Enlightened Populism: Rethinking Truth, Democracy & AI || Mohamed Nabil

Hello everyone, and welcome to another episode of the wisdom of our spot pass. I'm your host Ferdinand and to this case, it's Mohammed Nabi is an independent philosopher and author and creator of AIDPO, which is AIDPO, which is AIDPO on advanced publications. His work explores some fascinating questions about as we share intelligence, critical thinking, democracy, global governance, and how we determine what is truly what's actually true in this image of over-information, over-women information. Women are developed by a concept of light-same populace, which is presented as an alternative to both blind elitism and ignorance populace. Now, we advocate for direct democracy through citizen assemblies and believe that AI can play power for a role in making intellectual debates and publishing more transparent. Today, we will explore his ideas about AI philosophy, democracy, and the possibility of a more globally-connected political system. Hello, and welcome to the show Mohammed, thanks for being here today. Thank you for the warm introduction. Thank you very much. So, let's just begin with AIDPO, which is AIDOP. What exactly is AIDPO on one's publication and the crucial to the story behind why you created it? Well, AIDPO or AIDPO on one's publications involves a content creator, prompting an AI tool to criticize their own content on publishing the entire and adds transcript of back-and-forth organization within 24 hours of the exchange. So, basically, you have a piece of content to authorize a book, an essay, or a video or anything, and then you feed it into an AI tool and ask the tool to criticize it, then engage in back-and-forth argumentation and publish the whole transcript unaddicted within 24 hours of the exchange. It promotes radical transparency and intellectual humility. So, when I first told about it, I thought my ideas and books shall be dead if they are not publicly discussed and debated. So, I thought I started debating my own ideas with AI tools. I'm publishing these debates to give human beings a better starting point, so they can instead of starting from scratch, instead of presenting them with a theory or a thesis of mine, I can present these theories or thesis along with a set of arguments and counter-arguments around it, so people can have a better starting point for their own debates. Okay, thank you very much for sharing that. So, we talked about this prediction behind your ideas. So, I am trying to solve through AI DUP. AI DUP is about that conclusion of AI. It may have a revolutionary impact within education, publishing, policy-making, humanities and social sciences. So, then publishing it changes the relationship between the author and the readers. Instead of presenting a certain theory or thesis as if it was a fact, and instead of speaking from an ivory tower, authors can present their own views along with arguments and counter-arguments around them, so people can be aware of a certain issue before forming their own opinions. Within education, students can be asked to submit AI DUP sessions at the end of their assignments to avoid cheating through AI or stuff like that, and then they can handle debates with their colleagues, with their human beings on their findings. Within policy-making, I am advocating for direct democracy, people voting on issues, instead of voting for representatives to vote on our behalf. So, within policy-making, it would be helpful to have a better starting point, instead of having a policy or a bill, you can have this proposal along with arguments and counter-arguments around it. Within humanities and social sciences, the benefits are apparent as these fields rely on too much analysis and involve opinionated discussions. You have actually effected AI to criticize your published works and then publish your edited exchanges. Now, why do you believe that exposing your idea to consider this in this way is very valuable? I believe, as I told you, I believe ideas and books are dead if they are not discussed. So, I started these discussions on my own through AI tools, so people can follow my reasoning and inviting readers to my own thought lab. So, they can explore what I'm saying, why I'm saying it, and then formulate their own opinions. It has to do with having enough confidence in your own ideas and accepting criticism if it's valid and electrolytes on radical transparency and intellectual humility. Okay, thank you very much. Now, you just don't believe why it's pushing your ideas to consider this particular way is valuable. Now, can the Apple change the way books are reading, review, the published in the future? The questions, am I planning to do the same in the future? No, I'm talking about Apple, which is AI to be on one's politicians. Do you think it can change the way that books are reading, reviewed, or published in the future? Yes, sure. I believe, over time, it may have its own fans and then people or other authors and other concentrators shall be asked to do the same. Okay, can I hear me? Yes. All right, so now, moving on, you disagree between Planned Elicism, Ignorance Populism, I want to call Enlightening Populism. So, counter the parts each of these. So, what is blind Elicism? So, blind Elicism entails blind the following an expert or an elite on a certain issue. Okay, what is Ignorance Populism? Ignorance Populism also involves the absence of investigation while relying on feelings or trends. The Enlightening Populism. And Enlightening Populism is a behavioural pattern of communication that involves listening to multiple experts trying to understand how they reached certain conclusions and investigating the information to the screen of the truth. It contrasts with the two previously mentioned behavioural patterns of communication, which are the two dominant patterns in today's world, blind Elicism and Ignorance Populism. Okay, so now you're explaining. So now, what are some of the key differences between these two approach? Well, I believe Enlightening Populism may help provide the essential infrastructure for human beings with mental tribalism, loneliness, polarization, toxic competitiveness, oppression, systemic blicket, and stuff like that. So, I believe our main issues in today's world can