Speaker 1You can't entertain Americans when you actually hate the average American. Their values, their belief systems, you know, the country that they love. Enter The Daily Wire. Our newest release, Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels, is finally streaming. Radical jihadists will destroy our freedom, but only if we let them. If you're a fan of those over-the-top action-packed films from the 80s and 90s, Red Dawn, Toy Soldiers, this is a movie you're not going to want to miss. Red-blooded American good guys taking on the radical Islamic terrorists to regain their freedom. Watch Run, Hide, Fight, Infidels. It's streaming now, only on The Daily Wire.
Speaker 2It helps you compare life insurance quotes from top insurers in one place, for free. Their license team helps explain your options clearly, compare coverage amounts and prices, answer questions, and help you find a policy that fits your needs. No guesswork, no confusion, just clarity. And while they're helping with the shopping, you can get back to enjoying summer with the people who matter most. Policy Genius has helped thousands of families find the right coverage and has earned thousands of $5,000. And we've released our reviews in the process, because some items on the to-do list are worth checking off. With Policy Genius, you can see if you can find 20-year life insurance policies starting at just $276 a year for $1 million in coverage. Head to policygenius.com to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com. Well,
Speaker 3some races draw attention, others become the race everyone watches. And if you're a fan of The Daily Wire, you're going to want to check out Policy Genius. In Texas, James Tallarico and Ken Paxton are facing off in one of Kalshi's most traded midterm markets. Follow the race in real time on Kalshi, and then trade on the candidate you think is going to win. Each correct contract is worth $1 at settlement. Don't just follow the midterms. Trade what happens next on Kalshi. Use code DAILY, D-A-I-L-Y, to get up to $25 when you trade $25. That's Kalshi, K-A-L-S-H-I, Kalshi. Trade on anything. 18 plus only restrictions and eligibility requirements apply. Event contracts trading involves risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Kalshi products are not available in all jurisdictions. Prices, values, and available markets may differ from those mentioned. For more information, see Kalshi.com slash regulatory.
Speaker 1Medicare has thousands of plans. The system is really complex, deliberately so. The agents who guide you through it are often paid more to push certain plans, regardless of whether those plans are actually good for you. That's not a conspiracy. That's how the incentive structure works. Most people don't know that because you pick a plan and then you never look at it again. Chapter fixes all. They have independent Medicare advisors, the only ones who compare every plan nationwide, not a curated selection. They look at your doctors, your prescriptions, your specific health situation. They give you a straight answer. No commissions driving their recommendation. No big insurance pulling the strings. Just somebody actually working for you. People who have found better plans with Chapter have saved over $1,100 a year on average. That's real money back in your pocket and peace of mind. You're not leaving value on the table. Go to chapter.com slash dailywire. It's free. It takes under 20 minutes. They'll walk away knowing whether your plan fits your life. Which is more than the system was ever designed to give you. Go check them out right now. Much more efficient and better way of finding the care you need. That's chapter.com slash dailywire to get started right now. Again, chapter.com slash dailywire to get started right now.
Speaker 4So if I count
Speaker 1that right, that would be two transgenders, a 1970s-era militant feminist actress, mostly famous for burying her breasts in a movie called Atlantic City, and an anti-feminist, as a Jew, ham sandwich, bisexual actress. Every single person who I just named would be tossed off a building in Gaza or hanged from a crane in Tehran. Pathetic. Alrighty, so we're going to get to it all. Xi Jinping getting the red carpet treatment from President Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech at the UN, and the AI globalists appealing to the international community. But we begin with E. coli, a coalition of America haters in our streets. So, yesterday, a few hundred droogs and morons and vile America haters all got together, supposedly to protest the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the United Nations in New York. Now, let's start with this. This was not about human rights. Obviously, this was not about human rights. These people do not care one iota about human rights. They don't care about any of that. I'll get to what they do care about in a second. The UN is filled with actual evil states pursuing actual slaughter of actual civilians, deliberately, these people were not there protesting any of that. They were there to protest Netanyahu because that's part of a gestalt. It's part of a broader worldview. That worldview is simple. The West is evil. Anyone who is successful in the West or internationally, any country that is successful is a victimizer. Any country that is unsuccessful, and unsuccess, by the way, can be defined by how much you love terrorism, how miserable you make your own citizens. All of those places are victims. All those people who, effectively, do bad things in the world, they've been victimized by the system, and that's why they're failures. They're victims. Now, here's the thing. A lot of people today are going to tell you about what happened inside the UN. I actually don't care very much about what happened inside the UN. I'm much more interested in these dull-witted, malicious pieces of trash outside the UN than the dull-witted, malicious, and evil pieces of trash inside the UN. What happens inside the UN is of basically zero consequence. The UN General Assembly, this gigantic event that happens every year, it's basically, the Golden Globes for dictators. It's a legitimacy-generating institution for people who deserve no legitimacy. And the Trump administration ought to pull out immediately. I've said this. I've said this for my entire career. American taxpayer dollars should not be spent on this garbage heap of an institution. We should be pulling our money as fast as humanly possible. I noticed, by the way, all of the isolationists who are very keen on pulling military aid from Israel won't say a word about pulling the multiples of money that we spend at the UN. The UN is a trash, garbage, horrific organization. It requires between $66 billion and $69 billion to run every year. And we, the American taxpayers, pay for about a quarter of that. Somewhere between $15 and $18 billion annually we spend on the UN. Which, as I said yesterday, is the most high-sleeve international politics, a wretched hive of scum and villainy. I mean, just think about the UN Security Council, where literally Russia and China get to dictate international policy. We, the American taxpayers, are spending more on the UN than we do on the UN. We spend more on the UN each year than we do spend on the Coast Guard annually or the IRS or the FBI and ATF annually. We spend about five times as much on the UN as we spend on, for example, military aid to Israel, which, of course, is the big bugaboo. So, here's the thing. I don't actually care what happens inside the UN because, in essence, the UN is irrelevant. Every so often, they send a bunch of blue helmets to a place to not stop a mass killing or to engage in the rape of civilians or something. The UN is a monument to the stupidity of man. I don't care about an institution that stands by for actual genocide in Rwanda and mass slaughter in Somalia and Nigeria and Sudan and Ethiopia and Iran and that acts as a cat's paw for the world's worst dictatorships. The UN is inherently ridiculous. It always was ridiculous. It remains ridiculous today. I am, however, kind of worried about the people protesting outside. Why? Well, in our movie, Run, Hide, Fight Infidels, again, you should go to Daily Wire and you should watch it because it's fun, but there's also a message. The message of the movie is that there is an insanity to the red-hot, green alliance, a suicidal insanity, the alliance between radical leftists and radical Muslims. And we are seeing that materialize, not just on our streets, but here's the important part, in our government, in Congress. That's what's at stake. Not Susan Sarandon performatively getting arrested or Elliot Page trying to make a headline for something other than cutting off her body parts or Hannah Einbinder desperately attempting to seek more attention. I'm worried about people who agree with Ayatollah Khamenei and Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and Hassan Piker in Congress. A bunch of people who were there were not just kind of B-level starlets from Hollywood. There were a bunch of people who will be in about four months sitting in Congress. Here is footage of the NYPD beginning to arrest people because they were obstructing traffic. The whole point was to get arrested performatively. This includes Daryl Lisa Chevalier who is going to go to Congress in January because she's in a blue district and she won a primary over another fairly left-wing Democrat, Adrena Espaillat. She is a nut job, okay? And she was there. She got herself arrested. Again, these are people who are going to end up in Congress. They will be sitting in the halls of Congress momentarily. Adam Hamali, who literally was a translator for the blind, the Egyptian imam who was convicted in 1995 for conspiring in connection with the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 and a broader terrorist plot to attack New York City landmarks. Adam Hamali, a man who once traveled to Bosnia to volunteer for an aid group that was a front for Al-Qaeda. That guy is going to be sitting in Congress. He also was present at this protest.
