Ep. 1824 - The Jason Arday Scandal Is EVEN Worse Than You Think

Ever hit a wall in the middle of the day and a third coffee just doesn't do it anymore? Here's what's actually happening. Coffee only briefly blocks adenosine, the chemical that tires you out. When it stops working, your system is flooded and you crash. Modafinil is a prescription treatment that works in a completely different way. Modafinil works by stimulating multiple receptors in the brain associated with wakefulness, including dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, histamine, glutamate, and orexin. It's a more complete solution that gives you 10 to 12 hours of steady focus and energy. Go to mod.com, that's M-O-D dot com, for a free consultation. And use code DAILYWIRE to get 10% off your first order plus free shipping. That's code DAILYWIRE at mod.com to get free shipping and 10% off your first order. Black Londoners and other leftists did not take to the streets in large numbers following the murder of Henry Novak, a white college student who was butchered on the sidewalk late last year in Southampton by a foreigner, only for the police to mock him as he took his dying breaths. Nor did Black Londoners and other leftists hold massive demonstrations after a disabled white guy was nearly beheaded in Belfast in the middle of the road by one of the millions of barbaric fake asylum seekers who have been allowed into Europe. And they certainly didn't hold any events in support. The court of Anne Whittacombe, the elderly white conservative politician who was just brutally executed in her own home, she was hit 21 times on the head with a hammer simply because she wanted to end the mass demographic replacement that's been underway in the UK for many years now. None of these horrific events in the eyes of Black British activists and other leftists merited any concern whatsoever. Instead, these ghouls have been biding their time, waiting for their very own George Floyd moment to galvanize their fellow countrymen, communists. For years now, they've been eagerly awaiting the opportunity to canonize a homegrown BLM martyr. Their very own. Someone they can call their own, meaning a degenerate criminal, a liar, sociopath, who's a clear net negative for society. And with the untimely death of Jason Arday, the disgraced Cambridge professor DEI hire who lied about every aspect of his life story while also fabricating data and plagiarizing all of his important publications, it's clear that leftist mobs in Britain have finally found the martyr that they were waiting for. That's very evident based on the utterly deranged and psychotic display that just took place in Trafalgar Square in London on Monday in support of Arday. This was a cult-like event that has no parallel, at least going back to 2020. And, you know, the footage from this alleged vigil is genuinely hard to believe. It's so extraordinary that after we go through it, we have an obligation to look even closer at Jason Arday and his alleged quote-unquote scholarship, which these leftists are defending, even though none of them have read his scholarship in the first place. None of them. That's exactly what we're going to do later on in the show. Together we're going to sit through one of Arday's lectures, or at least part of one, as much as we can stomach. We'll get to pretend to be Cambridge students for a day and we'll uncover just how vapid and mush-brained this guy was. We'll also page through some of his research findings and we'll bask in the history of Arday. We'll bask in the preposterous, almost unbelievable incompetence of this total fraud who the left is now desperately trying to turn into a BLM martyr. But first, let's talk about what happened in Trafalgar Square. So to recap the backstory, if you didn't listen to the show yesterday, Arday was a plagiarist, a thug, a criminal, a narcissist, and a fraudster. He is now also dead after having apparently taken his own life. Although, given his track record for honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if he were sitting on a beach, somewhere right now. I mean, who knows? He was promoted to full professor by white liberal women at Cambridge, even though he lied about every single aspect of his life story. And even though he fabricated data in his academic work, in addition to plagiarizing entire passages across multiple articles, as well as his dissertation, Arday was hired for an extremely competitive position at one of the most famous universities in the world, solely because he was black. These people were desperate to find a competent black scholar, and they had to settle on Jason Arday. And once they hired him, because no one at Cambridge has any integrity, there was no looking back. So when he claimed that he ran 300 miles in three days, or that invisible masked men with knives had chased him around campus, or that a pig's head was left on the front porch of his parents' house, or that he couldn't read or write until he was 18, or that he had multiple tumors and epilepsy, none of these obviously false claims bothered anybody at Cambridge, they kept doubling down. And tripling down, lashing out at anybody who told the truth. And in the end, rather than face the consequences of his own actions, Arday chose to end his life and leave his two children behind. Now, at the risk of understatement, there is no conceivable defense of Arday's actions, nor is there a legitimate line of attack against the media or against Nathan Kofnes, who's the former Cambridge academic who publicized Arday's fraud this summer. Arday is the one who desperately courted me, and is the one who has the media attention at every opportunity. He also wrote a memoir, which he sold to Simon & Schuster, that was full of outright lies about his biography. He went out of his way to deceive everybody in a very public fashion. And when people raised questions about his research or about his biography, he brought in a law firm to harass them. He even called the police on a professor who noticed the plagiarism. Any society that sees any value in a delusional, narcissistic conman like Jason Arday is doomed to fail. That's exactly what we saw on Monday in London's Trafalgar Square. Thousands of leftists gathered not to pray for the salvation of Jason Arday's soul or to reflect on