Ep. 1825 - Lindsay Clancy Defenders Are Just As Sick As She Is

One of the hardest things to do when you're paying close attention to current events and you've watched one too many depraved TikToks is to take a step back and realize that things weren't always so bad. Not too long ago, for example, it would have been unthinkable for millions of women to spend their free time rallying to the defense of a psychotic mother like Lindsey Clancy, who murdered her own children one by one after sending her husband away on an errand. It would have been unthinkable for women to send nearly a million dollars to the mother's family via a GoFundMe as a reward for the horrific crime that she had committed. In another era, women certainly wouldn't be throwing themselves out of windows in a bizarre effort to prove that Lindsey Clancy is somehow being framed for murder, even though Clancy herself isn't even making that claim. But as you can see on your screen right now, that's exactly what we're seeing today. There are women so bored with their lives, so delusional and dumb that they're throwing themselves out of buildings on camera in a futile attempt to demonstrate that Lindsey Clancy was definitely pushed out of her second story window. They're also consulting astrology and birth charts to divine the killer's true identity watch. It's been a while, but I have to pop on here just to say that I've been following this Lindsey Clancy trial, especially as a mother of two who dealt with a lot of postpartum mental illness. And you know, just following all their birth charts in birthdays and zodiac signs, he did it. He did it. He's a Gemini man. His birthday is June 15th. I'm a Gemini woman. My birthday is June 14th. Let me give you another example of who a Gemini man is. Also birthday, June 14th. Men and women are different. Keep that in mind. Please don't judge me. Donald Trump. Patrick did it. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. Yeah, the husband did it, despite all the evidence pointing to the wife and despite the wife herself confessing to it. And we know he did it because his birthday is a few days apart from Donald Trump. And there are tons of videos like this one, okay? The idea that you can solve a crime based on looking at somebody's birthday is a legitimately popular view among women on social media. And I will also say as a side note and not to get hung up on the less important details here, but the other thing you notice about all these women on TikTok is that they all sound exactly the same. And I don't just mean that they sound the same because they're all sputtering the same nonsensical, morally retarded gibberish, although they are. I mean, that they sound the same in like their tone of voice in their mannerisms, in their inflection. They have the same facial expressions. They have the same text like the same smarmy grin, the same dramatic pauses where they always look very impressed with whatever they just said, even though it was the dumbest we've ever heard. They speak in the same cliches. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk, she says. And she's very impressed with herself for being approximately like the five billionth person to think of that joke. My point is that while these women are being radicalized and driven into psychosis, not by any postpartum biological phenomenon, but by a combination of social media and their own narcissism, there's also a kind of loss of individual identity that's happening on a massive scale that maybe should be a subject of its own video sometime because, you know, the woman in that video and in the thousands of videos like it has no personality of her own at all. No thoughts of her own. Doesn't even have her own distinct mannerisms or style of speaking. She is a drone. She is a walking cliche. She is a being devoid of distinctness and probably lacking anything resembling an actual interior life. Like if you could travel inside that woman's head, it would be like walking into a cave. You'd hear an echo. There's just like nothing happening. And this, this again is a phenomenon that we were witnessing on a culture wide scale. Now, we'll go through many more videos like this in a moment. There is a psychotic lust for child killing that's taken hold of a large number of American women, which may not seem surprising given their support for abortion in the majority anyway. But it's even worse than we thought. I mean, we're now at the point where if a random psycho-witch murder certain children in the basement, a preponderance of women on social media feel an instant kinship with her. At the same time, this is not just a problem that's confined to women. In just the past year, we've also seen thousands of black people rally around Carmelo Anthony, who stabbed a white kid to death at a track meet. Many of these people showed up to the courthouse to blame Austin Metcalf for his own murder. They donated hundreds of thousands of dollars explicitly because he killed a white teenager. This is racial tribalism, which mirrors the gender tribalism of the Lindsey Clancy case. We've also seen multiple assassinations or attempted assassinations against leading conservative figures and other people all prompting and outpouring of adulation from leftists. This is an obvious form of political tribalism on the left. These people instinctively support each other in everything they do and innocence are dying as a result. The rule of law is starting to fail in large swaths of the country because of it. So we've been told for years about the alleged radicalization of young white conservative men, but it seems clear that the worst and most psychotic forms of radicalization are happening in pretty much every group except that one. Take the one group that Merrick Garland and Joe Biden and Barack Obama warned us about, as it turns out, is the least radicalized, the least deranged, and least violent of all. And one way to explain the situation is that white men as a group have been beaten down by years of scolding and moral blackmail and propaganda by the government, by the media, by everyone. There's also the fact