Ep. 2059 - Libs FREAKOUT: The Lindsay Clancy Lone Juror Was A BLACK GUY

This episode is brought to you by Cardiff America's favorite small business lender with over 12 billion funds since 2004 applying under three minutes for same day funding up to 500,000 at Cardiff.co/noles. Ilhan Omar is reportedly under investigation and could be denaturalized and deported in what might be the greatest election year October surprise of all time. Then schools around the country worn against Islamophobia on the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and liberals nearly faint as the loan holdout juror in the Lindsey Clancy case turns out to be a black guy. I'm Michael Nolesus, the Michael Noles show. Welcome back to the show. President Trump has a proposal for the Smithsonian and it is hugely, it was literally hugely important. It's gigantic and it would be very, very good for American culture and American history. We'll get to it in a second. First, I want to tell you about pure talk. There's a lot more to say. First, they'll go to puretalk.com/nolescanadavls. Americans have been conditioned to believe that cell phone services supposed to be expensive. You walk into a store, somebody explains 17 different plans to you. Starts talking about credits and upgrades and activation fees. Eventually, you lose the will to live and you just hand them your credit card. This has been our system for decades. Puretalk has a simpler proposition. If you think you're paying too much for subpar service, you should really switch to pure talk. In a recent industry survey, PureTalk was the only wireless company to receive five stars in every category. Coverage, support, value, and data. Stop paying, stop overpaying for subpar service. Join PureTalk.com/nolescanadavls. Save 50% off your first month. Make the switch today. With unlimited high speed data for just $34.99 a month, you're going to save a fortune. I've had my PureTalk service for six years now with my phone, with my everything. It's just absolutely phenomenal. You can take it from me or from over 120,000 wireless customers. This PureTalk.com/nolescanadavls. Puretalk.com/noles. Welcome to PureTalk. Absolute cinema comes to us by way of CBS Mornings. One of the jurors, you know, these ladies, they are blabbing all over the place about the Lindsey Clancy trial anywhere that anyone will listen to them. They're going on TV and demonstrating the many flaws in their logic in the Lindsey Clancy case, infamous kind of stuff. I mean, the sort of thing that will go down in infamy to show the collapse of American judgment at least among liberal women in any case. One of the jurors is on CBS Mornings and she reveals a key fact about the identity of that lone gigachad, a holdout juror who said we are not going to let Lindsey Clancy off the hook from murdering her kids. One person of color and then everybody else was white. A lot of the jurors had children. One person of color was a person of color, a woman or a man. A man. A man. Is a holdout juror a person, a black man? Yes. A black man is a holdout juror? Yes. Well, I have to sit with that for just a second. After, like, it's like a looney tunes reaction, like Wiley Coyote, you know, the jaw drops, tongue unfurls. Hold on, and you could tell she had this trepidation, this deep dredge. She said, hold on. You said one of the jurors was a black guy. Yes, but it couldn't. You're not saying, no, but we've just been for a week, two weeks. We, please don't tell me it was the holdout juror. It was. Oh, I need to sit with that. That was the punchline to the setup that came on the Oprah Winfrey show when they were discussing the Lindsey Clancy case and a black woman reacted to the case, not by saying that all women should stop murdering their kids. She said, you know, I just want to make sure that black women have the same right to murder their kids that a white woman like Lindsey Clancy has. And the other thing that I would just be remiss to not say is, I hope this never happens again. We know statistically it really will. It will. I want us to have the same passion for people who don't look like Lindsey who don't have her same access. Who don't have her same access and education, her melanin, her privilege. There are women of color sitting around this country in prisons for the same thing that we've never heard of. And I just want to remind us to have the pink shirts and the energy for them as well. Yeah. That's right. Preach sister. Preach. It is the white supremacy of this country that is treating Lindsey Clancy with kid gloves. Well, the poor oppressed black women are not encouraged to murder their kids. It's as if this woman, this black woman on Oprah, she calls up the she says, I'd like to report a serious threat. White supremacy. White supremacy is stopping black women from murdering their kids. It's the it's a horrible racist and the operator interrupt says, ma, ma, the call is coming from inside the house. This is ma, the only black guy on the jury is the only person who was going to hold Lindsey Clancy accountable for this presidential medal of freedom, please. Hello. Hi, White House. Can I place an order for one presidential medal of freedom for this guy? This one guy with a reason and accountability. That would be the one black guy in the jury. So it totally throws the liberal narrative for a loop. It it reminds me there was this one time some liberal black lady was calling into the David Webb radio show, the conservative radio host David Webb. And he started beating her on the arguments. And so she says, well, you're only talking out of your white privilege because she didn't know she was a radio show. She couldn't see him. She didn't realize that David Webb is very much a black guy. So this is their their immediate reaction. That's their immediate boogie man. And this is