaker 21it doesn't matter hold it wait a minute he's been impeached twice not convicted he's been impeached twice well again you're going to have a situation where i think the republicans are going to maintain the senate they'll probably lose the house so you'll get folks to impeach him but then they'll step in and they'll save them and it'll be a continuing ongoing continuous thing and don't get me started with that because i get stuck i get disgusted with all that pomp and circumstance i'm so sick and tired of us acting like that's going to do something he's not going away until 2028 until 2028 he has the power of the pen of the executive office of the executive office of the the commanding chief of the united states of america you're going to have to deal with them and when it comes to getting things done i'm all about exhausting every means and every measure to try to do what's in the best interest of our community i'm not apologizing for that to anybody good for you okay so um
Speaker 1you know again you can see uh that some of the ladies here are very very upset about this how dare stephen a smith say this very obvious thing that he's the president of the united states so you meet with him because if you want to get something done you probably should talk to him and stephen a says you know there are a lot of people who voted for trump and you might want to note
Speaker 21that people think about him that's not what i think about i also think about the 77 million people who voted for him and the reality is is that a lot of times when we're talking so many people get so disgusted with him they ignore the reasons why he
Speaker 1was supported again he happens to be right and he's right but and the ladies of the view they don't even know what they're doing and they don't even know what he's doing and they don't even know what he's doing and they don't even know what he's doing and they don't even know what he's doing whoopi goldberg is going to sing to you i know you didn't want it i know you you i know you're begging me not to do it but all of your pleas are falling on deaf ears which frankly i wish i had right now deaf ears because here we go
Speaker 10ladies and gentlemen a message from jennifer lewis
Speaker 1and her
Speaker 22friends i don't
Speaker 20care who you are or where you work get your ass
Speaker 22out and vote this ain't the election to sit home and lurk get your ass out and vote get your ass out and vote get your ass out and vote also why is she wearing a bathrobe that's gonna do it that's gonna do it that's
Speaker 1that's that's a that's a turnout machine right there that that little ad from whoopi goldberg and company guys if you're actually gonna like put together a little choir shouldn't you at least take one second to figure out your harmonic dispositions like really like figure out where you're supposed to be in the harmony that or even what the tune is gonna be oh boy well this is what american politics has come to but don't worry they aren't the worst women of the day on today's show which brings us to cultural news alex cooper she is the call her daddy lady um and um she's very famous and she has a lot of listeners mainly because the country is filled with people and some of those people are not particularly smart and invariably all she does with her show is just destroy relations between the sexes she's announced the birth of a baby boy and she's dedicating every day from now on to making the world worse for that baby boy one interview at a time so first of all congrats i'm glad there are more babies in the world babies are good she had on sophia bush so sophia bush for those who have not checked in with sophia bush since one tree hill which was about 80 years ago now sophia bush a few years ago divorced her husband and became a lesbian i know i didn't know that either but apparently it's a thing anyway so alex cooper had her on and sophia bush decided it was time to give some hot advice about marriage because that's who you should go to and that's who you should go to and that's who you should go to for advice about marriage ladies is is a woman who got divorced and became a lesbian that's probably the best way to see if you're looking for marital advice this is the source you look to here we go and so to
Speaker 23hear you talk about these other relationships that you had and like having a gut feeling something was off and then getting into that other relationship and being like i think maybe i was actually asking for not enough because i was convincing myself that maybe if i just asked for this one thing that was not enough and i was actually asking for more and i was like okay well that will be fine and i can fill my cup elsewhere and then to finally get to a place in your life where you're like i was in my body after dissociating from things to get to a place where you're sitting here now being like of course there's work to still always be done oh my god yeah but all of these reps essentially it's only gotten better yeah and i think that's such a beautiful message to leave women with because i do think we can get really really in our heads about oh my god i feel like i'm maybe i shouldn't leave this marriage but i'm not going to leave this marriage because can i even get better and the answer is yes
Speaker 24the answer is always yes and this idea that it's too late or you're too old or who are you to want more that's patriarchy that is crazy we don't need it so don't stay in