be tackled based on how we are based on how we consume information. So, changing the way we consume information and communicate with each other, changes everything else. Okay, thank you. So now, let's talk about the ordinary people. Now, how can ordinary people investigate information effectively when we have a spa, politicians, influencers and AI systems given us information? So, how can ordinary people investigate information effectively? Well, this has to do with having, first of all, having the time, energy, and the willingness, willingness to be proven wrong sometimes. So, you can rely a little less on social media because it's a push agenda, the information is pushed at you, and rely a little more on search engines and alarm, but even search engines and alarm can turn into equal chambers of not used wisely, as they both rely on historical data of interactions. Using private and cognitive mode occasionally, while submitting queries through multiple search engines, and digging deep for multiple search engines are advisable, same goes for alarm, with the additional feature of intentionally getting into a debate with the LLM by prompting it to take a position opposing to yours. So the main idea in today's world, today's world is full of information everywhere. So the main idea is to seek opinions that are opposing to yours, actively see them and try to understand how other people are thinking, how other people reach certain conclusions. And then form your own opinion or updated accordingly. Okay, thank you so much. What's up in advance, the link for people to be called a license instead of being blind, eliciting or ignorant population. Now, you also argue that AI can't promote radical transparency. But the question is, if people know a song from the elites, as well as the express arts society, the government of these officers, and now use AI to participate in this. Now, how do you recognize AI? It says, from becoming an authority, that people blindly trust. It depends on how we use our own use of it. We all need to realize that AI tools are just tools. We are the human beings and we are the ones who use them however we want. So this has to do with checking multiple AI tools to make sure you are reaching as much information as you can. And then validating information through search engines and other websites because these AI tools sometimes hallucinate. And then you can actively see information that is discussed previously, information and opinions that are opposing to your own through all alarms and through human beings. All right, thank you very much. So now, okay, we just ask how can we convince AI of becoming an authority that people blindly trust. Now, you have written AI through in education. Now, what do you think AI? Okay, what do you think education could look like? If AI was primarily used to challenge students in kindergarten, simply give them answers. I believe these AI tools have almost have the some of human knowledge because of the huge data sets that they have been trained on. So you can effectively use them to come up with criticism, or come up with counter arguments to anything. You may want to discuss. So when you train students of the language, do this process, you are training future generations on critical thinking. And you are effectively encouraging enlightened populism within society. Okay, so now let's talk about the policies. Now, your advocate for single governments that's as good as it seems as English. The question is, what is your advocate for something like that? I miss you, you might have seen problems with the current national state system. So, can you share with us some of the problems that you see that the today's national state system has, that can look very quickly, so I'll see you're good to single, vulnerable governments. The problems we have today, and in the future are climate change, potentially recurring pandemics, and billionaires greet. Billionaires greet representatives and wars spread all over the world. Represents and tried labor in multiple places around the world. And presenting many other problems we are seeing extreme wealth concentration and wealth and inequality of wealth distribution. All of these have to do with these billionaires. These billionaires that effectively buy politicians all over the world and let us live in an oligarchly. So, this global government shall introduce a wealth cap at $999 million per person, effectively taxing billionaires out of existence, and shall introduce basic human rights such as shelter, access to clean water and food, education, health care, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, and stable speed internet connections. Okay, thank you very much for sharing this. Now, let's talk about the city of the Middle East. Now, what are the city of the Middle East? What do you believe that you can't participate in decisions rather than the traditional rather than traditional representative democracy? Okay, after establishing these basic human rights, it shall be difficult for anyone to buy votes, to buy the people's votes. So, these citizens and assemblies shall not be corrupt. These citizens and assemblies will have people from all over the world voting on each individual issue, each individual policy. These assemblies will be hyper-local. So, you will have your own assembly by four or ten minutes away from your own home, and then you will have issues to discuss that are related to your own local citizen assembly, and issues that shall be coordinated through facilitators, through citizen assemblies all over the world. For global issues, we will all vote on them and we will all have an equal vote, an equal say. Each person has one vote on every issue. Okay, thank you for sharing. We just talked about citizens and assemblies. Now, our question was, how do you comment about this particular idea for the students in assembly? Do you have an experience of how do you comment about this? Well, I was thinking of one alternative to the currently corrupt representative democracy spread all over the world, because these representatives are vote by billionaires all over the world, so I believe people should have the right to vote on each individual issue. So, when you think of a problem like AI taking over our jobs, this has to do