Ep. 2054 - Trump's New Plan for Moms INFURIATES Lib Feminists

Are you noticing your car insurance rate creep up even without tickets or claims? You're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry handles the legwork by comparing quotes side-by-side from over 50 top insurers, so you can confidently hit buy. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Jerry even tracks rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. Drivers who save with Jerry can save over $1,300 a year. Don't settle for higher rates. Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai slash wire today. We've all heard radio advertisements about owing the IRS money. They lean on fear and try to frighten you into calling. Tax relief advocates does things differently. Whether you owe $5,000, $50,000, or $500,000, TRA offers an actual solution. Do not lose hope. TRA could reduce or even eliminate what you owe the IRS. Their passion is taxes and helping individuals and businesses settle their IRS problems. They've earned over 1,000 five-star Google reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau. There is no need to fear the IRS any longer. Substantial, relief programs are available that can give you a fresh start, so do not delay. Visit TRA.com, that is TRA.com, or call 800-575-4908. That is, once more, 800-575-4908. Tax relief advocates, real solutions for real people. This episode is brought to you by Cardiff, America's favorite small business lender with over $12 billion funded since 2004, applying under three minutes for same-day funding, up to $500,000 at cardiff.co. The studios are closed. It's Labor Day. Okay, that's fine. I don't care. I have to come to you. I have to come to you live or quasi-live because the Trump administration has just proposed definitely the greatest family policy of either Trump 1 or Trump 2, maybe the greatest policy of either Trump 1 or Trump 2, and that is to support mothers, mostly, but fathers too, I guess, who want to stay home and raise their kids. So, right off the bat, you are going to hear some people who are more laissez-faire, who are a little more either libertarian or neoconny. They're going to say, well, we don't need another federal welfare program. Great, great news, because this is not a new welfare program. There is an existing program, which is the Child Care and Development Fund, and right now, that program goes to subsidize single mothers, almost entirely. So, it's a subsidy for mothers to pay for child care so that they can go work in the widget factory, which is fine. That's all well and good, but what the Trump administration is doing, and apparently, this is being spearheaded largely by the vice president, J.D. Vance, what they're doing now is saying, okay, well, if we're going to be subsidizing single mothers to get child care for their kids while they go out to the office, we should also offer some of this fund to mothers and fathers, who want to stay at home and raise their kids themselves. This is really, really good stuff, and it's driving the left nuts, because when the left says, you know, we just want to pay for medical insurance, we just want to give people child care, that's obviously not really what they're talking about. This goes down to the early days of second wave feminism. This goes down to the heart of leftist policy. There was a famous debate, infamous debate in the early days of second wave feminism, and Betty Friedan, who's another leftist feminist, she was American, and during this debate, Simone de Beauvoir said, we cannot give women the option to stay home and raise their kids, because if they have that option, too many women will take it. Betty Friedan, who was also wrong about everything and super lib and feminist, Betty Friedan said, whoa, lady, that's crazy. If women want to stay home, they should be able to, shouldn't they? And Simone de Beauvoir said, no, feminism cannot succeed if women have the ability to stay home and raise their kids. So, we currently have a fund that is paying for child care for people who struggle with it. The proposal from the Trump administration is, okay, well, if we already have this fund, can some of the money go toward mothers raising their own children, rather than mothers going off to the office, being forced to go off to the office, and then sending their kids to go be raised by Mamdani and a bunch of his bureaucrats? There was a Gallup poll that came out, this was some years ago now, somewhat recent, you know, it was maybe 2015, 2016, somewhere around there, which showed that 54% of working mothers wish that they could stay home and raise their kids, at least for a period of time. So, the majority of working mothers want to be able to stay home and raise their kids, and the leftists and the feminists have said, no, we'll subsidize you to go work, but we're not going to subsidize you to raise your kids, even out of that same fund. This welfare program, as it currently exists, is basically just a subsidy for corporate America, and it incentivizes single parenthood. So, what the Trump administration is doing is saying, we're not going to get rid of this welfare program, we're not going to enlarge this welfare program, we're just going to use it in ways that incentivize marriage, that incentivize people raising their own kids, especially when they want to, which is the case for the majority of working women. This is great, great stuff. The left is going to go crazy here, and they can't even adopt it. As the left is going to go crazy here, and they can't even adopt it, as the left is going to affordability and the difficulties for people to raise their