Does the Kevin Warsh Fed want investors to buy stocks or bonds?
7m 50s
The Fed’s September 16, 2026, rate hike marks a key step in a broader monetary strategy aimed at managing inflation and maintaining market stability. Market data suggests the Fed’s neutral rate is significantly underestimated—currently priced at 3.2% versus a market-implied range of 4.25% to 4.5%, indicating persistent inflationary pressures and rising real interest rates. The real effective Fed funds rate is below market expectations by 50 basis points, suggesting under-hiking and potential bond market volatility. Fed projections show inflation peaking at 3.7% in 2026 before gradually easing to 2% by 2029, a delay from earlier forecasts that raises credibility questions. The market interprets the Fed’s cautious tightening as a tactical move—not a full pivot—to create room for future monetary easing, rather than a commitment to aggressive rate hikes. This aligns with a "Paradigm C" framework where resilient economic growth and geopolitical factors have driven persistent inflation and elevated neutral rates. The analysis argues that if the Fed fails to act in line with market expectations, it risks triggering stronger bond market reactions and structural policy shifts such as yield curve control or bank deregulation. Overall, the tone reflects growing market skepticism about the Fed’s policy direction, with confidence in market-led pricing over central bank projections. The macro narrative remains anchored in the belief that the U.S. economy is more resilient than anticipated, requiring a higher neutral rate. Investors are advised to remain cautious, with fixed income markets likely to remain under pressure until policy adjustments fully reflect new equilibrium conditions.
Happy Wednesday out there team 42 at your skipper here.
Darius Delta percent our macro minute for Wednesday September
16th, 2026.
It's Fed hike Wednesday.
So we got a lot to unpack today,
but we'll be trying to catch out here quickly.
So as always, we'll start with the executive summary
from today's lead off morning note,
which we published obviously before the Fed meeting.
We're coming to you live shortly after the rate hike
in between the rate hike and the the the the catcher
washes out pressure.
So and that will offer our thoughts, obviously,
on what we saw in the summary,
we can have the projections, the dot plot, et cetera.
So without further delay, today's key macro question is,
does the Kevin Wash Fed want investors to buy stocks or bonds?
The short answer is likely bonds for now,
stocks for the long run.
The key supporting evidence is US dollar money markets
currently view the Fed's policy rate setting
as modestly accommodative according to the 42 macro
market implied Fed neutral rate model.
It must hike by two to four times to get back to neutral.
The increased competition for capital
has pushed up R star in the US by roughly 100 basis points
in February per the 42 macro market implied Fed R star model.
The real effective Fed funds rate is now below the lower bound
of our market implied estimate range
by roughly 50 basis points.
If the Fed risks agitating bond vigilantes via sticky inflation,
if it does not hike because it has fallen
at least two rate hikes behind the curve
as a result of this process.
So obviously, we saw one of the hikes today.
We shall see more.
What does this mean for your portfolio?
And Kevin Warslet Fed that chooses to bury its head in the sand
and ignore these publicly available data points
by falling short of the market's current expectation
of three rate hikes over the next 12 months
is a Fed that is signaling to investors
that it cares more about the stock market than the bond market.
If the Fed opts for this two-dovish policy,
two-dovish too soon policy prescription,
its actions will likely pull forward
a more aggressive treasury bond by the Fed program,
substantial bank deregulation,
accelerated reserve management purchases
and/or explicit yield curve control.
Why?
Because the mean of 42 macros 5 to 10-year nominal yield models
is currently 6.00%, 6%.
Fixed income technicals will likely continue
to force markets towards this equilibrium rate,
absent policy intervention.
And so normally, we wrap up with a question from our community.
But I thought it'd be interesting to kind of just quickly
briefly go over the summary of economic projections
with you guys live to get a sense of how we
are adjusting our views on the outlook for Fed policy.
And the quick takeaway is, no need to change.
We beat all of global Wall Street
according to Nick Turemos' post yesterday night
to our play action pass set up the run thing, which
is our view that the Fed will titan sickically,
titan on a transitory basis, to set the create the conditions
in the scope to ease structurally in order
to support or really combat the geopolitical driven
spot of man and bouts in the treasury bond market.