this is why on CBS morning is the host has to stop herself and say, Oh, wait a second. The one black guy is the only person to to insist that she's guilty. Yikes. I have to sit with that for a second. The reason she has to sit with that is because it forces her to reconsider all of her priors. So that is why I mean, probably he won't get the presidential medal of freedom. But one reason he should is not just holding this woman's feet to the fire for her horrible crime. Another reason he should is he has forced all of the liberals of America to reconsider all of their racial priors. Really, really good stuff. Last point in the Lindsey Clancy jury because they just keep talking. They just keep revealing how wrongheaded their thinking was. I mean, they're making all of us reconsider the legitimacy of trial by jury. The woman goes on and she says what Lindsey Clancy did was altruistic genocide. Was there any specific evidence that swayed you or and I'm very curious about the evidence that he was opposed to? Let's talk about the evidence for you first. I think Dr. Raznick, his testimony about altruistic filicide was really impactful because all throughout the trial we had all the witnesses. There had been nothing but good said about Lindsey and how amazing of a mother she was and how much she loved her children. We saw that in every picture that was taken of the house on the night that this happened. Everywhere you look, there was just love. There was a big sign that said it's a wonderful life. There wasn't anything that said she wasn't that and then to hear somebody talking about a real reason why all of a sudden this could happen. That was really impactful. Altruistic filicide. George Orwell spins in his grave at the extent of the absurd manipulation language. Altruistic filicide. She just clearly, the jurors just began from the premise that Lindsey Clancy had to be innocent. So they have to twist themselves into ulcers of knots to arrive at that conclusion from their false premise. So they have to concoct ideas such as altruistic filicide, which again, I guess you could, if one were in a state of complete psychosis, one could maybe kind of come to the conclusion that you were helping the kids by killing them if it were some like religious cult or something. There was actually a father who said he killed their kids because he felt that God was telling them to. But in the Lindsey Clancy case, there's absolutely no evidence of that. It was all methodically planned out. She was not diagnosed with postpartum depression and she was not on all the drugs people said she was on and it's weak stuff. Really, really weak stuff from the jury and one loan hold out. Absolutely. Love him. Great job. The way you know, she, the way you just know she was wrong from the outset. She says, you know, it was really impactful, the testimony. Anytime you hear someone say the word impactful, you can basically disregard everything else they've said. Not to be too pedantic or sneering or preening about it. But that one drives me nuts of all the corporate jargon, synergy, all the rest of it. Impactful drives me the craziest because it's very silly. Something is not full of impact. I remember Obama used impactful, but it's just a, it's a bad word because it's a weak metaphor. It's just a, it's a filler that people use when they're not thinking clearly. They could use more precise words like significant or powerful, but impactful. You can think it'd be full of power. I think it can't be full of impact. But regardless, it's just, it's one of these signs that people are just, like George Orwell said in politics in the English language, they're just, they're not going through the work of thinking for themselves, so they just open up their minds and allow these ready-made phrases, these dead metaphors to fill in. And it's why there was one person with clear thought on that jury. And it was the black guy. Okay, speaking of black people, Ilhan Omar is under investigation. She might be denaturalized and deported. First though, wait, what's, what's with the day? What was that thing about? I didn't say it was speechless. That was a different one. Was that like a Muslim thing? Is this, is this to promote run-hyde fight? This is what they're doing. They're trying to do a new ding dong campaign to promote run-hyde fight. But I thought it was like, whenever I said run-hyde fight, you do the ding dong. Instead, it's what? Whenever I mention a Muslim, whenever I mention a Muslim in America, we're going to do the ding dong ding for the run-hyde fight. You're going to end up with dings every three syllables. That's some great producing right there. Wow, great production for Mr. Davies. Okay, before we get to the deportation of Ilhan Omar, I want to tell you about Ave Maria Funz. First, I'll go to Ave Maria Funz.com/Michael, MICH AEL. People are very good at boycotting things. You know, this company supports something that I oppose, so I'm not going to buy their product. Okay, fair enough. Here's a little trickier question. Do you own their stock? If your values matter when you're spending money as a consumer, they probably automatically when you're spending your money as an investor too, right? That is one of many reasons I'm proud to serve on the board of Ave Maria Mitchell Funz. Ave Maria screens out companies involved with abortion, pornography, embryonic stem cell research, and companies supporting Planned Parenthood. Ave Maria has been doing this since 2001, today manages nearly $4 billion from where the 100,000 shareholders, whether you're planning for retirement, saving for your children's future, or simply looking for investment options that align with your beliefs. Ave Maria Mitchell Funz offers a range of choices designed to help you invest without compromising your principles. Learn more at