kids, they're not going to adopt this policy because it cuts against the heart of leftism. The heart of leftism, which says, we want to separate parents from their kids. We view parents as an obstacle to the raising of kids. These are our kids. It takes a village, and we trust parents to some degree, but really, we want them in kindergarten, actually pre-K, actually pre-pre-K, actually in Mamdani's New York. We're going to have a parents' night out. Drop your kids off with city bureaucrats. Do it whenever you want. Less family time, the better. Really, really good stuff. The Trump administration should be commended for this. The best objection to the policy is, we don't want to enlarge the welfare state. This does not do that. This is certainly a no-brainer for conservatives. Even libertarians have proposed similar kinds of policies. It's just Trump and Vance actually had the guts to do it. I love this. It's awesome. I love it enough that I will interrupt my Labor Day for it. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show. The Michael Knowles Show is a production of the Center for Autism and Related Disorders, and I'm Michael Knowles. transgressing all sorts of limits. And what never comes into play in these kinds of stories is the patients. Look, the headline says, I'm the UK's first deafblind doctor. My disability makes me a better medic. But the article never really explains how. Obviously, a doctor would be better if he could see or if he could hear or if he didn't need an oxygen tank to move around. So that's just, it's a nonsense to say such a thing. But it's all about the orientation. And in modern culture, the orientation is entirely toward the self and self-actualization and self-affirmation, whereas in a healthier culture, the orientation would be about the other person. You know, love is willing the good of another for his own sake. And ultimately, it would be oriented toward God. So it's like, I don't mean to knock on this girl in any way, but it's just so emblematic. And it seems it's a ridiculous headline because no one wants a deaf and blind doctor. Good for her, but what else could she do? And forget about her. What else could we all do in our lives if we didn't just place ourselves at the center of everything and considered other goods? Okay, speaking of doctors, we get some more fraud coming out of California. Go to takovas.com slash knolls, K-N-W-L-A-S. There are certain things a man should own, a decent knife, a good hat. And if you are going to walk around pretending you know anything about the American West, you should probably own a good pair of boots. That is where Takovas comes in. I love my Takovas. I have Takovas. Takovas cowboy boots are the only cowboy boots that I can even possibly pull off. My kid, for his recent birthday, just requested his own cowboy boots. And what I can more comfortably pull off as a Yankee, you know, is not the most cowboy guy in the world. The Takovas loafers, I wear them most days. They are absolutely phenomenal. I love my Takovas wallet, which I've gotten excellent compliments on. It's my favorite wallet. It's just a great company, okay? For the Takovas boots and shoes, they're comfortable right out of the box. You don't need to spend three weeks walking around your house looking like you've been wounded in battle just to break them in. They're just great. All of their stuff is terrific. Wonderful company. Get 10% off right now. Impress all your friends. Takovas.com slash Knowles. When you sign up for email and text, that's 10% off at T-E-C-O-V-A-S dot com slash Knowles. See site for details. Takovas. Point your toes west. Gavin Newsom, once again, at the center of a fraud story. Hat tip to. Chris Ruffo for pulling this one up. This is a brand new $28 million mansion in Hidden Hills, California, next to the Kardashian house. But the man who owns this property isn't a pop star or CEO. He's a respiratory therapist named Curtis Kirkova, and he got rich by billing California's Medicaid system more than $40 million. Oh, man. Nice work if you can get it, huh? Good stuff from Ruffo. Chris is obviously just. Just an absolute killer Gramscian political operative for the right. We just. We love him. We love our Chris Ruffo. And there are many such cases. We've uncovered a lot of fraud in Minnesota, in Ohio, in California. Newsom, quite crooked. These stories are really important to focus on because the Democrats are beginning this theme. They've tried it before. It lay dormant. Now it's back again for the midterms, and it will come up again a lot after the midterms. And that is they're going to try to call Trump corrupt. And they're going to try to call Trump corrupt because he's a successful businessman. He lost a bunch of money in his first term as president. He made a bunch of money in the interregnum when he was a private citizen. And they're going to say that this is corrupt, that he's trading off of the presidency. Never mind Hillary Clinton. Never mind the Bidens. Never mind any of that. Those people who are not serious businessmen, Trump obviously was. He's the richest guy ever to become president. Nevertheless, that's going to be a big, big focus. If the Democrats win the House, especially if they win the Senate, 100% of their effort, is going to be focused on dredging up evidence of Trump's corruption. And that will be the basis of why they try to impeach him. So what's important here is to make clear what Trump has actually done. It doesn't seem that he's violated any laws, whether we're talking about his coins or his business interest or his hotels. He's had hotels a lot longer than he's been a