Ep. 2067 - "You Can See Everything": My Take On The Elizabeth Holmes Documentary

Okay, fellas. Since Hollywood can't do anything right anymore, we did their job for them. The Daily Wire's newest movie is an ode to the great funny action films of the 80s and 90s, good guys win, bad guys lose. No one apologizes for it. Check out Run Hyde Fight Infidels now streaming only on the daily wire. This episode is brought to you by Cardiff, America's favorite small business lender. There were 12 billion funded since 2004, applying under three minutes for same day funding up to 500,000 at Cardiff.co/noles. A new documentary brings audiences an intimate look at Theranos founder ending incarcerated sociopath Elizabeth Holmes. It has a perfect score on rotten tomatoes. The trailer got over three million views in just 14 hours. People cannot get enough, and the fascination is about a lot more than Elizabeth Holmes. Then Stanford University uses AI to turn a Mexican boy into a black girl. That's impressive. And an investigator publishes new findings to suggest that Adolf Hitler might have killed another person just when you think you know a guy. I'm Michael Noles, it's the Michael Noles show. Welcome back to this show. You want to talk movies. I want to talk Run Hyde Fight Infidels. I'm very glad that so many of you have subscribed to dailywire.com/subscribe and you have seen the movie. If you haven't seen the movie yet, it's really subtle. I really want your take on the nuances, the esoteric message of slashing the throat of lesbians on rooftops and stuff. Anyway, if you haven't seen it yet, everyone's talking about it and meaming it and you want to be in the conversation. So go to dailywire.com/subscribe. We turn to another movie. You can't ignore it. This is the first Hollywood movie that's come out in gosh, I don't know, 20 years that everyone is talking about. Everyone is eagerly anticipating. This is documentary about Elizabeth Holmes, Elizabeth Holmes who is this sociopathic founder of Theranos, a fraud healthcare company starting in 2003. She defrauded all of these really smart rich people. She defrauded Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Jim Mattis. All these guys who were who were serving on the board, she cost gazillions of dollars. She was fetted as this amazing rising young star, this millennial woman founder CEO and it was all totally fake. So right before she goes to prison, she has a kid, just two kids actually. And in the 11 or so days, before she has to go to prison for 11 years, she decides instead of spending a lot of time with her family, she's going to invite a documentary filmmaker, Nathan Felder, to just spend the whole time with her. And this is the portrait that people can't get enough of. You've never been suspicious that she's ever lied to you. No, never. I still have this weird feeling that there's some things that I'm not seeing. 'Cause I don't have anything to hide. I know what you're feeling. No, you don't. So I may think about this movie for the rest of my life as one. To be okay with letting someone see me cry. Says, "Oh yeah, it took a long time to get comfortable with someone seeing me cry. This is a woman who never blinks. She just stares at you at this uncanny awkwardness." And then just as she said that, she blinks three times and squeezes at it to you right on cue. It's deeply unsettling. So the movie's called, "You can see everything." And nice artistic choice, that phrase doesn't totally fit on the screen. Why are people so fascinated with it? In part, it's because everyone's fascinated by sociopaths, because sociopaths just operate differently than we do. And in an egalitarian age, where we all believe in a tabla raza, that all people are born exactly the same. And any differences in outcomes are merely attributable to society. This is why the lives are always taking the side of criminals over perpetrators is because, for them, everyone's born exactly the same, because they ultimately deny original sin. So if something goes wrong, it has to be something that was done to the criminal. It can't be something that they were just born with. It can't just be a bad inclination. It can't be bad choices that they made along the way. It always has to be something that was done to them. That really does come down to what is essentially the biggest anthropological error of liberalism, which is the denial of original sin. But in any case, yeah, weirdos are always going to fascinate us, because this woman, like other sociopaths, just operates in the world differently than we do, and we find that interesting. But that's not the main reason, I think, why this movie is becoming a phenomenon. The reason is actually more about society than it is about the individual of Elizabeth Holmes. I think the reason that people are so fascinated by this, why it's kind of grabbed the throat of the zeitgeist, is because Elizabeth Holmes is the perfect millennial. She's the perfect millennial. She's a founder. She's a founder of a tech company. Tech is the industry of our times. She's a woman. And for the millennials, unlike the prior generations, the millennials were bred from their earliest days to be told that women need to be girl bosses. They need to go out. They need to work outside the home, not just get married and have kids. They need to create companies, not babies. The best version of that is to become a founder and entrepreneur, especially in the industry of our time. Tech, especially to charm the industrial capital of our time, which is Silicon Valley. And she did all of that. And it was a fraud. And so you get the perfect embodiment of the fraud at the level of the person of Elizabeth Holmes. But the whole thing was a fraud. The whole thing that teachers and parents and pop culture had been telling young women, that was a fraud too. The idea that women have to go be girl bosses, that women need to work outside the home, that they should put off having kids, that all that matters is work and a specific kind of work, the technological kind of work. All of that was a fraud. And we're coming to grips with that as a society now, as women reach the end of their childbearing years and they're having deeper bread over that. That's why you're seeing an explosion of IVF technology. A recognition of the failure of all of the decisions we made in the last 20, 30 years, many of which involve technology. And then to fix that problem, what are they doing? They're doing the only thing they know, which is they're turning to technology. But that's not going to fix it. It's going to make the problem worse. You're