that white men have been replaced in cities throughout the United States while being run out of every major institution. They've been conquered, in other words. It's not the first time this has happened, by the way. Here's some historical trivia for you from the medieval period, otherwise known as the golden age of civilization. After the Norman conquest of England and 1066, William the Conqueror commissioned something called the Doomsday book, which is actually spelled Doomsday, even though it's pronounced Doomsday. The point of the Doomsday book was to list the names of landowners at two points in time, 1066 before the Norman invasion, as well as in 1086 after the Normans took over. So the Doomsday book contained a side-by-side comparison of the names of landowners before the invasion, as well as the names of landowners after the invasion. Now, just by paging through the finished product, it becomes clear that the name Doomsday book is very much appropriate. The landowner's in 1066 mostly had names like Ulrich or Edwin or Godwin or Harold or my personal favorite Wolfsten. They were Germanic, Norse, Danish. But on the other hand, by 1086, the names were all French and Norman. There were names like Robert or Ralph or Roger or William. So to anyone reading the Doomsday book was immediately obvious that England had been conquered. A casual glance through the pages would confirm that as of 1086, the Thor brands and Leo Fricks were gone and the Ralphs had taken over. And this one book told the entire story. Now, of course, we don't have a Doomsday book anymore, at least by name. Everything has to be as sterile and clinical as we can make it. So today we have a census that doesn't really tell us anything. But if you know where to look, you can easily find modern day equivalents of the Doomsday book. So for example, you can browse through local news reports paying particularly close attention to stories documenting horrific and seemingly random crimes. And if you do that, you'll come to the same realization that a medieval peasant would have had in England back in 1086, paging through William the conquerors book. You'll realize, as if there's any doubt, that we have been conquered. So to give just one egregious example, which gets worse, the more you learn about it, considering the following story out of Fairfax County, Virginia. Now, this is one of the most affluent areas in the United States. Up until recently, pretty much everyone living there had a name like Steve or Peter. But those days are long gone. So here we go. On the morning of December 29, 2019, in Vienna, Virginia, a 61 year old landlord, named Mohamed Hamashim, was stabbed to death in a home by his tenant, 27 year old Abdulo Tosh Palazza. I'll say that again, Abdulo Tosh Palazza stabbed Mohamed Hamashim to death inside a mansion in Fairfax County. Now, it was a brutal murder, Abdulo, Abduly, whatever, we'll just call him Abdulo, was covered in blood from head to toe, quote unquote, when officers arrived in the home. He told the police, quote, I am guilty. And by the way, this guy had no legal right to be in the country. The first place unsurprisingly, he's an illegal alien. Now, with all that in mind, here's how a local news station covered this crime at the time. Watch. And is dead after being stabbed in Fairfax County. Yeah, news force Derek Ward just arrived on the scene and has the latest from Vienna. What do we know about this, Derek? Well, we're here in the 2900 block of edgley court or as we wrote in Vienna, police were called here at about 845 for the report of a person's stab. Now, when they got here, they performed CPR on the victim. It's taken to a hospital and later pronounced dead. Now, we haven't learned that suspect is in custody and Fairfax County police are saying that there is no threat to the public. This all seemed to appear. It seems to have happened inside a home here. As you can see, crime scene tape and investigators remain on the scene. But again, one person stabbed pronounced dead at a hospital here in Vienna. The 2900 block of edgley road police say they have a suspect in custody and that there is no threat to the public. It's all we know for now. No identities on the victim or the suspect. We are live in Vienna. Derek Ward news for back to you. So the local news really didn't want to provide the names of anyone involved in this incident. Even though a suspect wasn't custody and it was obvious he did it since he was found in the house and the police weren't looking for anyone else and also he said he did it. Now at the end of the clip, the anchor does express some surprise that a homicide like this could occur in such a wealthy area, but that's as far as it goes. You'll have to conclude that this was just another unfortunate altercation between a couple of random Virginia men who are just as American as anybody else. Unfortunately, the police caught the killer. So you'd assume obviously that, okay, well, he'll be spending the rest of his life in prison. Don't have to worry about that guy anymore at least, but that didn't happen. Instead in 2022, Abdullo was interviewed by a state-funded Muslim psychiatrist. And shockingly enough that Muslim psychiatrist found that Abdullo was not guilty by reason of insanity. So he was sent to the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute. And what this means is that under Virginia law, he was not criminally responsible for butchering his landlord. And so every year he's eligible for a psychiatric re-evaluation. And if the doctor determines that he's all better, then he can be released into the public with no conditions like the murder never happened. He can walk right outside the door of the mental institution as a free man and move in right next to you if he wants to. And we talked before about the insanity defense and how it should be abolished because none of this makes any degree of sense whatsoever. Once you kill someone, you forfeit your right to freedom permanently. It doesn't matter if a psychiatrist thinks you were insane at the time. Even if you could somehow prove that you couldn't control your own actions