Speaker 5Instead of supporting international law, we are supporting genocide. We are doing the opposite of what we should be doing. The whole point of the United Nations is to, is to, It's to stop exactly what's happening. The United Nations has failed. enabling this to happen. And this can't continue.
Speaker 1Literally a translator for a terrorist and a person who works for an organization that was a front group for Al Qaeda as a volunteer. Okay, that guy will be in Congress. I mean, here's Chevalier and Chris Rabb and Cynthia Nixon, again, who occasionally tries to run for higher office in New York and loses. They were also outside the UN. And I'm just going to point out that Dario Elisa Chevalier, who will be in Congress, was a co-founder of Columbia University Apartheid Divest, which called for total eradication of Western civilization and sought community and instruction from the global South. She despises everything there is to despise about America and much that is great about America. This is the lady who literally tweeted out that she wipes her hands on the American flag. Her boyfriend, by the way, is the lawyer for Zoram Mamdani, Ramzi Qasim, who also happened to be Al Qaeda. Mila Kirosh showed up. She's going to be sitting in Congress. This is the same Mila Kirosh who excused the murder of Jews in Colorado by saying that she doesn't know he's anti-Semitic, that Jews were firebombed in Colorado for protesting against hostage-taking by Hamas. Mila Kirosh was there. Again, it's the constellation of the people who despise the West who are there in the streets. And a bunch of those people are going to be in Congress. They're going to be in Congress. And, of course, they're going to be in Congress. Zoram Mamdani exists in the mayor's mansion in New York City as well. Zoram Mamdani, who we were told by the best sources, didn't care about what happens 8,000 miles away in the Middle East. He wasn't concerned about that at all. He spent yesterday hosting Palestinians from Gaza at Gracie Mansion to plant olive trees. Why precisely is that happening at Gracie Mansion, which is the house of the people in New York City? There is only one purpose, and that is the third world disbelief that America is evil and terrible in support of a quote-unquote genocidal regimes that aren't genocidal. And you have to act in a way that's not genocidal. And you have to act in a solidarity with the global victimized, the global poor, the vast majority of whom are living under the heavy hand of Islamic dictatorship or communist dictatorship. But here is Zoram Mamdani. How'd he spend his day? Again, these are people in public office. I'm less worried about Elliot Page and Susan Sarandon. I'm much more worried about all of the people who will be in Congress come January who are at this protest. And the people who are in the mayor's mansion right now in New York City. I mean, here's how Zoram Mamdani spent his day. He couldn't arrest Netanyahu. He had pledged to do that. And of course, he doesn't have the legal authority to do that. So instead, he was going to pop some plans at Gracie Mansion. Oh, how nice. Wow. New York did an amazing job here. Great job, New York. Again, take this video and cut it directly to Janine. And it looks the same. It's just it's insane. I'm sorry. This is all insane. And this is what the American people are going to go to. This is what the American people are going to go for. One of the people who normally would have been there certainly is Abdul El-Sayed, the Senate candidate in Michigan, who his sister, by the way, yesterday confirmed that, of course, he's a socialist. He's not a capitalist. We know this already. Again, this is the entire movement. It is a red green alliance. This is the entire movement, radical leftism and radical Islam. There's a reason that during the Iranian revolution of 1979, it was Marxists plus radical Muslims taking over the country in protests. And then the Marxists ended up at the end of a rope. Now, listen, the fact that we are on the knife's edge of having a bunch of people in Congress who legitimately hate the West and the West itself seems quasi-suicidal. It's just another reason why central banks have been stocking up on gold. The reality is that as the West continues to spend. Out the wazoo. Only a couple of ways they're going to be able to make that up when it comes to their debt. And one of those ways is to devalue currency. One way you can defeat that strategy is by investing in precious metals. It's why I've encouraged everyone for years to diversify at least some of their portfolio into precious metals. The best people to do that with are the folks over at Golden Crest Metals, because they're going to provide you with resources that are actually liquid, meaning that they're not going to give you like a specialized coin you can ever resell or something. They are actually selling you gold. They're actually selling you silver. They're actually giving you the things that maintain value over time. Right now, get a free 2026 info kit or a free portfolio review, plus up to 25 grand in free silver on qualifying purchases from our friends at Golden Crest Metals. You can call them at 888-429-3999. You can also text Ben to metals. That's Ben to 638-257 or head on over to goldencrestmetals.com slash Ben. In an uncertain world, there's a certain level of certainty that you get from precious metals ownership. Head on over to goldencrestmetals.com slash Ben to get started. Again, this
Speaker 4is the, this is the entire thing.