seeing the unhappiness of women, both in absolute terms and relative to men, women getting less and less happy, as we were told they were supposed to get happier and happier and happier. You see a recognition that the world idea that we've had for the last 30 years is insufficient, is ultimately unsatisfying, that we were sold to bill of goods that we were defrauded. And she is the actual embodiment of that. That's what's so fascinating about Elizabeth Holmes. There are all sorts of rosters. Why do we care more about Elizabeth Holmes than we care about Bernie made off? Because Bernie made off is the kind of scammer that could exist in any age. We live in a highly financialized age. It's so much of the economy now, it's financial services. So I guess that makes some semi-interested. But he's just a con man. Everywhere for all of time we've had con men. Elizabeth Holmes is a con man or a con woman specifically built for our present culture, for our society. And as we're coming to grips with all the problems in that culture and society, as we're starting to come apart, as you're seeing major political realignment and revolutions going on on the left and on the right is just everybody realizes, man, something's really going wrong here. This woman, a totally embodies it. I can't wait to see it. The other the other thing about this movie that I think is grabbing people's attention is that it's the first interesting piece of art to come out of Hollywood. Gosh, it'll in at least, I don't know, 10 years. I would say, you know, Barbie was kind of interesting. I'm Lady Bird was kind of interesting. I'm a Greta Gerwig defender. We'll get to Greta Gerwig in a second. But in terms of like real gripping art that blurs lines between genres, between documentary and drama, that actually plays onto the central theme because you don't know if you're being duped. You don't know if you're being defrauded. A lot of people saw that trailer. They thought it was a drama. They thought they just got a dead ringer to play Elizabeth Holmes. It wasn't. It's a documentary. But because this woman's whole life is performance, a documentary about her is necessarily going to be a kind of a drama. It's necessarily going to be a kind of a work of fiction. That's the other thing that's really interesting about this is it's a recognition. Oh, we can still make art. We can't. We don't have to just resign ourselves to a bunch of woke schlock on the one hand and catch Marvel movie nonsense on the other. That there actually is such a thing as art. We actually were making interesting movies even as recently as 15 years ago. We can do that again. That's the other thing it'll grab people. You know, the cream does rise to the top. I mentioned that I would bring up the Greta Gerwig thing. I just breathe. briefly, I'm not everyone's going crazy over this because Greta Gerwig is doing the Narnia movie based on the CS Lewis books and she has cast for the voice of Aslan, who is the Jesus character, she's cast Meryl Streep, she's cast a woman to play the character that represents Jesus and people are really freaking out about it and I, I'm a big Greta Gerwig Stan. I think the Greta Gerwig is clearly a deeply conservative filmmaker and so this new Narnia casting challenges my thesis about Greta Gerwig. I'm not even saying she's a consciously conservative filmmaker, I'm saying she just practically is. You look at Lady Bird, Lady Bird was about the kind of girls that exist today, kind of rebellious, have problems with their mind, daddy issues, all sorts of things, but what was the conclusion of Lady Bird? Spoiler alert, the conclusion of Lady Bird was that the main character decided to stop being a slut to call her mom and to go to Catholic Church. That was the, that was the final scene, spoiler alert. What about Barbie? Everyone's, I had a big disagreeing with Ben Shapiro about this, that he said Barbie was woke and feminist, but it wasn't actually. That was the crazy thing. Barbie presented a feminist vision of the world and concluded it was bad. Remember the opening scene of Barbie was the dawn of man and it was all nice and fun and then what happened? Feminism as Barbie came into the world and led all these girls who were playing with their cute little dolls like mothers to start dashing the little girls' brains on rocks. Feminism from the very earliest moments of the scene was presented as this destructive force and then the whole world of Barbie was this feminist fantasy. It's kind of mid-century girl fantasy and so every character in there was was unfulfilled, unsatisfying, unrealistic, even Ken was like a feminist version of what a man is and it was toxic. But then what was the conclusion of Barbie? The conclusion of Barbie was that Barbie goes, has a conversation with God and then decides instead of going out and getting a job in the real world, she goes to an OB-GYN because she wants to have a baby because she realizes that's more important. That's a profoundly anti-feminist movie and so, okay, my whole take on the Greta-Gurwig controversy is, I'm not going to have a take yet because I recognize the casting and moral street. This is bad. I don't like this. I feel uncomfortable with this but it's kind of like the people who call out Trump. They say, oh, they got Trump now. They got him now. He's really in trouble now. The walls are closing and then every time Trump gets out of it and he usually wins, that's how I feel about Greta-Gurwig. The pattern she has set up is that her movies on the surface look super-lib and feminist, but just slightly below the surface and then all the way down, they're deeply conservative. So I don't want to get duped and then I watch a movie and I say, actually, it was deeply conservative. This is scary. This is bad. I don't like the idea of it. I'm prepared to say that the conservative Greta-Run is over but I'm not prepared to say it just yet, okay? Is that fine? Is that enough of a hot take on Greta-Gurwig? I do want to get to some real life crazy women. Democrat representative Delia Ramirez, who's saying she's going to abolish ICE so that our people won't live in fear. Channel my inner Kanye West. Who is they though? What does our people mean as this woman makes this statement in Spanish? First, I will tell you about Cardiff. I've got a Cardiff.co/nulls. Growth can be expensive. That's a good problem to have in business but it's actually still a problem. You need the inventory before you sell it. You need the employee before that employee generates revenue. You need the equipment before you can take the bigger job. That is precisely