Does someone recently sent me one of those long form idea articles that you post on X and hope that it does well? This one was titled, "Your brain is about to need a gym." Now at a high level, this new piece is responding to my own New York Times op-ed that came out in March in which I argued that we need a cognitive fitness revolution to save our increasingly fried brains much in the same way that in the 20th century, we needed a physical fitness revolution to save our increasingly unhealthy bodies. This new article takes that proposal and follows it through to all of its implications. Here I want to read a quote from it. I also think cognitive fitness becomes a market, a big one. Imagine the cognitive equivalent of what the fitness industry built between 1980 and 2020. Apps that force you to think slowly. Coaches who train your attention to way trainers train your hamstrings. Those that re-teach deep reading after generation lost at the scrolling. Corporate programs that audit and report your team's cognitive endurance the way they currently audit lines of code. Insurance discounts for verified daily reading habits. A Strava for hours spent away from a screen. The Peloton of writing by hand. I'm half joking and half not. All right, so this new article in other words is asking a fascinating question. Fitness is a $100 billion industry. What would our commitment to cognitive fitness look like if we got equally serious about it? Well, it's Monday, which means it's time for an advice episode of this show, which is the perfect opportunity to explore some answers. All right, so here's my plan. I want to approach this topic with tears organized from moderate to intense commitment to cognitive fitness. At each tier, I'm going to give you an ever more intense set of tools or ideas to think about for how to push your cognitive fitness to the next level. We'll end up on some prediction for some perhaps truly insane places that this revolution might end up in the near future. So if you feel like the onslaught of the digital from hyper-palatable distractions on your phone to the increasing urge to offload mental strain to AI is making you dumber, and if you're fed up and you're ready to start pushing back, then this episode is for you. As always, I'm Cal Newport. And this is Deep Questions, the show for people seeking depth in a distracted world. All right, so let's start on our first tier of commitment to cognitive fitness. We'll call this moderate intensity. Now last month on this show, I described a collection of five simple exercises for your brain. Did I say are the lane of foundation of sort of good cognitive fitness? They're the mental health equivalent of what we do in physical health where we say like get enough steps or eat some vegetables. Easy things you can do on a regular basis. It will really make a big difference over time in starting to get more fit. This is our least intense tier of cognitive fitness intervention. So I want to go through these five exercises again real quickly. I actually have the the prop I used in that episode from a month ago. So we can use that again. And let's just briefly review the sort of moderate intensity commitment that I'm suggesting for cognitive fitness. My first suggestion was to read every day. Consuming the written word is like getting steps for your physical health that forces your brain to work together in a ways that otherwise want to do. It forges new connections and over time this literally makes your brain more capable. You become smarter. So you want to have a certain number of pages you read every day that you treat similarly in your physical health to getting a certain number of steps every day. All right. The second easy exercise I recommended was don't avoid writing. It is very tempting because of AI tools to offload that strain you feel when you look at a blank page by just having that chap or just clicking on that Jim and I button and Google doc just like, Hey, give me a draft of this. Just put some words down. I'd rather sort of just like edit what you have to say than having to, you know, conjure denovo words from scratch, but do not flee that strain that strain. You have to reconceptualize it. It's not a negative thing you're trying to avoid. It's the feeling of strength. It's the feeling of growth. It's like feeling a burn in your muscle when you lift a heavy weight. It towards the strain of feeling an empty page to be proud when you finish that little high you get after you've completed the act of cognitive construction, cognitive creation. Writing is, I'm going to say like the pull ups of your brain, right? So if reading is like getting enough steps, it was our foundation of movement writing is like pull ups, a simple exercise that works every muscle and is going to make you stronger. All right. The third of my moderate intensity to your suggestions is to go on thinking walks. While on foot, try to stick with a singular thought. It could be a professional thought. It could be just an idea thought. You're trying to make sense of a complicated idea or self-reflection. You're trying to solve or make sense of an issue in your own life. Do not bring your phone or have your phone off and in your bag so that it's hard to access for distraction. Practice being alone with your own thoughts. Just aiming your mind's eye on targets that you have intentionally chosen. We have lost the art of just long, consistent, self-directed thinking thinking walks will help you get it back. Before here, I said plug in your phone. What I talked about there was while at home, keep your phone plugged in your kitchen. After this episode, one of our listeners wrote in and said, "Hey, you should call that land lining." You turn your smartphone into like a land line because it's plugged in and it remains plugged in in your kitchen. This means at the very least when you're at home, you do not have the option of quickly glancing at your phone at the slightest hint of boredom or distraction. Your brain then gets used to feeling the feeling of, "I'm not 100% entertained right now." That's okay. The final of these moderate intensity tear suggestions was, "I said, learn a hard skill. Just have something you're doing. You have to do it every day, but have something you're doing that forces you to actually have to concentrate." I'm trying to learn how to play the song in the guitar like I have to concentrate. I'm trying to get better at hitting a softball for my softball team. I'm going to go to the batting cage as I have to concentrate. I got to think, adjust, focus, act, focus, adjust. That's all just getting your brain going. Again, this is going to be the physical equivalent of like, "I'm going to play pickup basketball. I'm going to play ultimate frisbee with the dads in the park." It's like an activity that gets your body moving in a way that you otherwise want it. You need an activity that keeps your mind moving in ways that you otherwise might avoid. That's tier one. Moderate intensity commitments. You've heard those things before. Let's move up to tier two. The serious intensity. If the first tier was the equivalent of having some reasonable health habits, like getting some steps in vegetables, the next most intense tear needs to be more like going to a gym on a regular basis. If we think about our physical health, you start with just everyday activity and basic healthy habits. Then you move up to, "I'm actually going to go out of my way to go to a gym. I'm going to drive somewhere. I'm going to go through an exercise routine. It's going