Ep. 2051 - Lindsay Clancy Verdict in Jeopardy After Jury Deadlock

This is episode is brought to you by Cardiff America's Favourite Small Business, lender with over 12 billion funded since 2004. Planned under three minutes for same day funding up to 500,000 Cardiff.co/nolves. Okay, it's the last day that I am on the road for my secret project that I can't tell you about. I'm in yet another country. It's crazy, but I will be back in the studio tomorrow in the meantime. I must weigh in on the news out of the Lindsey Clancy case. Lindsey Clancy's jury has decided they can't reach a unanimous decision. So here's the reporting from CNN. I'm hearing it for the first time. That's not true. I'm hearing it for like the second or third time. No verdict yet. jurors went home after the end of their fourth day of deliberations without reaching a verdict. If the jury could not reach a verdict within four seconds of deliberations, you know this thing is as the kids say, fubar. I think it's like the millennials who say fubar. In any case, that's crazy. The evidence is so clear. She did it. She was never diagnosed with postpartum depression. Her husband wasn't depriving her of resources. She planted out methodically. She sent her husband out of the house. Any conclusion in this case that this woman is not guilty. Is evidence of a kind of psychosis. But I think I've identified what the psychosis is. And I haven't heard anyone else say this. But this case reminds me of OJ. Do you remember? I was young when the OJ case was going on. But I remember it vividly. It's all anybody was talking about their lot of perils. And the other similarity with the OJ case is in both of those cases, the defendants were obviously guilty as all get out. And there was really no question among any reasonable people. And in the OJ case, OJ was acquitted. Now he was held liable in the civil trial because he obviously murdered his wife and her friend. But in the criminal case, he was acquitted. In this case, I don't know when you're going to be seeing this. Obviously, it's a little bit of a delayed time table because I'm recording this from another time zone. But regardless of whether or not Lindsey Clancy is convicted as she should be. Or if she gets off the hook because of the psychosis of the women on the jury. In any case, I think the read remains exactly the same. The real parallel to me between the OJ case and the Lindsey Clancy case. The deep parallel is that in both cases, what they reflect is a political community getting what the liberal activists of their community say that they want and them going crazy as a result of it. That's what I think is going on here. The OJ case occurred in the mid 90s. The mid 90s were the absolute apotheosis of all black activism, all the peaceful black activism, the radical black activism, the black panthers, everything, all of the above. The black community had gotten every single thing that the liberal activists said they needed to have. They got affirmative action. They got the Great Society. They got the Voting Rights Act. They got an expansion of the welfare state. They got racial grievance put into curricula in schools. They got Martin Luther King Day. They got every single thing. I'm not saying all black people. I'm saying the liberal black activists. Not Clarice Thomas. Not Thomas Sol. The liberal black activists said that they wanted. The black people got all of those things and it wasn't enough. Do you know what else they wanted? They wanted a guy to get off on murder just because he was black. They wanted a black person to be able to murder his wife and her friend, simply on the basis of being black. That's what they wanted. And in the Lindsey Clancy case, you're seeing exactly the same thing. We are living in the big two six. Women have gotten every single thing that the liberal women activists say that they want. Not all women, not the smart women, not the normal women, not the grounded, tradwife women, the liberal female activists, the feminists. They've gotten everything that they said they want. We are living post me too. We are living in an age of feminism. We are living in the age of affirmative action, which helps women too. We're living in an age in which women comprise or constitute most university students and most workers. They got everything they said they wanted. But they're not happy. So now what they demand is that a person get off the hook for murder, for murder of their own children, simply for being a woman. That's the argument. That's the argument of all the women who were showing up outside the courthouse with their kids throwing up the heart sign saying we support you Lindsey. The argument is if a woman feels bad someday because men just don't understand them, if that woman feels sad, she should be able to plan out the murder of her kids, send her husband out of the house, murder all of her kids, and get off the hook. Because there's nothing left to ask for, according to that ideology. They got everything they wanted. The same thing was true of the liberal black activists in the 90s. It's like the marquee decide, 120 days of Sodom. At a certain point, you've titillated yourself by all of the even plausibly normal criteria. And you need to get away with the most evil stuff. You need to get away with murder. In this case, you need to get away with murdering your own kid. In OJ's case, it was murdering your wife. In this case, it's murdering your kids. That's what this is about. And so this should be a cause for reflection. Because I think a reason that the liberal black activists were some favor of OJ in the 90s is because they got everything