Speaker 1By the way, how did El Sayed, spend his Wednesday? He was doing a fundraiser alongside Osama Siblani. Osama Siblani is the head of the Arab American Political Action Committee, and he has referred to Hezbollah and Hamas as freedom fighters. At a rally in 2022, Siblani urged the Fedayeen, those would be Islamic terrorists, to fight within their means against Israel, whether it be with stones, guns, or hands. He called Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Hezbollah, a hero and said that Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli Jews should be, quote, sent back to Poland. That is who El Sayed, was campaigning with, doing a fundraiser with in the meantime. And that guy is very likely to end up in the United States Senate. That's the thing that I'm worried about. Now, all of this is being mobilized around one word, genocide. It's a lie. It is not true. Let us start with the purported purpose of the supposed alliance, right? The alliance had formed well before 2023, but it has really sprung into action post October 7th, 2023. And they've made the tip of the spear, claiming that a genocide exists in the Gaza Strip. That doesn't exist. I say that there's a non-existent genocide because there is no genocide in Gaza. There is no deliberate attempt to wipe out the Palestinians there. It does not exist. It was the most targeted military campaign in military history directed against a terrorist group that murdered 1200 Jews in one day and took 250 hostages back into Gaza, into a tunnel system that they had spent billions of dollars building longer than the London Underground. They had embedded their rockets in hospitals, in schools, and in mosques. The genocide charge is absurd on its face. I'm going to get to why people are doing it, but let's just point out for the sake of truth, I understand truth has no truck for most of these people. That it's all about feelings and it has nothing to do with truth. Sure, facts don't care about your feelings, but feelings, it turns out, really don't care about the facts very much. Here is a chart. This is the difference between a genocide and a not genocide. Here is population data from Cambodia, from Europe for Jews during the pre and post-World War II period, the Rwandan genocide, and Gaza. You may notice one of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn't belong. Cambodia, 1960 to 1991, the Cambodian genocide, which happens in the mid to late 1970s, declines the population of Cambodia from nearly 7 million all the way down to about 5.4 million. And that happens in approximately three years. The world Jewish population during World War II declines from 17 million all the way down to 10 million, so between 10 and 11 million. Massive drop, Rwandan genocide, drop during the Rwandan genocide from 8 million all the way down to 5.5 million. Gaza, 2000 to May 2025, zero drop off, none, nada. The total population of Gaza stayed, the same or increased during the supposed genocide because of the natural birth rates inside the Gaza Strip. Not only that, here is a graph. This graph shows you the distribution of deaths during the Israeli military action in the Gaza Strip. This data was taken from the Gaza Ministry of Health, meaning Hamas. This is Hamas data showing what were the ages of the people who died. Now, if you were pursuing a quote-unquote genocide, what you would expect is an even higher rate of death. If you were pursuing a quote-unquote genocide, what you would expect is an even higher rate of death. If you were pursuing a quote-unquote genocide, of death across the age and sex spectrum, right? Because you're trying to kill everyone regardless of their age or their sex. Instead, what you see here is a huge bulk of death happening for males aged between 15 and 50. That's where the vast bulk of death occurs. What, what, what, why? I wonder why, because that's all military aged males. Hey, the reality is the civilian to terrorist death ratio during the Israeli operation in Gaza is again, the single lowest ratio in the history of urban warfare, in the history of urban warfare. Israel shipped in about a ton of food aid for every Palestinian over the course of the last several years, one ton. So Prime Minister Netanyahu goes to the UN and he explains all of this again. It doesn't matter because no one is really listening because it's never been about the truth. It has always been about the op. Here's Netanyahu explaining.
Speaker 6million polio vaccinations to the enemy's population. What genocidal regime enables the distribution of two million tons of food into Gaza? That's a ton for every person. Accusing Israel of genocide is the greatest lie of the century.
Speaker 1He is right about that. But we have to ask what the purpose of the lie is. What's the purpose of saying it? Although even advocates of the lie understand they're lying. Abdul El-Sayed, when he was questioned about this, he says genocide over and over. When he's questioned about this by Scott Galloway, he immediately admits that what actually happened isn't a genocide. He just says we have to say genocide so a genocide won't occur, which is about the equivalent of charging someone with murder who did self-defense and then saying the reason I'm charging you with murder is because we don't want you to murder someone. It makes zero sense at all, but it does if the whole thing is an operation to change opinions and to. form essentially a cultic base for your movement. If that's the purpose, it makes perfect sense. So what is the genocide lie about? Well, it's about a few things. First, it is meant to create solidarity with third world regimes that actually murder their own population. Number one, because if you can say that Israel did a genocide, that somehow whitewashes Iran murdering 50,000 of its own people back in January. The people protesting outside joined all of the various countries who walked out on Netanyahu's speech, mainly Muslim majority dictatorships and their allies, who routinely. engaged in the worst human rights violations on the planet. The people who are walking out on Israel, a country with a military that performs the most humane military operations, the most targeted military operations in all of human history. The regimes that walked out, they did so because they do the very thing that they charge Israel with. They have genocidal intent. They openly say so. They are the ones who are saying they want to wipe Israel off the map, which means inherently the death of millions of human beings. And you have to understand that these regimes have accused Israel of genocide literally since the day it was born in 1947-48. It's been a lie the entire time. They've been saying genocide about the '48 war, the 1948 war of independence, about the 1956 Suez Canal War, about the 1967 Six-Day War, about the 1973 Yom Kippur War, about the 1982 Hezbollah war against the PLO in southern Lebanon. They said the same thing about Intifada 1, Intifada 2, about Operation Castle. Like literally every time Israel fights an offensive war, they claim that they're pursuing genocide. That's why the walkout. Okay, that's why the walkout. Because if you walk out and you project onto Israel the thing that you are actually doing, then you can reverse the moral polarity. This is why you get Hannah Einbinder, who hates the West, hand in hand with Massoud Podeshkin, who also hates the West. Here's what it looked like, by the way, when there was a mass walkout at the U.N. General Assembly as Netanyahu took the podium.
Speaker 6"Just a quick announcement. If there are any other moral cowards who haven't yet left this hall, please do so now. Thank you very much."