to take 45 minutes. I'm going to sweat. It's going to be hard." That is the next tier of intensity and physical health. We need that equivalent in cognitive fitness. We need something that is like a brain gym. I've been thinking about this recently. I've been thinking about more intense cognitive fitness style activities I've been doing in my own life that might be the mental equivalent of going to the gym. I have two techniques here that I want to share. I think it's the first time I've talked about either. This is Ratchet. You didn't have our intensity here. The first technique I call immersive thinking. Here's how it works. You build out a mini excursion. It might take anywhere between one to four hours. It is designed to leverage novel environments to help push your brain temporarily into a higher gear than you would normally be. Just like going to a gym, you're going to lift much heavier weights than you're going to come across in your everyday life. Immersive thinking is about trying to leverage novel environments to push your brain to a new level of thinking that you want it normally doing everyday life and therefore get both comfort with thinking and growth of thinking ability. There's three elements for an immersive speaking thinking rather mini excursion to actually work. Element one, you need an environment that's novel and thought provoking. So a place that you associate with contemplation and that you don't associate with other things in your life is why your kitchen doesn't work or the conference room in your office doesn't work. You have too many other associations with that that will be distracting. The second element of making this idea work, have a warm up routine. Just like at the gym, you need to do a warm up routine before you start lifting those heavy weights. I am going to argue when you're doing immersive thinking, you need some sort of cognitive warm up routine that should be based on the consumption of information that just sort of gets those brain circuits fired up. Your brain activity is going. Now you're in a mode of, I want to, my brain is connected in different ways. I'm ready to start using it. And then finally, the third element of immersive thinking will be some sort of exercise routine in which you use this warm up brain to produce new information. Information that is a stretch for you or otherwise demanded and interesting. This is now the cognitive equivalent of actually lifting that heavy weight, trying to push things towards you.
towards failure, environment warm up exercise. That is what you need for the immersive thinking strategy to work. Now what I wanna do here is give you a case study for my own life. This is something I've actually done on multiple occasions here in my hometown of Washington, DC. I'm gonna sort of describe the three elements of an immersive thinking mini excursion that I've done before. All right, so for my example immersive thinking excursion, the environment I used was the national gallery of art here in Washington, DC, down on the mall. So for me, I can jump on the metro where I live, go a few stops. I'll get out like in judiciary square and maybe walk whatever it is, it's a third of a mile, half a mile down to the mall. I sort of like that walk and it helps clear my mind. It's not too far away. All right, so I went to the national gallery of art. My warm up routine, I would go to a particular gallery within the larger art museum. Like here is a room that has whatever dut still life paintings. I would read an article about either one of the artists featured in that gallery or the style in general and then consume the paintings. Let me look at these paintings, try to understand what's going on in light of what I just read about it. This is a warm up routine because now I'm consuming information that stimulated my brain and putting me into more of an intellectual or contemplative state. Then for the actual productive exercise, I've done this on a couple occasions. Go down to the Cascade Cafe, which is in the basement of the national gallery. It's actually in the underground tunnel that's connecting the modern from the non-modern art wing. You can see there's a waterfall that starts up top and you can see the waterfall from the cafe and I get very bad cell service down there. So you're effectively disconnected while you're down there. Get a coffee, sit down and now try to write something. I would typically would be writing either solving a proof or trying to write some sort of difficult idea or essay. That is the brain equivalent of, I went to a gym to see my trainer. We got warmed up and then went through a pretty hard routine. Let's take a quick break to hear from some of the sponsors that make this show possible. Now, summer's almost here, which means the arrival of vacation season. You don't wanna ruin your big trip worrying about money, which means you need monarch. Monarch is the personal finance app that tracks everything, accounts, investments, savings, goals and spending. And here's the great news. You can get your first year of monarch core for half off, just $50 if you use the promo code, deep. Now, most apps just tell you what you already spent, but monarch goes beyond that to help you set goals, map out big purchases and see if you're actually on track for your savings, objectives, including that special vacation that you've been daydreaming about. Now, here's something I really like about monarch. They're AI assistant, which you can ask anything about your own finances, like how much did I spend on travel last summer? It's like having a dedicated financial advisor available 24/7. Now, if you use code
[email protected], you'll get your first year of monarch core half off at just $50. That's 50% off your first year at monarch.com with code deep. I also want to talk about our friends at SHIP Station. If your business ships things, then you want 100% need to know about SHIP Station. Now, here's the thing. Most businesses are overpaying for their shipping without even realizing it. SHIP Station automatically compares rates across UPS, USPS and FedEx on every order with savings of up to 90%. This could add up to significantly more money in your business's pocket. SHIP Station, though, can also save you time. It's an end-to-end order fulfillment platform for e-commerce businesses built to handle your entire shipping workflow. Everything from order management to inventory and returns is centralized in one platform. All of this will allow you to turn your limited attention back to working deeply on the things that really matter, like growth. SHIP Station customers report scaling fulfillment up to 40 times while cutting cost up to 30%. No wonder that over 1 million businesses leveled up to shipping game with SHIP Station. The sooner you switch, the sooner you will start saving time and money, you get started with SHIP Station today. And you will get 60 days free at SHIPSTATION.com when you use the code deep, that SHIPSTATION.com code deep. SHIPSTATION.com code deep, taxes and fees apply. All right, let's get back to the show. All right, so I have a second technique to recommend here for the sort of more intense tier of cognitive fitness. I'm going to call this a cognitive cardio point system. All right, so I got to explain what I mean here. It's hard to believe. Let's back up. In the world of physical health, it's hard to believe that cardiovascular exercise was once considered bad. And I'm talking as late as the 1950s and 1960s, men were advised. This is true, men were advised not to do cardiovascular