Ep. 1825 - Lindsay Clancy Defenders Are Just As Sick As She Is
50m 57s
The speaker condemns the social media phenomenon defending Lindsay Clancy, a mother who confessed to murdering her three children, highlighting that women have raised over $920,000 for her via GoFundMe and spread baseless theories, including astrology, to blame her husband. He argues this reflects a broader cultural sickness driven by feminist propaganda, narcissism, and social media, where women are radicalized into supporting child killers and denying personal responsibility. He contrasts this with the case of Abdullo Tashpaladza, an illegal alien who murdered his landlord, was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and escaped to Tajikistan after being given a passport and a day pass by authorities, illustrating corruption in the insanity defense system. The speaker asserts that the insanity defense is unfalsifiable and should be abolished, as it enables criminals to evade justice. He further claims that while white conservative men are blamed for everything and thus remain grounded, other groups are told their failures are not their fault, leading to psychosis and tribalism. He criticizes therapists and celebrities like Lisa Rinna for reinforcing delusions, and warns that women defending Clancy are dangers to their own families. Ultimately, he argues that denying free will and responsibility leads to societal collapse, and that such people, and the society they populate, have no future.
Big banks don't want to fund your business, but Cardiff does.
My name's William Stern. In 2004, I founded Cardiff to make funding faster and easier
for small businesses. In less than five minutes, your business could qualify for up to $500,000
deposited same day, and there's zero impact to your personal credit.
Get started by going to cardiff.co slash dailywire. Again, that's cardiff.co slash dailywire.
Cardiff. Borrow better.
One of the hardest things to do when you're paying close attention to current events and
you've watched one too many depraved TikToks is to take a step back and realize that things
weren't always so bad. Not too long ago, for example, it would have been unthinkable for
millions of women to spend their free time rallying to the defense of a psychotic mother
like Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her own children one by one after sending her husband
away on an errand. It would have been unthinkable for women to send nearly
a million dollars to the mother's family via a GoFundMe as a reward for the horrific crime
that she had committed. In another era, women certainly wouldn't be throwing themselves out
of windows in a bizarre effort to prove that Lindsay Clancy is somehow being framed for
murder, even though Clancy herself isn't even making that claim. But as you can see on your
screen right now, that's exactly what we're seeing today. There are women so bored with
their lives, so delusional and dumb that they're throwing themselves out of buildings on camera
in a futile attempt to demonstrate that Lindsay Clancy was definitely pushed out of her second
story window. They're also consulting astrology and birth charts to divine the killer's true
identity. Watch. It's been a while, but I have to pop on here just to say that I've been following
this Lindsay Clancy trial, especially as a mother of two who dealt with a lot of postpartum
mental illness. And, you know, just following all their birth charts and birthdays and zodiac signs,
he did it.
He did it. He did it. He's a Gemini man. His birthday is June 15th. I'm a Gemini woman. My
birthday is June 14th. Let me give you another example of who a Gemini man is. Also birthday,
June 14th. Men and women are different. Keep that in mind. Please don't judge me. Donald Trump.
Patrick did it. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
Yeah, the husband did it, despite all the evidence pointing to the wife and despite
the wife herself confessing to it. And we know he did it because his birthday is a few days apart
from Donald Trump. And there are tons of videos like this one, okay? The idea that you can solve
a crime based on looking at somebody's birthday is a legitimately popular view among women on
social media. And I will also say as a side note, and not to get hung up on the less important
details here, but the other thing you need to know is that there are a lot of people who are
going to notice about all these women on TikTok is that they all sound exactly the same. And I
don't just mean that they sound the same because they're all sputtering the same nonsensical,
morally retarded gibberish, although they are. I mean that they sound the same in like their
tone of voice, in their mannerisms, in their inflection. They have the same facial expressions.
They have the same tics, like the same smarmy grin, the same dramatic pauses where they always
look very impressed with whatever they just said, even though it was the dumbest we've ever heard.
They speak in the same cliches. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk, she says,
and she's very impressed with herself for being approximately like the five billionth person to
think of that joke. My point is that while these women are being radicalized and driven into
psychosis, not by any postpartum biological phenomenon, but by a combination of social
media and their own narcissism, there's also a kind of loss of individual identity that's
happening on a massive scale that maybe should be a subject of its own video sometime. Because
you know, the woman in that video and in the thousands of videos like it has no personality
of her own at all. No thoughts of her own, doesn't even have her own distinct mannerisms or style of
speaking. She is a drone. She is a walking cliche. She is a being devoid of distinctness
and probably lacking anything resembling an actual interior life.
Like if you could travel inside that woman's head, it would be like walking into a cave
that you'd hear an echo. There's just like nothing happening. And this, this again is,
is a phenomenon that we were witnessing on a culture wide scale. Now we'll go through many
more videos like this in a moment. There is a psychotic lust for child killing that's taken
hold of a large number of American women, which may not seem surprising given their support for
abortion in the majority anyway, but it's even worse than we thought. I mean, we're now at the
point where we're going to get to the point where we're going to get to the point where we're going
murders her children in the basement, a preponderance of women on social media,
feel an instant kinship with her. At the same time, this is not just a problem that's confined
to women. In just the past year, we've also seen thousands of black people rally around Carmelo
Anthony, who stabbed a white kid to death at a track meet. Many of these people showed up to the
courthouse to blame Austin Metcalf for his own murder. They donated hundreds of thousands of
dollars explicitly because he killed a white teenager. This is racial tribalism, which mirrors
the gender tribalism.
of the Lindsay Clancy case. We've also seen multiple assassinations or attempted assassinations
against leading conservative figures and other people, all prompting an outpouring of adulation
from leftists. This is an obvious form of political tribalism on the left. These people
instinctively support each other in everything they do, and innocents are dying as a result.