how many white men have been subjected to discrimination in Britain for the benefit of incompetent black frauds like Arday, or to demand the termination of every white woman at Cambridge who hired him. That all would have been justified. Instead, the mob gathered to honor Arday as a BLM martyr, as a victim of systemic racism, who, in their view, now led an honorable life. At one point, a speaker stated that Arday had been assassinated. And again, it was just mass psychosis all over the place. Watch. So I'm going to be really, really quick. The truth that as many of you, I think, know is that many white people do not recognize the richness, the common humanity of black people. I think you know that in your heart of hearts. And I think that it's important that a white person stands on this stage and acknowledges it. And fixing that is many, many generations' work. But my promise to you is this: No other industry in the country, in the world, is allowed to monetize human pain and suffering. No other industry is allowed to profit from those things without being regulated. And nor should our increasingly revolting press. similarities, any common traits in a group, then it's not a group. I mean, by definition, calling it a group means that there are some things you can say about it that are generally true of that group that aren't true of other groups. And again, if you can't say that, then it's not a group, by definition. The left's mission when it comes to DEI is to invent an alternate reality where these disparities and differences don't exist. But they have a big problem. There simply aren't many qualified Black academics available to hire. So instead of accepting the fact that some disparities are inevitable, they're desperately picking random delusional Black guys off the street and making them professors at Cambridge. They're engaging in social engineering that's premised on lie after lie, and eventually it becomes unsustainable. And they feel like they're losing control of the debate, which they are, so now they're demanding the right to vote. And they feel like they're losing control of the debate, demanding that the government step in at gunpoint and shut down everyone who's exposing their fraud, which is fundamentally anti-white and anti-civilization. That white speaker in the footage, who was supposedly afraid to speak, I guess, is apparently named Julian Magim. He runs a leftist organization called the Good Law Project. This is an organization that's been spearheading the push to turn Arday into a BLM martyr from the moment that he died. And eventually, true to his word, he did stop speaking, mercifully, and turned the microphone over to the White House. And he said, well, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't brave people of color, and they proceeded to embarrass themselves as well at this so-called vigil. Watch. Racism did this, and I think we should be able to say that plainly this afternoon. There is another reason for my anger. For so many of us, Cambridge was once imagined as an arrival. We worked towards places like this. We believed in the university, in the academy, in knowledge. Perhaps we even believed that if we could make our way through these gates, and take our seat in these rooms, and learn their language well enough, become scholars ourselves, then we might finally have the tools to change something. And somewhere inside that, there was a hope that having arrived at Cambridge would be a way to change something. Having arrived meant that we might belong. Jason's death and the cruelty and smear that surrounded him reminds us that for many, we do not belong. Well, you're exactly right, ma'am. You don't belong there. You know, the vast majority of these non-white students don't belong at Cambridge or any other university. It's not racism to point that out. It's a product of the fact that the university openly discriminates against white applicants and gives enormous deference and privilege to non-white applicants solely on the basis of their skin color. No applicant who receives any kind of benefit based on his skin color, whether he's a student or faculty member, belongs at Cambridge or anywhere else. And if these people had any shame whatsoever, they'd admit that. Instead, she pretends that she's being transgressive by blaming racism. Oh, she's just going to come out and say it. You know, hey, we shouldn't be afraid to say this. I'm going to come out and say it right now to this group of leftist activists. This was racism. Wow. That took courage. You know, it always takes courage to say something when you're surrounded by a mob that agrees with you. Actually, the transgressive thing would be to say that schools like Cambridge need to start hiring based on merit. If that means that they have no black students, tough. Black students need to work harder, I guess. You know, cookie crumbles how it does, whatever. No, racism did not kill Jason Arday. Anti-white racism got him the job in the first place. Anti-white racism got him a book deal and dozens of media appearances. Anti-white racism is the reason anybody knows his name. As long as we're start there. In fact, if we're going to blame racism for Arday's death, it would be anti-white racism that killed him, arguably. Because without anti-white racism, he never would have been in any kind of prestigious position, which means he never would have been able to disgrace himself on the national stage, which means he'd probably still be alive. Working as a receptionist at a dental office or something where he could make up all the stories he wanted and everybody there would just kind of nod their head and smile. And it would have been fine. Here's another sordid moment from this vigil featuring one Lord Simon Woolley, principal of Homerton College, Cambridge. Presumably he was also elevated to that position because of his skin color, because he seems like the very definition of mediocrity. Watch. This time last week, I was with Jason because we knew Jason was suffering. We knew that he felt hounded. By those rabid wolves. Jason wouldn't dare leave the house. And we said, we'll get a taxi for you. We held him in our arms. We told him he was loved. He held Diane's hands. And he said, I love you. But he said, they're hounding me to death. And I cannot. I