exercise after the age of 40, because they thought this would avoid heart attacks. And women were told essentially avoid breaking a sweat all together if possible. Now, the person, perhaps most responsible for changing our understanding of exercise was Dr. Kenneth Cooper, who was a former Air Force doctor, who in 1968 published a groundbreaking book called Arobix, which made the case that cardiovascular activity is not a heart attack machine, but actually a way to make your heart and body healthier and you'll live longer. And not only should you do some cardiovascular activity that you should probably do a lot. I recently read Cooper's memoir we talked about here on the show. And he talks about how when that book first came out, fellow doctors thought that his advice was deranged and dangerous. One of them actually said the streets will soon be filled with the corpses of dead joggers, because advising middle-aged men to go running was going to cause deaths left and right. Well, of course Cooper was right and they were wrong. We now know cardiovascular exercise, of course, is healthy for you. In other words, if we go back and read Cooper's early work, here's what's interesting to me, how he advised people how to get enough cardiovascular activity. A lot of people have forgotten this about his work, but it's really interesting. He introduced back in the '60s and updated it throughout the years a point system. He got lots of different activities and assigned them points. These would be like appendixes in the back of his books even to today. And then he gave you a goal, 30 points a week. So you had some flexibility and when and how you got your cardio, but you knew your goal was to get the 30 points. And this would often require quite a bit of activity. I actually loaded up here, I mean his systems evolved, but I have here to load up a version of a system from 1982. So he kept updating it just to get a sense of what we're talking about here. I don't know Jesse, we'll see how we stack up. All right, so at the top here, he's talking about points for various walking and running sessions. So if you run a mile, how fast would we run a mile, Jesse? You think between 641 and 8 minutes? Or are you faster? Yeah, so that? Yeah, that's probably over seven now. All right, so over seven would be five points. If you can run a mile under 543, that's seven points. Look, he goes, if you run two miles, see what we take here. If you can run two miles, man, I think that'd take me 20 minutes. If you could get it under 20 minutes, you could get nine points, but between 20 and 24 minutes is seven points. Walking is going to give you fewer, what we got here. Look how detailed this is, Jesse. It's like every distance you might go and every time he tells you how many points. Oh, look, all you got to do is run 15 miles under an hour, 25, and you get 120 points. It wasn't just walking, running like here, cycling. I don't know cycling well, but look, if you do a two mile ride in seven minutes, you get 1.5 points, and so on. So we had all these different, he had all these different mappings of activities to points. And maybe you look cycling, maybe you're like running, maybe you're like walking, maybe you're like, you're like, you know, doing like a high intensity weight training. You would add up your points to try to get the 30 in a week. And it would take a non-trivial, like you really had to be putting aside time and training in order to hit the 30 points. So that was a good way of conveying. It takes a lot of exercise to get as much as you need. I think it's, we could use, here's my idea, we could use an equivalent point system for cognitive fitness that we could have a collection of assignments of points to different types of cognitive fitness activities and then following Cooper's model, say your goal's to get 30 points a week, as a way to get you past just doing some basic activities and actually doing a lot of the stuff you need. You know, I came up with a sample point system. I'll read a few of these ideas off here. Maybe you get one point for 20 pages of easy reading, two for 20 pages of moderately complex and three for 20 pages. Just say page is not minutes of hard reading, maybe two points for a 30 minute thinking walk, two points for 15 minutes of deliberate practice, five points for 20 minutes of writing, five points for 20 minutes of programming, no AI, maybe do three points for 30 minutes of being immersed in a craft based hobby, and so on, right? So we could imagine a system like that. So if we use the sample system I just talked about, here is an example of a collection.
of activities that would get you to 30 points in a week. Reading 100 pages of a moderately complex book, which gets you 10 points, taking a 30, I think I'm thinking here, two different 30 minute thinking walks at the six points. An hour total of deliberate practice on guitar, eight points and an hour spent working in the garden, six points. I might not have got that exactly right, but something like that adds up to something like 30 points on my scale, right? So that's like a non-trivial amount of cognitive fitness work, so you would have to actually put aside some time and have some intention to actually get there. Now, I don't have like a final definitive point system to recommend yet. And I think that's something I might actually work on for an upcoming episode, but for now, you might consider doing something like this on your own. Writing out a system, a point system for various cognitive fitness activities and setting a 30 point a week goal, keeping track of it. And this will push you to do more stuff with your brain than you otherwise might have. All right, so that's our second tier. That's sort of like serious intensity of cognitive fitness activity. As we continue this thought of experiment of taking seriously what will happen if cognitive fitness becomes a hundred billion dollar industry, let's go to our third tier, which I'm going to call insane mode intensity. And what I want to do here is look to the future. So the first two tiers are things you can do, very intensity of things you can do right now. But if cognitive fitness really becomes a massive industry like physical fitness, there's going to be an industry built around cognitive fitness. And so I want to put out three predictions about what we might see in the near future if and when cognitive fitness becomes an actual major industry. All right, so the first prediction is that we're going to see high end thinking trainers. I've spent most of my life as a professional thinker and there's if you're a professional thinker, there's lots of places you get informal, but pretty comprehensive training. Like when I was at MIT, you're basically taught maybe through osmos as an example, how to think, how to do math, how to sustain concentration on complicated problems. But I think there might be great benefit to bringing this sort of professional thinking training to people in all sorts of different walks of life, not just people that proved theorems for a living. Now this isn't fully new. So I'd long heard about Josh Waitskin, who was the chess prodigy that was featured in the movie searching for Bobby Fisher, who started from my understanding is at Waitskin does this type of training. He does thinking training for people for whom being able to think clear is vital to their success. I think his early clients were in finance where if you're running a hedge fund, the difference between being exceptional at thinking and kind of good could be like a $500 