politician. But we don't just want to go on defense here. We have to go on offense. One, because it's politically sound. But two, because it's the right thing to do. There is a lot of corruption in America. There's a Pew Research—no, sorry, it's Gallup. Gallup report. I mentioned this on the show a couple days ago. Record high 89% in the U.S. say that the government corruption is widespread. Substantial majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents agree. This is really bad. The figure is up 10 points from last year, well above readings that were in the 70s from 2010 to 2020. So that's a lot of corruption. That's a lot of corruption. So corruption is really, really bad. The question is, where does the corruption lie? Does the corruption lie chiefly in President Trump having meme coins or like Trump stores selling Trump watches or something like that? Is that where the corruption lies? Or does the corruption lie in Democrats in government allowing specifically immigrant communities to bilk the taxpayer in exchange for political support? Just like Democrats have been doing for 20 years. 200 years, just like Tammany Hall. And in California, where you get a guy who is theoretically a therapist, he looks like he's a rapper or a gangster, and he's bilking the California taxpayer, which means bilking the federal taxpayer in part because California gets federal funds for $40 million. That's where the focus has to be because corruption is a big problem. We shouldn't minimize the significance of corruption. Corruption is like a miasma in a political order. It just, it prevents you from trusting anything, and it makes everyone feel icky. It's like, it's like, It's like a radon. It's like a, an odorless poison in the air that just slowly kills everything. So you have to root out corruption. But, but in order to root out corruption, you have to see where the corruption really lies. And here, the corruption, you can point to individual Republicans and say, that might have been a corrupt act. That may have been a little dodgy. I mean, this is politics. That happens. But on the left, the corruption has been systematized. It's been institutionalized, and it is being committed at a level that is orders of magnitude higher than most of anything that you're seeing on the right. Okay. Now, I want to get into the mailbag. Go to cowboycolostrum.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-A-S. There are two kinds of health products, the ones that taste like you're being punished for making good decisions, and the ones you're actually disappointed when you run out of. Cowboy Colostrum falls into the second category. I am very skeptical of a lot of health products. Sweet Little Lisa, you know, who's quite pregnant, she takes these awful, like, prenatal vitamins and stuff every night, and a lot of them taste terrible. Cowboy Colostrum, totally different story. I love it. I've been hearing from my GigaChad friends over here, especially Mr. Davies, about how great colostrum is. And when your gut is working well, you simply feel better every day. Less bloating, better digestion, just feeling more like yourself. Cowboy has actually studied it in their clinical trial. Eighty-three percent of participants reported improvements. Gut health, 79 percent experienced less bloating. Seventy-two percent reported improved digestion. Right now, try the new cookies and cream flavor for yourself. For a limited time, listeners get up to 25 percent off their entire order. Use promo code Knowles at checkout. That's 25 percent off when you use code Knowles, K-N-W-L-A-S, at CowboyColostrum.com slash Knowles. There's a lot more to say. First, they'll go to Preborn.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-A-S. There's a woman named Alba who had been told something pretty difficult. Definitive. She could not have children. Her husband's diagnosis seemed to confirm it, so eventually, as painful as that news must have been, they accepted it, and then Alba got pregnant. So, from the outside, that sounds miraculous, but Alba did not experience it that way at first. She had already reorganized her expectations around the idea that this could never happen. Suddenly, she was pregnant, confused, frightened, and facing a future she had never prepared for. Alba eventually walked into a preborn network clinic. There, she was met with compassion and given a free ultrasound. She saw her child. She heard the heartbeat. Suddenly. Suddenly, the situation looked very different. Alba chose life. Today, her daughter, Laura, is healthy and thriving. The child Alba had been told was impossible. The pregnancy that initially felt like a crisis is now her daughter. Right now, another mother is walking into a preborn clinic, frightened and uncertain, and you can help give her that same opportunity to see her child. Just $28 helps provide one life-saving ultrasound. $140 helps rescue five babies. I personally support this organization. I encourage you to give what you can. It's the best ROI you're going to get. They fundraise separately for overhead, so every dollar you give goes towards saving babies. Please give today at Alpound250. Say keyword baby. That's Alpound250. Keyword baby. Or go to preborn.com slash Knowles. K-N-O-W-L-A-S. That's preborn.com slash Knowles. If you're a business owner, would you consider a larger donation to claim a write-off? A donation of $1,000, $2,000, $10,000, $15,000 will sponsor an ultrasound machine for a needy clinic, helping to save countless babies' lives for years to come. All gifts are tax-deductible and will reach eternity. Get involved today. One thing I love about