The rule of law is starting to fail in large swaths of the country because of it. So we've
been told for years about the alleged radicalization of young white conservative men, but it seems clear
that the worst and most psychotic forms of radicalization are happening in pretty much every
group except that one. Okay, the one group that Merrick Garland and Joe Biden and Barack Obama
warned us about, as it turns out, is the least radicalized, the least deranged, and least violent
of all. And one way to explain the situation is that white men as a group have been beaten down
by years of scolding and moral blackmail and propaganda by the government, by the media, by
the government, and have been replaced in cities throughout the United States while being run out
of every major institution. They've been conquered, in other words. It's not the first time this has
happened, by the way. Here's some historical trivia for you from the medieval period, otherwise
known as the golden age of civilization. After the Norman conquest of England in 1066, William
the Conqueror commissioned something called the Doomsday Book, which is actually spelled
Domesday, even though it's pronounced Doomsday. The point of the Doomsday Book was to list the
landowners at two points in time, 1066 before the Norman invasion, as well as in 1086 after the
Normans took over. So the Doomsday Book contained a side-by-side comparison of the names of landowners
before the invasion, as well as the names of landowners after the invasion. Now, just by paging
through the finished product, it becomes clear that the name Doomsday Book is very much appropriate.
The landowners in 1066 mostly had names like Alrick or Edwin or Godwin or Harold or my personal favorite,
Stan. They were Germanic, Norse, Danish. And on the other hand, by 1086, the names were all French
and Norman. They were names like Robert or Ralph or Roger or William. So to anyone reading the
Doomsday Book, it was immediately obvious that England had been conquered. A casual glance through
the pages would confirm that as of 1086, the Thorbrands and Leofrics were gone and the Ralphs
had taken over. And this one book told the entire story. Now, of course, we don't have a Doomsday
Book anymore, at least by name.
Everything has to be as sterile and clinical as we can make it. So today we have a census
that doesn't really tell us anything. But if you know where to look, you can easily find
modern-day equivalents of the Doomsday Book. So for example, you can browse through local news
reports, paying particularly close attention to stories documenting horrific and seemingly random
crimes. And if you do that, you'll come to the same realization that a medieval peasant would
have had in England back in 1086, paging through William the Conqueror's book. You'll realize,
as if there's any doubt, that
we have been conquered. So to give just one egregious example, which gets worse the more
you learn about it, considering the following story out of Fairfax County, Virginia. Now,
this is one of the most affluent areas in the United States. Up until recently, pretty much
everyone living there had a name like Steve or Peter. But those days are long gone. So here we
go. On the morning of December 29, 2019, in Vienna, Virginia, a 61-year-old landlord named Mohamed
Hamashin was stabbed to death in a home by his tenant, 27-year-old Abdullo Tashpaladza. I'll say
that again. Abdullo Tashpaladza stabbed Mohamed Hamashin to death inside a mansion in Fairfax
County. Now, it was a brutal murder. Abdullo, Abdullai, whatever, we'll just call him Abdullo,
was covered in blood from head to toe, quote unquote, when officers arrived in the home. He
told the police, quote, I am guilty. And by the way, this guy had no legal right to be in the
home. He was an illegal alien. Now, with all that in mind, here's how a local news station covered
this crime at the time. Watch. And is dead after being stabbed in Fairfax County. Yeah,
News 4's Derek Ward just arrived on the scene and has the latest from Vienna. What do we know
about this, Derek? Well, we're here in the 2900 block of Edgley Court or Edgley Road in Vienna.
Police were called here at about 845 for the report of a person stabbed. Now, when they got here,
They performed CPR on the victim.
was taken to a hospital and later pronounced dead now we have learned that a suspect is in custody
and fairfax county police are saying that there is no threat to the public this all seemed to appear
it seems to have happened inside a home here as you can see crime scene tape and investigators
remain on the scene but again one person stabbed pronounced dead at a hospital here in vienna the
2900 block of edgeley road police say they have a suspect in custody and that there is no threat
to the public that's all we know for now no identities on the victim or
the suspect we are live in vienna derek ward news 4. back to you
so the local news really didn't want to provide the names of anyone involved in this incident
even though a suspect was in custody and it was obvious he did it since he was found in
the house and the police weren't looking for anyone else and also he said he did it
now at the end of the clip the anchor does express some surprise that a homicide like
this could occur in such a wealthy area but that's as far as it goes you'll have to conclude that
this was just another unfortunate altercation between a couple of
random virginia men who are just as american as anybody else unfortunately the police caught the
killer so you'd assume obviously that okay well he'll be spending the rest of his life in prison
don't have to worry about that guy anymore at least but that didn't happen instead in 2022
abdullah was interviewed by a state-funded muslim psychiatrist and shockingly enough
that muslim psychiatrist found that abdullah was not guilty by reason of insanity so he was
sent to the northern virginia mental health institute and what this means is that the
under virginia law he was not criminally responsible for butchering his landlord and so
every year he's eligible for a psychiatric re-evaluation and if the doctor determines
that he's all better then he can be released into the public with no conditions like the
murder never happened he can walk right outside the door of the mental institution as a free man
and move in right next to you if he wants to we talked before about the
insanity defense and how it should be abolished because none of this makes any degree of sense
whatsoever once you kill someone you forfeit your right to freedom permanently it doesn't matter if
a psychiatrist thinks you were insane at the time even if you could somehow prove that you couldn't
control your own actions or you had no idea what was going on that's all the more reason to lock
you up you're a threat to everybody around you as long as you live but in this case abdullah didn't
even have to wait for a psychiatrist to give him the green light for release instead abdullah was
freed from the mental institution despite the fact that his doctors and the court strongly
believed that he should not be released so this is from the new york post quote
abdullah left the northern virginia mental health institute on july 6 for an authorized 48 hour pass
he was required to return two days later but he never did instead he traveled to washington