million Delta. Like it really matters. Of course we're gonna hire a trainer. We don't wanna leave any stone unturned. I think this is going to become more common. Why don't we actually load up his page, Jesse, just to see what he's talking about. So he calls his company now Stoke Ventures. He's very in the foil surfing. So it's probably a connected to that. Let's read his quote here. At the Razor's Edge, a peak performance in the decision-making athletics business, finance, chess, or anything deeply nuanced, the greatest insight is often right next to a blunder. Our genius is often entangled with our eccentricity, our virtuosity, springing from what might be disguised as dysfunction. The path to self-expression is fiercely subtle and individualized. If you're pushing yourself to your outer reaches as a way of life, you can dance on that edge with somebody. All right, that's pretty flowery, but let's go and talk about what their training actually includes. Areas of focus in training with Wittskins Company involves training to love training and the growth of the unlocks, embodying quality as a way of life, cultivating presence and mindfulness, the systematic cultivation of the art of focusing on what matters most, developing introspective sensitivity, identifying, supporting windows, a peak creativity and flow, developing, let's see, non-local impeller learning, training to learn the many from the one, and so on, right? So this is just an offering. Are they going to help you get more out of your brain? I think Wittskins on to something because in a lot of industries, that is a huge difference. We'll pay money for software or tools or productivity ideas, but getting your brain sharper is the ultimate productivity hack. I think for a living, I don't use social media. I was trained professionally to be a thinker and because of that, to use myself as an example, I can, for example, write incredibly quickly. I can sit down and have an idea and 30 minutes later have like a polished newsletter article or draft of an op-ed or a script for podcasts. That's an incredible productivity boom that I've gained, not by using AI, but by training a brain to produce better. So I think that's going to be something we see. Another thing we're going to see is we get to sort of insane mode cognitive fitness industry. It's going to be the rise of non-instrumental courses. People taking classes in person or online, like learning languages or hard math or training about puzzles or mastering difficult crafts, just to get their mind sharp. Like the whole point is this is going to push your mind. It's going to be hard to do. Like your hardest course you took in college, you're doing it now as like a middle-aged man because you want to make sure you keep pushing your mind not because the skill you're learning is instrumental, but because the learning itself is going to get your mind sharp. I think we're going to see this process focus marketing as opposed to skill focus marketing for courses in the near future, all a cognitive fitness play. Finally, I want to elaborate an idea that was mentioned in that article that we opened this episode with. I do think cognitive endurance testing is going to be something that actually we do more often. It's going to be numbers we know and it's going to be numbers that we are going to use which will completely change our conception of cognitive fitness, how to quantify it and its value. There'll be some sort of standardized test that gives you a number that I think might play a role in hiring. I mean, why wouldn't it? If you're in a non-trivial knowledge work job, what is your capability as a staining focus on a hard task in actually making progress through complexity? Can you resist distraction and actually use your brain to add value to information? This might be like a primary ability we're looking for if I'm hiring in one of these jobs, right? And then we might like give you a test right there and see what your score is. This might also become not something we use to gatekeep but also a measure that we aim to improve. I could imagine and I think I would approve of this, a world in which we're thinking about schooling instead of our standardized testing notion all being content based. We wanna make sure that our students know all of these things from some sort of list that experts produced is like, this is the knowledge you need to know. You need to know about Andrew Jackson's presidency but not Calvin Coolidge's presidency. You need to know about Euclidean geometry but you don't need to know about calculus on the trigonomic functions, right? We have these big lists that we're just like, these are what you have to know and not and let's test everyone and see where they are in knowledge. Imagine instead of schools are saying, we wanna see kids improving in cognitive endurance. That's just as important while they're here. Can you deploy your brain with intention? If you're cognitively fit, then no matter what you go off to do, you are gonna have a more success professionally. You're gonna thrive more personally. And we wanna train your ability to focus and use your brain and we're gonna test your cognitive endurance and different people be at different places. But we wanna see years go up. Improvement in cognitive fitness is maybe gonna be the number one sign that a particular educational institution is actually delivering on its promise. I think we're gonna see that and it will completely reorient the way we think about things. We're not gonna be giving everyone tablets and throwing stuff up on our smart whiteboards and we're just gonna let's just edit Google Docs instead of writing because kids these days need computers because that's gonna be reflected in slow or no improvement at all in cognitive endurance. Like no, do it the hard way because we want your brain to feel strange. That's okay. That feeling of strain is like the burn of muscles if you're trying to get stronger for a football position. It's good. You're getting stronger. Fitness is good. It's not something we fear. It's something that we embrace. All right, so high end thinking training, non-instrumental courses being a major part of the information economy and cognitive endurance testing being ingrained in both education and our professional lives. These are what I see in the future in the sort of the most intense tier of cognitive fitness that we might see with the revolution that's coming. All right, so let's go back. What am I trying to say here? Don't sleep on cognitive fitness. It's not something that, you know, cognitive fitness having your brain fit. It's gonna help you with this brain rot. It's gonna prevent technology companies from, you know, fully colonizing your mental life. But it's more than that. Cognitive fitness might very well be the key to healthy thriving and healthy thriving in dare I say deep life in the 21st century. I think it's an incredibly important trend that's just getting started. You could be ahead of the curve. Start taking cognitive fitness seriously now. Start with the moderate tier. Experiment with my more intense tier and be ready for the insane mode intensity that is going to follow. The future is going to be one by those with strong brains, not those that are the most comfortable with tools or using the most AI or the most up on the latest phone apps. It's gonna be the people who can get the most out of what's between their ears. I want you to be one of them. Let's take another quick break to hear from some of the sponsors that make this show possible.