Speaker 1Okay, so apparently there are over 70 countries that left. Some were absent the whole time, like Egypt and Jordan. They actually just didn't show up for the entire session. Some obviously did leave. There were some that remained. UAE remained. Bahrain remained. China remained. Colombia remained. Like there are a few that remained, obviously. But there is a reason for all of this, right? And again, it has nothing to do with human rights. Nothing to do with human rights. Right now, the Europeans are trying to pour billions of dollars of aid into the part of the Gaza Strip still run by Hamas, where according to the New York Times, women are being traded and forced to marry their rapists. No one in Europe cares about that. Hannah Einbinder doesn't care about that. If they do pretend to care about it, then the goal, of course, is to essentially suggest that all of that is just a result of evil Western ideals. Okay, so first point here is that this is meant to create solidarity. The genocide lie is meant to create solidarity with third world regimes who seek actual destruction of the West. The second reason for the genocide lie is because it's designed to short-circuit your brain. That's what it's meant to do. Right, if somebody just says "ugly war" or "Israel committed war crimes" or if you say that "Israel engaged in a war in a way that we don't like," it doesn't have the same impact. When you say genocide, it flips the switch. It flips the emotional switch to "you're the bad guy, period." Not only that, you're like the Nazis. Which, of course, is a really great way of trying to destroy the state of Israel, obviously, because one of the justifications for a state of Israel is that there is genocidal intent against Jews that has happened throughout history. Therefore, Jews require a state to defend themselves. If you say the Jews are akin to the Nazis, the only solution is to wipe them out. Now, again, the genocide lie is meant to flip an emotional switch. That's what it is for. It's why it's so evocative. And as I've said before, I can present you all the facts in the world showing that this is false, but it doesn't matter if people feel you've committed a genocide or if you get people to say, "Well, you know, maybe it's not a genocide, but where there's smoke, there's fire." If you can do that, then you can shut off the part of your brain that works. And then you get to the third purpose of the genocide lie, and that is cultic buy-in. This is true for all cults. All cults rely on people saying an outlandish, outrageous thing over and over and then believing it. If you can get lots of people to performatively say something that is clearly and obviously untrue, that is true skin in the game. It shows commitment to the cult. It is why cults make you say and do weird things or get weird tattoos. Now you're part of the club. It is the price of entry. The more outlandish the thing you can get people to say, the more they now work for you now and forever. This is why for the radical left, the goal is to get every Democrat to parrot the genocide lie. That's not enough for them to say they don't like what Israel's doing or they don't like Bibi Netanyahu or whatever. They have to say the word genocide. And if they refuse to say the word genocide, they're not on team. Because once you say it, once you tell the lie, you are complicit in the lie and they own you. Now, honestly, all of this is super depressing. I mean, the fact that you have an entire movement inside the West to basically destroy the West, it's unbelievably depressing. It might make you want to go to sleep, but you won't even be able to sleep unless you have the proper mattress. You need it. When I'm on the road, I don't sleep as well. Why? I don't have my Helix sleep mattress. But you can have your Helix sleep mattress made just for you. They give you the sleep quiz. They tell you what kind of mattress will be best for you. You get to try it out for 100 nights risk free. Head over to helixsleep.com/ben for 27% offsite wide during Helix's Labor Day best of the web sale. Again, it's a mattress that is personalized to your needs. You're not just going to a big box store lying down on the mattress. And then after five seconds being like this will serve for the next 15 years. None of that. Instead, you go take their quiz. They're going to get you the best mattress made just for you. Go to helixsleep.com/ben get 27% offsite wide. Make sure you enter our show name after checkout. So they know that we sent you that's helixsleep.com/ben. My wife and I have had a Helix sleep mattress for years. In fact, it's so good that we got it for my parents. We've gotten it for in laws. We've gotten it for friends as a gift makes an awesome gift. By the way, go check it out yourself helixsleep.com/ben and get that 27% off site wide and make sure you enter our show name after checkout. So they know that we sent you to helixsleep.com/ben. And then finally, the purpose of the genocide lie with regard to Israel is to misdirect away from the broader vision of the radical left, which of course is hatred of the West more broadly and pretend it's about something else. Hiding behind human rights while you ignore actual human rights violation. Or direct all of your ire against the Jews, always a popular target. It's pretty fascinating when you look at these specific candidates, these congressional candidates like Daria Elisa Chevalier or Abdul El-Sayed. They've said a lot of crap about America. You've noticed that she's not repeating any of that crap during her campaign. She's not going to say again that she wants to wipe her hands on the American flag. Abdul El-Sayed isn't going to go out there and repeat his disgusting ideas about 9/11. But they'll keep saying genocide because everyone who cares who's in their camp knows what is code for. The West is evil. Say the code word, you're part of the club. And then you hide behind the genocide lie when asked whether you hate the West and stand terrorists and radical Muslims. No, no, no, I'm just against genocide. It's all a fun and easy Mott & Bailey game. That is the entire shtick. Sometimes they say the quiet part out loud. Congressional candidate Chris Rabb, he says it. And he says it. It's all the same thing. It's all the same. This clip is so indicative of why the genocide lie, why they do this. What is the purpose of it? Here is Chris Rabb.
Speaker 7If you can't name the demon, you can't kill it. And nobody who gives money to my campaign that's going to get me to move on my position on genocide because I can't be free until the Palestinians are free. And like Brothers of the Street said, Israeli Jews can't be free until we have a free Palestine. But if we can't say genocide, we can't be free. We can't be free until we have a free Palestine. But if we can't say genocide, we can't be free until we have a free Palestine. If we can't say white supremacy, if we can't say patriarchy or oligarchy, if we can't say the words, how are you going to trust somebody to do the work when it matters most in the darkest times we've seen in a long time? We can't do it.
Speaker 1Again, that's the whole thing. Say the word. Say the cultic word. And we all know what you mean. We mean that you think America is white supremacist, that you think America is an oligarchy, that it's patriarchal. And you think America is a white supremacist, that you think America is an oligarchy, that it's patriarchal. And you think America is a white supremacist, that you think America is a white supremacist, that you think America is a white supremacist. It is why queer is for Palestine. It's why Elliot Page and Susan Saran and Chelsea Manning and all the rest of the people who would be hanged by a crane until dead are joining in the movement. In the back of their mind, they must know that if the radical Muslims actually had a chance of taking over, they'd be the first people tossed off buildings the way that they are in Run, Hide, Fight Infinite. else. But they don't care because first things first, first the West falls and then you worry about the rest. This, by the way, is also why the horseshoe right, if they weren't too busy at their cabin in Maine picking their toes, would have been sitting right alongside those nutjobs because they want the same thing. They want the same thing. Which brings us to election 2026. Right now, the Republicans are in rough shape going into the midterm elections. President Trump is sitting somewhere between a 37 and a 40 percent approval rating. He's deeply underwater. Now, that is not because Democrats have moved. Democrats always hated him. They always hated him. It is because of independents who have moved against him. But most importantly, it's because of Republicans. Here's the thing. If Republicans in the generic congressional ballot were down to say five points instead of eight points right now, that would likely mean that Republicans would pick up the seat in Michigan, would certainly win in Iowa, would certainly win in Texas and would certainly win in Maine and Alaska, which means they would maintain the Senate. That two to three percentage point margin means an awful lot when it comes to dead even races in a wide variety of Senate races. That is Republicans who are dropping off the bandwagon. If Republicans supported Trump at the 90 percent clip that they did a year ago, Republicans would still be in rough shape in the House, but they'd be in kind of commanding position in the Senate, just statistically speaking. So what does that mean? It means that when you have supposed friends of the administration, deep abiding friends, supposed strong Republicans who not only are expressing, they're upset with the Republican Party, but running directly against it and praising the evil, literally praising candidates of the Democratic Party. There's a reason for that. Tucker Carlson is overtly campaigning for Senate Democrats in places like Maine and Michigan. He overtly wants Democrats to win. It is not enough for him to say he is upset with Trump's policy. That is not what this is about. The question is, why is he out there openly encouraging people to vote for Democrats and to abandon Republicans? That's the real question. Here is Tucker Carlson. NPR loves this. Tucker is now receiving strange new respect treatment from all of the legacy media because there's nothing the legacy media loves better than an apostate Republican who turns tail and runs because that splits the party and then they're very happy. This is how Marjorie Taylor Greene goes from being a double digit IQ moron who is deeply disrespected by the legacy media to a double digit moron who is deeply respected by the media. It's how Thomas Massey, who is considered anathema to the legacy media, is now considered a source worth considering from the legacy media. Same thing for Tucker Carlson. Legacy media hate Tucker Carlson up until precisely the point at which there is a confluence of interest, at which point they start trotting him out, obviously. Here is NPR giving him the solidly massage-based treatment while Tucker says that Trump should be bundled out of office.