or you had no idea what was going on. That's all the more reason to lock you up. You're a threat to everybody around you as long as you live. But in this case, Abdullo didn't even have to wait for a psychiatrist to give him the green light for release. Instead, Abdullo was freed from mental institution despite the fact that his doctors and the courts strongly believed that he should not be released. So this is from the New York Post quote Abdullo Toshbaladza left the Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute on July six for an authorized 48 hour pass. He was required to return today's later, but he never did. Instead, he traveled to Washington, Dallas, international airport and boarded a Turkish Airlines flight to Istanbul before continuing to to Sean B at Tajikistan court documents show. So in other words, even though he was supposed to be held indefinitely in a mental institution, the mental institution gave him a 48 hour unsupervised day pass where he could go wherever he wanted. And what do you know he chose to board an airplane and go back to his homeland? Who could have possibly seen that coming? Now already this story is yet more evidence that the insanity defense must be abolished. Once you start coddling criminals and pretend they didn't actually do anything wrong, this is what happens. The government hires a bunch of social workers to treat these monsters like harmless little children and the monsters, particularly take full advantage of the situation. Except in this case, it's even worse than it sounds. So take a look at this document. It's from May of 2024. And as it turns out, the Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney, a Soros funded prosecutor named Steve Descano asked a judge to allow Abdullo to leave the mental institution temporarily. So you could travel to the embassy of the jica stand in Washington DC for the purpose of obtaining a passport. That was two years ago. It gave this murderer the tool he needed to flee the country. So this was a state sanctioned Soros backed jailbreak. In other words, and it proceeded in two steps. First, Democrats of Virginia helped an illegal alien, Islamic murderer to get a passport. Then the mental institution opened the doors and gave him a 48 hour head start to the airport. Now, if something like this happened in the third world, they'd be ashamed. It's too much even for them. First, you have the Muslim psychiatrists bailing out the Muslim killer. Then the government arranges the killers, the killers getaway flights. Like this is the kind of thing that doesn't even happen in Afghanistan. But it's now considered another day at the office in Fairfax, Virginia, which again, used to be one of the nicest areas in the country. The insanity defense enables all this corruption. Without the insanity defense, they wouldn't be able to issue day passes or drive criminals to get passports. But as it stands, because we've closed the asylum, a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially a get out of jail free card. If you're an Islamic murderer and you get a Muslim psychiatrist, you're in business. And this again is why the insanity defense should be abolished as we've been advocating for for years now. Although since we're on the subject, I feel that I should know it because hardly anyone else is. When you're talking about the insanity defense, there is a distinction that is lost in the debate about insanity and the insanity defense. Nobody denies that insanity is a real phenomenon, insane people exist. Recently, I saw a homeless guy on a street corner, half naked, unwashed, disheveled, engaged in a heated dispute with a lamp post. He was very obviously insane. He had no idea where he was, who he was, what he was doing. If he ever killed someone, which it's perfectly likely he will, I would agree that he had very little control over it, although he's still even more so if anything needs to be locked away forever. But the real debate is about the concept of temporary insanity. Okay, the question is whether a functional coherent person, someone capable of living as a normal member of society, engaging in normal conversations, showing an ability to plan for the future and fulfill their basic obligations and do all the stuff normal people do, but homeless people can't. Whether that person could nonetheless suddenly go insane and lose all agency, only to quickly regain agency and be somehow not crazy again, which is basically what they're claiming with Lindsey, Lindsey Clancy. Now, I think that this whole idea of temporary insanity is mythological. Okay, I think it's something out of the movies and not real life. And at any rate, it's unfalsifiable. So whatever you think about it, whether you think it's real or not, it is unfalsifiable, which is why it should never be in a courtroom. You cannot have unfalsifiable things presented in courtrooms by definition. It can never be proved or disproved. There is no way at all ever to determine what was happening inside the conscious mind of a currently sane person weeks or months ago. At a specific moment in time, there is no way for you to know what was going on in my head last Wednesday. You could never prove it. You could never know. You can't even know it now currently, but at least in the current moment, there are context clues, right, that you could, you can use. But last week, last year, three years ago, impossible. And so even if temporary insanity is a real thing, which I highly doubt, it would still be absolutely impossible to demonstrate or prove and literally any criminal for all we know could have been temporarily insane at the time of their crime. Our only choice then is to hold currently sane people entirely accountable for the crimes they committed no matter what they were or weren't thinking at the time. And as for currently insane people, we can feel very sorry for them if we want to. But they too have to be locked away forever for the good of society and the sake of the innocence that they can never be trusted to be around. So all of that is a long way of saying that this whole debate is ultimately or should