And so this rate hike today this afternoon
is the first step in that play action pass process.
But ultimately, all they're trying to do,
they're not actually trying to launch the ball deep all game.
What they really want to do is just back the linebackers
and the safety's off so they can create more space
in the run game.
Space in the run game equals scope to ease monetary policy.
Right now, the bond vigilantes aren't
given them enough space.
So getting them into--
and these are all American football references
for my friends across the globe, global Wall Street,
about half of our customers around the world
are international.
So I've got to keep that in mind when I use these football
references.
But neither here nor there.
Getting into this latest dot plot--
so let's just go down the list.
I mean, to me, it's pretty ridiculous.
So I want you guys to see my reactions to it in real time.
So we'll start with the GDP.
Fed's expecting a slightly pick up in GDP in 2026,
slight pick up in GDP in 2027, 2.2 same in 2028 and 2029.
I think the US is a trend 2% real GDP economy.
No change to unemployment rate, 4.1 all the way through.
This is actually an increase--
or so improvement in their previous projections of 4.3
in 2026 and 2027 and 4.2 in 2028.
So they think growth is going to be more resilient.
They think the labor market is going to be more resilient.
And obviously, that's part of the reason why they feel
like they have some scope to tighten monetary policy here.
Inflation is where the laughs and the jokes really
start to kick in.
So if you read the Fed statement on the inflation
paragraph in the statement, which is pretty short,
they said today's policy action will
support a timely return to the committee's 2% goal.
So let's just look at their PC inflation projections.
They're expecting 3.7% in 2026 versus 2.6 prior in June.
They're expecting 2.3% in 2027.
They're expecting 2.1% in 2028.
So some serial stickiness to inflation.
That's a positive revision relative to 2.0%
they're expecting in June.
And then ultimately, they expect to finally
get to their 2% target in 2029.
And again, let me read the statement again.
It says today's policy action will support a timely return
to the committee's 2% goal.
Again, the most recent June, the June FOMC
got saw them getting back to 2% inflation in 2028.
The most, today's SEP has them getting
to 2% inflation in 2029.
So riddle me of this.
I only have a Yale degree.
That's it.
That's all education I've obtained.
And I know that doesn't mean much.
But I'm pretty sure that 2029 is later than 2028.
So I don't know if they think we're stupid,
or if they're stupid, but this is stupid.
So we'll figure out what the bottom market's
going to vote on this in the coming weeks and months.
And ultimately, we're going to figure out
what the Fed is actually trying to do here.
I think we already figured out what the Fed is actually
trying to do here.
We understand the binding constraints of the system
in the context what has been our macro-smanagement
North Star since the summer of 2023, in terms of our paradigm,
A3 framework, A being the geopolitical driven
supply of man and balance in the treasure by market,
B being the cut, the deficit, the one
of the three sentable treatment options
to deal with the debt disease.
We're currently in paradigm C. Our friend Lisa Bramber,
it's a boomer today.
It took slight offense to one of her comments.
She said this robust economy--
so I'm paraphrasing, but this booming economy
has surprised all the economists on Wall Street.
I'm pretty sure I'm an economist on Wall Street.
And we're the ones who authored the resilient US economy
theme in the summer of 2022.
When consensus was freaking out about recession,
we also authored the paradigm C, A.K.A. running hot theme
in April of last year when consensus was freaking out
about terror.
So we've been expecting this booming paradigm
C resilient US economy the entire time.
And so this is why we have a lot of conviction in our belief
that the neutral rate has gravitated higher.
The R.S.R. has gravitated higher.
And it's finally looking at the Fed's projections
on the neutral rate.
They're expecting the neutral rate to be somewhere around 3.2%
on a median basis that's a positive revision to their 3.1%
projection in June.
Our model currently has the neutral rate
somewhere between 4.25 and 4.5%.
So the Fed thinks the neutral rate is about 100 basis points
below what the market is currently
priced in the neutral according to our model.
And so either the Fed's wrong or the market's wrong.