Speaker 8It's enough for me to say, he should be removed from office. He should have been removed from office by his own cabinet secretaries the moment he threatened a nuclear attack. You're talking now about the 25th amendment
Speaker 9where a majority of the cabinet. That's correct. Yeah.
Speaker 8He should have been bundled up and taken out. That's a crime. There's no greater
Speaker 1crime than that. Okay. I'm just going to point out that he literally said that if there was an assassination attempt against President Trump, then Trump should nuke Iran. Tucker said that himself to Ted Cruz. But they're trying to assassinate our president? They have been for two years. They are our enemies. Then why are we at war
Speaker 8with
Speaker 1them? Well, we are trying to take out- Why don't we
Speaker 8just nuke Tehran if they're trying to murder our president? There's nothing that you could do that would be worse for the United States than murdering Trump. And I just don't understand why you're not calling for the use of nuclear weapons against the Ayatollah right now. I'm serious. If you really believe they're trying to murder- The use of nuclear weapons. See, that's part of the problem of- What do you mean? You don't seem to take the allegation seriously. I do. If you believe they're trying to murder Trump, we need to stop what we're doing and-
Speaker 1Punish them. Okay. Now, Tucker also spent his day with NPR explaining that Obama was right on Iran all along. Not a shock. And yet the last
Speaker 9two Democratic presidents made a nuclear deal with Iran and then tried to remake a nuclear deal with Iran rather than launching a regime change war against Iran. It just doesn't seem like a true statement.
Speaker 8Which is a huge improvement over what Trump did. I will say that. Okay. As someone who opposed Obama, especially in his second term, it took, I thought, courage and a huge amount of effort to get that nuclear deal done. And he should get credit for it.
Speaker 1Again, this is who Tucker Carlson, openly standing for the Democrats in the middle of this election cycle. Openly standing for them, right? He's defending Graham Plattner still. Why? Because if there's an anti-Semite who's more obvious than Graham Plattner, it's hard to find him. He literally had a death's head tattoo on him, which means he's a friend of Tucker. So here is Tucker defending openly Graham Plattner. This would be after his open defense of Abdul
Speaker 8al-Sayed. His views were out of the- The Democratic mainstream. And he was destroyed by the Democratic party in a fake sex scandal.
Speaker 9So Graham Plattner should still be the Democratic nominee?
Speaker 8Of course. Graham Plattner was, by the way, Graham Plattner was the choice of voters. Remember them? In Maine. He won. So yeah, he was the overwhelming choice. But of course, they don't get to vote for him in the fall because the Democratic party, including the Democratic party of Maine, which is run by people who weren't even from Maine, rich girls, not from Maine, literally, rich girls, not everyone's offended by that because it's true. Yeah, they took him out. They took him out in a
Speaker 1fake sex scandal. It was a fake sex scandal with regard to Graham Plattner. Again, this is Tucker defending Democratic candidates, defending them. This is the same guy who said that he would not with a gun to his head vote for Mike Rogers against Abdul al-Sayed and then said that Abdul al-Sayed's old commentary on how America is worse than Al-Qaeda is basically right. What's the goal here? So what's the goal here? The goal is to lose. Tucker Carlson wants Republicans to lose. He's not hiding the ball. He wants Republicans to lose. This is so that the horseshoe right can claim that Trump's agenda has failed, particularly on foreign policy, so they can then destroy the party and take over the fragments of it. They can claim that they use their leverage to make Republicans lose. And the only way that they can possibly win again, Republicans, is to kowtow to the radicals who agree with AOC on foreign policy. This is what they want to do. They are not hiding it. Now, honestly, the conflict on planet Earth right now between the West and the rest is so simple. But I think that maybe we're just not staffed up for it. We need better people making our decisions, just like you at your business. You need better people making decisions. And this is why you should go check out ZipRecruiter right now. ZipRecruiter makes it super easy for great candidates to get your attention. It's not just a list of resumes and then you sort through them and everybody's like, I want the job. No, instead, they can actually show you how much they want the job. And that helps because when you are seeking employees, there is no substitute for hungry and it can't be taught. You want somebody who wants to work for you. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the very first day. You can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire. Again, that's ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire. We've been using ZipRecruiter here for years. An enormous number of our employees came to us and they showed us that they wanted to come here, which makes a huge difference because we are an ideologically oriented business. That means a very specific type of employee. That's the kind of people that we want. You want a specific type of person for your business as well. Go check out ZipRecruiter right now. ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire. Try it out for free. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter. Joel Webben is another one of these fringe nutjobs. He's out there saying that conservatives ought to support socialism. It's time. And if the left plays and
Speaker 10keeps promising their voters, we will give you free stuff for your vote. And the right says we're principled and purist and above this, then the left will lose forever. The game has changed, guys. People have figured it out. You can vote for stuff. My preference is that we stop doing it altogether. And we actually have a country. But if you refuse to do what's necessary, mass deportations, pass the SAVE Act while you're at it, get rid, repeal, hard seller and civil rights. If you're not going to do that, then you're going to have to do some element of socialism because it's already here.
Speaker 1Do socialism. Maybe call it a national socialism, actually. So what you are seeing in the streets from the mainstream left now, people who will be in Congress and the horseshoe right, is an attempt to destroy the West. I mean, that's what this is about. That's what the coalition of scavengers is. It's what I wrote about in Lions and Scavengers is what we're talking about and run high fight infidels. OK, this is the fight. Now, there's only one choice, and that is for the West to actually fight this evil, both internationally and domestically. It is a good thing when evil loses. That's a good thing. How this became controversial is beyond me. When evil people lose, that is good. On that basis, by the way, shout out to our friend Justin Folk. He's director of Matt Walsh's documentaries, has an awesome new documentary coming out. It's titled Paging Hezbollah, and it's about the pager attack that started the destruction of the Iranian backed Lebanese terrorist war machine. There's no substitute for victory. That's true abroad and it's true at home. OK, there's no substitute for victory, but there are a lot of people internationally who refuse to acknowledge this. Hey, those who sympathize with Iran and Hamas, whether because they advocate political Islam or whether because they are radical leftists in solidarity, must be defeated. But don't worry, there are plenty of people in the West who are perfectly willing to surrender to all of this. And here is the UK's foreign minister, David Milliman, shaking hands happily with Abbas Arahi on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. Again, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not wrong when he called out the Europeans for being cowards when it comes to defending freedom.