the. these federal holidays, when there's no news and nobody's going into work or whatever, is that I get to take more mailbag questions. From the voice mailbag. Take it away. Hi, Michael. For the better part of two years, I've been dealing with some serious health issues, and unfortunately, there's no end in sight. I'm a tradesman, and given the nature of my health problems, it's not possible or safe for me to continue my career. Trying to start over in a new career is not financially feasible right now, so my wife and I made the tough decision to switch roles, with her going back to work and me becoming primary caregiver, for our two kids. It has to be this way, but I'm really struggling. I worked really hard to learn a trade and build a career, so I could provide and she could stay home. I've never been depressed a day in my life, but it's really getting to me, and even though logically I know the situation's out of my control, I still feel like I've failed. How would you go about getting past this and making this role work as the man and head of household? How can I be supportive of my wife if she gets thrust back out into the workforce? What pitfalls should I look out for? On a side note, I also have a cigar question. Luckily, my health issues don't preclude me from enjoying cigars, which is great because they're some of my favorite things in the world. The bummer is that with all this upheaval, money's going to be tight for a while, so it's probably going to be a few years before I can justify putting them back in the budget. That being said, unfortunately, I only have one Mayflower Dusk Robusto left, and since that's my favorite cigar of all time, I want to save it for a very special occasion. I usually keep my cigars in a small tupper door at 67% humidity. Just curious if you would suggest keeping it at 67% for long-term storage or dropping it down some. Thanks for all you do, and God bless you and your family. Okay, well, I'm sorry to hear about. I'm sorry that you're going through this very difficult season right now. I'm sure it's brutal. You obviously have a good head on your shoulders, as evidenced by your excellent taste in cigars. So on the relatively minor question here, the cigar question first, yeah, 67% in the tupper door. Tupper door is what we cigar guys call the makeshift humidor out of Tupperware, which is great. I have a lot of cigars, actually, in Ziplocs and that kind of stuff. That'll be fine. But. On to the bigger question. You say this is tough because you learned to trade, and you were injured, and now, you know, right, you cannot continue in your trade. You can't pivot on a dime to start a new career, so your wife for a season is going to have to go out there and work. And this is tough. Now, as a lot of conservatives observe, and I've made it clear on the show many times, yeah, the normal thing is for the guy to go out and work and for the wife to stay home. That's the ideal situation. In our modern political economy, it's very difficult for women to stay home. Even under the best of circumstances. But there are exceptions. There is always the Margaret Thatcher exception. I know people for whom it does actually make sense for the wife to go out and work and for the guy to stay home. Whether it's because of an injury or what have you. There is, you know, it's a diverse and wonderful world, and there is the Thatcher exception. However, you say this is not ideal, and it really pains you. So, I suppose one thing you can focus on is. What would you like. What would you like to do next? You have to balance two things. The obligations that you have right now, which is keeping the home and raising the kids and doing all of that, which you did not expect to do, and maybe you don't feel that you're as well equipped to do as your wife is. And your wife is going to go out there into the workforce and work for a little bit. And maybe she doesn't feel that she's the best equipped for that, and she didn't expect to do that. And, you know, life surprises us sometimes. So, you have to do that job, which is a hard job for a woman, and it's going to be harder. Harder for you, because you're not expecting to do it. So, you're in for a very difficult go for a short period of time, at least. And then I would say you should balance that with, well, what would you like to end up doing? You know, you've never been depressed a day in your life, and you don't want to fall into despair, which is a sin. Okay, good. Well, what would you like to do? If your trade that you prepared for is now closed off to you, what's next? If you want to get back to a situation where your wife is able to stay home again, and you're going to be the breadwinner, what could that even be in theory? And I'm not saying that you're necessarily going to get it. You know, man plans and God laughs. But at the very least, I think you need to have that in the back of your mind. So that, you know, when you're working 12 hours a day to help take care of your kids, and maybe cook, and do all these things that you weren't ready to do, you do that for 12 hours a day. And then maybe you're preparing for another career for four or five hours a day. And that's hard. You know, it's going to be very hard. But I think that will help. I think that will help keep you grounded. Now, if you're just totally flat on your back, and, you know, your chronic health issues are such that there's no way you can do that, well, then you're going to have to double down on, you know, this new role that you find yourself in. But it doesn't quite sound like that's the situation. So I would balance those two things. And it's