when you don't have weeks to spend dealing with a big bank and mountains of paperwork and endless red tape. That is where Cardiff comes in. Cardiff has spent more than 20 years backing American business owners funding more than $12 billion to date. Their online application takes about three minutes. There's no impact your personal credit to view your offers and qualified businesses can access up to half a million dollars in same day funding. Approval and minutes funding the same day. Go check out Cardiff. Do not let the big banks mess up your business and stop your growth. If you've been in business for at least a year with over $20,000 a month in revenue, skip the banks and go to Cardiff.co/nulls. That is Cardiff.co/nulls, K-N-O-W-L-E-S. Real growth, fast funding. Do it right now. Don't allow your success to become your problem. Cardiff borrow better. We're looking ahead. We're weeks away from the midterm elections. Democrats look poised to retake the House and the Senate. They're looking good in all the polls and all the prediction markets. Even some of the signals we're getting out of the campaign. So here we have sitting Democrat representative Delia Ramirez speaking to her constituents promising to abolish DHS. We're going to abolish the Department of Homeland Security and create a new department where we completely strip ICE and customers and border patrol of their funding and authority. As well as the authorities, they're using to track you, keep lists of you, instead we're going to create a department of community safety. We're immigration will no longer be handled by a department that likes to call immigrants terrorists, whenever it suits them. So our people will no longer have to live in fear because of an unjust system. So today we're coming together to introduce the terrible law, blah, blah. Reads call to re-imagining safety act. You get the call. So I'm reminded of a controversy that occurred last week, which is you had some random Republican who made some impolite comments about Indian immigrants in Texas. Not illegal aliens. We're going to get deported by ICE, but legal immigrants in Texas students who were there on visas and he was looking at this image of a lot of Indians at Texas. Was it Texas A&M or was it UT or was one of those where he said, you know, this is terrible. This is a horrible view of America. We can't, you know, we're, there's too much immigration. Okay. What? And people, people attacked him. Even Republicans went after him. They said, this is this bad looks, bad optics. It's racist. I dare you. Okay. Okay. Yeah. I agree. It's kind of, it's bad optics. It's not, it's not exactly the way we should speak. If I, you know, I would use different language. We need to watch our language, Mr. Okay, fine. Sure. You got that guy. That's like the worst Republican running for office right now. He's running for railroad commissioner in Texas. That's like the worst one. And yeah, he uses some words that maybe he shouldn't, he should have said it differently. It's not his, it's not the point that he was making. It's just the way he said it. Okay. Okay. Fine. Fine. Or who else you got? You got Darlene Graham, Darlene Graham, Lindsey Graham sister running for Senate in South Carolina. And she doesn't know anything about foreign policy. Trump endorsed her. She's a reliable Republican vote. But, you know, she doesn't, she doesn't really know that much. She hasn't been a career politician. So she, it's her and the guy who made the mean tweet in Texas. They're like the worst Republicans running for office right now. And you have, you have Republican officeholders who are coming out saying, I'm not going to vote for these kinds of people. You have George Will, lifelong conservative pundit. Say, I'm not, I'm going to vote for the Democrat. And I would vote for the Democrat. If I live in South Carolina, blah, blah, blah. Okay. Sure. Whatever your issues with those with the weaker GOP candidates, they're running against this. They're running against politicians in the Democrat party who will not even speak English. They are so repelled by the American tradition and way of life by the historic American nation. They won't even speak the national language. They're, they're running against politicians who say, we need to destroy not even just ICE or customs and Border Patrol. We're going to destroy the whole Department of Homeland Security because they're not letting all the illegals come in. And they're deporting some of the illegals who are already here. So we're going to destroy the whole department so that our people will no longer live in fear. And the most charitable reading you can imagine, what does our people mean in that sentence? Is Delia, what's her name? Delia Ramirez sitting U.S. Congressman. Is she referring to the American people as our people? No. How do you read it that way? You can't. The people who are living in fear of DHS and ICE and Border Patrol are foreigners. They're foreign nationals. Those are the people who can be deported. American citizens aren't going to be deported. It's foreigners. So you have a party that is now running openly, explicitly as the representatives of hostile foreign powers who are openly promising to subvert your interests, your common good, your way of life. They won't even speak your language when they do it. They're going to speak the foreign languages. And I'm hearing Republicans say, I know, I don't want to vote for that guy in Texas. I don't want to vote for darling Graham. She's not smart. I don't want to vote for the Republicans because I don't like the Iran war. You don't like the Iran war? I don't really like the Iran war either. I wish there were not just two and a half million illegals removed. I wish they removed three and a half million. Yeah. I wish they removed 20 million. Yeah. I wish. Yeah. Wouldn't that be great. Wouldn't that be lovely? If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. But you know what folks? Trump has done a very good job. He's done a very good job. He's made some decisions I don't agree with. That's going to happen. Yeah. Sure. And even if he hadn't done a very good job, these are the people we're running against. Do you see who we're running against? They're people who are speaking a foreign language telling you that they're going to destroy the department that exists to protect your sovereignty because those people are going to represent a foreign people. And I'm hearing, I'm just a little, I don't know if I'm going to show up to the polls. I don't, I just, I don't get it, man. I just don't get it. Yeah, there's, there, there