Ave Maria Funz.com/Michael, MICH AEL, that's Ave Maria Funz.com/Michael, MICH AEL. All mutual funds are subject to market risk, including possible loss of principle, request a prospectus, which includes investment objectives, risks, fees, charges and expenses, and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. The prospectus can be obtained by calling 1-866-283-6274 or can be viewed at Ave Maria Funz.com, Ave Maria Mitchell Funz are distributed by Ultima's Fund Distributors. LLC, folks, very excited. You might be one, you're looking at me, you're saying, "Michael, why do you look so good today?" Well, it's not, it's not because I slept well. It's certainly not because I've been working out. It is because of this Mayflower Smoking Jacket. They are back pre-orders are now open. We do these every so often. We don't do them a ton. They sell out very, very quickly. If you want one, please order it right now. This year, we have a new color. This might be the most beautiful one we've done yet. We're working in tandem with the exceptional tailors over at Shepherd's Menwear. We're sourcing the velvet from Como, Italy, where the very, very finest label producers of Smoking Jackets get their velvet. It has real horn here for the buttons. It's just absolutely magnificent. It's cut to your individual measurements. Nothing is pulled off the shelf. The price for this jacket is the best price you will ever see for any Smoking Jacket. It probably beats off the rack high end Smoking Jackets by over 50% and in terms of bespoke, you'll never see anything like it. So again, not everybody needs a bespoke Smoking Jacket, but if you want one, this is the one you'll have your initials stitched inside of it. It's just their phenomenal. And I know everybody complains when they sell out pre-orders and now open through October 15th for delivery by Christmas. These are heirloom garments. They're well worth the weight if you want one under your own tree or under someone else's this year. You must be 21 years older to order conditions and exclusions. Apply. Ilhan Omar is under investigation. Does this mean do we hope against all hope? Do we do we allow ourselves to be so hopeful that she could be deported? Can you say though whether the federal government has evidence right now that Congresswoman Omar committed immigration or naturalization fraud because the DHS Secretary appeared to be making a declarative statement there? Well, I'm not going to comment on ongoing criminal investigation. I know things are going on, but I can't give specifics of what's happening, but now we'll see. I mean, if someone committed immigration violation, someone committed marriage fraud or anything like that, regardless if they're a congressman or not, no one's above the law. So I'll leave it at that. We'll let HSI, Homeland Security Investigations, continue the investigation. Okay, so you're confirming that there is an investigation into Congresswoman Omar. I'm confirming that ISIS. Yeah. Is there a denaturalization case that is being brought against her? Look, you know, I've been around 40 years and we've done denats cases. We have denaturalized citizens based on fraud, based on lying under applications or lying through the process, misrepresenting themselves or maybe representing organizations they belong to or beliefs they have. But denaturalization is a process. It's a very serious process. So if someone lies through that process to become a citizen and we can prove they, in fact, lie or misrepresent themselves, we can absolutely denaturalize them. We've done it before many times over the last 40 years I've been around. So it's a process. Okay, so hold on. I'm not going to allow my hopes to get too high here, but Tom Homan, who is the borders are under Trump and he's a very, very effective communicator of the immigration policies. Tom Homan is saying, yeah, Elhan Omar is under investigation. He's being very judicious, very prudential with his speech. And even when the anchor asks him, hold on, you are confirming she's under investigation. He starts to caution his language, but then he says, well, hold on. Yeah, no, that part's already public. Yeah, we're definitely investigating her. And she says, okay, well, is it possible? Let's say she's found guilty of immigration violations. Is it possible that she, a U.S. citizen and a member of Congress could be denaturalized, loser citizenship, and then be deported? And what does Tom Homan say? He doesn't miss a beat. He just says, well, I mean, that's what happens when you get denaturalized. And we've, I've seen it over my 40 year career. So we'll just, we're just going to let the investigation play out. This could be the greatest October surprise, maybe in any congressional election ever. You know, the, the October surprise is what happens right before the election. Now, probably it has to be more of a September surprise because we have early voting because the Democrats changed all the voting rules in order to cheat and rig the elections. But in any case, because we, we no longer just all vote on election day, a lot of people vote earlier, the October surprise has to come a little earlier. But the surprise is supposed to be the thing that at the last minute totally turns the momentum and the race and doesn't give the target enough time to respond. In this case, saying that the, the person who is running for office, in this case, an incumbent is going to lose citizenship and be deported, that's as good as it gets. Yeah, they always do some sex scandal or something. This is a, this is a sex scandal because one of the reasons for the investigation is that Elhan Omar, illegitimately married her brother in order to help him commit immigration fraud allegedly with a lot of evidence. And so there actually is a weird sex scandal in here. It's not the only incest