don't see a way out. Wow. Well, Jason sounds like a weak, whiny shell of a man. I mean, here's a way out, Jason. Resign. Admit that you lied for your entire career. Admit that you fabricated data. Admit that you plagiarized. Then apologize. Be a man. Have some dignity. Beg the Lord's forgiveness. Commit your life to raising your two children so they don't repeat your many, many crimes against humanity. Would that be glamorous? Probably not. It would involve sacrifice and hard work and introspection. It would involve courage that would actually take real courage. The kinds of things that, according to Cambridge, Jason Arday was supposed to be really good at. I mean, after all, this was a guy who overcame multiple tumors, epilepsy, masked bandits with knives, the complete inability to speak until he was 11, random pig heads on his porch, you know, illiteracy, and so on. So he's used to taking some knocks, or so we're told. But it turns out he'd much rather leave his children alone on this earth so that demonic DEI fraudsters could pretend he's some kind of hero. He's not. He's utterly pathetic. And so was the parade of grotesque black activists who took the podium throughout this whole proceeding. The first woman you'll see here is a member of parliament named Diane Abbott. Watch. He was first appointed. As a professor in Cambridge three years ago. And for those three years, he has had a vicious campaign, a bitter campaign by anonymous people, by other professors who just didn't believe that a black man should be a Cambridge professor. At his vigil tonight, thousands came to pay their respect, including one of his colleagues. His scholarship mattered enormously to so many, but his greatest contribution cannot be found in a publication, a title, or a citation, nor in his talks. It is found in people who continue to love him, in the lives he changed, and the confidence he gave us, and the doors that he fought to hold open behind him. The MP, Bell Rivera-Addy, passed on the family's words. The public cruelty Jason was subjected to was too much for him. He was a victim of a for any man to bear. Very intelligent. A lot of high IQs there. You look at that crowd and these are people who their IQ is exceeded only by their BMI, I think we can say. No man could have possibly bore this, is what they tell us. Really? No man could have bore it? I mean, there are men who have endured war concentration camps, childhood abuse, horrific forms of cancer. I mean, you name it. And they've done so with infinitely more integrity and poise and grace than Jason Arday who never demonstrated anything approaching integrity, poise or grace in his entire life. The only thing that happened to him is that people told the truth about the scam he was running. That's it. And we're led to believe that he had no other choice but to kill himself. Incidentally, they also believe he had no choice but to plagiarize and lie constantly because after all, what's a black left-wing professor supposed to do? Come up with his own ideas? Don't be ridiculous. And by the way, in response to the first woman, no, the accusers were not anonymous. They put their names to their accusations, which is why you people are harassing them as well. Now, we haven't seen public demonstrations this pathological, this detached from reality since the summer of George Floyd. I mean, these are people who truly believe that if you're not white, then you simply cannot be held responsible for your own actions. Everything you do, no matter how unethical, degrading, psychotic, animalistic, or criminal, is somehow caused by white people. You can commit violent felonies every time you get out of prison. as George Floyd did. You can fabricate every aspect of your life story and all of your work product as Jason Arday did. Arday even managed to abandon his children, just like George Floyd. And none of it matters to these people. As long as you're black, it's never your fault. So whose fault is it? Well, at this alleged vigil, the mob was pretty clear on that point. They blamed Nathan Kofnes for Arday's death. They whipped themselves into a frenzy, in fact, about this because Kofnes wrote a Substack article that proved beyond any doubt that Arday was a fraud. And because of that, the mob made it clear that he's their enemy. He's not welcome in London for telling the truth. We can't have any truth tellers in London. Your kind is not welcome around here, was their message. Watch. He was dismissed by Emanuel College because of his racism. And he insisted he can have pain over three years. Now, first of all, at a vigil, after somebody dies, like at a memorial, you're supposed to memorialize that person's life. That's kind of the whole point. And the problem for these activists is that Jason Arday's entire life was a fabrication, and he didn't do it. He didn't do any actual work either. Like George Floyd before him, Jason Arday was merely a fraudster, someone who would rather die committing fraud than live an honest life. So they can't actually talk about his life in any meaningful way. Instead, they have to look outwards towards men like Nathan Kofnes. In fact, it's quite telling that this was a vigil for a man who allegedly spent his life fighting off masked attackers with knives and breaking world records with his endurance running skills and evading demonetization. racists who leave severed animal heads on his porch and achieving academic prominence despite being illiterate and many other accomplishments. And yet the people memorializing him didn't mention any of that. That's pretty rough. Imagine you do all that with your life and then you die and nobody at your memorial mentions any of it. I mean, you're going to be looking on from the afterlife thinking like, what was the point? Well, no, it's almost as though they know that it was all nonsense. In case you couldn't hear, it's kind of hard to hear what the speaker was saying. It doesn't really matter. The speaker is attacking Kovnes, saying that he was fired from his job at Emanuel College, which is part of Cambridge, because he's an evil white supremacist. And the mob boos and jeers in response. They don't actually challenge the legitimacy of Kovnes' reporting. They don't dispute the accuracy of anything that he wrote on Substack about how Arday is a