are some things to criticize Trump over. Sure. Okay. Had I been on the NSC, I would have probably argued against this most recent Iran intervention that the previous one worked out pretty well. This one maybe could have worked out well. It just didn't. You can't predict the future. And yeah, diesels at six bucks gallon and that's unfortunate. I agree. Yeah, I agree. There's probably not going to be a resolution to that anytime soon. But folks, are you kidding me? Trump remains the greatest president of my lifetime. For whatever criticism you want to make of him, he remains the greatest president of my lifetime. And even if he weren't, we are, we are looking at the most radically left wing and most openly anti-American Democratic Party that has ever run in the history of the United States. Down, down to in the early days of the Democrat Party, when it was secessionist, this Democrat Party is more openly hostile to the American nation. I just don't want to hear it. If you're, if you're going to look at that and say, well, you know what, I think actually because I don't like that mean tweet from that guy in in Texas, I think we need to vote for Democrats or I think we need to stay home. I just, okay, then fine. You know, good luck. We get, you know what, I'm sure you're a nice person. I'm maybe I'm sure it's fine, but you're politically useless. This, the stakes are very, very high. Now, on the point of the Iran War, President Trump addressed it at the United Nations yesterday, yesterday, two days ago. And in tip, I talked about the subtlety of the Daily Wires, a new movie, Run Hat Fight Infidels. We had typical Trumpian subtlety here, which is he said, look, I'm looking forward to getting a deal with Iran or I'll annihilate it. We'll get to that in a moment first, though. Folks, very, very exciting. I want to tell you about Roonwood Rosaries. Go to Roonwood Rosary, r-u-n-e-wood-rosary.com code-noles. There are certain religious objects that are beautiful enough to display somewhere. And then there are the ones that are actually made to be used. And I have one of these right here, right in front of me, from Runewood Rosary Company. And it's just in time, because today is the beatification of Blessed Fulton Sheen. I have, they sent me a Fulton Sheen Rosary. And this is magnificent. I like, this is beautiful. I mean, you could certainly display this and I know people do that. But your rosary, it's your weapon. Okay, this is it. This is the weapon. This is, so these are meant to be used. You want the wood to get a little worn down. You want the metal to get a little bit tarnished. This is, and you need, I love the rosary. I try to pray it every day. And you should have rosaries all over the place. You should have a rosary in your car, have a rosary in your office, rosary by your bed. And this is a truly beautiful heirloom quality rosary. This is, you can see this lovely, more eastern crucifix here, but they have lots of great stuff. And to celebrate the beatification of Fulton Sheen, you can go find the Blessed Fulton Sheen rosary that I'm holding, as well as the rest of their collection at roonwoodrosary.com, promo code nullskinnitabivalius 10% off your order that is roonwoodrosary.com promo code nulls. President Trump was at the United Nations and he addressed the Iran war, which we'd all hope would wrap up in a month or two. It's going on a little bit longer than that. We are hoping for an end to the crisis. And here's what he foresees. But I have a big decision to make. Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before? Maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world? Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic? And do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again. Do I drive them into hell with no chance of survival in no home? Image of the Iranian representation. But I believe we'll make a deal right after the election because it doesn't make sense for them not to. They're waiting to see how I do in the midterm election. What they don't realize is that I'm not running. I did that already. And one in a landslide, we wanted a giant landslide. And I'll be here for two and a half years. The Republican party is running and I'll be helping them. But I am not running. I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence to the election when it comes to Iran. Okay, so we're getting a lot of what we would expect from President Trump here, which is, and he's being totally brutally honest. He's saying, yeah, we're not getting a deal on the Iran War before the midterms, of course not. I called this some month ago, two months ago. The Iranians know when the elections are too, just as well as we do. So the pain is going to get a lot worse. And there's no quick resolution to this. The Mullahs are a durable regime. They're an awful regime. They've gone after Americans. They've killed Americans from their earliest days. Don't forget, we're not even just talking about the global war on terror. We're talking about the Iran hostage crisis right when the Islamic regime took over. We're talking about the Beirut barracks bombings in the 1980s where the Iranian regime has gone after us for a very, very long time. They've chanted death to America for a very, very long time. They're very durable. They've lasted twice as long as the CIA supported regime after the outsting of Mosadek in 1953. So that would have been my argument against it. Some people are making arguments against the Iran War that we have no right to do it. And the Iranians don't actually want a nuclear weapon. And they actually don't mean us any harm. And it's only about Israel and maybe a little bit about Saudi Arabia. And it's not about the U.S. No, I don't really buy that. Don't buy that at all. My argument against the Iran War would just be practically speaking their durable regime. And if you're not going to go all the way in for regime change, it's going to create some problems for you. And I think that's where we are. So there's not going to be any quick resolution because the United States, okay, they've done a good job of managing the fallout from Iran. Iran hasn't really been able to do that much to us. They've manipulated global energy markets pretty massively. Even there, though, the United States was able to get some oil through. They've mostly been able to keep oil below $100 barrel, really below $75 barrel for a lot of the worse. Okay, we're in this kind of stalemate. We're in this moment of just waiting to see who's going to cry on call. But the United States can't back away and surrender the