ultimately be irrelevant. But it's made relevant because the objective is to let people like Lindsey Clancy off the hook using whatever legal tools tools are available. And that's exactly why all of these women and even some cucked gutless men are breathlessly making the insanity to case for Lindsey Clancy. They don't really care if she's insane or not, they want her to go free. And that's not based on any kind of logic or even on any kind of genuine misunderstanding or difference of opinion, they know she murdered her children, they know she chose to do it and they support her in spite of that or more grimly, in some cases, they support her because of it. Now these women have entered a state of communal psychosis in effect metaphorically, all to defend Clancy for committing the most heinous act imaginable strangling her own children to death, their plan, their plan, as was the case in Virginia, is to use the absurdity of the insanity defense to absolve her of responsibility for these brutal murders. And to be clear, you know, we're not talking about a handful of viral TikToks here. This is not a case of cherry picking the most extreme weirdos to develop a narrative. This phenomenon is widespread and mainstream as we speak a go fund me for Clancy's family, which is a roundabout way of donating to her has exceeded nine hundred and twenty thousand dollars in donations. This woman is going to clear a million, after murdering all three of her kids, she's going to make a million dollars or more, and you can see the fundraiser on the screen right here. The page reads, the muskrow family fund is for the two people who have remained at her side throughout every step of the of what followed her parents, Mike and Paula muskrow. For more than three years, Mike and Paula have shown up for Lindsey, the case will eventually reach its conclusion, whatever the outcome is, Mike and Paula will still have to pick up the pieces of their lives. They put a hold on to be there for their daughter, they should not have to face that future without the financial foundation, they spend decades building. Now, of course, there's no logical reason why anyone would donate to the fundraiser of the parents of a child murder. Since when do we do that? Do we have go fund me for the parents of school shooters? Like, since when is this a thing? But, you know, this again is about supporting Lindsey clansis, about supporting the murder. Now, to the extent that parents have spent money defending their child. killing daughter. That's their decision. Okay, no one owes them anything. The whole idea is preposterous. If they were honorable people, they would turn this money down. If I'm a parent and my child has committed a heinous barbaric crime against my own grandchildren, and people are donating a million dollars to me, I would say I'm not going to, I don't want to profit off of my child committing a crime. So if you're an honorable decent person, you turn that money down and you say, shut this, go find me now. I don't want this money. Have they done that? I don't know. Does being a despicable monster run in that family? I don't know. Now, when you look at the comments of the GoFundMe though, you see what's really going on here. It's not about the parents at all. Quote, "Lindsay is changing women's health and we know it and hopefully saving the lives of many struggling women." That's a comment. Here's another. As someone that worked in mental health for many years, I am disgusted, shocked, and appalled by the failures of so many professionals. Lindsay, I see you and I stand with you with an aching heart. I'm disgusted, shocked, and appalled not by the murder of three kids, but by the fact that people are being mean to the woman who did it. Quote, "I stand with Lindsay. I could have been you." Now, that last claim is especially popular among women who support Lindsay Clancy. They're all saying that, you know, just like Clancy. They could see themselves doctor shopping for a dozen different psych meds than brutally murdering their own children. A licensed therapist made the same claim on camera. Watch. The Lindsay Clancy trial is going to be one of the most significant trials of your lifetime. We are all experiencing something completely unprecedented. Never before have we seen so many mothers and women rally behind somebody who confessed to killing her three children. And it is not because we cannot hold women accountable. Many of us see ourselves in Lindsay. Many of us know that we could have been only one step away from doing some of those horrific things because we experienced significant mental health issues after one of our children was born. And many of us know just how dark some of those thoughts get. So yeah, this is going to be one of the most significant trials of your lifetime. Many of us know that we could have been only one step away from murdering our children as what she said. This is not an outlier. Again, this is a popular sentiment among Lindsay Clancy fans. To be clear, I don't actually think that it's true. I can't believe that it's true. Okay, according to the child killer's legion of groupies, it is very common for women to be nearly one step away from murdering their children. That is the point being made explicitly by Clancy's defenders. Now, if that were true, okay, if what these women are saying, if that were true, if it were common, you know, that these desires and women were as common as these people say. And if the difference between Lindsay Clancy and the average woman is just one of sheer luck, if the average woman could easily be Lindsay Clancy, if she has come with a mere inches of becoming Lindsay Clancy, that fact would have vast social and legal consequences. Indeed, it would be the greatest argument for the patriarchy that you could ever make. And it's an argument being made by Clancy's feminist defenders. The feminists are now out there saying that, hey, you can't necessarily trust us to not murder kids. Anyone of us could do it. Now, that's the claim they make. I personally reject that claim. I don't think that most women are merely one step away from