Speaker 1your marriage and try to improve it if there's if you're asking if there's someone else better out there for you the answer is always yes which is of course the message of marriage right we say till death do us part and you make a life for yourself long commitment to someone you should always have your eye on the door you should always i mean there might be who knows the next person who walks through that door might be better than this person and then after that person there might be somebody even better in fact every single time you ask yourself the question you should just break it up and you should take advice from you know alex cooper and sophia bush and all the rest of it toxic femininity is a thing gang it really really is and this idiocy bleeds over into real life and it leads to a a generally a generically anti-relationship and anti-male position and it has real effects on people's marriages if you take this kind of advice where instead of working on yourself in your marriage while you work on your marriage instead it's basically like well i can do better than this guy then uh things are not going to go well for you they just won't this is terrible advice and if you take it your life is going to get worse all right meanwhile we do have some updates on the cornell not rape again there is no evidence zero evidence that jane doe in this case was raped the evidence does not exist as far as we can tell from the existing from the existing existing evidence in fact the lawsuit has now dropped the frat president who is supposedly one of the alleged rapists that person has now been dropped but jane doe sent a message to the faculty senate saying she felt unsupported quote in a two-page letter to the faculty senate this is the new york times the former student known as jane doe said she had wanted to share a second-hand account as the senate considers a rare vote of no confidence in dr kotlikoff's administration his initial response to what was along the lines of why did she wait so long to report it when the tri delta president relayed this conversation to me i felt unsupported and disbelieved by president kotlikoff well yeah because uh why did you wait so long to report it and then why was your report openly evidence that you weren't raped you literally i mean there are literal text messages in which you say everything was consensual so there's that but again if you complain loud enough then you're the victim is the way this seems to work the cornell faculty has been holding struggle sessions over the cornell seven case here is a faculty senate meeting from last week uh it got wild this semester
Speaker 25i worked exclusively with first year first semester students were absolutely terrified they feel unsafe and they are shocked that this case happened in 2024 and that there wasn't an urgency when that happened is rape a less destructive expressive activity than protesting against genocide
Speaker 26i recognize the passion around this issue and around the issue with us but these are two separate areas here there is a real sense of importance importance and significance and i can really believe that that was one it's significant i totally think that was sincere i think it's also really the most important thing and i believe that's what happened with jango was extremely important and And I speak today because I am so afraid to speak that I'm shaking. And that culture of fear stifles speech for so many of us.
Speaker 1Don't send your kids to these universities. Honestly, they're just filled with psychos. Truly people who are crazy. Wherever the left is in control, by the way, they're totally crazy. They just don't understand how humans work. It really is incredible. Whether it's Sophia Bush talking to Alex Cooper and not understanding how marriage is supposed to work. Or whether it is the Cornell professors pretending that there's no such thing as evidence. Or whether it is Ireland. Ireland has now put out an ad talking about consent. This ad suggests that consent, like non-consensual touching, where that conversation starts is a child not wanting a hug from grandma. This is to teach consent. What now? What in the what? Um, what? Here we go. Ireland. They're really on top of things over in Ireland.
Speaker 22Granny! Granddad! Great to see you! Mr. Baby! Great to see you! Great to see you! Oh, Mr. Baby!
Speaker 27Not everyone wants a hug. Even from the people who love them. Awkward? Maybe. Important? Absolutely. We-consent.ia is here to help.
Speaker 1By the way, the woman in the. So when I talked about that ad, you thought I was going to have like a five-year-old who didn't want a hug from grandma? That lady's like 18. And apparently grandma is about to rape her or something, according to Ireland. That's how you teach consent. Things are going great. Things are just going really, really well. Alrighty, folks. Coming up, we are going to get into the insanity over at the American Psychological Association. That place is falling apart. Plus, we'll get to, you know, other inmates. Those are inmates at an asylum, but we have other sorts of inmates. We have an Andrew Tate update. Deep thoughts from him. But you have to become a member to get all of that. Plus, our upcoming movie Confession. Plus, our other upcoming movie Pawn Shop. Plus, all sorts of great stuff that is coming. So much great stuff that you're not even aware of. Now's a great time to become a member. Do it right now. Use code ShapiroCheckout for two months free on all annual. And if you have any plans, click that link in the description and join us. We'll see you next time.
Speaker 27Remember your duty. This isn't heroism. You useless sot. You sit there and shake because you're dependent on drink. You're sick as all over you. Have you ever seen a child starve to death, professor? No. I have.
Speaker 1Next. Coming for Congress. And they are coming for you. We can't afford to have people like AOC. Her communist friends running the show. Paid for by SLF PAC, not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee.