straight-of-war moves to Iran. That'd be a geopolitical, a blunder, a massive geopolitical blunder. So Trump says, okay, we'll deal with this after the election. That's when we'll get a deal. And either what we will do is we'll make a deal, which is in Iran's interest. That's what I want. Or I'll annihilate them. And you say, okay, well, Trump blusters sometimes. This is more empty talk from Trump. But he backs it up a little bit here, which is he says, they're going to see how I do in the elections. And they're going to hope that the Republicans get clobbered in the House and maybe get clobbered in the Senate. And then I'm in a lot of big political trouble. And then they don't have to deal with me. And they can hold out and wait for a Democrat president who's going to give them everything they want. But then Trump says, what they're failing to appreciate is that I am not running. And so this is bad news for some of the GOP candidates, perhaps this is bad news for the other people in what would otherwise be down ballot races. But it strengthens Trump's negotiating position. Because what he's basically saying is, I'm the honey badger. I don't care. Hey, Iran, you want to burn down the Republican party? Find by me. I don't really look. I'll help the Republicans. I can't paint with them. I don't really care. Hey, hey, you guys remember I took over the Republican party, right? I'm not some lifelong loyal, you know, bow tie, tweed wearing Republican. I don't care. I'm Trump. I'm the movement. I'm the party. I do what I want. So okay, you want to, you want to take out my majority in the house? You want to take out my majority in the Senate? Guess what? I'm still here. And now I'm a man with nothing to lose. Now I'm more dangerous actually than I was before the midterm elections. I got nothing to lose, man. Oh, you think this is going to hurt Republicans chances in 2028? I don't care. I'm not running in 2028. Oh, you think that I've just got some great loyalty to the party? I don't have any loyalty to the Republican party. So that's fine. You want to wait to see what happens after the election? Guess what? You have more to fear after the election because after the election, maybe I'll just throw 100,000 troops into Iran. What are you going to do? I'm the president. I have unilateral power to do that under the war powers resolution. And I'll do it quickly. I'm time limited three to six months, whatever. I'll do it in three to six. Guess what? If I send 100,000 ground troops to Iran, that'll get it done a lot faster than what we're doing here with just bombings and aircraft carriers in the straight. You want to do that? You want to play games? That's what he's saying. He's just he's kind of talking like a New Yorker. He's talking like a New York business. I mean, he said, you want to play games? You want to, you want to deal with me when I'm weaker? Guess what? When I'm weaker, I'm more dangerous. Whether it works or not, we'll see. I do love that he's, he turns up the rhetoric here. And he's looking right at that Iranian representative. The cameras just go right over to the Iranian representative. He goes, look, either I'll make a deal or I'll annihilate you and send you all back to hell. So what do you want? And you can say, he doesn't mean that he's bluffing. He's going to chicken out at the last minute. Maybe, maybe. But again, this was, this was what Russia had to face in the first Trump administration. When Trump said, hey, you know what? If you mess with me, if you invade Ukraine, I'm going to bomb Moscow. I'm going to bomb the Kremlin. And Russia hears that. They say, no, he's not. No, he's not. He's most likely not going to. But is there a five percent chance? Is there a 10 percent? Is there even five, even a four percent chance Trump's going to do that? Because if so, I can't take that risk. That's the question. That's what he's establishing. Probably the best move that Trump can make right now is to talk like this. It doesn't help the Republicans running in the other races. But but as far as Trump's negotiating position with Iran, he basically has to say, I don't care about them. And in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really matter. Okay. Speaking of the end times, speaking of the coming of World War Three, James Telleriko, a man who right now is the odds on favorite to become the next senator from Texas. I'm not predicting it's going to happen yet, but I'm getting a lot more worried than I was two months ago. James, there's always in Texas. There's always this claim. Oh, they're going to turn Texas blue. It's going to be Beto O'Rourke. You remember that guy? Beto O'Rourke. It's going to be Colin Allred. It's, and then it never is. Telleriko is the new Beto. But the conditions are more favorable to the Democrats right now. So who is Telleriko? We're told he's a straight, maybe white Christian man. Daily Wire. I got to give a big hat tip here to Daily Wire's Jacob Wheeler has gone into James Telleriko's church, interviewed one of James Telleriko's pastors. It's this past arrests. This lady named Babs Miller, who is reportedly an open lesbian. And we want to know if James Telleriko is going to be the next senator from Texas, if he's even just the Democrat nominee, we want to know about him. We want to know about what he thinks, especially. He makes Christianity such an important part of his identity. Well, what kind of spiritual formation does he have? Here is the past arrests, one of the past arrests of this church. A lot of quotes, a lot of air quotes in this entire description, describing what the church believes. Do we really believe that a virgin gave birth to a baby? Yeah. Okay. I just don't want to offend my own common sense. Yeah. No, don't. Yeah. Absolutely don't. Part of what we encourage here is for people to think for themselves. Yeah. And take what makes sense. It's kind of like what they say, a 12-step program. Take what you want and leave the rest. And I know that that would greatly offend your relatives who want to hang on to these archaic rules. Mary and the virgin birth comes out of the pagan belief that the gods came down and impregnated people. That people were still hanging on to during that time. We have no way of knowing if Jesus really existed. Yeah. Any more than we have an of knowing that the original Buddha ever existed. Yeah. And whether or not Jesus existed doesn't really matter to me. The fact remains that that message that was delivered by someone named Jesus supposedly. And it could have all been made up for all I know. And the God in the Old Testament is not a loving