dulles international airport and boarded a turkish airlines flight to istanbul before
continuing to uh dushanbe at tajikistan uh court documents show so in other words
even though he was supposed to be held in indefinitely in a mental institution the mental
institution gave him a 48-hour unsupervised day pass where he could go wherever he wanted and what
do you know he chose to board an airplane and go back to his homeland who could have possibly seen
that coming now already this story is yet more evidence that the insanity defense must be
abolished once you start coddling criminals and pretend they didn't actually do anything wrong
this is what happens the government hires a bunch of social workers to treat these monsters like
harmless little children and the monsters predictably take full advantage of the situation
except in this case it's even worse than it sounds so take a look at this document it's from
may of 2024 and as it turns out the fairfax county commonwealth attorney a soros-funded prosecutor
named steve descano asked a judge to allow abdullah to leave the mental institution temporarily so he
could travel to the embassy of tajikistan in washington dc for the purpose of obtaining a
passport that was two years ago it gave this murderer the tool he needed to flee the country
so this was a state-sanctioned soros-backed jailbreak in other words and it proceeded in
two steps first democrats of virginia helped an illegal alien islamic murderer to get a passport
then the mental institution opened the doors and gave him a 48-hour head start to the airport
now if something like this happened in the third world they'd be ashamed it's too much even for
them first you have the muslim psychiatrist bailing out the muslim killer then the government arranges
the gillers the killer's getaway flight like this is the kind of thing that doesn't even happen in
afghanistan but it's now considered another day at the office in fairfax virginia which again
used to be one of the nicest areas in the country the insanity defense enables all this corruption
without the insanity defense they wouldn't be able to issue day passes or drive criminals to get
passports but as it stands because we've closed the asylums a verdict of not guilty by reason of
insanity is essentially a get out of jail frequency
card if you're an islamic murderer and you get a muslim psychiatrist you're in business and this
again is why the insanity defense should be abolished as we've been advocating for for years
now although since we're on the subject i feel that i should know because hardly anyone else is
when you're talking about the insanity defense there is a distinction that is lost in the debate
about insanity and the insanity defense nobody denies that insanity is a real phenomenon insane
people exist recently i saw a video of a group of people talking about insanity and the insanity defense
recently i saw a homeless guy on a street corner half naked unwashed disheveled engaged in a heated
dispute with a lamppost okay he was very obviously insane he had no idea where he was who he was
what he was doing if he ever killed someone which it's perfectly likely he will i would
agree that he had very little control over it although he still even more so if anything
needs to be locked away forever but the real debate is about the concept of
temporary insanity okay the question is whether a functional coherent person someone capable of
living as a normal member of society engaging in normal conversations showing an ability to plan
for the future and fulfill their basic obligations and do all the stuff normal people do but homeless
people can't whether that person could nonetheless suddenly go insane and lose all agency only to
quickly regain agency and be somehow not crazy again which is basically what they're claiming
with lindsey lindsey clancy now i think that this whole idea of temporary insanity is mythological
okay i think it's something out of the movies and not real life and at any rate it's unfalsifiable
so whatever you think about it whether you think it's real or not it is unfalsifiable which is why
it should never be in a courtroom you cannot have unfalsifiable things presented in courtrooms by
definition it can never be proved or disproved there is no way at all ever to determine what was
happening inside the courtroom
the conscious mind of a currently sane person weeks or months ago at a specific moment in time
there is no way for you to know what was going on in my head last wednesday you could never prove it
you could never know you can't even know it now currently but at least in the current moment there
are context clues right that you could you could use but last week last year three years ago
i was in a courtroom and i was like oh my god i'm not even sure what's going on in my head right now
i'm not even sure what's going on in my head right now i'm not even sure what's going on in my head right now
and as for currently insane people we can feel very sorry for them if we want to
but they too have to be locked away forever for the good of society and the sake of the innocence
that they can never be trusted to be around so all of that is a long way of saying that this
whole debate is ultimately or should ultimately be irrelevant but it's made relevant because the
the objective is to let people like lindsey clancy off the hook using whatever legal tools tools are
available and that's exactly why all of these women and even some cucked gutless men are breathlessly
making the insanity decays for lindsey clancy they don't really care if she's insane or not
they want her to go free and that's not based on any kind of logic or even on any kind of genuine
misunderstanding or difference of opinion they know she murdered her children they know she
chose to do it and they support her in spite of that or more grimly in some cases they support
her because of it now these women have entered a state of communal psychosis in effect
metaphorically uh all to defend clancy for committing the most heinous act imaginable
strangling her own children to death their plane their plan as was the case in virginia is to use
the absurdity of the insanity defense to absolve her of responsibility for these brutal murders
and to be clear you know we're not talking about a handful of viral tick tocks here this is not a
case of cherry picking the most extreme weirdos to develop a narrative this phenomenon is widespread
and mainstream as we speak a go fund me for clancy's family which is a roundabout way of
donating to her has exceeded 920 000 in donations this woman is going to clear a million dollars
after murdering all three of her kids she's going to make a million dollars
or more and you can see the fundraiser on the screen right here the page reads the
musgrove family fund is for the two people who have remained at her side throughout every step of
the of the uh of what followed her parents mike and paula musgrove for more than three years mike
and paula have shown up for lindsay the case will eventually reach its conclusion whatever
the outcome is mike and paula will still have to pick up the pieces of their lives
they put a hold on to be there for their daughter they should not
have to face that future without the financial foundation they spent decades building.