with billionaires seeking extra money by replacing human beings and bringing over some AI tools. So, when you think of the problem, we can share the benefits of technology instead of letting them benefit alone. We can share or we can all share the benefits of technology by reducing working hours, and this way people will have the time and energy to practice enlightened populism across issues, investigate for the truth, and come up with better decisions. No system shall be 100% accurate, and no one will have 100% of the truths on all issues whatever may happen in the future. Yet, if you think of system assemblies and direct democracy, you have a few examples of system assemblies that are happening in certain countries around the world, yet these are only provide consultation nowadays. I'd like to turn them into the original system of governance, the basic system of governance. I just asked you how do you come about that particular idea? So, now you either include the publishing, say it's like food, play, words, healthcare, education, education, freedom of expression, and internal justice and physical rights. Now, how would the Google government realistically provide and to test all these rights? Well, we will text billionaires out of existence, and abolish monarchies because we will abolish nation states all over the world, and we will definitely abolish military industrial complexes because we will not need them, we will not be fighting against each other, and we will have enough mass of weapons from all over the world that can defend this planet from sexual stuff like alien invasion. So, all the trillions collected from these three measures can be used to introduce shelter, access to clean water and food, education, healthcare, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, and basic stable speed internet connections as basic human rights. Okay, that's very, very interesting. So, now, let's talk about Google advocacy. So, you advocate for a. global with cut of now the $99 million. What problem are you trying to solve with such a policy? And what would you say to critics who believe that it should discourage innovation and entrepreneurship? Well, people need money for three basic things. They need money for social status. They need money for influence and they need money to buy stuff. So as for buying stuff, having $9999 million will help you buy enough stuff if you need. As for the influence, the system is designed, the proposed system of mine is designed to eliminate this huge influence. No human being shall have all of these levels of influence. For the social status, we can have a list to be published across newspapers and magazines. Similar to the current lists of billionaires, we can publish a list for the highest levels of taxes each year. As for innovation and entrepreneurship, this will encourage people, even if the current players will not play this game and they are seeking just influence. They don't care about social status. Other players will emerge and they will benefit the economy accordingly. As for innovation, we need to remind ourselves that the major inventions and innovations came from the middle class. Billionaires didn't discover gravity. They didn't invent airplanes. They didn't invent electricity. They didn't do anything significant in terms of innovation. Most innovations came from the middle class. So I'm practically proposing something to expand the middle class. We will introduce shelter, access to clean water and food, education, healthcare, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, and stable speed internet connections as basic human rights. So people will have more time and energy to focus on the next level. According to Maslow, after you have your basic level satisfied, you start seeking self-actualization. So we would like to see how, to be exciting to see how many people will be capable of innovating more stuff as you move forward. So this has been very, very amazing. So my final question for you is, if you can look ahead. Now, let's look forward. Let's look forward to your ideas about air transparency, and life-saving, popularizing, and citizen-made democracy. What would you prove that the world was like 20 or 30 years from now? I imagine a beautiful world. We will have the main issues, the main diet of threats to humanity shall be almost eliminated. And we will have, we will have think of trivial matters. And we will have, as we expand the middle class, when people don't need to worry about their basic needs, we will have more authors, more publishers. I'm sorry, more authors, more philosophers, more artists, more painters, more filmmakers. You can see more people doing creative stuff, and jobs that don't currently pay well, but are highly needed and exciting. So one minute, thank you very much for sharing your ideas with us. Today, we have explored some big questions from AI, to publicize, to education, and to democracy. So we'll explore whether AI can transform publician education, so how we can determine what is true, and how democracy should work, and what are your many things? Everybody moves towards a single global political system. So honestly, a very big topic of shared ideas with us, which are largely the way we would think, so that we're starting to be on systems and assumptions that we're authentic from granted. So one minute and five minute, I would like you to leave it to us. One of these, one words from everything you have stayed today on the show, and they also, we bearish, the listener's point, which actually you are relating to from me. Well, the one word I'd like to leave is that no one has a monopoly on the truth. No one knows 100% of the truth from all issues. So truth seeking is appealing, and actually my last book is titled Truth is Sexy. So I believe truth seeking is a virtue in itself, and we should seek the truth at all costs, regardless of our initial views or initial impressions on issues. As for how to reach me out, people can reach me out through my website, Mohammednabildo12, M-O-H-A-M-E-D-N-A-B-I-L dot W-O-R-L-D. It would be helpful if you can leave it in the show notes. Okay, thank you very much for coming on the show, and I really, really enjoy our conversation. Thank you once again. Thank you for hosting me, it has been a pleasure.