God. Some vengeful killing people. Got a God. Yeah. This is this is a lot of mythology. Jesus was political. Yeah. Jesus was put on that cross not to save us. Yeah. Jesus was put on that cross because Rome hated him. And they thought he was a threat to their domination of that area. Yeah. And so they killed him. Yeah. So he was kind of save our sins. So he died more as a kind of a social justice warrior in some sign. Yes. So that makes a whole lot more sense to me. Yeah. And to say that some God would kill his son for us. That doesn't make sense. How does that make up for all the things I can do? No, it doesn't. Yeah. It's a foolishness to the Greeks. It's a stumbling block to the lady lesbian pastoruses of Texas. What is surprising about the pastoruses' heresy? It's not just that she spouts heresy. I would expect James Talleriko's pastor to spout heresy. What is impressive about this pastorus is that she seems to be spouting all of the heresies at once. She goes through all of them. She denies the virgin birth. That is the ancient heresy of ibeonatism and maybe kind of adoptionism, adoptionism, you know, which is another ancient heresy, but it crops up in modernity this idea that Jesus isn't, he's not born God. He just sort of becomes, he's like adopted as God in some sense. It includes dosatism, the idea that Jesus did not really have a physical body. And therefore, it's a kind of denial of the death of our sin. That one's a little weird. It's like a little bit of dosatism, a little bit of arianism, the denial of the divinity of Christ. The fact that she says, no, he didn't die for a sense. He was a political figure. He died running a political campaign that the Romans hated. This is Christ who, of course, is, my kingdom is not of this world, who, when the Pharisees are trying to tempt him, when test him, they say, well, should we pay her taxes? He says, give to Caesar everything that Caesar's, and give to God what is God's, as explicitly not a political activist, as one can possibly be. Then she throws in Marcianism, the idea that the God of the old testament is evil, and the God of the New Testament is good. Marcianism, which is an ancient heresy, see it crop up in modernity too, especially among anti-Semites. This is, it's astounding. It's very, the idea that Jesus didn't exist. We have greater evidence for the existence of Christ than we have for the existence of Socrates, for the existence of Hannibal, for the existence of Alexander, the great. She says, no, we don't know if he exists. It doesn't matter. It's all, no, no, and take what you want, leave the rest. So, this is very offensive. However, I think what the Republicans are going to try to do here is the same thing that we did to Obama when some impolitic clips of his pastor Jeremiah right came out. He's saying all sorts of terrible things about America. It's more political what Jeremiah right was saying. And the Republicans bullied Obama into disavowing Jeremiah right because they knew that if people found out Barack Obama's true religious and even political views that would scare off a lot of people, that's not going to work here. And the reason it's not going to work here is because Barack Obama at least pretended to disagree with his pastor. When his pastor was saying awful things about America, Obama could pretend to disagree even though Obama was campaigning on fundamentally transforming America. He was much more careful in his rhetoric. With James Tallarico, though, Tallarico doesn't even pretend to disagree with this lady. None of Tallarico's followers think that he disagrees with this lady. In fact, if Tallarico came out and disavowed this rank heresy, this vile anti-Christian rhetoric, that he would lose supporters. James Tallarico, he wouldn't gain. He loses base. That's what we're up against. So you look at the very practical, tangible policy level. You see the Democrats running on formally abolishing American sovereignty. You say, you know what, I don't care how bad the Republicans are. I'm going to vote for them. And then you see at the even deeper level, because all politics ultimately comes down to religion, all human conflict, cardinal manning tells us, comes down to religion. You see that these people are being formed by like all the heresies. All of them. Was it Pies the Ninth? Pies the Ninth to Pies the Tenth? Who said that modernism is a special kind of heresy, because it's actually the culmination of all of the heresies. That's what you're getting. That's what you're getting here. Okay. Speaking of rewriting history, Stanford University is using AI to swap out the races and sexes of its own students. We'll get to that momentarily. First, I want to tell you about policy genius. Go to policygenius.com/noles. www.les. September is life insurance awareness month. We now have an awareness month for nearly everything. Apparently means ordinary adult responsibilities require their own PR campaigns. Well, you shouldn't need the awareness month. This is your message. This is your month. People can tell you exactly what a stranger posted online yesterday, yet many have never checked whether their own families would be financially protected if something happened to them. So before the season gets busier, take care of the important task that you've been meaning to handle. Find out what life insurance coverage makes sense for your family. Policy genius makes that straightforward. It's a free online marketplace where you can compare quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side. Their license team clearly explains coverage amounts, prices and terms. They answer your questions, handle the paperwork, and advocate for you throughout the process, so you can get covered and get on with your life. With policy genius, you can find 20-year life insurance policies starting at just $276 a year for $1 million in coverage. Kind of WLS. To compare life insurance quotes from top companies, see how much you can save. That is policygenius.com/noles. My favorite contract yesterday is from JWP who says I'm 100% convinced that Michael's contract requires him to refer to Aristotle at least nine times per week. It's true. It's people make fun of me for that. They say, "Oh, Michael, you're always going back to Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas and maybe a little bit of Plato and maybe a little bit of Cicero and maybe a lot of Dante." You go, "You're always going back to the same half-dozen-dozen people." I say, "You're right." Do you know whose example I'm following in that case? You guessed it, Thomas Aquinas. Because we have this