that they wanted. They got everything that they said black people needed. But there were still problems because they misdiagnosed the problems. And they misdiagnosed the solutions. Misprescribed the solutions. Same thing for women. There's that famous study that came out of Yale at this point, 17, 18 years ago, the paradox of declining female happiness, which showed this strange fact that as feminism was on the incline, female happiness was on the decline, both in absolute terms and relative to men. Well, this doesn't make any sense. Women got all those rights that they said that they wanted. Now, of course, the reason that their happiness declined is that the liberal female activists were wrong. Feminism was wrong. It doesn't actually make women happy. And this is the last desperate gasp of that. By the time this airs, by the time, even if it airs earlier, by the time you're seeing this, Lindsey Clancy might have been convicted. She might have been let off the hook. The fact that the deliberations took longer than, forget for seconds, for nanoseconds tells you everything you need to know about the dynamics here. This ultimately is not just an indictment, but a conviction of feminism. It just didn't. If your ideology has led you to defending Lindsey Clancy, what good was your ideology? In this case, the ideology would be the ideology of feminism. Okay, one last bit I have to do before I go. I know these updates are supposed to be like two minutes. That's what the producers asked me to do. And I told them, I don't care what you want me to do. I'm going to talk more. The struggling of Abdul Al-Sahed is working. Keep it up. Keep it up. This is so good. It's all about his son, Piker. I've been talking about it for days. So I don't think we need to give you the total summary. The leader of the intellectual left intellectual is this guy. His son, Piker, who hates American calls for Republicans to be murdered. Abdul Al-Sahed was cozying up to him because he thought it would help them. Now it's a big liability. The struggling is working. Ask him, ask AOC, ask Mamdani, ask Bernie, ask all these Democrats who have campaigned with a son, Piker. In a son, Piker's defense, they invited him out. They wanted him to be part of their campaigns. Ask them why they support a guy who says he wipes his keyster with the American flag, says that he celebrates 9/11. And the America deserved it. Said that Republicans should be murdered in the US Senate for being Republican. Said he hopes that Charlie Kirk would be murdered. He wants to kill Charlie Kirk before Charlie was murdered by one of his fellow travelers. Ask him about that guy. Because the left defended Piker, then it became very inconvenient. So they tried to distance themselves. And then as son, Piker came out, credit to him, I love this. He comes out, he says, hey, you all invited me to your campaign events. I've known of Abdul and I've hung out with him. I've done fundraising online, small dollar donations from my community for his campaign, because he doesn't have any corporate packs, he opposes corporate pack money. He's a wonderful person, right? But he wasn't getting a lot of attention initially in his race. And he reached out to me and said, oh, let's go, let's do a campaign rally together. And I had already done stuff with him. I'd travel to Dearborn and we worked out, played basketball, all this stuff. So I didn't really think about it. So as son Piker comes out, he says, I'm not letting you off the hook. I don't care. You tried to distance yourself from me in the general election. You invited me out, buddy. What are you doing? I did you a favor. This is how you repay that favor. So because of that, Abdul Al-Sahia knows this looks too bad. He now has to re-embrace a son Piker, which is exactly what he did. A son, he supported you, he campaigned with you, he helped introduce you to younger voters. And now you're distancing yourself from comments he made about American Jews in Israel. At what point do you have to say, I've benefited from this person's platforms. I also have a responsibility to confront him when I think he's wrong. So I'll be honest, this is the odd thing about the way we think about this. It'd be like, you know, I come on your show. Let's say I invited you guys out to Michigan. I hope you'll come. Michigan's ready. Come out. And you're like, Hey, Abdul, I talked to him. My like on my, I think he's good. I think I think he cares about you. And then you, let's say, say something that I disagree with. And I'm like, I disagree with that thing. Does that mean that I'm condemning you? No, not disagree with the thing you said. It's not about distancing from an individual. It's about saying, here's the thing I disagree with. This is too good. This is exactly what I want to say. I want to clear up something in case anybody got fooled. Abdul Al-Sahed hasn't decided to take a courageous stand for his friend to son Piker and not play the disavowal game and cow-tow to the woke mob or whatever. The conservative mob is not doing that. He tried to throw his friend under the bus. He tried to betray his friend. It just didn't work. It wasn't working for him. So now he has to try another strategy. Because his friend came in and said, Hey, you invited me. What are you doing? You're just a liar. You're a complete hypocrite. So now he has to try new strategies as well. I'm not going to play this game and I don't want to disavow and he's only doing that. Because the first time he tried to throw a son Piker under the bus, it didn't work because his son Piker is taller and bigger than him. Abdul Al-Sahed is kind of a miniature guy