Now, here's something I've learned as someone who writes about technology. Sometimes figuring out how best to use a new tool can be just as hard as innovating the tool in the first place. This certainly seems to be the case with AI right now, where you have teams rushing the deploy dozens of different tools with no clean way of figuring out which ones actually help. This can even make things worse rather than better. All this is to say, the real challenge right now isn't adopting AI. It's understanding how it's being used and how to maximize the value you are getting from it. This is exactly what Leridin will help you do. Leridin gives a clear view of AI tool adoption and how teams are using them daily. No more guesswork. It tracks real usage data and outcomes so you can connect AI activity to actual business results. It can even help you enforce internal policies and manage risks, which is critical as AI usage grows. So if AI is already a part of your organization, now's the moment to get control of it. Head to leridin.com today and book a demo to start maximizing your impact from AI. That's leridin L-A-R-R-I-D-I-N dot com. I also want to talk about our friends at Pipetribe. Here's a stat that genuinely shocked me. Sales teams spend about 50% of their time on admin work. Instead of selling, building relationships and closing deals, this pseudo productivity can be devastating to your bottom line. Fortunately, this is where today's sponsor Pipetribe enters the scene. Now here's what I love about Pipetribe. It's a fantastic sales CRM system that's built with small and medium-sized businesses in mind. It's built from the ground up to strip away repetitive work with smart automations that can handle shallow tasks like reminders and deal updates and activity logging. You can customize all these automations to fit your unique sales process. And if you're not sure where there's room for improvement, you can use their AI features to analyze your pipeline and surface exactly what needs your attention. If your business sells things, then your business needs Pipetribe. It's time to switch to a CRM built by salespeople, for salespeople, and join the over 100,000 companies already using Pipetribe. My link gets you an exclusive 30 days free instead of the usual 14 day trial and no credit card or payment is needed. Just head to pipetribe.com/deep to get started. That's pipetribe.com/deep and you can be up and running in minutes. All right, well, that's enough about my thoughts. I want to hear what you have to say. On Mondays, we like to open our inbox and read notes from our listeners. As always, if you have a question or reaction or something you want to share, you can send the note to
[email protected]. All right, so for our first message, instead of responding to a single message, I thought what might be nice would be to go back, and I'm doing this with some trepidation, but go back to that episode from last month that was about reversing brain rot, where I introduced those five exercises we talked about today in our moderate tier and read some of the YouTube comments to the YouTube version of that episode, because this will all be feedback on the same type of ideas we talked about today. It seemed relevant, but Jesse, I'm a little bit nervous because reading YouTube comments can go both ways. All right, so I'm going to read a few of these here. I'll also put some of these up on the screen for those who are interesting. This comment says, "Cal, a single handily has got me out of a major rut in life. Thanks for everything. I will forever be in your debt." The deep life is the only life. Oh, so far so good, Jesse. All right, another one says, "I boiled my own daily self-care routine down to a pithy three words. Read, write, sweat. Those three things don't make my day better, but on days when I do those three things are usually better days." Another person says, "My brain rot prevention practice is one meditation, guided 20 minutes, two exercise, 30 minutes of strength training, 30 minutes of cardio, three yoga, guided from 30-50 minutes, four, two 90 minute study blocks, one for queer strictly and 90 for math and statistics also career related." I try to do as many of these as possible, doing the meditation exercise in yoga all in one morning before work changed my life. When I do my 90 minute study block and anything involving reading, I read aloud the practice speaking when I'm thinking when I can. I guess we can keep these off the screen, Jesse. The text is so small, it's kind of hard to see. Someone else said, "I deactivated my social media account in January. My experience was profound. For the first two weeks, I was craving the apps badly. After those two weeks, my brain started dumping out all of these imaginations and words with writing poetry. Each day I was writing a page worth of poetry. After about a month since quitting, my mind was quiet, my nervous system calm. In the past four months, I've read almost 20 books. I'm a busy mom of two teen girls who are involved with sports. These past four months have been some of the most peaceful of my life. Social media is a cancer and you won't realize it until you finally make the decision to put it down. Someone else says, "The thinking walk advice may be think of a quote from Nietzsche. Never trust a thought that occurs to you indoors." Oh, I love that one. Let's see here. Running analogies in a Kell Newport podcast is so good. I really appreciate that. They're pretty positive, Jesse. Where's the like, "You but?" You but and then some sort of like meme reference that don't understand. Low key based. Yeah. Low key based. I've never been able to read in bed by do love reading in the morning, preferably with a massive cup of coffee. I can get a good 5,200 pages in before work. This is my sacred me time. As far as what to read, I recommend walking around your local use bookshop, library or good will and bring home a nice nursing parallel books that look interesting. I would never trust an AI or algorithm or even a friend of recruitment books. You know what you like. I think these are all positive comments and there's a bigger thread that runs through this cognitive fitness matters. Like when you start caring about your mind, people are having profound impacts. I would argue a lot of these impacts sound a lot more profound than what people talk about when they add exercise to their life. A calmness they've never felt before. Their days are much better. And they're willing to go farther towards this. Like we know there's people who are really committed to physical fitness and we're impressed by it. We should be equally impressed by these examples. I get up early and read 100 pages every day. I just don't use social media at all. These are the type of things that are leading to really positive impacts in people's lives. So that's, I think that's a good collection of messages to talk about here because this revolution is going to happen. And I would like you to be a part of it. All