This podcast explores parallels between the medieval poet Geoffrey Chaucer's 1380 "raptus" accusation and modern sexual assault cases. The host, inspired by Shannon Miller's book *Know My Name* (about her assault by a Stanford swimmer), reflects on how historical figures like Chaucer faced similar allegations. The term "raptus" in Chaucer's era had ambiguous meanings—it could denote rape, abduction, or even bride abduction for marriage, as Professor Sebastian Subecki argues. However, Professor Mariantella cautions that uncertainty remains due to a lack of eyewitnesses. Notably, although his accuser Cecilia dropped charges, Chaucer still paid a fine of £10 (roughly $13,000 today), prompting questions about whether this payment admitted guilt or was a procedural step. The podcast contrasts this with modern cases, such as Harvey Weinstein's $25 million settlement with accusers, highlighting enduring complexities in sexual assault jurisprudence. The host invites listeners to consider how medieval legal models compare to contemporary ones, leaving key questions open for future episodes. Ultimately, the discussion underscores how historical ambiguity and modern legal challenges both reflect ongoing struggles for justice in sexual assault cases.
[Music] Hello, Professor Van Blomaheha. Hope you enjoyed this podcast. According to Chosa, we think it is a coordinate horizon. I think this information is according to reason. In light of the assault case that occurred at Stanford University, Shannon Miller, the woman sexually assaulted by the prominent Stanford swimmer, regained agency in her sexual story through her book, "No My Name," released in June 2019 by Viking Books. I am Maya Miller and her bravery, and hopefully her story can give women courage to tell their stories. As a medievalist in following this case, I couldn't help but think about another renowned figure. This time in past history, Chosa, the father of English poetry, who was also accused of rape or rather wrapped us. The word used at the time in 2018. In my medieval classes, especially when my students read Chosa, my students are always shocked by the information. And then we get into long discussions about the topic. As far as the medieval case goes, although Sicily Shampa dropped all the charges and released Chosa from all actions concerning the rape, there was still a cloud of suspicion. Since the term in that period had a double meaning, that is, it could mean abduction or rape. However, as the Guardian reports in June 2019, just recently, Sebastian Subecki, Professor of Medieval English at the University of Hoganel, he suggests that the term itself is noted to have not only been used for rape and abduction, but also for the abduction of a bride for a groom, so to speak. And in this case, Chosa's abduction of the bride, let's use her first name, Sicily, for his ward, the groom Edmund Steelegate in 3080. In fact, as Subecki states, Chosa's father was also abducted to be married to someone when he was a young boy and it didn't work out. And as Subecki contends, it was actually quite common. But the Guardian suggests that Mariantella, the author of Chosa, a European life, an associate professor of English at Jesus College Oxford. She states that Subecki is right to point out that raptus is sometimes associated with worship, and there could be a connection. However, as she asserts, we still need to accept uncertainty, because we don't know what happened. As Subecki himself acknowledges, "Well, I agree. There was certainly no eyewitnesses listed, which does leave it open for any possibility. My thoughts on the matter is that I do agree with the tuna, not only were the charges dropped by Sicily, but the document titled, "Consuming my rape, de rapto male," which was fortulite in 1873. The scribe Chosa evidently paying a fine of ten pounds to Sicily, which was a considerable amount of money at that time. I converted it using an online converter, which came up to about $13,092 US dollars, and about $10,014 pounds to Sicily. In 2020, I hope it's correct. Your thoughts on anything similar? Yep. Pay all deals in numerous high-profile rape cases in our recent past, and more recently, Weinstein's case, where the New York Times reported in December 2019 that Weinstein and his accusers, over 30 actresses and former employees, had reached a tentative PL deal of $25 million. Here are some questions for those listening. If Sicily dropped all the charges, why did Chosa still pay a fine? And is paying a fine a usual step to those proceedings? What did it demonstrate admittance to guilt, or final step to punishment or exoneration? Again, we might never fully know, but we can look at the model of rape-duis prudence in Chosa's lifetime to get an idea of the situation and compare it to our own. Let's discuss next time in Episode 2 of Ponyville Podcast. I bid you farewell.
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The podcast discusses the case of medieval poet Geoffrey Chaucer, who was accused of "raptus" (a term that could mean rape or abduction) in 1380, and compares it to modern high-profile sexual assault cases like the Stanford swimmer case and Harvey Weinstein's.
Shannon Miller, a Stanford sexual assault survivor, regained agency through her book *Know My Name* (2019), inspiring the podcast's reflection on historical parallels.
Historians debate Chaucer's case
Despite charges being dropped, Chaucer paid a fine of £10 (equivalent to about $13,000 in 2020), raising questions about whether this indicated guilt, punishment, or exoneration.
The podcast compares this to modern settlements, such as Weinstein's $25 million deal with accusers, and invites discussion on medieval and contemporary rape jurisprudence.
Summary:
This podcast explores parallels between the medieval poet Geoffrey Chaucer's 1380 "raptus" accusation and modern sexual assault cases. The host, inspired by Shannon Miller's book *Know My Name* (about her assault by a Stanford swimmer), reflects on how historical figures like Chaucer faced similar allegations. The term "raptus" in Chaucer's era had ambiguous meanings—it could denote rape, abduction, or even bride abduction for marriage, as Professor Sebastian Subecki argues.
However, Professor Mariantella cautions that uncertainty remains due to a lack of eyewitnesses. Notably, although his accuser Cecilia dropped charges, Chaucer still paid a fine of £10 (roughly $13,000 today), prompting questions about whether this payment admitted guilt or was a procedural step. The podcast contrasts this with modern cases, such as Harvey Weinstein's $25 million settlement with accusers, highlighting enduring complexities in sexual assault jurisprudence.
The host invites listeners to consider how medieval legal models compare to contemporary ones, leaving key questions open for future episodes. Ultimately, the discussion underscores how historical ambiguity and modern legal challenges both reflect ongoing struggles for justice in sexual assault cases.
FAQs
It is Shannon Miller's book, released in June 2019 by Viking Books, where she regains agency in her sexual story after being sexually assaulted by a Stanford swimmer.
Chaucer is the father of English poetry, who was accused of 'raptus' (a term meaning rape or abduction) in medieval times.
It had a double meaning: it could mean rape or abduction, and was also used for the abduction of a bride for a groom.
He suggested that 'raptus' was often associated with worship and that Chaucer's abduction of Sicily was for his ward, and it was a common practice.
He paid a fine of ten pounds (about $13,092 US dollars in 2020) despite charges being dropped, which raises questions about whether it showed guilt or was a final step in punishment.
It compares it to high-profile rape cases like Weinstein's, where a $25 million deal was reached with over 30 accusers, highlighting similarities in legal outcomes.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.