and his son Piker is very tall. So he just Abdul struggled to throw his son under the bus. He can't. He's not big enough to do it. So then what does he do? He has to change, of course, is why I'm not going to disavow my good friend to son Piker because I tried and it didn't work. Okay, love this. Perfect. This is a complete lose lose for Abdul Al-Sahed. Keep the struggling up. I've been calling for it for days and it's obviously been working. Keep the struggling up but expand it. Because it's not just Abdul Al-Sahed that was piling around with this guy. It's all those people I just mentioned. Mamdani, AOC, Bernie Sanders and many, many others. Keep that up. Every single Democrat in every single press gaggle and every single interview in every single town hall. Do you disavow his son Piker? Why did you do a campaign event with his son Piker? Why did you take a picture with his son Piker? This is the left wants to come out and say, well, he's not as bad as the fringe figures on the right. He's worse than every one of them. He said that America deserved that life in the 3,000 civilians deserved to die. He said that Republicans should be murdered in the street and that the streets should run red and capital is blood. There is no figure on the right. There are plenty of odious figures on the right. There are plenty of people I don't like on the right. There is no figure on the right anywhere close to the enormity of wickedness that you find from his son Piker. Every single one of them has to be held to account because it's the right thing to do because it's good for our country and at a very basic partisan level because it's working. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles Show. Hey, I'm Michael's executive producer and he forgot to mention that he had to catch a flight. He's flying back right now and couldn't finish the show. So he's going to have me and Professor Jacob finish out the show. We've got some really cool stories to fill you in on that I hope you'll enjoy. So stick around for that. Also, we have a reaction video that no one's seen before that will tease up for everyone watching. I think it was actually one of his favorite videos that he's done a while, but he will be back tomorrow and hopefully you enjoy the rest of this one. I am not Michael Knowles. I am Ben Davies, his executive producer. Thank you for tuning in and hanging out because there is a story this week that I just I could not shake and it involves one of the biggest Senate races in recent memory. I reported 140 million dollar HBO series that sets the roadmap for political racial justice moving forward and the NFL story that we all should have put to bed a decade ago and it is all tied so neatly and perfectly together by one person and what some thought was just a throwaway comment from AOC. What's even more interesting is that no one has noticed the timing of those comments and the betting markets completely flipping on their heads. And I'm joined today by the Michael Knowles Show Cultural Correspondent Professor Jacob. It's going on, guys. And now first, I do want to give all you guys update on Knowles. I feared that once he got this sweet taste of freedom outside of the office, ways galvancing through Europe, he might not return and I did have some hope recently. I did get a video of him traveling through France, which is a country that kind of notoriously has banned all nicotine pouches and public cigar smoke. So here's the video that they sent us this morning. Poor buddy. Oh, Michael. It's this should I should I should I flex on him really quick fan Davies? Oh, you're too. Oh, should I? You can indulge in that. Should I and Michael and Michael, if you're in Europe and you're watching this, I just want to. And I mean, I can just like light up right now. You say that little lip pillow right there. I'm going to pop that. Hold on, I'm not done yet. I'm not done. Give me one of these cigars. Oh, it's one of the good ones. These are one of the good ones ready. Got that done. I got your cigar into. I'm sorry, man. You shouldn't left. You shouldn't left. Well, before we get to the stories, I don't think anyone is connecting right now. Michael Knowles wants to tell you all about home serve. There's a lot more to say first. They've got home served. I'm slash Knowles Canada VLS. There's a moment in every homeowner's life when you realize no one's coming to fix this for you. When you're renting the water heater breaks, you call somebody. When you own the house, the water heater breaks, you call yourself congratulations. Your homeowner is and that's so great. That's where something like home serve starts making a lot of sense. Regular homeowner's insurance usually does not cover the everyday wear and tear problems that can suddenly become very expensive. Plumbing failures, electrical issues, HVAC breakdowns, home serve offers different plans covering various home systems starting as low as 499 a month. If something covered by your plan goes wrong, you call their 24/7 hotline and they help start the repair process with a local professional. Home serve has been doing this for more than 20 years with nearly 4.5 million customers and a national network of 2600 local contractors. Join the millions of customers who trust home serve. For 50% less your first year, go to homeserve.com/knowles. CanoWLS. That is homeserve.com/knowles. CanoWLS. You will get 50% off savings compared to renewal price void in Florida. All right, so let's set the stage a bit with AOC and why she is what ties so much of the news in the viral videos this week all together and it really stems from this one clip a few weeks