going to give you the grit of actually working, which is good for us. But it's also going to give you a kind of a terrestrial hope for what comes next. And, you know, it's a tough period. One consolation that Christians have that people of other faiths don't necessarily have is we believe that suffering can be sanctifying. That suffering is, you know, deeply unpleasant a lot of the time. But it can be sanctifying. And we can kiss it up to God. And it can teach us something about ourselves and even improve us. So best of luck. You know, obviously, we can all pray for you. I encourage the show audience to pray for you in that tough time. And I look forward, if we interact at some point in the future in person, I look forward to having that cigar. Okay, next one. Hey, Michael. It's Isaac. I still think Trump is doing a strong job overall. Iran is the one call I wrestle with. But I trust his judgment more than the people yelling from the sidelines. Tucker is in a different place. In June, he said he was out of the Republican Party over the war. Last week, he said a president who is considering nuclear first use should be removed immediately. And he asked why that effort isn't already underway. Vance still won't draw a line. At the RJC on Monday, he was asked about Tucker by name and talked around him. This is Trump's party. If Vance is the guy who is supposed to carry that project forward, is refusing to push back on Tucker coalition management, or is it a sign he's building something else? What's your read? Keep up the good work, man. Thank you very much. Good question. I don't know. I mean, I guess my read is probably coalition management, right? I mean, I don't really even totally understand what Tucker's after. It seemed like he might start a new party, but then that was sort of a fake out. And, you know, his views have changed on things. But I don't know. I mean, Tucker's. I mean, he's a very clever media personality, so I don't even know exactly what Tucker's after. But down to the basic question, if Tucker says that Trump should be removed from office, and J.D. Vance is the vice president, and he's obviously supporting President Trump's initiatives, and he obviously, I mean, we just saw this the other day, Tucker said he would never vote for Mike Rogers in Michigan, and he essentially is endorsing Abdul Al-Sayed, and J.D. Vance comes out and he says it's like crucial that Mike Rogers wins, the two guys obviously have major differences of opinion. And then on the removal from office point, J.D. Vance is the guy who could do that. If J.D. Vance were on Team Tucker when it comes to removing Trump from office, he would be the guy to do that, to, you know, call for the 25th Amendment, you know, to be exercised. And he's not doing that. So, I don't know. It seems like a truism to me that J.D. Vance is on Team Trump, and he is clearly the heir apparent to Trump and Trumpism and MAGA. So, at least in Trump's mind, you know, at least in the mind of the administration. So, I don't know. I see the trepidation, but this is always an issue. I mean, Charlie Kirk faced this issue of coalition management with all sorts of voices that, you know, there's a lot of dispute over who do you totally kick out of the tent and who do you keep in and try to mollify and try to keep them, you know, bring them closer to the center of the team. And so, that's a very, very difficult job. It's not an enviable job, but it's an essential job in politics. So, the fact that J.D. Vance seems to want to do it, I think that's a good thing. You know, better him than a lot of the rest of us. But, no, I don't. I don't think J.D. Vance is going to try to remove Trump from office or anything like that. Okay. Now, we do have some written mailbag questions that I'm very excited to get to. This is from Brayden. It says, Hi, Michael. I recently saw a video talking about how Christians don't talk enough about male modesty. I hadn't heard any of the things in the video before, but the biggest was that it's bad for men to be shirtless or post shirtless pics in the same way it's wrong for women to wear revealing clothing in public. Personally, I don't think it's the same. It's the male and female upper body are not the same. I'm curious about your thoughts on this. Yeah. No, I don't. No, it's not. It might be wrong for men to post shirtless pics on Instagram because that's kind of gay and vain and, like, ridiculous. But it's not. No, it's not the same thing as a woman posting a shirtless pic because men and women relate to sex differently. And men and women relate even to visual images differently. This is why men are much more aroused by the visual. And for women, it's a little more. It's a little more emotional and a little less tangible. That's just, yeah, we're different. You know, vive la différence. Okay, question here from no one who says, Michael, this isn't normal of me to mail in, but I wanted to ask since you seem pretty sound in your faith. I believe that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. However, I think I still struggle with the idea that there's a heaven or that I will someday be there. I'm only 26, and I'm sure it might just be normal, but I often find myself thinking about getting old and dying tomorrow. Missing out on many things and the like. It's just going out in an instant. I can't tell if it's a lack of conviction or faith that's getting me. I was raised non-denominational, not baptized, but I'm trying to find structure and stability in my faith. I'm not against the Catholic or Orthodox, as I quite enjoy their structure and piety. I just can't grapple yet with the difference