Now, of course, there's no logical reason why anyone would donate to the fundraiser of the
parents of a child murderer. Since when do we do that? Do we have GoFundMes for the parents of
school shooters? Since when is this a thing? But this, again, is about supporting Lindsay
Clancy. It's about supporting the murderer. Now, to the extent that parents have spent money
defending their child-killing daughter, that's their decision. Okay. No one owes them anything.
The whole idea is preposterous. If they were honorable people, they would turn this money down.
Okay. If I'm a parent and my child has committed a heinous, barbaric crime against my own
grandchildren, and people are donating a million dollars to me, I would say,
I don't want to profit off of my child committing a crime. So if you're an honorable,
decent person, you turn that money down and you say, shut this GoFundMe down. I don't want this
money. Have they done that? I don't know. Does being a despicable monster run in that family?
I don't know. Paying 70 plus dollars a month for wireless, that doesn't make any sense. It's
overpriced. It's unnecessary. Here is the reality.
My wireless company, PureTalk, offers unlimited high-speed data for just $34.99 a month. That is
a gigantic difference. You're getting the same core service without the bloated price tag.
And the same plan used to cost more, 55 bucks. But PureTalk keeps pushing to give you more for less.
We love PureTalk over here. I use it. My family uses it. Try it for 30 days. No contract,
no cancellation fees. Switching only takes about 10 minutes. Head on over to puretalk.com
slash Shapiro. Make that switch. Save money. Keep your service. It's that simple. PureTalk.com
slash Shapiro. Tired of your car insurance rate going up,
even with a car insurance rate going up?
clean driving record? You're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance
assistant. Jerry compares rates side-by-side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with
ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. No spam calls,
no hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year.
Switch with confidence. Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai slash wire.
Um, now when you look at the comments of the GoFundMe,
though, you see what's really going on here. It's not about the parents at all. Quote,
Lindsay is changing women's health, and we know it, and hopefully saving the lives of many
struggling women. That's a comment. Here's another. As someone that worked in mental
health for many years, I am disgusted, shocked, and appalled by the failures of so many professionals.
Lindsay, I see you, and I stand with you with an aching heart.
I'm disgusted, shocked, and appalled not by the murder of three kids,
but by the fact that people are being mean to the woman who did it.
Quote, I stand with Lindsay. I could have been you.
Now, that last claim is especially popular among women who support Lindsay Clancy. They're all
saying that, you know, just like Clancy, they could see themselves doctor shopping for a dozen
different psych meds, then brutally murdering their own children. A licensed therapist
made the same claim on camera. Watch.
The Lindsay Clancy trial is going to be one of the most dangerous crimes in the world.
One of the most significant trials of your lifetime. We are all experiencing something
completely unprecedented. Never before have we seen so many mothers and women rally behind
somebody who confessed to killing her three children. And it is not because we cannot hold
women accountable. Many of us see ourselves in Lindsay.
Many of us know that we could have been only one step away from doing some of those horrific
things because we experienced significant mental health issues after one of our children
was born. And many of us know just how dark some of those thoughts get.
So, yeah, this is going to be very, very dangerous. This is going to be a very, very, very, very,
very dangerous trial. This is going to be one of the most significant trials of your lifetime.
Many of us know that we could have been only one step away from murdering our children is what
she said. This is not an outlier. Again, this is a popular sentiment among Lindsay Clancy fans.
To be clear, I don't actually think that it's true. I can't believe that it's true.
Okay. According to the child killers legion of groupies, it is very common for women to be
merely one step away from murdering their children. That is the point being made explicitly
by Clancy's defenders. Now, if that were true, okay, if what these women are saying, if that
were true, if it were common, you know, that these desires in women were as common as these people
say, and if the difference between Lindsay Clancy and the average woman is just one of sheer luck,
if the average woman is just one of sheer luck, if the average woman is just one of sheer luck,
could easily be Lindsay Clancy. If she has come within mere inches of becoming Lindsay Clancy,
that fact would have vast social and legal consequences.
Indeed, it would be the greatest argument for the patriarchy that you could ever make.
And it's an argument being made by Clancy's feminist defenders.
The feminists are now out there saying that, hey, you can't necessarily trust us to not murder kids.
Any one of us could do it.
Now, that's the claim they make. I personally reject that claim. I don't think that most women
are merely one step away from strangling their children to death, as Clancy's fan club proposes.
Which means that I, the guy accused of being like the sexist in this debate,
I am putting forward a much more flattering and positive view of women than these women themselves
are.
But even if wanting to murder your children is not a common, banal sort of experience for the
average woman, still there is something happening, for sure, in an increasingly sizable portion of
the modern female population, and it can't be ignored. What's happening is the logical
endpoint of decades of feminist propaganda and policy, SSRI prescriptions, social media
saturation, it's all these things. For generations, women have been taught that their immediate needs
are more important than anybody else's, even their own children. You know, this is the pro-abortion
logic.
That, you know, if you're a woman, you should even be allowed to butcher your own child
with total impunity if your child is inconvenient to you. Even when abortion was illegal, very few
women were ever prosecuted for it. Instead of taking responsibility for their own actions in
every aspect of life, they've been told, much like racial minorities have been told, that the fault
for their behavior lies elsewhere. Selfishness has been taught as a virtue to all of the left's
favored demographic groups, including and especially women.