fraud. Instead, they attack Kovnes' work, his history, to imply that he's dishonest in some way. Well, the truth is, he's not dishonest. He's dishonest in some way. The truth is that Kovnes was fired as a research assistant by Emanuel College in April of 2024, but only because he wrote a blog post that, to this day, no one has refuted. In the post, Kovnes wrote a data-driven, dispassionate, logical argument against DEI. He said that we must, quote, accept that talent is not distributed equally within or across groups, because of course it isn't. He pointed out that, according to Harvard's own internal data, the number of black students at Harvard, would drop to less than 1% without DEI. And based on Harvard's finding, as well as similar data from other institutions, Kovnes concluded that without DEI in a totally merit-driven system, the number of black professors at Harvard would approach 0%. He also argued that black people would, quote, disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment. In other words, without DEI giving black candidates an artificial boost throughout their entire lives, the lead-in to the problem would be Kovnes. So, Kovnes' argument is that, quote, the leaders of America's major institutions, generally speaking, would not be black. Now, you can disagree with that argument if you want to. You shouldn't, because it's obviously true and the data bears it out. But no one at Emanuel College or Cambridge was interested in disagreement. Instead, like virtually every other college, they're interested in enforcing left-wing orthodoxy. So they got rid of Kovnes, even though several faculty members supported him on free speech grounds. In every respect, this episode was, quote, not a good one. It was a good one. This episode was shameful for Emanuel College and Cambridge, not for Kovnes. But to communists and black activists who have their, you know, committed their lives to silencing anyone who disagrees with them, Kovnes deserved what he got. And now that he's refused to shut up and go away, now that he's still exposing these fraudsters, they want him dead. He's constantly getting death threats as these psychopaths stir up a mob against him. They're not furious that a black professor committed fraud. They're furious that a white guy exposed it. There are certain bills that arrive every month and you just accept them. You don't know exactly why they cost what they cost. You don't remember agreeing to half the charges. You just sort of assume that this is the price of participating in modern civilization. The cell phone bill is perhaps the finest example. Apparently, it costs a small fortune every month for the privilege of looking at your phone 400 times a day, but it doesn't have to. Pure Talk is currently offering any of their plans for just 15 bucks a month for your first three months. And when they say any plan, they really mean it. You can even choose their. Top tier, $65 unlimited plan and pay just 15 bucks a month for the first three months. That's up to $150 in savings. Plus, there's no service contract, no cancellation fee. And when you need customer service, you get 100% US-based customer service every time you need it. So perhaps we've reached the point where blindly paying an enormous wireless bill every month is just no longer necessary. Progress. For a limited time, you can get any Pure Talk plan, including unlimited data, for just 15 bucks a month for your first three months. Simply go to PureTalk.com. PureTalk.com slash Walsh to claim this offer. Again, that's PureTalk.com slash Walsh to start saving today. The modern university system has become remarkably good at charging parents a fortune to undermine their values, the values they spent years teaching their children. If you're looking for an alternative to the woke university system, take a look at Grand Cannon University. GCU is a private, non-profit Christian university that builds upon faith, character, and purpose instead of treating the students as equals. And if you're looking for an alternative to the woke university system, take a look at Grand Cannon University. GCU is a private, non-profit Christian university that builds upon faith, character, and purpose instead of treating them as obstacles to an education. Students can choose from hundreds of programs designed to build practical skills and prepare them for meaningful careers, whether they study at GCU's Phoenix campus or online. That might mean preparing to lead a classroom, care for patients, build a business, or serve a community. The specific career may differ, but the goal is the same, leaving college ready to pursue something meaningful. GCU also understands that this kind of education needs to remain within reach. While the cost of nearly everything continues to rise, GCU has held tuition steady on its traditional campus for 17 years. They've continued investing in the student experience as well, with 75% of their programs and facilities built within just the last decade. More than 132,000 students have chosen GCU for an education grounded in purpose, leadership, and faith. Learn more at gcu.edu, Grand Cannon University, private Christian affordable non-profit. That's gcu.edu. One of the reasons this kind of propaganda can be effective is that if you're a normal person who doesn't have time to follow all the details of the case, then you might take their word for it. After all, how could so many people be so wrong about the basic facts of a major story? Of course, that happens all the time, and we saw something similar with the Michael Brown case, to give just one example of many. Tens of millions of Americans thought he said, hands up, don't shoot, before getting shot in the back. It's a lie that persists to this day. The average American has been shot in the back, and it's a lie that persists to this day. The average observer will hear a narrative like that, they'll assume it's true because they hear it everywhere, and then it becomes very difficult to change their mind. By the time you're explaining to them that Michael Brown was a thug who attacked a shop clerk and then beat a cop while trying to take his gun, and that all the forensics bore this out, and that this was the finding even of Obama's own DOJ, it's too late. So it's important to highlight as directly as possible the