prejudice in modernity, where we think that in order to be really smart and really sophisticated and really fancy, you need to quote like a billion people. You need to just take in all of the information that knowledge is best understood as a quantitative good. The greater the variety of knowledge that goes into your head, the smarter and more sophisticated you will be, I don't think so. Maybe I'm just a little thick. Maybe I'm a little bit slow. I'm a little more old school about this. When Thomas Aquinas is ready? He brings in a lot of different thinkers. He'll bring in platyna or absena or whoever. But you know who he's mostly bringing in other than scripture is Aristotle. He, in fact, he calls Aristotle the philosopher. What do I need other philosophers for? I got Aristotle, he gets the job done. The apostle is Paul, maybe you get a lot with Paul. You know, you don't need to, so I think actually learning and education and knowledge is a little more about quality than it is about quantity. Did Aristotle say that? I don't know, he might, maybe, I don't know. I gotta go back and read it. Speaking of education, Stanford University has just been caught in the weirdest scandal that I've seen out of the schools in a while and there are a lot of scandals out of the schools. They had this picture. The Stanford Review just published this, the conservative Stanford paper. The Stanford publishes a picture from their dining hall and the picture features three students. But it doesn't feature the actual students. It features a race swapped, gender swapped, mullage of students. So here's the original picture. The original picture as the student who got race and sex swapped, observes. It's got this nice looking, you know, a little Asian gal, then a kind of red-haired white guy and then a vaguely Hispanic-looking guy. You know, I would say distinctly Hispanic-looking guy wearing a gap sweater. But that's not the picture that Stanford published. Here's the picture Stanford published. We have, just for my own identification. Go back to the first one. Okay, now go to the second one. This is amazing. You almost don't catch this at first. So the first thing you notice is in the picture that Stanford actually published, the Mexican guy who, he's come out, he's talking about this, his name's Billy Ramirez. The Mexican guy became a black chick and his gap sweatshirt was, the hoodie was just transformed to a Stanford hoodie and she's holding a plate of what appears to be low-main. But that guy is not the only one who got changed. The Mexican dude transged into a black chick. It's not the only one to be changed. The Asian girl and the white guy were both transformed as well. The AI just made them look a little thinner. I think they looked perfectly nice before the AI, but Stanford apparently did not. Stanford thought they were fat or something. So Stanford goes in with the AI and says, you know what, not only is our student body not diverse enough, but not even the student body who really say the dining cohorts, the people who choose to be friends and have lunch together. Not only is it not diverse enough in the racial and sexual ways we want, but they're not looks-maxing. They're not, I don't know, was clavicular behind this publication from Stanford. So they kind of pull up the, the young Asian girls' jaw bones a little bit, kind of thin out her cheeks, same thing with the white guy. It's hard to tell if they looks maxed the Mexican guy because they just completely changed him. This is hilarious. And you know what it comes to? It comes to that old George Bernard Shaw line from the Democrats love saying. Some people see things that are and say, why I dream things that never were and say, why not? That's the essential difference with the lives. And it gets down to a real problem with the heart of the university. I'm writing a book about this now actually. It's why I have more bags under my eyes than usual. I'm in the throes of writing this book. Based on a commencement speech that I gave last year, which is, what is the one piece of advice that all the universities give you when you graduate? What is the theme of basically every college commencement address? Go out and change the world. That's what you need to go out and go change the world. Which is, in my opinion, the stupidest advice you can possibly give to a student. But it's very much in keeping with the history of the American left and with higher education, but I repeat myself. It's the George Bernard Shaw line. Some people see things that are and say, why? Are these dream things that never were and say, why not? Same thing as John F. Kennedy used that to the Irish parliament. But it goes back to Marx. Karl Marx and the Theses on firebuck. His conclusion in the Theses on firebuck is that the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways, but the point is to change it. But I don't think that's how you learn. Stanford looks at this and they say, hey, the black kids are sitting by themselves. And they're not, at least in this friend group, there's not enough black, we gotta put a black kid in there. And we need a chick and we need a guy. And we need, and you know what, they don't look good enough. It's not attractive enough. So what? Instead of asking why are things the way that they are? Even if you want to improve something, you have to know why things are the way that they are. Well, in that case, rather than think about that, they decide, I don't know, we're just gonna change it all. Absolutely ironic, 'cause the point of the university is to understand the world, is to come to know the truth. Okay, before we go, there's so much more I wanna talk about today. There's so much more, but before we go, I do wanna talk about Hitler. There's apparently a new story out that Hitler might have killed someone. Did you, well, no, I guess I should say, Hitler might have killed another person. Hitler is now suspected, according to some historians, in the death of his niece, Geli Rauball. Geli Rauball, who, I don't know if you're familiar with this story, if you've ever read about Hitler, this is one of the weird episodes. He had this niece, Geli. And he lived with her and he was very possessive of her. And when she started dating one of his staffers, he forced her to break up with him. And I think Eva Braun later on said she felt she was living in this niece's shadow. It's unclear if Hitler had like a super weird, super duper weird relationship with his niece, but he at least had a pretty weird relationship with this niece. Anyway, she wanted to go off and get married. And Hitler