This is relevant to the topic of parenting, also. You know, the truth, as uncomfortable
as it may be to hear, and I've already gotten in a lot of trouble on X for saying this, so
I'll say it here again, because, you know, whining at me and scolding me is only going
to make me say whatever I was saying even louder and more often. That's just the way
that it works. So I'll say here that the truth is that much of the depression that parents,
and not just moms, dads too, suffer after childbirth is not always due entirely to hormones,
or any purely physiological cause, but also to the fact that children, especially babies,
are demanding and difficult, and they require us to subordinate our own needs and desires for their
sake. Okay? The more selfish you are, and we're all selfish to some degree, the more selfish you
are, the more of an adjustment that's going to be. And as I've said explicitly many times,
postpartum depression is a real biological phenomenon. I haven't heard anyone deny that.
But that's not the only thing going on.
When a new child is born, and parents are adjusting to that reality, and also postpartum
depression is not an excuse to harm your child in any way, and if you do that, you should be
punished to the fullest extent of the law. I don't care how depressed you were. Once you do that,
you could cry all you want. I was depressed. Yeah, I don't give a shit. Okay? You should be executed.
Okay, yeah, go tell us about that in front of the firing squad. You killed a child. Go whine about
your depression in front of the firing squad. We'll take you up the gallows, put the noose around your
neck, and you could tell us about it. I don't care how depressed
you are. It doesn't matter. The moment you do that, it doesn't matter. But these emotional
challenges should be expected to some degree, because having children is by far the most
seismic change you'll ever experience in your life. I mean, nothing comes close to it. Getting
married, moving to another country, getting a new job, none of that has the effect of so immediately
and so totally changing the way you live your life on a day-to-day basis. It doesn't help anyone
to completely reduce the
mental hardship and frustration of this experience to a matter solely of hormones and brain chemistry
as if there aren't even deeper reasons why a parent might feel depressed as they learn to
live in an entirely different way and are forced for the first time to orient their lives around
something other than their own needs and desires. And of course, I'd say the same thing about
depression in general. They're very often deeper issues than just the chemicals.
Now, in the case of Lindsay Clancy, an extreme outlier case, though apparently not as much of
an outlier as we had thought or hoped, she was so selfish, she was so narcissistic, she was so utterly consumed
by her own wants and desires that she eventually lashed out in the most barbaric way she could.
The self-appointed experts may try to tell us that she had no free will, no ability to make
choices, that she was nothing but an automaton responding to chemical signals with no conscious
awareness of what she was doing. Like she was nothing but like a flesh and blood chat GPT.
But the experts are, for lack of a better term, full of crap. If you take a look at the Lindsay
Clancy content that's all over social media right now, it supports everything I'm saying.
You simply cannot watch these videos and come to any other conclusion. There's an epidemic of
narcissism among some women in this country, and it's leading them to broadcast their derangement
and psychopathy all over the internet. These are women who are not suffering from hormonal
imbalances that we know of, or if they are suffering from that, that's not their main
problem. Their main problem is a spiritual sickness, not a physical one. They're echoing
decades of soul-corrupting feminist
propaganda and coming to deranged theories about how Lindsay Clancy couldn't possibly
be responsible because in their view, no woman is responsible for anything ever. Watch.
Hypothetical scenario. A man is abusing his five-year-old daughter. He is part of a pedophile
ring. Other members of this ring include his best friend, the ADA, chief of police, possibly some
of his best friends, doctors, nurses, and now let's say that the mother finds out. Let's say she
takes her daughter to the doctor to get some digestion issues looked at, UTIs, things like that.
Let's say that doctor suggests to the mother that this child has been abused and she has
been abused recently. So of course the mother goes home and confronts this monster of a man.
What do you think he would do in that instance? Do you think he might snap? Strangle his wife?
Did the thing with, you know, the other three? Because why not at this point, right? Would he
then enlist the help of that ADA, that chief of police, those doctors and nurses that are in that
ring to help him cover it up? Don't forget what they did to Karen Reid.
Again, what I said before about these women have no personality, no identity of their own,
like nothing going on in their minds. And so you see the same like facial expressions,
the same, just the same. These are not even different people. I don't know. Like they have
no individual identity. At this point for a lot of these women, the tick tock brain damage is
probably irreversible for being honest. I mean, it is a full on psychosis.
And here she is creating this vast narrative in her mind that has no basis in reality.
The sole purpose of her delusion is to absolve a woman of responsibility from killing her own
child. And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that in her own life, this woman
certainly doesn't take responsibility for anything she does either. I mean, if she's willing to spin
up elaborate cinematic movie plots to absolve some other random woman of heinous crimes, just imagine
what she's willing to do, what sort of Olympic hurdles she's willing to jump over to absolve
herself of whatever terrible things she's done or will do. Back to school season is basically one
long reminder that your children need things, new shoes, new clothes, school supplies, sports
equipment, and somehow the list regenerates overnight. Us parents, we're pretty good at
spending money on everybody else and then deciding anything for ourselves can just kind of wait. But
here's one example.
One upgrade I actually think is worth making, and that is your bed. It's been about a third of our
lives sleeping and good sleep affects pretty much everything about the other two thirds. I've talked
about Bowling Branch sheets before. Ninety-four percent of their customers say the sheets get
softer with every wash, and I totally get the hype. But don't overlook the rest of their bedding
also. The Dream Comforter has this soft cloud-like texture with a little natural stretch. It's also
substantial without feeling stuffy. It's breathable enough for year-round use. And I love that it's
one piece, no duvet insert, no cover, no wrestling with your bedding just to make the bed. And it's
machine washable, as long as you don't have, you know, one of those tiny washing machines like they
do in Europe. So while you're buying backpacks and sneakers and everything else that your kids
apparently cannot survive another school year without, consider this your reminder that parents
are allowed an upgrade also, and one that helps you sleep better. Well, that actually makes a lot
of sense. I wasn't really someone who thought much about bedding, but after sleeping in Bowling
Branch, I figured, you know, I don't have to worry about bedding anymore. I don't have to worry about
bedding anymore. So that's what Bowling Branch is all
about. Sleep cooler this summer with Bowling Branch. Get 15% off your first order, plus free
shipping at BowlingBranch.com slash Walsh with code Walsh. That's Bowling Branch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D,
Branch.com slash Walsh. Code Walsh to unlock 15% off BowlingBranch.com slash Walsh. Code Walsh.