Podcast Summary

Key Points:

  1. The transcript opens with political advertising for The Daily Wire's film "Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels," GOPvotes.org early-voting efforts, and Prime Video's "The Terminalist" Season 2.
  2. The host argues that Rep. Ilhan Omar's "not to my knowledge" answer about marrying her brother signals immigration and marital fraud, citing alleged name changes, birth-date revisions, and perjury claims.
  3. The host contends that Rep. Omar exemplifies abuse of U.S. immigration systems by people who import anti-American ideologies and then use American institutions against the country.
  4. Abdulrahman El-Sayed, a Michigan Senate candidate, is portrayed as too radical, with alleged Muslim Brotherhood ties, refusal to condemn Iran or affirm Israel's right to exist, and a claim that he lied about his biography.
  5. The host says Western nations, especially France under Macron, dismiss genuine problems with mass immigration and radical Islam as AI-generated misinformation while riots and no-go zones spread.
  6. Brad Lander's West Bank olive-harvest trip is framed as a dangerous publicity stunt that ignored IDF coordination, contrasted with unreported violence against an Israeli politician.
  7. The Vivek Ramaswamy ad featuring Amy Acton's mother is called dicey and politically unwise, though the host says critics like Hassan Piker lack standing to feign outrage.
  8. The host criticizes Steve Witkoff calling Putin a "humanitarian," warns against treating enemies as friends on Russia and Ukraine, and mocks cultural segments on Alex Cooper, Cornell, and Irish consent ads.

Summary:

This transcript is a montage of political advertisements and commentary from a conservative host covering several interconnected themes. Early segments promote The Daily Wire's action film "Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels," a GOPvotes.org get-out-the-vote push warning of a Democratic Socialist takeover, Prime Video's military thriller "The Terminalist," and the SimpliSafe home security system.

The host's main argument centers on Rep. Ilhan Omar, alleging a pattern of immigration and marital fraud. He cites her "not to my knowledge" response when asked whether she married her brother, disputed birth dates, an alleged family name change from Elmi to Omar, and a withdrawn marriage-based immigration petition. He frames these claims as evidence that the U.S. immigration system is exploited by people who then undermine the country.

He extends this critique to Michigan Senate candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed, alleging Muslim Brotherhood ties and refusal to condemn Iran or affirm Israel's right to exist. He also discusses France's riots and Emmanuel Macron's response, Brad Lander's West Bank trip, the Ramaswamy ad controversy, Steve Witkoff's comments on Putin, and cultural commentary on Alex Cooper, Cornell, and Irish consent advertising. The through-line is that Western societies refuse to understand their enemies, tolerate radical ideologies, and let institutions be used against themselves.

FAQs

'Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels' is an action-packed film in the style of 80s and 90s movies like Red Dawn and Toy Soldiers. It is streaming now exclusively on The Daily Wire.

Visit GOPvotes.org to find your polling location and make a plan to vote early. Early voting is highlighted as already underway in Alaska, Michigan, Maine, Ohio, Iowa, and Texas.

It is a military thriller starring Chris Pratt as Navy SEAL Commander James Reese, adapted from Jack Carr's novel True Believer. Season 2 is streaming only on Prime Video.

SimpliSafe says most systems notify you after a break-in, while its system is designed to deter people from breaking in at all. You can save 60% on a new system with professional monitoring at simplisafe.com/Shapiro.

It is a debate between the speaker and Scott Galloway, framed by government facts from USA Facts, covering income inequality, entitlements, and housing costs. The full debate is available on the USA Facts YouTube channel.

The transcription alleges questions about her immigration status, name usage, and whether she married her brother for immigration purposes, citing documents and reporting. It also notes she answered 'not to my knowledge' when asked if she married her brother.

Chat with AI

Loading...

Pro features

Go deeper with this episode

Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.