sex scandal of the Democrat races this cycle because the Democrat Senate nominee up in Maine also fathered two children with his cousin. But that's neither here nor there. We're focusing on Elhan Omar. If she gets deported, that would be a great October surprise. But two, it would show that the administration is, is really going all the way. The administration has done a good job on deportations. A much better job than they're getting credit for from their opponents on the right. What's the number? The four and more percentage of population, four and more number in the population has gone down by two and a half million where they're about. So over the last year and a half. So that's actually pretty impressive. It's the first time that you're seeing a decline of the, of those foreigners in the country since what the 1930s or something like that. So it's very, very impressive. Nevertheless, though, people are saying, hold on, there could be 20 million. Some people say there are more illegal aliens in the country and the four and more percentage of population is even higher than that. So people saying, no, you have to increase the mass deportations and a lot of people are going to get off the hook. So if the previous debate was, do we only deport the face tattooed criminals or do we also deport Abuela and the gardeners and the other people who are otherwise peaceable despite having broken the law? That was the previous kind of debate. Now we might be getting to the debate of, do we only deport Abuela or do we also deport members of Congress? That's really impressive. I'm not totally holding my breath. It'll be very hard and there's no way that it'll happen before the election itself. But depending on what stage of the investigation we're at, there is a chance that we could get new information about a potential denaturalization case on Ilhan Omar. If I were Ilhan Omar, I'd be pretty worried because she pretty obviously committed. immigration fraud. Okay. Now turning from Ilhan Omar, but we're going to stick with people who still giggle about al-Qaeda. We turn to the Fairfax County Public Schools. Fairfax County Public Schools have been revealed to have this this lesson plan for the 25th anniversary and commemoration of 9/11. And one of the most important points of this lesson plan in Fairfax County, Virginia, right near the nation's capital is that we stop Islamophobia. I kid you not. They go, "Do spend time familiarizing yourself with the complexity of 9/11." Actually, it wasn't that complex. Muslims who had already attacked the World Trade Center before and who have been waging war on our civilization for 1400 years, they attacked the same place they already attacked and killed thousands of people. Prioritized students safety and wellness. What? Okay. Judging by immigration policies of the last 25 years, I don't think we've done that. Design instruction renders students needs and experiences. They need to know the truth. So, okay, I don't know if you're doing that. Design for accurate, inclusive representation, inclusive representation. We included so many people that we got the 9/11 attacks, emphasize humanity, hope, and unity. Okay. What are the don'ts? Don't create an emotionally stressful learning environment for any student. That's kind of hard when you're learning about mass terror attacks. Assume students' feelings and experiences based on their identity. Don't assume their feelings. Okay. Yeah, that's fair. Don't assume that Muslims support 9/11. Ignore statements rooted in bias, hate, and racism. What does that even mean? And then here's the key one. Don't associate the 9/11 attacks with Islam or Muslims. In other words, don't teach about 9/11. On the 25th anniversary of 9/11, the worst terrorist attack in American history, don't teach about 9/11. The Fairfax County public schools don't think that 9/11 had anything to do with Islam. It'd be like saying, hey, teach about the Vatican, but don't teach that the Vatican has anything to do with Catholicism. Teach about the state of Israel, but don't teach that the state of Israel has anything to do with Judaism. Don't the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated in the name of Islam and then were celebrated in Muslim countries. Whatever other thoughts, concerns, questions you have about 9/11, there is no question that Islamic terror groups took credit for the attacks and then Muslims around the world celebrated. There were Muslims who didn't celebrate it. There were Muslims who condemned it. But there were videos of Muslims around the world celebrating it and it was done in the name of Islam. And I can't just blame the Fairfax County public schools because you know what? Then President George W. Bush did the exact same thing at the time and 25 years later, he just proved he hasn't learned a thing about it. We'll get to that in a second. First, I want to tell you about Yaff. There's a lot more to say first. They'll go to yaff.org/national-journalism-center. If you are a young conservative who spends all day frustrated with the media, here is my challenge for you. Stop yelling at the journalists and become one. Because we can complain about biased coverage all day long, but ultimately, someone has to be willing to get into the newsroom, ask the uncomfortable questions, investigate what others want, and actually report the truth. That is exactly what the National Journalism Center, the NJC, has been preparing young journalists to do since 1977. NJC is a 12-week paid full-time internship that places you inside some of the most dynamic political newsrooms in Washington, D.C., including right here at the Daily Wire. You will spend Monday through Thursday actually working in a newsroom and producing published work on Fridays. You will learn directly from prominent names in conservative