in canon, which justifies a lot of the tradition they both follow. Thank you for your time. Sorry for the long question, if it makes sense. Okay, no, it's a long question, but I think it's a relatively simple answer. You say you believe Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. However, you don't. You struggle with the idea that there's a heaven. Well, if you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord, not to mention your Savior, even just your Lord, if you think he is God, if you think he speaks from authority, he says there's heaven. So, either you must believe in heaven or you must not believe that Christ is Lord, because he says that there's heaven. And in terms of your being in heaven someday, either you believe that you will be in heaven someday, or you don't believe that Christ is your Savior. you can't simultaneously hold both opinions. So it's going to be one or the other. let's say you believe in Jesus. You say, you're worried about getting old and dying. Yeah, okay. I think that's fair. I mean, Christ weeps when Lazarus dies five seconds before he raises Lazarus from the dead. Death is bad. Death is not good. Christianity is not a suicide cult. There have been offshoots and heretical versions of Christianity over the years, like Catharism, Albigensianism that have been death cults, but Christianity is not. So yeah, you can recognize that death is a bad thing. And that is all the more reason to be so grateful to God, to Christ for saving us from eternal death. Then you say you are not baptized. Again, if you believe that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior, he tells you to be baptized. Baptism is so important, in fact, that he is baptized. He is baptized raising baptism from a ritual or a sacramental all the way to a sacrament. So if you believe in him, you should be baptized. Then you say you're not against Catholic or Orthodox, but you grapple with the difference in canon, which justifies a lot of the tradition. Again, I don't think that's true. I think it's a little bit of a cope to say that the fact that the Catholic and Orthodox and Coptics and the Ethiopian Christians and all these people, you know, have more books in the Bible or something than traditions that emerge out of the 16th century. No, I don't think that the core of the Christian faith as practiced by Catholics and Orthodox and Coptics and Ethiopians and Syriacs and all the rest, I don't think that those come from the Deuterocanonical books exactly. You know, the Eucharist comes from the Gospel of St. John, John chapter 6, when Christ says, whosoever eats the flesh of the Son of Man and drinks his blood has life in him. If you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. And this is a hard saying. And the Jews dispute this and other disciples, you know, they go away. And, but Peter does not go away. And he says, why do you not go away? He says, because you are the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Christ says, well, only my father could have revealed this to you. And you are no longer Peter, you are Simon. Sorry, you are no longer Simon, you are Peter, Petros, rock. And on this rock, I will build my church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. So, you know, the Eucharist is from the Gospels. It's not from the Deuterocanonical books. And it's instituted then very clearly at the Last Supper. And you see it again, the first post-resurrection Eucharist. So, after the road to Emmaus walk at the dinner table. So, you've got all of that. You have Christ saying in the Gospels, I give you the power to forgive sins. Whose sins you forgive are forgiven, whose sins you retain are retained. That's a sacrament that is not from the Deuterocanonicals, it's from the Gospels. On and on and on, you know. And you can, one thing that will be helpful to you, I think, is reading some of the very early church fathers and Christian writers, guys like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Ignatius of Antioch, on and on. Who are describing a faith that is very similar to the one that you seem to be seeking. So, anyway, I don't want to be too pedantic about the whole thing, but if you believe it, if you say that you have this sort of kernel here of faith, where you say, I believe that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. Well, then you're going to believe the other stuff too. You're going to believe in heaven. And you're going, I think you would be baptized. And I think, if you believe that, if you can get yourself to the point where you say, I believe in Jesus, well, then you, you should keep his commandments. That's what he tells us to do. Okay. I'm out of time. So, I'll see you next time. I'm Michael Knowles. Every significant movement in history has started with protesting. You're a traitor. It's Uncle Tom. This is our generation's civil rights. I have no idea what the protest is about. Bingo. Given the current climate, should a figure as polarizing as Clay Saunders even be allowed on campus? Uh, can you hear me okay? Saunders is a close personal friend of Chancellor Friedman. This is a decision I cannot fight. Islam will conquer the West. Are we paying attention? They've taken over the building. They're downstairs and they've blocked the doors. I seek forgiveness from Allah, the Almighty. We cannot run and hide. Muhammad is the messenger. There is no God. There is no God but Allah. What do you say we turn those SOBs into a fine red mist? As we move, one man will cover while the other guys go. They call that leapfrogging. Stretch your arms and listen. You need a course in safe weapons handling.