strangling their children to death as Clancy's fan club proposes. Which means that I, the guy accused of being like the sexist in this debate, I am putting forward a much more flattering and positive view of women than these women themselves are. But even if wanting to murder your children is not a common banal sort of experience for the average woman, still there is something happening, for sure, in an increasingly sizable portion of the modern female population, and it can't be ignored. What's happening is the logical endpoint of decades of feminist propaganda and policy, SSRI prescriptions, social media saturation, it's all these things. For generations, women have been taught that their immediate needs are more important than anybody else's, even their own children. You know, this is the pro-abortion logic that, you know, if you're a woman, you should even be allowed to butcher your own child with total impunity, if your child is inconvenient to you. Even when abortion was illegal, very few women were ever prosecuted for it. Instead of taking responsibility for their own actions in every aspect of life, they've been told, much like racial minorities have been told, that the fault for their behavior lies elsewhere. Selfishness has been taught as a virtue to all of the left's favored demographic groups, including, especially women. This is relevant to the topic of parenting also, you know, the truth, as uncomfortable as it may be to hear, and I've already gotten a lot of trouble on X for saying this. So I'll say it here again, because, you know, whining at me and scolding me is only going to make me say whatever I was saying, even louder and more often. That's just the way that it works. So I'll say here that the truth is that much of the depression that parents and not just moms, dads too, suffer after childbirth is not always due entirely to hormones or any purely physiological cause, but also to the fact that children, especially babies, are demanding and difficult, and they require us to subordinate our own needs and desires for their sake. Okay? The more selfish you are, and we're all selfish to some degree. The more selfish you are, the more of an adjustment that's going to be. And as I've said, explicitly many times, postpartum depression is a real biological phenomenon. I haven't heard anyone deny that, but that's not the only thing going on when a new child is born and parents are adjusting to that reality. And also a postpartum depression is not an excuse to harm your child in any way. And if you do that, you should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. I don't care how depressed you were. Once you do that, you could cry all you want. I was depressed. Yeah, I don't give a shit. Okay? You should be executed. Okay. Yeah. Go tell us about that in front of the firing squad. You killed a child. Go whine about your depression in front of the firing squad. We'll take you up the gallows, put the news around your neck, and you could tell us all about how depressed you are. It doesn't matter. The moment you do that, it doesn't matter. But these emotional challenges should be expected to some degree, to some degree, because having children is by far the most seismic change you'll ever experience in your life. I mean, nothing comes close to it. You're getting married, moving to another country, getting a new job. None of that has the effect of so immediately and so totally changing the way you live your life on a day-to-day basis. It doesn't help anyone to completely reduce the mental hardship and frustration of this experience to a matter solely of hormones and brain chemistry as if there aren't even deeper reasons why a parent might feel depressed as they learn to live in an entirely different way and are forced for the first time to orient their lives around something other than their own needs and desires. And of course, I'd say the same thing about depression in general. They're very often deeper issues than just the chemicals. Now, in the case of Lindsey Clancy, an extreme outlier case, though apparently not as much of an outlier as we had thought or hoped, she was so selfish, she was so narcissistic, she was so utterly consumed by her own wants and desires that she eventually lashed out in the most barbaric way she could. The self-appointed experts may try to tell us that she had no free will, no ability to make choices that she was nothing but an automaton responding to chemical signals with no conscious awareness of what she was doing, like she was nothing but like a a flesh-and-blood chat GPT, but the experts are for lack of a better term full of crap. If you take a look at the Lindsey Clancy content that's all over social media right now, it supports everything I'm saying. You simply cannot watch these videos and come to any other conclusion. There's an epidemic of narcissism among some women in this country and it's leading them to broadcast their derangement and psychopathy all over the internet. These are women who are not suffering from hormonal imbalances that we know of, or if they are suffering from that, that's not their main problem. Their main problem is a spiritual sickness, not a physical one. They're echoing decades of soul-corrupting feminist propaganda and coming to deranged theories about how Lindsey Clancy couldn't possibly be responsible because, in their view, no woman is responsible for anything ever. Watch. Hypothetical scenario. A man is abusing his five-year-old daughter. He is part of a pedophile ring. Other members of this ring include his best friend, the ADA, Chief Police, possibly some doctors nurses and now let's say that the mother finds out Let's say she takes her daughter to the doctor to get some digestion issues looked at. UTIs, things like that. Let's say that doctor suggests to the mother that this child has been abused and she has been abused recently. So of course the mother goes home and confronts this monster of a man. What do you think he would do in that instance, do you think he might snap, strangle his wife, did the thing with, you know, the other three, because why not at this point, right? Would he then enlist the help of that ADA, that chief police, those doctors and nurses that are in that ring to help them cover it up? Don't forget what they did to Karen Reed. Again, what I said before about these women have no personality, no identity of their own, like nothing going on in their minds. And so you see the same like facial expressions, just the same because they're not even different people. They have no individual identity. Now at this point for a lot of these women, the TikTok brain damage is probably irreversible for being honest. I mean, it is a full on psychosis. And here she is creating this vast narrative in her mind that has no basis in reality. The sole purpose of her delusion is to absolve a woman of responsibility from killing her own child. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that in her own life, this woman certainly doesn't take responsibility for anything she does either. I mean, if she's willing to spin up elaborate cinematic movie plots to absolve some other random woman of heinous crimes, just imagine what she's willing to do, what sort of Olympic hurdles she's willing to jump over to absolve herself of whatever terrible things she's done, or will do. Back to school season is basically one long reminder that your children need things. New shoes, new clothes, school supplies, sports equipment, and somehow the list regenerates overnight, boss parents were pretty good at spending money on everybody else and then deciding anything for ourselves can just kind of wait. But here's one upgrade I actually think is worth making and that is your bed. It's been about third of our life sleeping and good sleep affects pretty much everything about the other two thirds. I've talked about bowling branch sheets before 94% of their customers say the sheets get softer with every wash and I totally get the hype. But don't overlook the rest of their betting also. The dream comforter has this soft cloud-like texture with a little natural stretch. It's also substantial without feeling stuffy. It's breathable enough for year-round use and I love that it's one piece, no duvet, insert, no cover, no wrestling with your betting just to make the bed as machine washable. As long as you don't have one of those tiny washing machines like they do in Europe. So while you're buying backpacks and sneakers and everything else that your kids apparently cannot survive another school year without consider this your reminder that parents are allowed in upgrade also and one that helps you sleep better, well that actually makes a lot of sense. I wasn't really someone who thought much about betting, but after sleeping in bowling branch and I don't understand, but I believe everyone else needs to invest in better sleep also. That's what bowling branch is all about. Sleep cooler this summer with bowling branch get 15% off your first order plus free shipping at bowlenbranch.com/walls with code walls. That's bowlenbranch B-O-L-L-L-A-N-D branch.com/walls. Go to walls to unlock 15% off bowlenbranch.com/walls code wall exclusion supply. In my house, they're always groceries to buy bills to pay children who will eventually need braces, cars, probably several other expensive inventions. I haven't even anticipated yet. Providing for a family means accepting a long list of responsibilities and those responsibilities don't simply disappear if something happens to you. And that's why life insurance makes a lot of sense for you and for me. You keep a spare tire in the car, install smoke detectors in the house, you save for unexpected expenses. You hope you'll never need any of that stuff, but responsible adults prepare for possibilities they would rather not think about. Well, if your family relies on your income, protecting them financially is simply part of their responsibility that comes with being a husband and a father. You know, a Palestinian makes it easier to fulfill that basic responsibility. It's a free online marketplace where you can compare life insurance quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side. Their license team helps you understand your options, answers your questions, handles paperwork, and advocates for you throughout the process. Thousands of customers have given policy genius five star reviews on Google and Trust Pilot. And you can find 20 year life insurance policy starting at just $276 a year for a million dollars in coverage. Go to policygenius.com/walls to compare life insurance quotes and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com/walls. Here's another clip along those lines from an alleged actress named Lisa Rina. She did it. Patrick did it. Patrick's the one who did it. Not Lindsay. Patrick did it because you know, I also heard that women typically don't strangle so awful that you even say, but that isn't what a woman would do. They don't strangle. I was actually in therapy today and my therapist and I were talking about it and she said, I said, well, what do they do? She said, well, they poison or I said, oh, or drown them. Like we literally have that conversation today. And she looks at me and she goes, he did it. I was like, wow, yeah. And now, yeah, yeah. You know, not surprising to see this from someone who's more lip than head at this point like her lips have taken up over her entire face. No room there for a brain inside that head. And yeah, there's another therapist who contributes to the patient's narcissistic delusions instead of doing anything to correct them. Women don't strangle, women don't strangle. What are you talking about? This is what all these women are tick-tocked to by the way, like whether it's this or Charlie Kirk or anything, it's always just, yeah, this is my, this is my woman's intuition. It just doesn't feel right. It doesn't see. I don't know. Something's off, guys. It kind of feels like women would never strangle. That's how it feels. Yeah, except in all the cases where they have strangle people to death, including the recent cases of Kenya Tilford in New York, Christie Marie Lynch in Virginia, Dresene Junkerman in South Africa, Lori Valodaybell and Idaho