ago. Check it out. I have a local city councilman that has this saying, woke one was crazy. You can cut out of this. Woke one was crazy. That was what came out of this interview. That's what so many people were talking about and we all saw the clip. Everyone covered it on any political show. You saw the daily wire. Everyone was covered this clip. Woke one. But I'm sure you saw too. He asked her what happened that went too far. Do you know how she responded? She should tell me. So when you saw her saying woke one was a little crazy, what was your first thought? Well, my first thought was like, okay, why are you being so vague? You're telling me woke one was crazy. Tell me what positions you're going to walk back that makes woke two different. You got to you got to change something. You can't just change the name and expect everyone to go along with it. But the issue is, is I think you're about to talk about like a perfect politician. AOC has been preparing for this moment. And what happens interview? Obviously, he presses her. Yeah. So what do they need to walk back? Like what was so crazy? Well, defunding famously called for defunding police. And then she just dances around it. That's that is the trick. That is the woke one. And what no one has noticed about this. They did point out the fact that obviously she dodges the question. Doesn't answer any of the things that we all wanted her to get pressed on. But what no one saw was what happened right after this clip. The betting markets for the Democrat primary before this clip went viral. AOC was third. The day after she was second, a few days later, she was leading the race in the betting markets. That is when you know something is working. That's when you know you have to pay attention to something. It is absolutely insane. And they get credit for this. They try to take credit. Like, yeah, we do notice this. We're not going to make any changes. But what people should really pay attention to is when politicians say something to gain power and it works. That shows you that this is not something that's going away. This is something that people are going to be running on. This is what AOC will be running on. The hiding the ball of woke one in this woke 2.0 world. Woke is not going away. Woke is not dead. And there are some incredible stories to show you that perfectly embody that. It's just it's insane that the betting market flipped for AOC to be the top after that. Because all this betting market is betting on is how stupid is the Democratic party? Like that said, will they fall for it? Will they fall for AOC side up? And obviously, they think that they are stupid, which I might agree with. This is so insightful because it is the roadmap for what the Democrats are going to do moving forward. 2020 was insane. They want to get credit for noticing, even though nothing was retired, they just got better at hiding the ball. And this week is it's in full display. The attack on the church, the origin story. They just rewrote on HBO. And the one thing that has been the third real and it should have been removed years ago in the NFL. And we'll get to that in a second. But first, we do want to check into what has been the target of most Democrats and really the pillar of America, the church. The Democrats have taken aim on religion. And our old pal James Talleriko was making the rounds again on X. In one of my favorite poems, the Islamic Mystic Hafiz says that we are all invited to join that dance. He says, "Every child has known God, not the God of names, not the God of don'ts, but the God who only knows four words and keeps repeating them, saying, come dance with me." It's truly wild how this guy has been positioned. He was a 36 year old former student at Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary and Teach for America Middle School teacher. That's his background before he just explodes onto the scene. It's pretty wild in comparison, too. You could just go from, I don't know, like, a bartender in the Bronx to being one of the most powerful and prominent Democrat politicians in America, who's also 36, by the way, which is actually pretty wild. But that to me, one of the reasons why he is the most dangerous politician in my mind is because he doesn't just espouse these talking points of like, you know, love is love or open borders or whatever. He actually infiltrates the church. He goes to churches and he talks about the Bible and how it maps on to his woke ideology. And that, to me, is why it is so dangerous. In that video, we've all seen, unfortunately, pride flags hanging on crosses and different ministers wearing, adorning themselves in the kind of progressive garb. But unfortunately, I've never seen people trying to infiltrate Islam into the church. Like, this is the first time in my experience that I've ever seen that done. And that is why it is so shocking to me that, hey, woke 1.0. Sure, love is love. We all need to be welcoming open borders, gay marriage, whatever. Those aren't going away. They're just adding new things. And now this ground swelling support for Islam in our universities, as well as in New York. It's no wonder why you have mayors now adorning themselves in the hijab talking to their constituents. And this can happen in church. It is no wonder it's happening everywhere from our churches to our politicians, to our institutions of higher learning. Like, I don't know colleges. We're now, everyone's taking like a soft pass to radical Islam. It's almost like someone should make a movie about it. Yeah. Like, run high and fight infidel is coming out soon. It's almost like this is such a big issue that we