right. What do we got as our second one here, Jesse? We have a message here from Rob who is sharing a disturbing new article by a college professor. All right. So I haven't read this article yet that Rob sent us. So we're going to do this in real time together. Let me pull it up here. The title is from the Chronicle Higher Education. The title of the article, oh, my students can't read. The generational collapse in literacy is measurable, persistent and likely to get worse. Let's just read the intro to this, Jesse. I'm sure this is going to get worse before it gets better. Six weeks into the term, I assigned my rhetoric and writing students a 20 page article. It was the same length I had assigned for five years and the same length I had read without complaint as an undergraduate a decade ago. Not one student finished it. It's not positive. When I asked why a student answered honestly, it was too long and she kept losing track of what the paper was about. This was not a remedial class. These are students who had cleared the admissions process and written as is good enough to get them here. Yet a routine academic reading assignment had defeated them. Every generation of professors has complained that their students cannot read. The lament is usually overblown, but data have caught up to anecdote. What I'm seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch. There is a measurable generational collapse and sustained reading and writing in the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul. It requires. All right. Well, Rob, I'm glad you sent that along. This is alarming. We saw something similar in physical health. When we saw the real canary and the coal mine, a real warning sign, a real point of break for a lot of medical professionals where the crisis alarms went off was seen a sudden rise in type 2 diabetes among kids. Kids didn't get type 2 diabetes. It used to take a long time through bad eating habits, etc. Just get the type 2 diabetes, but we got so bad in our diet and we cut out so much physical activity that we began to see kids with it. This is a trend that really picked up in the 21st century. This is when the alarm sirens went off for a lot of physical health practitioners. This is the equivalent, I think, for cognitive health. College students, high school graduates, road essays to getting the college had the test scores are looking at a 20-page article and say, "I can't read that." That is the cognitive equivalent of having type 2 diabetes. Your brain is not working. It is not anywhere near where it needs to be to be a functioning, thriving member of our sort of civic democracy and a knowledge work economy. This is a big deal. It's the type of thing that makes us say cognitive fitness matters and it goes back to that cognitive endurance testing. That's what I want if I'm a college maybe. I want to see where you are. Take one of these tests in a testing center. I don't care about your AI-generated college essay. Take one of these tests. How much can you focus? That's what I'm looking for. Do that one change. Let me tell you what you could do right now. I'm thinking about this on the fly. You want to change the trajectory of this country. You want to give new opportunities and the ability for our current young generation to have the best chance to do it.
of thriving in their lives, add alongside mandatory SAT testing for college admissions, add cognitive endurance testing. You get all these kids knowing, oh, my ability to like focus and sustain concentration is going to play a role in whether I can go to, you know, whatever school I want to go to, be a Georgetown or Dartmouth. Now suddenly they're going to look at their phone like a liability. They're going to look at TikTok like the thing that's going to keep them out of the Ivy League. They're going to look at a book like the activity that's going to help set up my future. And as a side effect, and this might be sort of leveraging a sort of crash, a crash instrumentality, but a side effect is these brains are going to be stronger and these are going to be more capable, more thriving, more successful, you know, citizens and individuals. So this is a crisis, but it's also an opportunity. I'll tell you what we don't need to do is say, well, AI is not going away. So why don't we just let all of our kids do everything with AI in school? And then are we high tech looking around? We're cool, right? I'm going to, you know, I'm going to put on my 90 style skater chain wallet because I'm as a 45 year old right? I'm cool, right? We're all cool. We're all going to use AI, right? It's going to be cool. No, the whole point is to get smarter. Having a machine do your work for you. What does that have to do with getting smarter, which is the whole point of school? So I appreciate that message. Jesse still wears an insist on wearing a chain wallet, is that true? Yeah, it's true. With carpenter pants and vans. Jesse's a big skater. It's always him with like 13 year olds at the skate park. He's always like, man, tubular man, radical. Radical front nose, Ollie, goofy foot. Yeah, that's all he's born. He's like, all right, kids, watch out this and up, tore my ACL. And then you hear an ambulance come and they just sort of pick them up and walk off in the stretcher. All right. Do we have a third message? We do. All right. Our final message comes from Tyler and it involves your interview with Laura Vandercam from a few weeks ago. Oh, yes. That's where we, Laura was talking to us about free time and scheduling and the myth that we don't have enough time. All right. Tyler says there was a great interview with Laura Vandercam. I had already implemented several of her ideas independently into my life. So it was validating to hear this. Are you familiar with the Paul Graham Maker Schedule versus Manager Schedule's concept? Laura's idea that we don't need long stretches of free time isn't exactly the same thing as the long stretches of unscheduled time that makers have in Paul Graham's article, but there are parallels and it may be wonder if us creative types are over romanticizing the idea of long uninterrupted time to work. Could it be possible that the makers that Paul Graham is describing don't really need long stretches, but rather more mental discipline to quickly lock into a mental context and stay focused for a solid hour or two rather than a whole morning. All right. There's a couple different things going on in here. So first of all, I think he's asking a question about Laura's idea that when it comes to our life in general, we don't, we have this imagination that like we need very sort of like open schedules to be happy and that we're all really impoverished on time and because of that, we just have to run around busy and she's like, you can do more with your existing schedule than you think. If you're just a little bit intentional about how you use your time, you can actually get a lot of fulfillment out of your life without having to drastically reduce like