Speaker 6There are some, and most recently, especially in Western Europe, who have chosen not to stand up. The leaders of these countries have chosen to succumb to the anti-Semitic mobs. They have chosen weakness. They have chosen appeasement. We cannot evade the sad truth before us. Many in the free world are afraid to defend freedom. And I ask them, what will this future, what will this behavior, what will the world hold for you?
Speaker 1Okay, that is right. Here's the thing. There's only one choice with regard to evil nations, particularly ones who are currently holding hostage entire oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz or through Bab al-Mandib, and that is victory. Now listen, everyone would like the war in Iran to end. I would like for it to end victoriously because there are only two ways a war ends. You lose or you win. There's no negotiated settlement with a bunch of radical Muslims who would prefer the eschaton to an actual agreement. Now, President Trump seems to be operating off of the assumption that the Iranian government is a rational government that makes rationally based decisions. If that were true, they would not have spent the last half century mass murdering their own people, engaging in a series of unwinnable wars, fostering terrorism around the region that has resulted in zero growth for their own country and their international isolation. None of that is rationalistic. None of it. And the Iranian president, Massoud Pazeshkian, he did an interview with Fox News' Brett Baier. And again, he is he's just out there spewing nonsense. Here he denied killing Iranian citizens to Brett Baier. And there are two sides to any negotiation. If the Iranians won't negotiate, that doesn't leave you a lot of choices, does it?
Speaker 11We would never attack our own population. You know, the thing is that, no, no, no, no. Who conducted terrorist actions against us? Who hit our schools?
Speaker 12In January 8th and 9th,
Speaker 11you definitely had security forces that killed Iranian citizens. Mr. Trump himself announced that we had equipped and armed these people in order to bring down the Iranian government. Netanyahu's people announced that from Kurdistan and Balochistan province, the forces would be penetrating the major metropolitan centers in order to bring down the government. They thought that it was a three, it would be a three-day affair, that the government would fall. It remained steadfast, became more cohesive, became more united. Even those who stood against the Iranian government opposed us for a number of reasons. Now they are supporting Iran.
Speaker 1Okay, that is not true at all, at all, at all. I would also prefer for the war to end because I would prefer that the oil prices come down. But here's the thing. There's one thing Americans like less than higher oil prices, and that's losing wars. We don't like losing wars, particularly to backwater dictatorships that don't have any forward capacity in any serious way. What does that leave on the table for President Trump? Well, it leaves on the table the possibility of continuing the blockade. That could continue until such point as there's an exogenous shock to the Iranian regime, or they can't pay their own people, or there's an uprising. Or the administration, if it wished to rush the process, could do what I've been suggesting since April, which is bomb Kharga Island, destroy the Iranian refineries, and prevent their capacity now and forever to export oil until they actually reintegrate with the international community, which would require change. All of that's possible. But for all the folks who think that some sort of bizarre, fast agreement with the Iranians to leave them in control of the Strait of Hormuz, where they can turn it on and off at whim, that that's somehow going to achieve a less significant republic. Loss in 2026. You're out of your mind. It's not going to work that way. Okay. On to the other big foreign policy issue of yesterday. So President Trump is receiving a lot of blowback for sort of whining and dining Xi Jinping, the dictator of China. Now, I think Xi Jinping is one of the worst people on planet Earth. I think that China is our geopolitical enemy. I do not think they're just an opponent. I think they are our enemy. I think they have nothing but bad hopes and wishes for the United States and our status on planet Earth. With that said, President Trump putting out the red carpet for the Chinese. That does not amount to an actual surrender to the Chinese. And there are people in the media who are treating it that way, which is really absurd. President Trump loves whining and dining people. This is his thing. He does it with everyone from Kim Jong-un to the Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He whines and dines pretty much everybody. I mean, hell, he'll go to Mamdani's house. He'll go to the Gracie Mansion and he'll pretend that he gets along with his own Mamdani. Trump is very big into the gripping and grinning. With various foreign leaders, including the mayor of New York. It doesn't mean that he is somehow surrendering to the Chinese. All that happened of material effect is that yesterday, Xi and Trump agreed to a one-year trade truce at a meeting in South Korea last October that got extended by a couple of months. So there was no actual agreement for the United States to give up anything. And again, China remains as opposed to the United States as it ever was. The Houthis in Yemen who have to exert pressure on the Babylonian Strait. The Houthis are basically supplied by the Chinese. The Iranians are also supplied by the Chinese. Okay. With that said, the sort of fakeness of the encounter is a little off-putting, I will admit. So President Xi yesterday, he suggested that we're about to overcome what he calls the Thucydides Trap. So the Thucydides Trap is a much overstated theory that basically a declining power will declare war. In order to prevent itself from falling behind another power. In his view, China is the rising power. America is the declining power. That is not accurate. Okay. China is a hollow shell. It doesn't mean they can't do damage. They certainly can. They're a nuclear-armed large power. With that said, their economy is built on debt. They do not innovate in the way the United States does. They're built on the theft of intellectual property and expropriation from their own citizens. Here is Xi.
Speaker 13Again, this is just a, it's silly. I'm sorry. This is all silly.
Speaker 1Here's President Xi then claiming that Chinese rejuvenation and making America great again can go hand in hand. No, they most certainly cannot.
Speaker 13And achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can go hand in hand. Let us meet the people's expectation and show our historical initiative. Let us keep advancing the cause of friendship between our two peoples and work together to build a better world.
Speaker 1Okay. Nobody believes one element of this. This is the same country that unleashed the COVID pandemic on planet earth, killing, legitimately millions and millions and millions of people. And then pretended they didn't do it. China is behind pretty much every nefarious movement across planet earth. They are not our friends. President Trump knows that just because he's shaking hands with Xi doesn't mean that he's forgotten about this. President Xi, by the way, invited 100,000 American students to study in China. Sounds awesome. How about this? How about instead of that, we just deport 100,000 Chinese students who are studying in America? How about we do that
Speaker 13instead? The hope of China-U.S. relationship lies in our people and its future lies with the young. I am glad to announce an invitation for 100,000 young Americans to visit China for exchanges and study in the coming five years.