should make a movie about it. And we are, it is awesome, by the way. Jake, when I have both seen run high and fight infidel. I am such a fan of this movie. You have no idea. Like the action, the writing is great. It's just, it's a phenomenal film and I encourage everybody to watch it. I mentioned this previously. This was, this is the most fun that you can have watching a politically charged movie. It is an absolute blast from start to finish. It's funny. There's action. You laugh. You'll cry. It's great. But anyway, I digress because I've got to get to why this is so nefarious and how woke 2.0 is so much worse than woke 1.0 because they're not just putting the pride flag and then the progressive flight pride flag. And whatever the next thing is on the cross in the church. Now, they're going to start slowly slipping that black flag with white text on it and that's just going to be added to it. It's not going away. But AOC avoided by saying, Oh, yeah, what would you do differently from woke 1.0? Ha, ha, nothing. We're just going to keep moving the ball forward. And it is absolutely terrifying. Everything James Taylor, Rico stands for is just absolute wolf and sheep's clothing and it's so dangerous. I'm glad we kind of get the message out there. I want to know my theory for why I think James Taylor, Tallerico is like so popular. I think forever, the left, they've kind of faced an internal problem. You know, it's part of human nature to kind of like long for God. And the left knows because all of the authoritative religious bodies in the world, kind of they should condemn the leftist values and stuff like that. So the left kind of walks around believing what they believe, knowing that they're distance from God. But when they see somebody like this, as you said, a wolf in sheep's clothing, oh, he parades around and he tries to make it seem like no, you believing that mutilating children and you believing that abortion, late terms or any term for that matter, God actually likes that. I think that's why he's so popular because he's an outlet for all of the Godless progressives to finally be like, Oh, I can believe what I believe in. And I can also have God on my side. And it's really dangerous. It's really dangerous. There's no, throughout history, if you look, there is no bigger motivator for politics than religion. None. And now James Telerego for I think the first time is kind of giving that motivation to the left. And that's why I think he's blowing up as much as he is. Yeah, it's incredibly dangerous. And I do want to get to the story that I'm actually, I want to get to because we can actually stop it. We can do something about it right now. But first I do have to mention the 140 million dollar dumpster fire that is James Guns lanterns on HBO, which completely took over the internet and my feed this week for episode three. And it pains me to say this, but unfortunately, the racism gaslighting is not going anywhere. That's one of the things I really wish that they would if there's one thing from Volk 1.0 that wish would just go away forever. It is the Stoking Racial Division and gaslighting of it. But it's not going anywhere. And I promise I'm not reading into it. This is from the mouth of one of the lead actors in the film who plays John Stewart's father. Take a listen. I think it's so important. I think this show hits a home that this black woman is the reason why this young man goes where he needs to go. Yeah. And shout like I said, shout out to HBO, shout out to Chris Mundy, shout out to James Gunn, but especially shout out to Vanessa and Baton Kelly for making sure that we centered that in this story because that's the center of our real lives. You know, because you imagine where we'll be right now if Kamala got up in that dog. You imagine how we would be very different, right? You know, so we're experiencing the consequences, but I'm not trusting the black woman. And now we have this show in a way that can kind of tell you how great it could be. Yeah. And how great of a superhero we can create and have if you trust the black woman, it's really dope. I love that scene. I love the constantly shout out to the costume designer as well. Yes. Dude, Michael like has like a rule where he says you shouldn't do that cringe thing. Oh, but imagine we did this. Can you just imagine sitting there for a second interview and saying see if Kamala got elected. See, look, look at the country right now. You should have trusted a white man. It's imagine it's crazy. Sorry for breaking your role, Michael, but I had to. But that isn't even the worst part. That's what we're kind of used to, unfortunately, because of woke 1.0. But this is woke 2.0 and it's a bit more clever. And this was the clip that was not everyone's feed yesterday. Check it out. This is the best I can do. Do you know the differences and race on earth? Do you understand how unfair it is to ask a black man in America if he's afraid? By black you mean brown skin. We are terrified daily of persecution and still show up sometimes better than everyone around us. Did you know that? I did not. Even a space you all don't consider us. What's so great about this clip is the woman sitting there interviewing the mother of Hal Jordan or not interviewing the mother of John Stewart is one of the guardians and her job is to go there and interview these different people who could potentially be in the lantern core, which is basically just space police with magic rings. And she has no idea that there's different races basically that could have different views or something in the galaxy. But there's actually in the lantern core, there's