journalism, plus receive one-on-one investigative training from reporters who know how to uncover fraud and hold government officials accountable. Because moving to D.C. is expensive, especially when you're young, NJC provides free housing right on Capitol Hill. This is really crucial. Yaff has been leading the way for young conservatives for many, many decades now in the National Journalism Center. It's one of the most important things they do. If you are ready to stop watching from the sidelines again to the game, then stand up and report the truth, apply to NJC today at Yaff that are a slash national hyphen, journalism hyphen center. One of the really unfortunate parts of the commemoration of the 25th anniversary of 9/11 was President Bush, who, you know, he is pilloried universally today by the Democrats and by the Republicans. The Republicans are probably harsher on him today than the Democrats are. And I think George W. Bush had a very tough job. He was President of very tough time. He made some big mistakes. There's no question about it. But he did a lot of good things too. And I think he did his best. And I'm actually a little softer on George W. Bush than a lot of my fellow Republicans are. But there is one error that he made, that he is doubling, tripling 25 timing down on on this anniversary. And this is the notion that Islam has nothing to do with 9/11 and that Islam, in fact, is a religion of peace. I want you to talk about a couple of those events. You talked about going to the Islamic Center and trying to make sure that our Muslim American citizens knew that we didn't blame them for what had happened. I also made it clear that Islam was a religion of peace, not a religion of war, and that these people subverted their religion. So he's doubling down on this, which he said 25 years ago. He says, you know, it's not just that we don't blame American Muslims for 9/11, which, you know, that may, that may have been a good thing to do. Sir, you certainly wouldn't blame all Muslims, but some of them were celebrating, but some of them were not. Some of them were condemning it. So, okay, that might be a good thing to do. Kind of, these are rights here pitching this in the right way. George W. Bush comes out. He says, well, you know, the other thing I said was that Islam is a religion of peace that these terrorists had subverted their religion. And I stand by that statement. That is not true. That is not true today. It was not true 25 years ago. It has never been true in the whole history of Islam. And I get why he said it. He get, he said it because he didn't want to go to war with like billions of Muslims. That's why that's why he said it. He didn't want to alienate our allies among the Muslim countries, among the Gulf states. He did, I get it. I understand the geopolitics of trying to downplay the intrinsic violence of Islam. But there are other ways to do it. You could say, Islam doesn't always have to be violent. There are, there are many peaceful passages in the Quran. You could say that, but to say that Islam is a religion of peace. And these people that had subverted their religion is just preposterous. If, if Islam were a religion of peace, Islam would be confined at most to the Arabian Peninsula. How do you think Islam spread? Islam spread from the very beginning through the sword. And then Islam spread throughout the Levant and North Africa by the sword. And then Islam spread up through Iberia across the straight of Gibraltar, up through Iberia, all through Greek islands, Sicily, up to about 150 miles outside of Paris through the sword. And it would have kept going north, if not for Charlemagne's grandpa Charles Martel turning them back at the Battle of Torres. That's the way Islam has always spread. It is a carnal religion. Whatever other good things you want to say about Islam, it is a carnal religion. It offers people carnal delights. I forget, was it Chester 10 who made that observation? I think it might have been Chester 10. Any, any fun quote you can basically just attribute to GK Chester 10. But notice Christianity is actually a religion of peace. Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire, not by killing other people, but by allowing themselves to be killed by the pagans. The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church. It's an actual peaceful religion. The instances I know in our modern revisionist history, we try to claim that Christianity is a terribly violent religion. It just isn't true. The number of times that you can actually count Christian polities converting people through the threat of violence. It's like two at most. I guess you could say a little bit under Charlemagne, an Alquin of York, his theologian told him to knock it off. And you could argue the Spanish inquisition under the Spanish crown, but even there, it's a little more complicated than that. But let's even grant that. Okay, those are like two instances ever. Islam has only spread by this order. You just, so I guess this is my frustration with George Bush. He had an impossible task before him, a very difficult task before him as the President on 9/11. He was trying to manage the Muslims in America and our Muslim allies abroad and he was trying not to go to war with the whole religion and start a crusade. But he lied. And maybe he really believes it. So maybe he just got it fantastically wrong. But it's just so false. It's just so obviously false. And it plays into a liberal view of rhetoric, of speech, of thought, which is that lies can be liberating. That's what liberalism ultimately kind of comes down to is that lies can be liberating. If we just lie, if we deny reality, if we just try to change reality through our will, if we just lie enough, if we tell the man that he's really a woman, if we just lie enough, that will be liberating