And if the Fed's wrong, the bond market's going to pull up.
And if we're wrong, then we'll kiss and talk to them.
We'll just risk manage that better than I would.
In my opinion, it'll risk manage that better than most
investors would, because again, we're
listening to the wisdom of the crowd as opposed
to what's going on in between dairy sales here.
So we're wrapping up there.
Dairy still here presenting our macro men
for Wednesday, September 16th, 2026.
Best of luck out there today.
We'll catch you back here tomorrow.
Cheers.
[VIDEO PLAYBACK]
Podcast Summary
Key Points:
The Fed's recent rate hike is part of a broader strategy to signal monetary tightening, with markets indicating the policy rate remains modestly accommodative and the neutral rate has risen significantly.
US dollar money markets imply a neutral rate of 3.2% for the Fed, while market models estimate it between 4.25% and 4.5%, suggesting a growing divergence between market expectations and Fed projections.
The real effective Fed funds rate is below the market-implied lower bound by 50 basis points, indicating potential under-hiking and significant pressure on bond markets.
The Fed’s projected inflation path shows persistent stickiness—rising from 2.6% in 2026 to 3.7% initially, then declining to 2% by 2029—raising questions about timing and credibility.
A "two-dovish" policy could signal a deeper shift toward aggressive bond market interventions, including yield curve control, bank deregulation, and expanded asset purchases.
The Fed’s delay in raising rates by three expected hikes reflects a policy of prioritizing stock markets over bond markets, potentially triggering further inflationary or structural risks.
The macro narrative aligns with a "Paradigm C" framework—where a resilient, geopolitically driven economy has sustained strong growth and inflation, pushing the neutral rate upward.
Despite the Fed’s stated goal of returning to 2% inflation by 2029 (a delay from 2028), market participants interpret this as a strategic move to create space for future easing, not a full policy reversal.
Summary:
The Fed’s September 16, 2026, rate hike marks a key step in a broader monetary strategy aimed at managing inflation and maintaining market stability. 5%, indicating persistent inflationary pressures and rising real interest rates. The real effective Fed funds rate is below market expectations by 50 basis points, suggesting under-hiking and potential bond market volatility.
7% in 2026 before gradually easing to 2% by 2029, a delay from earlier forecasts that raises credibility questions. The market interprets the Fed’s cautious tightening as a tactical move—not a full pivot—to create room for future monetary easing, rather than a commitment to aggressive rate hikes. This aligns with a "Paradigm C" framework where resilient economic growth and geopolitical factors have driven persistent inflation and elevated neutral rates.
The analysis argues that if the Fed fails to act in line with market expectations, it risks triggering stronger bond market reactions and structural policy shifts such as yield curve control or bank deregulation. Overall, the tone reflects growing market skepticism about the Fed’s policy direction, with confidence in market-led pricing over central bank projections. S.
economy is more resilient than anticipated, requiring a higher neutral rate. Investors are advised to remain cautious, with fixed income markets likely to remain under pressure until policy adjustments fully reflect new equilibrium conditions.
FAQs
The market currently prices the Fed's neutral rate between 4.25% and 4.5%, while the Fed's median projection is around 3.2%, indicating a significant divergence.
The Fed may be hiking rates to maintain monetary policy discipline and signal commitment to inflation control, even as inflation projections show gradual improvement.
A rise in R* by roughly 100 basis points indicates that the real cost of borrowing has increased, reflecting stronger market expectations of future policy rates and tighter monetary conditions.
In the short term, rate hikes favor bonds due to higher yields; in the long term, they may signal a shift toward more aggressive bond market intervention and potential stock market support.
This revision suggests persistent inflation stickiness, which could justify continued rate hikes and supports the Fed's cautious tightening stance despite progress toward 2% inflation.
The delay signals a more gradual path to normalization, possibly indicating the Fed is prioritizing stability over rapid cuts, and may reflect elevated inflation expectations or sticky labor markets.
Chat with AI
Loading...
Pro features
Go deeper with this episode
Unlock creator-grade tools that turn any transcript into show notes and subtitle files.