multiple different species, all these different races of people that are all working together. Anyway, put that all this side. What is brilliant about I think the way they're doing this in lanterns and which is why woke 2.0 is going to be so much more dangerous because they know that they fell into some pitfalls before. So let's just listen to the black females for once. That's kind of been tried and true. The writing this was very specific with these time jumps within the story. This goes back to 1986 where they're first interviewing. She's first talking to John Stewart's father of if he's going to be joining the lantern core. And that's when he has where she has the original conversation with John Stewart's mom. That's the only time we get to get like a historical reference is back in 1986. Then the main story kicks off in 2016. All the struggles that John Stewart is going through are in 2016. And why that is so perfect for the Democrats moving forward, which is why I think this is going to be exactly the playbook they are going to use during the election cycle is the world stops at two starts at 2019 or 2016. Do you know happen in 2016? The greatest president of my lifetime got elected. That's what happened in 2016. The great big scary orange man took office. Because it would be very awkward to have these kind of show elements and a lot of the conflict they're forcing on all of us in the show. If it took place and I don't know between 2008 and 2016, when you bring up these different problems that, oh, actually saying the people that are struggling the most that just can't handle fear at all, you have the most powerful person on your entire planet, elected twice in a white majority country. All these things that they're trying to subtly play, they can't do it during these specific time periods. But if you start the struggle in 2016, that is when a lot of people's memories start because the Democrat party, a lot of their base are young, motivated people and a lot of people's memories with politics that happen so fast. It's kind of like goldfish anyway. So what they're going to do is they're going to start in 2016. Nothing. They're going to erase Barack Obama entirely under the election. They're going to be like, hey, do you remember this horrible 12-year period of this mean orange man? And then, yeah, co was bad. And yeah, we had a dead man that was running the office for a while. That was the entire world. And so this is going to be the playbook. This is what they're going to do in Woke 2.0 for the elections. I had never thought I would see it so perfectly mapped out than I would in a HBO series with a $140 million behind it. I still can't get over that in that clip you showed she said oh so you guys don't care about us in space either. It's such a crazy comment. Yeah, unfortunately, this is the world they're setting up for all the elections moving forward in 2028. And it's exactly what AOC mentioned off the top. She just avoids it entirely. Like, they're just hiding the ball. It's not going to go away. There's going to get smarter about it because I don't think that same stuff that they played in 2020 is going to work again. Now, unfortunately, Wolson sheep's clothing infiltrating the churches and competing with the machine of Hollywood and changing direction of the stories they put out can be really difficult. But there has been a third rail that should have been the final straw for conservative years ago. And that's this. Why did you put that in front of my eyes? Guys, we can do better. Okay, the Patriots, the runner up to the Super Bowl. They're going to wheel this out onto the field for all the home games when you bring your friends and family. This is something we all should have got behind a long, long time ago. I mean, now, if we can't band together, which we did so well during the whole Bud Light controversy, like, we all rally together like, hey, you know what? This is too far. We can't have some guy in a dress selling us beer. All of our kids watching this on TV because they're watching different sporting events. That was that was a bridge too far. But we seem to have missed something like that worked. And I think we definitely need to refocus onto the male cheerleaders that have been going viral recently because now more teams are adopting it. The first male cheerleaders came out and I'm not talking about like the actual very skilled and strong male cheerleaders that do all the throws and do love the stabilizing stuff during these different cheerleading competitions. That's fine because that's a role for men because men are stronger and men and women are very different. So being their throwing women in the air doing these amazing tricks. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking when they started rolling out men in tight outfits, twerking and dancing with pom-pom for the audience. And this happened in 2018 and no one noticed. And this is the one pass that I'll give to conservatives like why we've not gotten around this and removed it from the space entirely. And that was because it was during the great Neilgate. I don't know if you remember that. Like for 2016-2020. What was his name? What was the guy's name? Concapernix. So we all rallied together because we had to we spoke up and called out like this is inappropriate to be doing a football field. And there was all the different racial questions and then Black Lives Matter and all this stuff. And while this was all going on, they just kind of slipped in male twerking cheerleaders in 2018. And no one seems to has focused on it. And now one third of the entire NFL has actual twerking male