and good for at least some people and maybe everybody. But that isn't true. If you're a Christian, you believe that lies are sinful and wrong and the wages of sin are death. And you believe that the truth will set you free. So you can't, you're not going to fix the problem. Do you know 25 years after 9/11, the number of mosques. in the United States has doubled, it's actually more than doubled. For most people, the only time, the first time they ever heard the phrase Islamophobia was after 9/11, when the big concern was that we were going to have an undue reaction against the Muslims. This is the norm joke. The norm McDonald joke, and I have this horrible fear that a Muslim terrorist will get a dirty bomb detonated over a major city killing tens of millions of people because the blowback against peaceful Muslims would be terrible. So a reminder to all of our elected officials, yes, have nuance, yes, manage coalitions, yes, do your best in the art of the possible, in the art of inclusion, but don't lie. The lies are not going to help you. Okay, speaking of civic education, President Trump has a proposal for the Smithsonian that I absolutely love. We will get to that, and then we will get to the latest ravings of James Taloriko, who right now is slated to become the next senator from Texas. President Trump posted an essay, an absolute essay to true social on history, on the kind of history lesson that George W. Bush kind of wants to deny, I guess. But this specifically focuses on George Washington. Trump writes, "I'm calling on the Smithsonian Institution to honor the Life and Legacy of George Washington America's greatest hero with a five-year exhibition at the National Museum of American History, beginning now continuing through February 22, 2032, the 300th anniversary of Washington's birth." It's a great idea. 300th anniversary of Washington's birth. You say, hold on, the Smithsonian wasn't going to do the Smithsonian should have an entire wing of the Smithsonian just permanently dedicated to George Washington. You're telling me, we don't really have many of any exhibits on him at all, and you weren't planning something for the 300th anniversary of his birth. That's crazy. The whole point of the Smithsonian is to promote American history. To promote America, they do the opposite. Then he says, "I'm calling on the Smithsonian to erect a 30-foot colossus statue of the father of our country outside the museum to replace the so-called infinity sculpture that stands there today. That strange modernist sculpture tells visitors nothing about America, inspires no one and honors none of our great-americaners. I don't know if we have the picture. We have the picture. No, maybe we don't. The current statue outside the Smithsonian is some weird obelisk with like a doodly-do on top." I think that's the specific technical name as a doodly-do. It's this weird little squiggly thing on top of an obelisk. That's the best we can do. Trump says, "No, let's replace it with a colossus statue, like a big, giant George Washington." Right now, he says, "The sculpture doesn't honor our great-americaneros. George Washington does. He's easily America's greatest hero, fact-check true. Without him, our country and our freedoms would not exist. Yet during our nations, 250th anniversary year, the museum is failed to give George Washington and our other founding fathers the celebration they deserve. Then he goes on to talk about Washington's crossing the Delaware in 1776, the Battle of Trenton, both of which Simon Noles, actually, who does have a statue in Washington DC now, I'm very, very happy, bad and grateful for. He was on both of those voyages and those battles. You don't see a lot about it. You see, instead from the Smithsonian, the Center for Restorative History, a decolonization plane, all this stuff that's contrary to promoting America. Trump is totally right about this. I can't read the whole thing, but for the people who say that Trump is just, you know, he kind of shoots from the hip and he's all emotion and he's not that thoughtful. This is pretty thoughtful. This is a full essay on the significance of George Washington in American history and why our institutions need to promote him. This stuff can be really enduring because I like a tax cut as much as the next guy. Putting up a big statue of George Washington at the Smithsonian is actually more important than a tax cut. I know that the policy wonks and the materialists and the economists are going to whining cry over this, but it's true. A beautiful building in our nation's capital, a big statue of an American hero, is actually more important for the nation than a tax cut or than ticking GDP up a little bit. I don't mean to totally minimize economic and material prosperity. That's important too. But the soul of the nation matters. A nation is more than just GDP, a nation is more than just a marketplace. This is why when you replace all the people in the country, you get a different kind of country. That's a lot of our demographic debate right now. If you have a country where we have relative material prosperity, but we all hate ourselves, you're going to have a bad country where we don't valorize our great heroes, where we actually tear them down instead, you're going to have a bad country. You're going to have the kind of country that ends up electing socialists and you're going to end up undermining even your material prosperity. You have to focus on the spiritual, the historical, the spirit of a people, what we mean, what the political community is as such, really, really good stuff, very, very important. And I look forward to the Smithsonian getting in line. Okay. The Taloreka, one of those awful politicians that we may very soon elect. Before we get to that though, my favorite comment on Fridays from Hardwell