sheer absurdity of the mob's position in this particular case. And instead of showing you how Jason Arday plagiarized most of his academic work, or how he lied about pig's heads getting left on his porch, or masked men chasing him around campus, or whatever, I'm going to do something a little unorthodox. I'm going to turn the floor over to Jason Arday himself. And before we get to his lecture, we'll start with the abstract of one of Arday's published papers. This was flagged by Drew Pavlou. And here's how it reads. I'm going to read exactly what it says. "Replete with espoused discourses of equality, diversity, and inclusion within public bodies is the UK, wherein lauded initiatives reward its universities' commitments to increasing the access and positioning of women in higher education." Now, this is, of course, horrendous, ugly, clunky writing with all the grace of a washing machine falling down the stairs. It's also exactly what you'd expect from a sociology professor by the way. Sociology is a pseudoscience where academics just make up a bunch of gibberish and try to compensate for the lack of substance by using big, important-sounding words. Also note the hideous clashing mixture of modern bureaucratic jargon on one hand, and these archaic formalities on the other hand, like "wherein." Another hallmark of halfwits, who have nothing to say, but you know, will spend ten thousand words saying it anyway, a very reliable general rule that many people have noticed is this: smart people make complicated, complicated complicated subjects seem simple. Pretentious morons like Jason Arday make simple subjects seem complicated. And academia, especially sociology, is overrun by the latter group. Or, you know, to put this in words that sociology professors would understand, rather than just saying that Arday's writing is ugly and bad, which is all that needs to be said, I will only say that the aforementioned syntatic assemblage revealed itself to be an aesthetically deficient and stylistically ungainly construction, one whose profound paucity of substantive intellectual content left it entirely bereft of any meaningful conceptual profundity or discursive rigor. And moreover, its compositional architecture was marked by an utterly gratuitous proliferation of ornamental rhetorical flourishes and elaborations whose sole effect was to end up in the hands of the public. Amplify an already excessive prolixity, thereby transforming what might otherwise have been a simple utterance into an exercise in wholly superfluous and barochly inflated verbosity. See, I can use a thesaurus also. Took a while, but, you know, someone give me a PhD. I mean, I could do this too. So let's take a look now at the title page of Arday's dissertation, next to the title page of the dissertation that he plagiarized. And this was first noticed by Hans Menck. This is pretty incredible also. So notice that the apostrophe after the word teachers appears in both titles. Well, the problem is, you know, I'm not an English major, but the apostrophe makes sense only in that other dissertation. It doesn't make any sense in our days. So you see, when you say teachers with an apostrophe, you're saying that something belongs to the teachers. And in the original dissertation, the author is talking about a reflective practice. And in the original dissertation, the author is talking about a practice that belongs to the teachers. But Arday's title, which he copied, reads simply, quote, an exploration of peer mentoring among student teachers. And then he adds the apostrophe for no reason. You know, it's astonishing to think about. He plagiarized everything from this other dissertation, even the title. But he couldn't even do that right. He includes a glaring typo in the title of the most important document of his academic career. But it's not really a typo at all. He simply carried over the apostrophe from the title of the most important document of his and the original document without looking at it. And nobody at Cambridge, that prestigious university, noticed this. The odds are extremely high that none of these people read the dissertation or any other dissertation. But things get even worse for Arday when you put yourself in the position of one of his students and actually listen to what he has to say. So this is from one of his recent lectures entitled Engaging Pedagogically with Race and Racism. We're going to watch some footage of the master at work so we can judge whether or not he actually deserved to be a full professor at Cambridge, which is the most prestigious level they have. And we'll give the mob the benefit of the doubt. You know, we'll forget about all the plagiarism and all the dishonesty and narcissism. And we'll just kind of listen to the man speak to see if he deserved to have the position that he did. We'll start with the beginning of Arday's lecture where he discusses the sinister nature of whiteness. And now, before we go any further, you should make a mental note about the fact that this particular DEI hire, like every other DEI hire, is only capable of talking about how we need even more DEI hires. That is the extent of Jason Arday's contribution to academia. Now, your expectations are probably already pretty low, given that he was a professor of sociology. But the reality of this guy's drivel is even worse than you might think. He never makes a single original or interesting argument about anything. He just makes more demands and more complaints. And the arguments don't even make sense. So behold the beginning of Jason Arday's lecture, which you can watch without being a student at the highly prestigious Cambridge University, if you can imagine it. Bask in your good fortune as we all absorb the wisdom of Jason Arday. Watch. You know, whiteness, the centrality of whiteness is all-encompassing, and it very much still defines a lot of what we do in our learning, teaching, and university spaces. I think the monopoly and the proliferation of kind of dominant white European canons, it compromises all our curriculum. You know, if we think through kind of STEM, if we think through kind of things around English literature, if we think through things around engaging in social sciences, human sciences, a lot of it is centered around kind of dominant white philosophies. And