struggled her own children. See, if you ignore all the evidence of women's strangling people, then women don't strangle people. It's airtight logic. Actually even if I couldn't name a single case of a woman's, of a woman's strangling someone, it doesn't preclude the possibility that it happened in this case because you see women have hands, and when you have hands, you can strangle somebody, particularly a child, and that's especially true in a case where the defendant admits that that's what happened. Now for his part, Douglas Mackey, the meme creator that Joe Biden threw in prison has a slightly more optimistic take on what we're seeing here, and this is what he wrote, quote, "You have to understand the Lindsey Clancy obsession as just a soap opera. It's a low stakes way for women to escape from their boring routines and feel like their life has meaning." And not just mom surfing TikTok and doing laundry, they are sleuths, detectives, activists, fighters, dogooters. Some may be clinically trying to, or cynically trying to capture TikTok, add money, yes. Others are just spectators wanting to feel something, anything to break the routine. Now, I think there's plenty of truth to that, but the problem with the argument is that as we can see in many different ways, these women actually believe what they're saying to some degree. It's not just a time-waster for them. Women in Massachusetts just got a law pass that allows them to murder their child until the moment of birth. They're genuinely becoming emotional, weeping on camera about the prospect of legalizing post-birth abortion, which is what the Lindsey Clancy case is really about. This is not just a lark, you know, or some kind of game for them. Logic won't convince these people of anything because as we saw, they're enamored with astrology and other forms of arcane magic watch. So if you're watching the Lindsey Clancy case, I've already gone over the forensic astrology charts that show that the perpetrator is a male, the perpetrator is having an affair and that the victims specifically Lindsey was drugged during this. And I've also gone over with the theory and the lie detection. I'm telling you all right now, when the South note goes into cancer in March of 2028, the South note is going to transit over Patrick Clancy's moaning cancer. He's going to be having eclipses over his natal moon, which is home, family, emotions, his emotional life. And then it's better. 2029, all the way into 2030. He is going to have eclipses over his genocide place since the South note is going to move over his son, his Mercury, Retrograde, his Venus, Retrograde. It's about to get real interesting in the next three to four years for him. I'm going to my popcorn. I can't wait for this man to be humbled and for Karma to do his thing. More of these clips you watch, the more you realize that these aren't just stupid gossipy women involving themselves in a soap opera. They're a danger to themselves and their families. I mean, some of these videos by themselves amount to probable calls for child protective services to launch an investigation, which they should in particular. There's a new trend where women are crying. while holding their own children as Lindsey Clancy's diary entries are read in court. Watch. - I'm desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone. My mind is trying to make something physically run with me. My mind never shuts off. It's constantly thinking of the next thing someone needs, I can't shut it off. I desperately want to go back to work, but now I don't know how I'm gonna function and it worries me. Wrote that, right? - Correct. - There were two consecutive indicated further on and into her travels. I am completely overwhelmed trying to take care of the kids I'm drowning every day. I feel guilty that I'm spending my family's money and not making any, I feel like I spend way too much. She wrote that, right? - Correct. - I'm tired of, I'm terrified of Calvin getting sick. He's a sick baby, a sick baby is miserable. He's sick now with a double ear infection. Clearly, he has a belly ache. It's miserable. I feel like the other kid. - Now this old display is, first of all, all those women should have their children taken away from them. And I don't say this lightly at all, but if you're a man and your wife is in the Lindsay Clancy fan club and posting videos like this, you need to take the child and get away from that woman. She is a danger to the child, period. That's not a joke. If you're a husband of one of those women we just saw there, that woman is a danger to the child. She has announced herself as such. This is all utterly unspeakably evil and eye opening in the worst ways. I mean, I'll never be able to unsee thousands of women rallying to the defense of a demon who strangled her children to death. It's one of the darkest things we've ever witnessed. Between this and the Carmelo Anthony fundraiser, we're getting a glimpse into a kind of cultural rot that cannot be easily waived away. Lindsay Clancy had every form of help imaginable. All these things about she needed help, she had family support, financial support, medical support to the point that she was doctor shopping and awarding pills and disregarding her doctor's advice to taper the medication. She had everything. What more could you give this woman? And still she chose to murder her children. She chose to commit an unfathomably barbaric act which assuming she has an ounce of humanity or sanity left will make every moment of her life a living hell from now until the day she dies. And I hope it is. I hope she suffers. All the people saying, oh, she's suffering now. She's in a wheelchair. She's like, I hope she is. Hope she suffers every second of the day until she's dead. That's justice, but not even. That's as close to justice as we're gonna get. So you have to ask, what exactly are these women even trying to achieve at this point? I mean, if they get what they want and Lindsay Clancy has released from prison, what happens next? Well, a podcaster named Brittany Hughes as far as I could tell is the only person asking that