said no, and they had a big fight about this. Hitler goes to Nuremberg and she kills herself. And then he has to come back and he falls into depression. Well, there's a new story out there that says, no, actually that was all an alibi. There's some document that shows that Hitler was actually in town, perhaps at the apartment, the day that the niece killed herself, and maybe he killed her. And you know, it's like you just, right when you think you know a guy, he goes and does something that totally transforms your opinion of, okay, I actually don't buy this story. I don't think it's true. I think other historians of Hitler also don't really buy this. It's probably more like a clerical error on the death certificate or on the idea that Hitler actually murdered her. The, I mean, I guess it wouldn't surprise me if he did, but in this case, I don't really believe it. And I guess my political takeaway here is, if we're gonna draw any political lesson from this case of Hitler's fascination with his niece, we don't need to embellish. We don't need to embellish. We don't need to overstate our case. Sometimes we overstate our case. We all do that in politics. And I'll tie it all the way back to the midterm elections. You know, every election, every single election here, this is the most important election in our lifetime. Every little race for dog catcher in Polucaville. This is the most important election in our lifetime. And it's not, I don't think this midterm is the most important election in our lifetime. It certainly involves the most radical candidates we've ever had. It's a very consequential election. It could set the stage for the most important election in our lifetime. But we don't have to embellish. I think we can be very blunt. If the Democrats win here, they are going to do everything they can to destroy the Trump administration, to destroy Republican's chances of winning in 2028. That I think is gonna be their real goal. And I think they're gonna do it pretty effectively if they win. They are then, if they really take power, they are going to abolish the Department of Homeland Security. They're gonna trans all the kids. They're going to take away a lot of your property. They're gonna flood the country with millions and millions of foreigners. They're gonna give amnesty to probably tens of millions of foreigners. They're very likely gonna destroy the Supreme Court. They're going, this is just according to their promises. This is just what they're saying they're gonna do. They're gonna give statehood to Washington DC, which is going to permanently alter the balance of power in the country and the electoral college. They're going to maintain a hold on power for an inestimably long time. And they're going to use that to advantage foreigners and criminals over the American people and innocent people. And that's what they're going to do. That's what they tell us they're going to do. We don't need to embellish the stakes. They're really, really bad. Okay, I know I'm running over. I don't care. You know why? Because today is a very special day. I wanted to go to the ceremony. As you know, I'm on baby watch and I'm in the throes of a lot of work right now. So I was not able to do it. It's mostly the baby watch, though, that keeps me from traveling. It's the beatification of Fulton Sheen. Fulton Sheen, who was the first televangelist. This is a great little bit of trivia. You know, as people who is the first televangelist? And a lot of people are going to say, "Oh, he's Billy Graham." I was Jerry Falwell. I think it was Oral Roberts. It's actually not true. The first televangelist was a Catholic bishop. Archbishop Fulton Sheen. He had a massive television program. He was the man. Here's just, if you're not familiar with Fulton Sheen, here's just a little clip. False compassion. Which is gradually growing in this country. Is a pity that is showing not to the mugged, but to the mugger. Not to the family of their murdered, but to the murderer. Not to the woman who was raped, but to the rapist. This is the false compassion. How did it start? It started in literature. And the novels of William Steroion. John Steinbeck. And then the novels of Mandel, James Jones, and others. In which pity is shown to every kind of pervert and degenerate. He's going on, full machine, not pulling any punches, haranging the perverts he's going after. This is in the 1950s. This show ran for a fairly long time. He's going on. He's there. It's all these movements. The pro homosexual movement, the pro criminal movement, the pro this. He's not pulling any punches whatsoever. He's talking about this issue more broadly. He's always giving the advantage to the wrongdoers, rather than the people who have been wronged. Full machine, not only a very, very important televangelist, not only a very, very important figure in the church, not only now a beatified person, which is the step right before someone is canonized as a saint by the church, but a profit for our times. Because that lecture, he's going without any notes, going really, really hard on the social issues of the time from the wisdom of the church, that could have been given in 2026. He wouldn't have had to change a single word. He might have had to dumb it down a little bit, but he wouldn't have had to change a single word on the actual points that he's making. The only reason you couldn't err at maybe in 2026 is because we didn't heed his warning. Okay. So I'm here. I've got my rune with Rosary, full machine Rosary that just came right in time for the beatification. And fittingly, it's theology Thursday. I will be joined by my friend Jeremiah Johnston to discuss another religious biblical issue. Daily Mail says, we have now officially found new, brand new scientific evidence. We've found the location of Noah's Ark. Show continues now. You don't want to miss it. Let's go know this candidate really as a check out for two months free on all annual plans. I have no idea what the protest is about. Bingo. Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as place Saunders even be allowed on campus? I'm here, okay, Saunders is a close personal friend of Chancellor Freeman, this is a decision I cannot find. Islam will conquer the West. Some more than you can. Are we paying attention? They've taken over the building, they're downstairs and they've blocked the doors. I seek forgiveness from Allah, the Almighty. We cannot run and hide. Muhammad is the messenger of God. There is no God but Allah. What do you say? We turn those vessel beings into a fine red mist. You need a course in safe weapons handling.