Entertainment says Napoleon or not, Trump's speech was certainly dynamite. Do you get it? I said that Trump was our Napoleon, which people, they did not interpret that because they're good aspects to that. They're bad aspects to that. It's a kind of ambiguous observation. Trump is our Napoleon. A wild of the revolution, but he's the undoing of the revolution. He's, but he's our Napoleon. He's this world historic figure and, but I'm a sucker for a good pun. Napoleon or not, the speech was dynamite. Am I right? Okay. There's a lot more to say first though. Go to Bolumbranch.com/Michael. I might say H-A-E-L. People spend a lot of time making the rooms guests see, look nice, the living room, the kitchen, the dining room. Meanwhile, the room where you spend roughly a third of your life is surviving on sheets you bought five years ago. 10 years ago, in some cases, if you're like me, Bolumbranch makes the kind of bedding that upgrades the whole room. Signature, organic cotton sheets, supportive pillows, cozy blankets, and beautifully made comfortors. Yes, it looks better. More importantly, it feels better. This is one of those upgrades that you enjoy every single night. I have slept on my Bolumbranch sheets for gosh, I don't know, almost 10 years now. They are absolutely magnificent. I was talking to Alisa last night about our mutual love of our Bolumbranch comforter. These are sheets that U.S. presidents have slept on, multiple U.S. presidents, and your favorite podcaster. They're so good. They're like the real deal. They're the real life. It's like sleeping in a five-star hotel every single night. Upgrade your sleep with Bolumbranch, get 15% off your first order, plus free shipping at Bolumbranch.com/Michael at message A-E-L with code Michael. That is Bolumbranch B-O-L-L-L-A-N-D branch.com/Michael. To unlike 15% off, exclusions apply. Speaking of these crazy awful candidates who could take over and speaking of education, James Telleriko has a suggestion for how we can improve the world. He wants it to be run like rural kindergartners. What if we ran our world like we run a kindergarten classroom? Because at the end of the day, aren't we all just really big kindergartners? Okay. What is he? What kind of stuff? So I don't want to. This is the kind of stuff pedophile say. I'm not accusing him of being a pedophile, I'm really not. But this is the kind of, hey, raw, hey kid, I'm just like you. I'm just like a big kindergartner. It's weird. It's creepy. And I'm actually not accusing him of any literal perversions here. I know he's got a girlfriend. She lives in Canada. She goes to another school. I know. She's speaking of schools. But regardless, this way of thinking is perverse. I'm not saying it's sexually perverse. I'm not saying it's literally. I'm saying it's perverse in a more figurative way. One, if he says we should run our country like we run a kindergarten classroom, what that suggests is that our political leaders should have absolute total control over us in local parenthesis. They should have the kind of control over us that a parent has over a little child, like a five year old, which is scary, for all the people that talk about Trump's authoritarian and supposedly tyrannical kind of rhetoric. That is more tyrannical rhetoric than anything we've ever heard from Trump. But beyond that, I hate this type of self-conception, because even if Talleriko here is just imprecise with his words and is considering himself to be like a kindergartner too, not just like the kindergarten teacher but like a kindergartner, I hate that. We're not just big kindergartners. We shouldn't be surprised or delighted when we find ourselves adulting to use that phrase from the millennials. This is really. I don't feel like a kindergartner. I don't know about you. I feel like a grown man. When I was a child, I did the things of a child. But when I became a man, I put away the things of a child. Who said that? Was that. I think I was a very wise man, a long time ago, writing to the Corinthians. Now, it's a little confusing in the Bible, because our Lord calls on us to be childlike. We should be childlike in that we should have innocence. We should pursue innocence, even people who have traded away their innocence and gotten involved in a lot of. You actually can regain your innocence. That is possible. Don't let the devil get you down on that. You actually can do that. So that's one thing our Lord is calling on us to do, is to be innocent and to be humble. We don't want to be just so puffed up with ourselves and look down on everyone and every other thing in the world. So we want to have a child like quality, but we don't want to be child-ish. Childlike, it's all the good features of a child. The wonder of a child, the humility of a child. The eye is seeing the world through the eyes of a child. But child-ish, it's all the bad qualities of a child. the temper tantra it's the It's the in gratitude, it's the ignorance, it's the lack of discipline. We don't want that. And that is exactly what the Democrats are selling us. We're all like big kindergarteners, aren't we? No, I'm not. I'm not like that. I don't want to live in a country like that. The Democrats want us to live in a country like that, because it makes us a lot easier to control. Meanwhile, Talleriko, more recently than that older video, Talleriko is doubling down on God as non-binary. There he was acquitted by the Senate, but I want to move on to our next question for you. In 2021, you said God is both masculine and feminine and everything in between. God is non-binary. Do you still stand by that? I was being provocative with that statement. I get that. What I was trying to say is that you can't use human categories to define God. And that's not controversial, theologically. OK, so he's trying to weasel out of the statement