question. Here's what she wrote. Quote, "I don't get why she wants to be found and not guilty for any reason. If you told me I'd completely lost my mind and murdered all three of my children, who I loved, you wouldn't have to give me the death penalty. I beg for it. I'd be so guilt-ridden and horrified. I'd do it if no one else would." Why would I want to be released on the grounds of anything to go back home and do what? Start a new life to live the rest of my miserable days in an insane asylum staring at a wall thinking about the babies I'd strangled? Honestly, even if you do believe that she was genuinely that disturbed, the most merciful thing you could do is send her to the Lord and let him sort out the rest. That's all true. It's an insight that requires thinking ahead to the future requires that you consider the ramifications of a not guilty verdict and what they might mean for Lindsey Clancy in particular and for society at large, more importantly. But none of the TikTok women are capable of doing that. Or if they have, they don't care. They're solely interested in their own moment to moment gratification. At the same time, we should take what they're saying seriously because it reveals a very profound sickness at a fundamental level. Saying of Lindsey Clancy, it could have happened to anyone. It's just another way of saying that none of us can control anything we do, ultimately. So you can't blame us for our own failures. That's also what's happening with Jason R. Day, right? It's, he takes his own life. I know, he was murdered by the, it's not his fault. This is maybe the defining element of our culture, this never-ending quest to relieve ourselves of the burden of free will. Now, I noted before how white conservative men are. It turns out the least tribal, the least extreme, the least prone to the sort of psychotic violent radicalism that prompts them to rally around somebody who strangles kids to death or stabs kids in the chest. I think this might be the reason for this dichotomy. Every other group in the culture, women, black people, all racial minorities, the LGBT club, all of them are told that ultimately their failures, their sins, their crimes, their choices are the fault not of themselves, but of abstract faceless villains like the system and whiteness and the patriarchy. There's been a decades-long quest to remove agency or the sense of agency from these favor demographics. But straight white conservative men are the only group. And I really do mean the only group who have never been told that their actions aren't their own fault. They certainly never been told that in the mainstream by our institutions or by the media or the government, instead they have the opposite issue. They are blamed not only for their own behavior, but for everyone else's too. White men have been given a surplus of agency. And this does tend to create resentment, bitterness, animosities of various and totally justified kinds, but it doesn't tend to drive you completely insane. Being blamed for stuff you didn't do makes you angry, but being told you aren't responsible for what you did do makes you, if you take it to heart after a while, crazy. I mean, after all, the very definition of a crazy person is a person who isn't responsible for what they do. And even if it doesn't lead to full-blown psychosis, still the people who don't believe they're responsible for their own actions will forever be miserable and envious and hateful, always looking for some external cause for their own pain and disappointment and frustration. Well, nobody wants to hear whether they're women on TikTok or Black British activists in the UK or Socialists in New York and Minneapolis, is that you idolize fraudsters and killers because you're a bad person. Your life is presumably terrible because of choices you've made. You're unhappy and bitter because you're unwilling to prioritize the interests of others over your own. And by telling you this, I can't sell you any medication. I'm not gonna win any fans on TikTok or X or anywhere else. In fact, if anything, I'm losing them, but it's a message that needs to get out there because as it stands, very few people are saying it. And whether we admit it or not, the most vulnerable among us, including children who can't speak for themselves are dying in horrific ways as a result. Ultimately, people who won't take responsibility for their own actions, people who deny their own free will have no future. And if there's any lesson from the Lindsey Clancy case and the conversation around it, it's at a society populated by such people as no future either. That'll do for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow, the great day. Godspeed. (upbeat music) - In all of my years of public life, I have never profited from public service. I welcome this kind of examination because people have got to know whether or not their president is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook. For more than five decades, from Iran, Contra, Zamanika Lewinsky to Russia gate, every political scandal has been measured against one, the Watergate affair. But what if Richard Nixon was telling the truth? What if Watergate isn't what it seems? What if hundreds of thousands of pages of sworn testimony, memoirs, and newly released government documents tell a different story than the one you learned in school? - I know America. In 1972, Nixon won the biggest electoral landslide in modern American history with grand plans to remake the federal government. With two years later, he was out of office. You were taught that Nixon's men broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters to spy on his political opponents. You were taught that when he found out, Nixon covered it up. And if the cover up was worse than the crime. You were taught that two heroic Washington Post reporters guided by a righteous FBI whistleblower brought the most powerful man in the world to justice. But you were never taught what we really had. - I shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. - Real history of the Watergate scandal is available now at the early bar please.