what's going on in your life. And he's comparing this. So the first thing Taylor students comparing that the Paul Graham's Maker Schedule versus Manager Schedule, I don't know. We've talked about the SSA before. It's really famous. It's from like 20 years ago. And basically his idea is makers like computer programmers need long stretches of uninterrupted time. Managers, however, want to jump into a lot of meanings and catch up with what's going on with things and these two scheduling philosophies are in conflict. And when the makers are forced to try to interface with manager schedules, the makers get miserable and can't produce stuff. All right. So I guess he's saying the maker schedule seems to be something that the importance of a maker schedule is maybe contrasting to Laura's idea that like you have enough time, you just have to make better use of it, right? You don't need to drastically simplify things. Laura's not talking about so the response to this first point. Laura's not talking about deep work, right? She's not saying you should be very frenetic at work and just jumping back and forth between meetings and email and you don't need long stretches of deep work. If your work requires depth, I produce complicated computer code. I have to write complicated reports on professor looking on research. Then like that's part of the activities that you will be scheduling. So I don't think she's giving a referendum on the importance or lack of importance of depth. But I like the second point is also worth talking about where Tyler says our knowledge workers in general over romanticizing this idea of a maker schedule of having long stretches of time that isn't interrupted. Well, here's what I think is relevant here. If you're not used to depth, if you're not used to deep work and you just clear out a schedule, then yeah, you might find that you have over romanticized it and you don't really know what to do with all this time and it doesn't necessarily make your professional life better. What I recommend people do is they start with specificity. When it comes to deep work, schedule like a meeting or appointment, deep work on your calendar, for specific deep objectives, not just I've protected all day, but you say here's two and a half hours I'm going to spend trying to get a draft of this report done. This afternoon, I've blocked off 90 minutes to specifically work on trying to run down this bug in this computer program I'm working on. So schedule specific deep work at first. Now what's going to happen is you're going to learn a lot about depth and how much time and concentration it requires and what schedule is best for it as you do this exercise. Sometimes you'll learn for a certain task that the amount of time you put aside was too much and for a lot of times you'll be budding up against the boundaries of the time you put aside like man, I could have used a lot more. This is where you learn this type of hyper-specific time blocking is where you learn about the reality of your brain and the type of things you do. This knowledge can then be deployed going forward into simpler heuristics. You might realize the best way for me to get this, this, and this done is to keep my whole morning clearer meetings because I need to get started with writing and then do my debugging. I need to have that done by 11 while I'm still caffeinated or I'm just not going to get it done at all. So you learn what type of maker schedule works for you and what you do in that maker schedule. So you're right. Jump in and switch to a maker schedule. You might waste a lot of time. But maker schedules are really valuable if you have a lot of self-awareness about what your brain is capable of, what this work looks like, what are the most important things for you to do. So start with hyper-specific time blocking. Schedule time for deep work blocks would be specific about what you're doing and then allow that to evolve into a maker schedule that makes sense for whatever type and intensity and volume of making that you actually do in your job. There's a lot of complicated points that are all hidden within that same discussion. All right. We like to end our episodes on Monday with giving you an update about what I am up to. The book I finished last week was Football by Chuck Cloucesterman. You might like this one, Jesse. I might learn it to you. Yeah. It's like a collection of essays. Cloucesterman does his sort of like very observational essays and he's just riffing on a lot of ideas. He's a super football fan obsessive. He's just riffing on a lot of ideas about football as a sport and it's cultural position and it's relationship to his own life. And he's a really, I've always really enjoyed his writing. So it's good. How did it compare to America's game when you were that a couple years ago? No, it's very different because America's game is a history. It's like what is the history of the NFL? Like how did this go? Cloucesterman, he just like has ideas and runs with them. So it's esoteric, kind of non-linear, eccentric observational essays like on football. Like the tactics or like the media component of it and stuff? A little bit on tactics. I mean, different stuff, right? Like so let me be specific. Like there's one long essay where he's just trying to grapple with the question of like who's the best football player ever. Okay. And then from there he really gets into like how do we measure such a thing because like training technology has gotten better and you know if you take an athlete from today and brought him back in time to the era of gym Thorpe, like they're going to be incredibly more athletic than gym Thorpe. But relative to other athletes, gym Thorpe was way more impressively athletic and he ends up concluded that gym Thorpe's the best football player of all time. He's like, but how do we compare that to like Tom Brady? So he gets like really, you know, he'll get really, he'll get really into that. He has a whole long thing of trying to understand like Randy Moss and the idea of Mossine, which like my son, I asked my son at the pool the other day. He's like, I'm Moss you. I was like, do you know who that's named for? I have no idea. What does it mean? So Mossine like if you talk to a 13 year old is where someone's throwing a ball to someone and you out jump them and grab it out of the air like Randy Moss used to do. And so it's a term now. In fact, there's even a game called Moss where like you throw the ball and you all try to like fight to get it. And they have no idea who Randy Moss is. Yeah. So like there's something on that. He gets into like fantasy football and betting. He gets into the fandom. He gets into like how should we, how should we ethically deal with like CTE? He has this like whole theory about how like football is kind of screwed. And you know, why like 20 years for like he has this whole history of how it's going to like fall apart. Why did football become popular and like horse racing used to be the most popular thing?