Exclusions apply. In my house, there are always groceries to buy, bills to pay,
children who will eventually need braces, cars, probably several other expensive
inventions I haven't even anticipated yet. Providing for a family means accepting a long
list of responsibilities, and those responsibilities don't simply disappear
if something happens to you. And that's why life insurance makes a lot of sense for you and for me.
You keep a spare tire in the car, install smoke detectors in the house, you save for unexpected
expenses. You hope you'll never need any of that stuff, but responsible adults prepare for
possibilities they would rather not think about. Well, if your family relies on your income,
protecting them financially is simply part of the responsibility that comes with being a husband and
father. Policy Genius makes it easier to fulfill that basic responsibility. It's a free online
marketplace where you can compare life insurance quotes from some of America's top insurers side
by side. Their license team helps you understand your options, answers your questions, handles
paperwork, and advocates for you throughout the process. Thousands of customers have given Policy
Genius five-star reviews on Google and Trustpilot, and you can find 20-year life insurance policies
starting at just $276 a year for a million dollars in coverage. Go to policygenius.com slash Walsh to
compare your life insurance quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side. Their license
and see how much you can save. That's policygenius.com slash Walsh. Here's another clip along
those lines from an alleged actress named Lisa Rinna. All right, he did it. Patrick did it.
Patrick's the one who did it. Not Lindsay. Patrick did it. Because, you know,
I also heard that women,
typically don't strangle. So awful to even say. But that isn't what a woman would do.
They don't strangle. I was actually in therapy today, and my therapist and I were talking about
it, and she said, I said, well, what do they do? She said, well, they poison, or I said,
oh, or drown them. Like, we literally had that conversation today. And she looks at me and she
goes, he did it. I was like, wow. Yeah. And now, yeah. Yeah.
You know, not, not surprising to see this from someone who's more, more lip than head at this
point. Like her, her lips have taken up over her, her entire face. No room, no room there for a,
for a brain inside that, that head. And yeah, there's another therapist who contributes to
the patient's narcissistic delusions. Instead of doing anything to correct,
correct them, women don't strangle. What? Women don't strangle? What are you talking about?
This is what all these women on TikTok do, by the way, that like,
they, they, for whether it's this or Charlie Kirk or anything, it's always just, yeah,
this is my, this is my woman's intuition. It just doesn't feel right. It doesn't seem,
I don't know. Something's off guys. It kind of feels like women would never strangle. That's
true. Yeah. Except in all the cases where they have strangled people to death, including the
recent cases of Kenya Tilford in New York, Christy Marie Lynch in Virginia, Drezine Jonkerman in South
Africa, uh, Lori Vallow Daybell in Idaho, strangled her own children. See, if you ignore all the
evidence of women strangling people, then women don't strangle people. It's airtight logic.
Actually, even if I couldn't name a single case of a woman, of a woman strangling someone,
it doesn't preclude the possibility that it happened in this case, because you see,
women have hands and when you have hands, you can strangle somebody, particularly a child.
And that's especially true in a case where the defendant admits, admits that that's what happened.
Now for his part, Douglas Mackey, the meme creator that Joe Biden threw in prison has a slightly more
optimistic take on what we're seeing here. And, uh, this is what he wrote. Quote, you have to
understand the Lindsay Clancy obsession as just a soap opera. It's a low stakes way for women to
escape from their boring routines and feel like their life has meaning. Not just mom surfing TikTok
and doing laundry.
They are sleuths, detectives, activists, fighters, do-gooders. Some may be clinically trying to,
or cynically trying to capture TikTok, add money. Yes. Others are just spectators wanting to feel
something, anything to break the routine. I think there's plenty of truth to that,
but the problem with the argument is that as we can see in many different ways,
these women actually believe what they're saying to some degree. It's not just a time waster for
them. Women in Massachusetts just got a law passed that allows them to murder their child until the
moment of birth. They're genuinely becoming emotional, weeping on camera about the prospect
of legalizing post-traumatic stress.
birth abortion, which is what the Lindsay Clancy case is really about. So this is not just a lark
or some kind of game for them. Logic won't convince these people of anything because as we
saw, they're enamored with astrology and other forms of arcane magic. Watch.
So if you're watching the Lindsay Clancy case, I've already gone over the forensic astrology
charts that show that the perpetrator is a male, the perpetrator is having an affair,
and that the victims, specifically Lindsay, was drugged during this.
And I've also gone over with the theory and the lie detection.
I'm telling you all right now, when the South Node goes into cancer in March of 2028,
the South Node is going to transit over Patrick Clancy's moon in cancer. He's going to be having
eclipses over his nose.
The natal moon, which is home, family, emotions, his emotional life. And then it gets better.
2029, all the way into 2030, he is going to have eclipses over his Gemini placements. The South
Node is going to move over his sun, his Mercury retrograde, his Venus retrograde. It's about to
get real interesting in the next, like, three to four years for him. I'm going to do my popcorn.
I can't wait for this man to be humbled and for karma to do its thing.
More of these clips you watch, the more you realize that these aren't just stupid gossipy
women involving themselves in a soap opera. They're a danger to themselves and their families. I mean,
some of these videos by themselves,
they're a danger to themselves and their families. I mean, some of these videos by themselves amount to
probable cause for child protective services to launch an investigation, which they should. In
particular, there's a new trend where women are crying while holding their own children
as Lindsay Clancy's diary entries are read in court. Watch.