that he has been pilloried for. The statement that God is non-binary. He's applying a radical gender ideology to God. Much as he used, he tried to instrumentalize the Blessed Virgin Mary in order to promote abortion. I mean, really satanic stuff. But he has a pretty good answer, at least in the first part. He says, look, I was being a little provocative with that statement. I'm aware. But what I just, the point that I was making is that you can't apply human categories to God. And that's not theologically controversial. He said about the religion in the central fact of which is that God becomes a man. Do you write this to me? I don't see anybody talking about this. But if you read James Talleriko in the worst ways, then he is like the antichrist, basically. But if you try to read him in the absolute most charitable way, he's also kind of like the antichrist, if you try to read him even in the most charitable way, he knows absolutely nothing about theology, about the Christian religion. He's not a Christian in any meaningful sense. I mean, don't forget, James Talleriko has previously come out and he said that all religions are equal paths to God, not just that all religions can in some ways, in partial ways, point to God, which is a statement that I agree with. I do think that's true. Natural paganism and Judaism, even to some degree, Islam, can point to God in some, even the non-theistic pagan religions sort of can in some ways. But he says, no, they're all equal paths to God. So right there, that is a statement that says, I'm not a Christian. I don't really believe in Christianity. But then to come out and say, you can't apply human categories to God. How about the categories like father, son, man, taking on flesh and dwelling among us? I mean, that the central mystery of the Christian faith is the Trinity, which is that God is three distinct persons in one divine unity, father, son, and holy ghost. The holy ghost being the bond of love between the father and the son. And the central fact of the Christian faith is that God becomes a man. He doesn't become a they-them. He doesn't become a she/him/he/her. God has pronouns and he asks us to respect them. He's just wrong in every way about every single thing. No candidate drives me crazier. I'll take 100 Abdul Al-Sayevs over one James Talleriko. It's not even close. We got to hope. The one thing that's starting to give me hope in the midterm elections is that candidate quality will save us here because he's just awful. Okay. Last little bit here on Mr. Talleriko. Talleriko, as he is, according to the calorie markets ahead, as he's leading in the polls, as he's, he's actually, he's looking pretty good. I think Ken Paxon is a better candidate than people give him credit for, but Talleriko's looking all right. Talleriko trots at these endorsements by Republicans. He says, Republican leaders endorsing James Talleriko. I'm just going to read some of the names here. James Edge, Jimmy Don Acock, Steve Bartlett, Dorothy Burton, Ryan Davenport, Donna Halstead, Deborah Hankinson, Kimberly Preist, Johnson, Susan Lewis, King, Adam Kinzinger, David Maxwell, Shane Phelps, Tom Phillips, Bennett, Ratcliffe. Have you heard of any of these people? Yes. You've heard of one of them. The person you've heard of is Adam Kinzinger. You've only heard of him because Trump made him cry. This is, there is no wave of Republicans endorsing James Talleriko. There is no moderation whatsoever. There is, in other words, there is no cross-party appeal to these Democrat candidates. If the Democrats win the House and the Senate, they will win the House and the Senate because the Republicans have been demoralized. There are no crossover voters. There is no one who voted for Trump in 2024, who is now voting for James Talleriko, God is non-binary, who is now voting for Abdul El-Sahed, who is now voting for any of these people. All the people campaigning with the San Piker, who says that America deserves 9/11, any wipes is rear-end with the American flag and that we should murder Republicans. There is no crossover vote. It is simply a question of motivation. Right now, the Democrats are super-motivated to go out and endorse these lunatics. The Republicans are feeling slightly demoralized because of the historical situation of being the first midterm election after the Republicans won Unified Government, in part because they don't like the Iran War, in part because economic challenges persist. Even though a lot of economic good has been done during the first year and a half of the Trump administration, compared to the Biden administration, nevertheless, it's not enough for a lot of people. It's that demoralization. And the question for the Republicans is not, how do we pull over the people who are now going to go vote for Democrats? The question is simply, how do we motivate our guys to go out and vote? It's not that the coalition has flipped, it's just potentially gotten smaller. Okay. The rest of the show continues now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member of U.S. Codinal's Canada VLAS. Check out for two months free and all annual plans. Bingo. Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as place sounders even be allowed on campus? Okay. So long as this is a close personal friend of Chancellor Freeman, this is a decision I cannot find. Islam will conquer the West. Are we paying attention? They've taken over the building, they're downstairs and they've blocked the doors. I seek forgiveness from Allah, the Almighty. We cannot run and hide. Muhammad is the messenger of God. There is no God but Allah. What you say? We turn those vessel beams into a fine red mist. As we move, one man will cover while the other guys go. They call that leaf frog. Stretch them out when they listen. You need a course in safe weapons handling.