cheerleaders. Well, you know, you know how we should start condemning them? We should we should name the teams. I have an article written from New. I've got them right here. You got them right here. So we have with the most, of course, the New Orleans Saints with 12 Washington commanders, Los Angeles Rams, the Tennessee Titans. Our beloved Tennessee Titans have five Seattle Seahawks. Obviously, Philadelphia Eagles, Minnesota Vikings, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, New England Patriots, as of this year because we were not watching as well as we should have San Francisco 49ers. I'm genuinely curious. I wonder if there are any statistics they can talk about points scored during the games before there were male cheerleaders and points scored after. I'm genuinely curious if there was any effect there on the scores. And I know some people will think that this is a small issue. However, if you normalize this and it is just spreading because no one's called it out because conservatives should. I mean, this is our place of community. This is a national pastime where you bring your your friends, your family. If we retreat that ground on the NFL field, you can't stop it anywhere. Like good luck stopping it at a public library or somewhere else. Like you you can't do it on a football field. We're all gathered together in one of like the most traditional conservative sports of all time. Good luck. I know people think that, you know, maybe the cheerleader conversation is they don't like cheerleaders in general. But let me just make the point that like it's actually kind of normal the way that we traditionally had it. Like many women are different, women are desirable, women inspire men. And in this setting to show off and perform to your highest potential in hopes of catching a smile from a pretty girl waving a pom-pom is as American as apple pie. And that's totally fine. Well, we can't have are the male cheerleaders twerking for our kids because no one wants to have that conversation of hey daddy, why is that guy wearing that and dancing on screen. We have to put a stop to that. It's also the whole the whole accusation like why do you care about it? It's such a small issue. It's so dishonest and it lacks foresight because like the entire the entire tactic of the left that turns society into the left wing society that we know today is by changing small things incrementally under our noses to the point where one day we just stand there for a second or like wait, wait, what do you mean this person's going in this bathroom? I mean, it's like it's like for example with the LGBT stuff. At first it was like, okay, love is love. Okay, now we want to get married. Okay, now they want men can want to become women. And now we want to put a Taliban ISIS flag. Exactly. It is the definition of a slippery slope. It's a snowball effect. And no, I don't care if it's a small fight. You fight it just like any other. The key is no one is walking it back. And woke one was crazy, huh? Well, they're doing anything differently. Islam is on the move. Hollywood is reframing history right in front of us. And they want a dude to working in front of your kids, not just at bars and libraries, but at your most at the most popular national pastimes. This is the fight because buckle up woke 2.0 and AOC are coming. It is nuts. And we got to pay attention to it. 100%. Well, that was depressing. Yeah, I, AOC might become the president. People are infiltrating the church with terrorist flags. I don't know. It's kind of a sad show, man. Fortunately, we do have a lot of fun at the Michael Noles show. And thank you guys so much for tuning in and watching all the content that we put out each week. One thing that's really fun for Jake, when I to do is to try to find something on the internet. And maybe Michael hasn't seen because he's obviously very well read and spends a lot of time constructing his shows each day. But sometimes we like to find videos from to react to for all of Michael's original stuff we put out for you. And since Michael's on the road, I didn't want to give you guys just a teaser for anyone else that you're tuning into the Michael Noles show we got coming out. And fortunately this week, we have a little bit of a palette cleanser. Jacob came to me with an idea that actually gave me a little hope during this dark time. Yeah, that's going to put it. I mean, it's like, we always, it seems like today in the political sphere, there's just a lot of bad news, a lot of, I don't know, we live in a fallen world. So it's easy to get sad off the news cycle. But I thought to myself, you know, why don't I have Michael cover something that might make him smile? Maybe, might make him smile. So it did just make it smile like it may have actually made him cry. So check out this is Michael reacting to hope core. Palette cleanser. There's a lot of bad stuff going on. You know, we got war, war. We got the weird sex stuff. We got mass migration, fighting. We'll get back to that in two seconds. This is going to be a little palette cleanser, little hope core part two. Take it away. [Music] [Music] That's very nice. Sorry, they just had some, they just brought a crate of onions into my office. So. Hey, who left us all of onions here? Anyway, it's very nice. You never know one thing about modern technology is now you don't know if it's just AI. Like, I don't remember that story from 2002. I don't, I'll choose to believe it's real. That has to be one of my favorite Michael Null's original we put out. So I hope I'm so glad we could give you a teaser of it first. It's about also tomorrow for the full one. But