I think one of the things that becomes really important is this idea of where do black, Asian, and minority ethnic learners in the classroom space how do they then conceptualize other people that have contributed to the canon? How do they develop that knowledge that, in essence, is supposed to equip them to undertake their place in the world of work? Well, we're off to a great start here. The centrality of whiteness is all-encompassing, he says, which seems like a contradiction because something in the center cannot be all-encompassing. By definition, if you're in the center, then you're not everywhere else. You're just in the center. Centrality indicates a focal, within the larger thing. All-encompassing indicates that it is the larger thing. So a thing cannot be within the larger thing and also be the larger thing at the same time. This might seem like a semantic point, but as you'll see, it's a recurring theme with Jason Arday and DEI activists in general. They say things and write things and copy-paste things that make no sense and are meant to sound a whole lot smarter than they really are. It's all just gibberish. Then you get to Arday's really interesting and original take, which is that the proliferation of dominant white European canons compromises all of our curriculum. Now, far be it for me, a lowly podcaster with only a high school diploma, to critique the grammar and vocabulary of an esteemed Cambridge professor. But in context, it seems that the word he wants here is "comprise," not "compromise." Like, he seems to be trying to say that dominant white European canons make up, encompass, and he says that, the curriculum, which would mean "comprise," not "compromise." You know, that'd be the correct word. And he specifically says that STEM, which is short for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, is, quote, "centered around kind of dominant white philosophies." Of course, he never explains what he means by that, which is another recurring theme in his fake scholarship. He just throws it out there. STEM is compromised by dominant white philosophies. And we're led to believe that this is a bad thing, because Black and Asian students will struggle to conceptualize other people that have contributed to the canon. And some others will hurt them when they leave college and enter the world of work. None of this makes even the slightest amount of sense, no matter how long you spend thinking about it, which you shouldn't spend any time. It sounds like he's complaining about the fact that Europe was the birthplace of the scientific revolution, that he wishes Copernicus and Bacon and Galileo and Newton had been morbidly obese Black women instead. Which, you know, there's really nothing we can do about that at this point. The ship has sailed. Newton was who he was. The reality is that the people who contributed the most to the advancement of civilization, the 17th and 18th centuries especially, and before that, forming the basis for modern-day STEM, were white men. In fact, nearly everyone who contributed to those advancements during that time were white men. The non-white male contributors were the rare exceptions. That is an inconvenient fact for DEI activists, to be sure. It might lead people to wonder what exactly Africa, you know, why exactly Africa lagged so far behind, what was going on there. But it still doesn't explain what Jason Arday wants to do about it. It is what it is. It was what it was. There's also the fact that inventions like algebra and Arabic numerals are obviously a part of mathematics education, even though white Europeans did not come up with those. It's almost as if when you're learning about math, you're learning about algebra. When you're learning about biology or calculus or the laws of thermodynamics, it doesn't matter who contributed to the canon, you're learning objective facts, where quote-unquote lived experience and political ideology and skin color are irrelevant. So what is he talking about exactly? Go to mod.com. That's M-O-D. M-O-D.com for a free consultation. Instead of explaining himself, he moves right along to discuss another meaningless string of woke cliches. Watch. So one thing that I think is really important is this idea of kind of systemic racism and stereotypes against ethnic minority groups. When you don't have, pedagogically speaking, people who are from those backgrounds in those spaces, I do think that there is license to misconstrue. ymddiriedolaethau ac amgylcheddau arbennig. Felly, er enghraifft, gallaf siarad am lleoliad genedlaethol, ond mewn gwirionedd, fel nŵr Cymraeg sy'n arwain mewn sefyllfa cyfrifol, mae llawer o bethau nad ydw i'n gallu eu cysylltu â nhw. Felly, gallaf siarad amdanyn nhw, ond heb i mi ddylai bod yn hollol modest, beth rydw i bob amser yn ei wneud pan dwi'n siarad am materion nad ydw i'n eu deall, ond dydw i ddim wedi'u profi, mae gwirionedd i gael pethau'n anghywir, mae gwirionedd i ysgrifennu, mae gwirionedd i gymryd cysylltiadau gwahanol sydd efallai nad ydyn nhw'n berthnasol i 1,000%. Ac rwy'n meddwl pan fyddwch yn gwneud hyn, wrth gwrs, nad ydych chi'n gallu bod yn berthnasol yn bendant, ond mae'n rhaid i chi fod yn gallu siarad am brofiad byw a deall y peth, os yw unrhyw beth arall. Wel, un peth rydyn ni wedi'i ddysgu yw bod y dyn yn hollol hoffi'r gair "pedagogiaeth". Roedd yn amlwg wedi clywed y gair hynny cyn i mi fynd i fynd i roi'r sgwrs hwn, ac mae'n dweud, "Mae'n gwaith gwych". Mae'n rhaid i fi. Felly, rwy'n cofio, chi'n gwybod, weithiau rydych chi'n clywed gair a'ch bod chi'n hoffi'r gair. Mae'n rhaid i chi ysgrifennu'r gair i fynd i'r sgwrs. Ac mae'n gair hwyl. Rwy'n. Mae hyn yn wir. Roeddwn i erioed wedi defnyddio'r gair "pedagog", "g-o-g" ar y diwedd, sydd, dwi'n meddwl, yn ysgrifennu'r gair. Roeddwn i'n ei ddefnyddio yn "scrabble", ac roedd yn y mwyaf gweithgaredd arbennig ar y bwrdd gwrtau sydd wedi'i gyflawni yn fy fywyd. Mwy na hynny'n ddiddorol yn rhedeg 300 mynedd a 3 diwrnod, ond, chi'n gwybod, ni allwn ni gyd fod yn Jason Arday. Yn unrhyw fath, mae'n dweud ei fod yn ymddiriedol i siarad am materion nad oes ganddo profiad personol gyda'i gilydd, sy'n dda oherwydd bod ei brofiad personol yn hollbwysig. Ond mae'n dweud, pan fydd yn gwneud hynny, bydd yn ddewis modestiaeth arbennig. Felly, yn arbennig, mae'n debyg