Speaker 1No, no, let's not do that. Let's instead deport the almost 300,000 students from China who are in the United States right now, many of whom are going to take their skill sets. And intellectual property they find in America and bring it back to the Chinese communist regime. I will say again, I don't really care very much about the president putting out a red carpet for Xi or whatever. This is what foreign leaders do for one another as a sort of typical thing. I was not a fan of something that, you know, it's one of those things where you kind of slightly chuckle, but it's not great. So the president was walking through this hall of portraits of prior presidents they put up. And as a sort of troll, the portrait of Joe Biden is a picture of the auto pen and he shows this to Xi Jinping and then Xi laughs. At Trump's auto pen portrait of Biden. Listen, I think Biden was the worst president in modern American history. I actually don't think it's particularly close. Still, he was an American president. I don't like Chinese dictators laughing at American presidents. I just don't. Okay. Again, as much as I despise Joe Biden as a politician and, you know, disdain him in many ways, I don't think that that is a great look. And President Trump, after his meeting with the Chinese, he said, we had a great meeting and he likes granite.
Speaker 14All right. We had a great meeting and he has great interest in granite. He likes granite. He's an expert on stone, aside from many other things. And he loves good granite. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1Okay, whatever. And then they had a state meeting, a state dinner, and that state dinner involved Trump, Bantz, the cabinet, ambassadors, Trump's kids, and then a bunch of other people. of tech bros showed up as well. People ranging from Jensen Huang over at NVIDIA to Mark Zuckerberg, to Tim Cook, to Jeff Bezos, Sam Altman, Michael Dell, Elon showed up. All right, fine. Whatever. Don't care very much. The one thing I care about is that President Trump is not surrendering on AI. And he did say this. He said that he is not going to change the AI system on behalf of China, which is the big thing. That is a very different thing, by the way, from the Democratic left-wing perspective on AI. Again, if a Democrat were president, they would be kowtowing in real time to China on AI. Here is Barack Obama talking about how we, meaning government, is going to have to take control, essentially, of AI development.
Speaker 15I will say that the rise of social media and the siloing, the information bubbles that we all occupy, so that the reality of somebody who's reading the New York Times, is entirely foreign to somebody who's watching Fox News. We're going to have to find ways to bridge that. And we're going to have to create new town squares, essentially, where everybody is having a common dialogue with certain rules. And that becomes even more important as technology accelerates and AI and deep fakes and all kinds of nonsense is coming.
Speaker 1Again, he's just the worst. He also has support from people like Bernie Sanders. Bernie, continue. to maintain that we should put people in prison for developing AI. And there's a reason why Bernie and the Chinese are best friends. Is it not extreme, though? 20 years seems like a long time to violate a regulation that you were suggesting.
Speaker 12Really? And if that violation results in the possibility of millions of people dying, do you think that that's really terribly radical? We're dealing with a technology that, according to some of the most knowledgeable people in the world, could be lethal, could be extremely dangerous. And if you want to know more, breaking the law and developing that technology and endangering millions of people. You know what? I think we should have strong laws to protect people. And if you break it, you got to pay the price. Again, this is what
Speaker 1Democrats would like. They want to work for all the people who are on the left who are saying Trump is kowtowing to China. If Democrats take office, they will immediately surrender to China. And you know who will help them out is half the tech bros who just want regulatory capture so that they can prevent everybody else from developing. So Dario, Modi actually spoke with the U.N. Again, just another reason why we should get rid of the U.N., blow up the building, salt the earth. Dario Modi spoke to the U.N. Security Council warning about his own industry.
Speaker 16I see two main categories of risk. The first is misuse of AI models, for example, misuse by bioterrorists to create biological weapons. The second risk is loss of control model capabilities accelerating beyond developers ability to control them. These questions are global in scope and concern all of humanity. They are grave enough that I believe they are important questions for this council, not just for economic or ICT ministries.
Speaker 1This is the call from Dario Modi and Sam Altman. They're leading the race right now. Great way to keep leading that race is to say that we're all going to die if you don't create regulations that enshrine us as the global leaders in AI development. Here is Sam Altman again speaking to the U.N. Security Council.
Speaker 17It doesn't matter whether people put the risk of catastrophe at 10 percent or 1 percent or 12 percent or 0.1 percent. None of these levels are remotely acceptable. And we should not train models that we cannot make an extremely strong case that will be able to keep under human control.
Speaker 1OK, this is just also I'm sorry, going to speak before China and Russia and beg their involvement in AI is such a disaster area. I'm with Jensen Huang of NVIDIA. He's speaking with The New York Times as a client. He says just because you're an alarmist doesn't mean that you're actually doing anything useful.
Speaker 18Is it good or bad? That we scare young people about the future of AI so much so that they don't even want to go to universities and don't want to go to college anymore because they don't think they'll get a job. Is that helpful or hurtful if it were to happen? It's hurtful. Don't think for a second just because you're an alarmist that you're doing a social good. It is not true. So I think that we need to be scientific. If you wanted to be scientific, be scientific. Do the science. Do the science. But alarming people making claims that don't they simply there's their their track record is horrible. I mean, he is
Speaker 1right about that. And he says, listen, if you don't like how it's developing, then don't release your product. I mean, like, why are all the rest of us bound by regulations you want to write while you're the ones claiming you're the danger?
Speaker 18Well, in that case, they shouldn't release the product. That's the simple answer. If you're if you're going to build a car, a self-driving car, and and let's say it's a robo taxi and there's a really difficult condition. And it just as an engineer, we just have no idea how to solve this problem because these cars are not programmed. They're trained. And so we have no idea how to train these cars and we have no idea how to align them to the safety standards that are expected on the road. And so what's the answer? Don't ship it. These products weren't released. What's that? So now it's coming back to engineering problem again. And so the one is one, you have to cause it. Second, you have to, you know, think about what's the what you could have done. What's the solution for it? And then in the future, you just, you know, improve your process so that you could you could avoid this from happening again.
Speaker 1Okay, so again, I'm with Jensen Huang. Mark Zuckerberg also spoke on a show called New Things with Joanna Stern, where he talked about the fact that there is in fact a commercial incentive for people to buy a car. And he said, you know, I'm not going to buy a car. I'm going to buy a car. I'm going to not blow up earth. Here he was.
Speaker 19And with the Muse launch that we just did, we had a version of it that was quite good a few months ago. And we wanted to make sure that we really nailed all the privacy and security parts of it, because part of this is that if you're building a product, like people aren't going to want to use it if it doesn't do what they want. You know, we want to get to a world where, you know, everyone can can benefit from this. And it's just not going to happen. People aren't going to adopt it if they if they don't trust it.