I'm glad we could almost in a high note. Is there anything else that we may have missed on the dredge of the internet that we got covered today? Well, you know me. There is, there is kind of a something that I kind of want to riff about that. It's not necessarily a new story that doesn't get a lot of attention, but it's a new story that I think gets the wrong kind of attention. You know, the biggest issue in my eyes. You have the taleriko's, you have the transgender stuff going on. You have AOC, you have all that. The biggest issue in my mind is the mass migration of Islamist migrants to the west. I mean, we already know based on like what you just saw from taleriko that the left loves this. But there seems to be this kind of new movement of people that they don't just outright admit that they love it. They empower it by denying that it's even happening in the first place. A really good example of this that you guys can kind of see what I'm talking about here. There's this guy named John Kiryaku. Kiryaku, I don't know how to pronounce his name. That was a good effort. How do you pronounce it? Do you know who I'm talking about? No, Mike likes to just look up everyone's name before he does it. And I'm not even going to say that. Kiryaku Kiryaku, I don't know much about the guy. What I do know about him is I haven't seen anybody blow up at the rate that he's blown up since I think Andrew Tate. He's like a former CIA agent or officer. Now he just talks about his experience. But he has a lot of followers and he has a lot of influence. And this is what he said about Sharia law in Islam. They hear, oh my God, Sharia law. Oh my God, we have to stop it. Muslims, they're going to blow us up. That's why I get a kick out of these, these state legislatures that pass laws banning Sharia law. Why? Right. They're not imposing it on anybody. No, nobody. Do you know what Sharia law is? Right. So Sharia law is, for example, if, if the head of the household dies, Sharia law says that the wife gets half of the estate and the sons get the other half. Can you believe this? That's all it. That's all it. What John is in telling you is that while what he's saying is true about Sharia law, yeah, that inheritance thing. Sharia law also includes like killing people that leave Islam, killing people who insult Muhammad, keeping sex slaves. And just about every other variation of violent and sexual crime, crime, comprehensible. It's all permitted under Sharia law. He also claimed that Islam is not trying to take over the United States. And that means he's either dishonest or has no general comprehension of world history. It lives under Iraq. Davies, do you think that Islam is trying to take over the United States? I think they're trying to look at certain cities and you can see it in their charters. Exactly. 100%. And there are moms all over the country that are outright saying it. But in itself, the history of Islam is rooted in conquering non-Muslim lands and subjugating them to Muhammadism. I mean, it's the entire reason that the crusades happened. You really don't even need to know 1000-year-old history to understand what I'm saying. I mean, if you look at England today, for three years now, three years, Muhammad has been the most popular name given to baby boys. Three years in a row. 15% of the population in London is Muslim and it is multiplying every single day. The mayor's Muslim. Londoners complain every single day about certain blocks in London that they can't go. They call them no-go zones because they enforce Sharia law. You know, it's like, it just, it upsets me that there's like this new, sir, this is the story I'm trying to get to. There's like this new group of people in the media who don't openly advocate for it to happen. They deny it's happening at all. They ask you to like, look away from from from what your eyes are showing you. We're getting so close you go from a Muslim mayor in London to a mayor in New York wearing hijab. Like we're very close. Like they slippery slopes to get right there. We're so close and the reason you got to call it out is because like the perfect example is like you look at London and London's like, okay, it's in the process. America's starting the process in places like Dearborn. But the most perfect example that I can think of is Lebanon. You know, you go to the average person you ask them, oh, what's the, what's the, historically, what has been the religion in Lebanon? They're going to say, oh, it's across the world and it's in the desert. They were probably Muslim. But that wasn't the case in Lebanon. They were Maranite Christians. The majority of them were Maranite Christians up until a couple decades ago. The Maranites were a, a sect of Catholics who they adhere to the Pope, but they have their own liturgy, through mass migration and violence and outpacing the Christians in reproduction. They're now the majority in the Hezbollah runs it, you know. So it's definitely something to look out for it. If you guys see anybody on your feed that is telling you, you know, the Sharia law, it's not that serious and they're not trying to invade this and that trust your own eyes because because there is a serious effort. I don't know where it's coming from. It's propping up on the right. It's propping. It's already existed on the left to just trust your eyes. That's my story. That is enough anti-Islamic propaganda from you. Michael Knowles will return tomorrow. He's going to make it back from his detox through Europe. The rest of the show continues right now. You do not want to miss it. Become a member and use code Knowles for two months free on all annual plans.