pan fydd Michael Scott yn ddewis gwrtaith yn y swyddfa, bydd yn sefyll ymlaen ynghylch y llyfrgell ac yn sgrifio, "Dwi'n ddewis modestiaeth arbennig!" Gwestiwn sylweddol, rwy'n disgwyl, ond mae'n rhywfaint paradoxol. Felly, sut mae rhywun yn ddewis rhywbeth yn modest? Sut mae person modest yn ddewis bod modestiaeth arbennig? Fel, gan ddeffiniad, os ydych chi'n modest, bydd y peth olaf y byddech chi'n ei wneud erioed yn ddewis eich hun i fod yn hynny. Mwy neu ddewis eich hun i fod yn hynny yn berffaith. Ddewis eich modestiaeth yw negu'r ddewis, gan ei wneud yn unig. Nawr, mae'n dweud nad ydych chi'n cael y profiad sylweddol iawn, yna mae "gysylltiad i gyflawni pethau'n anghywir, gysylltiad i amgylcheddoli, a gysylltiad i gymryd cwrsiau gwahanol gwahanol sy'n efallai nad yw'n 100% cyfrifol". Wrth gwrs, nid ydych chi'n gallu bod yn gyfrifol yn bennaf, ond mae'n rhaid i chi gallu siarad â phrofiad byw a deall y peth, os yw unrhyw beth arall. Nawr, nid wyf hyd yn oed yn mynd i mewn fel rhywun sy'n academaidd a'n ymddangos i fod yn dda iawn ac yn defnyddio'r holl lawer o iaith cymhleth honno. Yna, yn defnyddio'r term 1000%. Nid wyf hyd yn oed yn mynd i fynd i mewn, ond rydyn ni'n gwneud hynny. Rwy'n credu bod "licensed" yn golygu "tendency", ond mae'n dal i fod yn ddyluniad cyfranogol o'r holl bethau sy'n cael ei ystyried. Mae cyfranogiad yn bob adeilad arall. Nid ydym ni'n mynd i ddwylo ar y ffaith bod profiad byw yn cyfranogol. Mae pob profiad yn byw gan ddeffiniad. Os nad ydych chi wedi'i byw, nid yw'n profiad. Ac os ydych chi wedi'i brofiad, mae'n rhaid i chi fod wedi'i byw. Nid ydych chi'n gallu profi rhywbeth nad ydych chi wedi'i byw. Allwch chi gael profiad heb byw? Nawr, mae hefyd yn dweud nad ydych chi'n angen i fod yn hollbwysig, ond ar yr un pryd, mae'n beth peidio os nad ydych chi'n hollbwysig 1000%. Wel, beth yw hynny? Ac yn ystod hynny, pam arall mae angen i chi gael profiad gyntaf gyntaf gyntaf gyda pwnc penodol i'w ddysgu? Nid yw hynny'n canolbwyntio pob person byw gan ddysgu pob pwnc o hyd? Sut y byddwch chi'n cael prifysgwr gyda phrofiad byw am y Crusades? Unwaith yn unig. Nid ydych chi'n cofio'r ffaith fod academaethau blyneddol fel RDA yn parhau i fynd ymlaen ac ymlaen am bwysigrwydd, er nad oes gennych unrhyw brofiad byw gyda bod yn bwysig. Dyma gwestiynau y byddai, os oedd Jason RDA yn academaeth mewn gwirionedd, efallai y byddai ganddo atebion amdanyn nhw. Byddai'n cynnig syniadau sy'n cyflawni rhai gradd gwahanol. Yn hytrach, byddwn ni'n cael llyfriau i'w ddysgu unwaith eto ac eto. Felly, dyma un clip arall o'r llyfr hwn i ddeall beth mae'n ei ddweud yma, i'r amrywiaeth ei bod hi'n bosibl. Mae angen ychydig o bwysigrwydd i'w ddweud. Felly, "baim" sy'n golygu myfyrwyr Cymraeg a Cymraeg, ac "tariff" yn ymwneud â llyfrau test y mae myfyrwyr y DU yn eu cynnig cyn mynd i'r coleg. Felly, yn y clip hwn, mae'n gwneud y pwynt bod myfyrwyr Cymraeg yn cael graddau uchel yr un fath fel myfyrwyr Cymraeg yn y ysgol uchel, ond pan fyddant yn dod i'r coleg, mae myfyrwyr Cymraeg yn perfformio'n llawer gwaethaf, ac mae'n ei ddweud ei fod yn y canlyniad yn glir o'r rasism. Beth arall allai ei fod? Edrychwch. Felly, rwy'n credu mai un o'r pethau sy'n bwysig iawn yw'r syniadau ynghylch hysbyseb a chynhyrchu. Pam mae hynny'n digwydd? Ie, mae'r cyfathrebu amlwg i'w drafod yw rhwng Myfyrwyr Cymraeg a myfyrwyr Cymraeg ynghylch DU, ond o ran hysbyseb, un o'r pethau sy'n wirioneddol bwysig i'w cydnabod yw bod llawer o'r myfyrwyr BAME yma yn dod i'r DU gyda tariffau uchel yn y cyntaf, oherwydd bod y DU wedi gofyn am tariffau uchel o ran gallu astudio yma. Felly, os ydyn nhw'n dod allan o hyn, ac nid ydyn nhw'n cyflawni'r hyn y ddylai nhw ei gyflawni, mae'r go-to bob amser yn bod yn oherwydd nad yw'r myfyrwyr yn ddigon gallus. Nid yw'r myfyrwyr BAME yn ddigon gallus fel y mae'r myfyrwyr BAME. Maen nhw'n dod ar yr un tariff. Felly mae rhywbeth yn seiliedigol sydd wedi digwydd, neu sy'n digwydd yn ein sefydliadau ar draws y sector, nid yn unig yw'r DU, sydd angen newid i gyflawni'r myfyrwyr yma i gyflawni eu potensial cyflawni. Ydych chi'n dweud 'dysbariaeth', fel 'dysbariaeth' ond 'dysbariaeth'? Efallai y byddaf wedi clywed hynny'n anghywir, byddwch chi'n gwybod. Mae'n anodd i ddweud hynny oherwydd nid yw'n adnodd gwirioneddol, ond efallai y byddaf wedi clywed hynny'n anghywir. Mae synnwyr cyffredinol yn dweud y byddai'n rhaid iddo wneud ychydig o fariadau yma. Nid yw'n gwneud gwirionedd yn ei ffwrdd bod myfyrwyr BAME yn cael yr un graddau yn myfyrwyr BAME yn ysgol uchel, ac yna'n cyflawni'n llawer gwaethaf pan fyddant yn dod i'r brifysgol oherwydd racism. Er un peth, rydyn ni i gyd yn gwybod bod y colegau hyn yn mynd allan o'u ffordd i ddyfynnu myfyrwyr BAME, ac felly mae'r ysgolau uchel yn gwneud hynny a phob math o ysgol arall. Mae'n gweithredu llawer mwy i gynnwys bod y gwaith ysgol yn lefel y brifysgol yn llawer mwy hyfforddiol ynghylch beth bynnag y mae'r tariffau'n ei fesur. Nawr, dydw i ddim o'r DU, yn amlwg, diolch yn fawr. Dydw i ddim wedi trefnu cymaint o amser yno, dydw i ddim o ddiddordeb mewn gwirionedd. Dydw i ddim o brofiad byw gyda'i, ond hyd yn oed gyda pum secundd o ymchwil, fe wnes i ddarganfod y problem. Felly, mae'n digwydd bod tariffau'n gallu ymwneud â testau sy'n seiliedig ar ymchwil, neu mae'n gallu ymwneud â gwaith gwasanaethol, fel clases ar plwymo a chyflawni. Felly, mae'n bosibl i myfyrwyr gwledig gael tariffau uchel, neu adnoddau test, mewn, ddweud, plwymo, rhywbeth gwasanaethol, gan fod myfyrwyr gwledig gael tariffau uchel mewn gwydnwst, math a'r mathau hynny. Ni fyddai'n rhyfeddol sylweddol os, pan fydd y ddau myfyrwyr yma'n dod i'r coleg, mae'r myfyrwyr gwledig ymgynghori'r un gwledig ar ymgynghorau academaidd. Nid yw hynny'n rasism. Mae'n broblem mewn sut rydych chi'n cymryd myfyrwyr oherwydd maen nhw'n gwledig, hyd yn oed nad ydyn nhw'n cael eu cadw i'r coleg. Ac, fel Jason Arday, pan fydd y ddau myfyrwyr gwledig yma wedi'u rhoi mewn amgylchedd sydd allan o'u lleyg, maen nhw'n llwyddo'n gyflym. Felly, ble mae hyn yn mynd oddi wrth gwrs? Wel, yn seiliedig ar y gwledig hwnnw a'r ystadegau o weithredwyr gwlach yn y DU sydd â'r cefnogaeth y Prif Weinidog, wrth gwrs, gallwn gyfathrebu newid ar gyfer siarad llaw. Mae hyn yn ogystal â phobl gyda'r prosiect Llywodraeth Dda, yr ydw i'n ei ddweud yn gynharach. Dwi'n gofio'r