I'm desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone. My mind is trying to make
something physically wrong with me. My mind never shuts off. It's constantly thinking of the next
thing someone needs. I can't shut it off. I desperately want to go back to work, but now I
can't. How I'm going to function and it worries me. Wrote that, right? Correct. There were two
consecutive indicated further on into her travels. I am completely overwhelmed trying to take care of
the kids. I'm drowning every day. I feel guilty that I'm spending my family's money and not making
any. I feel like I spend way too much. She wrote that, right? Correct. I'm terrified of Callan
getting sick. He's a sick baby. A sick baby is miserable. He's sick now with a double ear
infection. Clearly has a bellyache. It's miserable. He's a sick baby. He's a sick baby. He's a sick
baby. I feel like the other kid. Now, this whole display is, first of all, all those women should
have their children taken away from them. I don't say this lightly at all, but if you're a man and
your wife is in the Lindsay Clancy fan club and posting videos like this, you need to take the
child and get away from that woman. She is a danger to the child, period. That's not a joke.
If you're a husband of one of those women we just saw there, that woman is a danger to the child.
She has announced herself as such. This is all utterly, unspeakably evil and eye-opening in the
worst ways. I'll never be able to unsee thousands of women rallying to the defense of a demon who
strangled her children to death. It's one of the darkest things we've ever witnessed. Between this
and the Carmelo Anthony fundraiser, we're getting a glimpse into a kind of cultural rot that cannot
be easily waved away. Lindsay Clancy had every form of help imaginable. All these things about
she needed help, she needed help. She had family support, financial support, medical support to the
point that she was doctor shopping and hoarding pills and disregarding her doctor's advice to
taper the medication. She had everything. What more could you give this woman? And still, she chose to
murder her children. She chose to commit an unfathomably barbaric act, which, assuming she
has an ounce of humanity or sanity left, will make every moment of her life a living hell from now
until the day she dies.
And I hope it is. I hope she suffers. All the people saying, oh, she's suffering now. She's in
a wheelchair. I hope she is. I hope she suffers every second of the day until she's dead. That's
justice, but not even. That's as close to justice as we're going to get. So you have to ask, what
exactly are these women even trying to achieve at this point? I mean, if they get what they want
and Lindsay Clancy is released from prison, what happens next? Well, a podcaster named Brittany
Hughes, as far as I could tell, is the only person asking that question. Here's what she wrote.
I don't get why she wants to be found not guilty for any reason. If you told me I'd completely lost
my mind and murdered all three of my children, whom I loved, you wouldn't have to give me the
death penalty. I'd beg for it. I'd be so guilt-ridden and horrified. I'd do it if no one else would.
Why would I want to be released on the grounds of anything? To go back home and do what? Start a new
life? To live the rest of my miserable days in an insane asylum, staring at a wall, thinking about
the babies I'd strangled? Honestly, even if you do believe that she was genuinely that disturbed,
the most merciful thing you could do is to kill her.
You could do is send her to the Lord and let him sort out the rest.
That's all true. It's an insight that requires thinking ahead to the future,
requires that you consider the ramifications of a not guilty verdict and what they might mean
for Lindsay Clancy in particular, and for society at large, more importantly. But none of the TikTok
women are capable of doing that. Or if they have, they don't care. They're solely interested in
their own moment-to-moment gratification. But at the same time, we should take what they're saying
seriously, because it reveals a very profound sickness at a fundamental level. Saying of Lindsay
Clancy, it could have happened to anyone, is just another way of saying that none of us can control
anything we do, ultimately. So you can't blame us for our own failures. That's also what's
happening with Jason Arday, right? He takes his own life. And oh, he was murdered by the. It's not his fault. This is maybe the defining element of our culture, this never-ending quest
to relieve ourselves of our own failures. And I think that's what's happening. And I think that's
the defining element of our culture, this never-ending quest to relieve ourselves of the
burden of free will. Now, I noted before how white conservative men are, it turns out, the least
tribal, the least extreme, the least prone to the sort of psychotic, violent radicalism that prompts
them to rally around somebody who strangles kids to death or stabs kids in the chest.
I think this might be the reason for this dichotomy. Every other group in the culture,
women, black people, all racial minorities, the LGBT club, all of them are told that ultimately
their failures, their failures, their failures, their failures, their failures,
their sins, their crimes, their choices are the fault, not of themselves, but of abstract,
faceless villains like the system and whiteness and the patriarchy. You know, there's been a decades
long quest to remove agency or the sense of agency from these favored demographics. But
straight white conservative men are the only group, and I really do mean the only group,
who have never been told that their actions aren't their own fault. They've certainly never been
told that in the mainstream by our institutions or by the media or the government. Instead,
they have the opposite issue. They are blamed not only for their own behavior, but for everyone
else's too. White men have been given a surplus of agency, and this does tend to create resentment,
bitterness, animosities of various and totally justified kinds, but it doesn't tend to drive
you completely insane. Being blamed for stuff you didn't do makes you angry, but being told you aren't
responsible for what you did do makes you, if you take it to heart after a while, crazy. I mean,
after all, the very definition of a crazy person is a person who isn't responsible for what they do.
And even if it doesn't lead to full-blown psychosis, still, the people who don't believe
they're responsible for their own actions will forever be miserable and envious and hateful,
always looking for some external cause for their own pain and disappointment and frustration.