Speaker 1I mean, he is right about all of that. By the way, the developments in tech are so extraordinary that many of the problems that we have been arguing about are going to become irrelevant fairly quickly. So one of the big developments in tech that people have been arguing about is data centers. Oh, my gosh, our precious farmlands are being taken. It's going to use all our water. None of that is true. But it may be obvious that we're going to have to do something about it. And I think that's going to be a big problem. And I think that's going to be obviated by the fact that Google just apparently announced that next Thursday they're going to send an experimental satellite into orbit that will have enough computing power to answer simple queries from space. So basically, this is space based data centers now. Right. This is the beginning. Well, if you got the data centers in space, you don't have to worry about it in the middle of Iowa, do you? Tech development is extraordinary. And again, it is the biggest economic bet in American history, as The Wall on the success of A.I. as a productivity grower. If you look at infrastructure spending as a percentage of GDP in major periods in the past. Between 1870s and 1890s, we spent about two point two four percent of American GDP on building railroads in the 50s and 70s. We spent in that period one point one three percent of American GDP was spent on building highways. Today, almost four percent of American GDP is being spent on building A.I. infrastructure. So this is a massive bet. And this is why we're going to have to do something about it. And I think that's going to be a big deal. I think it's going to be a big deal. and um again putting that number five is a wild overrate they've got game of thrones at number six which i think is probably about right number seven they have veep again an extremely overrated comedy starring starring julia louis dreyfus it is funny it's entertaining but it doesn't belong in the top 10 probably not i'd put veep in probably my top 30 i'm not sure that it makes the top 20 they've got 30 rock at number eight which again i like 30 rock there's no way it's the eighth best show of the of the uh 2000 it's just not real at nine they've curb your enthusiasm and at 10 they have atlanta atlanta is the biggest stretch in this whole group i'm not sure that seven people have ever watched atlanta that is not so so that list i would say that they got the top two basically right kind of but the rest of the list meh okay so here are the actual best tv shows since the turn of the century number one which they have rated number 28 is band of brothers band of brothers is the best thing that has ever been aired on tv because they included miniseries here band of brothers is a masterpiece band of brothers tells the story of the 101st airborne from training all the way through the end of world war ii and every episode is a gem all the acting is incredible the cinematography is wonderful the writing is terrific you will come away with a better feeling about your country and about america it's awesome band of brothers is easily the best thing that has ever been on tv it is not a particularly close call actually so band of brothers at number one number two got breaking bad number two got breaking bad number two got breaking bad number three got breaking bad number four which they had at number 19 is chernobyl chernobyl is a miniseries about the meltdown at chernobyl number three got breaking bad number two got breaking chernobyl which is an extraordinary look by craig mazen at the devolution of the soviet system and why chernobyl melted down and what happens when bureaucracy takes over and all the rest it is extraordinary it's a great great series if you haven't seen on hbo chernobyl one of the best things in the history of tv i've got that at number four they had at number 19 which is crazy i had game of thrones at number six now again i say that kind of with an asterisk because the reality is that the first three seasons of game of thrones are kind of wonderful and then it just falls apart the last season of game of thrones is not good at all so i've got game of thrones at number five they had it at number six okay i've got severance which is still airing so we'll see where it ends up i've got that at number six why i watch i've seen so many tv shows so many so many movies i love it when the writers take me a place i didn't think they're going and where i just have to sort of trust where they're going and the writing is so good that i do trust where they're going severance is that show severance is incredibly clever it's really compelling it's one of those shows where if you watch the first couple of seasons of game of thrones you're like oh my you will have to watch all the rest and you will be waiting with bated breath for the next week to see what happens it's a mystery based show in the same way as my number seven show lost so lost again is a show kind of like game of thrones in the sense the first three seasons of lost are extraordinary and then it kind of falls apart but the first three seasons revolutionized tv they made serialized tv a thing and so lost which again my entire family would get together including my grandmother we'd all get together it was on wednesday nights and we'd watch lost at my parents house they have that i've got that number seven i've got the office at number eight because the office again probably the best american comedy of all time certainly the most iconic and they had it at 11 so not that far off number nine downton abbey so downton abbey is terrific they had it at number 52 i don't see 51 better shows than downton abbey again maybe i'm being a populist here i think this is a fairly popular opinion downton abbey is beautifully written it's wonderfully acted it's really entertaining again the last couple of seasons didn't work as well as the first season but the first season is great okay then i've got the shield at number 10 again it rather the shield sort of revolutionized tv in the same way as the wire so they were kind of two sides of the same coin they've got that at number 70 which is unthinkable the shield is not the 70th best show since 2000 that's ridiculous so check out the shield is aired on fx originally and then i'll give you a couple of extras so the bear which they rank at number 74 i don't know if you've seen it i have it number 11 not because all three seasons the bear were a masterpiece but because the bear is responsible for the single best episode of tv probably ever aired it's called forks it happens in season one and it's just great first of all the bear is competence porn it's about how if you are good at things this can also help you become a better person and that's what happens to one of the main characters richie who's kind of a drunk and a derelict and an idiot and he's put in a position to learn to be good at things and his character transition over the is something you should show to pretty much every teenager because what it says is that hard work perfectionism focus on competence is a good thing and finally i'll give you one extra another extra shogun a shogun which they have ranked at 86 but beautifully produced and wonderfully acted and just incredible to watch shogun which came out i think last year is great all righty so those are the top tv shows already folks coming up you think we're done but we are not now again you have to be a daily wear member to get more analysis and more news coverage and also run hide fight infidels the single best performing entertainment property in the history of daily wire go over to daily wire right now and subscribe and you will get to hear me talk about what i talk about next which is going to be the democrats embracing a fake feminism that is not real at all particularly barack obama go check it out right now use code shapiro check out two months free on all annual plans click that link in the description and join us every significant movement in
Speaker 8history has started with protesting this is our generation's civil rights i have no idea what the protest is about
Speaker 19bingo
Speaker 8given the
Speaker 19current climate should a figure as polarizing as clay saunders even be allowed on campus uh can you
Speaker 20hear me okay saunders is a close personal friend of chancellor friedman this is a decision i cannot fight islam will conquer the west assalamu alaikum are we paying attention they've taken over the
Speaker 18building they're downstairs and they've blocked the doors i
Speaker 4seek forgiveness from allah the almighty we cannot run and hide muhammad is the messenger of god there is no god but allah what
Speaker 20do you say we turn those sob's into a fine red mist as we move one man will cover while the other guys go they call that leapfrog you need a course
Speaker 6in safe weapons handling well polls tell you what voters said
Speaker 3at one moment but calci gives you another way to follow a race a live market that moves as traders respond to new information in michigan abdul al-sayyad and mike rogers are competing in one of calci's most traded midterm matchups you can visit calci's midterms hub to track how the market views the race and then trade an event contract on the outcome you think is going to happen if you're right at settlement each winning contract is worth one dollar see the market make your call trade what happens next on calci use code daily d-a-i-l-y to get up to 25 when you trade 25 that's calci k-a-l-s-h-i calci trade on anything 18 plus only restrictions and eligibility requirements apply event contracts trading involves risk and may not be suitable for all investors calci products are not available in all jurisdictions prices values and available markets may differ from those mentioned for more information you can go see calci.com regulatory
PodcastTranscript AI