defnydd tragig o Jason Arday diwethaf. Yn gyntaf, byddwn i'n hoffi ddweud gobeithio ac mae fy mhrofiad fwyaf i'w teulu a'i ffrindiau. Dydw i ddim yn gallu deall, dydw i ddim hyd yn oed yn dechrau deall beth maen nhw'n mynd drwy ar hyn o bryd. Ond nid yw nhw'n unig. Rydym wedi ysgrifennu llythyr gyffredinol, llythyr agored i'r Prif Weinidog. Mae'r llythyr hwnnw wedi cael ei anfon gan wahanol unigolion, llawer ohonynt sy'n unigolion hyfryd yn gwledig, sydd wedi profi'r lefel o targed a chyfyngiad a chyfyngiad a chyfyngiad argyfwngol ar gyfer y cyfryngau y DU. Nid yw'n rhywbeth y byddwn ni'n parhau i'w golygu. Rydyn ni'n credu bod hynny'n digwydd nawr ac mae'r cyfryngau y DU yn rhaid iddyn nhw cael eu cyfrifol am eu cyflawni. Felly rydym wedi ysgrifennu i'r Prif Weinidog, mae yna ymgysylltiad cyffredinol i hyn, sy'n bwysig iawn iawn gan y gymuned llawer. Ac os ydych chi'n teimlo'n fawr fel rydyn ni am y cyfrifoldeb a'r cyfrifoldeb y cyfryngau y DU, rwy'n gobeithio y byddwn yn rhannu'r llythyr a'r post ac yn gwerthfawrogi eich cefnogaeth cyffredinol. Wel mae'r nod yma yw gwneud ymddygiad yn y DU i sylweddoli unrhyw beth sy'n anodd i gweithwyr go iawn. Rydych chi'n gweld eu bod nhw'n cael eu llythio gyda llyfrau heb unrhyw gyfrifoldeb, ond os ydych chi'n dweud y gwir am yr hyn y maen nhw'n ei wneud, rhaid i chi fynd i'r prifysgol. Fel rwy'n sylweddoli, mae prosiect Llywodraeth Da yn prifysgol yn y DU, ac roedden nhw'n llawer yn ymwneud â rhannu llyfrau i ddiogelu Arde. Felly, os oes unrhyw beth, fel y dywedodd Andy Ngo, mae cyfweliad cyhoeddus yn ei angen i'r prosiect Llywodraeth Da i ddiffyglu'r cyhoedd â chwefnau bod ymchwil ymarferol Arde yn ddiddorol ac yn dda. A fydd hynny'n digwydd? Wel, wrth gwrs, nid. Roedden ni i gyd wedi gweld y sefydliad academaidd yn y DU pan ddod Charlie Kirk i Oxford, lle fe wnaeth hi ddibynnu â'r Prif Weinidog y Cymdeithas Oxford, eu cymdeithas ddibynnu anhygoel. Ac, chi'n gwybod, y Prif Weinidog, ei enw oedd George Aberonier, oedd rhyw arbenig sy'n cymryd ysgafn a th-shirt, yn edrych fel sefydlu ei fod yn hollol allan o'i meddwl. Ac, yn ystod cyntaf, pan fydd Charlie Kirk wedi cael ei gyflawni, fe fyddai'r un gynulleidfa hwnnw'n cyffroi'r adnoddau. Fe wnaeth hi ysgrifennu, "Dod Charlie Kirk wedi cael ei gyflawni. Gadewch i ni ffynnu." Felly dyna'r diwethaf ar gyfer y ddigwyddiadwyr Cymreig hwnnw. And we can't forget it This is not merely a story about one fraudster And the white liberal women who enabled him It's that, it's about that But also if you stand in the way Of their ideological takeover If you have the wrong skin color These people want you dead They're not upset that Jason Arday took his own life They're upset that a white person Like Nathan Kofnes wasn't killed instead They would have preferred to see Kofnes gutted Like Henry Novak on the sidewalk And they're infuriated that he's still alive While the highest-profile DEI hire in the entire country The fraudster they expended so much energy to defend The guy who could supposedly run 300 miles in three days Is not This is an unusual position for these leftists You know, they're so used to killing their political opposition That they genuinely can't process the fact that They've lost one of their most prominent pieces on the chessboard But it's happened Because in their quest to place a DEI-like president They overlooked his obvious psychosis and mental instability And even now, when the evidence of their immorality and corruption Is laid so bare that a blind man could see it They're refusing to engage in an ounce of introspection They'd much rather resort to violence As Jason Arday himself used to say, and I quote Yeah, I'm chillin' on a dirt road Laid back swervin' like I'm George Jones Ain't it funny how rumors spread Man, that talk is gettin' old You better mind your business, man Watch your mouth Before I have to knock that loud mouth out Actually, just a correction I think that was Jason Aldean Not Arday, my mistake But in the spirit of the late Jason Arday We'll just pretend he said it And the point is, never forget these scenes in Trafalgar Square Do not forget the lies They will tell And the atrocities they will commit In order to defend their bankrupt ideology Especially now that it's been exposed so publicly I saw somebody observe that, you know This wasn't really a vigil At Trafalgar Square on Monday It was more like a last stand It was the last gasp of an ideology That's on the verge of defeat And if you're the optimistic type Then one way to read the sheer incoherence And depravity that was on display Is just that, you know It was a stark reminder Of what these demons are capable of And how we must commit ourselves Especially with some very important elections coming up To ensure that they never again hold power In our own country That's all I'll do for the show today Thanks for watching, thanks for listening Talk to you tomorrow Have a great day Godspeed But in all of my years of public life I have never profited from public service I welcome this kind of examination Because people have got to know Whether or not their president's a crook Well, I'm not a crook For more than five decades From Iran-Contra to Monica Lewinsky To Russia-Contra Every political scandal Has been measured against one The Watergate affair But what if Richard Nixon was telling the truth? What if Watergate isn't what it seems? What if hundreds of thousands of pages Of sworn testimony, memoirs And newly released government documents Tell a different story Than the one you learned in school? In 1972, Nixon won the biggest electoral landslide In modern American history With grand plans to remake the federal government Two years later, he was out of office And he was out of office You were taught that Nixon's men Broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters To spy on his political opponents You were taught that when he found out Nixon covered it up And that the cover-up was worse than the crime You were taught that two heroic Washington Post reporters Guided by a righteous FBI whistleblower Brought the most powerful man in the world to justice But you were never taught what really happened I shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow The real history of the Watergate affair The Watergate scandal is available now on Daily Wire Plus