What nobody wants to hear, whether they're women on TikTok or Black British activists in the UK or
socialists in New York and Minneapolis, is that you idolize fraudsters and killers because you're
a bad person. Your life is presumably terrible because of choices you've made. You're unhappy
and bitter because you're unwilling to prioritize the interests of others over your own.
And by telling you this, I can't sell you any medication. I'm not going to win any fans on
TikTok or X or anywhere else. In fact, if anything, I'm losing them, but it's a message
that needs to get out there because as it stands, very few people are saying it.
And whether we admit it or not, the most vulnerable among us, including children who
can't speak for themselves, are dying in horrific ways as a result. Ultimately, people who won't
take responsibility for their own actions, people who deny their own free will, have no future.
And if there's any lesson from the Lindsay Clancy case and the conversation around it,
it's that a society populated by such people has no future either. That'll do it for the
show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.
The Watergate Affair. But what if Richard Nixon was telling the truth? What if Watergate isn't what
it seems? What if hundreds of thousands of pages of sworn testimony, memoirs, and newly released
government documents tell a different story than the one you learned in school? In 1972,
Nixon won the biggest electoral landslide in modern American history with grand plans to
remake the federal government. Two years later, he was out of office. You were taught that Nixon's
men broke the law. You were taught that Nixon's men
When he found out, Nixon covered it up.
And the cover-up was worse than the crime.
You were taught that two heroic Washington Post reporters, guided by a righteous FBI whistleblower,
brought the most powerful man in the world to justice.
But you were never taught what really happened.
I shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow.
The real history of the Watergate scandal is available now on Daily Wire+.
Paying $70-plus a month for wireless? That doesn't make any sense.
It's overpriced. It's unnecessary.
Here is the reality.
And the same plan used to cost more, $55.
I use it. My family uses it.
Try it for 30 days, no contract, no cancellation fees.
Make that switch. Save money. Keep your service.
It's that simple. The midterm elections are heating up.
Congressional control and President Trump's agenda hangs in the balance.
Every headline has the potential to shift the odds.
And in a key Senate race, James Tallarico is currently trading at 52% to beat Ken Paxton.
That means a $100 trade pays out over $180 with a win.
Use code DAILY, D-A-I-L-Y, to get up to $20 when you trade $20.
KALSHI, K-A-L-S-H-I, KALSHI trade on anything.
18 plus only. Restrictions and eligibility requirements apply.
Event contract trading involves risk and may not be suitable for all investors.
KALSHI products are not available in all jurisdictions.
Prices, values, and available markets may differ from those mentioned.
For more information, see KALSHI.com slash regulatory.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The speaker criticizes the widespread social media support for Lindsay Clancy, a woman who murdered her children, with women donating nearly a million dollars and using astrology to blame her husband.
He argues that the insanity defense is flawed and unfalsifiable, citing the case of Abdullo Tashpaladza, an illegal alien who murdered his landlord in Virginia, received a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict, and fled the country with government assistance.
The speaker claims that women, racial minorities, and LGBT groups are radicalized through tribalism and a culture that removes personal responsibility, while white conservative men are the least radicalized because they are held accountable.
He links the Clancy case to broader cultural rot, including feminist propaganda, SSRI overuse, and social media, and calls for the abolition of the insanity defense and harsher punishment for child killers.
The speaker warns that women who defend Clancy pose a danger to their own children, urging husbands to remove children from such women, and concludes that a society denying free will has no future.
Summary:
The speaker condemns the social media phenomenon defending Lindsay Clancy, a mother who confessed to murdering her three children, highlighting that women have raised over $920,000 for her via GoFundMe and spread baseless theories, including astrology, to blame her husband. He argues this reflects a broader cultural sickness driven by feminist propaganda, narcissism, and social media, where women are radicalized into supporting child killers and denying personal responsibility. He contrasts this with the case of Abdullo Tashpaladza, an illegal alien who murdered his landlord, was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and escaped to Tajikistan after being given a passport and a day pass by authorities, illustrating corruption in the insanity defense system.
The speaker asserts that the insanity defense is unfalsifiable and should be abolished, as it enables criminals to evade justice. He further claims that while white conservative men are blamed for everything and thus remain grounded, other groups are told their failures are not their fault, leading to psychosis and tribalism. He criticizes therapists and celebrities like Lisa Rinna for reinforcing delusions, and warns that women defending Clancy are dangers to their own families.
Ultimately, he argues that denying free will and responsibility leads to societal collapse, and that such people, and the society they populate, have no future.
FAQs
Cardiff is a funding company founded in 2004 to provide fast and easy funding for small businesses. In less than five minutes, your business could qualify for up to $500,000, deposited the same day, with zero impact to your personal credit.
You can get started by visiting cardiff.co/dailywire. That's cardiff.co/dailywire. Cardiff's tagline is 'Borrow better.'
Lindsay Clancy is a Massachusetts woman who confessed to murdering her three children. The controversy arises from widespread social media support for her, with many women fundraising for her and using astrology and conspiracy theories to claim her husband was the real killer, despite evidence and her confession.
Supporters often claim she was driven by postpartum mental illness and argue she should not be held responsible. Others use astrology or birth charts to suggest her husband committed the murders, while some see themselves in her struggles, stating they could have been in her position.
The insanity defense is a legal argument that a defendant was not criminally responsible due to mental illness at the time of the crime. Critics argue it is unfalsifiable and often abused, allowing killers to avoid prison, as in the case of Abdullo Tashpaladza, who fled the country after being granted a day pass from a mental institution.
Abdullo Tashpaladza, an illegal alien, stabbed his landlord to death and confessed. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity, sent to a mental institution, and later given a 48-hour pass, which he used to flee to Tajikistan. The prosecutor helped him obtain a passport beforehand, leading to criticism of the system.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.