is it not? And the answer is because we used to all have a lot of interaction with horses. So like horse racing was huge in like the 1920s and 1930s because we all had horses or something we all knew intimately. And now no one knows anything about horses so it's become. Anyways, I like it. I got a signed copy. I'll loan it to you. I think you would like it. I have two more books I'm working on that I'm about to finish but we'll get to those soon. What have I watched? All right. So Jesse and I both went to see pressure. The the Brendan Frazier is Dwight Eisenhower movie about this is not the most exciting description of a movie. The meteorology involved in the D-Day invasion. Yeah. We saw it on the D-Day anniversary which was Saturday. Okay. What was your Friday? You saw Friday. What was your review? I have thoughts. The reason why I saw it was because Mad Dog had the author on of the book like a week prior about the whatever the guy's name was. I forgot already. Yeah. It was a neurologist. Yeah. Clearly with it. Clearly stuck with us. Yeah. Yeah. I liked it. I haven't been in the movie in a long time. So. How did you go into movies? I just. I'm watching them at home. I guess. We went to the movie where you can get like food and stuff so I mean it's not cheap but I liked it. Yeah. I got to do the movies more. I'm gonna take you to the movies. I got to so many movies. The average pre-pen was it in the at the height. The depression. The average American would buy 30 movie tickets the year. Really? And like 2018, 2019 pre-pandemic it's it's fallen to four. I would estimate that I see 20 to 30 movies a year. I think 20 in the theater. That's awesome. I think I see 20 in the theater. I like to. I mean look I like they're making that type of movie. It's like a small-to-mid-budget type movie. I mean they used. It's mainly like in the house where the the the center the command was. So it's mainly in a house and like the grounds. They use U.C. stock footage of like some warships and stuff like that. And then they like recreated basically two scenes from saving private Ryan where they use like exactly Jenis Kaminsky's like visual aesthetic with like the camera behind the machine gun from the German nest and the people in the handheld camera. They just like we're just going to replicate like three shots from saving private Ryan. You know that opening shot and saving private Ryan took like four weeks to film and cost $12 million. That was 25 years ago. Ninety-nine. Ninety-eight. And then it was 99 Oscars. Yeah. It was robbed for best picture by Shakespeare and Love. I like I mean I liked that they're making these movies. My my note was. Oh, if you notice this as well. They didn't do like Aaron Sorkin would have been better about this in the screenplay. They didn't do a good enough job of setting up what specifically about how the whatever the guy's name is. What specifically about the way he was doing meteorology was different than what the other guy was doing. Chris Macino was doing. Yeah. Right. Like you like Sorkin was very good. He could create tension about abstract concepts. Like you would understand like oh there's this new school of doing meteorology based on these principles and the old school is based on those principles. And this is where the tension is people don't trust this new principle and this is how we would verify. Oh, but this is how we know that principle is right. They didn't actually try to explain the meteorology. So it took some of the like friction out of the tension. Yeah. You just say like you're moronic. This is dumb how you're doing it. But it's like I think it's the weather's going to be this. Right. But like what was the difference? Yeah, that's a good point. Right. Like was it like jet stream was using the high atmosphere. So I think that was like bad technical screenwriting. Maybe too many long pauses and speeches and a little bit more momentum. And the wife subplot wasn't in it enough for it to make sense. Yeah. It wasn't the beginning and then like by the way her hospital got bombed. And then like just and that's it, right? Like I don't think she was in it enough. Also she looked too much like the ice and howers. Oh, yeah. What's her name? Yeah. Who was also his you know, that was his lover. Oh, I did not know that. Yeah. Like famously that was makes sense. Yeah. But that actress looked exactly like the wife. I was like, is this the same person? Is this like like why make up look different? What do you think about Brendan Frazier as Dwight D. Eisenhower? Mad Dog didn't like it. He thought it was cast wrong. I didn't mind it. Yeah. Yeah. That was only Matt. That was Matt dog's only complaint about the movie. He didn't like that. It did seem Brendan Frazier. But we just know we don't have a good sense of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Like you could do anything there. I'm like, all right. I guess that's what he was like. I don't know. Like all we know of Dwight D. Eisenhower, these sort of like stilted, you know, speeches to camera as president. So I don't know what he was like. So I guess that kind of heard it. I mean, it was no like Daniel Day Lewis and Lincoln speaking of Spielberg. Like that performance was crazy. Yeah. Completely lost in this completely like naturalistic character. When Matt dog had the author on he was saying he had video of when Eisenhower went to D. Day like four days after. Yeah. Or five days after whatever it was. And he was saying that he was like stountingly relieved that it worked. I could imagine. Yeah. Like that was the whole thing. Yeah. Yeah. Like that. That really had to happen. I had to I watched some so we rewatched the opening that on on D. Day Anniversary. We rewatched the Utah Omaha beat scene from saving private Ryan my dad and my my oldest son. And then I looked up like a bunch of historians talking about like what they liked or didn't like about it. It was pretty realistic as what they concluded. But you know, there's more more tanks. Your grandfather's fight in World War II. He was like on a ship as I could cook. I see. My one grandfather was in the Pacific as well. Got shot in Okinawa. I never use his elbow quite the same way again. He was a trucking. He was the like logistics guy in charge of the trucks. And there was a Japanese soldier in like one of those fox hole hiding whole things that popped up. Not them. Then his buddy shot him in different times. Yeah. For sure. I mean, we've had the deal with building the video game cabinet. It was not easy. Right. Sometimes the Metro is not as air conditioned as I would like. So like we all every generation has their their hardships. But that way. All right. And we're what am I up to otherwise where I went. So you know, from last week's episode, I was an Asheville. I was down there with my with my writer friend Brad Stolberg. We trained with our our shared trainer. You get answer good workouts. Yeah. He has a sled. Yeah. Yeah. One of those friction sleds. Yeah. Those are no fun. Um, along with the workouts. One was about an hour. Other time we were like working on form for stuff because we typically do remote. Yeah. Did you watch Brad deadlift like 500 pounds? I guess he was deadlifting. I think one of the days he was doing shoulders. Okay. Yeah. Um, like I know, have you ever seen a pendulum squat or whatever it is? It's like, yeah. Right. Like you're like on a seat and you like rotate all the way down and then come all the way back. So it's like you're doing a really deep squat but in a seat that like, yeah, pendulum. Yeah. Yeah. I've done that once. Yeah. It's not fun. In Phoenix. Yeah. Yeah. It's not fun. Yeah. We got to find a good place to train, Jesse. Yeah. We'll find a place. We'll build a gym. All right. That's all the time we have for today. Thank you for listening. Uh, stay tuned. I'll likely have an AI reality check episode on Thursday. But otherwise next Monday will be back with another Monday advice episode. So stay tuned and until then as always, stay deep. Hey, if you made it this far, you must be ready to join my fight for depth in a distracted world. Now, the best way to do this is to join over 125,000 people who receive my email newsletter each Monday. You can sign up at calnewport.com/ideas. And when you do, I will send you a free guide to my seven best ideas about cultivating a deep life. Sign up today at calnewport.com/ideas.
PodcastTranscript AI